Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Fisheries off West Coast States; Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; 2021 Harvest Specifications for Pacific Whiting, and 2021 Pacific Whiting Tribal Allocation, 23659-23669 [2021-08997]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 4, 2021 / Proposed Rules
individual letters soliciting the expert
opinions of four qualified specialists
selected from the academic and
scientific community. The charge to the
peer reviewers and the peer review
report have been placed in the
administrative record and posted on the
agency’s peer review agenda. In meeting
the OMB Peer Review Bulletin
requirements, we have also satisfied the
requirements of the 1994 joint U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service/NMFS peer review
policy (59 FR 34270; July 1, 1994).
Dated: April 27, 2021.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
Classification
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531–1543 and 16
U.S.C. 1361 et seq.
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA)
PART 224—ENDANGERED MARINE
AND ANADROMOUS SPECIES
1. The authority citation for part 224
continues to read as follows:
■
§ 224.101
The 1982 amendments to the ESA, in
section 4(b)(1)(A), restrict the
information that may be considered
when assessing species for listing to the
best scientific and commercial data
available. Based on this limitation of
criteria for a listing decision and the
opinion in Pacific Legal Foundation v.
Andrus, 657 F. 2d 829 (6th Cir. 1981),
we have concluded that NEPA does not
apply to ESA listing actions. (See NOAA
Administrative Order 216–6.)
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Flexibility Act, and Paperwork
Reduction Act
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 224 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
[Amended]
[FR Doc. 2021–09090 Filed 5–3–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 210423–0088]
RIN 0648–BK25
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
SUMMARY:
E.O. 13132 requires agencies to take
into account any federalism impacts of
regulations under development. It
includes specific consultation directives
for situations where a regulation will
preempt state law, or impose substantial
direct compliance costs on state and
local governments (unless required by
statute). Neither of these circumstances
is applicable to this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 224
Endangered and threatened species.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 May 03, 2021
Jkt 253001
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions;
Fisheries off West Coast States;
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; 2021
Harvest Specifications for Pacific
Whiting, and 2021 Pacific Whiting
Tribal Allocation
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Revised proposed rule;
reopening of public comment.
AGENCY:
NMFS issues the revised
proposed rule for the 2021 Pacific
whiting fishery under the authority of
the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery
Management Plan, the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act, the Pacific Whiting
Act of 2006 (Whiting Act), and other
applicable laws. NMFS issued a
proposed rule on February 16, 2021 that
proposed the 2021 Pacific whiting tribal
allocation and set-asides for research
and incidental mortality. NMFS is
issuing a revised proposed rule to
include additional actions due to the
lack of a bilateral agreement on the 2021
Pacific whiting coastwide total
allowable catch (TAC) by the
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Governments of Canada and the United
States. This revised proposed rule
includes the 2021 coastwide TAC and
U.S. TAC for Pacific whiting as
determined by NMFS under the Whiting
Act, the non-tribal sector allocations,
and the tribal allocation and set-asides
included in the original proposed rule.
The proposed measures are intended to
help prevent overfishing, achieve
optimum yield, and ensure that
management measures are based on the
best scientific information available.
Comments on this proposed rule
must be received no later than May 19,
2021.
DATES:
You may submit comments
on this document, identified by NOAA–
NMFS–2021–0002 by any of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and enter
NOAA–NMFS–2021–0002 in the Search
box. Click on the ‘‘Comment’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Barry Thom, c/o Stacey
Miller, Sustainable Fisheries Division,
West Coast Region, NMFS, 1201 NE
Lloyd Blvd., Suite 1100, Portland, OR
97232.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous).
ADDRESSES:
2. In § 224.101, in the table in
paragraph (h), under the subheading
‘‘Corals’’, remove the entry for ‘‘Coral,
[no common name] (Siderastrea
glynni)’’.
■
As noted in the Conference Report on
the 1982 amendments to the ESA,
economic impacts cannot be considered
when assessing the status of a species.
