Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fiscal Year 2021, 32146-32183 [2021-12546]
Download as PDF
32146
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
reader, the ADAMS accession numbers
and instructions about obtaining
materials referenced in this document
are provided in the ‘‘Availability of
Documents’’ section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anthony Rossi, Office of the Chief
Financial Officer, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, telephone: 301–415–
7341; email: Anthony.Rossi@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Parts 15, 170, and 171
[NRC–2018–0292]
RIN 3150–AK24
Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee
Recovery for Fiscal Year 2021
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Table of Contents
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is amending the
licensing, inspection, special project,
and annual fees charged to its
applicants and licensees. These
amendments are necessary to
implement the Nuclear Energy
Innovation and Modernization Act
(NEIMA), which, beginning with fiscal
year (FY) 2021, requires the NRC to
recover, to the maximum extent
practicable, approximately 100 percent
of its annual budget less certain
amounts excluded from this feerecovery requirement. In addition, the
NRC is also making improvements
associated with fee invoicing to
implement provisions of NEIMA.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
August 16, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2018–0292 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information for this action. You may
obtain publicly-available information
related to this action by any of the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2018–0292. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Dawn
Forder; telephone: 301–415–3407;
email: Dawn.Forder@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
final rule.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@
nrc.gov. The ADAMS accession number
for each document referenced (if it is
available in ADAMS) is provided the
first time that it is mentioned in this
document. For the convenience of the
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
I. Background; Statutory Authority
II. Discussion
III. Public Comment Analysis
IV. Public Comments and NRC Responses
V. Regulatory Flexibility Certification
VI. Regulatory Analysis
VII. Backfitting and Issue Finality
VIII. Plain Writing
IX. National Environmental Policy Act
X. Paperwork Reduction Act Public
Protection Notification
XI. Congressional Review Act
XII. Voluntary Consensus Standards
XIII. Availability of Guidance
XIV. Availability of Documents
I. Background; Statutory Authority
A. Statutory Authority
Revised Fee-Recovery Framework for
FY 2021 and Subsequent Fiscal Years
The NRC is amending the licensing,
inspection, special project, and annual
fees charged to its applicants and
licensees. These amendments are
necessary to implement Public Law
115–439, NEIMA (42 U.S.C. 2215). The
NEIMA fee-related changes, effective
October 1, 2020, include (1) repealing
the prior fee-recovery framework and
replacing it with a revised framework
and (2) requirements to improve the
accuracy of invoices for service fees.
Effective October 1, 2020, NEIMA
repealed Section 6101 of the Omnibus
Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, as
amended (OBRA–90) (42 U.S.C. 2214),
and put in place a revised fee-recovery
framework for FY 2021 and subsequent
fiscal years, requiring the NRC to
recover, to the maximum extent
practicable, approximately 100 percent
of its total budget authority for the fiscal
year, less the budget authority for
excluded activities. For FYs 2005
through 2020, OBRA–90 required the
NRC to recover through fees
approximately 90 percent of its budget
authority for the fiscal year, less
amounts for the activities excluded from
fee recovery under OBRA–90 or other
legislation. The 10 percent of the
remaining budget authority not
recovered through fees was historically
referred to as fee-relief activities. In this
final rule, the NRC has established a
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
revised fee-recovery framework, which
eliminates the 10 percent limit on feerelief activities. Accordingly, the NRC
will no longer provide a fee-relief credit
(when the amount budgeted for feerelief activities is less than the 10
percent threshold, which would have
decreased annual fees for licensees) or
assess a fee-relief surcharge (when the
amount budgeted for fee-relief activities
is greater than the 10 percent threshold,
which would have increased annual
fees for licensees) as part of the
calculation of annual fees for each
licensee fee class.
In FY 2021, the NRC’s fee regulations
are primarily governed by two laws: (1)
The Independent Offices Appropriation
Act, 1952 (IOAA) (31 U.S.C. 9701), and
(2) NEIMA (42 U.S.C. 2215). The IOAA
authorizes and encourages Federal
agencies to recover—to the fullest extent
possible—costs attributable to services
provided to identifiable recipients.
Under NEIMA, the NRC must recover, to
the maximum extent practicable,
approximately 100 percent of its annual
budget, less the budget authority for
excluded activities. Under Section
102(b)(1)(B) of NEIMA, ‘‘excluded
activities’’ include any fee-relief activity
as identified by the Commission,
generic homeland security activities,
waste incidental to reprocessing
activities, Nuclear Waste Fund
activities, advanced reactor regulatory
infrastructure activities, Inspector
General services for the Defense Nuclear
Facilities Safety Board, research and
development at universities in areas
relevant to the NRC’s mission, and a
nuclear science and engineering grant
program.
In FY 2021, the fee-relief activities
identified by the Commission are
consistent with prior final fee rules and
include Agreement State oversight,
regulatory support to Agreement States,
medical isotope production
infrastructure, fee exemptions for nonprofit educational institutions, costs not
recovered from small entities under
§ 171.16(c) of title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR), generic
decommissioning/reclamation activities,
the NRC’s uranium recovery program
and unregistered general licenses,
potential U.S. Department of Defense
Program Memorandum of
Understanding activities (Military
Radium-226), and non-military radium
sites. In addition, for FY 2021, the
Commission identified international
activities, not including the resources
for import and export licensing, as feerelief activities to be excluded from the
fee-recovery requirement.
Under NEIMA, the NRC must use its
IOAA authority first to collect service
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
fees for NRC work that provides specific
benefits to identifiable recipients (such
as licensing work, inspections, and
special projects). The NRC’s regulations
in 10 CFR part 170, ‘‘Fees for Facilities,
Materials, Import and Export Licenses,
and Other Regulatory Services Under
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
Amended,’’ explain how the agency
collects service fees from specific
beneficiaries. Because the NRC’s fee
recovery under the IOAA (10 CFR part
170) will not equal 100 percent of the
agency’s total budget authority for the
fiscal year (less the budget authority for
excluded activities), the NRC also
assesses ‘‘annual fees’’ under 10 CFR
part 171, ‘‘Annual Fees for Reactor
Licenses and Fuel Cycle Licenses and
Materials Licenses, Including Holders of
Certificates of Compliance,
Registrations, and Quality Assurance
Program Approvals and Government
Agencies Licensed by the NRC,’’ to
recover the remaining amount necessary
to comply with NEIMA.
In addition, Section 102(b)(3)(B)(i) of
NEIMA establishes a new cap for the
annual fees charged to operating reactor
licensees; under this provision, the
annual fee for an operating reactor
licensee, to the maximum extent
practicable, shall not exceed the annual
fee amount per operating reactor
licensee established in the FY 2015 final
fee rule (80 FR 37432; June 30, 2015),
adjusted for inflation (see Section II,
Discussion, ‘‘FY 2021 Fee Collection—
Revised Annual Fees,’’ of this final
rule).
B. Accurate Invoicing
Section 102(d) of NEIMA requires
three sets of actions related to NRC
invoices for service fees assessed under
10 CFR part 170. First, as stated in
Section 102(d)(1) of NEIMA, the NRC
must ‘‘ensure appropriate review and
approval prior to the issuance of
invoices’’ for service fees. Second, as
stated in Section 102(d)(2) of NEIMA,
the NRC must ‘‘develop and implement
processes to audit invoices [for 10 CFR
part 170 service fees] to ensure
accuracy, transparency, and fairness.’’
Third, as stated in Section 102(d)(3) of
NEIMA, the NRC is required to ‘‘modify
regulations to ensure fair and
appropriate processes to provide
licensees and applicants an opportunity
to efficiently dispute or otherwise seek
review and correction of errors in
invoices’’ for service fees.
The NRC developed and implemented
process improvements to ensure
accurate invoicing for the first two
actions. First, in July 2019, the NRC
implemented a new agencywide process
to standardize the validation of fees,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
which fully satisfies Section 102(d)(1)
and partially addresses Section
102(d)(2) of NEIMA. The new
standardized process improved
accountability and oversight within the
NRC to ensure that fee billing data is
correct before appearing on a licensee’s
invoice. Standardizing the fee validation
process defines roles and
responsibilities for performing fee
billing validation and certification; this
standardization process also improves
accountability and internal controls by
adding management oversight to
improve the accuracy of fee billing data.
The NRC’s new process will lead to
improved internal and external auditing
of service fee invoices to ensure
accuracy, transparency, and fairness of
invoices. The process requires offices
with fee billable charges to regularly
review and certify hours and costs to
validate the charges before the NRC
sends a bill for service fees. On an
annual basis, external financial
statement auditors will conduct an audit
of a sample of invoices to determine
whether the NRC is accurately invoicing
in accordance with the NRC’s fee
schedules. Therefore, the NRC’s
invoices will be reviewed and audited
by both internal and external parties.
The second NEIMA accurate
invoicing action also concerns the
transparency and fairness of the overall
billing process. The NRC is firmly
committed to the application of fairness
and equity in the assessment of fees. All
10 CFR part 170 service fees are
reassessed and published in the Federal
Register on a yearly basis. In January
2018, the NRC redesigned its invoices to
add clarity and transparency for its
stakeholders; new features included an
invoice legend of NRC acronyms and
the names of individual NRC staff and/
or the contractor company, if applicable,
who had performed the work associated
with the charges were added. In
addition, the NRC’s staff hours and
contractor costs were listed separately
on invoices so the recipient could view
the subtotals for the two different
categories of costs. Finally, the NRC
implemented a new data structure to
more effectively account for and track
all billable work at the project level. The
structure included a data element called
an Enterprise Project Identifier (EPID),
which provides useful details regarding
the type of project or work that is being
billed. Inspection report numbers were
converted to EPIDs to provide more
information, and descriptions of
inspection activities were added to the
invoice. Using this data structure
enabled the NRC’s licensees and other
persons assessed service fees to identify
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
32147
how many hours are being expended on
each of the various activities within a
project. To further these efforts, the NRC
standardized its Cost Activity Codes
(CACs) for all agency activities to clearly
provide licensees with consistent
descriptions of the work being
performed across licensing actions,
inspections, and over multiple dockets.
Invoices for service fees are now
presented in a more useful and readable
manner and hours and costs are no
longer commingled. As a result, the
NRC’s invoices provide stakeholders
greater transparency regarding fees.
In addition, in October 2019, the NRC
released an electronic billing (eBilling)
system. This public-facing, web-based
application provides persons assessed
service fees, including licensees,
immediate delivery of NRC invoices,
customizable email notifications, the
capability to view and analyze invoice
details, and access to the U.S.
Department of the Treasury systems to
pay invoices. The eBilling application
provides persons assessed service fees,
including licensees, increased billing
process transparency and has increased
applicant and licensee confidence in the
assessed fees and charges.
To address the third action, the NRC
is modifying the regulations under 10
CFR chapter I to provide a standard
process for licensees and applicants to
efficiently dispute or otherwise seek
review and correction of errors in
invoices for services fees (see Section II,
Discussion, ‘‘FY 2021—Policy
Changes,’’ of this final rule).
II. Discussion
FY 2021 Fee Collection—Overview
The NRC is issuing this FY 2021 final
fee rule based on the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2021 (the enacted
budget). The final fee rule reflects a total
budget authority in the amount of
$844.4 million, a decrease of $11.2
million from FY 2020. As explained
previously, certain portions of the
NRC’s total budget authority for the
fiscal year are excluded from NEIMA’s
fee-recovery requirement under Section
102(b)(1)(B) of NEIMA. Based on the FY
2021 enacted budget, these exclusions
total $123.0 million, consisting of $91.2
million for fee-relief activities, $17.7
million for advanced reactor regulatory
infrastructure activities, $11.7 million
for generic homeland security activities,
$1.2 million for waste incidental to
reprocessing activities, and $1.2 million
for Inspector General services for the
Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.
Table I summarizes the excluded
activities for the FY 2021 final rule.
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
32148
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE I—EXCLUDED ACTIVITIES
[Dollars in millions]
FY 2021
final rule
Fee-Relief Activities:
International activities (not including the resources for import and export licensing) ..................................................................
Agreement State oversight ...........................................................................................................................................................
Medical isotope production infrastructure ....................................................................................................................................
Fee exemption for nonprofit educational institutions ...................................................................................................................
Costs not recovered from small entities under 10 CFR 171.16(c) ..............................................................................................
Regulatory support to Agreement States .....................................................................................................................................
Generic decommissioning/reclamation activities (not related to the operating power reactors and spent fuel storage fee
classes) .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Uranium recovery program and unregistered general licensees .................................................................................................
Potential Department of Defense remediation program Memorandum of Understanding activities ...........................................
Non-military radium sites ..............................................................................................................................................................
$24.7
10.4
7.0
9.3
7.8
12.3
14.9
3.7
1.0
0.2
Subtotal Fee-Relief Activities .......................................................................................................................................................
Activities under Section 102(b)(1)(B)(ii) of NEIMA (Generic Homeland Security activities, Waste Incidental to Reprocessing activities, and the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board) ..............................................................................................................
Advanced reactor regulatory infrastructure activities ..........................................................................................................................
91.2
Total Excluded Activities ..............................................................................................................................................................
123.0
After accounting for the exclusions
from the fee-recovery requirement and
net billing adjustments (i.e., for FY 2021
invoices that the NRC estimates will not
be paid during the fiscal year, less
payments received in FY 2021 for prior
year invoices and current year
collections made for the termination of
one operating power reactor), the NRC
must recover approximately $708.0
million in fees in FY 2021. Of this
amount, the NRC estimates that $190.6
million will be recovered through 10
CFR part 170 service fees and
approximately $517.4 million will be
recovered through 10 CFR part 171
annual fees. Table II summarizes the
fee-recovery amounts for the FY 2021
final fee rule using the enacted budget
and takes into account the budget
authority for excluded activities and net
billing adjustments. For all information
presented in the following tables,
individual values may not sum to totals
due to rounding. Please see the work
papers (ADAMS Accession No.
ML21119A024) for actual amounts.
In FY 2021, the explanatory statement
associated with the Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 2021, also includes
14.1
17.7
direction for the NRC to use $35.0
million in prior-year unobligated
carryover funds, including $16.0 million
for the University Nuclear Leadership
Program, which replaced the Integrated
University Program. The NRC does not
assess fees in the current fiscal year for
any carryover funds because, consistent
with the requirements of NEIMA, fees
are calculated based on the budget
authority enacted for the current fiscal
year and fees were already assessed in
the fiscal year in which the carryover
funds were appropriated.
TABLE II—BUDGET AND FEE RECOVERY AMOUNTS 1
[Dollars in millions]
FY 2021
final rule
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
Total Budget Authority .........................................................................................................................................................................
Less Budget Authority for Excluded Activities: ....................................................................................................................................
Balance .........................................................................................................................................................................................
Fee Recovery Percent .........................................................................................................................................................................
Total Amount to be Recovered: ..........................................................................................................................................................
Less Estimated Amount to be Recovered through 10 CFR Part 170 Fees ................................................................................
Estimated Amount to be Recovered through 10 CFR Part 171 Fees .........................................................................................
10 CFR Part 171 Billing Adjustments:
Unpaid Current Year Invoices (estimated) ...................................................................................................................................
Less Current Year Collections from a Terminated Reactor—Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit 2 in FY 2020 and Indian
Point Nuclear Generating, Unit 3 in FY 2021 ...........................................................................................................................
Less Payments Received in Current Year for Previous Year Invoices (estimated) ....................................................................
Adjusted Amount to be Recovered through 10 CFR Parts 170 and 171 Fees ..................................................................................
Adjusted 10 CFR Part 171 Annual Fee Collections Required ............................................................................................................
1 For each table, numbers may not add due to
rounding.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
$844.4
¥123.0
721.4
100
721.4
¥190.6
530.8
2.1
¥2.7
¥12.8
708.0
$517.4
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
FY 2021 Fee Collection—Professional
Hourly Rate
The NRC uses a professional hourly
rate to assess fees under 10 CFR part 170
for specific services it provides. The
professional hourly rate also helps
determine flat fees (which are used for
the review of certain types of license
applications). This rate is applicable to
all activities for which fees are assessed
under §§ 170.21 and 170.31.
Professional
Hourly Rate
=
The NRC’s professional hourly rate is
derived by adding budgeted resources
for: (1) Mission-direct program salaries
and benefits, (2) mission-indirect
program support, and (3) agency
support (corporate support and the
Inspector General). The NRC then
subtracts certain offsetting receipts and
divides this total by the mission-direct
full-time equivalent (FTE) converted to
hours (the mission-direct FTE converted
Budgeted Resources
Mission-Direct FTE Converted to
Hours
For FY 2021, the NRC is increasing
the professional hourly rate from $279
to $288. The 3.2 percent increase in the
FY 2021 professional hourly rate is
primarily due to a 2.1 percent increase
in budgetary resources of approximately
$15.0 million. The increase in budgetary
resources is, in turn, primarily due to an
increase in salaries and benefits to
support Federal pay raises for NRC
employees. The anticipated decline in
the number of mission-direct FTE
compared to FY 2020 also contributed
to the increase in the professional
hourly rate. The professional hourly rate
is inversely related to the mission-direct
to hours is the product of the missiondirect FTE multiplied by the estimated
annual mission-direct FTE productive
hours). The only budgeted resources
excluded from the professional hourly
rate are those for mission-direct contract
resources, which are generally billed to
licensees separately. The following
shows the professional hourly rate
calculation:
$732.2 million
1,684x1,510
=------
FTE amount; therefore, as the number of
mission-direct FTE decrease the
professional hourly rate can increase.
The number of mission-direct FTE is
expected to decline by 17, primarily due
to: (1) The completion of probabilistic
risk assessment reviews related to
lessons learned from the accident at
Fukushima Dai-ichi in Japan; (2) the
closure of Duane Arnold Energy Center
(Duane Arnold); and (3) the reduced
workload associated with significance
determinations, operating experience
evaluations, and generic
communications development.
32149
=
$288
The FY 2021 estimate for annual
mission-direct FTE productive hours is
1,510 hours, which is unchanged from
FY 2020. This estimate, also referred to
as the productive hours assumption,
reflects the average number of hours
that a mission-direct employee spends
on mission-direct work in a given year.
This estimate, therefore, excludes hours
charged to annual leave, sick leave,
holidays, training, and general
administrative tasks. Table III shows the
professional hourly rate calculation
methodology. The FY 2020 amounts are
provided for comparison purposes.
TABLE III—PROFESSIONAL HOURLY RATE CALCULATION
[Dollars in millions, except as noted]
Mission-Direct Program Salaries & Benefits ...........................................................................................................
Mission-Indirect Program Support ...........................................................................................................................
Agency Support (Corporate Support and the IG) ...................................................................................................
$314.6
$110.8
$291.5
$335.3
$113.2
$283.7
Subtotal .............................................................................................................................................................
Less Offsetting Receipts 2 .......................................................................................................................................
Total Budgeted Resources Included in Professional Hourly Rate ..........................................................................
Mission-Direct FTE (Whole numbers) .....................................................................................................................
Annual Mission-Direct FTE Productive Hours (Whole numbers) ............................................................................
Mission-Direct FTE Converted to Hours (Mission-Direct FTE multiplied by Annual Mission-Direct FTE Productive Hours) ............................................................................................................................................................
Professional Hourly Rate (Total Budgeted Resources Included in Professional Hourly Rate Divided by MissionDirect FTE Converted to Hours) (Whole Numbers) ............................................................................................
$716.9
$0.0
$716.9
1,701
1,510
$732.2
$0.0
$732.2
1,684
1,510
2,568,510
2,542,840
$279
$288
FY 2021 Fee Collection—Flat
Application Fee Changes
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
FY 2021
final rule
The NRC is amending the flat
application fees it charges in its
schedule of fees in §§ 170.21 and 170.31
to reflect the revised professional hourly
rate of $288. The NRC charges these fees
2 The fees collected by the NRC for Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) services and indemnity fees
(financial protection required of all licensees for
public liability claims at 10 CFR part 140) are
subtracted from the budgeted resources amount
when calculating the 10 CFR part 170 professional
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
to applicants for materials licenses and
other regulatory services, as well as to
holders of materials licenses. The NRC
calculates these flat fees by multiplying
the average professional staff hours
needed to process the licensing actions
by the professional hourly rate for FY
2021. As part of its calculations, the
NRC analyzes the actual hours spent
performing licensing actions and
estimates the five-year average of
professional staff hours that are needed
to process licensing actions as part of its
biennial review of fees; these actions are
required by Section 205(a) of the Chief
Financial Officers Act of 1990 (31 U.S.C.
hourly rate, per the guidance in the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A–25,
User Charges. The budgeted resources for FOIA
activities are allocated under the product for
Information Services within the Corporate Support
business line. The budgeted resources for
indemnity activities are allocated under the
Licensing Actions and Research and Test Reactors
products within the Operating Reactors business
line.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
ER16JN21.000
FY 2020
final rule
32150
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
902(a)(8)). The NRC performed this
review in FY 2021 and will perform this
review again in FY 2023. The biennial
review adjustments and the higher
professional hourly rate of $288 are the
primary reasons for the increase in flat
application fees (see the work papers).
In order to simplify billing, the NRC
rounds these flat fees to a minimal
degree. Specifically, the NRC rounds
these flat fees (up or down) in such a
way that ensures both convenience for
its stakeholders and that any rounding
effects are minimal. Accordingly, fees
under $1,000 are rounded to the nearest
$10, fees between $1,000 and $100,000
are rounded to the nearest $100, and
fees greater than $100,000 are rounded
to the nearest $1,000.
The flat fees are applicable for import
and export licensing actions (see fee
categories K.1. through K.5. of § 170.21
and fee categories 15.A. through 15.R. of
§ 170.31), as well as certain materials
licensing actions (see fee categories 1.C.
through 1.D., 2.B. through 2.F., 3.A.
through 3.S., 4.B. through 5.A., 6.A.
through 9.D., 10.B., 15.A. through 15.L.,
15.R., and 16 of § 170.31). Applications
filed on or after the effective date of the
FY 2021 final fee rule will be subject to
the revised fees in the final rule.
FY 2021 Fee Collection—Low-Level
Waste Surcharge
As in prior years, the NRC is assessing
a generic low-level waste (LLW)
surcharge of $3.4 million. Disposal of
LLW occurs at commercially-operated
LLW disposal facilities that are licensed
by either the NRC or an Agreement
State. Four existing LLW disposal
facilities in the United States accept
various types of LLW. All are located in
Agreement States and, therefore, are
regulated by an Agreement State, rather
than the NRC. The NRC is allocating
this surcharge to its licensees based on
data available in the U.S. Department of
Energy’s (DOE) Manifest Information
Management System. This database
contains information on total LLW
volumes disposed of by four generator
classes: Academic, industrial, medical,
and utility. The ratio of waste volumes
disposed of by these generator classes to
total LLW volumes disposed over a
period of time is used to estimate the
portion of this surcharge that will be
allocated to the power reactors, fuel
facilities, and the materials users fee
classes. The materials users fee class
portion is adjusted to account for the
large percentage of materials licensees
that are licensed by the Agreement
States rather than the NRC.
Table IV shows the allocation of the
LLW surcharge and its allocation across
the various fee classes.
TABLE IV—ALLOCATION OF LLW SURCHARGE FY 2021
[Dollars in millions]
LLW Surcharge
Fee classes
Percent
$
Operating Power Reactors ......................................................................................................................................
Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor Decommissioning ......................................................................................................
Non-Power Production or Utilization Facilities ........................................................................................................
Fuel Facilities ...........................................................................................................................................................
Materials Users ........................................................................................................................................................
Transportation ..........................................................................................................................................................
Rare Earth Facilities ................................................................................................................................................
Uranium Recovery ...................................................................................................................................................
87.5
0.0
0.0
9.9
2.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
$2.941
0.000
0.000
0.333
0.087
0.000
0.000
0.000
Total ..................................................................................................................................................................
100.0
3.361
FY 2021 Fee Collection—Revised
Annual Fees
In accordance with SECY–05–0164,
‘‘Annual Fee Calculation Method’’
(ADAMS Accession No. ML052580332),
the NRC rebaselines its annual fees
every year. ‘‘Rebaselining’’ entails
analyzing the budget in detail and then
allocating the budgeted resources to
various classes or subclasses of
licensees. It also includes updating the
number of NRC licensees in its fee
calculation methodology.
The NRC is revising its annual fees in
§§ 171.15 and 171.16 to recover
approximately 100 percent of the NRC’s
FY 2021 enacted budget (less the budget
authority for excluded activities and the
estimated amount to be recovered
through 10 CFR part 170 fees). The total
estimated 10 CFR part 170 collections
for this final rule are $190.6 million,
which is a decrease of $29.6 million
from the FY 2020 final rule (see the
specific fee class sections for a
discussion of this decrease). The NRC,
therefore, must recover $517.4 million
through annual fees from its licensees,
which is an increase of $9.5 million
from the FY 2020 final rule.
Table V shows the rebaselined fees for
FY 2021 for a sample of licensee
categories. The FY 2020 amounts are
provided for comparison purposes.
TABLE V—REBASELINED ANNUAL FEES
[Actual dollars]
FY 2020
final
annual fee
($)
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
Class/category of licenses
Operating Power Reactors ......................................................................................................................................
+ Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor Decommissioning ...................................................................................................
Total, Combined Fee ........................................................................................................................................
Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor Decommissioning ......................................................................................................
Non-Power Production or Utilization Facilities ........................................................................................................
High Enriched Uranium Fuel Facility (Category 1.A.(1)(a)) ....................................................................................
Low Enriched Uranium Fuel Facility (Category 1.A.(1)(b)) .....................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
$4,621,000
188,000
4,809,000
188,000
81,300
5,067,000
1,717,000
FY 2021
final
annual fee
($)
$4,749,000
237,000
4,986,000
237,000
80,000
4,643,000
1,573,000
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
32151
TABLE V—REBASELINED ANNUAL FEES—Continued
[Actual dollars]
FY 2020
final
annual fee
($)
Class/category of licenses
Uranium Enrichment (Category 1.E) .......................................................................................................................
UF6 Conversion and Deconversion Facility (Category 2.A.(1) ...............................................................................
Basic In Situ Recovery Facilities (Category 2.A.(2)(b)) ..........................................................................................
Typical Users:
Radiographers (Category 3O) ..........................................................................................................................
All Other Specific Byproduct Material Licensees (Category 3P) .....................................................................
Medical Other (Category 7C) ...........................................................................................................................
Device/Product Safety Evaluation—Broad (Category 9A) ...............................................................................
The work papers that support this
final rule show in detail how the NRC
allocates the budgeted resources for
each class of licensees and calculates
the fees.
Paragraphs a. through h. of this
section describe the budgeted resources
allocated to each class of licensees and
the calculations of the rebaselined fees.
For more information about detailed fee
calculations for each class, please
consult the accompanying work papers
for this final rule.
FY 2021
final
annual fee
($)
2,208,000
510,000
49,200
2,023,000
467,000
47,200
29,900
9,700
14,800
13,800
29,100
9,900
16,800
17,900
a. Operating Power Reactors
The NRC will collect $441.7 million
in annual fees from the operating power
reactors fee class in FY 2021, as shown
in Table VI. The FY 2020 operating
power reactors fees are shown for
comparison purposes.
TABLE VI—ANNUAL FEE SUMMARY CALCULATIONS FOR OPERATING POWER REACTORS
[Dollars in millions]
FY 2020
final
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
Summary fee calculations
FY 2021
final
Total budgeted resources ........................................................................................................................................
Less estimated 10 CFR part 170 receipts ..............................................................................................................
$623.9
¥186.7
$611.8
¥161.6
Net 10 CFR part 171 resources .......................................................................................................................
Allocated generic transportation ..............................................................................................................................
Fee-relief adjustment ...............................................................................................................................................
Allocated LLW surcharge ........................................................................................................................................
Billing adjustment .....................................................................................................................................................
Adjustment: Estimated current year collections from terminated reactor (Indian Point Generating, Unit 2 in FY
2020 and Indian Point Generating, Unit 3 in FY 2021) .......................................................................................
Total required annual fee recovery ..................................................................................................................
Total operating reactors ...................................................................................................................................
Annual fee per reactor .............................................................................................................................................
437.2
0.2
¥1.2
3.1
2.4
450.2
0.3
N/A
2.9
¥9.1
¥2.7
439.0
95
$4.621
¥2.7
441.7
93
$4.749
In comparison to FY 2020, the FY
2021 annual fee for the operating power
reactors fee class is increasing primarily
due to the following: (1) The decline in
10 CFR part 170 estimated billings; (2)
the reduction in the total number of
operating power reactors due to the
closure of Duane Arnold and Indian
Point Energy Center (Indian Point Unit
3); and (3) the absence of the fee-relief
credit that was provided in FY 2020 as
part of the fee-relief adjustment. The
increase in the annual fee for the
operating power reactors fee class is
partially offset due to the following: (1)
The decrease in budgeted resources; (2)
the 10 CFR part 171 billing adjustment
that was included in the operating
power reactors fee class calculation due
to the deferral of annual fees and fees
for services due to the coronavirus
disease (COVID–19) pandemic; and (3)
the current year collection adjustment
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
due to the shutdown of Indian Point
Unit 3. These components are discussed
in the following paragraphs.
The 10 CFR part 170 estimated
billings declined primarily due to the
following: (1) The decrease due to the
plant closures; (2) the completion of
construction activities at Vogtle Electric
Generating Plant, Unit 3 (Vogtle Unit 3);
(3) the completion of the NuScale small
modular reactor (SMR) design
certification review; and (4) the impact
of continued travel restrictions and
limited on-site presence on inspection
activities due to the COVID–19
pandemic. This decrease in the 10 CFR
part 170 estimated billings is partially
offset by increased work to support the
following: (1) The review of the Oklo
Power LLC combined license (COL)
application for the Aurora micro reactor,
which was docketed in June 2020; and
(2) rescheduled inspection activities
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
that were deferred due to the COVID–19
pandemic.
In addition, as a result of the revised
fee-recovery framework under NEIMA,
the FY 2021 annual fee increased due to
the absence of the fee-relief credit that
was provided in FY 2020 as part of the
fee-relief adjustment. Because NEIMA
eliminated the approximately 90
percent requirement for fee recovery
and, in turn, the 10 percent limit on feerelief activities, the NRC will no longer
provide a fee-relief credit or assess a feerelief surcharge as part of the
calculation of annual fees for each
licensee fee class.
The increase in the annual fee is
partially offset by a decline in FTEs
associated with changes in workload,
including, but not limited to, the
following: (1) The completion of
probabilistic risk assessment reviews
related to lessons learned from the
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
32152
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
accident at Fukushima Dai-ichi in
Japan; (2) the closure of Duane Arnold;
(3) reduced workload associated with
significance determinations, operating
experience evaluations, and generic
communications development; (4) the
completion of the NuScale SMR design
certification review; (5) a decrease in
licensing actions and reduced demand
for operator licensing and vendor
inspection work resulting from the
completion of construction of Vogtle
Unit 3; and (6) decreases in research
workload in areas of flooding, high
energy arc faulting testing, and the near
completion of the Level 3 probabilistic
risk assessment project. The decrease in
the budgeted resources is offset by an
increase for certain contract costs due to
a reduction in the utilization of prioryear unobligated carryover funding and
an increase in the fully-costed FTE rate
compared to FY 2020.
In addition, the increase in the annual
fee is partially offset by the $9,143,303
billing adjustment that was included in
the operating power reactors calculation
due to the deferral of annual fees and
fees for services due to the COVID–19
pandemic, and a $2,700,000 current
year collection adjustment in the
operating power reactors fee class
calculation due to the shutdown of
Indian Point Unit 3.
The fee-recoverable budgeted
resources are divided equally among the
93 licensed operating power reactors, a
decrease of two operating power
reactors compared to FY 2020 due to the
closure of Duane Arnold and Indian
Point Unit 3, resulting in an annual fee
of $4,749,000 per reactor. Additionally,
each licensed operating power reactor is
assessed the FY 2021 spent fuel storage/
reactor decommissioning annual fee of
$237,000 (see Table VII and the
discussion that follows). The combined
FY 2021 annual fee for each operating
power reactor is $4,986,000.
The NRC included an estimate of the
operating power reactors annual fee in
Appendix C, ‘‘Estimated Operating
Power Reactors Annual Fee,’’ of the FY
2021 Congressional Budget Justification
(CBJ), with the intent to increase
transparency with stakeholders. The
NRC developed this estimate based on
the staff’s allocation of the FY 2021
budget request to fee classes under 10
CFR part 170, and allocations within the
operating power reactors fee class under
10 CFR part 171. In addition, the
estimated annual fee assumed 93
operating power reactors in FY 2021
and applied various data assumptions
from the FY 2019 final fee rule (84 FR
22331; May 17, 2019). Based on these
allocations and assumptions, the
operating power reactor annual fee
included in the FY 2021 CBJ was
estimated to be $4.8 million,
approximately $0.6 million below the
FY 2015 operating power reactors
annual fee amount adjusted for inflation
of $5.4 million. Collectively, these
actions serve to mitigate impacts
resulting from licensees leaving the fee
class and help the NRC continue to
develop budgets that account for a fee
class with a declining number of
licensees. Although the FY 2021 CBJ
included the estimated operating power
reactors annual fee, the assumptions
made between budget formulation and
the development of the FY 2021 final
rule have changed, as shown in Table
VI.
In FY 2016, the NRC amended its
licensing, inspection, and annual fee
regulations to establish a variable
annual fee structure for light-water
SMRs (81 FR 32617). Under the variable
annual fee structure, an SMR’s annual
fee would be assessed as a function of
its bundled licensed thermal power
rating. Currently, there are no operating
SMRs; therefore, the NRC will not assess
an annual fee in FY 2021 for this type
of licensee.
b. Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor
Decommissioning
The NRC will collect $28.9 million in
annual fees from 10 CFR part 50 power
reactor licensees, and from 10 CFR part
72 licensees that do not hold a 10 CFR
part 50 license, to recover the budgeted
resources for the spent fuel storage/
reactor decommissioning fee class in FY
2021, as shown in Table VII. The FY
2020 spent fuel storage/reactor
decommissioning fees are shown for
comparison purposes.
TABLE VII—ANNUAL FEE SUMMARY CALCULATIONS FOR SPENT FUEL STORAGE/REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING
[Dollars in millions]
FY 2020
final
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
Summary fee calculations
FY 2021
final
Total budgeted resources ........................................................................................................................................
Less estimated 10 CFR part 170 receipts ..............................................................................................................
$37.9
¥15.9
$42.2
¥13.8
Net 10 CFR part 171 resources .......................................................................................................................
Allocated generic transportation costs ....................................................................................................................
Fee-relief adjustment ...............................................................................................................................................
Billing adjustments ...................................................................................................................................................
Total required annual fee recovery ..................................................................................................................
Total spent fuel storage facilities ......................................................................................................................
Annual fee per facility ..............................................................................................................................................
22.1
0.8
¥0.1
0.1
22.9
122
$0.188
28.4
1.1
N/A
¥0.6
28.9
122
$0.237
In comparison to FY 2020, the FY
2021 annual fee for the spent fuel
storage/reactor decommissioning fee
class is increasing primarily due to the
increase in the budgeted resources and
the decline in the 10 CFR part 170
estimated billings. This increase is
partially offset by the 10 CFR part 171
billing adjustment that was included in
the spent fuel storage/reactor
decommissioning fee class calculation
due to the deferral of annual fees and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
fees for services due to the COVID–19
pandemic. These components are
discussed in the following paragraphs.
The budgeted resources for the spent
fuel storage/reactor decommissioning
fee class increased primarily to support
the following: (1) Decommissioning
activities associated with power reactors
in decommissioning, including the
transition of Duane Arnold from
operation to the power reactor
decommissioning program; and (2)
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
waste research activities associated with
accident tolerant fuel, high burnup, and
enrichment extension fuels.
The 10 CFR part 170 estimated
billings for FY 2021 decreased primarily
due to the following: (1) A reduction in
hours associated with the staff’s review
of applications for renewals and
amendments for independent spent fuel
storage installation (ISFSI) licenses and
dry cask storage certificates of
compliance (CoCs); (2) the near
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
32153
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
completion of the staff’s review of the
Interim Storage Partners consolidated
interim storage facility application; (3)
the completion of certain follow-up
inspections and other inspection
activities for San Onofre Nuclear
Generating Station; (4) the completion
of licensing actions, partial site release
requests, and a decrease in confirmatory
survey work at multiple sites; and (5)
the near completion of the license
termination for the La Crosse Boiling
Water Reactor. This decrease in the 10
CFR part 170 estimated billings is
partially offset by increased work to
support the following: (1) Inspection
activities for ISFSI licenses and dry cask
storage CoCs; (2) the staff’s safety and
environmental review of the Holtec HI–
STORE consolidated interim storage
facility application; (3) the staff’s review
of topical reports; and (4)
decommissioning activities within the
power reactor decommissioning
program, including the review of
decommissioning license amendment
requests, exemption requests, and
inspection activities at multiple sites.
The increase in the annual fee is
partially offset by an approximate $0.6
million 10 CFR part 171 billing
adjustment that was included in the
spent fuel storage/reactor
decommissioning calculation due to the
deferral of annual fees and fees for
services due to the COVID–19
pandemic.
The required annual fee recovery
amount is divided equally among 122
licensees, resulting in a FY 2021 annual
fee of $237,000 per licensee.
c. Fuel Facilities
The NRC will collect $17.5 million in
annual fees from the fuel facilities fee
class in FY 2021, as shown in Table
VIII. The FY 2020 fuel facilities fees are
shown for comparison purposes.
TABLE VIII—ANNUAL FEE SUMMARY CALCULATIONS FOR FUEL FACILITIES
[Dollars in millions]
FY 2020
final
Summary fee calculations
FY 2021
final
Total budgeted resources ........................................................................................................................................
Less estimated 10 CFR part 170 receipts ..............................................................................................................
$23.2
¥6.8
$23.3
¥7.3
Net 10 CFR part 171 resources .......................................................................................................................
Allocated generic transportation ..............................................................................................................................
Fee-relief adjustment ...............................................................................................................................................
Allocated LLW surcharge ........................................................................................................................................
Billing adjustments ...................................................................................................................................................
Total remaining required annual fee recovery ........................................................................................................
16.5
1.1
¥0.1
0.4
0.1
$18.0
16.0
1.5
N/A
0.3
¥0.4
$17.5
In comparison to FY 2020, the FY
2021 annual fee for the fuel facilities fee
class is decreasing primarily due to the
increase in 10 CFR part 170 estimated
billings and the 10 CFR part 171 billing
adjustment that was included in the fuel
facilities calculation due to the deferral
of annual fees and fees for services due
to the COVID–19 pandemic. The
decrease in the annual fee is offset by an
increase in the budgeted resources as
discussed in the following paragraphs.
The 10 CFR part 170 estimated
billings increased as a result of the
following: (1) The increased workload to
support the staff’s review of a license
amendment application associated with
high assay low-enriched uranium and
the associated security plans, and (2) the
review of the Westinghouse
environmental impact statement being
developed for the license renewal
application. As part of the final annual
fee calculation, an approximate $0.4
million billing adjustment was included
in the fuel facilities calculation due to
the deferral of annual fees and fees for
services due to the COVID–19
pandemic.
The decrease in the annual fee is
offset, in part, by an increase in the
resources for contract costs budgeted for
the fuel facilities fee class primarily due
to a reduction in the utilization of prioryear unobligated carryover compared to
FY 2020.
The NRC will continue allocating
annual fees to individual fuel facility
licensees based on the effort/fee
determination matrix developed in the
FY 1999 final fee rule (64 FR 31447;
June 10, 1999). To briefly recap, the
matrix groups licensees within this fee
class into various fee categories. The
matrix lists processes that are conducted
at licensed sites and assigns effort
factors for the safety and safeguards
activities associated with each process
(these effort levels are reflected in Table
IX). The annual fees are then distributed
across the fee class based on the
regulatory effort assigned by the matrix.
The effort factors in the matrix represent
regulatory effort that is not recovered
through 10 CFR part 170 fees (e.g.,
rulemaking, guidance). Regulatory effort
for activities that are subject to 10 CFR
part 170 fees, such as the number of
inspections, is not applicable to the
effort factor.
In addition, the NRC has added an
annual fee for fee category 1.A.(2),
‘‘Limited Operations,’’ in anticipation
that the NRC may decide to issue a
license amendment in the future that
would move a licensee to the ‘‘Limited
Operations’’ fee category from the 1.E,
‘‘Uranium Enrichment’’ fee category
because the NRC has received an
amendment application to a fuel facility
license that, if granted, would authorize
a significantly smaller operating facility.
TABLE IX—EFFORT FACTORS FOR FUEL FACILITIES, FY 2021
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
Facility type
(fee category)
High-Enriched Uranium Fuel (1.A.(1)(a)) ....................................................................................
Low-Enriched Uranium Fuel (1.A.(1)(b)) .....................................................................................
Limited Operations (1.A.(2)(a)) ....................................................................................................
Gas Centrifuge Enrichment Demonstration (1.A.(2)(b)) ..............................................................
Hot Cell (and others) (1.A.(2)(c)) .................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Effort factors
Number of
facilities
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
Safety
2
3
1
0
0
16JNR2
Safeguards
88
70
3
0
0
91
21
17
0
0
32154
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE IX—EFFORT FACTORS FOR FUEL FACILITIES, FY 2021—Continued
Facility type
(fee category)
Uranium Enrichment (1.E.) ..........................................................................................................
UF6 Conversion and Deconversion (2.A.(1)) ...............................................................................
In FY 2021, the total remaining
amount of annual fees to be recovered,
$17.5 million, is attributable to safety
activities, safeguards activities, and the
LLW surcharge. For FY 2021, the total
budgeted resources to be recovered as
annual fees for safety activities are $9.4
million. To calculate the annual fee, the
NRC allocates this amount to each fee
category based on its percentage of the
Effort factors
Number of
facilities
total regulatory effort for safety
activities. Similarly, the NRC allocates
the budgeted resources to be recovered
as annual fees for safeguards activities,
$7.8 million, to each fee category based
on its percentage of the total regulatory
effort for safeguards activities. Finally,
the fuel facilities fee class portion of the
LLW surcharge—$0.3 million—is
allocated to each fee category based on
Safety
Safeguards
1
1
16
7
23
2
its percentage of the total regulatory
effort for both safety and safeguards
activities. The annual fee per licensee is
then calculated by dividing the total
allocated budgeted resources for the fee
category by the number of licensees in
that fee category. The fee for each
facility is summarized in Table X.
TABLE X—ANNUAL FEES FOR FUEL FACILITIES
[Actual dollars]
FY 2020
final
annual fee
Facility type
(fee category)
High-Enriched Uranium Fuel (1.A.(1)(a)) ................................................................................................................
Low-Enriched Uranium Fuel (1.A.(1)(b)) .................................................................................................................
Facilities with limited operations (1.A.(2)(a)) ...........................................................................................................
Gas Centrifuge Enrichment Demonstration (1.A.(2)(b)) ..........................................................................................
Hot Cell (and others) (1.A.(2)(c)) .............................................................................................................................
Uranium Enrichment (1.E.) ......................................................................................................................................
UF6 Conversion and Deconversion (2.A.(1)) ..........................................................................................................
d. Uranium Recovery Facilities
The NRC will collect $0.2 million in
annual fees from the uranium recovery
facilities fee class in FY 2021, as shown
in Table XI. The FY 2020 uranium
$5,067,000
1,717,000
N/A
N/A
N/A
2,208,000
510,000
FY 2021
final
annual fee
$4,643,000
1,573,000
1,037,000
N/A
N/A
2,023,000
467,000
recovery facilities fees are shown for
comparison purposes.
TABLE XI—ANNUAL FEE SUMMARY CALCULATIONS FOR URANIUM RECOVERY FACILITIES
[Dollars in millions]
FY 2020
final
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
Summary fee calculations
FY 2021
final
Total budgeted resources ........................................................................................................................................
Less estimated 10 CFR part 170 receipts ..............................................................................................................
$0.6
¥0.4
$0.5
¥0.3
Net 10 CFR part 171 resources .......................................................................................................................
Allocated generic transportation ..............................................................................................................................
Fee-relief adjustment ...............................................................................................................................................
Billing adjustments ...................................................................................................................................................
Total required annual fee recovery .........................................................................................................................
0.2
N/A
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
N/A
N/A
0.0
0.2
In comparison to FY 2020, the FY
2021 annual fee for the uranium
recovery facilities fee class is decreasing
primarily due to a decline in the
budgeted resources because of an
expected decrease in casework
associated with uranium recovery
policy issues, environmental review
coordination activities, and guidance
development.
The NRC regulates DOE’s Title I and
Title II activities under the Uranium
Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
(UMTRCA).3 The annual fee assessed to
DOE includes the resources specifically
budgeted for the NRC’s UMTRCA Title
I and II activities, as well as 10 percent
3 Congress established the two programs, Title I
and Title II, under UMTRCA to protect the public
and the environment from hazards associated with
uranium milling. The UMTRCA Title I program is
for remedial action at abandoned mill tailings sites
where tailings resulted largely from production of
uranium for weapons programs. The NRC also
regulates DOE’s UMTRCA Title II program, which
is directed toward uranium mill sites licensed by
the NRC or Agreement States in or after 1978.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
of the remaining budgeted resources for
this fee class. The NRC described the
overall methodology for determining
fees for UMTRCA in the FY 2002 fee
rule (67 FR 42625; June 24, 2002), and
the NRC continues to use this
methodology. The DOE’s UMTRCA
annual fee is decreasing compared to FY
2020 due to an increase in the 10 CFR
part 170 estimated billings for the
anticipated workload increases at
various DOE UMTRCA sites. The NRC
assesses the remaining 90 percent of its
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
32155
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
budgeted resources to the remaining
licensee in this fee class, as described in
the work papers. This is reflected in
Table XII:
TABLE XII—COSTS RECOVERED THROUGH ANNUAL FEES; URANIUM RECOVERY FACILITIES FEE CLASS
[Actual dollars]
FY 2020
final
annual fee
Summary of costs
DOE Annual Fee Amount (UMTRCA Title I and Title II) General Licenses:
UMTRCA Title I and Title II budgeted resources less 10 CFR part 170 receipts ...........................................
10 percent of generic/other uranium recovery budgeted resources ................................................................
10 percent of uranium recovery fee-relief adjustment .....................................................................................
Total Annual Fee Amount for DOE (rounded) ........................................................................................................
Annual Fee Amount for Other Uranium Recovery Licenses:
90 percent of generic/other uranium recovery budgeted resources less the amounts specifically budgeted
for UMTRCA Title I and Title II activities ......................................................................................................
90 percent of uranium recovery fee-relief adjustment .....................................................................................
Total Annual Fee Amount for Other Uranium Recovery Licenses
Further, for any non-DOE licensees,
the NRC will continue using a matrix to
determine the effort levels associated
with conducting generic regulatory
actions for the different licensees in the
uranium recovery facilities fee class;
this is similar to the NRC’s approach for
fuel facilities, described previously. The
matrix methodology for uranium
recovery licensees first identifies the
licensee categories included within this
fee class (excluding DOE). These
categories are: Conventional uranium
mills and heap leach facilities, uranium
in situ recovery (ISR) and resin ISR
facilities, and mill tailings disposal
facilities. The matrix identifies the types
of operating activities that support and
FY 2021
final
annual fee
$114,577
5,573
¥107
$111,536
5,241
N/A
$120,000
$117,000
$50,153
¥959
$47,166
N/A
$49,194
$47,166
benefit these licensees, along with each
activity’s relative weight (see the work
papers). Currently, there is only one
remaining non-DOE licensee, which is a
basic in situ recovery facility. Table XIII
displays the benefit factors for the nonDOE licensee in that fee category:
TABLE XIII—BENEFIT FACTORS FOR URANIUM RECOVERY LICENSES
Number of
licensees
Fee category
Benefit factor
per licensee
Total value
Benefit factor
percent total
Conventional and Heap Leach mills (2.A.(2)(a)) .............................................
Basic In Situ Recovery facilities (2.A.(2)(b)) ....................................................
Expanded In Situ Recovery facilities (2.A.(2)(c)) ............................................
Section 11e.(2) disposal incidental to existing tailings sites (2.A.(4)) .............
0
1
0
0
0
190
0
0
0
190
0
0
0
100.0
0
0
Total ..........................................................................................................
1
190
190
100.0
The annual fee for the remaining nonDOE licensee is calculated by allocating
100 percent of the budgeted resources,
as summarized in Table XIV.
TABLE XIV—ANNUAL FEES FOR URANIUM RECOVERY LICENSEES
[Other than DOE; actual dollars]
FY 2020
final
annual fee
Facility type
(fee category)
Conventional and Heap Leach mills (2.A.(2)(a)) .....................................................................................................
Basic In Situ Recovery facilities (2.A.(2)(b)) ...........................................................................................................
Expanded In Situ Recovery facilities (2.A.(2)(c)) ....................................................................................................
Section 11e.(2) disposal incidental to existing tailings sites (2.A.(4)) .....................................................................
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
e. Non-Power Production or Utilization
Facilities
The NRC will collect $0.320 million
in annual fees from the non-power
production or utilization facilities fee
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
class in FY 2021, as shown in Table XV.
The non-power production or
utilization facilities fee class replaces
the research and test reactor fee class
from previous fiscal years. This revised
fee class accounts for commercial non-
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
N/A
$49,200
N/A
N/A
FY 2021
final
annual fee
N/A
$47,200
N/A
N/A
power production and utilization
facilities expected to be used for the
production of medical isotopes. The
final FY 2020 research and test reactors
fees are shown for comparison
purposes.
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
32156
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE XV—ANNUAL FEE SUMMARY CALCULATIONS FOR NON-POWER PRODUCTION OR UTILIZATION FACILITIES
[Actual dollars]
Summary fee calculations
FY 2020 final
FY 2021 final
Total budgeted resources ........................................................................................................................................
Less estimated 10 CFR part 170 receipts ..............................................................................................................
$3,317,830
¥3,030,000
$2,896,754
¥2,576,000
Net 10 CFR part 171 resources .......................................................................................................................
Allocated generic transportation ..............................................................................................................................
Fee-relief adjustment ...............................................................................................................................................
Billing adjustments ...................................................................................................................................................
Total required annual fee recovery ..................................................................................................................
Total non-power production or utilization facilities licenses .............................................................................
Total annual fee per license (rounded) ...................................................................................................................
287,830
30,713
¥6,183
12,980
325,341
4
$81,300
320,754
4,330
N/A
¥4,391
320,141
4
$80,000
In comparison to FY 2020, the
budgetary resources for the non-power
production or utilization facilities fee
class is primarily decreasing with
respect to the medical isotope
production facilities due to the near
completion of the activities associated
with the staff’s review of the operating
license application for SHINE Medical
Technologies, LLC (SHINE). In addition,
the 10 CFR part 170 estimated billings
are declining within the fee class as a
result of delayed submittals associated
with medical isotope production
facilities by various applicants. The 10
CFR part 170 estimated billings
associated with the four non-power
production or utilization facilities
licensees subject to annual fees
increased to support the following: (1)
Activities associated with the review of
the GE Nuclear Test Reactor license
renewal application; and (2) activities
associated with the review of a complex
license amendment for the National
Institute of Standards and Technology
Neutron Reactor.
