Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (AHD) Helicopters, 30218-30221 [2021-11804]
Download as PDF
30218
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 107 / Monday, June 7, 2021 / Proposed Rules
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of cracks
in the station (STA) 1000 front spar shear tie
at the left and right side buttock line (BL)
11.33, BL 33.99, BL 57.50, and BL 75.92, and
in the intercostal lug fitting at the left and
right side BL 11.33. The FAA is issuing this
AD to address any cracking in these areas
that could result in the loss of limit load
capability in a principal structural element,
the potential inability to restrain the cargo for
certain cargo configurations, and the
potential for a center fuel tank rupture for
certain cargo configurations under limit load
conditions, which could adversely affect the
structural integrity of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Required Actions
Except as specified by paragraph (h) of this
AD: At the applicable times specified in the
‘‘Compliance’’ paragraph of Boeing Alert
Requirements Bulletin 747–53A2904 RB,
dated December 16, 2020, do all applicable
actions identified in, and in accordance with,
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Requirements Bulletin 747–53A2904
RB, dated December 16, 2020.
Note 1 to paragraph (g): Guidance for
accomplishing the actions required by this
AD can be found in Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 747–53A2904, dated December 16,
2020, which is referred to in Boeing Alert
Requirements Bulletin 747–53A2904 RB,
dated December 16, 2020.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
(h) Exceptions to Service Information
Specifications
(1) Where Boeing Alert Requirements
Bulletin 747–53A2904 RB, dated December
16, 2020, uses the phrase ‘‘the original issue
date of Requirements Bulletin 747–53A2904
RB,’’ this AD requires using ‘‘the effective
date of this AD.’’
(2) Where Boeing Alert Requirements
Bulletin 747–53A2904 RB, dated December
16, 2020, specifies contacting Boeing for
repair instructions: This AD requires doing
the repair using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (i) of this AD.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or responsible Flight
Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in Related Information.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Jun 04, 2021
Jkt 253001
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by The Boeing Company
Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, to make
those findings. To be approved, the repair
method, modification deviation, or alteration
deviation must meet the certification basis of
the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
(j) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Stefanie Roesli, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA
98198; phone and fax: 206–231–3964; email:
Stefanie.N.Roesli@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd.,
MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;
telephone 562–797–1717; internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this
referenced service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational
Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
206–231–3195.
Issued on May 18, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–11844 Filed 6–4–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2021–0450; Project
Identifier 2017–SW–100–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (AHD)
Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH
(AHD) Model MBB–BK 117 D–2
helicopters. This proposed AD was
prompted by the discovery that certain
parts that are approved for installation
on multiple helicopter models are life
limited parts when installed on Model
MBB–BK 117 D–2 helicopters and some
helicopter delivery documents excluded
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the life limit information. This proposed
AD would require determining the total
hours time-in-service (TIS) of a certain
part-numbered rotor mast nut and reidentifying a certain part-numbered
rotor mast nut. This proposed AD would
also require establishing a life limit for
a certain part-numbered rotor mast nut
and helical gear support, and removing
each part from service before reaching
its life limit. Additionally, this proposed
AD would require replacing a certain
part-numbered main gearbox (MGB)
with a not affected MGB as specified in
a European Aviation Safety Agency
(now European Union Aviation Safety
Agency) (EASA) AD, which is proposed
for incorporation by reference (IBR). The
FAA is proposing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by July 22, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For material that is proposed for IBR
in this AD, contact EASA, KonradAdenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne,
Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000;
email ADs@easa.europa.eu; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
material on the EASA website at https://
ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this
material at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N–321,
Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call (817) 222–5110. It is also
available in the AD docket on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2021–0450.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2021–
0450; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this NPRM, any
comments received, and other
E:\FR\FM\07JNP1.SGM
07JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 107 / Monday, June 7, 2021 / Proposed Rules
information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rao
Edupuganti, Aerospace Engineer,
Dynamic Systems Section, Technical
Innovation Policy Branch, Policy &
Innovation Division, FAA, 10101
Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177;
telephone (817) 222–5110; email
rao.edupuganti@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send
your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2021–0450; Project Identifier
2017–SW–100–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of
the proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. The FAA will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend this proposal
because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this proposal.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this NPRM
contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated
as private, that you actually treat as
private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this NPRM, it is important
that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each
page of your submission containing CBI
as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such
marked submissions as confidential
under the FOIA, and they will not be
placed in the public docket of this
NPRM. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to Rao Edupuganti,
Aerospace Engineer, Dynamic Systems
Section, Technical Innovation Policy
Branch, Policy & Innovation Division,
FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Jun 04, 2021
Jkt 253001
Worth, TX 76177; telephone (817) 222–
5110; email rao.edupuganti@faa.gov.
