Redesignation of Certain Unclassifiable Areas for the 2010 1-Hour Sulfur Dioxide (SO2, 37683-37686 [2021-14376]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
37683
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 134 / Friday, July 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
required by CAA section 110(l) (40
CFR1090.290(d)). EPA published a
proposed approval of the SIP revision
on March 25, 2021 (86 FR 15844) and
a final approval of the SIP revision on
June 2, 2021 (86 FR 29520), with an
effective date of July 2, 2021. The RFG
opt-out regulations provide that the optout effective date shall be no less than
90 days from the EPA SIP approval
effective date (40 CFR 1090(d)(2)(ii)).
EPA is unaware of any reason that the
effective date should be postponed, and
therefore, is establishing an opt-out
effective date of September 30, 2021 for
the Southern Maine Area.
As provided by the RFG Opt-out Rule
and the opt-out regulations in 40 CFR
1090.290(e), EPA will publish a final
rule to remove the seven counties in the
Southern Maine Area from the list of
RFG covered areas in 40 CFR
1090.285(d) after the effective date of
the opt-out. EPA believes that
completing this ministerial exercise to
revise the list of covered areas in the
Code of Federal Regulations after the
effective date of the opt-out allows the
opt-out to become effective within the
timeframe described in 40 CFR
1090.290(d), and allows EPA to keep the
lists of RFG covered areas in 40 CFR
1090.285 up to date.
III. Action
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
EPA is approving Maine’s petition
because it contained the information
required by 40 CFR 1090(d) in its
petition to EPA to opt-out of the RFG
program and revised the approved
maintenance plan for the 1997 ozone
NAAQS for the Southern Maine Area to
remove the emissions reductions
associated with RFG. EPA is also
determining the opt-out effective date
by applying the criteria in 40 CFR
1090.290(d). As discussed in Section
II.A. above, the RFG opt-out regulations
require that if a state included RFG as
a control measure in an approved SIP,
the state must revise the SIP, reflecting
the removal of RFG as a control measure
before an opt-out can be effective, and
the opt-out cannot be effective less than
90 days after the effective date of the
approval of the SIP revision. EPA
published a final approval of Maine’s
maintenance plan revision and
noninterference demonstration on June
2, 2021 (86 FR 29520), with an effective
date of July 2, 2021.
In summary, EPA is notifying the
public that it has applied its regulatory
criteria to approve the petition by Maine
to opt-out of the RFG program for the
Southern Maine Area of the Portland
and Midcoast ozone maintenance area
for the 1997 ozone NAAQS and is
thereby removing the prohibition on the
sale of conventional gasoline in that
area as of September 30, 2021 (40 CFR
1090.290(d)). This opt-out effective date
applies to retailers, wholesale
purchasers, consumers, refiners,
importers, and distributors.
Michael S. Regan,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2021–15127 Filed 7–15–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 81
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2020–0292; FRL–7822–01–
OAR]
RIN 2060–AU79
Redesignation of Certain
Unclassifiable Areas for the 2010
1-Hour Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Primary
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is redesignating the
Lancaster County, Nebraska and Milam
County, Texas unclassifiable areas
initially designated during the EPA’s
Round 2 air quality designations for the
2010 1-Hour Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)
Primary National Ambient Air Quality
SUMMARY:
Standard (NAAQS). Specifically, the
EPA now has sufficient information to
determine that these unclassifiable areas
in Nebraska and Texas are attaining the
2010 1-hour SO2 primary NAAQS.
Therefore, the EPA is redesignating
these areas to attainment/unclassifiable
for the 2010 1-hour SO2 primary
NAAQS. The EPA is also approving
these states’ requests to redesignate the
areas.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
August 16, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2020–0292. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form.
Out of an abundance of caution for
members of the public and our staff, the
EPA Docket Center and Reading Room
are currently closed to the public, with
limited exceptions, to reduce the risk of
transmitting COVID–19. Our Docket
Center staff will continue to provide
remote customer service via email,
phone, and webform. For further
information on the EPA Docket Center
services and the current status, please
visit us online at https://www.epa.gov/
dockets.
