Airworthiness Directives; ATR-GIE Avions de Transport Régional Airplanes, 26195-26198 [2021-10015]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 91 / Thursday, May 13, 2021 / Proposed Rules
following are examples of prohibited network
restrictions on an issuer’s ability to contract
with other payment card networks:
i. Network rules or contract provisions
limiting or otherwise restricting the other
payment card networks that an issuer may
enable on a particular debit card, or network
rules or contract provisions that specify the
other networks that an issuer may enable on
a particular debit card.
ii. Network rules or guidelines that allow
only that payment card network’s (or its
affiliated networks’) brand, mark, or logo to
be displayed on a particular debit card, or
that otherwise limit the ability of brands,
marks, or logos of other payment card
networks to appear on the debit card.
4. Network logos or symbols on card not
required. Section 235.7(a) does not require
that a debit card display the brand, mark, or
logo of each payment card network over
which an electronic debit transaction may be
processed. For example, the rule does not
require a debit card that an issuer enables on
two or more unaffiliated payment card
networks to bear the brand, mark, or logo of
each such payment card network.
5. Voluntary exclusivity arrangements
prohibited. Section 235.7(a) requires that an
issuer enable at least two unaffiliated
payment card networks to process an
electronic debit transaction, even if the issuer
is not subject to any rule of, or contract or
other agreement with, a payment card
network requiring that all or a specified
minimum percentage of electronic debit
transactions be processed on the network or
its affiliated networks.
6. Affiliated payment card networks.
Section 235.7(a) does not prohibit an issuer
from enabling two affiliated payment card
networks among the networks on a particular
debit card, as long as at least two of the
networks that can be used to process each
electronic debit transaction are unaffiliated.
7. Application of rule regardless of means
of access. The network exclusivity provisions
in § 235.7(a) require that a debit card be
enabled by the issuer on at least two
unaffiliated payment card networks for each
means of access. The means of access that
carries the debit card information could be a
plastic card, a supplemental device such as
a fob, information stored inside an e-wallet
on a mobile phone or other device, or another
means of access that may be developed in the
future.
7(b) Prohibition on Routing Restrictions
1. Relationship to the network exclusivity
restrictions. An issuer or payment card
network is prohibited from inhibiting a
merchant’s ability to direct the routing of an
electronic debit transaction over any of the
payment card networks that the issuer has
enabled on that particular debit card. The
rule does not permit a merchant to route the
transaction over a payment card network that
the issuer did not enable to process
transactions using that debit card.
2. Examples of prohibited merchant
restrictions. The following are examples of
issuer or network practices that would
inhibit a merchant’s ability to direct the
routing of an electronic debit transaction and
that are therefore prohibited under § 235.7(b):
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 May 12, 2021
Jkt 253001
i. Prohibiting a merchant from encouraging
or discouraging a cardholder’s use of a
particular method of cardholder
authentication, for example prohibiting
merchants from favoring a cardholder’s use
of one cardholder authentication method
over another, or from discouraging the
cardholder’s use of any given cardholder
authentication method, as further described
in comment 7(a)–1.
ii. Establishing network rules or
designating issuer priorities directing the
processing of an electronic debit transaction
on a specified payment card network or its
affiliated networks, or directing the
processing of the transaction away from a
specified payment card network or its
affiliates, except as (i) a default rule in the
event the merchant, or its acquirer or
processor, does not designate a routing
preference, or (ii) if required by state law.
iii. Requiring a specific payment card
network to be used based on the means of
access presented by the cardholder to the
merchant.
*
*
*
*
*
5. No effect on network rules governing the
routing of subsequent transactions. Section
235.7 does not supersede a payment card
network rule that requires a chargeback or
return of an electronic debit transaction to be
processed on the same network that
processed the original transaction.
