Ocean Dumping; Modification of an Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site Offshore Port Everglades, Florida, 38563-38569 [2021-15529]
Download as PDF
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 138 / Thursday, July 22, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by September 20,
2021. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Jul 21, 2021
Jkt 253001
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: July 8, 2021.
Elizabeth Adams,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Environmental Protection
Agency amends part 52, chapter I, title
40 of the Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
38563
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 228
[EPA–R04–OW–2020–0056; FRL–8737–01–
R4]
Ocean Dumping; Modification of an
Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site
Offshore Port Everglades, Florida
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(207)(i)(C)(9) and
(c)(559) to read as follows:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is expanding the size of
the EPA designated ocean dredged
material disposal site (ODMDS) offshore
of Port Everglades, Florida (referred to
hereafter as the existing Port Everglades
ODMDS), pursuant to the Marine
Protection, Research and Sanctuaries
Act (MPRSA). The primary purpose for
the site modification is to enlarge the
site to provide for the long-term
disposal capacity to dump suitable
material dredged from the Port
Everglades Harbor in ocean waters. The
modified site will be subject to
monitoring and management to ensure
continued protection of the marine
environment.
§ 52.220
DATES:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
■
Identification of plan-in part.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(207) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) * * *
(9) Previously approved on August,
21, 1998 in paragraph (c)(207)(i)(C)(6) of
this section and now deleted with
replacement in paragraph
(c)(559)(i)(A)(1) of this section, Rule
2.29, ‘‘Graphic Arts Printing
Operations,’’ revised July 11, 2018.
*
*
*
*
*
(559) The following rules were
submitted on August 20, 2018, by the
Governor’s designee as an attachment to
a letter dated August 15, 2018.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A)
Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management
District.
(1) Rule 2.29, ‘‘Graphic Arts Printing
Operations,’’ revised on July 11, 2018.
(2) [Reserved]
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2021–15476 Filed 7–21–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
SUMMARY:
Effective: August 23, 2021.
EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R04–OW–2020–0056. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov website.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Wade Lehmann, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, Water
Division, Oceans and Estuarine
Management Section, 61 Forsyth Street,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303; phone number
(404) 562–8082; email:
Lehmann.Wade@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA
proposed rulemaking on March 13,
2020, and re-released for further public
review on May 22, 2020 (85 FR 14622
and 85 FR 31133), which was a proposal
to expand the size of the Port Everglades
ODMDS. Additionally, EPA is releasing
a Finding of No Significant Impact and
a final Environmental Assessment (EA),
pursuant to the National Environmental
Policy Act, which are available in the
docket for this action (Docket ID No.
EPA–R04–OW–2020–0056). EPA’s
responses to comments received on the
proposed rule and the draft EA are also
available in the docket for this action.
ADDRESSES:
I. Potentially Affected Persons
Persons potentially affected by this
action include those who seek or might
seek permits or approval to dispose of
E:\FR\FM\22JYR1.SGM
22JYR1
38564
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 138 / Thursday, July 22, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
dredged material into ocean waters
pursuant to the MPRSA, 33 U.S.C. 1401
to 1445. The EPA’s action would be
relevant to persons, including
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
would be most affected by this action.
Potentially affected categories and
persons include:
Category
Examples of potentially regulated persons
Federal Government ...........................................
Industry and general public ................................
State, local and tribal governments ....................
USACE Civil Works projects, and other Federal agencies.
Port authorities, marinas and harbors, shipyards and marine repair facilities, berth owners.
Governments owning and/or responsible for ports, harbors, and/or berths, government agencies requiring disposal of dredged material associated with public works projects.
This table is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding persons likely to
be affected by this action. For any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, please
refer to the contact person listed in the
preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
II. Background
a. History of Disposal Sites Offshore of
Port Everglades, Florida
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
organizations and government bodies
seeking to dispose of dredged material
in ocean waters offshore of Port
Everglades, Florida. Currently, the U.S.
There is currently one designated
ODMDS off the coast of Port Everglades
in Florida. The existing Port Everglades
ODMDS is located three nautical miles
offshore of Fort Lauderdale. EPA
designated the Port Everglades ODMDS
in 2005 with an area of 1.34 square
nautical miles (nmi2).
The USACE Jacksonville District and
EPA Region 4 identified a need to either
designate a new ODMDS or modify the
existing Port Everglades ODMDS. The
reasons for modifying the ocean
disposal capacity are based on future
dredged material capacity requirements,
historical dredging volumes, estimates
of dredging volumes for future proposed
projects, and limited capacity of upland
disposal in the area.
EPA is expanding the existing Port
Everglades ODMDS rather than
designate a new site off the coast of Fort
Lauderdale for ocean dumping of
dredged material. The modification of
the existing Port Everglades ODMDS for
dredged material, however, does not
mean that the USACE or the EPA has
approved the use of the existing Port
Everglades ODMDS or a modified Port
Everglades ODMDS for open water
disposal of dredged material from any
specific project. Before any person can
ocean dump dredged material at an
ODMDS, EPA and the USACE must
evaluate the project according to the
ocean dumping regulatory criteria (40
CFR part 227) and the USACE must
issue a permit or other authorization
document (e.g., contract specifications)
for the transportation and disposal of
dredged material and must attain
concurrence from EPA. Under section
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Jul 21, 2021
Jkt 253001
103 of the MPRSA, the USACE is the
Federal agency that initially determines
whether to issue a permit authorizing
the ocean disposal of dredged materials.
In the case of Federal navigation
projects, the USACE may implement the
MPRSA directly in the Federal projects
involving ocean disposal of dredged
materials. The USACE relies on EPA’s
ocean dumping criteria when evaluating
permit requests for (and implementing
Federal projects involving) the
transportation of dredged material for
the purpose of dumping it into ocean
waters. MPRSA permits and Federal
projects involving ocean dumping of
dredged material are subject to EPA
review and concurrence under MPRSA
33 U.S.C. 1413(c). EPA may concur with
or without conditions or decline to
concur on the permit, i.e., non-concur.
If EPA concurs with conditions, the
final permit or authorization must
include those conditions. If EPA
declines to concur (non-concurs), the
USACE cannot issue the permit for
ocean dumping of dredged material or
authorize the disposal. EPA’s site
modification is supported by a final
Environmental Assessment (EA), which
EPA previously provided for public
notice as draft and is available in the
docket for this action (Docket ID No.
EPA–R04–OW–2020–0056).
b. Location and Configuration of the
Port Everglades ODMDS
With this action, EPA expands the
size of the Port Everglades ODMDS,
which is at depths between ¥587 to
¥761 feet of water (¥179 to ¥232
meters). The ODMDS expansion
increases the area of the existing Port
Everglades ODMDS from approximately
1.34 nmi2 to 3.21 nmi2. The ODMDS is
bounded by the coordinates listed
below. The coordinates for the site are
in North American Datum 83 (NAD 83):
Modified Port Everglades ODMDS
(A) 26°08.750′ N, 80°01.000′ W
(B) 26°08.750′ N, 80°02.578′ W
(C) 26°06.500′ N, 80°02.578′ W
(D) 26°06.500′ N, 80°01.000′ W
The Site Management and Monitoring
Plan (SMMP) allows EPA to adaptively
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
manage the site to maximize its
capacity, minimize the potential for
mounding and loss of fine sediments
outside of the site, and minimize the
potential for any long-term adverse
effects to the marine environment.
c. Management and Monitoring of the
Site
The ODMDS is expected to receive
dredged material from the Federal
navigation project at Port Everglades
Harbor, Florida, and dredged material
from other applicants who obtain a
permit for the disposal of dredged
material at the ODMDS. All persons
using the site shall comply with the
conditions set forth in the most recent
approved SMMP, which EPA (in
conjunction with the USACE)
specifically developed for the ODMDS.
The SMMP includes management and
monitoring provisions to ensure that
dredged materials disposed at the
ODMDS are suitable for disposal in the
ocean and that adverse impacts of
disposal, if any, are addressed to the
maximum extent practicable. The
SMMP includes provisions to avoid and
minimize potential impacts to coral
reefs present near Port Everglades. The
SMMP for the ODMDS also addresses
management of the site to ensure
adverse mounding and dispersal of fine
sediments does not occur and to ensure
that disposal events minimize
interference with other uses of ocean
waters near the ODMDS.
d. MPRSA Criteria
In evaluating the ODMDS, the EPA
assessed the site according to the
criteria of the MPRSA, with emphasis
on the general and specific regulatory
criteria of 40 CFR part 228, to determine
whether the site designation satisfies
those criteria. The EPA’s EA provides an
extensive evaluation of the criteria and
other related factors for the modification
of the ODMDS.
