Title IV-E Prevention Services Clearinghouse Handbook of Standards and Procedures, 37332-37334 [2021-15065]
Download as PDF
37332
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 133 / Thursday, July 15, 2021 / Notices
analyze future trends related to the
diversity of the boards of directors of the
Banks and the Office of Finance and to
assess the effectiveness of the strategies
developed by the Banks and the Office
of Finance for promoting, developing,
and retaining diverse board talent.
B. Burden Estimate
FHFA estimates the total annual hour
burden imposed upon respondents by
this information collection to be 20.5
hours. This is based on estimates that
205 Bank and Office of Finance
Directors will respond annually, with
each response taking an average of 0.1
hours (6 minutes) (205 respondents ×
0.1 hours = 20.5 hours).
C. Comments Request
FHFA requests written comments on
the following: (1) Whether the collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of FHFA functions,
including whether the information has
practical utility; (2) the accuracy of
FHFA’s estimate of the burden of the
collection of information; (3) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Kevin Smith,
Chief Information Officer, Federal Housing
Finance Agency.
[FR Doc. 2021–15091 Filed 7–14–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8070–01–P
FEDERAL MEDIATION AND
CONCILIATION SERVICE
[Docket No.: FMCS–2021–2]
Availability of Draft Strategic Plan and
Request for Public Comment
Federal Mediation and
Conciliation Service (FMCS).
ACTION: Notice of availability of Draft
Strategic Plan; request for comments.
AGENCY:
The Federal Mediation and
Conciliation Service (FMCS) announces
the availability of its draft Strategic Plan
for 2022–2026. The Government
Performance and Results Act of 1993, as
amended by the GPRA Modernization
Act of 2010, requires that Federal
Agencies solicit input from interested
stakeholders when developing their
Strategic Plans. Therefore, FMCS invites
the general public and other Federal
Agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on FMCS’s draft Strategic
Plan.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Jul 14, 2021
Jkt 253001
DATES:
Comments must be submitted on
or before August 16, 2021.
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
You may send comments,
identified by FMCS–2021–2, by any of
the following methods:
• Mail: Office of Budget, FMCS, Floor
7, One Independence Square, 250 E
Street SW, Washington, DC 20427.
• Email: WShields@fmcs.gov. Include
FMCS–2021–2 on the subject line of the
message.
Please note that at this time, the
FMCS office is not open for visitors and
mail is not checked daily. Therefore, we
encourage emailed comments.
[Notice–PBS–2021–03; Docket No. 2021–
0002; Sequence No. 13]
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Will
Shields, 202–606–3635, WShields@
fmcs.gov.
FMCS’s
mission is to:
• Promote the development of sound
and stable labor management
relationships;
• Prevent or minimize work
stoppages by assisting labor and
management to settle their disputes
through mediation;
• Advocate collective bargaining,
mediation and voluntary arbitration as
the preferred processes for settling
issues between employers and
representatives of employees;
• Develop and advocate the art,
science and practice of conflict
resolution through the use of ADR;
• Assist parties in conflict through
the provision of conflict resolution
services; and
• Foster the establishment and
maintenance of constructive joint
processes to improve labor-management
relationships, employment security and
organizational effectiveness.
The draft Strategic Plan sets out how
FMCS will pursue its strategic goals and
is available at https://www.fmcs.gov/wpcontent/uploads/2021/07/2022-2026FMCS-Strategic-Plan-v02.pdf. FMCS
anticipates publishing its 2022–2026
Strategic Plan in February 2022 and
making it available on the FMCS
website, www.fmcs.gov, at that time.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: July 9, 2021.
William H. Shields,
Budget Director.
[FR Doc. 2021–15016 Filed 7–14–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6732–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Federal Management Regulation;
Designation of Federal Building
Public Buildings Service (PBS),
General Services Administration (GSA).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This bulletin announces the
designation of a Federal building.
DATES: This bulletin expires January 17,
2022. The building designation remains
in effect until canceled or superseded by
another bulletin.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
General Services Administration, Public
Buildings Service (PBS), Office of
Portfolio Management, Attn: Chandra
Kelley, 77 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta,
GA 30303, at 404–562–2763, or by email
at chandra.kelley@gsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
bulletin announces the designation of a
Federal building. Public Law 109–331,
dated October 12, 2006, designated
Building No. SC0017ZZ, located at 250
E North Street in Greenville, SC, as the
‘‘Carroll A. Campbell Jr. United States
Courthouse.’’
