Agency Information Collection Activities; Revision of a Currently Approved Collection: Petition by Entrepreneur To Remove Conditions on Permanent Resident Status, 26230-26231 [2021-10108]
Download as PDF
26230
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 91 / Thursday, May 13, 2021 / Notices
located in the United States. For
purposes of this document, CCSFs refers
to both facility-based CCSFs and CCSF–
K9s.
Abstract: TSA is seeking continued
approval from OMB for the collection of
information contained in the ICR.
Section 1602 of the Implementing
Recommendations of the 9/11
Commission Act of 2007, Public Law
110–53 (121 Stat. 266, Aug. 3, 2007) (9/
11 Act) required the development of a
system to screen 100 percent of such
cargo no later than August 2010. TSA
currently requires 100 percent screening
of all cargo transported on passenger
aircraft.1 The screening of air cargo must
be in a manner approved by TSA and
be commensurate with the level of
security for the screening of passenger
checked baggage.2
TSA’s regulations in 49 CFR part 1549
for the Certified Cargo Screening
Program (CCSP) support the 9/11 Act
mandate by providing an alternative
means of compliance with the 100
percent screening requirement. In order
to comply with the statutory mandate,
the CCSP allows shippers, indirect air
carriers, and other entities to voluntarily
participate in a program through which
TSA certifies entities to screen air cargo
off-airport before it is tendered to air
carriers for transport on passenger
aircraft. CCSFs may screen cargo offairport and must implement measures to
ensure a secure chain of custody from
the point of screening to the point at
which the cargo is tendered to the
aircraft operator. In addition, TSA
developed a program to certify 3PK9–C
Teams to screen air cargo.3 TSA
incorporated this capability under the
framework of the CCSP, providing an
opportunity for canine team providers
to choose to be regulated as CCSFs
under 49 CFR part 1549 and approved
to use Certified 3PK9–C Teams to screen
cargo for TSA regulated entities.
TSA’s three primary programs issued
under 49 CFR part 1549 provides
standards for compliance for those
entities subject to the program’s
requirements: (1) The Certified Cargo
Screening Security Program, applicable
to facilities-based CCSFs; (2) the
Certified Cargo Security Program–K9,
applicable to canine team providers;
and (3) the 3PK9–C Certifier Order,
applicable to third-party certifiers.
The following are required to
maintain the CCSP: CCSF applications,
3KP9 certifier applications, STA
1 See
49 CFR 1544.205(g) and 1546.205(g)(1).
See also 49 U.S.C. 44901(g)(2).
3 See sec. 1941 of the FAA Reauthorization Act
of 2019, Division K, Title I (Pub. L. 115–254; 132
Stat. 3186; Oct. 5, 2018).
applications, criminal history records
check, recordkeeping requirements,
security program information, 3PK9–C
Certifier Order, significant security
concerns information, and security
coordinator information.
Total Estimated Number of
Respondent: 2,527.
Total Estimated Annual Burden
Hours: 16,041 hours annually.4
Dated: May 10, 2021.
Christina A. Walsh,
Paperwork Reduction Act Officer,
Information Technology.
[FR Doc. 2021–10131 Filed 5–12–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services
[OMB Control Number 1615–0045]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Revision of a Currently
Approved Collection: Petition by
Entrepreneur To Remove Conditions
on Permanent Resident Status
U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services, Department of
Homeland Security.
ACTION: 60-Day notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Homeland
Security (DHS), U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services (USCIS) invites
the general public and other Federal
agencies to comment upon this
proposed revision of a currently
approved collection of information. In
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, the
information collection notice is
published in the Federal Register to
obtain comments regarding the nature of
the information collection, the
categories of respondents, the estimated
burden (i.e. the time, effort, and
resources used by the respondents to
respond), the estimated cost to the
respondent, and the actual information
collection instruments.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted for 60 days until July
12, 2021.
ADDRESSES: All submissions received
must include the OMB Control Number
1615–0045 in the body of the letter, the
agency name and Docket ID USCIS–
2006–0009. Submit comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal website at
https://www.regulations.gov under
SUMMARY:
2 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:52 May 12, 2021
Jkt 253001
4 The annual burden number has been updated
since the submission of the 60-day notice, which
reported, 16,189.98.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
e-Docket ID number USCIS–2006–0009.