Any commentary that the FAA receives
that is not specifically designated as CBI
will be placed in the public docket for
this rulemaking.
Background
EASA, which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA AD 2017–0037,
dated February 22, 2017 (EASA AD
2017–0037), to correct an unsafe
condition for Airbus Helicopters
Deutschland GmbH (formerly
Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH), Airbus
Helicopters Inc. (formerly American
Eurocopter LLC) Model MBB–BK 117
D–2 and MBB–BK117 D–2m helicopters.
This proposed AD was prompted by
the discovery that certain parts that are
approved for installation on multiple
helicopter models are life limited parts
when installed on Model MBB–BK 117
D–2 helicopters and some helicopter
delivery documents excluded the life
limit information. The FAA is proposing
this AD to address an unsafe condition
on these products. See EASA AD 2017–
0037 for additional background
information.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
EASA AD 2017–0037 requires
establishing a life limit for rotor mast
nut part number (P/N) D632K1133–201
and helical gear support P/N
D632K1113–201, and replacing these
parts before exceeding their life limit.
EASA AD 2017–0037 also requires
replacing each rotor mast nut P/N
D632K1133–201 for which the hours
time-in-service (TIS) are unknown and
replacing certain part-numbered rotor
mast nuts before accumulating 3,708
hours TIS since first installation on a
helicopter. EASA AD 2017–0037
requires re-identifying each rotor mast
nut P/N 117–12133–01 to P/N
D632K1133–201 by following the
specified service information. EASA AD
2017–0037 requires replacing any MGB
P/N D632K1001–051 with serial number
(S/N) D2–0001 up to D2–0108 inclusive,
D2–0123, D2–0126, D2–0127, or D2–
0130 up to D2–0136 inclusive with a not
affected MGB before the affected MGB
accumulates 3,708 hours TIS. EASA AD
2017–0037 also prohibits installing an
affected rotor mast nut or an affected
MGB that has accumulated more than
3,708 hours TIS since first installation
on a helicopter. Additionally, EASA AD
2017–0037 requires revising the Aircraft
Maintenance Program (AMP).
This material is reasonably available
because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
30219
of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section.
Other Related Service Information
The FAA reviewed Airbus Helicopters
Alert Service Bulletin MBB–BK117
D–2–63A–001, Revision 0, dated
December 1, 2016 (ASB 63A–001),
which is not incorporated by reference,
which specifies procedures for reidentifying the rotor mast nut by using
a vibrograph, crossing out the old P/N
and marking the new P/N on the outer
surface, engraving the letter ‘‘A’’ behind
the S/N of each part, and updating the
historical record and log card to confirm
compliance with ASB 63A–001. ASB
63A–001 also specifies during the next
MGB overhaul, making an entry in the
log card to confirm re-identification of
the helical gear support, and annotating
the S/N of the helical gear support.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
These products have been approved
by the aviation authority of another
country, and are approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to the
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, the FAA has been
notified of the unsafe condition
described in EASA AD 2017–0037. The
FAA is proposing this AD after
evaluating all the relevant information
and determining the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
EASA AD 2017–0037, described
previously, as incorporated by
reference, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this proposed AD and
except as discussed under ‘‘Differences
Between this Proposed AD and the
EASA AD.’’
