Notification of Policy for Flight Training in Certain Aircraft, 36493-36496 [2021-14765]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 130 / Monday, July 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: General requirements. Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
and
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
■
2021–14–12 True Flight Holdings LLC:
Amendment 39–21639; Docket No.
FAA–2021–0541; Project Identifier AD–
2021–00453–A.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Jul 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
This airworthiness directive (AD) is
effective July 27, 2021.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to True Flight Holdings
LLC Models AA–1, AA–1A, AA–1B, AA–1C,
and AA–5 airplanes, all serial numbers,
certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)
Code: 5512, Horizontal Stabilizer, Plate/Skin;
5522, Elevator, Plates/Skin Structure.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by corrosion and
delamination of the horizontal stabilizer
bondlines. The FAA is issuing this AD to
detect and address cracks, buckles, corrosion,
delamination, rust, and previous repair of the
horizontal stabilizers. The unsafe condition,
if not addressed, could result in reduced
structural integrity with consequent loss of
control of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Inspection of Bondlines of the Horizontal
Stabilizers
Within the next 25 hours time-in-service or
at the next scheduled 100 hour or annual
inspection after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs first, inspect the horizontal
stabilizers, paying particular attention to the
bondlines, for cracks, buckles, corrosion,
delamination, rust, and previous repair in
accordance with paragraphs 1. and 3. of Part
B of True Flight Aerospace Service Bulletin
SB–195, Revision A, dated June 1, 2021 (True
Flight SB–195, Revision A). If there is any
crack, buckle, corrosion, delamination, rust,
or previous repair, before further flight,
repair or replace the affected part in
accordance with paragraphs 1.c. and 2.
through 4. of True Flight SB–195, Revision A,
as applicable.
(h) No Reporting Requirement
True Flight SB–195, Revision A specifies
notifying True Flight Holdings LLC of
compliance with the service bulletin;
however, this AD does not contain that
requirement.
(i) Special Flight Permit
A special flight permit is prohibited.
■
§ 39.13
(a) Effective Date
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Atlanta ACO Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in Related Information.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36493
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(k) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Fred Caplan, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Atlanta ACO Branch, FAA, 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337;
phone: (404) 474–5507; fax: (404) 474–5606;
email: frederick.n.caplan@faa.gov.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) True Flight Aerospace Service Bulletin
SB–195, Revision A, dated June 1, 2021.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For True Flight Aerospace service
information identified in this AD, contact
True Flight Holdings LLC, 2300 Madison
Highway, Valdosta, GA 31601; phone: (229)
242–6337; email: info@
trueflightaerospace.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Policy and Innovation Division,
901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (816) 329–4148.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA,
email: fedreg.legal@nara.gov, or go to:
https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations.html.
Issued on June 25, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–14687 Filed 7–9–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Parts 61 and 141
[Docket No.: FAA–2021–0592]
Notification of Policy for Flight
Training in Certain Aircraft
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notification of policy.
AGENCY:
This notification provides
clarification on flight training for
compensation in certain aircraft that
hold special airworthiness certificates
including limited category,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\12JYR1.SGM
12JYR1
36494
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 130 / Monday, July 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
experimental category, and primary
category aircraft. It also provides
guidance on how flight training for
compensation can be accomplished in
these aircraft in compliance with
regulations and establishes a process for
owners of experimental aircraft to
obtain a letter of deviation authority to
receive and provide compensation for
flight training in their experimental
aircraft.
The policy described herein is
effective July 12, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical questions concerning this
policy notification, contact Erin Cappel
for information about Letters of
Deviation Authority and Thomas (TJ)
Leahy for information about exemption,
General Aviation and Commercial
Division, General Aviation Operations
Branch, (202) 267–1100, or email 9-AFS800-Correspondence@faa.gov, 800
Independence Ave. SW, Washington,
DC 20591.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
I. Background
On April 2, 2021, the United States
Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit dismissed a petition
for review of the FAA’s emergency cease
and desist order against Warbird
Adventures, Inc. and Thom Richard
(hereinafter ‘‘Warbirds’’), ordering that
they cease and desist from operating
their limited category aircraft in
violation of § 91.315 of title 14 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). In
this case, Warbirds maintained a
publicly available website that
advertised opportunities to fly in
Warbirds’ limited category aircraft at
upcoming airshows and allowed
members of the public to book flights in
exchange for substantial amounts of
money. Section 91.315 states that no
person may operate a limited category
aircraft carrying persons or property for
compensation or hire.
