Air Plan Approval; Pennsylvania; Emissions Statement Rule Certification for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard, 26448-26450 [2021-10203]
Download as PDF
26448
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 92 / Friday, May 14, 2021 / Proposed Rules
Financial Management Regulation:
Reimbursable Operations Policy: User
Fees,’’ July 2016 (available at https://
comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/
documents/fmr/current/11a/11a_
04.pdf), to reimburse expenses
associated with the government’s
response. These reimbursable expenses
may include the cost of:
(a) Materials and equipment used to
search for, copy, and produce
responsive information.
(b) Personnel time spent processing
and responding to the request or
demand.
(c) Attorney time spent assisting with
the government’s response, to include
reviewing the request or demand and
the potentially responsive information.
§ 97.11 Procedures—expert or opinion
testimony.
(a) Personnel may not present expert
or opinion testimony involving official
information, except when:
(1) The testimony is presented on
behalf of the United States, a federal
agency, or any party represented by the
Department of Justice.
(2) The chief legal advisor of the DoD
Component with primary equity has
granted special written approval upon a
showing of exceptional need or unique
circumstances, but only if the
anticipated testimony is not adverse to
the interests of the DoD or the United
States and is presented at no expense to
the government.
(b) If a court orders the presentation
of testimony disallowed by § 97.11(a),
personnel must respectfully decline to
comply with the court’s order unless the
chief legal advisor directs otherwise.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Appendix A to part 97—Litigation
Requests and Demands to the
Department of the Navy
A litigation request to the Department of
the Navy must be submitted to the
appropriate determining authority as defined
in Secretary of the Navy Instruction
5820.8_, ‘‘Release of Official Information for
Litigation Purposes and Testimony by
Department of the Navy Personnel,’’ August
27, 1991, as amended (available at https://
www.secnav.navy.mil/doni/Directives/
05000%20General%20Management
%20Security%20and%20Safety
%20Services/05-800%20Laws%20and
%20Legal%20Services/5820.8A%20CH1.pdf).
As with all service of process on the
Department of the Navy, a demand (subpoena
or court order) must be delivered to the Naval
Litigation Office using registered or certified
mail, a commercial courier service, or a
process server. The address for all service of
process is: General Counsel of the
Department of the Navy, Naval Litigation
Office, 720 Kennon St. SE, Room 233,
Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374–5013.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 May 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
Answers to frequently asked questions on
Touhy requests are available at https://
www.jag.navy.mil/organization/documents/
Touhy_Requests.pdf. Contact the Office of
the General Counsel at 202–685–7039 or the
Office of the Judge Advocate General at 202–
685–5450 with any additional questions.
Appendix B to Part 97—Litigation
Requests and Demands to the
Department of the Air Force
A litigation request or demand to the
Department of the Air Force must be
submitted to the base-level or servicing Staff
Judge Advocate for the installation or
organization where the official information or
witness is located.
Should the information or witness be
located in a Headquarters-level office, the
request or demand must be submitted to the
Commercial Litigation Field Support Center
(for matters involving contracts, acquisition,
and procurement) or to the Air Force General
Litigation Division (for all other matters).
Their addresses are: Commercial Litigation
Field Support Center, AFLOA/JAQC, 1500 W
Perimeter Rd., Suite 4100, Joint Base
Andrews, MD 20762; Air Force General
Litigation Division, AFLOA/JACL, 1500 W
Perimeter Rd., Suite 1370, 1st Floor, Joint
Base Andrews, MD 20762.
Dated: May 7, 2021.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2021–10077 Filed 5–13–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2020–0706; FRL–10023–
22–Region 3]
Air Plan Approval; Pennsylvania;
Emissions Statement Rule Certification
for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient
Air Quality Standard
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
state implementation plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania. This revision fulfills
Pennsylvania’s emissions statement
requirement for the 2015 ozone national
ambient air quality standard (NAAQS).
