Glycine From India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2020, 35733-35735 [2021-14450]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
35733
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 7, 2021 / Notices
CHILD AND ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM (CACFP)—Continued
[Per meal rates in whole or fractions of U.S. dollars; effective from July 1, 2021–June 30, 2022]
Centers
Breakfast
FREE ....................................................................................................................................
ALASKA:
PAID .....................................................................................................................................
REDUCED PRICE ................................................................................................................
FREE ....................................................................................................................................
HAWAII:
PAID .....................................................................................................................................
REDUCED PRICE ................................................................................................................
FREE ....................................................................................................................................
Breakfast
Lunch and
supper 1
Supplement
1.97
3.66
1.00
0.50
2.85
3.15
0.57
5.54
5.94
0.14
0.81
1.63
0.38
1.99
2.29
0.41
3.88
4.28
0.10
0.58
1.17
Lunch and supper
Supplement
Day care homes
Tier I
CONTIGUOUS STATES ..........................
ALASKA ...................................................
HAWAII ....................................................
Tier II
1.40
2.23
1.63
Tier I
0.51
0.79
0.58
Administrative reimbursement rates for sponsoring
organizations of day care homes
(per home/per month rates in U.S. dollars)
Tier II
2.63
4.26
3.08
Initial 50
CONTINGUOUS STATES ...............................................................................
ALASKA ...........................................................................................................
HAWAII ............................................................................................................
Tier I
1.59
2.57
1.86
Next 150
126
204
147
96
155
112
Tier II
0.78
1.27
0.91
Next 800
75
121
88
0.21
0.35
0.25
Each
additional
66
107
77
1 These rates do not include the value of USDA Foods or cash-in-lieu of USDA Foods which institutions receive as additional assistance for
each CACFP lunch or supper served to participants. A notice announcing the value of USDA Foods and cash-in-lieu of USDA Foods is published separately in the Federal Register.
This action is not a rule as defined by
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601–612) and thus is exempt from the
provisions of that Act. This notice has
been determined to be exempt under
Executive Order 12866.
CACFP is listed in the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance under No.
10.558 and is subject to the provisions
of Executive Order 12372, which
requires intergovernmental consultation
with State and local officials. (See 2 CFR
415.3–415.6).
This notice imposes no new reporting
or recordkeeping provisions that are
subject to OMB review in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3518).
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Authority: Sections 4(b)(2), 11a, 17(c) and
17(f)(3)(B) of the Richard B. Russell National
School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1753(b)(2),
1759a, 1766(f)(3)(B)) and section 4(b)(1)(B) of
the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C.
1773(b)(1)(B)).
Cynthia Long,
Acting Administrator, USDA Food and
Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–14435 Filed 7–6–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–883]
Glycine From India: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2018–2020
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) preliminarily finds that
producers or exporters subject to this
administrative review made sales of
subject merchandise at less than normal
value during the period of review
October 31, 2018, through May 31, 2020.
We invite interested parties to comment
on these preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable July 7, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Preston Cox or Yang Jin Chun, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–5041 or (202) 482–5760,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On August 6, 2020, Commerce
initiated the administrative review of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Jul 06, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the antidumping duty order on glycine
from India.1 On March 25, 2021,
Commerce extended the time limit for
these preliminary results to June 30,
2021, in accordance with section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act).2
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order
is glycine. For a complete description of
the scope of this administrative review,
see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.3
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review
in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of
the Act. Export price and constructed
export price are calculated in
accordance with section 772 of the Act.
Normal value is calculated in
accordance with section 773 of the Act.
For a full description of the
methodology underlying our
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR
47731, 47734 (August 6, 2020) (Initiation Notice).
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Glycine from India:
Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated
March 25, 2021.
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Glycine from India:
Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018–
2020,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum).
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
35734
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 7, 2021 / Notices
conclusions, see Preliminary Decision
Memorandum. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is made available to the
public via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be found at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/
index.html. A list of the topics
discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is attached as an
appendix to this notice.
Rates for Non-Selected Respondents
The statute and Commerce’s
regulations do not address the
establishment of a rate to be applied to
companies not selected for examination
when Commerce limits its examination
in an administrative review pursuant to
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally,
Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of
the Act, which provides instructions for
calculating the all-others rate in a
market economy investigation, for
guidance when calculating the rate for
companies which were not selected for
individual examination in an
administrative review. For the
respondents that were not selected for
individual examination in this
administrative review, we have assigned
to them the simple average of the
margins for Avid Organics Private
Limited and Kumar Industries/Rudraa
International, consistent with the
guidance in section 735(c)(5)(B) of the
Act.4
Preliminary Results of Review
We preliminarily determine that the
following estimated weighted-average
dumping margins exist for the period
October 31, 2018, through May 31, 2020.