Before the Court, Warbirds argued
that it was conducting flight training for
compensation in its limited category
aircraft, which it claimed is not
prohibited under § 91.315.1 The FAA
responded that, under the plain
language of § 91.315, flight training for
compensation constitutes operating a
limited category aircraft carrying a
person for compensation or hire and,
therefore, is a violation of the
regulation. After the Court dismissed
the petition for review, several industry
groups requested that the FAA publish
1 The FAA has not conceded that the flights being
operated by Warbirds were for the purpose of flight
training.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Jul 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
a statement explaining the impact of the
decision and providing clarification
regarding flight training in general and
flight training for compensation in
certain aircraft that hold special
airworthiness certificates.2 The FAA is
issuing this notification in response to
the request from industry.
II. FAA Regulations and Guidance
A. Pilot Requirements and Operating
Requirements
The requirements for a person
exercising the privileges of a pilot
certificate or a flight instructor
certificate are generally contained in 14
CFR part 61. These regulations govern
what is required to ‘‘act as pilot in
command,’’ ‘‘serve as a required
flightcrew member,’’ or ‘‘conduct flight
training in an aircraft.’’ The regulations
in 14 CFR part 91 by contrast contain
operating requirements that govern how
the aircraft itself may be operated. The
term ‘‘operate’’ is broadly defined in 14
CFR 1.1 as ‘‘use, cause to use or
authorize to use aircraft, for the purpose
(except as provided in § 91.13 of this
chapter) of air navigation including the
piloting of aircraft, with or without the
right of legal control (as owner, lessee,
or otherwise).’’ As such, the
determination of whether someone is
operating an aircraft is not contingent
on ownership, flightcrew status, or the
receipt of payment for the use of the
aircraft.
Although a person may hold the
appropriate privileges ‘‘to act as pilot in
command’’ or ‘‘conduct flight training’’
under part 61, the regulations in part 91
may restrict the exercise of those
privileges in a particular category of
aircraft under certain conditions, such
as operations conducted for
compensation or hire. As defined, the
term ‘‘operate’’ has broader meaning
than the general terms used in part 61
that address ‘‘acting as pilot in
command’’ or ‘‘exercising the
privileges’’ of a particular pilot
certificate. A person may be considered
to ‘‘operate’’ an aircraft under the § 1.1
definition without serving as a required
flightcrew member or manipulating the
controls of the aircraft.
As noted, under § 91.315, no person
may operate a limited category aircraft
carrying persons or property for
compensation or hire. Based on the
plain language of the regulation, the
FAA’s position as represented in a 2014
2 On April 19, 2021, AOPA, EAA, and GAMA
sent a joint letter to Ali Bahrami, then Associate
Administrator for Aviation Safety. A copy of this
letter and the response has been placed in the
docket for this notification.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
legal interpretation 3 and restated in the
Warbirds case is that a flight instructor
who is operating (i.e. ‘‘using’’) a limited
category aircraft that is carrying a
person (e.g. the person receiving
instruction) for compensation (e.g.
monetary payment) is acting contrary to
the regulation.4
The regulations governing other
categories of aircraft (experimental
aircraft in § 91.319 and primary category
aircraft in § 91.325) include the same
language as the prohibition in § 91.315.
The prohibitions in §§ 91.319 and
91.325 that mirror the language in
§ 91.315 must be read to have the same
meaning.5 As such, a flight instructor
providing flight training in one of these
categories of aircraft for compensation is
acting contrary to the regulations absent
a letter of deviation authority (LODA), if
applicable, or exemption.
B. FAA Guidance on Flight Training for
Compensation in Experimental Aircraft
FAA Order 8900.1 contains guidance
for FAA inspectors that indicates that
flight training in an experimental
aircraft for compensation is permissible
without a LODA under certain
circumstances.6 The guidance states that
flight instructors may receive
compensation for providing flight
training in an experimental aircraft but
may not receive compensation for the
use of the aircraft in which they provide
that flight training unless they obtain a
LODA issued under § 91.319(h).
Likewise, the guidance states that
owners of experimental aircraft may
receive and provide compensation for
flight training in their aircraft without a
LODA, but owners may not receive
compensation for the use of their
aircraft for flight training except in
3 FAA Legal Interpretation to Gregory Morris
(October 7, 2014). The Morris Interpretation
concluded, inter alia, that § 91.315 ‘‘does not set
forth any exceptions for providing flight training for
hire in a limited category aircraft’’ and that ‘‘the
only way to provide such training is pursuant to an
exemption from this section of the regulations’’
following the procedures of 14 CFR part 11.