Therefore, the economic analysis
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act are not applicable to the
listing process. In addition, this
proposed rule is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866. This
proposed rule does not contain a
collection of information requirement
for the purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
23659
Sfmt 4702
Electronic Access
This proposed rule is accessible via
the internet at the Office of the Federal
Register website at https://
www.federalregister.gov. Background
information and documents are
available at the NMFS website at
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov and at
the Pacific Fishery Management
Council’s website at https://
www.pcouncil.org/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stacey Miller, phone: 503–231–6290,
and email: Stacey.Miller@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
04MYP1
23660
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 4, 2021 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Background
This rule proposes establishing the
2021 Pacific whiting harvest
specifications, including the adjusted
coastwide TAC of 500,000 mt and the
adjusted U.S. TAC of 369,400 mt, and
2021 tribal allocations. NMFS issued a
proposed rule on February 16, 2021 (86
FR 9473) that proposed allocating 17.5
percent of the U.S. TAC of Pacific
whiting for 2021 to Pacific Coast Indian
tribes that have a treaty right to harvest
groundfish, and implement set-asides
(750 mt) for Pacific whiting for research
and incidental mortality in other
fisheries. We requested public comment
on these proposed actions through
March 18, 2021 but received no public
comments during the comment period.
NMFS is issuing a revised proposed rule
for these two actions as well as several
additional actions related to the Pacific
whiting fishery due to the lack of a
bilateral agreement on the 2021 Pacific
whiting coastwide TAC under the
Agreement between the Government of
the United States of America and the
Government of Canada on Pacific Hake/
Whiting of 2003 (Agreement). The
Agreement’s Joint Management
Committee (JMC) met on March 15–17,
2021 but was not able to reach
agreement on a coastwide TAC, which
resulted in the JMC not recommending
a coastwide TAC by March 25th, as
required by the Agreement. If the JMC
does not recommend a TAC, the
Whiting Act directs NMFS (as delegated
by the Secretary of Commerce) to
establish a coastwide and U.S. TAC for
Pacific whiting. This revised proposed
rule would establish the 2021 coastwide
and U.S. TAC for Pacific whiting based
on the criteria identified in the Whiting
Act and establish the Pacific whiting
non-tribal sector allocations. This
revised proposed rule also includes the
2021 tribal allocation and research set
aside, which were described in the
original proposed rule published
February 16, 2021 (86 FR 9473). The
allocations for Pacific whiting would be
effective until December 31, 2021.
Pacific Whiting Agreement and Whiting
Act
The transboundary stock of Pacific
whiting is managed through the
Agreement, which establishes bilateral
bodies to implement the terms of the
Agreement. The bilateral bodies
include: The JMC, which recommends
the annual catch level for Pacific
whiting; the Joint Technical Committee
(JTC), which conducts the Pacific
whiting stock assessment; the Scientific
Review Group (SRG), which reviews the
stock assessment; and the Advisory
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 May 03, 2021
Jkt 253001
Panel (AP), which provides stakeholder
input to the JMC.
The Agreement establishes a default
harvest policy of F–40 percent, which
means a fishing mortality rate that
would reduce the spawning biomass to
40 percent of the estimated unfished
level. The Agreement also allocates
73.88 percent of the Pacific whiting total
allowable catch (TAC) to the United
States and 26.12 percent of the TAC to
Canada.
Based on recommendations from the
Agreement’s JTC, SRG, and AP, the JMC
recommends the coastwide Pacific
whiting TAC by March 25th of each
year, which is subsequently approved
by NMFS, under the delegation of
authority from the Secretary of
Commerce. In years when the JMC does
make a TAC recommendation to the
parties, NMFS (under the delegation of
authority from the Secretary of
Commerce) approves the U.S. TAC with
concurrence from the Department of
State. The U.S. TAC is then allocated
into tribal and non-tribal sectors.
The 2021 JMC negotiations were held
from March 15–17, 2021. These
negotiations typically focus on two
factors to derive a coastwide TAC:
Agreement on a sustainable level of
realized catch using stock assessment
projections and other relevant scientific
advice, and estimating the likely
utilization rate, which is the proportion
of the TAC harvested by the various
sectors of the U.S. and Canadian
fisheries based on historical rates and
knowledge of existing conditions. Full
utilization of the TAC (100 percent) is
not practicable, due to myriad of
regulatory and operational constraints.
These constraints are long-identified
factors that affect utilization rates and
setting the coastwide TAC at a higher
level allows the fisheries to achieve the
realized catch target. During the March
2021 JMC meeting, the JMC agreed on a
realized catch target of 380,000 mt but
did not reach an agreement on a
utilization rate, and therefore did not
come to a bilateral agreement on the
coastwide TAC. This is the second
consecutive year that the JMC did not
reach an agreement on a coastwide TAC.
