Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Fisheries off West Coast States; Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; 2021 Harvest Specifications for Pacific Whiting, and 2021 Pacific Whiting Tribal Allocation, 23659-23669 [2021-08997]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 4, 2021 / Proposed Rules individual letters soliciting the expert opinions of four qualified specialists selected from the academic and scientific community. The charge to the peer reviewers and the peer review report have been placed in the administrative record and posted on the agency’s peer review agenda. In meeting the OMB Peer Review Bulletin requirements, we have also satisfied the requirements of the 1994 joint U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service/NMFS peer review policy (59 FR 34270; July 1, 1994). Dated: April 27, 2021. Samuel D. Rauch III, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine Fisheries Service. Classification Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531–1543 and 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) PART 224—ENDANGERED MARINE AND ANADROMOUS SPECIES 1. The authority citation for part 224 continues to read as follows: ■ § 224.101 The 1982 amendments to the ESA, in section 4(b)(1)(A), restrict the information that may be considered when assessing species for listing to the best scientific and commercial data available. Based on this limitation of criteria for a listing decision and the opinion in Pacific Legal Foundation v. Andrus, 657 F. 2d 829 (6th Cir. 1981), we have concluded that NEPA does not apply to ESA listing actions. (See NOAA Administrative Order 216–6.) Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Flexibility Act, and Paperwork Reduction Act khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 224 is proposed to be amended as follows: [Amended] [FR Doc. 2021–09090 Filed 5–3–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 660 [Docket No. 210423–0088] RIN 0648–BK25 Executive Order 13132, Federalism SUMMARY: E.O. 13132 requires agencies to take into account any federalism impacts of regulations under development. It includes specific consultation directives for situations where a regulation will preempt state law, or impose substantial direct compliance costs on state and local governments (unless required by statute). Neither of these circumstances is applicable to this proposed rule. List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 224 Endangered and threatened species. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:17 May 03, 2021 Jkt 253001 Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Fisheries off West Coast States; Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; 2021 Harvest Specifications for Pacific Whiting, and 2021 Pacific Whiting Tribal Allocation National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Revised proposed rule; reopening of public comment. AGENCY: NMFS issues the revised proposed rule for the 2021 Pacific whiting fishery under the authority of the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Management Plan, the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the Pacific Whiting Act of 2006 (Whiting Act), and other applicable laws. NMFS issued a proposed rule on February 16, 2021 that proposed the 2021 Pacific whiting tribal allocation and set-asides for research and incidental mortality. NMFS is issuing a revised proposed rule to include additional actions due to the lack of a bilateral agreement on the 2021 Pacific whiting coastwide total allowable catch (TAC) by the PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4702 Governments of Canada and the United States. This revised proposed rule includes the 2021 coastwide TAC and U.S. TAC for Pacific whiting as determined by NMFS under the Whiting Act, the non-tribal sector allocations, and the tribal allocation and set-asides included in the original proposed rule. The proposed measures are intended to help prevent overfishing, achieve optimum yield, and ensure that management measures are based on the best scientific information available. Comments on this proposed rule must be received no later than May 19, 2021. DATES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by NOAA– NMFS–2021–0002 by any of the following methods: • Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to https://www.regulations.gov and enter NOAA–NMFS–2021–0002 in the Search box. Click on the ‘‘Comment’’ icon, complete the required fields, and enter or attach your comments. • Mail: Barry Thom, c/o Stacey Miller, Sustainable Fisheries Division, West Coast Region, NMFS, 1201 NE Lloyd Blvd., Suite 1100, Portland, OR 97232. Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period, may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are part of the public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/ A’’ in the required fields if you wish to remain anonymous). ADDRESSES: 2. In § 224.101, in the table in paragraph (h), under the subheading ‘‘Corals’’, remove the entry for ‘‘Coral, [no common name] (Siderastrea glynni)’’. ■ As noted in the Conference Report on the 1982 amendments to the ESA, economic impacts cannot be considered when assessing the status of a species. Therefore, the economic analysis requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act are not applicable to the listing process. In addition, this proposed rule is exempt from review under Executive Order 12866. This proposed rule does not contain a collection of information requirement for the purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act. 23659 Sfmt 4702 Electronic Access This proposed rule is accessible via the internet at the Office of the Federal Register website at https:// www.federalregister.gov. Background information and documents are available at the NMFS website at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov and at the Pacific Fishery Management Council’s website at https:// www.pcouncil.org/. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stacey Miller, phone: 503–231–6290, and email: Stacey.Miller@noaa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM 04MYP1 23660 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 4, 2021 / Proposed Rules khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS Background This rule proposes establishing the 2021 Pacific whiting harvest specifications, including the adjusted coastwide TAC of 500,000 mt and the adjusted U.S. TAC of 369,400 mt, and 2021 tribal allocations. NMFS issued a proposed rule on February 16, 2021 (86 FR 9473) that proposed allocating 17.5 percent of the U.S. TAC of Pacific whiting for 2021 to Pacific Coast Indian tribes that have a treaty right to harvest groundfish, and implement set-asides (750 mt) for Pacific whiting for research and incidental mortality in other fisheries. We requested public comment on these proposed actions through March 18, 2021 but received no public comments during the comment period. NMFS is issuing a revised proposed rule for these two actions as well as several additional actions related to the Pacific whiting fishery due to the lack of a bilateral agreement on the 2021 Pacific whiting coastwide TAC under the Agreement between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Canada on Pacific Hake/ Whiting of 2003 (Agreement). The Agreement’s Joint Management Committee (JMC) met on March 15–17, 2021 but was not able to reach agreement on a coastwide TAC, which resulted in the JMC not recommending a coastwide TAC by March 25th, as required by the Agreement. If the JMC does not recommend a TAC, the Whiting Act directs NMFS (as delegated by the Secretary of Commerce) to establish a coastwide and U.S. TAC for Pacific whiting. This revised proposed rule would establish the 2021 coastwide and U.S. TAC for Pacific whiting based on the criteria identified in the Whiting Act and establish the Pacific whiting non-tribal sector allocations. This revised proposed rule also includes the 2021 tribal allocation and research set aside, which were described in the original proposed rule published February 16, 2021 (86 FR 9473). The allocations for Pacific whiting would be effective until December 31, 2021. Pacific Whiting Agreement and Whiting Act The transboundary stock of Pacific whiting is managed through the Agreement, which establishes bilateral bodies to implement the terms of the Agreement. The bilateral bodies include: The JMC, which recommends the annual catch level for Pacific whiting; the Joint Technical Committee (JTC), which conducts the Pacific whiting stock assessment; the Scientific Review Group (SRG), which reviews the stock assessment; and the Advisory VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:17 May 03, 2021 Jkt 253001 Panel (AP), which provides stakeholder input to the JMC. The Agreement establishes a default harvest policy of F–40 percent, which means a fishing mortality rate that would reduce the spawning biomass to 40 percent of the estimated unfished level. The Agreement also allocates 73.88 percent of the Pacific whiting total allowable catch (TAC) to the United States and 26.12 percent of the TAC to Canada. Based on recommendations from the Agreement’s JTC, SRG, and AP, the JMC recommends the coastwide Pacific whiting TAC by March 25th of each year, which is subsequently approved by NMFS, under the delegation of authority from the Secretary of Commerce. In years when the JMC does make a TAC recommendation to the parties, NMFS (under the delegation of authority from the Secretary of Commerce) approves the U.S. TAC with concurrence from the Department of State. The U.S. TAC is then allocated into tribal and non-tribal sectors. The 2021 JMC negotiations were held from March 15–17, 2021. These negotiations typically focus on two factors to derive a coastwide TAC: Agreement on a sustainable level of realized catch using stock assessment projections and other relevant scientific advice, and estimating the likely utilization rate, which is the proportion of the TAC harvested by the various sectors of the U.S. and Canadian fisheries based on historical rates and knowledge of existing conditions. Full utilization of the TAC (100 percent) is not practicable, due to myriad of regulatory and operational constraints. These constraints are long-identified factors that affect utilization rates and setting the coastwide TAC at a higher level allows the fisheries to achieve the realized catch target. During the March 2021 JMC meeting, the JMC agreed on a realized catch target of 380,000 mt but did not reach an agreement on a utilization rate, and therefore did not come to a bilateral agreement on the coastwide TAC. This is the second consecutive year that the JMC did not reach an agreement on a coastwide TAC. The Agreement does not specify a procedure for when the JMC does not agree on a coastwide TAC, however, the Whiting Act directs the Secretary of Commerce to establish the TAC for Pacific whiting when the JMC does not agree on a coastwide TAC. The Act states that NMFS (as delegated by the Secretary of Commerce) should establish the coastwide Pacific whiting TAC, taking into account recommendations from the JMC, JTC, SRG, AP, and the Pacific Fishery PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Management Council (Council). The Act requires NMFS to base the coastwide TAC decision on the best scientific information available, and use the default harvest rate unless scientific information indicates a different rate is necessary to sustain the Pacific whiting resource. The Act also requires NMFS to establish the U.S. share of the TAC based on the U.S./Canada percentage split and adjustments specified in the Agreement. 2021 Stock Assessment and Scientific Review The JTC completed a stock assessment for Pacific whiting in February 2021. This assessment is available at https:// www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/ document/2021-pacific-hake-whitingstock-assessment. The assessment was reviewed by the SRG during a four-day meeting held online. The SRG report is available at https:// www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/ document/2021-pacific-hake-whitingscientific-review-group-report. The SRG considered the 2021 assessment report and appendices to represent the best scientific information available for Pacific hake/whiting. The 2021 assessment model uses the same structure as the 2020 stock assessment model. The model is fit to an acoustic survey index of abundance, annual commercial catches of the transboundary Pacific whiting stock, and age composition data from an acoustic survey and commercial fisheries. Age-composition data provide information to estimate relative year class strength. Updates to the data in the 2021 assessment include: Fishery catch and age-composition data from 2020, weight-at-age data for 2020, and minor changes to pre-2020 data. There was not an acoustic survey planned for 2020 and therefore no new survey data were included in the 2021 model. Additionally, no new age data were available from the Canadian freezertrawler feet in 2020 due to the ongoing pandemic. The Pacific whiting biomass is a highly cyclical and highly productive stock. Since the 1960s, it is estimated to have ranged from well below to above unfished levels. Compared to other groundfish stocks, the Pacific whiting stock has high recruitment variability, with low average recruitment levels and occasional large year-classes that often comprise much of the biomass. At the start of 2021, the Pacific whiting stock continues to be supported by multiple above average cohorts, including the 2010, 2014, 2016, and 2017 year classes which comprise 14 percent, 25 percent, 24 percent and 17 percent, respectively E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM 04MYP1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 4, 2021 / Proposed Rules khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS of the stock biomass. The 2010 year class is estimated to be the second highest recruitment in the assessment time series; the 2014 and 2016 year classes are estimated to be above average in strength; and the 2012 and 2017 year classes are about average. The assessment estimates small year classes in 2011, 2013, 2015, and 2018. There is very little information in the data to estimate the size of the 2019 year class and there is no information in the data to estimate the sizes of the 2020 and 2021 year classes. The Pacific whiting relative spawning biomass was near unfished levels (97.9 percent of unfished) in 2017 and has been declining since that time as the 2010 and 2014 year classes are ageing and mortality surpasses increased production, combined with record high catches. At the start of 2021, the relative spawning stock biomass is still well above the biomass level associated with the default harvest rate (40 percent of unfished level), and is estimated to be 0.981 million mt, or 59 percent of unfished levels. The stock is considered at a healthy level, and the joint probability that the relative spawning stock biomass is both below 40 percent of unfished level and that fishing mortality is above the relative fishing intensity of the Agreement’s F–40 percent default harvest rate is estimated to be 1.7 percent. 2021 Pacific Whiting Coastwide TAC Evaluation and Recommendation In determining the coastwide TAC, NMFS considered information and recommendations from the Agreement’s JMC, JTC, SRG, and AP, and the Council. The stock assessment from the JTC and the SRG peer review are the best scientific information available for determining the coastwide Pacific whiting TAC. NMFS heard testimony from the AP and JMC at the JMC’s March 2021 meeting. NMFS has reached out to the Council and will consider any recommendations provided by the Council. NMFS considered a range of coastwide TAC alternatives including the coastwide TAC resulting from the default harvest rate (565,191 mt) and the coastwide TACs that were discussed during the AP and JMC March 2021 meeting. This includes the U.S. delegation’s initial (500,000 mt) and final positions (475,000 mt) and the Canadian delegation’s initial (422,000 mt) and final positions (465,000 mt). However, we excluded the Canadian delegation’s proposed TACs from further consideration because according to the stock assessment they are not necessary to support a sustainable VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:17 May 03, 2021 Jkt 253001 Pacific whiting resource. Members of the JMC and AP also identified that these TACs would have a disproportionally negative economic impact on the U.S. fishing fleet compared to the Canadian fishing fleet. NMFS therefore evaluated coastwide TACs ranging from 475,000 mt to 565,191 mt in developing our proposed coastwide TAC of 500,000 mt. The stock assessment supports the lower TACs within this range and would provide adequate opportunity for both Canadian and U.S. fleets, while sustainably managing the Pacific whiting resource. Biological Impacts of Potential Whiting TAC Levels The Act directs NMFS to use the default harvest rate set out in the Agreement unless NMFS determines that a different rate is necessary to sustain the offshore whiting resource. The Agreement specifies a default harvest rate of ‘‘F–40 percent’’ which is the fishing mortality rate that would reduce the relative spawning stock biomass, calculated on a per recruit basis (a measure of stock reproductive potential) to 40 percent of what it would have been in the absence of fishing mortality, often called B40. Although there is not a default biomass level, the JMC, since implementation of the Agreement, has focused on choosing a TAC designed to prevent the relative spawning stock biomass from falling below B40. NMFS followed the same practice of choosing a TAC designed to prevent the relative spawning stock biomass from falling below this biomass level. To evaluate the impact of the TACs on relative spawning stock biomass, we applied an estimate of the coastwide Pacific whiting fleet’s utilization rate (i.e. the proportion of the TAC removed through fishing effort) to the range of TACs we considered. Over the last ten years, neither the U.S. nor the Canadian fishing fleets have caught the entire coastwide TAC (100 percent utilization rate). The ten-year (2010–2019) average utilization rate is 69.8 percent of the coastwide TAC and the average utilization rate for the last 5 years was 70.06 percent of the coastwide TAC. To derive an upper estimate of utilization, NMFS took the average of the five highest utilization rates from 2011– 2020, which results in a utilization rate of 75.82 percent of the coastwide TAC. Because of this, NMFS determined it is reasonable to focus on a range of utilization rates from 70 percent to 76 percent, which encompass the average of the last five years (70.06 percent) and the average of the highest 5 utilization rates since 2011 (75.82 percent). These PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 23661 averages provide a realistic range for projecting the coastwide utilization rates in 2021 and 2022 and are consistent with the 2021 projected utilization rates provided by U.S. members of the AP during the JMC negotiations. We applied the range of average utilization rates to the range of coastwide TACs to derive the projected harvest level and anticipated impacts to the Pacific whiting spawning stock biomass. The stock assessment indicates that across the range of TACs and utilization rates evaluated, the projected harvest levels result in relative spawning stock biomass levels above B40 percent after one fishing year (47– 49 percent of unfished levels) and between 39–44 percent of unfished levels after two years of fishing at the same level. Using the same approach as described above, a coastwide TAC set at the default harvest rate (565,191 mt) combined with the 0.70 and 0.76 utilization rates results in projected harvest rates between 395,634 mt– 429,545 mt and a projected spawning biomass of 48–47 percent of unfished levels after one year of fishing, and 41– 39 percent of unfished levels after two years of fishing. Of the lower TACs