Air Plan Approval; Arizona; Miami Copper Smelter Sulfur Dioxide Control Measures, 24726-24728 [2021-09634]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
24726
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 88 / Monday, May 10, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—APPROVED BUT NOT INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE REGULATIONS—Continued
State/local
effective
date
State/local
citation
Title/subject
2.03 ...................
09/01/20
2.04 ...................
Confidential or Proprietary
Information.
Violations ..........................
2.05 ...................
Orders and Hearings .......
09/01/20
2.06 ...................
Appeal of Board Orders ...
09/01/20
2.10 ...................
Severability .......................
09/01/20
2.11 ...................
Penalties, Civil Penalties,
and Additional Means
for Enforcement.
Restraining Orders—Injunctions.
Regulatory Actions and
Penalties.
09/01/20
2.12 ...................
8.11 ...................
*
*
*
*
*
3. Amend § 52.2498 by revising
paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:
09/01/20
9/02/14
5/10/21, [Insert Federal
Register citation].
5/10/21, [Insert Federal
Register citation].
5/10/21, [Insert Federal
Register citation].
5/10/21, [Insert Federal
Register citation].
5/10/21, [Insert Federal
Register citation].
5/10/21, [Insert Federal
Register citation].
5/10/21, [Insert Federal
Register citation].
9/28/15, 80 FR 58216.
Visibility protection.
(a) * * *
(1) Sources subject to the jurisdiction
of local air authorities (except Benton
Clean Air Agency, Northwest Clean Air
Agency, Puget Sound Clean Air Agency,
Southwest Clean Air Agency, and
Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency);
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2021–09368 Filed 5–7–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2020–0735; FRL–10022–
52–Region 9]
Air Plan Approval; Arizona; Miami
Copper Smelter Sulfur Dioxide Control
Measures
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Explanations
Replaces WAC 173–400–230(1)&(6).
Replaces WAC 173–400–250.
Replaces WAC 173–400–230(2)&(3).
Replaces WAC 173–400–230(4).
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve a revision to the Arizona State
Implementation Plan (SIP). This
revision concerns emissions of sulfur
dioxide (SO2) from the copper smelter
in Miami, Arizona. We are approving
the rescission of two Arizona
Department of Environmental Quality
(ADEQ) Arizona Administrative Code
(A.A.C.) provisions from the Arizona
SIP that are no longer needed to regulate
this emission source under the Clean
Air Act (CAA or the ‘‘Act’’).
DATES: This rule is effective on June 9,
2021.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2020–0735. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
SUMMARY:
■
§ 52.2498
09/01/20
EPA approval date
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information. If
you need assistance in a language other
than English or if you are a person with
disabilities who needs a reasonable
accommodation at no cost to you, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin Gong, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA
94105. By phone: (415) 972–3073 or by
email at gong.kevin@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On March 3, 2021 (86 FR 12310), the
EPA proposed to approve the following
revision into the Arizona SIP.
TABLE 1—RULE FOR WHICH RESCISSION FROM THE SIP IS REQUESTED
Local agency
Citation
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
ADEQ ...............
A.A.C. R18–2–715(F)(2)
and (H).
We proposed to approve this revision
because we determined that it complies
with the relevant CAA requirements.
Our proposed action contains more
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 May 07, 2021
Jkt 253001
Rule title
Adopted
Standards of Performance for Existing Primary
Copper Smelters; Site-specific Requirements.
March 7, 2009 .......
information on the revision and our
evaluation.
PO 00000
SIP approval date
September 23, 2014.
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\10MYR1.SGM
10MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 88 / Monday, May 10, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
this period, we received one comment
(with four duplicates) that were
supportive of our action.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that
change our assessment of the revision as
described in our proposed action.
Therefore, as authorized in section
110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully
approving the rescission of A.A.C. R18–
2–715, sections (F)(2) and (H) from the
Arizona SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is amending
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. The EPA is
removing A.A.C. R18–2–715(F)(2) and
(H), as described in Table 1 of this
preamble, from the Arizona SIP, which
is incorporated by reference in
accordance with the requirements of 1
CFR part 51.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the Clean Air
Act. Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 May 07, 2021
Jkt 253001
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
24727
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by July 9, 2021.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides.
