International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Regular Employee, 28503-28505 [2021-11053]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 101 / Thursday, May 27, 2021 / Proposed Rules
for the Section 2 structural inspections
specified in paragraph 2.B.(2)(a) of the
Accomplishment Instructions of MHI RJ
Service Bulletin 670BA–05–001, dated
August 27, 2020.
(2) The task number, part number, model
effectivity, and discard time for the Section
3 safe life components specified in paragraph
2.B.(3)(a) of the Accomplishment Instructions
of MHI RJ Service Bulletin 670BA–05–001,
dated August 27, 2020.
(h) No Alternative Actions and Intervals
After the existing maintenance or
inspection program has been revised as
required by paragraph (g) of this AD, no
alternative actions (e.g., inspections) or
intervals may be used unless the actions and
intervals are approved as an alternative
method of compliance (AMOC) in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (i)(1) of this AD.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or
responsible Flight Standards Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the certification office,
send it to ATTN: Program Manager,
Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New
York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue,
Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone
516–228–7300; fax 516–794–5531. Before
using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a
principal inspector, the manager of the
responsible Flight Standards Office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain instructions
from a manufacturer, the instructions must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, New York ACO Branch,
FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA); or MHI RJ Aviation ULC’s TCCA
Design Approval Organization (DAO). If
approved by the DAO, the approval must
include the DAO-authorized signature.
(j) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) TCCA AD
CF–2020–53, dated December 7, 2020, for
related information. This MCAI may be
found in the AD docket on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2021–0382.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Antariksh Shetty, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe and Propulsion Section,
FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;
telephone 516–228–7300; fax 516–794–5531;
email 9-avs-nyaco-cos@faa.gov.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact MHI RJ Aviation ULC, 12655
Henri-Fabre Blvd., Mirabel, Que´bec J7N 1E1
Canada; Widebody Customer Response
Center North America toll-free telephone +1–
844–272–2720 or direct-dial telephone +1–
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 May 26, 2021
Jkt 253001
514–855–8500; fax +1–514–855–8501; email
thd.crj@mhirj.com; internet https://
mhirj.com. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
Issued on May 21, 2021.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives,
Compliance & Airworthiness Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–11137 Filed 5–26–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 120
[Public Notice: 11406]
RIN 1400–AF17
International Traffic in Arms
Regulations: Regular Employee
Department of State.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of State
proposes to amend the International
Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) to
update the definition of regular
employee to allow subject persons to
work remotely, and to clarify the
contractual relationships that meet the
definition of regular employee.
DATES: Send comments on or before July
26, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may
submit comments by one of the
following methods:
• Email: DDTCPublicComments@
state.gov, with the subject line ‘‘ITAR
Amendment: Regular Employee’’
• Internet: At www.regulations.gov,
search for this document using Docket
DOS–2021–0009.
Comments received after the
acceptance date may be considered if
feasible. Those submitting comments
should not include any personally
identifying information they do not
desire to be made public or information
for which a claim of confidentiality is
asserted. Comments and/or transmittal
emails will be made available for public
inspection and copying after the close of
the comment period via the Directorate
of Defense Trade Controls website at
www.pmddtc.state.gov. Parties who
wish to comment anonymously may
submit comments via
www.regulations.gov, leaving
identifying fields blank.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Engda Wubneh, Foreign Affairs Officer,
Office of Defense Trade Controls Policy,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28503
U.S. Department of State, telephone
(202) 663–1809; email
DDTCCustomerService@state.gov.
ATTN: Regulatory Change, ITAR
Section 120.39: Regular Employee.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In March
2020, the President declared a national
emergency as a result of the COVID–19
pandemic. Subsequently, the
Department announced a temporary
suspension, modification, and exception
through July 31, 2020, of the
requirement that a regular employee, for
purposes of ITAR § 120.39(a)(2), work at
a company’s facilities. The temporary
measure allowed individuals to work
remotely provided they are not located
in Russia or a country listed in ITAR
§ 126.1 (85 FR 25287, May 1, 2020), and
still be considered regular employees
under the ITAR. The Department
requested and received comments
regarding the efficacy and duration of
this temporary measure (85 FR 35376,
June 10, 2020). Many commenters, one
industry association, and several
individual entities endorsed the
telework provisions and requested that
this measure be effective until the end
of the year, if not extended indefinitely.
