Establishment of the Ulupalakua Viticultural Area, 34955-34957 [2021-14058]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 124 / Thursday, July 1, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB–2020–0014; T.D. TTB–171;
Ref: Notice No. 199]
RIN 1513–AC65
Establishment of the Ulupalakua
Viticultural Area
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
AGENCY:
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) establishes the
approximately 70-acre ‘‘Ulupalakua’’
viticultural area (AVA) on the island of
Maui, Hawaii. The Ulupalakua
viticultural area is not located within,
nor does it contain, any other
established viticultural area. TTB
designates viticultural areas to allow
vintners to better describe the origin of
their wines and to allow consumers to
better identify wines they may
purchase.
SUMMARY:
This final rule is effective August
2, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karen A. Thornton, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street
NW, Box 12, Washington, DC 20005;
phone 202–453–1039, ext. 175.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Background on Viticultural Areas
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act (FAA Act), 27
U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary
of the Treasury to prescribe regulations
for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits,
and malt beverages. The FAA Act
provides that these regulations should,
among other things, prohibit consumer
deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels and ensure that
labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity
and quality of the product. The Alcohol
and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
(TTB) administers the FAA Act
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The
Secretary has delegated the functions
and duties in the administration and
enforcement of these provisions to the
TTB Administrator through Treasury
Order 120–01, dated December 10, 2013
(superseding Treasury Order 120–01,
dated January 24, 2003).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Jun 30, 2021
Jkt 253001
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
part 4) authorizes TTB to establish
definitive viticultural areas and regulate
the use of their names as appellations of
origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets forth
standards for the preparation and
submission to TTB of petitions for the
establishment or modification of
American viticultural areas (AVAs) and
lists the approved AVAs.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines
a viticultural area for American wine as
a delimited grape-growing region having
distinguishing features as described in
part 9 of the regulations and, once
approved, a name and a delineated
boundary codified in part 9 of the
regulations. These designations allow
vintners and consumers to attribute a
given quality, reputation, or other
characteristic of a wine made from
grapes grown in an area to the wine’s
geographic origin. The establishment of
AVAs allows vintners to describe more
accurately the origin of their wines to
consumers and helps consumers to
identify wines they may purchase.
Establishment of an AVA is neither an
approval nor an endorsement by TTB of
the wine produced in that area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2)) outlines
the procedure for proposing an AVA
and allows any interested party to
petition TTB to establish a grapegrowing region as an AVA. Section 9.12
of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 9.12)
prescribes standards for petitions to
establish or modify AVAs. Petitions to
establish an AVA must include the
following:
• Evidence that the area within the
proposed AVA boundary is nationally
or locally known by the AVA name
specified in the petition;
• An explanation of the basis for
defining the boundary of the proposed
AVA;
• A narrative description of the
features of the proposed AVA affecting
viticulture, such as climate, geology,
soils, physical features, and elevation,
that make the proposed AVA distinctive
and distinguish it from adjacent areas
outside the proposed AVA boundary;
• The appropriate United States
Geological Survey (USGS) map(s)
showing the location of the proposed
AVA, with the boundary of the
proposed AVA clearly drawn thereon;
and
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
34955
• A detailed narrative description of
the proposed AVA boundary based on
USGS map markings.
Ulupalakua AVA Petition
TTB received a petition from Mark
Beaman, winemaker at Maui Wines,
proposing the establishment of the
‘‘Ulupalakua’’ AVA. The proposed AVA
is located within the privately-owned,
18,000-acre Ulupalakua Ranch on the
island of Maui, Hawaii. The proposed
AVA contains approximately 70 acres,
with approximately 16 acres of
vineyards. Although there is no winery
within the boundary of the proposed
AVA, grapes from the proposed AVA
are made into wine at the Maui Wines
facility, which is a short distance south
of the proposed AVA. According to the
petition, the distinguishing features of
the proposed Ulupalakua AVA include
its topography, soils, and climate.
The proposed Ulupalakua AVA
contains a series of four distinct benches
that are oriented to the southwest. The
benches are gently sloped, with slope
angles between 0 and 5 percent, and are
separated by steeper erosional ravines.
