Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Findings for Two Species, 32241-32243 [2021-12814]
Download as PDF
32241
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 86, No. 115
Thursday, June 17, 2021
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[FF09E21000 FXES11110900000 212]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; 90-Day Findings for Two
Species
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notification of petition findings
and initiation of status reviews.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce 90day findings on two petitions to add
species to the List of Endangered and
Threatened Wildlife under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act). Based on our review, we
find that the petitions present
substantial scientific or commercial
information indicating that the
petitioned actions may be warranted.
Therefore, with the publication of this
document, we announce that we plan to
initiate status reviews of the Temblor
SUMMARY:
those data or information by one of the
following methods:
(1) Electronically: Go to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. In the Search box,
enter the appropriate docket number
(see table under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION). Then, click on the
‘‘Search’’ button. After finding the
correct document, you may submit
information by clicking on ‘‘Comment
Now!’’ If your information will fit in the
provided comment box, please use this
feature of https://www.regulations.gov, as
it is most compatible with our
information review procedures. If you
attach your information as a separate
document, our preferred file format is
Microsoft Word. If you attach multiple
comments (such as form letters), our
preferred format is a spreadsheet in
Microsoft Excel.
(2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail
to: Public Comments Processing, Attn:
[Insert appropriate docket number; see
table under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION], U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, MS: PRB/3W, 5275 Leesburg
Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041–3803.
We request that you send information
only by the methods described above.
We will post all information we receive
on https://www.regulations.gov. This
generally means that we will post any
personal information you provide us
(see Request for Information for Status
Reviews, below, for more information).
Species common name
Contact person
Temblor legless lizard .....................
Santa Ana speckled dace ...............
Michael Fris, Project Leader, Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office, 916–414–6700, Michael_Fris@fws.gov.
Scott Sobiech, Field Supervisor, Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office, 760–431–9440, Scott_Sobiech@
fws.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf, please call the
Federal Relay Service at 800–877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
legless lizard (Anniella alexanderae)
and Santa Ana speckled dace
(Rhinichthys osculus) to determine
whether the petitioned actions are
warranted. To ensure that the status
reviews are comprehensive, we are
requesting scientific and commercial
data and other information regarding the
species and factors that may affect their
status. Based on the status reviews, we
will issue 12-month petition findings,
which will address whether or not the
petitioned actions are warranted, in
accordance with the Act.
DATES: These findings were made on
June 17, 2021. As we commence our
status reviews, we seek any new
information concerning the status of, or
threats to, the species or their habitats.
Any information we receive during the
course of our status reviews will be
considered.
ADDRESSES: Supporting documents:
Summaries of the basis for the petition
findings contained in this document are
available on https://www.regulations.gov
under the appropriate docket number
(see table under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION). In addition, this
supporting information is available by
contacting the appropriate person, as
specified in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Status reviews: If you have new
scientific or commercial data or other
information concerning the status of, or
threats to, the species for which we are
initiating status reviews, please provide
Section 4 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1533)
and its implementing regulations in title
50 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(50 CFR part 424) set forth the
procedures for adding species to,
removing species from, or reclassifying
species on the Federal Lists of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants (Lists or List) in 50 CFR part
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 Jun 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
17. Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act requires
that we make a finding on whether a
petition to add a species to the List (i.e.,
‘‘list’’ a species), remove a species from
the List (i.e., ‘‘delist’’ a species), or
change a listed species’ status from
endangered to threatened or from
threatened to endangered (i.e.,
‘‘reclassify’’ a species) presents
substantial scientific or commercial
information indicating that the
petitioned action may be warranted. To
the maximum extent practicable, we are
to make this finding within 90 days of
our receipt of the petition and publish
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the finding promptly in the Federal
Register.
Our regulations establish that
substantial scientific or commercial
information with regard to a 90-day
petition finding refers to credible
scientific or commercial information in
support of the petition’s claims such
that a reasonable person conducting an
impartial scientific review would
conclude that the action proposed in the
petition may be warranted (50 CFR
424.14(h)(1)(i)).