For
general questions concerning this
action, please contact Gobeail
McKinley, U.S. EPA, Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards, Air
Quality Policy Division, C539–04,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, by
email at mckinley.gobeail@epa.gov. The
following EPA Regional office contacts
can answer questions regarding the
specific areas being redesignated:
U.S. EPA REGIONAL OFFICE
CONTACTS:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regional office
Affected state
Contact
Telephone
Region VI ...........................
Region VII ..........................
Texas ................................
Nebraska ...........................
Robert Imhoff ....................
Will Stone ..........................
(214) 665–7262 .................
(913) 551–7714 .................
Most EPA offices are closed to reduce
the risk of transmitting COVID–19, but
staff remain available via telephone and
email. The EPA encourages the public to
review information related to the
redesignations at https://www.epa.gov/
sulfur-dioxide-designations and in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Jul 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
public docket for these SO2
redesignations at https://
www.regulations.gov under Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2020–0292.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
or ‘‘our’’ means the EPA.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Email
imhoff.robert@epa.gov.
stone.william@epa.gov.
I. Background
After the promulgation of a new or
revised NAAQS, the EPA is required to
designate all areas of the country,
pursuant to section 107(d)(1)–(2) of the
Clean Air Act (CAA). For the 2010
E:\FR\FM\16JYR1.SGM
16JYR1
37684
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 134 / Friday, July 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
1-hour SO2 primary NAAQS,1
designations are based on the EPA’s
application of the nationwide analytical
approach to, and technical assessment
of, the weight of evidence for each area,
including but not limited to available air
quality monitoring data and air quality
modeling results. Pursuant to a March 2,
2015, consent decree and court-ordered
schedule, the EPA finalized a second set
of initial area designations for the 2010
1-hour SO2 NAAQS in 2016 (also called,
‘‘Round 2’’). For the Round 2
designations, the EPA designated the
entirety of Lancaster County in
Nebraska and the entirety of Milam
County in Texas as unclassifiable. The
Round 2 intended designations for
Lancaster County, Nebraska and Milam
County, Texas were published on March
1, 2016. (81 FR 10563). The final
designation for Lancaster County,
Nebraska published on July 12, 2016.
(81 FR 45039). The final designation for
Milam County, Texas was published on
December 13, 2016, as part of a
supplement to the larger Round 2
designation action. (81 FR 89870).
Detailed rationale, analyses, and other
information supporting the designation
for these two areas can be found in the
intended and final Round 2
designations’ technical support
documents for Nebraska and Texas,
respectively. These Round 2 documents,
along with all other supporting
materials for the initial 2010 1-hour SO2
primary NAAQS designations for these
areas, can be found on the EPA’s SO2
designations website.2
On May 6, 2020, Nebraska submitted
a letter 3 to the EPA requesting that the
entirety of Lancaster County be
redesignated to attainment/
unclassifiable based on newly available
monitoring information, which
demonstrates attainment of the 2010
1-hour SO2 NAAQS. On June 26, 2020,
Texas submitted a letter 4 to the EPA
requesting that the entirety of Milam
County be redesignated to attainment/
unclassifiable based on newly available
monitoring information, which
demonstrates attainment of the 2010
1-hour SO2 NAAQS.
In a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) published on September 2,
1 The 2010 1-hour SO NAAQS is met when the
2
design value is 75 parts per billion (ppb) or less.
2 https://www.epa.gov/sulfur-dioxidedesignations.
3 See letter dated May 6, 2020, from Pete Ricketts,
Governor of the State of Nebraska to Jim Gilliford,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 7. This letter
is included in the docket for this action.
4 See letter dated June 26, 2020, from Toby Baker,
Executive Director of the Texas Commission of
Environmental Quality to Ken McQueen, Regional
Administrator, EPA Region 6. This letter is
included in the docket for this action.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Jul 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
2020 (85 FR 54517), the EPA proposed
to redesignate to attainment/
unclassifiable the unclassifiable
portions of Franklin and St. Charles
Counties in Missouri; the entirety of
Lancaster County in Nebraska; the
entirety of Gallia County and the
unclassifiable portion of Meigs County
in Ohio; and the entirety of Milam
County in Texas. As discussed in the
NPRM, this final action is based on the
currently available monitoring data for
two of the areas included in that NPRM
that demonstrate attainment of the 2010
1-hour SO2 primary NAAQS.