General Criteria (40 CFR 228.5)
(a) Sites must be selected to minimize
interference with other activities in the
marine environment, particularly
avoiding areas of existing fisheries or
E:\FR\FM\22JYR1.SGM
22JYR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 138 / Thursday, July 22, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
shellfisheries, and regions of heavy
commercial or recreational navigation
(40 CFR 228.5(a)).
Historically, an interim site located
approximately 1.6 nautical miles from
shore was used for ocean disposal of
dredged material from Port Everglades
Harbor but was discontinued in the
1980s due to the significant potential for
adverse impacts from sediments to
nearby coral reef resources. EPA
designated the existing Port Everglades
Harbor ODMDS in 2005 to fulfill the
need for an EPA designated ODMDS
near Port Everglades. The evaluation for
the 2005 designation included
considerations of potential interference
with other activities in the marine
environment including avoiding areas of
existing critical fisheries or
shellfisheries, and regions of heavy
commercial or recreational navigation.
EPA re-considered the evaluations from
2010 through to the present time
throughout the NEPA process.
(b) Sites must be situated such that
temporary perturbations to water quality
or other environmental conditions
during initial mixing caused by disposal
operations would be reduced to normal
ambient levels or undetectable
contaminant concentrations or effects
before reaching any beach, shoreline,
marine sanctuary, or known
geographically limited fishery or
shellfishery (40 CFR 228.5(b)).
The ODMDS area will be used only
for disposal of dredged material found
to be suitable under the Ocean Dumping
Regulations at 40 CFR parts 220 through
228. Based on the USACE and EPA
sediment testing and evaluation
procedures, disposal of dredged
maintenance material and proposed
new work material is not expected to
have any long-term impact on water
quality. The Port Everglades ODMDS is
located sufficiently far from shore and
fisheries resources to allow temporary
water quality disturbances caused by
disposal of dredged material to be
reduced to ambient conditions before
reaching any environmentally sensitive
areas.
(c) The sizes of disposal sites will be
limited in order to localize for
identification and control any
immediate adverse impacts, and to
permit the implementation of effective
monitoring and surveillance to prevent
adverse long-range impacts. Size,
configuration, and location are to be
determined as part of the disposal site
evaluation (40 CFR 228.5(d)).
The location, size, and configuration
of the ODMDS should provide sufficient
long-term disposal capacity expected for
anticipated dredging projects, while also
permitting effective site management,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Jul 21, 2021
Jkt 253001
site monitoring, and limiting
environmental impacts to the
surrounding area to the greatest extent
practicable.
Based on projected new work and
maintenance dredging, and permitted
dredged material disposal needs, EPA
and the USACE estimated that the
ODMDS should be approximately 3.21
nmi2 in size to meet the anticipated
long-term disposal needs of the nearby
area. Expanding the ODMDS to 3.21
nmi2 provides an estimated capacity of
approximately 6.7 million cubic yards,
which is sufficient to manage future
unknown disposal operations from
public and private entities and provide
protection of the marine environment at
the ODMDS.
When determining the size of the site,
EPA considered the need to implement
effective monitoring and surveillance
programs to ensure that the
environment of the site could be
protected, and that navigational safety
would not be compromised by the
mounding of dredged material. EPA and
the USACE have developed a SMMP for
the site that, when implemented, will be
used to determine if disposal at the site
is significantly affecting the
environment within the site or adjacent
areas. At a minimum, the monitoring
program will consist of bathymetric
surveys, sediment grain size analysis,
chemical analysis of constituents of
concern in the sediments, and an
assessment of the benthic community
structure.
(d) EPA will, wherever feasible,
designate ocean dumping sites beyond
the edge of the continental shelf and
other such sites where historical
disposal has occurred (40 CFR 228.5(e)).
The Port Everglades ODMDS is
beyond the edge of the continental shelf.
Specific Criteria (40 CFR 228.6)
(1) Geographical Position, Depth of
Water, Bottom Topography and
Distance from Coast (40 CFR
228.6(a)(1)).
The ODMDS is on the Florida
Continental Slope, 3.3 nautical miles
offshore of Fort Lauderdale, Florida.
Water depths range from ¥179 to ¥232
meters (¥587 to ¥761 feet), with an
average depth of 207 meters (¥678 feet).
Sediments consist of sand with various
mixtures of sand and silts with scattered
rubble hardbottom. The EA contains a
map of the ODMDS. The ODMDS
remains fully off the continental shelf at
a distance that is not expected to allow
sediments to travel to nearby shoreassociated coral reef habitat.
(2) Location in Relation to Breeding,
Spawning, Nursery, Feeding, or Passage
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38565
Areas of Living Resources in Adult or
Juvenile Phases (40 CFR 228.6(a)(2)).
The ODMDS location was selected to
avoid the presence of any exclusive
breeding, spawning, nursery, feeding, or
passage areas for adult or juvenile
phases of living resources.
(3) Location in Relation to Beaches
and Other Amenity Areas (40 CFR
228.6(a)(3)).
The center of the ODMDS is several
miles from any beaches or amenity
areas. No significant impacts to beaches
or amenity areas associated with the
Port Everglades ODMDS have been
detected, and the expansion is not
expected to affect that conclusion. The
U.S. Navy maintains facilities south of
the ODMDS, and EPA and the USACE
consulted the Navy to verify that no
impediments will exist with the
expanded ODMDS.
(4) Types and Quantities of Wastes
Proposed to be Disposed of, and
Proposed Methods of Release, including
Methods of Packing the Waste, if any (40
CFR 228.6(a)(4)).
Only suitable dredged material that
meets the Ocean Dumping Criteria in 40
CFR parts 227 and 228 will be disposed
in the ODMDS and only pursuant to a
duly issued permit or authorization
(e.g., contract specifications) for a
Federal project with concurrence by
EPA. Dredged materials dumped in this
area will be primarily sand and rock
with some fines that originate from the
Port Everglades Harbor. Average yearly
disposal of dredged maintenance
material into the ODMDS is expected to
be approximately 30,000 cubic yards
and variable volumes of new work
dredged material up to 6.7 million cubic
yards. None of the material is packaged
in any manner.
Under section 103 of the MPRSA, the
USACE is the Federal agency that
initially determines whether to issue a
permit authorizing the ocean disposal of
dredged materials. In the case of Federal
navigation projects involving ocean
disposal of dredged materials, in lieu of
the permit procedure, the USACE
authorizes projects based upon
application of the same criteria, and
other factors to be evaluated, the same
procedures, and the same requirements
that apply to the issuance of permits.
The USACE applies the EPA’s ocean
dumping criteria when evaluating
permit requests for (and implementing
Federal projects involving) the
transportation of dredged material for
the purpose of dumping it into ocean
waters. MPRSA permits and Federal
projects involving ocean dumping of
dredged material are subject to EPA’s
review and concurrence. EPA may
concur, with or without conditions, or
E:\FR\FM\22JYR1.SGM
22JYR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
38566
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 138 / Thursday, July 22, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
decline to concur on the request for
concurrence on the suitability of
dredged material for disposal in the
ODMDS. If EPA concurs with
conditions, the final permit or project
authorization (e.g., contract
specifications) must include those
conditions. If EPA declines to concur
(non-concurs) on an ocean dumping
permit for dredged material, the USACE
cannot issue the permit or authorize
ocean dumping for the Federal project.
(5) Feasibility of Surveillance and
Monitoring (40 CFR 228.6(a)(5)).
EPA expects monitoring and
surveillance at the ODMDS to be
feasible and readily performed from
ocean or regional class research vessels.
Monitoring and surveillance are
addressed in the SMMP. The area of the
ODMDS has been surveyed and sampled
in 2004, 2007 and 2014. EPA will
monitor the site for physical, biological,
and chemical attributes as well as for
potential impacts. Bathymetric surveys
will be conducted routinely, and
benthic infauna and epibenthic
organisms will be monitored, as
described in the SMMP for the site.
(6) Dispersal, Horizontal Transport
and Vertical Mixing Characteristics of
the Area, including Prevailing Current
Direction and Velocity, if any (40 CFR
228.6(a)(6)).
Current velocities vary throughout the
water column and are subject to wind
and the Florida current-based
circulations which are generally
northerly with eddies occurring that
drive currents south. Currents measured
at nearby sites are predominantly to the
north or south on the order of 1–4 knots
(50–200 centimeters per second).
