Airworthiness Directives; CFM International, S.A. Turbofan Engines, 27264-27268 [2021-10607]
Download as PDF
27264
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 96 / Thursday, May 20, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or responsible Flight
Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch,
send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-AVS-AIR730-AMOC@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the responsible
Flight Standards Office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain instructions
from a manufacturer, the instructions must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, Large Aircraft Section,
International Validation Branch, FAA; or
EASA; or Airbus SAS’s EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the
DOA-authorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except
as required by paragraph (i)(2) of this AD, if
any service information contains procedures
or tests that are identified as RC, those
procedures and tests must be done to comply
with this AD; any procedures or tests that are
not identified as RC are recommended. Those
procedures and tests that are not identified
as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator’s
maintenance or inspection program without
obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can
be done and the airplane can be put back in
an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or
changes to procedures or tests identified as
RC require approval of an AMOC.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
Large Aircraft Section, International
Validation Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th
St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and
fax 206–231–3223; email Sanjay.Ralhan@
faa.gov.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD 2021–0111, dated April 22, 2021.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For EASA AD 2021–0111, contact
EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668
Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999
000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu; Internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 May 19, 2021
Jkt 253001
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://
ad.easa.europa.eu.
(4) You may view this material at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational
Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
206–231–3195. This material may be found
in the AD docket on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA–2021–0370.
(5) You may view this material that is
incorporated by reference at the National
Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, email fedreg.legal@
nara.gov, or go to https://www.archives.gov/
federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued on May 12, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–10590 Filed 5–17–21; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2019–0568; Project
Identifier 2019–NE–20–AD; Amendment 39–
21542; AD 2021–10–09]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; CFM
International, S.A. Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all CFM
International, S.A. (CFM) CFM56–5B
and CFM56–7B model turbofan engines
with a certain high-pressure turbine
(HPT) inner stationary seal installed.
This AD was prompted by cracks found
in the rotating air HPT front seal. This
AD requires removal, inspection, and
replacement of the affected HPT inner
stationary seal and, depending on the
findings, replacement of the rotating air
HPT front seal, HPT rotor blades, and
No. 3 ball bearing. The FAA is issuing
this AD to address the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective June 24,
2021.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of June 24, 2021.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact CFM
International Inc., Aviation Operations
Center, 1 Neumann Way, M/D Room
285, Cincinnati, OH 45125; phone: (877)
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
432–3272; fax: (877) 432–3329; email:
aviation.fleetsupport@ge.com. You may
view this service information at the
FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (781) 238–
7759. It is also available at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2019–
0568.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket at
https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2019–0568; or in person at Docket
Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this
final rule, any comments received, and
other information. The address for
Docket Operations is U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher McGuire, Aviation Safety
Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone: (781) 238–7120; fax: (781) 238–
7199; email: chris.mcguire@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The FAA issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to all CFM CFM56–5B and
CFM56–7B model turbofan engines with
a certain HPT inner stationary seal
installed. The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on September 20, 2019
(84 FR 49487). The NPRM was
prompted by a report that two cracks
were discovered on a CFM CFM56–5B
model turbofan engine rotating air HPT
front seal during a routine engine shop
visit. After investigation, CFM
determined that the HPT inner
stationary seal, part number
1808M56G01, may not have received
the correct braze heat treat cycle at the
time of the honeycomb replacement. As
a result, the affected HPT inner
stationary seal could lead to a localized
separation of the replaced honeycomb,
which may reduce the life of the
rotating air HPT front seal. In the
NPRM, the FAA proposed to require
removal, inspection, and replacement of
the affected HPT inner stationary seal
and, depending on the findings,
replacement of the rotating air HPT
front seal, HPT rotor blades, and No. 3
ball bearing. The FAA is issuing this AD
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 96 / Thursday, May 20, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
to address the unsafe condition on these
products.
Discussion of Final Airworthiness
Directive
Comments
The FAA received comments from
nine commenters. The commenters were
Air Line Pilots Association,
International (ALPA); American
Airlines (AAL); Azur Aviation (Azur);
The Boeing Company (Boeing); CFM;
Delta Air Lines, Inc. (Delta); United
Airlines (UAL); MTU Maintenance
Canada (MTU) and Magnetic MRO. Four
of the nine commenters requested
changes that resulted in updates to this
AD. Three commenters requested
clarification on definitions. Two
commenters requested updates to the
service information. Two commenters
expressed support for the AD. The
following presents the comments
received on the NPRM and the FAA’s
response to each comment.
Request To Clarify Parts That Can Be
Returned to Service
Azur requested that the FAA clarify
the parts that can be returned to service
after removal. Azur reasoned that
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD requires that
an HPT inner stationary seal be removed
from service and replaced with either a
part that is not listed in the service
information or a repaired part identified
in paragraph (h)(2), Definitions, of this
AD. In contrast, paragraphs (g)(3)(i) and
(iii) of this AD, respectively, indicate
only to remove the rotating air HPT
front seal and No. 3 ball bearing from
service and replace them with a ‘‘part
eligible for installation.’’
Azur suggested adding one of the
following to this AD to remove the
ambiguity: (1) Remove ‘‘remove from
service’’ from paragraph (g)(1) of this
AD; (2) Identify rotating air HPT front
seals and No. 3 ball bearings that are not
eligible for installation; (3) Add an
‘‘Installation Prohibition’’ paragraph for
the removed rotating air HPT front seal
and No. 3 ball bearing; (4) Indicate what
to do with the removed rotating air HPT
front seal and No. 3 ball bearing in
paragraphs (g)(3)(i) and (iii) of this AD,
such as discard these parts; or (5)
Identify instruction for the removed
rotating air HPT front seals and No. 3
ball bearings.
Use of ‘‘remove from service’’ in this
AD indicates that the rotating air HPT
front seal and No. 3 ball bearing should
no longer be installed on an engine.
Therefore, neither the removed rotating
air HPT front seal nor the removed No.