Additionally, many commenters
mentioned that this temporary measure
allowed industry to continue their
business activities despite COVID–19 as
many employees could work remotely.
In response, this temporary measure
was extended until December 31, 2020
(85 FR 45513, July 29, 2020).
The Department is proposing to
amend ITAR § 120.39 permanently to
allow certain individuals to work
remotely, and further proposes to clarify
the contractual relationships that meet
the definition of regular employee. The
Department recognizes that the
workplace environment is evolving,
therefore, the current ‘‘regular
employee’’ criterion that an individual
must work at a company’s facilities will
be removed in the revised definition to
allow for remote work. The Department
also proposes to set forth clear criteria
that will allow regulated entities to treat
certain contractual staff as regular
employees for the purposes of the ITAR,
provided those individuals are
sufficiently subject to the employer’s
control such that the Department can
hold the regulated employer responsible
for the individual’s actions.
Further, the Department proposes to
codify the meaning of a ‘‘long term
contractual relationship’’ in ITAR
§ 120.39(a)(2) by clarifying in the
regulations that individuals must be
providing services to an entity under a
contract for a term of one year or more
(ITAR § 120.39(a)(2)(i)). The goal of this
E:\FR\FM\27MYP1.SGM
27MYP1
28504
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 101 / Thursday, May 27, 2021 / Proposed Rules
provision is to minimize the risk of
diversion of U.S. defense articles. The
delineation of a contract for one year or
more was selected in part based on the
Department’s expectation that a longterm contractor will receive superior
orientation and training from a
regulated entity upon onboarding, and
the ability to absorb and apply training
materials and adhere to compliance
policies and procedures (e.g., ITARrelated training) is more likely to occur
with at least a year of experience on the
job. For those individuals not in a ‘‘long
term contractual relationship’’ with a
regulated entity (i.e., where the contract
is less than one year), the Department
will allow such individuals to be treated
as regular employees provided that, in
addition to the control and nondisclosure considerations described in
ITAR § 120.39(a)(3), the individual also
maintains an active security clearance
approved by the United States or by the
government of the entity to which the
individual’s services are provided.
Lastly, although employment type is not
explicitly referenced in the definition,
individuals providing services pursuant
to a contractual relationship can include
independent contractors, seconded
employees, individuals provided by a
staffing agency, or contractors provided
by a contracting agency.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department of State is of the
opinion that controlling the import and
export of defense articles and services is
a foreign affairs function of the United
States Government and that rules
implementing this function are exempt
from sections 553 (rulemaking) and 554
(adjudications) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA), pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(a)(1). Since the Department
is of the opinion that this rule is exempt
from 5 U.S.C 553, it is the view of the
Department that the provisions of
Section 553(d) do not apply to this
rulemaking.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since this rule is exempt from the
notice-and-comment provisions of 5
U.S.C. 553(b), it does not require
analysis under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rulemaking does not involve a
mandate that will result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
in any year and it will not significantly
or uniquely affect small governments.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 May 26, 2021
Jkt 253001
Therefore, no actions are deemed
necessary under the provisions of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
costs on Indian tribal governments, and
will not preempt tribal law.
Accordingly, Executive Order 13175
does not apply to this rulemaking.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This rulemaking will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 13132,
it is determined that this proposed
amendment does not have sufficient
federalism implications to require
consultations or warrant the preparation
of a federalism summary impact
statement. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental
consultation on Federal programs and
activities do not apply to this
rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributed impacts, and equity).
