BNSF Railway Bridge Across the Missouri River Between Bismarck and Mandan, North Dakota; Draft Environmental Impact Statement, 30323-30324 [2021-11801]

Agencies

• Coast Guard
• DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 107 (Monday, June 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30323-30324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11801]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket Number USCG-2019-0882]


BNSF Railway Bridge Across the Missouri River Between Bismarck 
and Mandan, North Dakota; Draft Environmental Impact Statement

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability of draft Environmental Impact Statement, 
request for comments, and announcement of virtual public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Coast Guard, as the lead federal agency, 
announces the availability of a draft Environmental Impact Statement 
(EIS), in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
(NEPA), Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) NEPA implementing 
regulations, and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), 
evaluating the potential environmental consequences of permitting the 
replacement of the existing BNSF Railway Bridge across the Missouri 
River between the cities of Bismarck and Mandan, ND, or constructing a 
bridge adjacent to the existing bridge. The applicant proposes to 
remove the existing structure, which is eligible for listing on the 
National Register of Historic Places. The Coast Guard is analyzing 
proposed alternatives, through the NEPA and NHPA processes, to 
construct the new bridge while retaining the existing bridge. The Coast 
Guard is making the draft EIS available for public review and requests 
public comments. Additionally, the Coast Guard intends to host a 
virtual public meeting to provide additional information to the public 
and to solicit comments on potential issues and concerns.

DATES: Substantive and relevant comments must be submitted to the 
online docket via https://www.regulations.gov/ on or before July 22, 
2021.

ADDRESSES: You may submit substantive and relevant comments identified 
by docket number USCG-2019-0882 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at 
https://www.regulations.gov/. See the ``Public Participation and 
Request for Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 
for further instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rob McCaskey, Coast Guard District 
Eight Project Officer, 314-269-2381.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background and Purpose

    BNSF Railway Company owns and operates the existing bridge that 
crosses the Missouri River between the cities of Mandan, and Bismarck, 
North Dakota. With bridge components over 130 years old, the in-place 
structure is approaching the end of its useful service life. The 
structure has a history of exposure to ice jams and its substructure 
configuration renders it potentially susceptible to scour events which 
remove sediment from around the bridge abutments and piers. Although 
currently stable, the structure has experienced structural issues at 
both approaches in the past, resulting in unanticipated substructure 
movements. Since the bridge's original construction in 1882, the east 
hill slope has begun to move which resulted in the slope moving the 
pier west towards the river. Multiple remediation efforts to correct 
the pier damage and slope movement took place from the early 1900s to 
the mid-1950s. The purpose of the project is to construct a new, 
independent bridge across the Missouri River upstream of the in-place 
structure. The new structure will provide a significant improvement in 
operational reliability and safety, and will provide enhanced 
structural redundancy thereby making it less susceptible to damage. As 
the current structure is over 130 years old, it requires substantial 
inspection and maintenance, which are disruptive to rail service. The 
new structure will be a single-track bridge but have the capability to 
carry a second track in the future when and if volumes necessitate that 
addition.
    The BNSF Bismarck Bridge was constructed with similar methods in 
the same era as the Brooklyn Bridge. It is an iconic landmark that 
predates official North Dakota statehood by 6 years. The bridge is 
eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places for 
its association with broad patterns of railroad, commercial and 
military history of the United States. Because of these attributes, 
certain interest groups have expressed a desire to preserve the 
existing bridge.
    The federal bridge statutes, including the General Bridge Act of 
1946 (33 U.S.C. 525 et seq.), require that the location and plans of 
bridges in or over navigable waters of the United States be approved by 
the Secretary of Homeland Security, who has delegated that 
responsibility to the Coast Guard. The Missouri River is a navigable 
water of the United States as defined in 33 CFR 2.36(a). The Coast 
Guard's primary responsibility regarding BNSF's proposed railroad 
bridge is to ensure the structure does not unreasonably obstruct 
navigation. In exercising these bridge authorities, the Coast Guard 
considers navigational and environmental impacts, which include 
historic and tribal effects.
    The Coast Guard is the lead federal agency for this project and, as 
such, is responsible for the review of its potential effects on the 
human environment, including historic properties and tribal impacts, 
pursuant to NEPA and NHPA. The Coast Guard is, therefore, required by 
law to ensure potential environmental effects are carefully evaluated 
in each bridge permitting decision.
    The four alternatives considered for the proposed project include 
different span lengths and different distances from the current bridge. 
Specifically, the alternatives include:
     Building a new bridge with 200-foot spans and piers 92.5 
feet upstream of the existing bridge (alternative considered keeping 
the existing bridge and removing the existing bridge).
     Building a new bridge with 400-foot spans and piers 92.5 
feet upstream of