The annual fee-recovery amount is
divided equally among the four nonpower production or utilization
facilities licensees subject to annual fees
and results in an FY 2021 annual fee of
$80,000 for each licensee.
f. Rare Earth
The NRC has not allocated any
budgeted resources to this fee class;
therefore, the NRC is not assessing an
annual fee for this fee class in FY 2021.
g. Materials Users
The NRC will collect $35.3 million in
annual fees from materials users
licensed under 10 CFR parts 30, 40, and
70, as shown in Table XVI. The FY 2020
materials users fees are shown for
comparison purposes.
TABLE XVI—ANNUAL FEE SUMMARY CALCULATIONS FOR MATERIALS USERS
[Dollars in millions]
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
Summary fee calculations
FY 2020 final
FY 2021 final
Total budgeted resources for licensees not regulated by Agreement States .........................................................
Less estimated 10 CFR part 170 receipts ..............................................................................................................
$33.7
¥1.0
$35.1
¥1.0
Net 10 CFR part 171 resources .......................................................................................................................
Allocated generic transportation ..............................................................................................................................
Fee-relief adjustment ...............................................................................................................................................
LLW surcharge ........................................................................................................................................................
Billing adjustments ...................................................................................................................................................
Total required annual fee recovery ..................................................................................................................
32.8
1.2
0.0
0.0
0.1
$34.1
34.1
1.5
N/A
0.1
¥0.4
$35.3
The formula for calculating 10 CFR
part 171 annual fees for the various
categories of materials users is described
in detail in the work papers. Generally,
the calculation results in a single annual
fee that includes 10 CFR part 170 costs,
such as amendments, renewals,
inspections, and other licensing actions
specific to individual fee categories.
The total annual fee recovery of $35.3
million for FY 2021 shown in Table XVI
consists of $27.6 million for general
costs and $7.7 million for inspection
costs. To equitably and fairly allocate
the $35.3 million required to be
collected among approximately 2,500
diverse materials users licensees, the
NRC continues to calculate the annual
fees for each fee category within this
class based on the 10 CFR part 170
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
application fees and estimated
inspection costs for each fee category.
Because the application fees and
inspection costs are indicative of the
complexity of the materials license, this
approach provides a proxy for allocating
the generic and other regulatory costs to
the diverse fee categories. This fee
calculation method also considers the
inspection frequency (priority), which is
indicative of the safety risk and
resulting regulatory costs associated
with the categories of licenses.
In comparison to FY 2020, annual fees
are decreasing for 42 fee categories
within the materials users fee class to
reflect changes as a result of the biennial
review of fees, which included an
examination of the average professional
hours for licensing and oversight
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
activities. In addition, annual fees are
increasing for 11 fee categories within
the materials users fee class due to the
following: (1) An increase in the fullycosted FTE rate compared to FY 2020;
(2) an increase in the budgeted
resources for contract costs due to a
reduction in the utilization of prior-year
unobligated carryover funding
compared to FY 2020; (3) the
realignment of budgeted resources that
supports contract funding for general
license tracking, the materials event
database, and rulemaking information
technology activities; (4) changes as a
result of the biennial review of fees,
which included an examination of the
average professional hours for licensing
and oversight activities; and (5) an
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
increase in generic transportation costs
for materials users.
A constant multiplier is established to
recover the total general costs (including
allocated generic transportation costs) of
$27.6 million. To derive the constant
multiplier, the general cost amount is
divided by the sum of all fee categories
(application fee plus the inspection fee
divided by inspection priority) then
multiplied by the number of licensees.
This calculation results in a constant
multiplier of 1.0 for FY 2021. The
average inspection cost is the average
inspection hours for each fee category
multiplied by the professional hourly
rate of $288. The inspection priority is
the interval between routine
inspections, expressed in years. The
inspection multiplier is established in
order to recover the $7.7 million in
inspection costs. To derive the
inspection multiplier, the inspection
costs amount is divided by the sum of
all fee categories (inspection fee divided
by inspection priority) then multiplied
by the number of licensees. This
calculation results in an inspection
multiplier of 1.43 for FY 2021. The
unique category costs are any special
costs that the NRC has budgeted for a
specific category of licenses. Please see
the work papers for more detail about
this classification.
The annual fee being assessed to each
licensee also takes into account a share
32157
of approximately $0.087 million in LLW
surcharge costs allocated to the
materials users fee class (see Table IV,
‘‘Allocation of LLW Surcharge, FY
2021,’’ in Section II, ‘‘Discussion,’’ of
this document). The annual fee for each
fee category is shown in the revision to
§ 171.16(d).
h. Transportation
The NRC will collect $1.4 million in
annual fees to recover generic
transportation budgeted resources in FY
2021, as shown in Table XVII. The FY
2020 fees are shown for comparison
purposes.
TABLE XVII—ANNUAL FEE SUMMARY CALCULATIONS FOR TRANSPORTATION
[Dollars in millions]
Summary fee calculations
FY 2020 final
FY 2021 final
Total budgeted resources ........................................................................................................................................
Less estimated 10 CFR part 170 receipts ..............................................................................................................
$7.2
¥2.8
$8.3
¥2.3
Net 10 CFR part 171 resources .......................................................................................................................
Less generic transportation resources ....................................................................................................................
Fee-relief adjustment ...............................................................................................................................................
Billing adjustments ...................................................................................................................................................
Total required annual fee recovery ..................................................................................................................
4.4
¥3.4
0.0
0.0
$1.0
5.9
¥4.5
N/A
¥0.1
$1.4
In comparison to FY 2020, the annual
fee for the transportation fee class is
increasing primarily due to the
following: (1) The decline in 10 CFR
part 170 estimated billings related to
delays in new amendment packages;
and (2) an increase in the budgeted
resources for contract costs due to a
reduction in the utilization of prior-year
unobligated carryover funding
compared to FY 2020, an increase in the
number and complexities of
transportation package applications as a
result of an increase in the number of
power reactors in decommissioning, and
the expanded use of accident tolerant
fuels. The increase in the annual fee is
partially offset by an approximate $0.1
million 10 CFR part 171 billing
adjustment that was included in the
transportation fee class calculation due
to the deferral of annual fees and fees
for services due to the COVID–19
pandemic.
Consistent with the policy established
in the NRC’s FY 2006 final fee rule (71
FR 30721; May 30, 2006), the NRC
recovers generic transportation costs
unrelated to DOE by including those
costs in the annual fees for licensee fee
classes. The NRC continues to assess a
separate annual fee under § 171.16, fee
category 18.A., for DOE transportation
activities. The amount of the allocated
generic resources is calculated by
multiplying the percentage of total CoCs
used by each fee class (and DOE) by the
total generic transportation resources to
be recovered.
This resource distribution to the
licensee fee classes and DOE is shown
in Table XVIII. Note that for the nonpower production or utilization
facilities fee class, the NRC allocates the
distribution to only those licensees that
are subject to annual fees. Although five
CoCs benefit the entire non-power
production or utilization facilities fee
class, only 4 out of 31 non-power
production or utilization facilities
licensees are subject to annual fees.
Consequently, the number of CoCs used
to determine the proportion of generic
transportation resources allocated to
annual fees for the non-power
production or utilization facilities fee
class has been adjusted to 0.7 so these
licensees are charged a fair and
equitable portion of the total fees (see
the work papers).
TABLE XVIII—DISTRIBUTION OF TRANSPORTATION RESOURCES, FY 2021
[Dollars in millions]
Number
of CoCs
benefiting
fee class
or DOE
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
Licensee fee class/DOE
Materials Users ............................................................................................................................
Operating Power Reactors ..........................................................................................................
Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor Decommissioning ..........................................................................
Non-Power Production or Utilization Facilities ............................................................................
Fuel Facilities ...............................................................................................................................
Sub-Total of Generic Transportation Resources .........................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
23.0
5.0
16.0
0.7
23.0
67.7
16JNR2
Percentage of
total CoCs
25.9
5.6
18.0
0.7
25.9
76.3
Allocated
generic
transportation
resources
1.5
0.3
1.1
0.0
1.5
4.5
32158
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE XVIII—DISTRIBUTION OF TRANSPORTATION RESOURCES, FY 2021—Continued
[Dollars in millions]
Number
of CoCs
benefiting
fee class
or DOE
Licensee fee class/DOE
Allocated
generic
transportation
resources
DOE .............................................................................................................................................
21.0
23.7
1.4
Total ......................................................................................................................................
88.7
100.0
5.9
The NRC assesses an annual fee to
DOE based on the 10 CFR part 71 CoCs
it holds. The NRC, therefore, does not
allocate these DOE-related resources to
other licensees’ annual fees because
these resources specifically support
DOE.
FY 2021—Policy Changes
The NRC is making two policy
changes for FY 2021:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
Percentage of
total CoCs
Process for Disputing Errors in Invoices
for Service Fees
Section 102(d)(3) of NEIMA requires
the NRC to ‘‘modify regulations to
ensure fair and appropriate processes to
provide licensees and applicants an
opportunity to efficiently dispute or
otherwise seek review and correction of
errors in invoices’’ for service fees. The
NRC is implementing requirements for a
standard method for licensees and
applicants to efficiently dispute or seek
review and correction of errors in
invoices. The process being
implemented is illustrated in the
process map, ‘‘NRC Form 529,
Processing Dispute of Fees-For-Service
Charges’’ (ADAMS Accession No.
ML20311A159). This process follows
the established method for licensees and
applicants to submit requests for the
review of fees assessed under 10 CFR
part 170 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML20104C055). The NRC Form 529 will
be available in the agency’s eBilling
system and on the agency’s public
website, and can be found under
ADAMS Accession No. ML20339A673.
Standard use of an NRC form and
amendments to the current regulations
in § 15.31 will increase efficiency by
providing the licensees and applicants
with clear guidelines and expectations
for submitting a fee dispute. It also
eliminates ambiguity regarding the
appropriate information needed for the
NRC to consider and make a
determination on a fee dispute.
In response to NEIMA’s requirement
that the NRC modify its regulations to
provide licensees and applicants an
opportunity to efficiently dispute or
otherwise seek review and correction of
errors in service fee invoices, the NRC
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
is revising its regulations. Specifically
the NRC is revising § 15.31, ‘‘Disputed
debts,’’ with conforming amendments in
§§ 15.37, ‘‘Interest, penalties, and
administrative costs,’’ and 15.53,
‘‘Reasons for suspending collection
action,’’ and changing the heading for
§ 170.51, ‘‘Right to review and appeal of
prescribed fees,’’ to ‘‘Right to dispute
assessed fees.’’ The NRC is also adding
a new section, § 171.26, ‘‘Right to
dispute assessed fees,’’ to 10 CFR part
171. These changes outline the
interactions between the submitter and
the NRC. The process will enhance
understanding of the dispute process by
setting out the process for submitting a
fee dispute, the stages of the
decisionmaking process while the
dispute is under review, and the manner
by which the NRC will notify a debtor
after it makes a final determination on
a dispute. Additionally, these
amendments provide consistent
terminology to differentiate fee disputes
under 10 CFR part 15 from fee
exemptions under 10 CFR parts 170 and
171.
Assessment of Annual Fees for Future
10 CFR Part 50 Non-Power Production
or Utilization Facility Licensees and for
Small Modular Reactor Licensees
The NRC is amending § 171.15(a) so
that the assessment of annual fees
commences after future non-power
production or utilization facility (NPUF)
licensees have successfully completed
startup testing and have provided
written notification to the NRC. In
addition, the NRC is renaming the
‘‘research and test reactors’’ fee class the
‘‘non-power production or utilization
facilities’’ fee class, which would
include currently operating research
and test reactors and future NPUFs,
such as non-reactor NPUF technologies.
Finally, the NRC is amending
§ 171.15(e) so that the assessment of
annual fees for a SMR licensee
commences after the successful
completion of power ascension testing
and the licensee provides written
notification to the NRC. These policy
changes are consistent with the FY 2020
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
final fee rule (85 FR 37250; June 19,
2020) that amended the timing of the
assessment of annual fees for future 10
CFR part 50 power reactors and 10 CFR
part 52 COL holders.
Currently, § 171.15(a) requires the
NRC to assess annual fees to a test or
research reactor (excluding test or
research reactors exempted under
§ 171.11(b)) when the NRC authorizes
the licensee to use nuclear materials
(i.e., begin operating the reactor in
accordance with its license). Prior to
this final rule, the NRC had not
established a policy for assessing 10
CFR part 171 annual fees to future nonreactor NPUF licensees (e.g., SHINE); at
this time, the NRC currently assesses
only 10 CFR part 170 service fees to
prospective applicants for
preapplication activities, construction
permit holders (i.e., SHINE and
Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC
(NWMI)) and applicants for operating
licenses (i.e., SHINE) for commercial
NPUFs, as well as certain operating nonpower production or utilization
facilities not exempted under § 170.11.
While the NRC’s fee regulations do not
include a fee class for future non-reactor
NPUF licensees, the NRC historically
has included budgeted resources for
NWMI and SHINE within the research
and test reactor fee class. The budgeted
resources for NWMI and SHINE not
recovered in 10 CFR part 170 service
fees previously were included in feerelief. These resources for the
development of a medical isotope
production infrastructure are now
excluded from the fee-recovery
requirement under NEIMA as a fee-relief
activity identified by the Commission.
In anticipation that the NRC may
decide to issue an operating license in
the future, the NRC is revising its
regulations to provide for the
assessment of annual fees to NPUFs
under § 171.15(a) when they have
notified the NRC of the successful
completion of startup testing. This final
rule uses the term ‘‘non-power
production or utilization facility’’ to
have the same meaning as the definition
used in SECY–19–0062, ‘‘Final Rule:
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
Non-power Production or Utilization
Facility License Renewal’’ (ADAMS
Accession No. ML18031A000), dated
June 17, 2019.4 The definition includes
production or utilization facilities,
licensed under § 50.21(a) or (c), or
§ 50.22, as applicable, that are not
nuclear power reactors or production
facilities within the meaning of
paragraphs (1) and (2) of § 50.2, which
defines ‘‘production facility.’’ This
definition includes currently operating
and future research and test reactors and
proposed medical radioisotope facilities
that would be licensed under 10 CFR
part 50. As such, non-reactor NPUF
licensees, such as SHINE, would be
included in the same annual fee class as
currently operating research and test
reactors that pay 10 CFR part 171
annual fees. This approach is consistent
with the current approach of combining
limited numbers of similar facilities into
a single annual fee category, where ‘‘test
reactors’’ (of which only one is currently
operational) are assessed the same 10
CFR part 171 annual fees as ‘‘research
reactors.’’ In addition, the NRC expects
that NPUF facilities will request that a
single license under 10 CFR part 50
authorize the operation of multiple
utilization and/or production facilities.
Based on the number of facilities
authorized to operate under a single
license, the number of staff hours
dedicated to licensing and oversight
activities for these facilities is not
expected to differ significantly
compared to those for the current
operating fleet of NPUFs. Furthermore,
stakeholders have previously supported
this approach regarding the assessment
of 10 CFR part 171 annual fees for future
NPUFs. Therefore, a single annual fee
would be appropriate even where an
NPUF licensee has multiple facilities
operating under a single 10 CFR part 50
license.
SMR licenses can be issued under 10
CFR part 50 or 52. Currently, § 171.15
requires the NRC to assess annual fees
to a 10 CFR part 50 SMR licensee upon
issuance of an operating license, or to a
10 CFR part 52 SMR COL holder after
the Commission has made the finding
under § 52.103(g) for all licenses held
4 The NPUF draft final rule would also revise the
definition of research reactor in §§ 170.3 and 171.5
to conform to other definitions in 10 CFR chapter
I. The NRC is not proposing to change the definition
of Research reactor in the specific exemption for
federally-owned and State-owned research reactors
in § 170.11(a)(9) or § 171.11(b)(2). The current
definition in § 171.11(b)(2) is based on the language
of OBRA–90. Further, a substantively similar
definition of research reactor was included in the
provisions of NEIMA that relate to the NRC’s fee
recovery structure. Changing the definition of
research reactor in § 171.11(b)(2) would therefore
be inconsistent with NEIMA.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
for an SMR site. The annual fee would
be determined using the cumulative
licensed thermal power rating of all
SMR units and the bundled unit
concept. For a given site, the use of the
bundled unit concept is independent of
the number of SMR plants, the number
of SMR licenses issued, and the
sequencing of the SMR licenses that
have been issued. There are currently no
operating SMRs; therefore, the NRC has
not yet assessed an annual fee for this
type of licensee.
The NRC recognizes that, after the
issuance of an operating license under
10 CFR part 50 for NPUFs and SMRs, or
a COL and § 52.103(g) finding under 10
CFR part 52 for SMRs, fuel or targets (or
both) must be loaded and startup testing
(for NPUFs) and power ascension
testing (for SMRs) must be completed
before the facility begins full licensed
operation. As discussed in the statement
of considerations for the FY 2020 final
fee rule, 10 CFR part 52 COLs for power
reactors contain a standard license
condition that requires the submittal of
written notification to the NRC upon
successful completion of power
ascension testing. Therefore, the NRC
will incorporate a similar license
condition into all future 10 CFR part 50
operating licenses for NPUFs and SMRs,
and 10 CFR part 52 COLs for SMRs to
ensure that the licensee will promptly
notify the NRC of the successful
completion of startup testing or power
ascension testing. The annual fee
assessment for future NPUFs and SMR
licenses under 10 CFR part 50, and
SMRs under 10 CFR part 52, will begin
on the date of the licensee’s written
notification of the successful
completion of startup testing or power
ascension testing.
Accordingly, the NRC is amending
§ 171.15(a) and (e) so that annual fees
commence upon written notification to
the NRC of successful completion of
startup testing and power ascension
testing, rather than upon issuance of the
operating license for 10 CFR part 50
NPUFs and SMRs, or issuance of the
§ 52.103(g) finding for 10 CFR part 52
COL holders for SMRs, but upon written
notification to the NRC of successful
completion of startup testing and/or
power ascension testing. The NRC finds
this change to 10 CFR part 171 to be
reasonable, fair, and equitable, and to be
supported by the public comments the
NRC received on PRM–171–1, which
was submitted by Dr. Michael D. Meier
on behalf of the Southern Nuclear
Operating Company (ADAMS Accession
No. ML19081A015), and on the FY 2020
proposed fee rule (85 FR 9328; February
18, 2020). The NRC is also making
conforming changes by revising § 170.3,
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
32159
‘‘Definitions,’’ § 171.3, ‘‘Scope,’’ § 171.5,
‘‘Definitions,’’ and § 171.17,
‘‘Proration.’’
FY 2021—Administrative Changes
The NRC is making seven
administrative changes:
1. Change Small Entity Fees.
As stated in SECY–08–0174, ‘‘Fiscal
Year 2009 Proposed Fee Rule and
Advance Rulemaking for GridAppropriate Reactor Fees,’’ dated
November 7, 2008 (ADAMS Accession
No. ML083120518), the NRC
determined that the maximum small
entity fee should be adjusted biennially
using a fixed percentage of 39 percent
applied to the prior two-year weighted
average of materials users’ fees for all
fee categories that have small entity
licensees. The 39 percent was based on
the small entity annual fee for FY 2005,
which was the first year the NRC was
required to recover only 90 percent of
its budget authority. This methodology
remains in place; however, the NRC
does also consider whether or not
implementing an increase will have a
disproportionate impact on the NRC’s
small entity licensees when compared
to other licensees. Therefore, the
increase for the upper and lower tier
fees were capped at a 21 percent
increase.
For the FY 2021 proposed fee rule (86
FR 10459; February 22, 2021), the NRC
conducted a biennial review of small
entity fees to determine whether the
NRC should change those fees. The NRC
used the fee methodology, developed in
FY 2009, which applies a fixed
percentage of 39 percent to the prior
two-year weighted average of materials
users’ fees, when performing its biennial
review. Based on this methodology and
as a result of the FY 2021 biennial
review, the NRC is increasing the upper
tier small entity fee from $4,500 to
$4,900 and increasing the lower tier fee
from $900 to $1,000. This constitutes a
9 percent and 11 percent increase,
respectively. The NRC believes these
fees are reasonable and provide relief to
small entities, while at the same time
recovering from those licensees some of
the NRC’s costs for activities that benefit
them.
2. Amend § 170.1, ‘‘Purpose,’’ to
change the reference to the Independent
Offices Appropriation Act, 1952.
The NRC is amending § 170.1 to
replace the ‘‘of’’ after Independent
Offices Appropriation Act with a
comma to make the reference to the
legislation consistent with references in
other NRC contexts.
3. Amend § 170.3, ‘‘Definitions,’’ to
eliminate definitions for ‘‘Balance of
plants,’’ ‘‘Nuclear Steam Supply
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
32160
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
System,’’ and ‘‘Reference systems
concept’’.
The NRC is amending § 170.3 to
eliminate definitions for ‘‘Balance of
plants,’’ ‘‘Nuclear Steam Supply
System,’’ and ‘‘Reference systems
concept.’’ These definitions are no
longer applicable in 10 CFR part 170.
These definitions were added in the FY
1977 final fee rule (43 FR 7210; March
23, 1978) to resolve issues concerning
assessing fees for balance of plant
reviews, related to a previous fee
category (category A.4.b in the table at
§ 170.21 for standardized designreference systems concept), that was not
subject to full cost recovery. In the FY
1991 final fee rule, the NRC amended 10
CFR parts 52 and 170 to assess licensing
fees for the review of standardized
reactor designs, which would be subject
to full cost recovery (56 FR 31472; July
10, 1991). This amendment to eliminate
these definitions will not impact the
NRC’s assessment of 10 CFR part 170
fees for service.
4. Remove footnote 6 to the table in
§ 170.21, and footnote 12 to the table in
§ 170.31.
The NRC is removing footnote 6 to the
table in § 170.21 and footnote 12 to the
table in § 170.31 because (1) Congress
has not enacted legislation that would
exclude import and export activities
from the fee-recoverable budget in FY
2021; and (2) in accordance with
NEIMA, for FY 2021, the NRC identified
international activities as fee-relief
activities, but it did not include
resources for import and export
licensing. The NRC, therefore, will
charge fees for import and export
licensing actions.
5. Amend § 171.5, ‘‘Definitions,’’ to
replace the reference in ‘‘Budget
authority’’.
The NRC is amending the definition
of ‘‘budget authority’’ to replace the
reference to Public Law 101–508 (i.e.,
OBRA–90) with a reference to Public
Law 115–439 (i.e., NEIMA). Effective
October 1, 2020, NEIMA repealed
Section 6101 of OBRA–90 and put in
place a revised fee-recovery framework,
requiring the NRC to recover, to the
maximum extent practicable,
approximately 100 percent of its annual
budget, less the budget authority for
excluded activities.
6. Amend § 171.11(c), ‘‘Exemptions’’.
The NRC is revising § 171.11(c) to
change the ‘‘or’’ in the section to ‘‘and.’’
This change accurately reflects that even
when an exemption is ‘‘in the public
interest,’’ the NRC cannot grant the
exemption unless it is ‘‘authorized by
law.’’ This change also harmonizes
§ 171.11(c) with § 170.11(b), which uses
‘‘and.’’ This change does not alter the
NRC’s fee exemption policy.
7. Technical Correction.
The NRC is making a technical
correction to the program codes
referenced in §§ 170.31 and 171.16.
Under §§ 170.31 and 171.16, the NRC is
removing program code 03252 since it is
no longer in use for fee category 3(I).
Under § 171.16, the NRC is replacing the
program codes referenced for fee
category 3(A)(1) with 04010, 04012, and
04014 to reflect the correct program
codes that should be cited for this fee
category. Currently, 3(A)(1) references
program codes 03211, 03212 and 03213.
The NRC is also removing program
03235 referenced in fee category 4(A)
since it is used as a secondary program
code and no fees are charged to this
code.
Update on the Fees Transformation
Initiative
In the staff requirements
memorandum (SRM), dated October 19,
2016 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML16293A902), for SECY–16–0097,
‘‘Fee Setting Improvements and Fiscal
Year 2017 Proposed Fee Rule’’ (ADAMS
Accession No. ML16194A365), the
Commission directed the staff to
accelerate its process improvements for
setting fees. In addition, the
Commission directed the staff to begin
the fees transformation activities listed
in SECY–16–0097 as ‘‘Process Changes
Recommended for Future
Consideration—FY 2018 and Beyond.’’
The NRC has completed 39 of the 40
fees transformation activities.
The one fees transformation activity
yet to be completed is the rulemaking to
update the NRC’s small business size
standards in § 2.810, ‘‘NRC size
standards.’’ In FY 2020, the NRC
conducted a survey of materials
licensees to collect relevant data to help
determine the need for changes to the
NRC’s small business size standards in
§ 2.810. In addition, the NRC considered
changes in the small business size
standards published by the Small
Business Administration (SBA). On
December 7, 2020, the staff submitted
SECY–20–0111, ‘‘Rulemaking Plan to
Amend the Receipts-Based NRC Size
Standards,’’ to the Commission
(ADAMS Accession No. ML20268B327)
with the staff’s recommendations for
amending the NRC’s receipts-based size
standards. In the SRM for SECY–20–
0111 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML21029A186), the Commission
approved the staff’s recommendation to
initiate a rulemaking to amend the
NRC’s small business size standards in
§§ 2.810 and 171.16(c) to comply with
the Small Business Runway Extension
Act of 2018 (Runway Act) and related
SBA regulations and to reflect inflation
adjustments. The NRC is currently in
the process of developing the proposed
rule. The NRC will continue to include
updates on this rulemaking activity
within the FY 2021 and FY 2022 fee
rules to ensure that affected licensees
are adequately informed. The public can
track all NRC rulemaking activities,
including the rulemaking on the NRC’s
size standards, on the NRC’s
Rulemaking Tracking and Reporting
system at https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/doc-collections/rulemakingruleforum/active/RuleIndex.html, or by
Docket ID NRC–2014–0264 at https://
www.regulations.gov.
For more information, see the fees
transformation accomplishments
schedule, located on the NRC’s license
fees web page at: https://www.nrc.gov/
about-nrc/regulatory/licensing/feestransformation-accomplishments.html.
III. Public Comment Analysis
Overview of Public Comments
The NRC published a proposed rule
on February 22, 2021 (86 FR 10459), and
requested public comment on its
proposed revisions to 10 CFR parts 15,
170, and 171. By the close of the
comment period, the NRC received eight
written comment submissions on the FY
2021 proposed rule. In general, the
commenters were supportive of the
specific proposed regulatory changes.
Some commenters expressed concerns
about broader fee-policy issues related
to transparency, the overall size of the
NRC’s budget, fairness of fees, and
budget formulation. Some commenters’
concerns were outside the scope of the
fee rule.
The commenters are listed in Table
XIX.
TABLE XIX—FY 2021 PROPOSED FEE RULE COMMENTER SUBMISSIONS
Commenter
Affiliation
ADAMS
accession No.
Andrew Straw ............................................
M. Keller ....................................................
N/A ...............................................................................................................................
Hybrid Power Technologies LLC ................................................................................
ML21064A398.
ML21064A399
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
32161
TABLE XIX—FY 2021 PROPOSED FEE RULE COMMENTER SUBMISSIONS—Continued
Commenter
Affiliation
ADAMS
accession No.
Matthew Ostdiek ........................................
Gary Peters ...............................................
Jennifer Uhle .............................................
Cheryl Gayheart ........................................
Bradley Fewell ...........................................
Anonymous ................................................
Rendezvous Engineering, P.C. (RE) ..........................................................................
Framatome ..................................................................................................................
Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) ....................................................................................
Southern Nuclear Operating Company (SNC) ............................................................
Exelon Generation Company (Exelon) .......................................................................
N/A ...............................................................................................................................
ML21077A246
ML21082A394
ML21084A747
ML21084A747
ML21085A680
ML21090A120
Information about obtaining the
complete text of the comment
submissions is available in Section XIV,
‘‘Availability of Documents,’’ of this
document.
IV. Public Comments and NRC
Responses
The NRC has carefully considered the
public comments received on the
proposed rule. The comments have been
organized by topic. Comments from a
single commenter have been quoted to
ensure accuracy; brackets within those
comments are used to show changes
that have been made to the quoted
comments. The NRC responses are
preceded by a short summary of the
issues raised by the commenters.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
A. Overhead Costs
Comment: ‘‘The NRC fees are wildly
excessive relative to private industry.
The NRC fee is more than engineering
firm senior executives would charge a
client. There is simply no question that
the NRC bureaucracy is vast and
requires an extremely high overhead
cost be attached to the direct cost
associated with NRC staff carrying out
review activities. The NRC fee creates a
yearly charge that is more than the
salary of the U.S. president. As long as
significantly excessive fees are charged,
there appears to be no incentive for the
NRC to reduce the overhead bloat, the
proposed fee should be reduced by at
least 5% every year until the fee is more
similar to that of private industry doing
similar work.’’ (M. Keller)
Response: The NRC is a Federal
agency tasked with protecting the health
and safety of the public and the
common defense and security, and there
is no equivalent role found in private
industry. Unlike private industry, all
fees that the NRC assesses to applicants
and licensees must conform to statutory
requirements under the IOAA and
NEIMA. In other words, the fees that the
NRC charges are based in part on
requirements that would not be
reflected in the fees charged by private
engineering firms.
The IOAA prescribes the framework
for charging fees for government
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
services. Under the IOAA, fees must be
fair and based on the costs to the
Government and value of the service to
the recipient. Additionally, under
NEIMA, the NRC is required to recover
through fees, to the maximum extent
practicable, approximately 100 percent
of its annual budget authority, less the
budget authority for excluded activities.
Under NEIMA the NRC must also use its
IOAA authority first to collect 10 CFR
part 170 service fees for NRC work that
provides specific benefits to identifiable
recipients, such as licensing activities,
inspections, and special projects.
To comply with these laws, the NRC
establishes a professional hourly rate for
its work. Consistent with the IOAA, the
professional hourly rate is derived by
adding budgeted resources for: (1)
Mission-direct program salaries and
benefits; (2) mission-indirect program
support; and (3) agency support, which
includes corporate support and the
Inspector General. The NRC then
subtracts certain offsetting receipts and
divides this total by the mission-direct
FTE converted to hours (the missiondirect FTE converted to hours is the
product of the mission-direct FTE
multiplied by the estimated annual
mission-direct FTE productive hours).
The only budgeted resources excluded
from the professional hourly rate are
those for contract activities related to
mission-direct contract resources, which
are generally billed to licensees
separately. Because the NRC’s fee
recovery under the IOAA (10 CFR part
170) will not equal 100 percent of the
agency’s total budget authority for the
fiscal year (less the budget authority for
excluded activities), the NRC also
assesses annual fees under 10 CFR part
171 to recover the remaining amount
necessary to comply with NEIMA.
No change was made to the final rule
in response to this comment.
B. Operating Power Reactors Decline in
the Budget and 10 CFR Part 170
Estimated Billings
Comment: ‘‘Over the past five years,
Part 170 service fee collections have
decreased by over 20%. This reduction
is even more dramatic for the operating
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
plant fee class from which over 85% of
service fees are collected, where Part
170 service fee collections have
decreased by 45%. While there has been
a reduction in the NRC operating plant
budget during this time, the reduction
has not kept pace with the reduction in
operating plant service fee collections.
As a result, a greater percentage of the
budget is required to be recovered
through annual fees. The percentage of
the operating plant budget that is
derived from annual fees (currently at
73%) continues to increase; up from
62% in FY 2016. As noted in the fee
rule notices and associated work papers,
the reductions in service fee collections
in recent years have been attributable, in
part, to plant closures. These closures
were announced well in advance and
should have enabled adjustments to be
made to properly align the NRC budget
to reflect smaller projected workloads.
With a number of announced nuclear
plant closures in FY 2022 and
subsequent years, the downward trend
in Part 170 service fee collections will
continue. It is not realistic to expect a
decreasing number of operating plants
to support a budget that, on a per plant
basis, is appreciably increasing. The
anticipated reduction in Part 170 service
fee collections places a strong obligation
on the NRC to ensure that staffing levels
and budgets are properly aligned to
reflect smaller projected workloads. The
NRC should take all necessary steps to
continue and expedite its efficiency
efforts. Given the maturity of the U.S.
nuclear fleet, in combination with its
high level of operational performance
and a demonstrated level of safety,
timely reductions in unnecessary
regulatory burden are appropriate. We
are encouraged by efforts underway to
transform NRC into a modern riskinformed regulator. It is imperative that
these efforts continue.’’ (NEI)
Response: The relationship between
10 CFR part 170 (service fees) relative to
10 CFR part 171 (annual fees) is
workload-driven. The activities covered
by 10 CFR part 171 annual fees are
necessary for the NRC to accomplish its
safety and security mission as described
and justified in the CBJ. The amount of
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
32162
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
service fees collected under 10 CFR part
170, on the other hand, depends on
several factors, including the
professional hourly rate, licensee and
applicant decisions to pursue licensing
actions, and the number of hours
necessary to resolve any licensing
actions.
Since FY 2016, the fee class budget
for operating power reactors has
decreased from $750.4 million in FY
2016 to $611.8 million in FY 2021. This
represents a reduction of $138.6 million,
or approximately 18 percent, as a result
of the decreasing number of nuclear
power reactor licensees, application
delays and withdrawals, fewer license
amendment requests being submitted,
efficiencies gained with the merger of
the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
and the Office of New Reactors, and
long-term project completions. Over this
same period, the 10 CFR part 170
estimated billings for the operating
power reactors fee class have declined
from $287.8 million in FY 2016 to
$157.0 million in FY 2021, which
represents a decline of $130.8 million,
or approximately 45 percent. As
compared to FY 2016, the operating
power reactors fee class annual fee has
declined from $465.9 million in FY
2016 to $446.8 million in FY 2021,
which represents a decrease of $19.1
million, or approximately 4 percent.
These changes in the budgetary
resources and the 10 CFR part 170
estimated billings, as well as other
adjustments (including billing
adjustments, generic transportation, and
the LLW surcharge) and the elimination
of the fee-relief surcharge or credit in FY
2021, alter the amount of feerecoverable budgeted resources that are
required to be collected through 10 CFR
part 171 annual fees from the operating
power reactors fee class.
With respect to expediting efficiency
efforts, the NRC continues to review its
budget and pursue additional efficiency
improvements related to budget
formulation such as pursuing the use of
analytical tools (e.g., dashboards), to
help the NRC analyze and report data
quicker and more consistently and to
support a more efficient and riskinformed budget formulation process.
When formulating the budget, the NRC
takes into consideration: (1) Projected
operating power plant closures; (2)
workload forecasting, including
workload drivers, analysis of historical
data and trends, and communication
with stakeholders; (3) the estimated
level of effort for regulatory activities
and yearly recurring activities; and (4)
other external factors that may impact
how the NRC meets its statutory
responsibilities as the industry changes.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
However, the NRC budget is not linearly
proportional to the size of the operating
power reactor fleet, as there is a cost for
the infrastructure that must be
maintained independent of the number
of operating power reactors in the fleet.
The NRC is required by NEIMA to
recover, to the maximum extent
practicable, approximately 100 percent
of its annual budget authority, less the
budget authority for excluded activities.
NEIMA also caps the per-licensee
annual fee for operating reactors, to the
maximum extent practicable, at the FY
2015 annual fee amount as adjusted for
inflation. The NRC continues to
evaluate resource requirements and
adjustments that can be made to refine
the operating power reactors budget.
Finally, the NRC remains committed
to providing enhanced transparency
throughout the development of the
annual fee rule and supporting work
papers.
No changes were made to this final
rule as a result of these comments.
Comment: ‘‘The FY 2021 Proposed
Fee Rule continues to shift the burden
created by overestimating Part 170 fee
collections reflected in the NRC’s
appropriated budget to the recovery of
Part 171 annual fees. While Exelon
appreciates the challenge of precisely
estimating the amount of Part 170 fees
that will be recovered two years in
advance due to the budget cycle, we
note that this is precisely the problem
that NEIMA intended to address. The
Conference Report for NEIMA describes
exactly this challenge in explaining the
basis for the law: ‘‘Several problems
arise from [the OBRA–90] structure. If
the NRC overestimates the amount of
revenue it expect [sic] to collect under
Part 170, it must recover the resulting
revenue shortfall through Part 171 fees
in order to meet the OBRA–90 mandate
for 90 percent fee recovery.’’ The
Congress noted that this situation
‘‘highlight[s] the need for the NRC to
budget more accurately and recover fees
for work that is actually conducted.’’ It
is clear, therefore, that Congress
designed NEIMA with the existing
challenges of the budget cycle in mind.
Notwithstanding Congress’s clear intent
in this regard, the FY 2021 Proposed Fee
Rule would continue to shift the
impacts of Part 170 overbudgeting to
Part 171 annual fees, which does not
appear to take advantage of the
significantly greater flexibilities in
NEIMA with respect to the portions of
its appropriated budget that the NRC
must collect through fees.’’ In addition
to this comment submission, this
response addresses similar comments
made during the March 18, 2021, public
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
meeting to discuss the FY 2021
proposed fee rule. (Exelon)
Response: The NRC disagrees with the
commenter’s suggestion that the
allocation of service fees versus annual
fees in the FY 2021 proposed fee rule
might be inconsistent with
congressional intent underlying NEIMA.
Under NEIMA, the NRC is still required
to recover through fees the total
appropriated budget (with the exception
of discrete categories of budget
authority), and to do so through a
combination of both service fees and
annual fees. Specifically, NEIMA
requires the NRC to recover, to the
maximum extent practicable,
approximately 100 percent of its total
budget authority for the fiscal year, less
the budget authority for excluded
activities.
The NRC is fully in compliance with
NEIMA. The NRC identified fee-relief
activities in the FY 2021 CBJ (which
were consistent with the fee-relief
activities identified in the FY 2020 fee
rule, with the exception of international
activities, not including the resources
for import and export licensing) and the
FY 2021 final fee rule maintains those
same fee-relief activities. The
Congressional report referenced by the
commenter as support for the
proposition that NEIMA was intended
to provide the NRC ‘‘significantly
greater flexibilities’’ regarding fee
collection is not a conference report, but
rather a report issued by the Senate
Committee on Environment and Public
Works (Senate Report 115–86). At the
time when the bill was reported by the
Senate Committee on Environment and
Public Works, the bill would have
limited fee-relief activities to those
identified in the FY 2015 final fee rule.
This is inconsistent with the
commenter’s suggestion that this
Congressional report reflects an intent
for NEIMA to provide the NRC with
greater flexibility in determining what
portions of the appropriated budget are
recovered through fees. The
Congressional report in fact contains
statements reflecting an intention that
the NRC, under NEIMA, would collect
fees based on the agency’s workload, but
the amount not recovered through fees
would generally be unaffected. For
example, the report states that
‘‘[c]onsistent with current practice, the
taxpayer continues to pay only for the
items explicitly outlined in the law as
appropriated items and the rest of the
NRC’s budget is to be recovered through
fees[;] [a]s such, the cost to the taxpayer
is generally unaffected but the fee
recovery will be determined by the
agency’s workload rather than a
mandated percentage.’’
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
The FY 2021 CBJ provided the
agency’s explanation and justification
for the resources being requested to
allow the agency to complete its
mission, and the reason for changes in
the budget request for the NRC as
compared to the prior year, at the
business line and product line levels.
Appendix C of the FY 2021 CBJ was
included with the intent to increase
transparency with stakeholders. The
NRC developed this estimate based on
the NRC staff’s allocation of the FY 2021
budget request to fee classes under 10
CFR part 170 and allocations within the
operating power reactors fee class under
10 CFR part 171, as well as certain data
assumptions and historical information
available during the FY 2021 budget
formulation process.
Consistent with NEIMA, when
developing the annual fee rule, the NRC
had to take into account changes that
occurred in the two-year interval
between the development of the FY
2021 budget request, which began in FY
2019, and the enactment of the FY 2021
appropriation in December 2020. As
part of the development of the annual
fee rule, the NRC estimates the amount
of 10 CFR part 170 service fees by each
fee class by analyzing billing data and
the actual cost of work under NRC
contracts that was charged to licensees
and applicants for the previous four
quarters. The estimate, therefore,
reflects any recent changes in the NRC’s
regulatory activities.
The FY 2021 proposed rule utilized
four quarters of the prior year invoice
data, while the NRC is using a
combination of two quarters of the prior
year and two quarters of the current year
billing data (which is also updated to
reflect workload changes) for the FY
2021 final rule. In the FY 2021 proposed
fee rule, the 10 CFR part 170 estimated
billings were $157.0 million compared
to the $188.3 million that was included
in the FY 2021 CBJ. The decline in 10
CFR part 170 estimated billings was
primarily due to: (1) The plant closures
of Indian Point Unit 3 in April 2021 and
Duane Arnold in October 2020; (2) the
completion of construction activities at
Vogtle Unit 3; (3) the completion of the
NuScale SMR design certification
review; and (4) the impact of continued
travel restrictions and limited on-site
presence on inspection activities due to
the COVID–19 pandemic.
The NRC continues to actively
evaluate resource requirements to
address changes that occur between
budget formulation and execution, and
to pursue improvements that enhance
the accuracy of projections used in
budget formulation. For example, the
NRC considers projected operating
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
power plant closures and other external
factors when estimating workload
changes in a manner that allows the
agency to meet its statutory
responsibilities as the industry changes.
The NRC also seeks information from
licensees and other entities relevant to
projected workload through public
meetings and other forms of public
outreach, to better inform the NRC’s
budget formulation workload
assumptions. Ultimately, however, the
NRC budget is not linearly proportional
to the size of the operating fleet, as there
is a cost for the agency infrastructure
that must be maintained independent of
the number of operating power reactors
in the fleet.
No changes were made to this final
rule as a result of these comments.
C. Fee-Relief Adjustment and NEIMA
Comment: ‘‘In the FY 2021 Proposed
Fee Rule, the NRC did not make a ‘‘feerelief adjustment’’ that it has made in
past years on the basis that ‘‘[b]ecause
NEIMA eliminated the approximately
90 percent requirement for fee recovery
and, in turn, the 10 percent limit on feerelief activities, the NRC will no longer
provide a fee-relief credit or assess a feerelief surcharge as part of the
calculation of annual fees for each
licensee fee class.’’ However, nowhere
in NEIMA itself nor in the legislative
history did Congress direct the NRC to
eliminate fee-relief adjustments. NEIMA
specifically requires the deduction of
‘‘any fee relief activity, as identified by
the Commission,’’ which seems on its
face to provide significant flexibility to
the Commission to make necessary
adjustments since ‘‘any fee relief
activity’’ is not defined in the statute or
the legislative history. The Proposed Fee
Rule expressly acknowledges that the
exclusion of fee relief activities is
required by NEIMA as part of ‘‘Excluded
Activities’’ to be excluded from fee
recovery. But as explained in the
Proposed Fee Rule, ‘‘[i]n FY 2021, the
fee-relief activities identified by the
Commission are consistent with prior
final fee rules’’ with the exception of
some international activities. In other
words, while NEIMA made it possible
for the NRC to define ‘‘fee relief
activities’’ in a way that could have
accounted for Part 170 over-budgeting,
the Proposed Rule essentially maintains
the same constraints that existed under
OBRA–90. This interpretation was not
mandated by Congress, nor does it
appear to align with the NRC’s overall
vision to become a ‘‘modern, riskinformed regulator’’ that values
innovative approaches to problem
solving.’’ (Exelon)
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
32163
Response: The NRC disagrees with the
commenter’s suggestion that NEIMA
allows for the NRC to provide fee-relief
adjustments that would give licensees a
possible credit or surcharge like under
the OBRA–90 framework. NEIMA
requires the NRC to recover, to the
maximum extent practicable,
approximately 100 percent of its total
budget authority for the fiscal year, less
the budget authority for excluded
activities, one of which is fee-relief
activities as identified by the
Commission. Under NEIMA the NRC
must also use its IOAA authority first to
collect 10 CFR part 170 service fees for
NRC work that provides specific
benefits to identifiable recipients, such
as licensing activities, inspections, and
special projects.
Eliminating the fee-relief adjustment
increases the predictability for licensees
in forecasting their annual fees. The
NRC discussed the elimination of the 10
percent fee-relief credit or surcharge in
FY 2021 during the FY 2020 proposed
fee rule public meeting on March 5,
2020 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML20077G458), where the agency
explained how the elimination of the
credit or surcharge would make a
licensee’s annual fees more predictable.
For example, if the FY 2021 fee rule
had, hypothetically, remained governed
by OBRA–90 and the 10 percent
allowance for fee relief specified in
OBRA–90 applied, there would have
been a surcharge of $9.9 million to all
licensees in the FY 2021 fee rule. The
NRC’s FY 2021 appropriation totaled
$844.4 million, so a 10 percent
allowance would have resulted in $81.3
million for fee-relief activities. However,
the FY 2021 proposed fee rule and
supporting work papers illustrate that
the NRC’s budget for fee-relief activities
during FY 2021 totaled $91.2 million for
activities not attributable to an existing
licensee or class of licensees and
activities not assessed fees based on
existing law or Commission policy. This
would have resulted in an overage of
$9.9 million if the OBRA–90 framework
applied.
In addition, the commenter suggests
that the NRC should put in fee-relief
activities (instead of 10 CFR part 171
annual fees) the budgeted resources that
were anticipated to be used for 10 CFR
part 170 work (e.g., licensing and
oversight regulatory activities), but will
ultimately not be used for 10 CFR part
170 work this fiscal year (i.e., the
differences in the 10 CFR part 170
estimated billings shown in Appendix C
of the FY 2021 CBJ compared to the FY
2021 final fee rule). These resources
were anticipated to be used for 10 CFR
part 170 work for the operating power
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
32164
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
reactors fee class as shown in Appendix
C of the CBJ, which was developed
based on the NRC staff’s allocation of
the FY 2021 budget request to fee
classes under 10 CFR part 170 and
allocations within the operating power
reactors fee class under 10 CFR part 171,
as well as certain data assumptions and
historical information that was available
during the FY 2021 budget formulation
process. Consistent with NEIMA, when
developing the annual fee rule, the NRC
had to take into account changes that
occurred in the two-year interval
between the development of the FY
2021 budget request, which began in FY
2019, and the enactment of the FY 2021
appropriation in December 2020. In
developing the FY 2021 fee rule, the
NRC estimated the amount of 10 CFR
part 170 service fees by each fee class
by analyzing billing data and the actual
cost of work under NRC contracts that
was charged to licensees and applicants
for the previous four quarters. Because
the NRC’s fee recovery under the IOAA
(10 CFR part 170) will not equal 100
percent of the agency’s total budget
authority for the fiscal year (less the
budget authority for excluded
activities), the NRC must assess annual
fees under 10 CFR part 171 to recover
the remaining amount necessary to
comply with NEIMA. NEIMA requires
the NRC to establish a schedule of
annual fees that fairly and equitably
allocates budgeted resources. While
these resources were anticipated to be
used for 10 CFR part 170 work for the
operating power reactors fee class, the
resources have been shifted to being
used for work that is recovered through
10 CFR part 171 because it will benefit
the operating power reactors fee class.
Thus, the NRC has appropriately
included the resources in 10 CFR part
171 fees for this fee class.
Fee-relief activities identified by the
Commission fall into two categories: (1)
Activities not attributable to an existing
licensee or class of licensees, and (2)
activities not assessed 10 CFR part 170
or 171 fees based on existing law or
Commission policy. The categories of
fee-relief activities are identified in the
FY 2021 proposed fee rule in Table I
Excluded Activities and were also
discussed during the FY 2021 proposed
fee rule public meeting on March 18,
2021. The fee relief activities identified
by the Commission reflect a fair and
equitable allocation of resources.
No changes were made to this final
rule as a result of these comments.
D. Corporate Support Cap and the Fee
Rule Work Papers
Comment: One commenter stated that
‘‘One of NEIMA’s requirements is the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
limitation of Corporate Support costs as
a percentage of total budget authority, to
the maximum extent practicable. Exelon
suggests that the fee rule explain
whether the Corporate Support costs are
under the NEIMA limit. NRC should
also demonstrate, either in the fee rule
or the work papers, how the Corporate
Support cost as a percentage of total
budget authority is determined. For FY
2021, NEIMA limits Corporate Support
costs (to the maximum extent
practicable) to 30 percent of the NRC’s
total budget authority. During the March
18, 2021 NRC public meeting on the
Proposed Fee Rule, the staff explained
that Corporate Support costs for FY2021
totaled 31% of the agency’s overall
budget. However, the work papers for
the determination of the professional
hourly rate includes approximately
$284M for Corporate Support (with IG),
which amounts to approximately 34%
of the overall budget authority of
$844M. The NRC should clearly explain
in the fee rule how it arrived at the 31%
allocation that it described during the
public meeting.’’ (Exelon)
Response: Section 102(a)(3) of NEIMA
requires that, to the maximum extent
practicable, the corporate support costs
requested in the annual budget
justification provided to Congress not
exceed a specified percentage of the
total budget authority requested for the
NRC in its annual budget justification
(Section 102(a)(3)(A) includes the
percentage applicable to the annual
budget justification for FY 2021). As
stated in the Executive Summary to the
FY 2021 CBJ, the corporate support
request was approximately 31 percent of
the agency’s total requested budget
authority and reflects the agency’s
efforts to comply with Section
102(a)(3)(A) of NEIMA to the maximum
extent practicable. The FY 2021 CBJ
noted that further reductions to
corporate support in FY 2021 were not
feasible and would jeopardize the
corporate activities necessary to
accomplish the agency’s mission. Pages
83–86 of the FY 2021 CBJ provide more
specific information on the corporate
support costs by product line that
comprised the 31 percent referenced
during the March 18, 2021, public
meeting. The corporate support business
line resources total approximately
$271.4 million in FY 2021, as shown on
page 83 of the FY 2021 CBJ. Corporate
support does not include Inspector
General budgetary resources. The
percent corporate support is calculated
by dividing $271.4 million by $863.4
million, which is 31 percent of the
agency’s total requested budget
authority.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Section 102(a)(3) of NEIMA as it
pertains to the corporate support cap
applicable to the annual budget
justification does not apply to the
annual fee rule. In the FY 2021
proposed fee rule and supporting work
papers, the NRC’s professional hourly
rate calculation was derived by adding,
in part, resources for agency support,
which include both corporate support
and the Inspector General. The agency
support (corporate support and the
Inspector General) resources in the FY
2021 proposed fee rule total $283.7
million, or approximately 34 percent
when dividing by $844.4 million. In
addition, the NRC’s overall budget
authority was reduced by $19.0 million
(and Congress, in turn, directed the NRC
to use carryover funding, as further
discussed in the ‘‘FY 2021 Fee
Collection—Overview’’ section of this
document). Also, the FY 2021 fee rule
is based on the enacted budget, not the
budget request. The agency will
continue efforts to implement
efficiencies and invest resources in
initiatives that will result in future
savings in corporate support activities.