(7) Existence and Effects of Current
and Previous Discharges and Dumping
in the Area (including Cumulative
Effects) (40 CFR 228.6(a)(7)).
Historic disposal of dredged material
in the existing Port Everglades ODMDS
has resulted in temporary increases in
suspended sediment concentrations
during disposal operations, burial of
benthic organisms within the site, and
slight changes in the abundance and
composition of benthic assemblages.
Short-term, long-term, and cumulative
effects of dredged material disposal in
the ODMDS would be similar to those
for the previously designated site and
are expected to be temporary and return
to baseline over time.
(8) Interference with Shipping,
Fishing, Recreation, Mineral Extraction,
Desalination, Fish and Shellfish
Culture, Areas of Special Scientific
Importance and Other Legitimate Uses
of the Ocean (40 CFR 228.6(a)(8)).
The transport of dredged material to
the ODMDS will cause minor, short-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Jul 21, 2021
Jkt 253001
term interferences with commercial and
recreational boat traffic. during normal
disposal operations. EPA has not
identified an area of special scientific
importance at or near the site. There are
no aquaculture areas near the site. There
may be recreational fishing in the area.
The likelihood of direct interference
with these activities, however, is low.
The U.S. Navy, Fort Lauderdale Branch,
Naval Surface Warfare Center range is
located south of the ODMDS and the
expansion of the ODMDS will not
impair U.S. Navy operations in the area.
The SMMP for the ODMDS contains
provisions for corrective measures if
potential adverse impacts to potential
hardbottom habitat related to dredged
material disposal are identified.
(9) The Existing Water Quality and
Ecology of the Sites as Determined by
Available Data or Trend Assessment of
Baseline Surveys (40 CFR 228.6(a)(9)).
Water quality at the site is typical of
the Florida coast. Water and sediment
quality analyses conducted in the
vicinity of the ODMDS and experience
with historic disposal at the existing
Port Everglades ODMDS have not
identified any adverse water quality
impacts from ocean disposal of dredged
material. The site supports benthic and
epibenthic fauna characteristic of the
region.
(10) Potentiality for the Development
or Recruitment of Nuisance Species in
the Disposal Site (40 CFR 228.6(a)(10)).
Nuisance species, considered as any
undesirable organism not previously
existing at a location, have not been
observed at, or in the vicinity of, the
ODMDS. Disposal of dredged material,
as well as monitoring, has been ongoing
for the past 14 years. Nuisance species
have not been found. The dredged
material to be disposed at the ODMDS
is expected to be from similar locations
to those dredged previously; therefore, it
expected that any benthic organisms
transported to the site would be
relatively similar in nature to those
already present.
(11) Existence at or in Close Proximity
to the Site of any Significant Natural or
Cultural Feature of Historical
Importance (40 CFR 228.6(a)(11)).
EPA conducted a survey of this site in
2013 to identify areas of potential
hardbottom resources as well as any
historical artifacts. The survey revealed
the presence of only two anomalies that,
when evaluated, were not indicative of
potential historical or natural features.
Probable wreckage from one modern
sailing vessel was identified in the
northeast corner of the site. Scattered
rubble covering potential hardbottom
habitat was identified scattered within
the expanded footprint.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The SMMP for the ODMDS contains
measures to monitor potential identified
hardbottom resources.
III. Environmental Statutory Review
a. National Environmental Policy Act
EPA’s primary voluntary NEPA
document for expanding the existing
Port Everglades ODMDS is the EA,
prepared by EPA in cooperation with
the USACE and issued for public review
and comment as draft in January 2020.
Anyone desiring a copy of the EA may
access it through the docket for this
action (Docket ID No. EPA–R04–OW–
2020–0056) or obtain a copy from the
address given above. The draft EA
issued in March 2020 amends the draft
EA that was previously published for
public review and comment in August
2013. Comments received on the March
draft EA are provided in the Response
to Comments document appended to the
docket. The EA provides the threshold
environmental review for modification
of the ODMDS.
The action discussed in the EA is the
designation of an ODMDS offshore Port
Everglades, Florida. The purpose of the
action is to provide an environmentally
acceptable option for the ocean disposal
of dredged material. The reason for the
ODMDS expansion is based primarily
on demonstrated lack of capacity for
ocean disposal of dredged material from
the Port Everglades Harbor area
including the upcoming Federal
Navigation Project and any additional
port projects into the future. The actual
need for ocean disposal for particular,
specific future projects, and the
suitability of the material for ocean
disposal, will be determined on a caseby-case basis as part of the USACE
process for reviewing ocean disposal
actions and a public review process for
its own actions to ocean dump dredged
material from Federal Projects.
Subsequent proceedings to develop
permits and terms of the authorization
for Federal projects will include
evaluation of disposal alternatives; the
existence of a designated site merely
provides an option for disposition of
suitable material.
EPA’s EA discusses the reasons for
expanding the ODMDS and examines
ocean disposal site alternatives. The
reasons to expand the existing Port
Everglades ODMDS are based on: Future
capacity modeling; potential movement
of fine sediments estimated dredging
volumes for proposed projects; and
limited capacity of upland disposal
facilities in the area. EPA considered
other configurations for the expanded
site but the other options were
discarded due to potential for adverse
E:\FR\FM\22JYR1.SGM
22JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 138 / Thursday, July 22, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
impacts to protected coral resources.
The following three ocean disposal
alternatives were considered in the EA.
No Action Alternative
EPA identified the No Action
Alternative as not modifying the size of
the existing Port Everglades ODMDS.
Implementation of this alternative
would not have addressed the
inadequate capacity at the existing
ocean dump site to accommodate future
ocean disposal of dredging projections.
As a result, the No Action Alternative
does not meet the action’s purpose and
need. However, EPA developed and
evaluated the No Action Alternative as
a basis to compare the effects of the
other alternatives considered.
Alternative 1: Modification of the
existing Port Everglades ODMDS to
encompass a 3.21 nmi2 area in a northsouth orientation (Preferred
Alternative).
Modification of the existing Port
Everglades ODMDS in a north-south
orientation to encompass a 3.21 nmi2
area as described above is the
environmentally and operationally
preferred alternative and considered the
most viable option. The existing Port
Everglades ODMDS is relatively small
and has a limited capacity. Modifying
the existing Port Everglades ODMDS to
increase capacity would accommodate
the anticipated volumes of material
projected for possible ocean disposal
associated with: The congressionally
authorized widening and deepening of
the Port Everglades Harbor Federal
navigation channel; congressionally
authorized maintenance dredging; the
Broward County sand bypass and
navigation projects; and potential future
private interests. It is the most feasible
option based on containing dredged
material from disposal operations while
potentially affecting the least potential
hardbottom habitat. A detailed
justification for this preferred
alternative is included in Section 2 in
the EA.
Alternative 2: Modification of the
existing Port Everglades ODMDS to
encompass a 2.89 nmi2 area in an eastwest orientation.
In order to inform viable options for
expanding the existing site, EPA
evaluated the data and information
included in the September 2013
Evaluation of Dredged Material
Behavior at the Port Everglades Harbor
Federal Project Ocean Dredged Material
Disposal Site. EPA specifically
considered the option of expanding the
site in an east-west orientation.
Although designating an expanded
ODMDS in an east-west orientation
would provide adequate site capacity,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Jul 21, 2021
Jkt 253001
an east-west orientation had a greater
level of risk for adverse impact to
hardbottom habitat. As described in the
EA, a site more adequately protective of
potential hardbottom areas was selected
as the preferred alternative with a northsouth orientation (Alternative 1).
b. Magnuson-Stevens Act
The USACE, in conjunction with
EPA, submitted an essential fish habitat
(EFH) assessment to the National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS),
pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Act,
16 U.S.C. 1855(b)(2). The USACE
determined that the expansion of the
existing Port Everglades ODMDS will
not significantly affect managed species
or EFH.