Explanation of Required Compliance
Information
In the FAA’s ongoing efforts to
improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA initially worked with
Airbus and EASA to develop a process
to use certain EASA ADs as the primary
source of information for compliance
with requirements for corresponding
FAA ADs. The FAA has since
coordinated with other manufacturers
and civil aviation authorities (CAAs) to
use this process. As a result, EASA AD
2017–0037 will be incorporated by
reference in the FAA final rule. This
proposed AD would, therefore, require
compliance with EASA AD 2017–0037
E:\FR\FM\07JNP1.SGM
07JNP1
30220
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 107 / Monday, June 7, 2021 / Proposed Rules
in its entirety, through that
incorporation, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this proposed AD.
Using common terms that are the same
as the heading of a particular section in
the EASA AD does not mean that
operators need comply only with that
section. For example, where the AD
requirement refers to ‘‘all required
actions and compliance times,’’
compliance with this AD requirement is
not limited to the section titled
‘‘Required Action(s) and Compliance
Time(s)’’ in the EASA AD. Service
information specified in EASA AD
2017–0037 that is required for
compliance with EASA AD 2017–0037
will be available on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2021–0450 after the FAA final
rule is published.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the EASA AD
EASA AD 2017–0037 applies to
Model MBB–BK117 D–2 and D2m
helicopters, whereas this proposed AD
would only apply to Model MBB–
BK117 D–2 helicopters because Model
D–2m is not FAA type-certificated. If
the total hours TIS for an affected rotor
mast nut cannot be determined, this
proposed AD would require removing
the rotor mast nut from service before
further flight, whereas EASA AD 2017–
0037 does not contain this requirement.
EASA AD 2017–0037 requires using a
vibrograph to re-identify certain rotor
mast nuts, whereas this proposed AD
would require using a vibro etch
instead. EASA AD 2017–0037 requires
replacing certain parts, whereas this
proposed AD would require removing
certain parts from service instead. EASA
AD 2017–0037 requires revising the
AMP, whereas this proposed AD would
not.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD, if
adopted as proposed, would affect 30
helicopters of U.S. Registry. Labor rates
are estimated at $85 per work-hour.
Based on these numbers, the FAA
estimates the following costs to comply
with this proposed AD.
Determining the total hours TIS on an
affected rotor mast nut would take about
1 work-hour for an estimated cost of $85
per helicopter and $2,550 for the U.S.
fleet.
Re-identifying a rotor mast nut would
take about 1.5 work-hours for an
estimated cost of $128 per rotor mast
nut.
Replacing a rotor mast nut would take
about 6 work-hours and parts would
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Jun 04, 2021
Jkt 253001
cost about $5,351 for an estimated cost
of $5,861 per rotor mast nut.
Replacing a main gearbox, which
includes replacing the helical gear
support, would take about 42 workhours and parts would cost about
$295,000 (overhauled) for an estimated
cost of $298,570.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: General requirements. Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Would not affect intrastate
aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Would not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
■
Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH
(AHD): Docket No. FAA–2021–0450;
Project Identifier 2017–SW–100–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments by July
22, 2021.
(b) Affected Airworthiness Directives (ADs)
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Helicopters
Deutschland GmbH (AHD) Model MBB–BK
117 D–2 helicopters, certificated in any
category, with an affected main gearbox or
affected rotor mast nut as identified in Note
1 of European Aviation Safety Agency (now
European Union Aviation Safety Agency)
(EASA) AD 2017–0037, dated February 22,
2017 (EASA AD 2017–0037) installed.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)
Code: 6200, Main gearbox.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This proposed AD was prompted by the
discovery that certain parts that are approved
for installation on multiple helicopter models
are life limited parts when installed on
Model MBB–BK 117 D–2 helicopters and
some helicopter delivery documents
excluded the life limit information. The FAA
is issuing this AD to prevent certain parts
from remaining in service beyond their
fatigue life. The unsafe condition, if not
addressed, could result in failure of the part
and loss of control of the helicopter.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this
AD: Comply with all required actions and
compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, EASA AD 2017–0037.
