Private Security Contractors (PSCs) Operating in Contingency Operations, Humanitarian or Peace Operations, or Other Military Operations or Exercises, 28042-28047 [2021-10100]
Download as PDF
28042
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
■
Leonardo S.p.a.: Docket No. FAA–2021–
0375; Project Identifier MCAI–2020–
01245–R.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this
airworthiness directive (AD) by July 9, 2021.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Leonardo S.p.a. Model
AB139 and AW139 helicopters, certificated
in any category, with an emergency flotation
system (EFS) control panel part number
(P/N) 3G9560V00556 (for use with night
vision goggle) or 3G9560V00557 (standard)
installed.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 3212, Emergency Flotation Section.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by two events of
uncommanded EFS deployment during
flight. The FAA is issuing this AD to address
improper design of certain EFS control
panels. The unsafe condition, if not
addressed, could result in reduced control of
the helicopter.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Required Actions
(1) At the following compliance time,
replace EFS control panel P/N
3G9560V00556 or 3G9560V00557 with EFS
control panel P/N 3G9560V00559 or
3G9560V00558, respectively:
(i) For helicopters with EFS P/N
3G9560F00111 or 3G9560F00113, with
Aerosekur floats with ‘‘pyrotechnical’’
inflation system P/N 3G9560V01051
installed, within 94 hours time-in-service
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 May 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
(TIS) or 3 months after the effective date of
this AD, whichever occurs first.
(ii) For helicopters with EFS P/N
3G9560F00111 or 3G9560F00113, with
Aerosekur floats with ‘‘SMA’’ inflation
system P/N 3G9560V01052 installed, within
377 hours TIS or 12 months after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs first.
(iii) For helicopters with EFS P/N
3G9560F00212 with Aerosekur floats with
‘‘fuse disk’’ inflation system P/N
3G9560V02051 installed, within 565 hours
TIS or 18 months after the effective date of
this AD, whichever occurs first.
(2) As of the effective date of this AD, do
not install EFS control panel P/N
3G9560V00556 or 3G9560V00557 on any
helicopter.
(1) The Manager, International Validation
Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the International Validation
Branch, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (i)(1) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-AVS-AIR730-AMOC@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(i) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Ronnea Derby, Aerospace Engineer,
Denver ACO Branch, Compliance &
Airworthiness Division, FAA, 26805 E 68th
Ave., Mail Stop: Room 214; Denver, CO
80249; telephone (303) 342–1093; email
Ronnea.L.Derby@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Leonardo S.p.A. Helicopters,
Emanuele Bufano, Head of Airworthiness,
Viale G.Agusta 520, 21017 C.Costa di
Samarate (Va) Italy; telephone +39–0331–
225074; fax +39–0331–229046; or at https://
www.leonardocompany.com/en/home. You
may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy.,
Room 6N–321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (817) 222–5110.
(3) The subject of this AD is addressed in
European Aviation Safety Agency (now
European Union Aviation Safety Agency)
(EASA) AD 2015–0172, dated August 21,
2015. You may view the EASA AD at https://
www.regulations.gov in Docket No. FAA–
2021–0375.
Issued on May 18, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–10908 Filed 5–24–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 159
[Docket ID: DoD–2020–OS–0016]
RIN 0790–AK87
Private Security Contractors (PSCs)
Operating in Contingency Operations,
Humanitarian or Peace Operations, or
Other Military Operations or Exercises
Office of the Under Secretary of
Defense for Acquisition and
Sustainment, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The DoD is proposing updates
to this part to incorporate changes from
the National Defense Authorization Act
(NDAA) that were not available when
the rule was last published on August
11, 2011. These proposed changes
include administrative updates and
clarifications to PSCs performing duties
while under contract to DoD in support
of a contingency operations,
humanitarian or peace operations, or
other military operations or exercises.
DATES: Comments must be received by
July 26, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and/or
Regulatory Information Number (RIN)
number and title, by any of the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: DoD cannot receive written
comments at this time due to the
COVID–19 pandemic. Comments should
be sent electronically to the docket
listed above.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or RIN for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
SUMMARY:
Ms.
Donna M. Livingston, 703–692–3032,
donna.m.livingston.civ@mail.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Executive Summary
A. Purpose of the Existing Rule
The DoD may contract for private
security functions to fulfill non-combat
E:\FR\FM\25MYP1.SGM
25MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules
requirements for security in contingency
operations, humanitarian or peace
operations, and other military
operations or exercises. Private security
functions include guarding of
personnel, facilities, designated sites, or
property of a Federal agency, a
contractor or subcontractor, or a third
party. It is DoD policy that PSCs must
be established, registered, well
regulated, rigidly disciplined, and
properly staffed with carefully selected
operating personnel. This policy reflects
U.S. law and is implemented through
this rule, DoD Directives, DoD
Instructions, and acquisition policies
and regulations, to include the use of
rigorous and verifiable business and
operational standards.
B. Summary of Major Provisions of This
Regulatory Action
This regulatory action proposes
changes to the current rule in order to
provide clarification to PSCs supporting
DoD in support of contingency
operations, humanitarian or peace
operations, or other military operations
or exercises outside of the U.S. The
proposed changes include additional
citations for guidance on inherently
governmental functions and PSC
compliance with DoD approved national
and international recognized quality
assurance management standards. PSCs
must also cooperate with DoD on all
government investigations. DoD is
responsible for providing the
appropriate contract administration
oversight of PSCs. Finally, for
clarification, this regulatory action
proposes to add the definitions on total
force and arming authorities to ensure
compliance with statutory requirements.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
C. Legal Authority for This Program
The proposed updates to this rule are
required to meet the mandate of Section
862 of the 2008 NDAA, as amended by
Section 813 of the 2010 NDAA and
Section 832 of the 2011 NDAA.
II. Regulatory History
The rule was initially published as an
interim final rule in the Federal
Register (74 FR 34691) on July 17, 2009,
because there was insufficient policy
and guidance regulating the actions of
DoD and other governmental PSCs and
their employees’ movements in
operational areas. The final rule,
published in the Federal Register (74
FR 49650) on September 11, 2011,
established policy, assigned
responsibilities and provided
procedures for the regulation of the
selection, accountability, training,
equipping and conduct of personnel
performing private security functions
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 May 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
under a covered contract during
contingency operations, combat
operations, or other significant military
operations. It also assigned
responsibilities and established
procedures for incident reporting, use of
and accountability for equipment, rules
for the use of force, and a process for
administrative action or the removal, as
appropriate, of PSCs and PSC personnel.
The corresponding internal DoD
policy is captured in DoD Instruction
3020.50, ‘‘Private Security Contractors
(PSCs) Operating in Contingency
Operations, Humanitarian or Peace
Operations, or Other Military
Operations or Exercises,’’ published on
July 22, 2009, and last updated on
August 31, 2018. For additional
information, DoD Instruction 3020.50
can be accessed at https://
www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/
Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/
302050p.pdf.
