Tribal Energy Resource Agreements, 40147-40149 [2021-15929]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 27, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it amends and
establishes Class E airspace in York, PA,
to support instrument flight rule
operations at this airport.
History
The FAA published a notice of
proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register (86 FR 24795, May 10, 2021)
for Docket No. FAA–2021–0119 to
amend Class E surface airspace at York
Airport and establish Class E airspace
for York Airport and Wellspan York
Hospital Heliport, to accommodate area
navigation (RNAV) global positioning
system (GPS) standard instrument
approach procedures (SIAPs) serving
this airport.
Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking effort by
submitting written comments on the
proposal to the FAA. No comments
were received.
Class E airspace designations are
published in Paragraphs 6002 and 6005,
respectively, of FAA Order 7400.11E,
dated July 21, 2020, and effective
September 15, 2020, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designations
listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Availability and Summary of
Documents for Incorporation by
Reference
This document amends FAA Order
7400.11E, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated July 21, 2020,
and effective September 15, 2020. FAA
Order 7400.11E is publicly available as
listed in the ADDRESSES section of this
document. FAA Order 7400.11E lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas,
air traffic routes, and reporting points.
The Rule
The FAA amends 14 CFR part 71 by
amending Class E surface airspace at
York Airport, York, PA. An airspace
evaluation of the area determined the
additional airspace is necessary to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Jul 26, 2021
Jkt 253001
accommodate operations at the airport.
This action also updates the name of
York Airport (formerly York County
Airport). This action also establishes
Class E airspace extending upward from
700 feet above the surface at York
Airport and Wellspan York Hospital
Heliport to accommodate new area
navigation (RNAV) global positioning
system (GPS) standard instrument
approach procedures serving the
heliport.
Subsequent to publication of the
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the
FAA found the spelling of Wellspan
York Hospital Heliport was incorrect.
This action corrects the error.
Controlled airspace is necessary for the
safety and management of instrument
flight rules (IFR) operations in the area.
Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations
and Reporting Points, is published
yearly and effective on September 15.
Regulatory Notices and Analyses
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. It, therefore: (1) Is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that only affects air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when
promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Environmental Review
The FAA has determined that this
action qualifies for categorical exclusion
under the National Environmental
Policy Act in accordance with FAA
Order 1050.1F, ‘‘Environmental
Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’
paragraph 5–6.5a. This airspace action
is not expected to cause any potentially
significant environmental impacts, and
no extraordinary circumstances exist
that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.
Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40147
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11E,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated July 21, 2020, and
effective September 15, 2020, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 6002
Class E Surface Airspace.
*
*
*
*
*
AEA PA E2 York, PA [Amended]
York Airport, PA
(Lat. 39°55′01″ N, long. 76°52′23″ W)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface within a 6.8-mile radius of the York
Airport.
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
*
*
AEA PA E5 York, PA [New]
York Airport, PA
(Lat. 39°55′01″ N, long. 76°52′23″ W)
Wellspan York Hospital Heliport, PA
(Lat. 39°56′41″ N, long.76°43′06″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 9.3-mile
radius of York Airport, and within 4.0 miles
each side of the 339° bearing from the airport,
extending from the 9.3-mile radius to 11.9
miles northwest of the airport, and that
airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface within a 6-mile radius of
Wellspan York Hospital Heliport.
Issued in College Park, Georgia, on July 21,
2021.
Andreese C. Davis,
Manager, Airspace & Procedures Team South,
Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2021–15921 Filed 7–26–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
25 CFR Part 224
[212D0102DR/DS5A300000/
DR.5A311.IA000118]
RIN 1076–AF65
Tribal Energy Resource Agreements
AGENCY:
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
E:\FR\FM\27JYR1.SGM
27JYR1
40148
ACTION:
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 27, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Final rule.
The Bureau of Indian Affairs
(BIA) is confirming the interim final
rule published on May 24, 2021,
updating regulations governing Tribal
Energy Resource Agreements (TERAs)
between the Secretary of the Interior
(Secretary) and Indian Tribes. The
interim final rule added the statutory
requirement that that any application
for a Tribal Energy Development
Organization (TEDO) be submitted by
the Tribe and corrected cross-references.