considered in the range, a coastwide TAC of 500,000 mt results in projected harvest rates between 350,000 mt– 380,000 mt and projected spawning biomass of 49–48 percent of unfished levels after one year of fishing, and 43– 42 percent of unfished levels after 2 years of fishing, using the lower (0.70) and higher (0.76) utilization rates respectively. The lowest TAC considered (475,000 mt) combined with the 0.70 and 0.76 utilization rates results in lower projected harvest (332,500 mt–361,000 mt) and projections of relative spawning biomass of 49 percent after one year of fishing, and 44–43 percent of unfished levels after two years of fishing. Overall, the stock assessment indicates that the relative spawning stock biomass of Pacific whiting has a high probability of being lower at the beginning of 2022 than 2021, ranging from 65 percent probability with no harvest to a 90 percent probability at a catch equal to the default harvest rate. Although a decline in the Pacific whiting stock is probable even in the absence of fishing pressure, the decline does not threaten the sustainability of the resource. At the proposed TAC of 500,000 mt, with a realized catch goal of 380,000 mt (based on a 0.76 utilization rate), the stock assessment indicates there is a 36 percent chance of relative spawning stock biomass falling E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM 04MYP1 23662 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 4, 2021 / Proposed Rules khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS below B40 percent in one year. The stock assessment also indicates there is an 11 percent probability of falling below B25 percent, and a 1 percent chance of falling below B10 percent after one year for this realized catch level. Continuing this harvest level into a second year does have an increased chance of the relative spawning stock biomass falling below B40 percent. Two years of actual harvests at approximately 380,000 mt result in a 47 percent probability of falling below B40 percent, a 23 percent probability of falling below B25 percent, and a 4 percent probability of falling below B10 percent. In setting last year’s coastwide TAC, (85 FR 36803; June 18, 2020) NMFS selected a TAC that resulted in a biomass level above B40 after 2 years of fishing and took into account economic impacts to U.S. fisheries and coastal communities. NMFS continued with this approach to determine the 2021 coastwide TAC. The 2021 stock assessment estimates that the whiting stock is at a healthy level of 59 percent of unfished biomass. However, the stock is continuing to decline at an increased rate as natural mortality of the 2010 and 2014-year classes exceeds biomass growth. There is also a high level of uncertainty regarding the strength of recent recruitments. Therefore, NMFS determined the best scientific information available indicates that reduction from last year’s coastwide TAC (575,000 mt), and deviation from the Act’s default harvest rate, would support the long-term sustainability of the stock. Economic Impacts of Potential Pacific Whiting TAC levels The Pacific whiting fishery is the highest volume fishery on the West Coast of the United States, providing hundreds of jobs. In 2020, total revenue was estimated to be $21.4 million in the non-tribal shoreside sector and $21.5 million in the at-sea whiting sector. The total non-tribal ex-vessel revenue in 2020 is estimated to have been about $42.9 million. Maintaining access to the Pacific whiting resource is important for both direct fishery participants and West Coast fishing communities. During the JMC meeting, members of the JMC and AP also discussed the projected realized catch levels under each proposed TAC scenario and resulting economic impacts on the U.S. whiting fishery. The starting and ending coastwide TAC proposals from Canada, 422,000 mt and 465,000 mt, represent a 26 percent and 19 percent reduction from the 2020 VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:17 May 03, 2021 Jkt 253001 U.S. determined coastwide TAC, respectively. Reductions of this magnitude would have negative economic impacts on U.S. fisheries and coastal communities. Canada’s proposed TACs reflect their concern with the declining Pacific whiting biomass as the 2010 and 2014 year classes continue to age, as well as uncertainty of the recent recruitment strength because the stock assessment is not able to predict cohort strength until they are detected by the acoustic survey and fishery. However, the stock assessment indicates that the higher TACs proposed by the United States continue to provide a sustainable Pacific whiting resource and result in the relative spawning stock biomass levels above B40 percent after 1 year, and at or above B40 percent after 2 years of fishing. Because of these factors, NMFS has determined that a measured reduction in the coastwide TAC from last year is appropriately precautionary to achieve the conservation goals, but also recognizes the need to minimize the economic impacts to U.S. fisheries and coastal communities as much as possible. 2021 Pacific Whiting Adjusted TAC Recommendation The Act requires NMFS to make the necessary adjustments to the TAC specified in the Agreement (Paragraph 5 of Article II). The Agreement (Paragraph 5 of Article II) requires adjustments to the coastwide TAC to account for overages if either U.S. or Canadian catch in the previous year exceeded its individual TAC, or carryovers, if U.S. or Canadian catch was less than its individual TAC in the previous year. Both the United States and Canada harvested less than their individual TACs in 2020, therefore carryover is applied to the 2021 TACs. Taking into account the percentage shares for each country (26.12 percent for Canada and 73.88 percent for the United States) and the adjustments for uncaught fish (12,617 mt carryover for Canada and 55,080 mt carryover for the United States), as required by the Act, we recommend a final adjusted coastwide TAC of 500,000 mt, with a final adjusted TAC for Canada of 130,600 mt (117,983 mt + 12,617 mt carryover adjustment), and a final adjusted TAC for the United States of 369,400 mt (314,320 mt + 55,080 mt carryover adjustment). This recommendation is consistent with the best scientific information available, provisions of the Agreement, and the Whiting Act. PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Tribal Allocations The regulations at 50 CFR 660.50(d) identify the procedures for implementing the treaty rights that Pacific Coast treaty Indian tribes have to harvest groundfish in their usual and accustomed fishing areas in U.S. waters. Tribes with treaty fishing rights in the area covered by the Pacific Coast Groundfish FMP request allocations, set-asides, or regulations specific to the tribes during the Council’s biennial harvest specifications and management measures process. The regulations state that the Secretary will develop tribal allocations and regulations in consultation with the affected tribe(s) and, insofar as possible, with tribal consensus. NMFS allocates a portion of the U.S. TAC of Pacific whiting to the tribal fishery, following the process established in 50 CFR 660.50(d). The tribal allocation is subtracted from the U.S. Pacific whiting TAC before allocation to the non-tribal sectors. Four Washington coastal treaty Indian tribes including the Makah Indian Tribe, Quileute Indian Tribe, Quinault Indian Nation, and the Hoh Indian Tribe (collectively, the ‘‘Treaty Tribes’’), can participate in the tribal Pacific whiting fishery. Tribal allocations of Pacific whiting have been based on discussions with the Treaty Tribes regarding their intent for those fishing years. The Hoh Tribe has not expressed an interest in participating in the Pacific whiting fishery to date. The Quileute Tribe and Quinault Indian Nation have expressed interest in beginning to participate in the Pacific whiting fishery at a future date. To date, only the Makah Tribe has prosecuted a tribal fishery for Pacific whiting, and has harvested Pacific whiting since 1996 using midwater trawl gear. Table 1 below provides a recent history of U.S. TACs and annual tribal allocation in metric tons (mt). TABLE 1—U.S. TOTAL ALLOWABLE CATCH AND ANNUAL TRIBAL ALLOCATION IN METRIC TONS (mt) Year 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM 04MYP1 U.S. TAC 1 (mt) 193,935 290,903 186,037 269,745 316,206 325,072 367,553 441,433 441,433 441,433 Tribal allocation (mt) 49,939 66,908 48,556 63,205 55,336 56,888 64,322 77,251 77,251 77,251 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 4, 2021 / Proposed Rules of scientific research catch and estimated bycatch mortality in nongroundfish fisheries. At its November 2020 meeting, the Council recommended an incidental mortality set-aside of 750 mt for 2021. This is a Tribal U.S. TAC 1 reduction of the amount set-aside for Year allocation (mt) (mt) research and incidental mortality from 1,500 mt in 2020. The 750 mt 2020 .......... 424,810 74,342 recommendation, however, reflects the 1 Beginning in 2012, the United States startrecent 3 year average mortality that has ed using the term Total Allowable Catch, or declined from 942 mt in 2014–2016 to TAC, based on the Agreement between the 216 mt in 2017–2019. This rule Government of the United States of America and the Government of Canada on Pacific proposes the Council’s Hake/Whiting. Prior to 2012, the terms Optimal recommendations. TABLE 1—U.S. TOTAL ALLOWABLE CATCH AND ANNUAL TRIBAL ALLOCATION IN METRIC TONS (mt)—Continued Yield (OY) and Annual Catch Limit (ACL) were used. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS In 2009, NMFS, the states of Washington and Oregon, and the Treaty Tribes started a process to determine the long-term tribal allocation for Pacific whiting. However, these groups have not yet determined a long-term allocation. In order to ensure Treaty Tribes continue to receive allocations, this rule proposes the 2021 tribal allocation of Pacific whiting. This allocation is not intended to set precedent for future allocations. In exchanges between NMFS and the Treaty Tribes during November and December 2020, the Makah Tribe indicated their intent to participate in the tribal Pacific whiting fishery in 2021 and requested 17.5 percent of the U.S. TAC. The Quinault Indian Nation, Quileute Indian Tribe and Hoh Indian Tribe informed NMFS in December 2020 that they will not participate in the 2021 fishery. NMFS will contact the Tribes during the proposed rule comment period to refine the 2021 allocation before allocating the final U.S. TAC between the tribal and nontribal whiting fisheries. NMFS proposes a tribal allocation that accommodates the tribal request, specifically 17.5 percent of the U.S. TAC. The proposed 2021 adjusted U.S. TAC is 369,400 mt, and therefore the proposed 2021 tribal allocation is 64,645 mt. NMFS has determined that the current scientific information regarding the distribution and abundance of the coastal Pacific whiting stock indicates the 17.5 percent is within the range of the tribal treaty right to Pacific whiting. Non-Tribal Research and Bycatch SetAsides The U.S. non-tribal whiting fishery is managed under the Council’s Pacific Coast Groundfish FMP. Each year, the Council recommends the amount of Pacific whiting to accommodate incidental mortality of Pacific whiting in research activities and nongroundfish fisheries based on estimates VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:17 May 03, 2021 Jkt 253001 23663 This proposed rule would be implemented under the statutory and regulatory authority of section 304(b) and 305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and the Pacific Whiting Act of 2006. With this proposed rule, NMFS, acting on behalf of the Secretary, would ensure that the FMP is implemented in a manner consistent with treaty rights of four Treaty Tribes to fish in their ‘‘usual and accustomed grounds and stations’’ in common with non-tribal citizens. United States v. Washington, 384 F. Supp. 313 (W.D. 1974). Classification NMFS notes that the public comment period for this proposed rule is 15 days. Finalizing the Pacific whiting harvest In addition to the tribal allocation, specifications closer to the start of the this proposed rule establishes the Pacific whiting fishing season on May fishery harvest guideline (HG), called 15th provides the industry with more the non-tribal allocation. The proposed time to plan and execute the fishery and 2021 fishery HG for Pacific whiting is gives them earlier access to the finalized 304,005 mt. This amount was allocations of Pacific whiting. Moreover, determined by deducting the 64,645 mt the public already had an opportunity to tribal allocation and the 750 mt comment under the proposed rule allocation for scientific research catch and fishing mortality in non-groundfish issued on February 16, 2021 on percentage of the U.S. TAC allocated to fisheries from the total adjusted U.S. the Pacific Coast Indian tribes that have TAC of 369,400 mt. The Council a treaty right to harvest groundfish and recommends the research and bycatch set-aside research and incidental set-aside on an annual basis, based on mortality. NMFS has determined that a estimates of scientific research catch and estimated bycatch mortality in non- 15-day comment period best balances the interest in allowing the public groundfish fisheries. The regulations adequate time to comment on the further allocate the fishery HG among proposed measures while implementing the three non-tribal sectors of the Pacific the management measures, including whiting fishery: The catcher/processor the finalizing Pacific whiting (C/P) Coop Program, the Mothership allocations, in a timely manner. (MS) Coop Program, and the Shorebased Pursuant to section 304 (b)(1)(A) and Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) Program. 305 (d) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, The C/P Coop Program is allocated 34 the NMFS Assistant Administrator has percent (103,362 mt for 2021), the MS determined that this proposed rule is Coop Program is allocated 24 percent consistent with the Pacific Coast (72,961 mt for 2021), and the Groundfish FMP, other provisions of the Shorebased IFQ Program is allocated 42 Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other percent (127,682 mt for 2021). The applicable law, subject to further fishery south of 42° N lat. may not take consideration after public comment. In more than 6,384 mt (5 percent of the making its final determination, NMFS Shorebased IFQ Program allocation) will take into account the complete prior to May 15, the start of the primary record, including comments received Pacific whiting season north of 42° N during the comment period. lat. Pursuant to Executive Order 13175, this proposed rule was developed after TABLE 2—2021 PROPOSED PACIFIC meaningful consultation and WHITING ALLOCATIONS IN METRIC collaboration with tribal officials from TONS the area covered by the Pacific Coast Groundfish FMP. Under the Magnuson2021 Pacific Stevens Act at 16 U.S.C. 1852(b)(5), one whiting Sector of the voting members of the Pacific allocation Council must be a representative of an (mt) Indian tribe with federally recognized Tribal ..................................... 64,645 fishing rights from the area of the Catcher/Processor (C/P) Council’s jurisdiction. In addition, Coop Program ................... 103,362 regulations implementing the Pacific Mothership (MS) Coop ProCoast Groundfish FMP establish a gram .................................. 72,961 procedure by which the tribes with Shorebased IFQ Program .... 127,682 treaty fishing rights in the area covered Non-Tribal Harvest Guidelines and Allocations PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM 04MYP1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS 23664 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 4, 2021 / Proposed Rules by the Pacific Coast Groundfish FMP request allocations or regulations specific to the Tribes, in writing, before the first of the two meetings at which the Council considers groundfish management measures. The regulations at 50 CFR 660.324(d) further state, the Secretary will develop tribal allocations and regulations under this paragraph in consultation with the affected tribe(s) and, insofar as possible, with tribal consensus. The tribal management measures in this proposed rule have been developed following these procedures. The Office of Management and Budget has determined that this proposed rule is not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866. A range of potential total harvest levels for Pacific whiting have been considered under the Final Environmental Impact Statement for Harvest Specifications and Management Measures for 2015–2016 and Biennial Periods thereafter (2015/16 FEIS) and in the Environmental Assessment for Harvest Specifications and Management Measures for 2021–2022 and Biennial Periods Thereafter and is available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES). The 2015/16 FEIS examined the harvest specifications and management measures for 2015–16 and 10 year projections for routinely adjusted harvest specifications and management measures. The 10 year projections were produced to evaluate the impacts of the ongoing implementation of harvest specifications and management measures and to evaluate the impacts of the routine adjustments that are the main component of each biennial cycle. The EA for the 2021–22 cycle tiers from the 2015/16 FEIS and focuses on the harvest specifications and management measures that were not within the scope of the 10 year projections in the 2015/ 16 FEIS. An Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) was prepared for this action, as required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The IRFA describes the economic impact this proposed rule, if adopted, would have on small entities. A description of the action, why it is being considered, and the legal basis for this action is contained in the SUMMARY section and at the beginning of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of the preamble. A summary of the IRFA follow. Copies of the IRFAs are available from NMFS (See ADDRESSES). Under the RFA, the term ‘‘small entities’’ includes small businesses, small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions. The Small Business Administration has established VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:17 May 03, 2021 Jkt 253001 size criteria for entities involved in the fishing industry that qualify as small businesses. A business involved in fish harvesting is a small business if it is independently owned and operated and not dominant in its field of operation (including its affiliates) and if it has combined annual receipts, not in excess of $11 million for all its affiliated operations worldwide (see 80 FR 81194, December 29, 2015). A wholesale business servicing the fishing industry is a small business if it employs 100 or fewer persons on a full time, part time, temporary, or other basis, at all its affiliated operations worldwide. A small organization is any nonprofit enterprise that is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field. Effective February 26, 2016, a seafood processor is a small business if it is independently owned and operated, not dominant in its field of operation, and employs 750 or fewer persons on a full time, part time, temporary, or other basis, at all its affiliated operations worldwide (See NAICS 311710 at 81 FR 4469; January 26, 2016). For purposes of rulemaking, NMFS is also applying the seafood processor standard to catcher processors because whiting C/Ps earn the majority of the revenue from processed seafood product. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which the Rule Applies, and Estimate of Economic Impacts by Entity Size and Industry This proposed rule would establish the coastwide and U.S. TAC and affect how Pacific whiting is allocated to the following sectors/programs: Tribal, Shorebased IFQ Program Trawl Fishery, MS Coop Program Whiting At-sea Trawl Fishery, and C/P Coop Program Whiting At-sea Trawl Fishery. The amount of Pacific whiting allocated to these sectors is based on the U.S. TAC. We expect one tribal entity to fish for Pacific whiting in 2021. Tribes are not considered small entities for the purposes of RFA. Impacts to tribes are nevertheless considered in this analysis. As of January 2021, the Shorebased IFQ Program is composed of 166 Quota Share permits/accounts (134 of which were allocated whiting quota pounds), and 35 first receivers, one of which is designated as whiting-only receivers and 11 that may receive both whiting and non-whiting. These regulations also directly affect participants in the MS Co-op Program, a general term to describe the limited access program that applies to eligible harvesters and processors in the MS sector of the Pacific whiting at-sea trawl fishery. This program consists of six MS processor permits, and a catcher vessel PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 fleet currently composed of a single coop, with 34 Mothership/Catcher Vessel (MS/CV) endorsed permits (with three permits each having two catch history assignments). These regulations also directly affect the C/P Co-op Program, composed of 10 C/P endorsed permits owned by three companies that have formed a single coop. These co-ops are considered large entities from several perspectives; they have participants that are large entities, and have in total more than 750 employees worldwide including affiliates. Although there are three non-tribal sectors, many companies participate in two sectors and some participate in all three sectors. As part of the permit application processes for the non-tribal fisheries, based on a review of the Small Business Administration size criteria, permit applicants are asked if they considered themselves a ‘‘small’’ business, and they are asked to provide detailed ownership information. Data on employment worldwide, including affiliates, are not available for these companies, which generally operate in Alaska as well as the West Coast and may have operations in other countries as well. NMFS has limited entry permit holders self-report size status. For 2021, all 10 CP permits reported they are not small businesses, as did 8 mothership catcher vessels. There is substantial, but not complete overlap between permit ownership and vessel ownership so there may be a small number of additional small entity vessel owners who will be impacted by this rule. After accounting for cross participation, multiple Quota Share account holders, and affiliation through ownership, NMFS estimates that there are 103 nontribal entities directly affected by these proposed regulations, 89 of which are considered ‘‘small’’ businesses. This rule will allocate Pacific whiting between tribal and non-tribal harvesters (a mixture of small and large businesses). Tribal fisheries consist of a mixture of fishing activities that are similar to the activities that non-tribal fisheries undertake. Tribal harvests may be delivered to both shoreside plants and motherships for processing. These processing facilities also process fish harvested by non-tribal fisheries. The effect of the tribal allocation on nontribal fisheries will depend on the level of tribal harvests relative to their allocation and the reapportionment process. If the tribes do not harvest their entire allocation, there are opportunities during the year to reapportion unharvested tribal amounts to the nontribal fleets. For example, in 2020 NMFS reapportioned 40,000 mt of the original E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM 04MYP1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 4, 2021 / Proposed Rules 74,342 mt tribal allocation. This reapportionment was based on conversations with the tribes and the best information available at the time, which indicated that this amount would not limit tribal harvest opportunities for the remainder of the year. The reapportioning process allows unharvested tribal allocations of Pacific whiting to be fished by the non-tribal fleets, benefitting both large and small entities. The revised Pacific whiting allocations for 2020 following the reapportionment were: Tribal 34,342 mt, C/P Co-op 132,249 mt; MS Co-op 93,352 mt; and Shorebased IFQ Program 163,367 mt. The prices for Pacific whiting are largely determined by the world market because most of the Pacific whiting harvested in the United States is exported. The U.S. Pacific whiting TAC is highly variable, as have subsequent harvests and ex-vessel revenues. For the years 2016 to 2020, the total Pacific whiting fishery (tribal and non-tribal) averaged harvests of approximately 303,782 mt annually. The 2020 U.S. non-tribal fishery had a Pacific whiting catch of approximately 287,400 mt, and the tribal fishery landed less than 200 mt. Impacts to the U.S. non-tribal fishery are measured with an estimate of exvessel revenue. The NMFS proposed adjusted coastwide TAC of 500,000 mt would result in an adjusted U.S. TAC of 369,400 mt and U.S. non-tribal harvest guideline of 304,005 mt. Using the 2020 weighted-average non-tribal Oregon shoreside price per metric ton (e.g. $154 per metric ton), the proposed TAC is estimated to result in an ex-vessel revenue of $46.9 million for the U.S. non-tribal fishing fleet. The low and high range of the coastwide TAC NMFS considered (475,000 mt and 565,191 mt, respectively) is estimated to result in projected ex-vessel revenue range of $44.5 million to $53 million, respectively. Impacts to tribal catcher vessels who elect to participate in the tribal fishery are measured with an estimate of exvessel revenue. In lieu of more complete information on tribal deliveries, total exvessel revenue is estimated with the 2020 average shoreside ex-vessel price of Pacific whiting, which was $154 per mt. At that price, the proposed 2020 tribal allocation of 64,645 mt would have an ex-vessel value of $10 million. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:17 May 03, 2021 Jkt 253001 A Description of Any Significant Alternatives to the Proposed Rule That Accomplish the Stated Objectives of Applicable Statutes and That Minimize Any Significant Economic Impact of the Proposed Rule on Small Entities NMFS considered a ‘‘No Action’’ alternative as well as a range of alternatives for setting the Pacific whiting coastwide TAC. NMFS considered setting the coastwide TAC between 475,000 mt to 565,191 mt. A coastwide TAC at the bottom of the range (475,000 mt) may provide less economic opportunity for 2021 as compared to the TAC proposed in this rule (a coastwide TAC of 500,000 mt). A higher coastwide TAC of 565,191 mt may offer an increased economic opportunity for 2021 as compared to the TAC proposed in this rule. However, the 2021 stock assessment projections indicate this higher catch levels may result in near-term stock biomass declines below target levels. This is contrary to the Whiting Act and Agreement, which requires sustainable management of the Pacific whiting resource. Under the no action alternative, NMFS would not set a coastwide TAC, which would not fulfill NMFS’ responsibility to manage the U.S. fishery. Therefore this alternative received no further consideration. NMFS considered two alternatives for the Pacific whiting tribal allocation: The ‘‘No Action’’ and the ‘‘Proposed Action.’’ NMFS did not consider a broader range of alternatives to the proposed tribal allocation because the tribal allocation is a percent of the adjusted U.S. TAC and is based primarily on the requests of the tribes. These requests reflect the level of participation in the fishery that will allow them to exercise their treaty right to fish for Pacific whiting. Under the Proposed Action alternative, NMFS proposes to set the tribal allocation percentage at 17.5 percent, as requested by the Tribes. This would yield a tribal allocation of 64,645 mt for 2021. Consideration of a percentage lower than the tribal request of 17.5 percent is not appropriate in this instance. As a matter of policy, NMFS has historically supported the harvest levels requested by the Tribes. Based on the information available to NMFS, the tribal request is within their tribal treaty rights. A higher percentage would arguably also be within the scope of the treaty right. However, a higher percentage would unnecessarily limit the non-tribal fishery. Under the no action alternative, NMFS would not make an allocation to the tribal sector. This alternative was PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 23665 considered, but the regulatory framework provides for a tribal allocation on an annual basis only. Therefore, the no action alternative would result in no allocation of Pacific whiting to the tribal sector in 2021, which would be inconsistent with NMFS’ responsibility to manage the fishery consistent with the Tribes’ treaty rights. Given that there is a tribal request for allocation in 2021, this alternative received no further consideration. Regulatory Flexibility Act Determination of No Significant Impact NMFS determined this proposed rule would not adversely affect small entities. The reapportioning process allows unharvested tribal allocations of Pacific whiting, fished by small entities, to be fished by the non-tribal fleets, benefitting both large and small entities. NMFS has prepared an IRFA and is requesting comments on this conclusion. See ADDRESSES. This proposed rule contains no information collection requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. No Federal rules have been identified that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this action. List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660 Fisheries, Fishing, Indian Fisheries. Dated: April 26, 2021. Samuel D. Rauch, III, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine Fisheries Service. For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 660 is proposed to be amended as follows: PART 660—FISHERIES OFF WEST COAST STATES 1. The authority citation for part 660 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq., and 16 U.S.C. 7001 et seq. 2. In § 660.50, revise paragraph (f)(4) to read as follows: ■ § 660.50 Pacific Coast treaty Indian fisheries. * * * * * (f) * * * (4) Pacific whiting. The tribal allocation for 2021 will be 64,645 mt. * * * * * ■ 3. Revise Table 1a to part 660, subpart C–2021, to read as follows: E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM 04MYP1 23666 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 4, 2021 / Proposed Rules TABLE 1a TO PART 660, SUBPART C—2021, SPECIFICATIONS OF OFL, ABC, ACL, ACT AND FISHERY HG (Weights in Metric Tons) CAPITALIZED STOCKS ARE REBUILDING ACL a// Fishery HG b// Stocks Area OFL ABC Yelloweye Rockfish c/ ....................... Arrowtooth Flounder d/ ...................... Big Skate e/ ....................................... Black Rockfish f/ ................................ Black Rockfish g/ ............................... Bocaccio h/ ........................................ Cabezon i/ ......................................... California Scorpionfish j/ ................... Canary Rockfish k/ ............................ Chilipepper l/ ..................................... Cowcod m/ ......................................... Cowcod ...................................... Cowcod ...................................... Darkblotched Rockfish n/ .................. Dover Sole o/ ..................................... English Sole p/ .................................. Lingcod q/ .......................................... Lingcod r/ ........................................... Longnose Skate s/ ............................. Longspine Thornyhead t/ .................. Longspine Thornyhead u/ .................. Pacific Cod v/ ..................................... Pacific Ocean Perch w/ ...................... Pacific Whiting x/ ................................ Petrale Sole y/ .................................... Sablefish z/ ......................................... Sablefish aa/ ....................................... Shortspine Thornyhead bb/ ................ Shortspine Thornyhead cc/ ................ Spiny Dogfish dd/ ............................... Splitnose ee/ ....................................... Starry Flounder ff/ .............................. Widow Rockfish gg/ ............................ Yellowtail Rockfish hh/ ........................ Coastwide ......................................... Coastwide ......................................... Coastwide ......................................... California (S of 42° N lat.) ................ Washington (N of 46°16′ N lat.) ....... S of 40°10′ N lat ............................... California (S of 42° N lat.) ................ S of 34°27′ N lat ............................... Coastwide ......................................... S of 40°10′ N lat ............................... S of 40°10′ N lat ............................... (Conception) ..................................... (Monterey) ........................................ Coastwide ......................................... Coastwide ......................................... Coastwide ......................................... N of 40ß10′ N lat ............................... S of 40°10′ N lat ............................... Coastwide ......................................... N of 34°27′ N lat .............................. S of 34°27′ N lat ............................... Coastwide ......................................... N of 40°10′ N lat .............................. Coastwide ......................................... Coastwide ......................................... N of 36° N lat ................................... S of 36° N lat ................................... N of 34°27′ N lat .............................. S of 34°27′ N lat ............................... Coastwide ......................................... S of 40°10′ N lat ............................... Coastwide ......................................... Coastwide ......................................... N of 40°10′ N lat .............................. 97 13,551 1,690 379 319 1,887 225 319 1,459 2,571 114 95 19 953 93,547 11,107 5,816 1,255 2,086 5,097 ........................ 3,200 4,497 565,191 4,402 9,402 ........................ 3,211 ........................ 2,479 1,868 652 15,749 6,534 83 9,933 1,477 348 293 1,748 210 291 1,338 2,358 84 72 11 882 84,192 9,175 5,386 1,162 1,823 3,466 ........................ 1,926 3,854 (x/) 4,115 8,791 ........................ 2,183 ........................ 1,621 1,666 392 14,725 6,050 50 9,933 1,477 348 293 1,748 210 291 1,338 2,358 84 NA NA 882 50,000 9,175 5,369 1,102 1,823 2,634 832 1,600 3,854 (x/) 4,115 6,892 1,899 1,428 756 1,621 1,666 392 14,725 6,050 41.2 7,837.9 1,419.7 345.7 274.9 1,700.2 208.7 287.1 1,268.6 2,260.3 72.8 NA NA 862.9 48,402.8 8,924.37 5,090.6 1,089 1,571.6 2,580.3 829.8 1,093.9 3,829.3 304,005 3,727.5 See Table 1c 1,871.6 1,349.6 749.3 1,277 1,647.6 343.6 14,476.7 5,012.5 603 198 20 79 1,016 223 4,802 1,511 1,439 1,595 709 603 198 20 79 1,016 223 4,802 1,511 1,438 1,595 709 600.7 197.8 18.0 75.9 1,011.6 201.7 4,581.1 1,438.7 1,305.2 1,529.1 670.1 Stock Complexes Blue/Deacon/Black Rockfish ii/ .......... Cabezon/Kelp Greenling jj/ ................ Cabezon/Kelp Greenling kk/ ............... Nearshore Rockfish North ll/ .............. Nearshore Rockfish South mm/ .......... Other Fish nn/ ..................................... Other Flatfish oo/ ................................ Shelf Rockfish North pp/ ..................... Shelf Rockfish South qq/ .................... Slope Rockfish North rr/ ..................... Slope Rockfish South ss/ ................... Oregon ............................................. Oregon ............................................. Washington ...................................... N of 40°10′ N lat .............................. S of 40°10′ N lat ............................... Coastwide ......................................... Coastwide ......................................... N of 40°10′ N lat .............................. S of 40°10′ N lat ............................... N of 40°10′ N lat .............................. S of 40°10′ N lat ............................... 676 215 25 94 1,232 286 7,714 1,888 1,842 1,862 873 a/ Annual catch limits (ACLs), annual catch targets (ACTs) and harvest guidelines (HGs) are specified as total catch values. HGs means the HG or quota after subtracting Pacific Coast treaty Indian tribes allocations and projected catch, projected research catch, deductions for fishing mortality in non-groundfish fisheries, and deductions for EFPs from the ACL or ACT. c/ Yelloweye rockfish. The 50 mt ACL is based on the current rebuilding plan with a target year to rebuild of 2029 and an SPR harvest rate of 65 percent. 8.85 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (5 mt), EFP catch (0.24 mt), research (2.92 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (0.69 mt) resulting in a fishery HG of 41.2 mt. The non-trawl HG is 37.9 mt. The combined non-nearshore/nearshore HG is 7.9 mt. Recreational HGs are: 9.7 mt (Washington); 8.8 mt (Oregon); and 11.4 mt (California). In addition, the non-trawl ACT is 29.5, and the combined non-nearshore/nearshore ACT is 6.2 mt. Recreational ACTs are: 7.5 mt (Washington), 6.9 (Oregon), and 8.9 mt (California). d/ Arrowtooth flounder. 2,095.08 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (2,041 mt), EFP fishing (0.1 mt), research (12.98 mt) and incidental open access (41 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 7,837.9 mt. e/ Big skate. 57.31 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (15 mt), EFP fishing (0.1 mt), and research catch (5.49 mt), and incidental open access (36.72 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,419.7 mt. f/ Black rockfish (California). 2.26 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP fishing (1.0 mt), research (0.08 mt), and incidental open access (1.18 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 345.7 mt. g/ Black rockfish (Washington). 18.1 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (18 mt) and research catch (0.1 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 274.9 mt. h/ Bocaccio south of 40°10′ N lat. 47.82 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP catch (40 mt), research (5.6 mt), and incidental open access (2.22 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,700.2 mt. The combined non-nearshore and nearshore HG is 320.2 mt. The California recreational fishery HG is 716.2 mt. i/ Cabezon (California). 1.28 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP (1 mt), research (0.02 mt), and incidental open access fishery (0.26 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 208.7 mt. j/ California scorpionfish south of 34°27′ N lat. 3.89 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate research (0.18 mt) and the incidental open access fishery (3.71 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 287.1 mt. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS b/ Fishery VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:17 May 03, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM 04MYP1 khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 4, 2021 / Proposed Rules 23667 k/ Canary rockfish. 69.39 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (50 mt), EFP catch (8 mt), and research catch (10.08 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (1.31 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,268.6 mt. The combined nearshore/non-nearshore HG is 126.6 mt. Recreational HGs are: 43.3 mt (Washington); 65.1 mt (Oregon); and 116.7 mt (California). l/ Chilipepper rockfish south of 40°10′ N lat. 97.7 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP fishing (70 mt), research (14.04 mt), the incidental open access fishery (13.66 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 2,260.3 mt. m/ Cowcod south of 40°10′ N lat. 11.17 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP fishing (1.0 mt), research (10 mt), and incidental open access (0.17 mt), resulting in a fishery harvest guideline of 72.8 mt. A single ACT of 50 mt is being set for the Conception and Monterey areas combined. n/ Darkblotched rockfish. 