*
*
*
*
*
By order of the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2021–10013 Filed 5–12–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2021–0366; Project
Identifier MCAI–2021–00080–T]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; ATR—GIE
Avions de Transport Re´gional
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to
supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2020–23–13, which applies to all ATR—
GIE Avions de Transport Re´gional
Model ATR42–200, –300, and –320
airplanes. AD 2020–23–13 requires a
one-time inspection for discrepancies of
the wire bundles between the left- and
right-hand angle of attack (AOA) probes
and the crew alerting computer, and,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26195
depending on findings, applicable
corrective actions. Since the FAA issued
AD 2020–23–13, a wiring modification
for the captain stick shaker has been
developed, along with an update to the
aircraft flight manual (AFM). This
proposed AD would continue to require
the actions in AD 2020–23–13. This
proposed AD would also require, for
certain airplanes, modifying the captain
stick shaker wiring, and for all
airplanes, revising the existing AFM and
applicable corresponding operational
procedures to incorporate procedures
for the stick pusher/shaker, as specified
in a European Union Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA), which is proposed for
incorporation by reference. The FAA is
proposing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by June 28, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For material that will be incorporated
by reference (IBR) in this AD, contact
EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668
Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221
8999 000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu;
internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may
find this IBR material on the EASA
website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu.
You may view this IBR material at the
FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
It is also available in the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2021–
0366.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2021–
0366; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this NPRM, any
E:\FR\FM\13MYP1.SGM
13MYP1
26196
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 91 / Thursday, May 13, 2021 / Proposed Rules
comments received, and other
information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace
Engineer, Large Aircraft Section,
International Validation Branch, FAA,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA
98198; phone and fax: 206–231–3220;
email: shahram.daneshmandi@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send
your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2021–0366; Project Identifier
MCAI–2021–00080–T’’ at the beginning
of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of
the proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. The FAA will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend the proposal
because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this proposed
AD.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this NPRM
contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated
as private, that you actually treat as
private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this NPRM, it is important
that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each
page of your submission containing CBI
as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such
marked submissions as confidential
under the FOIA, and they will not be
placed in the public docket of this
NPRM. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to Shahram
Daneshmandi, Aerospace Engineer,
Large Aircraft Section, International
Validation Branch, FAA, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
phone and fax: 206–231–3220; email:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 May 12, 2021
Jkt 253001
shahram.daneshmandi@faa.gov. Any
commentary that the FAA receives
which is not specifically designated as
CBI will be placed in the public docket
for this rulemaking.
Background
The FAA issued AD 2020–23–13,
Amendment 39–21330 (85 FR 73407,
November 18, 2020) (AD 2020–23–13),
which applies to all ATR—GIE Avions
de Transport Re´gional Model ATR42–
200, –300, and –320 airplanes. AD
2020–23–13 requires a one-time
inspection for discrepancies of the wire
bundles between the left- and righthand AOA probes and the crew alerting
computer, and, depending on findings,
applicable corrective actions. The FAA
issued AD 2020–23–13 to address false
activation of the stall warning system,
which could result in loss of control of
the airplane during take-off and landing
phases.
Actions Since AD 2020–23–13 Was
Issued
Since the FAA issued AD 2020–23–
13, a wiring modification for the captain
stick shaker has been developed, along
with an update to the existing systems
limitations section of the AFM to
incorporate procedures for the stick
pusher/shaker.
EASA, which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA AD 2021–0024,
dated January 19, 2021 (EASA AD
2021–0024) (also referred to as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information, or the MCAI), to correct an
unsafe condition for all ATR—GIE
Avions de Transport Re´gional Model
ATR42–200, –300, and –320 airplanes.
EASA AD 2021–0024 supersedes EASA
AD 2020–0221, dated October 13, 2020
(which corresponds to FAA AD 2020–
23–13).
This AD was prompted by false
activation of the stall warning system
due to wiring damage on the wire
bundle between an AOA probe and the
crew alerting computer. Such activation
can lead to one or a combination of the
following events:
• Autopilot disconnection;
• Stick pusher activation;
• Stick shaker activation;
• Aural stall warning (cricket audio
alert);
• Master CAUTION light flashing
amber;
• STICK PUSHER green light ON;
• FLT CTL amber light on CAP;
• Stick PUSHER/SHAKER pushbutton
‘FAULT’ amber light illumination;
and
• Whooler Audio alert.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The FAA is proposing this AD to
address false activation of the stall
warning system, which could result in
loss of control of the airplane during
take-off and landing phases. See the
MCAI for additional background
information.
