Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection and Comments Requested; Reinstatement With Change of Previously Approved Collection #1121-0277: OJJDP's National Training and Technical Assistance Center (NTTAC) Feedback Form Package, 40650-40651 [2021-16078]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
40650
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 28, 2021 / Notices
Howard Smith, M.D., 83 FR at 18,910;
Samuel Mintlow, M.D., 80 FR at 3652.
In terms of egregiousness, the
violations that the substantial record
evidence shows Respondent committed
go to the heart of the CSA: Not
complying with the closed regulatory
system devised to ‘‘prevent the
diversion of drugs from legitimate to
illicit channels’’ and not prescribing
controlled substances in compliance
with the applicable standard of care and
in the usual course of professional
practice. Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. at
13–14, 27.
Respondent’s submissions address her
acceptance of responsibility. RFAAX 10
and RFAAX 11. According to her
Written Statement, she has ‘‘always
taken 100% responsibility’’ for her
diversion of controlled substances.’’
RFAAX 10, at 1. It also states that she
does ‘‘not deny nor . . . [has she] ever
in the past the unfortunate course of
actions . . . [she] decided to take by
diverting controlled substances.’’ Id. at
2. Her Written Statement continues with
her ‘‘accept[ing] sole responsibility and
. . . [stating that she has] taken actions
to become sober and healthy and
continue[s] to do such.’’ Id.
Respondent’s choice to submit a
Written Statement, instead of taking
advantage of her right to a hearing,
means that she cannot answer questions
about her acceptance of responsibility.
The several areas of concern I have
about her acceptance of responsibility,
therefore, remain unresolved. First,
Respondent’s statements accepting
responsibility are expressed only in the
general terms of diverting controlled
substances. Id. at 1, 2. Second, she does
not accept responsibility for all of the
OSC’s founded allegations. Instead, she
is explicit in her ‘‘deni[al of] all the
above charges against her,’’ meaning, at
least, the OSC charges that she was
convicted of a felony relating to a
controlled substance and that she
materially falsified her registration
renewal application. RFAAX 11, at 1.
Third, she does not address, let alone
accept responsibility for, the conduct
the TMB found as a basis for
disciplining Respondent. RFAAX 3, at
3–5 and RFAAX 11, at 11–13.
Consequently, Respondent’s
acceptance of responsibility is not broad
enough to encompass all of the Agency’s
charges against her. RFAAX 3, at 3–5
and RFAAX 11, at 1, 11–13. As such, it
is not unequivocal, as the Agency
requires. Jeffrey Stein, M.D., 84 FR
46,968, 46,972–73 (2019) (unequivocal
acceptance of responsibility); Jayam
Krishna-Iyer, M.D., 74 FR 459, 463
(2009) (collecting cases). These
deficiencies are concerning as they may
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Jul 27, 2021
Jkt 253001
mean that Respondent is not ready and/
or willing to appreciate (1) the full
extent of her misconduct and the (2)
breadth of the harm her misconduct
caused. I am also left wondering what
Respondent learned from her
misconduct, and whether Respondent
has the resources to avoid committing
the misconduct again.
For example, Respondent’s statements
accepting responsibility connect this
acceptance with a violation of ‘‘the oath
. . . [she] took as a physician and
trusted public figure.’’ RFAAX 10, at 1.
This, of course, is good and appropriate,
and it ties into her statements that she
has ‘‘done everything in . . . [her]
power to correct . . . [her] actions,’’ and
that ‘‘she continue[s] to work hard at
maintaining sobriety and gain[ing] the
trust of those that . . . [she has] lost,
including the public.’’ Id. Her
acceptance of responsibility does not
appear to extend beyond the impact of
her misconduct on herself, her sobriety,
and the public’s perception of her
trustworthiness. For example, she
focuses on herself as she characterizes
as ‘‘unfortunate’’ Parkland Hospital’s
taking legal action concerning her
diversion of controlled substances.
RFAAX 10, at 1; supra section II.F. She
does not mention, let alone
unequivocally accept responsibility for,
potentially endangering the lives of the
Hospital’s patients. RFAAX 3, at 3–4
and RFAAX 11, at 11–12. By way of
further example, she does not
acknowledge that her misconduct, not
complying with the closed regulatory
system devised to ‘‘prevent the
diversion of drugs from legitimate to
illicit channels,’’ goes to the heart of the
CSA. Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. at 13–
14, 27. Her stated ‘‘hard work’’ goes to
‘‘maintaining sobriety and gain[ing] the
trust of those that . . . [she has] lost,
including the public,’’ but not,
apparently, also to regaining the trust of
the Agency whose statutory
responsibilities include determining
who may be entrusted with the
responsibilities of a controlled
substance registration.
