Request for Information Related to IP Evaluation and Valuation Methods and Techniques, 35076-35078 [2021-14004]
Download as PDF
35076
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 124 / Thursday, July 1, 2021 / Notices
section of the NDAA for FY 2021 within
the acquisition regulations.
Authority: DoD Instruction 5000.35,
Defense Acquisition Regulations (DAR)
System.
Jennifer D. Johnson,
Editor/Publisher, Defense Acquisition
Regulations System.
[FR Doc. 2021–14009 Filed 6–30–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID: DoD–2021–OS–0056]
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Office of the Under Secretary of
Defense for Personnel and Readiness,
Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Information collection notice.
AGENCY:
Consistent with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 and
its implementing regulations, this
document provides notice DoD is
submitting an Information Collection
Request to OMB to collect information
on establishing an understanding of the
beliefs and attitudes of active
component mid-grade (O–4 to O–6) and
junior officers (O–2 to O–3) toward
diversity and inclusion (D&I), retention
and promotion, and specifically any
perceived differences of retention and
promotion related to race, ethnicity, and
gender. The study will identify potential
and existing factors that serve as barriers
which may affect such differences in
retention and promotion to inform D&I
policies, programs, and procedures.
DATES: Comments must be received by
July 16, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The Department has
requested emergency processing from
OMB for this information collection
request by 15 days after publication of
this notice. Interested parties can access
the supporting materials and collection
instrument and submit comments and
recommendations to OMB at
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
Find this particular information
collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under
15-day Review—Open for Public
Comments’’ or by using the search
function. Comments submitted in
response to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for OMB approval of this information
collection. They will also become a
matter of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Angela Duncan, 571–372–7574, or
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Jun 30, 2021
Jkt 253001
whs.mc-alex.esd.mbx.dd-dodinformation-collections@mail.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Officer Retention and Promotion Barrier
Analysis is a qualitative study which
will include virtual interviews and
focus groups with active component
mid-grade and junior officers from
Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine
Corps to examine their beliefs and
attitudes toward D&I, retention and
promotion, and specifically any
perceived differences of retention and
promotion related to race, ethnicity, and
gender. The study will identify potential
and existing factors that serve as barriers
which may affect such differences in
retention and promotion. The study will
assess topics related to retention and
promotion such as career progression
and mentorship, leadership, workplace
climate and culture, and work-life
balance. The Office of Diversity, Equity,
and Inclusion (ODEI) will analyze data
in aggregate and provide key themes
that emerge. In order to meet reporting
requirements per the Fiscal Year (FY)
2021 National Defense Authorization
Act (NDAA), the study needs to begin in
FY 2021 and completed by FY 2022. As
required by the NDAA, the study will
identify barriers to diversity to assist in
developing and implementing plans and
processes to resolve or eliminate any
barriers to diversity, and reviewing the
progress of the Services in
implementing previous plans and
processes to resolve or eliminate
barriers to diversity.
Title; Associated Form; and OMB
Number: Officer Retention and
Promotion Barrier Analysis; OMB
Control Number 0704–ORPB.
Type of Request: Emergency.
Number of Respondents: The study
will include 340 respondents (total of 20
interview respondents and 320 focus
group participants).
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Annual Responses: 340.
Average Burden per Response:
Interviews will require 60 minutes per
response. Focus groups will require 90
minutes per response.
Annual Burden Hours: The total
annual amount of burden hours for
interviews is 20 hours. The total amount
of annual burden for focus groups is 480
hours. The total annual burden hours
are 500.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households.
Frequency: Once.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
Request for Comments: Comments are
invited on: (1) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
functions of DoD, including whether the
information collected has practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of DoD’s
estimate of the burden (including hours
and cost) of the proposed collection of
information; (3) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including automated
collection techniques or the use of other
forms of information technology.
Dated: June 28, 2021.
Kayyonne T. Marston,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2021–14075 Filed 6–30–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID: DOD–2021–OS–0055]
Request for Information Related to IP
Evaluation and Valuation Methods and
Techniques
Office of the Deputy Assistant
Secretary of Defense (Acquisition
Enablers), Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Request for information.