A species may be determined to be an
endangered species or a threatened
species because of one or more of the
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
32242
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 115 / Thursday, June 17, 2021 / Proposed Rules
five factors described in section 4(a)(1)
of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1533(a)(1)). The
five factors are:
(a) The present or threatened
destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range
(Factor A);
(b) Overutilization for commercial,
recreational, scientific, or educational
purposes (Factor B);
(c) Disease or predation (Factor C);
(d) The inadequacy of existing
regulatory mechanisms (Factor D); and
(e) Other natural or manmade factors
affecting its continued existence (Factor
E).
These factors represent broad categories
of natural or human-caused actions or
conditions that could have an effect on
a species’ continued existence. In
evaluating these actions and conditions,
we look for those that may have a
negative effect on individuals of the
species, as well as other actions or
conditions that may ameliorate any
negative effects or may have positive
effects.
We use the term ‘‘threat’’ to refer in
general to actions or conditions that are
known to, or are reasonably likely to,
affect individuals of a species
negatively. The term ‘‘threat’’ includes
actions or conditions that have a direct
impact on individuals (direct impacts),
as well as those that affect individuals
through alteration of their habitat or
required resources (stressors). The term
‘‘threat’’ may encompass—either
together or separately—the source of the
action or condition, or the action or
condition itself. However, the mere
identification of any threat(s) may not
be sufficient to compel a finding that the
information in the petition is substantial
information indicating that the
petitioned action may be warranted. The
information presented in the petition
must include evidence sufficient to
suggest that these threats may be
affecting the species to the point that the
species may meet the definition of an
endangered species or threatened
species under the Act.
If we find that a petition presents
such information, our subsequent status
review will evaluate all identified
threats by considering the individual-,
population-, and species-level effects
and the expected response by the
species. We will evaluate individual
threats and their expected effects on the
species, then analyze the cumulative
effect of the threats on the species as a
whole. We also consider the cumulative
effect of the threats in light of those
actions and conditions that are expected
to have positive effects on the species—
such as any existing regulatory
mechanisms or conservation efforts that
may ameliorate threats. It is only after
conducting this cumulative analysis of
threats and the actions that may
ameliorate them, and the expected effect
on the species now and in the
foreseeable future, that we can
determine whether the species meets
the definition of an endangered species
or threatened species under the Act.
If we find that a petition presents
substantial scientific or commercial
information indicating that the
petitioned action may be warranted, the
Act requires that we promptly
commence a review of the status of the
species, and we will subsequently
complete a status review in accordance
with our prioritization methodology for
12-month findings (81 FR 49248; July
27, 2016).
Summaries of Petition Findings
The petition findings contained in
this document are listed in the table
below, and the basis for each finding,
along with supporting information, is
available on https://www.regulations.gov
under the appropriate docket number.
TABLE—STATUS REVIEWS
Common name
Docket No.
Temblor legless lizard .........
Santa Ana speckled dace ...
FWS–R8–ES–2021–0024
FWS–R8–ES–2021–0023
Evaluation of a Petition To List the
Temblor Legless Lizard
Species and Range
Temblor legless lizard (Anniella
alexanderae); California.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Petition History
On October 20, 2020, we received a
petition dated the same, from the Center
for Biological Diversity, requesting that
we list the Temblor legless lizard as an
endangered or threatened species and
designate critical habitat for this species
under the Act. The petition clearly
identified itself as such and included
the requisite identification information
for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR
424.14(c). This finding addresses the
petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition
and sources cited in the petition, we
find that the petition presents
substantial scientific or commercial
information indicating that the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 Jun 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
URL to docket on https://www.regulations.gov
https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FWS-R8-ES-2021-0024.
https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FWS-R8-ES-2021-0023.
petitioned action may be warranted for
the Temblor legless lizard due to
potential threats associated with the
following: Oil and gas development,
urbanization, habitat fragmentation, and
industrial solar projects (Factor A); and
climate change and wildfires (Factor E).
The petition also presented substantial
information that existing regulatory
mechanisms and conservation measures
may be inadequate to address impacts of
these threats (Factor D).
The basis for our finding on this
petition, and other information
regarding our review of the petition, can
be found as an appendix at https://
www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS–R8–ES–2021–0024 under
Supporting Documents.
