Air Plan Approval; Iowa; Infrastructure State Implementation Plan Requirements for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard, 34175-34177 [2021-13824]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 29, 2021 / Proposed Rules
System of Records notice (85 FR 14226,
March 11, 2020).
Documents mentioned in this SNPRM
as being available in this docket and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
website’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
and Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Amend § 117.313 by revising
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
■
§ 117.313
New River.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The draw of the Florida East Coast
(FEC) Railroad Bridge across the New
River, mile 2.5, at Fort Lauderdale shall
operate as follows:
(1) The drawbridge shall be
maintained in the fully open-tonavigation position for vessels at all
times, except during period when it is
closed for the passage of rail traffic,
inspections and to perform periodic
maintenance authorized in accordance
with subpart A of this part.
(2) The drawbridge shall not be closed
to navigation for more than 60
consecutive minutes.
(3) The drawbridge shall open and
remain open to navigation for a fixed
10-minute period each hour from 5 a.m.
to 11:59 p.m., except that the
drawbridge shall be open at the
following times which shall serve as the
hourly fixed 10-minute period:
—7:00 a.m. until 7:10 a.m.
—9:00 a.m. until 9:10 a.m.
—4:00 p.m. until 4:10 p.m.
—6:00 p.m. until 6:10 p.m.
—10:00 p.m. until 10:10 p.m.
(i) Additionally, in each hour from
12:00 p.m. to 2:59 p.m., the drawbridge
shall open and remain open to
navigation for an additional 10-minute
period.
(ii) The 10-minute opening periods
shall be published on a quarterly basis
by the drawbridge owner and reflected
on the drawbridge owner’s website and
mobile application.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Jun 28, 2021
Jkt 253001
(4) The drawbridge shall have a
drawbridge tender onsite at all times
who is capable of physically tending
and operating the drawbridge by local
control, if necessary, or when ordered
by the Coast Guard.
(i) The drawbridge tender shall
provide estimated times of drawbridge
openings and closures, upon request.
(ii) Operational information will be
provided 24 hours a day on VHF–FM
channels 9 and 16 or by telephone at
(305) 889–5572. Signs shall be posted
visible to marine traffic and displaying
VHF radio contact information, website
and application information, and the
telephone number for the bridge tender.
(5) In the event of a drawbridge
operational failure, or other emergency
circumstances impacting normal
drawbridge operations, the drawbridge
owner shall immediately notify the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port Miami
and provide an estimated time of repair
and return to normal operations.
(6) A drawbridge log shall be
maintained including drawbridge
opening and closing times. The
drawbridge log should include reasons
for those drawbridge closings that
interfere with scheduled openings in
this part. This drawbridge log shall be
maintained by the drawbridge owner
and upon request, be provided to the
Coast Guard.
(7) A website and mobile application
shall be maintained by the drawbridge
owner and publish:
(i) Drawbridge opening times required
by this subsection;
(ii) Timely updates to schedules;
including but not limited to impacts due
to emergency circumstances, minor
repairs and inspections;
(iii) At least 24-hour advance notice
for each schedule in order to facilitate
planning by maritime operators; and
(iv) To the extent reasonably
practicable, at least 60-minutes advance
notice of schedule changes or delays.
(8) The drawbridge shall display the
following lights:
(i) When the drawbridge is in the fully
open position, green lights shall be
displayed to indicate that vessels may
pass.
(ii) When rail traffic approaches the
block signal, the lights shall go to
flashing red, then the drawbridge lowers
and locks, and the lights shall remain
flashing red.
(iii) After the rail traffic has cleared
the drawbridge, the drawbridge shall
open and the lights return to green.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
34175
Dated: June 21, 2021.
