Certain Steel Nails From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of No Shipments and Final Partial Rescission, 2014-2015; Correction, 23932-23933 [2021-09498]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
23932
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 5, 2021 / Notices
notice,8 Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to CBP no
earlier than 35 days after the date of
publication of the final results of this
review in the Federal Register. If a
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
time for parties to file a request for a
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following deposit requirements
for estimated antidumping duties will
be effective upon publication of the
notice of these final results of review for
all shipments of flanges from Spain
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the date of
publication as provided by section
751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit
rate for ULMA, Grupo Cunado,
Tubacero, S.L., Ateaciones De Metales
Sinterizados S.A., Transglory S.A.,
Central Y Almacenes, Friedrich
Geldbach Gmbh, and Farina Group
Spain will be 1.41 percent; (2) for
merchandise exported by producers or
exporters not covered in this review but
covered in a prior segment of the
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recent period; (3)
if the exporter is not a firm covered in
this review, a prior review, or the
original investigation, but the producer
is, then the cash deposit rate will be the
rate established for the most recent
period for the producer of the
merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate
for all other producers or exporters will
continue to be 18.81 percent,9 the allothers rate established in the less-thanfair-value investigation. These cash
deposit requirements shall remain in
effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this POR. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in
Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
8 See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue
Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in
Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January
15, 2021).
9 See Order, 82 FR 27229.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:06 May 04, 2021
Jkt 253001
Notification to Interested Parties
Regarding Administrative Protective
Order
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the terms of an APO is
a sanctionable violation.
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213(h).
Dated: April 28, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Freight Revenue Capping
Comment 2: Marine Insurance
Comment 3: Certain Offset to G&A
Expenses
V. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2021–09413 Filed 5–4–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–909]
Certain Steel Nails From the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review, Final Determination of No
Shipments and Final Partial
Rescission, 2014–2015; Correction
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; correction.
AGENCY:
The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) published a notice in the
Federal Register of March 20, 2017 in
which Commerce announced the final
results of the 2014–2015 administrative
review of the antidumping duty (AD)
order on certain steel nails (nails) from
the People’s Republic of China (China).
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
This notice contained incorrect
information regarding the companies:
For which Commerce rescinded the
administrative review; for which
Commerce made a final no shipments
determination; and that Commerce
assigned to the China-wide entity.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Benito Ballesteros, AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–7425.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Correction
In the Federal Register of March 20,
2017, in FR Doc. 2017–05429, on page
14345, correct the first and second
paragraph of the ‘‘Final Partial
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review’’ section to read:
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1),
Commerce will rescind an administrative
review, in whole or in part, if a party who
requested the review withdraws the request
within 90 days of the date of publication of
notice of initiation. Mid Continent Steel &
Wire, Inc. (the petitioner) withdrew its
request for an administrative review on:
Besco Machinery Industry (Zhejiang) Co.,
Ltd.; Cana (Tianjin) Hardware Industrial Co.,
Ltd.; Certified Products International Inc.;
Chiieh Yung Metal Industrial Corporation;
China Staple Enterprise (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.;
Huanghua Jinhai Hardware Products Co. Ltd;
Huanghua Xiong Hua Hardware Product Co.,
Ltd.; Huanghua Yufutai Hardware Products
Limited; Jining Huarong Hardware Products;
Liaocheng Minghui Hardware Products Co.,
Ltd.; Nanjing Yuechang Hardware Co., Ltd.;
PT Enterprise Inc.; Shandong Oriental Cherry
Hardware Group; Shandong Oriental Cherry
Hardware Import & Export Co., Ltd.;
Shandong Qingyun Hongyi Hardware
Products Co., Ltd.; Shanghai Yueda
Fasterners Co., Ltd.; Shanxi Tianli Enterprise
Co., Ltd.; Shanxi Yuci Broad Wire Products
Co., Ltd.; Smart (Tianjin) Technology
Development Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Hongli
Qiangsheng Import and Export Co., Ltd.;
Tianjin Juxiang Metal Products Co.; Tianjin
Lianda Group Ltd.1 Tianjin Zhonglian Metals
Ware Co., Ltd.; and Xi’an Metals & Minerals
Import & Export Co., Ltd. No other party
requested a review of these companies.2
1 We note that ‘‘Tianjin Lianda Group Co. Ltd.’’
is subject to this review and is part of the Chinawide entity.