The Agreement does not specify a
procedure for when the JMC does not
agree on a coastwide TAC, however, the
Whiting Act directs the Secretary of
Commerce to establish the TAC for
Pacific whiting when the JMC does not
agree on a coastwide TAC. The Act
states that NMFS (as delegated by the
Secretary of Commerce) should
establish the coastwide Pacific whiting
TAC, taking into account
recommendations from the JMC, JTC,
SRG, AP, and the Pacific Fishery
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Management Council (Council). The Act
requires NMFS to base the coastwide
TAC decision on the best scientific
information available, and use the
default harvest rate unless scientific
information indicates a different rate is
necessary to sustain the Pacific whiting
resource. The Act also requires NMFS to
establish the U.S. share of the TAC
based on the U.S./Canada percentage
split and adjustments specified in the
Agreement.
2021 Stock Assessment and Scientific
Review
The JTC completed a stock assessment
for Pacific whiting in February 2021.
This assessment is available at https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/
document/2021-pacific-hake-whitingstock-assessment. The assessment was
reviewed by the SRG during a four-day
meeting held online. The SRG report is
available at https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/
document/2021-pacific-hake-whitingscientific-review-group-report. The SRG
considered the 2021 assessment report
and appendices to represent the best
scientific information available for
Pacific hake/whiting.
The 2021 assessment model uses the
same structure as the 2020 stock
assessment model. The model is fit to an
acoustic survey index of abundance,
annual commercial catches of the
transboundary Pacific whiting stock,
and age composition data from an
acoustic survey and commercial
fisheries. Age-composition data provide
information to estimate relative year
class strength. Updates to the data in the
2021 assessment include: Fishery catch
and age-composition data from 2020,
weight-at-age data for 2020, and minor
changes to pre-2020 data. There was not
an acoustic survey planned for 2020 and
therefore no new survey data were
included in the 2021 model.
Additionally, no new age data were
available from the Canadian freezertrawler feet in 2020 due to the ongoing
pandemic.
The Pacific whiting biomass is a
highly cyclical and highly productive
stock. Since the 1960s, it is estimated to
have ranged from well below to above
unfished levels. Compared to other
groundfish stocks, the Pacific whiting
stock has high recruitment variability,
with low average recruitment levels and
occasional large year-classes that often
comprise much of the biomass. At the
start of 2021, the Pacific whiting stock
continues to be supported by multiple
above average cohorts, including the
2010, 2014, 2016, and 2017 year classes
which comprise 14 percent, 25 percent,
24 percent and 17 percent, respectively
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
04MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 4, 2021 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
of the stock biomass. The 2010 year
class is estimated to be the second
highest recruitment in the assessment
time series; the 2014 and 2016 year
classes are estimated to be above
average in strength; and the 2012 and
2017 year classes are about average. The
assessment estimates small year classes
in 2011, 2013, 2015, and 2018. There is
very little information in the data to
estimate the size of the 2019 year class
and there is no information in the data
to estimate the sizes of the 2020 and
2021 year classes.
The Pacific whiting relative spawning
biomass was near unfished levels (97.9
percent of unfished) in 2017 and has
been declining since that time as the
2010 and 2014 year classes are ageing
and mortality surpasses increased
production, combined with record high
catches. At the start of 2021, the relative
spawning stock biomass is still well
above the biomass level associated with
the default harvest rate (40 percent of
unfished level), and is estimated to be
0.981 million mt, or 59 percent of
unfished levels. The stock is considered
at a healthy level, and the joint
probability that the relative spawning
stock biomass is both below 40 percent
of unfished level and that fishing
mortality is above the relative fishing
intensity of the Agreement’s F–40
percent default harvest rate is estimated
to be 1.7 percent.
2021 Pacific Whiting Coastwide TAC
Evaluation and Recommendation
In determining the coastwide TAC,
NMFS considered information and
recommendations from the Agreement’s
JMC, JTC, SRG, and AP, and the
Council. The stock assessment from the
JTC and the SRG peer review are the
best scientific information available for
determining the coastwide Pacific
whiting TAC. NMFS heard testimony
from the AP and JMC at the JMC’s
March 2021 meeting. NMFS has reached
out to the Council and will consider any
recommendations provided by the
Council.
NMFS considered a range of
coastwide TAC alternatives including
the coastwide TAC resulting from the
default harvest rate (565,191 mt) and the
coastwide TACs that were discussed
during the AP and JMC March 2021
meeting. This includes the U.S.
delegation’s initial (500,000 mt) and
final positions (475,000 mt) and the
Canadian delegation’s initial (422,000
mt) and final positions (465,000 mt).