III. Regulatory Analysis
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
a. Executive Orders
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ and Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review’’
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distribute impacts, and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. Accordingly, this rule has
been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the requirements of these Executive
orders. This rule has been designated a
‘‘not significant regulatory action,’’ and
determined not to be economically
significant, under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. It has been
determined that 32 CFR part 159 does
not have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy; a section of the economy;
productivity; competition; jobs; the
environment; public health or safety; or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities.
b. Summary
This proposed rule provides
clarification and updates for PSCs
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28043
supporting DoD in contingency
operations, humanitarian or peace
operations, or other military operations
or exercises outside of the U.S. The
clarification and updates are derived
from statue and regulations requiring
PSCs not to perform inherently
governmental functions, obtain third
party quality assurance standards, and
cooperate with DoD on all Government
investigations.
c. Affected Population
This proposed rule provides
information relevant to commercial
sector contractors and their personnel
who may provide contracted support to
the DoD during applicable operations
outside the United States.
D Contractor employees—Provides
information and describes the
requirements DoD imposes on
employees of private security
companies who may be employed in
support of DoD operating in
contingency operations, humanitarian
or peace operations, or other military
operations or exercises.
D Companies or organizations—
Provides information and describes the
requirements for private security
companies who may be employed in
support of DoD operating in
contingency operations, humanitarian
or peace operations, or other military
operations or exercises.
d. Costs
The proposed updates to the rule will
not result in an increased burden to
PSCs. PSCs are already implementing
these changes based on the current 32
CFR part 159 and contract clauses
outlined in Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS)
252.225–7039, ‘‘Defense Contractors
Performing Private Security Functions
Outside the United States.’’ The changes
in the proposed rule are a clarification
or update to the current rule.
e. Benefits
The proposed rule will clarify the
guidance to the public when
considering providing private security
contracting support to the DoD while
operating in a contingency operation,
humanitarian or peace operations, or
other military operations or exercises.
This updated rule consolidates guidance
into one document, which will improve
the public planning for providing
contract support to DoD. The
consolidation will ensure the public is
aware of all statutory requirements to
compete for and perform private
security contracts in support of DoD
outside of the U.S.
E:\FR\FM\25MYP1.SGM
25MYP1
28044
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules
f. Alternative
DoD has considered the following
alternative approaches:
D No action. If no action is taken, the
public will continue to use the current
rule for PSCs supporting DoD outside of
the U.S. DoD has improved its oversight
of PSCs and Operational Contract
Support through lessons learned since
the current rule was published. The
proposed rule, once accepted, will
provide clearer guidance to the public
on the contractor and government
responsibilities.
D Publish proposed rule. This updated
rule consolidates guidance into one
document which will improve the
public planning for providing contract
support to DoD. The consolidation will
ensure the public is aware of all
statutory requirements to compete for
and perform private security contracts
in support of DoD outside of the U.S.
B. Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. 601)
The Department of Defense certifies
that this proposed rule is not subject to
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601) because it would not, if
promulgated, have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Therefore, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended,
does not require us to prepare a
regulatory flexibility analysis.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
C. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as amended by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. DoD will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This proposed rule is
not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
D. Sec. 202, Public Law 104–4,
‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
(2 U.S.C. 1532) requires agencies to
assess anticipated costs and benefits
before issuing any rule whose mandates
require spending in any one year of
$100 million in 1995 dollars, updated
annually for inflation. This proposed
rule will not mandate any requirements
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 May 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
for State, local, or tribal governments,
nor will it affect private sector costs.
E. Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
It has been determined that 32 CFR
part 159 does impose reporting or
recordkeeping requirements under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This
collection has been reviewed and
approved by the OMB under OMB
Control Number 0704–0549 (expires
October 31, 2022), ‘‘Defense Contractors
Performing Private Security Functions
Outside the United States.’’ It included
a total cost of $1,080 annually for PSC
companies to report to the Geographic
Combatant Commander the following
incidents if and when they occur:
D A weapon is discharged by PSC
personnel performing private security
functions.
D PSC personnel performing private
security functions are attacked, killed,
or injured.
D PSC personnel are killed or injured
or property is destroyed as a result of
conduct by contractor personnel.
D A weapon is discharged against PSC
personnel performing private security
functions or personnel performing such
functions believe a weapon was so
discharged.
D Active, non-lethal countermeasures
(other than the discharge of a weapon)
are employed by PSC personnel
performing private security functions in
response to a perceived immediate
threat.
The changes proposed by this
regulatory action neither increases nor
decreases the public burden associated
with this collection of information.
F. Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
Executive Order 13132 establishes
certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it promulgates a
proposed rule (and subsequent final
rule) that imposes substantial direct
requirement costs on State and local
governments, preempts State law, or
otherwise has federalism implications.
This proposed rule will not have a
substantial effect on State and local
governments.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 159
Government contracts, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security
measures.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 159 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
PART 159—PRIVATE SECURITY
CONTRACTORS (PSCs) OPERATING
IN CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS,
HUMANITARIAN OR PEACE
OPERATIONS, OR OTHER MILITARY
OPERATIONS OR EXERCISES
1. The authority citation for part 159
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: Sec. 862, Pub. L. 110–181, 122
Stat. 253; Sec. 832, Sec 853, Pub. L. 110–417,
122 Stat. 4535; Sec. 831–833, Pub. L. 111–
383, 124 Stat. 4276.
2. Revise the heading for part 159 to
read as set forth above.
■ 3. Amend § 159.2 by:
■ a. In paragraph (a)(1):
■ i. Adding ‘‘(CJCS)’’ after ‘‘Office of the
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.’’
■ ii. Adding ‘‘(DoD)’’ after ‘‘the Office of
the Inspector General of the Department
of Defense.’’
■ iii. Removing ‘‘organizational entities
in the Department of Defense’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘organizational
entities in the DoD.’’
■ b. Revising paragraph (a)(2).
■ c. Adding paragraph (a)(3).
■ d. Revising paragraph (b)(1).
■ e. In paragraph (b)(2), removing
‘‘USG-funded’’ and adding in its place
‘‘U.S.G.-funded.’’
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
§ 159.2
Applicability and scope.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(2) The Department of State and other
U.S. Federal agencies insofar as it
implements the requirements of section
862 of Public Law 110–181, as
amended. Specifically, in areas of
operations which require enhanced
coordination of PSC and PSC personnel
working for United States Government
(U.S.G.) agencies, the Secretary of
Defense may designate such areas as
areas of combat operations or other
significant military operations for the
limited purposes of this part. In such an
instance, the standards established in
accordance with this part would, in
coordination with the Secretary of State,
expand from covering only DoD PSCs
and PSC personnel to cover all U.S.G.
funded PSCs and PSC personnel
operating in the designated area.
(3) The requirements of this part shall
not apply to a nonprofit
nongovernmental organization receiving
grants or cooperative agreements for
activities conducted within an area of
other significant military operations if
the Secretary of Defense and the
Secretary of State agree that such
organization may be exempted. An
exemption may be granted by the
E:\FR\FM\25MYP1.SGM
25MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules
agreement of the Secretaries under this
paragraph (a)(3) on an organization-byorganization or area-by-area basis. Such
an exemption may not be granted with
respect to an area of combat operations.
