Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Madeira Beach, FL, 33885-33887 [2021-13700]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 121 / Monday, June 28, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
(n) A conveyance used as part of a
mobile NTP may only be supplied with
narcotic drugs by the registered NTP
that operates such conveyance. Persons
permitted to dispense controlled
substances to mobile NTPs shall not:
(1) Receive controlled substances
from other mobile NTPs or any other
entity;
(2) Deliver controlled substances to
other mobile NTPs or any other entity;
or
(3) Conduct reverse distribution of
controlled substances on a mobile NTP.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 1304—RECORDS AND
REPORTS OF REGISTRANTS
7. The authority citation for part 1304
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 821, 827, 831, 871(b),
958(e)–(g), and 965, unless otherwise noted.
§ 1304.04
[Amended]
8. In § 1304.04, amend paragraph (f)
introductory text by adding ‘‘mobile
narcotic treatment program,’’ after
‘‘exporter’’.
■ 9. In § 1304.24, revise the section
heading and paragraphs (a) and (b) to
read as follows:
■
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
§ 1304.24 Records for maintenance
treatment programs, mobile narcotic
treatment programs, and detoxification
treatment programs.
(a) Each person registered or
authorized (by § 1301.22 of this chapter)
to maintain and/or detoxify controlled
substance users in a narcotic treatment
program (NTP), including a mobile NTP,
shall maintain records with the
following information for each narcotic
controlled substance:
(1) Name of substance;
(2) Strength of substance;
(3) Dosage form;
(4) Date dispensed;
(5) Adequate identification of patient
(consumer);
(6) Amount consumed;
(7) Amount and dosage form taken
home by patient; and
(8) Dispenser’s initials.
(b) The records required by paragraph
(a) of this section will be maintained in
a dispensing log at the NTP site, or in
the case of a mobile NTP, at the
registered site of the NTP, and will be
maintained in compliance with
§ 1304.22 without reference to
§ 1304.03.
(1) As an alternative to maintaining a
paper dispensing log, an NTP or its
mobile component may also use an
automated/computerized data
processing system for the storage and
retrieval of the program’s dispensing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Jun 25, 2021
Jkt 253001
records, if the following conditions are
met:
(i) The automated system maintains
the information required in paragraph
(a);
(ii) The automated system has the
capability of producing a hard copy
printout of the program’s dispensing
records;
(iii) The NTP or its mobile component
prints a hard copy of each day’s
dispensing log, which is then initialed
appropriately by each person who
dispensed medication to the program’s
patients;
(iv) The automated system is
approved by DEA;
(v) The NTP or its mobile component
maintains an off-site back-up of all
computer generated program
information; and
(vi) The automated system is capable
of producing accurate summary reports
for both the registered site of the NTP
and any mobile component, for any
time-frame selected by DEA personnel
during an investigation. If these
summary reports are maintained in hard
copy form, they must be kept in a
systematically organized file located at
the registered site of the NTP.
(2) The NTP must retain all records
for the NTP as well as any mobile
component two years from the date of
execution, in accordance with
§ 1304.04(a). However, if the State in
which the NTP is located requires that
records be retained longer than two
years, the NTP should contact its State
opioid treatment authority for
information about State requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
D. Christopher Evans,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2021–13519 Filed 6–25–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
33885
June 17, 2021. The interim final rule
implements requirements of the
National Defense Authorization Act
(NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2020 permitting
members of the uniformed services or
their authorized representatives to file
claims for personal injury or death
caused by a Department of Defense
(DoD) health care providers in certain
military medical treatment facilities.
Because Federal courts do not have
jurisdiction to consider these claims,
DoD is issued this rule to provide
uniform standards and procedures for
considering and processing these
actions.
This correction is effective on
July 19, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patricia Toppings, 571–372–0485.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc.
2021–12815, appearing at 86 FR 32194–
32215 in the Federal Register on
Thursday, June 17, 2021, the following
correction is made:
DATES:
§ 45.11
[Corrected]
1. On page 32213, in the third column,
line 47 from the top, in § 45.11, the
second paragraph (g)(5) and paragraphs
(g)(6) and (7) that follow are
redesignated as (g)(6) through (8).