However, we excluded the Canadian
delegation’s proposed TACs from
further consideration because according
to the stock assessment they are not
necessary to support a sustainable
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 May 03, 2021
Jkt 253001
Pacific whiting resource. Members of
the JMC and AP also identified that
these TACs would have a
disproportionally negative economic
impact on the U.S. fishing fleet
compared to the Canadian fishing fleet.
NMFS therefore evaluated coastwide
TACs ranging from 475,000 mt to
565,191 mt in developing our proposed
coastwide TAC of 500,000 mt. The stock
assessment supports the lower TACs
within this range and would provide
adequate opportunity for both Canadian
and U.S. fleets, while sustainably
managing the Pacific whiting resource.
Biological Impacts of Potential Whiting
TAC Levels
The Act directs NMFS to use the
default harvest rate set out in the
Agreement unless NMFS determines
that a different rate is necessary to
sustain the offshore whiting resource.
The Agreement specifies a default
harvest rate of ‘‘F–40 percent’’ which is
the fishing mortality rate that would
reduce the relative spawning stock
biomass, calculated on a per recruit
basis (a measure of stock reproductive
potential) to 40 percent of what it would
have been in the absence of fishing
mortality, often called B40. Although
there is not a default biomass level, the
JMC, since implementation of the
Agreement, has focused on choosing a
TAC designed to prevent the relative
spawning stock biomass from falling
below B40. NMFS followed the same
practice of choosing a TAC designed to
prevent the relative spawning stock
biomass from falling below this biomass
level.
To evaluate the impact of the TACs on
relative spawning stock biomass, we
applied an estimate of the coastwide
Pacific whiting fleet’s utilization rate
(i.e. the proportion of the TAC removed
through fishing effort) to the range of
TACs we considered. Over the last ten
years, neither the U.S. nor the Canadian
fishing fleets have caught the entire
coastwide TAC (100 percent utilization
rate). The ten-year (2010–2019) average
utilization rate is 69.8 percent of the
coastwide TAC and the average
utilization rate for the last 5 years was
70.06 percent of the coastwide TAC. To
derive an upper estimate of utilization,
NMFS took the average of the five
highest utilization rates from 2011–
2020, which results in a utilization rate
of 75.82 percent of the coastwide TAC.
Because of this, NMFS determined it is
reasonable to focus on a range of
utilization rates from 70 percent to 76
percent, which encompass the average
of the last five years (70.06 percent) and
the average of the highest 5 utilization
rates since 2011 (75.82 percent). These
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
23661
averages provide a realistic range for
projecting the coastwide utilization
rates in 2021 and 2022 and are
consistent with the 2021 projected
utilization rates provided by U.S.
members of the AP during the JMC
negotiations.
We applied the range of average
utilization rates to the range of
coastwide TACs to derive the projected
harvest level and anticipated impacts to
the Pacific whiting spawning stock
biomass. The stock assessment indicates
that across the range of TACs and
utilization rates evaluated, the projected
harvest levels result in relative
spawning stock biomass levels above
B40 percent after one fishing year (47–
49 percent of unfished levels) and
between 39–44 percent of unfished
levels after two years of fishing at the
same level.
Using the same approach as described
above, a coastwide TAC set at the
default harvest rate (565,191 mt)
combined with the 0.70 and 0.76
utilization rates results in projected
harvest rates between 395,634 mt–
429,545 mt and a projected spawning
biomass of 48–47 percent of unfished
levels after one year of fishing, and 41–
39 percent of unfished levels after two
years of fishing. Of the lower TACs
considered in the range, a coastwide
TAC of 500,000 mt results in projected
harvest rates between 350,000 mt–
380,000 mt and projected spawning
biomass of 49–48 percent of unfished
levels after one year of fishing, and 43–
42 percent of unfished levels after 2
years of fishing, using the lower (0.70)
and higher (0.76) utilization rates
respectively. The lowest TAC
considered (475,000 mt) combined with
the 0.70 and 0.76 utilization rates
results in lower projected harvest
(332,500 mt–361,000 mt) and
projections of relative spawning
biomass of 49 percent after one year of
fishing, and 44–43 percent of unfished
levels after two years of fishing.
Overall, the stock assessment
indicates that the relative spawning
stock biomass of Pacific whiting has a
high probability of being lower at the
beginning of 2022 than 2021, ranging
from 65 percent probability with no
harvest to a 90 percent probability at a
catch equal to the default harvest rate.