19.06 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (0.2 mt), EFP catch (0.6 mt), and research catch (8.46 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (9.8 mt) resulting in a fishery HG of 862.9 mt. o/ Dover sole. 1,597.21 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (1,497 mt), EFP fishing (0.1 mt), research (50.84 mt), and incidental open access (49.27 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 48,402.8 mt. p/ English sole. 250.63 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (200 mt), EFP fishing (0.1 mt), research (8.01 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (42.52 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 8,924.37 mt. q/ Lingcod north of 40°10′ N lat. 278.38 mt is deducted from the ACL for the Tribal fishery (250 mt), EFP catch (0.1 mt), research (16.6 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (11.68 mt) resulting in a fishery HG of 5,090.6 mt. r/ Lingcod south of 40°10′ N lat. 13 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP catch (1.5 mt), research (3.19 mt), and incidental open access fishery (8.31 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,089 mt. s/ Longnose skate. 251.40 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (220 mt), EFP catch (0.1 mt), and research catch (12.46 mt), and incidental open access fishery (18.84 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,571.6 mt. t/ Longspine thornyhead north of 34°27′ N lat. 53.71 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (30 mt), research catch (17.49 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (6.22 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 2,580.3 mt. u/ Longspine thornyhead south of 34°27′ N lat. 2.24 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate research catch (1.41 mt) and the incidental open access fishery (0.8 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 829.6 mt. v/ Pacific cod. 506.1 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (500 mt), EFP fishing (0.1 mt), research catch (5.47 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (0.53 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,093.9 mt. w/ Pacific ocean perch north of 40°10′ N lat. 24.73 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (9.2 mt), EFP fishing (0.1 mt), research catch (5.39 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (10.04 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 3,829.3 mt. x/ The 2021 OFL of 565,191 mt is based on the 2021 assessment with an F40 percent of FMSY proxy. The proposed 2021 coastwide adjusted Total Allowable Catch (TAC) is 500,000 mt. The U.S. TAC is 73.88 percent of the coastwide TAC. The proposed 2021 adjusted U.S. TAC is 369,400 mt (314,320 mt unadjusted TAC + 55,080 mt carryover adjustment). From the adjusted U.S. TAC, 64,645 mt is deducted to accommodate the Tribal fishery, and 750 mt is deducted to accommodate research and bycatch in other fisheries, resulting in a 2021 fishery HG of 304,005 mt. The TAC for Pacific whiting is established under the provisions of the Agreement with Canada on Pacific Hake/Whiting and the Pacific Whiting Act of 2006, 16 U.S.C. 7001–7010, and the international exception applies. Therefore, no ABC or ACL values are provided for Pacific whiting. y/ Petrale sole. 387.54 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (350 mt), EFP catch (0.1 mt), research (24.14 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (13.3 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 3,727.5 mt. z/ Sablefish north of 36° N lat. This coastwide ACL value is not specified in regulations. The coastwide ACL value is apportioned north and south of 36° N lat., using a rolling 5-year average estimated swept area biomass from the NMFS NWFSC trawl survey, with 78.4 percent apportioned north of 36° N lat. and 21.6 percent apportioned south of 36° N lat. The northern ACL is 6,892 mt and is reduced by 689.2 mt for the Tribal allocation (10 percent of the ACL north of 36° N lat.). The 689.2 mt Tribal allocation is reduced by 1.7 percent to account for discard mortality. Detailed sablefish allocations are shown in Table 1c. aa/ Sablefish south of 36° N lat. The ACL for the area south of 36° N lat. is 1,899 mt (21.6 percent of the calculated coastwide ACL value). 27.4 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate research (2.40 mt) and the incidental open access fishery (25 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,871.6 mt. bb/ Shortspine thornyhead north of 34°27′ N lat. 78.4 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (50 mt), EFP catch (0.1 mt), and research catch (10.48 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (17.82 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,349.6 mt for the area north of 34°27′ N lat. cc/ Shortspine thornyhead south of 34°27′ N lat. 6.71 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate research catch (0.71 mt) and the incidental open access fishery (6 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 749.3 mt for the area south of 34°27′ N lat. dd/ Spiny dogfish. 344 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (275 mt), EFP catch (1.1 mt), research (34.27 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (33.63 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,277 mt. ee/ Splitnose rockfish south of 40°10′ N lat. 18.42 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP catch (1.5 mt), research (11.17 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (5.75 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,647.6 mt. ff/ Starry flounder. 48.38 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (2 mt), EFP catch (0.1 mt), research (0.57 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (45.71 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 343.6 mt. gg/ Widow rockfish. 248.32 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (200 mt), EFP catch (28 mt), research (17.27 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (3.05 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 14,476.7 mt. hh/ Yellowtail rockfish north of 40°10′ N lat. 1,047.55 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (1,000 mt), EFP catch (10 mt), research (20.55 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (7 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 5,012.5 mt. ii/ Black rockfish/Blue rockfish/Deacon rockfish (Oregon). 2.32 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the EFP catch (0.5 mt), research (0.08 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (1.74 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 600.7 mt. jj/ Cabezon/kelp greenling (Oregon). 0.21 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP catch (0.1 mt), research (0.05 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (0.06 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 197.8 mt. kk/ Cabezon/kelp greenling (Washington). 2 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery, therefore the fishery HG is 18 mt. ll/ Nearshore Rockfish north of 40°10′ N lat. 3.08 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (1.5 mt), EFP catch (0.5 mt), research (0.47 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (0.61 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 75.9 mt. State specific HGs are Washington (18.4 mt), Oregon (22.7 mt), and California (37.6 mt). mm/ Nearshore Rockfish south of 40°10′ N lat. 4.42 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate research catch (2.68 mt) and the incidental open access fishery (2.68 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,011.6 mt. nn/ Other Fish. The Other Fish complex is comprised of kelp greenling off California and leopard shark coastwide. 21.34 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP catch (0.1 mt), research (6.29 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (14.95 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 201.7 mt. oo/ Other Flatfish. The Other Flatfish complex is comprised of flatfish species managed in the PCGFMP that are not managed with stock-specific OFLs/ABCs/ACLs. Most of the species in the Other Flatfish complex are unassessed and include: Butter sole, curlfin sole, flathead sole, Pacific sanddab, rock sole, sand sole, and rex sole. 220.89 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (60 mt), EFP catch (0.1 mt), research (23.63 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (137.16 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 4,581.1 mt. pp/ Shelf Rockfish north of 40°10′ N lat. 72.44 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (30 mt), EFP catch (1.5 mt), research (15.32 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (25.62 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,438.66 mt. qq/ Shelf Rockfish south of 40°10′ N lat. 132.77 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP catch (50 mt), research catch (15.1 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (67.67 mt) resulting in a fishery HG of 1,305.2 mt. rr/ Slope Rockfish north of 40°10′ N lat. 65.89 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (36 mt), EFP catch (0.5 mt), and research (10.51 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (18.88 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,529.1 mt. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:17 May 03, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM 04MYP1 23668 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 4, 2021 / Proposed Rules ss/ Slope Rockfish south of 40°10′ N lat. 38.94 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP catch (1 mt), and research (18.21 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (19.73 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 670.1 mt. Blackgill rockfish has a stock-specific HG for the entire groundfish fishery south of 40°10′ N lat. set equal to the species′ contribution to the ACL. Harvest of blackgill rockfish in all groundfish fisheries south of 40°10′ N lat. counts against this HG of 176.5 mt. 4. Revise Table 1b to part 660, subpart C, to read as follows: ■ TABLE 1b TO PART 660, SUBPART C—2021, ALLOCATIONS BY SPECIES OR SPECIES GROUP [Weight in metric tons] Stocks/stock complexes Trawl Fishery HG or ACT a/b/ Area % Yelloweye Rockfish a/ .......... Arrowtooth flounder ............. Big skate a/ .......................... Bocaccio a/ ........................... Canary rockfish a/ ................ Chilipepper rockfish ............ Cowcod a/ ............................ Darkblotched rockfish ......... Dover sole ........................... English sole ......................... Lingcod ................................ Lingcod a/ ............................. Longnose skate a/ ................ Longspine thornyhead ........ Pacific cod ........................... Pacific ocean perch ............ Pacific whiting c/ .................. Petrale sole a/ ...................... Coastwide ........................... Coastwide ........................... Coastwide ........................... S of 40°10′ N lat ................. Coastwide ........................... S of 40°10′ N lat ................. S of 40°10′ N lat ................. Coastwide ........................... Coastwide ........................... Coastwide ........................... N of 40′10° N lat ................ S of 40′10° N lat ................. Coastwide ........................... N of 34°27′ N lat ................ Coastwide ........................... N of 40°10′ N lat ................ Coastwide ........................... Coastwide ........................... 41.2 7,837.9 1,419.7 1,700.2 1,268.6 2,260.3 50 862.9 48,402.8 8,924.4 5,090.6 1,089 1,571.6 2,580.3 1,093.9 3,829.3 304,005 3,727.9 Sablefish ............................. N of 36° N lat ..................... NA Sablefish ............................. Shortspine thornyhead ........ Shortspine thornyhead ........ Splitnose rockfish ................ Starry flounder .................... Widow rockfish a/ ................. Yellowtail rockfish ............... Other Flatfish ...................... Shelf Rockfish a/ .................. Shelf Rockfish a/ .................. Slope Rockfish .................... Slope Rockfish a/ ................. S of 36° N lat ..................... N of 34°27′ N lat ................ S of 34°27′ N lat ................. S of 40°10′ N lat ................. Coastwide ........................... Coastwide ........................... N of 40°10′ N lat ................ Coastwide ........................... N of 40°10′ N lat ................ S of 40°10′ N lat ................. N of 40°10′ N lat ................ S of 40°10′ N lat ................. 1,861.6 1,349.6 749.3 1,647.6 343.6 14,476.7 5,012.5 4581.1 1,438.7 1,305.2 1,529.1 670.1 8 95 95 39 72 75 36 95 95 95 45 40 90 95 95 95 100 ........................ Non-trawl Mt % 3.3 7,446 1,348.7 663.8 917 1,695.2 18 819.8 45,982.7 8,478.2 2,290.8 435.6 1,414.4 2,451.3 1,039.2 3,637.8 304,005 3,697.9 Mt 92 5 5 60 28 25 64 5 5 5 55 60 10 5 5 5 0 ........................ 37.9 391.9 71 1,036.4 351.6 565.1 32 43.1 2,420.1 446.2 2,799.8 653.4 157.2 129 54.7 191.5 0 30 See Table 1c 42 95 ........................ 95 50 ........................ 88 90 60.2 12.2 81 ........................ 782.3 1,282.1 50 1,565.2 171.8 14,076.7 4,411.0 4,123 866.1 159.2 1,238.6 526.4 58 5 ........................ 5 50 ........................ 12 10 39.8 87.8 19 ........................ 1,080.3 67.5 699.3 82.4 171.8 400 601.5 458.1 572.6 1,146 290.5 143.7 a/ Allocations decided through the biennial specification process. cowcod fishery harvest guideline is further reduced to an ACT of 50 mt. The non-trawl allocation is further split 50:50 between the commercial and recreational sectors. c/ Consistent with regulations at § 660.55(i)(2), the commercial harvest guideline for Pacific whiting is allocated as follows: 34 percent for the C/ P Coop Program; 24 percent for the MS Coop Program; and 42 percent for the Shorebased IFQ Program. No more than 5 percent of the Shorebased IFQ Program allocation may be taken and retained south of 42° N lat. before the start of the primary Pacific whiting season north of 42° N lat. b/ The 5. In § 660.140, revise paragraph (d)(1)(ii)(D) to read as follows: ■ § 660.140 * Shorebased IFQ Program. * * (d) * * * (1) * * * * * (ii) * * * (D) For the trawl fishery, NMFS will issue QP based on the following shorebased trawl allocations: khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (d)(1)(ii)(D) IFQ species Area Yelloweye Rockfish ................................................. Arrowtooth flounder ................................................ Bocaccio ................................................................. Canary rockfish ....................................................... Chilipepper .............................................................. Cowcod ................................................................... Coastwide ............................................................... Coastwide ............................................................... South of 40°10′ N lat .............................................. Coastwide ............................................................... South of 40°10′ N lat .............................................. South of 40°10′ N lat .............................................. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:17 May 03, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM 2021 Shorebased trawl allocation (mt) 2022 Shorebased trawl allocation (mt) 3.3 7,376.02 663.75 880.96 1,695.2 18 3.4 5974.77 654.38 858.56 1,621 18 04MYP1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 4, 2021 / Proposed Rules 23669 TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (d)(1)(ii)(D)—Continued IFQ species Area Darkblotched rockfish ............................................. Dover sole ............................................................... English sole ............................................................ Lingcod ................................................................... Lingcod ................................................................... Longspine thornyhead ............................................ Pacific cod .............................................................. Pacific halibut (IBQ) ................................................ Pacific ocean perch ................................................ Pacific whiting ......................................................... Petrale sole ............................................................. Sablefish ................................................................. Sablefish ................................................................. Shortspine thornyhead ............................................ Shortspine thornyhead ............................................ Splitnose rockfish .................................................... Starry flounder ........................................................ Widow rockfish ........................................................ Yellowtail rockfish ................................................... Other Flatfish complex ............................................ Shelf Rockfish complex .......................................... Shelf Rockfish complex .......................................... Slope Rockfish complex ......................................... Slope Rockfish complex ......................................... Coastwide ............................................................... Coastwide ............................................................... Coastwide ............................................................... North of 40°10′ N lat .............................................. South of 40°10′ N lat .............................................. North of 34°27′ N lat .............................................. Coastwide ............................................................... North of 40°10′ N lat .............................................. North of 40°10′ N lat .............................................. Coastwide ............................................................... Coastwide ............................................................... North of 36° N lat ................................................... South of 36° N lat .................................................. North of 34°27′ N lat .............................................. South of 34°27′ N lat .............................................. South of 40°10′ N lat .............................................. Coastwide ............................................................... Coastwide ............................................................... North of 40°10′ N lat .............................................. Coastwide ............................................................... North of 40°10′ N lat .............................................. South of 40°10′ N lat .............................................. North of 40°10′ N lat .............................................. South of 40°10′ N lat .............................................. * * * * 2021 Shorebased trawl allocation (mt) 2022 Shorebased trawl allocation (mt) 743.39 45,972.65 8,478.2 2,275.78 435.6 2,451.28 1,039.21 69.6 3,337.74 127,682 3,692.9 3,139.59 786 1,212.12 50 1,565.20 171.8 13,600.68 4,091.13 4,088.00 831.07 159.24 938.58 526.4 694.94 45,972.65 8,407.9 2,090.83 463.6 2,278.38 1,039.21 69.6 3,201.94 TBD 3,237.5 2,985.42 748 1,178.87 50 1,531.00 171.8 12,663.68 3,898.4 4,120.40 794.56 158.02 916.71 523.9 * [FR Doc. 2021–08997 Filed 5–3–21; 8:45 am] khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS BILLING CODE 3510–22–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:17 May 03, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM 04MYP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 4, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 23659-23669]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-08997]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 660