On March 13, 2020, EPA issued a
letter to NMFS that described the EPA’s
plans to conduct a Remotely Operated
Vehicle (ROV) survey to supplement the
available data to further characterize
potential hardbottom geomorphology
and biological community in the
expanded footprint of the Port
Everglades ODMDS. On March 19, 2020,
NMFS responded by letter requesting
that in the event results from the ROV
survey indicate that significant
hardbottom resources occur in the
expanded ODMDS and use of the
ODMDS will adversely affect those
resources, EPA should re-initiate
consultation. EPA is committed to
continue working in close coordination
with NMFS and will evaluate the ROV
survey results when they become
available. If significant hardbottom
resources occur in the expanded
ODMDS and the use of the ODMDS will
adversely affect those resources, EPA
will re-initiate consultation with NMFS
pursuant to the Magnuson-Stephens
Act.
c. Coastal Zone Management Act
EPA evaluated site designations for
consistency with the enforceable
policies of Florida’s approved coastal
zone management program. On behalf of
EPA, the USACE Jacksonville District
documented that the site expansion is
consistent with the Florida Coastal
Management Program to the maximum
extent practicable. The Florida
Department of Environmental Protection
issued Coastal Zone Consistency for the
Port Everglades ODMDS on April 29,
2011. EPA further coordinated with
Florida to determine whether any
additional information has become
available that may warrant changes to
the State’s 2011 determination. Florida
responded, on April 17, 2020, that its
position has not changed and that the
action remains consistent to the
maximum extent practicable with the
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
38567
enforceable policies of the State’s
approved coastal program.
d. Endangered Species Act
The Endangered Species Act, as
amended, 16 U.S.C. 1531 to 1544,
requires Federal agencies to consult
with NMFS and the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service to ensure that any
action authorized, funded, or carried out
by the Federal agency is not likely to
jeopardize the continued existence of
any endangered species or threatened
species or result in the destruction or
adverse modification of any critical
habitat. EPA has concluded consultation
with NMFS, which provided a
Biological Opinion for the South
Atlantic District of the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers on March 7, 2014,
applicable for the proposed expansion
of the ODMDS. NMFS’s Biological
Opinion indicted that the expanded
ODMDS will have no effect on federallylisted species or critical habitat. During
a teleconference between EPA and
NMFS on August 18, 2020, and in email
correspondence issued on April 21,
2021, NMFS verified there are no
changes to its Biological Opinion.
The expansion of the Port Everglades
ODMDS will have no effect on federallylisted terrestrial or freshwater species
under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service.
e. National Historic Preservation Act
The National Historic Preservation
Act (NHPA), 16 U.S.C. 470 to 470a–2,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the effect of their actions on districts,
sites, buildings, structures, or objects,
included in, or eligible for inclusion in
the National Register of Historic Places
(NRHP). The depths of the ODMDS
(greater than 700 feet depth) exclude
potential habitation or resources related
to human settlements. In a letter dated
April 9, 2020, the Florida State Historic
Preservation Office stated that no
historic properties would be affected by
the expansion of the ODMDS.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This rule expands the area of the Port
Everglades ODMDS pursuant to Section
102 of the MPRSA. This action complies
with applicable executive orders and
statutory provisions as follows:
a. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under the terms of
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and is therefore not
E:\FR\FM\22JYR1.SGM
22JYR1
38568
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 138 / Thursday, July 22, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
subject to review under Executive
Orders 12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011).
b. Executive Order 13089: Coral Reef
Protection
This action considers Executive Order
13089 on Coral Reef Protection ‘‘to
preserve and protect the biodiversity,
health, heritage, and social and
economic value of U.S. coral reef
ecosystems and the marine
environment.’’ The SMMP is designed
to reduce potential impacts from
sediments on corals from vessels during
transit to the ODMDS.
c. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. Burden is
defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b). This site
designation, does not require persons to
obtain, maintain, retain, report, or
publicly disclose information to or for a
Federal agency.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
d. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
generally requires Federal agencies to
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis
of any rule subject to notice and
comment rulemaking requirements
under the Administrative Procedure Act
or any other statute unless the agency
certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Small entities include small businesses,
small organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions. For
purposes of assessing the impacts of this
rule on small entities, small entity is
defined as: (1) A small business defined
by the Small Business Administration’s
size regulations at 13 CFR 121.201; (2)
a small governmental jurisdiction that is
a government of a city, county, town,
school district, or special district with a
population of less than 50,000; and (3)
a small organization that is any not-forprofit enterprise which is independently
owned and operated and is not
dominant in its field. After considering
the economic impacts of this rule, EPA
certifies that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
e. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This action contains no Federal
mandates under the provisions of Title
II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act (UMRA) of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1531 to
1538, for State, local, or tribal
governments or the private sector. This
action imposes no new enforceable duty
on any State, local or tribal governments
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Jul 21, 2021
Jkt 253001
or the private sector. Therefore, this
action is not subject to the requirements
of sections 202 or 205 of the UMRA.
This action is also not subject to the
requirements of section 203 of the
UMRA because it contains no regulatory
requirements that might significantly or
uniquely affect small government
entities. Those entities are already
subject to existing permitting
requirements for the disposal of dredged
material in ocean waters.
f. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications. It does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among various levels of
government, as specified in Executive
Order 13132. Thus, Executive Order
13132 does not apply to this action. In
the spirit of Executive Order 13132, and
consistent with EPA policy to promote
communications between EPA and State
and local governments, EPA specifically
solicited comments on this action from
State and local officials.
g. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175 because the modification of
the existing Port Everglades ODMDS
will not have a direct effect on Indian
Tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes. The
depths of the ODMDS (greater than 700
feet depth) exclude potential habitation
or resources related to human
settlements. In addition, EPA sent
notification of the Seminole Tribe of
Florida and the Miccosukee Tribe of
Indians of Florida regarding the
proposed action to modify the Port
Everglades ODMDS and received no
comments. Thus, Executive Order 13175
does not apply to this action.
h. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
EPA interprets Executive Order 13045
as applying only to those regulatory
actions that concern health or safety
risks, such that the analysis required
under Section 5–501 of the Executive
order has the potential to influence the
regulation. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does
not establish an environmental standard
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
intended to mitigate health or safety
risks.
i. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations that Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355) because it is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as
defined under Executive Order 12866.
j. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (‘‘NTTAA’’’), Public Law
104–113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272), directs
EPA to use voluntary consensus
standards in its regulatory activities
unless to do so would be inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. Voluntary consensus
standards are technical standards (e.g.,
materials specifications, test methods,
sampling procedures, and business
practices) that are developed or adopted
by voluntary consensus bodies. The
NTTAA directs EPA to provide
Congress, through Office of Management
and Budget, explanations when the
Agency decides not to use available and
applicable voluntary consensus
standards. This action includes
environmental monitoring and
measurement as described in EPA’s
SMMP. EPA will not require the use of
specific, prescribed analytic methods for
monitoring and managing the ODMDS.
The Agency plans to allow the use of
any method, whether it constitutes a
voluntary consensus standard or not,
that meets the monitoring and
measurement criteria discussed in the
SMMP.
k. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629)
establishes Federal executive policy on
environmental justice. Its main
provision directs Federal agencies, to
the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make
environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States. EPA
determined that this rule will not have
disproportionately high and adverse
E:\FR\FM\22JYR1.SGM
22JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 138 / Thursday, July 22, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
human health or environmental effects
on minority or low-income populations
because it does not affect the level of
protection provided to human health or
the environment. EPA has assessed the
overall protectiveness of expanding the
Port Everglades ODMDS against the
criteria established pursuant to the
MPRSA to ensure that any adverse
impact to the environment will be
mitigated to the greatest extent
practicable.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 228
Environmental protection, Water
pollution control.
Dated: July 13, 2021.
John Blevins,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region
4.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, EPA amends chapter I, title
40 of the Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
PART 228—CRITERIA FOR THE
MANAGEMENT OF DISPOSAL SITES
FOR OCEAN DUMPING
1. The authority citation for part 228
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1412 and 1418.
2. Section 228.15 is amended by
revising paragraphs (h)(22)(i) through
(iii) and (vi) to read as follows:
■
§ 228.15 Dumping sites designated on a
final basis.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(22) * * *
(i) Location: Corner Coordinates (NAD
1983) 26°06.500′, 80°01.000′; 26°06.500′,
80°02.578′; 26°08.750′, 80°02.578′;
26°08.750′, 80°01.000′.
(ii) Size: Approximately 3.2 square
nautical miles in size.
(iii) Depth: Ranges from
approximately 587 to 761 feet (179 to
232 meters).
*
*
*
*
*
(vi) Restrictions:
(A) Disposal shall be limited to
dredged material from the Port
Everglades, Florida, area;
(B) Disposal shall be limited to
dredged material determined to be
suitable for ocean disposal according to
40 CFR parts 227 and 228; and
(C) Transportation and disposal shall
comply with conditions and monitoring
requirements set forth in the most recent
approved Site Management and
Monitoring Plan and conditions and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Jul 21, 2021
Jkt 253001
[FR Doc. 2021–15529 Filed 7–21–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
42 CFR Part 414
Authority: This action is issued under the
authority of Section 102 of the Marine
Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act, as
amended, 33 U.S.C. 1412 and 1418.