4 Given the broad definition of ‘‘operate’’ in § 1.1,
both the owner of a limited category aircraft seeking
flight training and the flight instructor providing
the training are considered to be operating the
aircraft. The FAA notes that the term ‘‘operate’’ has
a different meaning from the term ‘‘operational
control,’’ which is defined in § 1.1 as ‘‘the exercise
of authority over initiating, conducting or
terminating a flight.’’
5 Consistent with the position for limited category
aircraft, FAA Order 8900.1 addresses the
prohibition against the operation of an experimental
aircraft to carry persons or property for
compensation or hire. It acknowledges that the
restriction ‘‘prohibits the widespread use of
experimental aircraft for flight training for
compensation or hire.’’ FAA Order 8900.1, Vol. 3,
Chpt. 11, sec. 1, para. 3–293.
6 FAA Order 8900.1, Vol. 3, Chpt. 11, sec. 1, para.
3–292.
E:\FR\FM\12JYR1.SGM
12JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 130 / Monday, July 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
accordance with a LODA issued under
§ 91.319(h).7
The distinction set forth in FAA
Order 8900.1 is inconsistent with the
definition of ‘‘operate’’ in § 1.1 and the
plain language of § 91.319. Where a
regulation and guidance conflict, the
regulation controls.8 Accordingly,
owners of experimental aircraft and
flight instructors who have operated
experimental aircraft for the purpose of
compensated flight training without
obtaining a LODA (as allowed by FAA
guidance) will be required to obtain a
LODA to remain compliant with the
regulations.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
III. Process for Compliance
The FAA acknowledges that the
disconnect between the regulations and
the guidance to inspectors has created
confusion in industry. The FAA also
recognizes the value of specialized flight
training in aircraft that hold special
airworthiness certificates under certain
conditions. This section provides
guidance to owners of affected aircraft
and flight instructors seeking to conduct
flight training for compensation in these
aircraft.
A. Experimental Category Aircraft
In general, the FAA places limitations
on the use of aircraft that hold
experimental airworthiness certificates
because the airworthiness certification
requirements for these aircraft impose
no standard and pose unique
operational risk to the national airspace
system. FAA regulations and guidance
direct that, for most training, pilots
should use a standard category aircraft
to accomplish training rather than
aircraft that hold special airworthiness
certificates.
Section 91.319(h), however, permits a
person to apply for deviation authority
to conduct flight training in an
experimental aircraft. Currently,
individuals seeking to provide flight
training and receive compensation for
both the flight training and the use of
the experimental aircraft must submit
an application package to the Flight
Standards District Office (FSDO) in the
district in which the training will take
place. Under § 91.319(h)(2), a request for
deviation authority must contain a
complete description of the proposed
operation and justification that
establishes a level of safety equivalent to
that provided under the regulations for
7 Although there is no written guidance for
limited category and primary category aircraft, the
FAA has applied the same approach to flight
training for compensation in limited category and
primary category aircraft.
8 The FAA will revise the guidance in the 8900.1
to reflect the requirements in the regulation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Jul 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
the deviation requested. The FAA
generally limits LODAs to training that
can only be accomplished in aircraft
with experimental certificates and
directs its inspectors that, with a few
exceptions, LODAs should not be issued
to permit flight training in experimental
aircraft leading toward the issuance of a
pilot certificate, rating, or operating
privilege.
As discussed, FAA guidance
incorrectly indicates that no LODA is
necessary if the owner of an
experimental aircraft provides
compensation for flight training in the
owner’s own aircraft and no
compensation is provided for the use of
the aircraft itself. The FAA will update
the guidance to align with the
regulation, as previously discussed. To
mitigate disruption for this type of flight
training, which has been allowed under
FAA guidance and is viewed as an
increased safety measure for pilots who
regularly fly these aircraft, the FAA has
developed an interim process to issue
LODAs to the owners of experimental
aircraft and flight instructors that will
permit flight training for compensation
in experimental aircraft when no
compensation is provided for the use of
the aircraft.
The FAA finds that, for owners of
experimental aircraft seeking flight
training in the aircraft they will
regularly fly in the national airspace, the
standard under § 91.319(h)(2) for
granting a LODA has been met. The
FAA has long emphasized the
importance of pilots being trained and
checked in the aircraft they will operate.