Evaluation of a Petition To List the
Santa Ana Speckled Dace
Species and Range
Speckled dace (Rhinichthys osculus);
Southern California.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Petition History
On May 11, 2020, we received a
petition dated the same, from the Center
for Biological Diversity, requesting that
we list the Southern California
population of the speckled dace (Santa
Ana speckled dace), either as a
taxonomically defined species or as a
distinct population segment under our
Policy Regarding the Recognition of
Distinct Vertebrate Population Segments
Under the Endangered Species Act (61
FR 4722; February 7, 1996), as an
endangered or threatened species and
designate critical habitat for this species
under the Act. The petition clearly
identified itself as such and included
the requisite identification information
for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR
424.14(c). This finding addresses the
petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition
and sources cited in the petition, we
find that the petition presents
substantial scientific or commercial
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 115 / Thursday, June 17, 2021 / Proposed Rules
information indicating the petitioned
entity (Santa Ana speckled dace) may be
a distinct population segment (DPS) and
that the petitioned action may be
warranted due to potential threats
associated with the following: Dams,
reservoirs, and water diversions;
barriers to migration and movement;
roads; pollution; mining; concentrated
recreational use; and off-road vehicle
use (Factor A); predation (Factor C); and
drought, wildfires and flooding,
introduced species, climate change, and
population fragmentation (Factor E). We
further find that the petition presents
substantial scientific or commercial
information indicating that existing
regulatory mechanisms may be
inadequate to fully ameliorate the
identified threats (Factor D), although
there is also information indicating that
these regulatory mechanisms and other
conservation efforts provide some
protection to the Santa Ana speckled
dace.
The basis for our finding on this
petition, and other information
regarding our review of the petition, can
be found as an appendix at https://
www.regulations.gov under Docket No.
FWS–R8–ES–2021–0023 under the
Supporting Documents section.
Conclusion
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
On the basis of our evaluation of the
information presented in the petitions
under sections 4(b)(3)(A) and
4(b)(3)(D)(i) of the Act, we have
determined that the petitions
summarized above for the Temblor
legless lizard and Santa Ana speckled
dace present substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that
the petitioned actions may be
warranted. We are, therefore, initiating
status reviews of these species to
determine whether the actions are
warranted under the Act. At the
conclusion of the status reviews, we
will issue findings, in accordance with
section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act, as to
whether the petitioned actions are not
warranted, warranted, or warranted but
precluded by pending proposals to
determine whether any species is an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 Jun 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
endangered species or a threatened
species.
Request for Information for Status
Reviews
When we make a finding that a
petition presents substantial
information indicating that listing,
delisting, or reclassification of a species
may be warranted, we are required to
review the status of the species (a status
review). For the status review to be
complete and based on the best
available scientific and commercial
information, we request information on
the species from governmental agencies,
Native American Tribes, the scientific
community, industry, and any other
interested parties. We seek information
on:
(1) The species’ biology, range, and
population trends, including:
(a) Habitat requirements;
(b) Genetics and taxonomy;
(c) Historical and current range,
including distribution patterns; and
(d) Historical and current population
levels and current and projected trends.
(2) The five factors described in
section 4(a)(1) of the Act (see
Background, above) that are the basis for
making a listing, delisting, or
reclassification determination for a
species under section 4(a) of the Act,
including past and ongoing
conservation measures that could
decrease the extent to which one or
more of the factors affect the species, its
habitat, or both.
(3) The potential effects of climate
change on the species and its habitat,
and the extent to which it affects the
habitat or range of the species.
Submissions merely stating support
for or opposition to the actions under
consideration without providing
supporting information, although noted,
will not be considered in making a
determination. Section 4(b)(1)(A) of the
Act directs that determinations as to
whether any species is an endangered or
threatened species must be made
‘‘solely on the basis of the best scientific
and commercial data available.’’
You may submit your information
concerning the status review by one of
the methods listed in ADDRESSES. If you
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
32243
submit information via https://
www.regulations.gov, your entire
submission—including any personal
identifying information—will be posted
on the website. If you submit a
hardcopy that includes personal
identifying information, you may
request at the top of your document that
we withhold this personal identifying
information from public review.
However, we cannot guarantee that we
will be able to do so. We will post all
hardcopy submissions on https://
www.regulations.gov.
It is important to note that the
standard for a 90-day finding differs
from the Act’s standard that applies to
a status review to determine whether a
petitioned action is warranted. In
making a 90-day finding, we consider
information in the petition and sources
cited in the petition, as well as
information that is readily available,
and we evaluate merely whether that
information constitutes ‘‘substantial
information’’ indicating that the
petitioned action ‘‘may be warranted.’’