Eric C. Jones,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander
Seventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2021–13701 Filed 6–28–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2021–0378; FRL–10024–
86–Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Iowa; Infrastructure
State Implementation Plan
Requirements for the 2015 Ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
certain elements of a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submission
from the State of Iowa addressing the
applicable requirements of section 110
of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the 2015
Ozone (O3) National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS). Section 110
requires that each state adopt and
submit a SIP revision to support the
implementation, maintenance, and
enforcement of each new or revised
NAAQS promulgated by the EPA. These
SIPs are commonly referred to as
‘‘infrastructure’’ SIPs. The infrastructure
requirements are designed to ensure that
the structural components of each
state’s air quality management program
are adequate to meet the state’s
responsibilities under the CAA.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 29, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2021–0378 to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket ID No. for this
rulemaking. Comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov/, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on sending
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Written Comments’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jason Heitman, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air
Quality Planning Branch, 11201 Renner
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29JNP1.SGM
29JNP1
34176
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 29, 2021 / Proposed Rules
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219;
telephone number (913) 551–7664;
email address heitman.jason@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. A technical
support document (TSD) is included in
this proposed rulemaking docket.
Table of Contents
I. Written Comments
II. What is being addressed in this document?
III. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
IV. What action is EPA taking?
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
I. Written Comments
Submit your comments, identified by
Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2021–
0378, at https://www.regulations.gov.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
II. What is being addressed in this
document?
The EPA is proposing to approve the
infrastructure SIP submission received
from the state on November 30, 2018 in
accordance with section 110(a)(1) of the
CAA. Specifically, the EPA is proposing
to approve the following infrastructure
elements of section 110(a)(2) of the
CAA: (A) through (C), (D)(i)(II)—
prevention of significant deterioration of
air quality (prong 3) and protection of
visibility (prong 4), (D)(ii), (E) through
(H), and (J) through (M). Elements of
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)—significant
contribution to nonattainment (prong 1)
and interfering with maintenance of the
NAAQS (prong 2) will be addressed in
a separate action.
Section 110(a)(2)(I) was discussed in
the submission, however, the EPA does
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Jun 28, 2021
Jkt 253001
not expect infrastructure SIP
submissions to address element (I).
Section 110(a)(2)(I) requires states to
meet the applicable SIP requirements of
part D of the CAA relating to designated
nonattainment areas. The specific part D
submissions for designated
nonattainment areas are subject to
different submission schedules than
those for section 110 infrastructure
elements. The EPA will act on part D
attainment plan SIP submissions
through a separate rulemaking governed
by the requirements for nonattainment
areas, as described in part D.
A TSD is included as part of the
docket to discuss the details of this
proposed action, including an analysis
of how the SIP meets the applicable 110
requirements for infrastructure SIPs.
III. Have the requirements for approval
of a SIP revision been met?
The state submission has met the
public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR
51.102. The submission also satisfied
the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part
51, appendix V. The state provided a
public comment period for this SIP
revision from September 18, 2018 to
October 19, 2018, and received two
comments related to a request for more
stringent ozone requirements and an
increase in ozone monitors. The state
provided an adequate response to these
comments. In addition, as explained in
more detail in the TSD which is part of
this docket, the revision meets the
substantive SIP requirements of the
CAA, including section 110 and
implementing regulations.
IV. What action is EPA taking?
The EPA is proposing to approve
elements of the November 30, 2018,
submission addressing the
infrastructure elements for the 2015 O3
NAAQS. Specifically, the EPA is
proposing to approve the following
infrastructure elements of section
110(a)(2): (A) through(C), (D)(i)(II) prong
3 and prong 4, (D)(ii), (E) through (H),
(J) through (M). The EPA is not acting
on the elements of section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)—prong 1 and prong 2
at this time. Section 110(a)(2)(I) was
discussed in the submission as not
being an applicable element and the
EPA does not expect section 110(a)(2)(I)
to be addressed in an infrastructure SIP
submission. The EPA’s analysis of the
submission is addressed in a TSD which
is part of this docket.
We are processing this as a proposed
action because we are soliciting
comments on this proposed action.
Final rulemaking will occur after
consideration of any comments.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly,
this action merely approves state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTA) because this
rulemaking does not involve technical
standards; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
E:\FR\FM\29JNP1.SGM
29JNP1
34177
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 29, 2021 / Proposed Rules
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Dated: June 22, 2021.