Although a decline in the Pacific
whiting stock is probable even in the
absence of fishing pressure, the decline
does not threaten the sustainability of
the resource. At the proposed TAC of
500,000 mt, with a realized catch goal
of 380,000 mt (based on a 0.76
utilization rate), the stock assessment
indicates there is a 36 percent chance of
relative spawning stock biomass falling
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
04MYP1
23662
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 4, 2021 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
below B40 percent in one year. The
stock assessment also indicates there is
an 11 percent probability of falling
below B25 percent, and a 1 percent
chance of falling below B10 percent
after one year for this realized catch
level.
Continuing this harvest level into a
second year does have an increased
chance of the relative spawning stock
biomass falling below B40 percent. Two
years of actual harvests at
approximately 380,000 mt result in a 47
percent probability of falling below B40
percent, a 23 percent probability of
falling below B25 percent, and a 4
percent probability of falling below B10
percent.
In setting last year’s coastwide TAC,
(85 FR 36803; June 18, 2020) NMFS
selected a TAC that resulted in a
biomass level above B40 after 2 years of
fishing and took into account economic
impacts to U.S. fisheries and coastal
communities. NMFS continued with
this approach to determine the 2021
coastwide TAC. The 2021 stock
assessment estimates that the whiting
stock is at a healthy level of 59 percent
of unfished biomass. However, the stock
is continuing to decline at an increased
rate as natural mortality of the 2010 and
2014-year classes exceeds biomass
growth. There is also a high level of
uncertainty regarding the strength of
recent recruitments. Therefore, NMFS
determined the best scientific
information available indicates that
reduction from last year’s coastwide
TAC (575,000 mt), and deviation from
the Act’s default harvest rate, would
support the long-term sustainability of
the stock.
Economic Impacts of Potential Pacific
Whiting TAC levels
The Pacific whiting fishery is the
highest volume fishery on the West
Coast of the United States, providing
hundreds of jobs. In 2020, total revenue
was estimated to be $21.4 million in the
non-tribal shoreside sector and $21.5
million in the at-sea whiting sector. The
total non-tribal ex-vessel revenue in
2020 is estimated to have been about
$42.9 million. Maintaining access to the
Pacific whiting resource is important for
both direct fishery participants and
West Coast fishing communities. During
the JMC meeting, members of the JMC
and AP also discussed the projected
realized catch levels under each
proposed TAC scenario and resulting
economic impacts on the U.S. whiting
fishery.
The starting and ending coastwide
TAC proposals from Canada, 422,000 mt
and 465,000 mt, represent a 26 percent
and 19 percent reduction from the 2020
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 May 03, 2021
Jkt 253001
U.S. determined coastwide TAC,
respectively. Reductions of this
magnitude would have negative
economic impacts on U.S. fisheries and
coastal communities. Canada’s proposed
TACs reflect their concern with the
declining Pacific whiting biomass as the
2010 and 2014 year classes continue to
age, as well as uncertainty of the recent
recruitment strength because the stock
assessment is not able to predict cohort
strength until they are detected by the
acoustic survey and fishery. However,
the stock assessment indicates that the
higher TACs proposed by the United
States continue to provide a sustainable
Pacific whiting resource and result in
the relative spawning stock biomass
levels above B40 percent after 1 year,
and at or above B40 percent after 2 years
of fishing.
Because of these factors, NMFS has
determined that a measured reduction
in the coastwide TAC from last year is
appropriately precautionary to achieve
the conservation goals, but also
recognizes the need to minimize the
economic impacts to U.S. fisheries and
coastal communities as much as
possible.
2021 Pacific Whiting Adjusted TAC
Recommendation
The Act requires NMFS to make the
necessary adjustments to the TAC
specified in the Agreement (Paragraph 5
of Article II). The Agreement (Paragraph
5 of Article II) requires adjustments to
the coastwide TAC to account for
overages if either U.S. or Canadian catch
in the previous year exceeded its
individual TAC, or carryovers, if U.S. or
Canadian catch was less than its
individual TAC in the previous year.
Both the United States and Canada
harvested less than their individual
TACs in 2020, therefore carryover is
applied to the 2021 TACs.