Estimated
weightedaverage
dumping
margin
(percent)
Producer/exporter
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Avid Organics Private Limited ...............
Kumar Industries/Rudraa International
Mulji Mehta Enterprises ........................
Mulji Mehta Pharma ..............................
Paras Intermediates Private Ltd ...........
Studio Disrupt ........................................
0.00
13.61
6.81
6.81
6.81
6.81
Disclosure and Public Comment
We intend to disclose the calculations
performed to parties in this
administrative review within five days
after public announcement of the
4 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 9 for
more details.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Jul 06, 2021
Jkt 253001
preliminary results in accordance with
19 CFR 351.224(b).
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c),
interested parties may submit case briefs
no later than 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice. Rebuttal
briefs, limited to issues raised in the
case briefs, may be filed not later than
seven days after the date for filing case
briefs.5 Commerce has modified certain
of its requirements for serving
documents containing business
proprietary information until further
notice.6 Parties who submit case briefs
or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are
encouraged to submit with each
argument: (1) A statement of the issue;
(2) a brief summary of the argument;
and (3) a table of authorities.7
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c),
interested parties who wish to request a
hearing must submit a written request to
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance, filed electronically via
ACCESS. Requests should contain: (1)
The party’s name, address and
telephone number; (2) the number of
participants; and (3) a list of issues to be
discussed. Issues raised in the hearing
will be limited to those raised in the
respective case briefs. If a request for a
hearing is made, Commerce intends to
hold the hearing at a time and date to
be determined. An electronically filed
hearing request must be received
successfully in its entirety by
Commerce’s electronic records system,
ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time
within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice.8
Commerce intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review,
including the results of its analysis of
the issues raised in any written briefs,
no later than 120 days after the date of
publication of this notice, unless
extended, pursuant to section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Organics Private Limited or Kumar
Industries/Rudraa International is not
zero or de minimis in the final results
of this review, we will calculate, for
each company, an importer-specific
assessment rate on the basis of the ratio
of the total amount of dumping
calculated for each importer’s examined
sales and the total entered value of such
sales in accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(1).9 If any of these
companies’ weighted-average dumping
margin is zero or de minimis in the final
results of review, or if an importerspecific assessment rate for one of these
companies is zero or de minimis,
Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate
appropriate entries without regards to
antidumping duties.10 For entries of
subject merchandise during the period
of review produced by any of these
companies for which it did not know its
merchandise was destined for the
United States, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries.11
Consistent with its recent notice,12
Commerce intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35
days after the date of publication of the
final results of this review in the
Federal Register. If a timely summons is
filed at the U.S. Court of International
Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant
entries until the time for parties to file
a request for a statutory injunction has
expired (i.e., within 90 days of
publication). The final results of this
administrative review shall be the basis
for the assessment of antidumping
duties on entries of merchandise under
review and for future cash deposits of
estimated antidumping duties, where
applicable.
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of the final results,
Commerce shall determine and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries. If the weightedaverage dumping margin for Avid
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication in the Federal Register of
the notice of final results of
administrative review for all shipments
of glycine from India entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of
publication as provided by section
751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit
5 See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Temporary Rule
Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to
COVID–19, 85 FR 17006, 17007 (March 26, 2020)
(‘‘To provide adequate time for release of case briefs
via ACCESS, E&C intends to schedule the due date
for all rebuttal briefs to be 7 days after case briefs
are filed (while these modifications remain in
effect).’’)
6 See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service
Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of
Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020).
7 See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing
requirements).
8 See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
9 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103
(February 14, 2012).
10 Id. at 8102–03; see also 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
11 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
12 See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue
Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in
Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January
15, 2021).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 7, 2021 / Notices
rate for companies subject to this review
will be equal to the company-specific
weighted-average dumping margin
established in the final results of the
review; (2) for merchandise exported by
a company not covered in this review
but covered in a prior segment of the
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate
published in the completed segment for
the most recent period; (3) if the
exporter is not a firm covered in this
review, a prior review, or the original
investigation but the producer is, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate
established in the completed segment
for the most recent period for the
producer of the merchandise; (4) the
cash deposit rate for all other producers
or exporters will be 7.23 percent, the allothers rate established in the less-thanfair-value investigation, adjusted for the
export-subsidy rate in the companion
countervailing duty investigation.13
These cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.221.