3 ball bearing can be repaired and
returned to service. The FAA, however,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 May 19, 2021
Jkt 253001
updated paragraph (h), Definitions, of
this AD, to clarify that a part eligible for
installation for both a rotating air HPT
front seal and a No. 3 ball bearing refers
to parts that were not removed from
service based on the findings of
honeycomb separation of the HPT inner
stationary seal. The FAA also updated
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD to remove
‘‘remove from service’’ to clarify that the
HPT inner stationary seal can be
repaired and returned to service. The
FAA also moved the definition of an
HPT inner stationary seal that is eligible
for installation from paragraph (g)(1) to
paragraph (h)(1) of this AD.
Request To Update the Definition of
Engine Shop Visit
AAL, Delta, and UAL requested
updates or clarification of the definition
of an ‘‘engine shop visit’’ provided in
paragraph (h)(1) of this AD.
AAL requested that the FAA update
the definition of an engine shop visit to
clarify circumstances that are not an
engine shop visit. AAL reasoned that
CFM Service Bulletin (SB) CFM56–7B
S/B 72–0972 provides guidance on
when AD mandated actions can be
accomplished to avoid undue burden on
operators, specifically in circumstances
when engines are inducted to the shop
for quick corrective action, such as
repair for foreign object damage.
UAL requested that the FAA update
the definition of an engine shop visit to
specify which major mating engine case
flanges need to be separated to be an
engine shop visit as defined. UAL stated
that the ambiguity of the ‘‘major mating
engine case flange’’ may result in an
inspection of the HPT inner stationary
seal for honeycomb separation when the
core is not exposed, such as during fan
case replacement.
Delta recommended that the
manufacturer define ‘‘engine shop visit’’
in its service information.
The FAA agrees that the definition of
an engine shop visit in this AD does not
include the separation of engine flanges
solely for the purpose of transportation
of the engine or replacing the fan or
propulsor without subsequent
maintenance. All other separations of
major mating engine case flanges are an
engine shop visit, as defined, and
require removal, replacement, and
inspection of the HPT inner stationary
seal as required by paragraphs (g)(1) and
(2) of this AD. The FAA changed the
definition of ‘‘engine shop visit’’ in
paragraph (h) this AD to clarify the
definition of an engine shop visit.
The FAA did not revise this AD in
response to Delta’s comment. The FAA
notes, however, that in CFM Service
Bulletin (SB) CFM56–5B S/B 72–0952,
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
27265
Revision 01, and CFM SB CFM56–7B
S/B 72–1054, Revision 01, both dated
January 15, 2020, the manufacturer
updated the SBs to clarify that the quick
turn shop visit type is not included in
the SB’s definition of ‘‘shop visit.’’
Request To Change Inspection of HPT
Rotor Blade To Remove Debris
AAL requested that the FAA change
paragraph (g)(3)(ii) of this AD to
‘‘Remove the HPT rotor blade from
service and inspect per CFM56–7B
CFMI–TP.SM.10 Engine Shop Manual
(ESM) 72–52–01–09 High Pressure
Turbine Rotor Blades—Inspection 001
or replace with parts eligible for
installation.’’ AAL reasoned that the
HPT rotor blade collects various types of
debris over its service life, so attempting
to determine if the debris is honeycomb
material based upon a general visual
inspection is subjective and open to
interpretation. Therefore, AAL
suggested that removing the HPT rotor
blades would ensure that the repair
facility could remove the debris in the
internal cavities and return the HPT
rotor blades to service.
Since the NPRM was published, the
manufacturer revised the service
information, removing the inspection of
the HPT rotor blade internal cavities for
honeycomb metal debris. As a result,
the FAA changed paragraph (g)(3)(ii) of
this AD to eliminate the requirement to
inspect the HPT rotor blade internal
cavities for honeycomb metal debris.
The FAA also removed the estimated
cost associated with the inspection of
the HPT rotor blade internal cavities for
honeycomb metal debris from this AD.
Request To Clarify Reason To Replace
No. 3 Ball Bearing
Magnetic MRO requested clarification
for the reason to replace the No. 3 ball
bearing if metal debris is found in the
HPT blade cavities.
In the NPRM, the FAA proposed to
require replacement of the No. 3 ball
bearing if honeycomb separation was
found during the inspection required by
paragraph (g)(2) of this AD. The
replacement of the No. 3 ball bearing is
not linked to a finding of debris in the
HPT rotor blade internal cavities but is
required if honeycomb separation is
found. Honeycomb separation results in
increased secondary air flow impinging
on the rotating air HPT front seal, which
increases the axial load on the No. 3 ball
bearing. This increased axial load
impacts the durability of the No. 3 ball
bearing. The FAA did not change this
AD based on this comment.
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
27266
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 96 / Thursday, May 20, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Request To Add a Terminating Action
AAL requested that the FAA update
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD to include,
‘‘Accomplishment of these instructions
are considered terminating action to this
AD.’’ AAL reasoned that this statement
provides specific closure since the
corrective action has been clearly
defined and approved by the FAA. AAL
suggested this maintenance action is not
recurring and, as such, would constitute
an appropriate terminating action.
The FAA disagrees with adding the
terminating action statement.
Performing the actions required by this
AD achieves compliance with this AD.
A statement of terminating action is
unnecessary.
Request To Clarify Compliance
MTU commented that this AD
describes actions to be performed if
damage is found, but does not describe
actions to be performed when damage is
not found as specified in CFM SB
CFM56–7B S/B 72–1054, Revision 01,
dated January 15, 2020. MTU asked if
the AD could reference action that
needs to be performed when the engine
is inducted and disassembled for
reasons other than HPT inner stationary
seal issue and damage (or no damage) is
found.
The FAA disagrees with requiring
actions that are not related to the unsafe
condition described in this AD. The
HPT inner stationary seal is not
typically exposed unless the engine is
undergoing an engine shop visit.
However, if damage to the HPT inner
stationary seal is found during
inspections not related to this AD, the
ESM provides criteria to determine
appropriate action.
Request To Incorporate AC 20–176A in
Service Information
AAL and Delta requested that CFM
incorporate AC 20–176A into both CFM
SB CFM56–5B S/B 72–0952, Revision
01, dated January 15, 2020, and CFM SB
CFM56–7B S/B 72–1054, Revision 01,
dated January 15, 2020, for the purpose
of ‘‘. . . distinguishing which steps in
an SB will have a direct effect on
detecting, preventing, resolving, or
eliminating the unsafe condition
identified in an AD.’’ The commenters
reasoned that CFM should identify the
steps required for compliance (RC) in
the service information. AAL added that
the RC designation reduces global
AMOCs and streamlines the
accomplishment of key tasks while
meeting strict regulatory compliance.
