Auction of Construction Permits for Low Power Television and TV Translator Stations; Comment Sought on Competitive Bidding Procedures for Auction 111, 37972-37981 [2021-15146]
Download as PDF
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
37972
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 135 / Monday, July 19, 2021 / Proposed Rules
USEPA. 2008. Drinking Water: Regulatory
Determinations Regarding Contaminants
on the Second Drinking Water
Contaminant Candidate List. Federal
Register. Vol. 73, No. 174. p. 44251, July
30, 2008.
USEPA. 2009a. Final Contaminant Candidate
List 3 Chemicals: Identifying the
Universe. EPA 815–R09–006. August
2009.
USEPA. 2009b. Final Contaminant Candidate
List 3 Chemicals: Screening to a PCCL.
EPA. 815–R09–007. August 2009.
USEPA. 2009c. Community Water System
Survey 2006. Volume 1: Overview. EPA
815–R–09–001. February 2009.
USEPA. 2009d. Community Water System
Survey 2006. Volume II: Detailed Tables
and Survey Methodology. EPA 815–R–
09–002. May 2009.
USEPA. 2009e. Drinking Water Contaminant
Candidate List 3—Final. Federal
Register. Vol. 74, No. 194. p. 51850,
October 8, 2009.
USEPA. 2011. Drinking Water: Regulatory
Determination on Perchlorate. Federal
Register. Vol. 76, No. 29. p. 7762,
February 11, 2011.
USEPA. 2012a. Revisions to the Unregulated
Contaminant Monitoring Regulation
(UCMR 3) for Public Water Systems.
Federal Register. Vol. 77, No. 85. p.
26071, May 2, 2012.
USEPA. 2012b. TSCA Work Plan Chemicals:
Methods Document. February 2012.
Available on the internet at: https://
www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/
2014-03/documents/work_plan_
methods_document_web_final.pdf.
USEPA. 2014. Announcement of Preliminary
Regulatory Determination for
Contaminants on the Third Drinking
Water Contaminant Candidate List.
Federal Register. Vol. 79, No. 202, p.
62716, October 20, 2014.
USEPA. 2015. Algal Toxin Risk Assessment
and Management Strategic Plan for
Drinking Water, Strategy Submitted to
Congress to Meet the Requirements of
P.L. 114–45. EPA 810–R–04–003.
USEPA. 2016a. Revisions to the Unregulated
Contaminant Monitoring Regulation
(UCMR 4) for Public Water Systems.
Federal Register. Vol. 81, No. 244. p.
92666, December 20, 2016.
USEPA. 2016b. Final Regulatory
Determinations on the Third Drinking
Water Contaminant Candidate List.
Federal Register. Vol. 81, No. 1. P. 13–
19, January 4, 2016.
USEPA. 2016c. Drinking Water Contaminant
Candidate List 4-Final. Federal Register.
Vol. 81, No. 222. P. 81099, November 17,
2016.
USEPA. 2017. Analysis of Occurrence Data
from the Third Six-Year Review of
Existing National Primary Drinking
Water Regulations: Chemical Phase
Rules and Radionuclides Rules. EPA–
810–R–16–014. December 2016.
USEPA. 2018a. Request for Nominations of
Drinking Water Contaminants for the
Fifth Contaminant Candidate List.
Notice. Federal Register. Vol. 83, No.
194. p. 50364, October 5, 2018.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Jul 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
USEPA. 2018b. Basic Information on PFAS.
Available at: https://www.epa.gov/pfas/
basic-information-pfas.
USEPA. 2019a. Drinking Water: Final Action
on Perchlorate. Federal Register. Vol. 84,
No. 123, p. 30524. June 26, 2019.
USEPA. 2019b. EPA’s Per- and
Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)
Action Plan. EPA 823–R–18–004,
February 2019. Available at: https://
www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/
2019-02/documents/pfas_action_plan_
021319_508compliant_1.pdf.
USEPA. 2020. Drinking Water: Perchlorate.
Federal Register. Vol. 85, No. 140, p.
43990, July 2020. EPA–HQ–OW–2018–
0780–0302.
USEPA. 2021a. Revisions to the Unregulated
Contaminant Monitoring Regulation
(UCMR 5) for Public Water Systems.
Federal Register. Vol. 86, No. 46. p.
13846, March 11, 2021.
USEPA. 2021b. Announcement of Final
Regulatory Determinations for
Contaminants on the Fourth Drinking
Water Contaminant Candidate List.
Federal Register. Vol. 86, No. 40, p.
12272, March 3, 2021. EPA–HQ–OW–
2019–0583.
USEPA. 2021c. Technical Support Document
for the Draft Fifth Contaminant
Candidate List (CCL 5)—Chemical
Contaminants. EPA 815–R–21–005, July
2021.
USEPA. 2021d. Technical Support Document
for the Draft Fifth Contaminant
Candidate List (CCL 5)—Microbial
Contaminants. EPA 815–R–21–007, July
2021.
USEPA. 2021e. Technical Support Document
for the Draft Fifth Contaminant
Candidate List (CCL 5)—Contaminant
Information Sheets. EPA 815–R–21–006,
July 2021.
USEPA. 2021f. TSCA Section 8(a)(7)
Reporting and Recordkeeping
Requirements for Perfluoroalkyl and
Polyfluoroalkyl Substances. Proposed
Rule. 86 FR 33926. June 28, 2021.
Williams, A.J., C.M. Grulke, J. Edwards, A.D.
McEachran, K. Mansouri, N.C. Baker, G.
Patlewicz, I. Shah, J.F. Wambaugh, R.S.
Judson, and A.M. Richard. 2017. The
CompTox Chemistry Dashboard: a
community data resource for
environmental chemistry. Journal of
Cheminformatics. 9:61. doi:10.1186/
s13321–017–0247–6.
Radhika Fox,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Water.
[FR Doc. 2021–15121 Filed 7–16–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 1 and 73
[AU Docket No. 21–284; DA 21–801; FR ID
37717]
Auction of Construction Permits for
Low Power Television and TV
Translator Stations; Comment Sought
on Competitive Bidding Procedures for
Auction 111
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule; proposed auction
procedures.
AGENCY:
The Office of Economics and
Analytics and the Media Bureau
announce a closed auction of
construction permits for new or
modified low power television (LPTV)
stations and TV translator stations
(collectively, LPTV/translator stations).
This document seeks comment on the
procedures to be used for this auction,
which is designated as Auction 111.
DATES: Comments are due on or before
August 3, 2021, and reply comments are
due on or before August 13, 2021.
Bidding in this auction is expected to
commence in February 2022.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file
comments or reply comments in AU
Docket No. 21–284. Comments may be
filed using the Commission’s Electronic
Comment Filing System (ECFS). All
filings in response to the Auction 111
Comment Public Notice must refer to
AU Docket No. 21–284.
• Electronic Filers: Comments may be
filed electronically using the internet by
accessing the ECFS at https://
www.fcc.gov/ecfs/.
• Paper Filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
one copy of each filing.
• Filings in response to the Public
Notice can be sent by commercial
courier or by first-class or overnight U.S.
Postal Service mail. All filings must be
addressed to the Commission’s
Secretary, Office of the Secretary,
Federal Communications Commission
• Commercial deliveries (other than
U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and
Priority Mail) must be sent to 9050
Junction Dr., Annapolis Junction, MD
20701.
• U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, or Priority mail must be
addressed to 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554.
• Until further notice, the
Commission no longer accepts any hand
or messenger delivered filings. This is a
temporary measure taken to help protect
the health and safety of individuals, and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\19JYP1.SGM
19JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 135 / Monday, July 19, 2021 / Proposed Rules
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
to mitigate the transmission of COVID–
19.
• Email: Commenters are asked to
also submit a copy of their comments
and reply comments electronically to
the following address: auction111@
fcc.gov.
• People with Disabilities: To request
materials in accessible formats (braille,
large print, electronic files, audio
format) for people with disabilities,
send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call
the Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (voice), (202)
418–0432 (TTY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Auction legal questions: Lyndsey
Grunewald, (202) 418–0660,
Lyndsey.Grunewald@fcc.gov, or Scott
Mackoul, (202) 418–0660,
Scott.Mackoul@fcc.gov.
General auction questions: Auction
Hotline at (717) 338–2868.
LPTV/translator station service
questions: Shaun Maher (legal), (202)
418–2324, Shaun.Maher@fcc.gov, or
Mark Colombo (technical questions),
(202) 418–7611, Mark.Colombo@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Public Notice (Auction
111 Comment Public Notice), AU
Docket No. 21–284, DA 21–801, adopted
on July 9, 2021, and released on July 9,
2021. The Auction 111 Comment Public
Notice includes the following
attachments: Attachment A,
Construction Permits in Auction 111.
The complete text of the Auction 111
Comment Public Notice, including its
attachments, is available on the
Commission’s website at https://
www.fcc.gov/auction/111 or by using
the search function for AU Docket No.
21–284 on the Commission’s ECFS web
page at www.fcc.gov/ecfs. Alternative
formats are available to persons with
disabilities by sending an email to
FCC504@fcc.gov or by calling the
Consumer & Governmental Affairs
Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (voice), (202)
418–0432 (TTY).
I. Introduction
1. By the Auction 111 Comment
Public Notice, the Office of Economics
and Analytics (OEA) and the Media
Bureau (MB), announce a closed auction
of construction permits for new or
modified low power television (LPTV)
stations and TV translator stations
(collectively referred to as LPTV/
translator stations) and seek comment
on the procedures to be used for this
auction. The bidding for the auction,
which is designated as Auction 111, is
expected to commence in February
2022.
2. OEA and MB has sent a copy of the
Auction 111 Comment Public Notice by
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Jul 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
email and overnight delivery to the
contact address listed on each LPTV/
translator station application listed in
Attachment A of the Auction 111
Comment Public Notice. Future public
notices in this proceeding may be
provided directly to each applicant
listed in Attachment A at this contact
address as well. Each applicant is
reminded that pursuant to § 1.65 of the
Commission’s rules, it is obligated to
maintain the accuracy of this
information. 47 CFR 1.65. OEA and MB
ask each party that is eligible to file a
short-form application in Auction 111 to
make sure that the contact address
provided in its LPTV/translator station
application is accurate and is a location
capable of accepting packages. After the
deadline for filing short-form
applications (FCC Form 175) to
participate in Auction 111, Auction 111related materials will be sent to auction
applicants at the contact addresses in
their short-form applications.
II. Construction Permits Offered and
Application Processing
A. Construction Permits To Be Offered
in Auction 111
3. Auction 111 will resolve groups of
pending mutually exclusive (MX)
engineering proposals for up to 17 new
or modified LPTV/translator station
construction permits. Auction 111 is a
closed auction; only those individuals
or entities listed in Attachment A to the
Auction 111 Comment Public Notice are
eligible to participate in this auction
with respect to the construction
permit(s) for which each is listed.
4. The MX groups and engineering
proposals listed in Attachment A to the
Auction 111 Comment Public Notice
consist of applications for new LPTV/
translator stations, or major changes to
existing stations, that were accepted on
a first-come, first-served basis (i.e.,
rolling one-day windows), pursuant to
§ 74.787(a)(3) of the Commission’s rules
and displacement relief applications
filed pursuant to a special filing
window for eligible LPTV/translator
stations displaced by the broadcast
television spectrum incentive auction
(Auction 1000). Any LPTV/translator
station applications for new facilities,
major changes to existing facilities, or
displacement relief that are mutually
exclusive with one another must be
resolved via the Commission’s part 1
and part 73 competitive bidding rules.
In 2009, MB began accepting
applications for new rural digital LPTV/
translator stations on a limited basis and
then later froze those filings. All but one
of the MX groups listed in Attachment
A to the Auction 111 Comment Public
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
37973
Notice consist of applications for new or
modified rural digital LPTV/translator
stations that were submitted on the first
day that MB began accepting such
applications. With regard to the
remaining MX group, Auction 1000,
which repurposed 84 megahertz of the
600 MHz band spectrum, resulted in the
channel reassignments of certain full
power and Class A television stations,
and in turn displaced certain LPTV/
translator stations. In 2018, the
Incentive Auction Task Force and MB
opened a special displacement
application filing window for eligible
licensees and permittees of LPTV/
translator stations displaced by Auction
1000 to apply for new channels. The
remaining MX group listed in
Attachment A to the Auction 111
Comment Public Notice consists of two
displacement relief applications filed
pursuant to this special displacement
application filing window.
5. In order to facilitate resolution of
pending mutually exclusive LPTV/
translator station applications before
initiating competitive bidding
procedures, and given the passage of
time since the applications were filed,
MB announced that it would withhold
action on certain MX applications for
new or modified LPTV/translator
stations, including each application
listed in Attachment A to the Auction
111 Comment Public Notice, from June
1, 2020 to July 31, 2020, in order to
provide applicants with an opportunity
to resolve mutual exclusivity through
settlement or technical modification of
their engineering proposals. MB advised
each applicant that, absent resolution of
its mutual exclusivity, its application
would be subject to the Commission’s
competitive bidding procedures.
6. The 17 MX groups listed in
Attachment A to the Auction 111
Comment Public Notice are the groups
of 24 applicants that filed 40
applications that remain MX after the
filing window closed, and OEA and MB
will now proceed to resolve these
mutually exclusive LPTV/translator
station proposals by competitive
bidding in Auction 111. Attachment A
to the Auction 111 Comment Public
Notice also lists, for each proposal in
each MX group, the applicant name,
FCC Registration Number (FRN), file
number, facility identification number,
community of license, and the channel
requested in the relevant construction
permit application.
B. Application Processing and Limited
Auction Settlement Period
7. Attachment A to the Auction 111
Comment Public Notice lists the
pending LPTV/translator station
E:\FR\FM\19JYP1.SGM
19JYP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
37974
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 135 / Monday, July 19, 2021 / Proposed Rules
applications that will be resolved
through Auction 111 unless the
applicants resolve their mutual
exclusivity by entering into settlement
agreements or making minor
amendments to their pending
applications before the deadline for
filing short-form applications (FCC
Form 175) to participate in Auction 111,
which will be announced in a future
public notice. Specifically, if a member
of an MX group withdraws its
application on its own initiative or files
a unilateral engineering amendment, or
if members of the MX group enter into
and submit a settlement agreement and
supporting documentation that the
Commission staff determines to be fully
in accordance with the Communications
Act of 1934, as amended (Act) and the
Commission’s rules, and such actions
completely resolve the mutual
exclusivity prior to the short-form
application deadline, that MX group
will be removed from Auction 111 and
the remaining engineering proposal(s)
will be processed under standard
licensing procedures.