(b) * * *
(1) DoD PSCs and PSC personnel on
contract and subcontract, at any tier,
performing private security functions in
support of contingency operations,
humanitarian or peace operations, or
other military operations or exercises
outside the United States.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Amend § 159.3 by:
■ a. Adding the definition of ‘‘Arming
authority’’ in alphabetical order.
■ b. Revising the definition of
‘‘Contingency operation,’’ ‘‘Covered
contract,’’ ‘‘Other significant military
operations,’’ and ‘‘Private security
functions.’’
■ c. Removing the definition of ‘‘PSC.’’
■ d. Adding the definitions of ‘‘Private
Security Contractor (PSC)’’ and ‘‘Total
Force’’ in alphabetical order.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 159.3
Definitions.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
Arming authority. The GCC, or a
person or persons designated by the
GCC, who can authorize the arming of
civilians under their authority or
supervision for security functions or to
permit the carrying of firearms for
personal protection in support of
operations outside the United States.
Contingency operation. A military
operation that is either designated by
the Secretary of Defense as a
contingency operation or becomes a
contingency operation as a matter of law
as defined in 10 U.S.C. 101(a)(13).
*
*
*
*
*
Covered contract. (1) A DoD contract
for performance of services and/or
delivery of supplies in an area of
contingency operations, humanitarian
or peace operations, or other military
operations or exercises outside the
United States or non-DoD Federal
agency contract for performance of
services and/or delivery of supplies in
an area of combat operations or other
significant military operations, as
designated by the Secretary of Defense;
a subcontract at any tier under such
contracts; or a task order or delivery
order issued under such contracts or
subcontracts.
(2) Excludes temporary arrangements
entered into by non-DoD contractors for
the performance of private security
functions by individual indigenous
personnel not affiliated with a local or
expatriate security company.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 May 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
Other significant military operations.
(1) Activities, other than combat
operations, as part of an overseas
contingency operation that are carried
out by United States Armed Forces in an
uncontrolled or unpredictable highthreat environment where personnel
performing security functions may be
called upon to use deadly force.
(2) With respect to an area of other
significant military operations, the
requirements of this part shall apply
only upon agreement of the Secretary of
Defense and the Secretary of State. Such
an agreement of the Secretaries may be
made only on an area-by-area basis.
With respect to an area of combat
operations, the requirements of this part
shall always apply.
Private security functions. Activities
engaged in by a contractor under a
covered contract as follows:
(1) Guarding personnel, facilities,
designated sites, or property of a Federal
agency, the contractor or subcontractor,
or a third party.
(2) Any other activity for which
personnel are required to carry weapons
in the performance of their duties in
accordance with the terms of their
contract. For the DoD, DoD Instruction
3020.41, ‘‘Operational Contract Support
(OCS)’’ (available at https://
www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/
Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/
302041p.pdf) prescribes policies related
to personnel allowed to carry weapons
for self-defense.
(3) Contractors, including those
performing private security functions,
are not authorized to perform inherently
governmental functions. In this regard,
they are limited to a defensive response
to hostile acts or demonstrated hostile
intent.
Private Security Contractor (PSC). A
company contracted by the U.S.G. to
perform private security functions
under a covered contract.
*
*
*
*
*
Total Force. The organizations, units,
and individuals that comprise DoD’s
resources for implementing the National
Security Strategy. It includes the DoD
Active and Reserve Component military
personnel, DoD civilian personnel
(including foreign national direct-hires
as well as non-appropriated fund
employees), contracted support, and
host nation support personnel.
§ 159.4
[Amended]
5. Amend § 159.4 by:
a. In paragraph (a):
i. Adding ‘‘as amended,’’ after ‘‘Public
Law 110–181,’’.
■ ii. Removing ‘‘section 159.5 of this
part’’ and adding in its place ‘‘§ 159.5.’’
■ b. In paragraph (b):
■
■
■
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28045
i. Adding ‘‘(GCCs)’’ after ‘‘Geographic
Combatant Commanders.’’
■ ii. Redesignating footnotes 4 and 5 as
footnotes 1 and 2.
■ c. In paragraph (c):
■ i. Adding ‘‘(COM)’’ after ‘‘the relevant
Chief of Mission’’ in the first sentence.
■ ii. Removing ‘‘geographic Combatant
Commander’’ and adding in its place
‘‘GCC’’ in the first sentence.
■ iii. Removing ‘‘Chief of Mission’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘COM’’ in the
second sentence.
■ iv. Removing ‘‘geographic Combatant
Commander’’ and adding in its place
‘‘GCC’’ in the second sentence.
■ 6. Revise § 159.5 to read as follows:
■
§ 159.5
Responsibilities.
(a) The Under Secretary of Defense for
Personnel and Readiness (USD(P&R))
will provide Department-wide policies
on the total force manpower mix and
labor sourcing, consistent with statute,
the FAR, the DFARS, and other
applicable Federal policy documents,
especially with respect to contracted
services and restrictions on functions
that contractors may and may not
perform. The USD(P&R) will ensure that
policies specifically address
circumstances where use of PSCs would
be inherently governmental or where
GCCs would need to assess where
performance of the function by PSCs or
total reliance on PSCs would constitute
an unacceptable risk.
(b) The Deputy Assistant Secretary of
Defense for Logistics (DASD(Logistics)),
under the authority, direction, and
control of the Under Secretary of
Defense for Acquisition and
Sustainment (USD(A&S)) and through
the Assistant Secretary of Defense for
Sustainment, monitors the registering,
processing, and accounting of PSC
personnel in areas of contingency
operations, humanitarian or peace
operations, or other military operations
or exercises.
(c) The Principal Director, Defense
Pricing and Contracting (DPC), under
the authority, direction, and control of
the USD(A&S), ensures that the DFARS
and (when appropriate, in consultation
with the other members of the FAR
Council) the FAR, provides appropriate
guidance and publish contracting
requirements pursuant to this part and
Section 862 of Public Law 110–181.
(d) The CJCS shall ensure that joint
doctrine is consistent with the
principles established by DoD Directive
3020.49, ‘‘Orchestrating, Synchronizing,
and Integrating Program Management of
Contingency Acquisition Planning and
Its Operational Execution’’ (available at
https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/
Documents/DD/issuances/dodd/
E:\FR\FM\25MYP1.SGM
25MYP1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
28046
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules
302049p.pdf); DoD Instruction 3020.41,
DoD Directive 5210.56, ‘‘Arming and the
Use of Force’’ (available at https://
www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/
Documents/DD/issuances/dodd/
521056_dodd_2016.pdf); and this part.