USCIS is limiting communications for
this Notice as a result of USCIS’ COVID–
19 response actions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
USCIS, Office of Policy and Strategy,
Regulatory Coordination Division,
Samantha Deshommes, Chief, telephone
number (240) 721–3000 (This is not a
toll-free number. Comments are not
accepted via telephone message). Please
note contact information provided here
is solely for questions regarding this
notice. It is not for individual case
status inquiries. Applicants seeking
information about the status of their
individual cases can check Case Status
Online, available at the USCIS website
at https://www.uscis.gov, or call the
USCIS Contact Center at 800–375–5283
(TTY 800–767–1833).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
Information Collection Revision would
amend the Form I–829, Petition by
Investor to Remove Conditions on
Permanent Resident Status to clarify
who may file the petition in different
situations.
Background
On January 13, 2017, DHS published
a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM), EB–5 Immigrant Investor
Program Modernization. See 82 FR 4738
(Jan. 13, 2017). The NPRM sought to
‘‘clarify the process by which an
immigrant investor’s spouse and
children file separate Form I–829
petitions when they are not included in
the Form I–829 filed by the immigrant
investor. Generally, an immigrant
investor’s derivatives should be
included in the principal immigrant
investor’s Form
I–829 petition. See [prior] 8 CFR
216.6(a)(1). However, there are
situations in which derivatives may not
be included on the principal immigrant
investor’s Form I–829 petition . . . In
such circumstances, if the immigrant
investor would have otherwise been
eligible to have his or her conditions on
status removed, then the derivatives
would remain eligible to remove the
conditions on their status even if the
immigrant investor cannot or will not
file a Form I–829 petition.’’ 82 FR at
4750.
The NPRM continued, ‘‘DHS also
clarifies, however, that consistent with
current practice, each derivative must
file a separate Form I–829 petition in all
other situations in which the investor’s
spouse and children are not included in
the investor’s Form I–829 petition. See
id.’’ 82 FR at 4750.
On July 24, 2019, DHS published a
Final Rule, EB–5 Immigrant Investor
E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM
13MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 91 / Thursday, May 13, 2021 / Notices
Program Modernization. See 84 FR
35750 (Jul. 24, 2019). In response to a
public comment regarding derivative
filing, DHS responded that it ‘‘proposed
to standardize the process for those
derivatives who file an individual Form
I–829 petition and cannot be included
on the principal’s Form I–829, generally
because the principal fails or refuses to
file a Form I–829. Under these
circumstances, the final rule clarifies
the current DHS practice of requiring all
derivatives connected to a single
principal investor to file separately . . .
This final rule only allows derivatives to
apply together on a single Form I–829
petition when the principal is deceased,
because INA 204(l) directs DHS to
adjudicate ‘notwithstanding the death of
the qualifying relative.’ . . .This rule
does not change the current DHS
practice, and DHS is simply clarifying
language in 8 CFR 216.6(a)(1) to avoid
a situation where derivatives filing
separately do so incorrectly, causing
their petition to be rejected.’’ 84 FR at
35782.
Reasons for Change
DHS is clarifying language from the
preamble of both the NPRM and the
Final Rule with this form revision
regarding who may file the form. When
DHS stated that a derivative may file a
Form I–829 petition if the principal
immigrant investor ‘‘fails or refuses to
file a Form I–829,’’ DHS was referring to
the principal’s failure or refusal to file
a Form I–829 for the derivative(s). The
current DHS practice is for derivatives
not included on the principal’s Form
I–829 to file a separate Form I–829.
Therefore, DHS intended the comment
response in the Final Rule to be read as:
DHS proposed to standardize the
process for those derivatives who file an
individual Form I–829 petition and
cannot be included on the principal’s
Form I–829, generally because the
principal fails or refuses to file a Form
I–829 for the derivative(s).
DHS understands that the failure to
include ‘‘for the derivative(s)’’ may have
caused confusion concerning whether
the derivative of a principal immigrant
investor can petition for and obtain the
removal of conditions if the principal
immigrant investor has not petitioned to
remove his or her conditions. Through
its regulation, DHS only intended to
clarify existing practice for derivatives
seeking to remove conditions on
permanent residence. Currently, if the
principal immigrant is unable to remove
his or her conditions, the derivative
immigrant is generally unable to remove
his or her conditions, except where the
principal has died, as statutorily
required by INA 204(l).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:52 May 12, 2021
Jkt 253001
This is consistent with the terms
‘alien spouse’ and ‘alien child’ as
defined by INA 216A(f)(2). It is also
consistent with 8 CFR 216.6(a)(1)(ii),
and how derivative status is similarly
interpreted across immigration benefits:
That a derivative generally does not
have status without the principal.
Comments
You may access the information
collection instrument with instructions
or additional information by visiting the
Federal eRulemaking Portal site at:
https://www.regulations.gov and
entering USCIS–2006–0009 in the
search box. All submissions will be
posted, without change, to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov, and will include
any personal information you provide.