AGENCY:
The Secretary of Defense is
soliciting information from the public
(including, but not limited to, the
private sector, academia, and other
interested parties) related to Intellectual
Property (IP) evaluation and valuation
methods and techniques.
DATES: The due date for submitting
comments is August 2, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: The DoD cannot receive written
comments at this time due to the
COVID–19 pandemic. Comments should
be sent electronically to the docket
listed above.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name, docket
number and title for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 124 / Thursday, July 1, 2021 / Notices
Mr.
George Winborne, Communications,
Knowledge and Performance
Management Lead, Intellectual Property
Cadre, Office of the USD (Acquisition &
Sustainment), at 202–815–3995, or
email: george.o.winborne.civ@mail.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The DoD
has been authorized to carry out a Pilot
Program on IP Evaluation for
Acquisition Programs under Section 801
of the National Defense Authorization
Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2020.
To gain a better understanding of IP
valuation and evaluation strategies and
recommendations, the Pilot Program
seeks to obtain the views of industry,
academia, and the public.
Given the broad functional, technical,
and operational considerations of the
DoD and the assessment scope spanning
IP evaluation and valuation methods
and techniques, interested parties do
not need to respond to every category of
information requested or question and
may choose to offer additional
information pertinent to the topic in the
manner or format they prefer.
Interested parties may respond to
questions pertinent to their
organization’s technical focus, expertise,
and evaluation and/or valuation
capabilities. Submitted responses are
entirely voluntary, may be unstructured,
and should include only public
information (e.g., do not include
proprietary, business sensitive, or other
forms of confidential information).
Although not required, respondents are
encouraged to identify the industry,
academic, or occupational sector to
which they belong.
The following guidance applies
generally to all responses to questions in
topic areas (1) through (6) below.
A. Each response should consider and
identify the extent to which the
response may be limited or otherwise
affected by—
• The particular industry or academic
sector;
• The particular technologies
involved;
• The type of IP protections
governing the technology;
• The particular type of contract or
contracting vehicle used;
• Whether your organization is
responding as an IP/technology
purchaser, seller, or both; and;
• Whether your organization is a
prime contractor, subcontractor, or both.
B. Responses should include only
public information (e.g., do not include
proprietary, business sensitive, or other
forms of confidential information).
However, if applicable, the response
may indicate that additional responsive
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Jun 30, 2021
Jkt 253001
information may be available but is not
being provided because it is non-public
and would be subject to confidentiality
restrictions. Preferably, in such cases
the response will provide information in
a more abstract or generic form that may
still provide information responsive to
the question, but would not contain any
detailed, non-public information.
(1) Assessment Mechanisms for
Program IP Evaluation
a. What IP evaluation mechanisms
and techniques used by your
organization, or your industry or
academic sector in general, could be
adapted for use in DoD acquisition
programs?
b Please rank the IP evaluation
mechanisms identified in your answer
above from the most beneficial to those
that are less promising, and provide any
relevant examples and rationale for such
ranking.
b. What commercially available IP
valuation analysis and methods used by
your organization, or your industry or
academic sector in general, could be
adapted for use in DoD acquisition
programs?
b Please rank the IP valuation
analysis and methods identified in your
answer above from the most beneficial
to those that are less promising, and
provide any relevant examples and
rationale for such ranking.
a. Please identify any other emerging,
innovative, novel, or otherwise ‘‘outside
of the box’’ methods for IP valuation,
prioritization, and IP evaluation
techniques not identified above (in your
responses to questions 1a. or 1b.) that
could be adapted for use in DoD
acquisition programs.
b. Please identify acquisition planning
and technology assessment techniques
used by your organization, or your
industry or academic sector in general,
to analyze the use of a commercial
product or service or nondevelopmental item as an alternative to
acquiring a product or service that must
be specifically developed for a
particular DoD acquisition program.
(2) Development of Cost-Effective IP
Strategies
a. What does your organization, or
your industry or academic sector in
general, consider best practices for
utilizing IP valuation and evaluation
methods to develop cost-effective IP
strategies?
b. What factors should DoD consider
in developing IP strategies that plan for
uncertainties (e.g., design, requirement
changes; emergence of disruptive
technologies; selection of particular
vendors; defining the sustainment
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
35077
strategy) associated with predicting
downstream events, and for identifying
appropriate flexibility and other
potential options, when these
uncertainties become more defined?
