Air Plan Approval; Arizona; Maricopa County Air Quality Department, 32848-32850 [2021-12923]
Download as PDF
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
32848
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 23, 2021 / Proposed Rules
Orange, TX. Normally such actions are
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. A
preliminary Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket,
see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREA AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, call or email the
person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments.
Comments we post to https://
www.regulations.gov will include any
personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
submissions in response to this
document, see DHS’s eRulemaking
System of Records notice (85 FR 14226,
March 11, 2020).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in the docket, and
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
website’s instructions. We review all
comments received, but we will only
post comments that address the topic of
the proposed rule. We may choose not
to post off-topic, inappropriate, or
duplicate comments that we receive. If
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Jun 22, 2021
Jkt 253001
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard is proposing
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T08–0416 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T08–0416
Orange, Texas.
Safety Zone; Sabine River,
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All navigable waters of the
Sabine River, extending the entire width
of the river, adjacent to the public boat
ramp located in Orange, TX bounded to
the north by the Orange Public Wharf
and latitude 30°05′50″ N and to the
south at latitude 30°05′33″ N. The
duration of the safety zone is intended
to protect participants, spectators, and
other persons and vessels, in the
navigable waters of the Sabine River
during high-speed boat races and will
include breaks and opportunity for
vessels to transit through the regulated
area.
(b) Enforcement periods. This section
will be enforced from 7:30 a.m. through
6 p.m. daily on September 18, 2021 and
September 19, 2021.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry of vessels or persons into
this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Marine Safety Unit Port Arthur (COTP)
or a designated representative. They
may be contacted on VHF–FM channel
13 or 16, or by phone at by telephone
at 409–719–5070.
(2) The COTP or a designated
representative may forbid and control
the movement of all vessels in the
regulated area. When hailed or signaled
by an official patrol vessel, a vessel shall
come to an immediate stop and comply
with the directions given. Failure to do
so may result in expulsion from the
area, citation for failure to comply, or
both.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(3) The COTP or a designated
representative may terminate the event
or the operation of any vessel at any
time it is deemed necessary for the
protection of life or property.
(4) The COTP or a designated
representative will terminate
enforcement of the special local
regulations at the conclusion of the
event.
(d) Informational broadcasts. The
COTP or a designated representative
will inform the public of the effective
period for the safety zone as well as any
changes in the dates and times of
enforcement through Local Notice to
Mariners (LNMs), Broadcast Notices to
Mariners (BNMs), and/or Marine Safety
Information Bulletins (MSIBs) as
appropriate.
Dated: June 8, 2021.
Molly A. Wike,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Marine Safety Zone Port Arthur.
[FR Doc. 2021–12870 Filed 6–22–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2021–0369; FRL–10024–
69–Region 9]
Air Plan Approval; Arizona; Maricopa
County Air Quality Department
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
revisions to the Maricopa County Air
Quality Department’s (MCAQD) Rule
510 as part of the Arizona State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These rule
revisions concern revisions to the
maximum levels of ambient air
pollution for the protection of public
health and welfare. We are proposing to
approve this rule to regulate these
emissions under the Clean Air Act (CAA
or the Act). We are taking comments on
this proposal and plan to follow with a
final action.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before July 23, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–
OAR–2021–0369 at https://
www.regulations.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM
23JNP1
32849
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 23, 2021 / Proposed Rules
any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Buss, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–
4152, buss.jeffrey@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
A. What rules did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
rule revisions?
II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Proposed
Action
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation
criteria?
C. Public Comment and Proposed Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this
proposal with the date it was amended
and submitted by the MCAQD.
Table of Contents
I. The State’s Submittal
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES
Local agency
Rule No.
MCAQD .............
Title
510
Air Quality Standards ...................................................................................
MCAQD’s December 20, 2019 SIP
revision submittal became complete by
operation of law on June 20, 2020.
B. Are there other versions of these
rules?
We approved an earlier version of
MCAQD Rule 510 into the SIP on
November 9, 2009.1
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
rule revisions?
MCAQD Rule 510 articulates the
maximum levels of ambient air
pollutants for the protection of public
health and welfare. The revisions to
MCAQD Rule 510 update the standards
by lowering them to match the current
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
set forth in 40 CFR part 50. MCAQD
references the standards in Rule 510 in
its air quality permitting rules.