*
monitoring requirements incorporated
into the permit or Federal project
authorization.
*
*
*
*
*
[CMS–5534–N]
Medicare Program; Calendar Year 2021
Alternative Payment Model (APM)
Incentive Payment Advisory for
Clinicians—Request for Current Billing
Information for Qualifying APM
Participants
Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), Health and
Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Payment advisory.
AGENCY:
This advisory is to alert
certain clinicians who are Qualifying
APM participants (QPs) and eligible to
receive an Alternative Payment Model
(APM) Incentive Payment that CMS
does not have the current billing
information needed to disburse the
payment. This advisory provides
information to these clinicians on how
to update their billing information to
receive this payment.
DATES: Updated billing information
must be received no later than
November 1, 2021 (see SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION for details).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tanya Dorm, (410) 786–2216.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
Under the Medicare Quality Payment
Program, an eligible clinician who
participates in an Advanced Alternative
Payment Model (APM) and meets the
applicable payment amount or patient
count thresholds for a performance year
is a Qualifying APM Participant (QP) for
that year. An eligible clinician who is a
QP for a year based on their
performance in a QP Performance
Period earns a 5-percent lump sum APM
Incentive Payment that is paid in a
payment year that occurs 2 years after
the QP Performance Period. The amount
of the APM Incentive Payment is equal
to 5 percent of the estimated aggregate
paid amounts for covered professional
services furnished by the QP during the
calendar year (CY) immediately
preceding the payment year.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
38569
II. Provisions of the Advisory
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS) has identified those
eligible clinicians who earned an APM
Incentive Payment in CY 2021 based on
their CY 2019 QP status.
When CMS disbursed the CY 2021
APM Incentive Payments, CMS was
unable to verify current Medicare billing
information for some QPs and was
therefore unable to issue payment. In
order to successfully disburse the APM
Incentive Payment, CMS is requesting
assistance in identifying current
Medicare billing information for these
QPs in accordance with 42 CFR
414.1450(c)(8).
CMS has compiled a list of QPs we
have identified as having unverified
billing information. These QPs, and any
others who anticipated receiving an
APM Incentive Payment but have not,
should follow the instructions to
provide CMS with updated billing
information at the following web
address: https://qpp-cm-prodcontent.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/
1498/QP%20Notice%
20for%20APM%20Incentiv
e%20Payment.zip.
If you have any questions concerning
submission of information through the
website, please contact the Quality
Payment Program Help Desk at 1–866–
288–8292.
All submissions must be received no
later than November 1, 2021. After that
time, any claims by a QP to an APM
Incentive Payment will be forfeited for
the CY 2021 payment year.
The Administrator of the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS),
Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, having
reviewed and approved this document,
authorizes Lynette Wilson, who is the
Federal Register Liaison, to
electronically sign this document for
purposes of publication in the Federal
Register.
Dated: July 19, 2021.
Lynette Wilson,
Federal Register Liaison, Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2021–15652 Filed 7–21–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120–01–P
E:\FR\FM\22JYR1.SGM
22JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 138 (Thursday, July 22, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38563-38569]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15529]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 228
[EPA-R04-OW-2020-0056; FRL-8737-01-R4]
Ocean Dumping; Modification of an Ocean Dredged Material Disposal
Site Offshore Port Everglades, Florida
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is expanding the
size of the EPA designated ocean dredged material disposal site (ODMDS)
offshore of Port Everglades, Florida (referred to hereafter as the
existing Port Everglades ODMDS), pursuant to the Marine Protection,
Research and Sanctuaries Act (MPRSA). The primary purpose for the site
modification is to enlarge the site to provide for the long-term
disposal capacity to dump suitable material dredged from the Port
Everglades Harbor in ocean waters. The modified site will be subject to
monitoring and management to ensure continued protection of the marine
environment.
DATES: Effective: August 23, 2021.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R04-OW-2020-0056. All documents in the docket are listed on the
https://www.regulations.gov website.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wade Lehmann, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, Water Division, Oceans and Estuarine
Management Section, 61 Forsyth Street, Atlanta, Georgia 30303; phone
number (404) 562-8082; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA proposed rulemaking on March 13, 2020,
and re-released for further public review on May 22, 2020 (85 FR 14622
and 85 FR 31133), which was a proposal to expand the size of the Port
Everglades ODMDS. Additionally, EPA is releasing a Finding of No
Significant Impact and a final Environmental Assessment (EA), pursuant
to the National Environmental Policy Act, which are available in the
docket for this action (Docket ID No. EPA-R04-OW-2020-0056). EPA's
responses to comments received on the proposed rule and the draft EA
are also available in the docket for this action.
I. Potentially Affected Persons
Persons potentially affected by this action include those who seek
or might seek permits or approval to dispose of
[[Page 38564]]
dredged material into ocean waters pursuant to the MPRSA, 33 U.S.C.
1401 to 1445. The EPA's action would be relevant to persons, including
organizations and government bodies seeking to dispose of dredged
material in ocean waters offshore of Port Everglades, Florida.
Currently, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) would be most
affected by this action. Potentially affected categories and persons
include:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category Examples of potentially regulated persons
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Government........... USACE Civil Works projects, and other
Federal agencies.
Industry and general public.. Port authorities, marinas and harbors,
shipyards and marine repair facilities,
berth owners.
State, local and tribal Governments owning and/or responsible for
governments. ports, harbors, and/or berths,
government agencies requiring disposal
of dredged material associated with
public works projects.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide for readers regarding persons likely to be affected by this
action. For any questions regarding the applicability of this action to
a particular entity, please refer to the contact person listed in the
preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
II. Background
a. History of Disposal Sites Offshore of Port Everglades, Florida
There is currently one designated ODMDS off the coast of Port
Everglades in Florida. The existing Port Everglades ODMDS is located
three nautical miles offshore of Fort Lauderdale. EPA designated the
Port Everglades ODMDS in 2005 with an area of 1.34 square nautical
miles (nmi\2\).
The USACE Jacksonville District and EPA Region 4 identified a need
to either designate a new ODMDS or modify the existing Port Everglades
ODMDS. The reasons for modifying the ocean disposal capacity are based
on future dredged material capacity requirements, historical dredging
volumes, estimates of dredging volumes for future proposed projects,
and limited capacity of upland disposal in the area.
EPA is expanding the existing Port Everglades ODMDS rather than
designate a new site off the coast of Fort Lauderdale for ocean dumping
of dredged material. The modification of the existing Port Everglades
ODMDS for dredged material, however, does not mean that the USACE or
the EPA has approved the use of the existing Port Everglades ODMDS or a
modified Port Everglades ODMDS for open water disposal of dredged
material from any specific project. Before any person can ocean dump
dredged material at an ODMDS, EPA and the USACE must evaluate the
project according to the ocean dumping regulatory criteria (40 CFR part
227) and the USACE must issue a permit or other authorization document
(e.g., contract specifications) for the transportation and disposal of
dredged material and must attain concurrence from EPA. Under section
103 of the MPRSA, the USACE is the Federal agency that initially
determines whether to issue a permit authorizing the ocean disposal of
dredged materials. In the case of Federal navigation projects, the
USACE may implement the MPRSA directly in the Federal projects
involving ocean disposal of dredged materials. The USACE relies on
EPA's ocean dumping criteria when evaluating permit requests for (and
implementing Federal projects involving) the transportation of dredged
material for the purpose of dumping it into ocean waters. MPRSA permits
and Federal projects involving ocean dumping of dredged material are
subject to EPA review and concurrence under MPRSA 33 U.S.C. 1413(c).
EPA may concur with or without conditions or decline to concur on the
permit, i.e., non-concur. If EPA concurs with conditions, the final
permit or authorization must include those conditions. If EPA declines
to concur (non-concurs), the USACE cannot issue the permit for ocean
dumping of dredged material or authorize the disposal. EPA's site
modification is supported by a final Environmental Assessment (EA),
which EPA previously provided for public notice as draft and is
available in the docket for this action (Docket ID No. EPA-R04-OW-2020-
0056).
b. Location and Configuration of the Port Everglades ODMDS
With this action, EPA expands the size of the Port Everglades
ODMDS, which is at depths between -587 to -761 feet of water (-179 to -
232 meters). The ODMDS expansion increases the area of the existing
Port Everglades ODMDS from approximately 1.34 nmi\2\ to 3.21 nmi\2\.