8. Conversely, if an MX group listed
in Attachment A to the Auction 111
Comment Public Notice remains
mutually exclusive as of the short-form
application filing deadline, each
applicant in that MX group must timely
file a short-form application in order to
avoid dismissal of its pending LPTV/
translator station application.
Specifically, if any member of an MX
group that remains mutually exclusive
as of the short-form application filing
deadline fails to submit a timely shortform application, that party will have its
pending application for a new or
modified LPTV/translator station
dismissed for failure to prosecute.
Likewise, if only one member of an MX
group that remains mutually exclusive
as of the short-form application filing
deadline submits a short-form
application, the MX group will be
removed from the auction and the
engineering proposal of the party that
submitted a short-form application will
be treated as a singleton application and
processed under standard licensing
procedures. If an applicant forgoes filing
a short-form application pursuant to an
agreement with mutually exclusive
applicants, such settlement agreement
must be submitted to MB for approval
in accordance with § 73.3525 of the
Commission’s rules.
9. After the short-form application
filing deadline, OEA and MB will
release a public notice identifying the
mutually exclusive applications for
Auction 111. As provided in section
73.5002(d) of the Commission’s rules,
these mutually exclusive applicants will
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Jul 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
then be given a limited opportunity to
resolve mutual exclusivity of the
Commission’s rules by the filing of
technical amendments, dismissal
requests, and requests for approval of
universal settlements. The specific dates
of the settlement period will be
announced in the public notice
identifying the MX applications, but
will only last, at most, two weeks. Due
to the Commission’s competitive
bidding rule prohibiting certain
communications, 47 CFR 1.2105(c),
applicants in Auction 111 will not be
able to communicate after the shortform application deadline with each
other for the purpose of resolving
conflicts outside of this limited
settlement period.
10. An applicant listed in Attachment
A to the Auction 111 Comment Public
Notice may become qualified to bid in
Auction 111 only if it complies with the
auction filing, qualification, and
payment requirements, and otherwise
complies with applicable rules, policies,
and procedures. Each listed applicant
may become a qualified bidder only for
those construction permits specified for
that applicant in Attachment A to the
Auction 111 Comment Public Notice.
Each of the engineering proposals
within each MX group are directly
mutually exclusive with one another;
therefore, no more than one
construction permit will be awarded
through Auction 111 for each MX group
identified in Attachment A to the
Auction 111 Comment Public Notice.
Under the Commission’s established
precedent, once two or more short-form
applications are accepted for an MX
group, mutual exclusivity exists for the
relevant construction permit for auction
purposes. Unless the mutual exclusivity
is resolved during the limited settlement
opportunity mentioned above, an
applicant in Auction 111 cannot obtain
a construction permit without placing a
bid, even if no other applicant for that
particular construction permit becomes
qualified to bid or in fact places a bid.
III. Implementation of Part 1 and Part
73 Competitive Bidding Rules and
Requirements
11. Consistent with the provisions of
section 309(j)(3)(E)(i) of the Act, and to
ensure that potential bidders have
adequate time to familiarize themselves
with the specific rules that will govern
the day-to-day conduct of an auction,
OEA and MB seek comment on a variety
of auction-specific procedures relating
to the conduct of Auction 111.
12. The Commission’s part 1 and part
73 competitive bidding rules require
each applicant seeking to bid to acquire
a construction permit in a broadcast
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
auction to provide certain information
in a short-form application (FCC Form
175), including ownership details and
numerous certifications. The
competitive bidding rules in part 1,
subpart Q, and part 73 also contain a
framework for the implementation of a
competitive bidding design, application
and certification procedures, reporting
requirements, and the prohibition of
certain communications.
A. Upfront Payments and Bidding
Eligibility
13. In keeping with the usual practice
in spectrum auctions, OEA and MB
propose that applicants be required to
submit upfront payments as a
prerequisite to becoming qualified to
bid. An upfront payment is a refundable
deposit made by an applicant to
establish its eligibility to bid on
construction permits. Upfront payments
that are related to the specific
construction permits being auctioned
protect against frivolous or insincere
bidding and provide the Commission
with a source of funds from which to
collect payments owed at the close of
the bidding. As required by 47 CFR
1.2106(a), a former defaulter must
submit an upfront payment equal to
50% more than the amount that would
otherwise be required.
14. OEA and MB seek comment on an
appropriate upfront payment for each
construction permit being auctioned,
taking into account such factors as the
efficiency of the auction process and the
potential value of similar construction
permits. With these considerations in
mind, OEA and MB propose the upfront
payments set forth in Attachment A to
the Auction 111 Comment Public Notice
and seek comment on those proposed
upfront payment amounts.
15. OEA and MB further propose that
the amount of the upfront payment
submitted by an applicant will
determine its initial bidding eligibility
in bidding units, which are a measure
of bidder eligibility and bidding
activity. OEA and MB propose to assign
each construction permit a specific
number of bidding units, equal to one
bidding unit per dollar of the upfront
payment listed in Attachment A to the
Auction 111 Comment Public Notice.
The number of bidding units for a given
construction permit is fixed and does
not change during the auction as prices
change. If an applicant is found to be
qualified to bid on more than one
permit being offered in Auction 111,
such bidder may place bids on multiple
construction permits, provided that the
total number of bidding units associated
with those construction permits does
not exceed that bidder’s current
E:\FR\FM\19JYP1.SGM
19JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 135 / Monday, July 19, 2021 / Proposed Rules
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
eligibility. A bidder cannot increase its
eligibility during the auction; it can only
maintain its eligibility or decrease its
eligibility. In calculating its upfront
payment amount and hence its initial
bidding eligibility, an applicant must
determine the maximum number of
bidding units on which it may wish to
bid (or hold provisionally winning bids)
in any single round and submit an
upfront payment amount covering that
total number of bidding units. OEA and
MB request comment on these
proposals.
B. Reserve Price or Minimum Opening
Bids
16. As part of the pre-bidding process
for each auction, OEA and MB seek
comment on the use of a minimum
opening bid amount and/or reserve
price, as mandated by section 309(j) of
the Act. OEA and MB propose to
establish minimum opening bid
amounts for Auction 111. Based on its
experience in past broadcast auctions,
the Commission has found that setting
a minimum opening bid amount
judiciously is an effective bidding tool
for accelerating the competitive bidding
process. In the last auction of LPTV
construction permits (Auction 104),
OEA and MB similarly proposed
establishing minimum opening bids and
not reserve prices; no comments
opposed that proposal, and it was
adopted. Based on all of these facts,
OEA and MB propose establishing
minimum opening bids for Auction 111.
OEA and MB do not propose to
establish separate reserve prices for any
of the construction permits to be offered
in Auction 111 nor do they see any
reason to propose an aggregate reserve
price for the auction.
17. For auctions of broadcast permits,
the Commission generally proposes
minimum opening bid amounts
determined by taking into account the
type of service and class of facility
offered, market size, population covered
by the proposed broadcast facility, and
recent broadcast transaction data, to the
extent such information is available.
Consideration of such factors for
Auction 111 is complicated by a dearth
of such transaction data, the fact that a
permittee may opt to switch its intended
use of such facility from LPTV to
translator operation, or vice versa, and
the lack of accurate data on the
population that would be covered by
each proposed facility. In Auction 104,
the last auction of LPTV construction
permits, OEA and MB proposed
minimum opening bid amounts based
on the limited information available,
and received no comments suggesting
changes to the minimum opening bid
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Jul 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
amounts. OEA and MB followed a
similar methodology used in Auction
104 to set the minimum opening bid
amounts proposed in Attachment A to
the Auction 111 Comment Public Notice
for each construction permit available in
Auction 111. OEA and MB seek
comment on the minimum opening bid
amounts specified in Attachment A to
the Auction 111 Comment Public
Notice.
18. If commenters believe that these
minimum opening bid amounts will
result in unsold construction permits or
are not reasonable amounts at which to
start bidding, they should explain why
this is so and comment on the
desirability of an alternative approach.
Commenters should support their
claims with valuation analyses and
suggested amounts or formulas. In
establishing the minimum opening bid
amounts, OEA and MB particularly seek
comment on factors that could
reasonably have an impact on bidders’
valuation of the broadcast spectrum,
including the type of service and class
of facility offered, market size,
population covered by the proposed
broadcast facility and any other relevant
factors. Commenters also may wish to
address the general role of minimum
opening bids in managing the pace of
the auction. For example, commenters
could compare using minimum opening
bids—e.g., by setting higher minimum
opening bids to reduce the number of
rounds it takes for construction permits
to reach their final prices—to other
means of controlling auction pace, such
as changes to bidding schedules,
percentage increments, or activity
requirements.
C. Auction Delay, Suspension, or
Cancellation
19. For Auction 111, OEA and MB
propose that at any time before or
during the bidding process they may
delay, suspend, or cancel bidding in the
auction in the event of a natural
disaster, technical obstacle, network
interruption, administrative or weather
necessity, evidence of an auction
security breach or unlawful bidding
activity, or for any other reason that
affects the fair and efficient conduct of
competitive bidding. Notification of any
such delay, suspension, or cancellation
will be provided by public notice or
through the FCC auction bidding
system’s messages function. If bidding is
delayed or suspended, the auction may
resume starting from the beginning of
the current round or from some
previous round, or the auction may be
cancelled in its entirety. This authority
will be exercised solely at the discretion
of OEA and MB, and not as a substitute
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
37975
for situations in which bidders may
wish to apply activity rule waivers. OEA
and MB seek comment on this proposal.
D. Interim Withdrawal Payment
Percentage
20. As discussed below, OEA and MB
propose not to allow bid withdrawals in
Auction 111. In the event bid
withdrawals are permitted in Auction
111, however, OEA and MB propose the
interim bid withdrawal payment be
20% of the withdrawn bid. A bidder
that withdraws a provisionally winning
bid during an auction is subject to a
withdrawal payment equal to the
difference between the amount of the
withdrawn bid and the amount of the
winning bid in the same or a subsequent
auction. 47 CFR 1.2104(g)(1). However,
if a construction permit for which a bid
has been withdrawn does not receive a
subsequent higher bid or winning bid in
the same auction, the Commission
cannot calculate the final withdrawal
payment until that construction permit
receives a higher bid or winning bid in
a subsequent auction. In such cases,
when that final withdrawal payment
cannot yet be calculated, the
Commission imposes on the bidder
responsible for the withdrawn bid an
interim bid withdrawal payment, which
will be applied toward any final bid
withdrawal payment that is ultimately
assessed.
21. The percentage amount of the
interim bid withdrawal payment is
established in advance of bidding in
each auction and may range from 3% to
20% of the withdrawn bid amount. The
Commission has determined that the
level of interim withdrawal payment in
a particular auction will be based on the
nature of the service and the inventory
of the licenses being offered. The
Commission noted specifically that a
higher interim withdrawal payment
percentage is warranted to deter the
anti-competitive use of withdrawals
when, for example, bidders will not
need to aggregate the licenses being
offered in the auction or when there are
few synergies to be captured by
combining licenses. In light of these
considerations with respect to the
construction permits being offered in
this auction, OEA and MB propose to
use the maximum interim bid
withdrawal payment percentage
permitted by § 1.2104(g)(1) in the event
bid withdrawals are allowed in this
auction. OEA and MB request comment
on using 20% for calculating an interim
bid withdrawal payment amount in
Auction 111 in the event that bidders
would be permitted to withdraw bids.
Commenters advocating the use of bid
withdrawals should also address the
E:\FR\FM\19JYP1.SGM
19JYP1
37976
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 135 / Monday, July 19, 2021 / Proposed Rules
percentage of the interim bid
withdrawal payment.
E. Deficiency Payments and Additional
Default Payment Percentage
22. Any winning bidder that defaults
or is disqualified after the close of an
auction (i.e., fails to remit the required
down payment by the specified
deadline, fails to make full and timely
final payment, fails to submit a timely
long-form application, or whose longform application is not granted for any
reason, or is otherwise disqualified) is
liable for a default payment under
§ 1.2104(g)(2) of the rules. This payment
consists of a deficiency payment, equal
to the difference between the amount of
the Auction 111 bidder’s winning bid
and the amount of the winning bid the
next time a construction permit
covering the same spectrum is won in
an auction, plus an additional payment
equal to a percentage of the defaulter’s
bid or of the subsequent winning bid,
whichever is less.
23. The Commission’s rules provide
that, in advance of each auction, it will
establish a percentage between 3% and
20% of the applicable winning bid to be
assessed as an additional default
payment. As the Commission has
indicated, the level of this additional
payment in each auction will be based
on the nature of the service and the
construction permits being offered.
24. For Auction 111, OEA and MB
propose to establish an additional
default payment of 20%, which is
consistent with the percentage in prior
auctions of broadcast construction
permits. As the Commission has noted,
defaults weaken the integrity of the
auction process and may impede the
deployment of service to the public, and
an additional 20% default payment will
be more effective in deterring defaults
than the 3% used in some earlier
auctions. In light of these
considerations, OEA and MB propose
for Auction 111 an additional default
payment of 20% of the relevant bid.
OEA and MB seek comment on this
proposal.
IV. Proposed Bidding Procedures
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
A. Simultaneous Multiple-Round
Auction Design
25. OEA and MB propose to use the
Commission’s simultaneous multipleround auction format for Auction 111.
As described further below, this type of
auction offers every construction permit
for bid at the same time and consists of
successive bidding rounds in which
qualified bidders may place bids on
individual construction permits.
Typically, bidding remains open on all
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Jul 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
construction permits until bidding stops
on every construction permit. OEA and
MB seek comment on this proposal.
B. Bidding Rounds
26. The Commission will conduct
Auction 111 over the internet using the
FCC auction bidding system. A bidder
will also have the option of placing bids
by telephone through a dedicated
auction bidder line.
27. Under this proposal, Auction 111
will consist of sequential bidding
rounds, each followed by the release of
round results. The initial bidding
schedule will be announced in a public
notice to be released at least one week
before the start of bidding. Details on
viewing round results, including the
location and format of downloadable
round results files, will be included in
the same public notice.