[Docket No. 210423-0088]
RIN 0648-BK25


Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Fisheries off West Coast States; 
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; 2021 Harvest Specifications for 
Pacific Whiting, and 2021 Pacific Whiting Tribal Allocation

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Revised proposed rule; reopening of public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS issues the revised proposed rule for the 2021 Pacific 
whiting fishery under the authority of the Pacific Coast Groundfish 
Fishery Management Plan, the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
Management Act, the Pacific Whiting Act of 2006 (Whiting Act), and 
other applicable laws. NMFS issued a proposed rule on February 16, 2021 
that proposed the 2021 Pacific whiting tribal allocation and set-asides 
for research and incidental mortality. NMFS is issuing a revised 
proposed rule to include additional actions due to the lack of a 
bilateral agreement on the 2021 Pacific whiting coastwide total 
allowable catch (TAC) by the Governments of Canada and the United 
States. This revised proposed rule includes the 2021 coastwide TAC and 
U.S. TAC for Pacific whiting as determined by NMFS under the Whiting 
Act, the non-tribal sector allocations, and the tribal allocation and 
set-asides included in the original proposed rule. The proposed 
measures are intended to help prevent overfishing, achieve optimum 
yield, and ensure that management measures are based on the best 
scientific information available.

DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received no later than 
May 19, 2021.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by 
NOAA-NMFS-2021-0002 by any of the following methods:
     Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public 
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to https://www.regulations.gov and enter NOAA-NMFS-2021-0002 in the Search box. 
Click on the ``Comment'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter 
or attach your comments.
     Mail: Barry Thom, c/o Stacey Miller, Sustainable Fisheries 
Division, West Coast Region, NMFS, 1201 NE Lloyd Blvd., Suite 1100, 
Portland, OR 97232.
    Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other 
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period, 
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are part of the 
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on 
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying 
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business 
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily 
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous 
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain 
anonymous).

Electronic Access

    This proposed rule is accessible via the internet at the Office of 
the Federal Register website at https://www.federalregister.gov. 
Background information and documents are available at the NMFS website 
at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov and at the Pacific Fishery Management 
Council's website at https://www.pcouncil.org/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stacey Miller, phone: 503-231-6290, 
and email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

[[Page 23660]]

Background

    This rule proposes establishing the 2021 Pacific whiting harvest 
specifications, including the adjusted coastwide TAC of 500,000 mt and 
the adjusted U.S. TAC of 369,400 mt, and 2021 tribal allocations. NMFS 
issued a proposed rule on February 16, 2021 (86 FR 9473) that proposed 
allocating 17.5 percent of the U.S. TAC of Pacific whiting for 2021 to 
Pacific Coast Indian tribes that have a treaty right to harvest 
groundfish, and implement set-asides (750 mt) for Pacific whiting for 
research and incidental mortality in other fisheries. We requested 
public comment on these proposed actions through March 18, 2021 but 
received no public comments during the comment period. NMFS is issuing 
a revised proposed rule for these two actions as well as several 
additional actions related to the Pacific whiting fishery due to the 
lack of a bilateral agreement on the 2021 Pacific whiting coastwide TAC 
under the Agreement between the Government of the United States of 
America and the Government of Canada on Pacific Hake/Whiting of 2003 
(Agreement). The Agreement's Joint Management Committee (JMC) met on 
March 15-17, 2021 but was not able to reach agreement on a coastwide 
TAC, which resulted in the JMC not recommending a coastwide TAC by 
March 25th, as required by the Agreement. If the JMC does not recommend 
a TAC, the Whiting Act directs NMFS (as delegated by the Secretary of 
Commerce) to establish a coastwide and U.S. TAC for Pacific whiting. 
This revised proposed rule would establish the 2021 coastwide and U.S. 
TAC for Pacific whiting based on the criteria identified in the Whiting 
Act and establish the Pacific whiting non-tribal sector allocations. 
This revised proposed rule also includes the 2021 tribal allocation and 
research set aside, which were described in the original proposed rule 
published February 16, 2021 (86 FR 9473). The allocations for Pacific 
whiting would be effective until December 31, 2021.

Pacific Whiting Agreement and Whiting Act

    The transboundary stock of Pacific whiting is managed through the 
Agreement, which establishes bilateral bodies to implement the terms of 
the Agreement. The bilateral bodies include: The JMC, which recommends 
the annual catch level for Pacific whiting; the Joint Technical 
Committee (JTC), which conducts the Pacific whiting stock assessment; 
the Scientific Review Group (SRG), which reviews the stock assessment; 
and the Advisory Panel (AP), which provides stakeholder input to the 
JMC.
    The Agreement establishes a default harvest policy of F-40 percent, 
which means a fishing mortality rate that would reduce the spawning 
biomass to 40 percent of the estimated unfished level. The Agreement 
also allocates 73.88 percent of the Pacific whiting total allowable 
catch (TAC) to the United States and 26.12 percent of the TAC to 
Canada.
    Based on recommendations from the Agreement's JTC, SRG, and AP, the 
JMC recommends the coastwide Pacific whiting TAC by March 25th of each 
year, which is subsequently approved by NMFS, under the delegation of 
authority from the Secretary of Commerce. In years when the JMC does 
make a TAC recommendation to the parties, NMFS (under the delegation of 
authority from the Secretary of Commerce) approves the U.S. TAC with 
concurrence from the Department of State. The U.S. TAC is then 
allocated into tribal and non-tribal sectors.
    The 2021 JMC negotiations were held from March 15-17, 2021. These 
negotiations typically focus on two factors to derive a coastwide TAC: 
Agreement on a sustainable level of realized catch using stock 
assessment projections and other relevant scientific advice, and 
estimating the likely utilization rate, which is the proportion of the 
TAC harvested by the various sectors of the U.S. and Canadian fisheries 
based on historical rates and knowledge of existing conditions. Full 
utilization of the TAC (100 percent) is not practicable, due to myriad 
of regulatory and operational constraints. These constraints are long-
identified factors that affect utilization rates and setting the 
coastwide TAC at a higher level allows the fisheries to achieve the 
realized catch target. During the March 2021 JMC meeting, the JMC 
agreed on a realized catch target of 380,000 mt but did not reach an 
agreement on a utilization rate, and therefore did not come to a 
bilateral agreement on the coastwide TAC. This is the second 
consecutive year that the JMC did not reach an agreement on a coastwide 
TAC.
    The Agreement does not specify a procedure for when the JMC does 
not agree on a coastwide TAC, however, the Whiting Act directs the 
Secretary of Commerce to establish the TAC for Pacific whiting when the 
JMC does not agree on a coastwide TAC. The Act states that NMFS (as 
delegated by the Secretary of Commerce) should establish the coastwide 
Pacific whiting TAC, taking into account recommendations from the JMC, 
JTC, SRG, AP, and the Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council). The 
Act requires NMFS to base the coastwide TAC decision on the best 
scientific information available, and use the default harvest rate 
unless scientific information indicates a different rate is necessary 
to sustain the Pacific whiting resource. The Act also requires NMFS to 
establish the U.S. share of the TAC based on the U.S./Canada percentage 
split and adjustments specified in the Agreement.

2021 Stock Assessment and Scientific Review

    The JTC completed a stock assessment for Pacific whiting in 
February 2021. This assessment is available at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/document/2021-pacific-hake-whiting-stock-assessment. The assessment was reviewed by the SRG during a four-
day meeting held online. The SRG report is available at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/document/2021-pacific-hake-whiting-scientific-review-group-report. The SRG considered the 2021 assessment 
report and appendices to represent the best scientific information 
available for Pacific hake/whiting.
    The 2021 assessment model uses the same structure as the 2020 stock 
assessment model. The model is fit to an acoustic survey index of 
abundance, annual commercial catches of the transboundary Pacific 
whiting stock, and age composition data from an acoustic survey and 
commercial fisheries. Age-composition data provide information to 
estimate relative year class strength. Updates to the data in the 2021 
assessment include: Fishery catch and age-composition data from 2020, 
weight-at-age data for 2020, and minor changes to pre-2020 data. There 
was not an acoustic survey planned for 2020 and therefore no new survey 
data were included in the 2021 model. Additionally, no new age data 
were available from the Canadian freezer-trawler feet in 2020 due to 
the ongoing pandemic.
    The Pacific whiting biomass is a highly cyclical and highly 
productive stock. Since the 1960s, it is estimated to have ranged from 
well below to above unfished levels. Compared to other groundfish 
stocks, the Pacific whiting stock has high recruitment variability, 
with low average recruitment levels and occasional large year-classes 
that often comprise much of the biomass. At the start of 2021, the 
Pacific whiting stock continues to be supported by multiple above 
average cohorts, including the 2010, 2014, 2016, and 2017 year classes 
which comprise 14 percent, 25 percent, 24 percent and 17 percent, 
respectively

[[Page 23661]]

of the stock biomass. The 2010 year class is estimated to be the second 
highest recruitment in the assessment time series; the 2014 and 2016 
year classes are estimated to be above average in strength; and the 
2012 and 2017 year classes are about average. The assessment estimates 
small year classes in 2011, 2013, 2015, and 2018. There is very little 
information in the data to estimate the size of the 2019 year class and 
there is no information in the data to estimate the sizes of the 2020 
and 2021 year classes.
    The Pacific whiting relative spawning biomass was near unfished 
levels (97.9 percent of unfished) in 2017 and has been declining since 
that time as the 2010 and 2014 year classes are ageing and mortality 
surpasses increased production, combined with record high catches. At 
the start of 2021, the relative spawning stock biomass is still well 
above the biomass level associated with the default harvest rate (40 
percent of unfished level), and is estimated to be 0.981 million mt, or 
59 percent of unfished levels. The stock is considered at a healthy 
level, and the joint probability that the relative spawning stock 
biomass is both below 40 percent of unfished level and that fishing 
mortality is above the relative fishing intensity of the Agreement's F-
40 percent default harvest rate is estimated to be 1.7 percent.

2021 Pacific Whiting Coastwide TAC Evaluation and Recommendation

    In determining the coastwide TAC, NMFS considered information and 
recommendations from the Agreement's JMC, JTC, SRG, and AP, and the 
Council. The stock assessment from the JTC and the SRG peer review are 
the best scientific information available for determining the coastwide 
Pacific whiting TAC. NMFS heard testimony from the AP and JMC at the 
JMC's March 2021 meeting. NMFS has reached out to the Council and will 
consider any recommendations provided by the Council.
    NMFS considered a range of coastwide TAC alternatives including the 
coastwide TAC resulting from the default harvest rate (565,191 mt) and 
the coastwide TACs that were discussed during the AP and JMC March 2021 
meeting. This includes the U.S. delegation's initial (500,000 mt) and 
final positions (475,000 mt) and the Canadian delegation's initial 
(422,000 mt) and final positions (465,000 mt). However, we excluded the 
Canadian delegation's proposed TACs from further consideration because 
according to the stock assessment they are not necessary to support a 
sustainable Pacific whiting resource. Members of the JMC and AP also 
identified that these TACs would have a disproportionally negative 
economic impact on the U.S. fishing fleet compared to the Canadian 
fishing fleet.
    NMFS therefore evaluated coastwide TACs ranging from 475,000 mt to 
565,191 mt in developing our proposed coastwide TAC of 500,000 mt. The 
stock assessment supports the lower TACs within this range and would 
provide adequate opportunity for both Canadian and U.S. fleets, while 
sustainably managing the Pacific whiting resource.

Biological Impacts of Potential Whiting TAC Levels

    The Act directs NMFS to use the default harvest rate set out in the 
Agreement unless NMFS determines that a different rate is necessary to 
sustain the offshore whiting resource. The Agreement specifies a 
default harvest rate of ``F-40 percent'' which is the fishing mortality 
rate that would reduce the relative spawning stock biomass, calculated 
on a per recruit basis (a measure of stock reproductive potential) to 
40 percent of what it would have been in the absence of fishing 
mortality, often called B40. Although there is not a default biomass 
level, the JMC, since implementation of the Agreement, has focused on 
choosing a TAC designed to prevent the relative spawning stock biomass 
from falling below B40. NMFS followed the same practice of choosing a 
TAC designed to prevent the relative spawning stock biomass from 
falling below this biomass level.
    To evaluate the impact of the TACs on relative spawning stock 
biomass, we applied an estimate of the coastwide Pacific whiting 
fleet's utilization rate (i.e. the proportion of the TAC removed 
through fishing effort) to the range of TACs we considered. Over the 
last ten years, neither the U.S. nor the Canadian fishing fleets have 
caught the entire coastwide TAC (100 percent utilization rate). The 
ten-year (2010-2019) average utilization rate is 69.8 percent of the 
coastwide TAC and the average utilization rate for the last 5 years was 
70.06 percent of the coastwide TAC. To derive an upper estimate of 
utilization, NMFS took the average of the five highest utilization 
rates from 2011-2020, which results in a utilization rate of 75.82 
percent of the coastwide TAC. Because of this, NMFS determined it is 
reasonable to focus on a range of utilization rates from 70 percent to 
76 percent, which encompass the average of the last five years (70.06 
percent) and the average of the highest 5 utilization rates since 2011 
(75.82 percent). These averages provide a realistic range for 
projecting the coastwide utilization rates in 2021 and 2022 and are 
consistent with the 2021 projected utilization rates provided by U.S. 
members of the AP during the JMC negotiations.
    We applied the range of average utilization rates to the range of 
coastwide TACs to derive the projected harvest level and anticipated 
impacts to the Pacific whiting spawning stock biomass. The stock 
assessment indicates that across the range of TACs and utilization 
rates evaluated, the projected harvest levels result in relative 
spawning stock biomass levels above B40 percent after one fishing year 
(47-49 percent of unfished levels) and between 39-44 percent of 
unfished levels after two years of fishing at the same level.
    Using the same approach as described above, a coastwide TAC set at 
the default harvest rate (565,191 mt) combined with the 0.70 and 0.76 
utilization rates results in projected harvest rates between 395,634 
mt-429,545 mt and a projected spawning biomass of 48-47 percent of 
unfished levels after one year of fishing, and 41-39 percent of 
unfished levels after two years of fishing. Of the lower TACs 
considered in the range, a coastwide TAC of 500,000 mt results in 
projected harvest rates between 350,000 mt-380,000 mt and projected 
spawning biomass of 49-48 percent of unfished levels after one year of 
fishing, and 43-42 percent of unfished levels after 2 years of fishing, 
using the lower (0.70) and higher (0.76) utilization rates 
respectively. The lowest TAC considered (475,000 mt) combined with the 
0.70 and 0.76 utilization rates results in lower projected harvest 
(332,500 mt-361,000 mt) and projections of relative spawning biomass of 
49 percent after one year of fishing, and 44-43 percent of unfished 
levels after two years of fishing.
    Overall, the stock assessment indicates that the relative spawning 
stock biomass of Pacific whiting has a high probability of being lower 
at the beginning of 2022 than 2021, ranging from 65 percent probability 
with no harvest to a 90 percent probability at a catch equal to the 
default harvest rate. Although a decline in the Pacific whiting stock 
is probable even in the absence of fishing pressure, the decline does 
not threaten the sustainability of the resource. At the proposed TAC of 
500,000 mt, with a realized catch goal of 380,000 mt (based on a 0.76 
utilization rate), the stock assessment indicates there is a 36 percent 
chance of relative spawning stock biomass falling

[[Page 23662]]

below B40 percent in one year. The stock assessment also indicates 
there is an 11 percent probability of falling below B25 percent, and a 
1 percent chance of falling below B10 percent after one year for this 
realized catch level.
    Continuing this harvest level into a second year does have an 
increased chance of the relative spawning stock biomass falling below 
B40 percent. Two years of actual harvests at approximately 380,000 mt 
result in a 47 percent probability of falling below B40 percent, a 23 
percent probability of falling below B25 percent, and a 4 percent 
probability of falling below B10 percent.
    In setting last year's coastwide TAC, (85 FR 36803; June 18, 2020) 
NMFS selected a TAC that resulted in a biomass level above B40 after 2 
years of fishing and took into account economic impacts to U.S. 
fisheries and coastal communities. NMFS continued with this approach to 
determine the 2021 coastwide TAC. The 2021 stock assessment estimates 
that the whiting stock is at a healthy level of 59 percent of unfished 
biomass. However, the stock is continuing to decline at an increased 
rate as natural mortality of the 2010 and 2014-year classes exceeds 
biomass growth. There is also a high level of uncertainty regarding the 
strength of recent recruitments. Therefore, NMFS determined the best 
scientific information available indicates that reduction from last 
year's coastwide TAC (575,000 mt), and deviation from the Act's default 
harvest rate, would support the long-term sustainability of the stock.

