Plan for Periodic Review of Regulations, 34169-34171 [2021-13495]
Download as PDF
34169
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 29, 2021 / Proposed Rules
postcard on which the following
statement is made: ‘‘Comments to
Docket No. FAA–2021–0518/Airspace
Docket No. 21–ASW–12.’’ The postcard
will be date/time stamped and returned
to the commenter.
All communications received before
the specified closing date for comments
will be considered before taking action
on the proposed rule. The proposal
contained in this notice may be changed
in light of the comments received. A
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
concerned with this rulemaking will be
filed in the docket.
Availability of NPRMs
An electronic copy of this document
may be downloaded through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through
the FAA’s web page at https://
www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/
airspace_amendments/.
You may review the public docket
containing the proposal, any comments
received, and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office (see the
ADDRESSES section for the address and
phone number) between 9:00 a.m. and
5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except federal holidays. An informal
docket may also be examined during
normal business hours at the Federal
Aviation Administration, Air Traffic
Organization, Central Service Center,
Operations Support Group, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX
76177.
Availability and Summary of
Documents for Incorporation by
Reference
This document proposes to amend
FAA Order 7400.11E, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points,
dated July 21, 2020, and effective
September 15, 2020. FAA Order
7400.11E is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this
document. FAA Order 7400.11E lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas,
air traffic service routes, and reporting
points.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
The Proposal
The FAA is proposing an amendment
to 14 CFR part 71 by amending the Class
E airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface to within a 6.5mile (decreased from a 6.8-mile) radius
of Sundance Airport, Oklahoma City,
OK.
These actions are the result of an
airspace review caused by the
decommissioning of the Sundance LOC
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Jun 28, 2021
Jkt 253001
which provided guidance to instrument
procedures at this airport.
Class E airspace designations are
published in paragraph 6005 of FAA
Order 7400.11E, dated July 21, 2020,
and effective September 15, 2020, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designations
listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order.
FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on
September 15.
Regulatory Notices and Analyses
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current, is non-controversial and
unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it
is certified that this rule, when
promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Environmental Review
This proposal will be subject to an
environmental analysis in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F,
‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final
regulatory action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11E,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated July 21, 2020, and
effective September 15, 2020, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
*
*
ASW OK E5 Oklahoma City, OK
[Amended]
Will Rogers World Airport, OK
(Lat. 35°23′35″ N, long. 97°36′03″ W)
Tinker AFB, OK
(Lat. 35°24′53″ N, long. 97°23′12″ W)
University of Oklahoma Westheimer Airport,
OK
(Lat. 35°14′44″ N, long. 97°28′20″ W)
David Jay Perry Airport, OK
(Lat. 35°09′18″ N, long. 97°28′13″ W)
Clarence E. Page Municipal Airport, OK
(Lat. 35°29′17″ N, long. 97°49′25″ W)
El Reno Regional Airport, OK
(Lat. 35°28′22″ N, long. 98°00′21″ W)
Wiley Post Airport, OK
(Lat. 35°32′03″ N, long. 97°38′49″ W)
Sundance Airport, OK
(Lat. 35°36′07″ N, long. 97°42′22″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within an 8.1-mile
radius of Will Rogers World Airport, and
within an 8.2-mile radius of Tinker AFB, and
within a 6.7-mile radius of University of
Oklahoma Westheimer Airport, and within
2.0 miles each side of the 213° bearing from
the airport extending from the 6.7-mile
radius to 7.8 miles southwest of the airport,
and within a 6.3-mile radius of David Jay
Perry Airport, and within a 6.5-mile radius
of Clarence E. Page Municipal Airport, and
within a 6.6-mile radius of El Reno Regional
Airport, and within a 6.8-mile radius of
Wiley Post Airport, and within a 6.5-mile
radius of Sundance Airport.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on June 23,
2021.
Martin A. Skinner,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2021–13735 Filed 6–28–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to
amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
15 CFR Part 922
Plan for Periodic Review of
Regulations
Office of National Marine
Sanctuaries (ONMS), National Ocean
Service (NOS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce (DOC).