This action is being taken under the
Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before June 14, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03–
OAR–2020–0706 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Talley.David@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
confidential business information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Serena Nichols, Planning &
Implementation Branch (3AD30), Air &
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103. The telephone number is (215)
814–2053. Ms. Nichols can also be
reached via electronic mail at
Nichols.Serena@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April
23, 2020, the Pennsylvania Department
of Environmental Protection (PADEP)
submitted a revision to the
Pennsylvania SIP intended to satisfy the
Commonwealth’s obligations under the
CAA related to emissions statements for
the 2015 ozone NAAQS.
I. Background
On October 26, 2015, EPA revised the
ozone NAAQS from 0.075 parts per
million (ppm) to 0.070 ppm. See 80 FR
65291. Subsequently, on June 4, 2018,
EPA designated the PhiladelphiaWilmington-Atlantic City (PA-NJ-MDDE) Area as a marginal nonattainment
area for the 2015 ozone NAAQS. See 83
FR 25776. Pennsylvania’s portion of this
area includes Bucks, Chester, Delaware,
Montgomery, and Philadelphia
Counties. See 40 CFR 81.339.
Section 182 of the CAA identifies
plan submissions and requirements for
ozone nonattainment areas. Specifically,
section 182(a)(3)(B) of the CAA requires
E:\FR\FM\14MYP1.SGM
14MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 92 / Friday, May 14, 2021 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
that states develop and submit rules
which establish annual reporting
requirements for certain stationary
sources. Sources that are within
marginal (or worse) ozone
nonattainment areas must annually
report the actual emissions of nitrogen
oxides (NOX) and volatile organic
compounds (VOC) to the state.
However, states may waive reporting
requirements for sources that emit
under 25 tons per year (tpy) of NOX and
VOC if the state provides an inventory
of emissions from such class or category
of sources. See CAA section
182(a)(3)(B)(ii).
Additionally, Pennsylvania is located
in the ozone transport region (OTR)
established by Congress in section 184
of the CAA. Pursuant to section
184(b)(2), any stationary source that
emits or has the potential to emit at least
50 tpy of VOC shall be considered a
major stationary source and subject to
the requirements which would be
applicable to major stationary sources if
the area were classified as a moderate
nonattainment area. See CAA section
184. Thus, states within the OTR are
subject to plan requirements in CAA
section 182(b) applicable to moderate
nonattainment areas. Also, section
182(f)(1) of the CAA requires that the
plan provisions required for major
stationary sources of VOC also apply to
major stationary sources of NOX for
states with moderate (or worse) ozone
nonattainment areas. A major stationary
source of NOX is defined as a stationary
facility or source of air pollutants which
directly emits or has the potential to
emit 100 tpy or more of NOX. See CAA
section 302(j). Because Pennsylvania is
located in the OTR, Pennsylvania
sources that are located in ozone
attainment areas and emit above 50 tpy
of VOC or 100 tpy of NOX are
considered major sources and also
subject to the requirements of major
stationary sources in moderate (or
worse) nonattainment area, such as an
emissions statement submission
required by CAA section 182(a)(3)(B).
See CAA sections 182(f) and 184(b)(2).
II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA
Analysis
Pennsylvania’s emissions statement
requirements are codified at 25 Pa Code
chapter 135. Specifically, section
135.21, in accordance with CAA section
182(a)(3)(B), applies to NOX and VOC
sources within marginal (or worse)
nonattainment areas, as well as major
NOX and VOC sources located in
attainment areas located within the OTR
(i.e., the remainder of the
Commonwealth). Affected sources are
required annually to provide PADEP
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 May 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
with a statement containing the source’s
actual NOX and VOC emissions, the
method used to calculate those
emissions, the time period over which
the calculations are based, and a
certification by an appropriate company
officer that the statement is accurate. 25
Pa Code 135.21 also contains a waiver
for sources emitting less than 25 tpy, in
accordance with CAA
section182(a)(3)(B)(ii). Additionally, 25
Pa Code 135.5 contains recordkeeping
requirements necessary to document the
data presented in the annual emissions
statements.