Specifically, it is critical that pilots
understand and are familiar with the
particular systems, procedures,
operating characteristics, and
limitations of the aircraft they will
operate. This flight training is distinct
from a situation where an aircraft with
a special airworthiness certificate is
‘‘held out’’ broadly for training to
individuals who pay for both the flight
training and the use of an aircraft that
they will not have further access to
upon completion of LODA training. It is
also distinct from flight training that can
be accomplished effectively and safely
in a standard category aircraft.
The FAA will accept requests for a
LODA electronically from an owner of
an experimental aircraft or flight
instructor who chooses to conduct
training in experimental aircraft.
LODAs, once issued, will define the
scope of the flight training activity so
that owners of experimental aircraft may
receive and provide compensation for
flight training in their aircraft, as well as
permit flight instructors to receive
compensation for flight training in an
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36495
experimental aircraft. These LODAs will
prohibit owners and flight instructors
from receiving compensation for any
other use of the aircraft in which the
flight training is provided.
To obtain a LODA, owners of
experimental aircraft and flight
instructors providing flight training in
experimental aircraft may submit a
request to the following email address:
9-AVS-AFG-LODA@faa.gov. Applicants
seeking a LODA through this process
must provide the following information:
• Name
• Address
• Email address
• Pilot Certificate Number
• Flight instructor certificate number (if
applying as a Certificated Flight
Instructor (CFI))
• Aircraft Registration Number (if
applying as an owner)
• Aircraft make/model in which you
will receive or provide instruction
• Aircraft home base airport (if applying
as an owner)
The FAA will review the information
submitted and issue a LODA (via email)
that reflects the conditions and
limitations contained in this
notification, as well any additional
limitations required in accordance with
§ 91.319(h) and (i).
Individuals seeking to provide flight
training and receive compensation for
both the flight training and the use of
the aircraft must continue to apply for
LODAs through their local FSDOs.
B. Limited Category and Primary
Category Aircraft
Section 91.315 does not permit an
individual to obtain deviation authority
to conduct flight training for
compensation or hire in a limited
category aircraft. Therefore, as
explained in the 2014 legal
interpretation, the only way to provide
flight training for compensation in a
limited category aircraft is pursuant to
an exemption from the regulation.
Because there is no deviation authority
in § 91.325 for primary category aircraft,
the owners of these aircraft and flight
instructors seeking to conduct flight
training for compensation must likewise
obtain an exemption from the
regulation.
As with the process for issuing
LODAs to owners and flight instructors,
the FAA will consider adopting a fasttrack exemption process for owners of
limited category and primary category
aircraft seeking to conduct flight
training for compensation in these
aircraft. As with experimental category
aircraft, the FAA will consider granting
relief for flight training operations when
E:\FR\FM\12JYR1.SGM
12JYR1
36496
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 130 / Monday, July 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
compensation is provided solely for the
flight training and not the use of the
aircraft.
The FAA notes that any operator of a
limited category aircraft that holds an
exemption to conduct Living History of
Flight (LHFE) operations already holds
the necessary exemption relief to
conduct flight training for its flightcrew
members. LHFE exemptions grant relief
to the extent necessary to allow the
exemption holder to operate certain
aircraft for the purpose of carrying
persons for compensation or hire for
living history flight experiences. As a
condition of these exemptions, the
operators must provide regular flight
training and checking to flightcrew
members. As such, these flight training
operations are considered necessary for
the operator to conduct the LHFE flights
themselves.9 The FAA will clarify this
relief when operators apply for renewal
of their LHFE exemptions.
For the safety reasons set forth in this
notification, the FAA is considering a
rulemaking that would enable the flight
training activity discussed in this
notification without the need to obtain
an exemption or LODA from the FAA.
Issued in Washington, DC.
Ricardo Domingo,
Executive Director, Flight Standards Service,
AFX–1.
[FR Doc. 2021–14765 Filed 7–8–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Part 744
[Docket No. 210702–0143]
RIN 0694–AI57
Addition of Certain Entities to the
Entity List; Revision of Existing Entry
on the Entity List; Removal of Entity
From the Unverified List; and Addition
of Entity to the Military End-User (MEU)
List
Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule amends the
Export Administration Regulations
(EAR) by adding thirty-four entities
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
9 The FAA cautions, however, that LHFE
exemptions do not permit operators to allow
passengers on LHFE flights to manipulate the
controls of the aircraft under the guise of flight
training. The flight training relief extends only to
the LHFE operator’s own flightcrew members for
the purpose of training those individuals to conduct
LHFE flights.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Jul 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
under forty-three entries to the Entity
List. These thirty-four entities have been
determined by the U.S. Government to
be acting contrary to the foreign policy
interests of the United States and will be
listed on the Entity List under the
destinations of Canada; People’s
Republic of China (China); Iran;
Lebanon; Netherlands (The
Netherlands); Pakistan; Russia;
Singapore; South Korea; Taiwan;
Turkey; the United Arab Emirates
(UAE); and the United Kingdom. This
final rule also revises one entry on the
Entity List under the destination of
China. This final rule also removes one
entry from the Entity List under the
destination of Germany. This final rule
removes one entity from the Unverified
List, as a conforming change to this
same entity being added to the Entity
List. In addition, this final rule amends
the EAR by adding one entity to the
Military End-User (MEU) List under the
destination of Russia.