The FAA agrees that adding the RC
designation to the required service
information steps provides clarity to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 May 19, 2021
Jkt 253001
operators. CFM added the RC
designation to CFM SB CFM56–5B S/B
72–0952, Revision 01, dated January 15,
2020, and CFM SB CFM56–7B S/B 72–
1054, Revision 01, dated January 15,
2020. The FAA did not change this AD.
Request To Update References to the
ESM
Delta requested that the FAA update
paragraphs (c)(2) and (h)(2) of this AD
to reference the CFM56–5B ESM and the
CFM56–7B ESM entirely, rather than
specific repair tasks within the ESMs.
Delta reasoned that the CFM56–5B ESM
and CFM56–7B ESM might change in
future revisions.
The FAA disagrees with changing the
references from the specific repair tasks.
Paragraph (c)(2), Applicability, and
paragraph (h)(2), Definitions, of this AD
refer to specific repair tasks within
CFM56–5B ESM and CFM56–7B ESM
that are required to return a HPT inner
stationary seal to service. The FAA did
not change this AD, but will consider
requests for AMOCs if the repair tasks
change in future revisions of the ESM.
Comment on Revising Service
Information
CFM stated that they would update
CFM SB CFM56–5B S/B 72–0952 and
CFM SB CFM56–7B S/B 72–1054 based
on feedback from operators. CFM
indicated it would update the definition
of ‘‘shop visit’’ to clarify that replacing
a fan disk is not considered a shop visit.
CFM further indicated that it would
clarify that if honeycomb separation is
found, then the HPT blades may be
scrapped or overhauled. Finally, CFM
noted that it would revise the SBs by
adding ‘‘RC’’ to those tasks required for
compliance.
The FAA notes that it has revised this
AD by referring to CFM SB CFM56–5B
S/B 72–0952, Revision 01, dated January
15, 2020, and CFM SB CFM56–7B S/B
72–1054, Revision 01, dated January 15,
2020. In addition, the FAA has reviewed
the changes included in Revision 01 of
these SBs and determined that these are
clarifying changes only and impose no
additional burden to operators.
Request To Allow Use of Later
Revisions of Service Information
AAL and Delta requested that the
FAA add the phrase ‘‘or later’’ when
referencing the service information in
this AD. AAL stated that specifying ‘‘or
later’’ could prevent numerous requests
for alternative methods of compliance
(AMOCs) if the manufacturer revises the
service information. AAL also stated
that this request aligns with paragraph
2–3.d of Advisory Circular No. 20–
176A, ‘‘Service Bulletins Related to
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Airworthiness Directives and Indicating
FAA Approval on Service Documents,’’
dated June 16, 2014 (AC 20–176A).
The FAA disagrees with adding
language that allows the use of later
revisions of service information when
performing the required actions of this
AD. Later revisions of the service
information have not been reviewed by
the FAA. As noted, however, in a
previous comment response, the FAA
has revised this AD by referring to the
latest published revisions of the
referenced service information.
Support for No Reporting Requirement
AAL expressed support for the No
Reporting Requirement in paragraph (i)
of this AD.
Support for the AD
ALPA and Boeing expressed support
for the AD as written.
Conclusion
The FAA reviewed the relevant data,
considered any comments received, and
determined that air safety requires
adopting this AD as proposed.
Accordingly, the FAA is issuing this AD
to address the unsafe condition on these
products. Except for minor editorial
changes and any other changes
described previously, this AD is
adopted as proposed in the NPRM.
None of the changes will increase the
economic burden on any operator.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed CFM SB CFM56–
5B S/B 72–0952, Revision 01, dated
January 15, 2020, and CFM SB CFM56–
7B S/B 72–1054, Revision 01, dated
January 15, 2020. CFM SB CFM56–5B S/
B 72–0952, Revision 01, describes
procedures for repairing the CFM56–5B
turbofan engine HPT inner stationary
seal honeycomb. CFM SB CFM56–7B S/
B 72–1054, Revision 01, describes
procedures for repairing the CFM56–7B
turbofan engine HPT inner stationary
seal honeycomb. This service
information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course
of business or by the means identified
in ADDRESSES.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD
affects 210 engines installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry. Operators
have the option to replace or repair the
affected HPT inner stationary seal. The
part cost is for replacement with a
repaired HPT inner stationary seal.
The FAA estimates the following
costs to comply with this AD:
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
27267
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 96 / Thursday, May 20, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Replace HPT inner stationary seal .................
Inspect HPT inner stationary seal ..................
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 .................
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 .................
The FAA estimates the following
costs to do any necessary replacements
that would be required based on the
Parts cost
results of the inspection. The agency has
no way of determining the number of
$7,910
0
Cost per
product
Cost on U.S.
operators
$7,995
85
$1,678,950
17,850
engines that might need these
replacements:
ON-CONDITION COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Replace rotating air HPT front seal ..............................
Replace HPT rotor blades (pair) ..................................
Replace No. 3 ball bearing ...........................................
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 ...............................
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 ...............................
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 ...............................
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: General requirements. Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 May 19, 2021
Jkt 253001
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
■
2021–10–09 CFM International, S.A.:
Amendment 39–21542; Docket No.