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2017–0037
(1) Where EASA AD 2017–0037 refers to its
effective date, this AD requires using the
effective date of this AD.
(2) Where EASA AD 2017–0037 refers to
flight hours (FH), this AD requires using
hours time-in-service (TIS).
(3) Where paragraph (1) of EASA AD 2017–
0037 requires determining the FH (total
hours TIS) accumulated by the affected rotor
mast nut since first installation on a
helicopter, this AD requires removing the
rotor mast nut from service before further
E:\FR\FM\07JNP1.SGM
07JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 107 / Monday, June 7, 2021 / Proposed Rules
flight if the total hours TIS cannot be
determined.
(4) Where the service information
referenced in Note 3 of EASA AD 2017–0037
specifies to use a vibrograph to mark the new
part number, this AD requires using a vibro
etch.
(5) Where paragraph (4) of EASA AD 2017–
0037 requires replacing each affected rotor
mast nut with a not affected rotor mast nut
before exceeding 3,708 FH (total hours TIS)
since first installation on a helicopter, this
AD requires removing each affected rotor
mast nut from service before accumulating
3,708 total hours TIS.
(6) Where paragraph (6) of EASA AD 2017–
0037 requires replacing each part as
identified in Table 2 of EASA AD 2017–0037
before exceeding the FH (total hours TIS)
limit, this AD requires removing each part
from service before exceeding the total hours
TIS limit.
(7) Paragraph (7) of EASA AD 2017–0037
does not apply to this AD.
(8) The ‘‘Remarks’’ section of EASA AD
2017–0037 does not apply to this AD.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, International Validation
Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the International Validation
Branch, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (j)(2) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-AVS-AIR730-AMOC@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
(j) Related Information
(1) For EASA AD 2017–0037, contact
EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668
Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999
000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://
ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this
material at the FAA, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood
Pkwy., Room 6N–321, Fort Worth, TX 76177.
For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (817) 222–5110.
This material may be found in the AD docket
on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA–2021–0450.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Rao Edupuganti, Aerospace Engineer,
Dynamic Systems Section, Technical
Innovation Policy Branch, Policy &
Innovation Division, FAA, 10101 Hillwood
Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone
(817) 222–5110; email rao.edupuganti@
faa.gov.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Jun 04, 2021
Jkt 253001
30221
Issued on May 27, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
U.S.C.
United States Code
DHS Department of Homeland Security
Event PATCOM Event Patrol Commander
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The COTP Maryland-National Capital
Region is proposing to establish special
local regulations to be enforced from 9
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
On February 22, 2021, the Kent
[FR Doc. 2021–11804 Filed 6–4–21; 8:45 am]
Narrows Racing Association of Chester,
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
MD, notified the Coast Guard that it will
be conducting the Thunder on the
Choptank from 9:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
July 24, 2021, and from 9:30 a.m. to 5:30
SECURITY
p.m. on July 25, 2021. The high-speed
power boat racing event consists of
Coast Guard
approximately 50 participating inboard
and outboard hydroplane and runabout
33 CFR Part 100
race boats of various classes, 16 to 21
[Docket Number USCG–2021–0211]
feet in length. The vessels will be
competing on a designated, marked 1RIN 1625–AA08
mile oval course located in the
Choptank River in a cove located
Special Local Regulations, Choptank
between Hambrooks Bar and the
River, Cambridge, MD
shoreline at Cambridge, MD. Details of
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
the event were provided to the Coast
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
Guard on April 19, 2021. Hazards from
the power boat racing event include
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing
risks of injury or death resulting from
to establish special local regulations for
near or actual contact among participant
certain waters of the Choptank River.
vessels and spectator vessels or
This action is necessary to provide for
waterway users if normal vessel traffic
the safety of life on navigable waters
were to interfere with the event.
located at Cambridge, MD, during a
Additionally, such hazards include
high-speed power boat racing event on
participants operating near designated
July 24, 2021, and July 25, 2021. This
navigation channels, as well as
proposed rulemaking would prohibit
operating near approaches to local
persons and vessels from being in the
public boat ramps, private marinas and
regulated area unless authorized by the
yacht clubs, and waterfront businesses.