DATES: This rule is effective July 12,
2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chair, End-User Review Committee,
Office of the Assistant Secretary for
Export Administration, Bureau of
Industry and Security, Department of
Commerce, Phone: (202) 482–5991,
Email: ERC@bis.doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Entity List (supplement no. 4 to
part 744 of the EAR) identifies entities
for which there is reasonable cause to
believe, based on specific and
articulable facts, that the entities have
been involved, are involved, or pose a
significant risk of being or becoming
involved in activities contrary to the
national security or foreign policy
interests of the United States. The EAR
(15 CFR parts 730–774) impose
additional license requirements on, and
limit the availability of most license
exceptions for, exports, reexports, and
transfers (in-country) to listed entities.
The license review policy for each listed
entity is identified in the ‘‘License
Review Policy’’ column on the Entity
List, and the impact on the availability
of license exceptions is described in the
relevant Federal Register document
adding entities to the Entity List. BIS
places entities on the Entity List
pursuant to part 744 (Control Policy:
End-User and End-Use Based) and part
746 (Embargoes and Other Special
Controls) of the EAR.
The ‘Military End-User’ (MEU) List
(supplement no. 7 to part 744 of the
EAR) identifies entities that have been
determined by the End-User Review
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Committee (ERC) to be ‘military end
users’ pursuant to § 744.21 of the EAR.
That section imposes additional license
requirements on, and limits the
availability of, most license exceptions
for, exports, reexports, and transfers (incountry) to listed entities on the MEU
List, as specified in supplement no. 7 to
part 744 and § 744.21 of the EAR.
Entities may be listed on the MEU List
under the destinations of Burma, China,
Russia, or Venezuela. The license
review policy for each listed entity is
identified in the introductory text of
supplement no. 7 to part 744 and in
§ 744.21(b) and (e). The MEU List
includes introductory text, which
specifies the scope of the license
requirements, limitations on the use of
EAR license exceptions, and the license
review policy that applies to the
entities. These requirements are also
reflected in § 744.21, but for ease of
reference, these are also included in the
introductory text of the supplement.
The Unverified List, found in
supplement no. 6 to part 744 of the
EAR, contains the names and addresses
of foreign persons who are or have been
parties to a transaction, as such parties
are described in § 748.5 of the EAR,
involving the export, reexport, or
transfer (in-country) of items subject to
the EAR, and whose bona fides BIS has
been unable to verify through an enduse check. BIS may add persons to the
Unverified List when BIS or federal
officials acting on BIS’s behalf have
been unable to verify a foreign person’s
bona fides because an end-use check,
such as a pre-license check or a postshipment verification, cannot be
completed satisfactorily for reasons
outside the U.S. Government’s control.
The ERC, composed of representatives
of the Departments of Commerce
(Chair), State, Defense, Energy and,
where appropriate, the Treasury, makes
all decisions regarding additions to,
removals from, or other modifications to
the Entity List and MEU List. The ERC
makes all decisions to add an entry to
the Entity List and MEU List by majority
vote and makes all decisions to remove
or modify an entry by unanimous vote.
In addition, when an entity listed on the
Unverified List is being added to the
Entity List based on a majority vote of
the ERC, the ERC’s determination to add
that entity to the Entity List constitutes
interagency approval for a conforming
change to remove the same entity from
the Unverified List in supplement no. 6
to part 744 of the EAR.
E:\FR\FM\12JYR1.SGM
12JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 130 (Monday, July 12, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36493-36496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14765]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Parts 61 and 141
[Docket No.: FAA-2021-0592]
Notification of Policy for Flight Training in Certain Aircraft
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notification of policy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notification provides clarification on flight training
for compensation in certain aircraft that hold special airworthiness
certificates including limited category,
[[Page 36494]]
experimental category, and primary category aircraft. It also provides
guidance on how flight training for compensation can be accomplished in
these aircraft in compliance with regulations and establishes a process
for owners of experimental aircraft to obtain a letter of deviation
authority to receive and provide compensation for flight training in
their experimental aircraft.