Explanation of Retained Requirements
Although this proposed AD does not
explicitly restate the requirements of AD
2020–23–13, this proposed AD would
retain all of the requirements of AD
2020–23–13. Those requirements are
referenced in EASA AD 2021–0024,
which, in turn, is referenced in
paragraph (g) of this proposed AD.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
EASA AD 2021–0024 describes
procedures for a one-time detailed
visual inspection of the wire bundles
between the left- and right-hand AOA
probes and the crew alerting computer
for discrepancies (including, but not
limited to, wire damage, missing or
damaged conduits, and incorrect routing
of wiring and conduits), and, depending
on findings, applicable corrective
actions. EASA AD 2021–0024 also
describes procedures for modifying the
captain stick shaker wiring, and
amending the systems limitations
section of the applicable AFM to
incorporate procedures for the stick
pusher/shaker. This material is
reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business
or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to the
FAA’s bilateral agreement with the State
of Design Authority, the FAA has been
notified of the unsafe condition
described in the MCAI referenced
above. The FAA is proposing this AD
because the FAA evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
EASA AD 2021–0024 described
previously, as incorporated by
reference, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this AD. This
proposed AD would also require
E:\FR\FM\13MYP1.SGM
13MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 91 / Thursday, May 13, 2021 / Proposed Rules
sending the inspection results to ATR—
GIE Avions de Transport Re´gional.
EASA AD 2021–0024 requires
operators to ‘‘inform all flight crews’’ of
revisions to the AFM, and thereafter to
‘‘operate the aeroplane accordingly.’’
However, this AD would not
specifically require those actions as
those actions are already required by
FAA regulations. FAA regulations
require operators furnish to pilots any
changes to the AFM (for example, 14
CFR 121.137), and to ensure the pilots
are familiar with the AFM (for example,
14 CFR 91.505). As with any other
flightcrew training requirement, training
on the updated AFM content is tracked
by the operators and recorded in each
pilot’s training record, which is
available for the FAA to review. FAA
regulations also require pilots to follow
the procedures in the existing AFM
including all updates. 14 CFR 91.9
requires that any person operating a
civil aircraft must comply with the
operating limitations specified in the
AFM. Therefore, including a
requirement in this AD to operate the
airplane according to the revised AFM
would be redundant and unnecessary.
Further, compliance with such a
requirement in an AD would be
impracticable to demonstrate or track on
an ongoing basis; therefore, a
requirement to operate the airplane in
such a manner would be unenforceable.
Explanation of Required Compliance
Information
In the FAA’s ongoing efforts to
improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA initially worked with
Airbus and EASA to develop a process
to use certain EASA ADs as the primary
source of information for compliance
with requirements for corresponding
FAA ADs. The FAA has since
coordinated with other manufacturers
and civil aviation authorities (CAAs) to
use this process. As a result, EASA AD
2021–0024 will be incorporated by
reference in the FAA final rule. This
proposed AD would, therefore, require
compliance with EASA AD 2021–0024
in its entirety, through that
incorporation, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this proposed AD.
Using common terms that are the same
as the heading of a particular section in
26197
the EASA AD does not mean that
operators need comply only with that
section. For example, where the AD
requirement refers to ‘‘all required
actions and compliance times,’’
compliance with this AD requirement is
not limited to the section titled
‘‘Required Action(s) and Compliance
Time(s)’’ in the EASA AD. Service
information specified in EASA AD
2021–0024 that is required for
compliance with EASA AD 2021–0024
will be available on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2021–0366 after the FAA final
rule is published.
Interim Action
The FAA considers this proposed AD
interim action. If final action is later
identified, the FAA might consider
further rulemaking then.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this proposed
AD affects 26 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The FAA estimates the following costs
to comply with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS FOR REQUIRED ACTIONS *
Cost per
product
Parts cost
Cost on U.S.
operators
Action
Labor cost
Retained
actions
from
AD
2020-23-13.
New proposed actions ...................
Up to 10 work-hours × $85 per hour = Up to $850 ..
$0
Up to $850. ......
Up to $22,100.
4 work-hours × $85 per hour = $340 ........................
100
$440. ................
$11,440.
* Table does not include estimated costs for reporting.