The petition states that the gentle slopes
of the benches minimize the risk of
erosion, facilitate safe agriculture, and
allow vineyards planted on the benches
to receive uniform amounts of sunlight,
rainfall, and temperature-moderating
cloud cover. By contrast, the
surrounding regions all contain steeper
slopes. The petition notes that the
regions to the north, west, and east of
the proposed AVA have average slope
angles of 15 to 17 percent. The petition
also notes that the regions to the north
and west of the proposed AVA contain
more erosional features, such as ravines,
which are less suitable for viticulture
than gently sloping benches.
Furthermore, the region to the south of
the proposed AVA contains rugged,
exposed volcanic rocks that are not
suitable for viticulture.
The soils of the proposed Ulupalakua
AVA formed from the erosion of ancient
alkali lava flows from Mt. Haleakala.
Kula loam makes up 80 percent of the
soil of the proposed AVA and is derived
from weathered basic igneous rocks.
The remaining 20 percent of the soils of
the proposed AVA are comprised of the
Io series, which are silt loams that
gradually acquire more clay deeper in
the soils. According to the petition, the
soils of the proposed AVA are fertile
enough to produce healthy vines and
fruit without promoting excessive vine
and leaf growth. Additionally, the
uniformity of the soils within the
proposed AVA results in a greater
consistency in growing conditions for
vineyards than can be found in the
E:\FR\FM\01JYR1.SGM
01JYR1
34956
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 124 / Thursday, July 1, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
surrounding regions. To the south of the
proposed AVA, the soil changes to Kula
very rocky loam, which consists of very
large volcanic rocks and boulders which
would not be suitable for vineyards. The
same Kula soil found within the
proposed AVA is also found to the west,
but the petition notes that the topsoil
west of the proposed AVA has been
scoured by erosion and would be
thinner and not as suitable for
viticulture. The petition did not provide
information on the soils to the north and
east of the proposed AVA.
Within the proposed Ulupalakua
AVA, annual temperatures are moderate
and do not drop below 50 degrees
Fahrenheit (F), which is generally
considered to be the minimum
temperature required for grape vine
growth and fruit development. The
difference between the average high and
low temperatures each month in the
proposed AVA is typically 20 degrees or
less. The proposed AVA receives an
average of 30.7 inches of rainfall a year
and less than 2 inches per month in the
harvest months of July and August.
According to the petition, the low
rainfall amounts during harvest reduce
the risk of mildew and rot, while the
mild temperatures protect ripening fruit
against sunburn and heat stress.
The petition states that the proposed
AVA’s climate is influenced by its
proximity to Mt. Haleakala. To the north
of the proposed Ulupalakua AVA, on
the higher slopes of the mountain,
annual temperatures are cooler and
temperatures drop below 50 degrees F.
Because moist air moves from east to
west over the mountain, regions to the
east of the proposed AVA typically
receive higher average annual rainfall
amounts, while elevations to the west of
the proposed AVA have less rainfall.
The petition did not include
temperature data for locations to the
east, west, or south of the proposed
AVA, nor did it include precipitation
data for regions to the north and south
of the proposed AVA.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and
Comments Received
TTB published Notice No. 199 in the
Federal Register on November 10, 2020
(85 FR 71726), proposing to establish
the Ulupalakua AVA. In the notice, TTB
summarized the evidence from the
petition regarding the name, boundary,
and distinguishing features for the
proposed AVA. The notice also
compared the distinguishing features of
the proposed AVA to the surrounding
areas. For a detailed description of the
evidence relating to the name,
boundary, and distinguishing features of
the proposed AVA, and for a detailed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Jun 30, 2021
Jkt 253001
comparison of the distinguishing
features of the proposed AVA to the
surrounding areas, see Notice No. 199.
In Notice No. 199, TTB solicited
comments on the accuracy of the name,
boundary, and other required
information submitted in support of the
petition. The comment period closed on
January 11, 2021.
In response to Notice No. 199, TTB
received one comment. However, the
comment did not contain information
related to the proposed AVA or to the
AVA program in general, and was not
posted to the public docket.
TTB Determination
After careful review of the petition,
TTB finds that the evidence provided by
the petitioner supports the
establishment of the Ulupalakua AVA.