28. OEA and MB propose that the
initial bidding schedule may be
adjusted in order to foster an auction
pace that reasonably balances speed
with the bidders’ need to study round
results and adjust their bidding
strategies. Under this proposal, such
changes may include the amount of time
for the bidding rounds, the amount of
time between rounds, or the number of
rounds per day, depending upon
bidding activity and other factors. OEA
and MB seek comment on this proposal.
Commenters on this issue should
address the role of the bidding schedule
in managing the pace of the auction,
specifically discussing the tradeoffs in
managing auction pace by bidding
schedule changes, by changing the
activity requirement(s) or bid amount
parameters, or by using other means.
C. Stopping Rule
29. OEA and MB have discretion to
establish stopping rules before or during
multiple round auctions in order to
complete the auction within a
reasonable time. 47 CFR 1.2104(e). For
Auction 111, OEA and MB propose to
employ a simultaneous stopping rule
approach, which means all construction
permits remain available for bidding
until bidding stops on every
construction permit. Specifically,
bidding will close on all construction
permits after the first round in which no
bidder submits any new bid, applies a
proactive activity rule waiver, or
withdraws any provisionally winning
bid (if bid withdrawals are permitted in
this auction). Thus, under the proposed
simultaneous stopping rule, bidding
would remain open on all construction
permits until bidding stops on every
construction permit. Consequently,
under this approach, it is not possible
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
to determine in advance how long the
bidding in this auction will last.
30. Further, OEA and MB propose to
retain the discretion to exercise any of
the following stopping options during
Auction 111: (1) The auction would
close for all construction permits after
the first round in which no bidder
applies a waiver, no bidder withdraws
a provisionally winning bid (if
withdrawals are permitted in this
auction), or no bidder places any new
bid on a construction permit for which
it is not the provisionally winning
bidder. Absent any other bidding
activity, a bidder placing a new bid on
a construction permit for which it is the
provisionally winning bidder would not
keep the auction open under this
modified stopping rule; (2) the auction
would close for all construction permits
after the first round in which no bidder
applies a waiver, no bidder withdraws
a provisionally winning bid (if
withdrawals are permitted in this
auction), or no bidder places any new
bid on a construction permit that
already has a provisionally winning bid.
Absent any other bidding activity, a
bidder placing a new bid on an FCCheld construction permit (a construction
permit that does not already have a
provisionally winning bid) would not
keep the auction open under this
modified stopping rule; (3) the auction
would close using a modified version of
the simultaneous stopping rule that
combines (1) and (2); (4) the auction
would close after a specified number of
additional rounds (special stopping
rule) to be announced in advance in the
FCC auction bidding system. If this
special stopping rule is invoked, bids
will be accepted in the specified final
round(s), after which the auction will
close; and (5) the auction would remain
open even if no bidder places any new
bid, applies a waiver, or withdraws any
provisionally winning bid (if
withdrawals are permitted in this
auction). In this event, the effect will be
the same as if a bidder had applied a
waiver. The activity rule will apply as
usual, and a bidder with insufficient
activity will either lose bidding
eligibility or use a waiver.
31. OEA and MB propose to exercise
these options only in certain
circumstances, for example, where the
auction is proceeding unusually slowly
or quickly, there is minimal overall
bidding activity, or it appears likely that
the auction will not close within a
reasonable period of time or will close
prematurely. Before exercising these
options, OEA and MB are likely to
attempt to change the pace of the
auction. For example, the pace of
bidding may be adjusted by changing
E:\FR\FM\19JYP1.SGM
19JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 135 / Monday, July 19, 2021 / Proposed Rules
the number of bidding rounds per day
or the minimum acceptable bids. OEA
and MB propose to retain the discretion
to exercise any of these options with or
without prior announcement during the
auction. OEA and MB seek comment on
these proposals. Commenters should
provide specific reasons for supporting
or objecting to these proposals.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
D. Activity Rule
32. To ensure that the auction closes
within a reasonable period of time, an
activity rule requires bidders to bid
actively throughout the auction, rather
than wait until late in the auction before
participating. For purposes of the
activity rule, the FCC auction bidding
system calculates a bidder’s activity in
a round as the sum of the bidding units
associated with any construction
permits upon which it places bids
during the current round and the
bidding units associated with any
construction permits for which it holds
provisionally winning bids. Bidders are
required to be active on a specific
percentage of their current bidding
eligibility during each round of the
auction. OEA and MB propose a singlestage auction with a 100% activity
requirement. That is, in each bidding
round, a bidder desiring to maintain its
current bidding eligibility will be
required to be active on 100% of its
bidding eligibility. Thus, the activity
requirement would be satisfied when a
bidder has bidding activity on
construction permits with bidding units
that total 100% of its current eligibility
in the round. If the activity rule is met,
then the bidder’s eligibility does not
change in the next round. Failure to
maintain the requisite activity level will
result in the use of an activity rule
waiver, if any remain, or a reduction in
the bidder’s eligibility for the next
round of bidding, possibly curtailing or
eliminating the bidder’s ability to place
additional bids in the auction. OEA and
MB seek comment on these activity
requirements. Commenters that oppose
a 100% activity requirement are
encouraged to explain their reasons
with specificity.
E. Activity Rule Waivers and Reducing
Eligibility
33. For the proposed simultaneous
multiple-round auction format, OEA
and MB propose that when a bidder’s
activity in the current round is below
the required minimum level, it may
preserve its current level of eligibility
through an activity rule waiver, if the
bidder has any available. Consistent
with prior Commission auctions of
broadcast construction permits, OEA
and MB propose that each bidder in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Jul 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
Auction 111 be provided with three
activity rule waivers that may be used
as set forth below at the bidder’s
discretion during the course of the
auction.
34. An activity rule waiver applies to
an entire round of bidding, not to a
particular construction permit. Activity
rule waivers can be either proactive or
automatic. Activity rule waivers are
primarily a mechanism for a bidder to
avoid the loss of bidding eligibility in
the event that exigent circumstances
prevent it from bidding in a particular
round.
35. The FCC auction bidding system
will assume that a bidder that does not
meet the activity requirement would
prefer to use an activity rule waiver (if
available) rather than lose bidding
eligibility. Therefore, the system will
automatically apply a waiver at the end
of any bidding round in which a
bidder’s activity level is below the
minimum required unless: (1) The
bidder has no activity rule waiver
remaining; or (2) the bidder overrides
the automatic application of a waiver by
reducing eligibility, thereby meeting the
activity requirement. If a bidder has no
waivers remaining and does not satisfy
the required activity level, the bidder’s
current eligibility will be permanently
reduced, possibly curtailing or
eliminating the ability to place
additional bids in the auction.
36. A bidder with insufficient activity
may wish to reduce its bidding
eligibility rather than use an activity
rule waiver. If so, the bidder must
affirmatively override the automatic
waiver mechanism during the bidding
round by using the reduce eligibility
function in the FCC auction bidding
system. In this case, the bidder’s
eligibility would be permanently
reduced to bring it into compliance with
the activity rule described above.
Reducing eligibility is an irreversible
action; once eligibility has been
reduced, a bidder cannot regain its lost
bidding eligibility.
37. Under the proposed simultaneous
stopping rule, a bidder would be
permitted to apply an activity rule
waiver proactively as a means to keep
the auction open without placing a bid.
If a bidder proactively applies an
activity rule waiver (using the proactive
waiver function in the FCC auction
bidding system) during a bidding round
in which no bid is placed or withdrawn
(if bid withdrawals are permitted in this
auction), the auction will remain open
and the bidder’s eligibility will be
preserved. An automatic waiver applied
by the FCC auction bidding system in a
round in which there is no new bid, no
bid withdrawal (if bid withdrawals are
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
37977
permitted in this auction), or no
proactive waiver would not keep the
auction open. OEA and MB seek
comment on these proposals.
F. Bid Amount
38. OEA and MB propose that, in each
round, a qualified bidder will be able to
place a bid on a given construction
permit in any of up to nine different
amounts: The minimum acceptable bid
amount or one of the additional bid
amounts. Bidders must have sufficient
eligibility to place a bid on the
particular construction permit.
39. Minimum Acceptable Bid
Amounts. The first of the acceptable bid
amounts is called the minimum
acceptable bid amount. The minimum
acceptable bid amount for a
construction permit will be equal to its
minimum opening bid amount until
there is a provisionally winning bid for
the construction permit. Once there is a
provisionally winning bid for a
construction permit, the minimum
acceptable bid amount for that
construction permit will be equal to the
amount of the provisionally winning bid
plus a specified percentage of that bid
amount. The percentage used for this
calculation, the minimum acceptable
bid increment percentage, is multiplied
by the provisionally winning bid
amount, and the resulting amount is
added to the provisionally winning bid
amount. If, for example, the minimum
acceptable bid increment percentage is
10%, then the provisionally winning
bid amount is multiplied by 10%. The
result of that calculation is added to the
provisionally winning bid amount, and
that sum is rounded using the
Commission’s standard rounding
procedure for auctions as described in
the Auction 111 Comment Public
Notice. If bid withdrawals are permitted
in this auction, in the case of a
construction permit for which the
provisionally winning bid has been
withdrawn, the minimum acceptable
bid amount will equal the second
highest bid received for the construction
permit.
40. Additional Bid Amounts. Under
this proposal, the Commission will
calculate the eight additional bid
amounts using the minimum acceptable
bid amount and an additional bid
increment percentage. The minimum
acceptable bid amount is multiplied by
the additional bid increment percentage,
and that result (rounded) is the
additional increment amount. The first
additional acceptable bid amount equals
the minimum acceptable bid amount
plus the additional increment amount.
The second additional acceptable bid
amount equals the minimum acceptable
E:\FR\FM\19JYP1.SGM
19JYP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
37978
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 135 / Monday, July 19, 2021 / Proposed Rules
bid amount plus two times the
additional increment amount; the third
additional acceptable bid amount is the
minimum acceptable bid amount plus
three times the additional increment
amount; etc. If, for example, the
additional bid increment percentage is
5%, then the calculation of the
additional increment amount would be
(minimum acceptable bid amount) *
(0.05), rounded. The first additional
acceptable bid amount equals
(minimum acceptable bid amount) +
(additional increment amount); the
second additional acceptable bid
amount equals (minimum acceptable
bid amount) + (2*(additional increment
amount)); the third additional
acceptable bid amount equals
(minimum acceptable bid amount) +
(3*(additional increment amount)); etc.
41. For Auction 111, OEA and MB
propose to use a minimum acceptable
bid increment percentage of 10%. This
means that the minimum acceptable bid
amount for a construction permit will be
approximately 10% greater than the
provisionally winning bid amount for
the construction permit. To calculate
the additional acceptable bid amounts,
OEA and MB propose to use a bid
increment percentage of 5%. OEA and
MB seek comment on these proposals.
42. Bid Amount Changes. OEA and
MB propose to retain the discretion to
change the minimum acceptable bid
amounts, the minimum acceptable bid
percentage, the additional bid increment
percentage, and the number of
acceptable bid amounts if, consistent
with past practice, circumstances so
dictate. OEA and MB propose to retain
the discretion to do so on a construction
permit-by-construction permit basis.
OEA and MB also propose to retain the
discretion to limit (a) the amount by
which a minimum acceptable bid for a
construction permit may increase
compared with the corresponding
provisionally winning bid, and (b) the
amount by which an additional bid
amount may increase compared with
the immediately preceding acceptable
bid amount. For example, a $1,000 limit
could be set on increases in minimum
acceptable bid amounts over
provisionally winning bids. In this
example, if calculating a minimum
acceptable bid using the minimum
acceptable bid increment percentage
results in a minimum acceptable bid
amount that is $1,200 higher than the
provisionally winning bid on a
construction permit, the minimum
acceptable bid amount would instead be
capped at $1,000 above the
provisionally winning bid. OEA and MB
seek comment on the circumstances that
would call for employing such a limit,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Jul 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
factors to consider when determining
the dollar amount of the limit, and the
tradeoffs in setting such a limit or
changing other parameters, such as
changing the minimum acceptable bid
percentage, the bid increment
percentage, or the number of acceptable
bid amounts. If OEA and MB exercise
this discretion, bidders would be
notified by announcement in the FCC
auction bidding system during the
auction.
43. OEA and MB seek comment on
these proposals. If commenters disagree
with the proposal to begin the auction
with nine acceptable bid amounts per
construction permit, they should
suggest an alternative number of
acceptable bid amounts to use.
Commenters may wish to address the
role of the minimum acceptable bids
and the number of acceptable bid
amounts in managing the pace of the
auction and the tradeoffs in managing
auction pace by changing the bidding
schedule, activity requirement, bid
amounts, or by using other means.
G. Provisionally Winning Bids
44. The FCC auction bidding system
will determine provisionally winning
bids consistent with practice in past
auctions. At the end of a bidding round,
the bidding system will determine a
provisionally winning bid for each
construction permit based on the
highest bid amount received for that
permit. The FCC auction bidding system
will advise bidders of the status of their
bids when round results are released. A
provisionally winning bid will remain
the provisionally winning bid until
there is a higher bid on the same
construction permit at the close of a
subsequent round, unless the
provisionally winning bid is withdrawn
(if bid withdrawals are permitted in this
auction). Provisionally winning bids at
the end of the auction become the
winning bids. As a reminder,
provisionally winning bids count
toward activity for purposes of the
activity rule.
45. The FCC auction bidding system
assigns a pseudo-random number
generated by an algorithm to each bid
when the bid is entered. If identical
high bid amounts are submitted on a
construction permit in any given round
(i.e., tied bids), the FCC auction bidding
system will use a pseudo-random
number generator to select a single
provisionally winning bid from among
the tied bids. The tied bid with the
highest pseudo-random number wins
the tiebreaker and becomes the
provisionally winning bid. The
remaining bidders, as well as the
provisionally winning bidder, can
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
submit higher bids in subsequent
rounds. However, if the auction were to
end with no other bids being placed, the
winning bidder would be the one that
placed the provisionally winning bid. If
the construction permit receives any
bids in a subsequent round, the
provisionally winning bid again will be
determined by the highest bid amount
received for the construction permit.
H. Bid Removal and Bid Withdrawal
46. Bid Removal. The FCC auction
bidding system allows each bidder to
remove any of the bids it placed in a
round before the close of that round. By
removing a bid placed within a round,
a bidder effectively unsubmits the bid.