On January 12, 1995, EPA determined
that 25 Pa Code sections 135.5 and
135.21 were adequate for purposes of
implementing the requirements of CAA
section 182(a)(3)(B) and took final
action to incorporate those sections into
the Pennsylvania SIP. See 60 FR 2881.
Additionally, on June 6, 2018, EPA took
final action to approve a SIP submittal
from the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania in which PADEP certified
that its existing emissions statement
regulations remained adequate to
implement the requirements of CAA
section 182(a)(3)(B) as they pertained to
the 2008 ozone NAAQS. Similarly,
PADEP’s April 23, 2020 submittal
contains a certification that the existing
emissions statement program remains
adequate under the revised, 2015 ozone
NAAQS.
III. Proposed Action
EPA finds that PADEP’s existing SIPapproved emissions statement
regulations continue to satisfy CAA
section 182(a)(3)(B) because the existing
rules are applicable to the entire
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and
require stationary sources that emit NOX
or VOC (at required thresholds above 25
tpy in designated ozone nonattainment
areas and above 50 tpy VOC or 100 tpy
NOX in ozone attainment areas in the
OTR) to submit an emissions statement
to PADEP detailing the sources’
emissions. Therefore, EPA is proposing
to approve PADEP’s April 23, 2020
submittal as a revision to the
Pennsylvania SIP. EPA is soliciting
public comments on the issues
discussed in this document. These
comments will be considered before
taking final action.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26449
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule,
pertaining to Pennsylvania’s SIPapproved emissions statement
regulations, does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), because the SIP is not approved
to apply in Indian country located in the
State, and EPA notes that it will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping
E:\FR\FM\14MYP1.SGM
14MYP1
26450
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 92 / Friday, May 14, 2021 / Proposed Rules
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Dated: May 6, 2021.
Diana Esher,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
Table of Contents
I. Written Comments
II. What is being addressed in this document?
III. Background
IV. What is the EPA’s analysis of Missouri’s
SIP revision request?
V. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
VI. What action is the EPA taking?
VII. Incorporation by Reference
VIII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
[FR Doc. 2021–10203 Filed 5–13–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2021–0332; FRL–10023–
72–Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Removal
of Control of Emissions From the
Application of Deadeners and
Adhesives
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing approval of
a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the State of
Missouri on January 15, 2019, and
supplemented by letter on July 11, 2019.
Missouri requests that the EPA remove
a rule related to control of emissions
from the application of deadeners and
adhesives in the St. Louis, Missouri area
from its SIP. This rescission does not
have an adverse effect on air quality and
meets the requirements of the Clean Air
Act (CAA). The EPA’s proposed
approval of this rule revision is in
accordance with the requirements of the
CAA.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before June 14, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2021–0332 to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket ID No. for this
rulemaking. Comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov/, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on sending
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Written Comments’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ashley Keas, Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality
Planning Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219;
telephone number: (913) 551–7629;
email address: keas.ashley@epa.gov.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:54 May 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
I. Written Comments
Submit your comments, identified by
Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2021–
0332 at https://www.regulations.gov.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
II. What is being addressed in this
document?
The EPA is proposing to approve the
removal of 10 Code of State Regulations
(CSR) 10–5.370, Control of Emissions
from the Application of Deadeners and
Adhesives, from the Missouri SIP.
According to the July 11, 2019 letter
from the Missouri Department of
Natural Resources, available in the
docket for this proposed action,
Missouri rescinded the rule because the
only source once subject to the rule
ceased operations in 2009. Therefore,
the rule is no longer necessary for
attainment and maintenance of the
1979, 1997, 2008 or 2015 National
Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) for Ozone.
III. Background
The EPA established a 1-hour ozone
NAAQS in 1971 (36 FR 8186, April 30,
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
1971). On March 3, 1978, the entire St.
Louis Air Quality Control Region
(AQCR) (070) was identified as being in
nonattainment of the 1971 1-hour ozone
NAAQS, as required by the CAA
Amendments of 1977 (43 FR 8962,
March 3, 1978). On the Missouri side,
the St. Louis nonattainment area
included the St. Louis City and
Jefferson, St. Charles, Franklin and St.