■
Dated: June 22, 2021.
Patricia L. Toppings,
OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2021–13632 Filed 6–25–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2020–0694]
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
RIN 1625–AA09
Office of the Secretary
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Gulf
Intracoastal Waterway, Madeira Beach,
FL
32 CFR Part 45
[Docket ID: DOD–2021–OS–0047]
ACTION:
Medical Malpractice Claims by
Members of the Uniformed Services;
Correction
Department of Defense (DoD)
Office of General Counsel, DoD.
ACTION: Interim final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
The Department of Defense is
correcting an interim final rule that
appeared in the Federal Register on
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
RIN 0790–AL22
Sfmt 4700
The Coast Guard is changing
the operating schedule that governs the
Welch Causeway (SR 699) Bridge, Gulf
Intracoastal Waterway mile 122.8, at
Madeira Beach, Florida. This change
will place the drawbridge on a daily
operating schedule to alleviate vehicle
congestion due to on demand bridge
openings and balance the needs of all
modes of transportation due to the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28JNR1.SGM
28JNR1
33886
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 121 / Monday, June 28, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
economic growth in the vicinity of the
bridge.
DATES: This rule is effective July 28,
2021.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Type USCG–
2020–0694 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and
click ‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email LT Clark W. Sanford, U.S. Coast
Guard, Sector Saint Petersburg
Waterways Management Division;
telephone 727–824–7506, email
Clark.W.Sanford@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
OMB Office of Management and Budget
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(Advance, Supplemental)
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
FL Florida
TD Test Deviation
FDOT Florida Department of
Transportation
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
On December 18, 2020 the Coast
Guard published a Test Deviation
entitled Drawbridge Operation
Regulation; Gulf Intracoastal Waterway,
Madeira Beach, FL in the Federal
Register (85 FR 82355). The TD invited
comments on the proposed rule change.
One comment was received during the
test period which was addressed in the
NPRM.
On April 30, 2021, the Coast Guard
published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, with a request for
comments, entitled ‘‘Drawbridge
Operation Regulation; Gulf Intracoastal
Waterway, Madeira Beach, FL’’ in the
Federal Register (85 FR 22911). There
we stated why we issued the NPRM,
and invited comments on our proposed
regulatory action related to this
regulatory change. During the comment
period that ended May 15, 2021, we
received one comment and that
comment is addressed in Section IV of
this Final Rule.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority 33 U.S.C. 499. The City
of Madeira Beach, Florida has requested
the current operating schedule be
modified due to the increased economic
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Jun 25, 2021
Jkt 253001
growth and vehicle traffic in the area, as
well as a school located in close
proximity to the bridge. The bridge
owner, Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT), is in support of
the proposed changes.
The Welch Causeway (SR 699) Bridge
across the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway,
mile 122.8, at Madeira Beach, Florida is
a double-leaf bascule bridge with a 25
foot vertical clearance at mean high
water in the closed position and an 89
foot horizontal clearance between
fenders. The normal operating schedule
for the bridge is found in 33 CFR
117.287(h). Navigation on the waterway
is commercial and recreational.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes
and the Final Rule
The Coast Guard is changing the
operating schedule that governs the
Welch Causeway (SR 699) Bridge, mile
122.8 at Madeira Beach, Florida. The
bridge currently operates on demand,
and will continue to open on demand
with the following exception; from 7
a.m. to 7 p.m. daily, except Federal
holidays, the draw need only open on
the hour and half hour.