Dated: June 30, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Affiliation and Collapsing
V. Application of Facts Available and
Adverse Inferences
VI. Rate for Non-Selected Respondents
VII. Discussion of the Methodology
VIII. Currency Conversion
13 See Glycine from India and Japan: Amended
Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination
and Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR 29170, 29171
(June 21, 2019).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Jul 06, 2021
Jkt 253001
IX. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2021–14450 Filed 7–6–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–054]
Certain Aluminum Foil From the
People’s Republic of China:
Preliminary Results of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review and
Rescission of Review, in Part; 2019
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) preliminarily determines
that producers and exporters of certain
aluminum foil (aluminum foil) from the
People’s Republic of China (China)
received countervailable subsidies
during the period of review (POR),
January 1, 2019, through December 31,
2019.
DATES: Applicable July 7, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tyler Weinhold, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1121.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On April 19, 2018, Commerce
published in the Federal Register the
countervailing duty order on aluminum
foil from China.1 On April 1, 2020,
Commerce published in the Federal
Register a notice inviting interested
parties to request a review of the Order
for the POR. On April 30, 2020, we
received timely review requests for 33
companies.2 On June 8, 2020,
1 See Certain Aluminum Foil from the People’s
Republic of China: Amended Final Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determination and
Countervailing Duty Order, 83 FR 17360 (April 19,
2018) (Order).
2 See Petitioners’ Letter ‘‘Countervailing Duty
Order on Certain Aluminum Foil from the People’s
Republic of China—Petitioners’ Request for 2019/
2020 Administrative Review,’’ dated April 30, 2020
(Petitioners’ Review Request); Valeo’s Letter
‘‘Aluminum Foil from the People’s Republic of
China: Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated
April 30, 2020 (Valeo’s Review Request); Xiashun’s
Letter, ‘‘Aluminum Foil from the People’s Republic
of China: Request for Administrative Review,’’
dated April 30, 2020 (Xiashun’s Review Request);
Dingsheng Companies’ Letter, ‘‘Request for
Administrative Review of the Countervailing Duty
Order on Aluminum Foil from the People’s
Republic of China (C–570–054),’’ dated April 30,
2020 (Dingsheng Companies’ Review Request); and
Zhongji Companies’ Letter, ‘‘Certain Aluminum
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35735
Commerce published a notice of
initiation of an administrative review of
the Order, covering the requested
companies.3 On July 21, 2020,
Commerce tolled all deadlines in
administrative reviews by 60 days,
thereby extending the deadline for the
preliminary results until March 1,
2021.4 As explained below, on
September 8, 2020, the Aluminum
Association Trade Enforcement Working
Group (the petitioners) withdrew their
review requests with respect to certain
companies.5 On February 26, 2021,
Commerce fully extended the deadline
for these preliminary results until June
29, 2021.6
For a complete description of the
events that followed the initiation of
this review, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.7 A list of topics
discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is included as an
appendix to this notice. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
Scope of the Order
The product covered by the Order is
aluminum foil from China. For a
complete description of the scope of the
Order, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review
in accordance with section 751(a)(l)(A)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
Foil from the Peoples Republic of China: Request
for Second Administrative Review,’’ (Zhongji
Companies’ Review Request).
3 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR
35068 (June 8, 2020) (Initiation Notice).
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews,’’ dated July 21, 2020.
5 The petitioners withdrew their requests for
review of all companies for which they had
requested a review, except those companies covered
by other parties’ review requests. See Petitioners’
Letter, ‘‘2nd Administrative Review of the
Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Aluminum
Foil from the People’s Republic of China—
Petitioners’ Withdrawal of Certain Requests for
Administrative Reviews,’’ dated September 8, 2020
(Petitioner’s Withdrawal of Review Requests).
6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Aluminum Foil
from the People’s Republic of China: Extension of
Deadline for Preliminary Results of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review; 2019,’’ dated February
26, 2021.
7 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
E:\FR\FM\07JYN1.SGM
07JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 127 (Wednesday, July 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35733-35735]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14450]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-533-883]
Glycine From India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2018-2020
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily finds that
producers or exporters subject to this administrative review made sales
of subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period of
review October 31, 2018, through May 31, 2020. We invite interested
parties to comment on these preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable July 7, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Preston Cox or Yang Jin Chun, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5041 or (202) 482-5760,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 6, 2020, Commerce initiated the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on glycine from India.\1\ On March 25, 2021,
Commerce extended the time limit for these preliminary results to June
30, 2021, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 47731, 47734 (August 6, 2020)
(Initiation Notice).
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Glycine from India: Extension of Deadline
for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,''
dated March 25, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to the order is glycine. For a complete
description of the scope of this administrative review, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Glycine from India: Decision Memorandum
for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review;
2018-2020,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section
751(a)(2) of the Act. Export price and constructed export price are
calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value is
calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full
description of the methodology underlying our
[[Page 35734]]
conclusions, see Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is made available to the
public via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is
available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition,
a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be found
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. A list of the topics
discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as an
appendix to this notice.