(e) The GCCs in whose AOR
contingency operations, humanitarian
or peace operations, or other military
operations or exercises are occurring,
and within which PSCs and PSC
personnel perform under covered
contracts, shall:
(1) Provide guidance and procedures,
as necessary and consistent with the
principles established by DoD Directive
3020.49, DoD Instruction 3020.41, DoD
Instruction 1100.22, ‘‘Policy and
Procedures for Determining Workforce
Mix’’ (available at https://
www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/
Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/
110022p.pdf); DFARS, 48 CFR subpart
225.302, and this part, for the selection,
training, accountability, and equipping
of such PSC personnel and the conduct
of PSCs and PSC personnel within their
AOR. Individual training and
qualification standards shall meet, at a
minimum, one of the Military
Departments’ established standards.
Within a geographic Combatant
Command, a sub unified commander or
JFC shall be responsible for developing
and issuing implementing procedures as
warranted by the situation, operation,
and environment, in consultation with
the relevant COM in designated areas of
combat operations or other significant
military operations.
(2) Through the Contracting Officer,
the PSC should acknowledge that its
personnel understand their obligation to
comply with the terms and conditions
of applicable covered contracts.
(3) Issue written authorization to the
PSC identifying individual PSC
personnel who are authorized to be
armed. Rules for the Use of Force shall
be included with the written
authorization, if not previously
provided. Rules for the Use of Force
shall conform to the guidance in DoD
Directive 5210.56 and the CJCS
Instruction 3121.01B, ‘‘Standing Rules
of Engagement/Standing Rules for the
Use of Force for U.S. Forces.’’ Offerors’
and contractors’ access to the Rules for
the Use of Force may be controlled in
accordance with the terms of FAR
52.204–2, ‘‘Security Requirements’’;
DFARS 252.204–7000, ‘‘Disclosure of
Information’’; or both.1
1 CJCS Instruction 3121.01B provides guidance on
the standing rules of engagement (SROE) and
establishes standing rules for the use of force for
DoD operations worldwide. This document is
classified secret. CJCS Instruction 3121.01B is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 May 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
(4) Ensure that the procedures, orders,
directives, and instructions prescribed
in § 159.6 are available through a single
location (to include an internet website,
consistent with security considerations
and requirements).
(f) The Heads of the DoD Components
shall:
(1) Ensure that all private securityrelated requirement documents are in
compliance with the procedures listed
in § 159.6 and the guidance and
procedures issued by the geographic
Combatant Command.
(2) Ensure private security-related
contracts contain the appropriate
clauses in accordance with the
applicable FAR and DFARS clauses and
include additional mission-specific
requirements as appropriate.
(3) Ensure the head of the contracting
activity responsible for each covered
contract takes appropriate steps to
assign sufficient oversight personnel to
the contract to verify that the contractor
responsible for performing private
security functions complies with the
requirements of this part. This includes
ensuring that the contracting officer
coordinates with the requiring activity
to nominate and appoint a qualified
contracting officer’s representative
(COR) or other multiple or alternate
CORs, in accordance with DoD
Instruction 5000.72, ‘‘DoD Standard for
Contracting Officer’s Representative
(COR) Certification’’ (available at
https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/
Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/
500072p.pdf).
■ 7. Amend § 159.6 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (a) introductory
text.
■ b. In paragraph (a)(1)(i), removing ‘‘,
‘‘Contractor Personnel Authorized to
Accompany the U.S. Armed Forces.’’ ’’
and adding a period in its place.
■ c. In paragraph (a)(1)(iii) introductory
text:
■ i. Removing ‘‘geographic Combatant
Commander’’ everywhere it appears and
adding in its place ‘‘GCC’’ in the first
sentence.
■ ii. Removing ‘‘of this part’’.
■ d. In paragraph (a)(1)(iii)(C):
■ i. Removing ‘‘ ‘‘Guidance for
Determining Workforce Mix’’ ’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘ ‘‘Policy and
Procedures for Determining Workforce
Mix’’ ’’.
■ ii. Redesignating footnote 12 as
footnote 1.
■ e. In paragraph (a)(1)(iii)(F)(1),
redesignating footnote 13 as footnote 2.
■ f. In paragraph (a)(1)(iv), adding ‘‘PSC
personnel, weapons,’’ before ‘‘armored
vehicles’’.
available via Secure internet Protocol Router
Network at https://jsportal.osd.smil.mil.
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
g. In paragraph (a)(1)(v)(F), removing
‘‘TASER guns’’ and adding in its place
‘‘disruption devices’’.
■ h. In paragraph (a)(1)(viii), removing
‘‘commander of a combatant command
may request’’ and adding in its place
‘‘commander of a CCMD may, through
the contracting officer, request’’.
■ i. In paragraph (a)(1)(x), removing
‘‘paragraph (a)(2)(ii)’’ and adding in its
place ‘‘paragraph (a)(2)(iii)’’.
■ j. In paragraph (a)(2)(i), removing ‘‘,
‘‘Contractor Personnel Authorized to
Accompany the U.S. Armed Forces.’’ ’’
and adding a period in its place.
■ k. Redesignating paragraphs (a)(2)(ii)
through (iv) as paragraphs (a)(2)(iii)
through (iv) and adding new paragraph
(a)(2)(ii).
■ l. Further redesignating newly
redesignated paragraph (a)(2)(iv) as
paragraph (a)(2)(vi) and adding new
paragraph (a)(2)(v).
■ m. In newly redesignated paragraph
(a)(2)(vi), removing ‘‘Chief of Mission’’
and adding in its place ‘‘COM’’.
■ n. Removing paragraph (b) and
redesignating paragraphs (c) and (d) as
paragraphs (b) and (c).
■ o. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b):
■ i. Revising the paragraph heading.
■ ii. Removing ‘‘Chief of Mission’’ and
‘‘combatant command’’ and adding in
their places ‘‘COM’’ and ‘‘CCMD,’’
respectively.
■ p. In newly redesignated paragraph
(c):
■ i. Revising the paragraph heading.
■ ii. Removing ‘‘Chief of Mission’’ and
‘‘geographic Combatant Commander/sub
unified commander’’ and adding in
their places ‘‘COM’’ and ‘‘GCC/sub
unified commander,’’ respectively.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
§ 159.6
Procedures.
(a) Standing Combatant Command
(CCMD) guidance and procedures. Each
GCC shall develop and publish
guidance and procedures for PSCs and
PSC personnel operating during
contingency operations, humanitarian
or peace operations, or other military
operations or exercises within their
AOR, consistent with applicable law;
this part; applicable Military
Department publications; and other
applicable DoD issuances including
DoD Directive 3020.49, DoD Instruction
1100.22, ‘‘Policy and Procedures for
Determining Workforce Mix,’’ FAR,
DFARS, DoD Instruction 3020.41, DoD
Directive 2311.01E, ‘‘DoD Law of War
Program’’ (available at https://
www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/
Documents/DD/issuances/dodd/
231101e.pdf); DoD 5200.8-R, ‘‘Physical
E:\FR\FM\25MYP1.SGM
25MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules
Security Program’’ (available at https://
www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/
Documents/DD/issuances/dodm/
520008rm.pdf); CJCS Instruction
3121.01B, ‘‘Standing Rules of
Engagement/Standing Rules for the Use
of Force for U.S. Forces,’’ and DoD
Directive 5210.56. The guidance and
procedures shall:
*
*
*
*
*
(2) * * *
(ii) Assessing compliance with DoD
approved business and operational
standards for private security functions.