In contrast to the bid withdrawal
provisions described below, a bidder
removing a bid placed in the same
round is not subject to a withdrawal
payment. Once a round closes, a bidder
may no longer remove a bid. Consistent
with the design of the bidding system,
bidders in Auction 111 would be
permitted to remove bids placed in a
round before the close of that round.
47. Bid Withdrawal. OEA and MB
propose not to permit bidders in
Auction 111 to withdraw bids. When
permitted in an auction, bid
withdrawals provide a bidder with the
option of withdrawing bids placed in
prior rounds that have become
provisionally winning bids. A bidder
would be able to withdraw its
provisionally winning bids using the
withdraw function in the FCC auction
bidding system. A bidder that
withdraws its provisionally winning
bid(s), if permitted, is subject to the bid
withdrawal payment provisions of the
Commission’s rules. 47 CFR 1.2104(g),
1.2109.
48. The Commission has recognized
that bid withdrawals may be a helpful
tool in certain circumstances for bidders
seeking to efficiently aggregate licenses
or implement backup strategies. The
Commission has also acknowledged that
allowing bid withdrawals may
encourage insincere bidding or
increased opportunities for undesirable
strategic bidding in certain
circumstances. The Commission stated
that this discretion should be exercised
assertively, with consideration of
limiting the number of rounds in which
bidders may withdraw bids, and
preventing bidders from bidding on a
particular market if a bidder is abusing
the Commission’s bid withdrawal
procedures. In managing the auction,
therefore, OEA and MB have discretion
to limit the number of withdrawals to
prevent bidding abuses.
49. Based on this guidance and on
experience with past auctions of
E:\FR\FM\19JYP1.SGM
19JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 135 / Monday, July 19, 2021 / Proposed Rules
broadcast construction permits, OEA
and MB propose to prohibit bidders
from withdrawing any bid after the
close of the round in which that bid was
placed. OEA and MB make this proposal
in light of the site-specific nature and
wide geographic dispersion of the
permits available in this auction, which
suggests that potential applicants for
this auction may have fewer incentives
to aggregate permits through the auction
process (as compared with bidders in
many auctions of wireless licenses).
Thus, OEA and MB believe that it is
unlikely that bidders will have a need
to withdraw bids in this auction.
Further, bid withdrawals, particularly if
they were made late in this auction,
could result in delays in licensing new
broadcast stations and attendant delays
in the offering of new broadcast service
to the public. OEA and MB comment on
this proposal to prohibit bid
withdrawals in Auction 111.
Commenters advocating alternative
approaches should support their
arguments by taking into account the
construction permits offered, the impact
of auction dynamics and the pricing
mechanism, and the effects on the
bidding strategies of other bidders.
V. Tutorial and Additional Information
for Applicants
50. The Commission intends to
provide additional information on the
bidding system and to offer
demonstrations and other educational
opportunities for applicants in Auction
111 to familiarize themselves with the
FCC auction application system and the
auction bidding system. For example,
OEA and MB intend to release an online
tutorial that will help applicants
understand the procedures to be
followed in the filing of their auction
short-form applications (FCC Form 175)
and on the bidding procedures for
Auction 111.
VI. Procedural Matters
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
A. Paperwork Reduction Act
51. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has approved the
information collections in the
Application to Participate in an FCC
Auction, FCC Form 175, OMB Control
No. 3060–0600. The Auction 111
Comment Public Notice does not
propose new or modified information
collection requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), Public Law 104–13. Therefore, it
does not contain any new or modified
information collection burden for small
business concerns with fewer than 25
employees pursuant to the Small
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Jul 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,
Public Law 107–198.
B. Supplemental Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis
52. As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 603, the Commission
prepared Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analyses (IRFAs) in connection with the
Broadcast Competitive Bidding Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), 62 FR
65392, December 12, 1997, and other
Commission NPRMs (collectively,
Competitive Bidding NPRMs) pursuant
to which Auction 111 will be
conducted. Final Regulatory Flexibility
Analyses (FRFAs) likewise were
prepared in the Broadcast Competitive
Bidding Order, 63 FR 48615, September
11, 1998, and other Commission
rulemaking orders (collectively,
Competitive Bidding Orders) pursuant
to which Auction 111 will be
conducted. The Office of Economics and
Analytics (OEA), in conjunction with
the Media Bureau (MB), has prepared a
Supplemental Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (Supplemental
IRFA) of the possible significant
economic impact on small entities of the
policies and rules addressed in the
Auction 111 Comment Public Notice, to
supplement the Commission’s Initial
and Final Regulatory Flexibility
Analyses completed in the Competitive
Bidding NPRMs and the Competitive
Bidding Orders pursuant to which
Auction 111 will be conducted. Written
public comments are requested on the
Supplemental IRFA. Comments must be
identified as responses to the
Supplemental IRFA and must be filed
by the same filing deadlines for
comments specified in the DATES section
of this document. The Commission will
send a copy of the Auction 111
Comment Public Notice, including the
Supplemental IRFA, to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration (SBA).
53. Need for, and Objectives of, the
Public Notice. The proposed procedures
for the conduct of Auction 111 as
described in the Auction 111 Comment
Public Notice would constitute the more
specific implementation of the
competitive bidding rules contemplated
by parts 1 and 73 of the Commission’s
rules, adopted by the Commission in
multiple notice-and-comment
rulemaking proceedings, including the
Commission’s establishing in the
underlying rulemaking orders
additional procedures to be used on
delegated authority. More specifically,
the Auction 111 Comment Public Notice
seeks comment on proposed procedures,
terms and conditions governing Auction
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
37979
111, and the post-auction application
and payment processes, as well as
seeking comment on the minimum
opening bid amounts for the specified
construction permits, and is fully
consistent with the underlying
rulemaking orders, including the
Broadcast Competitive Bidding Order
and other relevant competitive bidding
orders.
54. The Auction 111 Comment Public
Notice provides notice of proposed
auction procedures and adequate time
for Auction 111 applicants to comment
on those proposed procedures. To
promote the efficient and fair
administration of the competitive
bidding process for all Auction 111
participants, including small
businesses, the Auction 111 Comment
Public Notice seeks comment on the
following proposed procedures:
Establishment of an interim bid
withdrawal percentage of 20% of the
withdrawn bid in the event bid
withdrawals are allowed in Auction
111; Establishment of an additional
default payment of 20% under
§ 1.2104(g)(2) in the event that a
winning bidder defaults or is
disqualified after the auction; use of a
simultaneous multiple-round auction
format, consisting of sequential bidding
rounds with a simultaneous stopping
rule (with discretion to exercise
alternative stopping rules under certain
circumstances); retention by OEA, in
conjunction with MB, to exercise its
discretion to delay, suspend, or cancel
bidding in Auction 111 for any reason
that affects the ability of the competitive
bidding process to be conducted fairly
and efficiently; retention by OEA of
discretion to adjust the bidding
schedule in order to manage the pace of
Auction 111; a specific minimum
opening bid amount for each
construction permit available in
Auction 111; a specific number of
bidding units for each construction
permit; a specific upfront payment
amount for each construction permit;
establishment of a bidder’s initial
bidding eligibility in bidding units
based on that bidder’s upfront payment
through assignment of a specific number
of bidding units for each construction
permit; use of an activity requirement so
that bidders must bid actively during
the auction rather than waiting until late
in the auction before participating; a
single stage auction in which a bidder
is required to be active on 100% of its
bidding eligibility in each round of the
auction; provision of three activity
waivers for each qualified bidder to
allow it to preserve eligibility during the
course of the auction; use of minimum
E:\FR\FM\19JYP1.SGM
19JYP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
37980
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 135 / Monday, July 19, 2021 / Proposed Rules
acceptable bid amounts and additional
bid increments, along with a proposed
methodology for calculating such
amounts, while retaining discretion to
change their methodology if
circumstances dictate; bid removal
procedures; and proposal to allow for
bid removals (before the close of a
bidding round) but not allow bid
withdrawals (after the close of a bidding
round).
55. Legal Basis. The Commission’s
statutory obligations to small businesses
participating in a spectrum auction
under the Act are found in sections
309(j)(3)(B) and 309(j)(4)(D). The
statutory basis for the Commission’s
competitive bidding rules is found in
various provisions of the Act, including
47 U.S.C. 154(i), 301, 303(e), 303(f),
303(r), 304, 307, and 309(j). The
Commission has established a
framework of competitive bidding rules
pursuant to which it has conducted
auctions since the inception of the
auction program in 1994 and would
conduct Auction 111. The Commission
has directed that OEA and MB, under
delegated authority, seek comment on a
variety of auction-specific procedures
prior to the start of bidding in each
auction.
56. Description and Estimate of the
Number of Small Entities to Which the
Proposed Procedures Will Apply. The
RFA directs agencies to provide a
description of and, where feasible, an
estimate of the number of small entities
that may be affected by the proposed
procedures, if adopted. The RFA
generally defines the term small entity
as having the same meaning as the terms
small business, small organization, and
small government jurisdiction. 5 U.S.C.
601(6). In addition, the term small
business has the same meaning as the
term small business concern under the
Small Business Act. A small business
concern is one which: (1) Is
independently owned and operated, (2)
is not dominant in its field of operation,
and (3) satisfies any additional criteria
established by the SBA. 15 U.S.C. 632.
57. The specific procedures and
minimum opening bid amounts on
which comment is sought in the
Auction 111 Comment Public Notice
will directly affect all applicants
participating in Auction 111, in which
applicant eligibility is closed. Therefore,
the specific competitive bidding
procedures and minimum opening bid
amounts described in the Auction 111
Comment Public Notice will affect only
the 24 individuals and entities listed in
Attachment A to the Auction 111
Comment Public Notice and that are the
only parties eligible to complete the
remaining steps to become qualified to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Jul 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
bid in Auction 111. These specific 24
Auction 111 individuals and entities
include firms of all sizes.
58. The Television Broadcasting
Economic Census category comprises
establishments primarily engaged in
broadcasting images together with
sound. These establishments operate
television broadcast studios and
facilities for the programming and
transmission of programs to the public.
These establishments also produce or
transmit visual programming to
affiliated broadcast television stations,
which in turn broadcast the programs to
the public on a predetermined schedule.
Programming may originate in their own
studio, from an affiliated network, or
from external sources. The SBA has
created the following small business
size standard for such businesses: Those
having $41.5 million or less in annual
receipts. 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS Code
515120. The 2012 Economic Census
reports that 751 firms in this category
operated that entire year. Of that
number, 656 had annual receipts of
$25,000,000 or less, and 25 had annual
receipts between $25,000,000 and
$49,999,999. Based on this data OEA
and MB therefore estimate that the
majority of commercial television
broadcasters are small entities under the
applicable SBA size standard.
59. Additionally, the Commission has
estimated the number of licensed
commercial television stations to be
1,374. Of this total, 1,269 stations (or
about 92.5%) had revenues of $41.5
million or less, according to
Commission staff review of the BIA
Kelsey Inc. Media Access Pro Television
Database (BIA) in April 20, 2021 and
therefore these stations qualify as small
entities under the SBA definition.
60. In addition, the Commission has
estimated the number of licensed
noncommercial educational (NCE)
television stations to be 384. These
stations are non-profit, and therefore
considered to be small entities.
61. There are also 2,371 LPTV
stations, including Class A stations, and
3,306 TV translators. Given the nature of
these services, OEA and MB presume
that all of these entities qualify as small
entities under the SBA small business
size standard.
62. The SBA size standard data,
however, does not enable a meaningful
estimate of the number of small entities
that may participate in Auction 111.
63. In assessing whether a business
entity qualifies as small under the SBA
definition, 13 CFR 121.103(a)(1),
business control affiliations must be
included. Business concerns are
affiliates of each other when one
concern controls or has the power to
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
control the other, or a third party or
parties controls or has the power to
control both. This estimate therefore
likely overstates the number of small
entities that might be affected by this
auction because the revenue figures on
which this estimate is based does not
include or aggregate revenues from
affiliated companies. Moreover, the
definition of small business also
requires that an entity not be dominant
in its field of operation and that the
entity be independently owned and
operated. The estimate of small
businesses to which Auction 111
competitive bidding rules may apply
does not exclude any television station
from the definition of a small business
on these bases and is therefore overinclusive to that extent. Furthermore,
OEA and MB are unable at this time to
define or quantify the criteria that
would establish whether a specific
LPTV station or TV translator is
dominant in its field of operation.
64. Further, it is not possible to
accurately develop an estimate of how
many of the 24 entities in this auction
are small businesses based on the
number of small entities that applied to
participate in prior broadcast auctions,
because that information is not collected
from applicants for broadcast auctions
in which bidding credits are not based
on an applicant’s size (as is the case in
auctions of licenses for wireless
services). OEA and MB conclude,
however, that the majority of Auction
111 eligible bidders would likely meet
the SBA’s definition of a small business
concern.
65. Description of Projected
Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other
Compliance Requirements for Small
Entities. The Commission designed the
auction application process itself to
minimize reporting and compliance
requirements for applicants, including
small business applicants. To
participate in this auction parties will
file streamlined, short-form applications
in which they certify under penalty of
perjury as to their qualifications.
Eligibility to participate in bidding is
based on an applicant’s short-form
application and certifications, as well as
its upfront payment. In the second
phase of the process, there are
additional compliance requirements for
winning bidders. Thus, a small business
that fails to become a winning bidder
does not need to satisfy additional
requirements of a winning bidder.
66. OEA and MB do not expect the
processes and procedures proposed in
the Auction 111 Comment Public Notice
will require small entities to hire
attorneys, engineers, consultants, or
other professionals to participate in
E:\FR\FM\19JYP1.SGM
19JYP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 135 / Monday, July 19, 2021 / Proposed Rules
Auction 111 and comply with the
procedures ultimately adopted because
of the information, resources, and
guidance the Commission makes
available to potential and actual
participants. For example, the
Commission intends to release an online
tutorial that will help applicants
understand the procedures for filing the
auction short-form application (FCC
Form 175). The Commission also
intends to make information on the
bidding system available and to offer
demonstrations and other educational
opportunities for applicants in Auction
111 to familiarize themselves with the
FCC auction application system and the
auction bidding system. By providing
these resources as well as the resources
discussed below, OEA and MB expect
small business entities who use the
available resources to experience lower
participation and compliance costs.