No changes were made to this final
rule as a result of these comments.
E. 10 CFR Part 171 Operating Power
Reactors Fee Class Invoicing
Comment: ‘‘As noted in the Proposed
Fee Rule, NRC has improved the
accuracy and clarity of Part 170 service
fee invoicing, e.g., via internal auditing
and development of Enterprise Project
Identifiers (EPID). Exelon acknowledges
and salutes the NRC’s success in this
area. However, as accuracy and clarity
in hourly fees collected under Part 170
has increased, the actual amount of fees
collected under Part 170 has decreased.
Exelon understands that the numerous
line item numbers shown in the work
papers’ Power Reactors Fee Class details
are themselves the summations of
multiple other supporting calculations
apparently too detailed to provide.
Numerous as these line items are, their
general nature makes understanding
difficult for an outside reviewer. Exelon
suggests that some ‘‘pointer’’
designation be developed, similar to the
EPID/CAC system used for Part 170 fees
[ ] and included in the quarterly Part 171
reactor fee invoicing. This way, the
details of which line items will be
funded via reactor fee invoicing within
a given calendar year quarter may be
better tracked back to the work papers,
allowing constructive dialogue between
NRC and reactor licensees regarding the
applicability of a particular line item to
that licensee.’’ (Exelon)
Response: With respect to 10 CFR part
171, it would be impractical for the NRC
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
to provide a ‘‘pointer,’’ such as the
budget string, since annual fees are a
recovery of remaining costs associated
with the particular business line budget
reconciled to a fee class.
The fee rule and its supporting work
papers are published so the public and
licensees can understand how fees are
determined for a fee class and a fee
category. Consistent with the
requirements of NEIMA, annual fees are
calculated by business lines, product
lines, and products based on the budget
authority enacted for the current fiscal
year. The NRC provides those business
lines, product lines, and products in the
fee rule work papers. The CBJ provides
the agency explanation and justification
for the resources being requested for the
budget year, including increases and
decreases, and the reason for changes in
the budget request for the agency as
compared to the prior year, at the
business line and product line levels; it
also includes the prior year actual
amounts at the business line and
product line levels.
Under NEIMA, the NRC must recover,
to the maximum extent practicable,
approximately 100 percent of its annual
budget, less the budget authority for
excluded activities. Under NEIMA, the
NRC must use its IOAA authority first
to collect 10 CFR part 170 service fees
for NRC work that provides specific
benefits to identifiable recipients, such
as licensing activities, inspections, and
special projects. In so doing, the NRC
establishes a professional hourly rate for
its work. The 10 CFR part 170 direct
work performed is included on the
quarterly invoice, which includes the
CAC/EPID combination, charges, and
the name(s) of the person(s) conducting
the activities associated with the
respective licensee fee class. With
respect to 10 CFR part 170 service fees,
the NRC staff time spent on licensing
and inspection activities is subject to
change, depending on the novelty and
complexity of the application (e.g., new
licenses, renewals, amendments, special
projects) under review or the facility
being inspected.
Because the NRC’s fee recovery under
the IOAA (10 CFR part 170) will not
equal 100 percent of the agency’s total
budget authority for the fiscal year (less
the budget authority for excluded
activities), the NRC also assesses annual
fees under 10 CFR part 171 to recover
the remaining amount necessary to
comply with NEIMA. Thus, providing a
‘‘pointer’’ for annual fees such as the
budget string, as suggested by the
commenter, would be impractical.
At the same time, to increase
transparency, the NRC first incorporated
a reconciliation of the FY 2020 CBJ
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
resources by business line to the
associated fee class in the FY 2020 fee
rule work papers so that stakeholders
can trace the CBJ business line budgets
to the resources recovered within each
fee class budget by product line. The FY
2021 fee rule work papers include the
reconciliation of the FY 2021 CBJ to the
respective fee class. The NRC continues
to strive to enhance transparency of how
fees are determined.
No changes were made to the final
rule as a result of this comment.
F. Public Participation in Budget
Formulation
Comment: ‘‘Exelon supports the
comments of the Nuclear Energy
Institute on the FY 2021 Proposed Fee
Rule. Given that there is no formal way
for stakeholders to provide input into
the formulation of the NRC’s annual
budget, Exelon encourages the NRC to
consider these comments as part of its
next budget and fee formulation
process. Exelon respects the objective
judgment that NRC exercises as an
independent safety regulator. However,
Exelon encourages the NRC to seek
ways to improve its interactions with
the regulated industry during budget
development, within the limits required
to maintain NRC independence.’’
(Exelon)
Response: The NRC seeks information
from licensees and other entities
relevant to projected workload, through
public meetings and other forms of
public outreach, to better inform the
NRC’s budget formulation workload
assumptions. This public outreach
provides an opportunity for the
regulated industry to provide
information to inform the NRC budget.
However, as noted in the comment, the
NRC is an independent regulator, and to
preserve its independence the NRC does
not involve non-government
organizations and members of the
public in budget formulation. In
addition, OMB establishes the Executive
Branch budget process through OMB
Circular No. A–11, ‘‘Preparation,
Submission, and Execution of the
Budget.’’ Section 22.1 of OMB Circular
No. A–11 requires that pre-decisional
budget deliberations remain
confidential until the release of the
President’s budget request (and, in turn,
the CBJ).
No changes were made to this final
rule as a result of these comments.
G. Small Entity
Comment: One commenter had
comments regarding the NRC’s small
entity size standards and that the NRC
should consider establishing lower
licensing fees by creating one or more
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
32165
additional ranges between the $520,000
and $7,000,000 gross annual receipts
range. The commenter stated that a fee
rate schedule with more steps for small
businesses would help reduce the
license fee burden on the smaller
entities and help small business
concerns. (RE)
Response: To reduce the significance
of the annual fees on a substantial
number of small entities, the NRC
established the maximum small entity
fee in FY 1991. In FY 1992, the NRC
introduced a second lower tier to the
small entity fee. Because the NRC’s
methodology for small entity size
standards has been approved by the
SBA, the NRC did not modify its current
methodology for this rulemaking.
In FY 2020, the NRC conducted a
survey of materials licensees to collect
relevant data to help determine the need
for changes to the NRC’s small business
size standards in § 2.810. In addition,
the NRC considered changes in the
small business size standards published
by the SBA.
On December 7, 2020, the staff
submitted SECY–20–0111, ‘‘Rulemaking
Plan to Amend the Receipts-Based NRC
Size Standards,’’ to the Commission
(ADAMS Accession No. ML20268B327)
with the staff’s recommendations for
amending the NRC’s receipts-based size
standards. While the NRC staff
recommended making inflation-related
increases and adjusting the
methodology for consistency with SBA
regulations, the survey results did not
suggest that the NRC should change its
small entity size standards. In the SRM
for SECY–20–0111 (ADAMS Accession
No. ML21029A186), the Commission
approved the staff’s recommendation to
initiate a rulemaking to amend the
NRC’s small business size standards in
§ 2.810 and to comply with the Runway
Act and related SBA regulations and to
reflect inflation adjustments, which will
be part of a separate rulemaking activity.
Also, as part of that rulemaking activity,
analogous to the proposed inflation
adjustment in § 2.810, the NRC will be
proposing to increase the upper tier and
lower tier receipts-based small entity
size standards in § 171.16(c).
The NRC is currently in the process
of developing the proposed rule for the
small entity rulemaking activity. The
NRC will continue to include updates
on this rulemaking activity in the
Federal Register notifications associated
with the FY 2021 and FY 2022 fee rules
to ensure that affected licensees are
adequately informed. The public can
track all NRC rulemaking activities,
including the rulemaking on the NRC’s
size standards, on the NRC’s
Rulemaking Tracking and Reporting
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
32166
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
system at https://www.nrc.gov/readingrm/doc-collections/rulemakingruleforum/active/RuleIndex.html, or by
Docket ID NRC–2014–0264 at https://
www.regulations.gov.
No change was made to this final rule
in response to this comment.
Comment: One commenter had
questions regarding the categories of
licensees that can qualify as small
entities, and the categories of licensees
whose average users’ fees are used to
determine the maximum small entity
fee. (Anonymous)
Response: In implementing the
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as
amended, the NRC ultimately
determined that it was appropriate for
the agency to establish its own size
standards that were consistent with the
NRC’s regulatory activities. The NRC
classifies its small business licensees by
their use of nuclear materials since the
NRC’s materials categories cover a mix
of industries. The NRC’s materials
licensees can use the size standards
criteria to quality as a small entity for
a reduced annual fee. The NRC’s
industry specific size standards were
approved by the SBA.
License types that allow a licensee to
be eligible to qualify as a small entity
and pay a reduced annual fee are listed
under § 171.16. These include materials
licenses (i.e., 10 CFR parts 30, 40, 70,
71, and 76 licenses) and 10 CFR part 72
licenses. The prior two-year weighted
average of service fees for the qualifying
fee categories that have small entity
licensees is used in the biennial
adjustment of the maximum small entity
fee. Average service fees for types of
licenses (e.g., 10 CFR part 50 licenses)
that do not allow a licensee to be
eligible to qualify as a small entity are
not used in the determination of small
entity fees.
No change was made to this final rule
in response to this comment.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
H. Definition of Research Reactor Under
§ 170.11, § 171.11, and NEIMA
Comment: ‘‘NEIMA’s exemption of a
research reactor is a reactor licensed
under section 104c of the Atomic
Energy Act of 1954. It does not mention
that it needs to be ‘‘Federal-owned and
State-Owned research reactors used
primarily for educational proposes.’’ So
any Research Reactor licensed under
104c of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954
and meets the requirement of operations
list should be except [sic] from fees. 10
CFR 170.11 and 10 CFR 171.11 need to
be changed to reflect NEIMA definition
of exempt. Having research and test
reactors exempt from both annual and
performance fees would encourage
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
private investment as NEIMA was trying
to do.’’ (Anonymous)
Response: The NRC disagrees with
this commenter’s position that, in order
to be consistent with NEIMA, the NRC
should change the definition of
‘‘research reactor’’ in §§ 170.11 and
171.11 to exempt from fees all research
reactors licensed under Section 104c. of
the Atomic Energy Act (AEA). First,
NEIMA (in Section 102(b)(3)(D)(ii))
makes the annual fee exemption
applicable for ‘‘federally owned
research reactor used primarily for
educational training and academic
research purposes.’’ In addition, the
primary purpose of this rule is to update
the NRC’s fee schedules to recover, to
the maximum extent practicable,
approximately 100 percent of the NRC’s
total budget authority for the current
fiscal year, less the budget authority for
excluded activities, and to make other
necessary corrections or appropriate
changes to specific aspects of the NRC’s
fee regulations in order to ensure
compliance with NEIMA.
The NRC has not proposed changing
the definition of ‘‘research reactor,’’ or
the types of research reactors that are
exempt (i.e., Federally-owned and Stateowned research reactors used primarily
for educational training and academic
research purposes) in the specific
exemptions in § 170.11(a)(9) or
§ 171.11(b)(2). The current ‘‘research
reactor’’ definition in §§ 170.11(a)(9)
and 171.11(b)(2), and the types of
research reactors that are exempt from
annual fees, stemmed from language in
OBRA–90. NEIMA included
substantively similar fee exemption
language for research reactors. Changing
the definition of ‘‘research reactor’’ in
§ 170.11(a)(9) or § 171.11(b)(2), or the
types of research reactors that are
exempt from fees pursuant to
§§ 170.11(a)(9) and 171.11(b)(2), to
include all research reactors licensed
under Section 104c. of the AEA would
not be consistent with the exemption
provision in NEIMA or its predecessor
in OBRA–90.
Section 106 of NEIMA, ‘‘Encouraging
private investment in research and test
reactors,’’ pertains to the financial
criteria used to determine whether a
utilization facility is licensed as a
commercial facility under Section 103
of the AEA, ‘‘Commercial Licenses,’’ or
as a research and development facility
under paragraph c of Section 104,
‘‘Medical Therapy and Research and
Development,’’ of the AEA. This subject
of this provision of NEIMA does not
relate to fees and is outside the scope of
this final rule.
No change was made to this final rule
in response to this comment.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
I. Accurate Invoicing
Comment: ‘‘What are the policies for
fairness? We’ve disputed invoices in the
[past] because the NRC had already
completed a task, we had been shut
down for years and there was no need
for the NRC to restudy, investigate or
review the issue. Yet, we were told that
the charges were valid because the
employee did indeed work the hours
they said on the project. Is it fair for us
to have to pay for the same work twice?
We don’t think so and the public would
not think so. We can’t tell from our
recent billings what activity within a
project. For example, an inspector or
auditor comes out and visits. Then they
go back and write their report and ask
RAI, etc. We only get total hours worked
on the project, not how much time it
took them to write the report, how much
time did [they] work on specific items
they are reporting on. That would be
useful information to us the licensee.’’
(Anonymous)
Response: The NRC is firmly
committed to the application of fairness
and equity in the assessment of fees.
NEIMA requires the NRC to establish a
schedule of fees that fairly and equitably
allocates these fees among the NRC’s
licensees and certificate holders. As part
of this process, each year the NRC
reassesses and publishes a proposed
rule and final rule of the revisions of the
fee schedules for each license fee class.
As stated in the proposed rule, under
NEIMA, the NRC must recover, to the
maximum extent practicable,
approximately 100 percent of its annual
budget, less the budget authority for
excluded activities. The NRC must use
its IOAA authority first to collect service
fees for NRC work that provides specific
benefits to identifiable recipients (such
as licensing activities, inspections, and
special projects). Because the NRC’s fee
recovery under the IOAA for 10 CFR
part 170 fees for service will not equal
100 percent of the agency’s total budget
authority for the fiscal year (less the
budget authority for excluded
activities), the NRC also assesses annual
fees under 10 CFR part 171 to recover
the remaining amount necessary to
comply with NEIMA. In the FY 2021
proposed fee rule, each license fee class
includes the specific information to
detail how the annual fees are derived,
such as the budgetary resources, and 10
CFR part 170 estimated billings for
direct activities, specific adjustments,
the explanations for the changes, and
the comparison to the prior fiscal year
in order to derive the 10 CFR part 171
annual fees.
Additionally, Section 102(d) of
NEIMA required three sets of actions
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
related to NRC invoices for service fees
assessed under 10 CFR part 170. First,
as stated in Section 102(d)(1) of NEIMA,
the NRC must ‘‘ensure appropriate
review and approval prior to the
issuance of invoices’’ for service fees.
Second, as stated in Section 102(d)(2) of
NEIMA, the NRC must ‘‘develop and
implement processes to audit invoices
[for 10 CFR part 170 service fees] to
ensure accuracy, transparency, and
fairness.’’ Third, as stated in Section
102(d)(3) of NEIMA, the NRC is required
to ‘‘modify regulations to ensure fair
and appropriate processes to provide
licensees and applicants an opportunity
to efficiently dispute or otherwise seek
review and correction of errors in
invoices’’ for service fees.
For the first two sets of actions, the
NRC developed and implemented
process improvements to ensure
accurate invoicing, which include, but
is not limited to the following: (1)
Implementing a process to standardize
the validation of fees to ensure that fee
billing data is correct before appearing
on a licensee’s invoice; (2) redesigning
the invoices to add clarity and
transparency for its stakeholders such as
including the names of individual NRC
staff and/or contractor companies, if
applicable, who had performed the
work associated with the charges; and
(3) implementing a new data structure
to more effectively account for and track
all billable work at the project level with
an EPID data element, which provides
useful details regarding the type of
project or work that is being billed.
Using this data structure allows NRC
licensees and other persons assessed
service fees to identify how many hours
are being expended on each of the
various activities within a project.
For the third set of actions, as
discussed in the proposed rule, the NRC
has developed and is implementing
requirements for a standard method for
licensees and applicants to efficiently
dispute or seek review and correction of
errors in invoices, which is illustrated
in the process map, ‘‘NRC Form 529,
Processing Dispute of Fees-For-Service
Charges’’ (ADAMS Accession No.
ML20311A159). Additionally, the NRC
is modifying its regulations related to
accurate invoicing to clearly outline the
interactions between the submitter and
the NRC and enhance clarity regarding
the dispute process by setting out: (1)
The process for submitting a fee dispute,
(2) the stages of the decisionmaking
process while the dispute is under
review, and (3) the manner by which the
NRC will notify a debtor after it makes
a final determination on a dispute.
Finally, regarding the commenter’s
specific comments on the regulatory
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
activities that the NRC has previously
conducted and billed to the commenter
(e.g., inspection activities, reports, and
requests for additional information on
projects), this is outside scope of this
final rule. If the commenter has specific
questions regarding NRC invoices and
fees that have been assessed, the
commenter can contact the Office of the
Chief Financial Officer via the eBilling
system support portal, by email to
FeeBillingInquiries.Resource@nrc.gov,
or by mail to the Office of the Chief
Financial Officer at U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, Attn: Chief Financial
Officer.
No change was made to this final rule
in response to this comment.
Comment: ‘‘NRC Form 529 on page 2
has a list [of] 7 pre-conditions that you
must certify that you have done. One of
them is I Certify that the NRC Form 527
‘‘Request for Information Related to
Fees-for-Service’’ was submitted and a
response was received by my
organization. Who fills out the
response? Do they know the details of
the work the person in dispute was
performing? We’ve used NRC Form 527
in the past. NRC Response did not
answer the questions we had in the
additional disputed details. They just
confirmed the information we already
knew. [They] confirmed that the
employee did work on the project, but
did not detail what work they were
doing.[ ] We’ve disputed bills in the
past, the process only confirmed that
the employee spent the hours working
on the project so the charges are correct.
The CFO refused to take into account
the benefit to the licensee and/or
fairness of the charge to the licensee. 45
days from initial demand letter (invoice)
is not enough time in some cases to
determine if the invoice was correct,
provided the licensee with a benefit, or
was fair for the licensee to be charged.
It should be 90 days from when the
error became apparent for the licensee
to dispute the charge. For example, [i]f
you don’t like the dispute resolution,
what is the process for future review or
appeals outside of the NRC CFO
office? ’’ (Anonymous)
Response: The NRC continues to
strive to enhance the invoicing process
to ensure invoice accuracy and the
availability of appropriate processes for
licensees to efficiently request a review
or submit a dispute for invoice errors. A
licensee who requests additional
information related to NRC staff/
contract costs associated with their NRC
invoice is responsible for completing all
items on page 1 of the NRC Form 527,
except for the dedicated response
section used by NRC staff only (detailed
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
32167
instructions are provided on page 2 in
addition to a process map on page 3 of
the form). After the licensee completely
fills out their required portions of the
NRC Form 527, it should be submitted
to the Office of the Chief Financial
Officer using one of the three listed
options on the form. Once the form is
received, the Office of the Chief
Financial Officer will forward it to the
appropriate EPID contact who will
provide the response. The NRC EPID
contact will always be the responsible
point of contact who is fully
knowledgeable of the work performed
and, therefore, the appropriate
individual to provide a response.
The NRC Form 529 contains a listing
of seven pre-conditions that all
licensees must meet before submitting
the form. These pre-conditions ensure
licensees have properly adhered to
NRC’s standard dispute process which
requires: (1) An initial submission of the
NRC Form 527 to request a formal
review of the charges in question, and
(2) submission of the NRC Form 529 to
officially request a dispute of the
charges after receiving the response
provided on the NRC Form 527.
Currently, most of the NRC’s licensees
subject to 10 CFR part 170 fees are
registered in eBilling, which is a publicfacing, web-based application that
provides immediate delivery of NRC
invoices in addition to the capability to
view and analyze invoice details.
Therefore, it is strongly recommended
that licensees not registered in eBilling
consider utilizing this electronic invoice
platform, if they have the capability to
do so. However, consideration was
given to the current initial demand
letter (invoice) 30-day policy, and the
NRC is amending § 15.31 to allow
licensees an additional 15 days to
submit a review request from the initial
demand letter (invoice). The NRC
believes that 45 days from receiving an
initial demand letter provides enough
time for all licensees to determine if an
invoice is accurate. Furthermore, upon
submission of the NRC Form 529, the
licensee must certify they are submitting
an official dispute request to the Office
of the Chief Financial Officer and agree
that the final determination of the status
of the disputed debt decision rests
solely with the NRC. The NRC’s
response to a licensee’s request
submitted on the NRC Form 529
officially completes the agency’s invoice
dispute process.
Finally, regarding the commenter’s
specific comments on the regulatory
activities that the NRC has previously
conducted and billed to the commenter
(e.g., inspection activities, reports, and
requests for additional information on
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
32168
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
projects), this is outside of the scope of
this final rule. If the commenter has
specific questions regarding NRC
invoices and fees that have been
assessed, the commenter can contact the
Office of the Chief Financial Officer via
the eBilling system support portal, by
email to FeeBillingInquiries.Resource@
nrc.gov, or by mail to the Office of the
Chief Financial Officer at U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, Attn: Chief Financial
Officer.
No change was made to this final rule
in response to this comment.
J. Comments on Matters Not Related to
This Rulemaking
Several commenters raised issues
outside the scope of the FY 2021 fee
rule. Commenters raised concerns with
the agency’s budgeting process and
requested public participation on the
agency’s budget formulation process. A
few commenters requested expediting
efficiency efforts and engaging industry
regarding additional efficiencies,
improvements and efficiencies in the
review process for topical reports to
reduce the professional hourly rate for
special project fees. These matters are
outside the scope of this final rule. The
primary purpose of the rule is to update
the NRC’s fee schedules to recover
approximately 100 percent of the NRC’s
total budget authority for the current
fiscal year, less the budget authority for
excluded activities, and to make other
necessary corrections or appropriate
changes to specific aspects of the NRC’s
fee regulations in order to ensure
compliance with NEIMA.
The NRC understands the importance
of examining and improving the
efficiency of its operations and the
prioritization of its regulatory activities.
Accordingly, the NRC has undertaken,
and continues to undertake, a number of
significant initiatives aimed at
improving the efficiency of NRC
operations and enhancing the agency’s
approach to regulating. Though
comments raising these issues are not
within the scope of this final rule, the
NRC will consider this input in its
future program operations.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
V. Regulatory Flexibility Certification
Section XIV, ‘‘Availability of
Documents,’’ of this document.
VI. Regulatory Analysis
Under NEIMA, the NRC is required to
recover, to the maximum extent
practicable, approximately 100 percent
of its annual budget for FY 2021 less the
budget authority for excluded activities.
The NRC established fee methodology
guidelines for 10 CFR part 170 in 1978,
and established additional fee
methodology guidelines for 10 CFR part
171 in 1986. In subsequent rulemakings,
the NRC has adjusted its fees without
changing the underlying principles of
its fee policy to ensure that the NRC
continues to comply with the statutory
requirements for cost recovery.
In this final rule, the NRC continues
this longstanding approach. Therefore,
the NRC did not identify any
alternatives to the current fee structure
guidelines and did not prepare a
regulatory analysis for this final rule.
VII. Backfitting and Issue Finality
The NRC has determined that the
backfit rule, § 50.109, does not apply to
this final rule and that a backfit analysis
is not required because these
amendments do not require the
modification of, or addition to, (1)
systems, structures, components, or the
design of a facility; (2) the design
approval or manufacturing license for a
facility; or (3) the procedures or
organization required to design,
construct, or operate a facility.
VIII. Plain Writing
The Plain Writing Act of 2010 (Pub.
L. 111–274) requires Federal agencies to
write documents in a clear, concise, and
well-organized manner. The NRC wrote
this document to be consistent with the
Plain Writing Act, as well as the
Presidential Memorandum, ‘‘Plain
Language in Government Writing,’’
published June 10, 1998 (63 FR 31885).
IX. National Environmental Policy Act
The NRC has determined that this
final rule is the type of action described
in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(1). Therefore, neither
an environmental impact statement nor
environmental assessment has been
prepared for this final rule.
As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended
(RFA),5 the NRC has prepared a
regulatory flexibility analysis related to
this final rule. The regulatory flexibility
analysis is available as indicated in
X. Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule does not contain a
collection of information as defined in
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and, therefore,
is not subject to the requirements of the
Act. In accordance with 5 CFR
5 5 U.S.C. 603. The RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, has
been amended by the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law 104–
121, Title II, 110 Stat. 847 (1996).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
1320.4(a)(2), NRC Forms 527 and 529
are also not subject to the requirements
of the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Public Protection Notification
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless the
document requesting or requiring the
collection displays a currently valid
OMB control number.
XI. Congressional Review Act
This final rule is a rule as defined in
the Congressional Review Act of 1996 (5
U.S.C. 801–808). The Office of
Management and Budget has found it to
be a major rule as defined in the
Congressional Review Act.
XII. Voluntary Consensus Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act of 1995, Public
Law 104–113, requires that Federal
agencies use technical standards that are
developed or adopted by voluntary
consensus standards bodies unless the
use of such a standard is inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. In this final rule, the NRC
is amending the licensing, inspection,
and annual fees charged to its licensees
and applicants, as necessary, to recover,
to the maximum extent practicable,
approximately 100 percent of its annual
budget for FY 2021 less the budget
authority for excluded activities, as
required by NEIMA. This action does
not constitute the establishment of a
standard that contains generally
applicable requirements.
XIII. Availability of Guidance
The Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act requires all
Federal agencies to prepare a written
compliance guide for each rule for
which the agency is required by 5 U.S.C.
604 to prepare a regulatory flexibility
analysis. The NRC, in compliance with
the law, prepared the ‘‘Small Entity
Compliance Guide’’ for the FY 2021
final fee rule. The compliance guide was
developed when the NRC completed the
small entity biennial review for FY
2021. This compliance guide is
available as indicated in Section XIV,
‘‘Availability of Documents,’’ of this
document.
XIV. Availability of Documents
The documents identified in the
following table are available to
interested persons through one or more
of the following methods, as indicated.
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Documents
ADAMS Accession No./web link
SECY–05–0164, ‘‘Annual Fee Calculation Method,’’ dated September 15, 2005 ..........
SECY–16–0097, ‘‘Fee Setting Improvements and Fiscal Year 2017 Proposed Fee
Rule,’’ dated August 15, 2016.
Staff Requirements Memorandum for SECY–16–0097, dated October 19, 2016 ..........
NUREG–1100, Volume 36, ‘‘Congressional Budget Justification: Fiscal Year 2021’’
(February 2020).
Process map, ‘‘NRC Form 527, Request for Information Related to Fees-for-Service’’
Process map, ‘‘NRC Form 529, Processing Dispute of Fees-For-Service Charges’’ .....
NRC Form 529, ‘‘Dispute of Fees-For-Service Charges in Accordance with Title 10 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Processing Dispute of Fees-For-Service
Charges § 170.51’’.
FY 2021 Final Rule Work Papers ....................................................................................
FY 2021 Final Fee Rule ..................................................................................................
FY 2021 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis ..........................................................................
FY 2021 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Small Entity Compliance Guide ...........
SECY–19–0062, ‘‘Final Rule: Non-Power Production or Utilization Facility License Renewal,’’ dated June 17, 2019.
SECY–20–0111, ‘‘Rulemaking Plan to Amend the Receipts-Based NRC Size Standards,’’ dated December 7, 2020.
SRM–SECY–20–0111, ‘‘Rulemaking Plan to Amend the Receipts-Based NRC Size
Standards’’ (NRC–2014–0264).
NRC Form 526, ‘‘Certification of Small Entity Status for the Purposes of Annual Fees
Imposed under 10 CFR Part 171’’.
OMB Circular A–25, ‘‘User Charges’’ ..............................................................................
Fees Transformation Accomplishments ..........................................................................
10 CFR Part 15
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Debt collection.
10 CFR Part 170
Byproduct material, Import and
export licenses, Intergovernmental
relations, Non-payment penalties,
Nuclear energy, Nuclear materials,
Nuclear power plants and reactors,
Source material, Special nuclear
material.
■
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
Annual charges, Approvals,
Byproduct material, Holders of
certificates, Intergovernmental relations,
Nonpayment penalties, Nuclear
materials, Nuclear power plants and
reactors, Registrations, Source material,
Special nuclear material.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble and under the authority of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended;
the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974,
as amended; and 5 U.S.C. 552 and 553,
the NRC is adopting the following
amendments to 10 CFR parts 15, 170,
and 171:
PART 15—DEBT COLLECTION
PROCEDURES
1. The authority citation for part 15
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Atomic Energy Act of 1954,
secs. 161, 186 (42 U.S.C. 2201, 2236); Energy
Reorganization Act of 1974, sec. 201 (42
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
ML16293A902.
ML20024D764.
ML20104C055.
ML20311A159.
ML20339A673.
ML21119A024.
ML21109A319.
ML21105A747.
ML21105A750.
ML18031A000.
ML20268B327.
ML21029A189.
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/forms/
nrc526.pdf.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/
omb/assets/OMB/circulars/a025/a025.html.
https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/licensing/feestransformation-accomplishments.html.
2. Revise § 15.31 to read as follows:
§ 15.31
10 CFR Part 171
VerDate Sep<11>2014
ML052580332.
ML16194A365.
U.S.C. 5841); 5 U.S.C. 5514; 26 U.S.C. 6402;
31 U.S.C. 3701, 3713, 3716, 3719, 3720A; 42
U.S.C. 664; 44 U.S.C. 3504 note; 31 CFR parts
900 through 904; 31 CFR part 285; E.O.
12146, 44 FR 42657, 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p.
409; E.O. 12988, 61 FR 4729, 3 CFR, 1996
Comp., p. 157.
List of Subjects
32169
Disputed debts.
(a) Submitting a dispute of debt. For
any type of charges assessed by the
NRC, a debtor may submit a dispute of
debt within 45 days from the date of the
initial demand letter. The debtor shall
explain why the debt is incorrect in fact
or in law and may support the
explanation by affidavit, cancelled
checks, or other relevant evidence. The
dispute must be submitted to the Office
of the Chief Financial Officer via the
eBilling system, by email to
FeeBillingInquiries.Resource@nrc.gov,
or by mail to the Office of the Chief
Financial Officer at: U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001, Attn: Chief Financial
Officer. For debt disputes related to
charges for 10 CFR part 170 fees, the
debtor must complete and submit an
NRC Form 529 with the required
information.
(b) Notification of receipt. Following
receipt of the dispute, the NRC will
acknowledge receipt to the contact
person identified by the debtor.
(c) Dispute review. The NRC will
consider the facts involved in the
dispute and, if it considers it necessary,
arrange for a conference during which
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
the debtor may present evidence and
any arguments in support of the debtor’s
position. If the debtor’s dispute
potentially raises an error, the NRC may
extend the interest waiver period as
described in § 15.37(j) pending a final
determination of the existence or
amount of the debt.
(d) Dispute resolution. If the NRC
finds that the dispute has not identified
an error, the NRC will notify the dispute
contact. If the NRC finds that the
dispute has identified an error, the NRC
will:
(1) Notify the dispute contact;
(2) Make corrections to the charges or
information on the demand letter; and
(3) Issue a revised demand letter.
■ 3. In § 15.37, revise paragraph (j) to
read as follows:
§ 15.37 Interest, penalties, and
administrative costs.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) The NRC may waive interest during
the period a debt disputed under
§ 15.31 is under consideration by the NRC.
However, this additional waiver is not
automatic and must be requested before
the expiration of the initial 30-day waiver
period. The NRC may grant the additional
waiver only when it finds the debtor’s
dispute potentially raises an error.
*
*
*
*
*
4. In § 15.53, revise paragraphs (c) and
(e) to read as follows:
■
§ 15.53
action.
*
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
*
Reasons for suspending collection
*
16JNR2
*
*
32170
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
(c) The debtor has requested a review
of the debt or has disputed the debt.
*
*
*
*
*
(e)(1) The NRC shall suspend
collection activity during the time
required for consideration of the
debtor’s request for review or dispute of
the debt, if the statute under which the
request is sought prohibits the NRC
from collecting the debt during that
time.
(2) If the statute under which the
request is sought does not prohibit
collection activity pending
consideration of the request, the NRC
may use discretion, on a case-by-case
basis, to suspend collection. Further, the
NRC ordinarily should suspend
collection action upon a request for
review or dispute of the debt, if the NRC
is prohibited by statute or regulation
from issuing a refund of amounts
collected prior to NRC consideration of
the debtor’s request. However, the NRC
should not suspend collection when the
NRC determines that the request for
review or dispute of the debt is frivolous
or was made primarily to delay
collection.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 170—FEES FOR FACILITIES,
MATERIALS, IMPORT AND EXPORT
LICENSES, AND OTHER
REGULATORY SERVICES UNDER THE
ATOMIC ENERGY ACT OF 1954, AS
AMENDED
5. The authority citation for part 170
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: Atomic Energy Act of 1954,
secs. 11, 161(w) (42 U.S.C. 2014, 2201(w));
Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, sec. 201
(42 U.S.C. 5841); 42 U.S.C. 2215; 31 U.S.C.
901, 902, 9701; 44 U.S.C. 3504 note.
■
6. Revise § 170.1 to read as follows:
§ 170.1
The addition reads as follows:
§ 170.3
*
*
*
*
Non-power production or utilization
facility means a production or
utilization facility licensed under 10
CFR 50.21(a) or (c), or 10 CFR 50.22, as
applicable, that is not a nuclear power
reactor or production facility as defined
under paragraphs (1) and (2) of the
definition of ‘‘production facility’’ in 10
CFR 50.2.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 170.20
Purpose.
The regulations in this part set out
fees charged for licensing services,
inspection services, and special projects
rendered by the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission as authorized under title V
of the Independent Offices
Appropriation Act, 1952 (31 U.S.C.
9701(a)).
■ 7. In § 170.3:
■ a. Remove the definition for ‘‘Balance
of plant’’;
■ b. Add a definition for ‘‘Non-power
production or utilization facility’’ in
alphabetical order; and
■ c. Remove the definitions for ‘‘Nuclear
Steam Supply System’’ and ‘‘Reference
systems concept’’.
Definitions.
*
[Amended]
8. In § 170.20, remove the dollar
amount ‘‘$279’’ and add in its place the
dollar amount ‘‘$288’’.
■
9. In § 170.21, in the table:
a. Revise the table heading and the
entry for ‘‘K. Import and export
licenses’’; and
■ b. Remove footnote 6.
The revisions read as follows:
■
■
§ 170.21 Schedule of fees for production
and utilization facilities, review of standard
referenced design approvals, special
projects, inspections and import and export
licenses.
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE 1 TO § 170.21—SCHEDULE OF FACILITY FEES
[See footnotes at end of table]
Fees 1 2
Facility categories and type of fees
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
*
*
*
K. Import and export licenses:
Licenses for the import and export only of production or utilization facilities or the export only of components for production
or utilization facilities issued under 10 CFR part 110.
1. Application for import or export of production or utilization facilities 4 (including reactors and other facilities) and exports of components requiring Commission and Executive Branch review, for example, actions under 10 CFR
110.40(b).
Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request .....................................................................
2. Application for export of reactor and other components requiring Executive Branch review, for example, those actions under 10 CFR 110.41(a).
Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request .....................................................................
3. Application for export of components requiring the assistance of the Executive Branch to obtain foreign government
assurances.
Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request .....................................................................
4. Application for export of facility components and equipment not requiring Commission or Executive Branch review,
or obtaining foreign government assurances.
Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request .....................................................................
5. Minor amendment of any active export or import license, for example, to extend the expiration date, change domestic information, or make other revisions which do not involve any substantive changes to license terms or conditions
or to the type of facility or component authorized for export and, therefore, do not require in-depth analysis or review
or consultation with the Executive Branch, U.S. host state, or foreign government authorities.
Minor amendment to license ..........................................................................................................................................
*
$20,200
10,100
7,200
4,900
4,300
1 Fees will be charged for approvals issued under a specific exemption provision of the Commission’s regulations under title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (e.g., 10 CFR 50.12, 10 CFR 73.5) and any other sections in effect now or in the future, regardless of whether the approval
is in the form of a license amendment, letter of approval, safety evaluation report, or other form.
2 Full cost fees will be determined based on the professional staff time and appropriate contractual support services expended. For applications
currently on file and for which fees are determined based on the full cost expended for the review, the professional staff hours expended for the
review of the application up to the effective date of the final rule will be determined at the professional rates in effect when the service was
provided.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
32171
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
*
*
10. In § 170.31, revise the table to read
as follows:
■
§ 170.31 Schedule of fees for materials
licenses and other regulatory services,
including inspections, and import and
export licenses.
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE 1 TO § 170.31—SCHEDULE OF MATERIALS FEES
[See footnotes at end of table]
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
Category of materials licenses and type of fees 1
Fees 2 3
1. Special nuclear material: 11
A. (1) Licenses for possession and use of U–235 or plutonium for fuel fabrication activities.
(a) Strategic Special Nuclear Material (High Enriched Uranium) 6 [Program Code(s): 21213] .........................................
(b) Low Enriched Uranium in Dispersible Form Used for Fabrication of Power Reactor Fuel 6 [Program Code(s):
21210].
(2) All other special nuclear materials licenses not included in Category 1.A. (1) which are licensed for fuel cycle activities 6.
(a) Facilities with limited operations 6 [Program Code(s): 21240, 21310, 21320] .............................................................
(b) Gas centrifuge enrichment demonstration facilities.6 [Program Code(s): 21205] ........................................................
(c) Others, including hot cell facilities.6 [Program Code(s): 21130, 21133] ......................................................................
B. Licenses for receipt and storage of spent fuel and reactor-related Greater than Class C (GTCC) waste at an independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) 6 [Program Code(s): 23200].
C. Licenses for possession and use of special nuclear material of less than a critical mass as defined in § 70.4 of this
chapter in sealed sources contained in devices used in industrial measuring systems, including x-ray fluorescence analyzers.4.
Application [Program Code(s): 22140] ...............................................................................................................................
D. All other special nuclear material licenses, except licenses authorizing special nuclear material in sealed or unsealed
form in combination that would constitute a critical mass, as defined in § 70.4 of this chapter, for which the licensee
shall pay the same fees as those under Category 1.A.4.
Application [Program Code(s): 22110, 22111, 22120, 22131, 22136, 22150, 22151, 22161, 22170, 23100, 23300,
23310].
E. Licenses or certificates for construction and operation of a uranium enrichment facility 6 [Program Code(s): 21200] .......
F. Licenses for possession and use of special nuclear material greater than critical mass as defined in § 70.4 of this
chapter, for development and testing of commercial products, and other non-fuel-cycle activities.4 6 [Program Code(s):
22155].
2. Source material: 11
A. (1) Licenses for possession and use of source material for refining uranium mill concentrates to uranium hexafluoride
or for deconverting uranium hexafluoride in the production of uranium oxides for disposal.6 [Program Code(s): 11400].
(2) Licenses for possession and use of source material in recovery operations such as milling, in-situ recovery, heapleaching, ore buying stations, ion-exchange facilities, and in processing of ores containing source material for extraction
of metals other than uranium or thorium, including licenses authorizing the possession of byproduct waste material
(tailings) from source material recovery operations, as well as licenses authorizing the possession and maintenance of
a facility in a standby mode 6.
(a) Conventional and Heap Leach facilities 6 [Program Code(s): 11100] ..........................................................................
(b) Basic In Situ Recovery facilities 6 [Program Code(s): 11500] ......................................................................................
(c) Expanded In Situ Recovery facilities 6 [Program Code(s): 11510] ...............................................................................
(d) In Situ Recovery Resin facilities 6 [Program Code(s): 11550] .....................................................................................
(e) Resin Toll Milling facilities 6 [Program Code(s): 11555] ...............................................................................................
(f) Other facilities 6 [Program Code(s): 11700] ...................................................................................................................
(3) Licenses that authorize the receipt of byproduct material, as defined in Section 11e.(2) of the Atomic Energy Act, from
other persons for possession and disposal, except those licenses subject to the fees in Category 2.A.(2) or Category
2.A.(4) 6 [Program Code(s): 11600, 12000].
(4) Licenses that authorize the receipt of byproduct material, as defined in Section 11e.(2) of the Atomic Energy Act, from
other persons for possession and disposal incidental to the disposal of the uranium waste tailings generated by the licensee’s milling operations, except those licenses subject to the fees in Category 2.A.(2) 6 [Program Code(s): 12010].
B. Licenses which authorize the possession, use, and/or installation of source material for shielding.7 8.
Application [Program Code(s): 11210] ...............................................................................................................................
C. Licenses to distribute items containing source material to persons exempt from the licensing requirements of part 40 of
this chapter.
Application [Program Code(s): 11240] ...............................................................................................................................
D. Licenses to distribute source material to persons generally licensed under part 40 of this chapter..
Application [Program Code(s): 11230, 11231] ...................................................................................................................
E. Licenses for possession and use of source material for processing or manufacturing of products or materials containing source material for commercial distribution.
Application [Program Code(s): 11710] ...............................................................................................................................
F. All other source material licenses..
Application [Program Code(s): 11200, 11220, 11221, 11300, 11800, 11810, 11820] ......................................................
3. Byproduct material: 11
A. Licenses of broad scope for the possession and use of byproduct material issued under parts 30 and 33 of this chapter for processing or manufacturing of items containing byproduct material for commercial distribution. Number of locations of use: 1–5.
Application [Program Code(s): 03211, 03212, 03213] ......................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
Full Cost.
Full Cost.
Full
Full
Full
Full
Cost.
Cost.
Cost.
Cost.
$1,300.
$2,700.
Full Cost.
Full Cost.
Full Cost.
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Cost.
Cost.
Cost.
Cost.
Cost.
Cost.
Cost.
Full Cost.
$1,300.
$6,200.
$2,900.
$2,700.
$2,700.
$13,500.
32172
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1 TO § 170.31—SCHEDULE OF MATERIALS FEES—Continued
[See footnotes at end of table]
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
Category of materials licenses and type of fees 1
Fees 2 3
(1). Licenses of broad scope for the possession and use of byproduct material issued under parts 30 and 33 of this
chapter for processing or manufacturing of items containing byproduct material for commercial distribution. Number
of locations of use: 6–20.
Application [Program Code(s): 04010, 04012, 04014] ...............................................................................................
(2). Licenses of broad scope for the possession and use of byproduct material issued under parts 30 and 33 of this
chapter for processing or manufacturing of items containing byproduct material for commercial distribution. Number
of locations of use: More than 20.
Application [Program Code(s): 04011, 04013, 04015] ...............................................................................................
B. Other licenses for possession and use of byproduct material issued under part 30 of this chapter for processing or
manufacturing of items containing byproduct material for commercial distribution. Number of locations of use: 1–5.
Application [Program Code(s): 03214, 03215, 22135, 22162] ..........................................................................................
(1). Other licenses for possession and use of byproduct material issued under part 30 of this chapter for processing
or manufacturing of items containing byproduct material for commercial distribution. Number of locations of use: 6–
20.
Application [Program Code(s): 04110, 04112, 04114, 04116] ...................................................................................
(2). Other licenses for possession and use of byproduct material issued under part 30 of this chapter for processing
or manufacturing of items containing byproduct material for commercial distribution. Number of locations of use:
More than 20.
Application [Program Code(s): 04111, 04113, 04115, 04117] ...................................................................................
C. Licenses issued under §§ 32.72 and/or 32.74 of this chapter that authorize the processing or manufacturing and distribution or redistribution of radiopharmaceuticals, generators, reagent kits, and/or sources and devices containing byproduct material. This category does not apply to licenses issued to nonprofit educational institutions whose processing
or manufacturing is exempt under § 170.11(a)(4). Number of locations of use: 1–5.
Application [Program Code(s): 02500, 02511, 02513] ......................................................................................................
(1). Licenses issued under §§ 32.72 and/or 32.74 of this chapter that authorize the processing or manufacturing and
distribution or redistribution of radiopharmaceuticals, generators, reagent kits, and/or sources and devices containing byproduct material. This category does not apply to licenses issued to nonprofit educational institutions
whose processing or manufacturing is exempt under § 170.11(a)(4). Number of locations of use: 6–20.
Application [Program Code(s): 04210, 04212, 04214] ...............................................................................................
(2). Licenses issued under §§ 32.72 and/or 32.74 of this chapter that authorize the processing or manufacturing and
distribution or redistribution of radiopharmaceuticals, generators, reagent kits, and/or sources and devices containing byproduct material. This category does not apply to licenses issued to nonprofit educational institutions
whose processing or manufacturing is exempt under § 170.11(a)(4). Number of locations of use: More than 20.
Application [Program Code(s): 04211, 04213, 04215] ...............................................................................................
D. [Reserved] .............................................................................................................................................................................
E. Licenses for possession and use of byproduct material in sealed sources for irradiation of materials in which the
source is not removed from its shield (self-shielded units).
Application [Program Code(s): 03510, 03520] ...................................................................................................................
F. Licenses for possession and use of less than or equal to 10,000 curies of byproduct material in sealed sources for irradiation of materials in which the source is exposed for irradiation purposes. This category also includes underwater
irradiators for irradiation of materials where the source is not exposed for irradiation purposes.
Application [Program Code(s): 03511] ...............................................................................................................................
G. Licenses for possession and use of greater than 10,000 curies of byproduct material in sealed sources for irradiation
of materials in which the source is exposed for irradiation purposes. This category also includes underwater irradiators
for irradiation of materials where the source is not exposed for irradiation purposes.
Application [Program Code(s): 03521] ...............................................................................................................................
H. Licenses issued under subpart A of part 32 of this chapter to distribute items containing byproduct material that require device review to persons exempt from the licensing requirements of part 30 of this chapter. The category does
not include specific licenses authorizing redistribution of items that have been authorized for distribution to persons exempt from the licensing requirements of part 30 of this chapter.
Application [Program Code(s): 03254, 03255, 03257] ......................................................................................................
I. Licenses issued under subpart A of part 32 of this chapter to distribute items containing byproduct material or quantities
of byproduct material that do not require device evaluation to persons exempt from the licensing requirements of part
30 of this chapter. This category does not include specific licenses authorizing redistribution of items that have been
authorized for distribution to persons exempt from the licensing requirements of part 30 of this chapter..
Application [Program Code(s): 03250, 03251, 03253, 03256] ..........................................................................................
J. Licenses issued under subpart B of part 32 of this chapter to distribute items containing byproduct material that require
sealed source and/or device review to persons generally licensed under part 31 of this chapter. This category does not
include specific licenses authorizing redistribution of items that have been authorized for distribution to persons generally licensed under part 31 of this chapter.
Application [Program Code(s): 03240, 03241, 03243] ......................................................................................................
K. Licenses issued under subpart B of part 32 of this chapter to distribute items containing byproduct material or quantities of byproduct material that do not require sealed source and/or device review to persons generally licensed under
part 31 of this chapter. This category does not include specific licenses authorizing redistribution of items that have
been authorized for distribution to persons generally licensed under part 31 of this chapter.
Application [Program Code(s): 03242, 03244] ...................................................................................................................
L. Licenses of broad scope for possession and use of byproduct material issued under parts 30 and 33 of this chapter for
research and development that do not authorize commercial distribution. Number of locations of use: 1–5.
Application [Program Code(s): 01100, 01110, 01120, 03610, 03611, 03612, 03613] ......................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:35 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
$17,900.
$22,400.
$3,700.
$5,000.
$6,200.
$5,400.
$7,200.
$8,900.
N/A.
$3,300.
$6,700.
$64,300.
$6,900.
$15,300.
$2,100.
$1,200.
$5,700.
32173
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1 TO § 170.31—SCHEDULE OF MATERIALS FEES—Continued
[See footnotes at end of table]
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
Category of materials licenses and type of fees 1
Fees 2 3
(1) Licenses of broad scope for possession and use of byproduct material issued under parts 30 and 33 of this chapter for research and development that do not authorize commercial distribution. Number of locations of use: 6–20..
Application [Program Code(s): 04610, 04612, 04614, 04616, 04618, 04620, 04622] ..............................................
(2) Licenses of broad scope for possession and use of byproduct material issued under parts 30 and 33 of this chapter for research and development that do not authorize commercial distribution. Number of locations of use: More
than 20.
Application [Program Code(s): 04611, 04613, 04615, 04617, 04619, 04621, 04623] ..............................................
M. Other licenses for possession and use of byproduct material issued under part 30 of this chapter for research and development that do not authorize commercial distribution.
Application [Program Code(s): 03620] ...............................................................................................................................
N. Licenses that authorize services for other licensees, except: (1) Licenses that authorize only calibration and/or leak
testing services are subject to the fees specified in fee Category 3.P.; and (2) Licenses that authorize waste disposal
services are subject to the fees specified in fee Categories 4.A., 4.B., and 4.C.
Application [Program Code(s): 03219, 03225, 03226] ......................................................................................................
O. Licenses for possession and use of byproduct material issued under part 34 of this chapter for industrial radiography
operations. Number of locations of use: 1–5.
Application [Program Code(s): 03310, 03320] ...................................................................................................................
(1). Licenses for possession and use of byproduct material issued under part 34 of this chapter for industrial radiography operations. Number of locations of use: 6–20.
Application [Program Code(s): 04310, 04312] ...........................................................................................................
(2). Licenses for possession and use of byproduct material issued under part 34 of this chapter for industrial radiography operations. Number of locations of use: More than 20.
Application [Program Code(s): 04311, 04313] ...........................................................................................................
P. All other specific byproduct material licenses, except those in Categories 4.A. through 9.D.9 Number of locations of
use: 1–5.
Application [Program Code(s): 02400, 02410, 03120, 03121, 03122, 03123, 03124, 03130, 03140, 03220, 03221,
03222, 03800, 03810, 22130].
(1). All other specific byproduct material licenses, except those in Categories 4.A. through 9.D.9 Number of locations
of use: 6–20.
Application [Program Code(s): 04410, 04412, 04414, 04416, 04418, 04420, 04422, 04424, 04426, 04428,
04430, 04432, 04434, 04436, 04438].
(2). All other specific byproduct material licenses, except those in Categories 4.A. through 9.D.9 Number of locations
of use: More than 20.
Application [Program Code(s): 04411, 04413, 04415, 04417, 04419, 04421, 04423, 04425, 04427, 04429,
04431, 04433, 04435, 04437, 04439].
Q. Registration of a device(s) generally licensed under part 31 of this chapter. Registration .................................................
R. Possession of items or products containing radium-226 identified in § 31.12 of this chapter which exceed the number
of items or limits specified in that section 5.
1. Possession of quantities exceeding the number of items or limits in § 31.12(a)(4) or (5) of this chapter but less
than or equal to 10 times the number of items or limits specified.
Application [Program Code(s): 02700] ........................................................................................................................
2. Possession of quantities exceeding 10 times the number of items or limits specified in § 31.12(a)(4) or (5) of this
chapter.
Application [Program Code(s): 02710] ........................................................................................................................
S. Licenses for production of accelerator-produced radionuclides.
Application [Program Code(s): 03210] ...............................................................................................................................