FAA–2019–0568; Project Identifier
2019–NE–20–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) is
effective June 24, 2021.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
(1) This AD applies to all CFM
International, S.A. (CFM) CFM56–5B1, –5B1/
2P, –5B1/3, –5B1/P, –5B2, –5B2/2P, –5B2/3,
–5B2/P, –5B3/2P, –5B3/2P1, –5B3/3, –5B3/
3B1, –5B3/P, –5B3/P1, –5B4, –5B4/2P, –5B4/
2P1, –5B4/3, –5B4/3B1, –5B4/P, –5B4/P1,
–5B5, –5B5/3, –5B5/P, –5B6, –5B6/2P, –5B6/
3, –5B6/P, –5B7, –5B7/3, –5B7/P, –5B8/3,
–5B8/P, –5B9/2P, –5B9/3, –5B9/P, CFM56–
7B20, –7B20/2, –7B20/3, –7B20E, –7B22,
–7B22/2, –7B22/3, –7B22/3B1, –7B22/B1,
–7B22E, –7B22E/B1, –7B24, –7B24/2, –7B24/
3, –7B24/3B1, –7B24/B1, –7B24E, –7B24E/
B1, –7B26, –7B26/2, –7B26/3, –7B26/3B1,
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Parts cost
$344,600
31,000
30,000
Cost per
product
$344,685
31,085
30,085
–7B26/3B2, –7B26/3B2F, –7B26/3F, –7B26/
B1, –7B26/B2, –7B26E, –7B26E/B1, –7B26E/
B2, –7B26E/B2F, –7B26E/F, –7B27, –7B27/2,
–7B27/3, –7B27/3B1, –7B27/3B1F, –7B27/
3B3, –7B27/3F, –7B27/B1, –7B27/B3,
–7B27A, –7B27A/3, –7B27AE, –7B27E,
–7B27E/B1, –7B27E/B1F, –7B27E/B3, and
–7B27E/F model turbofan engines with a
high-pressure turbine (HPT) inner stationary
seal, part number (P/N) 1808M56G01
installed that has a serial number (S/N) listed
in Planning Information, Paragraph 1.A.,
Table 1, of CFM Service Bulletin (SB)
CFM56–5B S/B 72–0952, Revision 01, dated
January 15, 2020, or in Planning Information,
Paragraph 1.A., Table 1, CFM SB CFM56–7B
S/B 72–1054, Revision 01, dated January 15,
2020, installed.
(2) This AD does not apply to affected CFM
CFM56–5B and CFM56–7B model turbofan
engines with the affected HPT inner
stationary seal installed if the seal has been
repaired as specified in CFM56–5B Engine
Shop Manual (ESM), 72–41–03, REPAIR 003,
or CFM56–7B ESM, 72–41–03, REPAIR 003,
after the year listed in Paragraph 1.A., Table
1, of CFM SB CFM56–5B S/B 72–0952,
Revision 01, dated January 15, 2020, or
Paragraph 1.A., Table 1, CFM SB CFM56–7B
S/B 72–1054, Revision 01, dated January 15,
2020.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)
Code 7230, Turbine Engine Compressor
Section.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by cracks found in
the rotating air HPT front seal. The FAA is
issuing this AD to prevent failure of the HPT
inner stationary seal and the rotating air HPT
front seal. The unsafe condition, if not
addressed, could result in uncontained
release of the rotating air HPT front seal,
damage to the engine, and damage to the
airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
27268
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 96 / Thursday, May 20, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
(g) Required Actions
(1) At the next engine shop visit after the
effective date of this AD, remove the affected
HPT inner stationary seal and replace with a
HPT inner stationary seal that is eligible for
installation.
(2) After removing the affected HPT inner
stationary seal required by paragraph (g)(1),
inspect the removed HPT inner stationary
seal for honeycomb separation, as defined in
the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph
3.C.(1), in CFM SB CFM56–5B S/B 72–0952,
Revision 01, dated January 15, 2020, or in
CFM SB CFM56–7B S/B 72–1054, Revision
01, dated January 15, 2020.
(3) If honeycomb separation is found
during the inspection required by paragraph
(g)(2) of this AD, before further flight:
(i) Remove the rotating air HPT front seal
from service and replace with a rotating air
HPT front seal that is eligible for installation.
(ii) Remove the HPT rotor blades and
replace them with HPT rotor blades eligible
for installation.
(iii) Remove the No. 3 ball bearing from
service and replace with a No. 3 ball bearing
eligible for installation.
(h) Definitions
(1) For the purpose of this AD, an ‘‘engine
shop visit’’ is the induction of an engine into
the shop for maintenance involving the
separation of pairs of major mating engine
case flanges, except for the following
situations, which do not constitute an engine
shop visit.
(i) Separation of engine flanges solely for
the purpose of transportation of the engine
without subsequent maintenance.
(ii) Separation of engine flanges solely for
the purpose of replacing the fan or propulsor
without subsequent maintenance.
(2) For the purpose of this AD, an HPT
inner stationary seal that is eligible for
installation is an HPT inner stationary seal:
(i) That is not listed in Planning
Information, Paragraph 1.A., Table 1, of CFM
SB CFM56–5B S/B 72–0952, Revision 01,
dated January 15, 2020, or in Planning
Information, Paragraph 1.A., Table 1, CFM
SB CFM56–7B S/B 72–1054, Revision 01,
dated January 15, 2020; or
(ii) with a P/N 1808M56G01 and with a
S/N listed in Paragraph 1.A., Table 1, of CFM
SB CFM56–5B S/B 72–0952, Revision 01,
dated January 15, 2020, or Paragraph 1.A.,
Table 1, CFM SB CFM56–7B S/B 72–1054,
Revision 01, dated January 15, 2020, that has
been repaired per CFM56–5B ESM, 72–41–
03, REPAIR 003, or CFM56–7B ESM, 72–41–
03, REPAIR 003, after the year listed in
Paragraph 1.A., Table 1, of CFM SB CFM56–
5B S/B 72–0952, Revision 01, dated January
15, 2020, or Paragraph 1.A., Table 1, CFM SB
CFM56–7B S/B 72–1054, Revision 01, dated
January 15, 2020.
(3) For the purpose of this AD, a rotating
air HPT front seal that is eligible for
installation is any rotating air HPT front seal
that was not removed from service as a result
of the inspection of the HPT inner stationary
seal required by paragraph (g)(2) of this AD
in which there was a finding of honeycomb
separation.
(4) For the purpose of this AD, HPT rotor
blades eligible for installation are new HPT
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 May 19, 2021
Jkt 253001
rotor blades with zero flight hours since news
or HPT rotor blades that have been inspected
and returned to a serviceable condition using
approved engine manual requirements.
(5) For the purpose of this AD, a No. 3 ball
bearing eligible for installation is any No. 3
ball bearing that was not removed from
service as a result of the inspection of the
HPT inner stationary seal required by
paragraph (g)(2) of this AD in which there
was a finding of honeycomb separation.