Additionally, the rule requires public
notification of ambient air quality. The
EPA’s technical support document
(TSD) has more information about the
rule.
II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Proposed
Action
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?
Rules in the SIP must be enforceable
(see CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not
interfere with applicable requirements
concerning attainment and reasonable
further progress (RFP) or other CAA
requirements (see CAA section 110(l)),
and must not modify certain SIP control
requirements in nonattainment areas
without ensuring equivalent or greater
1 74
FR 57612.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Jun 22, 2021
Amended
Jkt 253001
Submitted
12/11/2019
12/20/2019
emissions reductions (see CAA section
193).
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation
criteria?
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
These rules are consistent with CAA
requirements and relevant guidance
regarding enforceability and SIP
revisions. We propose approval of Rule
510 because it is more stringent than the
version currently in the SIP and will not
interfere with any applicable
requirement concerning attainment and
RFP, as required by CAA sections 110(l)
and 193. The TSD has more information
on our evaluation.
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this proposed action
merely proposes to approve state
regulations as meeting federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
C. Public Comment and Proposed
Action
As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of
the Act, the EPA proposes to fully
approve the submitted rule because it
fulfills all relevant requirements. We
will accept comments from the public
on this proposal until July 23, 2021. If
we take final action to approve the
submitted rules, our final action will
incorporate the rule into the federally
enforceable SIP.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
the MCAQD rule described in Table 1 of
this preamble. The EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these materials
available through www.regulations.gov
and at the EPA Region IX Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
section of
this preamble for more information).
E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM
23JNP1
32850
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 118 / Wednesday, June 23, 2021 / Proposed Rules
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address
disproportionate human health or
environmental effects with practical,
appropriate, and legally permissible
methods under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the proposed rule does
not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur dioxide.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: June 10, 2021.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2021–12923 Filed 6–22–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2020–0515; FRL–10024–
72–Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; North Carolina;
Revision to Approved Motor Vehicle
Emissions Budgets
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Jun 22, 2021
Jkt 253001
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
revision to the North Carolina State
Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted to
EPA on July 16, 2020, by the State of
North Carolina, through the North
Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources, Division of Air
Quality (NCDAQ) for the purpose of
allocating a portion of the available
2026 safety margin in the 2008 8-hour
Ozone Maintenance Plan to the 2026
nitrogen oxides (NOX) and volatile
organic compounds (VOC) motor
vehicle emissions budgets (‘‘MVEBs’’ or
‘‘budgets’’) for the North Carolina
portion of the Charlotte-Rock Hill, NCSC bi-state Area (hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘North Carolina portion of the
Charlotte Maintenance Area’’) to
account for uncertainty associated with
the mobile emissions model and
unanticipated growth in vehicle miles
traveled for the North Carolina portion
of the Charlotte Maintenance Area. This
SIP revision also revises the 2026
MVEBs which are used for
transportation conformity. NCDAQ’s
July 16, 2020 submission supplements
the revised 2008 8-hour Ozone
Maintenance Plan submitted by NCDAQ
on July 25, 2018, and approved by EPA
on September 11, 2019. EPA is
proposing to approve North Carolina’s
July 16, 2020 SIP revision and deem the
MVEBs adequate for transportation
conformity purposes because they meet
all the statutory and regulatory
requirements.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received on
or before July 23, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2020–0515 at
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. EPA will generally
not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
www2.epa.gov/dockets/commentingepa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dianna Myers, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
The telephone number is (404) 562–
9207. Ms. Myers can also be reached via
electronic mail at myers.dianna@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. What action is EPA proposing?
EPA is proposing to approve
NCDAQ’s July 16, 2020, SIP revision to
allocate a portion of the available safety
margin to revise the 2026 NOX and VOC
budgets for the North Carolina portion
of Charlotte 2008 8-hour Ozone
Maintenance Area 1 for transportation
conformity purposes. NCDAQ requested
approval of the July 16, 2020 SIP
revision in order to account for
unanticipated changes in the travel
demand model, such as unanticipated
growth in vehicle miles traveled,
changes and uncertainty in vehicle mix
assumptions, and uncertainty associated
with mobile emissions modeling.
