Special Local Regulation; Clinch River, Oak Ridge, TN, 24492-24494 [2021-09725]
Download as PDF
24492
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 87 / Friday, May 7, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform
This regulation meets the applicable
standards set forth in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of E.O. 12988 to eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize
litigation, provide a clear legal standard
for affected conduct, and promote
simplification and burden reduction.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
This rulemaking does not have
federalism implications warranting the
application of E.O. 13132. The rule does
not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Executive Order 13175, Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications warranting the application
of E.O. 13175. It does not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal government and Indian tribes.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601–612) applies to rules that
are subject to notice and comment
under section 553(b) of the APA. As
noted in the above discussion regarding
the applicability of the APA, DEA is not
required to publish a general notice of
proposed rulemaking. Consequently, the
RFA does not apply to this interim final
rule.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
In accordance with the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) of 1995,
2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq., DEA has
determined that this action would not
result in any Federal mandate that may
result ‘‘in the expenditure by State,
local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100,000,000 or more (adjusted
annually for inflation) in any 1 year.’’
Therefore, neither a Small Government
Agency Plan nor any other action is
required under UMRA of 1995.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This action does not impose a new
collection of information requirement
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995. 44 U.S.C. 3501–3521. This action
would not impose recordkeeping or
reporting requirements on State or local
governments, individuals, businesses, or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 May 06, 2021
Jkt 253001
organizations. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Congressional Review Act
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by the Congressional Review
Act (CRA), 5 U.S.C. 804. However,
pursuant to the CRA, DEA is submitting
a copy of this interim final rule to both
Houses of Congress and to the
Comptroller General.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308
Administrative practice and
procedure, Drug traffic control,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set out above, DEA
amends 21 CFR part 1308 as follows:
PART 1308—SCHEDULES OF
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
1. The authority citation for part 1308
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b),
956(b) unless otherwise noted.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
2. In § 1308.14:
a. Redesignate paragraphs (f)(11)
through (13) as (f)(12) through (14); and
■ b. Add new paragraph (f)(11).
The addition reads as follows:
■
■
§ 1308.14
*
Schedule IV.
*
*
(f) * * *
*
*
(11) Serdexmethylphenidate .........
*
*
*
*
1729
*
D. Christopher Evans,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2021–09738 Filed 5–6–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG–2021–0215]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulation; Clinch River,
Oak Ridge, TN
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard establishes a
temporary special local regulation for all
navigable waters on the Clinch River
from mile marker (MM) 48.5 to MM 52.0
during the U.S. Rowing Southeast Youth
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Championship. This special local
regulation prohibits non-participant
persons and vessels from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the race area and
prohibits vessels from transiting at
speeds that cause wake within the
spectator area unless authorized by
Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley
or a designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 6 a.m.
until 6 p.m. from May 8, 2021, to May
9, 2021.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2021–
0215 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Petty Officer First Class Nicholas
Jones, Marine Safety Detachment
Nashville, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
615–736–5421, email Nicholas.J.Jones@
uscg.mil.
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is
impracticable. We must establish this
temporary safety zone by May 8, 2021
and lack sufficient time to provide a
reasonable comment period and then
consider those comments before issuing
the rule.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be contrary to the public
E:\FR\FM\07MYR1.SGM
07MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 87 / Friday, May 7, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
interest of ensuring the safety of
spectators and vessels during the event
and immediate action is necessary to
prevent possible loss of life and
property.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034
(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The
Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley
(COTP) has determined that potential
hazards associated with the US Rowing
Southeast Youth Championship marine
event will be a safety concern, and is
establishing a special local regulation
from Mile Marker (MM) 48.5 to 52.0 on
the Clinch River. This rule is needed to
protect personnel and vessels on the
navigable waters during the marine
event.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a special local
regulation from 6 a.m. until 6 p.m. from
May 8, 2021, to May 9, 2021. The
special local regulation will cover all
navigable waters between MM 48.5 to
MM 52.0 on the Clinch River. The
duration of the zone is intended to
ensure spectators and vessels’ safety on
these navigable waters for the duration
of the event. All non-participants are
prohibited from entering, transiting
through, anchoring in, or remaining
within the regulated area described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Sector Ohio Valley or their designated
representative. To seek permission to
enter, contact the COTP or the COTP’s
representative by Sector Ohio Valley
Command Center at 502–779–5422.