In a 12-month finding, we must
complete a thorough status review of the
species and evaluate the ‘‘best scientific
and commercial data available’’ to
determine whether a petitioned action
‘‘is warranted.’’ Because the Act’s
standards for 90-day and 12-month
findings are different, a substantial 90day finding does not mean that the 12month finding will result in a
‘‘warranted’’ finding.
Authors
The primary authors of this document
are staff members of the Ecological
Services Program, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service.
Authority
The authority for these actions is the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Martha Williams,
Principal Deputy Director, Exercising the
Delegated Authority of the Director, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–12814 Filed 6–16–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
E:\FR\FM\17JNP1.SGM
17JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 115 (Thursday, June 17, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 32241-32243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12814]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 115 / Thursday, June 17, 2021 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 32241]]
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
[FF09E21000 FXES11110900000 212]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Findings
for Two Species
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notification of petition findings and initiation of status
reviews.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce 90-
day findings on two petitions to add species to the List of Endangered
and Threatened Wildlife under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act). Based on our review, we find that the petitions present
substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the
petitioned actions may be warranted. Therefore, with the publication of
this document, we announce that we plan to initiate status reviews of
the Temblor legless lizard (Anniella alexanderae) and Santa Ana
speckled dace (Rhinichthys osculus) to determine whether the petitioned
actions are warranted. To ensure that the status reviews are
comprehensive, we are requesting scientific and commercial data and
other information regarding the species and factors that may affect
their status. Based on the status reviews, we will issue 12-month
petition findings, which will address whether or not the petitioned
actions are warranted, in accordance with the Act.
DATES: These findings were made on June 17, 2021. As we commence our
status reviews, we seek any new information concerning the status of,
or threats to, the species or their habitats. Any information we
receive during the course of our status reviews will be considered.
ADDRESSES: Supporting documents: Summaries of the basis for the
petition findings contained in this document are available on https://www.regulations.gov under the appropriate docket number (see table
under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). In addition, this supporting
information is available by contacting the appropriate person, as
specified in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Status reviews: If you have new scientific or commercial data or
other information concerning the status of, or threats to, the species
for which we are initiating status reviews, please provide those data
or information by one of the following methods:
(1) Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. In the Search box, enter the appropriate docket
number (see table under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). Then, click on the
``Search'' button. After finding the correct document, you may submit
information by clicking on ``Comment Now!'' If your information will
fit in the provided comment box, please use this feature of https://www.regulations.gov, as it is most compatible with our information
review procedures. If you attach your information as a separate
document, our preferred file format is Microsoft Word. If you attach
multiple comments (such as form letters), our preferred format is a
spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel.
(2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail to: Public Comments
Processing, Attn: [Insert appropriate docket number; see table under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION], U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, MS: PRB/3W,
5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA 22041-3803.
We request that you send information only by the methods described
above. We will post all information we receive on https://www.regulations.gov. This generally means that we will post any
personal information you provide us (see Request for Information for
Status Reviews, below, for more information).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Species common name Contact person
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Temblor legless lizard............ Michael Fris, Project Leader,
Sacramento Fish and Wildlife
Office, 916-414-6700,
[email protected].
Santa Ana speckled dace........... Scott Sobiech, Field Supervisor,
Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office,
760-431-9440,
[email protected].
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf, please call
the Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 4 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1533) and its implementing
regulations in title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations (50 CFR part
424) set forth the procedures for adding species to, removing species
from, or reclassifying species on the Federal Lists of Endangered and
Threatened Wildlife and Plants (Lists or List) in 50 CFR part 17.
Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the Act requires that we make a finding on
whether a petition to add a species to the List (i.e., ``list'' a
species), remove a species from the List (i.e., ``delist'' a species),
or change a listed species' status from endangered to threatened or
from threatened to endangered (i.e., ``reclassify'' a species) presents
substantial scientific or commercial information indicating that the
petitioned action may be warranted. To the maximum extent practicable,
we are to make this finding within 90 days of our receipt of the
petition and publish the finding promptly in the Federal Register.
Our regulations establish that substantial scientific or commercial
information with regard to a 90-day petition finding refers to credible
scientific or commercial information in support of the petition's
claims such that a reasonable person conducting an impartial scientific
review would conclude that the action proposed in the petition may be
warranted (50 CFR 424.14(h)(1)(i)).