(i) No Reporting Requirement
The reporting requirements contained
within the SBs referenced in paragraph (g) of
this AD are not required by this AD.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, ECO Branch, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD,
if requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the certification office,
send it to the attention of the person
identified in Related Information. You may
email your request to: ANE-AD-AMOC@
faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(k) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Christopher McGuire, Aviation Safety
Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: (781)
238–7120; fax: (781) 238–7199; email:
chris.mcguire@faa.gov.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) CFM Service Bulletin CFM56–5B S/B
72–0952, Revision 01, dated January 15,
2020.
(ii) CFM Service Bulletin CFM56–7B S/B
72–1054, Revision 01, dated January 15,
2020.
(3) For CFM service information identified
in this AD, contact CFM International Inc.,
Aviation Operations Center, 1 Neumann
Way, M/D Room 285, Cincinnati, OH 45125;
phone: (877) 432–3272; fax: (877) 432–3329;
email: aviation.fleetsupport@ge.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (781) 238–7759.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA,
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
email: fedreg.legal@nara.gov, or go to:
https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations.html.
Issued on April 29, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–10607 Filed 5–19–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2021–0143; Product
Identifier 2019–SW–024–AD; Amendment
39–21547; AD 2021–10–14]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Helicopters Deutschland GmbH
Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH
Model BO–105A, BO–105C, BO–105S,
and BO–105LS A–3 helicopters. This
AD was prompted by the FAA’s
determination that aging of the
elastomeric material in a tension torsion
strap (TT-strap) could affect the
structural characteristics of the TTstrap. This AD requires replacement of
certain TT-straps with serviceable parts
and implementation of a new storage
life limit for TT-straps, as specified in
a European Aviation Safety Agency
(now European Union Aviation Safety
Agency) (EASA) AD, which is
incorporated by reference. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective June 24,
2021.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of June 24, 2021.
ADDRESSES: For material incorporated
by reference (IBR) in this AD, contact
the EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3,
50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49
221 8999 000; email ADs@
easa.europa.eu; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
material on the EASA website at https://
ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this
material at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N–321,
Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 96 (Thursday, May 20, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27264-27268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-10607]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2019-0568; Project Identifier 2019-NE-20-AD; Amendment
39-21542; AD 2021-10-09]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; CFM International, S.A. Turbofan
Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
CFM International, S.A. (CFM) CFM56-5B and CFM56-7B model turbofan
engines with a certain high-pressure turbine (HPT) inner stationary
seal installed. This AD was prompted by cracks found in the rotating
air HPT front seal. This AD requires removal, inspection, and
replacement of the affected HPT inner stationary seal and, depending on
the findings, replacement of the rotating air HPT front seal, HPT rotor
blades, and No. 3 ball bearing. The FAA is issuing this AD to address
the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective June 24, 2021.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of June 24,
2021.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact CFM International Inc., Aviation Operations Center, 1 Neumann
Way, M/D Room 285, Cincinnati, OH 45125; phone: (877) 432-3272; fax:
(877) 432-3329; email: [email protected]. You may view this
service information at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
(781) 238-7759. It is also available at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-0568.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-0568; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, any
comments received, and other information. The address for Docket
Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE, Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher McGuire, Aviation Safety
Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone: (781) 238-7120; fax: (781) 238-7199; email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all CFM CFM56-5B and
CFM56-7B model turbofan engines with a certain HPT inner stationary
seal installed. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on September
20, 2019 (84 FR 49487). The NPRM was prompted by a report that two
cracks were discovered on a CFM CFM56-5B model turbofan engine rotating
air HPT front seal during a routine engine shop visit. After
investigation, CFM determined that the HPT inner stationary seal, part
number 1808M56G01, may not have received the correct braze heat treat
cycle at the time of the honeycomb replacement. As a result, the
affected HPT inner stationary seal could lead to a localized separation
of the replaced honeycomb, which may reduce the life of the rotating
air HPT front seal. In the NPRM, the FAA proposed to require removal,
inspection, and replacement of the affected HPT inner stationary seal
and, depending on the findings, replacement of the rotating air HPT
front seal, HPT rotor blades, and No. 3 ball bearing. The FAA is
issuing this AD
[[Page 27265]]
to address the unsafe condition on these products.
Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive
Comments
The FAA received comments from nine commenters. The commenters were
Air Line Pilots Association, International (ALPA); American Airlines
(AAL); Azur Aviation (Azur); The Boeing Company (Boeing); CFM; Delta
Air Lines, Inc. (Delta); United Airlines (UAL); MTU Maintenance Canada
(MTU) and Magnetic MRO. Four of the nine commenters requested changes
that resulted in updates to this AD. Three commenters requested
clarification on definitions. Two commenters requested updates to the
service information. Two commenters expressed support for the AD. The
following presents the comments received on the NPRM and the FAA's
response to each comment.
Request To Clarify Parts That Can Be Returned to Service
Azur requested that the FAA clarify the parts that can be returned
to service after removal. Azur reasoned that paragraph (g)(1) of this
AD requires that an HPT inner stationary seal be removed from service
and replaced with either a part that is not listed in the service
information or a repaired part identified in paragraph (h)(2),
Definitions, of this AD. In contrast, paragraphs (g)(3)(i) and (iii) of
this AD, respectively, indicate only to remove the rotating air HPT
front seal and No. 3 ball bearing from service and replace them with a
``part eligible for installation.''
Azur suggested adding one of the following to this AD to remove the
ambiguity: (1) Remove ``remove from service'' from paragraph (g)(1) of
this AD; (2) Identify rotating air HPT front seals and No. 3 ball
bearings that are not eligible for installation; (3) Add an
``Installation Prohibition'' paragraph for the removed rotating air HPT
front seal and No. 3 ball bearing; (4) Indicate what to do with the
removed rotating air HPT front seal and No. 3 ball bearing in
paragraphs (g)(3)(i) and (iii) of this AD, such as discard these parts;
or (5) Identify instruction for the removed rotating air HPT front
seals and No. 3 ball bearings.