Those in the regulated area must
comply with all lawful orders or
directions given to them by the COTP or
the designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
this rule has not been reviewed by the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 May 06, 2021
Jkt 253001
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-day of the special local
regulation. This special local regulation
restricts transit on a two and a half mile
segment of the Clinch River for twelve
hours on two days. Moreover, the Coast
Guard would issue Broadcast Notices to
Mariners (BNMs), Local Notices to
Mariners (LNMs), and Marine Safety
Information Bulletins (MSIBs) about this
special local regulation so that
waterway users may plan accordingly
for this short restriction on transit, and
the rule would allow vessels to request
permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the special
local regulation may be small entities,
for the reasons stated in section V.A
above, this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
24493
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01 and Environmental
Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
E:\FR\FM\07MYR1.SGM
07MYR1
24494
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 87 / Friday, May 7, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a
special local regulation lasting twelve
hours that will prohibit entry from MM
48.5 to 52.0 on the Clinch River. It is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L61 in Table 3–
1 of U.S. Coast Guard Environmental
Planning Implementing Procedures
5090.1. A Memorandum for Record
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
(c) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m.
from May 8, 2021 to May 9, 2021.
(d) Information broadcast. The COTP
will issue Broadcast Notices to Mariners
(BNMs), Local Notices to Mariners
(LNMs), and Marine Safety Information
Bulletins (MSIBs) about this special
local regulation so that waterway users
may plan accordingly for this short
restriction on transit, and the rule
would allow vessels to request
permission to enter the zone.
G. Protest Activities
Dated: May 4, 2021.
A.M. Beach,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector Ohio Valley.
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
[FR Doc. 2021–09725 Filed 5–6–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
38 CFR Part 17
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
RIN 2900–AP64
Adopting Standards for Laboratory
Requirements
ACTION:
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70041; 33 CFR 1.05–
1.
2. Add § 100.T08–0215 to read as
follows:
■
§ 100.T08–0215 Oak Ridge, TN. Clinch
River mile 48.5 to 52.0.
(a) Location. The regulations in this
section apply to the following area: All
navigable waters of the Clinch River
from mile 48.5 to mile 52.0, extending
the entire width of the river.
(b) Regulations. (1) All nonparticipants are prohibited from
entering, transiting through, anchoring
in, or remaining within the regulated
area described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port Sector Ohio Valley or a
designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter,
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
representative by Sector Ohio Valley
Command Center at 502–779–5422.
Those in the regulated area must
comply with all lawful orders or
directions given to them by the COTP or
the designated representative.
16:08 May 06, 2021
Jkt 253001
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) adopts as final, with
changes, a proposed rule amending its
medical regulations to establish
standards for VA clinical laboratories.
The Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS) has established
standards for the staffing, management,
procedures, and oversight of clinical
laboratories that perform testing used
for the diagnosis, prevention, or
treatment of any disease or impairment
of, or the assessment of the health of,
human beings. VA is required, in
consultation with HHS, to establish
standards equal to those applicable to
other clinical laboratories. As a matter
of policy and practice VA has applied
HHS standards to its VA laboratory
operations, and this rule formalizes this
practice. In response to public
comments this final rulemaking amends
proposed language to more accurately
reflect VA’s utilization of CMS-deemed
accreditation organizations in the
process of inspection, oversight, and
operational approval of VA clinical
laboratories.
DATES: This final rule is effective June
7, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Quynh Vantu, Health Science
Specialist, Pathology and Laboratory
Service (1011DIAG2), Office of Clinical
Care Services, Veterans Health
SUMMARY:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
For the reasons discussed in this
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 100 as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Ave NW,
Washington, DC 20420, (202) 632–8418.
(This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
document published in the Federal
Register on October 17, 2018, VA
proposed to amend its medical
regulations to establish standards for VA
clinical laboratories. 83 FR 52345. We
provided a 60-day comment period,
which ended on December 17, 2018,
and we received four comments.
The Clinical Laboratory Improvement
Amendments of 1988 (Public Law (Pub.
L.) 100–578) amended section 353 of the
Public Health Service Act to establish
legal requirements for the staffing,
management, procedures, reporting of
results and oversight of clinical
laboratories that perform testing used
for the diagnosis, prevention, or
treatment of any disease or impairment
of, or assessment of the health of,
human beings. These statutory
requirements are codified at 42 U.S.C.
263a. The Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services (CMS), within HHS,
has primary responsibility for the
administration of the Clinical
Laboratory Improvement Amendments
(CLIA) program and implementing
regulations for CLIA at 42 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part 493.