Additionally, in that NPRM, the EPA
proposed to approve requests for
redesignation from the states of
Nebraska, Ohio, and Texas for the areas
subject to the notice. The 30-day public
comment period for the NPRM closed
on October 2, 2020. The EPA did not
receive any comments specific to the
proposed redesignations of Lancaster
County in Nebraska and Milam County
in Texas. This action only addresses the
redesignation of Lancaster County,
Nebraska and Milam County, Texas. The
areas in Missouri and Ohio received
adverse comments and will be
addressed in separate rulemaking
actions. The details of each state’s
submittal and the rationale for the EPA’s
actions are further explained in the
NPRM.
II. Final Action
In this action, the EPA is taking final
action to redesignate Lancaster County,
Nebraska and Milam County, Texas to
attainment/unclassifiable for the 2010
1-hour SO2 primary NAAQS pursuant to
CAA section 107(d)(3)(D). The EPA is
also taking final action to approve a
request for redesignation from
unclassifiable to attainment/
unclassifiable for the 2010 SO2 primary
NAAQS from the state of Nebraska
dated May 6, 2020, and from the state
of Texas dated June 26, 2020. This
action changes the legal designation for
these areas, found at 40 CFR part 81,
from unclassifiable to attainment/
unclassifiable for the 2010 1-hour SO2
primary NAAQS.
III. Environmental Justice Concerns
When the EPA establishes a new or
revised NAAQS, the CAA requires the
EPA to designate all areas of the U.S. as
either nonattainment, attainment, or
unclassifiable. This action addresses
redesignation determinations for two
areas for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS. Under
CAA section 107(d)(3), the
redesignation of an area to attainment/
unclassifiable is an action that affects
the status of a geographical area and
does not impose any additional
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
regulatory requirements on sources
beyond those imposed by state law. A
redesignation to attainment/
unclassifiable does not in and of itself
create any new requirements.
Accordingly, this final action merely
redesignates areas to attainment/
unclassifiable and does not impose
additional requirements. Area
redesignations address environmental
justice concerns by ensuring that the
public is properly informed about the
air quality in an area. In locations where
air quality does not meet the NAAQS,
the CAA requires relevant state
authorities to initiate appropriate air
quality management actions to ensure
that all those residing, working,
attending school, or otherwise present
in those areas are protected, regardless
of minority and economic status.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is exempt from the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) and
was, therefore, not submitted to OMB
for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
PRA. This action is a redesignation of
two areas to attainment/unclassifiable is
an action that affects the status of a
geographical area and does not impose
any additional regulatory requirements
on sources beyond those imposed by
state law. Therefore, this final
rulemaking does not impose any new
information collection burden under the
PRA.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
This redesignation action under CAA
section 107(d) is not subject to the RFA.
The RFA applies only to rules subject to
notice-and-comment rulemaking
requirements under the Administrative
Procedures Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 553, or
any other statute. Redesignations under
CAA section 107(d) are not among the
list of actions that are subject to the
notice-and-comment rulemaking
requirements of CAA section 307(d).
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This action does not contain any
unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538 and does
not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. The action imposes no
enforceable duty on any state, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector.
E:\FR\FM\16JYR1.SGM
16JYR1
37685
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 134 / Friday, July 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. The division of
responsibility between the federal
government and the states for purposes
of implementing the NAAQS is
established under the CAA.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have Tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000) because no tribal lands are located
within the areas covered in this action
and the redesignation does not create
new requirements. The EPA notes this
final redesignation action will not
impose substantial direct costs on Tribal
governments or preempt Tribal law.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order
13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern
environmental health or safety risks that
the EPA has reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, per
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory
action’’ in section 2–202 of the
Executive Order. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
because it does not concern an
environmental health risk or safety risk.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This rulemaking does not involve
technical standards.
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See CAA
section 307(b)(2).
V. Statutory Authority
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes that this action does
not have disproportionately high and
adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority populations, lowincome populations and/or indigenous
peoples, as specified in Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The documentation for this
determination is contained in Section III
of this preamble, ‘‘Environmental
Justice Concerns.’’
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and
the EPA will submit a rule report to
each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United
States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
L. Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by September 14, 2021. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
The statutory authority for this action
is provided by 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Sulfur oxides.