SUMMARY:
Katy Kale,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2021–15090 Filed 7–14–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–Y1–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Title IV–E Prevention Services
Clearinghouse Handbook of Standards
and Procedures
Administration for Children
and Families, HHS.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
AGENCY:
The Administration for
Children and Families (ACF), within the
U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS), established the Title
IV–E Prevention Services Clearinghouse
(hereafter, the Clearinghouse; https://
preventionservices.abtsites.com). This
Federal Register Notice (FRN) seeks
comments by August 16, 2021 on the
Clearinghouse’s Handbook of Standards
and Procedures, Version 1.0. Responses
to this FRN will inform potential
updates and clarifications to existing
standards and procedures. Readers are
referred to the full version of the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15JYN1.SGM
15JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 133 / Thursday, July 15, 2021 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Handbook of Standards and Procedures,
Version 1.0 on the Clearinghouse
website (https://
preventionservices.abtsites.com/reviewprocess). Specifically, feedback is
invited on each of the steps and
operational procedures of the
Prevention Services Clearinghouse
systematic review process.
DATES: The deadline for comments on
this notice is August 16, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may
submit written questions, comments,
and supplementary documents by email
to preventionservices@abtassoc.com
with ‘‘Title IV–E PSC FRN comment’’ in
the subject line. To ensure that your
comments have maximum effect, please
identify clearly the section of the
Handbook of Standards and Procedures,
Version 1.0 (https://
preventionservices.abtsites.com/reviewprocess) that your comment addresses.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1.0 Background and Legislative
Context
The Family First Prevention Services
Act (FFPSA) was signed into law as part
of the Bipartisan Budget Act (H.R. 1892)
on February 9, 2018. FFPSA amended
the Social Security Act (the Act) to
enable use of Federal funds available
under parts B and E of title IV of the
Social Security Act to provide enhanced
support to children and families and
prevent foster care placements through
the provision of evidence-based mental
health and substance abuse prevention
and treatment services, in-home parent
skill-based programs, and kinship
navigator services. As described in the
statutory language, these services and
programs are intended ‘‘for children
who are candidates for foster care or
who are pregnant or parenting foster
youth and the parents or kin caregivers
of the children.’’
The Act requires an independent
systematic review of evidence to
designate programs and services as
‘‘promising,’’ ‘‘supported,’’ and ‘‘well
supported’’ practices, defined as follows
in section 471(e)(4)(C):
• Promising Practice: ‘‘A practice
shall be considered to be a ‘promising
practice’ if the practice is superior to an
appropriate comparison practice using
conventional standards of statistical
significance (in terms of demonstrated
meaningful improvements in validated
measures of important child and parent
outcomes, such as mental health,
substance abuse, and child safety and
well-being), as established by the results
or outcomes of at least one study that—
(1) was rated by an independent
systematic review for the quality of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Jul 14, 2021
Jkt 253001
study design and execution and
determined to be well-designed and
well-executed; and (2) utilized some
form of control (such as an untreated
group, a placebo group, or a wait list
study).’’
• Supported Practice: ‘‘A practice
shall be considered to be a ‘supported
practice’ if (I) the practice is superior to
an appropriate comparison practice
using conventional standards of
statistical significance (in terms of
demonstrated meaningful improvements
in validated measures of important
child and parent outcomes, such as
mental health, substance abuse, and
child safety and well-being), as
established by the results or outcomes of
at least one study that—(aa) was rated
by an independent systematic review for
the quality of the study design and
execution and determined to be welldesigned and well-executed; (bb) was a
rigorous random-controlled trial (or, if
not available, a study using a rigorous
quasi-experimental research design);
and (cc) was carried out in a usual care
or practice setting; and (II) the study
described in sub-clause (I) established
that the practice has a sustained effect
(when compared to a control group) for
at least 6 months beyond the end of
treatment.’’
• Well-supported Practice: ‘‘A
practice shall be considered to be a
‘well-supported practice’ if (I) the
practice is superior to an appropriate
comparison practice using conventional
standards of statistical significance (in
terms of demonstrated meaningful
improvements in validated measures of
important child and parent outcomes,
such as mental health, substance abuse,
and child safety and well-being), as
established by the results or outcomes of
at least two studies that—(aa) were rated
by an independent systematic review for
the quality of the study design and
execution and determined to be welldesigned and well-executed; and (bb)
were rigorous random-controlled trials
(or, if not available, studies using a
rigorous quasi-experimental research
design); and (cc) were carried out in a
usual care or practice setting; and (II) at
least one of the studies described in subclause (I) established that the practice
has a sustained effect (when compared
to a control group) for at least 1 year
beyond the end of treatment.’’