This rule’s scope does not impose
additional regulatory requirements or
obligations; therefore, the Department
believes costs associated with this rule
will be minimal. Although the
Department cannot determine based on
available data how many fewer licenses
will be submitted as a result of this rule,
the amendment to the definition will
inherently relieve the licensing burden
for any exporter utilizing it in a
qualifying scenario. Executive Order
13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This rule
has not been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ by the Office and
Information and Regulatory Affairs
under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988
The Department of State has reviewed
this rulemaking in light of Executive
Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity,
minimize litigation, establish clear legal
standards, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13175
The Department of State has
determined that this rulemaking will
not have tribal implications, will not
impose substantial direct compliance
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
This rulemaking does not impose or
revise any information collections
subject to 44 U.S.C. chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 120
Arms and munitions, Classified
information, Exports.
For the reasons set forth above, title
22, chapter I, subchapter M, part 120 of
the Code of Federal Regulations is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 120—PURPOSE AND
DEFINITIONS
1. The authority citation for part 120
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, and 71, Pub. L. 90–
629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778,
2797); 22 U.S.C. 2794; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; Pub.
L. 105–261, 112 Stat. 1920; Pub. L. 111–266;
Section 1261, Pub. L. 112–239; E.O. 13637,
78 FR 16129.
2. Section 120.39 is revised to read as
follows:
■
§ 120.39
Regular employee.
(a) Regular employee means:
(1) An individual permanently and
directly employed by an entity; or
(2) An individual providing services
to an entity:
(i) Under a contract with a term of one
year or more;
(ii) Who works under the entity’s
direction and control;
(iii) Who works full time for the
entity;
(iv) Who is subject to the entity’s
compliance policies and procedures;
and
(v) Who executes a nondisclosure
agreement with the entity that provides
assurances that the individual will not
transfer any defense articles to persons
or entities unless specifically authorized
by the entity; or
(3) An individual providing services
to an entity:
(i) Under a contract with a term of less
than one year;
(ii) Who maintains an active security
clearance approved by the United States
or by the government of the entity to
which the individual is providing
services;
(iii) Who works under the entity’s
direction and control;
(iv) Who works full time for the
entity;
(v) Who is subject to the entity’s
compliance policies and procedures;
and
E:\FR\FM\27MYP1.SGM
27MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 101 / Thursday, May 27, 2021 / Proposed Rules
(vi) Who executes a nondisclosure
agreement with the entity that provides
assurances that the individual will not
transfer any defense articles to persons
or entities unless specifically authorized
by the entity.
(4) A secondment from one entity to
another meets the definitions described
in paragraphs (a)(2) and (3) of this
section.
(b) Nothing in this section shall be
construed to provide authorization for
the export, retransfer, or reexport of
defense articles or defense services.
Choo S. Kang,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of
International Security and Nonproliferation,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2021–11053 Filed 5–26–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Office of Labor-Management
Standards
29 CFR Parts 403 and 408
RIN 1245–AA12
Rescission of Labor Organization
Annual Financial Report for Trusts in
Which a Labor Organization Is
Interested, Form T–1
Office of Labor-Management
Standards, Department of Labor.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking;
request for comments.
AGENCY:
This document proposes to
withdraw the final rule published in the
Federal Register on March 6, 2020, 85
FR 13414 (Mar. 6, 2020) (2020 Form
T–1 rule), which established the Form
T–1, Trust Annual Report, required to
be filed by labor organizations about
certain trusts in which they are
interested pursuant to the LaborManagement Reporting and Disclosure
Act (LMRDA). Upon further review of
the 2020 Form T–1 rule, including the
pertinent facts and legally relevant
policy considerations surrounding that
rulemaking, the Department of Labor
(Department) proposes to withdraw the
rule implementing the Form T–1,
because it believes that the trust
reporting required under the rule is
overly broad and is not necessary to
prevent the circumvention and evasion
of the Title II reporting requirements.