Nevertheless, while OEA and MB
cannot quantify the cost of compliance
with the proposed procedures, they do
not believe that the costs of compliance
will unduly burden small entities that
choose to participate in the auction
because the proposals for Auction 111
are similar in many respects to the
procedures in recent auctions
conducted by the Commission.
67. Steps Taken to Minimize the
Significant Economic Impact on Small
Entities, and Significant Alternatives
Considered. The RFA requires an
agency to describe any significant,
specifically small business, alternatives
that it has considered in reaching its
proposed approach, which may include
the following four alternatives (among
others): (1) The establishment of
differing compliance or reporting
requirements or timetables that take into
account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of
compliance and reporting requirements
under the rule for such small entities;
(3) the use of performance rather than
design standards; and (4) an exemption
from coverage of the rule, or any part
thereof, for such small entities. 5 U.S.C.
603(c)(1)–(4).
68. The Commission has taken steps
to minimize any economic impact of its
auction procedures on small businesses
through, among other things, the many
resources it provides potential auction
participants. Small entities and other
auction participants may seek
clarification of or guidance on
complying with competitive bidding
rules and procedures, reporting
requirements, and the FCC’s auction
bidding system. An FCC Auctions
Hotline provides access to Commission
staff for information about the auction
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:26 Jul 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
process and procedures. The FCC
Auctions Technical Support Hotline is
another resource which provides
technical assistance to applicants,
including small entities, on issues such
as access to or navigation within the
electronic FCC Form 175 and use of the
FCC’s auction bidding system. Small
entities may also use the web-based,
interactive online tutorial produced by
Commission staff to familiarize
themselves with auction procedures,
filing requirements, bidding procedures,
and other matters related to an auction.
69. The Commission also makes
various databases and other sources of
information, including the Auctions
program websites and copies of
Commission decisions, available to the
public without charge, providing a lowcost mechanism for small entities to
conduct research prior to and
throughout the auction. Prior to and at
the close of Auction 111, the
Commission will post public notices on
the Auctions website, which articulate
the procedures and deadlines for the
auction. The Commission makes this
information easily accessible and
without charge to benefit all Auction
111 applicants, including small entities,
thereby lowering their administrative
costs to comply with the Commission’s
competitive bidding rules.
70. Prior to the start of bidding,
eligible bidders will be given an
opportunity to become familiar with
auction procedures and the bidding
system by participating in a mock
auction. Further, the Commission
intends to conduct Auction 111
electronically over the internet using its
web-based auction system that
eliminates the need for bidders to be
physically present in a specific location.
Qualified bidders also have the option
to place bids by telephone. These
mechanisms are made available to
facilitate participation in Auction 111
by all eligible bidders and may result in
significant cost savings for small
business entities that use these
alternatives. Moreover, the adoption of
bidding procedures in advance of the
auction, consistent with statutory
directive, is designed to ensure that the
auction will be administered
predictably and fairly for all
participants, including small entities.
71. Federal Rules that May Duplicate,
Overlap, or Conflict with the Proposed
Rules. None.
C. Deadlines and Filing Procedures
72. Interested parties may file
comments or reply comments on or
before the dates indicated in the DATES
section of this summary in AU Docket
No. 21–248. Comments may be filed
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
37981
using the Commission’s Electronic
Comment Filing System (ECFS).
73. Ex Parte Requirements. This
proceeding has been designated as a
‘‘permit-but-disclose’’ proceeding in
accordance with the Commission’s ex
parte rules. 47 CFR 1.1200(a), 1.1206.
Persons making ex parte presentations
must file a copy of any written
presentation or a memorandum
summarizing any oral presentation
within two business days after the
presentation (unless a different deadline
applicable to the Sunshine period
applies). Persons making oral ex parte
presentations are reminded that
memoranda summarizing the
presentations must (1) list all persons
attending or otherwise participating in
the meeting at which the ex parte
presentation was made, and (2)
summarize all data presented and
arguments made during the
presentation. If the presentation
consisted in whole or in part of the
presentation of data or arguments
already reflected in the presenter’s
written comments, memoranda, or other
filings in the proceeding, the presenter
may provide citations to such data or
arguments in his or her prior comments,
memoranda, or other filings (specifying
the relevant page and/or paragraph
numbers where such data or arguments
can be found) in lieu of summarizing
them in the memorandum. Documents
shown or given to the Commission staff
during ex parte meetings are deemed to
be written ex parte presentations and
must be filed consistent with section
§ 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by
§ 1.49(f) or for which the Commission
has made available a method of
electronic filing, written ex parte
presentations and memoranda
summarizing oral ex parte
presentations, and all attachments
thereto, must be filed through the
Electronic Comment Filing System
available for that proceeding, and must
be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc,
.xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants
in this proceeding should familiarize
themselves with the Commission’s ex
parte rules.
Federal Communications Commission.
William W. Huber,
Associate Chief, Auctions Division, Office of
Economics and Analytics.
[FR Doc. 2021–15146 Filed 7–16–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
E:\FR\FM\19JYP1.SGM
19JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 135 (Monday, July 19, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 37972-37981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15146]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 1 and 73
[AU Docket No. 21-284; DA 21-801; FR ID 37717]
Auction of Construction Permits for Low Power Television and TV
Translator Stations; Comment Sought on Competitive Bidding Procedures
for Auction 111
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule; proposed auction procedures.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Economics and Analytics and the Media Bureau
announce a closed auction of construction permits for new or modified
low power television (LPTV) stations and TV translator stations
(collectively, LPTV/translator stations). This document seeks comment
on the procedures to be used for this auction, which is designated as
Auction 111.
DATES: Comments are due on or before August 3, 2021, and reply comments
are due on or before August 13, 2021. Bidding in this auction is
expected to commence in February 2022.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file comments or reply comments in AU
Docket No. 21-284. Comments may be filed using the Commission's
Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). All filings in response to the
Auction 111 Comment Public Notice must refer to AU Docket No. 21-284.
Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically
using the internet by accessing the ECFS at https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/.
Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must
file an original and one copy of each filing.
Filings in response to the Public Notice can be sent by
commercial courier or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service
mail. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary,
Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission
Commercial deliveries (other than U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9050 Junction Dr.,
Annapolis Junction, MD 20701.
U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, or Priority mail
must be addressed to 45 L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554.
Until further notice, the Commission no longer accepts any
hand or messenger delivered filings. This is a temporary measure taken
to help protect the health and safety of individuals, and
[[Page 37973]]
to mitigate the transmission of COVID-19.
Email: Commenters are asked to also submit a copy of their
comments and reply comments electronically to the following address:
[email protected].
People with Disabilities: To request materials in
accessible formats (braille, large print, electronic files, audio
format) for people with disabilities, send an email to [email protected]
or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530
(voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Auction legal questions: Lyndsey Grunewald, (202) 418-0660,
[email protected], or Scott Mackoul, (202) 418-0660,
[email protected].
General auction questions: Auction Hotline at (717) 338-2868.
LPTV/translator station service questions: Shaun Maher (legal),
(202) 418-2324, [email protected], or Mark Colombo (technical
questions), (202) 418-7611, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Public Notice
(Auction 111 Comment Public Notice), AU Docket No. 21-284, DA 21-801,
adopted on July 9, 2021, and released on July 9, 2021. The Auction 111
Comment Public Notice includes the following attachments: Attachment A,
Construction Permits in Auction 111. The complete text of the Auction
111 Comment Public Notice, including its attachments, is available on
the Commission's website at https://www.fcc.gov/auction/111 or by using
the search function for AU Docket No. 21-284 on the Commission's ECFS
web page at www.fcc.gov/ecfs. Alternative formats are available to
persons with disabilities by sending an email to [email protected] or by
calling the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530
(voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY).
I. Introduction
1. By the Auction 111 Comment Public Notice, the Office of
Economics and Analytics (OEA) and the Media Bureau (MB), announce a
closed auction of construction permits for new or modified low power
television (LPTV) stations and TV translator stations (collectively
referred to as LPTV/translator stations) and seek comment on the
procedures to be used for this auction. The bidding for the auction,
which is designated as Auction 111, is expected to commence in February
2022.
2. OEA and MB has sent a copy of the Auction 111 Comment Public
Notice by email and overnight delivery to the contact address listed on
each LPTV/translator station application listed in Attachment A of the
Auction 111 Comment Public Notice. Future public notices in this
proceeding may be provided directly to each applicant listed in
Attachment A at this contact address as well. Each applicant is
reminded that pursuant to Sec. 1.65 of the Commission's rules, it is
obligated to maintain the accuracy of this information. 47 CFR 1.65.
OEA and MB ask each party that is eligible to file a short-form
application in Auction 111 to make sure that the contact address
provided in its LPTV/translator station application is accurate and is
a location capable of accepting packages. After the deadline for filing
short-form applications (FCC Form 175) to participate in Auction 111,
Auction 111-related materials will be sent to auction applicants at the
contact addresses in their short-form applications.
II. Construction Permits Offered and Application Processing
A. Construction Permits To Be Offered in Auction 111
3. Auction 111 will resolve groups of pending mutually exclusive
(MX) engineering proposals for up to 17 new or modified LPTV/translator
station construction permits. Auction 111 is a closed auction; only
those individuals or entities listed in Attachment A to the Auction 111
Comment Public Notice are eligible to participate in this auction with
respect to the construction permit(s) for which each is listed.
4. The MX groups and engineering proposals listed in Attachment A
to the Auction 111 Comment Public Notice consist of applications for
new LPTV/translator stations, or major changes to existing stations,
that were accepted on a first-come, first-served basis (i.e., rolling
one-day windows), pursuant to Sec. 74.787(a)(3) of the Commission's
rules and displacement relief applications filed pursuant to a special
filing window for eligible LPTV/translator stations displaced by the
broadcast television spectrum incentive auction (Auction 1000). Any
LPTV/translator station applications for new facilities, major changes
to existing facilities, or displacement relief that are mutually
exclusive with one another must be resolved via the Commission's part 1
and part 73 competitive bidding rules. In 2009, MB began accepting
applications for new rural digital LPTV/translator stations on a
limited basis and then later froze those filings. All but one of the MX
groups listed in Attachment A to the Auction 111 Comment Public Notice
consist of applications for new or modified rural digital LPTV/
translator stations that were submitted on the first day that MB began
accepting such applications. With regard to the remaining MX group,
Auction 1000, which repurposed 84 megahertz of the 600 MHz band
spectrum, resulted in the channel reassignments of certain full power
and Class A television stations, and in turn displaced certain LPTV/
translator stations. In 2018, the Incentive Auction Task Force and MB
opened a special displacement application filing window for eligible
licensees and permittees of LPTV/translator stations displaced by
Auction 1000 to apply for new channels. The remaining MX group listed
in Attachment A to the Auction 111 Comment Public Notice consists of
two displacement relief applications filed pursuant to this special
displacement application filing window.
5. In order to facilitate resolution of pending mutually exclusive
LPTV/translator station applications before initiating competitive
bidding procedures, and given the passage of time since the
applications were filed, MB announced that it would withhold action on
certain MX applications for new or modified LPTV/translator stations,
including each application listed in Attachment A to the Auction 111
Comment Public Notice, from June 1, 2020 to July 31, 2020, in order to
provide applicants with an opportunity to resolve mutual exclusivity
through settlement or technical modification of their engineering
proposals. MB advised each applicant that, absent resolution of its
mutual exclusivity, its application would be subject to the
Commission's competitive bidding procedures.
6. The 17 MX groups listed in Attachment A to the Auction 111
Comment Public Notice are the groups of 24 applicants that filed 40
applications that remain MX after the filing window closed, and OEA and
MB will now proceed to resolve these mutually exclusive LPTV/translator
station proposals by competitive bidding in Auction 111. Attachment A
to the Auction 111 Comment Public Notice also lists, for each proposal
in each MX group, the applicant name, FCC Registration Number (FRN),
file number, facility identification number, community of license, and
the channel requested in the relevant construction permit application.
B. Application Processing and Limited Auction Settlement Period
7. Attachment A to the Auction 111 Comment Public Notice lists the
pending LPTV/translator station
[[Page 37974]]
applications that will be resolved through Auction 111 unless the
applicants resolve their mutual exclusivity by entering into settlement
agreements or making minor amendments to their pending applications
before the deadline for filing short-form applications (FCC Form 175)
to participate in Auction 111, which will be announced in a future
public notice. Specifically, if a member of an MX group withdraws its
application on its own initiative or files a unilateral engineering
amendment, or if members of the MX group enter into and submit a
settlement agreement and supporting documentation that the Commission
staff determines to be fully in accordance with the Communications Act
of 1934, as amended (Act) and the Commission's rules, and such actions
completely resolve the mutual exclusivity prior to the short-form
application deadline, that MX group will be removed from Auction 111
and the remaining engineering proposal(s) will be processed under
standard licensing procedures.
8. Conversely, if an MX group listed in Attachment A to the Auction
111 Comment Public Notice remains mutually exclusive as of the short-
form application filing deadline, each applicant in that MX group must
timely file a short-form application in order to avoid dismissal of its
pending LPTV/translator station application. Specifically, if any
member of an MX group that remains mutually exclusive as of the short-
form application filing deadline fails to submit a timely short-form
application, that party will have its pending application for a new or
modified LPTV/translator station dismissed for failure to prosecute.
Likewise, if only one member of an MX group that remains mutually
exclusive as of the short-form application filing deadline submits a
short-form application, the MX group will be removed from the auction
and the engineering proposal of the party that submitted a short-form
application will be treated as a singleton application and processed
under standard licensing procedures. If an applicant forgoes filing a
short-form application pursuant to an agreement with mutually exclusive
applicants, such settlement agreement must be submitted to MB for
approval in accordance with Sec. 73.3525 of the Commission's rules.
9. After the short-form application filing deadline, OEA and MB
will release a public notice identifying the mutually exclusive
applications for Auction 111. As provided in section 73.5002(d) of the
Commission's rules, these mutually exclusive applicants will then be
given a limited opportunity to resolve mutual exclusivity of the
Commission's rules by the filing of technical amendments, dismissal
requests, and requests for approval of universal settlements. The
specific dates of the settlement period will be announced in the public
notice identifying the MX applications, but will only last, at most,
two weeks. Due to the Commission's competitive bidding rule prohibiting
certain communications, 47 CFR 1.2105(c), applicants in Auction 111
will not be able to communicate after the short-form application
deadline with each other for the purpose of resolving conflicts outside
of this limited settlement period.