In accordance with the statute,
practices must also meet the following
requirements:
• Book or manual: The practice has a
book, manual, or other available
writings that specify the components of
the practice protocol and describe how
to administer the practice.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
37333
• No empirical risk of harm: There is
no empirical basis suggesting that,
compared to its likely benefits, the
practice constitutes a risk of harm to
those receiving it.
• Weight of evidence supports
benefits: If multiple outcome studies
have been conducted, the overall weight
of evidence supports the benefits of the
practice.
• Reliable and valid outcome
measures: Outcome measures are
reliable and valid, and are administrated
consistently and accurately across all
those receiving the practice.
• No case data for severe or frequent
risk of harm: There is no case data
suggesting a risk of harm that was
probably caused by the treatment and
that was severe or frequent (section
471(e)(4)(C)(ii) of the Act).
In order to meet these requirements,
ACF established the Clearinghouse. The
Clearinghouse carries out a systematic
review process implemented by trained
reviewers using consistent, transparent
standards and procedures. The
Handbook of Standards and Procedures,
Version 1.0 (https://prevention
services.abtsites.com/review-process)
provides a detailed description of the
standards used to identify and review
programs and services for the
Clearinghouse and the procedures
followed by the Clearinghouse staff. The
Handbook of Standards and Procedures,
Version 1.0 was informed by public
comments submitted in response to
Federal Register Notice 83 FR 29122
(https://www.federalregister.gov/
documents/2018/06/22/2018-13420/
decisions-related-to-the-development-ofa-clearinghouse-of-evidence-basedpractices-in-accordance), consultations
with research and practice experts, and
the review processes developed and
used by other prominent evidence
clearinghouses.
2.0 Request for Information (RFI)
Through this FRN, ACF invites
feedback on the Handbook of Standards
and Procedures, Version 1.0 (https://
preventionservices.abtsites.com/reviewprocess). Specifically, feedback is
invited on each of the steps of the
Prevention Services Clearinghouse
systematic review process:
1. Identify programs and services for
review. Candidate programs and
services relevant to the mission of the
Clearinghouse are identified using an
inclusive process that invites
recommendations from stakeholders,
including states, to ensure broad
coverage across program or service areas
(Chapter 1).
2. Select and prioritize programs and
services for review. Candidate programs
E:\FR\FM\15JYN1.SGM
15JYN1
37334
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 133 / Thursday, July 15, 2021 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
and services are evaluated against the
program or service eligibility criteria
and prioritized for review (Chapter 2).
3. Literature search. Clearinghouse
staff conduct comprehensive literature
searches to locate available and relevant
research on the prioritized programs
and services (Chapter 3).
4. Study eligibility screening and
prioritization. Studies identified in the
literature searches are screened against
the study eligibility criteria. Studies
determined to be eligible for review are
considered against prioritization criteria
to determine the order and depth of
their review (Chapter 4).
5. Evidence review. All eligible
studies are reviewed by trained
reviewers using the Clearinghouse
design and execution standards. Study
authors may be queried to request
information deemed necessary to assign
a rating. One of three ratings is assigned
to prioritized studies: High, moderate,
or low support of causal evidence
(Chapter 5).
6. Program and service ratings.
Studies that are rated as high or
moderate support of causal evidence are
considered in assigning each program or
service one of four ratings: Wellsupported, supported, promising, or
does not currently meet criteria (Chapter
6). These ratings also take into
consideration any evidence of risk of
harm.
Feedback is also invited on the
operational procedures for reviewing
programs and services (Chapter 7).