Taking into account the percentage
shares for each country (26.12 percent
for Canada and 73.88 percent for the
United States) and the adjustments for
uncaught fish (12,617 mt carryover for
Canada and 55,080 mt carryover for the
United States), as required by the Act,
we recommend a final adjusted
coastwide TAC of 500,000 mt, with a
final adjusted TAC for Canada of
130,600 mt (117,983 mt + 12,617 mt
carryover adjustment), and a final
adjusted TAC for the United States of
369,400 mt (314,320 mt + 55,080 mt
carryover adjustment). This
recommendation is consistent with the
best scientific information available,
provisions of the Agreement, and the
Whiting Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Tribal Allocations
The regulations at 50 CFR 660.50(d)
identify the procedures for
implementing the treaty rights that
Pacific Coast treaty Indian tribes have to
harvest groundfish in their usual and
accustomed fishing areas in U.S. waters.
Tribes with treaty fishing rights in the
area covered by the Pacific Coast
Groundfish FMP request allocations,
set-asides, or regulations specific to the
tribes during the Council’s biennial
harvest specifications and management
measures process. The regulations state
that the Secretary will develop tribal
allocations and regulations in
consultation with the affected tribe(s)
and, insofar as possible, with tribal
consensus.
NMFS allocates a portion of the U.S.
TAC of Pacific whiting to the tribal
fishery, following the process
established in 50 CFR 660.50(d). The
tribal allocation is subtracted from the
U.S. Pacific whiting TAC before
allocation to the non-tribal sectors.
Four Washington coastal treaty Indian
tribes including the Makah Indian Tribe,
Quileute Indian Tribe, Quinault Indian
Nation, and the Hoh Indian Tribe
(collectively, the ‘‘Treaty Tribes’’), can
participate in the tribal Pacific whiting
fishery. Tribal allocations of Pacific
whiting have been based on discussions
with the Treaty Tribes regarding their
intent for those fishing years. The Hoh
Tribe has not expressed an interest in
participating in the Pacific whiting
fishery to date. The Quileute Tribe and
Quinault Indian Nation have expressed
interest in beginning to participate in
the Pacific whiting fishery at a future
date. To date, only the Makah Tribe has
prosecuted a tribal fishery for Pacific
whiting, and has harvested Pacific
whiting since 1996 using midwater
trawl gear. Table 1 below provides a
recent history of U.S. TACs and annual
tribal allocation in metric tons (mt).
TABLE 1—U.S. TOTAL ALLOWABLE
CATCH AND ANNUAL TRIBAL ALLOCATION IN METRIC TONS (mt)
Year
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
..........
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
04MYP1
U.S. TAC 1
(mt)
193,935
290,903
186,037
269,745
316,206
325,072
367,553
441,433
441,433
441,433
Tribal
allocation
(mt)
49,939
66,908
48,556
63,205
55,336
56,888
64,322
77,251
77,251
77,251
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 4, 2021 / Proposed Rules
of scientific research catch and
estimated bycatch mortality in nongroundfish fisheries. At its November
2020 meeting, the Council
recommended an incidental mortality
set-aside of 750 mt for 2021. This is a
Tribal
U.S. TAC 1
reduction of the amount set-aside for
Year
allocation
(mt)
(mt)
research and incidental mortality from
1,500 mt in 2020. The 750 mt
2020 ..........
424,810
74,342 recommendation, however, reflects the
1 Beginning in 2012, the United States startrecent 3 year average mortality that has
ed using the term Total Allowable Catch, or declined from 942 mt in 2014–2016 to
TAC, based on the Agreement between the 216 mt in 2017–2019. This rule
Government of the United States of America
and the Government of Canada on Pacific proposes the Council’s
Hake/Whiting. Prior to 2012, the terms Optimal recommendations.
TABLE 1—U.S. TOTAL ALLOWABLE
CATCH AND ANNUAL TRIBAL ALLOCATION IN METRIC TONS (mt)—Continued
Yield (OY) and Annual Catch Limit (ACL) were
used.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
In 2009, NMFS, the states of
Washington and Oregon, and the Treaty
Tribes started a process to determine the
long-term tribal allocation for Pacific
whiting. However, these groups have
not yet determined a long-term
allocation. In order to ensure Treaty
Tribes continue to receive allocations,
this rule proposes the 2021 tribal
allocation of Pacific whiting. This
allocation is not intended to set
precedent for future allocations.
In exchanges between NMFS and the
Treaty Tribes during November and
December 2020, the Makah Tribe
indicated their intent to participate in
the tribal Pacific whiting fishery in 2021
and requested 17.5 percent of the U.S.