Accordingly, under the authority of the
FAA Act, section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002, and
parts 4 and 9 of the TTB regulations,
TTB establishes the ‘‘Ulupalakua’’ AVA
in Hawaii, effective 30 days from the
publication date of this document.
Boundary Description
See the narrative description of the
boundary of the Ulupalakua AVA in the
regulatory text published at the end of
this final rule.
Maps
The petitioner provided the required
maps, and they are listed below in the
regulatory text. The Ulupalakua AVA
boundary may also be viewed on the
AVA Map Explorer on the TTB website,
at https://www.ttb.gov/wine/ava-mapexplorer.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits
any label reference on a wine that
indicates or implies an origin other than
the wine’s true place of origin. For a
wine to be labeled with an AVA name
or with a brand name that includes an
AVA name, at least 85 percent of the
wine must be derived from grapes
grown within the area represented by
that name, and the wine must meet the
other conditions listed in 27 CFR
4.25(e)(3). If the wine is not eligible for
labeling with an AVA name and that
name appears in the brand name, then
the label is not in compliance and the
bottler must change the brand name and
obtain approval of a new label.
Similarly, if the AVA name appears in
another reference on the label in a
misleading manner, the bottler would
have to obtain approval of a new label.
Different rules apply if a wine has a
brand name containing an AVA name
that was used as a brand name on a
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
label approved before July 7, 1986. See
27 CFR 4.39(i)(2) for details.
With the establishment of the
Ulupalakua AVA, its name,
‘‘Ulupalakua,’’ will be recognized as a
name of viticultural significance under
§ 4.39(i)(3) of the TTB regulations (27
CFR 4.39(i)(3)). The text of the
regulations clarifies this point.
Consequently, wine bottlers using the
name ‘‘Ulupalakua’’ in a brand name,
including a trademark, or in another
label reference to the origin of the wine,
will have to ensure that the product is
eligible to use the AVA name as an
appellation of origin.
The establishment of the Ulupalakua
AVA will not affect any existing AVA.
The establishment of the Ulupalakua
AVA will allow vintners to use
‘‘Ulupalakua’’ as an appellation of
origin for wines made primarily from
grapes grown within the Ulupalakua
AVA if the wines meet the eligibility
requirements for the appellation.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this regulation will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. The regulation imposes no new
reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit
derived from the use of an AVA name
would be the result of a proprietor’s
efforts and consumer acceptance of
wines from that area. Therefore, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is
required.
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this final
rule is not a significant regulatory action
as defined by Executive Order 12866 of
September 30, 1993. Therefore, no
regulatory assessment is required.
Drafting Information
Karen A. Thornton of the Regulations
and Rulings Division drafted this final
rule.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, TTB amends title 27, chapter
I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as
follows:
PART 9—AMERICAN VITICULTURAL
AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 9
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
E:\FR\FM\01JYR1.SGM
01JYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 124 / Thursday, July 1, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Subpart C—Approved American
Viticultural Areas
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
2. Subpart C is amended by adding
§ 9.278 to read as follows:
■
§ 9.278
27 CFR Part 70
Ulupalakua AVA.
[Docket No. TTB–2021–0004; T.D. TTB–169]
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
(a) Name. The name of the viticultural
area described in this section is
‘‘Ulupalakua’’. For purposes of part 4 of
this chapter, ‘‘Ulupalakua’’ is a term of
viticultural significance.
(b) Approved maps. The United States
Geological Survey (USGS) 1:24,000
scale topographic maps used to
determine the boundary of the
Ulupalakua viticultural area is titled
‘‘Makena, Hawaii, 1983.’’
(c) Boundary. The Ulupalakua
viticultural area is located on the island
of Maui, in Hawaii. The boundary of the
Ulupalakua viticultural area is as
described in paragraphs (c)(1) through
(6) of this section:
(1) The beginning point is on the
Makena, Hawaii, map at the intersection
of an unnamed, light-duty road known
locally as State Highway 37 and the
northernmost unnamed, unimproved
road in the Palauea land division (a land
division is known as an ‘‘ahupua’a’’ in
Hawaii). From the beginning point,
proceed south along State Highway 37
to the next unnamed, unimproved road
in the Palauea land division; then
(2) Proceed west in a straight line for
approximately 2,700 feet to the 1,560foot elevation contour; then
(3) Proceed north along the 1,560-foot
elevation contour to the northern
boundary of the Palauea land division;
then
(4) Proceed east along the northern
boundary of the Palauea land division to
the 1,800-foot elevation contour; then
(5) Proceed south along the 1,800-foot
elevation contour for approximately 400
feet to the point where the 1,800-foot
elevation contour intersects with an
imaginary line drawn from the terminus
of the northernmost unnamed,
unimproved road in the Palauea land
division; then
(6) Proceed east in a straight line for
approximately 800 feet, returning to the
beginning point.