Captain of the Port Maryland-National
The COTP Maryland-National Capital
Capital Region or Coast Guard Event
Region has determined that potential
Patrol Commander. We invite your
hazards associated with the power boat
comments on this proposed rulemaking. races would be a safety concern for
DATES: Comments and related material
anyone intending to operate within
must be received by the Coast Guard on certain waters of the Choptank River at
or before June 22, 2021.
Cambridge, MD.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
identified by docket number USCG–
protect event participants, spectators,
2021–0211 using the Federal
and transiting vessels on certain waters
eRulemaking Portal at https://
of Choptank River before, during, and
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
after the scheduled event. The Coast
Participation and Request for
Guard proposes this rulemaking under
Comments’’ portion of the
authority in 46 U.S.C. 70041.
The Coast Guard is requesting that
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
interested parties provide comments
further instructions on submitting
within a shortened comment period of
comments.
15 days instead of the more typical 30
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this proposed days for this notice of proposed
rulemaking. The Coast Guard believes
rulemaking, call or email LCDR Samuel
the 15-day comment period still
M. Danus, Waterways Management
provides for a reasonable amount of
Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
410–576–2519, email Samuel.M.Danus@ time for interested parties to review the
proposal and provide informed
uscg.mil.
comments on it while also ensuring that
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
the Coast Guard has time to review and
respond to any significant comments
I. Table of Abbreviations
and has a final rule in effect in time for
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
the scheduled event.
COTP Captain of the Port
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\07JNP1.SGM
07JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 107 (Monday, June 7, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 30218-30221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11804]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2021-0450; Project Identifier 2017-SW-100-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH
(AHD) Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (AHD) Model MBB-BK 117 D-2
helicopters. This proposed AD was prompted by the discovery that
certain parts that are approved for installation on multiple helicopter
models are life limited parts when installed on Model MBB-BK 117 D-2
helicopters and some helicopter delivery documents excluded the life
limit information. This proposed AD would require determining the total
hours time-in-service (TIS) of a certain part-numbered rotor mast nut
and re-identifying a certain part-numbered rotor mast nut. This
proposed AD would also require establishing a life limit for a certain
part-numbered rotor mast nut and helical gear support, and removing
each part from service before reaching its life limit. Additionally,
this proposed AD would require replacing a certain part-numbered main
gearbox (MGB) with a not affected MGB as specified in a European
Aviation Safety Agency (now European Union Aviation Safety Agency)
(EASA) AD, which is proposed for incorporation by reference (IBR). The
FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 22,
2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For material that is proposed for IBR in this AD, contact EASA,
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999
000; email [email protected]; internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may
find this material on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu.
You may view this material at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321, Fort Worth, TX
76177. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call (817) 222-5110. It is also available in the AD docket on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2021-0450.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-
0450; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, any comments received, and other
[[Page 30219]]
information. The street address for Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rao Edupuganti, Aerospace Engineer,
Dynamic Systems Section, Technical Innovation Policy Branch, Policy &
Innovation Division, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177;
telephone (817) 222-5110; email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2021-0450; Project Identifier
2017-SW-100-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposal because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this proposal.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Rao
Edupuganti, Aerospace Engineer, Dynamic Systems Section, Technical
Innovation Policy Branch, Policy & Innovation Division, FAA, 10101
Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone (817) 222-5110; email
[email protected]. Any commentary that the FAA receives that is
not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket
for this rulemaking.