10. An applicant listed in Attachment A to the Auction 111 Comment
Public Notice may become qualified to bid in Auction 111 only if it
complies with the auction filing, qualification, and payment
requirements, and otherwise complies with applicable rules, policies,
and procedures. Each listed applicant may become a qualified bidder
only for those construction permits specified for that applicant in
Attachment A to the Auction 111 Comment Public Notice. Each of the
engineering proposals within each MX group are directly mutually
exclusive with one another; therefore, no more than one construction
permit will be awarded through Auction 111 for each MX group identified
in Attachment A to the Auction 111 Comment Public Notice. Under the
Commission's established precedent, once two or more short-form
applications are accepted for an MX group, mutual exclusivity exists
for the relevant construction permit for auction purposes. Unless the
mutual exclusivity is resolved during the limited settlement
opportunity mentioned above, an applicant in Auction 111 cannot obtain
a construction permit without placing a bid, even if no other applicant
for that particular construction permit becomes qualified to bid or in
fact places a bid.
III. Implementation of Part 1 and Part 73 Competitive Bidding Rules and
Requirements
11. Consistent with the provisions of section 309(j)(3)(E)(i) of
the Act, and to ensure that potential bidders have adequate time to
familiarize themselves with the specific rules that will govern the
day-to-day conduct of an auction, OEA and MB seek comment on a variety
of auction-specific procedures relating to the conduct of Auction 111.
12. The Commission's part 1 and part 73 competitive bidding rules
require each applicant seeking to bid to acquire a construction permit
in a broadcast auction to provide certain information in a short-form
application (FCC Form 175), including ownership details and numerous
certifications. The competitive bidding rules in part 1, subpart Q, and
part 73 also contain a framework for the implementation of a
competitive bidding design, application and certification procedures,
reporting requirements, and the prohibition of certain communications.
A. Upfront Payments and Bidding Eligibility
13. In keeping with the usual practice in spectrum auctions, OEA
and MB propose that applicants be required to submit upfront payments
as a prerequisite to becoming qualified to bid. An upfront payment is a
refundable deposit made by an applicant to establish its eligibility to
bid on construction permits. Upfront payments that are related to the
specific construction permits being auctioned protect against frivolous
or insincere bidding and provide the Commission with a source of funds
from which to collect payments owed at the close of the bidding. As
required by 47 CFR 1.2106(a), a former defaulter must submit an upfront
payment equal to 50% more than the amount that would otherwise be
required.
14. OEA and MB seek comment on an appropriate upfront payment for
each construction permit being auctioned, taking into account such
factors as the efficiency of the auction process and the potential
value of similar construction permits. With these considerations in
mind, OEA and MB propose the upfront payments set forth in Attachment A
to the Auction 111 Comment Public Notice and seek comment on those
proposed upfront payment amounts.
15. OEA and MB further propose that the amount of the upfront
payment submitted by an applicant will determine its initial bidding
eligibility in bidding units, which are a measure of bidder eligibility
and bidding activity. OEA and MB propose to assign each construction
permit a specific number of bidding units, equal to one bidding unit
per dollar of the upfront payment listed in Attachment A to the Auction
111 Comment Public Notice. The number of bidding units for a given
construction permit is fixed and does not change during the auction as
prices change. If an applicant is found to be qualified to bid on more
than one permit being offered in Auction 111, such bidder may place
bids on multiple construction permits, provided that the total number
of bidding units associated with those construction permits does not
exceed that bidder's current
[[Page 37975]]
eligibility. A bidder cannot increase its eligibility during the
auction; it can only maintain its eligibility or decrease its
eligibility. In calculating its upfront payment amount and hence its
initial bidding eligibility, an applicant must determine the maximum
number of bidding units on which it may wish to bid (or hold
provisionally winning bids) in any single round and submit an upfront
payment amount covering that total number of bidding units. OEA and MB
request comment on these proposals.
B. Reserve Price or Minimum Opening Bids
16. As part of the pre-bidding process for each auction, OEA and MB
seek comment on the use of a minimum opening bid amount and/or reserve
price, as mandated by section 309(j) of the Act. OEA and MB propose to
establish minimum opening bid amounts for Auction 111. Based on its
experience in past broadcast auctions, the Commission has found that
setting a minimum opening bid amount judiciously is an effective
bidding tool for accelerating the competitive bidding process. In the
last auction of LPTV construction permits (Auction 104), OEA and MB
similarly proposed establishing minimum opening bids and not reserve
prices; no comments opposed that proposal, and it was adopted. Based on
all of these facts, OEA and MB propose establishing minimum opening
bids for Auction 111. OEA and MB do not propose to establish separate
reserve prices for any of the construction permits to be offered in
Auction 111 nor do they see any reason to propose an aggregate reserve
price for the auction.
17. For auctions of broadcast permits, the Commission generally
proposes minimum opening bid amounts determined by taking into account
the type of service and class of facility offered, market size,
population covered by the proposed broadcast facility, and recent
broadcast transaction data, to the extent such information is
available. Consideration of such factors for Auction 111 is complicated
by a dearth of such transaction data, the fact that a permittee may opt
to switch its intended use of such facility from LPTV to translator
operation, or vice versa, and the lack of accurate data on the
population that would be covered by each proposed facility. In Auction
104, the last auction of LPTV construction permits, OEA and MB proposed
minimum opening bid amounts based on the limited information available,
and received no comments suggesting changes to the minimum opening bid
amounts. OEA and MB followed a similar methodology used in Auction 104
to set the minimum opening bid amounts proposed in Attachment A to the
Auction 111 Comment Public Notice for each construction permit
available in Auction 111. OEA and MB seek comment on the minimum
opening bid amounts specified in Attachment A to the Auction 111
Comment Public Notice.
18. If commenters believe that these minimum opening bid amounts
will result in unsold construction permits or are not reasonable
amounts at which to start bidding, they should explain why this is so
and comment on the desirability of an alternative approach. Commenters
should support their claims with valuation analyses and suggested
amounts or formulas. In establishing the minimum opening bid amounts,
OEA and MB particularly seek comment on factors that could reasonably
have an impact on bidders' valuation of the broadcast spectrum,
including the type of service and class of facility offered, market
size, population covered by the proposed broadcast facility and any
other relevant factors. Commenters also may wish to address the general
role of minimum opening bids in managing the pace of the auction. For
example, commenters could compare using minimum opening bids--e.g., by
setting higher minimum opening bids to reduce the number of rounds it
takes for construction permits to reach their final prices--to other
means of controlling auction pace, such as changes to bidding
schedules, percentage increments, or activity requirements.
C. Auction Delay, Suspension, or Cancellation
19. For Auction 111, OEA and MB propose that at any time before or
during the bidding process they may delay, suspend, or cancel bidding
in the auction in the event of a natural disaster, technical obstacle,
network interruption, administrative or weather necessity, evidence of
an auction security breach or unlawful bidding activity, or for any
other reason that affects the fair and efficient conduct of competitive
bidding. Notification of any such delay, suspension, or cancellation
will be provided by public notice or through the FCC auction bidding
system's messages function. If bidding is delayed or suspended, the
auction may resume starting from the beginning of the current round or
from some previous round, or the auction may be cancelled in its
entirety. This authority will be exercised solely at the discretion of
OEA and MB, and not as a substitute for situations in which bidders may
wish to apply activity rule waivers. OEA and MB seek comment on this
proposal.
D. Interim Withdrawal Payment Percentage
20. As discussed below, OEA and MB propose not to allow bid
withdrawals in Auction 111. In the event bid withdrawals are permitted
in Auction 111, however, OEA and MB propose the interim bid withdrawal
payment be 20% of the withdrawn bid. A bidder that withdraws a
provisionally winning bid during an auction is subject to a withdrawal
payment equal to the difference between the amount of the withdrawn bid
and the amount of the winning bid in the same or a subsequent auction.
47 CFR 1.2104(g)(1). However, if a construction permit for which a bid
has been withdrawn does not receive a subsequent higher bid or winning
bid in the same auction, the Commission cannot calculate the final
withdrawal payment until that construction permit receives a higher bid
or winning bid in a subsequent auction. In such cases, when that final
withdrawal payment cannot yet be calculated, the Commission imposes on
the bidder responsible for the withdrawn bid an interim bid withdrawal
payment, which will be applied toward any final bid withdrawal payment
that is ultimately assessed.
21. The percentage amount of the interim bid withdrawal payment is
established in advance of bidding in each auction and may range from 3%
to 20% of the withdrawn bid amount. The Commission has determined that
the level of interim withdrawal payment in a particular auction will be
based on the nature of the service and the inventory of the licenses
being offered. The Commission noted specifically that a higher interim
withdrawal payment percentage is warranted to deter the anti-
competitive use of withdrawals when, for example, bidders will not need
to aggregate the licenses being offered in the auction or when there
are few synergies to be captured by combining licenses. In light of
these considerations with respect to the construction permits being
offered in this auction, OEA and MB propose to use the maximum interim
bid withdrawal payment percentage permitted by Sec. 1.2104(g)(1) in
the event bid withdrawals are allowed in this auction. OEA and MB
request comment on using 20% for calculating an interim bid withdrawal
payment amount in Auction 111 in the event that bidders would be
permitted to withdraw bids. Commenters advocating the use of bid
withdrawals should also address the
[[Page 37976]]
percentage of the interim bid withdrawal payment.
E. Deficiency Payments and Additional Default Payment Percentage
22. Any winning bidder that defaults or is disqualified after the
close of an auction (i.e., fails to remit the required down payment by
the specified deadline, fails to make full and timely final payment,
fails to submit a timely long-form application, or whose long-form
application is not granted for any reason, or is otherwise
disqualified) is liable for a default payment under Sec. 1.2104(g)(2)
of the rules. This payment consists of a deficiency payment, equal to
the difference between the amount of the Auction 111 bidder's winning
bid and the amount of the winning bid the next time a construction
permit covering the same spectrum is won in an auction, plus an
additional payment equal to a percentage of the defaulter's bid or of
the subsequent winning bid, whichever is less.
23. The Commission's rules provide that, in advance of each
auction, it will establish a percentage between 3% and 20% of the
applicable winning bid to be assessed as an additional default payment.
As the Commission has indicated, the level of this additional payment
in each auction will be based on the nature of the service and the
construction permits being offered.
24. For Auction 111, OEA and MB propose to establish an additional
default payment of 20%, which is consistent with the percentage in
prior auctions of broadcast construction permits. As the Commission has
noted, defaults weaken the integrity of the auction process and may
impede the deployment of service to the public, and an additional 20%
default payment will be more effective in deterring defaults than the
3% used in some earlier auctions. In light of these considerations, OEA
and MB propose for Auction 111 an additional default payment of 20% of
the relevant bid. OEA and MB seek comment on this proposal.
IV. Proposed Bidding Procedures
A. Simultaneous Multiple-Round Auction Design
25. OEA and MB propose to use the Commission's simultaneous
multiple-round auction format for Auction 111. As described further
below, this type of auction offers every construction permit for bid at
the same time and consists of successive bidding rounds in which
qualified bidders may place bids on individual construction permits.
Typically, bidding remains open on all construction permits until
bidding stops on every construction permit. OEA and MB seek comment on
this proposal.
B. Bidding Rounds
26. The Commission will conduct Auction 111 over the internet using
the FCC auction bidding system. A bidder will also have the option of
placing bids by telephone through a dedicated auction bidder line.
27. Under this proposal, Auction 111 will consist of sequential
bidding rounds, each followed by the release of round results. The
initial bidding schedule will be announced in a public notice to be
released at least one week before the start of bidding. Details on
viewing round results, including the location and format of
downloadable round results files, will be included in the same public
notice.
28. OEA and MB propose that the initial bidding schedule may be
adjusted in order to foster an auction pace that reasonably balances
speed with the bidders' need to study round results and adjust their
bidding strategies. Under this proposal, such changes may include the
amount of time for the bidding rounds, the amount of time between
rounds, or the number of rounds per day, depending upon bidding
activity and other factors. OEA and MB seek comment on this proposal.
Commenters on this issue should address the role of the bidding
schedule in managing the pace of the auction, specifically discussing
the tradeoffs in managing auction pace by bidding schedule changes, by
changing the activity requirement(s) or bid amount parameters, or by
using other means.
C. Stopping Rule
29. OEA and MB have discretion to establish stopping rules before
or during multiple round auctions in order to complete the auction
within a reasonable time. 47 CFR 1.2104(e). For Auction 111, OEA and MB
propose to employ a simultaneous stopping rule approach, which means
all construction permits remain available for bidding until bidding
stops on every construction permit. Specifically, bidding will close on
all construction permits after the first round in which no bidder
submits any new bid, applies a proactive activity rule waiver, or
withdraws any provisionally winning bid (if bid withdrawals are
permitted in this auction). Thus, under the proposed simultaneous
stopping rule, bidding would remain open on all construction permits
until bidding stops on every construction permit. Consequently, under
this approach, it is not possible to determine in advance how long the
bidding in this auction will last.
30. Further, OEA and MB propose to retain the discretion to
exercise any of the following stopping options during Auction 111: (1)
The auction would close for all construction permits after the first
round in which no bidder applies a waiver, no bidder withdraws a
provisionally winning bid (if withdrawals are permitted in this
auction), or no bidder places any new bid on a construction permit for
which it is not the provisionally winning bidder. Absent any other
bidding activity, a bidder placing a new bid on a construction permit
for which it is the provisionally winning bidder would not keep the
auction open under this modified stopping rule; (2) the auction would
close for all construction permits after the first round in which no
bidder applies a waiver, no bidder withdraws a provisionally winning
bid (if withdrawals are permitted in this auction), or no bidder places
any new bid on a construction permit that already has a provisionally
winning bid. Absent any other bidding activity, a bidder placing a new
bid on an FCC-held construction permit (a construction permit that does
not already have a provisionally winning bid) would not keep the
auction open under this modified stopping rule; (3) the auction would
close using a modified version of the simultaneous stopping rule that
combines (1) and (2); (4) the auction would close after a specified
number of additional rounds (special stopping rule) to be announced in
advance in the FCC auction bidding system. If this special stopping
rule is invoked, bids will be accepted in the specified final round(s),
after which the auction will close; and (5) the auction would remain
open even if no bidder places any new bid, applies a waiver, or
withdraws any provisionally winning bid (if withdrawals are permitted
in this auction). In this event, the effect will be the same as if a
bidder had applied a waiver. The activity rule will apply as usual, and
a bidder with insufficient activity will either lose bidding
eligibility or use a waiver.