Signed: June 21, 2021.
Mary G. Ryan,
Administrator.
Approved: June 21, 2021.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and
Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2021–14058 Filed 6–30–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Jun 30, 2021
Jkt 253001
RIN 1513–AC56
Removal of Obsolete Regulation
Regarding Rewards for Information
Relating to Violations of Tax Laws
Administered by the Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
AGENCY:
In this final rule, the Alcohol
and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
(TTB) is removing obsolete regulatory
provisions related to whistleblower
rewards. Under the Internal Revenue
Code, individuals who provide
information to the Treasury Department
regarding underpayment of taxes or
violations of internal revenue laws may
file claims for monetary
‘‘whistleblower’’ awards. Recent
changes to the Code have made the TTB
regulation regarding whistleblower
rewards obsolete, and, therefore, TTB is
removing that provision from its
regulations. TTB has signed a
memorandum of understanding with the
Internal Revenue Service, under which
the Internal Revenue Service will
process whistleblower award claims for
information regarding underpayment of
taxes collected by TTB or violations of
the internal revenue laws administered
by TTB.
DATES: This final rule is effective on July
1, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Hoover, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street
NW, Box 12, Washington, DC 20005;
202–453–1039, ext. 135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau (TTB) administers the
following provisions of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(IRC, 26 U.S.C.): Chapter 51 (imposing
Federal excise tax on distilled spirits,
wine, and beer), chapter 52 (imposing
Federal excise tax on tobacco products
and cigarette papers and tubes), and
sections 4181–4182 (imposing Federal
excise tax on firearms and ammunition).
TTB administers these provisions
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002, as
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
34957
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The
Secretary of the Treasury (the Secretary)
has delegated related IRC administrative
and enforcement authorities to TTB
through Treasury Order 120–01. The
Secretary also has delegated
administration and enforcement of other
internal revenue laws to the Internal
Revenue Service under Treasury Order
150–10.
Under section 7623 of the IRC (26
U.S.C. 7623), individuals who provide
information to the Department of the
Treasury that is used to detect
underpayments of Federal taxes or
violations of internal revenue laws may
be eligible for monetary
‘‘whistleblower’’ awards under
regulations issued by the Secretary.
TTB had previously issued a
whistleblower reward regulation at 27
CFR 70.41. However, amendments to
the Internal Revenue Code have made
this regulation obsolete. See the
amendments made to 26 U.S.C. 7623 by
section 406 of the Tax Relief and Health
Care Act of 2006 (Pub L. 109–432),
section 41108 of the Balanced Budget
Act of 2018 (Pub. L. 115–123), and
section 1405 of the Taxpayer First Act
(Pub. L. 116–25). As a result of these
statutory amendments, described more
fully below, § 70.41 has become
obsolete, and TTB is removing that
section from its regulations in 27 CFR
part 70, Procedure and Administration.
Section 406 of the Tax Relief and
Health Care Act of 2006 significantly
revised 26 U.S.C. 7623 and required the
Treasury Department to establish a
‘‘Whistleblower Office’’ within the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to
analyze information received by
whistleblower claimants and determine
the amount of any award under 26
U.S.C. 7623(b). The IRS Whistleblower
Office processes claims pertaining to
underpayments of tax that are owed to
the IRS or violations of internal revenue
laws administered by the IRS that may
be eligible for an award under 26 U.S.C.
7623(a) and (b). See IRS Delegation
Order 25–07 (delegation to the
Whistleblower Office of the authority to
approve IRS discretionary awards under
section 7623(a)). Section 41108 of the
Balanced Budget Act of 2018 then
clarified the definition of ‘‘collected
proceeds’’ from which the Treasury
Department may make awards to
whistleblowers. The Taxpayer First Act
further amended 26 U.S.C. 7623 by
establishing a notification process for
whistleblowers and adding protections
for whistleblowers against retaliation.