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\29JNP1.SGM
29JNP1
34170
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 29, 2021 / Proposed Rules
Section 610 of the RFA, 5 U.S.C. 610,
requires Federal agencies to review
existing regulations which have or will
have a significant economic impact on
SUMMARY: The Regulatory Flexibility Act
a substantial number of small entities. It
(RFA) requires that NOAA’s Office of
requires that ONMS publish a plan in
National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS)
the Federal Register explaining how it
periodically review existing regulations
will review existing regulations that
that have a significant economic impact
have a significant economic impact on
on a substantial number of small
a substantial number of small entities.
entities, such as small businesses, small
Regulations that have a significant
organizations, and small governmental
economic impact on a substantial
jurisdictions. This plan describes how
number of small entities that became
ONMS will perform this review and
effective after January 1, 1981, must be
describes the regulations proposed for
reviewed within 10 years of the
review in fiscal year 2022.
publication date of the final rule.
DATES: Comments must be received on
Section 610(c) requires that ONMS
or before July 29, 2021.
publish in the Federal Register a list of
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
rules it will review during the
submitted by:
succeeding 12 months. The list must
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
describe, explain the need for, and
electronic public comments via the
provide the legal basis for the rules, as
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to
well as invite public comment on the
https://www.regulations.gov, and search
rules.
for docket NOAA–NOS–2021–0047,
In addition, section 605 of the RFA,
click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
5 U.S.C. 605, provides that if, when a
complete the required fields, and enter
rule is proposed or finalized, the head
or attach your comments.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
of an agency certifies to the Small
other method, to any other address or
Business Administration’s Chief
individual, or received after the end of
Counsel for Advocacy that the rule
the comment period, may not be
would not have a significant economic
considered by NOAA. All comments
impact on a substantial number of small
received are a part of the public record
entities, then initial and final regulatory
and will generally be posted for public
flexibility analyses do not need to be
viewing on www.regulations.gov
prepared for the rule. The Small
without change. All personally
Business Administration’s guidance on
identifiable information (for example,
implementing the requirements of RFA
name, address, etc.), confidential
section 610 indicates that agencies may
business information, or otherwise
exercise their discretion to determine if
sensitive information submitted
previously changed conditions may
voluntarily submitted by the commenter mean that a certified rule now does have
will be publicly accessible. NOAA will
a significant economic impact on a
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/ substantial number of small entities
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
and, therefore, should be subject to a
remain anonymous).
full section 610 review. If there is
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
evidence that a previously certified rule
Meredith Walz, NOAA Office of
is now having a significant economic
National Marine Sanctuaries, 1305 East
impact on a substantial number of small
West Highway, Silver Spring, MD
entities, then the Small Business
20910, meredith.walz@noaa.gov, or
Administration recommends that the
240–533–0686.
agency should conduct a section 610
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
review of the rule.
Notice of plan for periodic
review of regulations; request for
comments.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
ACTION:
Background
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., requires that
Federal agencies take into account how
their regulations affect ‘‘small entities,’’
which the RFA defines to include small
businesses, small governmental
jurisdictions and small organizations. 5
U.S.C. 601. For regulations proposed
after January 1, 1981, the agency must
either prepare a Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis or certify that the regulation, if
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Jun 28, 2021
Jkt 253001
Criteria for Review of Existing
Regulations
The purpose of a section 610 review
is to determine whether existing rules
should be left unchanged, or whether
they should be revised or rescinded in
order to minimize significant economic
impacts on a substantial number of
small entities, consistent with the
objectives of other applicable statutes.
RFA section 610(b) requires agencies to
consider five factors when conducting
this review:
(1) Whether the rule is still needed;
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(2) What type of public complaints or
comments were received concerning the
rule;
(3) How complex is the rule;
(4) How much the rule overlaps,
duplicates or conflicts with other
Federal rules, and, to the extent feasible,
with state and local governmental rules;
and
(5) How long it has been since the rule
has been evaluated or how much the
technology, economic conditions, or
other factors have changed in the area
affected by the rule.
For rules that were certified under
RFA section 605, ONMS is not required
to conduct a review under RFA section
610. However, ONMS may exercise its
discretion to prepare an assessment to
determine whether changed conditions
may mean that the existing rules now do
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
and should therefore be reviewed under
RFA section 610.