Responses to this FRN will inform
ongoing discussion about potential
updates and clarifications to existing
standards and procedures. Consistent
with the practice of other prominent
federal evidence reviews, standards and
procedures may be revised over time as
research methods evolve, the needs of
the field change, and lessons are learned
during the review process. Potential
revisions to the Clearinghouse’s
standards and procedures may affect
which programs and services are
eligible or prioritized for review, which
studies of programs and services are
eligible or prioritized for review, which
studies of programs and services meet
design and execution ratings, and
program or service ratings. ACF
especially welcomes comments on how
the standards and procedures might be
revised to better reflect the goals and
requirements of the Executive Order on
Advancing Racial Equity and Support
for Underserved Communities Through
the Federal Government (https://
www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/
presidential-actions/2021/01/20/
executive-order-advancing-racialequity-and-support-for-underservedcommunities-through-the-federalgovernment/) and the President’s
Memorandum on Restoring Trust in
Government Through Scientific
Integrity and Evidence-Based
Policymaking (https://
www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/
presidential-actions/2021/01/27/
memorandum-on-restoring-trust-ingovernment-through-scientific-integrityand-evidence-based-policymaking/).
Through this FRN, ACF is soliciting
information from a broad array of
stakeholders. This FRN is one way to
ensure that activities associated with the
Title IV–E Prevention Services
Clearinghouse are transparent and build
from the existing knowledge of states,
federal agencies, researchers, evaluators,
program and service developers, key
stakeholders and experts, and the
general public. The public will have an
opportunity to comment on specific
revisions to the Clearinghouse’s
standards and procedures through a
future FRN.
To facilitate the review of
submissions, please identify the
chapter, section, and/or page number of
the Handbook of Standards and
Procedures, Version 1.0 (https://
preventionservices.abtsites.com/reviewprocess) that your comments address.
This RFI is for information and
planning purposes only and should not
be construed as a solicitation or as an
obligation on the part of ACF or HHS.
For more information about the
Prevention Services Clearinghouse,
visit: https://preventionservices.abtsites.
com.
Naomi Goldstein,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Planning,
Research, and Evaluation.
[FR Doc. 2021–15065 Filed 7–14–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Community Living
Intent To Award 54 Single-Source
Supplements for Current Senior
Medicare Patrol (SMP) State Grantees
Announcing the intent to award
54 single-source supplements for
current Senior Medicare Patrol (SMP)
state grantees.
ACTION:
The Administration for
Community Living (ACL) announces the
intent to award 54 administrative
supplements in the form of cooperative
agreements to existing SMP project
grantees to support the expansion and
enhancement of virtual capacity of the
program. This effort will benefit the
SMP programs in each state, the District
of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, and
the U.S. Virgin Islands. The purpose of
existing grantees’ work is to empower
and assist Medicare beneficiaries, their
families, and caregivers to prevent,
detect, and report health care fraud,
errors, and abuse through outreach,
counseling, and education with an
emphasis on reaching Medicare
beneficiaries with limited income and
those residing in rural areas. As a result
of the COVID–19 pandemic and related
travel and congregation limitations and
public health concerns, it has been
identified that focus on expansion of
virtual capacity is crucial at this time.
The administrative supplements for FY
2021 will be distributed at a flat rate of
$18,000 to each of the existing 54 state
grantees, bringing the total for the
supplement awards to $972,000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information or comments
regarding this program supplement,
contact Marissa Whitehouse, U.S.
Department of Health and Human
Services, Administration for
Community Living, Center for Integrated
Programs, Office of Healthcare
Information and Counseling; telephone
(202) 795–7425; email
Marissa.Whitehouse@acl.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Program Name: Senior Medicare
Patrol (SMP).
Recipient: 54 current SMP grantees.
SUMMARY:
Current grantee
State
Alabama Dept of Senior Services .................................................................................................
Alaska Department of Health and Social Services .......................................................................
Arizona Department of Economic Security ...................................................................................
Arkansas Department of Human Services ....................................................................................
Alabama ...................................
Alaska ......................................
Arizona .....................................
Arkansas ..................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Jul 14, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\15JYN1.SGM
15JYN1
FY21 ACL
recommended
supplement
amount
$18,000
18,000
18,000
18,000
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 133 (Thursday, July 15, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37332-37334]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-15065]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families
Title IV-E Prevention Services Clearinghouse Handbook of
Standards and Procedures
AGENCY: Administration for Children and Families, HHS.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Administration for Children and Families (ACF), within the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), established the
Title IV-E Prevention Services Clearinghouse (hereafter, the
Clearinghouse; https://preventionservices.abtsites.com). This Federal
Register Notice (FRN) seeks comments by August 16, 2021 on the
Clearinghouse's Handbook of Standards and Procedures, Version 1.0.