4. Waste disposal and processing: 11
A. Licenses specifically authorizing the receipt of waste byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material
from other persons for the purpose of contingency storage or commercial land disposal by the licensee; or licenses authorizing contingency storage of low-level radioactive waste at the site of nuclear power reactors; or licenses for receipt
of waste from other persons for incineration or other treatment, packaging of resulting waste and residues, and transfer
of packages to another person authorized to receive or dispose of waste material.
Application [Program Code(s): 03231, 03233, 03236, 06100, 06101] ..............................................................................
B. Licenses specifically authorizing the receipt of waste byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material
from other persons for the purpose of packaging or repackaging the material. The licensee will dispose of the material
by transfer to another person authorized to receive or dispose of the material.
Application [Program Code(s): 03234] ...............................................................................................................................
C. Licenses specifically authorizing the receipt of prepackaged waste byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material from other persons. The licensee will dispose of the material by transfer to another person authorized to
receive or dispose of the material.
Application [Program Code(s): 03232] ...............................................................................................................................
5. Well logging: 11
A. Licenses for possession and use of byproduct material, source material, and/or special nuclear material for well logging, well surveys, and tracer studies other than field flooding tracer studies.
Application [Program Code(s): 03110, 03111, 03112] ......................................................................................................
B. Licenses for possession and use of byproduct material for field flooding tracer studies.
Licensing [Program Code(s): 03113] .................................................................................................................................
6. Nuclear laundries: 11
A. Licenses for commercial collection and laundry of items contaminated with byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material.
Application [Program Code(s): 03218] ...............................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
$7,500.
$9,400.
$8,600.
$9,200.
$9,200.
$12,200.
$15,300.
$6,600.
$8,800.
$10,900.
$800.
$2,600.
$2,600.
$14,700.
Full Cost.
$7,200.
$5,200.
$4,800.
Full Cost.
$22,900.
32174
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1 TO § 170.31—SCHEDULE OF MATERIALS FEES—Continued
[See footnotes at end of table]
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
Category of materials licenses and type of fees 1
Fees 2 3
7. Medical licenses: 11
A. Licenses issued under parts 30, 35, 40, and 70 of this chapter for human use of byproduct material, source material,
or special nuclear material in sealed sources contained in gamma stereotactic radiosurgery units, teletherapy devices,
or similar beam therapy devices. Number of locations of use: 1–5.
Application [Program Code(s): 02300, 02310] ...................................................................................................................
(1). Licenses issued under parts 30, 35, 40, and 70 of this chapter for human use of byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material in sealed sources contained in gamma stereotactic radiosurgery units, teletherapy
devices, or similar beam therapy devices. Number of locations of use: 6–20.
Application [Program Code(s): 04510, 04512] ...........................................................................................................
(2). Licenses issued under parts 30, 35, 40, and 70 of this chapter for human use of byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material in sealed sources contained in gamma stereotactic radiosurgery units, teletherapy
devices, or similar beam therapy devices. Number of locations of use: More than 20.
Application [Program Code(s): 04511, 04513] ...........................................................................................................
B. Licenses of broad scope issued to medical institutions or two or more physicians under parts 30, 33, 35, 40, and 70 of
this chapter authorizing research and development, including human use of byproduct material, except licenses for byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material in sealed sources contained in teletherapy devices. This
category also includes the possession and use of source material for shielding when authorized on the same license.
Number of locations of use: 1–5.
Application [Program Code(s): 02110] ...............................................................................................................................
(1). Licenses of broad scope issued to medical institutions or two or more physicians under parts 30, 33, 35, 40, and
70 of this chapter authorizing research and development, including human use of byproduct material, except licenses for byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material in sealed sources contained in teletherapy devices. This category also includes the possession and use of source material for shielding when authorized on the same license. Number of locations of use: 6–20.
Application [Program Code(s): 04710] ........................................................................................................................
(2). Licenses of broad scope issued to medical institutions or two or more physicians under parts 30, 33, 35, 40, and
70 of this chapter authorizing research and development, including human use of byproduct material, except licenses for byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material in sealed sources contained in teletherapy devices. This category also includes the possession and use of source material for shielding when authorized on the same license. Number of locations of use: More than 20.
Application [Program Code(s): 04711] ........................................................................................................................
C. Other licenses issued under parts 30, 35, 40, and 70 of this chapter for human use of byproduct material, source material, and/or special nuclear material, except licenses for byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material in sealed sources contained in teletherapy devices.10 Number of locations of use: 1–5.
Application [Program Code(s): 02120, 02121, 02200, 02201, 02210, 02220, 02230, 02231, 02240, 22160] .................
(1). Other licenses issued under parts 30, 35, 40, and 70 of this chapter for human use of byproduct material, source
material, and/or special nuclear material, except licenses for byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear
material in sealed sources contained in teletherapy devices.10 Number of locations of use: 6–20.
Application [Program Code(s): 04810, 04812, 04814, 04816, 04818, 04820, 04822, 04824, 04826, 04828] ..........
(2). Other licenses issued under parts 30, 35, 40, and 70 of this chapter for human use of byproduct material, source
material, and/or special nuclear material, except licenses for byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear
material in sealed sources contained in teletherapy devices.10 Number of locations of use: More than 20.
Application [Program Code(s): 04811,04813, 04815, 04817, 04819, 04821,04823, 04825, 04827, 04829] ............
8. Civil defense: 11
A. Licenses for possession and use of byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material for civil defense
activities.
Application [Program Code(s): 03710] ...............................................................................................................................
9. Device, product, or sealed source safety evaluation:
A. Safety evaluation of devices or products containing byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material,
except reactor fuel devices, for commercial distribution.
Application—each device ...................................................................................................................................................
B. Safety evaluation of devices or products containing byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material
manufactured in accordance with the unique specifications of, and for use by, a single applicant, except reactor fuel
devices.
Application—each device ...................................................................................................................................................
C. Safety evaluation of sealed sources containing byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material, except
reactor fuel, for commercial distribution.
Application—each source ...................................................................................................................................................
D. Safety evaluation of sealed sources containing byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material, manufactured in accordance with the unique specifications of, and for use by, a single applicant, except reactor fuel.
Application—each source ...................................................................................................................................................
10. Transportation of radioactive material:
A. Evaluation of casks, packages, and shipping containers.
1. Spent Fuel, High-Level Waste, and plutonium air packages ........................................................................................
2. Other Casks ...................................................................................................................................................................
B. Quality assurance program approvals issued under part 71 of this chapter.
1. Users and Fabricators. Application ................................................................................................................................
Inspections ..................................................................................................................................................................
2. Users. Application ..........................................................................................................................................................
Inspections ..................................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
$11,500.
$15,300.
$19,100.
$9,000.
$11,900.
$14,900.
$10,900.
$9,000.
$11,300.
$2,600.
$17,900.
$9,300.
$5,500.
$1,100.
Full Cost.
Full Cost.
$4,300.
Full Cost.
$4,300.
Full Cost.
32175
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1 TO § 170.31—SCHEDULE OF MATERIALS FEES—Continued
[See footnotes at end of table]
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
Category of materials licenses and type of fees 1
Fees 2 3
C. Evaluation of security plans, route approvals, route surveys, and transportation security devices (including immobilization devices).
11. Review of standardized spent fuel facilities ...............................................................................................................................
12. Special projects: Including approvals, pre-application/licensing activities, and inspections.
Application [Program Code: 25110] ..........................................................................................................................................
13. A. Spent fuel storage cask Certificate of Compliance ...............................................................................................................
B. Inspections related to storage of spent fuel under § 72.210 of this chapter ........................................................................
14. Decommissioning/Reclamation: 11
A. Byproduct, source, or special nuclear material licenses and other approvals authorizing decommissioning, decontamination, reclamation, or site restoration activities under parts 30, 40, 70, 72, and 76 of this chapter, including master
materials licenses (MMLs). The transition to this fee category occurs when a licensee has permanently ceased principal activities. [Program Code(s): 03900, 11900, 21135, 21215, 21325, 22200].
B. Site-specific decommissioning activities associated with unlicensed sites, including MMLs, regardless of whether or not
the sites have been previously licensed.
15. Import and Export licenses:
Licenses issued under part 110 of this chapter for the import and export only of special nuclear material, source material,
tritium and other byproduct material, and the export only of heavy water, or nuclear grade graphite (fee categories
15.A. through 15.E.).
A. Application for export or import of nuclear materials, including radioactive waste requiring Commission and Executive
Branch review, for example, those actions under § 110.40(b) of this chapter.
Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request .........................................................................
B. Application for export or import of nuclear material, including radioactive waste, requiring Executive Branch review, but
not Commission review. This category includes applications for the export and import of radioactive waste and requires
the NRC to consult with domestic host state authorities (i.e., Low-Level Radioactive Waste Compact Commission, the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, etc.).
Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request .........................................................................
C. Application for export of nuclear material, for example, routine reloads of low enriched uranium reactor fuel and/or natural uranium source material requiring the assistance of the Executive Branch to obtain foreign government assurances.
Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request .........................................................................
D. Application for export or import of nuclear material not requiring Commission or Executive Branch review, or obtaining
foreign government assurances.
Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request .........................................................................
E. Minor amendment of any active export or import license, for example, to extend the expiration date, change domestic
information, or make other revisions which do not involve any substantive changes to license terms and conditions or
to the type/quantity/chemical composition of the material authorized for export and, therefore, do not require in-depth
analysis, review, or consultations with other Executive Branch, U.S. host state, or foreign government authorities. Minor
amendment.
Licenses issued under part 110 of this chapter for the import and export only of Category 1 and Category 2 quantities of
radioactive material listed in appendix P to part 110 of this chapter (fee categories 15.F. through 15.R.).
Category 1 (Appendix P, 10 CFR Part 110) Exports:
F. Application for export of appendix P Category 1 materials requiring Commission review (e.g. exceptional circumstance
review under § 110.42(e)(4) of this chapter) and to obtain one government-to-government consent for this process. For
additional consent see fee category 15.I.
Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request .........................................................................
G. Application for export of appendix P Category 1 materials requiring Executive Branch review and to obtain one government-to-government consent for this process. For additional consents see fee category 15.I.
Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request .........................................................................
H. Application for export of appendix P Category 1 materials and to obtain one government-to-government consent for
this process. For additional consents see fee category 15.I.
Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request .........................................................................
I. Requests for each additional government-to-government consent in support of an export license application or active
export license.
Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request .........................................................................
Category 2 (Appendix P, 10 CFR Part 110) Exports:
J. Application for export of appendix P Category 2 materials requiring Commission review (e.g. exceptional circumstance
review under § 110.42(e)(4) of this chapter).
Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request .........................................................................
K. Applications for export of appendix P Category 2 materials requiring Executive Branch review.
Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request .........................................................................
L. Application for the export of Category 2 materials.
Application—new license, or amendment; or license exemption request .........................................................................
M. [Reserved] ............................................................................................................................................................................
N. [Reserved] .............................................................................................................................................................................
O. [Reserved] ............................................................................................................................................................................
P. [Reserved] .............................................................................................................................................................................
Q. [Reserved] ............................................................................................................................................................................
Minor Amendments (Category 1 and 2, Appendix P, 10 CFR Part 110, Export):
R. Minor amendment of any active export license, for example, to extend the expiration date, change domestic information, or make other revisions which do not involve any substantive changes to license terms and conditions or to the
type/quantity/chemical composition of the material authorized for export and, therefore, do not require in-depth analysis,
review, or consultations with other Executive Branch, U.S. host state, or foreign authorities. Minor amendment.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
Full Cost.
Full Cost.
Full Cost.
Full Cost.
Full Cost.
Full Cost.
Full Cost.
$20,200.
$10,100.
$7,200.
$4,900.
$4,900.
$17,300.
$8,600.
$4,900.
$1,400.
$17,300.
$8,600.
$4,300.
N/A.
N/A.
N/A.
N/A.
N/A.
$1,400.
32176
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1 TO § 170.31—SCHEDULE OF MATERIALS FEES—Continued
[See footnotes at end of table]
Category of materials licenses and type of fees 1
Fees 2 3
16. Reciprocity:
Agreement State licensees who conduct activities under the reciprocity provisions of § 150.20 of this chapter.
Application ..........................................................................................................................................................................
17. Master materials licenses of broad scope issued to Government agencies.
Application [Program Code(s): 03614] ......................................................................................................................................
18. Department of Energy:
A. Certificates of Compliance. Evaluation of casks, packages, and shipping containers (including spent fuel, high-level
waste, and other casks, and plutonium air packages).
B. Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) activities .......................................................................................
$2,700.
Full Cost.
Full Cost.
Full Cost.
1 Types
of fees—Separate charges, as shown in the schedule, will be assessed for pre-application consultations and reviews; applications for
new licenses, approvals, or license terminations; possession-only licenses; issuances of new licenses and approvals; certain amendments and
renewals to existing licenses and approvals; safety evaluations of sealed sources and devices; generally licensed device registrations; and certain inspections. The following guidelines apply to these charges:
(1) Application and registration fees. Applications for new materials licenses and export and import licenses; applications to reinstate expired,
terminated, or inactive licenses, except those subject to fees assessed at full costs; applications filed by Agreement State licensees to register
under the general license provisions of 10 CFR 150.20; and applications for amendments to materials licenses that would place the license in a
higher fee category or add a new fee category must be accompanied by the prescribed application fee for each category.
(i) Applications for licenses covering more than one fee category of special nuclear material or source material must be accompanied by the
prescribed application fee for the highest fee category.
(ii) Applications for new licenses that cover both byproduct material and special nuclear material in sealed sources for use in gauging devices
will pay the appropriate application fee for fee category 1.C. only.
(2) Licensing fees. Fees for reviews of applications for new licenses, renewals, and amendments to existing licenses, pre-application consultations and other documents submitted to the NRC for review, and project manager time for fee categories subject to full cost fees are due upon
notification by the Commission in accordance with § 170.12(b).
(3) Amendment fees. Applications for amendments to export and import licenses must be accompanied by the prescribed amendment fee for
each license affected. An application for an amendment to an export or import license or approval classified in more than one fee category must
be accompanied by the prescribed amendment fee for the category affected by the amendment, unless the amendment is applicable to two or
more fee categories, in which case the amendment fee for the highest fee category would apply.
(4) Inspection fees. Inspections resulting from investigations conducted by the Office of Investigations and nonroutine inspections that result
from third-party allegations are not subject to fees. Inspection fees are due upon notification by the Commission in accordance with § 170.12(c).
(5) Generally licensed device registrations under 10 CFR 31.5. Submittals of registration information must be accompanied by the prescribed
fee.
2 Fees will be charged for approvals issued under a specific exemption provision of the Commission’s regulations under title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (e.g., 10 CFR 30.11, 40.14, 70.14, 73.5, and any other sections in effect now or in the future), regardless of whether the approval is in the form of a license amendment, letter of approval, safety evaluation report, or other form. In addition to the fee shown, an applicant
may be assessed an additional fee for sealed source and device evaluations as shown in fee categories 9.A. through 9.D.
3 Full cost fees will be determined based on the professional staff time multiplied by the appropriate professional hourly rate established in
§ 170.20 in effect when the service is provided, and the appropriate contractual support services expended.
4 Licensees paying fees under categories 1.A., 1.B., and 1.E. are not subject to fees under categories 1.C., 1.D. and 1.F. for sealed sources
authorized in the same license, except for an application that deals only with the sealed sources authorized by the license.
5 Persons who possess radium sources that are used for operational purposes in another fee category are not also subject to the fees in this
category. (This exception does not apply if the radium sources are possessed for storage only.)
6 Licensees subject to fees under fee categories 1.A., 1.B., 1.E., or 2.A. must pay the largest applicable fee and are not subject to additional
fees listed in this table.
7 Licensees paying fees under 3.C., 3.C.1, or 3.C.2 are not subject to fees under 2.B. for possession and shielding authorized on the same license.
8 Licensees paying fees under 7.C. are not subject to fees under 2.B. for possession and shielding authorized on the same license.
9Licensees paying fees under 3.N. are not subject to paying fees under 3.P., 3.P.1, or 3.P.2 for calibration or leak testing services authorized
on the same license.
10 Licensees paying fees under 7.B., 7.B.1, or 7.B.2 are not subject to paying fees under 7.C., 7.C.1, or 7.C.2. for broad scope licenses issued
under parts 30, 35, 40, and 70 of this chapter for human use of byproduct material, source material, and/or special nuclear material, except licenses for byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material in sealed sources contained in teletherapy devices authorized on the
same license.
11 A materials license (or part of a materials license) that transitions to fee category 14.A is assessed full-cost fees under 10 CFR part 170, but
is not assessed an annual fee under 10 CFR part 171. If only part of a materials license is transitioned to fee category 14.A, the licensee may be
charged annual fees (and any applicable 10 CFR part 170 fees) for other activities authorized under the license that are not in decommissioning
status.
■
11. Revise § 170.51 to read as follows:
§ 170.51
Right to dispute assessed fees.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
All debtors’ disputes of fees assessed
must be submitted in accordance with
10 CFR 15.31.
PART 171—ANNUAL FEES FOR
REACTOR LICENSES AND FUEL
CYCLE LICENSES AND MATERIALS
LICENSES, INCLUDING HOLDERS OF
CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCE,
REGISTRATIONS, AND QUALITY
ASSURANCE PROGRAM APPROVALS
AND GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
LICENSED BY THE NRC
12. The authority citation for part 171
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: Atomic Energy Act of 1954,
secs. 11, 161(w), 223, 234 (42 U.S.C. 2014,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
2201(w), 2273, 2282); Energy Reorganization
Act of 1974, sec. 201 (42 U.S.C. 5841); 42
U.S.C. 2215; 44 U.S.C. 3504 note.
■
13. Revise § 171.3 to read as follows:
§ 171.3
Scope.
The regulations in this part apply to
any person holding an operating license
for a non-power production or
utilization facility issued under 10 CFR
part 50 that has provided notification to
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC) that the licensee has successfully
completed startup testing, and to any
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
32177
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
person holding an operating license for
a power reactor or small modular
reactor licensed under 10 CFR part 50
or a combined license issued under 10
CFR part 52 that has provided
notification to the NRC that the licensee
has successfully completed power
ascension testing. The regulations in
this part also apply to any person
holding a materials license as defined in
this part, a certificate of compliance, a
sealed source or device registration, a
quality assurance program approval,
and to a Government agency as defined
in this part. Notwithstanding the other
provisions in this section, the
regulations in this part do not apply to
uranium recovery and fuel facility
licensees until after the Commission
verifies through inspection that the
facility has been constructed in
accordance with the requirements of the
license.
■ 14. In § 171.5, revise the definition of
‘‘Budget authority’’ and add a definition
for ‘‘Non-power production or
utilization facility’’ in alphabetical order
to read as follows:
§ 171.5
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Budget authority means the authority,
in the form of an appropriation,
provided by law and becoming available
during the year, to enter into obligations
that will result in immediate or future
outlays involving Federal Government
funds. The appropriation is an
authorization by an Act of Congress that
permits the NRC to incur obligations
and to make payments out of the
Treasury for specified purposes. Fees
assessed pursuant to Public Law 115–
439 are based on the NRC’s budget
authority.
*
*
*
*
*
Non-power production or utilization
facility means a production or
utilization facility licensed under 10
CFR 50.21(a) or (c), or 10 CFR 50.22, as
applicable, that is not a nuclear power
reactor or production facility as defined
under paragraphs (1) and (2) of the
definition of ‘‘production facility’’ in 10
CFR 50.2.
*
*
*
*
*
15. In § 171.11, revise paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
■
§ 171.11
Exemptions.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The Commission may, upon
application by an interested person or
on its own initiative, grant an
exemption from the requirements of this
part that it determines is authorized by
law and otherwise in the public interest.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 16. In § 171.15:
■ a. Revise the section heading and
paragraphs (a), (b)(1), (b)(2) introductory
text, (c)(1), and (c)(2) introductory text;
■ b. Remove paragraph (d);
■ c. Redesignate paragraphs (e) and (f)
as paragraphs (d) and (e); and
■ d. Revise newly redesignated
paragraphs (d) and (e).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 171.15 Annual fees: Non-power
production or utilization licenses, reactor
licenses, and independent spent fuel
storage licenses.
(a) Each person holding an operating
license for one or more non-power
production or utilization facilities under
10 CFR part 50 that has provided
notification to the NRC of the successful
completion of startup testing; each
person holding an operating license for
a power reactor licensed under 10 CFR
part 50 or a combined license under 10
CFR part 52 that has provided
notification to the NRC of the successful
completion of power ascension testing;
each person holding a 10 CFR part 50
or 52 power reactor license that is in
decommissioning or possession only
status, except those that have no spent
fuel onsite; and each person holding a
10 CFR part 72 license who does not
hold a 10 CFR part 50 or 52 license and
provides notification in accordance with
10 CFR 72.80(g), shall pay the annual
fee for each license held during the
Federal fiscal year in which the fee is
due. This paragraph (a) does not apply
to test or research reactors exempted
under § 171.11(b).
(b)(1) The FY 2021 annual fee for each
operating power reactor that must be
collected by September 30, 2021, is
$4,749,000.
(2) The FY 2021 annual fees are
comprised of a base annual fee for
power reactors licensed to operate, a
base spent fuel storage/reactor
decommissioning annual fee, and
associated additional charges. The
activities comprising the spent fuel
storage/reactor decommissioning base
annual fee are shown in paragraphs
(c)(2)(i) and (ii) of this section. The
activities comprising the FY 2021 base
annual fee for operating power reactors
are as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
(c)(1) The FY 2021 annual fee for each
power reactor holding a 10 CFR part 50
license or combined license issued
under 10 CFR part 52 that is in a
decommissioning or possession-only
status and has spent fuel onsite, and for
each independent spent fuel storage 10
CFR part 72 licensee who does not hold
a 10 CFR part 50 license or a 10 CFR
part 52 combined license, is $237,000.
(2) The FY 2021 annual fee is
comprised of a base spent fuel storage/
reactor decommissioning annual fee
(which is also included in the operating
power reactor annual fee shown in
paragraph (b) of this section). The
activities comprising the FY 2021 spent
fuel storage/reactor decommissioning
rebaselined annual fee are:
*
*
*
*
*
(d)(1) Each person holding an
operating license for an SMR issued
under 10 CFR part 50 or a combined
license issued under 10 CFR part 52 that
has provided notification to the NRC of
the successful completion startup
testing, shall pay the annual fee for all
licenses held for an SMR site. The
annual fee will be determined using the
cumulative licensed thermal power
rating of all SMR units and the bundled
unit concept, during the fiscal year in
which the fee is due. For a given site,
the use of the bundled unit concept is
independent of the number of SMR
plants, the number of SMR licenses
issued, or the sequencing of the SMR
licenses that have been issued.
(2) The annual fees for a small
modular reactor(s) located on a single
site to be collected by September 30 of
each year, are as follows:
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (d)(2)
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
Bundled unit thermal power rating
First Bundled Unit:
0 MWt ≤250 MWt .................................................................................................................
>250 MWt ≤2,000 MWt ........................................................................................................
>2,000 MWt ≤4,500 MWt .....................................................................................................
Additional Bundled Units:
0 MWt ≤2,000 MWt ..............................................................................................................
>2,000 MWt ≤4,500 MWt .....................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:35 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Minimum fee
Variable fee
TBD ................
TBD ................
N/A .................
N/A .................
TBD ................
N/A .................
N/A.
N/A.
TBD.
N/A .................
N/A .................
TBD ................
N/A .................
N/A.
TBD.
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
Maximum fee
32178
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
(3) The annual fee for an SMR
collected under this paragraph (d) is in
lieu of any fee otherwise required under
paragraph (b) of this section. The annual
fee under this paragraph (d) covers the
same activities listed for the power
reactor base annual fee and the spent
fuel storage/reactor decommissioning
reactor fee.
(e) The FY 2021 annual fee for
licensees authorized to operate one or
more non-power production or
utilization facilities under a single 10
CFR part 50 license, unless the reactor
is exempted from fees under § 171.11(b),
is $80,000.
■ 17. In § 171.16:
■ a. Revise paragraphs (c) and (d); and
■ b. Remove paragraph (e).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 171.16 Annual fees: Materials licensees,
holders of certificates of compliance,
holders of sealed source and device
registrations, holders of quality assurance
program approvals, and government
agencies licensed by the NRC.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) A licensee who is required to pay
an annual fee under this section, in
addition to 10 CFR part 72 licenses, may
qualify as a small entity. If a licensee
qualifies as a small entity and provides
the Commission with the proper
certification along with its annual fee
payment, the licensee may pay reduced
annual fees as shown in Table 1 to this
paragraph (c). Failure to file a small
entity certification in a timely manner
could result in the receipt of a
delinquent invoice requesting the
outstanding balance due and/or denial
of any refund that might otherwise be
due. The small entity fees are as follows:
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (c)
Maximum
annual fee
per licensed
category
NRC small entity classification
Small Businesses Not Engaged in Manufacturing (Average gross receipts over last 3 completed fiscal years):
$485,000 to $7 million ..................................................................................................................................................................
Less than $485,000 ......................................................................................................................................................................
Small Not-For-Profit Organizations (Annual Gross Receipts):
$485,000 to $7 million ..................................................................................................................................................................
Less than $485,000 ......................................................................................................................................................................
Manufacturing Entities that Have An Average of 500 Employees or Fewer:
35 to 500 employees ....................................................................................................................................................................
Fewer than 35 employees ............................................................................................................................................................
Small Governmental Jurisdictions (Including publicly supported educational institutions) (Population):
20,000 to 49,999 ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Fewer than 20,000 .......................................................................................................................................................................
Educational Institutions that are not State or Publicly Supported, and have 500 Employees or Fewer:
35 to 500 employees ....................................................................................................................................................................
Fewer than 35 employees ............................................................................................................................................................
(d) The FY 2021 annual fees for
materials licensees and holders of
certificates, registrations, or approvals
$4,900
1,000
4,900
1,000
4,900
1,000
4,900
1,000
4,900
1,000
subject to fees under this section are
shown table 2 to this paragraph (d):
TABLE 2 TO PARAGRAPH (d)—SCHEDULE OF MATERIALS ANNUAL FEES AND FEES FOR GOVERNMENT AGENCIES LICENSED
BY NRC
[See footnotes at end of table]
Annual
fees 1 2 3
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
Category of materials licenses
1. Special nuclear material:
A. (1) Licenses for possession and use of U–235 or plutonium for fuel fabrication activities.
(a) Strategic Special Nuclear Material (High Enriched Uranium) 15 [Program Code(s): 21213] ..........................................
(b) Low Enriched Uranium in Dispersible Form Used for Fabrication of Power Reactor Fuel 15 [Program Code(s):
21210] ................................................................................................................................................................................
(2) All other special nuclear materials licenses not included in Category 1.A.(1) which are licensed for fuel cycle activities.
(a) Facilities with limited operations 15 [Program Code(s): 21310, 21320] ...........................................................................
(b) Gas centrifuge enrichment demonstration facility 15 [Program Code(s): 21205] ............................................................
(c) Others, including hot cell facility 15 [Program Code(s): 21130, 21133] ...........................................................................
B. Licenses for receipt and storage of spent fuel and reactor-related Greater than Class C (GTCC) waste at an independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) 11 15 [Program Code(s): 23200] ......................................................................
C. Licenses for possession and use of special nuclear material of less than a critical mass, as defined in § 70.4 of this
chapter, in sealed sources contained in devices used in industrial measuring systems, including x-ray fluorescence analyzers. [Program Code(s): 22140] .............................................................................................................................................
D. All other special nuclear material licenses, except licenses authorizing special nuclear material in sealed or unsealed
form in combination that would constitute a critical mass, as defined in § 70.4 of this chapter, for which the licensee shall
pay the same fees as those under Category 1.A. [Program Code(s): 22110, 22111, 22120, 22131, 22136, 22150, 22151,
22161, 22170, 23100, 23300, 23310] ......................................................................................................................................
E. Licenses or certificates for the operation of a uranium enrichment facility 15 [Program Code(s): 21200] ..............................
F. Licenses for possession and use of special nuclear materials greater than critical mass, as defined in § 70.4 of this
chapter, for development and testing of commercial products, and other non-fuel cycle activities.4 [Program Code: 22155]
2. Source material:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
$4,643,000
$1,573,000
$1,037,000
N/A
N/A
N/A
$2,400
$5,700
$2,023,000
$4,300
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
32179
TABLE 2 TO PARAGRAPH (d)—SCHEDULE OF MATERIALS ANNUAL FEES AND FEES FOR GOVERNMENT AGENCIES LICENSED
BY NRC—Continued
[See footnotes at end of table]
Annual
fees 1 2 3
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
Category of materials licenses
A. (1) Licenses for possession and use of source material for refining uranium mill concentrates to uranium hexafluoride or
for deconverting uranium hexafluoride in the production of uranium oxides for disposal.15 [Program Code: 11400] ............
(2) Licenses for possession and use of source material in recovery operations such as milling, in-situ recovery, heap-leaching, ore buying stations, ion-exchange facilities and in-processing of ores containing source material for extraction of metals other than uranium or thorium, including licenses authorizing the possession of byproduct waste material (tailings)
from source material recovery operations, as well as licenses authorizing the possession and maintenance of a facility in
a standby mode.
(a) Conventional and Heap Leach facilities.15 [Program Code(s): 11100] ...........................................................................
(b) Basic In Situ Recovery facilities.15 [Program Code(s): 11500] .......................................................................................
(c) Expanded In Situ Recovery facilities 15 [Program Code(s): 11510] ................................................................................
(d) In Situ Recovery Resin facilities.15 [Program Code(s): 11550] ......................................................................................
(e) Resin Toll Milling facilities.15 [Program Code(s): 11555] ................................................................................................
(f) Other facilities 6 [Program Code(s): 11700] ......................................................................................................................
(3) Licenses that authorize the receipt of byproduct material, as defined in Section 11e.(2) of the Atomic Energy Act, from
other persons for possession and disposal, except those licenses subject to the fees in Category 2.A.(2) or Category
2.A.(4).15 [Program Code(s): 11600, 12000] ............................................................................................................................
(4) Licenses that authorize the receipt of byproduct material, as defined in Section 11e.(2) of the Atomic Energy Act, from
other persons for possession and disposal incidental to the disposal of the uranium waste tailings generated by the licensee’s milling operations, except those licenses subject to the fees in Category 2.A.(2).15 [Program Code(s): 12010] ....
B. Licenses which authorize the possession, use, and/or installation of source material for shielding.16 17 Application [Program Code(s): 11210] ...............................................................................................................................................................
C. Licenses to distribute items containing source material to persons exempt from the licensing requirements of part 40 of
this chapter. [Program Code: 11240] .......................................................................................................................................
D. Licenses to distribute source material to persons generally licensed under part 40 of this chapter. [Program Code(s):
11230 and 11231] .....................................................................................................................................................................
E. Licenses for possession and use of source material for processing or manufacturing of products or materials containing
source material for commercial distribution. [Program Code: 11710] ......................................................................................
F. All other source material licenses. [Program Code(s): 11200, 11220, 11221, 11300, 11800, 11810, 11820] ......................
3. Byproduct material:
A. Licenses of broad scope for possession and use of byproduct material issued under parts 30 and 33 of this chapter for
processing or manufacturing of items containing byproduct material for commercial distribution. Number of locations of
use: 1–5. [Program Code(s): 03211, 03212, 03213] ................................................................................................................
(1). Licenses of broad scope for the possession and use of byproduct material issued under parts 30 and 33 of this
chapter for processing or manufacturing of items containing byproduct material for commercial distribution. Number
of locations of use: 6–20. [Program Code(s): 04010, 04012, 04014] ...............................................................................
(2). Licenses of broad scope for the possession and use of byproduct material issued under parts 30 and 33 of this
chapter for processing or manufacturing of items containing byproduct material for commercial distribution. Number
of locations of use: More than 20. [Program Code(s): 04011, 04013, 04015] .................................................................
B. Other licenses for possession and use of byproduct material issued under part 30 of this chapter for processing or manufacturing of items containing byproduct material for commercial distribution. Number of locations of use: 1–5. [Program
Code(s): 03214, 03215, 22135, 22162] ....................................................................................................................................
(1). Other licenses for possession and use of byproduct material issued under part 30 of this chapter for processing or
manufacturing of items containing byproduct material for commercial distribution. Number of locations of use: 6–20.
[Program Code(s): 04110, 04112, 04114, 04116] ............................................................................................................
(2). Other licenses for possession and use of byproduct material issued under part 30 of this chapter for processing or
manufacturing of items containing byproduct material for commercial distribution. Number of locations of use: More
than 20. [Program Code(s): 04111, 04113, 04115, 04117] ..............................................................................................
C. Licenses issued under §§ 32.72 and/or 32.74 of this chapter that authorize the processing or manufacturing and distribution or redistribution of radiopharmaceuticals, generators, reagent kits, and/or sources and devices containing byproduct
material. This category does not apply to licenses issued to nonprofit educational institutions whose processing or manufacturing is exempt under § 170.11(a)(4) of this chapter. Number of locations of use: 1–5. [Program Code(s): 02500,
02511, 02513] ...........................................................................................................................................................................
(1). Licenses issued under §§ 32.72 and/or 32.74 of this chapter that authorize the processing or manufacturing and
distribution or redistribution of radiopharmaceuticals, generators, reagent kits, and/or sources and devices containing
byproduct material. This category does not apply to licenses issued to nonprofit educational institutions whose processing or manufacturing is exempt under § 170.11(a)(4). Number of locations of use: 6–20. [Program Code(s):
04210, 04212, 04214] ........................................................................................................................................................
(2). Licenses issued under §§ 32.72 and/or 32.74 of this chapter that authorize the processing or manufacturing and
distribution or redistribution of radiopharmaceuticals, generators, reagent kits, and/or sources and devices containing
byproduct material. This category does not apply to licenses issued to nonprofit educational institutions whose processing or manufacturing is exempt under § 170.11(a)(4). Number of locations of use: more than 20. [Program
Code(s): 04211, 04213, 04215] .........................................................................................................................................
D. [Reserved] ................................................................................................................................................................................
E. Licenses for possession and use of byproduct material in sealed sources for irradiation of materials in which the source
is not removed from its shield (self-shielded units) [Program Code(s): 03510, 03520] ..........................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
$467,000
N/A
$47,200
N/A
5 N/A
5 N/A
5 N/A
5 N/A
N/A
$2,700
$8,900
$5,100
$6,300
$8,500
$27,400
$36,400
$45,500
$9,600
$12,700
$15,800
$9,000
$12,000
$16,200
5 N/A
$9,900
32180
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2 TO PARAGRAPH (d)—SCHEDULE OF MATERIALS ANNUAL FEES AND FEES FOR GOVERNMENT AGENCIES LICENSED
BY NRC—Continued
[See footnotes at end of table]
Annual
fees 1 2 3
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
Category of materials licenses
F. Licenses for possession and use of less than or equal to 10,000 curies of byproduct material in sealed sources for irradiation of materials in which the source is exposed for irradiation purposes. This category also includes underwater
irradiators for irradiation of materials in which the source is not exposed for irradiation purposes [Program Code(s):
03511] .......................................................................................................................................................................................
G. Licenses for possession and use of greater than 10,000 curies of byproduct material in sealed sources for irradiation of
materials in which the source is exposed for irradiation purposes. This category also includes underwater irradiators for
irradiation of materials in which the source is not exposed for irradiation purposes [Program Code(s): 03521] ...................
H. Licenses issued under subpart A of part 32 of this chapter to distribute items containing byproduct material that require
device review to persons exempt from the licensing requirements of part 30 of this chapter, except specific licenses authorizing redistribution of items that have been authorized for distribution to persons exempt from the licensing requirements of part 30 of this chapter [Program Code(s): 03254, 03255, 03257] ............................................................................
I. Licenses issued under subpart A of part 32 of this chapter to distribute items containing byproduct material or quantities
of byproduct material that do not require device evaluation to persons exempt from the licensing requirements of part 30
of this chapter, except for specific licenses authorizing redistribution of items that have been authorized for distribution to
persons exempt from the licensing requirements of part 30 of this chapter [Program Code(s): 03250, 03251, 03253,
03256] .......................................................................................................................................................................................
J. Licenses issued under subpart B of part 32 of this chapter to distribute items containing byproduct material that require
sealed source and/or device review to persons generally licensed under part 31 of this chapter, except specific licenses
authorizing redistribution of items that have been authorized for distribution to persons generally licensed under part 31
of this chapter [Program Code(s): 03240, 03241, 03243] ........................................................................................................
K. Licenses issued under subpart B of part 32 of this chapter to distribute items containing byproduct material or quantities
of byproduct material that do not require sealed source and/or device review to persons generally licensed under part 31
of this chapter, except specific licenses authorizing redistribution of items that have been authorized for distribution to
persons generally licensed under part 31 of this chapter [Program Code(s): 03242, 03244] .................................................
L. Licenses of broad scope for possession and use of byproduct material issued under parts 30 and 33 of this chapter for
research and development that do not authorize commercial distribution. Number of locations of use: 1–5. [Program
Code(s): 01100, 01110, 01120, 03610, 03611, 03612, 03613] ...............................................................................................
(1) Licenses of broad scope for possession and use of product material issued under parts 30 and 33 of this chapter
for research and development that do not authorize commercial distribution. Number of locations of use: 6–20. [Program Code(s): 04610, 04612, 04614, 04616, 04618, 04620, 04622] ..............................................................................
(2) Licenses of broad scope for possession and use of byproduct material issued under parts 30 and 33 of this chapter
for research and development that do not authorize commercial distribution. Number of locations of use: More than
20. [Program Code(s): 04611, 04613, 04615, 04617, 04619, 04621, 04623] ..................................................................
M. Other licenses for possession and use of byproduct material issued under part 30 of this chapter for research and development that do not authorize commercial distribution [Program Code(s): 03620] ..............................................................
N. Licenses that authorize services for other licensees, except: (1) Licenses that authorize only calibration and/or leak testing services are subject to the fees specified in fee Category 3.P.; and (2) Licenses that authorize waste disposal services are subject to the fees specified in fee categories 4.A., 4.B., and 4.C.21 [Program Code(s): 03219, 03225, 03226] ....
O. Licenses for possession and use of byproduct material issued under part 34 of this chapter for industrial radiography operations. This category also includes the possession and use of source material for shielding authorized under part 40 of
this chapter when authorized on the same license Number of locations of use: 1–5. [Program Code(s): 03310, 03320] ....
(1). Licenses for possession and use of byproduct material issued under part 34 of this chapter for industrial radiography operations. This category also includes the possession and use of source material for shielding authorized
under part 40 of this chapter when authorized on the same license. Number of locations of use: 6–20. [Program
Code(s): 04310, 04312] .....................................................................................................................................................
(2). Licenses for possession and use of byproduct material issued under part 34 of this chapter for industrial radiography operations. This category also includes the possession and use of source material for shielding authorized
under part 40 of this chapter when authorized on the same license. Number of locations of use: More than 20. [Program Code(s): 04311, 04313] ...........................................................................................................................................
P. All other specific byproduct material licenses, except those in Categories 4.A. through 9.D.18 Number of locations of use:
1–5. [Program Code(s): 02400, 02410, 03120, 03121, 03122, 03123, 03124, 03140, 03130, 03220, 03221, 03222,
03800, 03810, 22130] ...............................................................................................................................................................
(1). All other specific byproduct material licenses, except those in Categories 4.A. through 9.D.18 Number of locations
of use: 6–20. [Program Code(s): 04410, 04412, 04414, 04416, 04418, 04420, 04422, 04424, 04426, 04428, 04430,
04432, 04434, 04436, 04438] ...........................................................................................................................................
(2). All other specific byproduct material licenses, except those in Categories 4.A. through 9.D.18 Number of locations
of use: More than 20. [Program Code(s): 04411, 04413, 04415, 04417, 04419, 04421, 04423, 04425, 04427, 04429,
04431, 04433, 04435, 04437, 04439] ...............................................................................................................................
Q. Registration of devices generally licensed under part 31 of this chapter ...............................................................................
R. Possession of items or products containing radium–226 identified in § 31.12 of this chapter which exceed the number of
items or limits specified in that section: 14
(1). Possession of quantities exceeding the number of items or limits in § 31.12(a)(4), or (5) of this chapter but less
than or equal to 10 times the number of items or limits specified [Program Code(s): 02700] ........................................
(2). Possession of quantities exceeding 10 times the number of items or limits specified in § 31.12(a)(4) or (5) of this
chapter [Program Code(s): 02710] ....................................................................................................................................
S. Licenses for production of accelerator-produced radionuclides [Program Code(s): 03210] ...................................................
4. Waste disposal and processing:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
$8,900
$72,100
$8,700
$17,400
$3,600
$2,700
$12,500
$16,600
$20,700
$13,400
$15,200
$29,100
$38,700
$48,600
$9,900
$13,100
$16,300
13 N/A
$6,000
$6,400
$23,800
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
32181
TABLE 2 TO PARAGRAPH (d)—SCHEDULE OF MATERIALS ANNUAL FEES AND FEES FOR GOVERNMENT AGENCIES LICENSED
BY NRC—Continued
[See footnotes at end of table]
Annual
fees 1 2 3
Category of materials licenses
5.
6.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
7.
8.
9.
A. Licenses specifically authorizing the receipt of waste byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material
from other persons for the purpose of contingency storage or commercial land disposal by the licensee; or licenses authorizing contingency storage of low-level radioactive waste at the site of nuclear power reactors; or licenses for receipt
of waste from other persons for incineration or other treatment, packaging of resulting waste and residues, and transfer
of packages to another person authorized to receive or dispose of waste material. [Program Code(s): 03231, 03233,
03236, 06100, 06101] ...............................................................................................................................................................
B. Licenses specifically authorizing the receipt of waste byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material
from other persons for the purpose of packaging or repackaging the material. The licensee will dispose of the material by
transfer to another person authorized to receive or dispose of the material. [Program Code(s): 03234] ...............................
C. Licenses specifically authorizing the receipt of prepackaged waste byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material from other persons. The licensee will dispose of the material by transfer to another person authorized to
receive or dispose of the material. [Program Code(s): 03232] ................................................................................................
Well logging:
A. Licenses for possession and use of byproduct material, source material, and/or special nuclear material for well logging,
well surveys, and tracer studies other than field flooding tracer studies. [Program Code(s): 03110, 03111, 03112] ............
B. Licenses for possession and use of byproduct material for field flooding tracer studies. [Program Code(s): 03113] ...........
Nuclear laundries:
A. Licenses for commercial collection and laundry of items contaminated with byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material. [Program Code(s): 03218] ......................................................................................................................
Medical licenses:
A. Licenses issued under parts 30, 35, 40, and 70 of this chapter for human use of byproduct material, source material, or
special nuclear material in sealed sources contained in gamma stereotactic radiosurgery units, teletherapy devices, or
similar beam therapy devices. This category also includes the possession and use of source material for shielding when
authorized on the same license.9 Number of locations of use: 1–5. [Program Code(s): 02300, 02310] ................................
(1). Licenses issued under parts 30, 35, 40, and 70 of this chapter for human use of byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material in sealed sources contained in gamma stereotactic radiosurgery units, teletherapy
devices, or similar beam therapy devices. This category also includes the possession and use of source material for
shielding when authorized on the same license.9 Number of locations of use: 6–20. [Program Code(s): 04510,
04512] ................................................................................................................................................................................
(2). Licenses issued under parts 30, 35, 40, and 70 of this chapter for human use of byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material in sealed sources contained in gamma stereotactic radiosurgery units, teletherapy
devices, or similar beam therapy devices. This category also includes the possession and use of source material for
shielding when authorized on the same license.9 Number of locations of use: More than 20. [Program Code(s):
04511, 04513] ....................................................................................................................................................................
B. Licenses of broad scope issued to medical institutions or two or more physicians under parts 30, 33, 35, 40, and 70 of
this chapter authorizing research and development, including human use of byproduct material, except licenses for byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material in sealed sources contained in teletherapy devices. This
category also includes the possession and use of source material for shielding when authorized on the same license.9
Number of locations of use: 1–5. [Program Code(s): 02110] ..................................................................................................
(1). Licenses of broad scope issued to medical institutions or two or more physicians under parts 30, 33, 35, 40, and
70 of this chapter authorizing research and development, including human use of byproduct material, except licenses for byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material in sealed sources contained in teletherapy devices. This category also includes the possession and use of source material for shielding when authorized on the same license.9 Number of locations of use: 6–20. [Program Code(s): 04710] .............................................
(2). Licenses of broad scope issued to medical institutions or two or more physicians under parts 30, 33, 35, 40, and
70 of this chapter authorizing research and development, including human use of byproduct material, except licenses for byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material in sealed sources contained in teletherapy devices. This category also includes the possession and use of source material for shielding when authorized on the same license.9 Number of locations of use: More than 20. [Program Code(s): 04711] ...............................
C. Other licenses issued under parts 30, 35, 40, and 70 of this chapter for human use of byproduct material, source material, and/or special nuclear material, except licenses for byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material in
sealed sources contained in teletherapy devices. This category also includes the possession and use of source material
for shielding when authorized on the same license.9 19 Number of locations of use: 1-5. [Program Code(s): 02120,
02121, 02200, 02201, 02210, 02220, 02230, 02231, 02240, 22160] ......................................................................................
(1). Other licenses issued under parts 30, 35, 40, and 70 of this chapter for human use of byproduct material, source
material, and/or special nuclear material, except licenses for byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear
material in sealed sources contained in teletherapy devices. This category also includes the possession and use of
source material for shielding when authorized on the same license.9 19 Number of locations of use: 6–20. [Program
Code(s): 04810, 04812, 04814, 04816, 04818, 04820, 04822, 04824, 04826, 04828] ...................................................
(2). Other licenses issued under parts 30, 35, 40, and 70 of this chapter for human use of byproduct material, source
material, and/or special nuclear material, except licenses for byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear
material in sealed sources contained in teletherapy devices. This category also includes the possession and use of
source material for shielding when authorized on the same license.9 19 Number of locations of use: More than 20.
[Program Code(s): 04811, 04813, 04815, 04817, 04819, 04821, 04823, 04825, 04827, 04829] ...................................
Civil defense:
A. Licenses for possession and use of byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material for civil defense activities. [Program Code(s): 03710] ............................................................................................................................................
Device, product, or sealed source safety evaluation:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
$22,500
$15,800
$8,700
$12,500
5 N/A
$28,100
$27,100
$36,100
$45,200
$37,000
$49,300
$61,500
$16,800
$16,900
$20,900
$6,000
32182
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2 TO PARAGRAPH (d)—SCHEDULE OF MATERIALS ANNUAL FEES AND FEES FOR GOVERNMENT AGENCIES LICENSED
BY NRC—Continued
[See footnotes at end of table]
Annual
fees 1 2 3
Category of materials licenses
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
A. Registrations issued for the safety evaluation of devices or products containing byproduct material, source material, or
special nuclear material, except reactor fuel devices, for commercial distribution ..................................................................
B. Registrations issued for the safety evaluation of devices or products containing byproduct material, source material, or
special nuclear material manufactured in accordance with the unique specifications of, and for use by, a single applicant,
except reactor fuel devices .......................................................................................................................................................
C. Registrations issued for the safety evaluation of sealed sources containing byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material, except reactor fuel, for commercial distribution .....................................................................................
D. Registrations issued for the safety evaluation of sealed sources containing byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material, manufactured in accordance with the unique specifications of, and for use by, a single applicant,
except reactor fuel ....................................................................................................................................................................
Transportation of radioactive material:
A. Certificates of Compliance or other package approvals issued for design of casks, packages, and shipping containers.
1. Spent Fuel, High-Level Waste, and plutonium air packages ...........................................................................................
2. Other Casks ......................................................................................................................................................................
B. Quality assurance program approvals issued under part 71 of this chapter.
1. Users and Fabricators .......................................................................................................................................................
2. Users .................................................................................................................................................................................
C. Evaluation of security plans, route approvals, route surveys, and transportation security devices (including immobilization
devices) .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Standardized spent fuel facilities ...................................................................................................................................................
Special Projects [Program Code(s): 25110] ..................................................................................................................................
A. Spent fuel storage cask Certificate of Compliance ..................................................................................................................
B. General licenses for storage of spent fuel under § 72.210 of this chapter .............................................................................
Decommissioning/Reclamation:
A. Byproduct, source, or special nuclear material licenses and other approvals authorizing decommissioning, decontamination, reclamation, or site restoration activities under parts 30, 40, 70, 72, and 76 of this chapter, including master materials licenses (MMLs). The transition to this fee category occurs when a licensee has permanently ceased principal activities. [Program Code(s): 03900, 11900, 21135, 21215, 21325, 22200] ...................................................................................
B. Site-specific decommissioning activities associated with unlicensed sites, including MMLs, whether or not the sites have
been previously licensed ..........................................................................................................................................................
Import and Export licenses ............................................................................................................................................................
Reciprocity .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Master materials licenses of broad scope issued to Government agencies.15 [Program Code(s): 03614] .................................
Department of Energy:
A. Certificates of Compliance .......................................................................................................................................................
B. Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA) activities [Program Code(s): 03237, 03238] ..................................
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
1 Annual
$17,900
$9,300
$5,500
$1,100
6
6
6 N/A
6 N/A
6 N/A
6 N/A
6 N/A
6 N/A
12 N/A
7 20 N/A
7 N/A
8 N/A
8 N/A
$340,000
10 $1,354,000
$117,000
fees will be assessed based on whether a licensee held a valid license with the NRC authorizing possession and use of radioactive
material during the current FY. The annual fee is waived for those materials licenses and holders of certificates, registrations, and approvals who
either filed for termination of their licenses or approvals or filed for possession only/storage licenses before October 1 of the current FY, and permanently ceased licensed activities entirely before this date. Annual fees for licensees who filed for termination of a license, downgrade of a license, or for a possession-only license during the FY and for new licenses issued during the FY will be prorated in accordance with the provisions of § 171.17. If a person holds more than one license, certificate, registration, or approval, the annual fee(s) will be assessed for each license, certificate, registration, or approval held by that person. For licenses that authorize more than one activity on a single license (e.g.,
human use and irradiator activities), annual fees will be assessed for each category applicable to the license.
2 Payment of the prescribed annual fee does not automatically renew the license, certificate, registration, or approval for which the fee is paid.
Renewal applications must be filed in accordance with the requirements of part 30, 40, 70, 71, 72, or 76 of this chapter.
3 Each FY, fees for these materials licenses will be calculated and assessed in accordance with § 171.13 and will be published in the Federal
Register for notice and comment.
4 Other facilities include licenses for extraction of metals, heavy metals, and rare earths.
5 There are no existing NRC licenses in these fee categories. If NRC issues a license for these categories, the Commission will consider establishing an annual fee for this type of license.
6 Standardized spent fuel facilities, 10 CFR parts 71 and 72 Certificates of Compliance and related Quality Assurance program approvals, and
special reviews, such as topical reports, are not assessed an annual fee because the generic costs of regulating these activities are primarily attributable to users of the designs, certificates, and topical reports.