[[Page 30324]]

the existing bridge (alternative considered keeping the existing bridge 
and removing the existing bridge).
     Building a new bridge with 200-foot spans and piers 42.5 
feet upstream of the existing bridge (alternative considered keeping 
the existing bridge and removing the existing bridge).
     Building a new bridge with 200-foot spans and piers 20 
feet upstream of the existing bridge and removing the existing bridge 
(BNSF Preferred Design).
    The alternatives were developed to meet the purpose and need of the 
project, which is to provide BNSF Railway with a new bridge that can 
accommodate two tracks at a future date should a second track become 
needed. There are specific constraints in the area that must be taken 
into consideration as designs are evaluated. For example, the bridge is 
close to the Missouri River Natural Area, which is a federally funded 
park managed by the North Dakota Parks and Recreation Department in 
cooperation with the North Dakota Department of Transportation, Morton 
County Parks, and the City of Mandan. The Missouri River Natural Area 
is the home to many species, including bald eagles, fox, deer and owls. 
Likewise, the bridge is in close proximity to the Bismarck Reservoir, 
which is a major source of drinking water for residents of the area and 
is located in an area with a history of significant slope stability 
issues.
    As part of this evaluation process, the Coast Guard solicits 
substantive and relevant comments from the public, and any Federal, 
State, and local agencies with expertise in, and authority over, 
particular resources that may be impacted by a project. Additionally, 
the Coast Guard seeks input from any tribes that may be affected or 
otherwise have expertise or equities in the project. Agencies that have 
already participated in the environmental review of this Project 
include the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), the U.S. Fish and 
Wildlife Service (USFWS), the U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA), the North Dakota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and 
the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP).

II. Discussion

    The Coast Guard developed a draft EIS that addresses impacts 
associated with the alternatives mentioned in Section I above. These 
impacts include those environmental control laws listed in the Coast 
Guard's Bridge Permit Application Guide (available at https://www.dco.uscg.mil/Portals/9/DCO%20Documents/5pw/Office%20of%20Bridge%20Programs/BPAG%20COMDTPUB%20P16591%203D_Sequential%20Clearance%20Final(July2016).p
df), as well as those impacts associated with floodplain rise, impacts 
to the Bismarck Water Reservoir and the Missouri River Natural Area.
    On January 15, 2021, a Programmatic Agreement in accordance with 
Section 106 of the NHPA was signed to address the adverse effect on the 
historic bridge. To date, the Coast Guard has held 16 consultation 
meetings with stakeholders to develop the Final Programmatic Agreement. 
The Coast Guard is currently working with consulting parties to develop 
a Memorandum of Agreement, which will act as an implementation plan for 
the Programmatic Agreement. The Programmatic Agreement is available in 
the appendix of the draft EIS.
    We request your substantive and relevant comments on environmental 
concerns that you may have related to the draft EIS. Your comments will 
be considered in preparing a final environmental document.

III. Public Participation and Comments

    We encourage you to submit substantive and relevant comments (or 
related material) on the draft Environmental Impact Statement. We will 
consider all substantive and relevant submissions and may adjust our 
final action based on your comments. If you submit a comment, please 
include the docket number for this notice, indicate the specific 
section of this document to which each comment applies, and provide a 
reason for each suggestion or recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking 
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov/. If your material cannot be 
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov/, contact the person in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate 
instructions. The draft EIS and public comments will be available in 
our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov/ and can be viewed by 
following that website's instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All substantive and relevant comments 
received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov/ 
and will include any personal information you have provided. For more 
information about privacy and submissions to the docket in response to 
this document, see DHS's eRulemaking System of Records notice (85 FR 
14226, March 11, 2020).

IV. Virtual Public Meeting

    Due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the Coast Guard intends to 
hold a virtual public meeting to receive oral and written comments on 
this draft EIS. The meeting will be held on June 30, 2021 from 6:00-
9:00 p.m. (Central), and can be accessed online at https://ch2m-pge.my.webex.com/ch2m-pge.my/j.php?MTID=m45e9e9fb750989eb89f8bf260630b06c. Attendees may also join 
by phone. The call-in number is 1-510-338-9438 (USA toll) and the 
access code is 182 625 0321. The meeting is expected to last 
approximately 3 hours.
    The virtual meeting is open to the public. Those who plan to attend 
the meeting and wish to present substantive and relevant comments may 
request to do so through the online docket at https://www.regulations.gov, and will be called in order of requests received. 
Attendees who have not previously made a request to present comments 
will follow those who have already submitted a request, as time 
permits. If a large number of persons wish to speak, the presiding 
officer may be required to limit the time allotted to each speaker. It 
is requested that one member from a group speak on behalf of that group 
in order to allow more views to be presented. The public meeting may 
end early if all present wishing to speak have done so.
    A transcript of the meeting will be made available for public 
review approximately 30 days after the meeting. All substantive and 
relevant comments will be incorporated into the official case record.
    Information on Service for Individuals With Disabilities: For 
information on services for individuals with disabilities or to request 
special assistance during the public meeting contact Mr. Rob McCaskey 
at the telephone number under the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section of this notice.
    This notice is issued under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 552 (a) and 
40 CFR 1506.6.

    Dated: June 1, 2021.
Brian L. Dunn,
Chief, U.S. Coast Guard, Office of Bridge Programs.
[FR Doc. 2021-11801 Filed 6-4-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P