Use of ``remove from service'' in this AD indicates that the
rotating air HPT front seal and No. 3 ball bearing should no longer be
installed on an engine. Therefore, neither the removed rotating air HPT
front seal nor the removed No. 3 ball bearing can be repaired and
returned to service. The FAA, however, updated paragraph (h),
Definitions, of this AD, to clarify that a part eligible for
installation for both a rotating air HPT front seal and a No. 3 ball
bearing refers to parts that were not removed from service based on the
findings of honeycomb separation of the HPT inner stationary seal. The
FAA also updated paragraph (g)(1) of this AD to remove ``remove from
service'' to clarify that the HPT inner stationary seal can be repaired
and returned to service. The FAA also moved the definition of an HPT
inner stationary seal that is eligible for installation from paragraph
(g)(1) to paragraph (h)(1) of this AD.
Request To Update the Definition of Engine Shop Visit
AAL, Delta, and UAL requested updates or clarification of the
definition of an ``engine shop visit'' provided in paragraph (h)(1) of
this AD.
AAL requested that the FAA update the definition of an engine shop
visit to clarify circumstances that are not an engine shop visit. AAL
reasoned that CFM Service Bulletin (SB) CFM56-7B S/B 72-0972 provides
guidance on when AD mandated actions can be accomplished to avoid undue
burden on operators, specifically in circumstances when engines are
inducted to the shop for quick corrective action, such as repair for
foreign object damage.
UAL requested that the FAA update the definition of an engine shop
visit to specify which major mating engine case flanges need to be
separated to be an engine shop visit as defined. UAL stated that the
ambiguity of the ``major mating engine case flange'' may result in an
inspection of the HPT inner stationary seal for honeycomb separation
when the core is not exposed, such as during fan case replacement.
Delta recommended that the manufacturer define ``engine shop
visit'' in its service information.
The FAA agrees that the definition of an engine shop visit in this
AD does not include the separation of engine flanges solely for the
purpose of transportation of the engine or replacing the fan or
propulsor without subsequent maintenance. All other separations of
major mating engine case flanges are an engine shop visit, as defined,
and require removal, replacement, and inspection of the HPT inner
stationary seal as required by paragraphs (g)(1) and (2) of this AD.
The FAA changed the definition of ``engine shop visit'' in paragraph
(h) this AD to clarify the definition of an engine shop visit.
The FAA did not revise this AD in response to Delta's comment. The
FAA notes, however, that in CFM Service Bulletin (SB) CFM56-5B S/B 72-
0952, Revision 01, and CFM SB CFM56-7B S/B 72-1054, Revision 01, both
dated January 15, 2020, the manufacturer updated the SBs to clarify
that the quick turn shop visit type is not included in the SB's
definition of ``shop visit.''
Request To Change Inspection of HPT Rotor Blade To Remove Debris
AAL requested that the FAA change paragraph (g)(3)(ii) of this AD
to ``Remove the HPT rotor blade from service and inspect per CFM56-7B
CFMI-TP.SM.10 Engine Shop Manual (ESM) 72-52-01-09 High Pressure
Turbine Rotor Blades--Inspection 001 or replace with parts eligible for
installation.'' AAL reasoned that the HPT rotor blade collects various
types of debris over its service life, so attempting to determine if
the debris is honeycomb material based upon a general visual inspection
is subjective and open to interpretation. Therefore, AAL suggested that
removing the HPT rotor blades would ensure that the repair facility
could remove the debris in the internal cavities and return the HPT
rotor blades to service.
Since the NPRM was published, the manufacturer revised the service
information, removing the inspection of the HPT rotor blade internal
cavities for honeycomb metal debris. As a result, the FAA changed
paragraph (g)(3)(ii) of this AD to eliminate the requirement to inspect
the HPT rotor blade internal cavities for honeycomb metal debris. The
FAA also removed the estimated cost associated with the inspection of
the HPT rotor blade internal cavities for honeycomb metal debris from
this AD.
Request To Clarify Reason To Replace No. 3 Ball Bearing
Magnetic MRO requested clarification for the reason to replace the
No. 3 ball bearing if metal debris is found in the HPT blade cavities.
In the NPRM, the FAA proposed to require replacement of the No. 3
ball bearing if honeycomb separation was found during the inspection
required by paragraph (g)(2) of this AD. The replacement of the No. 3
ball bearing is not linked to a finding of debris in the HPT rotor
blade internal cavities but is required if honeycomb separation is
found. Honeycomb separation results in increased secondary air flow
impinging on the rotating air HPT front seal, which increases the axial
load on the No. 3 ball bearing. This increased axial load impacts the
durability of the No. 3 ball bearing. The FAA did not change this AD
based on this comment.
[[Page 27266]]
Request To Add a Terminating Action
AAL requested that the FAA update paragraph (g)(1) of this AD to
include, ``Accomplishment of these instructions are considered
terminating action to this AD.'' AAL reasoned that this statement
provides specific closure since the corrective action has been clearly
defined and approved by the FAA. AAL suggested this maintenance action
is not recurring and, as such, would constitute an appropriate
terminating action.
The FAA disagrees with adding the terminating action statement.
Performing the actions required by this AD achieves compliance with
this AD. A statement of terminating action is unnecessary.
Request To Clarify Compliance
MTU commented that this AD describes actions to be performed if
damage is found, but does not describe actions to be performed when
damage is not found as specified in CFM SB CFM56-7B S/B 72-1054,
Revision 01, dated January 15, 2020. MTU asked if the AD could
reference action that needs to be performed when the engine is inducted
and disassembled for reasons other than HPT inner stationary seal issue
and damage (or no damage) is found.
The FAA disagrees with requiring actions that are not related to
the unsafe condition described in this AD. The HPT inner stationary
seal is not typically exposed unless the engine is undergoing an engine
shop visit. However, if damage to the HPT inner stationary seal is
found during inspections not related to this AD, the ESM provides
criteria to determine appropriate action.
Request To Incorporate AC 20-176A in Service Information
AAL and Delta requested that CFM incorporate AC 20-176A into both
CFM SB CFM56-5B S/B 72-0952, Revision 01, dated January 15, 2020, and
CFM SB CFM56-7B S/B 72-1054, Revision 01, dated January 15, 2020, for
the purpose of ``. . . distinguishing which steps in an SB will have a
direct effect on detecting, preventing, resolving, or eliminating the
unsafe condition identified in an AD.'' The commenters reasoned that
CFM should identify the steps required for compliance (RC) in the
service information. AAL added that the RC designation reduces global
AMOCs and streamlines the accomplishment of key tasks while meeting
strict regulatory compliance.