Michael S. Regan,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the EPA amends title 40 CFR
part 81as set forth below:
PART 81—DESIGNATION OF AREAS
FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING
PURPOSES
1. The authority citation for part 81
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
2. In § 81.328, the table titled,
‘‘Nebraska–2010 Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS
[Primary]’’ is amended by revising the
entry for ‘‘Lancaster County’’ and
redesignating it alplabetically under
‘‘Statewide’’ before the entry for
‘‘Lincoln County’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 81.328
*
*
Nebraska.
*
*
*
NEBRASKA—2010 SULFUR DIOXIDE NAAQS
[Primary]
Designation
Designated area 1
Date 2
*
*
*
*
Lancaster County ...........................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
Type
*
*
August 16, 2021 .................
*
*
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
*
*
1 Includes
any Indian country in each county or area, unless otherwise specified. The EPA is not determining the boundaries of any area of Indian country in this table, including any area of Indian country located in the larger designation area. The inclusion of any Indian country in the
designation area is not a determination that the state has regulatory authority under the Clean Air Act for such Indian country.
2 This date is April 9, 2018, unless otherwise noted.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 81.344, the table titled
‘‘Texas—2010 Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Jul 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
[Primary]’’ is amended by revising the
entry for ‘‘Milam County, TX’’ to read as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 81.344
*
E:\FR\FM\16JYR1.SGM
*
Texas.
*
16JYR1
*
*
37686
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 134 / Friday, July 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
TEXAS—2010 SULFUR DIOXIDE NAAQS
[Primary]
Designation
Designated area
Date
*
*
*
*
Milam County, TX ..........................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
Type
*
*
August 16, 2021 .................
*
*
1 Includes
*
Attainment/Unclassifiable.
*
any Indian country in each county or area, unless otherwise specified. The EPA is not determining the boundaries of any area of Indian country in this table, including any area of Indian country located in the larger designation area. The inclusion of any Indian country in the
designation area is not a determination that the state has regulatory authority under the Clean Air Act for such Indian country.
2 This date is April 9, 2018, unless otherwise noted.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2021–14376 Filed 7–15–21; 8:45 am]
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Jul 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\16JYR1.SGM
16JYR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 134 (Friday, July 16, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37683-37686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14376]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 81
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2020-0292; FRL-7822-01-OAR]
RIN 2060-AU79
Redesignation of Certain Unclassifiable Areas for the 2010 1-Hour
Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS)
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is redesignating the
Lancaster County, Nebraska and Milam County, Texas unclassifiable areas
initially designated during the EPA's Round 2 air quality designations
for the 2010 1-Hour Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Primary National
Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). Specifically, the EPA now has
sufficient information to determine that these unclassifiable areas in
Nebraska and Texas are attaining the 2010 1-hour SO2 primary
NAAQS. Therefore, the EPA is redesignating these areas to attainment/
unclassifiable for the 2010 1-hour SO2 primary NAAQS. The
EPA is also approving these states' requests to redesignate the areas.
DATES: This final rule is effective on August 16, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2020-0292. All documents in the docket are
listed in the https://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential
Business Information or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form.
Out of an abundance of caution for members of the public and our
staff, the EPA Docket Center and Reading Room are currently closed to
the public, with limited exceptions, to reduce the risk of transmitting
COVID-19. Our Docket Center staff will continue to provide remote
customer service via email, phone, and webform. For further information
on the EPA Docket Center services and the current status, please visit
us online at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general questions concerning this
action, please contact Gobeail McKinley, U.S. EPA, Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Policy Division, C539-04,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, by email at [email protected].
The following EPA Regional office contacts can answer questions
regarding the specific areas being redesignated:
U.S. EPA REGIONAL OFFICE CONTACTS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regional office Affected state Contact Telephone Email
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Region VI....................... Texas............. Robert Imhoff..... (214) 665-7262.... [email protected].
Region VII...................... Nebraska.......... Will Stone........ (913) 551-7714.... [email protected].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Most EPA offices are closed to reduce the risk of transmitting
COVID-19, but staff remain available via telephone and email. The EPA
encourages the public to review information related to the
redesignations at https://www.epa.gov/sulfur-dioxide-designations and
in the public docket for these SO2 redesignations at https://www.regulations.gov under Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2020-0292.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' or
``our'' means the EPA.