31. OEA and MB propose to exercise these options only in certain
circumstances, for example, where the auction is proceeding unusually
slowly or quickly, there is minimal overall bidding activity, or it
appears likely that the auction will not close within a reasonable
period of time or will close prematurely. Before exercising these
options, OEA and MB are likely to attempt to change the pace of the
auction. For example, the pace of bidding may be adjusted by changing
[[Page 37977]]
the number of bidding rounds per day or the minimum acceptable bids.
OEA and MB propose to retain the discretion to exercise any of these
options with or without prior announcement during the auction. OEA and
MB seek comment on these proposals. Commenters should provide specific
reasons for supporting or objecting to these proposals.
D. Activity Rule
32. To ensure that the auction closes within a reasonable period of
time, an activity rule requires bidders to bid actively throughout the
auction, rather than wait until late in the auction before
participating. For purposes of the activity rule, the FCC auction
bidding system calculates a bidder's activity in a round as the sum of
the bidding units associated with any construction permits upon which
it places bids during the current round and the bidding units
associated with any construction permits for which it holds
provisionally winning bids. Bidders are required to be active on a
specific percentage of their current bidding eligibility during each
round of the auction. OEA and MB propose a single-stage auction with a
100% activity requirement. That is, in each bidding round, a bidder
desiring to maintain its current bidding eligibility will be required
to be active on 100% of its bidding eligibility. Thus, the activity
requirement would be satisfied when a bidder has bidding activity on
construction permits with bidding units that total 100% of its current
eligibility in the round. If the activity rule is met, then the
bidder's eligibility does not change in the next round. Failure to
maintain the requisite activity level will result in the use of an
activity rule waiver, if any remain, or a reduction in the bidder's
eligibility for the next round of bidding, possibly curtailing or
eliminating the bidder's ability to place additional bids in the
auction. OEA and MB seek comment on these activity requirements.
Commenters that oppose a 100% activity requirement are encouraged to
explain their reasons with specificity.
E. Activity Rule Waivers and Reducing Eligibility
33. For the proposed simultaneous multiple-round auction format,
OEA and MB propose that when a bidder's activity in the current round
is below the required minimum level, it may preserve its current level
of eligibility through an activity rule waiver, if the bidder has any
available. Consistent with prior Commission auctions of broadcast
construction permits, OEA and MB propose that each bidder in Auction
111 be provided with three activity rule waivers that may be used as
set forth below at the bidder's discretion during the course of the
auction.
34. An activity rule waiver applies to an entire round of bidding,
not to a particular construction permit. Activity rule waivers can be
either proactive or automatic. Activity rule waivers are primarily a
mechanism for a bidder to avoid the loss of bidding eligibility in the
event that exigent circumstances prevent it from bidding in a
particular round.
35. The FCC auction bidding system will assume that a bidder that
does not meet the activity requirement would prefer to use an activity
rule waiver (if available) rather than lose bidding eligibility.
Therefore, the system will automatically apply a waiver at the end of
any bidding round in which a bidder's activity level is below the
minimum required unless: (1) The bidder has no activity rule waiver
remaining; or (2) the bidder overrides the automatic application of a
waiver by reducing eligibility, thereby meeting the activity
requirement. If a bidder has no waivers remaining and does not satisfy
the required activity level, the bidder's current eligibility will be
permanently reduced, possibly curtailing or eliminating the ability to
place additional bids in the auction.
36. A bidder with insufficient activity may wish to reduce its
bidding eligibility rather than use an activity rule waiver. If so, the
bidder must affirmatively override the automatic waiver mechanism
during the bidding round by using the reduce eligibility function in
the FCC auction bidding system. In this case, the bidder's eligibility
would be permanently reduced to bring it into compliance with the
activity rule described above. Reducing eligibility is an irreversible
action; once eligibility has been reduced, a bidder cannot regain its
lost bidding eligibility.
37. Under the proposed simultaneous stopping rule, a bidder would
be permitted to apply an activity rule waiver proactively as a means to
keep the auction open without placing a bid. If a bidder proactively
applies an activity rule waiver (using the proactive waiver function in
the FCC auction bidding system) during a bidding round in which no bid
is placed or withdrawn (if bid withdrawals are permitted in this
auction), the auction will remain open and the bidder's eligibility
will be preserved. An automatic waiver applied by the FCC auction
bidding system in a round in which there is no new bid, no bid
withdrawal (if bid withdrawals are permitted in this auction), or no
proactive waiver would not keep the auction open. OEA and MB seek
comment on these proposals.
F. Bid Amount
38. OEA and MB propose that, in each round, a qualified bidder will
be able to place a bid on a given construction permit in any of up to
nine different amounts: The minimum acceptable bid amount or one of the
additional bid amounts. Bidders must have sufficient eligibility to
place a bid on the particular construction permit.
39. Minimum Acceptable Bid Amounts. The first of the acceptable bid
amounts is called the minimum acceptable bid amount. The minimum
acceptable bid amount for a construction permit will be equal to its
minimum opening bid amount until there is a provisionally winning bid
for the construction permit. Once there is a provisionally winning bid
for a construction permit, the minimum acceptable bid amount for that
construction permit will be equal to the amount of the provisionally
winning bid plus a specified percentage of that bid amount. The
percentage used for this calculation, the minimum acceptable bid
increment percentage, is multiplied by the provisionally winning bid
amount, and the resulting amount is added to the provisionally winning
bid amount. If, for example, the minimum acceptable bid increment
percentage is 10%, then the provisionally winning bid amount is
multiplied by 10%. The result of that calculation is added to the
provisionally winning bid amount, and that sum is rounded using the
Commission's standard rounding procedure for auctions as described in
the Auction 111 Comment Public Notice. If bid withdrawals are permitted
in this auction, in the case of a construction permit for which the
provisionally winning bid has been withdrawn, the minimum acceptable
bid amount will equal the second highest bid received for the
construction permit.
40. Additional Bid Amounts. Under this proposal, the Commission
will calculate the eight additional bid amounts using the minimum
acceptable bid amount and an additional bid increment percentage. The
minimum acceptable bid amount is multiplied by the additional bid
increment percentage, and that result (rounded) is the additional
increment amount. The first additional acceptable bid amount equals the
minimum acceptable bid amount plus the additional increment amount. The
second additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum acceptable
[[Page 37978]]
bid amount plus two times the additional increment amount; the third
additional acceptable bid amount is the minimum acceptable bid amount
plus three times the additional increment amount; etc. If, for example,
the additional bid increment percentage is 5%, then the calculation of
the additional increment amount would be (minimum acceptable bid
amount) * (0.05), rounded. The first additional acceptable bid amount
equals (minimum acceptable bid amount) + (additional increment amount);
the second additional acceptable bid amount equals (minimum acceptable
bid amount) + (2*(additional increment amount)); the third additional
acceptable bid amount equals (minimum acceptable bid amount) +
(3*(additional increment amount)); etc.
41. For Auction 111, OEA and MB propose to use a minimum acceptable
bid increment percentage of 10%. This means that the minimum acceptable
bid amount for a construction permit will be approximately 10% greater
than the provisionally winning bid amount for the construction permit.
To calculate the additional acceptable bid amounts, OEA and MB propose
to use a bid increment percentage of 5%. OEA and MB seek comment on
these proposals.
42. Bid Amount Changes. OEA and MB propose to retain the discretion
to change the minimum acceptable bid amounts, the minimum acceptable
bid percentage, the additional bid increment percentage, and the number
of acceptable bid amounts if, consistent with past practice,
circumstances so dictate. OEA and MB propose to retain the discretion
to do so on a construction permit-by-construction permit basis. OEA and
MB also propose to retain the discretion to limit (a) the amount by
which a minimum acceptable bid for a construction permit may increase
compared with the corresponding provisionally winning bid, and (b) the
amount by which an additional bid amount may increase compared with the
immediately preceding acceptable bid amount. For example, a $1,000
limit could be set on increases in minimum acceptable bid amounts over
provisionally winning bids. In this example, if calculating a minimum
acceptable bid using the minimum acceptable bid increment percentage
results in a minimum acceptable bid amount that is $1,200 higher than
the provisionally winning bid on a construction permit, the minimum
acceptable bid amount would instead be capped at $1,000 above the
provisionally winning bid. OEA and MB seek comment on the circumstances
that would call for employing such a limit, factors to consider when
determining the dollar amount of the limit, and the tradeoffs in
setting such a limit or changing other parameters, such as changing the
minimum acceptable bid percentage, the bid increment percentage, or the
number of acceptable bid amounts. If OEA and MB exercise this
discretion, bidders would be notified by announcement in the FCC
auction bidding system during the auction.
43. OEA and MB seek comment on these proposals. If commenters
disagree with the proposal to begin the auction with nine acceptable
bid amounts per construction permit, they should suggest an alternative
number of acceptable bid amounts to use. Commenters may wish to address
the role of the minimum acceptable bids and the number of acceptable
bid amounts in managing the pace of the auction and the tradeoffs in
managing auction pace by changing the bidding schedule, activity
requirement, bid amounts, or by using other means.
G. Provisionally Winning Bids
44. The FCC auction bidding system will determine provisionally
winning bids consistent with practice in past auctions. At the end of a
bidding round, the bidding system will determine a provisionally
winning bid for each construction permit based on the highest bid
amount received for that permit. The FCC auction bidding system will
advise bidders of the status of their bids when round results are
released. A provisionally winning bid will remain the provisionally
winning bid until there is a higher bid on the same construction permit
at the close of a subsequent round, unless the provisionally winning
bid is withdrawn (if bid withdrawals are permitted in this auction).
Provisionally winning bids at the end of the auction become the winning
bids. As a reminder, provisionally winning bids count toward activity
for purposes of the activity rule.
45. The FCC auction bidding system assigns a pseudo-random number
generated by an algorithm to each bid when the bid is entered. If
identical high bid amounts are submitted on a construction permit in
any given round (i.e., tied bids), the FCC auction bidding system will
use a pseudo-random number generator to select a single provisionally
winning bid from among the tied bids. The tied bid with the highest
pseudo-random number wins the tiebreaker and becomes the provisionally
winning bid. The remaining bidders, as well as the provisionally
winning bidder, can submit higher bids in subsequent rounds. However,
if the auction were to end with no other bids being placed, the winning
bidder would be the one that placed the provisionally winning bid. If
the construction permit receives any bids in a subsequent round, the
provisionally winning bid again will be determined by the highest bid
amount received for the construction permit.
H. Bid Removal and Bid Withdrawal
46. Bid Removal. The FCC auction bidding system allows each bidder
to remove any of the bids it placed in a round before the close of that
round. By removing a bid placed within a round, a bidder effectively
unsubmits the bid. In contrast to the bid withdrawal provisions
described below, a bidder removing a bid placed in the same round is
not subject to a withdrawal payment. Once a round closes, a bidder may
no longer remove a bid. Consistent with the design of the bidding
system, bidders in Auction 111 would be permitted to remove bids placed
in a round before the close of that round.
47. Bid Withdrawal. OEA and MB propose not to permit bidders in
Auction 111 to withdraw bids. When permitted in an auction, bid
withdrawals provide a bidder with the option of withdrawing bids placed
in prior rounds that have become provisionally winning bids. A bidder
would be able to withdraw its provisionally winning bids using the
withdraw function in the FCC auction bidding system. A bidder that
withdraws its provisionally winning bid(s), if permitted, is subject to
the bid withdrawal payment provisions of the Commission's rules. 47 CFR
1.2104(g), 1.2109.
48. The Commission has recognized that bid withdrawals may be a
helpful tool in certain circumstances for bidders seeking to
efficiently aggregate licenses or implement backup strategies. The
Commission has also acknowledged that allowing bid withdrawals may
encourage insincere bidding or increased opportunities for undesirable
strategic bidding in certain circumstances. The Commission stated that
this discretion should be exercised assertively, with consideration of
limiting the number of rounds in which bidders may withdraw bids, and
preventing bidders from bidding on a particular market if a bidder is
abusing the Commission's bid withdrawal procedures. In managing the
auction, therefore, OEA and MB have discretion to limit the number of
withdrawals to prevent bidding abuses.
49. Based on this guidance and on experience with past auctions of
[[Page 37979]]
broadcast construction permits, OEA and MB propose to prohibit bidders
from withdrawing any bid after the close of the round in which that bid
was placed. OEA and MB make this proposal in light of the site-specific
nature and wide geographic dispersion of the permits available in this
auction, which suggests that potential applicants for this auction may
have fewer incentives to aggregate permits through the auction process
(as compared with bidders in many auctions of wireless licenses). Thus,
OEA and MB believe that it is unlikely that bidders will have a need to
withdraw bids in this auction. Further, bid withdrawals, particularly
if they were made late in this auction, could result in delays in
licensing new broadcast stations and attendant delays in the offering
of new broadcast service to the public. OEA and MB comment on this
proposal to prohibit bid withdrawals in Auction 111. Commenters
advocating alternative approaches should support their arguments by
taking into account the construction permits offered, the impact of
auction dynamics and the pricing mechanism, and the effects on the
bidding strategies of other bidders.
V. Tutorial and Additional Information for Applicants
50. The Commission intends to provide additional information on the
bidding system and to offer demonstrations and other educational
opportunities for applicants in Auction 111 to familiarize themselves
with the FCC auction application system and the auction bidding system.
For example, OEA and MB intend to release an online tutorial that will
help applicants understand the procedures to be followed in the filing
of their auction short-form applications (FCC Form 175) and on the
bidding procedures for Auction 111.
VI. Procedural Matters
A. Paperwork Reduction Act
51. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the
information collections in the Application to Participate in an FCC
Auction, FCC Form 175, OMB Control No. 3060-0600. The Auction 111
Comment Public Notice does not propose new or modified information
collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), Public Law 104-13. Therefore, it does not contain any new or
modified information collection burden for small business concerns with
fewer than 25 employees pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief
Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198.