DATES: The policy described herein is effective July 12, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical questions concerning
this policy notification, contact Erin Cappel for information about
Letters of Deviation Authority and Thomas (TJ) Leahy for information
about exemption, General Aviation and Commercial Division, General
Aviation Operations Branch, (202) 267-1100, or email [email protected], 800 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20591.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On April 2, 2021, the United States Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit dismissed a petition for review of the
FAA's emergency cease and desist order against Warbird Adventures, Inc.
and Thom Richard (hereinafter ``Warbirds''), ordering that they cease
and desist from operating their limited category aircraft in violation
of Sec. 91.315 of title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14
CFR). In this case, Warbirds maintained a publicly available website
that advertised opportunities to fly in Warbirds' limited category
aircraft at upcoming airshows and allowed members of the public to book
flights in exchange for substantial amounts of money. Section 91.315
states that no person may operate a limited category aircraft carrying
persons or property for compensation or hire.
Before the Court, Warbirds argued that it was conducting flight
training for compensation in its limited category aircraft, which it
claimed is not prohibited under Sec. 91.315.\1\ The FAA responded
that, under the plain language of Sec. 91.315, flight training for
compensation constitutes operating a limited category aircraft carrying
a person for compensation or hire and, therefore, is a violation of the
regulation. After the Court dismissed the petition for review, several
industry groups requested that the FAA publish a statement explaining
the impact of the decision and providing clarification regarding flight
training in general and flight training for compensation in certain
aircraft that hold special airworthiness certificates.\2\ The FAA is
issuing this notification in response to the request from industry.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The FAA has not conceded that the flights being operated by
Warbirds were for the purpose of flight training.
\2\ On April 19, 2021, AOPA, EAA, and GAMA sent a joint letter
to Ali Bahrami, then Associate Administrator for Aviation Safety. A
copy of this letter and the response has been placed in the docket
for this notification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. FAA Regulations and Guidance
A. Pilot Requirements and Operating Requirements
The requirements for a person exercising the privileges of a pilot
certificate or a flight instructor certificate are generally contained
in 14 CFR part 61. These regulations govern what is required to ``act
as pilot in command,'' ``serve as a required flightcrew member,'' or
``conduct flight training in an aircraft.'' The regulations in 14 CFR
part 91 by contrast contain operating requirements that govern how the
aircraft itself may be operated. The term ``operate'' is broadly
defined in 14 CFR 1.1 as ``use, cause to use or authorize to use
aircraft, for the purpose (except as provided in Sec. 91.13 of this
chapter) of air navigation including the piloting of aircraft, with or
without the right of legal control (as owner, lessee, or otherwise).''
As such, the determination of whether someone is operating an aircraft
is not contingent on ownership, flightcrew status, or the receipt of
payment for the use of the aircraft.
Although a person may hold the appropriate privileges ``to act as
pilot in command'' or ``conduct flight training'' under part 61, the
regulations in part 91 may restrict the exercise of those privileges in
a particular category of aircraft under certain conditions, such as
operations conducted for compensation or hire. As defined, the term
``operate'' has broader meaning than the general terms used in part 61
that address ``acting as pilot in command'' or ``exercising the
privileges'' of a particular pilot certificate. A person may be
considered to ``operate'' an aircraft under the Sec. 1.1 definition
without serving as a required flightcrew member or manipulating the
controls of the aircraft.
As noted, under Sec. 91.315, no person may operate a limited
category aircraft carrying persons or property for compensation or
hire. Based on the plain language of the regulation, the FAA's position
as represented in a 2014 legal interpretation \3\ and restated in the
Warbirds case is that a flight instructor who is operating (i.e.
``using'') a limited category aircraft that is carrying a person (e.g.
the person receiving instruction) for compensation (e.g. monetary
payment) is acting contrary to the regulation.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ FAA Legal Interpretation to Gregory Morris (October 7,
2014). The Morris Interpretation concluded, inter alia, that Sec.
91.315 ``does not set forth any exceptions for providing flight
training for hire in a limited category aircraft'' and that ``the
only way to provide such training is pursuant to an exemption from
this section of the regulations'' following the procedures of 14 CFR
part 11.