The FAA estimates that it would take
about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the proposed reporting
requirement in this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per hour. Based
on these figures, the FAA estimates the
cost of reporting the inspection results
on U.S. operators to be $2,210, or $85
per product.
The FAA has received no definitive
data on which to base the cost estimates
for the on-condition actions specified in
this proposed AD.
Paperwork Reduction Act
A federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, nor shall a person be subject
to penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a current valid
OMB control number. The control
number for the collection of information
required by this proposed AD is 2120–
0056. The paperwork cost associated
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 May 12, 2021
Jkt 253001
with this proposed AD has been
detailed in the Costs of Compliance
section of this document and includes
time for reviewing instructions, as well
as completing and reviewing the
collection of information. Therefore, all
reporting associated with this proposed
AD is mandatory. Comments concerning
the accuracy of this burden and
suggestions for reducing the burden
should be directed to Information
Collection Clearance Officer, Federal
Aviation Administration, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX
76177–1524.
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: General requirements. Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Regulatory Findings
E:\FR\FM\13MYP1.SGM
13MYP1
26198
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 91 / Thursday, May 13, 2021 / Proposed Rules
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Would not affect intrastate
aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Would not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by:
■ a. Removing Airworthiness Directive
(AD) 2020–23–13, Amendment 39–
21330 (85 FR 73407, November 18,
2020), and
■ b. Adding the following new AD:
■
ATR—GIE Avions de Transport Re´gional:
Docket No. FAA–2021–0366; Project
Identifier MCAI–2021–00080–T.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this
airworthiness directive (AD) by June 28,
2021.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2020–23–13,
Amendment 39–21330 (85 FR 73407,
November 18, 2020) (AD 2020–23–13).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all ATR—GIE Avions
de Transport Re´gional Model ATR42–200,
–300, and –320 airplanes, certificated in any
category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 31, Instruments.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by false activation
of the stall warning system due to wiring
damage on the wire bundle between an angle
of attack (AOA) probe and the crew alerting
computer, and the development of a wiring
modification and aircraft flight manual
(AFM) update to address the unsafe
condition. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address this condition, which could result in
loss of control of the airplane during take-off
and landing phases.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 May 12, 2021
Jkt 253001
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this
AD: Comply with all required actions and
compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2021–0024, dated
January 19, 2021 (EASA AD 2021–0024).
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2021–0024
(1) Where EASA AD 2021–0024 refers to its
effective date, this AD requires using the
effective date of this AD.
(2) Where EASA AD 2021–0024 refers to
‘‘the effective date of EASA AD 2020–0221,’’
this AD requires using December 3, 2020 (the
effective date of AD 2020–23–13).
(3) The ‘‘Remarks’’ section of EASA AD
2021–0024 does not apply to this AD.
(4) Paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2021–0024
specifies to report inspection results to
ATR—GIE Avions de Transport Re´gional
within a certain compliance time. For this
AD, report inspection results at the
applicable time specified in paragraph
(h)(4)(i) or (ii) of this AD.
(i) If the inspection was done on or after
December 3, 2020 (the effective date of AD
2020–23–13): Submit the report within 30
days after the inspection.
(ii) If the inspection was done before
December 3, 2020 (the effective date of AD
2020–23–13): Submit the report within 30
days after the effective date of this AD.
(5) Paragraphs (5) and (6) of EASA AD
2021–0024 specify amending ‘‘the applicable
AFM [aircraft flight manual] of that aeroplane
by inserting the AFM change provided in
Appendix 1 of this [EASA] AD,’’ but this AD
requires amending ‘‘the existing AFM and
applicable corresponding operational
procedures to incorporate the limitations and
procedures specified in Appendix 1 of EASA
AD 2021–0024.’’
(6) Where paragraphs (5) and (6) of EASA
AD 2021–0024 specify to ‘‘inform all flight
crews, and, thereafter, operate the aeroplane
accordingly,’’ this AD does not require those
actions as those actions are already required
by existing FAA operating regulations.