Rates for Non-Selected Respondents
The statute and Commerce's regulations do not address the
establishment of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for
examination when Commerce limits its examination in an administrative
review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, Commerce
looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for
calculating the all-others rate in a market economy investigation, for
guidance when calculating the rate for companies which were not
selected for individual examination in an administrative review. For
the respondents that were not selected for individual examination in
this administrative review, we have assigned to them the simple average
of the margins for Avid Organics Private Limited and Kumar Industries/
Rudraa International, consistent with the guidance in section
735(c)(5)(B) of the Act.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 9 for more details.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Preliminary Results of Review
We preliminarily determine that the following estimated weighted-
average dumping margins exist for the period October 31, 2018, through
May 31, 2020.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated
weighted-
average
Producer/exporter dumping
margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Avid Organics Private Limited............................... 0.00
Kumar Industries/Rudraa International....................... 13.61
Mulji Mehta Enterprises..................................... 6.81
Mulji Mehta Pharma.......................................... 6.81
Paras Intermediates Private Ltd............................. 6.81
Studio Disrupt.............................................. 6.81
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure and Public Comment
We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this
administrative review within five days after public announcement of the
preliminary results in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case
briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this
notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs,
may be filed not later than seven days after the date for filing case
briefs.\5\ Commerce has modified certain of its requirements for
serving documents containing business proprietary information until
further notice.\6\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in
this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A
statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a
table of authorities.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Temporary Rule Modifying AD/
CVD Service Requirements Due to COVID-19, 85 FR 17006, 17007 (March
26, 2020) (``To provide adequate time for release of case briefs via
ACCESS, E&C intends to schedule the due date for all rebuttal briefs
to be 7 days after case briefs are filed (while these modifications
remain in effect).'')
\6\ See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due
to COVID-19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10,
2020).
\7\ See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to
request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via
ACCESS. Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and
telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of
issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to
those raised in the respective case briefs. If a request for a hearing
is made, Commerce intends to hold the hearing at a time and date to be
determined. An electronically filed hearing request must be received
successfully in its entirety by Commerce's electronic records system,
ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of
publication of this notice.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce intends to issue the final results of this administrative
review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in
any written briefs, no later than 120 days after the date of
publication of this notice, unless extended, pursuant to section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of the final results, Commerce shall determine and
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess antidumping
duties on all appropriate entries. If the weighted-average dumping
margin for Avid Organics Private Limited or Kumar Industries/Rudraa
International is not zero or de minimis in the final results of this
review, we will calculate, for each company, an importer-specific
assessment rate on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of
dumping calculated for each importer's examined sales and the total
entered value of such sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).\9\
If any of these companies' weighted-average dumping margin is zero or
de minimis in the final results of review, or if an importer-specific
assessment rate for one of these companies is zero or de minimis,
Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without
regards to antidumping duties.\10\ For entries of subject merchandise
during the period of review produced by any of these companies for
which it did not know its merchandise was destined for the United
States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted-
Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping
Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 (February 14,
2012).
\10\ Id. at 8102-03; see also 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
\11\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consistent with its recent notice,\12\ Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date
of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal
Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of
International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to
liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request
for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of
publication). The final results of this administrative review shall be
the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of
merchandise under review and for future cash deposits of estimated
antidumping duties, where applicable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue
Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in Applicable Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January
15, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication in the Federal Register of the notice of final results of
administrative review for all shipments of glycine from India entered,
or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of
publication as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash
deposit
[[Page 35735]]
rate for companies subject to this review will be equal to the company-
specific weighted-average dumping margin established in the final
results of the review; (2) for merchandise exported by a company not
covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of the
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-
specific rate published in the completed segment for the most recent
period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a
prior review, or the original investigation but the producer is, the
cash deposit rate will be the rate established in the completed segment
for the most recent period for the producer of the merchandise; (4) the
cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will be 7.23
percent, the all-others rate established in the less-than-fair-value
investigation, adjusted for the export-subsidy rate in the companion
countervailing duty investigation.\13\ These cash deposit requirements,
when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See Glycine from India and Japan: Amended Final Affirmative
Antidumping Duty Determination and Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR
29170, 29171 (June 21, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221.
Dated: June 30, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Affiliation and Collapsing
V. Application of Facts Available and Adverse Inferences
VI. Rate for Non-Selected Respondents
VII. Discussion of the Methodology
VIII. Currency Conversion
IX. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2021-14450 Filed 7-6-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