\4\ Given the broad definition of ``operate'' in Sec. 1.1, both
the owner of a limited category aircraft seeking flight training and
the flight instructor providing the training are considered to be
operating the aircraft. The FAA notes that the term ``operate'' has
a different meaning from the term ``operational control,'' which is
defined in Sec. 1.1 as ``the exercise of authority over initiating,
conducting or terminating a flight.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The regulations governing other categories of aircraft
(experimental aircraft in Sec. 91.319 and primary category aircraft in
Sec. 91.325) include the same language as the prohibition in Sec.
91.315. The prohibitions in Sec. Sec. 91.319 and 91.325 that mirror
the language in Sec. 91.315 must be read to have the same meaning.\5\
As such, a flight instructor providing flight training in one of these
categories of aircraft for compensation is acting contrary to the
regulations absent a letter of deviation authority (LODA), if
applicable, or exemption.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Consistent with the position for limited category aircraft,
FAA Order 8900.1 addresses the prohibition against the operation of
an experimental aircraft to carry persons or property for
compensation or hire. It acknowledges that the restriction
``prohibits the widespread use of experimental aircraft for flight
training for compensation or hire.'' FAA Order 8900.1, Vol. 3, Chpt.
11, sec. 1, para. 3-293.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. FAA Guidance on Flight Training for Compensation in Experimental
Aircraft
FAA Order 8900.1 contains guidance for FAA inspectors that
indicates that flight training in an experimental aircraft for
compensation is permissible without a LODA under certain
circumstances.\6\ The guidance states that flight instructors may
receive compensation for providing flight training in an experimental
aircraft but may not receive compensation for the use of the aircraft
in which they provide that flight training unless they obtain a LODA
issued under Sec. 91.319(h). Likewise, the guidance states that owners
of experimental aircraft may receive and provide compensation for
flight training in their aircraft without a LODA, but owners may not
receive compensation for the use of their aircraft for flight training
except in
[[Page 36495]]
accordance with a LODA issued under Sec. 91.319(h).\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ FAA Order 8900.1, Vol. 3, Chpt. 11, sec. 1, para. 3-292.
\7\ Although there is no written guidance for limited category
and primary category aircraft, the FAA has applied the same approach
to flight training for compensation in limited category and primary
category aircraft.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The distinction set forth in FAA Order 8900.1 is inconsistent with
the definition of ``operate'' in Sec. 1.1 and the plain language of
Sec. 91.319. Where a regulation and guidance conflict, the regulation
controls.\8\ Accordingly, owners of experimental aircraft and flight
instructors who have operated experimental aircraft for the purpose of
compensated flight training without obtaining a LODA (as allowed by FAA
guidance) will be required to obtain a LODA to remain compliant with
the regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The FAA will revise the guidance in the 8900.1 to reflect
the requirements in the regulation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Process for Compliance
The FAA acknowledges that the disconnect between the regulations
and the guidance to inspectors has created confusion in industry. The
FAA also recognizes the value of specialized flight training in
aircraft that hold special airworthiness certificates under certain
conditions. This section provides guidance to owners of affected
aircraft and flight instructors seeking to conduct flight training for
compensation in these aircraft.
A. Experimental Category Aircraft
In general, the FAA places limitations on the use of aircraft that
hold experimental airworthiness certificates because the airworthiness
certification requirements for these aircraft impose no standard and
pose unique operational risk to the national airspace system. FAA
regulations and guidance direct that, for most training, pilots should
use a standard category aircraft to accomplish training rather than
aircraft that hold special airworthiness certificates.
Section 91.319(h), however, permits a person to apply for deviation
authority to conduct flight training in an experimental aircraft.
Currently, individuals seeking to provide flight training and receive
compensation for both the flight training and the use of the
experimental aircraft must submit an application package to the Flight
Standards District Office (FSDO) in the district in which the training
will take place. Under Sec. 91.319(h)(2), a request for deviation
authority must contain a complete description of the proposed operation
and justification that establishes a level of safety equivalent to that
provided under the regulations for the deviation requested. The FAA
generally limits LODAs to training that can only be accomplished in
aircraft with experimental certificates and directs its inspectors
that, with a few exceptions, LODAs should not be issued to permit
flight training in experimental aircraft leading toward the issuance of
a pilot certificate, rating, or operating privilege.
As discussed, FAA guidance incorrectly indicates that no LODA is
necessary if the owner of an experimental aircraft provides
compensation for flight training in the owner's own aircraft and no
compensation is provided for the use of the aircraft itself. The FAA
will update the guidance to align with the regulation, as previously
discussed. To mitigate disruption for this type of flight training,
which has been allowed under FAA guidance and is viewed as an increased
safety measure for pilots who regularly fly these aircraft, the FAA has
developed an interim process to issue LODAs to the owners of
experimental aircraft and flight instructors that will permit flight
training for compensation in experimental aircraft when no compensation
is provided for the use of the aircraft.