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or responsible Flight
Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch,
send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (j)(2) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-AVS-AIR730-AMOC@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the responsible
Flight Standards Office.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain instructions
from a manufacturer, the instructions must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, Large Aircraft Section,
International Validation Branch, FAA; or
EASA; or ATR—GIE Avions de Transport
Re´gional’s EASA Design Organization
Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA,
the approval must include the DOAauthorized signature.
(j) Related Information
(1) For information about EASA AD 2021–
0024, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer
3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49
221 8999 000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu;
Internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may find
this EASA AD on the EASA website at
https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this
material at the FAA, Airworthiness Products
Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195. This
material may be found in the AD docket on
the internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2021–0366.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace
Engineer, Large Aircraft Section,
International Validation Branch, FAA, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
phone and fax: 206–231–3220; email:
shahram.daneshmandi@faa.gov.
Issued on May 7, 2021.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives,
Compliance & Airworthiness Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–10015 Filed 5–12–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2021–0364; Project
Identifier MCAI–2020–00274–R]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Leonardo
S.p.a. Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Leonardo S.p.a. (Leonardo) Model
A109S and AW109SP helicopters with a
certain part-numbered vertical fin
vibration absorber installation installed.
This proposed AD would require
repetitive inspections of the vertical fin
vibration absorber installation and the
surrounding structure and depending on
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13MYP1.SGM
13MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 91 (Thursday, May 13, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26195-26198]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-10015]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2021-0366; Project Identifier MCAI-2021-00080-T]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; ATR--GIE Avions de Transport
R[eacute]gional Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2020-23-13, which applies to all ATR--GIE Avions de Transport
R[eacute]gional Model ATR42-200, -300, and -320 airplanes. AD 2020-23-
13 requires a one-time inspection for discrepancies of the wire bundles
between the left- and right-hand angle of attack (AOA) probes and the
crew alerting computer, and, depending on findings, applicable
corrective actions. Since the FAA issued AD 2020-23-13, a wiring
modification for the captain stick shaker has been developed, along
with an update to the aircraft flight manual (AFM). This proposed AD
would continue to require the actions in AD 2020-23-13. This proposed
AD would also require, for certain airplanes, modifying the captain
stick shaker wiring, and for all airplanes, revising the existing AFM
and applicable corresponding operational procedures to incorporate
procedures for the stick pusher/shaker, as specified in a European
Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is proposed for
incorporation by reference. The FAA is proposing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 28,
2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For material that will be incorporated by reference (IBR) in this
AD, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany;
telephone +49 221 8999 000; email [email protected]; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this IBR material on the EASA website
at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this IBR material at the
FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195. It is also available in
the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0366.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-
0366; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, any
[[Page 26196]]
comments received, and other information. The street address for Docket
Operations is listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace
Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206-231-
3220; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2021-0366; Project Identifier
MCAI-2021-00080-T'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
the proposal because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this proposed AD.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to
Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section,
International Validation Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA 98198; phone and fax: 206-231-3220; email:
[email protected]. Any commentary that the FAA receives which
is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public
docket for this rulemaking.
Background
The FAA issued AD 2020-23-13, Amendment 39-21330 (85 FR 73407,
November 18, 2020) (AD 2020-23-13), which applies to all ATR--GIE
Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional Model ATR42-200, -300, and -320
airplanes. AD 2020-23-13 requires a one-time inspection for
discrepancies of the wire bundles between the left- and right-hand AOA
probes and the crew alerting computer, and, depending on findings,
applicable corrective actions. The FAA issued AD 2020-23-13 to address
false activation of the stall warning system, which could result in
loss of control of the airplane during take-off and landing phases.
Actions Since AD 2020-23-13 Was Issued
Since the FAA issued AD 2020-23-13, a wiring modification for the
captain stick shaker has been developed, along with an update to the
existing systems limitations section of the AFM to incorporate
procedures for the stick pusher/shaker.
EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2021-0024, dated January 19, 2021
(EASA AD 2021-0024) (also referred to as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or the MCAI), to correct an unsafe condition
for all ATR--GIE Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional Model ATR42-200, -
300, and -320 airplanes. EASA AD 2021-0024 supersedes EASA AD 2020-
0221, dated October 13, 2020 (which corresponds to FAA AD 2020-23-13).
