Air Plan Approval; California; El Dorado County Air Quality Management District; South Coast Air Quality Management District, 36227-36229 [2021-14407]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 129 / Friday, July 9, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Ave. SW, LBJ, Room 6W208D,
Washington, DC 20202–8240.
Note: The Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs in OMB and the
Department review all comments related
36227
to the information collection activities
posted at www.regulations.gov.
COLLECTION OF INFORMATION
Estimated
number
responses
Information collection
activity
Total
estimated
burden hours
Estimated cost
at an hourly
rate of $90.22
LEA Completion of Forms and Applications to SEA .......................................
SEA ARP–HCY Plans .....................................................................................
15,000
52
7.5
22
112,500
1,144
$10,150,000
103,300
Annualized Total .......................................................................................
15,052
........................
113,644
10,253,300
Intergovernmental Review
The ARP–HCY program is not subject
to Executive Order 12372 and the
regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
Accessible Format: On request to the
program contact person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
individuals with disabilities can obtain
this document in an accessible format.
The Department will provide the
requestor with an accessible format that
may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or
text format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3
file, braille, large print, audiotape, or
compact disc, or other accessible format.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. You may access the official
edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations at
www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can
view this document, as well as all other
documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or portable document format (PDF).
To use PDF you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Ian Rosenblum,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and
Programs, Delegated the Authority to Perform
the Functions and Duties of the Assistant
Secretary, Office of Elementary and
Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2021–14705 Filed 7–8–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Hours per
response
Local agency
EDCAQMD ................................
SCAQMD ..................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:58 Jul 08, 2021
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2020–0543; FRL–10024–
68–Region 9]
Air Plan Approval; California; El
Dorado County Air Quality
Management District; South Coast Air
Quality Management District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve revisions to the El Dorado
County Air Quality Management District
(EDCAQMD) and the South Coast Air
Quality Management District
(SCAQMD) portions of the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern emissions of volatile
organic compounds (VOC) from
architectural coatings and a rule that
provides definitions for certain terms
that are necessary for the
implementation of local rules that
regulate sources of air pollution. We are
approving rules to regulate these
emission sources under the Clean Air
Act (CAA or the Act).
DATES: This rule is effective August 9,
2021.
SUMMARY:
The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2020–0543. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
ADDRESSES:
Rule #
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA
94105. By phone: (415) 972–3024 or by
email at Lazarus.Arnold@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On March 9, 2021 (86 FR 13514), the
EPA proposed to approve the following
rules into the California SIP.
Revised/
amended
Rule title
215
102
Jkt 253001
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information. If
you need assistance in a language other
than English or if you are a person with
disabilities who needs a reasonable
accommodation at no cost to you, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Architectural Coatings ..................................................................
Definition of Terms .......................................................................
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\09JYR1.SGM
09JYR1
08/25/2020
01/10/2020
Submitted
09/21/2020
09/16/2020
36228
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 129 / Friday, July 9, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
We proposed to approve these rules
because we determined that they
comply with the relevant CAA
requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the rules
and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. We
received three comments during the
comment period and each one was
supportive of the proposed action.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that
change our assessment of the rules as
described in our proposed action.
Therefore, as authorized in section
110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully
approving these rules into the California
SIP. The August 25, 2020 version of
Rule 215 and the January10, 2020
version of Rule 102 will replace the
previously approved versions of these
rules in the SIP.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
EDCAPCD and the SCAQMD rules
described in the amendments to 40 CFR
part 52 set forth below. The EPA has
made, and will continue to make, these
documents available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region IX Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:58 Jul 08, 2021
Jkt 253001
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by September 7,
2021. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality
of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time
within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: June 30, 2021.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(207)(i)(B)(6),
(c)(345)(i)(A)(3), and (c)(556) and (557)
to read as follows:
■
§ 52.220
Identification of plan-in part.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(207) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) * * *
(6) Previously approved on July 18,
1996 in paragraph (c)(207)(i)(B)(3) of
this section and now deleted with
replacement in (c)(557)(i)(A)(1), Rule
215, adopted on September 27, 1994.
*
*
*
*
*
(345) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(3) Previously approved on January 8,
2007 in paragraph (c)(345)(i)(A)(1) of
this section and now deleted with
E:\FR\FM\09JYR1.SGM
09JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 129 / Friday, July 9, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
replacement in (c)(556)(i)(A)(1), Rule
102, adopted on December 3, 2004.