7 Licensees in this category are not assessed an annual fee because they are charged an annual fee in other categories while they are licensed to operate.
8 No annual fee is charged because it is not practical to administer due to the relatively short life or temporary nature of the license.
9 Separate annual fees will not be assessed for pacemaker licenses issued to medical institutions that also hold nuclear medicine licenses
under fee categories 7.A, 7.A.1, 7.A.2, 7.B., 7.B.1, 7.B.2, 7.C, 7.C.1, or 7.C.2.
10 This includes Certificates of Compliance issued to the U.S. Department of Energy that are not funded from the Nuclear Waste Fund.
11 See § 171.15(c).
12 See § 171.15(c).
13 No annual fee is charged for this category because the cost of the general license registration program applicable to licenses in this category will be recovered through 10 CFR part 170 fees.
14 Persons who possess radium sources that are used for operational purposes in another fee category are not also subject to the fees in this
category. (This exception does not apply if the radium sources are possessed for storage only.)
15 Licensees subject to fees under categories 1.A., 1.B., 1.E., 2.A., and licensees paying fees under fee category 17 must pay the largest applicable fee and are not subject to additional fees listed in this table.
16 Licensees paying fees under 3.C. are not subject to fees under 2.B. for possession and shielding authorized on the same license.
17 Licensees paying fees under 7.C. are not subject to fees under 2.B. for possession and shielding authorized on the same license.
18 Licensees paying fees under 3.N. are not subject to paying fees under 3.P., 3.P.1, or 3.P.2 for calibration or leak testing services authorized
on the same license.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
32183
19 Licensees paying fees under 7.B., 7.B.1, or 7.B.2 are not subject to paying fees under 7.C., 7.C.1, or 7.C.2 for broad scope license licenses
issued under parts 30, 35, 40, and 70 of this chapter for human use of byproduct material, source material, and/or special nuclear material, except licenses for byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material in sealed sources contained in teletherapy devices authorized
on the same license.
20 No annual fee is charged for a materials license (or part of a materials license) that has transitioned to this fee category because the decommissioning costs will be recovered through 10 CFR part 170 fees, but annual fees may be charged for other activities authorized under the license that are not in decommissioning status.
21 Licensees paying fees under 4.A., 4.B. or 4.C. are not subject to paying fees under 3.N. licenses that authorize services for other licensees
authorized on the same license.
18. In § 171.17, revise paragraphs
(a)(1) and (2) to read as follows:
■
§ 171.17
Proration.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES2
(a) * * *
(1) New licenses. (i) The annual fees
for new licenses for power reactors and
small modular reactors that are subject
to fees under this part, for which the
licensee has notified the NRC on or after
October 1 of a fiscal year (FY) that the
licensee has successfully completed
power ascension testing, are prorated on
the basis of the number of days
remaining in the FY. Thereafter, the full
annual fee is due and payable each
subsequent FY.
(ii) The annual fees for new licenses
for non-power production or utilization
facilities, 10 CFR part 72 licensees who
do not hold 10 CFR part 50 or 52
licenses, and materials licenses with
annual fees of $100,000 or greater for a
single fee category for the current FY,
that are subject to fees under this part
and are granted a license to operate on
or after October 1 of a FY, are prorated
on the basis of the number of days
remaining in the FY. Thereafter, the full
annual fee is due and payable each
subsequent FY.
(2) Terminations. The base operating
power reactor annual fee for operating
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jun 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
reactor licensees or the annual fee for
small modular reactor licensees, who
have requested amendment to withdraw
operating authority permanently during
the FY will be prorated based on the
number of days during the FY the
license was in effect before docketing of
the certifications for permanent
cessation of operations and permanent
removal of fuel from the reactor vessel
or when a final legally effective order to
permanently cease operations has come
into effect. The spent fuel storage/
reactor decommissioning annual fee for
reactor licensees who permanently
cease operations and have permanently
removed fuel from the site during the
FY will be prorated on the basis of the
number of days remaining in the FY
after docketing of both the certifications
of permanent cessation of operations
and permanent removal of fuel from the
site. The spent fuel storage/reactor
decommissioning annual fee will be
prorated for those 10 CFR part 72
licensees who do not hold a 10 CFR part
50 or 52 license who request
termination of the 10 CFR part 72
license and permanently cease activities
authorized by the license during the FY
based on the number of days the license
was in effect before receipt of the
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
termination request. The annual fee for
materials licenses with annual fees of
$100,000 or greater for a single fee
category for the current FY will be
prorated based on the number of days
remaining in the FY when a termination
request or a request for a possessiononly license is received by the NRC,
provided the licensee permanently
ceased licensed activities during the
specified period. The annual fee for
non-power production or utilization
facilities will be prorated based on the
number of days remaining in the FY
when the authorization to operate the
facility has been permanently removed
from the license during the FY.
*
*
*
*
*
■
19. Add § 171.26 to read as follows:
§ 171.26
Right to dispute assessed fees.
All debtors’ disputes of fees assessed
must be submitted in accordance with
10 CFR 15.31.
Dated: June 9, 2021.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Cherish K. Johnson,
Chief Financial Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021–12546 Filed 6–15–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
E:\FR\FM\16JNR2.SGM
16JNR2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 114 (Wednesday, June 16, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32146-32183]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-12546]
[[Page 32145]]
Vol. 86
Wednesday,
No. 114
June 16, 2021
Part II
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
10 CFR Parts 15, 170, and 171
Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fiscal Year 2021; Final
Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 86 , No. 114 / Wednesday, June 16, 2021 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 32146]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
10 CFR Parts 15, 170, and 171
[NRC-2018-0292]
RIN 3150-AK24
Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for Fiscal Year 2021
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is amending the
licensing, inspection, special project, and annual fees charged to its
applicants and licensees. These amendments are necessary to implement
the Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act (NEIMA), which,
beginning with fiscal year (FY) 2021, requires the NRC to recover, to
the maximum extent practicable, approximately 100 percent of its annual
budget less certain amounts excluded from this fee-recovery
requirement. In addition, the NRC is also making improvements
associated with fee invoicing to implement provisions of NEIMA.
DATES: This final rule is effective on August 16, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2018-0292 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of information for this action. You may
obtain publicly-available information related to this action by any of
the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2018-0292. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Dawn Forder; telephone: 301-415-3407;
email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this final rule.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or
by email to [email protected]. The ADAMS accession number for each
document referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the first
time that it is mentioned in this document. For the convenience of the
reader, the ADAMS accession numbers and instructions about obtaining
materials referenced in this document are provided in the
``Availability of Documents'' section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Rossi, Office of the Chief
Financial Officer, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
20555-0001, telephone: 301-415-7341; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background; Statutory Authority
II. Discussion
III. Public Comment Analysis
IV. Public Comments and NRC Responses
V. Regulatory Flexibility Certification
VI. Regulatory Analysis
VII. Backfitting and Issue Finality
VIII. Plain Writing
IX. National Environmental Policy Act
X. Paperwork Reduction Act Public Protection Notification
XI. Congressional Review Act
XII. Voluntary Consensus Standards
XIII. Availability of Guidance
XIV. Availability of Documents
I. Background; Statutory Authority
A. Statutory Authority
Revised Fee-Recovery Framework for FY 2021 and Subsequent Fiscal Years
The NRC is amending the licensing, inspection, special project, and
annual fees charged to its applicants and licensees. These amendments
are necessary to implement Public Law 115-439, NEIMA (42 U.S.C. 2215).
The NEIMA fee-related changes, effective October 1, 2020, include (1)
repealing the prior fee-recovery framework and replacing it with a
revised framework and (2) requirements to improve the accuracy of
invoices for service fees.
Effective October 1, 2020, NEIMA repealed Section 6101 of the
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, as amended (OBRA-90) (42
U.S.C. 2214), and put in place a revised fee-recovery framework for FY
2021 and subsequent fiscal years, requiring the NRC to recover, to the
maximum extent practicable, approximately 100 percent of its total
budget authority for the fiscal year, less the budget authority for
excluded activities. For FYs 2005 through 2020, OBRA-90 required the
NRC to recover through fees approximately 90 percent of its budget
authority for the fiscal year, less amounts for the activities excluded
from fee recovery under OBRA-90 or other legislation. The 10 percent of
the remaining budget authority not recovered through fees was
historically referred to as fee-relief activities. In this final rule,
the NRC has established a revised fee-recovery framework, which
eliminates the 10 percent limit on fee-relief activities. Accordingly,
the NRC will no longer provide a fee-relief credit (when the amount
budgeted for fee-relief activities is less than the 10 percent
threshold, which would have decreased annual fees for licensees) or
assess a fee-relief surcharge (when the amount budgeted for fee-relief
activities is greater than the 10 percent threshold, which would have
increased annual fees for licensees) as part of the calculation of
annual fees for each licensee fee class.
In FY 2021, the NRC's fee regulations are primarily governed by two
laws: (1) The Independent Offices Appropriation Act, 1952 (IOAA) (31
U.S.C. 9701), and (2) NEIMA (42 U.S.C. 2215). The IOAA authorizes and
encourages Federal agencies to recover--to the fullest extent
possible--costs attributable to services provided to identifiable
recipients. Under NEIMA, the NRC must recover, to the maximum extent
practicable, approximately 100 percent of its annual budget, less the
budget authority for excluded activities. Under Section 102(b)(1)(B) of
NEIMA, ``excluded activities'' include any fee-relief activity as
identified by the Commission, generic homeland security activities,
waste incidental to reprocessing activities, Nuclear Waste Fund
activities, advanced reactor regulatory infrastructure activities,
Inspector General services for the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety
Board, research and development at universities in areas relevant to
the NRC's mission, and a nuclear science and engineering grant program.
In FY 2021, the fee-relief activities identified by the Commission
are consistent with prior final fee rules and include Agreement State
oversight, regulatory support to Agreement States, medical isotope
production infrastructure, fee exemptions for non-profit educational
institutions, costs not recovered from small entities under Sec.
171.16(c) of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR),
generic decommissioning/reclamation activities, the NRC's uranium
recovery program and unregistered general licenses, potential U.S.
Department of Defense Program Memorandum of Understanding activities
(Military Radium-226), and non-military radium sites. In addition, for
FY 2021, the Commission identified international activities, not
including the resources for import and export licensing, as fee-relief
activities to be excluded from the fee-recovery requirement.
Under NEIMA, the NRC must use its IOAA authority first to collect
service
[[Page 32147]]
fees for NRC work that provides specific benefits to identifiable
recipients (such as licensing work, inspections, and special projects).
The NRC's regulations in 10 CFR part 170, ``Fees for Facilities,
Materials, Import and Export Licenses, and Other Regulatory Services
Under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as Amended,'' explain how the
agency collects service fees from specific beneficiaries. Because the
NRC's fee recovery under the IOAA (10 CFR part 170) will not equal 100
percent of the agency's total budget authority for the fiscal year
(less the budget authority for excluded activities), the NRC also
assesses ``annual fees'' under 10 CFR part 171, ``Annual Fees for
Reactor Licenses and Fuel Cycle Licenses and Materials Licenses,
Including Holders of Certificates of Compliance, Registrations, and
Quality Assurance Program Approvals and Government Agencies Licensed by
the NRC,'' to recover the remaining amount necessary to comply with
NEIMA.
In addition, Section 102(b)(3)(B)(i) of NEIMA establishes a new cap
for the annual fees charged to operating reactor licensees; under this
provision, the annual fee for an operating reactor licensee, to the
maximum extent practicable, shall not exceed the annual fee amount per
operating reactor licensee established in the FY 2015 final fee rule
(80 FR 37432; June 30, 2015), adjusted for inflation (see Section II,
Discussion, ``FY 2021 Fee Collection--Revised Annual Fees,'' of this
final rule).
B. Accurate Invoicing
Section 102(d) of NEIMA requires three sets of actions related to
NRC invoices for service fees assessed under 10 CFR part 170. First, as
stated in Section 102(d)(1) of NEIMA, the NRC must ``ensure appropriate
review and approval prior to the issuance of invoices'' for service
fees. Second, as stated in Section 102(d)(2) of NEIMA, the NRC must
``develop and implement processes to audit invoices [for 10 CFR part
170 service fees] to ensure accuracy, transparency, and fairness.''
Third, as stated in Section 102(d)(3) of NEIMA, the NRC is required to
``modify regulations to ensure fair and appropriate processes to
provide licensees and applicants an opportunity to efficiently dispute
or otherwise seek review and correction of errors in invoices'' for
service fees.
The NRC developed and implemented process improvements to ensure
accurate invoicing for the first two actions. First, in July 2019, the
NRC implemented a new agencywide process to standardize the validation
of fees, which fully satisfies Section 102(d)(1) and partially
addresses Section 102(d)(2) of NEIMA. The new standardized process
improved accountability and oversight within the NRC to ensure that fee
billing data is correct before appearing on a licensee's invoice.
Standardizing the fee validation process defines roles and
responsibilities for performing fee billing validation and
certification; this standardization process also improves
accountability and internal controls by adding management oversight to
improve the accuracy of fee billing data. The NRC's new process will
lead to improved internal and external auditing of service fee invoices
to ensure accuracy, transparency, and fairness of invoices. The process
requires offices with fee billable charges to regularly review and
certify hours and costs to validate the charges before the NRC sends a
bill for service fees. On an annual basis, external financial statement
auditors will conduct an audit of a sample of invoices to determine
whether the NRC is accurately invoicing in accordance with the NRC's
fee schedules. Therefore, the NRC's invoices will be reviewed and
audited by both internal and external parties.
The second NEIMA accurate invoicing action also concerns the
transparency and fairness of the overall billing process. The NRC is
firmly committed to the application of fairness and equity in the
assessment of fees. All 10 CFR part 170 service fees are reassessed and
published in the Federal Register on a yearly basis. In January 2018,
the NRC redesigned its invoices to add clarity and transparency for its
stakeholders; new features included an invoice legend of NRC acronyms
and the names of individual NRC staff and/or the contractor company, if
applicable, who had performed the work associated with the charges were
added. In addition, the NRC's staff hours and contractor costs were
listed separately on invoices so the recipient could view the subtotals
for the two different categories of costs. Finally, the NRC implemented
a new data structure to more effectively account for and track all
billable work at the project level. The structure included a data
element called an Enterprise Project Identifier (EPID), which provides
useful details regarding the type of project or work that is being
billed. Inspection report numbers were converted to EPIDs to provide
more information, and descriptions of inspection activities were added
to the invoice. Using this data structure enabled the NRC's licensees
and other persons assessed service fees to identify how many hours are
being expended on each of the various activities within a project. To
further these efforts, the NRC standardized its Cost Activity Codes
(CACs) for all agency activities to clearly provide licensees with
consistent descriptions of the work being performed across licensing
actions, inspections, and over multiple dockets. Invoices for service
fees are now presented in a more useful and readable manner and hours
and costs are no longer commingled. As a result, the NRC's invoices
provide stakeholders greater transparency regarding fees.
In addition, in October 2019, the NRC released an electronic
billing (eBilling) system. This public-facing, web-based application
provides persons assessed service fees, including licensees, immediate
delivery of NRC invoices, customizable email notifications, the
capability to view and analyze invoice details, and access to the U.S.
Department of the Treasury systems to pay invoices. The eBilling
application provides persons assessed service fees, including
licensees, increased billing process transparency and has increased
applicant and licensee confidence in the assessed fees and charges.
To address the third action, the NRC is modifying the regulations
under 10 CFR chapter I to provide a standard process for licensees and
applicants to efficiently dispute or otherwise seek review and
correction of errors in invoices for services fees (see Section II,
Discussion, ``FY 2021--Policy Changes,'' of this final rule).
II. Discussion
FY 2021 Fee Collection--Overview
The NRC is issuing this FY 2021 final fee rule based on the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (the enacted budget). The final
fee rule reflects a total budget authority in the amount of $844.4
million, a decrease of $11.2 million from FY 2020. As explained
previously, certain portions of the NRC's total budget authority for
the fiscal year are excluded from NEIMA's fee-recovery requirement
under Section 102(b)(1)(B) of NEIMA. Based on the FY 2021 enacted
budget, these exclusions total $123.0 million, consisting of $91.2
million for fee-relief activities, $17.7 million for advanced reactor
regulatory infrastructure activities, $11.7 million for generic
homeland security activities, $1.2 million for waste incidental to
reprocessing activities, and $1.2 million for Inspector General
services for the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board. Table I
summarizes the excluded activities for the FY 2021 final rule.
[[Page 32148]]
Table I--Excluded Activities
[Dollars in millions]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2021 final
rule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fee-Relief Activities:
International activities (not including the $24.7
resources for import and export licensing).........
Agreement State oversight........................... 10.4
Medical isotope production infrastructure........... 7.0
Fee exemption for nonprofit educational institutions 9.3
Costs not recovered from small entities under 10 CFR 7.8
171.16(c)..........................................
Regulatory support to Agreement States.............. 12.3
Generic decommissioning/reclamation activities (not 14.9
related to the operating power reactors and spent
fuel storage fee classes)..........................
Uranium recovery program and unregistered general 3.7
licensees..........................................
Potential Department of Defense remediation program 1.0
Memorandum of Understanding activities.............
Non-military radium sites........................... 0.2
---------------
Subtotal Fee-Relief Activities...................... 91.2
Activities under Section 102(b)(1)(B)(ii) of NEIMA 14.1
(Generic Homeland Security activities, Waste Incidental
to Reprocessing activities, and the Defense Nuclear
Facilities Safety Board)...............................
Advanced reactor regulatory infrastructure activities... 17.7
---------------
Total Excluded Activities........................... 123.0
------------------------------------------------------------------------
After accounting for the exclusions from the fee-recovery
requirement and net billing adjustments (i.e., for FY 2021 invoices
that the NRC estimates will not be paid during the fiscal year, less
payments received in FY 2021 for prior year invoices and current year
collections made for the termination of one operating power reactor),
the NRC must recover approximately $708.0 million in fees in FY 2021.
Of this amount, the NRC estimates that $190.6 million will be recovered
through 10 CFR part 170 service fees and approximately $517.4 million
will be recovered through 10 CFR part 171 annual fees. Table II
summarizes the fee-recovery amounts for the FY 2021 final fee rule
using the enacted budget and takes into account the budget authority
for excluded activities and net billing adjustments. For all
information presented in the following tables, individual values may
not sum to totals due to rounding. Please see the work papers (ADAMS
Accession No. ML21119A024) for actual amounts.
In FY 2021, the explanatory statement associated with the
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, also includes direction for the
NRC to use $35.0 million in prior-year unobligated carryover funds,
including $16.0 million for the University Nuclear Leadership Program,
which replaced the Integrated University Program. The NRC does not
assess fees in the current fiscal year for any carryover funds because,
consistent with the requirements of NEIMA, fees are calculated based on
the budget authority enacted for the current fiscal year and fees were
already assessed in the fiscal year in which the carryover funds were
appropriated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ For each table, numbers may not add due to rounding.
Table II--Budget and Fee Recovery Amounts 1
[Dollars in millions]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2021 final
rule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Budget Authority.................................. $844.4
Less Budget Authority for Excluded Activities:.......... -123.0
Balance............................................. 721.4
Fee Recovery Percent.................................... 100
Total Amount to be Recovered:........................... 721.4
Less Estimated Amount to be Recovered through 10 CFR -190.6
Part 170 Fees......................................
Estimated Amount to be Recovered through 10 CFR Part 530.8
171 Fees...........................................
10 CFR Part 171 Billing Adjustments:
Unpaid Current Year Invoices (estimated)............ 2.1
Less Current Year Collections from a Terminated -2.7
Reactor--Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit 2 in
FY 2020 and Indian Point Nuclear Generating, Unit 3
in FY 2021.........................................
Less Payments Received in Current Year for Previous -12.8
Year Invoices (estimated)..........................
Adjusted Amount to be Recovered through 10 CFR Parts 170 708.0
and 171 Fees...........................................
Adjusted 10 CFR Part 171 Annual Fee Collections Required $517.4
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 32149]]
FY 2021 Fee Collection--Professional Hourly Rate
The NRC uses a professional hourly rate to assess fees under 10 CFR
part 170 for specific services it provides. The professional hourly
rate also helps determine flat fees (which are used for the review of
certain types of license applications). This rate is applicable to all
activities for which fees are assessed under Sec. Sec. 170.21 and
170.31.
The NRC's professional hourly rate is derived by adding budgeted
resources for: (1) Mission-direct program salaries and benefits, (2)
mission-indirect program support, and (3) agency support (corporate
support and the Inspector General). The NRC then subtracts certain
offsetting receipts and divides this total by the mission-direct full-
time equivalent (FTE) converted to hours (the mission-direct FTE
converted to hours is the product of the mission-direct FTE multiplied
by the estimated annual mission-direct FTE productive hours). The only
budgeted resources excluded from the professional hourly rate are those
for mission-direct contract resources, which are generally billed to
licensees separately. The following shows the professional hourly rate
calculation:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR16JN21.000
For FY 2021, the NRC is increasing the professional hourly rate
from $279 to $288. The 3.2 percent increase in the FY 2021 professional
hourly rate is primarily due to a 2.1 percent increase in budgetary
resources of approximately $15.0 million. The increase in budgetary
resources is, in turn, primarily due to an increase in salaries and
benefits to support Federal pay raises for NRC employees. The
anticipated decline in the number of mission-direct FTE compared to FY
2020 also contributed to the increase in the professional hourly rate.
The professional hourly rate is inversely related to the mission-direct
FTE amount; therefore, as the number of mission-direct FTE decrease the
professional hourly rate can increase. The number of mission-direct FTE
is expected to decline by 17, primarily due to: (1) The completion of
probabilistic risk assessment reviews related to lessons learned from
the accident at Fukushima Dai-ichi in Japan; (2) the closure of Duane
Arnold Energy Center (Duane Arnold); and (3) the reduced workload
associated with significance determinations, operating experience
evaluations, and generic communications development.
The FY 2021 estimate for annual mission-direct FTE productive hours
is 1,510 hours, which is unchanged from FY 2020. This estimate, also
referred to as the productive hours assumption, reflects the average
number of hours that a mission-direct employee spends on mission-direct
work in a given year. This estimate, therefore, excludes hours charged
to annual leave, sick leave, holidays, training, and general
administrative tasks. Table III shows the professional hourly rate
calculation methodology. The FY 2020 amounts are provided for
comparison purposes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The fees collected by the NRC for Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) services and indemnity fees (financial protection required of
all licensees for public liability claims at 10 CFR part 140) are
subtracted from the budgeted resources amount when calculating the
10 CFR part 170 professional hourly rate, per the guidance in the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-25, User Charges.
The budgeted resources for FOIA activities are allocated under the
product for Information Services within the Corporate Support
business line. The budgeted resources for indemnity activities are
allocated under the Licensing Actions and Research and Test Reactors
products within the Operating Reactors business line.
Table III--Professional Hourly Rate Calculation
[Dollars in millions, except as noted]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2020 final FY 2021 final
rule rule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mission-Direct Program Salaries & $314.6 $335.3
Benefits...............................
Mission-Indirect Program Support........ $110.8 $113.2
Agency Support (Corporate Support and $291.5 $283.7
the IG)................................
-------------------------------
Subtotal............................ $716.9 $732.2
Less Offsetting Receipts 2.............. $0.0 $0.0
Total Budgeted Resources Included in $716.9 $732.2
Professional Hourly Rate...............
Mission-Direct FTE (Whole numbers)...... 1,701 1,684
Annual Mission-Direct FTE Productive 1,510 1,510
Hours (Whole numbers)..................
Mission-Direct FTE Converted to Hours 2,568,510 2,542,840
(Mission-Direct FTE multiplied by
Annual Mission-Direct FTE Productive
Hours).................................
Professional Hourly Rate (Total Budgeted $279 $288
Resources Included in Professional
Hourly Rate Divided by Mission-Direct
FTE Converted to Hours) (Whole Numbers)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2021 Fee Collection--Flat Application Fee Changes
The NRC is amending the flat application fees it charges in its
schedule of fees in Sec. Sec. 170.21 and 170.31 to reflect the revised
professional hourly rate of $288. The NRC charges these fees to
applicants for materials licenses and other regulatory services, as
well as to holders of materials licenses. The NRC calculates these flat
fees by multiplying the average professional staff hours needed to
process the licensing actions by the professional hourly rate for FY
2021. As part of its calculations, the NRC analyzes the actual hours
spent performing licensing actions and estimates the five-year average
of professional staff hours that are needed to process licensing
actions as part of its biennial review of fees; these actions are
required by Section 205(a) of the Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990
(31 U.S.C.
[[Page 32150]]
902(a)(8)). The NRC performed this review in FY 2021 and will perform
this review again in FY 2023. The biennial review adjustments and the
higher professional hourly rate of $288 are the primary reasons for the
increase in flat application fees (see the work papers).
In order to simplify billing, the NRC rounds these flat fees to a
minimal degree. Specifically, the NRC rounds these flat fees (up or
down) in such a way that ensures both convenience for its stakeholders
and that any rounding effects are minimal. Accordingly, fees under
$1,000 are rounded to the nearest $10, fees between $1,000 and $100,000
are rounded to the nearest $100, and fees greater than $100,000 are
rounded to the nearest $1,000.
The flat fees are applicable for import and export licensing
actions (see fee categories K.1. through K.5. of Sec. 170.21 and fee
categories 15.A. through 15.R. of Sec. 170.31), as well as certain
materials licensing actions (see fee categories 1.C. through 1.D., 2.B.
through 2.F., 3.A. through 3.S., 4.B. through 5.A., 6.A. through 9.D.,
10.B., 15.A. through 15.L., 15.R., and 16 of Sec. 170.31).
Applications filed on or after the effective date of the FY 2021 final
fee rule will be subject to the revised fees in the final rule.
FY 2021 Fee Collection--Low-Level Waste Surcharge
As in prior years, the NRC is assessing a generic low-level waste
(LLW) surcharge of $3.4 million. Disposal of LLW occurs at
commercially-operated LLW disposal facilities that are licensed by
either the NRC or an Agreement State. Four existing LLW disposal
facilities in the United States accept various types of LLW. All are
located in Agreement States and, therefore, are regulated by an
Agreement State, rather than the NRC. The NRC is allocating this
surcharge to its licensees based on data available in the U.S.
Department of Energy's (DOE) Manifest Information Management System.
This database contains information on total LLW volumes disposed of by
four generator classes: Academic, industrial, medical, and utility. The
ratio of waste volumes disposed of by these generator classes to total
LLW volumes disposed over a period of time is used to estimate the
portion of this surcharge that will be allocated to the power reactors,
fuel facilities, and the materials users fee classes. The materials
users fee class portion is adjusted to account for the large percentage
of materials licensees that are licensed by the Agreement States rather
than the NRC.
Table IV shows the allocation of the LLW surcharge and its
allocation across the various fee classes.
Table IV--Allocation of LLW Surcharge FY 2021
[Dollars in millions]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LLW Surcharge
Fee classes -------------------------------
Percent $
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating Power Reactors................ 87.5 $2.941
Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor 0.0 0.000
Decommissioning........................
Non-Power Production or Utilization 0.0 0.000
Facilities.............................
Fuel Facilities......................... 9.9 0.333
Materials Users......................... 2.6 0.087
Transportation.......................... 0.0 0.000
Rare Earth Facilities................... 0.0 0.000
Uranium Recovery........................ 0.0 0.000
-------------------------------
Total............................... 100.0 3.361
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2021 Fee Collection--Revised Annual Fees
In accordance with SECY-05-0164, ``Annual Fee Calculation Method''
(ADAMS Accession No. ML052580332), the NRC rebaselines its annual fees
every year. ``Rebaselining'' entails analyzing the budget in detail and
then allocating the budgeted resources to various classes or subclasses
of licensees. It also includes updating the number of NRC licensees in
its fee calculation methodology.
The NRC is revising its annual fees in Sec. Sec. 171.15 and 171.16
to recover approximately 100 percent of the NRC's FY 2021 enacted
budget (less the budget authority for excluded activities and the
estimated amount to be recovered through 10 CFR part 170 fees). The
total estimated 10 CFR part 170 collections for this final rule are
$190.6 million, which is a decrease of $29.6 million from the FY 2020
final rule (see the specific fee class sections for a discussion of
this decrease). The NRC, therefore, must recover $517.4 million through
annual fees from its licensees, which is an increase of $9.5 million
from the FY 2020 final rule.
Table V shows the rebaselined fees for FY 2021 for a sample of
licensee categories. The FY 2020 amounts are provided for comparison
purposes.
Table V--Rebaselined Annual Fees
[Actual dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2020 final FY 2021 final
Class/category of licenses annual fee ($) annual fee ($)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating Power Reactors................ $4,621,000 $4,749,000
+ Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor 188,000 237,000
Decommissioning........................
Total, Combined Fee................. 4,809,000 4,986,000
Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor 188,000 237,000
Decommissioning........................
Non-Power Production or Utilization 81,300 80,000
Facilities.............................
High Enriched Uranium Fuel Facility 5,067,000 4,643,000
(Category 1.A.(1)(a))..................
Low Enriched Uranium Fuel Facility 1,717,000 1,573,000
(Category 1.A.(1)(b))..................
[[Page 32151]]
Uranium Enrichment (Category 1.E)....... 2,208,000 2,023,000
UF6 Conversion and Deconversion Facility 510,000 467,000
(Category 2.A.(1)......................
Basic In Situ Recovery Facilities 49,200 47,200
(Category 2.A.(2)(b))..................
Typical Users:
Radiographers (Category 3O)......... 29,900 29,100
All Other Specific Byproduct 9,700 9,900
Material Licensees (Category 3P)...
Medical Other (Category 7C)......... 14,800 16,800
Device/Product Safety Evaluation-- 13,800 17,900
Broad (Category 9A)................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The work papers that support this final rule show in detail how the
NRC allocates the budgeted resources for each class of licensees and
calculates the fees.
Paragraphs a. through h. of this section describe the budgeted
resources allocated to each class of licensees and the calculations of
the rebaselined fees. For more information about detailed fee
calculations for each class, please consult the accompanying work
papers for this final rule.
a. Operating Power Reactors
The NRC will collect $441.7 million in annual fees from the
operating power reactors fee class in FY 2021, as shown in Table VI.
The FY 2020 operating power reactors fees are shown for comparison
purposes.
Table VI--Annual Fee Summary Calculations for Operating Power Reactors
[Dollars in millions]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary fee calculations FY 2020 final FY 2021 final
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total budgeted resources................ $623.9 $611.8
Less estimated 10 CFR part 170 receipts. -186.7 -161.6
-------------------------------
Net 10 CFR part 171 resources....... 437.2 450.2
Allocated generic transportation........ 0.2 0.3
Fee-relief adjustment................... -1.2 N/A
Allocated LLW surcharge................. 3.1 2.9
Billing adjustment...................... 2.4 -9.1
Adjustment: Estimated current year -2.7 -2.7
collections from terminated reactor
(Indian Point Generating, Unit 2 in FY
2020 and Indian Point Generating, Unit
3 in FY 2021)..........................
Total required annual fee recovery.. 439.0 441.7
Total operating reactors............ 95 93
Annual fee per reactor.................. $4.621 $4.749
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In comparison to FY 2020, the FY 2021 annual fee for the operating
power reactors fee class is increasing primarily due to the following:
(1) The decline in 10 CFR part 170 estimated billings; (2) the
reduction in the total number of operating power reactors due to the
closure of Duane Arnold and Indian Point Energy Center (Indian Point
Unit 3); and (3) the absence of the fee-relief credit that was provided
in FY 2020 as part of the fee-relief adjustment. The increase in the
annual fee for the operating power reactors fee class is partially
offset due to the following: (1) The decrease in budgeted resources;
(2) the 10 CFR part 171 billing adjustment that was included in the
operating power reactors fee class calculation due to the deferral of
annual fees and fees for services due to the coronavirus disease
(COVID-19) pandemic; and (3) the current year collection adjustment due
to the shutdown of Indian Point Unit 3. These components are discussed
in the following paragraphs.
The 10 CFR part 170 estimated billings declined primarily due to
the following: (1) The decrease due to the plant closures; (2) the
completion of construction activities at Vogtle Electric Generating
Plant, Unit 3 (Vogtle Unit 3); (3) the completion of the NuScale small
modular reactor (SMR) design certification review; and (4) the impact
of continued travel restrictions and limited on-site presence on
inspection activities due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This decrease in
the 10 CFR part 170 estimated billings is partially offset by increased
work to support the following: (1) The review of the Oklo Power LLC
combined license (COL) application for the Aurora micro reactor, which
was docketed in June 2020; and (2) rescheduled inspection activities
that were deferred due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
In addition, as a result of the revised fee-recovery framework
under NEIMA, the FY 2021 annual fee increased due to the absence of the
fee-relief credit that was provided in FY 2020 as part of the fee-
relief adjustment. Because NEIMA eliminated the approximately 90
percent requirement for fee recovery and, in turn, the 10 percent limit
on fee-relief activities, the NRC will no longer provide a fee-relief
credit or assess a fee-relief surcharge as part of the calculation of
annual fees for each licensee fee class.
The increase in the annual fee is partially offset by a decline in
FTEs associated with changes in workload, including, but not limited
to, the following: (1) The completion of probabilistic risk assessment
reviews related to lessons learned from the
[[Page 32152]]
accident at Fukushima Dai-ichi in Japan; (2) the closure of Duane
Arnold; (3) reduced workload associated with significance
determinations, operating experience evaluations, and generic
communications development; (4) the completion of the NuScale SMR
design certification review; (5) a decrease in licensing actions and
reduced demand for operator licensing and vendor inspection work
resulting from the completion of construction of Vogtle Unit 3; and (6)
decreases in research workload in areas of flooding, high energy arc
faulting testing, and the near completion of the Level 3 probabilistic
risk assessment project. The decrease in the budgeted resources is
offset by an increase for certain contract costs due to a reduction in
the utilization of prior-year unobligated carryover funding and an
increase in the fully-costed FTE rate compared to FY 2020.
In addition, the increase in the annual fee is partially offset by
the $9,143,303 billing adjustment that was included in the operating
power reactors calculation due to the deferral of annual fees and fees
for services due to the COVID-19 pandemic, and a $2,700,000 current
year collection adjustment in the operating power reactors fee class
calculation due to the shutdown of Indian Point Unit 3.
The fee-recoverable budgeted resources are divided equally among
the 93 licensed operating power reactors, a decrease of two operating
power reactors compared to FY 2020 due to the closure of Duane Arnold
and Indian Point Unit 3, resulting in an annual fee of $4,749,000 per
reactor. Additionally, each licensed operating power reactor is
assessed the FY 2021 spent fuel storage/reactor decommissioning annual
fee of $237,000 (see Table VII and the discussion that follows). The
combined FY 2021 annual fee for each operating power reactor is
$4,986,000.
The NRC included an estimate of the operating power reactors annual
fee in Appendix C, ``Estimated Operating Power Reactors Annual Fee,''
of the FY 2021 Congressional Budget Justification (CBJ), with the
intent to increase transparency with stakeholders. The NRC developed
this estimate based on the staff's allocation of the FY 2021 budget
request to fee classes under 10 CFR part 170, and allocations within
the operating power reactors fee class under 10 CFR part 171. In
addition, the estimated annual fee assumed 93 operating power reactors
in FY 2021 and applied various data assumptions from the FY 2019 final
fee rule (84 FR 22331; May 17, 2019). Based on these allocations and
assumptions, the operating power reactor annual fee included in the FY
2021 CBJ was estimated to be $4.8 million, approximately $0.6 million
below the FY 2015 operating power reactors annual fee amount adjusted
for inflation of $5.4 million. Collectively, these actions serve to
mitigate impacts resulting from licensees leaving the fee class and
help the NRC continue to develop budgets that account for a fee class
with a declining number of licensees. Although the FY 2021 CBJ included
the estimated operating power reactors annual fee, the assumptions made
between budget formulation and the development of the FY 2021 final
rule have changed, as shown in Table VI.
In FY 2016, the NRC amended its licensing, inspection, and annual
fee regulations to establish a variable annual fee structure for light-
water SMRs (81 FR 32617). Under the variable annual fee structure, an
SMR's annual fee would be assessed as a function of its bundled
licensed thermal power rating. Currently, there are no operating SMRs;
therefore, the NRC will not assess an annual fee in FY 2021 for this
type of licensee.
b. Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor Decommissioning
The NRC will collect $28.9 million in annual fees from 10 CFR part
50 power reactor licensees, and from 10 CFR part 72 licensees that do
not hold a 10 CFR part 50 license, to recover the budgeted resources
for the spent fuel storage/reactor decommissioning fee class in FY
2021, as shown in Table VII. The FY 2020 spent fuel storage/reactor
decommissioning fees are shown for comparison purposes.
Table VII--Annual Fee Summary Calculations for Spent Fuel Storage/
Reactor Decommissioning
[Dollars in millions]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary fee calculations FY 2020 final FY 2021 final
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total budgeted resources................ $37.9 $42.2
Less estimated 10 CFR part 170 receipts. -15.9 -13.8
-------------------------------
Net 10 CFR part 171 resources....... 22.1 28.4
Allocated generic transportation costs.. 0.8 1.1
Fee-relief adjustment................... -0.1 N/A
Billing adjustments..................... 0.1 -0.6
Total required annual fee recovery.. 22.9 28.9
Total spent fuel storage facilities. 122 122
Annual fee per facility................. $0.188 $0.237
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In comparison to FY 2020, the FY 2021 annual fee for the spent fuel
storage/reactor decommissioning fee class is increasing primarily due
to the increase in the budgeted resources and the decline in the 10 CFR
part 170 estimated billings. This increase is partially offset by the
10 CFR part 171 billing adjustment that was included in the spent fuel
storage/reactor decommissioning fee class calculation due to the
deferral of annual fees and fees for services due to the COVID-19
pandemic. These components are discussed in the following paragraphs.
The budgeted resources for the spent fuel storage/reactor
decommissioning fee class increased primarily to support the following:
(1) Decommissioning activities associated with power reactors in
decommissioning, including the transition of Duane Arnold from
operation to the power reactor decommissioning program; and (2) waste
research activities associated with accident tolerant fuel, high
burnup, and enrichment extension fuels.
The 10 CFR part 170 estimated billings for FY 2021 decreased
primarily due to the following: (1) A reduction in hours associated
with the staff's review of applications for renewals and amendments for
independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) licenses and dry
cask storage certificates of compliance (CoCs); (2) the near
[[Page 32153]]
completion of the staff's review of the Interim Storage Partners
consolidated interim storage facility application; (3) the completion
of certain follow-up inspections and other inspection activities for
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station; (4) the completion of licensing
actions, partial site release requests, and a decrease in confirmatory
survey work at multiple sites; and (5) the near completion of the
license termination for the La Crosse Boiling Water Reactor. This
decrease in the 10 CFR part 170 estimated billings is partially offset
by increased work to support the following: (1) Inspection activities
for ISFSI licenses and dry cask storage CoCs; (2) the staff's safety
and environmental review of the Holtec HI-STORE consolidated interim
storage facility application; (3) the staff's review of topical
reports; and (4) decommissioning activities within the power reactor
decommissioning program, including the review of decommissioning
license amendment requests, exemption requests, and inspection
activities at multiple sites.
The increase in the annual fee is partially offset by an
approximate $0.6 million 10 CFR part 171 billing adjustment that was
included in the spent fuel storage/reactor decommissioning calculation
due to the deferral of annual fees and fees for services due to the
COVID-19 pandemic.
The required annual fee recovery amount is divided equally among
122 licensees, resulting in a FY 2021 annual fee of $237,000 per
licensee.
c. Fuel Facilities
The NRC will collect $17.5 million in annual fees from the fuel
facilities fee class in FY 2021, as shown in Table VIII. The FY 2020
fuel facilities fees are shown for comparison purposes.
Table VIII--Annual Fee Summary Calculations for Fuel Facilities
[Dollars in millions]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary fee calculations FY 2020 final FY 2021 final
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total budgeted resources................ $23.2 $23.3
Less estimated 10 CFR part 170 receipts. -6.8 -7.3
-------------------------------
Net 10 CFR part 171 resources....... 16.5 16.0
Allocated generic transportation........ 1.1 1.5
Fee-relief adjustment................... -0.1 N/A
Allocated LLW surcharge................. 0.4 0.3
Billing adjustments..................... 0.1 -0.4
Total remaining required annual fee $18.0 $17.5
recovery...............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In comparison to FY 2020, the FY 2021 annual fee for the fuel
facilities fee class is decreasing primarily due to the increase in 10
CFR part 170 estimated billings and the 10 CFR part 171 billing
adjustment that was included in the fuel facilities calculation due to
the deferral of annual fees and fees for services due to the COVID-19
pandemic. The decrease in the annual fee is offset by an increase in
the budgeted resources as discussed in the following paragraphs.
The 10 CFR part 170 estimated billings increased as a result of the
following: (1) The increased workload to support the staff's review of
a license amendment application associated with high assay low-enriched
uranium and the associated security plans, and (2) the review of the
Westinghouse environmental impact statement being developed for the
license renewal application. As part of the final annual fee
calculation, an approximate $0.4 million billing adjustment was
included in the fuel facilities calculation due to the deferral of
annual fees and fees for services due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The decrease in the annual fee is offset, in part, by an increase
in the resources for contract costs budgeted for the fuel facilities
fee class primarily due to a reduction in the utilization of prior-year
unobligated carryover compared to FY 2020.
The NRC will continue allocating annual fees to individual fuel
facility licensees based on the effort/fee determination matrix
developed in the FY 1999 final fee rule (64 FR 31447; June 10, 1999).
To briefly recap, the matrix groups licensees within this fee class
into various fee categories. The matrix lists processes that are
conducted at licensed sites and assigns effort factors for the safety
and safeguards activities associated with each process (these effort
levels are reflected in Table IX). The annual fees are then distributed
across the fee class based on the regulatory effort assigned by the
matrix. The effort factors in the matrix represent regulatory effort
that is not recovered through 10 CFR part 170 fees (e.g., rulemaking,
guidance). Regulatory effort for activities that are subject to 10 CFR
part 170 fees, such as the number of inspections, is not applicable to
the effort factor.
In addition, the NRC has added an annual fee for fee category
1.A.(2), ``Limited Operations,'' in anticipation that the NRC may
decide to issue a license amendment in the future that would move a
licensee to the ``Limited Operations'' fee category from the 1.E,
``Uranium Enrichment'' fee category because the NRC has received an
amendment application to a fuel facility license that, if granted,
would authorize a significantly smaller operating facility.
Table IX--Effort Factors for Fuel Facilities, FY 2021
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Effort factors
Facility type (fee category) Number of -------------------------------
facilities Safety Safeguards
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
High-Enriched Uranium Fuel (1.A.(1)(a))......................... 2 88 91
Low-Enriched Uranium Fuel (1.A.(1)(b)).......................... 3 70 21
Limited Operations (1.A.(2)(a))................................. 1 3 17
Gas Centrifuge Enrichment Demonstration (1.A.(2)(b))............ 0 0 0
Hot Cell (and others) (1.A.(2)(c)).............................. 0 0 0
[[Page 32154]]
Uranium Enrichment (1.E.)....................................... 1 16 23
UF6 Conversion and Deconversion (2.A.(1))....................... 1 7 2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In FY 2021, the total remaining amount of annual fees to be
recovered, $17.5 million, is attributable to safety activities,
safeguards activities, and the LLW surcharge. For FY 2021, the total
budgeted resources to be recovered as annual fees for safety activities
are $9.4 million. To calculate the annual fee, the NRC allocates this
amount to each fee category based on its percentage of the total
regulatory effort for safety activities. Similarly, the NRC allocates
the budgeted resources to be recovered as annual fees for safeguards
activities, $7.8 million, to each fee category based on its percentage
of the total regulatory effort for safeguards activities. Finally, the
fuel facilities fee class portion of the LLW surcharge--$0.3 million--
is allocated to each fee category based on its percentage of the total
regulatory effort for both safety and safeguards activities. The annual
fee per licensee is then calculated by dividing the total allocated
budgeted resources for the fee category by the number of licensees in
that fee category. The fee for each facility is summarized in Table X.
Table X--Annual Fees for Fuel Facilities
[Actual dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2020 final FY 2021 final
Facility type (fee category) annual fee annual fee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
High-Enriched Uranium Fuel (1.A.(1)(a)). $5,067,000 $4,643,000
Low-Enriched Uranium Fuel (1.A.(1)(b)).. 1,717,000 1,573,000
Facilities with limited operations N/A 1,037,000
(1.A.(2)(a))...........................
Gas Centrifuge Enrichment Demonstration N/A N/A
(1.A.(2)(b))...........................
Hot Cell (and others) (1.A.(2)(c))...... N/A N/A
Uranium Enrichment (1.E.)............... 2,208,000 2,023,000
UF6 Conversion and Deconversion 510,000 467,000
(2.A.(1))..............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
d. Uranium Recovery Facilities
The NRC will collect $0.2 million in annual fees from the uranium
recovery facilities fee class in FY 2021, as shown in Table XI. The FY
2020 uranium recovery facilities fees are shown for comparison
purposes.
Table XI--Annual Fee Summary Calculations for Uranium Recovery
Facilities
[Dollars in millions]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary fee calculations FY 2020 final FY 2021 final
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total budgeted resources................ $0.6 $0.5
Less estimated 10 CFR part 170 receipts. -0.4 -0.3
-------------------------------
Net 10 CFR part 171 resources....... 0.2 0.2
Allocated generic transportation........ N/A N/A
Fee-relief adjustment................... 0.0 N/A
Billing adjustments..................... 0.0 0.0
Total required annual fee recovery...... 0.2 0.2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In comparison to FY 2020, the FY 2021 annual fee for the uranium
recovery facilities fee class is decreasing primarily due to a decline
in the budgeted resources because of an expected decrease in casework
associated with uranium recovery policy issues, environmental review
coordination activities, and guidance development.
The NRC regulates DOE's Title I and Title II activities under the
Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA).\3\ The annual fee
assessed to DOE includes the resources specifically budgeted for the
NRC's UMTRCA Title I and II activities, as well as 10 percent of the
remaining budgeted resources for this fee class. The NRC described the
overall methodology for determining fees for UMTRCA in the FY 2002 fee
rule (67 FR 42625; June 24, 2002), and the NRC continues to use this
methodology. The DOE's UMTRCA annual fee is decreasing compared to FY
2020 due to an increase in the 10 CFR part 170 estimated billings for
the anticipated workload increases at various DOE UMTRCA sites. The NRC
assesses the remaining 90 percent of its
[[Page 32155]]
budgeted resources to the remaining licensee in this fee class, as
described in the work papers. This is reflected in Table XII:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Congress established the two programs, Title I and Title II,
under UMTRCA to protect the public and the environment from hazards
associated with uranium milling. The UMTRCA Title I program is for
remedial action at abandoned mill tailings sites where tailings
resulted largely from production of uranium for weapons programs.
The NRC also regulates DOE's UMTRCA Title II program, which is
directed toward uranium mill sites licensed by the NRC or Agreement
States in or after 1978.
Table XII--Costs Recovered Through Annual Fees; Uranium Recovery
Facilities Fee Class
[Actual dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2020 final FY 2021 final
Summary of costs annual fee annual fee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOE Annual Fee Amount (UMTRCA Title I
and Title II) General Licenses:
UMTRCA Title I and Title II budgeted $114,577 $111,536
resources less 10 CFR part 170
receipts...........................
10 percent of generic/other uranium 5,573 5,241
recovery budgeted resources........
10 percent of uranium recovery fee- -107 N/A
relief adjustment..................
-------------------------------
Total Annual Fee Amount for DOE $120,000 $117,000
(rounded)..............................
Annual Fee Amount for Other Uranium
Recovery Licenses:
90 percent of generic/other uranium $50,153 $47,166
recovery budgeted resources less
the amounts specifically budgeted
for UMTRCA Title I and Title II
activities.........................
90 percent of uranium recovery fee- -959 N/A
relief adjustment..................
-------------------------------
Total Annual Fee Amount for Other $49,194 $47,166
Uranium Recovery Licenses
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, for any non-DOE licensees, the NRC will continue using a
matrix to determine the effort levels associated with conducting
generic regulatory actions for the different licensees in the uranium
recovery facilities fee class; this is similar to the NRC's approach
for fuel facilities, described previously. The matrix methodology for
uranium recovery licensees first identifies the licensee categories
included within this fee class (excluding DOE). These categories are:
Conventional uranium mills and heap leach facilities, uranium in situ
recovery (ISR) and resin ISR facilities, and mill tailings disposal
facilities. The matrix identifies the types of operating activities
that support and benefit these licensees, along with each activity's
relative weight (see the work papers). Currently, there is only one
remaining non-DOE licensee, which is a basic in situ recovery facility.
Table XIII displays the benefit factors for the non-DOE licensee in
that fee category:
Table XIII--Benefit Factors for Uranium Recovery Licenses
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Benefit factor Benefit factor
Fee category licensees per licensee Total value percent total
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conventional and Heap Leach mills (2.A.(2)(a)).. 0 0 0 0
Basic In Situ Recovery facilities (2.A.(2)(b)).. 1 190 190 100.0
Expanded In Situ Recovery facilities 0 0 0 0
(2.A.(2)(c))...................................
Section 11e.(2) disposal incidental to existing 0 0 0 0
tailings sites (2.A.(4)).......................
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................................... 1 190 190 100.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The annual fee for the remaining non-DOE licensee is calculated by
allocating 100 percent of the budgeted resources, as summarized in
Table XIV.
Table XIV--Annual Fees for Uranium Recovery Licensees
[Other than DOE; actual dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FY 2020 final FY 2021 final
Facility type (fee category) annual fee annual fee
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conventional and Heap Leach mills N/A N/A
(2.A.(2)(a))...........................
Basic In Situ Recovery facilities $49,200 $47,200
(2.A.(2)(b))...........................
Expanded In Situ Recovery facilities N/A N/A
(2.A.(2)(c))...........................
Section 11e.(2) disposal incidental to N/A N/A
existing tailings sites (2.A.(4))......
------------------------------------------------------------------------
e. Non-Power Production or Utilization Facilities
The NRC will collect $0.320 million in annual fees from the non-
power production or utilization facilities fee class in FY 2021, as
shown in Table XV. The non-power production or utilization facilities
fee class replaces the research and test reactor fee class from
previous fiscal years. This revised fee class accounts for commercial
non-power production and utilization facilities expected to be used for
the production of medical isotopes. The final FY 2020 research and test
reactors fees are shown for comparison purposes.