The FAA agrees that adding the RC designation to the required
service information steps provides clarity to the operators. CFM added
the RC designation to CFM SB CFM56-5B S/B 72-0952, Revision 01, dated
January 15, 2020, and CFM SB CFM56-7B S/B 72-1054, Revision 01, dated
January 15, 2020. The FAA did not change this AD.
Request To Update References to the ESM
Delta requested that the FAA update paragraphs (c)(2) and (h)(2) of
this AD to reference the CFM56-5B ESM and the CFM56-7B ESM entirely,
rather than specific repair tasks within the ESMs. Delta reasoned that
the CFM56-5B ESM and CFM56-7B ESM might change in future revisions.
The FAA disagrees with changing the references from the specific
repair tasks. Paragraph (c)(2), Applicability, and paragraph (h)(2),
Definitions, of this AD refer to specific repair tasks within CFM56-5B
ESM and CFM56-7B ESM that are required to return a HPT inner stationary
seal to service. The FAA did not change this AD, but will consider
requests for AMOCs if the repair tasks change in future revisions of
the ESM.
Comment on Revising Service Information
CFM stated that they would update CFM SB CFM56-5B S/B 72-0952 and
CFM SB CFM56-7B S/B 72-1054 based on feedback from operators. CFM
indicated it would update the definition of ``shop visit'' to clarify
that replacing a fan disk is not considered a shop visit. CFM further
indicated that it would clarify that if honeycomb separation is found,
then the HPT blades may be scrapped or overhauled. Finally, CFM noted
that it would revise the SBs by adding ``RC'' to those tasks required
for compliance.
The FAA notes that it has revised this AD by referring to CFM SB
CFM56-5B S/B 72-0952, Revision 01, dated January 15, 2020, and CFM SB
CFM56-7B S/B 72-1054, Revision 01, dated January 15, 2020. In addition,
the FAA has reviewed the changes included in Revision 01 of these SBs
and determined that these are clarifying changes only and impose no
additional burden to operators.
Request To Allow Use of Later Revisions of Service Information
AAL and Delta requested that the FAA add the phrase ``or later''
when referencing the service information in this AD. AAL stated that
specifying ``or later'' could prevent numerous requests for alternative
methods of compliance (AMOCs) if the manufacturer revises the service
information. AAL also stated that this request aligns with paragraph 2-
3.d of Advisory Circular No. 20-176A, ``Service Bulletins Related to
Airworthiness Directives and Indicating FAA Approval on Service
Documents,'' dated June 16, 2014 (AC 20-176A).
The FAA disagrees with adding language that allows the use of later
revisions of service information when performing the required actions
of this AD. Later revisions of the service information have not been
reviewed by the FAA. As noted, however, in a previous comment response,
the FAA has revised this AD by referring to the latest published
revisions of the referenced service information.
Support for No Reporting Requirement
AAL expressed support for the No Reporting Requirement in paragraph
(i) of this AD.
Support for the AD
ALPA and Boeing expressed support for the AD as written.
Conclusion
The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered any comments
received, and determined that air safety requires adopting this AD as
proposed. Accordingly, the FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products. Except for minor editorial changes and any
other changes described previously, this AD is adopted as proposed in
the NPRM. None of the changes will increase the economic burden on any
operator.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed CFM SB CFM56-5B S/B 72-0952, Revision 01, dated
January 15, 2020, and CFM SB CFM56-7B S/B 72-1054, Revision 01, dated
January 15, 2020. CFM SB CFM56-5B S/B 72-0952, Revision 01, describes
procedures for repairing the CFM56-5B turbofan engine HPT inner
stationary seal honeycomb. CFM SB CFM56-7B S/B 72-1054, Revision 01,
describes procedures for repairing the CFM56-7B turbofan engine HPT
inner stationary seal honeycomb. This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties have access to it through
their normal course of business or by the means identified in
ADDRESSES.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD affects 210 engines installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry. Operators have the option to replace or
repair the affected HPT inner stationary seal. The part cost is for
replacement with a repaired HPT inner stationary seal.
The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:
[[Page 27267]]
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replace HPT inner stationary seal..... 1 work-hour x $85 per $7,910 $7,995 $1,678,950
hour = $85.
Inspect HPT inner stationary seal..... 1 work-hour x $85 per 0 85 17,850
hour = $85.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary
replacements that would be required based on the results of the
inspection. The agency has no way of determining the number of engines
that might need these replacements:
On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Action Labor cost Parts cost product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replace rotating air HPT front seal........... 1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85 $344,600 $344,685
Replace HPT rotor blades (pair)............... 1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85 31,000 31,085
Replace No. 3 ball bearing.................... 1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85 30,000 30,085
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:
2021-10-09 CFM International, S.A.: Amendment 39-21542; Docket No.
FAA-2019-0568; Project Identifier 2019-NE-20-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective June 24, 2021.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
(1) This AD applies to all CFM International, S.A. (CFM) CFM56-
5B1, -5B1/2P, -5B1/3, -5B1/P, -5B2, -5B2/2P, -5B2/3, -5B2/P, -5B3/
2P, -5B3/2P1, -5B3/3, -5B3/3B1, -5B3/P, -5B3/P1, -5B4, -5B4/2P, -
5B4/2P1, -5B4/3, -5B4/3B1, -5B4/P, -5B4/P1, -5B5, -5B5/3, -5B5/P, -
5B6, -5B6/2P, -5B6/3, -5B6/P, -5B7, -5B7/3, -5B7/P, -5B8/3, -5B8/P,
-5B9/2P, -5B9/3, -5B9/P, CFM56-7B20, -7B20/2, -7B20/3, -7B20E, -
7B22, -7B22/2, -7B22/3, -7B22/3B1, -7B22/B1, -7B22E, -7B22E/B1, -
7B24, -7B24/2, -7B24/3, -7B24/3B1, -7B24/B1, -7B24E, -7B24E/B1, -
7B26, -7B26/2, -7B26/3, -7B26/3B1, -7B26/3B2, -7B26/3B2F, -7B26/3F,
-7B26/B1, -7B26/B2, -7B26E, -7B26E/B1, -7B26E/B2, -7B26E/B2F, -
7B26E/F, -7B27, -7B27/2, -7B27/3, -7B27/3B1, -7B27/3B1F, -7B27/3B3,
-7B27/3F, -7B27/B1, -7B27/B3, -7B27A, -7B27A/3, -7B27AE, -7B27E, -
7B27E/B1, -7B27E/B1F, -7B27E/B3, and -7B27E/F model turbofan engines
with a high-pressure turbine (HPT) inner stationary seal, part
number (P/N) 1808M56G01 installed that has a serial number (S/N)
listed in Planning Information, Paragraph 1.A., Table 1, of CFM
Service Bulletin (SB) CFM56-5B S/B 72-0952, Revision 01, dated
January 15, 2020, or in Planning Information, Paragraph 1.A., Table
1, CFM SB CFM56-7B S/B 72-1054, Revision 01, dated January 15, 2020,
installed.