A species may be determined to be an endangered species or a
threatened species because of one or more of the
[[Page 32242]]
five factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act (16 U.S.C.
1533(a)(1)). The five factors are:
(a) The present or threatened destruction, modification, or
curtailment of its habitat or range (Factor A);
(b) Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or
educational purposes (Factor B);
(c) Disease or predation (Factor C);
(d) The inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms (Factor D);
and
(e) Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued
existence (Factor E).
These factors represent broad categories of natural or human-caused
actions or conditions that could have an effect on a species' continued
existence. In evaluating these actions and conditions, we look for
those that may have a negative effect on individuals of the species, as
well as other actions or conditions that may ameliorate any negative
effects or may have positive effects.
We use the term ``threat'' to refer in general to actions or
conditions that are known to, or are reasonably likely to, affect
individuals of a species negatively. The term ``threat'' includes
actions or conditions that have a direct impact on individuals (direct
impacts), as well as those that affect individuals through alteration
of their habitat or required resources (stressors). The term ``threat''
may encompass--either together or separately--the source of the action
or condition, or the action or condition itself. However, the mere
identification of any threat(s) may not be sufficient to compel a
finding that the information in the petition is substantial information
indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted. The information
presented in the petition must include evidence sufficient to suggest
that these threats may be affecting the species to the point that the
species may meet the definition of an endangered species or threatened
species under the Act.
If we find that a petition presents such information, our
subsequent status review will evaluate all identified threats by
considering the individual-, population-, and species-level effects and
the expected response by the species. We will evaluate individual
threats and their expected effects on the species, then analyze the
cumulative effect of the threats on the species as a whole. We also
consider the cumulative effect of the threats in light of those actions
and conditions that are expected to have positive effects on the
species--such as any existing regulatory mechanisms or conservation
efforts that may ameliorate threats. It is only after conducting this
cumulative analysis of threats and the actions that may ameliorate
them, and the expected effect on the species now and in the foreseeable
future, that we can determine whether the species meets the definition
of an endangered species or threatened species under the Act.
If we find that a petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be
warranted, the Act requires that we promptly commence a review of the
status of the species, and we will subsequently complete a status
review in accordance with our prioritization methodology for 12-month
findings (81 FR 49248; July 27, 2016).
Summaries of Petition Findings
The petition findings contained in this document are listed in the
table below, and the basis for each finding, along with supporting
information, is available on https://www.regulations.gov under the
appropriate docket number.
Table--Status Reviews
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL to docket on https://
Common name Docket No. www.regulations.gov
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Temblor legless lizard............. FWS-R8-ES-2021-0024 https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FWS-R8-ES-2021-0024.
Santa Ana speckled dace............ FWS-R8-ES-2021-0023 https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FWS-R8-ES-2021-0023.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evaluation of a Petition To List the Temblor Legless Lizard
Species and Range
Temblor legless lizard (Anniella alexanderae); California.
Petition History
On October 20, 2020, we received a petition dated the same, from
the Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that we list the
Temblor legless lizard as an endangered or threatened species and
designate critical habitat for this species under the Act. The petition
clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite
identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR
424.14(c). This finding addresses the petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial information indicating that the petitioned action may be
warranted for the Temblor legless lizard due to potential threats
associated with the following: Oil and gas development, urbanization,
habitat fragmentation, and industrial solar projects (Factor A); and
climate change and wildfires (Factor E). The petition also presented
substantial information that existing regulatory mechanisms and
conservation measures may be inadequate to address impacts of these
threats (Factor D).
The basis for our finding on this petition, and other information
regarding our review of the petition, can be found as an appendix at
https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R8-ES-2021-0024 under
Supporting Documents.
Evaluation of a Petition To List the Santa Ana Speckled Dace
Species and Range
Speckled dace (Rhinichthys osculus); Southern California.
Petition History
On May 11, 2020, we received a petition dated the same, from the
Center for Biological Diversity, requesting that we list the Southern
California population of the speckled dace (Santa Ana speckled dace),
either as a taxonomically defined species or as a distinct population
segment under our Policy Regarding the Recognition of Distinct
Vertebrate Population Segments Under the Endangered Species Act (61 FR
4722; February 7, 1996), as an endangered or threatened species and
designate critical habitat for this species under the Act. The petition
clearly identified itself as such and included the requisite
identification information for the petitioner, required at 50 CFR
424.14(c). This finding addresses the petition.