The FAA finds that, for owners of experimental aircraft seeking
flight training in the aircraft they will regularly fly in the national
airspace, the standard under Sec. 91.319(h)(2) for granting a LODA has
been met. The FAA has long emphasized the importance of pilots being
trained and checked in the aircraft they will operate. Specifically, it
is critical that pilots understand and are familiar with the particular
systems, procedures, operating characteristics, and limitations of the
aircraft they will operate. This flight training is distinct from a
situation where an aircraft with a special airworthiness certificate is
``held out'' broadly for training to individuals who pay for both the
flight training and the use of an aircraft that they will not have
further access to upon completion of LODA training. It is also distinct
from flight training that can be accomplished effectively and safely in
a standard category aircraft.
The FAA will accept requests for a LODA electronically from an
owner of an experimental aircraft or flight instructor who chooses to
conduct training in experimental aircraft. LODAs, once issued, will
define the scope of the flight training activity so that owners of
experimental aircraft may receive and provide compensation for flight
training in their aircraft, as well as permit flight instructors to
receive compensation for flight training in an experimental aircraft.
These LODAs will prohibit owners and flight instructors from receiving
compensation for any other use of the aircraft in which the flight
training is provided.
To obtain a LODA, owners of experimental aircraft and flight
instructors providing flight training in experimental aircraft may
submit a request to the following email address: [email protected]. Applicants seeking a LODA through this process must
provide the following information:
Name
Address
Email address
Pilot Certificate Number
Flight instructor certificate number (if applying as a
Certificated Flight Instructor (CFI))
Aircraft Registration Number (if applying as an owner)
Aircraft make/model in which you will receive or provide
instruction
Aircraft home base airport (if applying as an owner)
The FAA will review the information submitted and issue a LODA (via
email) that reflects the conditions and limitations contained in this
notification, as well any additional limitations required in accordance
with Sec. 91.319(h) and (i).
Individuals seeking to provide flight training and receive
compensation for both the flight training and the use of the aircraft
must continue to apply for LODAs through their local FSDOs.
B. Limited Category and Primary Category Aircraft
Section 91.315 does not permit an individual to obtain deviation
authority to conduct flight training for compensation or hire in a
limited category aircraft. Therefore, as explained in the 2014 legal
interpretation, the only way to provide flight training for
compensation in a limited category aircraft is pursuant to an exemption
from the regulation. Because there is no deviation authority in Sec.
91.325 for primary category aircraft, the owners of these aircraft and
flight instructors seeking to conduct flight training for compensation
must likewise obtain an exemption from the regulation.
As with the process for issuing LODAs to owners and flight
instructors, the FAA will consider adopting a fast-track exemption
process for owners of limited category and primary category aircraft
seeking to conduct flight training for compensation in these aircraft.
As with experimental category aircraft, the FAA will consider granting
relief for flight training operations when
[[Page 36496]]
compensation is provided solely for the flight training and not the use
of the aircraft.
The FAA notes that any operator of a limited category aircraft that
holds an exemption to conduct Living History of Flight (LHFE)
operations already holds the necessary exemption relief to conduct
flight training for its flightcrew members. LHFE exemptions grant
relief to the extent necessary to allow the exemption holder to operate
certain aircraft for the purpose of carrying persons for compensation
or hire for living history flight experiences. As a condition of these
exemptions, the operators must provide regular flight training and
checking to flightcrew members. As such, these flight training
operations are considered necessary for the operator to conduct the
LHFE flights themselves.\9\ The FAA will clarify this relief when
operators apply for renewal of their LHFE exemptions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The FAA cautions, however, that LHFE exemptions do not
permit operators to allow passengers on LHFE flights to manipulate
the controls of the aircraft under the guise of flight training. The
flight training relief extends only to the LHFE operator's own
flightcrew members for the purpose of training those individuals to
conduct LHFE flights.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the safety reasons set forth in this notification, the FAA is
considering a rulemaking that would enable the flight training activity
discussed in this notification without the need to obtain an exemption
or LODA from the FAA.
Issued in Washington, DC.
Ricardo Domingo,
Executive Director, Flight Standards Service, AFX-1.
[FR Doc. 2021-14765 Filed 7-8-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P