Edward H. Chu,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the EPA proposes to amend
40 CFR part 52 as set forth below:
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Infrastructure,
Intergovernmental relations, Ozone.
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart Q—Iowa
2. In § 52.820, the table in paragraph
(e) is amended by adding the entry
‘‘(54)’’ in numerical order to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.820
*
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED IOWA NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS
Name of
nonregulatory
SIP provision
*
*
(54)Section 110(a)(2) Infrastructure Requirements for
the 2015 O3 NAAQS.
Applicable
geographic
or nonattainment area
*
Statewide .......
[FR Doc. 2021–13824 Filed 6–28–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA–R07–OAR–2021–0391; FRL–10025–
26–Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri
Redesignation Request and
Associated Maintenance Plan for the
Jefferson County 2010 SO2 1-Hour
NAAQS Nonattainment Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
On December 27, 2017, the
State of Missouri submitted a request for
the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) to redesignate the Jefferson
County, Missouri, 2010 1-hour sulfur
dioxide (SO2) National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS)
nonattainment area to attainment and to
approve a State Implementation Plan
(SIP) revision containing a maintenance
plan for the area. The State provided
supplemental information on: May 15,
2018; February 7, 2019; February 25,
2019; and April 9, 2021. In response to
these submittals, the EPA is proposing
to take the following actions: Approve
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Jun 28, 2021
State
submittal
date
Jkt 253001
11/30/18
EPA approval date
Explanation
*
*
[Date of publication of the final
rule in the Federal Register], [Federal Register citation of the final rule].
*
*
[EPA–R07–OAR–2021–0378;
FRL–10024–
86–Region 7].
This action proposes to approve the following
CAA elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C),
(D)(i)(II)—prongs 3 and 4, (D)(ii), (E), (F),
(G), (H), (J), (K), (L), and (M).
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)—prongs 1 and 2 will be
addressed in a separate action. 110(a)(2)(I)
is not applicable.
the State’s plan for maintaining
attainment of the 2010 1-hour SO2
primary standard in the area; and
approve the State’s request to
redesignate the Jefferson County SO2
nonattainment area to attainment for the
2010 1-hour SO2 primary standard.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 29, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2021–0391 to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket ID No. for this
rulemaking. Comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov/, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on sending
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Written Comments’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ashley Keas, Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality
Planning Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at
(913) 551–7629 or by email at
keas.ashley@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Table of Contents
I. Written Comments
II. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
III. What is the background for the EPA’s
proposed actions?
IV. What are the criteria for redesignation?
V. What is the EPA’s analysis of the request?
VI. What are the actions the EPA is proposing
to take?
VII. Environmental Justice Concerns
VIII. Incorporation by Reference
IX. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Written Comments
Submit your comments, identified by
Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2021–
0391, at https://www.regulations.gov.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
E:\FR\FM\29JNP1.SGM
29JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 122 (Tuesday, June 29, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34175-34177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13824]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2021-0378; FRL-10024-86-Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Iowa; Infrastructure State Implementation Plan
Requirements for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve certain elements of a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submission from the State of Iowa addressing the applicable
requirements of section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the 2015
Ozone (O3) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS).
Section 110 requires that each state adopt and submit a SIP revision to
support the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of each new or
revised NAAQS promulgated by the EPA. These SIPs are commonly referred
to as ``infrastructure'' SIPs. The infrastructure requirements are
designed to ensure that the structural components of each state's air
quality management program are adequate to meet the state's
responsibilities under the CAA.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 29, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2021-0378 to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID
No. for this rulemaking. Comments received will be posted without
change to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information provided. For detailed instructions on sending comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Written
Comments'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason Heitman, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality Planning Branch, 11201
Renner
[[Page 34176]]
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone number (913) 551-7664; email
address [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA. A technical support document (TSD) is
included in this proposed rulemaking docket.