This AD was prompted by false activation of the stall warning
system due to wiring damage on the wire bundle between an AOA probe and
the crew alerting computer. Such activation can lead to one or a
combination of the following events:
Autopilot disconnection;
Stick pusher activation;
Stick shaker activation;
Aural stall warning (cricket audio alert);
Master CAUTION light flashing amber;
STICK PUSHER green light ON;
FLT CTL amber light on CAP;
Stick PUSHER/SHAKER pushbutton `FAULT' amber light
illumination; and
Whooler Audio alert.
The FAA is proposing this AD to address false activation of the
stall warning system, which could result in loss of control of the
airplane during take-off and landing phases. See the MCAI for
additional background information.
Explanation of Retained Requirements
Although this proposed AD does not explicitly restate the
requirements of AD 2020-23-13, this proposed AD would retain all of the
requirements of AD 2020-23-13. Those requirements are referenced in
EASA AD 2021-0024, which, in turn, is referenced in paragraph (g) of
this proposed AD.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
EASA AD 2021-0024 describes procedures for a one-time detailed
visual inspection of the wire bundles between the left- and right-hand
AOA probes and the crew alerting computer for discrepancies (including,
but not limited to, wire damage, missing or damaged conduits, and
incorrect routing of wiring and conduits), and, depending on findings,
applicable corrective actions. EASA AD 2021-0024 also describes
procedures for modifying the captain stick shaker wiring, and amending
the systems limitations section of the applicable AFM to incorporate
procedures for the stick pusher/shaker. This material is reasonably
available because the interested parties have access to it through
their normal course of business or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to the FAA's bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority,
the FAA has been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
referenced above. The FAA is proposing this AD because the FAA
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in EASA AD 2021-0024 described previously, as incorporated by
reference, except for any differences identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this AD. This proposed AD would also require
[[Page 26197]]
sending the inspection results to ATR--GIE Avions de Transport
R[eacute]gional.
EASA AD 2021-0024 requires operators to ``inform all flight crews''
of revisions to the AFM, and thereafter to ``operate the aeroplane
accordingly.'' However, this AD would not specifically require those
actions as those actions are already required by FAA regulations. FAA
regulations require operators furnish to pilots any changes to the AFM
(for example, 14 CFR 121.137), and to ensure the pilots are familiar
with the AFM (for example, 14 CFR 91.505). As with any other flightcrew
training requirement, training on the updated AFM content is tracked by
the operators and recorded in each pilot's training record, which is
available for the FAA to review. FAA regulations also require pilots to
follow the procedures in the existing AFM including all updates. 14 CFR
91.9 requires that any person operating a civil aircraft must comply
with the operating limitations specified in the AFM. Therefore,
including a requirement in this AD to operate the airplane according to
the revised AFM would be redundant and unnecessary. Further, compliance
with such a requirement in an AD would be impracticable to demonstrate
or track on an ongoing basis; therefore, a requirement to operate the
airplane in such a manner would be unenforceable.
Explanation of Required Compliance Information
In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA initially worked with Airbus and EASA to develop a
process to use certain EASA ADs as the primary source of information
for compliance with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has
since coordinated with other manufacturers and civil aviation
authorities (CAAs) to use this process. As a result, EASA AD 2021-0024
will be incorporated by reference in the FAA final rule. This proposed
AD would, therefore, require compliance with EASA AD 2021-0024 in its
entirety, through that incorporation, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this proposed AD.
Using common terms that are the same as the heading of a particular
section in the EASA AD does not mean that operators need comply only
with that section. For example, where the AD requirement refers to
``all required actions and compliance times,'' compliance with this AD
requirement is not limited to the section titled ``Required Action(s)
and Compliance Time(s)'' in the EASA AD. Service information specified
in EASA AD 2021-0024 that is required for compliance with EASA AD 2021-
0024 will be available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0366 after the FAA
final rule is published.
Interim Action
The FAA considers this proposed AD interim action. If final action
is later identified, the FAA might consider further rulemaking then.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this proposed AD affects 26 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with
this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs for Required Actions *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Retained actions from AD Up to 10 $0 Up to $850............ Up to $22,100.
2020[dash]23[dash]13. work[dash]hours
x $85 per hour =
Up to $850.