To modernize the process for
accepting, processing, and rewarding
whistleblowers and to give effect to the
statutory changes, TTB has entered into
E:\FR\FM\01JYR1.SGM
01JYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 124 (Thursday, July 1, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 34955-34957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14058]
[[Page 34955]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB-2020-0014; T.D. TTB-171; Ref: Notice No. 199]
RIN 1513-AC65
Establishment of the Ulupalakua Viticultural Area
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) establishes
the approximately 70-acre ``Ulupalakua'' viticultural area (AVA) on the
island of Maui, Hawaii. The Ulupalakua viticultural area is not located
within, nor does it contain, any other established viticultural area.
TTB designates viticultural areas to allow vintners to better describe
the origin of their wines and to allow consumers to better identify
wines they may purchase.
DATES: This final rule is effective August 2, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen A. Thornton, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G
Street NW, Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; phone 202-453-1039, ext. 175.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (FAA Act),
27 U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to prescribe
regulations for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits, and malt
beverages. The FAA Act provides that these regulations should, among
other things, prohibit consumer deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels and ensure that labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity and quality of the product. The
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) administers the FAA Act
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The Secretary has delegated the functions
and duties in the administration and enforcement of these provisions to
the TTB Administrator through Treasury Order 120-01, dated December 10,
2013 (superseding Treasury Order 120-01, dated January 24, 2003).
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 4) authorizes TTB to
establish definitive viticultural areas and regulate the use of their
names as appellations of origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets
forth standards for the preparation and submission to TTB of petitions
for the establishment or modification of American viticultural areas
(AVAs) and lists the approved AVAs.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i))
defines a viticultural area for American wine as a delimited grape-
growing region having distinguishing features as described in part 9 of
the regulations and, once approved, a name and a delineated boundary
codified in part 9 of the regulations. These designations allow
vintners and consumers to attribute a given quality, reputation, or
other characteristic of a wine made from grapes grown in an area to the
wine's geographic origin. The establishment of AVAs allows vintners to
describe more accurately the origin of their wines to consumers and
helps consumers to identify wines they may purchase. Establishment of
an AVA is neither an approval nor an endorsement by TTB of the wine
produced in that area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2))
outlines the procedure for proposing an AVA and allows any interested
party to petition TTB to establish a grape-growing region as an AVA.
Section 9.12 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 9.12) prescribes standards
for petitions to establish or modify AVAs. Petitions to establish an
AVA must include the following:
Evidence that the area within the proposed AVA boundary is
nationally or locally known by the AVA name specified in the petition;
An explanation of the basis for defining the boundary of
the proposed AVA;
A narrative description of the features of the proposed
AVA affecting viticulture, such as climate, geology, soils, physical
features, and elevation, that make the proposed AVA distinctive and
distinguish it from adjacent areas outside the proposed AVA boundary;
The appropriate United States Geological Survey (USGS)
map(s) showing the location of the proposed AVA, with the boundary of
the proposed AVA clearly drawn thereon; and
A detailed narrative description of the proposed AVA
boundary based on USGS map markings.
Ulupalakua AVA Petition
TTB received a petition from Mark Beaman, winemaker at Maui Wines,
proposing the establishment of the ``Ulupalakua'' AVA. The proposed AVA
is located within the privately-owned, 18,000-acre Ulupalakua Ranch on
the island of Maui, Hawaii. The proposed AVA contains approximately 70
acres, with approximately 16 acres of vineyards. Although there is no
winery within the boundary of the proposed AVA, grapes from the
proposed AVA are made into wine at the Maui Wines facility, which is a
short distance south of the proposed AVA. According to the petition,
the distinguishing features of the proposed Ulupalakua AVA include its
topography, soils, and climate.
The proposed Ulupalakua AVA contains a series of four distinct
benches that are oriented to the southwest. The benches are gently
sloped, with slope angles between 0 and 5 percent, and are separated by
steeper erosional ravines. The petition states that the gentle slopes
of the benches minimize the risk of erosion, facilitate safe
agriculture, and allow vineyards planted on the benches to receive
uniform amounts of sunlight, rainfall, and temperature-moderating cloud
cover. By contrast, the surrounding regions all contain steeper slopes.
