Air Plan Approval; Texas; Reasonable Further Progress Plan for the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria Ozone Nonattainment Area, 24717-24718 [2021-09626]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 88 / Monday, May 10, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
access to material indexed but not
provided in the docket.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ means the EPA.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2020–0300; FRL–10019–
45–Region 6]
I. Background
Air Plan Approval; Texas; Reasonable
Further Progress Plan for the HoustonGalveston-Brazoria Ozone
Nonattainment Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
Pursuant to the Federal Clean
Air Act (CAA or the Act), the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
is approving revisions to the Texas State
Implementation Plan (SIP) to meet the
Reasonable Further Progress (RFP)
requirements for the HoustonGalveston-Brazoria (HGB) serious ozone
nonattainment area for the 2008 ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS). Specifically, EPA is
approving the RFP demonstration and
associated Motor Vehicle Emission
Budgets (MVEBs), and a revised 2011
base year emissions inventory (EI) for
the HGB area. EPA is also notifying the
public of the status of EPA’s adequacy
determination for the MVEBs for the
HGB area. EPA is not finalizing the
proposed approval of revisions to the
SIP to address contingency measure
requirements in the HGB area for the
2008 Ozone NAAQS at this time.
DATES: This rule is effective on June 9,
2021.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R06–OAR–2020–0300. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet. Publicly available docket
materials are available electronically
through https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carrie Paige, EPA Region 6 Office,
Infrastructure & Ozone Section, 214–
665–6521, paige.carrie@epa.gov. Out of
an abundance of caution for members of
the public and our staff, the EPA Region
6 office may be closed to the public to
reduce the risk of transmitting COVID–
19. Please call or email the contact
listed above if you need alternative
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 May 07, 2021
Jkt 253001
The background for this action is
discussed in detail in our September 29,
2020 proposal (85 FR 60928). In that
action we proposed to approve only the
HGB portion of the May 13, 2020, Texas
SIP submittal that addressed RFP
requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS for the two serious ozone
nonattainment areas in Texas (‘‘the
TCEQ submittal’’). These two areas are
the HGB and the Dallas-Fort Worth
(DFW) areas. The TCEQ submittal also
establishes MVEBs for the year 2020 and
includes contingency measures for each
of the HGB and DFW areas, should the
areas fail to make reasonable further
progress, or to attain the NAAQS by the
applicable attainment date. The portion
of the TCEQ submittal that refers to the
DFW area will be addressed in a
separate rulemaking action.1
Our September 29, 2020 proposal
provided a detailed description of the
revisions and the rationale for EPA’s
proposed actions, together with a
discussion of the opportunity to
comment. The public comment period
for these actions closed on October 29,
2020. We did not receive comments
regarding our proposal. Therefore, with
one exception, we are finalizing our
action as proposed.
On January 29, 2021, the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit (‘‘D.C. Circuit’’) issued a
decision in response to challenges to
EPA’s 2015 and 2018 rules
implementing the NAAQS for ozone,
(80 FR 12264 (March 6, 2015) and 83 FR
62998 (December 6, 2018)). Sierra Club,
et al. v. EPA, 985 F.3d 1055 (D.C. Cir.
2021). Among the rulings in this
decision, the D.C. Circuit vacated EPA’s
interpretation of the CAA to allow states
to rely on already implemented control
measures to meet the statutory
requirements of section 172(c)(9) or
182(c)(9) for contingency measures in
nonattainment plans for the ozone
NAAQS (see 83 FR 62998, 63026–27).
The EPA is reexamining the
contingency measures portion of the
TCEQ submission for the HGB area in
light of the D.C. Circuit decision.
Therefore, we are not taking final action
at this time on the contingency
1 Our proposal to approve the RFP plan for the
DFW area was published on October 9, 2020 (85 FR
64084). We have not issued a final rule for the DFW
area.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
24717
measures submitted as part of the May
13, 2020, TCEQ SIP submission for the
HGB area included in the proposed
action. EPA expects to address the
contingency measures in a separate
future action.