Finding
Based on our review of the petition and sources cited in the
petition, we find that the petition presents substantial scientific or
commercial
[[Page 32243]]
information indicating the petitioned entity (Santa Ana speckled dace)
may be a distinct population segment (DPS) and that the petitioned
action may be warranted due to potential threats associated with the
following: Dams, reservoirs, and water diversions; barriers to
migration and movement; roads; pollution; mining; concentrated
recreational use; and off-road vehicle use (Factor A); predation
(Factor C); and drought, wildfires and flooding, introduced species,
climate change, and population fragmentation (Factor E). We further
find that the petition presents substantial scientific or commercial
information indicating that existing regulatory mechanisms may be
inadequate to fully ameliorate the identified threats (Factor D),
although there is also information indicating that these regulatory
mechanisms and other conservation efforts provide some protection to
the Santa Ana speckled dace.
The basis for our finding on this petition, and other information
regarding our review of the petition, can be found as an appendix at
https://www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FWS-R8-ES-2021-0023 under
the Supporting Documents section.
Conclusion
On the basis of our evaluation of the information presented in the
petitions under sections 4(b)(3)(A) and 4(b)(3)(D)(i) of the Act, we
have determined that the petitions summarized above for the Temblor
legless lizard and Santa Ana speckled dace present substantial
scientific or commercial information indicating that the petitioned
actions may be warranted. We are, therefore, initiating status reviews
of these species to determine whether the actions are warranted under
the Act. At the conclusion of the status reviews, we will issue
findings, in accordance with section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Act, as to
whether the petitioned actions are not warranted, warranted, or
warranted but precluded by pending proposals to determine whether any
species is an endangered species or a threatened species.
Request for Information for Status Reviews
When we make a finding that a petition presents substantial
information indicating that listing, delisting, or reclassification of
a species may be warranted, we are required to review the status of the
species (a status review). For the status review to be complete and
based on the best available scientific and commercial information, we
request information on the species from governmental agencies, Native
American Tribes, the scientific community, industry, and any other
interested parties. We seek information on:
(1) The species' biology, range, and population trends, including:
(a) Habitat requirements;
(b) Genetics and taxonomy;
(c) Historical and current range, including distribution patterns;
and
(d) Historical and current population levels and current and
projected trends.
(2) The five factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act (see
Background, above) that are the basis for making a listing, delisting,
or reclassification determination for a species under section 4(a) of
the Act, including past and ongoing conservation measures that could
decrease the extent to which one or more of the factors affect the
species, its habitat, or both.
(3) The potential effects of climate change on the species and its
habitat, and the extent to which it affects the habitat or range of the
species.
Submissions merely stating support for or opposition to the actions
under consideration without providing supporting information, although
noted, will not be considered in making a determination. Section
4(b)(1)(A) of the Act directs that determinations as to whether any
species is an endangered or threatened species must be made ``solely on
the basis of the best scientific and commercial data available.''
You may submit your information concerning the status review by one
of the methods listed in ADDRESSES. If you submit information via
https://www.regulations.gov, your entire submission--including any
personal identifying information--will be posted on the website. If you
submit a hardcopy that includes personal identifying information, you
may request at the top of your document that we withhold this personal
identifying information from public review. However, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so. We will post all hardcopy
submissions on https://www.regulations.gov.
It is important to note that the standard for a 90-day finding
differs from the Act's standard that applies to a status review to
determine whether a petitioned action is warranted. In making a 90-day
finding, we consider information in the petition and sources cited in
the petition, as well as information that is readily available, and we
evaluate merely whether that information constitutes ``substantial
information'' indicating that the petitioned action ``may be
warranted.'' In a 12-month finding, we must complete a thorough status
review of the species and evaluate the ``best scientific and commercial
data available'' to determine whether a petitioned action ``is
warranted.'' Because the Act's standards for 90-day and 12-month
findings are different, a substantial 90-day finding does not mean that
the 12-month finding will result in a ``warranted'' finding.
Authors
The primary authors of this document are staff members of the
Ecological Services Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Authority
The authority for these actions is the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Martha Williams,
Principal Deputy Director, Exercising the Delegated Authority of the
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-12814 Filed 6-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P