TAC. The Quinault Indian Nation,
Quileute Indian Tribe and Hoh Indian
Tribe informed NMFS in December
2020 that they will not participate in the
2021 fishery. NMFS will contact the
Tribes during the proposed rule
comment period to refine the 2021
allocation before allocating the final
U.S. TAC between the tribal and nontribal whiting fisheries. NMFS proposes
a tribal allocation that accommodates
the tribal request, specifically 17.5
percent of the U.S. TAC. The proposed
2021 adjusted U.S. TAC is 369,400 mt,
and therefore the proposed 2021 tribal
allocation is 64,645 mt. NMFS has
determined that the current scientific
information regarding the distribution
and abundance of the coastal Pacific
whiting stock indicates the 17.5 percent
is within the range of the tribal treaty
right to Pacific whiting.
Non-Tribal Research and Bycatch SetAsides
The U.S. non-tribal whiting fishery is
managed under the Council’s Pacific
Coast Groundfish FMP. Each year, the
Council recommends the amount of
Pacific whiting to accommodate
incidental mortality of Pacific whiting
in research activities and nongroundfish fisheries based on estimates
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 May 03, 2021
Jkt 253001
23663
This proposed rule would be
implemented under the statutory and
regulatory authority of section 304(b)
and 305(d) of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act, and the Pacific Whiting Act of
2006. With this proposed rule, NMFS,
acting on behalf of the Secretary, would
ensure that the FMP is implemented in
a manner consistent with treaty rights of
four Treaty Tribes to fish in their ‘‘usual
and accustomed grounds and stations’’
in common with non-tribal citizens.
United States v. Washington, 384 F.
Supp. 313 (W.D. 1974).
Classification
NMFS notes that the public comment
period for this proposed rule is 15 days.
Finalizing the Pacific whiting harvest
In addition to the tribal allocation,
specifications closer to the start of the
this proposed rule establishes the
Pacific whiting fishing season on May
fishery harvest guideline (HG), called
15th provides the industry with more
the non-tribal allocation. The proposed
time to plan and execute the fishery and
2021 fishery HG for Pacific whiting is
gives them earlier access to the finalized
304,005 mt. This amount was
allocations of Pacific whiting. Moreover,
determined by deducting the 64,645 mt
the public already had an opportunity to
tribal allocation and the 750 mt
comment under the proposed rule
allocation for scientific research catch
and fishing mortality in non-groundfish issued on February 16, 2021 on
percentage of the U.S. TAC allocated to
fisheries from the total adjusted U.S.
the Pacific Coast Indian tribes that have
TAC of 369,400 mt. The Council
a treaty right to harvest groundfish and
recommends the research and bycatch
set-aside research and incidental
set-aside on an annual basis, based on
mortality. NMFS has determined that a
estimates of scientific research catch
and estimated bycatch mortality in non- 15-day comment period best balances
the interest in allowing the public
groundfish fisheries. The regulations
adequate time to comment on the
further allocate the fishery HG among
proposed measures while implementing
the three non-tribal sectors of the Pacific
the management measures, including
whiting fishery: The catcher/processor
the finalizing Pacific whiting
(C/P) Coop Program, the Mothership
allocations, in a timely manner.
(MS) Coop Program, and the Shorebased
Pursuant to section 304 (b)(1)(A) and
Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) Program. 305 (d) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act,
The C/P Coop Program is allocated 34
the NMFS Assistant Administrator has
percent (103,362 mt for 2021), the MS
determined that this proposed rule is
Coop Program is allocated 24 percent
consistent with the Pacific Coast
(72,961 mt for 2021), and the
Groundfish FMP, other provisions of the
Shorebased IFQ Program is allocated 42 Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other
percent (127,682 mt for 2021). The
applicable law, subject to further
fishery south of 42° N lat. may not take
consideration after public comment. In
more than 6,384 mt (5 percent of the
making its final determination, NMFS
Shorebased IFQ Program allocation)
will take into account the complete
prior to May 15, the start of the primary record, including comments received
Pacific whiting season north of 42° N
during the comment period.
lat.
Pursuant to Executive Order 13175,
this proposed rule was developed after
TABLE 2—2021 PROPOSED PACIFIC
meaningful consultation and
WHITING ALLOCATIONS IN METRIC collaboration with tribal officials from
TONS
the area covered by the Pacific Coast
Groundfish FMP. Under the Magnuson2021 Pacific
Stevens Act at 16 U.S.C. 1852(b)(5), one
whiting
Sector
of the voting members of the Pacific
allocation
Council must be a representative of an
(mt)
Indian tribe with federally recognized
Tribal .....................................
