Tijuana Estuary Tidal Restoration Program II, Phase I (TETRP II Phase I), 28638-28640 [2021-11251]
Download as PDF
28638
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 101 / Thursday, May 27, 2021 / Notices
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
will be assessed to plan and inform
efforts to improve or maintain the
quality of service offered to the public.
If this information is not collected, vital
feedback from customers and
stakeholders on the Agency’s services
will be unavailable.
The Agency will only submit a
collection for approval under this
generic clearance if it meets the
following conditions:
• Information gathered will be used
only internally for general service
improvement and program management
purposes and is not intended for release
outside of the agency (if released,
procedures outlined in Question 16 will
be followed);
• Information gathered will not be
used for the purpose of substantially
informing influential policy decisions; 1
• Information gathered will yield
qualitative information; the collections
will not be designed or expected to
yield statistically reliable results or used
as though the results are generalizable to
the population of study;
• The collections are voluntary;
• The collections are low-burden for
respondents (based on considerations of
total burden hours, total number of
respondents, or burden-hours per
respondent) and are low-cost for both
the respondents and the Federal
Government;
• The collections are noncontroversial and do not raise issues of
concern to other Federal agencies;
• Any collection is targeted to the
solicitation of opinions from
respondents who have experience with
the program or may have experience
with the program in the near future; and
• With the exception of information
needed to provide renumeration for
participants of focus groups and
cognitive laboratory studies, personally
identifiable information (PII) is
collected only to the extent necessary
and is not retained.
If these conditions are not met, the
Agency will submit an information
collection request to OMB for approval
through the normal PRA process.
To obtain approval for a collection
that meets the conditions of this generic
clearance, a standardized form will be
submitted to OMB along with
supporting documentation (e.g., a copy
of the comment card). The submission
will have automatic approval, unless
OMB identifies issues within 5 business
days.
1 As defined in OMB and agency Information
Quality Guidelines, ‘‘influential’’ means that ‘‘an
agency can reasonably determine that
dissemination of the information will have or does
have a clear and substantial impact on important
public policies or important private sector
decisions.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 May 26, 2021
Jkt 253001
The types of collections that this
generic clearance covers include, but are
not limited to:
• Customer comment cards/complaint
forms
• Small discussion groups
• Focus Groups of customers, potential
customers, delivery partners, or
other stakeholders
• Cognitive laboratory studies, such as
those used to refine questions or
assess usability of a website;
• Qualitative customer satisfaction
surveys (e.g., post-transaction
surveys; opt-out web surveys)
• In-person observation testing (e.g.,
website or software usability tests)
The Agency has established a
manager/managing entity to serve for
this generic clearance and will conduct
an independent review of each
information collection to ensure
compliance with the terms of this
clearance prior to submitting each
collection to OMB.
If appropriate, agencies will collect
information electronically and/or use
online collaboration tools to reduce
burden.
Small business or other small entities
may be involved in these efforts, but the
Agency will minimize the burden on
them of information collections
approved under this clearance by
sampling, asking for readily available
information, and using short, easy-tocomplete information collection
instruments.
Without these types of feedback, the
Agency will not have timely
information to adjust its services to meet
customer needs.
If a confidentiality pledge is deemed
useful and feasible, the Agency will
only include a pledge of confidentiality
that is supported by authority
established in statute or regulation, that
is supported by disclosure and data
security policies that are consistent with
the pledge, and that does not
unnecessarily impede sharing of data
with other agencies for compatible
confidential use. If the agency includes
a pledge of confidentiality, it will
include a citation for the statute or
regulation supporting the pledge.
There is no change in the information
being collected. There is no change to
the burden associated with this
collection.
The Office of Management and Budget
is particularly interested in comments
which:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
4. Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
Analysis
Agency: Department of Homeland
Security, (DHS).
Title: Generic Clearance for the
Collection of Qualitative Feedback on
Agency Service Delivery.
OMB Number: 1600–0014.
Frequency: On Occasion.
Affected Public: Private Sector.
Number of Respondents: 184,902.
Estimated Time per Respondent: 1
Hour.
Total Burden Hours: 300,000.
Robert Dorr,
Executive Director, Business Management
Directorate.