*
*
*
*
*
(v) Requirements for the PSC to
cooperate with any investigation
conducted by the DoD, including by
providing access to its employees and
relevant information in its possession
regarding the matter(s) under
investigation.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Subordinate guidance and
procedures. * * *
(c) Consultation and coordination.
* * *
Dated: May 10, 2021.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2021–10100 Filed 5–24–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 310
[Docket ID: DoD–2021–OS–0004]
RIN 0790–AL20
Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation
Office of the Secretary of
Defense (OSD), Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of Defense
(Department or DoD) is giving
concurrent notice of a new Departmentwide system of records pursuant to the
Privacy Act of 1974 for the DoD 0006,
‘‘Military Justice and Civilian Criminal
Case Records’’ system of records and
this proposed rulemaking. In this
proposed rulemaking, the Department
proposes to exempt portions of this
system of records from certain
provisions of the Privacy Act because of
national security and law enforcement
requirements.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
Send comments on or before July
26, 2021.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:12 May 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
Ms.
Lyn Kirby, Defense Privacy, Civil
Liberties, and Transparency Division,
Directorate for Oversight and
Compliance, Department of Defense,
4800 Mark Center Drive, Mailbox #24,
Suite 08D09, Alexandria, VA 22350–
1700; OSD.DPCLTD@mail.mil; (703)
571–0070.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Background
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
DATES:
You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods.
* Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments.
* Mail: The DoD cannot receive
written comments at this time due to the
COVID–19 pandemic. Comments should
be sent electronically to the docket
listed above.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory
Information Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general
policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public
is to make these submissions available
for public viewing on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
ADDRESSES:
In accordance with the Privacy Act of
1974, the Department of Defense (DoD)
is establishing a new system of records
titled, ‘‘Military Justice and Civilian
Criminal Case Records,’’ DoD 0006. This
system of records describes DoD’s
collection, use, and maintenance of
records for the handling of Uniform
Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and
disciplinary cases within the authority
of the DoD. This system of records also
includes records created when DoD
legal practitioners, in support of the
U.S. Department of Justice, prosecute in
U.S. District Courts crimes that occurred
on military installations or property.
Individuals covered by this system of
records include armed forces members
and others identified in Article 2 of the
UCMJ, as well as civilians who are
alleged to have engaged in criminal acts
on DoD installations and properties.
The purpose of this system of records
is to support the collection,
maintenance, use, and sharing of
records compiled by the DoD for the
adjudication and litigation of cases
conducted under the Uniform Code of
Military Justice, as well as criminal
proceedings brought in U.S. District
Courts for offenses occurring on DoD
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28047
installations or property. This system
contains information, records, and
filings publicly accessible on the
Department’s court docket. It also
supports the compilation of internal
statistics and reports related to these
activities.
The collection and maintenance of
this information by the DoD is necessary
to meet its statutory obligations and to
ensure good order and discipline.
II. Privacy Act Exemption
The Privacy Act allows federal
agencies to exempt eligible records in a
system of records from certain
provisions of the Act, including those
that provide individuals with a right to
request access to and amendment of
their own records. If an agency intends
to exempt a particular system of records,
it must first go through the rulemaking
process to provide public notice and an
opportunity to comment on the
proposed exemption. This proposed
rule explains why an exemption is being
claimed for this system of records and
invites public comment, which DoD
will consider before the issuance of a
final rule implementing the exemption.
The DoD proposes to modify 32 CFR
part 310 to add a new Privacy Act
exemption rule for the DoD 0006,
‘‘Military Justice and Civilian Criminal
Case Records’’ system of records. The
DoD proposes this exemption because
some of its records may contain
classified national security information
and notice, access, amendment and
disclosure (to include accounting for
those records) to an individual may
cause damage to national security. The
Privacy Act, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552a(k)(1), authorizes agencies to claim
an exemption for systems of records that
contain information properly classified
pursuant to executive order. The DoD is
proposing to claim an exemption from
several provisions of the Privacy Act,
including various access, amendment,
disclosure of accounting, and certain
record-keeping and notice requirements
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(1), to
prevent disclosure of any information
properly classified pursuant to
executive order, as implemented by DoD
Instruction 5200.01 and DoD Manual
5200.01, Volumes 1 and 3.
The DoD also proposes to exempt this
system of records because these records
support the conduct of criminal law
enforcement activities, and certain
requirements of the Privacy Act may
interfere with the effective execution of
these activities, and undermine good
order and discipline. The Privacy Act,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2),
authorizes agencies with a principal law
enforcement function pertaining to the
E:\FR\FM\25MYP1.SGM
25MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 25, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28042-28047]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-10100]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 159
[Docket ID: DoD-2020-OS-0016]
RIN 0790-AK87
Private Security Contractors (PSCs) Operating in Contingency
Operations, Humanitarian or Peace Operations, or Other Military
Operations or Exercises
AGENCY: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and
Sustainment, Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The DoD is proposing updates to this part to incorporate
changes from the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that were
not available when the rule was last published on August 11, 2011.
These proposed changes include administrative updates and
clarifications to PSCs performing duties while under contract to DoD in
support of a contingency operations, humanitarian or peace operations,
or other military operations or exercises.
DATES: Comments must be received by July 26, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and/or
Regulatory Information Number (RIN) number and title, by any of the
following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: DoD cannot receive written comments at this time due
to the COVID-19 pandemic. Comments should be sent electronically to the
docket listed above.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or RIN for this Federal Register document. The
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without
change, including any personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Donna M. Livingston, 703-692-3032,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Executive Summary
A. Purpose of the Existing Rule
The DoD may contract for private security functions to fulfill non-
combat
[[Page 28043]]
requirements for security in contingency operations, humanitarian or
peace operations, and other military operations or exercises. Private
security functions include guarding of personnel, facilities,
designated sites, or property of a Federal agency, a contractor or
subcontractor, or a third party. It is DoD policy that PSCs must be
established, registered, well regulated, rigidly disciplined, and
properly staffed with carefully selected operating personnel. This
policy reflects U.S. law and is implemented through this rule, DoD
Directives, DoD Instructions, and acquisition policies and regulations,
to include the use of rigorous and verifiable business and operational
standards.
B. Summary of Major Provisions of This Regulatory Action
This regulatory action proposes changes to the current rule in
order to provide clarification to PSCs supporting DoD in support of
contingency operations, humanitarian or peace operations, or other
military operations or exercises outside of the U.S. The proposed
changes include additional citations for guidance on inherently
governmental functions and PSC compliance with DoD approved national
and international recognized quality assurance management standards.
PSCs must also cooperate with DoD on all government investigations. DoD
is responsible for providing the appropriate contract administration
oversight of PSCs. Finally, for clarification, this regulatory action
proposes to add the definitions on total force and arming authorities
to ensure compliance with statutory requirements.