2 The petitioner withdrew its request for: Hebei
Cangzhou New Century Foreign Trade Co. Ltd;
Nanjing Caiqing Hardware Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Jinghai
County Hongli Industry & Business Co., Ltd.; and
Tianjin Universal Machinery Import & Export Corp.
However, these companies also self-requested a
review. Therefore, we have not rescinded this
review with respect to these four companies. The
petitioner also withdrew its request for Mingguang
Abundant Hardware Products Co., Ltd. However, in
the Preliminary Results, we found Mingguang
Abundant Hardware Products Co., Ltd. to be the
same company as Mingguang Ruifeng Hardware
E:\FR\FM\05MYN1.SGM
05MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 85 / Wednesday, May 5, 2021 / Notices
Accordingly, we are rescinding this
review, in part, with respect to the
companies identified above, pursuant to
19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).
In the Federal Register of March 20,
2017, in FR Doc 2017–05429, on page
14345, correct the first paragraph of the
‘‘Final Determination of No Shipments’’
section to read:
In the Preliminary Results, Commerce
preliminarily determined that Zhejian GemChun Hardware Accessory Co., Ltd. (Zhejian
Gem-Chun) did not have any reviewable
transactions during the POR.3 Consistent
with Commerce’s assessment practice in nonmarket economy (NME) cases, we completed
the review with respect to Zhejian GemChun. Based on the certifications submitted
by Zhejian Gem-Chun, and our analysis of
CBP information, we continue to determine
that the company did not have any
reviewable transactions during the POR. As
noted in the ‘‘Assessment Rates’’ section of
the Final Results, Commerce intends to issue
appropriate instructions to CBP for Zhejian
Gem-Chun based on the final results of this
review.
In the Federal Register of March 20,
2017, in FR Doc 2017–05429, on page
14345, after the ‘‘Final Determination of
No Shipments’’ section, add section
‘‘China-Wide Entity’’ to read:
In the Preliminary Results, we found that
14 companies, Cana (Tianjin) Hardware
Industrial Co., Ltd., China Staple Enterprise
(Tianjin) Co., Ltd., Huanghua Jinhai
Hardware Products Co. Ltd, Huanghua Xiong
Hua Hardware Product Co., Ltd., Huanghua
Yufutai Hardware Products Limited,
Liaocheng Minghui Hardware Products Co.,
Ltd., Mingguang Abundant Hardware
Products Co., Ltd., Qingdao D&L Group Co.,
Ltd., Shandong Qingyun Hongyi Hardware
Products Co., Ltd., Shanghai Yueda
Fasterners Co., Ltd., Shanxi Tianli Enterprise
Co., Ltd., Smart (Tianjin) Technology
Development Co., Ltd., Tianjin Hongli
Qiangsheng Import and Export Co., Ltd., and
Tianjin Lianda Group Ltd., for which a
review was requested had not established
eligibility for a separate rate and, thus, we
considered them to be part of the China-wide
entity.
Products Co., Ltd. because the company changed it
English name. Because Mingguang Ruifeng
Hardware Products Co., Ltd. self-requested a
review, we have not rescinded this review with
respect to the company(ies). Similarly, we find
Qingdao D&L Group, Ltd. and SDC International
Australia (PTY) Ltd. to be the same as Qingdao D&L
Group Co., Ltd. and SDC International Aust. PTY.
Ltd., respectively, which self-requested a review.
Therefore, we have not rescinded this review with
respect to Qingdao D&L Group, Ltd. and SDC
International Aust. PTY. Ltd.