The petition notes that the regions to the north, west, and east of the
proposed AVA have average slope angles of 15 to 17 percent. The
petition also notes that the regions to the north and west of the
proposed AVA contain more erosional features, such as ravines, which
are less suitable for viticulture than gently sloping benches.
Furthermore, the region to the south of the proposed AVA contains
rugged, exposed volcanic rocks that are not suitable for viticulture.
The soils of the proposed Ulupalakua AVA formed from the erosion of
ancient alkali lava flows from Mt. Haleakala. Kula loam makes up 80
percent of the soil of the proposed AVA and is derived from weathered
basic igneous rocks. The remaining 20 percent of the soils of the
proposed AVA are comprised of the Io series, which are silt loams that
gradually acquire more clay deeper in the soils. According to the
petition, the soils of the proposed AVA are fertile enough to produce
healthy vines and fruit without promoting excessive vine and leaf
growth. Additionally, the uniformity of the soils within the proposed
AVA results in a greater consistency in growing conditions for
vineyards than can be found in the
[[Page 34956]]
surrounding regions. To the south of the proposed AVA, the soil changes
to Kula very rocky loam, which consists of very large volcanic rocks
and boulders which would not be suitable for vineyards. The same Kula
soil found within the proposed AVA is also found to the west, but the
petition notes that the topsoil west of the proposed AVA has been
scoured by erosion and would be thinner and not as suitable for
viticulture. The petition did not provide information on the soils to
the north and east of the proposed AVA.
Within the proposed Ulupalakua AVA, annual temperatures are
moderate and do not drop below 50 degrees Fahrenheit (F), which is
generally considered to be the minimum temperature required for grape
vine growth and fruit development. The difference between the average
high and low temperatures each month in the proposed AVA is typically
20 degrees or less. The proposed AVA receives an average of 30.7 inches
of rainfall a year and less than 2 inches per month in the harvest
months of July and August. According to the petition, the low rainfall
amounts during harvest reduce the risk of mildew and rot, while the
mild temperatures protect ripening fruit against sunburn and heat
stress.
The petition states that the proposed AVA's climate is influenced
by its proximity to Mt. Haleakala. To the north of the proposed
Ulupalakua AVA, on the higher slopes of the mountain, annual
temperatures are cooler and temperatures drop below 50 degrees F.
Because moist air moves from east to west over the mountain, regions to
the east of the proposed AVA typically receive higher average annual
rainfall amounts, while elevations to the west of the proposed AVA have
less rainfall. The petition did not include temperature data for
locations to the east, west, or south of the proposed AVA, nor did it
include precipitation data for regions to the north and south of the
proposed AVA.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Comments Received
TTB published Notice No. 199 in the Federal Register on November
10, 2020 (85 FR 71726), proposing to establish the Ulupalakua AVA. In
the notice, TTB summarized the evidence from the petition regarding the
name, boundary, and distinguishing features for the proposed AVA. The
notice also compared the distinguishing features of the proposed AVA to
the surrounding areas. For a detailed description of the evidence
relating to the name, boundary, and distinguishing features of the
proposed AVA, and for a detailed comparison of the distinguishing
features of the proposed AVA to the surrounding areas, see Notice No.
199. In Notice No. 199, TTB solicited comments on the accuracy of the
name, boundary, and other required information submitted in support of
the petition. The comment period closed on January 11, 2021.
In response to Notice No. 199, TTB received one comment. However,
the comment did not contain information related to the proposed AVA or
to the AVA program in general, and was not posted to the public docket.
TTB Determination
After careful review of the petition, TTB finds that the evidence
provided by the petitioner supports the establishment of the Ulupalakua
AVA. Accordingly, under the authority of the FAA Act, section 1111(d)
of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, and parts 4 and 9 of the TTB
regulations, TTB establishes the ``Ulupalakua'' AVA in Hawaii,
effective 30 days from the publication date of this document.
Boundary Description
See the narrative description of the boundary of the Ulupalakua AVA
in the regulatory text published at the end of this final rule.