[FR Doc. 2021–10994 Filed 5–26–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9112–FL–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R8–NWRS–2021–N011;
FXRS12610800000–212–FF08RSDC00]
Tijuana Estuary Tidal Restoration
Program II, Phase I (TETRP II Phase I)
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service’s Tijuana Slough National
Wildlife Refuge, along with the
California Department of Parks and
Recreation’s Border Field State Park,
propose to act in partnership to prepare
a joint draft environmental impact
statement/environmental impact report
to evaluate the impacts on the human
environment related to restoring coastal
wetlands within the Tijuana River
National Estuarine Research Reserve at
the southwestern corner of San Diego
County, California. We are providing
this notice to open a public scoping
period and announce our intent to
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM
27MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 101 / Thursday, May 27, 2021 / Notices
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
conduct public scoping meetings in
accordance with the requirements of the
National Environmental Policy Act, and
its implementing regulations.
DATES: To ensure consideration in our
reviews, we are requesting submission
of new information no later than July
12, 2021.
The draft environmental impact
statement/environmental impact report
is scheduled for release in October 2021.
The final environmental impact
statement is scheduled for completion
by March 2022, with the record of
decision expected to be issued in April
2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written
comments and materials by one of the
following methods:
• U.S. Mail: Brian Collins, USFWS,
San Diego NWR Complex, 1080
Gunpowder Point Drive, Chula Vista,
CA 91910.
• Email: fw8plancomments@fws.gov;
please include ‘‘TETRP NOI’’ in the
email subject line.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Collins, Refuge Manager, at brian_
collins@fws.gov or 760–431–9440
extension 273. Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Relay
Service at 1–800–877–8339 between 8
a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday
through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service’s (Service)
Tijuana Slough National Wildlife Refuge
and the California Department of Parks
and Recreation’s Border Field State Park
propose to prepare a draft
environmental impact statement/
environmental impact report to evaluate
the effects of restoring 80 to 85 acres (ac)
of coastal wetlands within the Tijuana
Estuary, north of Monument Road and
south of the existing tidal inlet, in
southwestern San Diego County. We are
requesting comments concerning the
scope of the analysis and identification
of relevant information and studies.
Purpose and Need for the Proposed
Action
The purpose of the Tijuana Estuary
Tidal Restoration Program II, Phase I
(TETRP II Phase I) project is to restore
native coastal habitats and functions to
a portion of the southern arm of the
Tijuana Estuary consistent with the
recommendations presented in the
Tijuana Estuary—Friendship Marsh
Restoration Feasibility Study prepared
in 2008. The need for the proposed
action is to reverse ongoing degradation
of coastal resources essential to the
long-term survival of listed species,
migratory birds, fish, and other aquatic
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 May 26, 2021
Jkt 253001
resources, while also increasing the
estuary’s tidal prism to improve water
quality and maintain continuous tidal
exchange through the tidal inlet.
Preliminary Proposed Action and
Alternatives
Two action alternatives and the no
action alternative will be evaluated in
the draft environmental impact
statement/environmental impact report.
Both action alternatives would
reconfigure a portion of the southern
arm of the Tijuana Estuary to establish
coastal wetlands supported by an
extensive system of tidal channels
intended to increase the estuary’s tidal
prism and enhance estuarine function
within the system. The project site
would be excavated to establish
elevations with appropriate inundation
frequencies to support specific coastal
wetland habitat types. Suitable
excavated material would be
beneficially used to establish and/or
reconfigure transitional areas located
along the southern edge of the
restoration area and/or the barrier dunes
to the west, increasing resiliency to sealevel rise. Additionally, some of the
excavated material may be suitable for
nearshore disposal.
Alternative 1 (Maximum Tidal Prism)
is currently identified as the proposed
action. This alternative, which would
restore approximately 85 ac of coastal
habitat, would maximize deeper
intertidal habitats, by expanding tidal
channels and intertidal mudflat.
Alternative 2 (Reduced Impact
Alternative), which would restore
approximately 80 ac of coastal habitat,
has been designed to preserve existing
native plant communities, including
high salt marsh and transition zone
throughout the project site. The primary
tidal connection to Alternative 2 is the
existing South Beach Slough, which
would be deepened to increase tidal
flows into the proposed restoration site.
The primary differences between the
two action alternatives include the
amount of intertidal mudflat restored
versus salt marsh habitat; the total
acreage of restored versus preserved
habitats; and the number of connections
to existing tidal channels.
Under the No Action Alternative,
restoration of the estuary would not be
implemented. No sediment or
vegetation would be removed and no
establishment of habitat for the
enhancement of biological and
hydrological functions within the
project site would occur.
Summary of Expected Impacts
Based on our initial evaluation of the
proposed action and alternatives, the
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28639
following impacts would be expected:
Conversion of existing upland habitat to
coastal wetlands; replacement of high
salt marsh habitat with low salt marsh
habitat; short-term disturbance to listed
and sensitive avian species; temporary
increases in dust and other air
pollutants during construction; changes
to the area’s existing fluvial hydrology;
temporary impacts to water quality
during excavation; temporary and
permanent changes to existing public
access; and temporary increases in
construction traffic on the roadways
within the Tijuana River Valley.