*
*
*
*
*
(556) The following rule was
submitted on September 16, 2020, by
the Governor’s designee as an
attachment to a letter dated September
16, 2020.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A)
South Coast Air Quality Management
District.
(1) Rule 102, ‘‘Definition of Terms,’’
adopted on January 10, 2020.
(2) [Reserved]
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) [Reserved]
(557) The following rule was
submitted on September 21, 2020, by
the Governor’s designee as an
attachment to a letter dated September
18, 2020.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) El
Dorado County Air Quality Management
District.
(1) Rule 215, ‘‘Architectural
Coatings,’’ adopted on August 25, 2020.
(2) [Reserved]
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) [Reserved]
[FR Doc. 2021–14407 Filed 7–8–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Parts 204, 212, and 252
[Docket DARS–2020–0007]
RIN 0750–AK30
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: Data
Collection and Inventory for Services
Contracts (DFARS Case 2018–D063)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is issuing a final rule
amending the Defense Federal
Acquisition Regulation Supplement to
implement a section of the United States
Code that requires the collection of data
on certain DoD service contracts.
DATES: Effective July 9, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Carrie Moore, telephone 571–372–6093.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services
42 CFR Part 510
[CMS–5529–F]
RIN 0938–AU01
Medicare Program: Comprehensive
Care for Joint Replacement Model
Three-Year Extension and Changes to
Episode Definition and Pricing;
Medicare and Medicaid Programs;
Policies and Regulatory Revisions in
Response to the COVID–19 Public
Health Emergency
Correction
In rule document 2021–09097,
appearing on pages 23496 through
23576 in the issue of Monday, May 3,
2021 make the following corrections.
§ 510.400
[Amended]
1. On page 23574, in the second
column, in paragraph (b)(4)(ii)(A), on
the second line, ‘‘•80%’’ should read
‘‘≥80%’’.
■ 2. On the same page, in the same
column, in the same paragraph, on the
third line, ‘‘•300’’ should read ‘‘≥300’’.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
■
[FR Doc. C1–2021–09097 Filed 7–8–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 0099–10–D
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:58 Jul 08, 2021
Jkt 253001
DoD published a proposed rule in the
Federal Register at 85 FR 34569 on June
5, 2020, to implement 10 U.S.C. 2330a,
as amended by section 812 of the
National Defense Authorization Act
(NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 (Pub.
L. 114–328), which requires DoD to
establish a data collection system to
provide certain management
information with regard to an awarded
contract or task order that is valued in
excess of $3 million and is for the
following service acquisition portfolio
groups: Logistics management services,
equipment-related services, knowledgebased services, or electronics and
communications services.
DoD published a prior proposed rule
under DFARS Case 2012–D051 in the
Federal Register at 79 FR 32522 on June
5, 2014, to implement 10 U.S.C. 2330a
(section 807 of the NDAA for FY 2008),
which required DoD to establish a data
collection system to provide certain data
on the purchasing of services by DoD
and to submit to Congress an annual
inventory of services contracts awarded
by or on behalf of DoD. The proposed
rule for DFARS Case 2012–D051
required contractors to enter the
required data into a DoD-unique system,
Enterprise Contractor Manpower
Reporting Application (ECMRA). In
response to public comments received
in response to the proposed rule for
DFARS Case 2012–D051, DoD made the
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
36229
following changes in the proposed rule
for DFARS Case 2018–D063:
• DoD has adopted the service
contract reporting process used by other
Federal agencies and no longer requires
contractor reporting in ECMRA. This
change enables DoD to use the Federal
Procurement Data System (FPDS) to
obtain a majority of the information
required by 10 U.S.C. 2330a. FPDS does
not provide data on the direct labor
hours expended and dollar amounts
invoiced for contracted services.
Therefore, both the proposed and final
rules require applicable contractors to
enter the labor hours and dollar
amounts in SAM, which is the process
used by other Federal agencies, in
accordance with Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) subpart 4.17.