[[Page 32156]]
Table XV--Annual Fee Summary Calculations For Non-Power Production or
Utilization Facilities
[Actual dollars]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary fee calculations FY 2020 final FY 2021 final
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total budgeted resources................ $3,317,830 $2,896,754
Less estimated 10 CFR part 170 receipts. -3,030,000 -2,576,000
-------------------------------
Net 10 CFR part 171 resources....... 287,830 320,754
Allocated generic transportation........ 30,713 4,330
Fee-relief adjustment................... -6,183 N/A
Billing adjustments..................... 12,980 -4,391
Total required annual fee recovery.. 325,341 320,141
Total non-power production or 4 4
utilization facilities licenses....
Total annual fee per license (rounded).. $81,300 $80,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In comparison to FY 2020, the budgetary resources for the non-power
production or utilization facilities fee class is primarily decreasing
with respect to the medical isotope production facilities due to the
near completion of the activities associated with the staff's review of
the operating license application for SHINE Medical Technologies, LLC
(SHINE). In addition, the 10 CFR part 170 estimated billings are
declining within the fee class as a result of delayed submittals
associated with medical isotope production facilities by various
applicants. The 10 CFR part 170 estimated billings associated with the
four non-power production or utilization facilities licensees subject
to annual fees increased to support the following: (1) Activities
associated with the review of the GE Nuclear Test Reactor license
renewal application; and (2) activities associated with the review of a
complex license amendment for the National Institute of Standards and
Technology Neutron Reactor.
The annual fee-recovery amount is divided equally among the four
non-power production or utilization facilities licensees subject to
annual fees and results in an FY 2021 annual fee of $80,000 for each
licensee.
f. Rare Earth
The NRC has not allocated any budgeted resources to this fee class;
therefore, the NRC is not assessing an annual fee for this fee class in
FY 2021.
g. Materials Users
The NRC will collect $35.3 million in annual fees from materials
users licensed under 10 CFR parts 30, 40, and 70, as shown in Table
XVI. The FY 2020 materials users fees are shown for comparison
purposes.
Table XVI--Annual Fee Summary Calculations for Materials Users
[Dollars in millions]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary fee calculations FY 2020 final FY 2021 final
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total budgeted resources for licensees $33.7 $35.1
not regulated by Agreement States......
Less estimated 10 CFR part 170 receipts. -1.0 -1.0
-------------------------------
Net 10 CFR part 171 resources....... 32.8 34.1
Allocated generic transportation........ 1.2 1.5
Fee-relief adjustment................... 0.0 N/A
LLW surcharge........................... 0.0 0.1
Billing adjustments..................... 0.1 -0.4
Total required annual fee recovery.. $34.1 $35.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The formula for calculating 10 CFR part 171 annual fees for the
various categories of materials users is described in detail in the
work papers. Generally, the calculation results in a single annual fee
that includes 10 CFR part 170 costs, such as amendments, renewals,
inspections, and other licensing actions specific to individual fee
categories.
The total annual fee recovery of $35.3 million for FY 2021 shown in
Table XVI consists of $27.6 million for general costs and $7.7 million
for inspection costs. To equitably and fairly allocate the $35.3
million required to be collected among approximately 2,500 diverse
materials users licensees, the NRC continues to calculate the annual
fees for each fee category within this class based on the 10 CFR part
170 application fees and estimated inspection costs for each fee
category. Because the application fees and inspection costs are
indicative of the complexity of the materials license, this approach
provides a proxy for allocating the generic and other regulatory costs
to the diverse fee categories. This fee calculation method also
considers the inspection frequency (priority), which is indicative of
the safety risk and resulting regulatory costs associated with the
categories of licenses.
In comparison to FY 2020, annual fees are decreasing for 42 fee
categories within the materials users fee class to reflect changes as a
result of the biennial review of fees, which included an examination of
the average professional hours for licensing and oversight activities.
In addition, annual fees are increasing for 11 fee categories within
the materials users fee class due to the following: (1) An increase in
the fully-costed FTE rate compared to FY 2020; (2) an increase in the
budgeted resources for contract costs due to a reduction in the
utilization of prior-year unobligated carryover funding compared to FY
2020; (3) the realignment of budgeted resources that supports contract
funding for general license tracking, the materials event database, and
rulemaking information technology activities; (4) changes as a result
of the biennial review of fees, which included an examination of the
average professional hours for licensing and oversight activities; and
(5) an
[[Page 32157]]
increase in generic transportation costs for materials users.
A constant multiplier is established to recover the total general
costs (including allocated generic transportation costs) of $27.6
million. To derive the constant multiplier, the general cost amount is
divided by the sum of all fee categories (application fee plus the
inspection fee divided by inspection priority) then multiplied by the
number of licensees. This calculation results in a constant multiplier
of 1.0 for FY 2021. The average inspection cost is the average
inspection hours for each fee category multiplied by the professional
hourly rate of $288. The inspection priority is the interval between
routine inspections, expressed in years. The inspection multiplier is
established in order to recover the $7.7 million in inspection costs.
To derive the inspection multiplier, the inspection costs amount is
divided by the sum of all fee categories (inspection fee divided by
inspection priority) then multiplied by the number of licensees. This
calculation results in an inspection multiplier of 1.43 for FY 2021.
The unique category costs are any special costs that the NRC has
budgeted for a specific category of licenses. Please see the work
papers for more detail about this classification.
The annual fee being assessed to each licensee also takes into
account a share of approximately $0.087 million in LLW surcharge costs
allocated to the materials users fee class (see Table IV, ``Allocation
of LLW Surcharge, FY 2021,'' in Section II, ``Discussion,'' of this
document). The annual fee for each fee category is shown in the
revision to Sec. 171.16(d).
h. Transportation
The NRC will collect $1.4 million in annual fees to recover generic
transportation budgeted resources in FY 2021, as shown in Table XVII.
The FY 2020 fees are shown for comparison purposes.
Table XVII--Annual Fee Summary Calculations for Transportation
[Dollars in millions]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary fee calculations FY 2020 final FY 2021 final
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total budgeted resources................ $7.2 $8.3
Less estimated 10 CFR part 170 receipts. -2.8 -2.3
-------------------------------
Net 10 CFR part 171 resources....... 4.4 5.9
Less generic transportation resources... -3.4 -4.5
Fee-relief adjustment................... 0.0 N/A
Billing adjustments..................... 0.0 -0.1
Total required annual fee recovery.. $1.0 $1.4
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In comparison to FY 2020, the annual fee for the transportation fee
class is increasing primarily due to the following: (1) The decline in
10 CFR part 170 estimated billings related to delays in new amendment
packages; and (2) an increase in the budgeted resources for contract
costs due to a reduction in the utilization of prior-year unobligated
carryover funding compared to FY 2020, an increase in the number and
complexities of transportation package applications as a result of an
increase in the number of power reactors in decommissioning, and the
expanded use of accident tolerant fuels. The increase in the annual fee
is partially offset by an approximate $0.1 million 10 CFR part 171
billing adjustment that was included in the transportation fee class
calculation due to the deferral of annual fees and fees for services
due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Consistent with the policy established in the NRC's FY 2006 final
fee rule (71 FR 30721; May 30, 2006), the NRC recovers generic
transportation costs unrelated to DOE by including those costs in the
annual fees for licensee fee classes. The NRC continues to assess a
separate annual fee under Sec. 171.16, fee category 18.A., for DOE
transportation activities. The amount of the allocated generic
resources is calculated by multiplying the percentage of total CoCs
used by each fee class (and DOE) by the total generic transportation
resources to be recovered.
This resource distribution to the licensee fee classes and DOE is
shown in Table XVIII. Note that for the non-power production or
utilization facilities fee class, the NRC allocates the distribution to
only those licensees that are subject to annual fees. Although five
CoCs benefit the entire non-power production or utilization facilities
fee class, only 4 out of 31 non-power production or utilization
facilities licensees are subject to annual fees. Consequently, the
number of CoCs used to determine the proportion of generic
transportation resources allocated to annual fees for the non-power
production or utilization facilities fee class has been adjusted to 0.7
so these licensees are charged a fair and equitable portion of the
total fees (see the work papers).
Table XVIII--Distribution of Transportation Resources, FY 2021
[Dollars in millions]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allocated
Number of CoCs Percentage of generic
Licensee fee class/DOE benefiting fee total CoCs transportation
class or DOE resources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Materials Users................................................. 23.0 25.9 1.5
Operating Power Reactors........................................ 5.0 5.6 0.3
Spent Fuel Storage/Reactor Decommissioning...................... 16.0 18.0 1.1
Non-Power Production or Utilization Facilities.................. 0.7 0.7 0.0
Fuel Facilities................................................. 23.0 25.9 1.5
Sub-Total of Generic Transportation Resources................... 67.7 76.3 4.5
[[Page 32158]]
DOE............................................................. 21.0 23.7 1.4
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 88.7 100.0 5.9
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NRC assesses an annual fee to DOE based on the 10 CFR part 71
CoCs it holds. The NRC, therefore, does not allocate these DOE-related
resources to other licensees' annual fees because these resources
specifically support DOE.
FY 2021--Policy Changes
The NRC is making two policy changes for FY 2021:
Process for Disputing Errors in Invoices for Service Fees
Section 102(d)(3) of NEIMA requires the NRC to ``modify regulations
to ensure fair and appropriate processes to provide licensees and
applicants an opportunity to efficiently dispute or otherwise seek
review and correction of errors in invoices'' for service fees. The NRC
is implementing requirements for a standard method for licensees and
applicants to efficiently dispute or seek review and correction of
errors in invoices. The process being implemented is illustrated in the
process map, ``NRC Form 529, Processing Dispute of Fees-For-Service
Charges'' (ADAMS Accession No. ML20311A159). This process follows the
established method for licensees and applicants to submit requests for
the review of fees assessed under 10 CFR part 170 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML20104C055). The NRC Form 529 will be available in the agency's
eBilling system and on the agency's public website, and can be found
under ADAMS Accession No. ML20339A673. Standard use of an NRC form and
amendments to the current regulations in Sec. 15.31 will increase
efficiency by providing the licensees and applicants with clear
guidelines and expectations for submitting a fee dispute. It also
eliminates ambiguity regarding the appropriate information needed for
the NRC to consider and make a determination on a fee dispute.
In response to NEIMA's requirement that the NRC modify its
regulations to provide licensees and applicants an opportunity to
efficiently dispute or otherwise seek review and correction of errors
in service fee invoices, the NRC is revising its regulations.
Specifically the NRC is revising Sec. 15.31, ``Disputed debts,'' with
conforming amendments in Sec. Sec. 15.37, ``Interest, penalties, and
administrative costs,'' and 15.53, ``Reasons for suspending collection
action,'' and changing the heading for Sec. 170.51, ``Right to review
and appeal of prescribed fees,'' to ``Right to dispute assessed fees.''
The NRC is also adding a new section, Sec. 171.26, ``Right to dispute
assessed fees,'' to 10 CFR part 171. These changes outline the
interactions between the submitter and the NRC. The process will
enhance understanding of the dispute process by setting out the process
for submitting a fee dispute, the stages of the decisionmaking process
while the dispute is under review, and the manner by which the NRC will
notify a debtor after it makes a final determination on a dispute.
Additionally, these amendments provide consistent terminology to
differentiate fee disputes under 10 CFR part 15 from fee exemptions
under 10 CFR parts 170 and 171.
Assessment of Annual Fees for Future 10 CFR Part 50 Non-Power
Production or Utilization Facility Licensees and for Small Modular
Reactor Licensees
The NRC is amending Sec. 171.15(a) so that the assessment of
annual fees commences after future non-power production or utilization
facility (NPUF) licensees have successfully completed startup testing
and have provided written notification to the NRC. In addition, the NRC
is renaming the ``research and test reactors'' fee class the ``non-
power production or utilization facilities'' fee class, which would
include currently operating research and test reactors and future
NPUFs, such as non-reactor NPUF technologies. Finally, the NRC is
amending Sec. 171.15(e) so that the assessment of annual fees for a
SMR licensee commences after the successful completion of power
ascension testing and the licensee provides written notification to the
NRC. These policy changes are consistent with the FY 2020 final fee
rule (85 FR 37250; June 19, 2020) that amended the timing of the
assessment of annual fees for future 10 CFR part 50 power reactors and
10 CFR part 52 COL holders.
Currently, Sec. 171.15(a) requires the NRC to assess annual fees
to a test or research reactor (excluding test or research reactors
exempted under Sec. 171.11(b)) when the NRC authorizes the licensee to
use nuclear materials (i.e., begin operating the reactor in accordance
with its license). Prior to this final rule, the NRC had not
established a policy for assessing 10 CFR part 171 annual fees to
future non-reactor NPUF licensees (e.g., SHINE); at this time, the NRC
currently assesses only 10 CFR part 170 service fees to prospective
applicants for preapplication activities, construction permit holders
(i.e., SHINE and Northwest Medical Isotopes, LLC (NWMI)) and applicants
for operating licenses (i.e., SHINE) for commercial NPUFs, as well as
certain operating non-power production or utilization facilities not
exempted under Sec. 170.11. While the NRC's fee regulations do not
include a fee class for future non-reactor NPUF licensees, the NRC
historically has included budgeted resources for NWMI and SHINE within
the research and test reactor fee class. The budgeted resources for
NWMI and SHINE not recovered in 10 CFR part 170 service fees previously
were included in fee-relief. These resources for the development of a
medical isotope production infrastructure are now excluded from the
fee-recovery requirement under NEIMA as a fee-relief activity
identified by the Commission.
In anticipation that the NRC may decide to issue an operating
license in the future, the NRC is revising its regulations to provide
for the assessment of annual fees to NPUFs under Sec. 171.15(a) when
they have notified the NRC of the successful completion of startup
testing. This final rule uses the term ``non-power production or
utilization facility'' to have the same meaning as the definition used
in SECY-19-0062, ``Final Rule:
[[Page 32159]]
Non-power Production or Utilization Facility License Renewal'' (ADAMS
Accession No. ML18031A000), dated June 17, 2019.\4\ The definition
includes production or utilization facilities, licensed under Sec.
50.21(a) or (c), or Sec. 50.22, as applicable, that are not nuclear
power reactors or production facilities within the meaning of
paragraphs (1) and (2) of Sec. 50.2, which defines ``production
facility.'' This definition includes currently operating and future
research and test reactors and proposed medical radioisotope facilities
that would be licensed under 10 CFR part 50. As such, non-reactor NPUF
licensees, such as SHINE, would be included in the same annual fee
class as currently operating research and test reactors that pay 10 CFR
part 171 annual fees. This approach is consistent with the current
approach of combining limited numbers of similar facilities into a
single annual fee category, where ``test reactors'' (of which only one
is currently operational) are assessed the same 10 CFR part 171 annual
fees as ``research reactors.'' In addition, the NRC expects that NPUF
facilities will request that a single license under 10 CFR part 50
authorize the operation of multiple utilization and/or production
facilities. Based on the number of facilities authorized to operate
under a single license, the number of staff hours dedicated to
licensing and oversight activities for these facilities is not expected
to differ significantly compared to those for the current operating
fleet of NPUFs. Furthermore, stakeholders have previously supported
this approach regarding the assessment of 10 CFR part 171 annual fees
for future NPUFs. Therefore, a single annual fee would be appropriate
even where an NPUF licensee has multiple facilities operating under a
single 10 CFR part 50 license.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The NPUF draft final rule would also revise the definition
of research reactor in Sec. Sec. 170.3 and 171.5 to conform to
other definitions in 10 CFR chapter I. The NRC is not proposing to
change the definition of Research reactor in the specific exemption
for federally-owned and State-owned research reactors in Sec.
170.11(a)(9) or Sec. 171.11(b)(2). The current definition in Sec.
171.11(b)(2) is based on the language of OBRA-90. Further, a
substantively similar definition of research reactor was included in
the provisions of NEIMA that relate to the NRC's fee recovery
structure. Changing the definition of research reactor in Sec.
171.11(b)(2) would therefore be inconsistent with NEIMA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
SMR licenses can be issued under 10 CFR part 50 or 52. Currently,
Sec. 171.15 requires the NRC to assess annual fees to a 10 CFR part 50
SMR licensee upon issuance of an operating license, or to a 10 CFR part
52 SMR COL holder after the Commission has made the finding under Sec.
52.103(g) for all licenses held for an SMR site. The annual fee would
be determined using the cumulative licensed thermal power rating of all
SMR units and the bundled unit concept. For a given site, the use of
the bundled unit concept is independent of the number of SMR plants,
the number of SMR licenses issued, and the sequencing of the SMR
licenses that have been issued. There are currently no operating SMRs;
therefore, the NRC has not yet assessed an annual fee for this type of
licensee.
The NRC recognizes that, after the issuance of an operating license
under 10 CFR part 50 for NPUFs and SMRs, or a COL and Sec. 52.103(g)
finding under 10 CFR part 52 for SMRs, fuel or targets (or both) must
be loaded and startup testing (for NPUFs) and power ascension testing
(for SMRs) must be completed before the facility begins full licensed
operation. As discussed in the statement of considerations for the FY
2020 final fee rule, 10 CFR part 52 COLs for power reactors contain a
standard license condition that requires the submittal of written
notification to the NRC upon successful completion of power ascension
testing. Therefore, the NRC will incorporate a similar license
condition into all future 10 CFR part 50 operating licenses for NPUFs
and SMRs, and 10 CFR part 52 COLs for SMRs to ensure that the licensee
will promptly notify the NRC of the successful completion of startup
testing or power ascension testing. The annual fee assessment for
future NPUFs and SMR licenses under 10 CFR part 50, and SMRs under 10
CFR part 52, will begin on the date of the licensee's written
notification of the successful completion of startup testing or power
ascension testing.
Accordingly, the NRC is amending Sec. 171.15(a) and (e) so that
annual fees commence upon written notification to the NRC of successful
completion of startup testing and power ascension testing, rather than
upon issuance of the operating license for 10 CFR part 50 NPUFs and
SMRs, or issuance of the Sec. 52.103(g) finding for 10 CFR part 52 COL
holders for SMRs, but upon written notification to the NRC of
successful completion of startup testing and/or power ascension
testing. The NRC finds this change to 10 CFR part 171 to be reasonable,
fair, and equitable, and to be supported by the public comments the NRC
received on PRM-171-1, which was submitted by Dr. Michael D. Meier on
behalf of the Southern Nuclear Operating Company (ADAMS Accession No.
ML19081A015), and on the FY 2020 proposed fee rule (85 FR 9328;
February 18, 2020). The NRC is also making conforming changes by
revising Sec. 170.3, ``Definitions,'' Sec. 171.3, ``Scope,'' Sec.
171.5, ``Definitions,'' and Sec. 171.17, ``Proration.''
FY 2021--Administrative Changes
The NRC is making seven administrative changes:
1. Change Small Entity Fees.
As stated in SECY-08-0174, ``Fiscal Year 2009 Proposed Fee Rule and
Advance Rulemaking for Grid-Appropriate Reactor Fees,'' dated November
7, 2008 (ADAMS Accession No. ML083120518), the NRC determined that the
maximum small entity fee should be adjusted biennially using a fixed
percentage of 39 percent applied to the prior two-year weighted average
of materials users' fees for all fee categories that have small entity
licensees. The 39 percent was based on the small entity annual fee for
FY 2005, which was the first year the NRC was required to recover only
90 percent of its budget authority. This methodology remains in place;
however, the NRC does also consider whether or not implementing an
increase will have a disproportionate impact on the NRC's small entity
licensees when compared to other licensees. Therefore, the increase for
the upper and lower tier fees were capped at a 21 percent increase.
For the FY 2021 proposed fee rule (86 FR 10459; February 22, 2021),
the NRC conducted a biennial review of small entity fees to determine
whether the NRC should change those fees. The NRC used the fee
methodology, developed in FY 2009, which applies a fixed percentage of
39 percent to the prior two-year weighted average of materials users'
fees, when performing its biennial review. Based on this methodology
and as a result of the FY 2021 biennial review, the NRC is increasing
the upper tier small entity fee from $4,500 to $4,900 and increasing
the lower tier fee from $900 to $1,000. This constitutes a 9 percent
and 11 percent increase, respectively. The NRC believes these fees are
reasonable and provide relief to small entities, while at the same time
recovering from those licensees some of the NRC's costs for activities
that benefit them.
2. Amend Sec. 170.1, ``Purpose,'' to change the reference to the
Independent Offices Appropriation Act, 1952.
The NRC is amending Sec. 170.1 to replace the ``of'' after
Independent Offices Appropriation Act with a comma to make the
reference to the legislation consistent with references in other NRC
contexts.
3. Amend Sec. 170.3, ``Definitions,'' to eliminate definitions for
``Balance of plants,'' ``Nuclear Steam Supply
[[Page 32160]]
System,'' and ``Reference systems concept''.
The NRC is amending Sec. 170.3 to eliminate definitions for
``Balance of plants,'' ``Nuclear Steam Supply System,'' and ``Reference
systems concept.'' These definitions are no longer applicable in 10 CFR
part 170. These definitions were added in the FY 1977 final fee rule
(43 FR 7210; March 23, 1978) to resolve issues concerning assessing
fees for balance of plant reviews, related to a previous fee category
(category A.4.b in the table at Sec. 170.21 for standardized design-
reference systems concept), that was not subject to full cost recovery.
In the FY 1991 final fee rule, the NRC amended 10 CFR parts 52 and 170
to assess licensing fees for the review of standardized reactor
designs, which would be subject to full cost recovery (56 FR 31472;
July 10, 1991). This amendment to eliminate these definitions will not
impact the NRC's assessment of 10 CFR part 170 fees for service.
4. Remove footnote 6 to the table in Sec. 170.21, and footnote 12
to the table in Sec. 170.31.
The NRC is removing footnote 6 to the table in Sec. 170.21 and
footnote 12 to the table in Sec. 170.31 because (1) Congress has not
enacted legislation that would exclude import and export activities
from the fee-recoverable budget in FY 2021; and (2) in accordance with
NEIMA, for FY 2021, the NRC identified international activities as fee-
relief activities, but it did not include resources for import and
export licensing. The NRC, therefore, will charge fees for import and
export licensing actions.
5. Amend Sec. 171.5, ``Definitions,'' to replace the reference in
``Budget authority''.
The NRC is amending the definition of ``budget authority'' to
replace the reference to Public Law 101-508 (i.e., OBRA-90) with a
reference to Public Law 115-439 (i.e., NEIMA). Effective October 1,
2020, NEIMA repealed Section 6101 of OBRA-90 and put in place a revised
fee-recovery framework, requiring the NRC to recover, to the maximum
extent practicable, approximately 100 percent of its annual budget,
less the budget authority for excluded activities.
6. Amend Sec. 171.11(c), ``Exemptions''.
The NRC is revising Sec. 171.11(c) to change the ``or'' in the
section to ``and.'' This change accurately reflects that even when an
exemption is ``in the public interest,'' the NRC cannot grant the
exemption unless it is ``authorized by law.'' This change also
harmonizes Sec. 171.11(c) with Sec. 170.11(b), which uses ``and.''
This change does not alter the NRC's fee exemption policy.
7. Technical Correction.
The NRC is making a technical correction to the program codes
referenced in Sec. Sec. 170.31 and 171.16. Under Sec. Sec. 170.31 and
171.16, the NRC is removing program code 03252 since it is no longer in
use for fee category 3(I). Under Sec. 171.16, the NRC is replacing the
program codes referenced for fee category 3(A)(1) with 04010, 04012,
and 04014 to reflect the correct program codes that should be cited for
this fee category. Currently, 3(A)(1) references program codes 03211,
03212 and 03213. The NRC is also removing program 03235 referenced in
fee category 4(A) since it is used as a secondary program code and no
fees are charged to this code.
Update on the Fees Transformation Initiative
In the staff requirements memorandum (SRM), dated October 19, 2016
(ADAMS Accession No. ML16293A902), for SECY-16-0097, ``Fee Setting
Improvements and Fiscal Year 2017 Proposed Fee Rule'' (ADAMS Accession
No. ML16194A365), the Commission directed the staff to accelerate its
process improvements for setting fees. In addition, the Commission
directed the staff to begin the fees transformation activities listed
in SECY-16-0097 as ``Process Changes Recommended for Future
Consideration--FY 2018 and Beyond.'' The NRC has completed 39 of the 40
fees transformation activities.
The one fees transformation activity yet to be completed is the
rulemaking to update the NRC's small business size standards in Sec.
2.810, ``NRC size standards.'' In FY 2020, the NRC conducted a survey
of materials licensees to collect relevant data to help determine the
need for changes to the NRC's small business size standards in Sec.
2.810. In addition, the NRC considered changes in the small business
size standards published by the Small Business Administration (SBA). On
December 7, 2020, the staff submitted SECY-20-0111, ``Rulemaking Plan
to Amend the Receipts-Based NRC Size Standards,'' to the Commission
(ADAMS Accession No. ML20268B327) with the staff's recommendations for
amending the NRC's receipts-based size standards. In the SRM for SECY-
20-0111 (ADAMS Accession No. ML21029A186), the Commission approved the
staff's recommendation to initiate a rulemaking to amend the NRC's
small business size standards in Sec. Sec. 2.810 and 171.16(c) to
comply with the Small Business Runway Extension Act of 2018 (Runway
Act) and related SBA regulations and to reflect inflation adjustments.
The NRC is currently in the process of developing the proposed rule.
The NRC will continue to include updates on this rulemaking activity
within the FY 2021 and FY 2022 fee rules to ensure that affected
licensees are adequately informed. The public can track all NRC
rulemaking activities, including the rulemaking on the NRC's size
standards, on the NRC's Rulemaking Tracking and Reporting system at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/rulemaking-ruleforum/active/RuleIndex.html, or by Docket ID NRC-2014-0264 at https://www.regulations.gov.
For more information, see the fees transformation accomplishments
schedule, located on the NRC's license fees web page at: https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/licensing/fees-transformation-accomplishments.html.
III. Public Comment Analysis
Overview of Public Comments
The NRC published a proposed rule on February 22, 2021 (86 FR
10459), and requested public comment on its proposed revisions to 10
CFR parts 15, 170, and 171. By the close of the comment period, the NRC
received eight written comment submissions on the FY 2021 proposed
rule. In general, the commenters were supportive of the specific
proposed regulatory changes. Some commenters expressed concerns about
broader fee-policy issues related to transparency, the overall size of
the NRC's budget, fairness of fees, and budget formulation. Some
commenters' concerns were outside the scope of the fee rule.
The commenters are listed in Table XIX.
Table XIX--FY 2021 Proposed Fee Rule Commenter Submissions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADAMS accession
Commenter Affiliation No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andrew Straw................. N/A.................. ML21064A398.
M. Keller.................... Hybrid Power ML21064A399
Technologies LLC.
[[Page 32161]]
Matthew Ostdiek.............. Rendezvous ML21077A246
Engineering, P.C.
(RE).
Gary Peters.................. Framatome............ ML21082A394
Jennifer Uhle................ Nuclear Energy ML21084A747
Institute (NEI).
Cheryl Gayheart.............. Southern Nuclear ML21084A747
Operating Company
(SNC).
Bradley Fewell............... Exelon Generation ML21085A680
Company (Exelon).
Anonymous.................... N/A.................. ML21090A120
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information about obtaining the complete text of the comment
submissions is available in Section XIV, ``Availability of Documents,''
of this document.
IV. Public Comments and NRC Responses
The NRC has carefully considered the public comments received on
the proposed rule. The comments have been organized by topic. Comments
from a single commenter have been quoted to ensure accuracy; brackets
within those comments are used to show changes that have been made to
the quoted comments. The NRC responses are preceded by a short summary
of the issues raised by the commenters.
A. Overhead Costs
Comment: ``The NRC fees are wildly excessive relative to private
industry. The NRC fee is more than engineering firm senior executives
would charge a client. There is simply no question that the NRC
bureaucracy is vast and requires an extremely high overhead cost be
attached to the direct cost associated with NRC staff carrying out
review activities. The NRC fee creates a yearly charge that is more
than the salary of the U.S. president. As long as significantly
excessive fees are charged, there appears to be no incentive for the
NRC to reduce the overhead bloat, the proposed fee should be reduced by
at least 5% every year until the fee is more similar to that of private
industry doing similar work.'' (M. Keller)
Response: The NRC is a Federal agency tasked with protecting the
health and safety of the public and the common defense and security,
and there is no equivalent role found in private industry. Unlike
private industry, all fees that the NRC assesses to applicants and
licensees must conform to statutory requirements under the IOAA and
NEIMA. In other words, the fees that the NRC charges are based in part
on requirements that would not be reflected in the fees charged by
private engineering firms.
The IOAA prescribes the framework for charging fees for government
services. Under the IOAA, fees must be fair and based on the costs to
the Government and value of the service to the recipient. Additionally,
under NEIMA, the NRC is required to recover through fees, to the
maximum extent practicable, approximately 100 percent of its annual
budget authority, less the budget authority for excluded activities.
Under NEIMA the NRC must also use its IOAA authority first to collect
10 CFR part 170 service fees for NRC work that provides specific
benefits to identifiable recipients, such as licensing activities,
inspections, and special projects.
To comply with these laws, the NRC establishes a professional
hourly rate for its work. Consistent with the IOAA, the professional
hourly rate is derived by adding budgeted resources for: (1) Mission-
direct program salaries and benefits; (2) mission-indirect program
support; and (3) agency support, which includes corporate support and
the Inspector General. The NRC then subtracts certain offsetting
receipts and divides this total by the mission-direct FTE converted to
hours (the mission-direct FTE converted to hours is the product of the
mission-direct FTE multiplied by the estimated annual mission-direct
FTE productive hours). The only budgeted resources excluded from the
professional hourly rate are those for contract activities related to
mission-direct contract resources, which are generally billed to
licensees separately. Because the NRC's fee recovery under the IOAA (10
CFR part 170) will not equal 100 percent of the agency's total budget
authority for the fiscal year (less the budget authority for excluded
activities), the NRC also assesses annual fees under 10 CFR part 171 to
recover the remaining amount necessary to comply with NEIMA.
No change was made to the final rule in response to this comment.
B. Operating Power Reactors Decline in the Budget and 10 CFR Part 170
Estimated Billings
Comment: ``Over the past five years, Part 170 service fee
collections have decreased by over 20%. This reduction is even more
dramatic for the operating plant fee class from which over 85% of
service fees are collected, where Part 170 service fee collections have
decreased by 45%. While there has been a reduction in the NRC operating
plant budget during this time, the reduction has not kept pace with the
reduction in operating plant service fee collections. As a result, a
greater percentage of the budget is required to be recovered through
annual fees. The percentage of the operating plant budget that is
derived from annual fees (currently at 73%) continues to increase; up
from 62% in FY 2016. As noted in the fee rule notices and associated
work papers, the reductions in service fee collections in recent years
have been attributable, in part, to plant closures. These closures were
announced well in advance and should have enabled adjustments to be
made to properly align the NRC budget to reflect smaller projected
workloads. With a number of announced nuclear plant closures in FY 2022
and subsequent years, the downward trend in Part 170 service fee
collections will continue. It is not realistic to expect a decreasing
number of operating plants to support a budget that, on a per plant
basis, is appreciably increasing. The anticipated reduction in Part 170
service fee collections places a strong obligation on the NRC to ensure
that staffing levels and budgets are properly aligned to reflect
smaller projected workloads. The NRC should take all necessary steps to
continue and expedite its efficiency efforts. Given the maturity of the
U.S. nuclear fleet, in combination with its high level of operational
performance and a demonstrated level of safety, timely reductions in
unnecessary regulatory burden are appropriate. We are encouraged by
efforts underway to transform NRC into a modern risk-informed
regulator. It is imperative that these efforts continue.'' (NEI)
Response: The relationship between 10 CFR part 170 (service fees)
relative to 10 CFR part 171 (annual fees) is workload-driven. The
activities covered by 10 CFR part 171 annual fees are necessary for the
NRC to accomplish its safety and security mission as described and
justified in the CBJ. The amount of
[[Page 32162]]
service fees collected under 10 CFR part 170, on the other hand,
depends on several factors, including the professional hourly rate,
licensee and applicant decisions to pursue licensing actions, and the
number of hours necessary to resolve any licensing actions.
Since FY 2016, the fee class budget for operating power reactors
has decreased from $750.4 million in FY 2016 to $611.8 million in FY
2021. This represents a reduction of $138.6 million, or approximately
18 percent, as a result of the decreasing number of nuclear power
reactor licensees, application delays and withdrawals, fewer license
amendment requests being submitted, efficiencies gained with the merger
of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation and the Office of New
Reactors, and long-term project completions. Over this same period, the
10 CFR part 170 estimated billings for the operating power reactors fee
class have declined from $287.8 million in FY 2016 to $157.0 million in
FY 2021, which represents a decline of $130.8 million, or approximately
45 percent. As compared to FY 2016, the operating power reactors fee
class annual fee has declined from $465.9 million in FY 2016 to $446.8
million in FY 2021, which represents a decrease of $19.1 million, or
approximately 4 percent. These changes in the budgetary resources and
the 10 CFR part 170 estimated billings, as well as other adjustments
(including billing adjustments, generic transportation, and the LLW
surcharge) and the elimination of the fee-relief surcharge or credit in
FY 2021, alter the amount of fee-recoverable budgeted resources that
are required to be collected through 10 CFR part 171 annual fees from
the operating power reactors fee class.
With respect to expediting efficiency efforts, the NRC continues to
review its budget and pursue additional efficiency improvements related
to budget formulation such as pursuing the use of analytical tools
(e.g., dashboards), to help the NRC analyze and report data quicker and
more consistently and to support a more efficient and risk-informed
budget formulation process. When formulating the budget, the NRC takes
into consideration: (1) Projected operating power plant closures; (2)
workload forecasting, including workload drivers, analysis of
historical data and trends, and communication with stakeholders; (3)
the estimated level of effort for regulatory activities and yearly
recurring activities; and (4) other external factors that may impact
how the NRC meets its statutory responsibilities as the industry
changes. However, the NRC budget is not linearly proportional to the
size of the operating power reactor fleet, as there is a cost for the
infrastructure that must be maintained independent of the number of
operating power reactors in the fleet.
The NRC is required by NEIMA to recover, to the maximum extent
practicable, approximately 100 percent of its annual budget authority,
less the budget authority for excluded activities. NEIMA also caps the
per-licensee annual fee for operating reactors, to the maximum extent
practicable, at the FY 2015 annual fee amount as adjusted for
inflation. The NRC continues to evaluate resource requirements and
adjustments that can be made to refine the operating power reactors
budget.
Finally, the NRC remains committed to providing enhanced
transparency throughout the development of the annual fee rule and
supporting work papers.
No changes were made to this final rule as a result of these
comments.
Comment: ``The FY 2021 Proposed Fee Rule continues to shift the
burden created by overestimating Part 170 fee collections reflected in
the NRC's appropriated budget to the recovery of Part 171 annual fees.
While Exelon appreciates the challenge of precisely estimating the
amount of Part 170 fees that will be recovered two years in advance due
to the budget cycle, we note that this is precisely the problem that
NEIMA intended to address. The Conference Report for NEIMA describes
exactly this challenge in explaining the basis for the law: ``Several
problems arise from [the OBRA-90] structure. If the NRC overestimates
the amount of revenue it expect [sic] to collect under Part 170, it
must recover the resulting revenue shortfall through Part 171 fees in
order to meet the OBRA-90 mandate for 90 percent fee recovery.'' The
Congress noted that this situation ``highlight[s] the need for the NRC
to budget more accurately and recover fees for work that is actually
conducted.'' It is clear, therefore, that Congress designed NEIMA with
the existing challenges of the budget cycle in mind. Notwithstanding
Congress's clear intent in this regard, the FY 2021 Proposed Fee Rule
would continue to shift the impacts of Part 170 overbudgeting to Part
171 annual fees, which does not appear to take advantage of the
significantly greater flexibilities in NEIMA with respect to the
portions of its appropriated budget that the NRC must collect through
fees.'' In addition to this comment submission, this response addresses
similar comments made during the March 18, 2021, public meeting to
discuss the FY 2021 proposed fee rule. (Exelon)
Response: The NRC disagrees with the commenter's suggestion that
the allocation of service fees versus annual fees in the FY 2021
proposed fee rule might be inconsistent with congressional intent
underlying NEIMA. Under NEIMA, the NRC is still required to recover
through fees the total appropriated budget (with the exception of
discrete categories of budget authority), and to do so through a
combination of both service fees and annual fees. Specifically, NEIMA
requires the NRC to recover, to the maximum extent practicable,
approximately 100 percent of its total budget authority for the fiscal
year, less the budget authority for excluded activities.
The NRC is fully in compliance with NEIMA. The NRC identified fee-
relief activities in the FY 2021 CBJ (which were consistent with the
fee-relief activities identified in the FY 2020 fee rule, with the
exception of international activities, not including the resources for
import and export licensing) and the FY 2021 final fee rule maintains
those same fee-relief activities. The Congressional report referenced
by the commenter as support for the proposition that NEIMA was intended
to provide the NRC ``significantly greater flexibilities'' regarding
fee collection is not a conference report, but rather a report issued
by the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works (Senate Report
115-86). At the time when the bill was reported by the Senate Committee
on Environment and Public Works, the bill would have limited fee-relief
activities to those identified in the FY 2015 final fee rule. This is
inconsistent with the commenter's suggestion that this Congressional
report reflects an intent for NEIMA to provide the NRC with greater
flexibility in determining what portions of the appropriated budget are
recovered through fees. The Congressional report in fact contains
statements reflecting an intention that the NRC, under NEIMA, would
collect fees based on the agency's workload, but the amount not
recovered through fees would generally be unaffected. For example, the
report states that ``[c]onsistent with current practice, the taxpayer
continues to pay only for the items explicitly outlined in the law as
appropriated items and the rest of the NRC's budget is to be recovered
through fees[;] [a]s such, the cost to the taxpayer is generally
unaffected but the fee recovery will be determined by the agency's
workload rather than a mandated percentage.''
[[Page 32163]]
The FY 2021 CBJ provided the agency's explanation and justification
for the resources being requested to allow the agency to complete its
mission, and the reason for changes in the budget request for the NRC
as compared to the prior year, at the business line and product line
levels. Appendix C of the FY 2021 CBJ was included with the intent to
increase transparency with stakeholders. The NRC developed this
estimate based on the NRC staff's allocation of the FY 2021 budget
request to fee classes under 10 CFR part 170 and allocations within the
operating power reactors fee class under 10 CFR part 171, as well as
certain data assumptions and historical information available during
the FY 2021 budget formulation process.
Consistent with NEIMA, when developing the annual fee rule, the NRC
had to take into account changes that occurred in the two-year interval
between the development of the FY 2021 budget request, which began in
FY 2019, and the enactment of the FY 2021 appropriation in December
2020. As part of the development of the annual fee rule, the NRC
estimates the amount of 10 CFR part 170 service fees by each fee class
by analyzing billing data and the actual cost of work under NRC
contracts that was charged to licensees and applicants for the previous
four quarters. The estimate, therefore, reflects any recent changes in
the NRC's regulatory activities.
The FY 2021 proposed rule utilized four quarters of the prior year
invoice data, while the NRC is using a combination of two quarters of
the prior year and two quarters of the current year billing data (which
is also updated to reflect workload changes) for the FY 2021 final
rule. In the FY 2021 proposed fee rule, the 10 CFR part 170 estimated
billings were $157.0 million compared to the $188.3 million that was
included in the FY 2021 CBJ. The decline in 10 CFR part 170 estimated
billings was primarily due to: (1) The plant closures of Indian Point
Unit 3 in April 2021 and Duane Arnold in October 2020; (2) the
completion of construction activities at Vogtle Unit 3; (3) the
completion of the NuScale SMR design certification review; and (4) the
impact of continued travel restrictions and limited on-site presence on
inspection activities due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The NRC continues to actively evaluate resource requirements to
address changes that occur between budget formulation and execution,
and to pursue improvements that enhance the accuracy of projections
used in budget formulation. For example, the NRC considers projected
operating power plant closures and other external factors when
estimating workload changes in a manner that allows the agency to meet
its statutory responsibilities as the industry changes. The NRC also
seeks information from licensees and other entities relevant to
projected workload through public meetings and other forms of public
outreach, to better inform the NRC's budget formulation workload
assumptions. Ultimately, however, the NRC budget is not linearly
proportional to the size of the operating fleet, as there is a cost for
the agency infrastructure that must be maintained independent of the
number of operating power reactors in the fleet.
No changes were made to this final rule as a result of these
comments.
C. Fee-Relief Adjustment and NEIMA
Comment: ``In the FY 2021 Proposed Fee Rule, the NRC did not make a
``fee-relief adjustment'' that it has made in past years on the basis
that ``[b]ecause NEIMA eliminated the approximately 90 percent
requirement for fee recovery and, in turn, the 10 percent limit on fee-
relief activities, the NRC will no longer provide a fee-relief credit
or assess a fee-relief surcharge as part of the calculation of annual
fees for each licensee fee class.'' However, nowhere in NEIMA itself
nor in the legislative history did Congress direct the NRC to eliminate
fee-relief adjustments. NEIMA specifically requires the deduction of
``any fee relief activity, as identified by the Commission,'' which
seems on its face to provide significant flexibility to the Commission
to make necessary adjustments since ``any fee relief activity'' is not
defined in the statute or the legislative history. The Proposed Fee
Rule expressly acknowledges that the exclusion of fee relief activities
is required by NEIMA as part of ``Excluded Activities'' to be excluded
from fee recovery. But as explained in the Proposed Fee Rule, ``[i]n FY
2021, the fee-relief activities identified by the Commission are
consistent with prior final fee rules'' with the exception of some
international activities. In other words, while NEIMA made it possible
for the NRC to define ``fee relief activities'' in a way that could
have accounted for Part 170 over-budgeting, the Proposed Rule
essentially maintains the same constraints that existed under OBRA-90.
This interpretation was not mandated by Congress, nor does it appear to
align with the NRC's overall vision to become a ``modern, risk-informed
regulator'' that values innovative approaches to problem solving.''
(Exelon)
Response: The NRC disagrees with the commenter's suggestion that
NEIMA allows for the NRC to provide fee-relief adjustments that would
give licensees a possible credit or surcharge like under the OBRA-90
framework. NEIMA requires the NRC to recover, to the maximum extent
practicable, approximately 100 percent of its total budget authority
for the fiscal year, less the budget authority for excluded activities,
one of which is fee-relief activities as identified by the Commission.
Under NEIMA the NRC must also use its IOAA authority first to collect
10 CFR part 170 service fees for NRC work that provides specific
benefits to identifiable recipients, such as licensing activities,
inspections, and special projects.
Eliminating the fee-relief adjustment increases the predictability
for licensees in forecasting their annual fees. The NRC discussed the
elimination of the 10 percent fee-relief credit or surcharge in FY 2021
during the FY 2020 proposed fee rule public meeting on March 5, 2020
(ADAMS Accession No. ML20077G458), where the agency explained how the
elimination of the credit or surcharge would make a licensee's annual
fees more predictable.
For example, if the FY 2021 fee rule had, hypothetically, remained
governed by OBRA-90 and the 10 percent allowance for fee relief
specified in OBRA-90 applied, there would have been a surcharge of $9.9
million to all licensees in the FY 2021 fee rule. The NRC's FY 2021
appropriation totaled $844.4 million, so a 10 percent allowance would
have resulted in $81.3 million for fee-relief activities. However, the
FY 2021 proposed fee rule and supporting work papers illustrate that
the NRC's budget for fee-relief activities during FY 2021 totaled $91.2
million for activities not attributable to an existing licensee or
class of licensees and activities not assessed fees based on existing
law or Commission policy. This would have resulted in an overage of
$9.9 million if the OBRA-90 framework applied.
In addition, the commenter suggests that the NRC should put in fee-
relief activities (instead of 10 CFR part 171 annual fees) the budgeted
resources that were anticipated to be used for 10 CFR part 170 work
(e.g., licensing and oversight regulatory activities), but will
ultimately not be used for 10 CFR part 170 work this fiscal year (i.e.,
the differences in the 10 CFR part 170 estimated billings shown in
Appendix C of the FY 2021 CBJ compared to the FY 2021 final fee rule).
These resources were anticipated to be used for 10 CFR part 170 work
for the operating power
[[Page 32164]]
reactors fee class as shown in Appendix C of the CBJ, which was
developed based on the NRC staff's allocation of the FY 2021 budget
request to fee classes under 10 CFR part 170 and allocations within the
operating power reactors fee class under 10 CFR part 171, as well as
certain data assumptions and historical information that was available
during the FY 2021 budget formulation process. Consistent with NEIMA,
when developing the annual fee rule, the NRC had to take into account
changes that occurred in the two-year interval between the development
of the FY 2021 budget request, which began in FY 2019, and the
enactment of the FY 2021 appropriation in December 2020. In developing
the FY 2021 fee rule, the NRC estimated the amount of 10 CFR part 170
service fees by each fee class by analyzing billing data and the actual
cost of work under NRC contracts that was charged to licensees and
applicants for the previous four quarters. Because the NRC's fee
recovery under the IOAA (10 CFR part 170) will not equal 100 percent of
the agency's total budget authority for the fiscal year (less the
budget authority for excluded activities), the NRC must assess annual
fees under 10 CFR part 171 to recover the remaining amount necessary to
comply with NEIMA. NEIMA requires the NRC to establish a schedule of
annual fees that fairly and equitably allocates budgeted resources.
While these resources were anticipated to be used for 10 CFR part 170
work for the operating power reactors fee class, the resources have
been shifted to being used for work that is recovered through 10 CFR
part 171 because it will benefit the operating power reactors fee
class. Thus, the NRC has appropriately included the resources in 10 CFR
part 171 fees for this fee class.
Fee-relief activities identified by the Commission fall into two
categories: (1) Activities not attributable to an existing licensee or
class of licensees, and (2) activities not assessed 10 CFR part 170 or
171 fees based on existing law or Commission policy. The categories of
fee-relief activities are identified in the FY 2021 proposed fee rule
in Table I Excluded Activities and were also discussed during the FY
2021 proposed fee rule public meeting on March 18, 2021. The fee relief
activities identified by the Commission reflect a fair and equitable
allocation of resources.
No changes were made to this final rule as a result of these
comments.
D. Corporate Support Cap and the Fee Rule Work Papers
Comment: One commenter stated that ``One of NEIMA's requirements is
the limitation of Corporate Support costs as a percentage of total
budget authority, to the maximum extent practicable. Exelon suggests
that the fee rule explain whether the Corporate Support costs are under
the NEIMA limit. NRC should also demonstrate, either in the fee rule or
the work papers, how the Corporate Support cost as a percentage of
total budget authority is determined. For FY 2021, NEIMA limits
Corporate Support costs (to the maximum extent practicable) to 30
percent of the NRC's total budget authority. During the March 18, 2021
NRC public meeting on the Proposed Fee Rule, the staff explained that
Corporate Support costs for FY2021 totaled 31% of the agency's overall
budget. However, the work papers for the determination of the
professional hourly rate includes approximately $284M for Corporate
Support (with IG), which amounts to approximately 34% of the overall
budget authority of $844M. The NRC should clearly explain in the fee
rule how it arrived at the 31% allocation that it described during the
public meeting.'' (Exelon)
Response: Section 102(a)(3) of NEIMA requires that, to the maximum
extent practicable, the corporate support costs requested in the annual
budget justification provided to Congress not exceed a specified
percentage of the total budget authority requested for the NRC in its
annual budget justification (Section 102(a)(3)(A) includes the
percentage applicable to the annual budget justification for FY 2021).
As stated in the Executive Summary to the FY 2021 CBJ, the corporate
support request was approximately 31 percent of the agency's total
requested budget authority and reflects the agency's efforts to comply
with Section 102(a)(3)(A) of NEIMA to the maximum extent practicable.
The FY 2021 CBJ noted that further reductions to corporate support in
FY 2021 were not feasible and would jeopardize the corporate activities
necessary to accomplish the agency's mission. Pages 83-86 of the FY
2021 CBJ provide more specific information on the corporate support
costs by product line that comprised the 31 percent referenced during
the March 18, 2021, public meeting. The corporate support business line
resources total approximately $271.4 million in FY 2021, as shown on
page 83 of the FY 2021 CBJ. Corporate support does not include
Inspector General budgetary resources. The percent corporate support is
calculated by dividing $271.4 million by $863.4 million, which is 31
percent of the agency's total requested budget authority.
Section 102(a)(3) of NEIMA as it pertains to the corporate support
cap applicable to the annual budget justification does not apply to the
annual fee rule. In the FY 2021 proposed fee rule and supporting work
papers, the NRC's professional hourly rate calculation was derived by
adding, in part, resources for agency support, which include both
corporate support and the Inspector General. The agency support
(corporate support and the Inspector General) resources in the FY 2021
proposed fee rule total $283.7 million, or approximately 34 percent
when dividing by $844.4 million. In addition, the NRC's overall budget
authority was reduced by $19.0 million (and Congress, in turn, directed
the NRC to use carryover funding, as further discussed in the ``FY 2021
Fee Collection--Overview'' section of this document). Also, the FY 2021
fee rule is based on the enacted budget, not the budget request. The
agency will continue efforts to implement efficiencies and invest
resources in initiatives that will result in future savings in
corporate support activities.
No changes were made to this final rule as a result of these
comments.
E. 10 CFR Part 171 Operating Power Reactors Fee Class Invoicing
Comment: ``As noted in the Proposed Fee Rule, NRC has improved the
accuracy and clarity of Part 170 service fee invoicing, e.g., via
internal auditing and development of Enterprise Project Identifiers
(EPID). Exelon acknowledges and salutes the NRC's success in this area.
However, as accuracy and clarity in hourly fees collected under Part
170 has increased, the actual amount of fees collected under Part 170
has decreased. Exelon understands that the numerous line item numbers
shown in the work papers' Power Reactors Fee Class details are
themselves the summations of multiple other supporting calculations
apparently too detailed to provide. Numerous as these line items are,
their general nature makes understanding difficult for an outside
reviewer. Exelon suggests that some ``pointer'' designation be
developed, similar to the EPID/CAC system used for Part 170 fees [ ]
and included in the quarterly Part 171 reactor fee invoicing. This way,
the details of which line items will be funded via reactor fee
invoicing within a given calendar year quarter may be better tracked
back to the work papers, allowing constructive dialogue between NRC and
reactor licensees regarding the applicability of a particular line item
to that licensee.'' (Exelon)
Response: With respect to 10 CFR part 171, it would be impractical
for the NRC
[[Page 32165]]
to provide a ``pointer,'' such as the budget string, since annual fees
are a recovery of remaining costs associated with the particular
business line budget reconciled to a fee class.
The fee rule and its supporting work papers are published so the
public and licensees can understand how fees are determined for a fee
class and a fee category. Consistent with the requirements of NEIMA,
annual fees are calculated by business lines, product lines, and
products based on the budget authority enacted for the current fiscal
year. The NRC provides those business lines, product lines, and
products in the fee rule work papers. The CBJ provides the agency
explanation and justification for the resources being requested for the
budget year, including increases and decreases, and the reason for
changes in the budget request for the agency as compared to the prior
year, at the business line and product line levels; it also includes
the prior year actual amounts at the business line and product line
levels.