DATES: This rule is effective July 27,
2021.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Appel, Director, Office of
Regulatory Affairs & Collaborative
Action, (202) 273–4680;
elizabeth.appel@bia.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
I. Summary of Rule
This final rule updates TERA
regulations that BIA published on
December 18, 2019 (84 FR 69602), under
the authority of the Indian Tribal Energy
Development and Self-Determination
Act of 2005, as amended by the Indian
Tribal Energy Development and SelfDetermination Act Amendments of
2017, 25 U.S.C. 3501–3504, Public Law
115–325, and 25 U.S.C. 2 and 9. The
rule addressed the requirements of the
Indian Tribal Energy Development and
Self-Determination Act Amendments of
2017 (2017 Amendments), including
establishing a process and criteria for
TEDOs to obtain certification from the
Secretary so that they may enter into
leases, business agreements, and rightsof-way with Tribes on Tribal land
without Secretarial approval. See
Section 103(b) of the 2017
Amendments.
The 2019 regulation stated at
§ 224.202 that a TEDO must submit an
application. The statute, however, states
that the Tribe submits the application
for certification of a TEDO. See 25
U.S.C. 3504(h)(1). This final rule
corrects the regulation at § 224.202 to
provide that a Tribe must submit the
application.
This final rule also corrects
typographical errors in the crossreferences to paragraphs in § 224.53, as
follows:
• In paragraph (a)(3), the crossreference is corrected to be paragraph
(b), rather than paragraph (c);
• In paragraph (a)(5), the crossreference is corrected to be paragraph (c)
rather than paragraph (d); and
• In paragraph (b), the cross reference
is corrected to be paragraph (a)(3) rather
than paragraph (a)(6).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Jul 26, 2021
Jkt 253001
On May 24, 2021 (86 FR 27806), BIA
published an interim final rule making
these changes and announced the
opportunity to comment by June 23,
2021. BIA received no comments on the
interim final rule, so this final rule
adopts the interim final rule as
published without change.
II. Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
(E.O. 12866, 13563)
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 provides
that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) at the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) will
review all significant rules. OIRA has
determined that this rule is not
significant.
E.O. 13563 reaffirms the principles of
E.O. 12866 while calling for
improvements in the Nation’s regulatory
system to promote predictability, to
reduce uncertainty, and to use the best,
most innovative, and least burdensome
tools for achieving regulatory ends. The
E.O. directs agencies to consider
regulatory approaches that reduce
burdens and maintain flexibility and
freedom of choice for the public where
these approaches are relevant, feasible,
and consistent with regulatory
objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes
further that regulations must be based
on the best available science and that
the rulemaking process must allow for
public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed
this rule in a manner consistent with
these requirements.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
C. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more;
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions; and
(c) Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises
because this rule makes minor
corrections.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
Tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
rule does not have a monetarily
significant or unique effect on State,
local, or Tribal governments or the
private sector. A statement containing
the information required by the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
E. Takings (E.O. 12630)
This rule does not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630 because this rule does not
affect individual property rights
protected by the Fifth Amendment or
involve a compensable ‘‘taking.’’ A
takings implication assessment is not
required.
F. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of
Executive Order 13132, this rule does
not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation
of a federalism summary impact
statement because the rule affects only
agreements entered into by Tribes and
the Department. A federalism summary
impact statement is not required.
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule complies with the
requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule: (a) Meets the
criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate
errors and ambiguity and be written to
minimize litigation; and (b) Meets the
criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that
all regulations be written in clear
language and contain clear legal
standards.
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes
(E.O. 13175)
The Department of the Interior strives
to strengthen its government-togovernment relationship with Indian
Tribes through a commitment to
consultation with Indian Tribes and
recognition of their right to selfgovernance and Tribal sovereignty. We
have evaluated this rule under the
Department’s consultation policy and
under the criteria in Executive Order
13175 and have determined that it does
not have substantial direct effects on
federally recognized Indian Tribes
because the Department consulted on
substantive requirements of the rule that
is in effect, and this rule merely makes
minor corrections to that substantive
rule.
E:\FR\FM\27JYR1.SGM
27JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 141 / Tuesday, July 27, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
I. Paperwork Reduction Act
OMB Control No. 1076–0167
currently authorizes the collections of
information contained in 25 CFR part
224. This rule does not affect those
collections of information.
J. National Environmental Policy Act
K. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O.
13211)
This rule is not a significant energy
action under the definition in Executive
Order 13211. A Statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 224
Agreement, Appeals, Application,
Business agreements, Energy
development, Interested party, Lease,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Right-of-way, Tribal
Energy Resource Agreements, Tribal
capacity, Tribal lands, Trust, Trust
asset.