Therefore, submitting this information
makes it public. You may wish to
consider limiting the amount of
personal information that you provide
in any voluntary submission you make
to DHS. DHS may withhold information
provided in comments from public
viewing that it determines may impact
the privacy of an individual or is
offensive. For additional information,
please read the Privacy Act notice that
is available via the link in the footer of
https://www.regulations.gov.
Written comments and suggestions
from the public and affected agencies
should address one or more of the
following four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Overview of This Information
Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection:
Revision of a Currently Approved
Collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection:
Petition by Entrepreneur to Remove
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26231
Conditions on Permanent Resident
Status.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and
the applicable component of the DHS
sponsoring the collection: I–829; USCIS.
(4) Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as a brief
abstract: Primary: Individuals or
households; Business or other for-profit.
This form is used by a conditional
resident alien entrepreneur who
obtained such status through a
qualifying investment, to apply to
remove conditions on his or her
conditional residence.
(5) An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: The estimated total number of
respondents for the information
collection I–829 is 2,790 and the
estimated hour burden per response is
4.17 hours. The estimated total number
of respondents for the information
collection Site Visit is 150 and the
estimated hour burden per response is
2 hours. The estimated total number of
respondents for the information
collection of Biometric Processing is
2,790 and the estimated hour burden
per response is 1.17 hours.
(6) An estimate of the total public
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: The total estimated annual
hour burden associated with this
collection is 15,189 hours.
(7) An estimate of the total public
burden (in cost) associated with the
collection: The estimated total annual
cost burden associated with this
collection of information is $1,308,077.
Dated: May 7, 2021.
Samantha L. Deshommes,
Chief, Regulatory Coordination Division,
Office of Policy and Strategy, U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration Services, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2021–10108 Filed 5–12–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–97–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
[212A2100DD/AAKC001030/
A0A501010.999900 253G; OMB Control
Number 1076–0190]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Indian Highway Safety Grant
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of information collection;
request for comment.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we,
the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) are
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM
13MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 91 (Thursday, May 13, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26230-26231]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-10108]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
[OMB Control Number 1615-0045]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Revision of a Currently
Approved Collection: Petition by Entrepreneur To Remove Conditions on
Permanent Resident Status
AGENCY: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of
Homeland Security.
ACTION: 60-Day notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration Services (USCIS) invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to comment upon this proposed revision of a currently
approved collection of information. In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, the information collection notice is
published in the Federal Register to obtain comments regarding the
nature of the information collection, the categories of respondents,
the estimated burden (i.e. the time, effort, and resources used by the
respondents to respond), the estimated cost to the respondent, and the
actual information collection instruments.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for 60 days until
July 12, 2021.
ADDRESSES: All submissions received must include the OMB Control Number
1615-0045 in the body of the letter, the agency name and Docket ID
USCIS-2006-0009. Submit comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal
website at https://www.regulations.gov under e-Docket ID number USCIS-
2006-0009. USCIS is limiting communications for this Notice as a result
of USCIS' COVID-19 response actions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: USCIS, Office of Policy and Strategy,
Regulatory Coordination Division, Samantha Deshommes, Chief, telephone
number (240) 721-3000 (This is not a toll-free number. Comments are not
accepted via telephone message). Please note contact information
provided here is solely for questions regarding this notice. It is not
for individual case status inquiries. Applicants seeking information
about the status of their individual cases can check Case Status
Online, available at the USCIS website at https://www.uscis.gov, or
call the USCIS Contact Center at 800-375-5283 (TTY 800-767-1833).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This Information Collection Revision would
amend the Form I-829, Petition by Investor to Remove Conditions on
Permanent Resident Status to clarify who may file the petition in
different situations.
Background
On January 13, 2017, DHS published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM), EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program Modernization. See 82 FR 4738
(Jan. 13, 2017). The NPRM sought to ``clarify the process by which an
immigrant investor's spouse and children file separate Form I-829
petitions when they are not included in the Form I-829 filed by the
immigrant investor. Generally, an immigrant investor's derivatives
should be included in the principal immigrant investor's Form I-829
petition. See [prior] 8 CFR 216.6(a)(1). However, there are situations
in which derivatives may not be included on the principal immigrant
investor's Form I-829 petition . . . In such circumstances, if the
immigrant investor would have otherwise been eligible to have his or
her conditions on status removed, then the derivatives would remain
eligible to remove the conditions on their status even if the immigrant
investor cannot or will not file a Form I-829 petition.'' 82 FR at
4750.
The NPRM continued, ``DHS also clarifies, however, that consistent
with current practice, each derivative must file a separate Form I-829
petition in all other situations in which the investor's spouse and
children are not included in the investor's Form I-829 petition. See
id.'' 82 FR at 4750.