(3) Assessment and Management of IP
Value and Costs
a. Given the specialized mechanisms
governing IP acquisitions in the national
defense mission space, how can the DoD
best identify, assess, and validate the
value of different kinds of IP across the
acquisition lifecycle?
(4) Cross-Functional Team of Subject
Matter Experts
a. Does your organization, or your
industry or academic sector in general,
utilize a designated group or team of
subject matter experts to identify and
manage IP issues on behalf of the
organization (e.g., an IP Management
Team; or a cadre of cross-functional
subject matter experts analogous to that
required for DoD at 10 U.S.C. 2322(b))?
b. If so, how is such team or group
structured, and what functional areas of
subject matter expertise are represented
(e.g., intellectual property, law,
engineering, contracting, program
management, product support and
sustainment, financial analysis)?
(5) Engagement With the Private Sector
a. In conducting the Section 801 Pilot
Program, how can the DoD best engage
the public (including but not limited to
the private sector, academia, and other
interested parties) to support and inform
the development of IP strategies?
b. In general, what processes and
procedures can the DoD implement to
enable its acquisition programs to better
engage with interested parties in
identifying appropriate IP evaluation
methods in the development of IP
strategies, preservation of program
flexibility, increases in costeffectiveness, and improvements in
sustainment efforts?
(6) Future Activities
a. What specific topics and questions
not discussed above should the DoD
consider including as part of future
requests for information related to this
IP Pilot Program?
b. Please provide any additional
comments or recommendations
regarding the Section 801 Pilot Program
that were not included in your answers
above that may improve DoD’s
acquisition of IP.
c. Although this initial request for
information is limited to responses
having only publicly available
information, the DoD recognizes that
respondents may have non-public
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
35078
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 124 / Thursday, July 1, 2021 / Notices
information that would otherwise have
been responsive to one or more
questions. Please indicate whether your
organization possesses any such nonpublic information (e.g., proprietary,
business sensitive, or other forms of
confidential information) that your
organization may be willing to share
with the DoD in support of this IP Pilot
Program effort in the future, provided
that such information could be shared
subject to appropriate confidentiality
protections. If so, please identify the
nature or type of confidentiality
protections that would be necessary to
allow for such sharing (e.g., use and
disclosure authorized only for particular
purposes or to particular categories of
organizations or individuals). As
discussed, please note that your
participation is voluntary and that your
responses may be unstructured.
Dated: June 25, 2021.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2021–14004 Filed 6–30–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID: DOD–2021–OS–0033]
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Office of the Under Secretary of
Defense for Personnel and Readiness,
Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: 30-Day information collection
notice.
AGENCY:
The DoD has submitted to
OMB for clearance the following
proposal for collection of information
under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
DATES: Consideration will be given to all
comments received by August 2, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Angela Duncan, 571–372–7574, or
whs.mc-alex.esd.mbx.dd-dodinformation-collections@mail.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title; Associated Form; and OMB
Number: Defense Biometric
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:45 Jun 30, 2021
Jkt 253001
Identification System (DBIDS)
Registration Application; OMB Control
Number 0704–0455.
Type of Request: Extension.
Number of Respondents: 2,500,000.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Annual Responses: 2,500,000.
Average Burden per Response: 7.5
minutes.
Annual Burden Hours: 312,500.
Needs and Uses: The information
collection requirement is necessary to
obtain and record the biographic and
biometric data connected with
positively identifying identity,
eligibility for access, and fitness within
DBIDS and shared with Identity
Matching Engine for Security and
Analysts (IMESA)/Interoperability Layer
Service (IoLS). The form data is used in
the determination of access at DBIDS
sites and affiliated systems through use
of IMESA/IoLS.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households.
Frequency: On occasion.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
Obtain or Retain Benefits.
OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet
Seehra.
You may also submit comments and
recommendations, identified by Docket
ID number and title, by the following
method:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name, Docket
ID number, and title for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
DOD Clearance Officer: Ms. Angela
Duncan.