One comment was received. The
commenter felt the bridge should
remain on demand, not limit when
vessels can pass and that better vehicle
traffic control would solve any traffic
congestion. Due to the increase in
vehicle traffic, the Coast Guard has
determined that placing the bridge on a
schedule will alleviate some congestion
while still meeting the reasonable needs
of navigation. Additionally, vessels able
to pass beneath the bridge without an
opening may do so at any time.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive Orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protesters.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, it
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the ability that vessels can
still transit the bridge given advanced
notice.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires federal agencies to consider the
potential impact of regulations on small
entities during rulemaking. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard received zero
comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rule. The Coast
Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b)
that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the bridge
may be small entities, for the reasons
stated in section V.A above, this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Government
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
E:\FR\FM\28JNR1.SGM
28JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 121 / Monday, June 28, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01, Rev. 1,
associated implementing instructions,
and Environmental Planning Policy
COMDTINST 5090.1 (series) which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f). The Coast Guard has determined
that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. This rule
promulgates the operating regulations or
procedures for drawbridges and is
categorically excluded from further
review, under paragraph L49, of Chapter
3, Table 3–1 of the U.S. Coast Guard
Environmental Planning
Implementation Procedures.
Neither a Record of Environmental
Consideration nor a Memorandum for
the Record are required for this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:59 Jun 25, 2021
Jkt 253001
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
and Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Amend § 117.287 by revising
paragraph (h) to read as follows:
■
§ 117.287
Gulf Intracoastal Waterway
*
*
*
*
*
(h) The draw of the Welch Causeway
(SR 699) Bridge, Gulf Intracoastal
Waterway mile 122.8, at Madeira Beach,
Florida, shall open on signal; except
that, from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. daily, except
Federal holidays, the draw need only
open on the hour and half hour.
Dated: June 21, 2021.
Eric C. Jones,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander
Seventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2021–13700 Filed 6–25–21; 8:45 am]
33887
If
you have questions about this
notification of non-enforcement, call or
email Lieutenant Peter McAndrew,
Sector Puget Sound Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone 206–217–6051, email
SectorPugetSoundWWM@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast
Guard normally enforces the safety zone
for the Seattle Seafair Firework Display
in Lake Washington, Seattle, WA found
in 33 CFR 165.1332 annually during the
month of July. This year, the event
organizers cancelled Seafair. Therefore,
the Coast Guard does not plan to enforce
the safety zone for the Seattle Seafair
Firework Display in Lake Washington,
Seattle, WA found in 33 CFR 165.1332,
in July 2021.
In addition to this notification of nonenforcement in the Federal Register, if
the situation changes and the Captain of
the Port Sector Puget Sound (COTP)
determines that the regulated area needs
to be enforced, the COTP will issue a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners and
provide actual notice of enforcement to
any persons in the regulated area.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dated: June 21, 2021.
P.M. Hilbert,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Puget Sound.
[FR Doc. 2021–13722 Filed 6–25–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2021–0452]
[Docket No. USCG–2021–0453]
Safety Zones; Annual Fireworks
Displays Within the Captain of the Port
Sector Puget Sound Area of
Responsibility
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notification of non-enforcement
of regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will not
enforce the Safety Zone for the Seattle
Seafair Firework Display in Lake
Washington, Seattle, WA in July 2021.
The Captain of the Port Sector Puget
Sound has determined that enforcement
of this regulation is not necessary
because Seafair the event was cancelled.
DATES: The Coast Guard does not plan
to enforce the Safety Zone for the Seattle
Seafair Firework Display in Lake
Washington in 33 CFR 165.1332 in July
2021.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Seafair Air Show Performance, Seattle,
WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notification of non-enforcement
of regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will not
enforce the safety zone for the Seafair
Air Show Performance in Lake
Washington, Seattle, WA in July and
August 2021. The Captain of the Port
Sector Puget Sound has determined
enforcement of this regulation is not
necessary because this event is
cancelled.
DATES: The Coast Guard does not plan
to enforce regulations in 33 CFR
165.1319 in July and August 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this
notification of non-enforcement, call or
email Lieutenant Peter McAndrew,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28JNR1.SGM
28JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 121 (Monday, June 28, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 33885-33887]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13700]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG-2020-0694]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Gulf Intracoastal Waterway,
Madeira Beach, FL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is changing the operating schedule that
governs the Welch Causeway (SR 699) Bridge, Gulf Intracoastal Waterway
mile 122.8, at Madeira Beach, Florida. This change will place the
drawbridge on a daily operating schedule to alleviate vehicle
congestion due to on demand bridge openings and balance the needs of
all modes of transportation due to the
[[Page 33886]]
economic growth in the vicinity of the bridge.