Economic Impacts of Potential Pacific Whiting TAC levels

    The Pacific whiting fishery is the highest volume fishery on the 
West Coast of the United States, providing hundreds of jobs. In 2020, 
total revenue was estimated to be $21.4 million in the non-tribal 
shoreside sector and $21.5 million in the at-sea whiting sector. The 
total non-tribal ex-vessel revenue in 2020 is estimated to have been 
about $42.9 million. Maintaining access to the Pacific whiting resource 
is important for both direct fishery participants and West Coast 
fishing communities. During the JMC meeting, members of the JMC and AP 
also discussed the projected realized catch levels under each proposed 
TAC scenario and resulting economic impacts on the U.S. whiting 
fishery.
    The starting and ending coastwide TAC proposals from Canada, 
422,000 mt and 465,000 mt, represent a 26 percent and 19 percent 
reduction from the 2020 U.S. determined coastwide TAC, respectively. 
Reductions of this magnitude would have negative economic impacts on 
U.S. fisheries and coastal communities. Canada's proposed TACs reflect 
their concern with the declining Pacific whiting biomass as the 2010 
and 2014 year classes continue to age, as well as uncertainty of the 
recent recruitment strength because the stock assessment is not able to 
predict cohort strength until they are detected by the acoustic survey 
and fishery. However, the stock assessment indicates that the higher 
TACs proposed by the United States continue to provide a sustainable 
Pacific whiting resource and result in the relative spawning stock 
biomass levels above B40 percent after 1 year, and at or above B40 
percent after 2 years of fishing.
    Because of these factors, NMFS has determined that a measured 
reduction in the coastwide TAC from last year is appropriately 
precautionary to achieve the conservation goals, but also recognizes 
the need to minimize the economic impacts to U.S. fisheries and coastal 
communities as much as possible.

2021 Pacific Whiting Adjusted TAC Recommendation

    The Act requires NMFS to make the necessary adjustments to the TAC 
specified in the Agreement (Paragraph 5 of Article II). The Agreement 
(Paragraph 5 of Article II) requires adjustments to the coastwide TAC 
to account for overages if either U.S. or Canadian catch in the 
previous year exceeded its individual TAC, or carryovers, if U.S. or 
Canadian catch was less than its individual TAC in the previous year. 
Both the United States and Canada harvested less than their individual 
TACs in 2020, therefore carryover is applied to the 2021 TACs.
    Taking into account the percentage shares for each country (26.12 
percent for Canada and 73.88 percent for the United States) and the 
adjustments for uncaught fish (12,617 mt carryover for Canada and 
55,080 mt carryover for the United States), as required by the Act, we 
recommend a final adjusted coastwide TAC of 500,000 mt, with a final 
adjusted TAC for Canada of 130,600 mt (117,983 mt + 12,617 mt carryover 
adjustment), and a final adjusted TAC for the United States of 369,400 
mt (314,320 mt + 55,080 mt carryover adjustment). This recommendation 
is consistent with the best scientific information available, 
provisions of the Agreement, and the Whiting Act.

Tribal Allocations

    The regulations at 50 CFR 660.50(d) identify the procedures for 
implementing the treaty rights that Pacific Coast treaty Indian tribes 
have to harvest groundfish in their usual and accustomed fishing areas 
in U.S. waters. Tribes with treaty fishing rights in the area covered 
by the Pacific Coast Groundfish FMP request allocations, set-asides, or 
regulations specific to the tribes during the Council's biennial 
harvest specifications and management measures process. The regulations 
state that the Secretary will develop tribal allocations and 
regulations in consultation with the affected tribe(s) and, insofar as 
possible, with tribal consensus.
    NMFS allocates a portion of the U.S. TAC of Pacific whiting to the 
tribal fishery, following the process established in 50 CFR 660.50(d). 
The tribal allocation is subtracted from the U.S. Pacific whiting TAC 
before allocation to the non-tribal sectors.
    Four Washington coastal treaty Indian tribes including the Makah 
Indian Tribe, Quileute Indian Tribe, Quinault Indian Nation, and the 
Hoh Indian Tribe (collectively, the ``Treaty Tribes''), can participate 
in the tribal Pacific whiting fishery. Tribal allocations of Pacific 
whiting have been based on discussions with the Treaty Tribes regarding 
their intent for those fishing years. The Hoh Tribe has not expressed 
an interest in participating in the Pacific whiting fishery to date. 
The Quileute Tribe and Quinault Indian Nation have expressed interest 
in beginning to participate in the Pacific whiting fishery at a future 
date. To date, only the Makah Tribe has prosecuted a tribal fishery for 
Pacific whiting, and has harvested Pacific whiting since 1996 using 
midwater trawl gear. Table 1 below provides a recent history of U.S. 
TACs and annual tribal allocation in metric tons (mt).

   Table 1--U.S. Total Allowable Catch and Annual Tribal Allocation in
                            Metric Tons (mt)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Tribal
                  Year                     U.S. TAC \1\     allocation
                                               (mt)            (mt)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2010....................................         193,935          49,939
2011....................................         290,903          66,908
2012....................................         186,037          48,556
2013....................................         269,745          63,205
2014....................................         316,206          55,336
2015....................................         325,072          56,888
2016....................................         367,553          64,322
2017....................................         441,433          77,251
2018....................................         441,433          77,251
2019....................................         441,433          77,251

[[Page 23663]]

 
2020....................................         424,810          74,342
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Beginning in 2012, the United States started using the term Total
  Allowable Catch, or TAC, based on the Agreement between the Government
  of the United States of America and the Government of Canada on
  Pacific Hake/Whiting. Prior to 2012, the terms Optimal Yield (OY) and
  Annual Catch Limit (ACL) were used.

    In 2009, NMFS, the states of Washington and Oregon, and the Treaty 
Tribes started a process to determine the long-term tribal allocation 
for Pacific whiting. However, these groups have not yet determined a 
long-term allocation. In order to ensure Treaty Tribes continue to 
receive allocations, this rule proposes the 2021 tribal allocation of 
Pacific whiting. This allocation is not intended to set precedent for 
future allocations.
    In exchanges between NMFS and the Treaty Tribes during November and 
December 2020, the Makah Tribe indicated their intent to participate in 
the tribal Pacific whiting fishery in 2021 and requested 17.5 percent 
of the U.S. TAC. The Quinault Indian Nation, Quileute Indian Tribe and 
Hoh Indian Tribe informed NMFS in December 2020 that they will not 
participate in the 2021 fishery. NMFS will contact the Tribes during 
the proposed rule comment period to refine the 2021 allocation before 
allocating the final U.S. TAC between the tribal and non-tribal whiting 
fisheries. NMFS proposes a tribal allocation that accommodates the 
tribal request, specifically 17.5 percent of the U.S. TAC. The proposed 
2021 adjusted U.S. TAC is 369,400 mt, and therefore the proposed 2021 
tribal allocation is 64,645 mt. NMFS has determined that the current 
scientific information regarding the distribution and abundance of the 
coastal Pacific whiting stock indicates the 17.5 percent is within the 
range of the tribal treaty right to Pacific whiting.

Non-Tribal Research and Bycatch Set-Asides

    The U.S. non-tribal whiting fishery is managed under the Council's 
Pacific Coast Groundfish FMP. Each year, the Council recommends the 
amount of Pacific whiting to accommodate incidental mortality of 
Pacific whiting in research activities and non-groundfish fisheries 
based on estimates of scientific research catch and estimated bycatch 
mortality in non-groundfish fisheries. At its November 2020 meeting, 
the Council recommended an incidental mortality set-aside of 750 mt for 
2021. This is a reduction of the amount set-aside for research and 
incidental mortality from 1,500 mt in 2020. The 750 mt recommendation, 
however, reflects the recent 3 year average mortality that has declined 
from 942 mt in 2014-2016 to 216 mt in 2017-2019. This rule proposes the 
Council's recommendations.

Non-Tribal Harvest Guidelines and Allocations

    In addition to the tribal allocation, this proposed rule 
establishes the fishery harvest guideline (HG), called the non-tribal 
allocation. The proposed 2021 fishery HG for Pacific whiting is 304,005 
mt. This amount was determined by deducting the 64,645 mt tribal 
allocation and the 750 mt allocation for scientific research catch and 
fishing mortality in non-groundfish fisheries from the total adjusted 
U.S. TAC of 369,400 mt. The Council recommends the research and bycatch 
set-aside on an annual basis, based on estimates of scientific research 
catch and estimated bycatch mortality in non-groundfish fisheries. The 
regulations further allocate the fishery HG among the three non-tribal 
sectors of the Pacific whiting fishery: The catcher/processor (C/P) 
Coop Program, the Mothership (MS) Coop Program, and the Shorebased 
Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) Program. The C/P Coop Program is 
allocated 34 percent (103,362 mt for 2021), the MS Coop Program is 
allocated 24 percent (72,961 mt for 2021), and the Shorebased IFQ 
Program is allocated 42 percent (127,682 mt for 2021). The fishery 
south of 42[deg] N lat. may not take more than 6,384 mt (5 percent of 
the Shorebased IFQ Program allocation) prior to May 15, the start of 
the primary Pacific whiting season north of 42[deg] N lat.

    Table 2--2021 Proposed Pacific Whiting Allocations in Metric Tons
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           2021 Pacific
                                                              whiting
                         Sector                             allocation
                                                               (mt)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tribal..................................................          64,645
Catcher/Processor (C/P) Coop Program....................         103,362
Mothership (MS) Coop Program............................          72,961
Shorebased IFQ Program..................................         127,682
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This proposed rule would be implemented under the statutory and 
regulatory authority of section 304(b) and 305(d) of the Magnuson-
Stevens Act, and the Pacific Whiting Act of 2006. With this proposed 
rule, NMFS, acting on behalf of the Secretary, would ensure that the 
FMP is implemented in a manner consistent with treaty rights of four 
Treaty Tribes to fish in their ``usual and accustomed grounds and 
stations'' in common with non-tribal citizens. United States v. 
Washington, 384 F. Supp. 313 (W.D. 1974).

Classification

    NMFS notes that the public comment period for this proposed rule is 
15 days.
    Finalizing the Pacific whiting harvest specifications closer to the 
start of the Pacific whiting fishing season on May 15th provides the 
industry with more time to plan and execute the fishery and gives them 
earlier access to the finalized allocations of Pacific whiting. 
Moreover, the public already had an opportunity to comment under the 
proposed rule issued on February 16, 2021 on percentage of the U.S. TAC 
allocated to the Pacific Coast Indian tribes that have a treaty right 
to harvest groundfish and set-aside research and incidental mortality. 
NMFS has determined that a 15-day comment period best balances the 
interest in allowing the public adequate time to comment on the 
proposed measures while implementing the management measures, including 
the finalizing Pacific whiting allocations, in a timely manner.
    Pursuant to section 304 (b)(1)(A) and 305 (d) of the Magnuson-
Stevens Act, the NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this 
proposed rule is consistent with the Pacific Coast Groundfish FMP, 
other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law, 
subject to further consideration after public comment. In making its 
final determination, NMFS will take into account the complete record, 
including comments received during the comment period.
    Pursuant to Executive Order 13175, this proposed rule was developed 
after meaningful consultation and collaboration with tribal officials 
from the area covered by the Pacific Coast Groundfish FMP. Under the 
Magnuson-Stevens Act at 16 U.S.C. 1852(b)(5), one of the voting members 
of the Pacific Council must be a representative of an Indian tribe with 
federally recognized fishing rights from the area of the Council's 
jurisdiction. In addition, regulations implementing the Pacific Coast 
Groundfish FMP establish a procedure by which the tribes with treaty 
fishing rights in the area covered

[[Page 23664]]

by the Pacific Coast Groundfish FMP request allocations or regulations 
specific to the Tribes, in writing, before the first of the two 
meetings at which the Council considers groundfish management measures. 
The regulations at 50 CFR 660.324(d) further state, the Secretary will 
develop tribal allocations and regulations under this paragraph in 
consultation with the affected tribe(s) and, insofar as possible, with 
tribal consensus. The tribal management measures in this proposed rule 
have been developed following these procedures.
    The Office of Management and Budget has determined that this 
proposed rule is not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866.
    A range of potential total harvest levels for Pacific whiting have 
been considered under the Final Environmental Impact Statement for 
Harvest Specifications and Management Measures for 2015-2016 and 
Biennial Periods thereafter (2015/16 FEIS) and in the Environmental 
Assessment for Harvest Specifications and Management Measures for 2021-
2022 and Biennial Periods Thereafter and is available from NMFS (see 
ADDRESSES). The 2015/16 FEIS examined the harvest specifications and 
management measures for 2015-16 and 10 year projections for routinely 
adjusted harvest specifications and management measures. The 10 year 
projections were produced to evaluate the impacts of the ongoing 
implementation of harvest specifications and management measures and to 
evaluate the impacts of the routine adjustments that are the main 
component of each biennial cycle. The EA for the 2021-22 cycle tiers 
from the 2015/16 FEIS and focuses on the harvest specifications and 
management measures that were not within the scope of the 10 year 
projections in the 2015/16 FEIS.
    An Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) was prepared for 
this action, as required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility 
Act (RFA). The IRFA describes the economic impact this proposed rule, 
if adopted, would have on small entities. A description of the action, 
why it is being considered, and the legal basis for this action is 
contained in the SUMMARY section and at the beginning of the 
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of the preamble. A summary of the 
IRFA follow. Copies of the IRFAs are available from NMFS (See 
ADDRESSES).
    Under the RFA, the term ``small entities'' includes small 
businesses, small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions. 
The Small Business Administration has established size criteria for 
entities involved in the fishing industry that qualify as small 
businesses. A business involved in fish harvesting is a small business 
if it is independently owned and operated and not dominant in its field 
of operation (including its affiliates) and if it has combined annual 
receipts, not in excess of $11 million for all its affiliated 
operations worldwide (see 80 FR 81194, December 29, 2015). A wholesale 
business servicing the fishing industry is a small business if it 
employs 100 or fewer persons on a full time, part time, temporary, or 
other basis, at all its affiliated operations worldwide. A small 
organization is any nonprofit enterprise that is independently owned 
and operated and is not dominant in its field. Effective February 26, 
2016, a seafood processor is a small business if it is independently 
owned and operated, not dominant in its field of operation, and employs 
750 or fewer persons on a full time, part time, temporary, or other 
basis, at all its affiliated operations worldwide (See NAICS 311710 at 
81 FR 4469; January 26, 2016). For purposes of rulemaking, NMFS is also 
applying the seafood processor standard to catcher processors because 
whiting C/Ps earn the majority of the revenue from processed seafood 
product.

Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which the 
Rule Applies, and Estimate of Economic Impacts by Entity Size and 
Industry

    This proposed rule would establish the coastwide and U.S. TAC and 
affect how Pacific whiting is allocated to the following sectors/
programs: Tribal, Shorebased IFQ Program Trawl Fishery, MS Coop Program 
Whiting At-sea Trawl Fishery, and C/P Coop Program Whiting At-sea Trawl 
Fishery. The amount of Pacific whiting allocated to these sectors is 
based on the U.S. TAC.
    We expect one tribal entity to fish for Pacific whiting in 2021. 
Tribes are not considered small entities for the purposes of RFA. 
Impacts to tribes are nevertheless considered in this analysis.
    As of January 2021, the Shorebased IFQ Program is composed of 166 
Quota Share permits/accounts (134 of which were allocated whiting quota 
pounds), and 35 first receivers, one of which is designated as whiting-
only receivers and 11 that may receive both whiting and non-whiting.
    These regulations also directly affect participants in the MS Co-op 
Program, a general term to describe the limited access program that 
applies to eligible harvesters and processors in the MS sector of the 
Pacific whiting at-sea trawl fishery. This program consists of six MS 
processor permits, and a catcher vessel fleet currently composed of a 
single co-op, with 34 Mothership/Catcher Vessel (MS/CV) endorsed 
permits (with three permits each having two catch history assignments).
    These regulations also directly affect the C/P Co-op Program, 
composed of 10 C/P endorsed permits owned by three companies that have 
formed a single coop. These co-ops are considered large entities from 
several perspectives; they have participants that are large entities, 
and have in total more than 750 employees worldwide including 
affiliates.
    Although there are three non-tribal sectors, many companies 
participate in two sectors and some participate in all three sectors. 
As part of the permit application processes for the non-tribal 
fisheries, based on a review of the Small Business Administration size 
criteria, permit applicants are asked if they considered themselves a 
``small'' business, and they are asked to provide detailed ownership 
information. Data on employment worldwide, including affiliates, are 
not available for these companies, which generally operate in Alaska as 
well as the West Coast and may have operations in other countries as 
well. NMFS has limited entry permit holders self-report size status. 
For 2021, all 10 CP permits reported they are not small businesses, as 
did 8 mothership catcher vessels. There is substantial, but not 
complete overlap between permit ownership and vessel ownership so there 
may be a small number of additional small entity vessel owners who will 
be impacted by this rule. After accounting for cross participation, 
multiple Quota Share account holders, and affiliation through 
ownership, NMFS estimates that there are 103 non-tribal entities 
directly affected by these proposed regulations, 89 of which are 
considered ``small'' businesses.
    This rule will allocate Pacific whiting between tribal and non-
tribal harvesters (a mixture of small and large businesses). Tribal 
fisheries consist of a mixture of fishing activities that are similar 
to the activities that non-tribal fisheries undertake. Tribal harvests 
may be delivered to both shoreside plants and motherships for 
processing. These processing facilities also process fish harvested by 
non-tribal fisheries. The effect of the tribal allocation on non-tribal 
fisheries will depend on the level of tribal harvests relative to their 
allocation and the reapportionment process. If the tribes do not 
harvest their entire allocation, there are opportunities during the 
year to reapportion unharvested tribal amounts to the non-tribal 
fleets. For example, in 2020 NMFS reapportioned 40,000 mt of the 
original

[[Page 23665]]

74,342 mt tribal allocation. This reapportionment was based on 
conversations with the tribes and the best information available at the 
time, which indicated that this amount would not limit tribal harvest 
opportunities for the remainder of the year. The reapportioning process 
allows unharvested tribal allocations of Pacific whiting to be fished 
by the non-tribal fleets, benefitting both large and small entities. 
The revised Pacific whiting allocations for 2020 following the 
reapportionment were: Tribal 34,342 mt, C/P Co-op 132,249 mt; MS Co-op 
93,352 mt; and Shorebased IFQ Program 163,367 mt.
    The prices for Pacific whiting are largely determined by the world 
market because most of the Pacific whiting harvested in the United 
States is exported. The U.S. Pacific whiting TAC is highly variable, as 
have subsequent harvests and ex-vessel revenues. For the years 2016 to 
2020, the total Pacific whiting fishery (tribal and non-tribal) 
averaged harvests of approximately 303,782 mt annually. The 2020 U.S. 
non-tribal fishery had a Pacific whiting catch of approximately 287,400 
mt, and the tribal fishery landed less than 200 mt.
    Impacts to the U.S. non-tribal fishery are measured with an 
estimate of ex-vessel revenue. The NMFS proposed adjusted coastwide TAC 
of 500,000 mt would result in an adjusted U.S. TAC of 369,400 mt and 
U.S. non-tribal harvest guideline of 304,005 mt. Using the 2020 
weighted-average non-tribal Oregon shoreside price per metric ton (e.g. 
$154 per metric ton), the proposed TAC is estimated to result in an ex-
vessel revenue of $46.9 million for the U.S. non-tribal fishing fleet. 
The low and high range of the coastwide TAC NMFS considered (475,000 mt 
and 565,191 mt, respectively) is estimated to result in projected ex-
vessel revenue range of $44.5 million to $53 million, respectively.
    Impacts to tribal catcher vessels who elect to participate in the 
tribal fishery are measured with an estimate of ex-vessel revenue. In 
lieu of more complete information on tribal deliveries, total ex-vessel 
revenue is estimated with the 2020 average shoreside ex-vessel price of 
Pacific whiting, which was $154 per mt. At that price, the proposed 
2020 tribal allocation of 64,645 mt would have an ex-vessel value of 
$10 million.

A Description of Any Significant Alternatives to the Proposed Rule That 
Accomplish the Stated Objectives of Applicable Statutes and That 
Minimize Any Significant Economic Impact of the Proposed Rule on Small 
Entities

    NMFS considered a ``No Action'' alternative as well as a range of 
alternatives for setting the Pacific whiting coastwide TAC. NMFS 
considered setting the coastwide TAC between 475,000 mt to 565,191 mt. 
A coastwide TAC at the bottom of the range (475,000 mt) may provide 
less economic opportunity for 2021 as compared to the TAC proposed in 
this rule (a coastwide TAC of 500,000 mt). A higher coastwide TAC of 
565,191 mt may offer an increased economic opportunity for 2021 as 
compared to the TAC proposed in this rule. However, the 2021 stock 
assessment projections indicate this higher catch levels may result in 
near-term stock biomass declines below target levels. This is contrary 
to the Whiting Act and Agreement, which requires sustainable management 
of the Pacific whiting resource. Under the no action alternative, NMFS 
would not set a coastwide TAC, which would not fulfill NMFS' 
responsibility to manage the U.S. fishery. Therefore this alternative 
received no further consideration.
    NMFS considered two alternatives for the Pacific whiting tribal 
allocation: The ``No Action'' and the ``Proposed Action.'' NMFS did not 
consider a broader range of alternatives to the proposed tribal 
allocation because the tribal allocation is a percent of the adjusted 
U.S. TAC and is based primarily on the requests of the tribes. These 
requests reflect the level of participation in the fishery that will 
allow them to exercise their treaty right to fish for Pacific whiting. 
Under the Proposed Action alternative, NMFS proposes to set the tribal 
allocation percentage at 17.5 percent, as requested by the Tribes. This 
would yield a tribal allocation of 64,645 mt for 2021. Consideration of 
a percentage lower than the tribal request of 17.5 percent is not 
appropriate in this instance. As a matter of policy, NMFS has 
historically supported the harvest levels requested by the Tribes. 
Based on the information available to NMFS, the tribal request is 
within their tribal treaty rights. A higher percentage would arguably 
also be within the scope of the treaty right. However, a higher 
percentage would unnecessarily limit the non-tribal fishery.
    Under the no action alternative, NMFS would not make an allocation 
to the tribal sector. This alternative was considered, but the 
regulatory framework provides for a tribal allocation on an annual 
basis only. Therefore, the no action alternative would result in no 
allocation of Pacific whiting to the tribal sector in 2021, which would 
be inconsistent with NMFS' responsibility to manage the fishery 
consistent with the Tribes' treaty rights. Given that there is a tribal 
request for allocation in 2021, this alternative received no further 
consideration.

Regulatory Flexibility Act Determination of No Significant Impact

    NMFS determined this proposed rule would not adversely affect small 
entities. The reapportioning process allows unharvested tribal 
allocations of Pacific whiting, fished by small entities, to be fished 
by the non-tribal fleets, benefitting both large and small entities.
    NMFS has prepared an IRFA and is requesting comments on this 
conclusion. See ADDRESSES.
    This proposed rule contains no information collection requirements 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    No Federal rules have been identified that duplicate, overlap, or 
conflict with this action.

List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660

    Fisheries, Fishing, Indian Fisheries.

    Dated: April 26, 2021.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.

    For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 660 is 
proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 660--FISHERIES OFF WEST COAST STATES

0
1. The authority citation for part 660 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq., and 
16 U.S.C. 7001 et seq.

0
2. In Sec.  660.50, revise paragraph (f)(4) to read as follows:


Sec.  660.50   Pacific Coast treaty Indian fisheries.

* * * * *
    (f) * * *
    (4) Pacific whiting. The tribal allocation for 2021 will be 64,645 
mt.
* * * * *
0
3. Revise Table 1a to part 660, subpart C-2021, to read as follows:

[[Page 23666]]



  Table 1a to Part 660, Subpart C--2021, Specifications of OFL, ABC, ACL, ACT and Fishery HG (Weights in Metric
                                     Tons) Capitalized Stocks are Rebuilding
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                  Fishery HG b//
            Stocks                    Area              OFL             ABC           ACL a//
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yelloweye Rockfish c/.........  Coastwide.......              97              83              50            41.2
Arrowtooth Flounder d/........  Coastwide.......          13,551           9,933           9,933         7,837.9
Big Skate e/..................  Coastwide.......           1,690           1,477           1,477         1,419.7
Black Rockfish f/.............  California (S of             379             348             348           345.7
                                 42[deg] N lat.).
Black Rockfish g/.............  Washington (N of             319             293             293           274.9
                                 46[deg]16' N
                                 lat.).
Bocaccio h/...................  S of 40[deg]10'            1,887           1,748           1,748         1,700.2
                                 N lat.
Cabezon i/....................  California (S of             225             210             210           208.7
                                 42[deg] N lat.).
California Scorpionfish j/....  S of 34[deg]27'              319             291             291           287.1
                                 N lat.
Canary Rockfish k/............  Coastwide.......           1,459           1,338           1,338         1,268.6
Chilipepper l/................  S of 40[deg]10'            2,571           2,358           2,358         2,260.3
                                 N lat.
Cowcod m/.....................  S of 40[deg]10'              114              84              84            72.8
                                 N lat.
    Cowcod....................  (Conception)....              95              72              NA              NA
    Cowcod....................  (Monterey)......              19              11              NA              NA
Darkblotched Rockfish n/......  Coastwide.......             953             882             882           862.9
Dover Sole o/.................  Coastwide.......          93,547          84,192          50,000        48,402.8
English Sole p/...............  Coastwide.......          11,107           9,175           9,175        8,924.37
Lingcod q/....................  N of 40[ordm]10'           5,816           5,386           5,369         5,090.6
                                 N lat.
Lingcod r/....................  S of 40[deg]10'            1,255           1,162           1,102           1,089
                                 N lat.
Longnose Skate s/.............  Coastwide.......           2,086           1,823           1,823         1,571.6
Longspine Thornyhead t/.......  N of 34[deg]27'            5,097           3,466           2,634         2,580.3
                                 N lat.
Longspine Thornyhead u/.......  S of 34[deg]27'   ..............  ..............             832           829.8
                                 N lat.
Pacific Cod v/................  Coastwide.......           3,200           1,926           1,600         1,093.9
Pacific Ocean Perch w/........  N of 40[deg]10'            4,497           3,854           3,854         3,829.3
                                 N lat.
Pacific Whiting x/............  Coastwide.......         565,191            (x/)            (x/)         304,005
Petrale Sole y/...............  Coastwide.......           4,402           4,115           4,115         3,727.5
Sablefish z/..................  N of 36[deg] N             9,402           8,791           6,892    See Table 1c
                                 lat.
Sablefish aa/.................  S of 36[deg] N    ..............  ..............           1,899         1,871.6
                                 lat.
Shortspine Thornyhead bb/.....  N of 34[deg]27'            3,211           2,183           1,428         1,349.6
                                 N lat.
Shortspine Thornyhead cc/.....  S of 34[deg]27'   ..............  ..............             756           749.3
                                 N lat.
Spiny Dogfish dd/.............  Coastwide.......           2,479           1,621           1,621           1,277
Splitnose ee/.................  S of 40[deg]10'            1,868           1,666           1,666         1,647.6
                                 N lat.
Starry Flounder ff/...........  Coastwide.......             652             392             392           343.6
Widow Rockfish gg/............  Coastwide.......          15,749          14,725          14,725        14,476.7
Yellowtail Rockfish hh/.......  N of 40[deg]10'            6,534           6,050           6,050         5,012.5
                                 N lat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 Stock Complexes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blue/Deacon/Black Rockfish ii/  Oregon..........             676             603             603           600.7
Cabezon/Kelp Greenling jj/....  Oregon..........             215             198             198           197.8
Cabezon/Kelp Greenling kk/....  Washington......              25              20              20            18.0
Nearshore Rockfish North ll/..  N of 40[deg]10'               94              79              79            75.9
                                 N lat.
Nearshore Rockfish South mm/..  S of 40[deg]10'            1,232           1,016           1,016         1,011.6
                                 N lat.
Other Fish nn/................  Coastwide.......             286             223             223           201.7
Other Flatfish oo/............  Coastwide.......           7,714           4,802           4,802         4,581.1
Shelf Rockfish North pp/......  N of 40[deg]10'            1,888           1,511           1,511         1,438.7
                                 N lat.
Shelf Rockfish South qq/......  S of 40[deg]10'            1,842           1,439           1,438         1,305.2
                                 N lat.
Slope Rockfish North rr/......  N of 40[deg]10'            1,862           1,595           1,595         1,529.1
                                 N lat.
Slope Rockfish South ss/......  S of 40[deg]10'              873             709             709           670.1
                                 N lat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a/ Annual catch limits (ACLs), annual catch targets (ACTs) and harvest guidelines (HGs) are specified as total
  catch values.
b/ Fishery HGs means the HG or quota after subtracting Pacific Coast treaty Indian tribes allocations and
  projected catch, projected research catch, deductions for fishing mortality in non-groundfish fisheries, and
  deductions for EFPs from the ACL or ACT.
c/ Yelloweye rockfish. The 50 mt ACL is based on the current rebuilding plan with a target year to rebuild of
  2029 and an SPR harvest rate of 65 percent. 8.85 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery
  (5 mt), EFP catch (0.24 mt), research (2.92 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (0.69 mt) resulting in
  a fishery HG of 41.2 mt. The non-trawl HG is 37.9 mt. The combined non-nearshore/nearshore HG is 7.9 mt.
  Recreational HGs are: 9.7 mt (Washington); 8.8 mt (Oregon); and 11.4 mt (California). In addition, the non-
  trawl ACT is 29.5, and the combined non-nearshore/nearshore ACT is 6.2 mt. Recreational ACTs are: 7.5 mt
  (Washington), 6.9 (Oregon), and 8.9 mt (California).
d/ Arrowtooth flounder. 2,095.08 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (2,041 mt), EFP
  fishing (0.1 mt), research (12.98 mt) and incidental open access (41 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 7,837.9
  mt.
e/ Big skate. 57.31 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (15 mt), EFP fishing (0.1 mt),
  and research catch (5.49 mt), and incidental open access (36.72 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,419.7 mt.
f/ Black rockfish (California). 2.26 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP fishing (1.0 mt), research
  (0.08 mt), and incidental open access (1.18 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 345.7 mt.
g/ Black rockfish (Washington). 18.1 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (18 mt) and
  research catch (0.1 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 274.9 mt.
h/ Bocaccio south of 40[deg]10' N lat. 47.82 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP catch (40 mt),
  research (5.6 mt), and incidental open access (2.22 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,700.2 mt. The combined
  non-nearshore and nearshore HG is 320.2 mt. The California recreational fishery HG is 716.2 mt.
i/ Cabezon (California). 1.28 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP (1 mt), research (0.02 mt), and
  incidental open access fishery (0.26 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 208.7 mt.
j/ California scorpionfish south of 34[deg]27' N lat. 3.89 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate research
  (0.18 mt) and the incidental open access fishery (3.71 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 287.1 mt.