II. Final Action
We are approving revisions to the
Texas SIP that address the RFP
requirements for the HGB serious ozone
nonattainment area for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS. Specifically, we are approving
the RFP demonstration and associated
MVEBs, and the revised 2011 base year
EI for the HGB area.
We are also notifying the public that
EPA finds the newly established MVEBs
for Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) and Volatile
Organic Compounds (VOC) for the HGB
area adequate for the purpose of
transportation conformity. Within 24
months from this final rule, the
transportation partners will need to
demonstrate conformity to the new NOX
and VOC MVEBs pursuant to 40 CFR
93.104(e)(3).
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
E:\FR\FM\10MYR1.SGM
10MYR1
24718
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 88 / Monday, May 10, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by July 9, 2021.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
reference, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: April 30, 2021.
David Gray,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Environmental Protection
Agency amends 40 CFR part 52 as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart SS—Texas
2. In § 52.2270(e), the table titled
‘‘EPA Approved Nonregulatory
Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory
Measures in the Texas SIP’’ is amended
by adding the entry ‘‘Reasonable Further
Progress Plan (RFP), RFP Motor Vehicle
Emission Budgets for 2020, and Revised
2011 Base Year Emissions Inventory’’ at
the end of the table to read as follows:
■
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
§ 52.2270
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
EPA APPROVED NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES IN THE TEXAS SIP
Name of SIP provision
Applicable geographic or non-attainment
area
*
*
Reasonable Further Progress Plan (RFP),
RFP Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets
for 2020, and Revised 2011 Base Year
Emissions Inventory.
*
*
Brazoria, Chambers, Fort Bend, Galveston, Harris, Liberty, Montgomery,
and Waller Counties, TX.
*
*
*
*
*
ACTION:
State
submittal/
effective
date
*
3/4/2020
Final rule.
[FR Doc. 2021–09626 Filed 5–7–21; 8:45 am]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2020–0650; FRL–10022–
48–Region 10]
Air Plan Approval; Washington;
Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 May 07, 2021
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a revision to
the Washington State Implementation
Plan (SIP) that was submitted by the
Department of Ecology (Ecology) in
coordination with the Spokane Regional
Clean Air Agency (SRCAA). This
revision updates the SIP with local
SRCAA regulations that apply in lieu of,
or in supplement to, Ecology’s statewide
general air quality regulations for
SRCAA’s jurisdiction. We are also
approving SRCAA’s adoption by
reference of certain Ecology general air
quality regulations, which do not have
SUMMARY:
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
EPA
approval
date
*
5/10/2021 [Insert
Federal Register
citation].
Comments
*
local agency replacement corollaries, to
apply in SRCAA’s jurisdiction.
DATES: This final rule is effective June
9, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R10–OAR–2020–0650. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
E:\FR\FM\10MYR1.SGM
10MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 88 (Monday, May 10, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24717-24718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-09626]
[[Page 24717]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R06-OAR-2020-0300; FRL-10019-45-Region 6]
Air Plan Approval; Texas; Reasonable Further Progress Plan for
the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria Ozone Nonattainment Area
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act), the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving revisions to the
Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP) to meet the Reasonable Further
Progress (RFP) requirements for the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria (HGB)
serious ozone nonattainment area for the 2008 ozone National Ambient
Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). Specifically, EPA is approving the RFP
demonstration and associated Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets (MVEBs),
and a revised 2011 base year emissions inventory (EI) for the HGB area.
EPA is also notifying the public of the status of EPA's adequacy
determination for the MVEBs for the HGB area. EPA is not finalizing the
proposed approval of revisions to the SIP to address contingency
measure requirements in the HGB area for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS at this
time.
DATES: This rule is effective on June 9, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R06-OAR-2020-0300. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet. Publicly available docket
materials are available electronically through https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carrie Paige, EPA Region 6 Office,
Infrastructure & Ozone Section, 214-665-6521, [email protected]. Out
of an abundance of caution for members of the public and our staff, the
EPA Region 6 office may be closed to the public to reduce the risk of
transmitting COVID-19. Please call or email the contact listed above if
you need alternative access to material indexed but not provided in the
docket.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' means the EPA.