Section 101 of Pub. L. 102–139
(enacted October 28, 1991), required
VA, within a specified time-frame and
in consultation with HHS, to ‘‘establish
standards [by regulation] equal to that
[sic] applicable to other medical facility
laboratories in accordance with the
requirements of section 353(f) of the
Public Health Service Act.’’ VA’s
regulations must ‘‘include appropriate
provisions respecting compliance with
such requirements [set forth in section
353(f) of the Public Health Service Act]’’
and may include appropriate provisions
respecting waivers and accreditations as
described in section 353(d) and 353(e),
respectively, of the Public Health
Service Act. This final rule complies
with the requirement for rulemaking by
amending VA’s medical regulations to
reference the portions of 42 CFR part
493 adopted by VA as they apply to VA
medical facility laboratories and clinics,
and to clarify that these standards are
subject to VA oversight and enforcement
by VA only. In addition, this final rule
allows VA laboratories to be accredited
by an accreditation organization granted
deeming authority by CMS under the
CLIA program, in accordance with the
accreditation requirements in the CLIA
regulations at subpart E of 42 CFR part
493, and participate in an HHS
approved proficiency testing program.
E:\FR\FM\07MYR1.SGM
07MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 87 (Friday, May 7, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24492-24494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-09725]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG-2021-0215]
RIN 1625-AA08
Special Local Regulation; Clinch River, Oak Ridge, TN
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard establishes a temporary special local
regulation for all navigable waters on the Clinch River from mile
marker (MM) 48.5 to MM 52.0 during the U.S. Rowing Southeast Youth
Championship. This special local regulation prohibits non-participant
persons and vessels from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the race area and prohibits vessels from transiting at
speeds that cause wake within the spectator area unless authorized by
Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley or a designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 6 a.m. until 6 p.m. from May 8,
2021, to May 9, 2021.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2021-0215 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Petty Officer First Class Nicholas Jones, Marine Safety
Detachment Nashville, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 615-736-5421, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is impracticable. We must
establish this temporary safety zone by May 8, 2021 and lack sufficient
time to provide a reasonable comment period and then consider those
comments before issuing the rule.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be contrary to the public
[[Page 24493]]
interest of ensuring the safety of spectators and vessels during the
event and immediate action is necessary to prevent possible loss of
life and property.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain of the Port Sector Ohio
Valley (COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with the
US Rowing Southeast Youth Championship marine event will be a safety
concern, and is establishing a special local regulation from Mile
Marker (MM) 48.5 to 52.0 on the Clinch River. This rule is needed to
protect personnel and vessels on the navigable waters during the marine
event.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a special local regulation from 6 a.m. until
6 p.m. from May 8, 2021, to May 9, 2021. The special local regulation
will cover all navigable waters between MM 48.5 to MM 52.0 on the
Clinch River. The duration of the zone is intended to ensure spectators
and vessels' safety on these navigable waters for the duration of the
event. All non-participants are prohibited from entering, transiting
through, anchoring in, or remaining within the regulated area described
in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port Sector Ohio Valley or their designated representative. To seek
permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's representative by
Sector Ohio Valley Command Center at 502-779-5422. Those in the
regulated area must comply with all lawful orders or directions given
to them by the COTP or the designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this
rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the special local regulation.
This special local regulation restricts transit on a two and a half
mile segment of the Clinch River for twelve hours on two days.
Moreover, the Coast Guard would issue Broadcast Notices to Mariners
(BNMs), Local Notices to Mariners (LNMs), and Marine Safety Information
Bulletins (MSIBs) about this special local regulation so that waterway
users may plan accordingly for this short restriction on transit, and
the rule would allow vessels to request permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
special local regulation may be small entities, for the reasons stated
in section V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01 and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
[[Page 24494]]
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
special local regulation lasting twelve hours that will prohibit entry
from MM 48.5 to 52.0 on the Clinch River. It is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph L61 in Table 3-1 of U.S. Coast
Guard Environmental Planning Implementing Procedures 5090.1. A
Memorandum for Record supporting this determination is available in the
docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in this preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70041; 33 CFR 1.05-1.
0
2. Add Sec. 100.T08-0215 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.T08-0215 Oak Ridge, TN. Clinch River mile 48.5 to 52.0.
(a) Location. The regulations in this section apply to the
following area: All navigable waters of the Clinch River from mile 48.5
to mile 52.0, extending the entire width of the river.
(b) Regulations. (1) All non-participants are prohibited from
entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the
regulated area described in paragraph (a) of this section unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley or a
designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's
representative by Sector Ohio Valley Command Center at 502-779-5422.
Those in the regulated area must comply with all lawful orders or
directions given to them by the COTP or the designated representative.
(c) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 6 a.m.
to 6 p.m. from May 8, 2021 to May 9, 2021.
(d) Information broadcast. The COTP will issue Broadcast Notices to
Mariners (BNMs), Local Notices to Mariners (LNMs), and Marine Safety
Information Bulletins (MSIBs) about this special local regulation so
that waterway users may plan accordingly for this short restriction on
transit, and the rule would allow vessels to request permission to
enter the zone.
Dated: May 4, 2021.
A.M. Beach,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley.
[FR Doc. 2021-09725 Filed 5-6-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P