3 In the Final Results, Commerce inadvertently
included Besco Machinery Industry (Zhejiang) Co.,
Ltd., Jining Huarong Hardware Products, Nanjing
Yuechang Hardware Co., Ltd., PT Enterprise Inc.,
and Shanxi Yuci Broad Wire Products Co., Ltd. in
the no shipments category. However, the petitioner
made a timely request to rescind the review on
these companies. Therefore, Commerce has
removed these companies from the no shipments
category.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:06 May 04, 2021
Jkt 253001
However, this list was incorrect.
Mingguang Abundant Hardware Products
Co., Ltd., under its new name Mingguang
Ruifeng Hardware Products Co., Ltd., and
Qingdao D&L Group Co., Ltd., under Qingdao
D&L Group Ltd., were granted separate rate
status. For the remaining companies, except
Tianjin Lianda Group Co., Ltd., Commerce
has rescinded the review, as noted above.
For the Final Results, we find that, for two
companies, Suzhou Xingya Nail Co., Ltd. and
Tianjin Lianda Group Co., Ltd., we have not
received any information since the issuance
of the Preliminary Results that provides a
basis for reconsidering this preliminary
determination. Therefore, Commerce
continues to find that Suzhou Xingya Nail
Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Lianda Group Co., Ltd.
are part of the China-wide entity.
Background
On March 20, 2017, Commerce
published in the Federal Register the
final results of the 2014–2015
administrative reviews of the AD order
on nails from China.4 This notice
contained incorrect information
regarding the companies for which
Commerce: (1) Rescinded the
administrative review; (2) made a final
no shipments determination; and (3)
assigned the entities to the China-wide
entity.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended.
Dated: April 29, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2021–09498 Filed 5–4–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and
Technology
National Advanced Spectrum and
Communications Test Network:
Characterizing User Equipment
Emissions
National Institute of Standards
and Technology, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Announcement of meeting.
AGENCY:
The National Advanced
Spectrum and Communications Test
Network (NASCTN) is hosting a public
meeting on the conclusion of their
SUMMARY:
4 See Certain Steel Nails from the People’s
Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination of
No Shipments and Final Partial Rescission; 2014–
2015, 82 FR 14344 (March 20, 2017).
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
23933
project Characterizing User Equipment
Emissions on May 13, 2021 at 10:00
a.m.–12:30 p.m. Mountain Daylight
Time. The purpose of this meeting is to
bring together federal, industry, and
academic stakeholders; to disseminate
NASCTN’s findings; and to share
information.
DATES: The NASCTN meeting on
Characterizing User Equipment
Emissions will take place on May 13,
2021 at 10:00 a.m.–12:30 p.m. Mountain
Daylight Time.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held
via web conference. For instructions on
how to participate in the meeting,
please see the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt
Briel at matthew.briel@nist.gov or 303–
908–2747.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
National Advanced Spectrum and
Communications Test Network
(NASCTN) is hosting a public meeting
on the conclusion of their project
Characterizing User Equipment
Emissions on May 13, 2021 at 10:00
a.m.–12:30 p.m. Mountain Daylight
Time. The purpose of this meeting is to
bring together federal, industry, and
academic stakeholders; to disseminate
NASCTN’s findings; and to share
information.
This project characterizes cellular
emissions (LTE uplinks) to support
interference models used to coordinate
commercial carrier deployments in the
AWS–3 band (1755–1780 MHz band)
with Department of Defense systems
that remain in the band. This effort
consisted of two parts: (1) A Factor
Screening effort which identified the
key factors impacting emissions, and (2)
characterization of factors impacting UE
uplink emissions when closed-loop
power control is enabled in the cell, and
models of the emissions over
operational scenarios. The output of this
work can aid in the development of
emissions models and interference
calculations in the AWS–3 band and
beyond.
More information about this project
can be found on our website: https://
www.nist.gov/programs-projects/
characterizing-user-equipmentemissions.