Louis Counties (hereinafter referred to
in this document as the ‘‘St. Louis
Area’’). On February 8, 1979, the EPA
revised the 1-hour ozone NAAQS,
referred to as the 1979 ozone NAAQS
(44 FR 8202, February 8, 1979). On May
26, 1988, the EPA notified Missouri that
the SIP was substantially inadequate
(hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘SIP
Call’’) to attain the 1-hour ozone
NAAQS in the St. Louis Area (see 54 FR
43183, October 23, 1989). To address
the inadequacies identified in the SIP
Call, Missouri submitted volatile
organic compound (VOC) control
regulations on June 14, 1985; November
19, 1986; and March 30, 1989. The EPA
subsequently approved the revised
control regulations for the St. Louis
Area on March 5, 1990 and February 17,
2000. The VOC control regulations
approved by the EPA into the SIP
included reasonably available control
technology (RACT) rules as required by
CAA section 172(b)(2), including 10–
5.370, Control of Emissions from the
Application of Deadeners and
Adhesives.
The EPA redesignated the St. Louis
Area to attainment of the 1979 1-hour
ozone standard on May 12, 2003 (68 FR
25418). Pursuant to section 175A of the
CAA, the first 10-year maintenance
period for the 1-hour ozone standard
began on May 12, 2003, the effective
date of the redesignation approval. On
April 30, 2004, the EPA published a
final rule in the Federal Register stating
the 1-hour ozone NAAQS would no
longer apply (i.e., would be revoked) for
an area one year after the effective date
of the area’s designation for the 8-hour
ozone NAAQS (69 FR 23951, April 30,
2004). The effective date of the
revocation of the 1979 1-hour ozone
standard for the St. Louis Area was June
15, 2005 (see 70 FR 44470, August 3,
2005).
As noted previously, 10 CSR 10–
5.370, Control of Emissions from the
Application of Deadeners and
Adhesives, was approved into the
Missouri SIP as a RACT rule on March
5, 1990 (55 FR 7712, March 5, 1990). At
the time that the rule was approved into
the SIP, 10 CSR 10–5.370 applied to all
installations in St. Louis City and
Franklin, Jefferson, St. Charles, and St.
Louis Counties in Missouri that had the
E:\FR\FM\14MYP1.SGM
14MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 92 (Friday, May 14, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26448-26450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-10203]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2020-0706; FRL-10023-22-Region 3]
Air Plan Approval; Pennsylvania; Emissions Statement Rule
Certification for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. This revision fulfills Pennsylvania's
emissions statement requirement for the 2015 ozone national ambient air
quality standard (NAAQS). This action is being taken under the Clean
Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before June 14, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03-
OAR-2020-0706 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow
the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the For Further Information Contact section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Serena Nichols, Planning &
Implementation Branch (3AD30), Air & Radiation Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. The telephone number is (215) 814-
2053. Ms. Nichols can also be reached via electronic mail at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 23, 2020, the Pennsylvania
Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) submitted a revision to
the Pennsylvania SIP intended to satisfy the Commonwealth's obligations
under the CAA related to emissions statements for the 2015 ozone NAAQS.
I. Background
On October 26, 2015, EPA revised the ozone NAAQS from 0.075 parts
per million (ppm) to 0.070 ppm. See 80 FR 65291. Subsequently, on June
4, 2018, EPA designated the Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City (PA-
NJ-MD-DE) Area as a marginal nonattainment area for the 2015 ozone
NAAQS. See 83 FR 25776. Pennsylvania's portion of this area includes
Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, and Philadelphia Counties. See 40
CFR 81.339.