Under NEIMA, the NRC must recover, to the maximum extent
practicable, approximately 100 percent of its annual budget, less the
budget authority for excluded activities. Under NEIMA, the NRC must use
its IOAA authority first to collect 10 CFR part 170 service fees for
NRC work that provides specific benefits to identifiable recipients,
such as licensing activities, inspections, and special projects. In so
doing, the NRC establishes a professional hourly rate for its work. The
10 CFR part 170 direct work performed is included on the quarterly
invoice, which includes the CAC/EPID combination, charges, and the
name(s) of the person(s) conducting the activities associated with the
respective licensee fee class. With respect to 10 CFR part 170 service
fees, the NRC staff time spent on licensing and inspection activities
is subject to change, depending on the novelty and complexity of the
application (e.g., new licenses, renewals, amendments, special
projects) under review or the facility being inspected.
Because the NRC's fee recovery under the IOAA (10 CFR part 170)
will not equal 100 percent of the agency's total budget authority for
the fiscal year (less the budget authority for excluded activities),
the NRC also assesses annual fees under 10 CFR part 171 to recover the
remaining amount necessary to comply with NEIMA. Thus, providing a
``pointer'' for annual fees such as the budget string, as suggested by
the commenter, would be impractical.
At the same time, to increase transparency, the NRC first
incorporated a reconciliation of the FY 2020 CBJ resources by business
line to the associated fee class in the FY 2020 fee rule work papers so
that stakeholders can trace the CBJ business line budgets to the
resources recovered within each fee class budget by product line. The
FY 2021 fee rule work papers include the reconciliation of the FY 2021
CBJ to the respective fee class. The NRC continues to strive to enhance
transparency of how fees are determined.
No changes were made to the final rule as a result of this comment.
F. Public Participation in Budget Formulation
Comment: ``Exelon supports the comments of the Nuclear Energy
Institute on the FY 2021 Proposed Fee Rule. Given that there is no
formal way for stakeholders to provide input into the formulation of
the NRC's annual budget, Exelon encourages the NRC to consider these
comments as part of its next budget and fee formulation process. Exelon
respects the objective judgment that NRC exercises as an independent
safety regulator. However, Exelon encourages the NRC to seek ways to
improve its interactions with the regulated industry during budget
development, within the limits required to maintain NRC independence.''
(Exelon)
Response: The NRC seeks information from licensees and other
entities relevant to projected workload, through public meetings and
other forms of public outreach, to better inform the NRC's budget
formulation workload assumptions. This public outreach provides an
opportunity for the regulated industry to provide information to inform
the NRC budget. However, as noted in the comment, the NRC is an
independent regulator, and to preserve its independence the NRC does
not involve non-government organizations and members of the public in
budget formulation. In addition, OMB establishes the Executive Branch
budget process through OMB Circular No. A-11, ``Preparation,
Submission, and Execution of the Budget.'' Section 22.1 of OMB Circular
No. A-11 requires that pre-decisional budget deliberations remain
confidential until the release of the President's budget request (and,
in turn, the CBJ).
No changes were made to this final rule as a result of these
comments.
G. Small Entity
Comment: One commenter had comments regarding the NRC's small
entity size standards and that the NRC should consider establishing
lower licensing fees by creating one or more additional ranges between
the $520,000 and $7,000,000 gross annual receipts range. The commenter
stated that a fee rate schedule with more steps for small businesses
would help reduce the license fee burden on the smaller entities and
help small business concerns. (RE)
Response: To reduce the significance of the annual fees on a
substantial number of small entities, the NRC established the maximum
small entity fee in FY 1991. In FY 1992, the NRC introduced a second
lower tier to the small entity fee. Because the NRC's methodology for
small entity size standards has been approved by the SBA, the NRC did
not modify its current methodology for this rulemaking.
In FY 2020, the NRC conducted a survey of materials licensees to
collect relevant data to help determine the need for changes to the
NRC's small business size standards in Sec. 2.810. In addition, the
NRC considered changes in the small business size standards published
by the SBA.
On December 7, 2020, the staff submitted SECY-20-0111, ``Rulemaking
Plan to Amend the Receipts-Based NRC Size Standards,'' to the
Commission (ADAMS Accession No. ML20268B327) with the staff's
recommendations for amending the NRC's receipts-based size standards.
While the NRC staff recommended making inflation-related increases and
adjusting the methodology for consistency with SBA regulations, the
survey results did not suggest that the NRC should change its small
entity size standards. In the SRM for SECY-20-0111 (ADAMS Accession No.
ML21029A186), the Commission approved the staff's recommendation to
initiate a rulemaking to amend the NRC's small business size standards
in Sec. 2.810 and to comply with the Runway Act and related SBA
regulations and to reflect inflation adjustments, which will be part of
a separate rulemaking activity. Also, as part of that rulemaking
activity, analogous to the proposed inflation adjustment in Sec.
2.810, the NRC will be proposing to increase the upper tier and lower
tier receipts-based small entity size standards in Sec. 171.16(c).
The NRC is currently in the process of developing the proposed rule
for the small entity rulemaking activity. The NRC will continue to
include updates on this rulemaking activity in the Federal Register
notifications associated with the FY 2021 and FY 2022 fee rules to
ensure that affected licensees are adequately informed. The public can
track all NRC rulemaking activities, including the rulemaking on the
NRC's size standards, on the NRC's Rulemaking Tracking and Reporting
[[Page 32166]]
system at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/rulemaking-ruleforum/active/RuleIndex.html, or by Docket ID NRC-2014-0264 at
https://www.regulations.gov.
No change was made to this final rule in response to this comment.
Comment: One commenter had questions regarding the categories of
licensees that can qualify as small entities, and the categories of
licensees whose average users' fees are used to determine the maximum
small entity fee. (Anonymous)
Response: In implementing the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980,
as amended, the NRC ultimately determined that it was appropriate for
the agency to establish its own size standards that were consistent
with the NRC's regulatory activities. The NRC classifies its small
business licensees by their use of nuclear materials since the NRC's
materials categories cover a mix of industries. The NRC's materials
licensees can use the size standards criteria to quality as a small
entity for a reduced annual fee. The NRC's industry specific size
standards were approved by the SBA.
License types that allow a licensee to be eligible to qualify as a
small entity and pay a reduced annual fee are listed under Sec.
171.16. These include materials licenses (i.e., 10 CFR parts 30, 40,
70, 71, and 76 licenses) and 10 CFR part 72 licenses. The prior two-
year weighted average of service fees for the qualifying fee categories
that have small entity licensees is used in the biennial adjustment of
the maximum small entity fee. Average service fees for types of
licenses (e.g., 10 CFR part 50 licenses) that do not allow a licensee
to be eligible to qualify as a small entity are not used in the
determination of small entity fees.
No change was made to this final rule in response to this comment.
H. Definition of Research Reactor Under Sec. 170.11, Sec. 171.11, and
NEIMA
Comment: ``NEIMA's exemption of a research reactor is a reactor
licensed under section 104c of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954. It does
not mention that it needs to be ``Federal-owned and State-Owned
research reactors used primarily for educational proposes.'' So any
Research Reactor licensed under 104c of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954
and meets the requirement of operations list should be except [sic]
from fees. 10 CFR 170.11 and 10 CFR 171.11 need to be changed to
reflect NEIMA definition of exempt. Having research and test reactors
exempt from both annual and performance fees would encourage private
investment as NEIMA was trying to do.'' (Anonymous)
Response: The NRC disagrees with this commenter's position that, in
order to be consistent with NEIMA, the NRC should change the definition
of ``research reactor'' in Sec. Sec. 170.11 and 171.11 to exempt from
fees all research reactors licensed under Section 104c. of the Atomic
Energy Act (AEA). First, NEIMA (in Section 102(b)(3)(D)(ii)) makes the
annual fee exemption applicable for ``federally owned research reactor
used primarily for educational training and academic research
purposes.'' In addition, the primary purpose of this rule is to update
the NRC's fee schedules to recover, to the maximum extent practicable,
approximately 100 percent of the NRC's total budget authority for the
current fiscal year, less the budget authority for excluded activities,
and to make other necessary corrections or appropriate changes to
specific aspects of the NRC's fee regulations in order to ensure
compliance with NEIMA.
The NRC has not proposed changing the definition of ``research
reactor,'' or the types of research reactors that are exempt (i.e.,
Federally-owned and State-owned research reactors used primarily for
educational training and academic research purposes) in the specific
exemptions in Sec. 170.11(a)(9) or Sec. 171.11(b)(2). The current
``research reactor'' definition in Sec. Sec. 170.11(a)(9) and
171.11(b)(2), and the types of research reactors that are exempt from
annual fees, stemmed from language in OBRA-90. NEIMA included
substantively similar fee exemption language for research reactors.
Changing the definition of ``research reactor'' in Sec. 170.11(a)(9)
or Sec. 171.11(b)(2), or the types of research reactors that are
exempt from fees pursuant to Sec. Sec. 170.11(a)(9) and 171.11(b)(2),
to include all research reactors licensed under Section 104c. of the
AEA would not be consistent with the exemption provision in NEIMA or
its predecessor in OBRA-90.
Section 106 of NEIMA, ``Encouraging private investment in research
and test reactors,'' pertains to the financial criteria used to
determine whether a utilization facility is licensed as a commercial
facility under Section 103 of the AEA, ``Commercial Licenses,'' or as a
research and development facility under paragraph c of Section 104,
``Medical Therapy and Research and Development,'' of the AEA. This
subject of this provision of NEIMA does not relate to fees and is
outside the scope of this final rule.
No change was made to this final rule in response to this comment.
I. Accurate Invoicing
Comment: ``What are the policies for fairness? We've disputed
invoices in the [past] because the NRC had already completed a task, we
had been shut down for years and there was no need for the NRC to
restudy, investigate or review the issue. Yet, we were told that the
charges were valid because the employee did indeed work the hours they
said on the project. Is it fair for us to have to pay for the same work
twice? We don't think so and the public would not think so. We can't
tell from our recent billings what activity within a project. For
example, an inspector or auditor comes out and visits. Then they go
back and write their report and ask RAI, etc. We only get total hours
worked on the project, not how much time it took them to write the
report, how much time did [they] work on specific items they are
reporting on. That would be useful information to us the licensee.''
(Anonymous)
Response: The NRC is firmly committed to the application of
fairness and equity in the assessment of fees. NEIMA requires the NRC
to establish a schedule of fees that fairly and equitably allocates
these fees among the NRC's licensees and certificate holders. As part
of this process, each year the NRC reassesses and publishes a proposed
rule and final rule of the revisions of the fee schedules for each
license fee class. As stated in the proposed rule, under NEIMA, the NRC
must recover, to the maximum extent practicable, approximately 100
percent of its annual budget, less the budget authority for excluded
activities. The NRC must use its IOAA authority first to collect
service fees for NRC work that provides specific benefits to
identifiable recipients (such as licensing activities, inspections, and
special projects). Because the NRC's fee recovery under the IOAA for 10
CFR part 170 fees for service will not equal 100 percent of the
agency's total budget authority for the fiscal year (less the budget
authority for excluded activities), the NRC also assesses annual fees
under 10 CFR part 171 to recover the remaining amount necessary to
comply with NEIMA. In the FY 2021 proposed fee rule, each license fee
class includes the specific information to detail how the annual fees
are derived, such as the budgetary resources, and 10 CFR part 170
estimated billings for direct activities, specific adjustments, the
explanations for the changes, and the comparison to the prior fiscal
year in order to derive the 10 CFR part 171 annual fees.
Additionally, Section 102(d) of NEIMA required three sets of
actions
[[Page 32167]]
related to NRC invoices for service fees assessed under 10 CFR part
170. First, as stated in Section 102(d)(1) of NEIMA, the NRC must
``ensure appropriate review and approval prior to the issuance of
invoices'' for service fees. Second, as stated in Section 102(d)(2) of
NEIMA, the NRC must ``develop and implement processes to audit invoices
[for 10 CFR part 170 service fees] to ensure accuracy, transparency,
and fairness.'' Third, as stated in Section 102(d)(3) of NEIMA, the NRC
is required to ``modify regulations to ensure fair and appropriate
processes to provide licensees and applicants an opportunity to
efficiently dispute or otherwise seek review and correction of errors
in invoices'' for service fees.
For the first two sets of actions, the NRC developed and
implemented process improvements to ensure accurate invoicing, which
include, but is not limited to the following: (1) Implementing a
process to standardize the validation of fees to ensure that fee
billing data is correct before appearing on a licensee's invoice; (2)
redesigning the invoices to add clarity and transparency for its
stakeholders such as including the names of individual NRC staff and/or
contractor companies, if applicable, who had performed the work
associated with the charges; and (3) implementing a new data structure
to more effectively account for and track all billable work at the
project level with an EPID data element, which provides useful details
regarding the type of project or work that is being billed. Using this
data structure allows NRC licensees and other persons assessed service
fees to identify how many hours are being expended on each of the
various activities within a project.
For the third set of actions, as discussed in the proposed rule,
the NRC has developed and is implementing requirements for a standard
method for licensees and applicants to efficiently dispute or seek
review and correction of errors in invoices, which is illustrated in
the process map, ``NRC Form 529, Processing Dispute of Fees-For-Service
Charges'' (ADAMS Accession No. ML20311A159). Additionally, the NRC is
modifying its regulations related to accurate invoicing to clearly
outline the interactions between the submitter and the NRC and enhance
clarity regarding the dispute process by setting out: (1) The process
for submitting a fee dispute, (2) the stages of the decisionmaking
process while the dispute is under review, and (3) the manner by which
the NRC will notify a debtor after it makes a final determination on a
dispute.
Finally, regarding the commenter's specific comments on the
regulatory activities that the NRC has previously conducted and billed
to the commenter (e.g., inspection activities, reports, and requests
for additional information on projects), this is outside scope of this
final rule. If the commenter has specific questions regarding NRC
invoices and fees that have been assessed, the commenter can contact
the Office of the Chief Financial Officer via the eBilling system
support portal, by email to [email protected], or by
mail to the Office of the Chief Financial Officer at U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attn: Chief Financial
Officer.
No change was made to this final rule in response to this comment.
Comment: ``NRC Form 529 on page 2 has a list [of] 7 pre-conditions
that you must certify that you have done. One of them is I Certify that
the NRC Form 527 ``Request for Information Related to Fees-for-
Service'' was submitted and a response was received by my organization.
Who fills out the response? Do they know the details of the work the
person in dispute was performing? We've used NRC Form 527 in the past.
NRC Response did not answer the questions we had in the additional
disputed details. They just confirmed the information we already knew.
[They] confirmed that the employee did work on the project, but did not
detail what work they were doing.[ ] We've disputed bills in the past,
the process only confirmed that the employee spent the hours working on
the project so the charges are correct. The CFO refused to take into
account the benefit to the licensee and/or fairness of the charge to
the licensee. 45 days from initial demand letter (invoice) is not
enough time in some cases to determine if the invoice was correct,
provided the licensee with a benefit, or was fair for the licensee to
be charged. It should be 90 days from when the error became apparent
for the licensee to dispute the charge. For example, [i]f you don't
like the dispute resolution, what is the process for future review or
appeals outside of the NRC CFO office? '' (Anonymous)
Response: The NRC continues to strive to enhance the invoicing
process to ensure invoice accuracy and the availability of appropriate
processes for licensees to efficiently request a review or submit a
dispute for invoice errors. A licensee who requests additional
information related to NRC staff/contract costs associated with their
NRC invoice is responsible for completing all items on page 1 of the
NRC Form 527, except for the dedicated response section used by NRC
staff only (detailed instructions are provided on page 2 in addition to
a process map on page 3 of the form). After the licensee completely
fills out their required portions of the NRC Form 527, it should be
submitted to the Office of the Chief Financial Officer using one of the
three listed options on the form. Once the form is received, the Office
of the Chief Financial Officer will forward it to the appropriate EPID
contact who will provide the response. The NRC EPID contact will always
be the responsible point of contact who is fully knowledgeable of the
work performed and, therefore, the appropriate individual to provide a
response.
The NRC Form 529 contains a listing of seven pre-conditions that
all licensees must meet before submitting the form. These pre-
conditions ensure licensees have properly adhered to NRC's standard
dispute process which requires: (1) An initial submission of the NRC
Form 527 to request a formal review of the charges in question, and (2)
submission of the NRC Form 529 to officially request a dispute of the
charges after receiving the response provided on the NRC Form 527.
Currently, most of the NRC's licensees subject to 10 CFR part 170 fees
are registered in eBilling, which is a public-facing, web-based
application that provides immediate delivery of NRC invoices in
addition to the capability to view and analyze invoice details.
Therefore, it is strongly recommended that licensees not registered in
eBilling consider utilizing this electronic invoice platform, if they
have the capability to do so. However, consideration was given to the
current initial demand letter (invoice) 30-day policy, and the NRC is
amending Sec. 15.31 to allow licensees an additional 15 days to submit
a review request from the initial demand letter (invoice). The NRC
believes that 45 days from receiving an initial demand letter provides
enough time for all licensees to determine if an invoice is accurate.
Furthermore, upon submission of the NRC Form 529, the licensee must
certify they are submitting an official dispute request to the Office
of the Chief Financial Officer and agree that the final determination
of the status of the disputed debt decision rests solely with the NRC.
The NRC's response to a licensee's request submitted on the NRC Form
529 officially completes the agency's invoice dispute process.
Finally, regarding the commenter's specific comments on the
regulatory activities that the NRC has previously conducted and billed
to the commenter (e.g., inspection activities, reports, and requests
for additional information on
[[Page 32168]]
projects), this is outside of the scope of this final rule. If the
commenter has specific questions regarding NRC invoices and fees that
have been assessed, the commenter can contact the Office of the Chief
Financial Officer via the eBilling system support portal, by email to
[email protected], or by mail to the Office of the
Chief Financial Officer at U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attn: Chief Financial Officer.
No change was made to this final rule in response to this comment.
J. Comments on Matters Not Related to This Rulemaking
Several commenters raised issues outside the scope of the FY 2021
fee rule. Commenters raised concerns with the agency's budgeting
process and requested public participation on the agency's budget
formulation process. A few commenters requested expediting efficiency
efforts and engaging industry regarding additional efficiencies,
improvements and efficiencies in the review process for topical reports
to reduce the professional hourly rate for special project fees. These
matters are outside the scope of this final rule. The primary purpose
of the rule is to update the NRC's fee schedules to recover
approximately 100 percent of the NRC's total budget authority for the
current fiscal year, less the budget authority for excluded activities,
and to make other necessary corrections or appropriate changes to
specific aspects of the NRC's fee regulations in order to ensure
compliance with NEIMA.
The NRC understands the importance of examining and improving the
efficiency of its operations and the prioritization of its regulatory
activities. Accordingly, the NRC has undertaken, and continues to
undertake, a number of significant initiatives aimed at improving the
efficiency of NRC operations and enhancing the agency's approach to
regulating. Though comments raising these issues are not within the
scope of this final rule, the NRC will consider this input in its
future program operations.
V. Regulatory Flexibility Certification
As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended
(RFA),\5\ the NRC has prepared a regulatory flexibility analysis
related to this final rule. The regulatory flexibility analysis is
available as indicated in Section XIV, ``Availability of Documents,''
of this document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 5 U.S.C. 603. The RFA, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, has been amended by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
Public Law 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 847 (1996).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
VI. Regulatory Analysis
Under NEIMA, the NRC is required to recover, to the maximum extent
practicable, approximately 100 percent of its annual budget for FY 2021
less the budget authority for excluded activities. The NRC established
fee methodology guidelines for 10 CFR part 170 in 1978, and established
additional fee methodology guidelines for 10 CFR part 171 in 1986. In
subsequent rulemakings, the NRC has adjusted its fees without changing
the underlying principles of its fee policy to ensure that the NRC
continues to comply with the statutory requirements for cost recovery.
In this final rule, the NRC continues this longstanding approach.
Therefore, the NRC did not identify any alternatives to the current fee
structure guidelines and did not prepare a regulatory analysis for this
final rule.
VII. Backfitting and Issue Finality
The NRC has determined that the backfit rule, Sec. 50.109, does
not apply to this final rule and that a backfit analysis is not
required because these amendments do not require the modification of,
or addition to, (1) systems, structures, components, or the design of a
facility; (2) the design approval or manufacturing license for a
facility; or (3) the procedures or organization required to design,
construct, or operate a facility.
VIII. Plain Writing
The Plain Writing Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-274) requires Federal
agencies to write documents in a clear, concise, and well-organized
manner. The NRC wrote this document to be consistent with the Plain
Writing Act, as well as the Presidential Memorandum, ``Plain Language
in Government Writing,'' published June 10, 1998 (63 FR 31885).
IX. National Environmental Policy Act
The NRC has determined that this final rule is the type of action
described in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(1). Therefore, neither an environmental
impact statement nor environmental assessment has been prepared for
this final rule.
X. Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule does not contain a collection of information as
defined in the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
and, therefore, is not subject to the requirements of the Act. In
accordance with 5 CFR 1320.4(a)(2), NRC Forms 527 and 529 are also not
subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Public Protection Notification
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless the document requesting
or requiring the collection displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
XI. Congressional Review Act
This final rule is a rule as defined in the Congressional Review
Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801-808). The Office of Management and Budget has
found it to be a major rule as defined in the Congressional Review Act.
XII. Voluntary Consensus Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995,
Public Law 104-113, requires that Federal agencies use technical
standards that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies unless the use of such a standard is inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical. In this final rule, the NRC is
amending the licensing, inspection, and annual fees charged to its
licensees and applicants, as necessary, to recover, to the maximum
extent practicable, approximately 100 percent of its annual budget for
FY 2021 less the budget authority for excluded activities, as required
by NEIMA. This action does not constitute the establishment of a
standard that contains generally applicable requirements.
XIII. Availability of Guidance
The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act requires all
Federal agencies to prepare a written compliance guide for each rule
for which the agency is required by 5 U.S.C. 604 to prepare a
regulatory flexibility analysis. The NRC, in compliance with the law,
prepared the ``Small Entity Compliance Guide'' for the FY 2021 final
fee rule. The compliance guide was developed when the NRC completed the
small entity biennial review for FY 2021. This compliance guide is
available as indicated in Section XIV, ``Availability of Documents,''
of this document.
XIV. Availability of Documents
The documents identified in the following table are available to
interested persons through one or more of the following methods, as
indicated.
[[Page 32169]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Documents ADAMS Accession No./web link
------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECY-05-0164, ``Annual Fee Calculation ML052580332.
Method,'' dated September 15, 2005.
SECY-16-0097, ``Fee Setting Improvements ML16194A365.
and Fiscal Year 2017 Proposed Fee
Rule,'' dated August 15, 2016.
Staff Requirements Memorandum for SECY- ML16293A902.
16-0097, dated October 19, 2016.
NUREG-1100, Volume 36, ``Congressional ML20024D764.
Budget Justification: Fiscal Year
2021'' (February 2020).
Process map, ``NRC Form 527, Request for ML20104C055.
Information Related to Fees-for-
Service''.
Process map, ``NRC Form 529, Processing ML20311A159.
Dispute of Fees-For-Service Charges''.
NRC Form 529, ``Dispute of Fees-For- ML20339A673.
Service Charges in Accordance with
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) Processing Dispute
of Fees-For-Service Charges Sec.
170.51''.
FY 2021 Final Rule Work Papers.......... ML21119A024.
FY 2021 Final Fee Rule.................. ML21109A319.
FY 2021 Regulatory Flexibility Analysis. ML21105A747.
FY 2021 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory ML21105A750.
Commission Small Entity Compliance
Guide.
SECY-19-0062, ``Final Rule: Non-Power ML18031A000.
Production or Utilization Facility
License Renewal,'' dated June 17, 2019.
SECY-20-0111, ``Rulemaking Plan to Amend ML20268B327.
the Receipts-Based NRC Size
Standards,'' dated December 7, 2020.
SRM-SECY-20-0111, ``Rulemaking Plan to ML21029A189.
Amend the Receipts-Based NRC Size
Standards'' (NRC-2014-0264).
NRC Form 526, ``Certification of Small https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
Entity Status for the Purposes of doc-collections/forms/
Annual Fees Imposed under 10 CFR Part nrc526.pdf.
171''.
OMB Circular A-25, ``User Charges''..... https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/omb/assets/OMB/circulars/a025/a025.html.
Fees Transformation Accomplishments..... https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/licensing/fees-transformation-accomplishments.html.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Subjects
10 CFR Part 15
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Debt collection.
10 CFR Part 170
Byproduct material, Import and export licenses, Intergovernmental
relations, Non-payment penalties, Nuclear energy, Nuclear materials,
Nuclear power plants and reactors, Source material, Special nuclear
material.
10 CFR Part 171
Annual charges, Approvals, Byproduct material, Holders of
certificates, Intergovernmental relations, Nonpayment penalties,
Nuclear materials, Nuclear power plants and reactors, Registrations,
Source material, Special nuclear material.
For the reasons set out in the preamble and under the authority of
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended; the Energy Reorganization
Act of 1974, as amended; and 5 U.S.C. 552 and 553, the NRC is adopting
the following amendments to 10 CFR parts 15, 170, and 171:
PART 15--DEBT COLLECTION PROCEDURES
0
1. The authority citation for part 15 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Atomic Energy Act of 1954, secs. 161, 186 (42 U.S.C.
2201, 2236); Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, sec. 201 (42 U.S.C.
5841); 5 U.S.C. 5514; 26 U.S.C. 6402; 31 U.S.C. 3701, 3713, 3716,
3719, 3720A; 42 U.S.C. 664; 44 U.S.C. 3504 note; 31 CFR parts 900
through 904; 31 CFR part 285; E.O. 12146, 44 FR 42657, 3 CFR, 1979
Comp., p. 409; E.O. 12988, 61 FR 4729, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 157.
0
2. Revise Sec. 15.31 to read as follows:
Sec. 15.31 Disputed debts.
(a) Submitting a dispute of debt. For any type of charges assessed
by the NRC, a debtor may submit a dispute of debt within 45 days from
the date of the initial demand letter. The debtor shall explain why the
debt is incorrect in fact or in law and may support the explanation by
affidavit, cancelled checks, or other relevant evidence. The dispute
must be submitted to the Office of the Chief Financial Officer via the
eBilling system, by email to [email protected], or
by mail to the Office of the Chief Financial Officer at: U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attn: Chief Financial
Officer. For debt disputes related to charges for 10 CFR part 170 fees,
the debtor must complete and submit an NRC Form 529 with the required
information.
(b) Notification of receipt. Following receipt of the dispute, the
NRC will acknowledge receipt to the contact person identified by the
debtor.
(c) Dispute review. The NRC will consider the facts involved in the
dispute and, if it considers it necessary, arrange for a conference
during which the debtor may present evidence and any arguments in
support of the debtor's position. If the debtor's dispute potentially
raises an error, the NRC may extend the interest waiver period as
described in Sec. 15.37(j) pending a final determination of the
existence or amount of the debt.
(d) Dispute resolution. If the NRC finds that the dispute has not
identified an error, the NRC will notify the dispute contact. If the
NRC finds that the dispute has identified an error, the NRC will:
(1) Notify the dispute contact;
(2) Make corrections to the charges or information on the demand
letter; and
(3) Issue a revised demand letter.
0
3. In Sec. 15.37, revise paragraph (j) to read as follows:
Sec. 15.37 Interest, penalties, and administrative costs.
* * * * *
(j) The NRC may waive interest during the period a debt disputed
under
Sec. 15.31 is under consideration by the NRC. However, this
additional waiver is not automatic and must be requested before the
expiration of the initial 30-day waiver period. The NRC may grant the
additional waiver only when it finds the debtor's dispute potentially
raises an error.
* * * * *
0
4. In Sec. 15.53, revise paragraphs (c) and (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 15.53 Reasons for suspending collection action.
* * * * *
[[Page 32170]]
(c) The debtor has requested a review of the debt or has disputed
the debt.
* * * * *
(e)(1) The NRC shall suspend collection activity during the time
required for consideration of the debtor's request for review or
dispute of the debt, if the statute under which the request is sought
prohibits the NRC from collecting the debt during that time.
(2) If the statute under which the request is sought does not
prohibit collection activity pending consideration of the request, the
NRC may use discretion, on a case-by-case basis, to suspend collection.
Further, the NRC ordinarily should suspend collection action upon a
request for review or dispute of the debt, if the NRC is prohibited by
statute or regulation from issuing a refund of amounts collected prior
to NRC consideration of the debtor's request. However, the NRC should
not suspend collection when the NRC determines that the request for
review or dispute of the debt is frivolous or was made primarily to
delay collection.
* * * * *
PART 170--FEES FOR FACILITIES, MATERIALS, IMPORT AND EXPORT
LICENSES, AND OTHER REGULATORY SERVICES UNDER THE ATOMIC ENERGY ACT
OF 1954, AS AMENDED
0
5. The authority citation for part 170 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: Atomic Energy Act of 1954, secs. 11, 161(w) (42
U.S.C. 2014, 2201(w)); Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, sec. 201
(42 U.S.C. 5841); 42 U.S.C. 2215; 31 U.S.C. 901, 902, 9701; 44
U.S.C. 3504 note.
0
6. Revise Sec. 170.1 to read as follows:
Sec. 170.1 Purpose.
The regulations in this part set out fees charged for licensing
services, inspection services, and special projects rendered by the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission as authorized under title V of the
Independent Offices Appropriation Act, 1952 (31 U.S.C. 9701(a)).
0
7. In Sec. 170.3:
0
a. Remove the definition for ``Balance of plant'';
0
b. Add a definition for ``Non-power production or utilization
facility'' in alphabetical order; and
0
c. Remove the definitions for ``Nuclear Steam Supply System'' and
``Reference systems concept''.
The addition reads as follows:
Sec. 170.3 Definitions.
* * * * *
Non-power production or utilization facility means a production or
utilization facility licensed under 10 CFR 50.21(a) or (c), or 10 CFR
50.22, as applicable, that is not a nuclear power reactor or production
facility as defined under paragraphs (1) and (2) of the definition of
``production facility'' in 10 CFR 50.2.
* * * * *
Sec. 170.20 [Amended]
0
8. In Sec. 170.20, remove the dollar amount ``$279'' and add in its
place the dollar amount ``$288''.
0
9. In Sec. 170.21, in the table:
0
a. Revise the table heading and the entry for ``K. Import and export
licenses''; and
0
b. Remove footnote 6.
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 170.21 Schedule of fees for production and utilization
facilities, review of standard referenced design approvals, special
projects, inspections and import and export licenses.
* * * * *
Table 1 to Sec. 170.21--Schedule of Facility Fees
[See footnotes at end of table]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facility categories and type of fees Fees 1 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
K. Import and export licenses:
Licenses for the import and export only of
production or utilization facilities or the export
only of components for production or utilization
facilities issued under 10 CFR part 110............
1. Application for import or export of
production or utilization facilities \4\
(including reactors and other facilities) and
exports of components requiring Commission and
Executive Branch review, for example, actions
under 10 CFR 110.40(b).........................
Application--new license, or amendment; or $20,200
license exemption request..................
2. Application for export of reactor and other
components requiring Executive Branch review,
for example, those actions under 10 CFR
110.41(a)......................................
Application--new license, or amendment; or 10,100
license exemption request..................
3. Application for export of components
requiring the assistance of the Executive
Branch to obtain foreign government assurances.
Application--new license, or amendment; or 7,200
license exemption request..................
4. Application for export of facility components
and equipment not requiring Commission or
Executive Branch review, or obtaining foreign
government assurances..........................
Application--new license, or amendment; or 4,900
license exemption request..................
5. Minor amendment of any active export or
import license, for example, to extend the
expiration date, change domestic information,
or make other revisions which do not involve
any substantive changes to license terms or
conditions or to the type of facility or
component authorized for export and, therefore,
do not require in-depth analysis or review or
consultation with the Executive Branch, U.S.
host state, or foreign government authorities..
Minor amendment to license.................. 4,300
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Fees will be charged for approvals issued under a specific exemption
provision of the Commission's regulations under title 10 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (e.g., 10 CFR 50.12, 10 CFR 73.5) and any other
sections in effect now or in the future, regardless of whether the
approval is in the form of a license amendment, letter of approval,
safety evaluation report, or other form.
\2\ Full cost fees will be determined based on the professional staff
time and appropriate contractual support services expended. For
applications currently on file and for which fees are determined based
on the full cost expended for the review, the professional staff hours
expended for the review of the application up to the effective date of
the final rule will be determined at the professional rates in effect
when the service was provided.
[[Page 32171]]
* * * * *
0
10. In Sec. 170.31, revise the table to read as follows:
Sec. 170.31 Schedule of fees for materials licenses and other
regulatory services, including inspections, and import and export
licenses.
* * * * *
Table 1 to Sec. 170.31--Schedule of Materials Fees
[See footnotes at end of table]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category of materials licenses and type of
fees \1\ Fees 2 3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Special nuclear material: \11\
A. (1) Licenses for possession and use of
U-235 or plutonium for fuel fabrication
activities.
(a) Strategic Special Nuclear Full Cost.
Material (High Enriched Uranium) \6\
[Program Code(s): 21213].
(b) Low Enriched Uranium in Full Cost.
Dispersible Form Used for
Fabrication of Power Reactor Fuel
\6\ [Program Code(s): 21210].
(2) All other special nuclear materials
licenses not included in Category 1.A.
(1) which are licensed for fuel cycle
activities \6\.
(a) Facilities with limited Full Cost.
operations \6\ [Program Code(s):
21240, 21310, 21320].
(b) Gas centrifuge enrichment Full Cost.
demonstration facilities.\6\
[Program Code(s): 21205].
(c) Others, including hot cell Full Cost.
facilities.\6\ [Program Code(s):
21130, 21133].
B. Licenses for receipt and storage of Full Cost.
spent fuel and reactor-related Greater
than Class C (GTCC) waste at an
independent spent fuel storage
installation (ISFSI) \6\ [Program
Code(s): 23200].
C. Licenses for possession and use of
special nuclear material of less than a
critical mass as defined in Sec. 70.4
of this chapter in sealed sources
contained in devices used in industrial
measuring systems, including x-ray
fluorescence analyzers.\4\.
Application [Program Code(s): 22140]. $1,300.
D. All other special nuclear material
licenses, except licenses authorizing
special nuclear material in sealed or
unsealed form in combination that would
constitute a critical mass, as defined
in Sec. 70.4 of this chapter, for
which the licensee shall pay the same
fees as those under Category 1.A.\4\.
Application [Program Code(s): 22110, $2,700.
22111, 22120, 22131, 22136, 22150,
22151, 22161, 22170, 23100, 23300,
23310].
E. Licenses or certificates for Full Cost.
construction and operation of a uranium
enrichment facility \6\ [Program
Code(s): 21200].
F. Licenses for possession and use of Full Cost.
special nuclear material greater than
critical mass as defined in Sec. 70.4
of this chapter, for development and
testing of commercial products, and
other non-fuel-cycle activities.4 6
[Program Code(s): 22155].
2. Source material: \11\
A. (1) Licenses for possession and use of Full Cost.
source material for refining uranium
mill concentrates to uranium
hexafluoride or for deconverting uranium
hexafluoride in the production of
uranium oxides for disposal.\6\ [Program
Code(s): 11400].
(2) Licenses for possession and use of
source material in recovery operations
such as milling, in-situ recovery, heap-
leaching, ore buying stations, ion-
exchange facilities, and in processing
of ores containing source material for
extraction of metals other than uranium
or thorium, including licenses
authorizing the possession of byproduct
waste material (tailings) from source
material recovery operations, as well as
licenses authorizing the possession and
maintenance of a facility in a standby
mode \6\.
(a) Conventional and Heap Leach Full Cost.
facilities \6\ [Program Code(s):
11100].
(b) Basic In Situ Recovery facilities Full Cost.
\6\ [Program Code(s): 11500].
(c) Expanded In Situ Recovery Full Cost.
facilities \6\ [Program Code(s):
11510].
(d) In Situ Recovery Resin facilities Full Cost.
\6\ [Program Code(s): 11550].
(e) Resin Toll Milling facilities \6\ Full Cost.
[Program Code(s): 11555].
(f) Other facilities \6\ [Program Full Cost.
Code(s): 11700].
(3) Licenses that authorize the receipt Full Cost.
of byproduct material, as defined in
Section 11e.(2) of the Atomic Energy
Act, from other persons for possession
and disposal, except those licenses
subject to the fees in Category 2.A.(2)
or Category 2.A.(4) \6\ [Program
Code(s): 11600, 12000].
(4) Licenses that authorize the receipt Full Cost.
of byproduct material, as defined in
Section 11e.(2) of the Atomic Energy
Act, from other persons for possession
and disposal incidental to the disposal
of the uranium waste tailings generated
by the licensee's milling operations,
except those licenses subject to the
fees in Category 2.A.(2) \6\ [Program
Code(s): 12010].
B. Licenses which authorize the
possession, use, and/or installation of
source material for shielding.7 8.
Application [Program Code(s): 11210]. $1,300.
C. Licenses to distribute items
containing source material to persons
exempt from the licensing requirements
of part 40 of this chapter.
Application [Program Code(s): 11240]. $6,200.
D. Licenses to distribute source material
to persons generally licensed under part
40 of this chapter..
Application [Program Code(s): 11230, $2,900.
11231].
E. Licenses for possession and use of
source material for processing or
manufacturing of products or materials
containing source material for
commercial distribution.
Application [Program Code(s): 11710]. $2,700.
F. All other source material licenses....
Application [Program Code(s): 11200, $2,700.
11220, 11221, 11300, 11800, 11810,
11820].
3. Byproduct material: \11\
A. Licenses of broad scope for the
possession and use of byproduct material
issued under parts 30 and 33 of this
chapter for processing or manufacturing
of items containing byproduct material
for commercial distribution. Number of
locations of use: 1-5.
Application [Program Code(s): 03211, $13,500.
03212, 03213].
[[Page 32172]]
(1). Licenses of broad scope for the
possession and use of byproduct
material issued under parts 30 and
33 of this chapter for processing or
manufacturing of items containing
byproduct material for commercial
distribution. Number of locations of
use: 6-20.
Application [Program Code(s): $17,900.
04010, 04012, 04014].
(2). Licenses of broad scope for the
possession and use of byproduct
material issued under parts 30 and
33 of this chapter for processing or
manufacturing of items containing
byproduct material for commercial
distribution. Number of locations of
use: More than 20.
Application [Program Code(s): $22,400.
04011, 04013, 04015].
B. Other licenses for possession and use
of byproduct material issued under part
30 of this chapter for processing or
manufacturing of items containing
byproduct material for commercial
distribution. Number of locations of
use: 1-5.
Application [Program Code(s): 03214, $3,700.
03215, 22135, 22162].
(1). Other licenses for possession
and use of byproduct material issued
under part 30 of this chapter for
processing or manufacturing of items
containing byproduct material for
commercial distribution. Number of
locations of use: 6-20.
Application [Program Code(s): $5,000.
04110, 04112, 04114, 04116].
(2). Other licenses for possession
and use of byproduct material issued
under part 30 of this chapter for
processing or manufacturing of items
containing byproduct material for
commercial distribution. Number of
locations of use: More than 20.
Application [Program Code(s): $6,200.
04111, 04113, 04115, 04117].
C. Licenses issued under Sec. Sec.
32.72 and/or 32.74 of this chapter that
authorize the processing or
manufacturing and distribution or
redistribution of radiopharmaceuticals,
generators, reagent kits, and/or sources
and devices containing byproduct
material. This category does not apply
to licenses issued to nonprofit
educational institutions whose
processing or manufacturing is exempt
under Sec. 170.11(a)(4). Number of
locations of use: 1-5.
Application [Program Code(s): 02500, $5,400.
02511, 02513].
(1). Licenses issued under Sec. Sec.
32.72 and/or 32.74 of this chapter
that authorize the processing or
manufacturing and distribution or
redistribution of
radiopharmaceuticals, generators,
reagent kits, and/or sources and
devices containing byproduct
material. This category does not
apply to licenses issued to
nonprofit educational institutions
whose processing or manufacturing is
exempt under Sec. 170.11(a)(4).
Number of locations of use: 6-20.
Application [Program Code(s): $7,200.
04210, 04212, 04214].
(2). Licenses issued under Sec. Sec.
32.72 and/or 32.74 of this chapter
that authorize the processing or
manufacturing and distribution or
redistribution of
radiopharmaceuticals, generators,
reagent kits, and/or sources and
devices containing byproduct
material. This category does not
apply to licenses issued to
nonprofit educational institutions
whose processing or manufacturing is
exempt under Sec. 170.11(a)(4).
Number of locations of use: More
than 20.
Application [Program Code(s): $8,900.
04211, 04213, 04215].
D. [Reserved]............................ N/A.
E. Licenses for possession and use of
byproduct material in sealed sources for
irradiation of materials in which the
source is not removed from its shield
(self-shielded units).
Application [Program Code(s): 03510, $3,300.
03520].
F. Licenses for possession and use of
less than or equal to 10,000 curies of
byproduct material in sealed sources for
irradiation of materials in which the
source is exposed for irradiation
purposes. This category also includes
underwater irradiators for irradiation
of materials where the source is not
exposed for irradiation purposes.
Application [Program Code(s): 03511]. $6,700.
G. Licenses for possession and use of
greater than 10,000 curies of byproduct
material in sealed sources for
irradiation of materials in which the
source is exposed for irradiation
purposes. This category also includes
underwater irradiators for irradiation
of materials where the source is not
exposed for irradiation purposes.
Application [Program Code(s): 03521]. $64,300.
H. Licenses issued under subpart A of
part 32 of this chapter to distribute
items containing byproduct material that
require device review to persons exempt
from the licensing requirements of part
30 of this chapter. The category does
not include specific licenses
authorizing redistribution of items that
have been authorized for distribution to
persons exempt from the licensing
requirements of part 30 of this chapter.
Application [Program Code(s): 03254, $6,900.
03255, 03257].
I. Licenses issued under subpart A of
part 32 of this chapter to distribute
items containing byproduct material or
quantities of byproduct material that do
not require device evaluation to persons
exempt from the licensing requirements
of part 30 of this chapter. This
category does not include specific
licenses authorizing redistribution of
items that have been authorized for
distribution to persons exempt from the
licensing requirements of part 30 of
this chapter..
Application [Program Code(s): 03250, $15,300.
03251, 03253, 03256].
J. Licenses issued under subpart B of
part 32 of this chapter to distribute
items containing byproduct material that
require sealed source and/or device
review to persons generally licensed
under part 31 of this chapter. This
category does not include specific
licenses authorizing redistribution of
items that have been authorized for
distribution to persons generally
licensed under part 31 of this chapter.
Application [Program Code(s): 03240, $2,100.
03241, 03243].
K. Licenses issued under subpart B of
part 32 of this chapter to distribute
items containing byproduct material or
quantities of byproduct material that do
not require sealed source and/or device
review to persons generally licensed
under part 31 of this chapter. This
category does not include specific
licenses authorizing redistribution of
items that have been authorized for
distribution to persons generally
licensed under part 31 of this chapter.
Application [Program Code(s): 03242, $1,200.
03244].
L. Licenses of broad scope for possession
and use of byproduct material issued
under parts 30 and 33 of this chapter
for research and development that do not
authorize commercial distribution.
Number of locations of use: 1-5.
Application [Program Code(s): 01100, $5,700.
01110, 01120, 03610, 03611, 03612,
03613].
[[Page 32173]]
(1) Licenses of broad scope for
possession and use of byproduct
material issued under parts 30 and
33 of this chapter for research and
development that do not authorize
commercial distribution. Number of
locations of use: 6-20..
Application [Program Code(s): $7,500.
04610, 04612, 04614, 04616,
04618, 04620, 04622].
(2) Licenses of broad scope for
possession and use of byproduct
material issued under parts 30 and
33 of this chapter for research and
development that do not authorize
commercial distribution. Number of
locations of use: More than 20.
Application [Program Code(s): $9,400.
04611, 04613, 04615, 04617,
04619, 04621, 04623].
M. Other licenses for possession and use
of byproduct material issued under part
30 of this chapter for research and
development that do not authorize
commercial distribution.
Application [Program Code(s): 03620]. $8,600.
N. Licenses that authorize services for
other licensees, except: (1) Licenses
that authorize only calibration and/or
leak testing services are subject to the
fees specified in fee Category 3.P.; and
(2) Licenses that authorize waste
disposal services are subject to the
fees specified in fee Categories 4.A.,
4.B., and 4.C.
Application [Program Code(s): 03219, $9,200.
03225, 03226].
O. Licenses for possession and use of
byproduct material issued under part 34
of this chapter for industrial
radiography operations. Number of
locations of use: 1-5.
Application [Program Code(s): 03310, $9,200.
03320].
(1). Licenses for possession and use
of byproduct material issued under
part 34 of this chapter for
industrial radiography operations.
Number of locations of use: 6-20.
Application [Program Code(s): $12,200.
04310, 04312].
(2). Licenses for possession and use
of byproduct material issued under
part 34 of this chapter for
industrial radiography operations.
Number of locations of use: More
than 20.
Application [Program Code(s): $15,300.
04311, 04313].
P. All other specific byproduct material
licenses, except those in Categories
4.A. through 9.D.\9\ Number of locations
of use: 1-5.
Application [Program Code(s): 02400, $6,600.
02410, 03120, 03121, 03122, 03123,
03124, 03130, 03140, 03220, 03221,
03222, 03800, 03810, 22130].
(1). All other specific byproduct
material licenses, except those in
Categories 4.A. through 9.D.\9\
Number of locations of use: 6-20.
Application [Program Code(s): $8,800.
04410, 04412, 04414, 04416,
04418, 04420, 04422, 04424,
04426, 04428, 04430, 04432,
04434, 04436, 04438].
(2). All other specific byproduct
material licenses, except those in
Categories 4.A. through 9.D.\9\
Number of locations of use: More
than 20.
Application [Program Code(s): $10,900.
04411, 04413, 04415, 04417,
04419, 04421, 04423, 04425,
04427, 04429, 04431, 04433,
04435, 04437, 04439].
Q. Registration of a device(s) generally $800.
licensed under part 31 of this chapter.
Registration.
R. Possession of items or products
containing radium-226 identified in Sec.
31.12 of this chapter which exceed the
number of items or limits specified in
that section \5\.
1. Possession of quantities exceeding
the number of items or limits in
Sec. 31.12(a)(4) or (5) of this
chapter but less than or equal to 10
times the number of items or limits
specified.
Application [Program Code(s): $2,600.
02700].
2. Possession of quantities exceeding
10 times the number of items or
limits specified in Sec.
31.12(a)(4) or (5) of this chapter.
Application [Program Code(s): $2,600.
02710].
S. Licenses for production of accelerator-
produced radionuclides.
Application [Program Code(s): 03210]. $14,700.
4. Waste disposal and processing: \11\
A. Licenses specifically authorizing the
receipt of waste byproduct material,
source material, or special nuclear
material from other persons for the
purpose of contingency storage or
commercial land disposal by the
licensee; or licenses authorizing
contingency storage of low-level
radioactive waste at the site of nuclear
power reactors; or licenses for receipt
of waste from other persons for
incineration or other treatment,
packaging of resulting waste and
residues, and transfer of packages to
another person authorized to receive or
dispose of waste material.
Application [Program Code(s): 03231, Full Cost.
03233, 03236, 06100, 06101].
B. Licenses specifically authorizing the
receipt of waste byproduct material,
source material, or special nuclear
material from other persons for the
purpose of packaging or repackaging the
material. The licensee will dispose of
the material by transfer to another
person authorized to receive or dispose
of the material.
Application [Program Code(s): 03234]. $7,200.
C. Licenses specifically authorizing the
receipt of prepackaged waste byproduct
material, source material, or special
nuclear material from other persons. The
licensee will dispose of the material by
transfer to another person authorized to
receive or dispose of the material.
Application [Program Code(s): 03232]. $5,200.
5. Well logging: \11\
A. Licenses for possession and use of
byproduct material, source material, and/
or special nuclear material for well
logging, well surveys, and tracer
studies other than field flooding tracer
studies.
Application [Program Code(s): 03110, $4,800.
03111, 03112].
B. Licenses for possession and use of
byproduct material for field flooding
tracer studies.
Licensing [Program Code(s): 03113]... Full Cost.
6. Nuclear laundries: \11\
A. Licenses for commercial collection and
laundry of items contaminated with
byproduct material, source material, or
special nuclear material.
Application [Program Code(s): 03218]. $22,900.
[[Page 32174]]
7. Medical licenses: \11\
A. Licenses issued under parts 30, 35,
40, and 70 of this chapter for human use
of byproduct material, source material,
or special nuclear material in sealed
sources contained in gamma stereotactic
radiosurgery units, teletherapy devices,
or similar beam therapy devices. Number
of locations of use: 1-5.
Application [Program Code(s): 02300, $11,500.
02310].
(1). Licenses issued under parts 30,
35, 40, and 70 of this chapter for
human use of byproduct material,
source material, or special nuclear
material in sealed sources contained
in gamma stereotactic radiosurgery
units, teletherapy devices, or
similar beam therapy devices. Number
of locations of use: 6-20.
Application [Program Code(s): $15,300.
04510, 04512].
(2). Licenses issued under parts 30,
35, 40, and 70 of this chapter for
human use of byproduct material,
source material, or special nuclear
material in sealed sources contained
in gamma stereotactic radiosurgery
units, teletherapy devices, or
similar beam therapy devices. Number
of locations of use: More than 20.
Application [Program Code(s): $19,100.
04511, 04513].
B. Licenses of broad scope issued to
medical institutions or two or more
physicians under parts 30, 33, 35, 40,
and 70 of this chapter authorizing
research and development, including
human use of byproduct material, except
licenses for byproduct material, source
material, or special nuclear material in
sealed sources contained in teletherapy
devices. This category also includes the
possession and use of source material
for shielding when authorized on the
same license. Number of locations of
use: 1-5.
Application [Program Code(s): 02110]. $9,000.
(1). Licenses of broad scope issued
to medical institutions or two or
more physicians under parts 30, 33,
35, 40, and 70 of this chapter
authorizing research and
development, including human use of
byproduct material, except licenses
for byproduct material, source
material, or special nuclear
material in sealed sources contained
in teletherapy devices. This
category also includes the
possession and use of source
material for shielding when
authorized on the same license.
Number of locations of use: 6-20.
Application [Program Code(s): $11,900.
04710].
(2). Licenses of broad scope issued
to medical institutions or two or
more physicians under parts 30, 33,
35, 40, and 70 of this chapter
authorizing research and
development, including human use of
byproduct material, except licenses
for byproduct material, source
material, or special nuclear
material in sealed sources contained
in teletherapy devices. This
category also includes the
possession and use of source
material for shielding when
authorized on the same license.
Number of locations of use: More
than 20.
Application [Program Code(s): $14,900.
04711].