B. Supplemental Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
52. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as
amended (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 603, the Commission prepared Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analyses (IRFAs) in connection with the Broadcast
Competitive Bidding Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), 62 FR 65392,
December 12, 1997, and other Commission NPRMs (collectively,
Competitive Bidding NPRMs) pursuant to which Auction 111 will be
conducted. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analyses (FRFAs) likewise were
prepared in the Broadcast Competitive Bidding Order, 63 FR 48615,
September 11, 1998, and other Commission rulemaking orders
(collectively, Competitive Bidding Orders) pursuant to which Auction
111 will be conducted. The Office of Economics and Analytics (OEA), in
conjunction with the Media Bureau (MB), has prepared a Supplemental
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (Supplemental IRFA) of the
possible significant economic impact on small entities of the policies
and rules addressed in the Auction 111 Comment Public Notice, to
supplement the Commission's Initial and Final Regulatory Flexibility
Analyses completed in the Competitive Bidding NPRMs and the Competitive
Bidding Orders pursuant to which Auction 111 will be conducted. Written
public comments are requested on the Supplemental IRFA. Comments must
be identified as responses to the Supplemental IRFA and must be filed
by the same filing deadlines for comments specified in the DATES
section of this document. The Commission will send a copy of the
Auction 111 Comment Public Notice, including the Supplemental IRFA, to
the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration
(SBA).
53. Need for, and Objectives of, the Public Notice. The proposed
procedures for the conduct of Auction 111 as described in the Auction
111 Comment Public Notice would constitute the more specific
implementation of the competitive bidding rules contemplated by parts 1
and 73 of the Commission's rules, adopted by the Commission in multiple
notice-and-comment rulemaking proceedings, including the Commission's
establishing in the underlying rulemaking orders additional procedures
to be used on delegated authority. More specifically, the Auction 111
Comment Public Notice seeks comment on proposed procedures, terms and
conditions governing Auction 111, and the post-auction application and
payment processes, as well as seeking comment on the minimum opening
bid amounts for the specified construction permits, and is fully
consistent with the underlying rulemaking orders, including the
Broadcast Competitive Bidding Order and other relevant competitive
bidding orders.
54. The Auction 111 Comment Public Notice provides notice of
proposed auction procedures and adequate time for Auction 111
applicants to comment on those proposed procedures. To promote the
efficient and fair administration of the competitive bidding process
for all Auction 111 participants, including small businesses, the
Auction 111 Comment Public Notice seeks comment on the following
proposed procedures: Establishment of an interim bid withdrawal
percentage of 20% of the withdrawn bid in the event bid withdrawals are
allowed in Auction 111; Establishment of an additional default payment
of 20% under Sec. 1.2104(g)(2) in the event that a winning bidder
defaults or is disqualified after the auction; use of a simultaneous
multiple-round auction format, consisting of sequential bidding rounds
with a simultaneous stopping rule (with discretion to exercise
alternative stopping rules under certain circumstances); retention by
OEA, in conjunction with MB, to exercise its discretion to delay,
suspend, or cancel bidding in Auction 111 for any reason that affects
the ability of the competitive bidding process to be conducted fairly
and efficiently; retention by OEA of discretion to adjust the bidding
schedule in order to manage the pace of Auction 111; a specific minimum
opening bid amount for each construction permit available in Auction
111; a specific number of bidding units for each construction permit; a
specific upfront payment amount for each construction permit;
establishment of a bidder's initial bidding eligibility in bidding
units based on that bidder's upfront payment through assignment of a
specific number of bidding units for each construction permit; use of
an activity requirement so that bidders must bid actively during the
auction rather than waiting until late in the auction before
participating; a single stage auction in which a bidder is required to
be active on 100% of its bidding eligibility in each round of the
auction; provision of three activity waivers for each qualified bidder
to allow it to preserve eligibility during the course of the auction;
use of minimum
[[Page 37980]]
acceptable bid amounts and additional bid increments, along with a
proposed methodology for calculating such amounts, while retaining
discretion to change their methodology if circumstances dictate; bid
removal procedures; and proposal to allow for bid removals (before the
close of a bidding round) but not allow bid withdrawals (after the
close of a bidding round).
55. Legal Basis. The Commission's statutory obligations to small
businesses participating in a spectrum auction under the Act are found
in sections 309(j)(3)(B) and 309(j)(4)(D). The statutory basis for the
Commission's competitive bidding rules is found in various provisions
of the Act, including 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 301, 303(e), 303(f), 303(r),
304, 307, and 309(j). The Commission has established a framework of
competitive bidding rules pursuant to which it has conducted auctions
since the inception of the auction program in 1994 and would conduct
Auction 111. The Commission has directed that OEA and MB, under
delegated authority, seek comment on a variety of auction-specific
procedures prior to the start of bidding in each auction.
56. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to
Which the Proposed Procedures Will Apply. The RFA directs agencies to
provide a description of and, where feasible, an estimate of the number
of small entities that may be affected by the proposed procedures, if
adopted. The RFA generally defines the term small entity as having the
same meaning as the terms small business, small organization, and small
government jurisdiction. 5 U.S.C. 601(6). In addition, the term small
business has the same meaning as the term small business concern under
the Small Business Act. A small business concern is one which: (1) Is
independently owned and operated, (2) is not dominant in its field of
operation, and (3) satisfies any additional criteria established by the
SBA. 15 U.S.C. 632.
57. The specific procedures and minimum opening bid amounts on
which comment is sought in the Auction 111 Comment Public Notice will
directly affect all applicants participating in Auction 111, in which
applicant eligibility is closed. Therefore, the specific competitive
bidding procedures and minimum opening bid amounts described in the
Auction 111 Comment Public Notice will affect only the 24 individuals
and entities listed in Attachment A to the Auction 111 Comment Public
Notice and that are the only parties eligible to complete the remaining
steps to become qualified to bid in Auction 111. These specific 24
Auction 111 individuals and entities include firms of all sizes.
58. The Television Broadcasting Economic Census category comprises
establishments primarily engaged in broadcasting images together with
sound. These establishments operate television broadcast studios and
facilities for the programming and transmission of programs to the
public. These establishments also produce or transmit visual
programming to affiliated broadcast television stations, which in turn
broadcast the programs to the public on a predetermined schedule.
Programming may originate in their own studio, from an affiliated
network, or from external sources. The SBA has created the following
small business size standard for such businesses: Those having $41.5
million or less in annual receipts. 13 CFR 121.201, NAICS Code 515120.
The 2012 Economic Census reports that 751 firms in this category
operated that entire year. Of that number, 656 had annual receipts of
$25,000,000 or less, and 25 had annual receipts between $25,000,000 and
$49,999,999. Based on this data OEA and MB therefore estimate that the
majority of commercial television broadcasters are small entities under
the applicable SBA size standard.
59. Additionally, the Commission has estimated the number of
licensed commercial television stations to be 1,374. Of this total,
1,269 stations (or about 92.5%) had revenues of $41.5 million or less,
according to Commission staff review of the BIA Kelsey Inc. Media
Access Pro Television Database (BIA) in April 20, 2021 and therefore
these stations qualify as small entities under the SBA definition.
60. In addition, the Commission has estimated the number of
licensed noncommercial educational (NCE) television stations to be 384.
These stations are non-profit, and therefore considered to be small
entities.
61. There are also 2,371 LPTV stations, including Class A stations,
and 3,306 TV translators. Given the nature of these services, OEA and
MB presume that all of these entities qualify as small entities under
the SBA small business size standard.
62. The SBA size standard data, however, does not enable a
meaningful estimate of the number of small entities that may
participate in Auction 111.
63. In assessing whether a business entity qualifies as small under
the SBA definition, 13 CFR 121.103(a)(1), business control affiliations
must be included. Business concerns are affiliates of each other when
one concern controls or has the power to control the other, or a third
party or parties controls or has the power to control both. This
estimate therefore likely overstates the number of small entities that
might be affected by this auction because the revenue figures on which
this estimate is based does not include or aggregate revenues from
affiliated companies. Moreover, the definition of small business also
requires that an entity not be dominant in its field of operation and
that the entity be independently owned and operated. The estimate of
small businesses to which Auction 111 competitive bidding rules may
apply does not exclude any television station from the definition of a
small business on these bases and is therefore over-inclusive to that
extent. Furthermore, OEA and MB are unable at this time to define or
quantify the criteria that would establish whether a specific LPTV
station or TV translator is dominant in its field of operation.
64. Further, it is not possible to accurately develop an estimate
of how many of the 24 entities in this auction are small businesses
based on the number of small entities that applied to participate in
prior broadcast auctions, because that information is not collected
from applicants for broadcast auctions in which bidding credits are not
based on an applicant's size (as is the case in auctions of licenses
for wireless services). OEA and MB conclude, however, that the majority
of Auction 111 eligible bidders would likely meet the SBA's definition
of a small business concern.
65. Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other
Compliance Requirements for Small Entities. The Commission designed the
auction application process itself to minimize reporting and compliance
requirements for applicants, including small business applicants. To
participate in this auction parties will file streamlined, short-form
applications in which they certify under penalty of perjury as to their
qualifications. Eligibility to participate in bidding is based on an
applicant's short-form application and certifications, as well as its
upfront payment. In the second phase of the process, there are
additional compliance requirements for winning bidders. Thus, a small
business that fails to become a winning bidder does not need to satisfy
additional requirements of a winning bidder.
66. OEA and MB do not expect the processes and procedures proposed
in the Auction 111 Comment Public Notice will require small entities to
hire attorneys, engineers, consultants, or other professionals to
participate in
[[Page 37981]]
Auction 111 and comply with the procedures ultimately adopted because
of the information, resources, and guidance the Commission makes
available to potential and actual participants. For example, the
Commission intends to release an online tutorial that will help
applicants understand the procedures for filing the auction short-form
application (FCC Form 175). The Commission also intends to make
information on the bidding system available and to offer demonstrations
and other educational opportunities for applicants in Auction 111 to
familiarize themselves with the FCC auction application system and the
auction bidding system. By providing these resources as well as the
resources discussed below, OEA and MB expect small business entities
who use the available resources to experience lower participation and
compliance costs. Nevertheless, while OEA and MB cannot quantify the
cost of compliance with the proposed procedures, they do not believe
that the costs of compliance will unduly burden small entities that
choose to participate in the auction because the proposals for Auction
111 are similar in many respects to the procedures in recent auctions
conducted by the Commission.
67. Steps Taken to Minimize the Significant Economic Impact on
Small Entities, and Significant Alternatives Considered. The RFA
requires an agency to describe any significant, specifically small
business, alternatives that it has considered in reaching its proposed
approach, which may include the following four alternatives (among
others): (1) The establishment of differing compliance or reporting
requirements or timetables that take into account the resources
available to small entities; (2) the clarification, consolidation, or
simplification of compliance and reporting requirements under the rule
for such small entities; (3) the use of performance rather than design
standards; and (4) an exemption from coverage of the rule, or any part
thereof, for such small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603(c)(1)-(4).
68. The Commission has taken steps to minimize any economic impact
of its auction procedures on small businesses through, among other
things, the many resources it provides potential auction participants.
Small entities and other auction participants may seek clarification of
or guidance on complying with competitive bidding rules and procedures,
reporting requirements, and the FCC's auction bidding system. An FCC
Auctions Hotline provides access to Commission staff for information
about the auction process and procedures. The FCC Auctions Technical
Support Hotline is another resource which provides technical assistance
to applicants, including small entities, on issues such as access to or
navigation within the electronic FCC Form 175 and use of the FCC's
auction bidding system. Small entities may also use the web-based,
interactive online tutorial produced by Commission staff to familiarize
themselves with auction procedures, filing requirements, bidding
procedures, and other matters related to an auction.
69. The Commission also makes various databases and other sources
of information, including the Auctions program websites and copies of
Commission decisions, available to the public without charge, providing
a low-cost mechanism for small entities to conduct research prior to
and throughout the auction. Prior to and at the close of Auction 111,
the Commission will post public notices on the Auctions website, which
articulate the procedures and deadlines for the auction. The Commission
makes this information easily accessible and without charge to benefit
all Auction 111 applicants, including small entities, thereby lowering
their administrative costs to comply with the Commission's competitive
bidding rules.
70. Prior to the start of bidding, eligible bidders will be given
an opportunity to become familiar with auction procedures and the
bidding system by participating in a mock auction. Further, the
Commission intends to conduct Auction 111 electronically over the
internet using its web-based auction system that eliminates the need
for bidders to be physically present in a specific location. Qualified
bidders also have the option to place bids by telephone. These
mechanisms are made available to facilitate participation in Auction
111 by all eligible bidders and may result in significant cost savings
for small business entities that use these alternatives. Moreover, the
adoption of bidding procedures in advance of the auction, consistent
with statutory directive, is designed to ensure that the auction will
be administered predictably and fairly for all participants, including
small entities.
71. Federal Rules that May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict with the
Proposed Rules. None.
C. Deadlines and Filing Procedures
72. Interested parties may file comments or reply comments on or
before the dates indicated in the DATES section of this summary in AU
Docket No. 21-248. Comments may be filed using the Commission's
Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS).
73. Ex Parte Requirements. This proceeding has been designated as a
``permit-but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's
ex parte rules. 47 CFR 1.1200(a), 1.1206. Persons making ex parte
presentations must file a copy of any written presentation or a
memorandum summarizing any oral presentation within two business days
after the presentation (unless a different deadline applicable to the
Sunshine period applies). Persons making oral ex parte presentations
are reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must (1) list
all persons attending or otherwise participating in the meeting at
which the ex parte presentation was made, and (2) summarize all data
presented and arguments made during the presentation. If the
presentation consisted in whole or in part of the presentation of data
or arguments already reflected in the presenter's written comments,
memoranda, or other filings in the proceeding, the presenter may
provide citations to such data or arguments in his or her prior
comments, memoranda, or other filings (specifying the relevant page
and/or paragraph numbers where such data or arguments can be found) in
lieu of summarizing them in the memorandum. Documents shown or given to
the Commission staff during ex parte meetings are deemed to be written
ex parte presentations and must be filed consistent with section Sec.
1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by Sec. 1.49(f) or for which the
Commission has made available a method of electronic filing, written ex
parte presentations and memoranda summarizing oral ex parte
presentations, and all attachments thereto, must be filed through the
Electronic Comment Filing System available for that proceeding, and
must be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc, .xml, .ppt,
searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding should familiarize
themselves with the Commission's ex parte rules.
Federal Communications Commission.
William W. Huber,
Associate Chief, Auctions Division, Office of Economics and Analytics.
[FR Doc. 2021-15146 Filed 7-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P