Maps
The petitioner provided the required maps, and they are listed
below in the regulatory text. The Ulupalakua AVA boundary may also be
viewed on the AVA Map Explorer on the TTB website, at https://www.ttb.gov/wine/ava-map-explorer.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits any label reference on a
wine that indicates or implies an origin other than the wine's true
place of origin. For a wine to be labeled with an AVA name or with a
brand name that includes an AVA name, at least 85 percent of the wine
must be derived from grapes grown within the area represented by that
name, and the wine must meet the other conditions listed in 27 CFR
4.25(e)(3). If the wine is not eligible for labeling with an AVA name
and that name appears in the brand name, then the label is not in
compliance and the bottler must change the brand name and obtain
approval of a new label. Similarly, if the AVA name appears in another
reference on the label in a misleading manner, the bottler would have
to obtain approval of a new label. Different rules apply if a wine has
a brand name containing an AVA name that was used as a brand name on a
label approved before July 7, 1986. See 27 CFR 4.39(i)(2) for details.
With the establishment of the Ulupalakua AVA, its name,
``Ulupalakua,'' will be recognized as a name of viticultural
significance under Sec. 4.39(i)(3) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
4.39(i)(3)). The text of the regulations clarifies this point.
Consequently, wine bottlers using the name ``Ulupalakua'' in a brand
name, including a trademark, or in another label reference to the
origin of the wine, will have to ensure that the product is eligible to
use the AVA name as an appellation of origin.
The establishment of the Ulupalakua AVA will not affect any
existing AVA. The establishment of the Ulupalakua AVA will allow
vintners to use ``Ulupalakua'' as an appellation of origin for wines
made primarily from grapes grown within the Ulupalakua AVA if the wines
meet the eligibility requirements for the appellation.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The
regulation imposes no new reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit derived from the use of an AVA
name would be the result of a proprietor's efforts and consumer
acceptance of wines from that area. Therefore, no regulatory
flexibility analysis is required.
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this final rule is not a significant
regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
1993. Therefore, no regulatory assessment is required.
Drafting Information
Karen A. Thornton of the Regulations and Rulings Division drafted
this final rule.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, TTB amends title 27,
chapter I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 9--AMERICAN VITICULTURAL AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
[[Page 34957]]
Subpart C--Approved American Viticultural Areas
0
2. Subpart C is amended by adding Sec. 9.278 to read as follows:
Sec. 9.278 Ulupalakua AVA.
(a) Name. The name of the viticultural area described in this
section is ``Ulupalakua''. For purposes of part 4 of this chapter,
``Ulupalakua'' is a term of viticultural significance.
(b) Approved maps. The United States Geological Survey (USGS)
1:24,000 scale topographic maps used to determine the boundary of the
Ulupalakua viticultural area is titled ``Makena, Hawaii, 1983.''
(c) Boundary. The Ulupalakua viticultural area is located on the
island of Maui, in Hawaii. The boundary of the Ulupalakua viticultural
area is as described in paragraphs (c)(1) through (6) of this section:
(1) The beginning point is on the Makena, Hawaii, map at the
intersection of an unnamed, light-duty road known locally as State
Highway 37 and the northernmost unnamed, unimproved road in the Palauea
land division (a land division is known as an ``ahupua'a'' in Hawaii).
From the beginning point, proceed south along State Highway 37 to the
next unnamed, unimproved road in the Palauea land division; then
(2) Proceed west in a straight line for approximately 2,700 feet to
the 1,560-foot elevation contour; then
(3) Proceed north along the 1,560-foot elevation contour to the
northern boundary of the Palauea land division; then
(4) Proceed east along the northern boundary of the Palauea land
division to the 1,800-foot elevation contour; then
(5) Proceed south along the 1,800-foot elevation contour for
approximately 400 feet to the point where the 1,800-foot elevation
contour intersects with an imaginary line drawn from the terminus of
the northernmost unnamed, unimproved road in the Palauea land division;
then
(6) Proceed east in a straight line for approximately 800 feet,
returning to the beginning point.
Signed: June 21, 2021.
Mary G. Ryan,
Administrator.
Approved: June 21, 2021.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2021-14058 Filed 6-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P