(2) This AD does not apply to affected CFM CFM56-5B and CFM56-7B
model turbofan engines with the affected HPT inner stationary seal
installed if the seal has been repaired as specified in CFM56-5B
Engine Shop Manual (ESM), 72-41-03, REPAIR 003, or CFM56-7B ESM, 72-
41-03, REPAIR 003, after the year listed in Paragraph 1.A., Table 1,
of CFM SB CFM56-5B S/B 72-0952, Revision 01, dated January 15, 2020,
or Paragraph 1.A., Table 1, CFM SB CFM56-7B S/B 72-1054, Revision
01, dated January 15, 2020.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 7230, Turbine Engine
Compressor Section.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by cracks found in the rotating air HPT
front seal. The FAA is issuing this AD to prevent failure of the HPT
inner stationary seal and the rotating air HPT front seal. The
unsafe condition, if not addressed, could result in uncontained
release of the rotating air HPT front seal, damage to the engine,
and damage to the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
[[Page 27268]]
(g) Required Actions
(1) At the next engine shop visit after the effective date of
this AD, remove the affected HPT inner stationary seal and replace
with a HPT inner stationary seal that is eligible for installation.
(2) After removing the affected HPT inner stationary seal
required by paragraph (g)(1), inspect the removed HPT inner
stationary seal for honeycomb separation, as defined in the
Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 3.C.(1), in CFM SB CFM56-5B
S/B 72-0952, Revision 01, dated January 15, 2020, or in CFM SB
CFM56-7B S/B 72-1054, Revision 01, dated January 15, 2020.
(3) If honeycomb separation is found during the inspection
required by paragraph (g)(2) of this AD, before further flight:
(i) Remove the rotating air HPT front seal from service and
replace with a rotating air HPT front seal that is eligible for
installation.
(ii) Remove the HPT rotor blades and replace them with HPT rotor
blades eligible for installation.
(iii) Remove the No. 3 ball bearing from service and replace
with a No. 3 ball bearing eligible for installation.
(h) Definitions
(1) For the purpose of this AD, an ``engine shop visit'' is the
induction of an engine into the shop for maintenance involving the
separation of pairs of major mating engine case flanges, except for
the following situations, which do not constitute an engine shop
visit.
(i) Separation of engine flanges solely for the purpose of
transportation of the engine without subsequent maintenance.
(ii) Separation of engine flanges solely for the purpose of
replacing the fan or propulsor without subsequent maintenance.
(2) For the purpose of this AD, an HPT inner stationary seal
that is eligible for installation is an HPT inner stationary seal:
(i) That is not listed in Planning Information, Paragraph 1.A.,
Table 1, of CFM SB CFM56-5B S/B 72-0952, Revision 01, dated January
15, 2020, or in Planning Information, Paragraph 1.A., Table 1, CFM
SB CFM56-7B S/B 72-1054, Revision 01, dated January 15, 2020; or
(ii) with a P/N 1808M56G01 and with a S/N listed in Paragraph
1.A., Table 1, of CFM SB CFM56-5B S/B 72-0952, Revision 01, dated
January 15, 2020, or Paragraph 1.A., Table 1, CFM SB CFM56-7B S/B
72-1054, Revision 01, dated January 15, 2020, that has been repaired
per CFM56-5B ESM, 72-41-03, REPAIR 003, or CFM56-7B ESM, 72-41-03,
REPAIR 003, after the year listed in Paragraph 1.A., Table 1, of CFM
SB CFM56-5B S/B 72-0952, Revision 01, dated January 15, 2020, or
Paragraph 1.A., Table 1, CFM SB CFM56-7B S/B 72-1054, Revision 01,
dated January 15, 2020.
(3) For the purpose of this AD, a rotating air HPT front seal
that is eligible for installation is any rotating air HPT front seal
that was not removed from service as a result of the inspection of
the HPT inner stationary seal required by paragraph (g)(2) of this
AD in which there was a finding of honeycomb separation.
(4) For the purpose of this AD, HPT rotor blades eligible for
installation are new HPT rotor blades with zero flight hours since
news or HPT rotor blades that have been inspected and returned to a
serviceable condition using approved engine manual requirements.
(5) For the purpose of this AD, a No. 3 ball bearing eligible
for installation is any No. 3 ball bearing that was not removed from
service as a result of the inspection of the HPT inner stationary
seal required by paragraph (g)(2) of this AD in which there was a
finding of honeycomb separation.
(i) No Reporting Requirement
The reporting requirements contained within the SBs referenced
in paragraph (g) of this AD are not required by this AD.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, ECO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of the person
identified in Related Information. You may email your request to:
[email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(k) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Christopher McGuire,
Aviation Safety Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803; phone: (781) 238-7120; fax: (781) 238-7199;
email: [email protected].
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) CFM Service Bulletin CFM56-5B S/B 72-0952, Revision 01,
dated January 15, 2020.
(ii) CFM Service Bulletin CFM56-7B S/B 72-1054, Revision 01,
dated January 15, 2020.
(3) For CFM service information identified in this AD, contact
CFM International Inc., Aviation Operations Center, 1 Neumann Way,
M/D Room 285, Cincinnati, OH 45125; phone: (877) 432-3272; fax:
(877) 432-3329; email: [email protected].
(4) You may view this service information at FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (781) 238-7759.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email: [email protected], or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued on April 29, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-10607 Filed 5-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P