C. Other licenses issued under parts 30,
35, 40, and 70 of this chapter for human
use of byproduct material, source
material, and/or special nuclear
material, except licenses for byproduct
material, source material, or special
nuclear material in sealed sources
contained in teletherapy devices.\10\
Number of locations of use: 1-5.
Application [Program Code(s): 02120, $10,900.
02121, 02200, 02201, 02210, 02220,
02230, 02231, 02240, 22160].
(1). Other licenses issued under
parts 30, 35, 40, and 70 of this
chapter for human use of byproduct
material, source material, and/or
special nuclear material, except
licenses for byproduct material,
source material, or special nuclear
material in sealed sources contained
in teletherapy devices.\10\ Number
of locations of use: 6-20.
Application [Program Code(s): $9,000.
04810, 04812, 04814, 04816,
04818, 04820, 04822, 04824,
04826, 04828].
(2). Other licenses issued under
parts 30, 35, 40, and 70 of this
chapter for human use of byproduct
material, source material, and/or
special nuclear material, except
licenses for byproduct material,
source material, or special nuclear
material in sealed sources contained
in teletherapy devices.\10\ Number
of locations of use: More than 20.
Application [Program Code(s): $11,300.
04811,04813, 04815, 04817,
04819, 04821,04823, 04825,
04827, 04829].
8. Civil defense: \11\
A. Licenses for possession and use of
byproduct material, source material, or
special nuclear material for civil
defense activities.
Application [Program Code(s): 03710]. $2,600.
9. Device, product, or sealed source safety
evaluation:
A. Safety evaluation of devices or
products containing byproduct material,
source material, or special nuclear
material, except reactor fuel devices,
for commercial distribution.
Application--each device............. $17,900.
B. Safety evaluation of devices or
products containing byproduct material,
source material, or special nuclear
material manufactured in accordance with
the unique specifications of, and for
use by, a single applicant, except
reactor fuel devices.
Application--each device............. $9,300.
C. Safety evaluation of sealed sources
containing byproduct material, source
material, or special nuclear material,
except reactor fuel, for commercial
distribution.
Application--each source............. $5,500.
D. Safety evaluation of sealed sources
containing byproduct material, source
material, or special nuclear material,
manufactured in accordance with the
unique specifications of, and for use
by, a single applicant, except reactor
fuel.
Application--each source............. $1,100.
10. Transportation of radioactive material:
A. Evaluation of casks, packages, and
shipping containers.
1. Spent Fuel, High-Level Waste, and Full Cost.
plutonium air packages.
2. Other Casks....................... Full Cost.
B. Quality assurance program approvals
issued under part 71 of this chapter.
1. Users and Fabricators. Application $4,300.
Inspections...................... Full Cost.
2. Users. Application................ $4,300.
Inspections...................... Full Cost.
[[Page 32175]]
C. Evaluation of security plans, route Full Cost.
approvals, route surveys, and
transportation security devices
(including immobilization devices).
11. Review of standardized spent fuel Full Cost.
facilities.
12. Special projects: Including approvals,
pre-application/licensing activities, and
inspections.
Application [Program Code: 25110]........ Full Cost.
13. A. Spent fuel storage cask Certificate of Full Cost.
Compliance.
B. Inspections related to storage of Full Cost.
spent fuel under Sec. 72.210 of this
chapter.
14. Decommissioning/Reclamation: \11\
A. Byproduct, source, or special nuclear Full Cost.
material licenses and other approvals
authorizing decommissioning,
decontamination, reclamation, or site
restoration activities under parts 30,
40, 70, 72, and 76 of this chapter,
including master materials licenses
(MMLs). The transition to this fee
category occurs when a licensee has
permanently ceased principal activities.
[Program Code(s): 03900, 11900, 21135,
21215, 21325, 22200].
B. Site-specific decommissioning Full Cost.
activities associated with unlicensed
sites, including MMLs, regardless of
whether or not the sites have been
previously licensed.
15. Import and Export licenses:
Licenses issued under part 110 of this
chapter for the import and export only
of special nuclear material, source
material, tritium and other byproduct
material, and the export only of heavy
water, or nuclear grade graphite (fee
categories 15.A. through 15.E.).
A. Application for export or import of
nuclear materials, including radioactive
waste requiring Commission and Executive
Branch review, for example, those
actions under Sec. 110.40(b) of this
chapter.
Application--new license, or $20,200.
amendment; or license exemption
request.
B. Application for export or import of
nuclear material, including radioactive
waste, requiring Executive Branch
review, but not Commission review. This
category includes applications for the
export and import of radioactive waste
and requires the NRC to consult with
domestic host state authorities (i.e.,
Low-Level Radioactive Waste Compact
Commission, the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, etc.).
Application--new license, or $10,100.
amendment; or license exemption
request.
C. Application for export of nuclear
material, for example, routine reloads
of low enriched uranium reactor fuel and/
or natural uranium source material
requiring the assistance of the
Executive Branch to obtain foreign
government assurances.
Application--new license, or $7,200.
amendment; or license exemption
request.
D. Application for export or import of
nuclear material not requiring
Commission or Executive Branch review,
or obtaining foreign government
assurances.
Application--new license, or $4,900.
amendment; or license exemption
request.
E. Minor amendment of any active export $4,900.
or import license, for example, to
extend the expiration date, change
domestic information, or make other
revisions which do not involve any
substantive changes to license terms and
conditions or to the type/quantity/
chemical composition of the material
authorized for export and, therefore, do
not require in-depth analysis, review,
or consultations with other Executive
Branch, U.S. host state, or foreign
government authorities. Minor amendment.
Licenses issued under part 110 of this
chapter for the import and export only
of Category 1 and Category 2 quantities
of radioactive material listed in
appendix P to part 110 of this chapter
(fee categories 15.F. through 15.R.).
Category 1 (Appendix P, 10 CFR Part 110)
Exports:
F. Application for export of appendix P
Category 1 materials requiring
Commission review (e.g. exceptional
circumstance review under Sec.
110.42(e)(4) of this chapter) and to
obtain one government-to-government
consent for this process. For additional
consent see fee category 15.I.
Application--new license, or $17,300.
amendment; or license exemption
request.
G. Application for export of appendix P
Category 1 materials requiring Executive
Branch review and to obtain one
government-to-government consent for
this process. For additional consents
see fee category 15.I.
Application--new license, or $8,600.
amendment; or license exemption
request.
H. Application for export of appendix P
Category 1 materials and to obtain one
government-to-government consent for
this process. For additional consents
see fee category 15.I.
Application--new license, or $4,900.
amendment; or license exemption
request.
I. Requests for each additional
government-to-government consent in
support of an export license application
or active export license.
Application--new license, or $1,400.
amendment; or license exemption
request.
Category 2 (Appendix P, 10 CFR Part 110)
Exports:
J. Application for export of appendix P
Category 2 materials requiring
Commission review (e.g. exceptional
circumstance review under Sec.
110.42(e)(4) of this chapter).
Application--new license, or $17,300.
amendment; or license exemption
request.
K. Applications for export of appendix P
Category 2 materials requiring Executive
Branch review.
Application--new license, or $8,600.
amendment; or license exemption
request.
L. Application for the export of Category
2 materials.
Application--new license, or $4,300.
amendment; or license exemption
request.
M. [Reserved]............................ N/A.
N. [Reserved]............................ N/A.
O. [Reserved]............................ N/A.
P. [Reserved]............................ N/A.
Q. [Reserved]............................ N/A.
Minor Amendments (Category 1 and 2, Appendix
P, 10 CFR Part 110, Export):
R. Minor amendment of any active export $1,400.
license, for example, to extend the
expiration date, change domestic
information, or make other revisions
which do not involve any substantive
changes to license terms and conditions
or to the type/quantity/chemical
composition of the material authorized
for export and, therefore, do not
require in-depth analysis, review, or
consultations with other Executive
Branch, U.S. host state, or foreign
authorities. Minor amendment.
[[Page 32176]]
16. Reciprocity:
Agreement State licensees who conduct
activities under the reciprocity
provisions of Sec. 150.20 of this
chapter.
Application.......................... $2,700.
17. Master materials licenses of broad scope
issued to Government agencies.
Application [Program Code(s): 03614]..... Full Cost.
18. Department of Energy:
A. Certificates of Compliance. Evaluation Full Cost.
of casks, packages, and shipping
containers (including spent fuel, high-
level waste, and other casks, and
plutonium air packages).
B. Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Full Cost.
Control Act (UMTRCA) activities.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Types of fees--Separate charges, as shown in the schedule, will be
assessed for pre-application consultations and reviews; applications
for new licenses, approvals, or license terminations; possession-only
licenses; issuances of new licenses and approvals; certain amendments
and renewals to existing licenses and approvals; safety evaluations of
sealed sources and devices; generally licensed device registrations;
and certain inspections. The following guidelines apply to these
charges:
(1) Application and registration fees. Applications for new materials
licenses and export and import licenses; applications to reinstate
expired, terminated, or inactive licenses, except those subject to
fees assessed at full costs; applications filed by Agreement State
licensees to register under the general license provisions of 10 CFR
150.20; and applications for amendments to materials licenses that
would place the license in a higher fee category or add a new fee
category must be accompanied by the prescribed application fee for
each category.
(i) Applications for licenses covering more than one fee category of
special nuclear material or source material must be accompanied by the
prescribed application fee for the highest fee category.
(ii) Applications for new licenses that cover both byproduct material
and special nuclear material in sealed sources for use in gauging
devices will pay the appropriate application fee for fee category 1.C.
only.
(2) Licensing fees. Fees for reviews of applications for new licenses,
renewals, and amendments to existing licenses, pre-application
consultations and other documents submitted to the NRC for review, and
project manager time for fee categories subject to full cost fees are
due upon notification by the Commission in accordance with Sec.
170.12(b).
(3) Amendment fees. Applications for amendments to export and import
licenses must be accompanied by the prescribed amendment fee for each
license affected. An application for an amendment to an export or
import license or approval classified in more than one fee category
must be accompanied by the prescribed amendment fee for the category
affected by the amendment, unless the amendment is applicable to two
or more fee categories, in which case the amendment fee for the
highest fee category would apply.
(4) Inspection fees. Inspections resulting from investigations conducted
by the Office of Investigations and nonroutine inspections that result
from third-party allegations are not subject to fees. Inspection fees
are due upon notification by the Commission in accordance with Sec.
170.12(c).
(5) Generally licensed device registrations under 10 CFR 31.5.
Submittals of registration information must be accompanied by the
prescribed fee.
\2\ Fees will be charged for approvals issued under a specific exemption
provision of the Commission's regulations under title 10 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (e.g., 10 CFR 30.11, 40.14, 70.14, 73.5, and
any other sections in effect now or in the future), regardless of
whether the approval is in the form of a license amendment, letter of
approval, safety evaluation report, or other form. In addition to the
fee shown, an applicant may be assessed an additional fee for sealed
source and device evaluations as shown in fee categories 9.A. through
9.D.
\3\ Full cost fees will be determined based on the professional staff
time multiplied by the appropriate professional hourly rate
established in Sec. 170.20 in effect when the service is provided,
and the appropriate contractual support services expended.
\4\ Licensees paying fees under categories 1.A., 1.B., and 1.E. are not
subject to fees under categories 1.C., 1.D. and 1.F. for sealed
sources authorized in the same license, except for an application that
deals only with the sealed sources authorized by the license.
\5\ Persons who possess radium sources that are used for operational
purposes in another fee category are not also subject to the fees in
this category. (This exception does not apply if the radium sources
are possessed for storage only.)
\6\ Licensees subject to fees under fee categories 1.A., 1.B., 1.E., or
2.A. must pay the largest applicable fee and are not subject to
additional fees listed in this table.
\7\ Licensees paying fees under 3.C., 3.C.1, or 3.C.2 are not subject to
fees under 2.B. for possession and shielding authorized on the same
license.
\8\ Licensees paying fees under 7.C. are not subject to fees under 2.B.
for possession and shielding authorized on the same license.
\9\Licensees paying fees under 3.N. are not subject to paying fees under
3.P., 3.P.1, or 3.P.2 for calibration or leak testing services
authorized on the same license.
\10\ Licensees paying fees under 7.B., 7.B.1, or 7.B.2 are not subject
to paying fees under 7.C., 7.C.1, or 7.C.2. for broad scope licenses
issued under parts 30, 35, 40, and 70 of this chapter for human use of
byproduct material, source material, and/or special nuclear material,
except licenses for byproduct material, source material, or special
nuclear material in sealed sources contained in teletherapy devices
authorized on the same license.
\11\ A materials license (or part of a materials license) that
transitions to fee category 14.A is assessed full-cost fees under 10
CFR part 170, but is not assessed an annual fee under 10 CFR part 171.
If only part of a materials license is transitioned to fee category
14.A, the licensee may be charged annual fees (and any applicable 10
CFR part 170 fees) for other activities authorized under the license
that are not in decommissioning status.
0
11. Revise Sec. 170.51 to read as follows:
Sec. 170.51 Right to dispute assessed fees.
All debtors' disputes of fees assessed must be submitted in
accordance with 10 CFR 15.31.
PART 171--ANNUAL FEES FOR REACTOR LICENSES AND FUEL CYCLE LICENSES
AND MATERIALS LICENSES, INCLUDING HOLDERS OF CERTIFICATES OF
COMPLIANCE, REGISTRATIONS, AND QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM APPROVALS
AND GOVERNMENT AGENCIES LICENSED BY THE NRC
0
12. The authority citation for part 171 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: Atomic Energy Act of 1954, secs. 11, 161(w), 223,
234 (42 U.S.C. 2014, 2201(w), 2273, 2282); Energy Reorganization Act
of 1974, sec. 201 (42 U.S.C. 5841); 42 U.S.C. 2215; 44 U.S.C. 3504
note.
0
13. Revise Sec. 171.3 to read as follows:
Sec. 171.3 Scope.
The regulations in this part apply to any person holding an
operating license for a non-power production or utilization facility
issued under 10 CFR part 50 that has provided notification to the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) that the licensee has successfully
completed startup testing, and to any
[[Page 32177]]
person holding an operating license for a power reactor or small
modular reactor licensed under 10 CFR part 50 or a combined license
issued under 10 CFR part 52 that has provided notification to the NRC
that the licensee has successfully completed power ascension testing.
The regulations in this part also apply to any person holding a
materials license as defined in this part, a certificate of compliance,
a sealed source or device registration, a quality assurance program
approval, and to a Government agency as defined in this part.
Notwithstanding the other provisions in this section, the regulations
in this part do not apply to uranium recovery and fuel facility
licensees until after the Commission verifies through inspection that
the facility has been constructed in accordance with the requirements
of the license.
0
14. In Sec. 171.5, revise the definition of ``Budget authority'' and
add a definition for ``Non-power production or utilization facility''
in alphabetical order to read as follows:
Sec. 171.5 Definitions.
* * * * *
Budget authority means the authority, in the form of an
appropriation, provided by law and becoming available during the year,
to enter into obligations that will result in immediate or future
outlays involving Federal Government funds. The appropriation is an
authorization by an Act of Congress that permits the NRC to incur
obligations and to make payments out of the Treasury for specified
purposes. Fees assessed pursuant to Public Law 115-439 are based on the
NRC's budget authority.
* * * * *
Non-power production or utilization facility means a production or
utilization facility licensed under 10 CFR 50.21(a) or (c), or 10 CFR
50.22, as applicable, that is not a nuclear power reactor or production
facility as defined under paragraphs (1) and (2) of the definition of
``production facility'' in 10 CFR 50.2.
* * * * *
0
15. In Sec. 171.11, revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 171.11 Exemptions.
* * * * *
(c) The Commission may, upon application by an interested person or
on its own initiative, grant an exemption from the requirements of this
part that it determines is authorized by law and otherwise in the
public interest.
* * * * *
0
16. In Sec. 171.15:
0
a. Revise the section heading and paragraphs (a), (b)(1), (b)(2)
introductory text, (c)(1), and (c)(2) introductory text;
0
b. Remove paragraph (d);
0
c. Redesignate paragraphs (e) and (f) as paragraphs (d) and (e); and
0
d. Revise newly redesignated paragraphs (d) and (e).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 171.15 Annual fees: Non-power production or utilization
licenses, reactor licenses, and independent spent fuel storage
licenses.
(a) Each person holding an operating license for one or more non-
power production or utilization facilities under 10 CFR part 50 that
has provided notification to the NRC of the successful completion of
startup testing; each person holding an operating license for a power
reactor licensed under 10 CFR part 50 or a combined license under 10
CFR part 52 that has provided notification to the NRC of the successful
completion of power ascension testing; each person holding a 10 CFR
part 50 or 52 power reactor license that is in decommissioning or
possession only status, except those that have no spent fuel onsite;
and each person holding a 10 CFR part 72 license who does not hold a 10
CFR part 50 or 52 license and provides notification in accordance with
10 CFR 72.80(g), shall pay the annual fee for each license held during
the Federal fiscal year in which the fee is due. This paragraph (a)
does not apply to test or research reactors exempted under Sec.
171.11(b).
(b)(1) The FY 2021 annual fee for each operating power reactor that
must be collected by September 30, 2021, is $4,749,000.
(2) The FY 2021 annual fees are comprised of a base annual fee for
power reactors licensed to operate, a base spent fuel storage/reactor
decommissioning annual fee, and associated additional charges. The
activities comprising the spent fuel storage/reactor decommissioning
base annual fee are shown in paragraphs (c)(2)(i) and (ii) of this
section. The activities comprising the FY 2021 base annual fee for
operating power reactors are as follows:
* * * * *
(c)(1) The FY 2021 annual fee for each power reactor holding a 10
CFR part 50 license or combined license issued under 10 CFR part 52
that is in a decommissioning or possession-only status and has spent
fuel onsite, and for each independent spent fuel storage 10 CFR part 72
licensee who does not hold a 10 CFR part 50 license or a 10 CFR part 52
combined license, is $237,000.
(2) The FY 2021 annual fee is comprised of a base spent fuel
storage/reactor decommissioning annual fee (which is also included in
the operating power reactor annual fee shown in paragraph (b) of this
section). The activities comprising the FY 2021 spent fuel storage/
reactor decommissioning rebaselined annual fee are:
* * * * *
(d)(1) Each person holding an operating license for an SMR issued
under 10 CFR part 50 or a combined license issued under 10 CFR part 52
that has provided notification to the NRC of the successful completion
startup testing, shall pay the annual fee for all licenses held for an
SMR site. The annual fee will be determined using the cumulative
licensed thermal power rating of all SMR units and the bundled unit
concept, during the fiscal year in which the fee is due. For a given
site, the use of the bundled unit concept is independent of the number
of SMR plants, the number of SMR licenses issued, or the sequencing of
the SMR licenses that have been issued.
(2) The annual fees for a small modular reactor(s) located on a
single site to be collected by September 30 of each year, are as
follows:
Table 1 to Paragraph (d)(2)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bundled unit thermal power rating Minimum fee Variable fee Maximum fee
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First Bundled Unit:
0 MWt <=250 MWt............... TBD..................... N/A..................... N/A.
>250 MWt <=2,000 MWt.......... TBD..................... TBD..................... N/A.
>2,000 MWt <=4,500 MWt........ N/A..................... N/A..................... TBD.
Additional Bundled Units:
0 MWt <=2,000 MWt............. N/A..................... TBD..................... N/A.
>2,000 MWt <=4,500 MWt........ N/A..................... N/A..................... TBD.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 32178]]
(3) The annual fee for an SMR collected under this paragraph (d) is
in lieu of any fee otherwise required under paragraph (b) of this
section. The annual fee under this paragraph (d) covers the same
activities listed for the power reactor base annual fee and the spent
fuel storage/reactor decommissioning reactor fee.
(e) The FY 2021 annual fee for licensees authorized to operate one
or more non-power production or utilization facilities under a single
10 CFR part 50 license, unless the reactor is exempted from fees under
Sec. 171.11(b), is $80,000.
0
17. In Sec. 171.16:
0
a. Revise paragraphs (c) and (d); and
0
b. Remove paragraph (e).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 171.16 Annual fees: Materials licensees, holders of certificates
of compliance, holders of sealed source and device registrations,
holders of quality assurance program approvals, and government agencies
licensed by the NRC.
* * * * *
(c) A licensee who is required to pay an annual fee under this
section, in addition to 10 CFR part 72 licenses, may qualify as a small
entity. If a licensee qualifies as a small entity and provides the
Commission with the proper certification along with its annual fee
payment, the licensee may pay reduced annual fees as shown in Table 1
to this paragraph (c). Failure to file a small entity certification in
a timely manner could result in the receipt of a delinquent invoice
requesting the outstanding balance due and/or denial of any refund that
might otherwise be due. The small entity fees are as follows:
Table 1 to Paragraph (c)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maximum annual
fee per
NRC small entity classification licensed
category
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Small Businesses Not Engaged in Manufacturing (Average
gross receipts over last 3 completed fiscal years):
$485,000 to $7 million.............................. $4,900
Less than $485,000.................................. 1,000
Small Not-For-Profit Organizations (Annual Gross
Receipts):
$485,000 to $7 million.............................. 4,900
Less than $485,000.................................. 1,000
Manufacturing Entities that Have An Average of 500
Employees or Fewer:
35 to 500 employees................................. 4,900
Fewer than 35 employees............................. 1,000
Small Governmental Jurisdictions (Including publicly
supported educational institutions) (Population):
20,000 to 49,999.................................... 4,900
Fewer than 20,000................................... 1,000
Educational Institutions that are not State or Publicly
Supported, and have 500 Employees or Fewer:
35 to 500 employees................................. 4,900
Fewer than 35 employees............................. 1,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(d) The FY 2021 annual fees for materials licensees and holders of
certificates, registrations, or approvals subject to fees under this
section are shown table 2 to this paragraph (d):
Table 2 to Paragraph (d)--Schedule of Materials Annual Fees and Fees for
Government Agencies Licensed by NRC
[See footnotes at end of table]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual fees 1
Category of materials licenses 2 3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Special nuclear material:
A. (1) Licenses for possession and use of U-235 or
plutonium for fuel fabrication activities.
(a) Strategic Special Nuclear Material (High $4,643,000
Enriched Uranium) \15\ [Program Code(s): 21213]
(b) Low Enriched Uranium in Dispersible Form $1,573,000
Used for Fabrication of Power Reactor Fuel \15\
[Program Code(s): 21210].......................
(2) All other special nuclear materials licenses not
included in Category 1.A.(1) which are licensed for
fuel cycle activities..............................
(a) Facilities with limited operations \15\ $1,037,000
[Program Code(s): 21310, 21320]................
(b) Gas centrifuge enrichment demonstration N/A
facility \15\ [Program Code(s): 21205].........
(c) Others, including hot cell facility \15\ N/A
[Program Code(s): 21130, 21133]................
B. Licenses for receipt and storage of spent fuel N/A
and reactor-related Greater than Class C (GTCC)
waste at an independent spent fuel storage
installation (ISFSI) 11 15 [Program Code(s): 23200]
C. Licenses for possession and use of special $2,400
nuclear material of less than a critical mass, as
defined in Sec. 70.4 of this chapter, in sealed
sources contained in devices used in industrial
measuring systems, including x-ray fluorescence
analyzers. [Program Code(s): 22140]................
D. All other special nuclear material licenses, $5,700
except licenses authorizing special nuclear
material in sealed or unsealed form in combination
that would constitute a critical mass, as defined
in Sec. 70.4 of this chapter, for which the
licensee shall pay the same fees as those under
Category 1.A. [Program Code(s): 22110, 22111,
22120, 22131, 22136, 22150, 22151, 22161, 22170,
23100, 23300, 23310]...............................
E. Licenses or certificates for the operation of a $2,023,000
uranium enrichment facility \15\ [Program Code(s):
21200].............................................
F. Licenses for possession and use of special $4,300
nuclear materials greater than critical mass, as
defined in Sec. 70.4 of this chapter, for
development and testing of commercial products, and
other non-fuel cycle activities.\4\ [Program Code:
22155].............................................
2. Source material:
[[Page 32179]]
A. (1) Licenses for possession and use of source $467,000
material for refining uranium mill concentrates to
uranium hexafluoride or for deconverting uranium
hexafluoride in the production of uranium oxides
for disposal.\15\ [Program Code: 11400]............
(2) Licenses for possession and use of source
material in recovery operations such as milling, in-
situ recovery, heap-leaching, ore buying stations,
ion-exchange facilities and in-processing of ores
containing source material for extraction of metals
other than uranium or thorium, including licenses
authorizing the possession of byproduct waste
material (tailings) from source material recovery
operations, as well as licenses authorizing the
possession and maintenance of a facility in a
standby mode.......................................
(a) Conventional and Heap Leach facilities.\15\ N/A
[Program Code(s): 11100].......................
(b) Basic In Situ Recovery facilities.\15\ $47,200
[Program Code(s): 11500].......................
(c) Expanded In Situ Recovery facilities \15\ N/A
[Program Code(s): 11510].......................
(d) In Situ Recovery Resin facilities.\15\ \5\ N/A
[Program Code(s): 11550].......................
(e) Resin Toll Milling facilities.\15\ [Program \5\ N/A
Code(s): 11555]................................
(f) Other facilities \6\ [Program Code(s): \5\ N/A
11700].........................................
(3) Licenses that authorize the receipt of byproduct \5\ N/A
material, as defined in Section 11e.(2) of the
Atomic Energy Act, from other persons for
possession and disposal, except those licenses
subject to the fees in Category 2.A.(2) or Category
2.A.(4).\15\ [Program Code(s): 11600, 12000].......
(4) Licenses that authorize the receipt of byproduct N/A
material, as defined in Section 11e.(2) of the
Atomic Energy Act, from other persons for
possession and disposal incidental to the disposal
of the uranium waste tailings generated by the
licensee's milling operations, except those
licenses subject to the fees in Category
2.A.(2).\15\ [Program Code(s): 12010]..............
B. Licenses which authorize the possession, use, and/ $2,700
or installation of source material for shielding.16
17 Application [Program Code(s): 11210]............
C. Licenses to distribute items containing source $8,900
material to persons exempt from the licensing
requirements of part 40 of this chapter. [Program
Code: 11240].......................................
D. Licenses to distribute source material to persons $5,100
generally licensed under part 40 of this chapter.
[Program Code(s): 11230 and 11231].................
E. Licenses for possession and use of source $6,300
material for processing or manufacturing of
products or materials containing source material
for commercial distribution. [Program Code: 11710].
F. All other source material licenses. [Program $8,500
Code(s): 11200, 11220, 11221, 11300, 11800, 11810,
11820].............................................
3. Byproduct material:
A. Licenses of broad scope for possession and use of $27,400
byproduct material issued under parts 30 and 33 of
this chapter for processing or manufacturing of
items containing byproduct material for commercial
distribution. Number of locations of use: 1-5.
[Program Code(s): 03211, 03212, 03213].............
(1). Licenses of broad scope for the possession $36,400
and use of byproduct material issued under
parts 30 and 33 of this chapter for processing
or manufacturing of items containing byproduct
material for commercial distribution. Number of
locations of use: 6-20. [Program Code(s):
04010, 04012, 04014]...........................
(2). Licenses of broad scope for the possession $45,500
and use of byproduct material issued under
parts 30 and 33 of this chapter for processing
or manufacturing of items containing byproduct
material for commercial distribution. Number of
locations of use: More than 20. [Program
Code(s): 04011, 04013, 04015]..................
B. Other licenses for possession and use of $9,600
byproduct material issued under part 30 of this
chapter for processing or manufacturing of items
containing byproduct material for commercial
distribution. Number of locations of use: 1-5.
[Program Code(s): 03214, 03215, 22135, 22162]......
(1). Other licenses for possession and use of $12,700
byproduct material issued under part 30 of this
chapter for processing or manufacturing of
items containing byproduct material for
commercial distribution. Number of locations of
use: 6-20. [Program Code(s): 04110, 04112,
04114, 04116]..................................
(2). Other licenses for possession and use of $15,800
byproduct material issued under part 30 of this
chapter for processing or manufacturing of
items containing byproduct material for
commercial distribution. Number of locations of
use: More than 20. [Program Code(s): 04111,
04113, 04115, 04117]...........................
C. Licenses issued under Sec. Sec. 32.72 and/or $9,000
32.74 of this chapter that authorize the processing
or manufacturing and distribution or redistribution
of radiopharmaceuticals, generators, reagent kits,
and/or sources and devices containing byproduct
material. This category does not apply to licenses
issued to nonprofit educational institutions whose
processing or manufacturing is exempt under Sec.
170.11(a)(4) of this chapter. Number of locations
of use: 1-5. [Program Code(s): 02500, 02511, 02513]
(1). Licenses issued under Sec. Sec. 32.72 $12,000
and/or 32.74 of this chapter that authorize the
processing or manufacturing and distribution or
redistribution of radiopharmaceuticals,
generators, reagent kits, and/or sources and
devices containing byproduct material. This
category does not apply to licenses issued to
nonprofit educational institutions whose
processing or manufacturing is exempt under
Sec. 170.11(a)(4). Number of locations of
use: 6-20. [Program Code(s): 04210, 04212,
04214].........................................
(2). Licenses issued under Sec. Sec. 32.72 $16,200
and/or 32.74 of this chapter that authorize the
processing or manufacturing and distribution or
redistribution of radiopharmaceuticals,
generators, reagent kits, and/or sources and
devices containing byproduct material. This
category does not apply to licenses issued to
nonprofit educational institutions whose
processing or manufacturing is exempt under
Sec. 170.11(a)(4). Number of locations of
use: more than 20. [Program Code(s): 04211,
04213, 04215]..................................
D. [Reserved]....................................... \5\ N/A
E. Licenses for possession and use of byproduct $9,900
material in sealed sources for irradiation of
materials in which the source is not removed from
its shield (self-shielded units) [Program Code(s):
03510, 03520]......................................
[[Page 32180]]
F. Licenses for possession and use of less than or $8,900
equal to 10,000 curies of byproduct material in
sealed sources for irradiation of materials in
which the source is exposed for irradiation
purposes. This category also includes underwater
irradiators for irradiation of materials in which
the source is not exposed for irradiation purposes
[Program Code(s): 03511]...........................
G. Licenses for possession and use of greater than $72,100
10,000 curies of byproduct material in sealed
sources for irradiation of materials in which the
source is exposed for irradiation purposes. This
category also includes underwater irradiators for
irradiation of materials in which the source is not
exposed for irradiation purposes [Program Code(s):
03521].............................................
H. Licenses issued under subpart A of part 32 of $8,700
this chapter to distribute items containing
byproduct material that require device review to
persons exempt from the licensing requirements of
part 30 of this chapter, except specific licenses
authorizing redistribution of items that have been
authorized for distribution to persons exempt from
the licensing requirements of part 30 of this
chapter [Program Code(s): 03254, 03255, 03257].....
I. Licenses issued under subpart A of part 32 of $17,400
this chapter to distribute items containing
byproduct material or quantities of byproduct
material that do not require device evaluation to
persons exempt from the licensing requirements of
part 30 of this chapter, except for specific
licenses authorizing redistribution of items that
have been authorized for distribution to persons
exempt from the licensing requirements of part 30
of this chapter [Program Code(s): 03250, 03251,
03253, 03256]......................................
J. Licenses issued under subpart B of part 32 of $3,600
this chapter to distribute items containing
byproduct material that require sealed source and/
or device review to persons generally licensed
under part 31 of this chapter, except specific
licenses authorizing redistribution of items that
have been authorized for distribution to persons
generally licensed under part 31 of this chapter
[Program Code(s): 03240, 03241, 03243].............
K. Licenses issued under subpart B of part 32 of $2,700
this chapter to distribute items containing
byproduct material or quantities of byproduct
material that do not require sealed source and/or
device review to persons generally licensed under
part 31 of this chapter, except specific licenses
authorizing redistribution of items that have been
authorized for distribution to persons generally
licensed under part 31 of this chapter [Program
Code(s): 03242, 03244].............................
L. Licenses of broad scope for possession and use of $12,500
byproduct material issued under parts 30 and 33 of
this chapter for research and development that do
not authorize commercial distribution. Number of
locations of use: 1-5. [Program Code(s): 01100,
01110, 01120, 03610, 03611, 03612, 03613]..........
(1) Licenses of broad scope for possession and $16,600
use of product material issued under parts 30
and 33 of this chapter for research and
development that do not authorize commercial
distribution. Number of locations of use: 6-20.
[Program Code(s): 04610, 04612, 04614, 04616,
04618, 04620, 04622]...........................
(2) Licenses of broad scope for possession and $20,700
use of byproduct material issued under parts 30
and 33 of this chapter for research and
development that do not authorize commercial
distribution. Number of locations of use: More
than 20. [Program Code(s): 04611, 04613, 04615,
04617, 04619, 04621, 04623]....................
M. Other licenses for possession and use of $13,400
byproduct material issued under part 30 of this
chapter for research and development that do not
authorize commercial distribution [Program Code(s):
03620].............................................
N. Licenses that authorize services for other $15,200
licensees, except: (1) Licenses that authorize only
calibration and/or leak testing services are
subject to the fees specified in fee Category 3.P.;
and (2) Licenses that authorize waste disposal
services are subject to the fees specified in fee
categories 4.A., 4.B., and 4.C.\21\ [Program
Code(s): 03219, 03225, 03226]......................
O. Licenses for possession and use of byproduct $29,100
material issued under part 34 of this chapter for
industrial radiography operations. This category
also includes the possession and use of source
material for shielding authorized under part 40 of
this chapter when authorized on the same license
Number of locations of use: 1-5. [Program Code(s):
03310, 03320]......................................
(1). Licenses for possession and use of $38,700
byproduct material issued under part 34 of this
chapter for industrial radiography operations.
This category also includes the possession and
use of source material for shielding authorized
under part 40 of this chapter when authorized
on the same license. Number of locations of
use: 6-20. [Program Code(s): 04310, 04312].....
(2). Licenses for possession and use of $48,600
byproduct material issued under part 34 of this
chapter for industrial radiography operations.
This category also includes the possession and
use of source material for shielding authorized
under part 40 of this chapter when authorized
on the same license. Number of locations of
use: More than 20. [Program Code(s): 04311,
04313].........................................
P. All other specific byproduct material licenses, $9,900
except those in Categories 4.A. through 9.D.\18\
Number of locations of use: 1-5. [Program Code(s):
02400, 02410, 03120, 03121, 03122, 03123, 03124,
03140, 03130, 03220, 03221, 03222, 03800, 03810,
22130].............................................
(1). All other specific byproduct material $13,100
licenses, except those in Categories 4.A.
through 9.D.\18\ Number of locations of use: 6-
20. [Program Code(s): 04410, 04412, 04414,
04416, 04418, 04420, 04422, 04424, 04426,
04428, 04430, 04432, 04434, 04436, 04438]......
(2). All other specific byproduct material $16,300
licenses, except those in Categories 4.A.
through 9.D.\18\ Number of locations of use:
More than 20. [Program Code(s): 04411, 04413,
04415, 04417, 04419, 04421, 04423, 04425,
04427, 04429, 04431, 04433, 04435, 04437,
04439].........................................
Q. Registration of devices generally licensed under \13\ N/A
part 31 of this chapter............................
R. Possession of items or products containing radium-
226 identified in Sec. 31.12 of this chapter
which exceed the number of items or limits
specified in that section: \14\
(1). Possession of quantities exceeding the $6,000
number of items or limits in Sec.
31.12(a)(4), or (5) of this chapter but less
than or equal to 10 times the number of items
or limits specified [Program Code(s): 02700]...
(2). Possession of quantities exceeding 10 times $6,400
the number of items or limits specified in Sec.
31.12(a)(4) or (5) of this chapter [Program
Code(s): 02710]................................
S. Licenses for production of accelerator-produced $23,800
radionuclides [Program Code(s): 03210].............
4. Waste disposal and processing:
[[Page 32181]]
A. Licenses specifically authorizing the receipt of $22,500
waste byproduct material, source material, or
special nuclear material from other persons for the
purpose of contingency storage or commercial land
disposal by the licensee; or licenses authorizing
contingency storage of low-level radioactive waste
at the site of nuclear power reactors; or licenses
for receipt of waste from other persons for
incineration or other treatment, packaging of
resulting waste and residues, and transfer of
packages to another person authorized to receive or
dispose of waste material. [Program Code(s): 03231,
03233, 03236, 06100, 06101]........................
B. Licenses specifically authorizing the receipt of $15,800
waste byproduct material, source material, or
special nuclear material from other persons for the
purpose of packaging or repackaging the material.
The licensee will dispose of the material by
transfer to another person authorized to receive or
dispose of the material. [Program Code(s): 03234]..
C. Licenses specifically authorizing the receipt of $8,700
prepackaged waste byproduct material, source
material, or special nuclear material from other
persons. The licensee will dispose of the material
by transfer to another person authorized to receive
or dispose of the material. [Program Code(s):
03232].............................................
5. Well logging:
A. Licenses for possession and use of byproduct $12,500
material, source material, and/or special nuclear
material for well logging, well surveys, and tracer
studies other than field flooding tracer studies.
[Program Code(s): 03110, 03111, 03112].............
B. Licenses for possession and use of byproduct \5\ N/A
material for field flooding tracer studies.
[Program Code(s): 03113]...........................
6. Nuclear laundries:
A. Licenses for commercial collection and laundry of $28,100
items contaminated with byproduct material, source
material, or special nuclear material. [Program
Code(s): 03218]....................................
7. Medical licenses:
A. Licenses issued under parts 30, 35, 40, and 70 of $27,100
this chapter for human use of byproduct material,
source material, or special nuclear material in
sealed sources contained in gamma stereotactic
radiosurgery units, teletherapy devices, or similar
beam therapy devices. This category also includes
the possession and use of source material for
shielding when authorized on the same license.\9\
Number of locations of use: 1-5. [Program Code(s):
02300, 02310]......................................
(1). Licenses issued under parts 30, 35, 40, and $36,100
70 of this chapter for human use of byproduct
material, source material, or special nuclear
material in sealed sources contained in gamma
stereotactic radiosurgery units, teletherapy
devices, or similar beam therapy devices. This
category also includes the possession and use
of source material for shielding when
authorized on the same license.\9\ Number of
locations of use: 6-20. [Program Code(s):
04510, 04512]..................................
(2). Licenses issued under parts 30, 35, 40, and $45,200
70 of this chapter for human use of byproduct
material, source material, or special nuclear
material in sealed sources contained in gamma
stereotactic radiosurgery units, teletherapy
devices, or similar beam therapy devices. This
category also includes the possession and use
of source material for shielding when
authorized on the same license.\9\ Number of
locations of use: More than 20. [Program
Code(s): 04511, 04513].........................
B. Licenses of broad scope issued to medical $37,000
institutions or two or more physicians under parts
30, 33, 35, 40, and 70 of this chapter authorizing
research and development, including human use of
byproduct material, except licenses for byproduct
material, source material, or special nuclear
material in sealed sources contained in teletherapy
devices. This category also includes the possession
and use of source material for shielding when
authorized on the same license.\9\ Number of
locations of use: 1-5. [Program Code(s): 02110]....
(1). Licenses of broad scope issued to medical $49,300
institutions or two or more physicians under
parts 30, 33, 35, 40, and 70 of this chapter
authorizing research and development, including
human use of byproduct material, except
licenses for byproduct material, source
material, or special nuclear material in sealed
sources contained in teletherapy devices. This
category also includes the possession and use
of source material for shielding when
authorized on the same license.\9\ Number of
locations of use: 6-20. [Program Code(s):
04710].........................................
(2). Licenses of broad scope issued to medical $61,500
institutions or two or more physicians under
parts 30, 33, 35, 40, and 70 of this chapter
authorizing research and development, including
human use of byproduct material, except
licenses for byproduct material, source
material, or special nuclear material in sealed
sources contained in teletherapy devices. This
category also includes the possession and use
of source material for shielding when
authorized on the same license.\9\ Number of
locations of use: More than 20. [Program
Code(s): 04711]................................
C. Other licenses issued under parts 30, 35, 40, and $16,800
70 of this chapter for human use of byproduct
material, source material, and/or special nuclear
material, except licenses for byproduct material,
source material, or special nuclear material in
sealed sources contained in teletherapy devices.
This category also includes the possession and use
of source material for shielding when authorized on
the same license.9 19 Number of locations of use:
1[dash]5. [Program Code(s): 02120, 02121, 02200,
02201, 02210, 02220, 02230, 02231, 02240, 22160]...
(1). Other licenses issued under parts 30, 35, $16,900
40, and 70 of this chapter for human use of
byproduct material, source material, and/or
special nuclear material, except licenses for
byproduct material, source material, or special
nuclear material in sealed sources contained in
teletherapy devices. This category also
includes the possession and use of source
material for shielding when authorized on the
same license.9 19 Number of locations of use: 6-
20. [Program Code(s): 04810, 04812, 04814,
04816, 04818, 04820, 04822, 04824, 04826,
04828].........................................
(2). Other licenses issued under parts 30, 35, $20,900
40, and 70 of this chapter for human use of
byproduct material, source material, and/or
special nuclear material, except licenses for
byproduct material, source material, or special
nuclear material in sealed sources contained in
teletherapy devices. This category also
includes the possession and use of source
material for shielding when authorized on the
same license.9 19 Number of locations of use:
More than 20. [Program Code(s): 04811, 04813,
04815, 04817, 04819, 04821, 04823, 04825,
04827, 04829]..................................
8. Civil defense:
A. Licenses for possession and use of byproduct $6,000
material, source material, or special nuclear
material for civil defense activities. [Program
Code(s): 03710]....................................
9. Device, product, or sealed source safety evaluation:
[[Page 32182]]
A. Registrations issued for the safety evaluation of $17,900
devices or products containing byproduct material,
source material, or special nuclear material,
except reactor fuel devices, for commercial
distribution.......................................
B. Registrations issued for the safety evaluation of $9,300
devices or products containing byproduct material,
source material, or special nuclear material
manufactured in accordance with the unique
specifications of, and for use by, a single
applicant, except reactor fuel devices.............
C. Registrations issued for the safety evaluation of $5,500
sealed sources containing byproduct material,
source material, or special nuclear material,
except reactor fuel, for commercial distribution...
D. Registrations issued for the safety evaluation of $1,100
sealed sources containing byproduct material,
source material, or special nuclear material,
manufactured in accordance with the unique
specifications of, and for use by, a single
applicant, except reactor fuel.....................
10. Transportation of radioactive material:
A. Certificates of Compliance or other package
approvals issued for design of casks, packages, and
shipping containers................................
1. Spent Fuel, High-Level Waste, and plutonium \6\
air packages...................................
2. Other Casks.................................. \6\
B. Quality assurance program approvals issued under
part 71 of this chapter............................
1. Users and Fabricators........................ \6\ N/A
2. Users........................................ \6\ N/A
C. Evaluation of security plans, route approvals, \6\ N/A
route surveys, and transportation security devices
(including immobilization devices).................
11. Standardized spent fuel facilities.................. \6\ N/A
12. Special Projects [Program Code(s): 25110]........... \6\ N/A
13. A. Spent fuel storage cask Certificate of Compliance \6\ N/A
B. General licenses for storage of spent fuel under \12\ N/A
Sec. 72.210 of this chapter......................
14. Decommissioning/Reclamation:
A. Byproduct, source, or special nuclear material 7 20 N/A
licenses and other approvals authorizing
decommissioning, decontamination, reclamation, or
site restoration activities under parts 30, 40, 70,
72, and 76 of this chapter, including master
materials licenses (MMLs). The transition to this
fee category occurs when a licensee has permanently
ceased principal activities. [Program Code(s):
03900, 11900, 21135, 21215, 21325, 22200]..........
B. Site-specific decommissioning activities \7\ N/A
associated with unlicensed sites, including MMLs,
whether or not the sites have been previously
licensed...........................................
15. Import and Export licenses.......................... \8\ N/A
16. Reciprocity......................................... \8\ N/A
17. Master materials licenses of broad scope issued to $340,000
Government agencies.\15\ [Program Code(s): 03614]......
18. Department of Energy:
A. Certificates of Compliance....................... \10\
$1,354,000
B. Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act $117,000
(UMTRCA) activities [Program Code(s): 03237, 03238]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Annual fees will be assessed based on whether a licensee held a
valid license with the NRC authorizing possession and use of
radioactive material during the current FY. The annual fee is waived
for those materials licenses and holders of certificates,
registrations, and approvals who either filed for termination of their
licenses or approvals or filed for possession only/storage licenses
before October 1 of the current FY, and permanently ceased licensed
activities entirely before this date. Annual fees for licensees who
filed for termination of a license, downgrade of a license, or for a
possession-only license during the FY and for new licenses issued
during the FY will be prorated in accordance with the provisions of
Sec. 171.17. If a person holds more than one license, certificate,
registration, or approval, the annual fee(s) will be assessed for each
license, certificate, registration, or approval held by that person.
For licenses that authorize more than one activity on a single license
(e.g., human use and irradiator activities), annual fees will be
assessed for each category applicable to the license.
\2\ Payment of the prescribed annual fee does not automatically renew
the license, certificate, registration, or approval for which the fee
is paid. Renewal applications must be filed in accordance with the
requirements of part 30, 40, 70, 71, 72, or 76 of this chapter.
\3\ Each FY, fees for these materials licenses will be calculated and
assessed in accordance with Sec. 171.13 and will be published in the
Federal Register for notice and comment.
\4\ Other facilities include licenses for extraction of metals, heavy
metals, and rare earths.
\5\ There are no existing NRC licenses in these fee categories. If NRC
issues a license for these categories, the Commission will consider
establishing an annual fee for this type of license.
\6\ Standardized spent fuel facilities, 10 CFR parts 71 and 72
Certificates of Compliance and related Quality Assurance program
approvals, and special reviews, such as topical reports, are not
assessed an annual fee because the generic costs of regulating these
activities are primarily attributable to users of the designs,
certificates, and topical reports.
\7\ Licensees in this category are not assessed an annual fee because
they are charged an annual fee in other categories while they are
licensed to operate.
\8\ No annual fee is charged because it is not practical to administer
due to the relatively short life or temporary nature of the license.
\9\ Separate annual fees will not be assessed for pacemaker licenses
issued to medical institutions that also hold nuclear medicine
licenses under fee categories 7.A, 7.A.1, 7.A.2, 7.B., 7.B.1, 7.B.2,
7.C, 7.C.1, or 7.C.2.
\10\ This includes Certificates of Compliance issued to the U.S.
Department of Energy that are not funded from the Nuclear Waste Fund.
\11\ See Sec. 171.15(c).
\12\ See Sec. 171.15(c).
\13\ No annual fee is charged for this category because the cost of the
general license registration program applicable to licenses in this
category will be recovered through 10 CFR part 170 fees.
\14\ Persons who possess radium sources that are used for operational
purposes in another fee category are not also subject to the fees in
this category. (This exception does not apply if the radium sources
are possessed for storage only.)
\15\ Licensees subject to fees under categories 1.A., 1.B., 1.E., 2.A.,
and licensees paying fees under fee category 17 must pay the largest
applicable fee and are not subject to additional fees listed in this
table.
\16\ Licensees paying fees under 3.C. are not subject to fees under 2.B.
for possession and shielding authorized on the same license.
\17\ Licensees paying fees under 7.C. are not subject to fees under 2.B.
for possession and shielding authorized on the same license.
\18\ Licensees paying fees under 3.N. are not subject to paying fees
under 3.P., 3.P.1, or 3.P.2 for calibration or leak testing services
authorized on the same license.
[[Page 32183]]
\19\ Licensees paying fees under 7.B., 7.B.1, or 7.B.2 are not subject
to paying fees under 7.C., 7.C.1, or 7.C.2 for broad scope license
licenses issued under parts 30, 35, 40, and 70 of this chapter for
human use of byproduct material, source material, and/or special
nuclear material, except licenses for byproduct material, source
material, or special nuclear material in sealed sources contained in
teletherapy devices authorized on the same license.
\20\ No annual fee is charged for a materials license (or part of a
materials license) that has transitioned to this fee category because
the decommissioning costs will be recovered through 10 CFR part 170
fees, but annual fees may be charged for other activities authorized
under the license that are not in decommissioning status.
\21\ Licensees paying fees under 4.A., 4.B. or 4.C. are not subject to
paying fees under 3.N. licenses that authorize services for other
licensees authorized on the same license.
0
18. In Sec. 171.17, revise paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) to read as
follows:
Sec. 171.17 Proration.
(a) * * *
(1) New licenses. (i) The annual fees for new licenses for power
reactors and small modular reactors that are subject to fees under this
part, for which the licensee has notified the NRC on or after October 1
of a fiscal year (FY) that the licensee has successfully completed
power ascension testing, are prorated on the basis of the number of
days remaining in the FY. Thereafter, the full annual fee is due and
payable each subsequent FY.
(ii) The annual fees for new licenses for non-power production or
utilization facilities, 10 CFR part 72 licensees who do not hold 10 CFR
part 50 or 52 licenses, and materials licenses with annual fees of
$100,000 or greater for a single fee category for the current FY, that
are subject to fees under this part and are granted a license to
operate on or after October 1 of a FY, are prorated on the basis of the
number of days remaining in the FY. Thereafter, the full annual fee is
due and payable each subsequent FY.
(2) Terminations. The base operating power reactor annual fee for
operating reactor licensees or the annual fee for small modular reactor
licensees, who have requested amendment to withdraw operating authority
permanently during the FY will be prorated based on the number of days
during the FY the license was in effect before docketing of the
certifications for permanent cessation of operations and permanent
removal of fuel from the reactor vessel or when a final legally
effective order to permanently cease operations has come into effect.
The spent fuel storage/reactor decommissioning annual fee for reactor
licensees who permanently cease operations and have permanently removed
fuel from the site during the FY will be prorated on the basis of the
number of days remaining in the FY after docketing of both the
certifications of permanent cessation of operations and permanent
removal of fuel from the site. The spent fuel storage/reactor
decommissioning annual fee will be prorated for those 10 CFR part 72
licensees who do not hold a 10 CFR part 50 or 52 license who request
termination of the 10 CFR part 72 license and permanently cease
activities authorized by the license during the FY based on the number
of days the license was in effect before receipt of the termination
request. The annual fee for materials licenses with annual fees of
$100,000 or greater for a single fee category for the current FY will
be prorated based on the number of days remaining in the FY when a
termination request or a request for a possession-only license is
received by the NRC, provided the licensee permanently ceased licensed
activities during the specified period. The annual fee for non-power
production or utilization facilities will be prorated based on the
number of days remaining in the FY when the authorization to operate
the facility has been permanently removed from the license during the
FY.
* * * * *
0
19. Add Sec. 171.26 to read as follows:
Sec. 171.26 Right to dispute assessed fees.
All debtors' disputes of fees assessed must be submitted in
accordance with 10 CFR 15.31.
Dated: June 9, 2021.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Cherish K. Johnson,
Chief Financial Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021-12546 Filed 6-15-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P