I. Background
The background for this action is discussed in detail in our
September 29, 2020 proposal (85 FR 60928). In that action we proposed
to approve only the HGB portion of the May 13, 2020, Texas SIP
submittal that addressed RFP requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS for the two serious ozone nonattainment areas in Texas (``the
TCEQ submittal''). These two areas are the HGB and the Dallas-Fort
Worth (DFW) areas. The TCEQ submittal also establishes MVEBs for the
year 2020 and includes contingency measures for each of the HGB and DFW
areas, should the areas fail to make reasonable further progress, or to
attain the NAAQS by the applicable attainment date. The portion of the
TCEQ submittal that refers to the DFW area will be addressed in a
separate rulemaking action.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Our proposal to approve the RFP plan for the DFW area was
published on October 9, 2020 (85 FR 64084). We have not issued a
final rule for the DFW area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our September 29, 2020 proposal provided a detailed description of
the revisions and the rationale for EPA's proposed actions, together
with a discussion of the opportunity to comment. The public comment
period for these actions closed on October 29, 2020. We did not receive
comments regarding our proposal. Therefore, with one exception, we are
finalizing our action as proposed.
On January 29, 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit (``D.C. Circuit'') issued a decision in response to
challenges to EPA's 2015 and 2018 rules implementing the NAAQS for
ozone, (80 FR 12264 (March 6, 2015) and 83 FR 62998 (December 6,
2018)). Sierra Club, et al. v. EPA, 985 F.3d 1055 (D.C. Cir. 2021).
Among the rulings in this decision, the D.C. Circuit vacated EPA's
interpretation of the CAA to allow states to rely on already
implemented control measures to meet the statutory requirements of
section 172(c)(9) or 182(c)(9) for contingency measures in
nonattainment plans for the ozone NAAQS (see 83 FR 62998, 63026-27).
The EPA is reexamining the contingency measures portion of the TCEQ
submission for the HGB area in light of the D.C. Circuit decision.
Therefore, we are not taking final action at this time on the
contingency measures submitted as part of the May 13, 2020, TCEQ SIP
submission for the HGB area included in the proposed action. EPA
expects to address the contingency measures in a separate future
action.
II. Final Action
We are approving revisions to the Texas SIP that address the RFP
requirements for the HGB serious ozone nonattainment area for the 2008
ozone NAAQS. Specifically, we are approving the RFP demonstration and
associated MVEBs, and the revised 2011 base year EI for the HGB area.
We are also notifying the public that EPA finds the newly
established MVEBs for Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) and Volatile
Organic Compounds (VOC) for the HGB area adequate for the purpose of
transportation conformity. Within 24 months from this final rule, the
transportation partners will need to demonstrate conformity to the new
NOX and VOC MVEBs pursuant to 40 CFR 93.104(e)(3).
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive
[[Page 24718]]
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 9, 2021. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: April 30, 2021.
David Gray,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental
Protection Agency amends 40 CFR part 52 as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart SS--Texas
0
2. In Sec. 52.2270(e), the table titled ``EPA Approved Nonregulatory
Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures in the Texas SIP'' is amended
by adding the entry ``Reasonable Further Progress Plan (RFP), RFP Motor
Vehicle Emission Budgets for 2020, and Revised 2011 Base Year Emissions
Inventory'' at the end of the table to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2270 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
EPA Approved Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures in the Texas SIP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable geographic State
Name of SIP provision or non-attainment submittal/ EPA approval date Comments
area effective date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Reasonable Further Progress Plan Brazoria, Chambers, 3/4/2020 5/10/2021 [Insert
(RFP), RFP Motor Vehicle Emission Fort Bend, Federal Register
Budgets for 2020, and Revised Galveston, Harris, citation].
2011 Base Year Emissions Liberty, Montgomery,
Inventory. and Waller Counties,
TX.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-09626 Filed 5-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P