Requests for copies of the information
collection proposal should be sent to
Ms. Duncan at whs.mc-alex.esd.mbx.dddod-information-collections@mail.mil.
Dated: June 28, 2021.
Kayyonne T. Marston,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2021–14074 Filed 6–30–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID: DoD–2021–OS–0010]
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Office of the Under Secretary of
Defense for Research and Engineering,
Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: 30-Day information collection
notice.
AGENCY:
The DoD has submitted to
OMB for clearance the following
proposal for collection of information
under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
DATES: Consideration will be given to all
comments received by August 2, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Angela Duncan, 571–372–7574, or
whs.mc-alex.esd.mbx.dd-dodinformation-collections@mail.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title; Associated Form; and OMB
Number: Certification of Qualified
Products; DD Form 1718; OMB Control
Number 0704–0487.
Type of Request: Extension.
Number of Respondents: 1,320.
Responses per Respondent: 1.
Annual Responses: 1,320.
Average Burden per Response: 30
minutes.
Annual Burden Hours: 660.
Needs and Uses: The information
collection requirement is necessary to
obtain, certify, and record qualification
of products or processes falling under
the DoD Qualification Program.
Qualification ensures continued product
performance, quality, and reliability. DD
Form 1718 is sent to manufacturers
every two years by the Qualifying
Activity when the applicable
specification does not contain complete
requalification testing, and requests that
manufacturers complete the form,
certifying that their products still meet
the specification requirements as
originally tested. DD Form 1718 is
included as an exhibit in an appeal or
hearing case file as evidence of the
reviewers’ products or process
qualifications in advance of, and
independent of, acquisition.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 124 (Thursday, July 1, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35076-35078]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-14004]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID: DOD-2021-OS-0055]
Request for Information Related to IP Evaluation and Valuation
Methods and Techniques
AGENCY: Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense
(Acquisition Enablers), Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Request for information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Secretary of Defense is soliciting information from the
public (including, but not limited to, the private sector, academia,
and other interested parties) related to Intellectual Property (IP)
evaluation and valuation methods and techniques.
DATES: The due date for submitting comments is August 2, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and
title, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: The DoD cannot receive written comments at this time due to
the COVID-19 pandemic. Comments should be sent electronically to the
docket listed above.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency
name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
[[Page 35077]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. George Winborne, Communications,
Knowledge and Performance Management Lead, Intellectual Property Cadre,
Office of the USD (Acquisition & Sustainment), at 202-815-3995, or
email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The DoD has been authorized to carry out a
Pilot Program on IP Evaluation for Acquisition Programs under Section
801 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year
(FY) 2020. To gain a better understanding of IP valuation and
evaluation strategies and recommendations, the Pilot Program seeks to
obtain the views of industry, academia, and the public.
Given the broad functional, technical, and operational
considerations of the DoD and the assessment scope spanning IP
evaluation and valuation methods and techniques, interested parties do
not need to respond to every category of information requested or
question and may choose to offer additional information pertinent to
the topic in the manner or format they prefer.
Interested parties may respond to questions pertinent to their
organization's technical focus, expertise, and evaluation and/or
valuation capabilities. Submitted responses are entirely voluntary, may
be unstructured, and should include only public information (e.g., do
not include proprietary, business sensitive, or other forms of
confidential information). Although not required, respondents are
encouraged to identify the industry, academic, or occupational sector
to which they belong.
The following guidance applies generally to all responses to
questions in topic areas (1) through (6) below.
A. Each response should consider and identify the extent to which
the response may be limited or otherwise affected by--
The particular industry or academic sector;
The particular technologies involved;
The type of IP protections governing the technology;
The particular type of contract or contracting vehicle
used;
Whether your organization is responding as an IP/
technology purchaser, seller, or both; and;
Whether your organization is a prime contractor,
subcontractor, or both.
B. Responses should include only public information (e.g., do not
include proprietary, business sensitive, or other forms of confidential
information). However, if applicable, the response may indicate that
additional responsive information may be available but is not being
provided because it is non-public and would be subject to
confidentiality restrictions. Preferably, in such cases the response
will provide information in a more abstract or generic form that may
still provide information responsive to the question, but would not
contain any detailed, non-public information.