C. Legal Authority for This Program
The proposed updates to this rule are required to meet the mandate
of Section 862 of the 2008 NDAA, as amended by Section 813 of the 2010
NDAA and Section 832 of the 2011 NDAA.
II. Regulatory History
The rule was initially published as an interim final rule in the
Federal Register (74 FR 34691) on July 17, 2009, because there was
insufficient policy and guidance regulating the actions of DoD and
other governmental PSCs and their employees' movements in operational
areas. The final rule, published in the Federal Register (74 FR 49650)
on September 11, 2011, established policy, assigned responsibilities
and provided procedures for the regulation of the selection,
accountability, training, equipping and conduct of personnel performing
private security functions under a covered contract during contingency
operations, combat operations, or other significant military
operations. It also assigned responsibilities and established
procedures for incident reporting, use of and accountability for
equipment, rules for the use of force, and a process for administrative
action or the removal, as appropriate, of PSCs and PSC personnel.
The corresponding internal DoD policy is captured in DoD
Instruction 3020.50, ``Private Security Contractors (PSCs) Operating in
Contingency Operations, Humanitarian or Peace Operations, or Other
Military Operations or Exercises,'' published on July 22, 2009, and
last updated on August 31, 2018. For additional information, DoD
Instruction 3020.50 can be accessed at https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/302050p.pdf.
III. Regulatory Analysis
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
a. Executive Orders
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' and Executive
Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review''
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distribute impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. Accordingly, this rule has been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under the requirements of these Executive
orders. This rule has been designated a ``not significant regulatory
action,'' and determined not to be economically significant, under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866. It has been determined that 32
CFR part 159 does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy; a
section of the economy; productivity; competition; jobs; the
environment; public health or safety; or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities.
b. Summary
This proposed rule provides clarification and updates for PSCs
supporting DoD in contingency operations, humanitarian or peace
operations, or other military operations or exercises outside of the
U.S. The clarification and updates are derived from statue and
regulations requiring PSCs not to perform inherently governmental
functions, obtain third party quality assurance standards, and
cooperate with DoD on all Government investigations.
c. Affected Population
This proposed rule provides information relevant to commercial
sector contractors and their personnel who may provide contracted
support to the DoD during applicable operations outside the United
States.
[ssquf] Contractor employees--Provides information and describes
the requirements DoD imposes on employees of private security companies
who may be employed in support of DoD operating in contingency
operations, humanitarian or peace operations, or other military
operations or exercises.
[ssquf] Companies or organizations--Provides information and
describes the requirements for private security companies who may be
employed in support of DoD operating in contingency operations,
humanitarian or peace operations, or other military operations or
exercises.
d. Costs
The proposed updates to the rule will not result in an increased
burden to PSCs. PSCs are already implementing these changes based on
the current 32 CFR part 159 and contract clauses outlined in Defense
Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 252.225-7039,
``Defense Contractors Performing Private Security Functions Outside the
United States.'' The changes in the proposed rule are a clarification
or update to the current rule.
e. Benefits
The proposed rule will clarify the guidance to the public when
considering providing private security contracting support to the DoD
while operating in a contingency operation, humanitarian or peace
operations, or other military operations or exercises. This updated
rule consolidates guidance into one document, which will improve the
public planning for providing contract support to DoD. The
consolidation will ensure the public is aware of all statutory
requirements to compete for and perform private security contracts in
support of DoD outside of the U.S.
[[Page 28044]]
f. Alternative
DoD has considered the following alternative approaches:
[ssquf] No action. If no action is taken, the public will continue
to use the current rule for PSCs supporting DoD outside of the U.S. DoD
has improved its oversight of PSCs and Operational Contract Support
through lessons learned since the current rule was published. The
proposed rule, once accepted, will provide clearer guidance to the
public on the contractor and government responsibilities.
[ssquf] Publish proposed rule. This updated rule consolidates
guidance into one document which will improve the public planning for
providing contract support to DoD. The consolidation will ensure the
public is aware of all statutory requirements to compete for and
perform private security contracts in support of DoD outside of the
U.S.
B. Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. 601)
The Department of Defense certifies that this proposed rule is not
subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601) because it
would not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Therefore, the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, as amended, does not require us to prepare a
regulatory flexibility analysis.
C. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as amended by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. DoD will submit a report containing this
rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States. A
major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in
the Federal Register. This proposed rule is not a ``major rule'' as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
D. Sec. 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (2
U.S.C. 1532) requires agencies to assess anticipated costs and benefits
before issuing any rule whose mandates require spending in any one year
of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for inflation. This
proposed rule will not mandate any requirements for State, local, or
tribal governments, nor will it affect private sector costs.
E. Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter
35)
It has been determined that 32 CFR part 159 does impose reporting
or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995. This collection has been reviewed and approved by the OMB under
OMB Control Number 0704-0549 (expires October 31, 2022), ``Defense
Contractors Performing Private Security Functions Outside the United
States.'' It included a total cost of $1,080 annually for PSC companies
to report to the Geographic Combatant Commander the following incidents
if and when they occur:
[ssquf] A weapon is discharged by PSC personnel performing private
security functions.
[ssquf] PSC personnel performing private security functions are
attacked, killed, or injured.
[ssquf] PSC personnel are killed or injured or property is
destroyed as a result of conduct by contractor personnel.
[ssquf] A weapon is discharged against PSC personnel performing
private security functions or personnel performing such functions
believe a weapon was so discharged.
[ssquf] Active, non-lethal countermeasures (other than the
discharge of a weapon) are employed by PSC personnel performing private
security functions in response to a perceived immediate threat.
The changes proposed by this regulatory action neither increases
nor decreases the public burden associated with this collection of
information.
F. Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an
agency must meet when it promulgates a proposed rule (and subsequent
final rule) that imposes substantial direct requirement costs on State
and local governments, preempts State law, or otherwise has federalism
implications. This proposed rule will not have a substantial effect on
State and local governments.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 159
Government contracts, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Security measures.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 159 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 159--PRIVATE SECURITY CONTRACTORS (PSCs) OPERATING IN
CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS, HUMANITARIAN OR PEACE OPERATIONS, OR OTHER
MILITARY OPERATIONS OR EXERCISES
0
1. The authority citation for part 159 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: Sec. 862, Pub. L. 110-181, 122 Stat. 253; Sec. 832,
Sec 853, Pub. L. 110-417, 122 Stat. 4535; Sec. 831-833, Pub. L. 111-
383, 124 Stat. 4276.
0
2. Revise the heading for part 159 to read as set forth above.
0
3. Amend Sec. 159.2 by:
0
a. In paragraph (a)(1):
0
i. Adding ``(CJCS)'' after ``Office of the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs
of Staff.''
0
ii. Adding ``(DoD)'' after ``the Office of the Inspector General of the
Department of Defense.''
0
iii. Removing ``organizational entities in the Department of Defense''
and adding in its place ``organizational entities in the DoD.''
0
b. Revising paragraph (a)(2).
0
c. Adding paragraph (a)(3).
0
d. Revising paragraph (b)(1).
0
e. In paragraph (b)(2), removing ``USG-funded'' and adding in its place
``U.S.G.-funded.''