Background
EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2017-0037, dated February 22, 2017
(EASA AD 2017-0037), to correct an unsafe condition for Airbus
Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (formerly Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH),
Airbus Helicopters Inc. (formerly American Eurocopter LLC) Model MBB-BK
117 D-2 and MBB-BK117 D-2m helicopters.
This proposed AD was prompted by the discovery that certain parts
that are approved for installation on multiple helicopter models are
life limited parts when installed on Model MBB-BK 117 D-2 helicopters
and some helicopter delivery documents excluded the life limit
information. The FAA is proposing this AD to address an unsafe
condition on these products. See EASA AD 2017-0037 for additional
background information.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
EASA AD 2017-0037 requires establishing a life limit for rotor mast
nut part number (P/N) D632K1133-201 and helical gear support P/N
D632K1113-201, and replacing these parts before exceeding their life
limit. EASA AD 2017-0037 also requires replacing each rotor mast nut P/
N D632K1133-201 for which the hours time-in-service (TIS) are unknown
and replacing certain part-numbered rotor mast nuts before accumulating
3,708 hours TIS since first installation on a helicopter. EASA AD 2017-
0037 requires re-identifying each rotor mast nut P/N 117-12133-01 to P/
N D632K1133-201 by following the specified service information. EASA AD
2017-0037 requires replacing any MGB P/N D632K1001-051 with serial
number (S/N) D2-0001 up to D2-0108 inclusive, D2-0123, D2-0126, D2-
0127, or D2-0130 up to D2-0136 inclusive with a not affected MGB before
the affected MGB accumulates 3,708 hours TIS. EASA AD 2017-0037 also
prohibits installing an affected rotor mast nut or an affected MGB that
has accumulated more than 3,708 hours TIS since first installation on a
helicopter. Additionally, EASA AD 2017-0037 requires revising the
Aircraft Maintenance Program (AMP).
This material is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Other Related Service Information
The FAA reviewed Airbus Helicopters Alert Service Bulletin MBB-
BK117 D-2-63A-001, Revision 0, dated December 1, 2016 (ASB 63A-001),
which is not incorporated by reference, which specifies procedures for
re-identifying the rotor mast nut by using a vibrograph, crossing out
the old P/N and marking the new P/N on the outer surface, engraving the
letter ``A'' behind the S/N of each part, and updating the historical
record and log card to confirm compliance with ASB 63A-001. ASB 63A-001
also specifies during the next MGB overhaul, making an entry in the log
card to confirm re-identification of the helical gear support, and
annotating the S/N of the helical gear support.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
These products have been approved by the aviation authority of
another country, and are approved for operation in the United States.
Pursuant to the bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority,
the FAA has been notified of the unsafe condition described in EASA AD
2017-0037. The FAA is proposing this AD after evaluating all the
relevant information and determining the unsafe condition described
previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same
type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in EASA AD 2017-0037, described previously, as incorporated by
reference, except for any differences identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this proposed AD and except as discussed under
``Differences Between this Proposed AD and the EASA AD.''
Explanation of Required Compliance Information
In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA initially worked with Airbus and EASA to develop a
process to use certain EASA ADs as the primary source of information
for compliance with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has
since coordinated with other manufacturers and civil aviation
authorities (CAAs) to use this process. As a result, EASA AD 2017-0037
will be incorporated by reference in the FAA final rule. This proposed
AD would, therefore, require compliance with EASA AD 2017-0037
[[Page 30220]]
in its entirety, through that incorporation, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this proposed AD.
Using common terms that are the same as the heading of a particular
section in the EASA AD does not mean that operators need comply only
with that section. For example, where the AD requirement refers to
``all required actions and compliance times,'' compliance with this AD
requirement is not limited to the section titled ``Required Action(s)
and Compliance Time(s)'' in the EASA AD. Service information specified
in EASA AD 2017-0037 that is required for compliance with EASA AD 2017-
0037 will be available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0450 after the FAA
final rule is published.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the EASA AD
EASA AD 2017-0037 applies to Model MBB-BK117 D-2 and D2m
helicopters, whereas this proposed AD would only apply to Model MBB-
BK117 D-2 helicopters because Model D-2m is not FAA type-certificated.