Moreover, upon further consideration,
the Department is concerned that the
2020 rulemaking record was insufficient
to justify the separate trust reporting
requirements as set forth in the 2020
Form T–1 rule.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:28 May 26, 2021
Jkt 253001
The Department will consider all
written comments submitted on or
before July 26, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by RIN 1245–AA12, only by
the following method: Internet—Federal
eRulemaking Portal. Electronic
comments may be submitted through
https://www.regulations.gov. To locate
the proposed rule, use RIN 1245–AA12
or key words such as ‘‘T–1,’’ ‘‘LaborManagement Standards’’ or ‘‘Trust
Annual Reports’’ to search documents
accepting comments. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Please be advised that comments
received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including
any personal information provided.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew Davis, Chief of the Division of
Interpretations and Standards, Office of
Labor-Management Standards, U.S.
Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW, Room N–5609,
Washington, DC 20210, (202) 693–0123
(this is not a toll-free number), (800)
877–8339 (TTY/TDD), OLMS-Public@
dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
I. Statutory Authority
The Department’s statutory authority
is set forth in section 208 of the
LMRDA, 29 U.S.C. 438. Section 208 of
the LMRDA provides that the Secretary
of Labor ‘‘shall have authority to issue,
amend, and rescind rules and
regulations prescribing the form and
publication of reports required to be
filed under [the Act] and such other
reasonable rules and regulations . . . as
he may find necessary to prevent the
circumvention or evasion of such
reporting requirements.’’
The Secretary has delegated his
authority under the LMRDA to the
Director of the Office of LaborManagement Standards (OLMS) and
permitted re-delegation of such
authority. See Secretary’s Order
03–2012 (Oct. 19, 2012), published at 77
FR 69375 (Nov. 16, 2012).
II. Background
A. Introduction
In enacting the LMRDA in 1959,
Congress sought to protect the rights
and interests of employees, labor
organizations and the public generally
as they relate to the activities of labor
organizations, employers, labor relations
consultants, and their officers,
employees, and representatives. The
LMRDA’s various reporting provisions
are designed to empower labor
organization members by providing
them the means to maintain democratic
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28505
control over their labor organizations
and ensure a proper accounting of labor
organization funds. Labor organization
members are better able to monitor their
labor organization’s financial affairs and
to make informed choices about the
leadership of their labor organization
and its direction when labor
organizations disclose financial
information as required by the LMRDA.
By reviewing a labor organization’s
financial reports, a member may
ascertain the labor organization’s
priorities and whether they are in
accord with the member’s own priorities
and those of fellow members. At the
same time, this transparency promotes
both the labor organization’s own
interests as a democratic institution and
the interests of the public and the
government. Furthermore, the LMRDA’s
reporting and disclosure provisions,
together with the fiduciary duty
provision, 29 U.S.C. 501, which directly
regulates the primary conduct of labor
organization officials, operate to
safeguard a labor organization’s funds
from depletion by improper or illegal
means. Timely and complete reporting
also helps deter labor organization
officers or employees from embezzling
or otherwise making improper use of
such funds.
B. The LMRDA’s Reporting and Other
Requirements
When it enacted the LMRDA in 1959,
a bipartisan Congress made the
legislative finding that in the labor and
management fields ‘‘there have been a
number of instances of breach of trust,
corruption, disregard of the rights of
individual employees, and other failures
to observe high standards of
responsibility and ethical conduct
which require further and
supplementary legislation that will
afford necessary protection of the rights
and interests of employees and the
public generally as they relate to the
activities of labor organizations,
employers, labor relations consultants,
and their officers and representatives.’’
29 U.S.C. 401(b). The statute was
designed to remedy these various ills
through a set of integrated provisions
aimed at labor organization governance
and management. These include a ‘‘bill
of rights’’ for labor organization
members, which provides for equal
voting rights, freedom of speech and
assembly, and other basic safeguards for
labor organization democracy, see 29
U.S.C. 411–415; financial reporting and
disclosure requirements for labor
organizations, their officers and
employees, employers, labor relations
consultants, and surety companies, see
29 U.S.C. 431–436, 441; detailed
E:\FR\FM\27MYP1.SGM
27MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 101 (Thursday, May 27, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28503-28505]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-11053]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 120
[Public Notice: 11406]
RIN 1400-AF17
International Traffic in Arms Regulations: Regular Employee
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of State proposes to amend the International
Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) to update the definition of regular
employee to allow subject persons to work remotely, and to clarify the
contractual relationships that meet the definition of regular employee.