[[Page 23667]]

 
k/ Canary rockfish. 69.39 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (50 mt), EFP catch (8
  mt), and research catch (10.08 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (1.31 mt), resulting in a fishery
  HG of 1,268.6 mt. The combined nearshore/non-nearshore HG is 126.6 mt. Recreational HGs are: 43.3 mt
  (Washington); 65.1 mt (Oregon); and 116.7 mt (California).
l/ Chilipepper rockfish south of 40[deg]10' N lat. 97.7 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP fishing
  (70 mt), research (14.04 mt), the incidental open access fishery (13.66 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of
  2,260.3 mt.
m/ Cowcod south of 40[deg]10' N lat. 11.17 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP fishing (1.0 mt),
  research (10 mt), and incidental open access (0.17 mt), resulting in a fishery harvest guideline of 72.8 mt. A
  single ACT of 50 mt is being set for the Conception and Monterey areas combined.
n/ Darkblotched rockfish. 19.06 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (0.2 mt), EFP
  catch (0.6 mt), and research catch (8.46 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (9.8 mt) resulting in a
  fishery HG of 862.9 mt.
o/ Dover sole. 1,597.21 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (1,497 mt), EFP fishing
  (0.1 mt), research (50.84 mt), and incidental open access (49.27 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 48,402.8
  mt.
p/ English sole. 250.63 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (200 mt), EFP fishing (0.1
  mt), research (8.01 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (42.52 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of
  8,924.37 mt.
q/ Lingcod north of 40[deg]10' N lat. 278.38 mt is deducted from the ACL for the Tribal fishery (250 mt), EFP
  catch (0.1 mt), research (16.6 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (11.68 mt) resulting in a fishery
  HG of 5,090.6 mt.
r/ Lingcod south of 40[deg]10' N lat. 13 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP catch (1.5 mt), research
  (3.19 mt), and incidental open access fishery (8.31 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,089 mt.
s/ Longnose skate. 251.40 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (220 mt), EFP catch (0.1
  mt), and research catch (12.46 mt), and incidental open access fishery (18.84 mt), resulting in a fishery HG
  of 1,571.6 mt.
t/ Longspine thornyhead north of 34[deg]27' N lat. 53.71 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal
  fishery (30 mt), research catch (17.49 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (6.22 mt), resulting in a
  fishery HG of 2,580.3 mt.
u/ Longspine thornyhead south of 34[deg]27' N lat. 2.24 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate research
  catch (1.41 mt) and the incidental open access fishery (0.8 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 829.6 mt.
v/ Pacific cod. 506.1 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (500 mt), EFP fishing (0.1
  mt), research catch (5.47 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (0.53 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of
  1,093.9 mt.
w/ Pacific ocean perch north of 40[deg]10' N lat. 24.73 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal
  fishery (9.2 mt), EFP fishing (0.1 mt), research catch (5.39 mt), and the incidental open access fishery
  (10.04 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 3,829.3 mt.
x/ The 2021 OFL of 565,191 mt is based on the 2021 assessment with an F40 percent of FMSY proxy. The proposed
  2021 coastwide adjusted Total Allowable Catch (TAC) is 500,000 mt. The U.S. TAC is 73.88 percent of the
  coastwide TAC. The proposed 2021 adjusted U.S. TAC is 369,400 mt (314,320 mt unadjusted TAC + 55,080 mt
  carryover adjustment). From the adjusted U.S. TAC, 64,645 mt is deducted to accommodate the Tribal fishery,
  and 750 mt is deducted to accommodate research and bycatch in other fisheries, resulting in a 2021 fishery HG
  of 304,005 mt. The TAC for Pacific whiting is established under the provisions of the Agreement with Canada on
  Pacific Hake/Whiting and the Pacific Whiting Act of 2006, 16 U.S.C. 7001-7010, and the international exception
  applies. Therefore, no ABC or ACL values are provided for Pacific whiting.
y/ Petrale sole. 387.54 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (350 mt), EFP catch (0.1
  mt), research (24.14 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (13.3 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of
  3,727.5 mt.
z/ Sablefish north of 36[deg] N lat. This coastwide ACL value is not specified in regulations. The coastwide ACL
  value is apportioned north and south of 36[deg] N lat., using a rolling 5-year average estimated swept area
  biomass from the NMFS NWFSC trawl survey, with 78.4 percent apportioned north of 36[deg] N lat. and 21.6
  percent apportioned south of 36[deg] N lat. The northern ACL is 6,892 mt and is reduced by 689.2 mt for the
  Tribal allocation (10 percent of the ACL north of 36[deg] N lat.). The 689.2 mt Tribal allocation is reduced
  by 1.7 percent to account for discard mortality. Detailed sablefish allocations are shown in Table 1c.
aa/ Sablefish south of 36[deg] N lat. The ACL for the area south of 36[deg] N lat. is 1,899 mt (21.6 percent of
  the calculated coastwide ACL value). 27.4 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate research (2.40 mt) and
  the incidental open access fishery (25 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,871.6 mt.
bb/ Shortspine thornyhead north of 34[deg]27' N lat. 78.4 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal
  fishery (50 mt), EFP catch (0.1 mt), and research catch (10.48 mt), and the incidental open access fishery
  (17.82 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,349.6 mt for the area north of 34[deg]27' N lat.
cc/ Shortspine thornyhead south of 34[deg]27' N lat. 6.71 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate research
  catch (0.71 mt) and the incidental open access fishery (6 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 749.3 mt for the
  area south of 34[deg]27' N lat.
dd/ Spiny dogfish. 344 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (275 mt), EFP catch (1.1
  mt), research (34.27 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (33.63 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of
  1,277 mt.
ee/ Splitnose rockfish south of 40[deg]10' N lat. 18.42 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP catch
  (1.5 mt), research (11.17 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (5.75 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of
  1,647.6 mt.
ff/ Starry flounder. 48.38 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (2 mt), EFP catch (0.1
  mt), research (0.57 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (45.71 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 343.6
  mt.
gg/ Widow rockfish. 248.32 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (200 mt), EFP catch (28
  mt), research (17.27 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (3.05 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of
  14,476.7 mt.
hh/ Yellowtail rockfish north of 40[deg]10' N lat. 1,047.55 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the
  Tribal fishery (1,000 mt), EFP catch (10 mt), research (20.55 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (7
  mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 5,012.5 mt.
ii/ Black rockfish/Blue rockfish/Deacon rockfish (Oregon). 2.32 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the
  EFP catch (0.5 mt), research (0.08 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (1.74 mt), resulting in a
  fishery HG of 600.7 mt.
jj/ Cabezon/kelp greenling (Oregon). 0.21 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP catch (0.1 mt),
  research (0.05 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (0.06 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 197.8 mt.
kk/ Cabezon/kelp greenling (Washington). 2 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery,
  therefore the fishery HG is 18 mt.
ll/ Nearshore Rockfish north of 40[deg]10' N lat. 3.08 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal
  fishery (1.5 mt), EFP catch (0.5 mt), research (0.47 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (0.61 mt),
  resulting in a fishery HG of 75.9 mt. State specific HGs are Washington (18.4 mt), Oregon (22.7 mt), and
  California (37.6 mt).
mm/ Nearshore Rockfish south of 40[deg]10' N lat. 4.42 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate research catch
  (2.68 mt) and the incidental open access fishery (2.68 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,011.6 mt.
nn/ Other Fish. The Other Fish complex is comprised of kelp greenling off California and leopard shark
  coastwide. 21.34 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP catch (0.1 mt), research (6.29 mt), and the
  incidental open access fishery (14.95 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 201.7 mt.
oo/ Other Flatfish. The Other Flatfish complex is comprised of flatfish species managed in the PCGFMP that are
  not managed with stock-specific OFLs/ABCs/ACLs. Most of the species in the Other Flatfish complex are
  unassessed and include: Butter sole, curlfin sole, flathead sole, Pacific sanddab, rock sole, sand sole, and
  rex sole. 220.89 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (60 mt), EFP catch (0.1 mt),
  research (23.63 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (137.16 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 4,581.1
  mt.
pp/ Shelf Rockfish north of 40[deg]10' N lat. 72.44 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal
  fishery (30 mt), EFP catch (1.5 mt), research (15.32 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (25.62 mt),
  resulting in a fishery HG of 1,438.66 mt.
qq/ Shelf Rockfish south of 40[deg]10' N lat. 132.77 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP catch (50
  mt), research catch (15.1 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (67.67 mt) resulting in a fishery HG of
  1,305.2 mt.
rr/ Slope Rockfish north of 40[deg]10' N lat. 65.89 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal
  fishery (36 mt), EFP catch (0.5 mt), and research (10.51 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (18.88
  mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,529.1 mt.

[[Page 23668]]

 
ss/ Slope Rockfish south of 40[deg]10' N lat. 38.94 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP catch (1 mt),
  and research (18.21 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (19.73 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 670.1
  mt. Blackgill rockfish has a stock-specific HG for the entire groundfish fishery south of 40[deg]10' N lat.
  set equal to the species' contribution to the ACL. Harvest of blackgill rockfish in all groundfish fisheries
  south of 40[deg]10' N lat. counts against this HG of 176.5 mt.

0
4. Revise Table 1b to part 660, subpart C, to read as follows:

                                     Table 1b to Part 660, Subpart C--2021, Allocations by Species or Species Group
                                                                 [Weight in metric tons]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                       Trawl                         Non-trawl
          Stocks/stock complexes                        Area               Fishery HG or ---------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                             ACT a/b/            %              Mt               %              Mt
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yelloweye Rockfish a/.....................  Coastwide...................            41.2               8             3.3              92            37.9
Arrowtooth flounder.......................  Coastwide...................         7,837.9              95           7,446               5           391.9
Big skate a/..............................  Coastwide...................         1,419.7              95         1,348.7               5              71
Bocaccio a/...............................  S of 40[deg]10' N lat.......         1,700.2              39           663.8              60         1,036.4
Canary rockfish a/........................  Coastwide...................         1,268.6              72             917              28           351.6
Chilipepper rockfish......................  S of 40[deg]10' N lat.......         2,260.3              75         1,695.2              25           565.1
Cowcod a/.................................  S of 40[deg]10' N lat.......              50              36              18              64              32
Darkblotched rockfish.....................  Coastwide...................           862.9              95           819.8               5            43.1
Dover sole................................  Coastwide...................        48,402.8              95        45,982.7               5         2,420.1
English sole..............................  Coastwide...................         8,924.4              95         8,478.2               5           446.2
Lingcod...................................  N of 40'10[deg] N lat.......         5,090.6              45         2,290.8              55         2,799.8
Lingcod a/................................  S of 40'10[deg] N lat.......           1,089              40           435.6              60           653.4
Longnose skate a/.........................  Coastwide...................         1,571.6              90         1,414.4              10           157.2
Longspine thornyhead......................  N of 34[deg]27' N lat.......         2,580.3              95         2,451.3               5             129
Pacific cod...............................  Coastwide...................         1,093.9              95         1,039.2               5            54.7
Pacific ocean perch.......................  N of 40[deg]10' N lat.......         3,829.3              95         3,637.8               5           191.5
Pacific whiting c/........................  Coastwide...................         304,005             100         304,005               0               0
Petrale sole a/...........................  Coastwide...................         3,727.9  ..............         3,697.9  ..............              30
                                                                                         ---------------------------------------------------------------
Sablefish.................................  N of 36[deg] N lat..........              NA                           See Table 1c
                                                                                         ---------------------------------------------------------------
Sablefish.................................  S of 36[deg] N lat..........         1,861.6              42           782.3              58         1,080.3
Shortspine thornyhead.....................  N of 34[deg]27' N lat.......         1,349.6              95         1,282.1               5            67.5
Shortspine thornyhead.....................  S of 34[deg]27' N lat.......           749.3  ..............              50  ..............           699.3
Splitnose rockfish........................  S of 40[deg]10' N lat.......         1,647.6              95         1,565.2               5            82.4
Starry flounder...........................  Coastwide...................           343.6              50           171.8              50           171.8
Widow rockfish a/.........................  Coastwide...................        14,476.7  ..............        14,076.7  ..............             400
Yellowtail rockfish.......................  N of 40[deg]10' N lat.......         5,012.5              88         4,411.0              12           601.5
Other Flatfish............................  Coastwide...................          4581.1              90           4,123              10           458.1
Shelf Rockfish a/.........................  N of 40[deg]10' N lat.......         1,438.7            60.2           866.1            39.8           572.6
Shelf Rockfish a/.........................  S of 40[deg]10' N lat.......         1,305.2            12.2           159.2            87.8           1,146
Slope Rockfish............................  N of 40[deg]10' N lat.......         1,529.1              81         1,238.6              19           290.5
Slope Rockfish a/.........................  S of 40[deg]10' N lat.......           670.1  ..............           526.4  ..............           143.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a/ Allocations decided through the biennial specification process.
b/ The cowcod fishery harvest guideline is further reduced to an ACT of 50 mt. The non-trawl allocation is further split 50:50 between the commercial
  and recreational sectors.
c/ Consistent with regulations at Sec.   660.55(i)(2), the commercial harvest guideline for Pacific whiting is allocated as follows: 34 percent for the
  C/P Coop Program; 24 percent for the MS Coop Program; and 42 percent for the Shorebased IFQ Program. No more than 5 percent of the Shorebased IFQ
  Program allocation may be taken and retained south of 42[deg] N lat. before the start of the primary Pacific whiting season north of 42[deg] N lat.

0
5. In Sec.  660.140, revise paragraph (d)(1)(ii)(D) to read as follows:


Sec.  660.140   Shorebased IFQ Program.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (ii) * * *
    (D) For the trawl fishery, NMFS will issue QP based on the 
following shorebased trawl allocations:

                                       Table 1 to Paragraph (d)(1)(ii)(D)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                             2021 Shorebased    2022 Shorebased
                IFQ species                               Area               trawl allocation   trawl allocation
                                                                                   (mt)               (mt)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yelloweye Rockfish.........................  Coastwide....................                3.3                3.4
Arrowtooth flounder........................  Coastwide....................           7,376.02            5974.77
Bocaccio...................................  South of 40[deg]10' N lat....             663.75             654.38
Canary rockfish............................  Coastwide....................             880.96             858.56
Chilipepper................................  South of 40[deg]10' N lat....            1,695.2              1,621
Cowcod.....................................  South of 40[deg]10' N lat....                 18                 18

[[Page 23669]]

 
Darkblotched rockfish......................  Coastwide....................             743.39             694.94
Dover sole.................................  Coastwide....................          45,972.65          45,972.65
English sole...............................  Coastwide....................            8,478.2            8,407.9
Lingcod....................................  North of 40[deg]10' N lat....           2,275.78           2,090.83
Lingcod....................................  South of 40[deg]10' N lat....              435.6              463.6
Longspine thornyhead.......................  North of 34[deg]27' N lat....           2,451.28           2,278.38
Pacific cod................................  Coastwide....................           1,039.21           1,039.21
Pacific halibut (IBQ)......................  North of 40[deg]10' N lat....               69.6               69.6
Pacific ocean perch........................  North of 40[deg]10' N lat....           3,337.74           3,201.94
Pacific whiting............................  Coastwide....................            127,682                TBD
Petrale sole...............................  Coastwide....................            3,692.9            3,237.5
Sablefish..................................  North of 36[deg] N lat.......           3,139.59           2,985.42
Sablefish..................................  South of 36[deg] N lat.......                786                748
Shortspine thornyhead......................  North of 34[deg]27' N lat....           1,212.12           1,178.87
Shortspine thornyhead......................  South of 34[deg]27' N lat....                 50                 50
Splitnose rockfish.........................  South of 40[deg]10' N lat....           1,565.20           1,531.00
Starry flounder............................  Coastwide....................              171.8              171.8
Widow rockfish.............................  Coastwide....................          13,600.68          12,663.68
Yellowtail rockfish........................  North of 40[deg]10' N lat....           4,091.13            3,898.4
Other Flatfish complex.....................  Coastwide....................           4,088.00           4,120.40
Shelf Rockfish complex.....................  North of 40[deg]10' N lat....             831.07             794.56
Shelf Rockfish complex.....................  South of 40[deg]10' N lat....             159.24             158.02
Slope Rockfish complex.....................  North of 40[deg]10' N lat....             938.58             916.71
Slope Rockfish complex.....................  South of 40[deg]10' N lat....              526.4              523.9
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-08997 Filed 5-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.