New proposed actions.......... 4 work-hours x 100 $440.................. $11,440.
$85 per hour =
$340.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Table does not include estimated costs for reporting.
The FAA estimates that it would take about 1 work-hour per product
to comply with the proposed reporting requirement in this proposed AD.
The average labor rate is $85 per hour. Based on these figures, the FAA
estimates the cost of reporting the inspection results on U.S.
operators to be $2,210, or $85 per product.
The FAA has received no definitive data on which to base the cost
estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed AD.
Paperwork Reduction Act
A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a current valid OMB control number. The control
number for the collection of information required by this proposed AD
is 2120-0056. The paperwork cost associated with this proposed AD has
been detailed in the Costs of Compliance section of this document and
includes time for reviewing instructions, as well as completing and
reviewing the collection of information. Therefore, all reporting
associated with this proposed AD is mandatory. Comments concerning the
accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should
be directed to Information Collection Clearance Officer, Federal
Aviation Administration, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177-
1524.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
[[Page 26198]]
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by:
0
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2020-23-13, Amendment 39-21330
(85 FR 73407, November 18, 2020), and
0
b. Adding the following new AD:
ATR--GIE Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional: Docket No. FAA-2021-
0366; Project Identifier MCAI-2021-00080-T.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) by June 28, 2021.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2020-23-13, Amendment 39-21330 (85 FR 73407,
November 18, 2020) (AD 2020-23-13).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all ATR--GIE Avions de Transport
R[eacute]gional Model ATR42-200, -300, and -320 airplanes,
certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 31, Instruments.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by false activation of the stall warning
system due to wiring damage on the wire bundle between an angle of
attack (AOA) probe and the crew alerting computer, and the
development of a wiring modification and aircraft flight manual
(AFM) update to address the unsafe condition. The FAA is issuing
this AD to address this condition, which could result in loss of
control of the airplane during take-off and landing phases.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
2021-0024, dated January 19, 2021 (EASA AD 2021-0024).
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2021-0024
(1) Where EASA AD 2021-0024 refers to its effective date, this
AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
(2) Where EASA AD 2021-0024 refers to ``the effective date of
EASA AD 2020-0221,'' this AD requires using December 3, 2020 (the
effective date of AD 2020-23-13).
(3) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2021-0024 does not apply
to this AD.
(4) Paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2021-0024 specifies to report
inspection results to ATR--GIE Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional
within a certain compliance time. For this AD, report inspection
results at the applicable time specified in paragraph (h)(4)(i) or
(ii) of this AD.
(i) If the inspection was done on or after December 3, 2020 (the
effective date of AD 2020-23-13): Submit the report within 30 days
after the inspection.
(ii) If the inspection was done before December 3, 2020 (the
effective date of AD 2020-23-13): Submit the report within 30 days
after the effective date of this AD.
(5) Paragraphs (5) and (6) of EASA AD 2021-0024 specify amending
``the applicable AFM [aircraft flight manual] of that aeroplane by
inserting the AFM change provided in Appendix 1 of this [EASA] AD,''
but this AD requires amending ``the existing AFM and applicable
corresponding operational procedures to incorporate the limitations
and procedures specified in Appendix 1 of EASA AD 2021-0024.''
(6) Where paragraphs (5) and (6) of EASA AD 2021-0024 specify to
``inform all flight crews, and, thereafter, operate the aeroplane
accordingly,'' this AD does not require those actions as those
actions are already required by existing FAA operating regulations.
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or responsible Flight
Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, send it
to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (j)(2) of
this AD. Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
responsible Flight Standards Office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch, FAA; or EASA; or ATR--GIE
Avions de Transport R[eacute]gional's EASA Design Organization
Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval must include
the DOA-authorized signature.
(j) Related Information
(1) For information about EASA AD 2021-0024, contact EASA,
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221
8999 000; email [email protected]; Internet www.easa.europa.eu. You
may find this EASA AD on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this material at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195. This material may be
found in the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-
2021-0366.
(2) For more information about this AD, contact Shahram
Daneshmandi, Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section,
International Validation Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206-231-3220; email:
[email protected].
Issued on May 7, 2021.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-10015 Filed 5-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P