Responses to this FRN will inform potential updates and clarifications
to existing standards and procedures. Readers are referred to the full
version of the
[[Page 37333]]
Handbook of Standards and Procedures, Version 1.0 on the Clearinghouse
website (https://preventionservices.abtsites.com/review-process).
Specifically, feedback is invited on each of the steps and operational
procedures of the Prevention Services Clearinghouse systematic review
process.
DATES: The deadline for comments on this notice is August 16, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may submit written questions, comments,
and supplementary documents by email to [email protected]
with ``Title IV-E PSC FRN comment'' in the subject line. To ensure that
your comments have maximum effect, please identify clearly the section
of the Handbook of Standards and Procedures, Version 1.0 (https://preventionservices.abtsites.com/review-process) that your comment
addresses.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1.0 Background and Legislative Context
The Family First Prevention Services Act (FFPSA) was signed into
law as part of the Bipartisan Budget Act (H.R. 1892) on February 9,
2018. FFPSA amended the Social Security Act (the Act) to enable use of
Federal funds available under parts B and E of title IV of the Social
Security Act to provide enhanced support to children and families and
prevent foster care placements through the provision of evidence-based
mental health and substance abuse prevention and treatment services,
in-home parent skill-based programs, and kinship navigator services. As
described in the statutory language, these services and programs are
intended ``for children who are candidates for foster care or who are
pregnant or parenting foster youth and the parents or kin caregivers of
the children.''
The Act requires an independent systematic review of evidence to
designate programs and services as ``promising,'' ``supported,'' and
``well supported'' practices, defined as follows in section
471(e)(4)(C):
Promising Practice: ``A practice shall be considered to be
a `promising practice' if the practice is superior to an appropriate
comparison practice using conventional standards of statistical
significance (in terms of demonstrated meaningful improvements in
validated measures of important child and parent outcomes, such as
mental health, substance abuse, and child safety and well-being), as
established by the results or outcomes of at least one study that--(1)
was rated by an independent systematic review for the quality of the
study design and execution and determined to be well-designed and well-
executed; and (2) utilized some form of control (such as an untreated
group, a placebo group, or a wait list study).''
Supported Practice: ``A practice shall be considered to be
a `supported practice' if (I) the practice is superior to an
appropriate comparison practice using conventional standards of
statistical significance (in terms of demonstrated meaningful
improvements in validated measures of important child and parent
outcomes, such as mental health, substance abuse, and child safety and
well-being), as established by the results or outcomes of at least one
study that--(aa) was rated by an independent systematic review for the
quality of the study design and execution and determined to be well-
designed and well-executed; (bb) was a rigorous random-controlled trial
(or, if not available, a study using a rigorous quasi-experimental
research design); and (cc) was carried out in a usual care or practice
setting; and (II) the study described in sub-clause (I) established
that the practice has a sustained effect (when compared to a control
group) for at least 6 months beyond the end of treatment.''
Well-supported Practice: ``A practice shall be considered
to be a `well-supported practice' if (I) the practice is superior to an
appropriate comparison practice using conventional standards of
statistical significance (in terms of demonstrated meaningful
improvements in validated measures of important child and parent
outcomes, such as mental health, substance abuse, and child safety and
well-being), as established by the results or outcomes of at least two
studies that--(aa) were rated by an independent systematic review for
the quality of the study design and execution and determined to be
well-designed and well-executed; and (bb) were rigorous random-
controlled trials (or, if not available, studies using a rigorous
quasi-experimental research design); and (cc) were carried out in a
usual care or practice setting; and (II) at least one of the studies
described in sub-clause (I) established that the practice has a
sustained effect (when compared to a control group) for at least 1 year
beyond the end of treatment.''
In accordance with the statute, practices must also meet the
following requirements:
Book or manual: The practice has a book, manual, or other
available writings that specify the components of the practice protocol
and describe how to administer the practice.
No empirical risk of harm: There is no empirical basis
suggesting that, compared to its likely benefits, the practice
constitutes a risk of harm to those receiving it.
Weight of evidence supports benefits: If multiple outcome
studies have been conducted, the overall weight of evidence supports
the benefits of the practice.
Reliable and valid outcome measures: Outcome measures are
reliable and valid, and are administrated consistently and accurately
across all those receiving the practice.
No case data for severe or frequent risk of harm: There is
no case data suggesting a risk of harm that was probably caused by the
treatment and that was severe or frequent (section 471(e)(4)(C)(ii) of
the Act).