Dated: April 30, 2021.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart D—Arizona
2. In § 52.120, amend table 2 in
paragraph (c), under the heading
‘‘Article 7 (Existing Stationary Source
Performance Standards),’’ by removing
the entry reading ‘‘R18–2–715, sections
F, G, and H’’ and adding in its place the
entry ‘‘R18–2–715, section F, excluding
(F)(2), and section G’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.120
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
E:\FR\FM\10MYR1.SGM
10MYR1
*
*
24728
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 88 / Monday, May 10, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2—EPA-APPROVED ARIZONA REGULATIONS
State citation
State
effective
date
Title/subject
*
*
*
Additional
explanation
EPA approval date
*
*
*
*
Article 7 (Existing Stationary Source Performance Standards)
*
*
*
R18–2–715, section F, exStandards of Performance for
cluding (F)(2), and section
Existing Primary Copper
G.
Smelters: Site-Specific Requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2020–0541; FRL–10022–
97–Region 8]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Utah; R307–204
Emission Standards: Smoke
Management
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving state
implementation plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by State of Utah on November
5, 2019. The revisions amend R307–204
to meet the requirements set forth in
Utah’s 2019 House Bill (H.B.) 155. This
action is being taken under section 110
of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This rule is effective on June 9,
2021.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R08–OAR–2020–0541. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
16:22 May 07, 2021
*
September 23, 2014, 79 FR
56655; May 10, 2021, [INSERT Federal Register
CITATION].
*
*
section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amrita Singh, Air and Radiation
Division, EPA, Region 8, Mailcode
8ARD–QP, 1595 Wynkoop Street,
Denver, Colorado 80202–1129, (303)
312–6103, singh.amrita@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
the EPA.
INFORMATION CONTACT
[FR Doc. 2021–09634 Filed 5–7–21; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
March 7, 2009
Jkt 253001
I. Background
On February 25, 2021 (86 FR 11687),
the EPA proposed approval of the
revisions to the Utah Divison of
Administrative Rules, specifically:
R307–204–1. Purpose and Goals; R307–
204–2. Applicability; R307–204–3.
Definitions; R307–204–4. General
Requirements; R307–204–5. Burn
Schedule; R307–204–6. Small
Prescribed Fires (de minimis); R307–
204–7. Small Prescribed Pile Fires (de
minimis); R307–204–8. Large Prescribed
Fires; R307–204–9. Large Prescribed
Pile Fires; and R307–204–10.
Requirements for Wildland Fire Use
events that were submitted by the State
on November 5, 2019.
The rule revisions for R307–204 were
submitted to align with the recent 2019
H.B. 155 which removes outdated
terminology and language regarding
adjusting fire emission factors and
combines sections R307–204–6. Small
Prescribed Fires (de minimis), R307–
204–7. Small Prescribed Pile Fires (de
minimis), R307–204–8. Large Prescribed
Fires, and R307–204–9. Large Prescribed
Pile Fires to reduce redundancies.
II. Response to Comments
The comment period for our February
25, 2021 (86 FR 11687) proposed rule
was open for 30 days. The EPA did not
receive any comments.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
EPA approved the rescission
of sections (F)(2) and (H)
on May 10, 2021.
*
III. Final Action
For the reasons stated in our February
25, 2021 proposed rule, the EPA is
finalizing approval of SIP revisions
submitted by the State of Utah on
November 5, 2019. EPA is approving:
• Revisions to sections: R307–204–1.
Purpose and Goals; R307–204–2.
Applicability; R307–204–3. Definitions;
R307–204–4. General Requirements; and
R307–204–5. Burn Schedule.
• Revisions to combine R307–204–6.