DATES: Send comments on or before July 26, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may submit comments by one of the
following methods:
Email: [email protected], with the subject line
``ITAR Amendment: Regular Employee''
Internet: At www.regulations.gov, search for this document
using Docket DOS-2021-0009.
Comments received after the acceptance date may be considered if
feasible. Those submitting comments should not include any personally
identifying information they do not desire to be made public or
information for which a claim of confidentiality is asserted. Comments
and/or transmittal emails will be made available for public inspection
and copying after the close of the comment period via the Directorate
of Defense Trade Controls website at www.pmddtc.state.gov. Parties who
wish to comment anonymously may submit comments via
www.regulations.gov, leaving identifying fields blank.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Engda Wubneh, Foreign Affairs
Officer, Office of Defense Trade Controls Policy, U.S. Department of
State, telephone (202) 663-1809; email [email protected].
ATTN: Regulatory Change, ITAR Section 120.39: Regular Employee.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In March 2020, the President declared a
national emergency as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Subsequently,
the Department announced a temporary suspension, modification, and
exception through July 31, 2020, of the requirement that a regular
employee, for purposes of ITAR Sec. 120.39(a)(2), work at a company's
facilities. The temporary measure allowed individuals to work remotely
provided they are not located in Russia or a country listed in ITAR
Sec. 126.1 (85 FR 25287, May 1, 2020), and still be considered regular
employees under the ITAR. The Department requested and received
comments regarding the efficacy and duration of this temporary measure
(85 FR 35376, June 10, 2020). Many commenters, one industry
association, and several individual entities endorsed the telework
provisions and requested that this measure be effective until the end
of the year, if not extended indefinitely. Additionally, many
commenters mentioned that this temporary measure allowed industry to
continue their business activities despite COVID-19 as many employees
could work remotely. In response, this temporary measure was extended
until December 31, 2020 (85 FR 45513, July 29, 2020).
The Department is proposing to amend ITAR Sec. 120.39 permanently
to allow certain individuals to work remotely, and further proposes to
clarify the contractual relationships that meet the definition of
regular employee. The Department recognizes that the workplace
environment is evolving, therefore, the current ``regular employee''
criterion that an individual must work at a company's facilities will
be removed in the revised definition to allow for remote work. The
Department also proposes to set forth clear criteria that will allow
regulated entities to treat certain contractual staff as regular
employees for the purposes of the ITAR, provided those individuals are
sufficiently subject to the employer's control such that the Department
can hold the regulated employer responsible for the individual's
actions.
Further, the Department proposes to codify the meaning of a ``long
term contractual relationship'' in ITAR Sec. 120.39(a)(2) by
clarifying in the regulations that individuals must be providing
services to an entity under a contract for a term of one year or more
(ITAR Sec. 120.39(a)(2)(i)). The goal of this
[[Page 28504]]
provision is to minimize the risk of diversion of U.S. defense
articles. The delineation of a contract for one year or more was
selected in part based on the Department's expectation that a long-term
contractor will receive superior orientation and training from a
regulated entity upon onboarding, and the ability to absorb and apply
training materials and adhere to compliance policies and procedures
(e.g., ITAR-related training) is more likely to occur with at least a
year of experience on the job. For those individuals not in a ``long
term contractual relationship'' with a regulated entity (i.e., where
the contract is less than one year), the Department will allow such
individuals to be treated as regular employees provided that, in
addition to the control and non-disclosure considerations described in
ITAR Sec. 120.39(a)(3), the individual also maintains an active
security clearance approved by the United States or by the government
of the entity to which the individual's services are provided. Lastly,
although employment type is not explicitly referenced in the
definition, individuals providing services pursuant to a contractual
relationship can include independent contractors, seconded employees,
individuals provided by a staffing agency, or contractors provided by a
contracting agency.