Plan for Periodic Review of Rules
ONMS will conduct reviews in such
a way as to ensure that all rules for
which a final regulatory flexibility
analysis was prepared are reviewed
within 10 years of the year in which
they were originally issued. During this
same period, ONMS may exercise its
discretion to also review rules certified
under RFA section 605 as not having
significant impacts. ONMS may
evaluate whether changed conditions
may mean that the existing rules now do
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
and therefore should be reviewed under
RFA section 610. ONMS intends that it
will conduct section 610 reviews on
applicable regulations on an annual
basis. ONMS will make RFA Section
610 review reports available at the
following website: https://
sanctuaries.noaa.gov/library/
alldocs.html.
ONMS Regulation Requiring Review for
Fiscal Year 2022
ONMS has determined that one
rulemaking finalized in fiscal year 2012
requires review under RFA section 610:
‘‘Research Area Within Gray’s Reef
National Marine Sanctuary’’. RIN 0648–
AV88 (76 FR 63824; October 14, 2011).
This final rule created an 8.27 squaremile research area within the southern
portion of Gray’s Reef National Marine
Sanctuary. NOAA created the research
area pursuant to its authority under the
National Marine Sanctuaries Act, 16
U.S.C. 1431 et seq., in order to provide
a zone specifically designed for
conducting controlled scientific studies
in the absence of certain human
E:\FR\FM\29JNP1.SGM
29JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 122 / Tuesday, June 29, 2021 / Proposed Rules
activities that could affect the results.
NOAA prohibited fishing, diving, and
stopping a vessel in the research area.
NOAA prepared a final regulatory
flexibility analysis for this rule when it
was finalized.
ONMS invites comments on this rule,
and will evaluate comments that would
assist ONMS in conducting its RFA
section 610 review. Unless we publish
a document stating otherwise, ONMS
will make the final report available at
https://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/library/
alldocs.html.
John Armor,
Director, Office of National Marine
Sanctuaries, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. 2021–13495 Filed 6–28–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–NK–P
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
16 CFR Chapter II
[Docket No. CP–21–1]
Petition Requesting Rulemaking on
Duster Aerosol Products
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Request for comment on
petition for rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Consumer Product Safety
Commission (CPSC or Commission) has
received a petition requesting that the
Commission initiate rulemaking to
adopt a safety standard for duster
aerosol products. The Commission
invites written comments concerning
the petition.
DATES: Submit comments by August 30,
2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by Docket No. CP–21–1, by
any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit
electronic comments to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
CPSC does not accept comments
submitted by electronic mail (email),
except through https://
www.regulations.gov and as described
below. CPSC encourages you to submit
electronic comments by using the
Federal eRulemaking Portal, as
described above.
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier Written
Submissions: Submit comments by
mail/hand delivery/courier to: Division
of the Secretariat, Consumer Product
Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330
East West Highway, Bethesda, MD
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:40 Jun 28, 2021
Jkt 253001
20814; telephone: (301) 504–7479.
Alternatively, as a temporary option
during the COVID–19 pandemic, you
may email such submissions to: cpscos@cpsc.gov.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number for this notice. CPSC may post
all comments without change, including
any personal identifiers, contact
information, or other personal
information provided, to: https://
www.regulations.gov. Do not submit
electronically: Confidential business
information, trade secret information, or
other sensitive or protected information
that you do not want to be available to
the public. If you wish to submit such
information, please submit it according
to the instructions for mail/hand
delivery/courier written submissions.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to: https://
www.regulations.gov, and insert the
docket number, CP–21–1, into the
‘‘Search’’ box, and follow the prompts.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alberta E. Mills, Division of the
Secretariat, Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone: 301–
504–7479; email: amills@cpsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April
2, 2021, Families United Against
Inhalant Abuse (FUAIA) (petitioner),
submitted a petition requesting the
Commission initiate rulemaking to
adopt a mandatory CPSC safety standard
to address the hazards associated with
‘‘duster’’ aerosol products used for
cleaning electronics and other items and
containing the chemical 1,1Difluorethane, or any derivative thereof.