In order to meet these requirements, ACF established the
Clearinghouse. The Clearinghouse carries out a systematic review
process implemented by trained reviewers using consistent, transparent
standards and procedures. The Handbook of Standards and Procedures,
Version 1.0 (https://preventionservices.abtsites.com/review-process)
provides a detailed description of the standards used to identify and
review programs and services for the Clearinghouse and the procedures
followed by the Clearinghouse staff. The Handbook of Standards and
Procedures, Version 1.0 was informed by public comments submitted in
response to Federal Register Notice 83 FR 29122 (https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/06/22/2018-13420/decisions-related-to-the-development-of-a-clearinghouse-of-evidence-based-practices-in-accordance), consultations with research and practice
experts, and the review processes developed and used by other prominent
evidence clearinghouses.
2.0 Request for Information (RFI)
Through this FRN, ACF invites feedback on the Handbook of Standards
and Procedures, Version 1.0 (https://preventionservices.abtsites.com/review-process). Specifically, feedback is invited on each of the steps
of the Prevention Services Clearinghouse systematic review process:
1. Identify programs and services for review. Candidate programs
and services relevant to the mission of the Clearinghouse are
identified using an inclusive process that invites recommendations from
stakeholders, including states, to ensure broad coverage across program
or service areas (Chapter 1).
2. Select and prioritize programs and services for review.
Candidate programs
[[Page 37334]]
and services are evaluated against the program or service eligibility
criteria and prioritized for review (Chapter 2).
3. Literature search. Clearinghouse staff conduct comprehensive
literature searches to locate available and relevant research on the
prioritized programs and services (Chapter 3).
4. Study eligibility screening and prioritization. Studies
identified in the literature searches are screened against the study
eligibility criteria. Studies determined to be eligible for review are
considered against prioritization criteria to determine the order and
depth of their review (Chapter 4).
5. Evidence review. All eligible studies are reviewed by trained
reviewers using the Clearinghouse design and execution standards. Study
authors may be queried to request information deemed necessary to
assign a rating. One of three ratings is assigned to prioritized
studies: High, moderate, or low support of causal evidence (Chapter 5).
6. Program and service ratings. Studies that are rated as high or
moderate support of causal evidence are considered in assigning each
program or service one of four ratings: Well-supported, supported,
promising, or does not currently meet criteria (Chapter 6). These
ratings also take into consideration any evidence of risk of harm.
Feedback is also invited on the operational procedures for
reviewing programs and services (Chapter 7).
Responses to this FRN will inform ongoing discussion about
potential updates and clarifications to existing standards and
procedures. Consistent with the practice of other prominent federal
evidence reviews, standards and procedures may be revised over time as
research methods evolve, the needs of the field change, and lessons are
learned during the review process. Potential revisions to the
Clearinghouse's standards and procedures may affect which programs and
services are eligible or prioritized for review, which studies of
programs and services are eligible or prioritized for review, which
studies of programs and services meet design and execution ratings, and
program or service ratings. ACF especially welcomes comments on how the
standards and procedures might be revised to better reflect the goals
and requirements of the Executive Order on Advancing Racial Equity and
Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government
(https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/20/executive-order-advancing-racial-equity-and-support-for-underserved-communities-through-the-federal-government/) and the President's
Memorandum on Restoring Trust in Government Through Scientific
Integrity and Evidence-Based Policymaking (https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2021/01/27/memorandum-on-restoring-trust-in-government-through-scientific-integrity-and-evidence-based-policymaking/).
Through this FRN, ACF is soliciting information from a broad array
of stakeholders. This FRN is one way to ensure that activities
associated with the Title IV-E Prevention Services Clearinghouse are
transparent and build from the existing knowledge of states, federal
agencies, researchers, evaluators, program and service developers, key
stakeholders and experts, and the general public. The public will have
an opportunity to comment on specific revisions to the Clearinghouse's
standards and procedures through a future FRN.
To facilitate the review of submissions, please identify the
chapter, section, and/or page number of the Handbook of Standards and
Procedures, Version 1.0 (https://preventionservices.abtsites.com/review-process) that your comments address.
This RFI is for information and planning purposes only and should
not be construed as a solicitation or as an obligation on the part of
ACF or HHS.
For more information about the Prevention Services Clearinghouse,
visit: https://preventionservices.abtsites.com.
Naomi Goldstein,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Planning, Research, and Evaluation.
[FR Doc. 2021-15065 Filed 7-14-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-P