I. Background
After the promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS, the EPA is
required to designate all areas of the country, pursuant to section
107(d)(1)-(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). For the 2010
[[Page 37684]]
1-hour SO2 primary NAAQS,\1\ designations are based on the
EPA's application of the nationwide analytical approach to, and
technical assessment of, the weight of evidence for each area,
including but not limited to available air quality monitoring data and
air quality modeling results. Pursuant to a March 2, 2015, consent
decree and court-ordered schedule, the EPA finalized a second set of
initial area designations for the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS in
2016 (also called, ``Round 2''). For the Round 2 designations, the EPA
designated the entirety of Lancaster County in Nebraska and the
entirety of Milam County in Texas as unclassifiable. The Round 2
intended designations for Lancaster County, Nebraska and Milam County,
Texas were published on March 1, 2016. (81 FR 10563). The final
designation for Lancaster County, Nebraska published on July 12, 2016.
(81 FR 45039). The final designation for Milam County, Texas was
published on December 13, 2016, as part of a supplement to the larger
Round 2 designation action. (81 FR 89870). Detailed rationale,
analyses, and other information supporting the designation for these
two areas can be found in the intended and final Round 2 designations'
technical support documents for Nebraska and Texas, respectively. These
Round 2 documents, along with all other supporting materials for the
initial 2010 1-hour SO2 primary NAAQS designations for these
areas, can be found on the EPA's SO2 designations
website.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS is met when the design
value is 75 parts per billion (ppb) or less.
\2\ https://www.epa.gov/sulfur-dioxide-designations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On May 6, 2020, Nebraska submitted a letter \3\ to the EPA
requesting that the entirety of Lancaster County be redesignated to
attainment/unclassifiable based on newly available monitoring
information, which demonstrates attainment of the 2010 1-hour
SO2 NAAQS. On June 26, 2020, Texas submitted a letter \4\ to
the EPA requesting that the entirety of Milam County be redesignated to
attainment/unclassifiable based on newly available monitoring
information, which demonstrates attainment of the 2010 1-hour
SO2 NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See letter dated May 6, 2020, from Pete Ricketts, Governor
of the State of Nebraska to Jim Gilliford, Regional Administrator,
EPA Region 7. This letter is included in the docket for this action.
\4\ See letter dated June 26, 2020, from Toby Baker, Executive
Director of the Texas Commission of Environmental Quality to Ken
McQueen, Regional Administrator, EPA Region 6. This letter is
included in the docket for this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) published on September 2,
2020 (85 FR 54517), the EPA proposed to redesignate to attainment/
unclassifiable the unclassifiable portions of Franklin and St. Charles
Counties in Missouri; the entirety of Lancaster County in Nebraska; the
entirety of Gallia County and the unclassifiable portion of Meigs
County in Ohio; and the entirety of Milam County in Texas. As discussed
in the NPRM, this final action is based on the currently available
monitoring data for two of the areas included in that NPRM that
demonstrate attainment of the 2010 1-hour SO2 primary NAAQS.
Additionally, in that NPRM, the EPA proposed to approve requests for
redesignation from the states of Nebraska, Ohio, and Texas for the
areas subject to the notice. The 30-day public comment period for the
NPRM closed on October 2, 2020. The EPA did not receive any comments
specific to the proposed redesignations of Lancaster County in Nebraska
and Milam County in Texas. This action only addresses the redesignation
of Lancaster County, Nebraska and Milam County, Texas. The areas in
Missouri and Ohio received adverse comments and will be addressed in
separate rulemaking actions. The details of each state's submittal and
the rationale for the EPA's actions are further explained in the NPRM.
II. Final Action
In this action, the EPA is taking final action to redesignate
Lancaster County, Nebraska and Milam County, Texas to attainment/
unclassifiable for the 2010 1-hour SO2 primary NAAQS
pursuant to CAA section 107(d)(3)(D). The EPA is also taking final
action to approve a request for redesignation from unclassifiable to
attainment/unclassifiable for the 2010 SO2 primary NAAQS
from the state of Nebraska dated May 6, 2020, and from the state of
Texas dated June 26, 2020. This action changes the legal designation
for these areas, found at 40 CFR part 81, from unclassifiable to
attainment/unclassifiable for the 2010 1-hour SO2 primary
NAAQS.