Section 182 of the CAA identifies plan submissions and requirements
for ozone nonattainment areas. Specifically, section 182(a)(3)(B) of
the CAA requires
[[Page 26449]]
that states develop and submit rules which establish annual reporting
requirements for certain stationary sources. Sources that are within
marginal (or worse) ozone nonattainment areas must annually report the
actual emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOX) and volatile
organic compounds (VOC) to the state. However, states may waive
reporting requirements for sources that emit under 25 tons per year
(tpy) of NOX and VOC if the state provides an inventory of
emissions from such class or category of sources. See CAA section
182(a)(3)(B)(ii).
Additionally, Pennsylvania is located in the ozone transport region
(OTR) established by Congress in section 184 of the CAA. Pursuant to
section 184(b)(2), any stationary source that emits or has the
potential to emit at least 50 tpy of VOC shall be considered a major
stationary source and subject to the requirements which would be
applicable to major stationary sources if the area were classified as a
moderate nonattainment area. See CAA section 184. Thus, states within
the OTR are subject to plan requirements in CAA section 182(b)
applicable to moderate nonattainment areas. Also, section 182(f)(1) of
the CAA requires that the plan provisions required for major stationary
sources of VOC also apply to major stationary sources of NOX
for states with moderate (or worse) ozone nonattainment areas. A major
stationary source of NOX is defined as a stationary facility
or source of air pollutants which directly emits or has the potential
to emit 100 tpy or more of NOX. See CAA section 302(j).
Because Pennsylvania is located in the OTR, Pennsylvania sources that
are located in ozone attainment areas and emit above 50 tpy of VOC or
100 tpy of NOX are considered major sources and also subject
to the requirements of major stationary sources in moderate (or worse)
nonattainment area, such as an emissions statement submission required
by CAA section 182(a)(3)(B). See CAA sections 182(f) and 184(b)(2).
II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis
Pennsylvania's emissions statement requirements are codified at 25
Pa Code chapter 135. Specifically, section 135.21, in accordance with
CAA section 182(a)(3)(B), applies to NOX and VOC sources
within marginal (or worse) nonattainment areas, as well as major
NOX and VOC sources located in attainment areas located
within the OTR (i.e., the remainder of the Commonwealth). Affected
sources are required annually to provide PADEP with a statement
containing the source's actual NOX and VOC emissions, the
method used to calculate those emissions, the time period over which
the calculations are based, and a certification by an appropriate
company officer that the statement is accurate. 25 Pa Code 135.21 also
contains a waiver for sources emitting less than 25 tpy, in accordance
with CAA section182(a)(3)(B)(ii). Additionally, 25 Pa Code 135.5
contains recordkeeping requirements necessary to document the data
presented in the annual emissions statements.
On January 12, 1995, EPA determined that 25 Pa Code sections 135.5
and 135.21 were adequate for purposes of implementing the requirements
of CAA section 182(a)(3)(B) and took final action to incorporate those
sections into the Pennsylvania SIP. See 60 FR 2881. Additionally, on
June 6, 2018, EPA took final action to approve a SIP submittal from the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in which PADEP certified that its existing
emissions statement regulations remained adequate to implement the
requirements of CAA section 182(a)(3)(B) as they pertained to the 2008
ozone NAAQS. Similarly, PADEP's April 23, 2020 submittal contains a
certification that the existing emissions statement program remains
adequate under the revised, 2015 ozone NAAQS.
III. Proposed Action
EPA finds that PADEP's existing SIP-approved emissions statement
regulations continue to satisfy CAA section 182(a)(3)(B) because the
existing rules are applicable to the entire Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania and require stationary sources that emit NOX or
VOC (at required thresholds above 25 tpy in designated ozone
nonattainment areas and above 50 tpy VOC or 100 tpy NOX in
ozone attainment areas in the OTR) to submit an emissions statement to
PADEP detailing the sources' emissions. Therefore, EPA is proposing to
approve PADEP's April 23, 2020 submittal as a revision to the
Pennsylvania SIP. EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues
discussed in this document. These comments will be considered before
taking final action.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule, pertaining to Pennsylvania's SIP-
approved emissions statement regulations, does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian
country located in the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
[[Page 26450]]
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: May 6, 2021.
Diana Esher,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2021-10203 Filed 5-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P