The Commission’s procedure for
petitioning for rulemaking is described
at 16 CFR part 1051.
The petitioner states that ‘‘duster’’
products are any hydrofluorocarbon
propellant cleaner products intended for
the purpose of cleaning electronic
devices, photographic equipment, and
any other items having areas where dust
resides and is inaccessible by hand. The
petitioner also states that such duster
products contain hydrofluorocarbon
propellant cleaner, such as 1,1Difluoroethane, or a similar derivative.
The petitioner notes that these duster
products are sold under a variety of
brand names and are widely available to
consumers in various retail stores and
online.
The petitioner states that when 1,1Difluoroethane used in duster aerosol
products is inhaled from the can
(commonly called huffing), intoxication
occurs rapidly, yet is very short-lived (4
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
34171
to 5 minutes). According to the
petitioner, inhalation of this chemical is
acutely dangerous and causes
immediate brain damage and possible
Sudden Sniffing Death (SSD). The
petitioner states that 22 percent of firsttime duster inhalers die, and the
majority of all duster-inhalant deaths
are attributed to SSD.
After reviewing all of the data, the
petitioner concludes that: (1) Duster
inhalation in the United States is a
‘‘chronic problem’’; (2) individuals of all
ages, genders, ethnicities, and
education, and socioeconomic levels are
involved in the use of duster as an
inhalant and are dying in large numbers
throughout the United States; (3) there
is an ‘‘unreasonable’’ risk of physical
injury and death due to the inhalant use
of duster products; and (4) current
interventions (legislation, retail
practices, manufacturer design) have
been ineffective in resolving this
problem.
The petitioner requests that CPSC
promulgate a mandatory safety standard
that includes the following:
• A performance standard. Require
manufacturers to add an aversive
(bitterant other than Denatonium
Benzoate) to all duster aerosol cans at a
level of 30–40 ppm. The duster can
injection technology must be improved
to ensure that the bitterant actually gets
into the can and will also appear in the
spray at the designated level.
• Warning requirements.1 Place a
‘‘much stronger’’ warning on the can.
An example of this warning could be:
‘‘DANGER: DEATH—This product can
kill you if you breathe it.’’
The Commission seeks comments
concerning this petition.
The major factors the Commission
considers in deciding whether to grant
or deny a petition regarding a product
include the following items:
(1) Whether the product involved
presents an unreasonable risk of injury.
(2) Whether a rule is reasonably
necessary to eliminate or reduce the risk
of injury.
(3) Whether failure of the Commission
to initiate the rulemaking proceeding
requested would unreasonably expose
the petitioner or other consumers to the
risk of injury which the petitioner
alleges is presented by the product. 16
CFR § 1051.9(a).
1 The petitioner also requests that CPSC
promulgate a provision in a standard that requires
retailers to monitor and limit individuals from
continually purchasing multiple cans of duster from
their stores within a designated (1 month) period.
Under Section 7 of the CPSA, the Commission may
issue only performance requirements and
requirements for warnings or instructions.
Therefore, the Commission lacks authority to
require these additional provisions.
E:\FR\FM\29JNP1.SGM
29JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 122 (Tuesday, June 29, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34169-34171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13495]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
15 CFR Part 922
Plan for Periodic Review of Regulations
AGENCY: Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS), National Ocean
Service (NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce (DOC).
[[Page 34170]]
ACTION: Notice of plan for periodic review of regulations; request for
comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) requires that NOAA's
Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS) periodically review
existing regulations that have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, such as small businesses, small
organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions. This plan
describes how ONMS will perform this review and describes the
regulations proposed for review in fiscal year 2022.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 29, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to https://www.regulations.gov, and search for docket NOAA-NOS-2021-0047, click
the ``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NOAA. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personally identifiable
information (for example, name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
submitted by the commenter will be publicly accessible. NOAA will
accept anonymous comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you
wish to remain anonymous).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Meredith Walz, NOAA Office of National
Marine Sanctuaries, 1305 East West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910,
[email protected], or 240-533-0686.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.,
requires that Federal agencies take into account how their regulations
affect ``small entities,'' which the RFA defines to include small
businesses, small governmental jurisdictions and small organizations. 5
U.S.C. 601. For regulations proposed after January 1, 1981, the agency
must either prepare a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis or certify that
the regulation, if promulgated, will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Section 610 of the RFA, 5 U.S.C. 610, requires Federal agencies to
review existing regulations which have or will have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. It requires
that ONMS publish a plan in the Federal Register explaining how it will
review existing regulations that have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. Regulations that have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
that became effective after January 1, 1981, must be reviewed within 10
years of the publication date of the final rule. Section 610(c)
requires that ONMS publish in the Federal Register a list of rules it
will review during the succeeding 12 months. The list must describe,
explain the need for, and provide the legal basis for the rules, as
well as invite public comment on the rules.
