Air Plan Approval; WA; Regional Haze Best Available Retrofit Technology Revision for TransAlta Centralia Generation Plant, 24502-24503 [2021-09383]
Download as PDF
24502
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 87 / Friday, May 7, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R10–OAR–2020–0732; FRL–10022–
93–Region 10]
Air Plan Approval; WA; Regional Haze
Best Available Retrofit Technology
Revision for TransAlta Centralia
Generation Plant
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a sourcespecific State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the Washington
State Department of Ecology (Ecology)
on December 18, 2020. The SIP revision
makes changes to nitrogen oxide control
requirements for the TransAlta Centralia
Generation Plant (TransAlta). These
requirements were established in an
order issued to TransAlta by the State to
satisfy the Clean Air Act Best Available
Retrofit Technology Requirements
(BART) put in place by Congress to
reduce regional haze and restore
visibility in national parks and
wilderness areas. The changes
submitted by the State improve the
operation of pollution control
equipment at TransAlta while
continuing to meet BART requirements.
DATES: This final rule is effective June
7, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R10–OAR–2020–0732. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available at https://www.regulations.
gov, or please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section for additional
availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff
Hunt, EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth
Avenue—Suite 155, Seattle, WA 98101,
at (206) 553–0256, or hunt.jeff@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, it means
the EPA.
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 May 06, 2021
Jkt 253001
I. Background
On March 8, 2021, we proposed to
approve the source-specific SIP revision
submitted by Ecology for the TransAlta
Centralia Generation Plant (86 FR
13256). The reasons for our proposed
approval were stated in the proposed
rulemaking and will not be re-stated
here. The public comment period for
our proposed action ended on April 7,
2021. We received no comments.
Therefore, we are finalizing our action
as proposed.
II. Final Action
The EPA is approving, and
incorporating by reference into the
Washington SIP, BART Order 6426 for
the TransAlta Centralia Generation
Plant, state effective July 29, 2020.1 The
EPA is also removing from
incorporation by reference the previous
BART Order 6426 for the TransAlta
Centralia Generation Plant, State
effective December 13, 2011.2 The EPA
has determined that the changes
improve the operation of pollution
controls at the plant and are consistent
with regional haze and other Clean Air
Act (CAA) requirements.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, we are finalizing the changes to
the incorporation by reference as
described in section II of this preamble.
The EPA has made, and will continue
to make, these materials generally
available through https://
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 10 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
Therefore, these materials have been
approved by the EPA for inclusion in
the SIP, have been incorporated by
reference by the EPA into that plan, are
fully federally-enforceable under
sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of
the effective date of the final rule of the
EPA’s approval, and will be
incorporated by reference in the next
update to the SIP compilation.3
1 In the Matter of an Administrative Order
Against, TransAlta Centralia Generation LLC,
Second Revision: Order No. 6426, except the
undesignated introductory text, the section titled
‘‘Findings,’’ and the undesignated text following
condition 9, State effective July 29, 2020.
2 In the Matter of an Administrative Order
Against, TransAlta Centralia Generation LLC, First
Revision: Order No. 6426, except the undesignated
introductory text, the section titled ‘‘Findings,’’ and
the undesignated text following condition 13, State
effective December 13, 2011.
3 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Review
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
it does not address technical standards;
and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land in
Washington except as specifically noted
below and is also not approved to apply
in any other area where the EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
E:\FR\FM\07MYR1.SGM
07MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 87 / Friday, May 7, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Washington’s SIP is approved to apply
on non-trust land within the exterior
boundaries of the Puyallup Indian
Reservation, also known as the 1873
Survey Area. Under the Puyallup Tribe
of Indians Settlement Act of 1989, 25
U.S.C. 1773, Congress explicitly
provided state and local agencies in
Washington authority over activities on
non-trust lands within the 1873 Survey
Area. Consistent with EPA policy, the
EPA provided a consultation
opportunity to the Puyallup Tribe, and
other tribes located in Washington, in a
letter dated September 4, 2020.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by July 6, 2021. Filing a petition
for reconsideration by the Administrator
of this final rule does not affect the
finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the
time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
24503
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: April 28, 2021.
Michelle L. Pirzadeh,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart WW—Washington
2. In § 52.2470, amend the table in
paragraph (d) by:
■ a. Removing the entry ‘‘TransAlta
Centralia BART’’; and
■ b. Adding the entry ‘‘TransAlta
Centralia BART—Second Revision’’ to
the end of the table.
The addition reads as follows:
■
§ 52.2470
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(d) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED STATE OF WASHINGTON SOURCE-SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS 1
Order/permit
No.
Name of source
*
TransAlta Centralia
BART—Second Revision.
State effective
date
*
*
7/29/2020
#6426
EPA approval date
*
5/7/2021, [Insert Federal
Register citation].
Explanations
*
*
*
Except the undesignated introductory text, the section titled ‘‘Findings,’’ and the undesignated text
following condition 9.
1 The EPA does not have the authority to remove these source-specific requirements in the absence of a demonstration that their removal
would not interfere with attainment or maintenance of the NAAQS, violate any prevention of significant deterioration increment or result in visibility impairment. Washington Department of Ecology may request removal by submitting such a demonstration to the EPA as a SIP revision.