(1) Assessment Mechanisms for Program IP Evaluation
a. What IP evaluation mechanisms and techniques used by your
organization, or your industry or academic sector in general, could be
adapted for use in DoD acquisition programs?
[squ] Please rank the IP evaluation mechanisms identified in your
answer above from the most beneficial to those that are less promising,
and provide any relevant examples and rationale for such ranking.
b. What commercially available IP valuation analysis and methods
used by your organization, or your industry or academic sector in
general, could be adapted for use in DoD acquisition programs?
[squ] Please rank the IP valuation analysis and methods identified
in your answer above from the most beneficial to those that are less
promising, and provide any relevant examples and rationale for such
ranking.
a. Please identify any other emerging, innovative, novel, or
otherwise ``outside of the box'' methods for IP valuation,
prioritization, and IP evaluation techniques not identified above (in
your responses to questions 1a. or 1b.) that could be adapted for use
in DoD acquisition programs.
b. Please identify acquisition planning and technology assessment
techniques used by your organization, or your industry or academic
sector in general, to analyze the use of a commercial product or
service or non-developmental item as an alternative to acquiring a
product or service that must be specifically developed for a particular
DoD acquisition program.
(2) Development of Cost-Effective IP Strategies
a. What does your organization, or your industry or academic sector
in general, consider best practices for utilizing IP valuation and
evaluation methods to develop cost-effective IP strategies?
b. What factors should DoD consider in developing IP strategies
that plan for uncertainties (e.g., design, requirement changes;
emergence of disruptive technologies; selection of particular vendors;
defining the sustainment strategy) associated with predicting
downstream events, and for identifying appropriate flexibility and
other potential options, when these uncertainties become more defined?
(3) Assessment and Management of IP Value and Costs
a. Given the specialized mechanisms governing IP acquisitions in
the national defense mission space, how can the DoD best identify,
assess, and validate the value of different kinds of IP across the
acquisition lifecycle?
(4) Cross-Functional Team of Subject Matter Experts
a. Does your organization, or your industry or academic sector in
general, utilize a designated group or team of subject matter experts
to identify and manage IP issues on behalf of the organization (e.g.,
an IP Management Team; or a cadre of cross-functional subject matter
experts analogous to that required for DoD at 10 U.S.C. 2322(b))?
b. If so, how is such team or group structured, and what functional
areas of subject matter expertise are represented (e.g., intellectual
property, law, engineering, contracting, program management, product
support and sustainment, financial analysis)?
(5) Engagement With the Private Sector
a. In conducting the Section 801 Pilot Program, how can the DoD
best engage the public (including but not limited to the private
sector, academia, and other interested parties) to support and inform
the development of IP strategies?
b. In general, what processes and procedures can the DoD implement
to enable its acquisition programs to better engage with interested
parties in identifying appropriate IP evaluation methods in the
development of IP strategies, preservation of program flexibility,
increases in cost-effectiveness, and improvements in sustainment
efforts?
(6) Future Activities
a. What specific topics and questions not discussed above should
the DoD consider including as part of future requests for information
related to this IP Pilot Program?
b. Please provide any additional comments or recommendations
regarding the Section 801 Pilot Program that were not included in your
answers above that may improve DoD's acquisition of IP.
c. Although this initial request for information is limited to
responses having only publicly available information, the DoD
recognizes that respondents may have non-public
[[Page 35078]]
information that would otherwise have been responsive to one or more
questions. Please indicate whether your organization possesses any such
non-public information (e.g., proprietary, business sensitive, or other
forms of confidential information) that your organization may be
willing to share with the DoD in support of this IP Pilot Program
effort in the future, provided that such information could be shared
subject to appropriate confidentiality protections. If so, please
identify the nature or type of confidentiality protections that would
be necessary to allow for such sharing (e.g., use and disclosure
authorized only for particular purposes or to particular categories of
organizations or individuals). As discussed, please note that your
participation is voluntary and that your responses may be unstructured.
Dated: June 25, 2021.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2021-14004 Filed 6-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P