The ODMDS is bounded by the coordinates listed below. The coordinates
for the site are in North American Datum 83 (NAD 83):
Modified Port Everglades ODMDS
(A) 26[deg]08.750' N, 80[deg]01.000' W
(B) 26[deg]08.750' N, 80[deg]02.578' W
(C) 26[deg]06.500' N, 80[deg]02.578' W
(D) 26[deg]06.500' N, 80[deg]01.000' W
The Site Management and Monitoring Plan (SMMP) allows EPA to adaptively
manage the site to maximize its capacity, minimize the potential for
mounding and loss of fine sediments outside of the site, and minimize
the potential for any long-term adverse effects to the marine
environment.
c. Management and Monitoring of the Site
The ODMDS is expected to receive dredged material from the Federal
navigation project at Port Everglades Harbor, Florida, and dredged
material from other applicants who obtain a permit for the disposal of
dredged material at the ODMDS. All persons using the site shall comply
with the conditions set forth in the most recent approved SMMP, which
EPA (in conjunction with the USACE) specifically developed for the
ODMDS. The SMMP includes management and monitoring provisions to ensure
that dredged materials disposed at the ODMDS are suitable for disposal
in the ocean and that adverse impacts of disposal, if any, are
addressed to the maximum extent practicable. The SMMP includes
provisions to avoid and minimize potential impacts to coral reefs
present near Port Everglades. The SMMP for the ODMDS also addresses
management of the site to ensure adverse mounding and dispersal of fine
sediments does not occur and to ensure that disposal events minimize
interference with other uses of ocean waters near the ODMDS.
d. MPRSA Criteria
In evaluating the ODMDS, the EPA assessed the site according to the
criteria of the MPRSA, with emphasis on the general and specific
regulatory criteria of 40 CFR part 228, to determine whether the site
designation satisfies those criteria. The EPA's EA provides an
extensive evaluation of the criteria and other related factors for the
modification of the ODMDS.
General Criteria (40 CFR 228.5)
(a) Sites must be selected to minimize interference with other
activities in the marine environment, particularly avoiding areas of
existing fisheries or
[[Page 38565]]
shellfisheries, and regions of heavy commercial or recreational
navigation (40 CFR 228.5(a)).
Historically, an interim site located approximately 1.6 nautical
miles from shore was used for ocean disposal of dredged material from
Port Everglades Harbor but was discontinued in the 1980s due to the
significant potential for adverse impacts from sediments to nearby
coral reef resources. EPA designated the existing Port Everglades
Harbor ODMDS in 2005 to fulfill the need for an EPA designated ODMDS
near Port Everglades. The evaluation for the 2005 designation included
considerations of potential interference with other activities in the
marine environment including avoiding areas of existing critical
fisheries or shellfisheries, and regions of heavy commercial or
recreational navigation. EPA re-considered the evaluations from 2010
through to the present time throughout the NEPA process.
(b) Sites must be situated such that temporary perturbations to
water quality or other environmental conditions during initial mixing
caused by disposal operations would be reduced to normal ambient levels
or undetectable contaminant concentrations or effects before reaching
any beach, shoreline, marine sanctuary, or known geographically limited
fishery or shellfishery (40 CFR 228.5(b)).
The ODMDS area will be used only for disposal of dredged material
found to be suitable under the Ocean Dumping Regulations at 40 CFR
parts 220 through 228. Based on the USACE and EPA sediment testing and
evaluation procedures, disposal of dredged maintenance material and
proposed new work material is not expected to have any long-term impact
on water quality. The Port Everglades ODMDS is located sufficiently far
from shore and fisheries resources to allow temporary water quality
disturbances caused by disposal of dredged material to be reduced to
ambient conditions before reaching any environmentally sensitive areas.
(c) The sizes of disposal sites will be limited in order to
localize for identification and control any immediate adverse impacts,
and to permit the implementation of effective monitoring and
surveillance to prevent adverse long-range impacts. Size,
configuration, and location are to be determined as part of the
disposal site evaluation (40 CFR 228.5(d)).
The location, size, and configuration of the ODMDS should provide
sufficient long-term disposal capacity expected for anticipated
dredging projects, while also permitting effective site management,
site monitoring, and limiting environmental impacts to the surrounding
area to the greatest extent practicable.
Based on projected new work and maintenance dredging, and permitted
dredged material disposal needs, EPA and the USACE estimated that the
ODMDS should be approximately 3.21 nmi\2\ in size to meet the
anticipated long-term disposal needs of the nearby area. Expanding the
ODMDS to 3.21 nmi\2\ provides an estimated capacity of approximately
6.7 million cubic yards, which is sufficient to manage future unknown
disposal operations from public and private entities and provide
protection of the marine environment at the ODMDS.
When determining the size of the site, EPA considered the need to
implement effective monitoring and surveillance programs to ensure that
the environment of the site could be protected, and that navigational
safety would not be compromised by the mounding of dredged material.
EPA and the USACE have developed a SMMP for the site that, when
implemented, will be used to determine if disposal at the site is
significantly affecting the environment within the site or adjacent
areas. At a minimum, the monitoring program will consist of bathymetric
surveys, sediment grain size analysis, chemical analysis of
constituents of concern in the sediments, and an assessment of the
benthic community structure.
(d) EPA will, wherever feasible, designate ocean dumping sites
beyond the edge of the continental shelf and other such sites where
historical disposal has occurred (40 CFR 228.5(e)).
The Port Everglades ODMDS is beyond the edge of the continental
shelf.
Specific Criteria (40 CFR 228.6)
(1) Geographical Position, Depth of Water, Bottom Topography and
Distance from Coast (40 CFR 228.6(a)(1)).
The ODMDS is on the Florida Continental Slope, 3.3 nautical miles
offshore of Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Water depths range from -179 to -
232 meters (-587 to -761 feet), with an average depth of 207 meters (-
678 feet). Sediments consist of sand with various mixtures of sand and
silts with scattered rubble hardbottom. The EA contains a map of the
ODMDS. The ODMDS remains fully off the continental shelf at a distance
that is not expected to allow sediments to travel to nearby shore-
associated coral reef habitat.
(2) Location in Relation to Breeding, Spawning, Nursery, Feeding,
or Passage Areas of Living Resources in Adult or Juvenile Phases (40
CFR 228.6(a)(2)).
The ODMDS location was selected to avoid the presence of any
exclusive breeding, spawning, nursery, feeding, or passage areas for
adult or juvenile phases of living resources.
(3) Location in Relation to Beaches and Other Amenity Areas (40 CFR
228.6(a)(3)).
The center of the ODMDS is several miles from any beaches or
amenity areas. No significant impacts to beaches or amenity areas
associated with the Port Everglades ODMDS have been detected, and the
expansion is not expected to affect that conclusion. The U.S. Navy
maintains facilities south of the ODMDS, and EPA and the USACE
consulted the Navy to verify that no impediments will exist with the
expanded ODMDS.
(4) Types and Quantities of Wastes Proposed to be Disposed of, and
Proposed Methods of Release, including Methods of Packing the Waste, if
any (40 CFR 228.6(a)(4)).
Only suitable dredged material that meets the Ocean Dumping
Criteria in 40 CFR parts 227 and 228 will be disposed in the ODMDS and
only pursuant to a duly issued permit or authorization (e.g., contract
specifications) for a Federal project with concurrence by EPA. Dredged
materials dumped in this area will be primarily sand and rock with some
fines that originate from the Port Everglades Harbor. Average yearly
disposal of dredged maintenance material into the ODMDS is expected to
be approximately 30,000 cubic yards and variable volumes of new work
dredged material up to 6.7 million cubic yards. None of the material is
packaged in any manner.
Under section 103 of the MPRSA, the USACE is the Federal agency
that initially determines whether to issue a permit authorizing the
ocean disposal of dredged materials. In the case of Federal navigation
projects involving ocean disposal of dredged materials, in lieu of the
permit procedure, the USACE authorizes projects based upon application
of the same criteria, and other factors to be evaluated, the same
procedures, and the same requirements that apply to the issuance of
permits. The USACE applies the EPA's ocean dumping criteria when
evaluating permit requests for (and implementing Federal projects
involving) the transportation of dredged material for the purpose of
dumping it into ocean waters. MPRSA permits and Federal projects
involving ocean dumping of dredged material are subject to EPA's review
and concurrence. EPA may concur, with or without conditions, or
[[Page 38566]]
decline to concur on the request for concurrence on the suitability of
dredged material for disposal in the ODMDS. If EPA concurs with
conditions, the final permit or project authorization (e.g., contract
specifications) must include those conditions. If EPA declines to
concur (non-concurs) on an ocean dumping permit for dredged material,
the USACE cannot issue the permit or authorize ocean dumping for the
Federal project.