In addition, section 605 of the RFA, 5 U.S.C. 605, provides that
if, when a rule is proposed or finalized, the head of an agency
certifies to the Small Business Administration's Chief Counsel for
Advocacy that the rule would not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities, then initial and final
regulatory flexibility analyses do not need to be prepared for the
rule. The Small Business Administration's guidance on implementing the
requirements of RFA section 610 indicates that agencies may exercise
their discretion to determine if previously changed conditions may mean
that a certified rule now does have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities and, therefore, should be subject
to a full section 610 review. If there is evidence that a previously
certified rule is now having a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, then the Small Business
Administration recommends that the agency should conduct a section 610
review of the rule.
Criteria for Review of Existing Regulations
The purpose of a section 610 review is to determine whether
existing rules should be left unchanged, or whether they should be
revised or rescinded in order to minimize significant economic impacts
on a substantial number of small entities, consistent with the
objectives of other applicable statutes. RFA section 610(b) requires
agencies to consider five factors when conducting this review:
(1) Whether the rule is still needed;
(2) What type of public complaints or comments were received
concerning the rule;
(3) How complex is the rule;
(4) How much the rule overlaps, duplicates or conflicts with other
Federal rules, and, to the extent feasible, with state and local
governmental rules; and
(5) How long it has been since the rule has been evaluated or how
much the technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed
in the area affected by the rule.
For rules that were certified under RFA section 605, ONMS is not
required to conduct a review under RFA section 610. However, ONMS may
exercise its discretion to prepare an assessment to determine whether
changed conditions may mean that the existing rules now do have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
and should therefore be reviewed under RFA section 610.
Plan for Periodic Review of Rules
ONMS will conduct reviews in such a way as to ensure that all rules
for which a final regulatory flexibility analysis was prepared are
reviewed within 10 years of the year in which they were originally
issued. During this same period, ONMS may exercise its discretion to
also review rules certified under RFA section 605 as not having
significant impacts. ONMS may evaluate whether changed conditions may
mean that the existing rules now do have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities and therefore should be
reviewed under RFA section 610. ONMS intends that it will conduct
section 610 reviews on applicable regulations on an annual basis. ONMS
will make RFA Section 610 review reports available at the following
website: https://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/library/alldocs.html.
ONMS Regulation Requiring Review for Fiscal Year 2022
ONMS has determined that one rulemaking finalized in fiscal year
2012 requires review under RFA section 610:
``Research Area Within Gray's Reef National Marine Sanctuary''. RIN
0648-AV88 (76 FR 63824; October 14, 2011). This final rule created an
8.27 square-mile research area within the southern portion of Gray's
Reef National Marine Sanctuary. NOAA created the research area pursuant
to its authority under the National Marine Sanctuaries Act, 16 U.S.C.
1431 et seq., in order to provide a zone specifically designed for
conducting controlled scientific studies in the absence of certain
human
[[Page 34171]]
activities that could affect the results. NOAA prohibited fishing,
diving, and stopping a vessel in the research area. NOAA prepared a
final regulatory flexibility analysis for this rule when it was
finalized.
ONMS invites comments on this rule, and will evaluate comments that
would assist ONMS in conducting its RFA section 610 review. Unless we
publish a document stating otherwise, ONMS will make the final report
available at https://sanctuaries.noaa.gov/library/alldocs.html.
John Armor,
Director, Office of National Marine Sanctuaries, National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. 2021-13495 Filed 6-28-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-NK-P