Small Prescribed Fires (de minimis) and
R307–204–7. Small Prescribed Pile Fires
(de minimis), under R307–204–6. Small
Prescribed Fires (de minimis) to
streamline and reduce redundancies.
• Revisions to combine R307–204–8.
Large Prescribed Fires and R307–204–9.
Large Prescribed Pile Fires, under R307–
204–7, and to retitle R307–204–7 to
‘‘Large Prescribed Fires,’’ which will
streamline and reduce redundancies.
• Removal of R307–204–10.
Requirements for Wildland Fire Use
events. This deletion is removing
outdated smoke policy terminology,
such as, wildland fire use.
The revisions for R307–204 meet the
applicable CAA requirements and
contains smoke management
requirements for land managers within
the State of Utah as required by 40 CFR
51.309(d)(6).
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is
finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is incorporating by
reference R307–204–1; R307–204–2;
R307–204–3; R307–204–4; R307–204–5;
combination of R307–204–6 and R307–
204–7, under R307–204–6 for
streamlining; combination of R307–204–
8 and R307–204–9, under R307–204–7;
and the removal of R307–204–10 due to
outdated information. The EPA has
E:\FR\FM\10MYR1.SGM
10MYR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 88 (Monday, May 10, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24726-24728]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-09634]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2020-0735; FRL-10022-52-Region 9]
Air Plan Approval; Arizona; Miami Copper Smelter Sulfur Dioxide
Control Measures
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve a revision to the Arizona State Implementation Plan
(SIP). This revision concerns emissions of sulfur dioxide
(SO2) from the copper smelter in Miami, Arizona. We are
approving the rescission of two Arizona Department of Environmental
Quality (ADEQ) Arizona Administrative Code (A.A.C.) provisions from the
Arizona SIP that are no longer needed to regulate this emission source
under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the ``Act'').
DATES: This rule is effective on June 9, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2020-0735. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information. If you need assistance
in a language other than English or if you are a person with
disabilities who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you,
please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Gong, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone: (415) 972-3073 or by
email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On March 3, 2021 (86 FR 12310), the EPA proposed to approve the
following revision into the Arizona SIP.
Table 1--Rule for Which Rescission From the SIP Is Requested
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Citation Rule title Adopted SIP approval date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADEQ................ A.A.C. R18-2- Standards of March 7, 2009.......... September 23, 2014.
715(F)(2) and Performance for
(H). Existing Primary
Copper Smelters;
Site-specific
Requirements.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We proposed to approve this revision because we determined that it
complies with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action
contains more information on the revision and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During
[[Page 24727]]
this period, we received one comment (with four duplicates) that were
supportive of our action.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that change our assessment of the
revision as described in our proposed action. Therefore, as authorized
in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving the
rescission of A.A.C. R18-2-715, sections (F)(2) and (H) from the
Arizona SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is amending regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. The EPA is removing A.A.C. R18-2-715(F)(2)
and (H), as described in Table 1 of this preamble, from the Arizona
SIP, which is incorporated by reference in accordance with the
requirements of 1 CFR part 51.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 9, 2021. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides.
Dated: April 30, 2021.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart D--Arizona
0
2. In Sec. 52.120, amend table 2 in paragraph (c), under the heading
``Article 7 (Existing Stationary Source Performance Standards),'' by
removing the entry reading ``R18-2-715, sections F, G, and H'' and
adding in its place the entry ``R18-2-715, section F, excluding (F)(2),
and section G'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.120 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
[[Page 24728]]
Table 2--EPA-Approved Arizona Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State effective Additional
State citation Title/subject date EPA approval date explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Article 7 (Existing Stationary Source Performance Standards)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
R18-2-715, section F, excluding Standards of March 7, 2009..... September 23, EPA approved the
(F)(2), and section G. Performance for 2014, 79 FR rescission of
Existing Primary 56655; May 10, sections (F)(2)
Copper Smelters: 2021, [INSERT and (H) on May
Site-Specific Federal Register 10, 2021.
Requirements. CITATION].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-09634 Filed 5-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