(5) Feasibility of Surveillance and Monitoring (40 CFR
228.6(a)(5)).
EPA expects monitoring and surveillance at the ODMDS to be feasible
and readily performed from ocean or regional class research vessels.
Monitoring and surveillance are addressed in the SMMP. The area of the
ODMDS has been surveyed and sampled in 2004, 2007 and 2014. EPA will
monitor the site for physical, biological, and chemical attributes as
well as for potential impacts. Bathymetric surveys will be conducted
routinely, and benthic infauna and epibenthic organisms will be
monitored, as described in the SMMP for the site.
(6) Dispersal, Horizontal Transport and Vertical Mixing
Characteristics of the Area, including Prevailing Current Direction and
Velocity, if any (40 CFR 228.6(a)(6)).
Current velocities vary throughout the water column and are subject
to wind and the Florida current-based circulations which are generally
northerly with eddies occurring that drive currents south. Currents
measured at nearby sites are predominantly to the north or south on the
order of 1-4 knots (50-200 centimeters per second).
(7) Existence and Effects of Current and Previous Discharges and
Dumping in the Area (including Cumulative Effects) (40 CFR
228.6(a)(7)).
Historic disposal of dredged material in the existing Port
Everglades ODMDS has resulted in temporary increases in suspended
sediment concentrations during disposal operations, burial of benthic
organisms within the site, and slight changes in the abundance and
composition of benthic assemblages. Short-term, long-term, and
cumulative effects of dredged material disposal in the ODMDS would be
similar to those for the previously designated site and are expected to
be temporary and return to baseline over time.
(8) Interference with Shipping, Fishing, Recreation, Mineral
Extraction, Desalination, Fish and Shellfish Culture, Areas of Special
Scientific Importance and Other Legitimate Uses of the Ocean (40 CFR
228.6(a)(8)).
The transport of dredged material to the ODMDS will cause minor,
short-term interferences with commercial and recreational boat traffic.
during normal disposal operations. EPA has not identified an area of
special scientific importance at or near the site. There are no
aquaculture areas near the site. There may be recreational fishing in
the area. The likelihood of direct interference with these activities,
however, is low. The U.S. Navy, Fort Lauderdale Branch, Naval Surface
Warfare Center range is located south of the ODMDS and the expansion of
the ODMDS will not impair U.S. Navy operations in the area. The SMMP
for the ODMDS contains provisions for corrective measures if potential
adverse impacts to potential hardbottom habitat related to dredged
material disposal are identified.
(9) The Existing Water Quality and Ecology of the Sites as
Determined by Available Data or Trend Assessment of Baseline Surveys
(40 CFR 228.6(a)(9)).
Water quality at the site is typical of the Florida coast. Water
and sediment quality analyses conducted in the vicinity of the ODMDS
and experience with historic disposal at the existing Port Everglades
ODMDS have not identified any adverse water quality impacts from ocean
disposal of dredged material. The site supports benthic and epibenthic
fauna characteristic of the region.
(10) Potentiality for the Development or Recruitment of Nuisance
Species in the Disposal Site (40 CFR 228.6(a)(10)).
Nuisance species, considered as any undesirable organism not
previously existing at a location, have not been observed at, or in the
vicinity of, the ODMDS. Disposal of dredged material, as well as
monitoring, has been ongoing for the past 14 years. Nuisance species
have not been found. The dredged material to be disposed at the ODMDS
is expected to be from similar locations to those dredged previously;
therefore, it expected that any benthic organisms transported to the
site would be relatively similar in nature to those already present.
(11) Existence at or in Close Proximity to the Site of any
Significant Natural or Cultural Feature of Historical Importance (40
CFR 228.6(a)(11)).
EPA conducted a survey of this site in 2013 to identify areas of
potential hardbottom resources as well as any historical artifacts. The
survey revealed the presence of only two anomalies that, when
evaluated, were not indicative of potential historical or natural
features. Probable wreckage from one modern sailing vessel was
identified in the northeast corner of the site. Scattered rubble
covering potential hardbottom habitat was identified scattered within
the expanded footprint.
The SMMP for the ODMDS contains measures to monitor potential
identified hardbottom resources.
III. Environmental Statutory Review
a. National Environmental Policy Act
EPA's primary voluntary NEPA document for expanding the existing
Port Everglades ODMDS is the EA, prepared by EPA in cooperation with
the USACE and issued for public review and comment as draft in January
2020. Anyone desiring a copy of the EA may access it through the docket
for this action (Docket ID No. EPA-R04-OW-2020-0056) or obtain a copy
from the address given above. The draft EA issued in March 2020 amends
the draft EA that was previously published for public review and
comment in August 2013. Comments received on the March draft EA are
provided in the Response to Comments document appended to the docket.
The EA provides the threshold environmental review for modification of
the ODMDS.
The action discussed in the EA is the designation of an ODMDS
offshore Port Everglades, Florida. The purpose of the action is to
provide an environmentally acceptable option for the ocean disposal of
dredged material. The reason for the ODMDS expansion is based primarily
on demonstrated lack of capacity for ocean disposal of dredged material
from the Port Everglades Harbor area including the upcoming Federal
Navigation Project and any additional port projects into the future.
The actual need for ocean disposal for particular, specific future
projects, and the suitability of the material for ocean disposal, will
be determined on a case-by-case basis as part of the USACE process for
reviewing ocean disposal actions and a public review process for its
own actions to ocean dump dredged material from Federal Projects.
Subsequent proceedings to develop permits and terms of the
authorization for Federal projects will include evaluation of disposal
alternatives; the existence of a designated site merely provides an
option for disposition of suitable material.
EPA's EA discusses the reasons for expanding the ODMDS and examines
ocean disposal site alternatives. The reasons to expand the existing
Port Everglades ODMDS are based on: Future capacity modeling; potential
movement of fine sediments estimated dredging volumes for proposed
projects; and limited capacity of upland disposal facilities in the
area. EPA considered other configurations for the expanded site but the
other options were discarded due to potential for adverse
[[Page 38567]]
impacts to protected coral resources. The following three ocean
disposal alternatives were considered in the EA.
No Action Alternative
EPA identified the No Action Alternative as not modifying the size
of the existing Port Everglades ODMDS. Implementation of this
alternative would not have addressed the inadequate capacity at the
existing ocean dump site to accommodate future ocean disposal of
dredging projections. As a result, the No Action Alternative does not
meet the action's purpose and need. However, EPA developed and
evaluated the No Action Alternative as a basis to compare the effects
of the other alternatives considered.
Alternative 1: Modification of the existing Port Everglades ODMDS
to encompass a 3.21 nmi\2\ area in a north-south orientation (Preferred
Alternative).
Modification of the existing Port Everglades ODMDS in a north-south
orientation to encompass a 3.21 nmi\2\ area as described above is the
environmentally and operationally preferred alternative and considered
the most viable option. The existing Port Everglades ODMDS is
relatively small and has a limited capacity. Modifying the existing
Port Everglades ODMDS to increase capacity would accommodate the
anticipated volumes of material projected for possible ocean disposal
associated with: The congressionally authorized widening and deepening
of the Port Everglades Harbor Federal navigation channel;
congressionally authorized maintenance dredging; the Broward County
sand bypass and navigation projects; and potential future private
interests. It is the most feasible option based on containing dredged
material from disposal operations while potentially affecting the least
potential hardbottom habitat. A detailed justification for this
preferred alternative is included in Section 2 in the EA.
Alternative 2: Modification of the existing Port Everglades ODMDS
to encompass a 2.89 nmi\2\ area in an east-west orientation.
In order to inform viable options for expanding the existing site,
EPA evaluated the data and information included in the September 2013
Evaluation of Dredged Material Behavior at the Port Everglades Harbor
Federal Project Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site. EPA specifically
considered the option of expanding the site in an east-west
orientation. Although designating an expanded ODMDS in an east-west
orientation would provide adequate site capacity, an east-west
orientation had a greater level of risk for adverse impact to
hardbottom habitat. As described in the EA, a site more adequately
protective of potential hardbottom areas was selected as the preferred
alternative with a north-south orientation (Alternative 1).
b. Magnuson-Stevens Act
The USACE, in conjunction with EPA, submitted an essential fish
habitat (EFH) assessment to the National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS), pursuant to the Magnuson-Stevens Act, 16 U.S.C. 1855(b)(2). The
USACE determined that the expansion of the existing Port Everglades
ODMDS will not significantly affect managed species or EFH.