On July 24, 2019, DHS published a Final Rule, EB-5 Immigrant
Investor
[[Page 26231]]
Program Modernization. See 84 FR 35750 (Jul. 24, 2019). In response to
a public comment regarding derivative filing, DHS responded that it
``proposed to standardize the process for those derivatives who file an
individual Form I-829 petition and cannot be included on the
principal's Form I-829, generally because the principal fails or
refuses to file a Form I-829. Under these circumstances, the final rule
clarifies the current DHS practice of requiring all derivatives
connected to a single principal investor to file separately . . . This
final rule only allows derivatives to apply together on a single Form
I-829 petition when the principal is deceased, because INA 204(l)
directs DHS to adjudicate `notwithstanding the death of the qualifying
relative.' . . .This rule does not change the current DHS practice, and
DHS is simply clarifying language in 8 CFR 216.6(a)(1) to avoid a
situation where derivatives filing separately do so incorrectly,
causing their petition to be rejected.'' 84 FR at 35782.
Reasons for Change
DHS is clarifying language from the preamble of both the NPRM and
the Final Rule with this form revision regarding who may file the form.
When DHS stated that a derivative may file a Form I-829 petition if the
principal immigrant investor ``fails or refuses to file a Form I-829,''
DHS was referring to the principal's failure or refusal to file a Form
I-829 for the derivative(s). The current DHS practice is for
derivatives not included on the principal's Form I-829 to file a
separate Form I-829. Therefore, DHS intended the comment response in
the Final Rule to be read as: DHS proposed to standardize the process
for those derivatives who file an individual Form I-829 petition and
cannot be included on the principal's Form I-829, generally because the
principal fails or refuses to file a Form I-829 for the derivative(s).
DHS understands that the failure to include ``for the
derivative(s)'' may have caused confusion concerning whether the
derivative of a principal immigrant investor can petition for and
obtain the removal of conditions if the principal immigrant investor
has not petitioned to remove his or her conditions. Through its
regulation, DHS only intended to clarify existing practice for
derivatives seeking to remove conditions on permanent residence.
Currently, if the principal immigrant is unable to remove his or her
conditions, the derivative immigrant is generally unable to remove his
or her conditions, except where the principal has died, as statutorily
required by INA 204(l).
This is consistent with the terms `alien spouse' and `alien child'
as defined by INA 216A(f)(2). It is also consistent with 8 CFR
216.6(a)(1)(ii), and how derivative status is similarly interpreted
across immigration benefits: That a derivative generally does not have
status without the principal.
Comments
You may access the information collection instrument with
instructions or additional information by visiting the Federal
eRulemaking Portal site at: https://www.regulations.gov and entering
USCIS-2006-0009 in the search box. All submissions will be posted,
without change, to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov, and will include any personal information you
provide. Therefore, submitting this information makes it public. You
may wish to consider limiting the amount of personal information that
you provide in any voluntary submission you make to DHS. DHS may
withhold information provided in comments from public viewing that it
determines may impact the privacy of an individual or is offensive. For
additional information, please read the Privacy Act notice that is
available via the link in the footer of https://www.regulations.gov.
Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected
agencies should address one or more of the following four points:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of
the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
Overview of This Information Collection
(1) Type of Information Collection: Revision of a Currently
Approved Collection.
(2) Title of the Form/Collection: Petition by Entrepreneur to
Remove Conditions on Permanent Resident Status.
(3) Agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the
DHS sponsoring the collection: I-829; USCIS.
(4) Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as
well as a brief abstract: Primary: Individuals or households; Business
or other for-profit. This form is used by a conditional resident alien
entrepreneur who obtained such status through a qualifying investment,
to apply to remove conditions on his or her conditional residence.
(5) An estimate of the total number of respondents and the amount
of time estimated for an average respondent to respond: The estimated
total number of respondents for the information collection I-829 is
2,790 and the estimated hour burden per response is 4.17 hours. The
estimated total number of respondents for the information collection
Site Visit is 150 and the estimated hour burden per response is 2
hours. The estimated total number of respondents for the information
collection of Biometric Processing is 2,790 and the estimated hour
burden per response is 1.17 hours.
(6) An estimate of the total public burden (in hours) associated
with the collection: The total estimated annual hour burden associated
with this collection is 15,189 hours.
(7) An estimate of the total public burden (in cost) associated
with the collection: The estimated total annual cost burden associated
with this collection of information is $1,308,077.
Dated: May 7, 2021.
Samantha L. Deshommes,
Chief, Regulatory Coordination Division, Office of Policy and Strategy,
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland
Security.
[FR Doc. 2021-10108 Filed 5-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-97-P