Individuals and representatives of
organizations who would like to ask
questions or offer suggestions related to
the test are invited to request a place on
the agenda. Approximately fifteen
minutes will be reserved for public
comments and speaking times will be
assigned on a first-come, first-served
basis. Public comments can be provided
via email or by web conference
E:\FR\FM\05MYN1.SGM
05MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 85 (Wednesday, May 5, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23932-23933]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-09498]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-909]
Certain Steel Nails From the People's Republic of China: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final Determination
of No Shipments and Final Partial Rescission, 2014-2015; Correction
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) published a notice in
the Federal Register of March 20, 2017 in which Commerce announced the
final results of the 2014-2015 administrative review of the antidumping
duty (AD) order on certain steel nails (nails) from the People's
Republic of China (China). This notice contained incorrect information
regarding the companies: For which Commerce rescinded the
administrative review; for which Commerce made a final no shipments
determination; and that Commerce assigned to the China-wide entity.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benito Ballesteros, AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-7425.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Correction
In the Federal Register of March 20, 2017, in FR Doc. 2017-05429,
on page 14345, correct the first and second paragraph of the ``Final
Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review'' section
to read:
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in part, if a party who requested
the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of
publication of notice of initiation. Mid Continent Steel & Wire,
Inc. (the petitioner) withdrew its request for an administrative
review on: Besco Machinery Industry (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd.; Cana
(Tianjin) Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd.; Certified Products
International Inc.; Chiieh Yung Metal Industrial Corporation; China
Staple Enterprise (Tianjin) Co., Ltd.; Huanghua Jinhai Hardware
Products Co. Ltd; Huanghua Xiong Hua Hardware Product Co., Ltd.;
Huanghua Yufutai Hardware Products Limited; Jining Huarong Hardware
Products; Liaocheng Minghui Hardware Products Co., Ltd.; Nanjing
Yuechang Hardware Co., Ltd.; PT Enterprise Inc.; Shandong Oriental
Cherry Hardware Group; Shandong Oriental Cherry Hardware Import &
Export Co., Ltd.; Shandong Qingyun Hongyi Hardware Products Co.,
Ltd.; Shanghai Yueda Fasterners Co., Ltd.; Shanxi Tianli Enterprise
Co., Ltd.; Shanxi Yuci Broad Wire Products Co., Ltd.; Smart
(Tianjin) Technology Development Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Hongli
Qiangsheng Import and Export Co., Ltd.; Tianjin Juxiang Metal
Products Co.; Tianjin Lianda Group Ltd.\1\ Tianjin Zhonglian Metals
Ware Co., Ltd.; and Xi'an Metals & Minerals Import & Export Co.,
Ltd. No other party requested a review of these companies.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ We note that ``Tianjin Lianda Group Co. Ltd.'' is subject to
this review and is part of the China-wide entity.
\2\ The petitioner withdrew its request for: Hebei Cangzhou New
Century Foreign Trade Co. Ltd; Nanjing Caiqing Hardware Co., Ltd.;
Tianjin Jinghai County Hongli Industry & Business Co., Ltd.; and
Tianjin Universal Machinery Import & Export Corp. However, these
companies also self-requested a review. Therefore, we have not
rescinded this review with respect to these four companies. The
petitioner also withdrew its request for Mingguang Abundant Hardware
Products Co., Ltd. However, in the Preliminary Results, we found
Mingguang Abundant Hardware Products Co., Ltd. to be the same
company as Mingguang Ruifeng Hardware Products Co., Ltd. because the
company changed it English name. Because Mingguang Ruifeng Hardware
Products Co., Ltd. self-requested a review, we have not rescinded
this review with respect to the company(ies). Similarly, we find
Qingdao D&L Group, Ltd. and SDC International Australia (PTY) Ltd.
to be the same as Qingdao D&L Group Co., Ltd. and SDC International
Aust. PTY. Ltd., respectively, which self-requested a review.