• To relieve burden and minimize
impact for contractors and
subcontractors, both the proposed and
final rules require contractors to report
the total number of hours worked (both
contractor and subcontractor) under the
contract for the entire fiscal year and
does not require a breakdown of those
hours by employee type or by
subcontractor. The requirement to
report subcontractor data is limited to
first-tier subcontractors, consistent with
the FAR requirement for service
contract reporting. The proposed and
final rules leave the process for
collecting subcontractor data up to the
discretion of each contractor; the rules
do not prescribe a specific methodology
that contractors must use to gather this
data on applicable subcontracts, or
prescribe a reporting requirement for
subcontractors via the flow-down of the
contract clause.
• The estimated burdens for
respondents and responses published in
the proposed rule for DFARS Case
2021–D051 have been updated to reflect
the revised requirements of 10 U.S.C.
2330a, as amended.
The following is a summary of the
public comments received in response
to the proposed rule for DFARS Case
2012–D051:
A. Exemptions
Comment: Several respondents
recommended that the rule exempt
certain areas including: Research and
development projects; architect and
engineering services;
telecommunications and transmission
and internet; and actions using criteria
similar to the Service Contract Labor
Standards exemptions in FAR 22.1003–
4(d)(1).
Response: The proposed rule for
DFARS Case 2018–D063 implements 10
U.S.C. 2330a, as amended by section
812 of the NDAA for FY 2017, which
E:\FR\FM\09JYR1.SGM
09JYR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 129 (Friday, July 9, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36227-36229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14407]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2020-0543; FRL-10024-68-Region 9]
Air Plan Approval; California; El Dorado County Air Quality
Management District; South Coast Air Quality Management District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve revisions to the El Dorado County Air Quality
Management District (EDCAQMD) and the South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD) portions of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern emissions of
volatile organic compounds (VOC) from architectural coatings and a rule
that provides definitions for certain terms that are necessary for the
implementation of local rules that regulate sources of air pollution.
We are approving rules to regulate these emission sources under the
Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).
DATES: This rule is effective August 9, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2020-0543. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information. If you need assistance
in a language other than English or if you are a person with
disabilities who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you,
please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone: (415) 972-3024 or by
email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On March 9, 2021 (86 FR 13514), the EPA proposed to approve the
following rules into the California SIP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Revised/
Local agency Rule # Rule title amended Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EDCAQMD................................. 215 Architectural Coatings..... 08/25/2020 09/21/2020
SCAQMD.................................. 102 Definition of Terms........ 01/10/2020 09/16/2020
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 36228]]
We proposed to approve these rules because we determined that they
comply with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action contains
more information on the rules and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
We received three comments during the comment period and each one was
supportive of the proposed action.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that change our assessment of the rules
as described in our proposed action. Therefore, as authorized in
section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving these rules
into the California SIP. The August 25, 2020 version of Rule 215 and
the January10, 2020 version of Rule 102 will replace the previously
approved versions of these rules in the SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
EDCAPCD and the SCAQMD rules described in the amendments to 40 CFR part
52 set forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these
documents available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region
IX Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 7, 2021. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: June 30, 2021.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(207)(i)(B)(6),
(c)(345)(i)(A)(3), and (c)(556) and (557) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan-in part.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(207) * * *
(i) * * *
(B) * * *
(6) Previously approved on July 18, 1996 in paragraph
(c)(207)(i)(B)(3) of this section and now deleted with replacement in
(c)(557)(i)(A)(1), Rule 215, adopted on September 27, 1994.
* * * * *
(345) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(3) Previously approved on January 8, 2007 in paragraph
(c)(345)(i)(A)(1) of this section and now deleted with
[[Page 36229]]
replacement in (c)(556)(i)(A)(1), Rule 102, adopted on December 3,
2004.
* * * * *
(556) The following rule was submitted on September 16, 2020, by
the Governor's designee as an attachment to a letter dated September
16, 2020.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) South Coast Air Quality
Management District.
(1) Rule 102, ``Definition of Terms,'' adopted on January 10, 2020.
(2) [Reserved]
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) [Reserved]
(557) The following rule was submitted on September 21, 2020, by
the Governor's designee as an attachment to a letter dated September
18, 2020.
(i) Incorporation by reference. (A) El Dorado County Air Quality
Management District.
(1) Rule 215, ``Architectural Coatings,'' adopted on August 25,
2020.
(2) [Reserved]
(B) [Reserved]
(ii) [Reserved]
[FR Doc. 2021-14407 Filed 7-8-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