Anticipated Permits and Authorizations
The following permits and other
authorizations are anticipated to be
required:
• U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Clean
Water Act (CWA) section 404
Nationwide Permit 27 and others, if
appropriate;
• San Diego Regional Water Quality
Control Board CWA section 401 water
quality certification;
• California Coastal Commission
consistency determination in
compliance with section 930.34 et seq.
of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
federal consistency regulations for
actions on Refuge lands and a coastal
development permit for actions on
Border Field State Park;
• Refuge special use permit to the
California Department of Parks and
Recreation for construction access and
activities on Refuge lands;
• Consultation pursuant to section 7
of the Federal Endangered Species Act
with the Service and National Marine
Fisheries Service;
• Consultation with Tribes and the
State Historic Preservation Officer
pursuant to section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act;
• Consultations with NOAA Fisheries
for essential fish habitat under the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, and
for marine mammals pursuant to the
Marine Mammal Protection Act.
Schedule for the Decision-Making
Process
Processing of the environmental
impact statement from the public
scoping stage to the signing of the
record of decision, is expected to take
approximately 1 year. Subsequent
actions will involve the processing of all
required permits needed to implement
restoration, which is not expected to
occur until additional funding is
identified for project implementation.
E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM
27MYN1
28640
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 101 / Thursday, May 27, 2021 / Notices
Public Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the 45day scoping process, which guides the
development of the draft environmental
impact statement/environmental impact
report. The scoping process is designed
to elicit comments from the public,
public agencies, Tribal governments,
and other interested parties on the scope
of the draft environmental impact
statement. All interested parties are
encouraged to provide written
comments and to participate in
upcoming public scoping meetings. The
details about upcoming public scoping
meetings will be posted on the Tijuana
Slough National Wildlife Refuge website
at www.fws.gov/refuge/Tijuana_Slough/
what_we_do/resource_management
.html (click on ‘‘TETRP II Phase I’’).
Requests to be contacted about
scheduled scoping opportunities should
be submitted via any of the contact
methods provided under ADDRESSES or
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT,
above.
action. The decision, which will be
documented in the record of decision,
will also consider the consistency of the
action with agency policies, regulations,
and applicable laws, and the
contribution the action will make
towards achieving the purposes for
which the Tijuana Slough National
Wildlife Refuge was established, while
also contributing to the mission and
goals of the National Wildlife Refuge
System.
Request for Identification of Potential
Alternatives, Information, and
Analyses Relevant to the Proposed
Action
The Service requests comments
concerning the scope of the analysis and
identification of relevant information
and studies. All interested parties are
invited to provide input related to the
identification of potential alternatives,
information, and analyses relevant to
the Proposed Action in writing or
during the public scoping meeting. All
written comments should be submitted
via any of the methods provided under
ADDRESSES.
Authority
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
The Service is the lead agency for the
environmental impact statement, and
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will
participate as a cooperating agency. The
California Department of Parks and
Recreation will serve as the lead State
agency for those components of the
project that are under the jurisdiction of
the State of California.
Geological Survey
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Decision Maker
The Decision Maker is the Service’s
Regional Director for the Department of
the Interior Region 8.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Regional Director, after
considering the analysis and
information provided in the final
environmental impact statement, as well
as the comments received throughout
the review process, will select the
alternative that best achieves the
purpose and need for the intended
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 May 26, 2021
Jkt 253001
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
This document is published under the
authority of the National Environmental
Policy Act regulations pertaining to the
publication of a notice of intent to issue
an environmental impact statement (40
CFR 1501.9(d)).
Martha Maciel,
Acting Regional Director, Sacramento,
California.
[FR Doc. 2021–11251 Filed 5–26–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[GX21LR000F60100; OMB Control Number
1028–0053]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget for Review
and Approval; Nonferrous Metals
Surveys
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS),
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of information collection;
request for comment.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we,
the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) are
proposing to renew an Information
Collection.