DATES: This rule is effective July 28, 2021.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov. Type USCG-
2020-0694 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email LT Clark W. Sanford, U.S. Coast Guard, Sector Saint
Petersburg Waterways Management Division; telephone 727-824-7506, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
OMB Office of Management and Budget
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Advance, Supplemental)
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
FL Florida
TD Test Deviation
FDOT Florida Department of Transportation
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
On December 18, 2020 the Coast Guard published a Test Deviation
entitled Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Gulf Intracoastal Waterway,
Madeira Beach, FL in the Federal Register (85 FR 82355). The TD invited
comments on the proposed rule change. One comment was received during
the test period which was addressed in the NPRM.
On April 30, 2021, the Coast Guard published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, with a request for comments, entitled ``Drawbridge
Operation Regulation; Gulf Intracoastal Waterway, Madeira Beach, FL''
in the Federal Register (85 FR 22911). There we stated why we issued
the NPRM, and invited comments on our proposed regulatory action
related to this regulatory change. During the comment period that ended
May 15, 2021, we received one comment and that comment is addressed in
Section IV of this Final Rule.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority 33 U.S.C. 499.
The City of Madeira Beach, Florida has requested the current operating
schedule be modified due to the increased economic growth and vehicle
traffic in the area, as well as a school located in close proximity to
the bridge. The bridge owner, Florida Department of Transportation
(FDOT), is in support of the proposed changes.
The Welch Causeway (SR 699) Bridge across the Gulf Intracoastal
Waterway, mile 122.8, at Madeira Beach, Florida is a double-leaf
bascule bridge with a 25 foot vertical clearance at mean high water in
the closed position and an 89 foot horizontal clearance between
fenders. The normal operating schedule for the bridge is found in 33
CFR 117.287(h). Navigation on the waterway is commercial and
recreational.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes and the Final Rule
The Coast Guard is changing the operating schedule that governs the
Welch Causeway (SR 699) Bridge, mile 122.8 at Madeira Beach, Florida.
The bridge currently operates on demand, and will continue to open on
demand with the following exception; from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. daily,
except Federal holidays, the draw need only open on the hour and half
hour.
One comment was received. The commenter felt the bridge should
remain on demand, not limit when vessels can pass and that better
vehicle traffic control would solve any traffic congestion. Due to the
increase in vehicle traffic, the Coast Guard has determined that
placing the bridge on a schedule will alleviate some congestion while
still meeting the reasonable needs of navigation. Additionally, vessels
able to pass beneath the bridge without an opening may do so at any
time.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protesters.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, it has
not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the ability that
vessels can still transit the bridge given advanced notice.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received zero comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rule. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
bridge may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section V.A
above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Government
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship
[[Page 33887]]
between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it
is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing
instructions, and Environmental Planning Policy COMDTINST 5090.1
(series) which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f). The
Coast Guard has determined that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This rule promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for drawbridges and is categorically excluded
from further review, under paragraph L49, of Chapter 3, Table 3-1 of
the U.S. Coast Guard Environmental Planning Implementation Procedures.
Neither a Record of Environmental Consideration nor a Memorandum
for the Record are required for this rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; and Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Amend Sec. 117.287 by revising paragraph (h) to read as follows:
Sec. 117.287 Gulf Intracoastal Waterway
* * * * *
(h) The draw of the Welch Causeway (SR 699) Bridge, Gulf
Intracoastal Waterway mile 122.8, at Madeira Beach, Florida, shall open
on signal; except that, from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. daily, except Federal
holidays, the draw need only open on the hour and half hour.
Dated: June 21, 2021.
Eric C. Jones,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander Seventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2021-13700 Filed 6-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P