If EPA finalizes this proposed
approval, the revised 2026 budgets from
NCDAQ’s July 16, 2020, SIP revision
will replace the existing budgets in the
State’s 2008 8-hour Ozone Maintenance
Plan revision approved on September
11, 2019. See 84 FR 47889. If approved,
these newly revised 2026 budgets must
be used in future transportation
conformity analyses for the Area
according to the transportation
conformity rule. See 40 CFR 93.118.
Therefore, the September 11, 2019,
approved budgets would no longer be
applicable for transportation conformity
purposes.
In the State’s submission, all
emissions inventories (on-road, point,
area, and nonroad) from NCDAQ’s
September 11, 2019, SIP revision remain
the same. The submission only allocates
a portion of the available safety margin
to the 2026 NOX and VOC MVEBs.
Therefore, EPA is proposing to conclude
that North Carolina’s July 16, 2020, SIP
revision continues to demonstrate
1 The North Carolina portion of the Charlotte
Maintenance Area for the 2008 ozone NAAQS is
comprised of the following counties: Mecklenburg
in its entirety and portions of Cabarrus, Gaston,
Iredell, Lincoln, Rowan, and Union counties. See
section II.B. for more detail.
E:\FR\FM\23JNP1.SGM
23JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 118 (Wednesday, June 23, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 32848-32850]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12923]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2021-0369; FRL-10024-69-Region 9]
Air Plan Approval; Arizona; Maricopa County Air Quality
Department
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve revisions to the Maricopa County Air Quality Department's
(MCAQD) Rule 510 as part of the Arizona State Implementation Plan
(SIP). These rule revisions concern revisions to the maximum levels of
ambient air pollution for the protection of public health and welfare.
We are proposing to approve this rule to regulate these emissions under
the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). We are taking comments on this
proposal and plan to follow with a final action.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 23, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
OAR-2021-0369 at https://www.regulations.gov. For comments submitted at
Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish
[[Page 32849]]
any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically
any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Buss, EPA Region IX, (415)
947-4152, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State's Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions?
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Proposed Action
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
C. Public Comment and Proposed Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State's Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this proposal with the date it
was amended and submitted by the MCAQD.
Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule No. Title Amended Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MCAQD............................. 510 Air Quality Standards....... 12/11/2019 12/20/2019
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MCAQD's December 20, 2019 SIP revision submittal became complete by
operation of law on June 20, 2020.
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
We approved an earlier version of MCAQD Rule 510 into the SIP on
November 9, 2009.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 74 FR 57612.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions?
MCAQD Rule 510 articulates the maximum levels of ambient air
pollutants for the protection of public health and welfare. The
revisions to MCAQD Rule 510 update the standards by lowering them to
match the current National Ambient Air Quality Standards set forth in
40 CFR part 50. MCAQD references the standards in Rule 510 in its air
quality permitting rules. Additionally, the rule requires public
notification of ambient air quality. The EPA's technical support
document (TSD) has more information about the rule.
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Proposed Action
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?
Rules in the SIP must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)),
must not interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment
and reasonable further progress (RFP) or other CAA requirements (see
CAA section 110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control
requirements in nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or
greater emissions reductions (see CAA section 193).
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
These rules are consistent with CAA requirements and relevant
guidance regarding enforceability and SIP revisions. We propose
approval of Rule 510 because it is more stringent than the version
currently in the SIP and will not interfere with any applicable
requirement concerning attainment and RFP, as required by CAA sections
110(l) and 193. The TSD has more information on our evaluation.
C. Public Comment and Proposed Action
As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA proposes to
fully approve the submitted rule because it fulfills all relevant
requirements. We will accept comments from the public on this proposal
until July 23, 2021. If we take final action to approve the submitted
rules, our final action will incorporate the rule into the federally
enforceable SIP.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference the MCAQD rule described in Table 1 of this preamble. The EPA
has made, and will continue to make, these materials available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this proposed action merely proposes to approve state
regulations as meeting federal requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described
[[Page 32850]]
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with
practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the proposed rule does not have tribal implications and
will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or
preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur dioxide.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: June 10, 2021.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2021-12923 Filed 6-22-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P