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2021–0136; FRL–10023–
01–Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of
Volatile Organic Compound Emissions
From Wood Furniture Manufacturing
Operations
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Final rule.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:08 May 06, 2021
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve a State Implementation Plan
(SIP) revision submitted by the State of
Missouri on February 15, 2019. This
final action will amend the SIP to revise
a Missouri regulation which restricts the
emissions of volatile organic
compounds from wood furniture
manufacturing operations in St. Louis
City and Jefferson, St. Charles, Franklin,
and St. Louis Counties. These revisions
do not have an adverse effect on air
quality. The EPA’s approval of this rule
revision is being done in accordance
with the requirements of the Clean Air
Act (CAA).
DATES: This final rule is effective on
June 7, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
SUMMARY:
[FR Doc. 2021–09383 Filed 5–6–21; 8:45 am]
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
No. EPA–R07–OAR–2021–0136. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Stone, Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 7 Office, Air
E:\FR\FM\07MYR1.SGM
07MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 87 (Friday, May 7, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24502-24503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-09383]
[[Page 24502]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R10-OAR-2020-0732; FRL-10022-93-Region 10]
Air Plan Approval; WA; Regional Haze Best Available Retrofit
Technology Revision for TransAlta Centralia Generation Plant
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a
source-specific State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by
the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) on December 18,
2020. The SIP revision makes changes to nitrogen oxide control
requirements for the TransAlta Centralia Generation Plant (TransAlta).
These requirements were established in an order issued to TransAlta by
the State to satisfy the Clean Air Act Best Available Retrofit
Technology Requirements (BART) put in place by Congress to reduce
regional haze and restore visibility in national parks and wilderness
areas. The changes submitted by the State improve the operation of
pollution control equipment at TransAlta while continuing to meet BART
requirements.
DATES: This final rule is effective June 7, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R10-OAR-2020-0732. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information or other information the disclosure
of which is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available at https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Hunt, EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth
Avenue--Suite 155, Seattle, WA 98101, at (206) 553-0256, or
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, it means the EPA.
I. Background
On March 8, 2021, we proposed to approve the source-specific SIP
revision submitted by Ecology for the TransAlta Centralia Generation
Plant (86 FR 13256). The reasons for our proposed approval were stated
in the proposed rulemaking and will not be re-stated here. The public
comment period for our proposed action ended on April 7, 2021. We
received no comments. Therefore, we are finalizing our action as
proposed.
II. Final Action
The EPA is approving, and incorporating by reference into the
Washington SIP, BART Order 6426 for the TransAlta Centralia Generation
Plant, state effective July 29, 2020.\1\ The EPA is also removing from
incorporation by reference the previous BART Order 6426 for the
TransAlta Centralia Generation Plant, State effective December 13,
2011.\2\ The EPA has determined that the changes improve the operation
of pollution controls at the plant and are consistent with regional
haze and other Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In the Matter of an Administrative Order Against, TransAlta
Centralia Generation LLC, Second Revision: Order No. 6426, except
the undesignated introductory text, the section titled ``Findings,''
and the undesignated text following condition 9, State effective
July 29, 2020.
\2\ In the Matter of an Administrative Order Against, TransAlta
Centralia Generation LLC, First Revision: Order No. 6426, except the
undesignated introductory text, the section titled ``Findings,'' and
the undesignated text following condition 13, State effective
December 13, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, we are finalizing the changes to the incorporation by reference
as described in section II of this preamble. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials generally available through https://www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 10 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information). Therefore, these materials have
been approved by the EPA for inclusion in the SIP, have been
incorporated by reference by the EPA into that plan, are fully
federally-enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the
effective date of the final rule of the EPA's approval, and will be
incorporated by reference in the next update to the SIP compilation.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Review
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because it does not address technical standards; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land in
Washington except as specifically noted below and is also not approved
to apply in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have
[[Page 24503]]
tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on
tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Washington's SIP is
approved to apply on non-trust land within the exterior boundaries of
the Puyallup Indian Reservation, also known as the 1873 Survey Area.
Under the Puyallup Tribe of Indians Settlement Act of 1989, 25 U.S.C.
1773, Congress explicitly provided state and local agencies in
Washington authority over activities on non-trust lands within the 1873
Survey Area. Consistent with EPA policy, the EPA provided a
consultation opportunity to the Puyallup Tribe, and other tribes
located in Washington, in a letter dated September 4, 2020.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by July 6, 2021. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: April 28, 2021.
Michelle L. Pirzadeh,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart WW--Washington
0
2. In Sec. 52.2470, amend the table in paragraph (d) by:
0
a. Removing the entry ``TransAlta Centralia BART''; and
0
b. Adding the entry ``TransAlta Centralia BART--Second Revision'' to
the end of the table.
The addition reads as follows:
Sec. 52.2470 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
EPA-Approved State of Washington Source-Specific Requirements \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order/permit State
Name of source No. effective date EPA approval date Explanations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
TransAlta Centralia BART--Second #6426 7/29/2020 5/7/2021, [Insert Except the undesignated
Revision. Federal Register introductory text, the
citation]. section titled
``Findings,'' and the
undesignated text
following condition 9.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The EPA does not have the authority to remove these source-specific requirements in the absence of a
demonstration that their removal would not interfere with attainment or maintenance of the NAAQS, violate any
prevention of significant deterioration increment or result in visibility impairment. Washington Department of
Ecology may request removal by submitting such a demonstration to the EPA as a SIP revision.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-09383 Filed 5-6-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P