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 159.2 Applicability and scope.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(2) The Department of State and other U.S. Federal agencies insofar
as it implements the requirements of section 862 of Public Law 110-181,
as amended. Specifically, in areas of operations which require enhanced
coordination of PSC and PSC personnel working for United States
Government (U.S.G.) agencies, the Secretary of Defense may designate
such areas as areas of combat operations or other significant military
operations for the limited purposes of this part. In such an instance,
the standards established in accordance with this part would, in
coordination with the Secretary of State, expand from covering only DoD
PSCs and PSC personnel to cover all U.S.G. funded PSCs and PSC
personnel operating in the designated area.
(3) The requirements of this part shall not apply to a nonprofit
nongovernmental organization receiving grants or cooperative agreements
for activities conducted within an area of other significant military
operations if the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State agree
that such organization may be exempted. An exemption may be granted by
the
[[Page 28045]]
agreement of the Secretaries under this paragraph (a)(3) on an
organization-by-organization or area-by-area basis. Such an exemption
may not be granted with respect to an area of combat operations.
(b) * * *
(1) DoD PSCs and PSC personnel on contract and subcontract, at any
tier, performing private security functions in support of contingency
operations, humanitarian or peace operations, or other military
operations or exercises outside the United States.
* * * * *
0
4. Amend Sec. 159.3 by:
0
a. Adding the definition of ``Arming authority'' in alphabetical order.
0
b. Revising the definition of ``Contingency operation,'' ``Covered
contract,'' ``Other significant military operations,'' and ``Private
security functions.''
0
c. Removing the definition of ``PSC.''
0
d. Adding the definitions of ``Private Security Contractor (PSC)'' and
``Total Force'' in alphabetical order.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 159.3 Definitions.
* * * * *
Arming authority. The GCC, or a person or persons designated by the
GCC, who can authorize the arming of civilians under their authority or
supervision for security functions or to permit the carrying of
firearms for personal protection in support of operations outside the
United States.
Contingency operation. A military operation that is either
designated by the Secretary of Defense as a contingency operation or
becomes a contingency operation as a matter of law as defined in 10
U.S.C. 101(a)(13).
* * * * *
Covered contract. (1) A DoD contract for performance of services
and/or delivery of supplies in an area of contingency operations,
humanitarian or peace operations, or other military operations or
exercises outside the United States or non-DoD Federal agency contract
for performance of services and/or delivery of supplies in an area of
combat operations or other significant military operations, as
designated by the Secretary of Defense; a subcontract at any tier under
such contracts; or a task order or delivery order issued under such
contracts or subcontracts.
(2) Excludes temporary arrangements entered into by non-DoD
contractors for the performance of private security functions by
individual indigenous personnel not affiliated with a local or
expatriate security company.
Other significant military operations. (1) Activities, other than
combat operations, as part of an overseas contingency operation that
are carried out by United States Armed Forces in an uncontrolled or
unpredictable high-threat environment where personnel performing
security functions may be called upon to use deadly force.
(2) With respect to an area of other significant military
operations, the requirements of this part shall apply only upon
agreement of the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State. Such
an agreement of the Secretaries may be made only on an area-by-area
basis. With respect to an area of combat operations, the requirements
of this part shall always apply.
Private security functions. Activities engaged in by a contractor
under a covered contract as follows:
(1) Guarding personnel, facilities, designated sites, or property
of a Federal agency, the contractor or subcontractor, or a third party.
(2) Any other activity for which personnel are required to carry
weapons in the performance of their duties in accordance with the terms
of their contract. For the DoD, DoD Instruction 3020.41, ``Operational
Contract Support (OCS)'' (available at https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/302041p.pdf) prescribes policies related
to personnel allowed to carry weapons for self-defense.
(3) Contractors, including those performing private security
functions, are not authorized to perform inherently governmental
functions. In this regard, they are limited to a defensive response to
hostile acts or demonstrated hostile intent.
Private Security Contractor (PSC). A company contracted by the
U.S.G. to perform private security functions under a covered contract.
* * * * *
Total Force. The organizations, units, and individuals that
comprise DoD's resources for implementing the National Security
Strategy. It includes the DoD Active and Reserve Component military
personnel, DoD civilian personnel (including foreign national direct-
hires as well as non-appropriated fund employees), contracted support,
and host nation support personnel.
Sec. 159.4 [Amended]
0
5. Amend Sec. 159.4 by:
0
a. In paragraph (a):
0
i. Adding ``as amended,'' after ``Public Law 110-181,''.
0
ii. Removing ``section 159.5 of this part'' and adding in its place
``Sec. 159.5.''
0
b. In paragraph (b):
0
i. Adding ``(GCCs)'' after ``Geographic Combatant Commanders.''
0
ii. Redesignating footnotes 4 and 5 as footnotes 1 and 2.
0
c. In paragraph (c):
0
i. Adding ``(COM)'' after ``the relevant Chief of Mission'' in the
first sentence.
0
ii. Removing ``geographic Combatant Commander'' and adding in its place
``GCC'' in the first sentence.
0
iii. Removing ``Chief of Mission'' and adding in its place ``COM'' in
the second sentence.
0
iv. Removing ``geographic Combatant Commander'' and adding in its place
``GCC'' in the second sentence.
0
6. Revise Sec. 159.5 to read as follows:
Sec. 159.5 Responsibilities.
(a) The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness
(USD(P&R)) will provide Department-wide policies on the total force
manpower mix and labor sourcing, consistent with statute, the FAR, the
DFARS, and other applicable Federal policy documents, especially with
respect to contracted services and restrictions on functions that
contractors may and may not perform. The USD(P&R) will ensure that
policies specifically address circumstances where use of PSCs would be
inherently governmental or where GCCs would need to assess where
performance of the function by PSCs or total reliance on PSCs would
constitute an unacceptable risk.
(b) The Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Logistics
(DASD(Logistics)), under the authority, direction, and control of the
Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment (USD(A&S))
and through the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Sustainment,
monitors the registering, processing, and accounting of PSC personnel
in areas of contingency operations, humanitarian or peace operations,
or other military operations or exercises.
(c) The Principal Director, Defense Pricing and Contracting (DPC),
under the authority, direction, and control of the USD(A&S), ensures
that the DFARS and (when appropriate, in consultation with the other
members of the FAR Council) the FAR, provides appropriate guidance and
publish contracting requirements pursuant to this part and Section 862
of Public Law 110-181.
(d) The CJCS shall ensure that joint doctrine is consistent with
the principles established by DoD Directive 3020.49, ``Orchestrating,
Synchronizing, and Integrating Program Management of Contingency
Acquisition Planning and Its Operational Execution'' (available at
https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodd/
[[Page 28046]]
302049p.pdf); DoD Instruction 3020.41, DoD Directive 5210.56, ``Arming
and the Use of Force'' (available at https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodd/521056_dodd_2016.pdf); and this part.