[Docket Number USCG–2021–0131]
Security Zone, Christina River,
Newport, DE
Coast Guard, Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a security zone for certain
waters of the Christina River to prevent
waterside threats and incidents for
persons under the protection of the
United States Secret Service (USSS) as
they transit by vehicle on the route 141
bridge over the Christina River near
Newport, Delaware. The security zone
will be enforced intermittently and only
during times of a protected person
transit over the bridge. Vessel traffic
will be restricted while the zone is being
enforced. This rule will prohibit persons
and vessels from entering or remaining
within the security zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Delaware Bay or a designated
representative.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective July 27,
2021.
To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2021–
0131 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Petty Officer Edmund Ofalt,
Sector Delaware Bay, Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone 215–271–4889,
Edmund.J.Ofalt@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
The interim final rule amending 25
CFR part 224 which was published at 86
FR 27806 on May 24, 2021, is adopted
as final without change.
■
Bryan Newland,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian
Affairs.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
33 CFR Part 165
DATES:
PART 224—TRIBAL ENERGY
RESOURCE AGREEMENTS UNDER
THE INDIAN TRIBAL ENERGY
DEVELOPMENT AND SELF
DETERMINATION ACT
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
Coast Guard
RIN 1625–AA87
This rule does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment. A
detailed statement under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) is not required because this is
an administrative and procedural
regulation. (For further information see
43 CFR 46.210(i)). We have also
determined that the rule does not
involve any of the extraordinary
circumstances listed in 43 CFR 46.215
that would require further analysis
under NEPA.
[FR Doc. 2021–15929 Filed 7–26–21; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
Since January of 2021 the United
States Secret Service (USSS) has
routinely requested, pursuant to
authorities listed in 18 U.S.C. 3056, the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Jul 26, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
40149
Coast Guard to implement a security
zone in the vicinity of the 141 bridge
over the Christina River near Newport,
Delaware. Between January 1, 2021, and
July 20, 2021, the waterside security
zone around the 141 bridge has been
requested fourteen times. In response to
these frequent requests the Coast Guard
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) on April 5, 2021,
titled ‘‘Security Zone; Christina River,
Newport, DE’’ (86 FR 17565). There we
stated why we issued the NPRM and
invited comments on our proposed
regulatory action related to recurring
transists of persons protected by the
USSS across the 141 bridge in Newport,
Delaware. During the comment period
that ended May 5, 2021, we received
one comment.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable and
contrary to the public interest. This rule
must be immediately effective to guard
against potential acts of terrorism,
sabotage, subversive acts, accidents, or
other causes of a similar nature.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
Under the Ports and Waterways Safety
Act, the Coast Guard has authority to
establish water or waterfront safety
zones, or other measures, for limited,
controlled, or conditional access and
activity when necessary for the
protection of any vessel, structure,
waters, or shore area, 46 U.S.C.
70011(b)(3). This rule safeguards the
lives of persons protected by the Secret
Service, and of the general public, by
enhancing the safety and security of
navigable waters of the United States
during USSS protectee transits over the
route 141 bridge over the Christina
River near Newport, Delaware. The
Coast Guard will activate the security
zone when requested by the USSS for
the protection of persons the USSS
protects under 18 U.S.C. 3056 or
pursuant to Presidential memorandum.
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034
(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231), as
delegated by Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No.00170.1(II)(70),
Revision No. 01.2, from the Secretary of
DHS to the Commandant of the U.S.
Coast Guard, and further redelegated by
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and
160.5 to the Captains of the Port. The
Captain of the Port Delaware Bay
(COTP) has determined that recurring
transits of persons under the protection
of the USSS, which started in January of
2021, present a potential target for
E:\FR\FM\27JYR1.SGM
27JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 141 (Tuesday, July 27, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 40147-40149]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15929]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
25 CFR Part 224
[212D0102DR/DS5A300000/DR.5A311.IA000118]
RIN 1076-AF65
Tribal Energy Resource Agreements
AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.
[[Page 40148]]
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) is confirming the interim
final rule published on May 24, 2021, updating regulations governing
Tribal Energy Resource Agreements (TERAs) between the Secretary of the
Interior (Secretary) and Indian Tribes. The interim final rule added
the statutory requirement that that any application for a Tribal Energy
Development Organization (TEDO) be submitted by the Tribe and corrected
cross-references.