III. Environmental Justice Concerns
When the EPA establishes a new or revised NAAQS, the CAA requires
the EPA to designate all areas of the U.S. as either nonattainment,
attainment, or unclassifiable. This action addresses redesignation
determinations for two areas for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS. Under
CAA section 107(d)(3), the redesignation of an area to attainment/
unclassifiable is an action that affects the status of a geographical
area and does not impose any additional regulatory requirements on
sources beyond those imposed by state law. A redesignation to
attainment/unclassifiable does not in and of itself create any new
requirements. Accordingly, this final action merely redesignates areas
to attainment/unclassifiable and does not impose additional
requirements. Area redesignations address environmental justice
concerns by ensuring that the public is properly informed about the air
quality in an area. In locations where air quality does not meet the
NAAQS, the CAA requires relevant state authorities to initiate
appropriate air quality management actions to ensure that all those
residing, working, attending school, or otherwise present in those
areas are protected, regardless of minority and economic status.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is exempt from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) and was, therefore, not submitted to OMB for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA. This action is a redesignation of two areas to attainment/
unclassifiable is an action that affects the status of a geographical
area and does not impose any additional regulatory requirements on
sources beyond those imposed by state law. Therefore, this final
rulemaking does not impose any new information collection burden under
the PRA.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
This redesignation action under CAA section 107(d) is not subject
to the RFA. The RFA applies only to rules subject to notice-and-comment
rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedures Act (APA),
5 U.S.C. 553, or any other statute. Redesignations under CAA section
107(d) are not among the list of actions that are subject to the
notice-and-comment rulemaking requirements of CAA section 307(d).
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538 and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state,
local, or tribal governments or the private sector.
[[Page 37685]]
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government. The
division of responsibility between the federal government and the
states for purposes of implementing the NAAQS is established under the
CAA.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have Tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000) because no tribal
lands are located within the areas covered in this action and the
redesignation does not create new requirements. The EPA notes this
final redesignation action will not impose substantial direct costs on
Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental
health risk or safety risk.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes that this action does not have disproportionately
high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority
populations, low-income populations and/or indigenous peoples, as
specified in Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The
documentation for this determination is contained in Section III of
this preamble, ``Environmental Justice Concerns.''
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of
the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
L. Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by September 14, 2021. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See CAA section 307(b)(2).
V. Statutory Authority
The statutory authority for this action is provided by 42 U.S.C.
7401, et seq.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Sulfur oxides.
Michael S. Regan,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends title 40 CFR
part 81as set forth below:
PART 81--DESIGNATION OF AREAS FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING PURPOSES
0
1. The authority citation for part 81 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 81.328, the table titled, ``Nebraska-2010 Sulfur Dioxide
NAAQS [Primary]'' is amended by revising the entry for ``Lancaster
County'' and redesignating it alplabetically under ``Statewide'' before
the entry for ``Lincoln County'' to read as follows:
Sec. 81.328 Nebraska.
* * * * *
Nebraska--2010 Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS
[Primary]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Designation
Designated area \1\ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date \2\ Type
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Lancaster County................. August 16, 2021....................... Attainment/Unclassifiable.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Includes any Indian country in each county or area, unless otherwise specified. The EPA is not determining
the boundaries of any area of Indian country in this table, including any area of Indian country located in
the larger designation area. The inclusion of any Indian country in the designation area is not a
determination that the state has regulatory authority under the Clean Air Act for such Indian country.
\2\ This date is April 9, 2018, unless otherwise noted.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 81.344, the table titled ``Texas--2010 Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS
[Primary]'' is amended by revising the entry for ``Milam County, TX''
to read as follows:
Sec. 81.344 Texas.
* * * * *
[[Page 37686]]
Texas--2010 Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS
[Primary]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Designation
Designated area ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Type
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Milam County, TX................. August 16, 2021....................... Attainment/Unclassifiable.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Includes any Indian country in each county or area, unless otherwise specified. The EPA is not determining
the boundaries of any area of Indian country in this table, including any area of Indian country located in
the larger designation area. The inclusion of any Indian country in the designation area is not a
determination that the state has regulatory authority under the Clean Air Act for such Indian country.
\2\ This date is April 9, 2018, unless otherwise noted.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-14376 Filed 7-15-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