SUMMARY:
Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before June 28,
2021.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments on
this Information Collection Request
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(ICR) to the Office of Management and
Budget’s Desk Officer for the
Department of the Interior by email at
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov; or via
facsimile to (202) 395–5806. Please
provide a copy of your comments to
U.S. Geological Survey, Information
Collections Officer, 12201 Sunrise
Valley Drive, MS 159, Reston, VA
20192; or by email to gs-info_
collections@usgs.gov. Please reference
OMB Control Number 1028–0053 in the
subject line of your comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request additional information about
this ICR, contact Elizabeth S. Sangine by
email at escottsangine@usgs.gov, or by
telephone at 703–648–7720. You may
also view the ICR at https://
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, we provide the
general public and other Federal
agencies with an opportunity to
comment on new, proposed, revised,
and continuing collections of
information. This helps us assess the
impact of our information collection
requirements and minimize the public’s
reporting burden. It also helps the
public understand our information
collection requirements and provide the
requested data in the desired format.
A Federal Register notice with a 60day public comment period soliciting
comments on this collection of
information was published on October
29, 2020, 85 FR 68592. We did not
receive any public comments in
response to that notice.
We are again soliciting comments on
the proposed ICR that is described
below. We are especially interested in
public comments addressing the
following issues: (1) Is the collection
necessary to the proper functions of the
USGS; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
(4) how might the USGS enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the USGS minimize the burden of
this collection on the respondents,
including through the use of
information technology.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. Before including your
address, phone number, email address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM
27MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 101 (Thursday, May 27, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28638-28640]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11251]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R8-NWRS-2021-N011; FXRS12610800000-212-FF08RSDC00]
Tijuana Estuary Tidal Restoration Program II, Phase I (TETRP II
Phase I)
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's Tijuana Slough National
Wildlife Refuge, along with the California Department of Parks and
Recreation's Border Field State Park, propose to act in partnership to
prepare a joint draft environmental impact statement/environmental
impact report to evaluate the impacts on the human environment related
to restoring coastal wetlands within the Tijuana River National
Estuarine Research Reserve at the southwestern corner of San Diego
County, California. We are providing this notice to open a public
scoping period and announce our intent to
[[Page 28639]]
conduct public scoping meetings in accordance with the requirements of
the National Environmental Policy Act, and its implementing
regulations.
DATES: To ensure consideration in our reviews, we are requesting
submission of new information no later than July 12, 2021.
The draft environmental impact statement/environmental impact
report is scheduled for release in October 2021. The final
environmental impact statement is scheduled for completion by March
2022, with the record of decision expected to be issued in April 2022.
ADDRESSES: You may submit written comments and materials by one of the
following methods:
U.S. Mail: Brian Collins, USFWS, San Diego NWR Complex,
1080 Gunpowder Point Drive, Chula Vista, CA 91910.
Email: [email protected]; please include ``TETRP
NOI'' in the email subject line.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Collins, Refuge Manager, at
[email protected] or 760-431-9440 extension 273. Individuals who
use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Relay Service at 1-800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's
(Service) Tijuana Slough National Wildlife Refuge and the California
Department of Parks and Recreation's Border Field State Park propose to
prepare a draft environmental impact statement/environmental impact
report to evaluate the effects of restoring 80 to 85 acres (ac) of
coastal wetlands within the Tijuana Estuary, north of Monument Road and
south of the existing tidal inlet, in southwestern San Diego County. We
are requesting comments concerning the scope of the analysis and
identification of relevant information and studies.
Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action
The purpose of the Tijuana Estuary Tidal Restoration Program II,
Phase I (TETRP II Phase I) project is to restore native coastal
habitats and functions to a portion of the southern arm of the Tijuana
Estuary consistent with the recommendations presented in the Tijuana
Estuary--Friendship Marsh Restoration Feasibility Study prepared in
2008. The need for the proposed action is to reverse ongoing
degradation of coastal resources essential to the long-term survival of
listed species, migratory birds, fish, and other aquatic resources,
while also increasing the estuary's tidal prism to improve water
quality and maintain continuous tidal exchange through the tidal inlet.
Preliminary Proposed Action and Alternatives
Two action alternatives and the no action alternative will be
evaluated in the draft environmental impact statement/environmental
impact report. Both action alternatives would reconfigure a portion of
the southern arm of the Tijuana Estuary to establish coastal wetlands
supported by an extensive system of tidal channels intended to increase
the estuary's tidal prism and enhance estuarine function within the
system. The project site would be excavated to establish elevations
with appropriate inundation frequencies to support specific coastal
wetland habitat types. Suitable excavated material would be
beneficially used to establish and/or reconfigure transitional areas
located along the southern edge of the restoration area and/or the
barrier dunes to the west, increasing resiliency to sea-level rise.
Additionally, some of the excavated material may be suitable for
nearshore disposal.
Alternative 1 (Maximum Tidal Prism) is currently identified as the
proposed action. This alternative, which would restore approximately 85
ac of coastal habitat, would maximize deeper intertidal habitats, by
expanding tidal channels and intertidal mudflat.