Table of Contents
I. Written Comments
II. What is being addressed in this document?
III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
IV. What action is EPA taking?
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Written Comments
Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-2021-
0378, at https://www.regulations.gov. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
II. What is being addressed in this document?
The EPA is proposing to approve the infrastructure SIP submission
received from the state on November 30, 2018 in accordance with section
110(a)(1) of the CAA. Specifically, the EPA is proposing to approve the
following infrastructure elements of section 110(a)(2) of the CAA: (A)
through (C), (D)(i)(II)--prevention of significant deterioration of air
quality (prong 3) and protection of visibility (prong 4), (D)(ii), (E)
through (H), and (J) through (M). Elements of section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)--significant contribution to nonattainment (prong 1)
and interfering with maintenance of the NAAQS (prong 2) will be
addressed in a separate action.
Section 110(a)(2)(I) was discussed in the submission, however, the
EPA does not expect infrastructure SIP submissions to address element
(I). Section 110(a)(2)(I) requires states to meet the applicable SIP
requirements of part D of the CAA relating to designated nonattainment
areas. The specific part D submissions for designated nonattainment
areas are subject to different submission schedules than those for
section 110 infrastructure elements. The EPA will act on part D
attainment plan SIP submissions through a separate rulemaking governed
by the requirements for nonattainment areas, as described in part D.
A TSD is included as part of the docket to discuss the details of
this proposed action, including an analysis of how the SIP meets the
applicable 110 requirements for infrastructure SIPs.
III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
The state submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The
state provided a public comment period for this SIP revision from
September 18, 2018 to October 19, 2018, and received two comments
related to a request for more stringent ozone requirements and an
increase in ozone monitors. The state provided an adequate response to
these comments. In addition, as explained in more detail in the TSD
which is part of this docket, the revision meets the substantive SIP
requirements of the CAA, including section 110 and implementing
regulations.
IV. What action is EPA taking?
The EPA is proposing to approve elements of the November 30, 2018,
submission addressing the infrastructure elements for the 2015
O3 NAAQS. Specifically, the EPA is proposing to approve the
following infrastructure elements of section 110(a)(2): (A) through(C),
(D)(i)(II) prong 3 and prong 4, (D)(ii), (E) through (H), (J) through
(M). The EPA is not acting on the elements of section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)--prong 1 and prong 2 at this time. Section
110(a)(2)(I) was discussed in the submission as not being an applicable
element and the EPA does not expect section 110(a)(2)(I) to be
addressed in an infrastructure SIP submission. The EPA's analysis of
the submission is addressed in a TSD which is part of this docket.
We are processing this as a proposed action because we are
soliciting comments on this proposed action. Final rulemaking will
occur after consideration of any comments.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Administrator is required to
approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act
and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly,
this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements
and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTA) because this rulemaking does not
involve technical standards; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
[[Page 34177]]
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Infrastructure, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone.
Dated: June 22, 2021.
Edward H. Chu,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA proposes to amend
40 CFR part 52 as set forth below:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart Q--Iowa
0
2. In Sec. 52.820, the table in paragraph (e) is amended by adding the
entry ``(54)'' in numerical order to read as follows:
Sec. 52.820 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
EPA-Approved Iowa Nonregulatory Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Name of nonregulatory SIP Applicable geographic submittal EPA approval date Explanation
provision or nonattainment area date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
(54)Section 110(a)(2) Statewide............. 11/30/18 [Date of [EPA-R07-OAR-2021-0
Infrastructure Requirements for publication of the 378; FRL-10024-86-
the 2015 O3 NAAQS. final rule in the Region 7].
Federal Register], This action
[Federal Register proposes to
citation of the approve the
final rule]. following CAA
elements:
110(a)(2)(A), (B),
(C), (D)(i)(II)--
prongs 3 and 4,
(D)(ii), (E), (F),
(G), (H), (J),
(K), (L), and (M).
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I)
-prongs 1 and 2
will be addressed
in a separate
action.
110(a)(2)(I) is
not applicable.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2021-13824 Filed 6-28-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P