For all of the above reasons, it is not
reasonable for me, at this time, to trust
that Respondent will comply with all
controlled-substance related legal
requirements in the future.19 Alra Labs.,
Inc. v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 54 F.3d at 452
(‘‘An agency rationally may conclude
that past performance is the best
predictor of future performance.’’).
19 I do not consider remedial measures when a
Respondent does not unequivocally accept
responsibility. As discussed, the scope of
Respondent’s presentation of remedial efforts was
limited and, therefore, unpersuasive and not
reassuring.
PO 00000
Frm 00207
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Accordingly, I shall order that
Respondent’s registration be revoked
and that all pending applications to
renew or modify Respondent’s
registration, and any pending
application for a new registration in
Texas, be denied.
Order
Pursuant to 28 CFR 0.100(b) and the
authority vested in me by 21 U.S.C.
824(a) and 21 U.S.C. 823(f), I hereby
revoke DEA Certificate of Registration
No. FG2374053 issued to Erica N. Grant,
M.D. Pursuant to 28 CFR 0.100(b) and
the authority vested in me by 21 U.S.C.
824(a) and 21 U.S.C. 823(f), I further
hereby deny any pending application of
Erica N. Grant, M.D., to renew or modify
this registration, as well as any other
pending application of Erica N. Grant,
M.D. for registration in Texas. This
Order is effective August 27, 2021.
Anne Milgram,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2021–16003 Filed 7–27–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1121–0277]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection and
Comments Requested; Reinstatement
With Change of Previously Approved
Collection #1121–0277: OJJDP’s
National Training and Technical
Assistance Center (NTTAC) Feedback
Form Package
Office of Juvenile Justice and
Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP),
Department of Justice.
ACTION: 60-Day notice.
AGENCY:
The Office of Juvenile Justice
and Delinquency Prevention,
Department of Justice (DOJ), will be
submitting the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for 60 days until
September 27, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have comments, especially on the
estimated public burden or associated
response time, suggestions, or need a
copy of the proposed information
collection instrument with instructions
or additional information, please
contact Jill Molter, Web Content
Manager, OJJDP’s NTTAC COR at 202–
514–8871, Office of Juvenile Justice and
Delinquency Prevention, Office of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 142 / Wednesday, July 28, 2021 / Notices
Justice Programs, Department of Justice,
810 7th Street NW, Washington, DC
20530 or by email at jill.molter@
usdoj.gov. Written comments and/or
suggestions can also be sent to the
Office of Management and Budget,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Attention Department of Justice
Desk Officers, Washington, DC 20503 or
sent to OIRA_submissions@
omb.eop.gov.
Written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
— Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Office of Juvenile
Justice and Delinquency Prevention,
including whether the information
will have practical utility;
— Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
— Evaluate whether and if so how the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected can be
enhanced; and
— Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those
who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Overview of This Information
Collection
1. Type of Information Collection:
Reinstatement with change of
previously approved collection.
2. The Title of the Form/Collection:
OJJDP’s NTTAC Feedback Form
Package.
3. The agency form number: OJJDP’s
NTTAC, all forms included in package
#1121–0277.
4. Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract:
Primary: Individuals or households.
Other: Federal Government, State,
local or tribal government; Not-for-profit
institutions; Businesses or other forprofit.
Abstract: The Office for Juvenile
Justice and Delinquency Prevention
National Training and Technical
Assistance Center (NTTAC) Feedback
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:16 Jul 27, 2021
Jkt 253001
Form Package is designed to collect inperson and online data necessary to
continuously assess the outcomes of the
assistance provided for both monitoring
and accountability purposes and for
continuously assessing and meeting the
needs of the field. OJJDP’s NTTAC will
send these forms to technical assistance
(TA) recipients; conference attendees;
training and TA providers; online
meeting participants; in-person meeting
participants; and focus group
participants to capture important
feedback on the recipients’ satisfaction
with the quality, efficiency, referrals,
information, and resources provided
and assess the recipients’ additional
training and TA needs. The data will
then be used to advise OJJDP’s NTTAC
on ways to improve the support
provided to its users; the juvenile justice
field at-large; and ultimately improve
services and outcomes for youth.
5. An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: It is estimated that 5066
respondents will complete forms and
the response time will range from .03
hours to 1.5 hours.
6. An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: An estimated 520.5 total
annual burden hours are associated with
this collection.
If additional information is required,
contact: Melody Braswell, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE, 3E.405B,
Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: July 23, 2021.
Melody Braswell,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2021–16078 Filed 7–27–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2007–0003]
RIN 1218–AC98
40651
the 1971 American National Standards
Institute (ANSI) industry consensus
standard for mechanical power presses.