(e) The GCCs in whose AOR contingency operations, humanitarian or
peace operations, or other military operations or exercises are
occurring, and within which PSCs and PSC personnel perform under
covered contracts, shall:
(1) Provide guidance and procedures, as necessary and consistent
with the principles established by DoD Directive 3020.49, DoD
Instruction 3020.41, DoD Instruction 1100.22, ``Policy and Procedures
for Determining Workforce Mix'' (available at https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/110022p.pdf); DFARS, 48 CFR
subpart 225.302, and this part, for the selection, training,
accountability, and equipping of such PSC personnel and the conduct of
PSCs and PSC personnel within their AOR. Individual training and
qualification standards shall meet, at a minimum, one of the Military
Departments' established standards. Within a geographic Combatant
Command, a sub unified commander or JFC shall be responsible for
developing and issuing implementing procedures as warranted by the
situation, operation, and environment, in consultation with the
relevant COM in designated areas of combat operations or other
significant military operations.
(2) Through the Contracting Officer, the PSC should acknowledge
that its personnel understand their obligation to comply with the terms
and conditions of applicable covered contracts.
(3) Issue written authorization to the PSC identifying individual
PSC personnel who are authorized to be armed. Rules for the Use of
Force shall be included with the written authorization, if not
previously provided. Rules for the Use of Force shall conform to the
guidance in DoD Directive 5210.56 and the CJCS Instruction 3121.01B,
``Standing Rules of Engagement/Standing Rules for the Use of Force for
U.S. Forces.'' Offerors' and contractors' access to the Rules for the
Use of Force may be controlled in accordance with the terms of FAR
52.204-2, ``Security Requirements''; DFARS 252.204-7000, ``Disclosure
of Information''; or both.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ CJCS Instruction 3121.01B provides guidance on the standing
rules of engagement (SROE) and establishes standing rules for the
use of force for DoD operations worldwide. This document is
classified secret. CJCS Instruction 3121.01B is available via Secure
internet Protocol Router Network at https://jsportal.osd.smil.mil.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(4) Ensure that the procedures, orders, directives, and
instructions prescribed in Sec. 159.6 are available through a single
location (to include an internet website, consistent with security
considerations and requirements).
(f) The Heads of the DoD Components shall:
(1) Ensure that all private security-related requirement documents
are in compliance with the procedures listed in Sec. 159.6 and the
guidance and procedures issued by the geographic Combatant Command.
(2) Ensure private security-related contracts contain the
appropriate clauses in accordance with the applicable FAR and DFARS
clauses and include additional mission-specific requirements as
appropriate.
(3) Ensure the head of the contracting activity responsible for
each covered contract takes appropriate steps to assign sufficient
oversight personnel to the contract to verify that the contractor
responsible for performing private security functions complies with the
requirements of this part. This includes ensuring that the contracting
officer coordinates with the requiring activity to nominate and appoint
a qualified contracting officer's representative (COR) or other
multiple or alternate CORs, in accordance with DoD Instruction 5000.72,
``DoD Standard for Contracting Officer's Representative (COR)
Certification'' (available at https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/500072p.pdf).
0
7. Amend Sec. 159.6 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (a) introductory text.
0
b. In paragraph (a)(1)(i), removing ``, ``Contractor Personnel
Authorized to Accompany the U.S. Armed Forces.'' '' and adding a period
in its place.
0
c. In paragraph (a)(1)(iii) introductory text:
0
i. Removing ``geographic Combatant Commander'' everywhere it appears
and adding in its place ``GCC'' in the first sentence.
0
ii. Removing ``of this part''.
0
d. In paragraph (a)(1)(iii)(C):
0
i. Removing `` ``Guidance for Determining Workforce Mix'' '' and adding
in its place `` ``Policy and Procedures for Determining Workforce Mix''
''.
0
ii. Redesignating footnote 12 as footnote 1.
0
e. In paragraph (a)(1)(iii)(F)(1), redesignating footnote 13 as
footnote 2.
0
f. In paragraph (a)(1)(iv), adding ``PSC personnel, weapons,'' before
``armored vehicles''.
0
g. In paragraph (a)(1)(v)(F), removing ``TASER guns'' and adding in its
place ``disruption devices''.
0
h. In paragraph (a)(1)(viii), removing ``commander of a combatant
command may request'' and adding in its place ``commander of a CCMD
may, through the contracting officer, request''.
0
i. In paragraph (a)(1)(x), removing ``paragraph (a)(2)(ii)'' and adding
in its place ``paragraph (a)(2)(iii)''.
0
j. In paragraph (a)(2)(i), removing ``, ``Contractor Personnel
Authorized to Accompany the U.S. Armed Forces.'' '' and adding a period
in its place.
0
k. Redesignating paragraphs (a)(2)(ii) through (iv) as paragraphs
(a)(2)(iii) through (iv) and adding new paragraph (a)(2)(ii).
0
l. Further redesignating newly redesignated paragraph (a)(2)(iv) as
paragraph (a)(2)(vi) and adding new paragraph (a)(2)(v).
0
m. In newly redesignated paragraph (a)(2)(vi), removing ``Chief of
Mission'' and adding in its place ``COM''.
0
n. Removing paragraph (b) and redesignating paragraphs (c) and (d) as
paragraphs (b) and (c).
0
o. In newly redesignated paragraph (b):
0
i. Revising the paragraph heading.
0
ii. Removing ``Chief of Mission'' and ``combatant command'' and adding
in their places ``COM'' and ``CCMD,'' respectively.
0
p. In newly redesignated paragraph (c):
0
i. Revising the paragraph heading.
0
ii. Removing ``Chief of Mission'' and ``geographic Combatant Commander/
sub unified commander'' and adding in their places ``COM'' and ``GCC/
sub unified commander,'' respectively.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 159.6 Procedures.
(a) Standing Combatant Command (CCMD) guidance and procedures. Each
GCC shall develop and publish guidance and procedures for PSCs and PSC
personnel operating during contingency operations, humanitarian or
peace operations, or other military operations or exercises within
their AOR, consistent with applicable law; this part; applicable
Military Department publications; and other applicable DoD issuances
including DoD Directive 3020.49, DoD Instruction 1100.22, ``Policy and
Procedures for Determining Workforce Mix,'' FAR, DFARS, DoD Instruction
3020.41, DoD Directive 2311.01E, ``DoD Law of War Program'' (available
at https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodd/231101e.pdf); DoD 5200.8-R, ``Physical
[[Page 28047]]
Security Program'' (available at https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodm/520008rm.pdf); CJCS Instruction 3121.01B,
``Standing Rules of Engagement/Standing Rules for the Use of Force for
U.S. Forces,'' and DoD Directive 5210.56. The guidance and procedures
shall:
* * * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) Assessing compliance with DoD approved business and
operational standards for private security functions.
* * * * *
(v) Requirements for the PSC to cooperate with any investigation
conducted by the DoD, including by providing access to its employees
and relevant information in its possession regarding the matter(s)
under investigation.
* * * * *
(b) Subordinate guidance and procedures. * * *
(c) Consultation and coordination. * * *
Dated: May 10, 2021.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2021-10100 Filed 5-24-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P