Therefore, we have not rescinded this review with respect to Qingdao
D&L Group, Ltd. and SDC International Aust. PTY. Ltd.
[[Page 23933]]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accordingly, we are rescinding this review, in part, with respect
to the companies identified above, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1).
In the Federal Register of March 20, 2017, in FR Doc 2017-05429, on
page 14345, correct the first paragraph of the ``Final Determination of
No Shipments'' section to read:
In the Preliminary Results, Commerce preliminarily determined
that Zhejian Gem-Chun Hardware Accessory Co., Ltd. (Zhejian Gem-
Chun) did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR.\3\
Consistent with Commerce's assessment practice in non-market economy
(NME) cases, we completed the review with respect to Zhejian Gem-
Chun. Based on the certifications submitted by Zhejian Gem-Chun, and
our analysis of CBP information, we continue to determine that the
company did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR. As
noted in the ``Assessment Rates'' section of the Final Results,
Commerce intends to issue appropriate instructions to CBP for
Zhejian Gem-Chun based on the final results of this review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ In the Final Results, Commerce inadvertently included Besco
Machinery Industry (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd., Jining Huarong Hardware
Products, Nanjing Yuechang Hardware Co., Ltd., PT Enterprise Inc.,
and Shanxi Yuci Broad Wire Products Co., Ltd. in the no shipments
category. However, the petitioner made a timely request to rescind
the review on these companies. Therefore, Commerce has removed these
companies from the no shipments category.
In the Federal Register of March 20, 2017, in FR Doc 2017-05429, on
page 14345, after the ``Final Determination of No Shipments'' section,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
add section ``China-Wide Entity'' to read:
In the Preliminary Results, we found that 14 companies, Cana
(Tianjin) Hardware Industrial Co., Ltd., China Staple Enterprise
(Tianjin) Co., Ltd., Huanghua Jinhai Hardware Products Co. Ltd,
Huanghua Xiong Hua Hardware Product Co., Ltd., Huanghua Yufutai
Hardware Products Limited, Liaocheng Minghui Hardware Products Co.,
Ltd., Mingguang Abundant Hardware Products Co., Ltd., Qingdao D&L
Group Co., Ltd., Shandong Qingyun Hongyi Hardware Products Co.,
Ltd., Shanghai Yueda Fasterners Co., Ltd., Shanxi Tianli Enterprise
Co., Ltd., Smart (Tianjin) Technology Development Co., Ltd., Tianjin
Hongli Qiangsheng Import and Export Co., Ltd., and Tianjin Lianda
Group Ltd., for which a review was requested had not established
eligibility for a separate rate and, thus, we considered them to be
part of the China-wide entity.
However, this list was incorrect. Mingguang Abundant Hardware
Products Co., Ltd., under its new name Mingguang Ruifeng Hardware
Products Co., Ltd., and Qingdao D&L Group Co., Ltd., under Qingdao
D&L Group Ltd., were granted separate rate status. For the remaining
companies, except Tianjin Lianda Group Co., Ltd., Commerce has
rescinded the review, as noted above.
For the Final Results, we find that, for two companies, Suzhou
Xingya Nail Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Lianda Group Co., Ltd., we have
not received any information since the issuance of the Preliminary
Results that provides a basis for reconsidering this preliminary
determination. Therefore, Commerce continues to find that Suzhou
Xingya Nail Co., Ltd. and Tianjin Lianda Group Co., Ltd. are part of
the China-wide entity.
Background
On March 20, 2017, Commerce published in the Federal Register the
final results of the 2014-2015 administrative reviews of the AD order
on nails from China.\4\ This notice contained incorrect information
regarding the companies for which Commerce: (1) Rescinded the
administrative review; (2) made a final no shipments determination; and
(3) assigned the entities to the China-wide entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Certain Steel Nails from the People's Republic of China:
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final
Determination of No Shipments and Final Partial Rescission; 2014-
2015, 82 FR 14344 (March 20, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.
Dated: April 29, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2021-09498 Filed 5-4-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