On March 13, 2020, EPA issued a letter to NMFS that described the
EPA's plans to conduct a Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) survey to
supplement the available data to further characterize potential
hardbottom geomorphology and biological community in the expanded
footprint of the Port Everglades ODMDS. On March 19, 2020, NMFS
responded by letter requesting that in the event results from the ROV
survey indicate that significant hardbottom resources occur in the
expanded ODMDS and use of the ODMDS will adversely affect those
resources, EPA should re-initiate consultation. EPA is committed to
continue working in close coordination with NMFS and will evaluate the
ROV survey results when they become available. If significant
hardbottom resources occur in the expanded ODMDS and the use of the
ODMDS will adversely affect those resources, EPA will re-initiate
consultation with NMFS pursuant to the Magnuson-Stephens Act.
c. Coastal Zone Management Act
EPA evaluated site designations for consistency with the
enforceable policies of Florida's approved coastal zone management
program. On behalf of EPA, the USACE Jacksonville District documented
that the site expansion is consistent with the Florida Coastal
Management Program to the maximum extent practicable. The Florida
Department of Environmental Protection issued Coastal Zone Consistency
for the Port Everglades ODMDS on April 29, 2011. EPA further
coordinated with Florida to determine whether any additional
information has become available that may warrant changes to the
State's 2011 determination. Florida responded, on April 17, 2020, that
its position has not changed and that the action remains consistent to
the maximum extent practicable with the enforceable policies of the
State's approved coastal program.
d. Endangered Species Act
The Endangered Species Act, as amended, 16 U.S.C. 1531 to 1544,
requires Federal agencies to consult with NMFS and the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service to ensure that any action authorized, funded, or
carried out by the Federal agency is not likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of any endangered species or threatened species or
result in the destruction or adverse modification of any critical
habitat. EPA has concluded consultation with NMFS, which provided a
Biological Opinion for the South Atlantic District of the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers on March 7, 2014, applicable for the proposed
expansion of the ODMDS. NMFS's Biological Opinion indicted that the
expanded ODMDS will have no effect on federally-listed species or
critical habitat. During a teleconference between EPA and NMFS on
August 18, 2020, and in email correspondence issued on April 21, 2021,
NMFS verified there are no changes to its Biological Opinion.
The expansion of the Port Everglades ODMDS will have no effect on
federally-listed terrestrial or freshwater species under the
jurisdiction of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
e. National Historic Preservation Act
The National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), 16 U.S.C. 470 to
470a-2, requires Federal agencies to consider the effect of their
actions on districts, sites, buildings, structures, or objects,
included in, or eligible for inclusion in the National Register of
Historic Places (NRHP). The depths of the ODMDS (greater than 700 feet
depth) exclude potential habitation or resources related to human
settlements. In a letter dated April 9, 2020, the Florida State
Historic Preservation Office stated that no historic properties would
be affected by the expansion of the ODMDS.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This rule expands the area of the Port Everglades ODMDS pursuant to
Section 102 of the MPRSA. This action complies with applicable
executive orders and statutory provisions as follows:
a. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the
terms of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is
therefore not
[[Page 38568]]
subject to review under Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011).
b. Executive Order 13089: Coral Reef Protection
This action considers Executive Order 13089 on Coral Reef
Protection ``to preserve and protect the biodiversity, health,
heritage, and social and economic value of U.S. coral reef ecosystems
and the marine environment.'' The SMMP is designed to reduce potential
impacts from sediments on corals from vessels during transit to the
ODMDS.
c. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b). This site designation, does not
require persons to obtain, maintain, retain, report, or publicly
disclose information to or for a Federal agency.
d. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act generally requires Federal agencies
to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative
Procedure Act or any other statute unless the agency certifies that the
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Small entities include small businesses,
small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions. For purposes
of assessing the impacts of this rule on small entities, small entity
is defined as: (1) A small business defined by the Small Business
Administration's size regulations at 13 CFR 121.201; (2) a small
governmental jurisdiction that is a government of a city, county, town,
school district, or special district with a population of less than
50,000; and (3) a small organization that is any not-for-profit
enterprise which is independently owned and operated and is not
dominant in its field. After considering the economic impacts of this
rule, EPA certifies that this action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
e. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This action contains no Federal mandates under the provisions of
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) of 1995, 2 U.S.C.
1531 to 1538, for State, local, or tribal governments or the private
sector. This action imposes no new enforceable duty on any State, local
or tribal governments or the private sector. Therefore, this action is
not subject to the requirements of sections 202 or 205 of the UMRA.
This action is also not subject to the requirements of section 203 of
the UMRA because it contains no regulatory requirements that might
significantly or uniquely affect small government entities. Those
entities are already subject to existing permitting requirements for
the disposal of dredged material in ocean waters.
f. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It does not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among various levels of government, as specified
in Executive Order 13132. Thus, Executive Order 13132 does not apply to
this action. In the spirit of Executive Order 13132, and consistent
with EPA policy to promote communications between EPA and State and
local governments, EPA specifically solicited comments on this action
from State and local officials.
g. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175 because the modification of the existing Port
Everglades ODMDS will not have a direct effect on Indian Tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes. The depths of the ODMDS (greater than 700
feet depth) exclude potential habitation or resources related to human
settlements. In addition, EPA sent notification of the Seminole Tribe
of Florida and the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida regarding the
proposed action to modify the Port Everglades ODMDS and received no
comments. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.
h. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health and Safety Risks
EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern health or safety risks, such that the
analysis required under Section 5-501 of the Executive order has the
potential to influence the regulation. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not establish an environmental
standard intended to mitigate health or safety risks.
i. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions
Concerning Regulations that Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355) because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' as defined under Executive Order 12866.
j. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (``NTTAA'''), Public Law 104-113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272),
directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory
activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling
procedures, and business practices) that are developed or adopted by
voluntary consensus bodies. The NTTAA directs EPA to provide Congress,
through Office of Management and Budget, explanations when the Agency
decides not to use available and applicable voluntary consensus
standards. This action includes environmental monitoring and
measurement as described in EPA's SMMP. EPA will not require the use of
specific, prescribed analytic methods for monitoring and managing the
ODMDS. The Agency plans to allow the use of any method, whether it
constitutes a voluntary consensus standard or not, that meets the
monitoring and measurement criteria discussed in the SMMP.
k. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629) establishes Federal executive
policy on environmental justice. Its main provision directs Federal
agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their mission by identifying and
addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human
health or environmental effects of their programs, policies, and
activities on minority populations and low-income populations in the
United States. EPA determined that this rule will not have
disproportionately high and adverse
[[Page 38569]]
human health or environmental effects on minority or low-income
populations because it does not affect the level of protection provided
to human health or the environment. EPA has assessed the overall
protectiveness of expanding the Port Everglades ODMDS against the
criteria established pursuant to the MPRSA to ensure that any adverse
impact to the environment will be mitigated to the greatest extent
practicable.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 228
Environmental protection, Water pollution control.
Authority: This action is issued under the authority of Section
102 of the Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act, as
amended, 33 U.S.C. 1412 and 1418.
Dated: July 13, 2021.
John Blevins,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region 4.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, EPA amends chapter I,
title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 228--CRITERIA FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF DISPOSAL SITES FOR OCEAN
DUMPING
0
1. The authority citation for part 228 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1412 and 1418.
0
2. Section 228.15 is amended by revising paragraphs (h)(22)(i) through
(iii) and (vi) to read as follows:
Sec. 228.15 Dumping sites designated on a final basis.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(22) * * *
(i) Location: Corner Coordinates (NAD 1983) 26[deg]06.500',
80[deg]01.000'; 26[deg]06.500', 80[deg]02.578'; 26[deg]08.750',
80[deg]02.578'; 26[deg]08.750', 80[deg]01.000'.
(ii) Size: Approximately 3.2 square nautical miles in size.
(iii) Depth: Ranges from approximately 587 to 761 feet (179 to 232
meters).
* * * * *
(vi) Restrictions:
(A) Disposal shall be limited to dredged material from the Port
Everglades, Florida, area;
(B) Disposal shall be limited to dredged material determined to be
suitable for ocean disposal according to 40 CFR parts 227 and 228; and
(C) Transportation and disposal shall comply with conditions and
monitoring requirements set forth in the most recent approved Site
Management and Monitoring Plan and conditions and monitoring
requirements incorporated into the permit or Federal project
authorization.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-15529 Filed 7-21-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P