DATES: This rule is effective July 27, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Appel, Director, Office of
Regulatory Affairs & Collaborative Action, (202) 273-4680;
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Summary of Rule
This final rule updates TERA regulations that BIA published on
December 18, 2019 (84 FR 69602), under the authority of the Indian
Tribal Energy Development and Self-Determination Act of 2005, as
amended by the Indian Tribal Energy Development and Self-Determination
Act Amendments of 2017, 25 U.S.C. 3501-3504, Public Law 115-325, and 25
U.S.C. 2 and 9. The rule addressed the requirements of the Indian
Tribal Energy Development and Self-Determination Act Amendments of 2017
(2017 Amendments), including establishing a process and criteria for
TEDOs to obtain certification from the Secretary so that they may enter
into leases, business agreements, and rights-of-way with Tribes on
Tribal land without Secretarial approval. See Section 103(b) of the
2017 Amendments.
The 2019 regulation stated at Sec. 224.202 that a TEDO must submit
an application. The statute, however, states that the Tribe submits the
application for certification of a TEDO. See 25 U.S.C. 3504(h)(1). This
final rule corrects the regulation at Sec. 224.202 to provide that a
Tribe must submit the application.
This final rule also corrects typographical errors in the cross-
references to paragraphs in Sec. 224.53, as follows:
In paragraph (a)(3), the cross-reference is corrected to
be paragraph (b), rather than paragraph (c);
In paragraph (a)(5), the cross-reference is corrected to
be paragraph (c) rather than paragraph (d); and
In paragraph (b), the cross reference is corrected to be
paragraph (a)(3) rather than paragraph (a)(6).
On May 24, 2021 (86 FR 27806), BIA published an interim final rule
making these changes and announced the opportunity to comment by June
23, 2021. BIA received no comments on the interim final rule, so this
final rule adopts the interim final rule as published without change.
II. Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O. 12866, 13563)
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 provides that the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) at the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) will review all significant rules. OIRA has determined
that this rule is not significant.
E.O. 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866 while calling for
improvements in the Nation's regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, most
innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends.
The E.O. directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches that reduce
burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for the public
where these approaches are relevant, feasible, and consistent with
regulatory objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes further that regulations
must be based on the best available science and that the rulemaking
process must allow for public participation and an open exchange of
ideas. We have developed this rule in a manner consistent with these
requirements.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
C. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more;
(b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions; and
(c) Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises
because this rule makes minor corrections.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
Tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. The rule does not have a monetarily significant or unique effect
on State, local, or Tribal governments or the private sector. A
statement containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
E. Takings (E.O. 12630)
This rule does not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630 because this rule
does not affect individual property rights protected by the Fifth
Amendment or involve a compensable ``taking.'' A takings implication
assessment is not required.
F. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of Executive Order 13132, this rule
does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism summary impact statement because the rule
affects only agreements entered into by Tribes and the Department. A
federalism summary impact statement is not required.
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule: (a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a)
requiring that all regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and be written to minimize litigation; and (b) Meets the
criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all regulations be written
in clear language and contain clear legal standards.
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175)
The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its
government-to-government relationship with Indian Tribes through a
commitment to consultation with Indian Tribes and recognition of their
right to self-governance and Tribal sovereignty. We have evaluated this
rule under the Department's consultation policy and under the criteria
in Executive Order 13175 and have determined that it does not have
substantial direct effects on federally recognized Indian Tribes
because the Department consulted on substantive requirements of the
rule that is in effect, and this rule merely makes minor corrections to
that substantive rule.
[[Page 40149]]
I. Paperwork Reduction Act
OMB Control No. 1076-0167 currently authorizes the collections of
information contained in 25 CFR part 224. This rule does not affect
those collections of information.
J. National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment. A detailed statement
under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) is not
required because this is an administrative and procedural regulation.
(For further information see 43 CFR 46.210(i)). We have also determined
that the rule does not involve any of the extraordinary circumstances
listed in 43 CFR 46.215 that would require further analysis under NEPA.
K. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O. 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition
in Executive Order 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 224
Agreement, Appeals, Application, Business agreements, Energy
development, Interested party, Lease, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Right-of-way, Tribal Energy Resource Agreements, Tribal
capacity, Tribal lands, Trust, Trust asset.
PART 224--TRIBAL ENERGY RESOURCE AGREEMENTS UNDER THE INDIAN TRIBAL
ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AND SELF DETERMINATION ACT
0
The interim final rule amending 25 CFR part 224 which was published at
86 FR 27806 on May 24, 2021, is adopted as final without change.
Bryan Newland,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2021-15929 Filed 7-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337-15-P