This ANSI standard has been updated a
number of times since 1971. OSHA is
seeking information regarding whether
it should update the mechanical power
presses standard and, if so, how closely
the standard should follow the current
ANSI standard for mechanical power
presses. It is also seeking information on
the types of presses that should be
covered, the use and certification of
equipment, and other topics such as
presence-sensing device initiation
(PSDI) systems, and requirements for
press modifications, training, and injury
reporting. OSHA will use the
information received in response to this
RFI to determine what action, if any, it
may take to reduce regulatory burdens
while maintaining worker safety.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
October 26, 2021. All submissions must
bear a postmark or provide other
evidence of the submission date.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted as follows:
Electronically: You may submit
comments, including attachments,
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov, the Federal
eRulemaking Portal. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
OSHA will place comments and
requests for a hearing, including
personal information, in the public
docket, which will be available online.
Therefore, OSHA cautions interested
parties about submitting personal
information such as Social Security
numbers and birthdates.
Docket: To read or download
comments or other material in the
docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Documents in the
docket are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index; however,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to
read or download through this website.
All submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
through the OSHA Docket Office.
Contact the OSHA Docket Office for
assistance in locating docket
submissions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mechanical Power Presses Update
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), DOL.
ACTION: Request for information (RFI).
AGENCY:
OSHA requests information
and comment on issues related to the
mechanical power presses standard. The
standard was issued in 1971 based upon
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00208
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Press Inquiries: Frank Meilinger,
Director, OSHA Office of
Communications; telephone: 202–693–
1999; email: meilinger.francis2@dol.gov.
General and technical information:
Lisa Long, OSHA Directorate of
Standards and Guidance; email:
long.lisa@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM
28JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 142 (Wednesday, July 28, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40650-40651]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16078]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[OMB Number 1121-0277]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection and
Comments Requested; Reinstatement With Change of Previously Approved
Collection #1121-0277: OJJDP's National Training and Technical
Assistance Center (NTTAC) Feedback Form Package
AGENCY: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP),
Department of Justice.
ACTION: 60-Day notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention,
Department of Justice (DOJ), will be submitting the following
information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for 60 days until
September 27, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have comments, especially on
the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions,
or need a copy of the proposed information collection instrument with
instructions or additional information, please contact Jill Molter, Web
Content Manager, OJJDP's NTTAC COR at 202-514-8871, Office of Juvenile
Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of
[[Page 40651]]
Justice Programs, Department of Justice, 810 7th Street NW, Washington,
DC 20530 or by email at [email protected]. Written comments and/or
suggestions can also be sent to the Office of Management and Budget,
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention Department of
Justice Desk Officers, Washington, DC 20503 or sent to
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of
information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of
the following four points:
-- Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the functions of the Office of Juvenile
Justice and Delinquency Prevention, including whether the information
will have practical utility;
-- Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
-- Evaluate whether and if so how the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected can be enhanced; and
-- Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Overview of This Information Collection
1. Type of Information Collection: Reinstatement with change of
previously approved collection.
2. The Title of the Form/Collection: OJJDP's NTTAC Feedback Form
Package.
3. The agency form number: OJJDP's NTTAC, all forms included in
package #1121-0277.
4. Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as
well as a brief abstract:
Primary: Individuals or households.
Other: Federal Government, State, local or tribal government; Not-
for-profit institutions; Businesses or other for-profit.
Abstract: The Office for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency
Prevention National Training and Technical Assistance Center (NTTAC)
Feedback Form Package is designed to collect in-person and online data
necessary to continuously assess the outcomes of the assistance
provided for both monitoring and accountability purposes and for
continuously assessing and meeting the needs of the field. OJJDP's
NTTAC will send these forms to technical assistance (TA) recipients;
conference attendees; training and TA providers; online meeting
participants; in-person meeting participants; and focus group
participants to capture important feedback on the recipients'
satisfaction with the quality, efficiency, referrals, information, and
resources provided and assess the recipients' additional training and
TA needs. The data will then be used to advise OJJDP's NTTAC on ways to
improve the support provided to its users; the juvenile justice field
at-large; and ultimately improve services and outcomes for youth.
5. An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount of
time estimated for an average respondent to respond: It is estimated
that 5066 respondents will complete forms and the response time will
range from .03 hours to 1.5 hours.
6. An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated
with the collection: An estimated 520.5 total annual burden hours are
associated with this collection.
If additional information is required, contact: Melody Braswell,
Department Clearance Officer, United States Department of Justice,
Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two
Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE, 3E.405B, Washington, DC 20530.
Dated: July 23, 2021.
Melody Braswell,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2021-16078 Filed 7-27-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P