If the total hours TIS for an affected rotor mast nut cannot be
determined, this proposed AD would require removing the rotor mast nut
from service before further flight, whereas EASA AD 2017-0037 does not
contain this requirement. EASA AD 2017-0037 requires using a vibrograph
to re-identify certain rotor mast nuts, whereas this proposed AD would
require using a vibro etch instead. EASA AD 2017-0037 requires
replacing certain parts, whereas this proposed AD would require
removing certain parts from service instead. EASA AD 2017-0037 requires
revising the AMP, whereas this proposed AD would not.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would
affect 30 helicopters of U.S. Registry. Labor rates are estimated at
$85 per work-hour. Based on these numbers, the FAA estimates the
following costs to comply with this proposed AD.
Determining the total hours TIS on an affected rotor mast nut would
take about 1 work-hour for an estimated cost of $85 per helicopter and
$2,550 for the U.S. fleet.
Re-identifying a rotor mast nut would take about 1.5 work-hours for
an estimated cost of $128 per rotor mast nut.
Replacing a rotor mast nut would take about 6 work-hours and parts
would cost about $5,351 for an estimated cost of $5,861 per rotor mast
nut.
Replacing a main gearbox, which includes replacing the helical gear
support, would take about 42 work-hours and parts would cost about
$295,000 (overhauled) for an estimated cost of $298,570.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:
Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (AHD): Docket No. FAA-2021-0450;
Project Identifier 2017-SW-100-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments by July 22, 2021.
(b) Affected Airworthiness Directives (ADs)
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (AHD)
Model MBB-BK 117 D-2 helicopters, certificated in any category, with
an affected main gearbox or affected rotor mast nut as identified in
Note 1 of European Aviation Safety Agency (now European Union
Aviation Safety Agency) (EASA) AD 2017-0037, dated February 22, 2017
(EASA AD 2017-0037) installed.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code: 6200, Main gearbox.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This proposed AD was prompted by the discovery that certain
parts that are approved for installation on multiple helicopter
models are life limited parts when installed on Model MBB-BK 117 D-2
helicopters and some helicopter delivery documents excluded the life
limit information. The FAA is issuing this AD to prevent certain
parts from remaining in service beyond their fatigue life. The
unsafe condition, if not addressed, could result in failure of the
part and loss of control of the helicopter.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, EASA AD 2017-0037.
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2017-0037
(1) Where EASA AD 2017-0037 refers to its effective date, this
AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
(2) Where EASA AD 2017-0037 refers to flight hours (FH), this AD
requires using hours time-in-service (TIS).
(3) Where paragraph (1) of EASA AD 2017-0037 requires
determining the FH (total hours TIS) accumulated by the affected
rotor mast nut since first installation on a helicopter, this AD
requires removing the rotor mast nut from service before further
[[Page 30221]]
flight if the total hours TIS cannot be determined.
(4) Where the service information referenced in Note 3 of EASA
AD 2017-0037 specifies to use a vibrograph to mark the new part
number, this AD requires using a vibro etch.
(5) Where paragraph (4) of EASA AD 2017-0037 requires replacing
each affected rotor mast nut with a not affected rotor mast nut
before exceeding 3,708 FH (total hours TIS) since first installation
on a helicopter, this AD requires removing each affected rotor mast
nut from service before accumulating 3,708 total hours TIS.
(6) Where paragraph (6) of EASA AD 2017-0037 requires replacing
each part as identified in Table 2 of EASA AD 2017-0037 before
exceeding the FH (total hours TIS) limit, this AD requires removing
each part from service before exceeding the total hours TIS limit.
(7) Paragraph (7) of EASA AD 2017-0037 does not apply to this
AD.
(8) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2017-0037 does not apply
to this AD.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, International Validation Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the International Validation Branch, send
it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (j)(2) of
this AD. Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(j) Related Information
(1) For EASA AD 2017-0037, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3,
50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email
[email protected]; internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may
view this material at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321, Fort Worth, TX
76177. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call (817) 222-5110. This material may be found in the AD
docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0450.
(2) For more information about this AD, contact Rao Edupuganti,
Aerospace Engineer, Dynamic Systems Section, Technical Innovation
Policy Branch, Policy & Innovation Division, FAA, 10101 Hillwood
Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone (817) 222-5110; email
[email protected].
Issued on May 27, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-11804 Filed 6-4-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P