Regulatory Analysis and Notices
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department of State is of the opinion that controlling the
import and export of defense articles and services is a foreign affairs
function of the United States Government and that rules implementing
this function are exempt from sections 553 (rulemaking) and 554
(adjudications) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1). Since the Department is of the opinion that this
rule is exempt from 5 U.S.C 553, it is the view of the Department that
the provisions of Section 553(d) do not apply to this rulemaking.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Since this rule is exempt from the notice-and-comment provisions of
5 U.S.C. 553(b), it does not require analysis under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rulemaking does not involve a mandate that will result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any year and it
will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore,
no actions are deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132
This rulemaking will not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the National Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive
Order 13132, it is determined that this proposed amendment does not
have sufficient federalism implications to require consultations or
warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The
regulations implementing Executive Order 12372 regarding
intergovernmental consultation on Federal programs and activities do
not apply to this rulemaking.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributed impacts, and equity). This
rule's scope does not impose additional regulatory requirements or
obligations; therefore, the Department believes costs associated with
this rule will be minimal. Although the Department cannot determine
based on available data how many fewer licenses will be submitted as a
result of this rule, the amendment to the definition will inherently
relieve the licensing burden for any exporter utilizing it in a
qualifying scenario. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated
a ``significant regulatory action'' by the Office and Information and
Regulatory Affairs under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988
The Department of State has reviewed this rulemaking in light of
Executive Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity, minimize litigation,
establish clear legal standards, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13175
The Department of State has determined that this rulemaking will
not have tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on Indian tribal governments, and will not preempt
tribal law. Accordingly, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this
rulemaking.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rulemaking does not impose or revise any information
collections subject to 44 U.S.C. chapter 35.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 120
Arms and munitions, Classified information, Exports.
For the reasons set forth above, title 22, chapter I, subchapter M,
part 120 of the Code of Federal Regulations is proposed to be amended
as follows:
PART 120--PURPOSE AND DEFINITIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 120 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, and 71, Pub. L. 90-629, 90 Stat. 744 (22
U.S.C. 2752, 2778, 2797); 22 U.S.C. 2794; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; Pub. L.
105-261, 112 Stat. 1920; Pub. L. 111-266; Section 1261, Pub. L. 112-
239; E.O. 13637, 78 FR 16129.
0
2. Section 120.39 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 120.39 Regular employee.
(a) Regular employee means:
(1) An individual permanently and directly employed by an entity;
or
(2) An individual providing services to an entity:
(i) Under a contract with a term of one year or more;
(ii) Who works under the entity's direction and control;
(iii) Who works full time for the entity;
(iv) Who is subject to the entity's compliance policies and
procedures; and
(v) Who executes a nondisclosure agreement with the entity that
provides assurances that the individual will not transfer any defense
articles to persons or entities unless specifically authorized by the
entity; or
(3) An individual providing services to an entity:
(i) Under a contract with a term of less than one year;
(ii) Who maintains an active security clearance approved by the
United States or by the government of the entity to which the
individual is providing services;
(iii) Who works under the entity's direction and control;
(iv) Who works full time for the entity;
(v) Who is subject to the entity's compliance policies and
procedures; and
[[Page 28505]]
(vi) Who executes a nondisclosure agreement with the entity that
provides assurances that the individual will not transfer any defense
articles to persons or entities unless specifically authorized by the
entity.
(4) A secondment from one entity to another meets the definitions
described in paragraphs (a)(2) and (3) of this section.
(b) Nothing in this section shall be construed to provide
authorization for the export, retransfer, or reexport of defense
articles or defense services.
Choo S. Kang,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of International Security and
Nonproliferation, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2021-11053 Filed 5-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P