Alternative 2 (Reduced Impact Alternative), which would restore
approximately 80 ac of coastal habitat, has been designed to preserve
existing native plant communities, including high salt marsh and
transition zone throughout the project site. The primary tidal
connection to Alternative 2 is the existing South Beach Slough, which
would be deepened to increase tidal flows into the proposed restoration
site.
The primary differences between the two action alternatives include
the amount of intertidal mudflat restored versus salt marsh habitat;
the total acreage of restored versus preserved habitats; and the number
of connections to existing tidal channels.
Under the No Action Alternative, restoration of the estuary would
not be implemented. No sediment or vegetation would be removed and no
establishment of habitat for the enhancement of biological and
hydrological functions within the project site would occur.
Summary of Expected Impacts
Based on our initial evaluation of the proposed action and
alternatives, the following impacts would be expected: Conversion of
existing upland habitat to coastal wetlands; replacement of high salt
marsh habitat with low salt marsh habitat; short-term disturbance to
listed and sensitive avian species; temporary increases in dust and
other air pollutants during construction; changes to the area's
existing fluvial hydrology; temporary impacts to water quality during
excavation; temporary and permanent changes to existing public access;
and temporary increases in construction traffic on the roadways within
the Tijuana River Valley.
Anticipated Permits and Authorizations
The following permits and other authorizations are anticipated to
be required:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Clean Water Act (CWA) section
404 Nationwide Permit 27 and others, if appropriate;
San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board CWA section
401 water quality certification;
California Coastal Commission consistency determination in
compliance with section 930.34 et seq. of the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) federal consistency regulations for
actions on Refuge lands and a coastal development permit for actions on
Border Field State Park;
Refuge special use permit to the California Department of
Parks and Recreation for construction access and activities on Refuge
lands;
Consultation pursuant to section 7 of the Federal
Endangered Species Act with the Service and National Marine Fisheries
Service;
Consultation with Tribes and the State Historic
Preservation Officer pursuant to section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act;
Consultations with NOAA Fisheries for essential fish
habitat under the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act, and for marine mammals pursuant to the Marine Mammal Protection
Act.
Schedule for the Decision-Making Process
Processing of the environmental impact statement from the public
scoping stage to the signing of the record of decision, is expected to
take approximately 1 year. Subsequent actions will involve the
processing of all required permits needed to implement restoration,
which is not expected to occur until additional funding is identified
for project implementation.
[[Page 28640]]
Public Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the 45-day scoping process, which
guides the development of the draft environmental impact statement/
environmental impact report. The scoping process is designed to elicit
comments from the public, public agencies, Tribal governments, and
other interested parties on the scope of the draft environmental impact
statement. All interested parties are encouraged to provide written
comments and to participate in upcoming public scoping meetings. The
details about upcoming public scoping meetings will be posted on the
Tijuana Slough National Wildlife Refuge website at www.fws.gov/refuge/Tijuana_Slough/what_we_do/resource_management .html (click on ``TETRP
II Phase I''). Requests to be contacted about scheduled scoping
opportunities should be submitted via any of the contact methods
provided under ADDRESSES or FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, above.
Request for Identification of Potential Alternatives, Information, and
Analyses Relevant to the Proposed Action
The Service requests comments concerning the scope of the analysis
and identification of relevant information and studies. All interested
parties are invited to provide input related to the identification of
potential alternatives, information, and analyses relevant to the
Proposed Action in writing or during the public scoping meeting. All
written comments should be submitted via any of the methods provided
under ADDRESSES.
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
The Service is the lead agency for the environmental impact
statement, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will participate as a
cooperating agency. The California Department of Parks and Recreation
will serve as the lead State agency for those components of the project
that are under the jurisdiction of the State of California.
Decision Maker
The Decision Maker is the Service's Regional Director for the
Department of the Interior Region 8.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Regional Director, after considering the analysis and
information provided in the final environmental impact statement, as
well as the comments received throughout the review process, will
select the alternative that best achieves the purpose and need for the
intended action. The decision, which will be documented in the record
of decision, will also consider the consistency of the action with
agency policies, regulations, and applicable laws, and the contribution
the action will make towards achieving the purposes for which the
Tijuana Slough National Wildlife Refuge was established, while also
contributing to the mission and goals of the National Wildlife Refuge
System.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Authority
This document is published under the authority of the National
Environmental Policy Act regulations pertaining to the publication of a
notice of intent to issue an environmental impact statement (40 CFR
1501.9(d)).
Martha Maciel,
Acting Regional Director, Sacramento, California.
[FR Doc. 2021-11251 Filed 5-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P