64,645 fishing rights from the area of the
Catcher/Processor (C/P)
Council’s jurisdiction. In addition,
Coop Program ...................
103,362 regulations implementing the Pacific
Mothership (MS) Coop ProCoast Groundfish FMP establish a
gram ..................................
72,961
procedure by which the tribes with
Shorebased IFQ Program ....
127,682
treaty fishing rights in the area covered
Non-Tribal Harvest Guidelines and
Allocations
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
04MYP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
23664
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 4, 2021 / Proposed Rules
by the Pacific Coast Groundfish FMP
request allocations or regulations
specific to the Tribes, in writing, before
the first of the two meetings at which
the Council considers groundfish
management measures. The regulations
at 50 CFR 660.324(d) further state, the
Secretary will develop tribal allocations
and regulations under this paragraph in
consultation with the affected tribe(s)
and, insofar as possible, with tribal
consensus. The tribal management
measures in this proposed rule have
been developed following these
procedures.
The Office of Management and Budget
has determined that this proposed rule
is not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
A range of potential total harvest
levels for Pacific whiting have been
considered under the Final
Environmental Impact Statement for
Harvest Specifications and Management
Measures for 2015–2016 and Biennial
Periods thereafter (2015/16 FEIS) and in
the Environmental Assessment for
Harvest Specifications and Management
Measures for 2021–2022 and Biennial
Periods Thereafter and is available from
NMFS (see ADDRESSES). The 2015/16
FEIS examined the harvest
specifications and management
measures for 2015–16 and 10 year
projections for routinely adjusted
harvest specifications and management
measures. The 10 year projections were
produced to evaluate the impacts of the
ongoing implementation of harvest
specifications and management
measures and to evaluate the impacts of
the routine adjustments that are the
main component of each biennial cycle.
The EA for the 2021–22 cycle tiers from
the 2015/16 FEIS and focuses on the
harvest specifications and management
measures that were not within the scope
of the 10 year projections in the 2015/
16 FEIS.
An Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (IRFA) was prepared for this
action, as required by section 603 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The
IRFA describes the economic impact
this proposed rule, if adopted, would
have on small entities. A description of
the action, why it is being considered,
and the legal basis for this action is
contained in the SUMMARY section and at
the beginning of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of the preamble. A
summary of the IRFA follow. Copies of
the IRFAs are available from NMFS (See
ADDRESSES).
Under the RFA, the term ‘‘small
entities’’ includes small businesses,
small organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions. The Small
Business Administration has established
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 May 03, 2021
Jkt 253001
size criteria for entities involved in the
fishing industry that qualify as small
businesses. A business involved in fish
harvesting is a small business if it is
independently owned and operated and
not dominant in its field of operation
(including its affiliates) and if it has
combined annual receipts, not in excess
of $11 million for all its affiliated
operations worldwide (see 80 FR 81194,
December 29, 2015). A wholesale
business servicing the fishing industry
is a small business if it employs 100 or
fewer persons on a full time, part time,
temporary, or other basis, at all its
affiliated operations worldwide. A small
organization is any nonprofit enterprise
that is independently owned and
operated and is not dominant in its
field. Effective February 26, 2016, a
seafood processor is a small business if
it is independently owned and operated,
not dominant in its field of operation,
and employs 750 or fewer persons on a
full time, part time, temporary, or other
basis, at all its affiliated operations
worldwide (See NAICS 311710 at 81 FR
4469; January 26, 2016). For purposes of
rulemaking, NMFS is also applying the
seafood processor standard to catcher
processors because whiting C/Ps earn
the majority of the revenue from
processed seafood product.
Description and Estimate of the Number
of Small Entities to Which the Rule
Applies, and Estimate of Economic
Impacts by Entity Size and Industry
This proposed rule would establish
the coastwide and U.S. TAC and affect
how Pacific whiting is allocated to the
following sectors/programs: Tribal,
Shorebased IFQ Program Trawl Fishery,
MS Coop Program Whiting At-sea Trawl
Fishery, and C/P Coop Program Whiting
At-sea Trawl Fishery. The amount of
Pacific whiting allocated to these sectors
is based on the U.S. TAC.
We expect one tribal entity to fish for
Pacific whiting in 2021. Tribes are not
considered small entities for the
purposes of RFA. Impacts to tribes are
nevertheless considered in this analysis.
As of January 2021, the Shorebased
IFQ Program is composed of 166 Quota
Share permits/accounts (134 of which
were allocated whiting quota pounds),
and 35 first receivers, one of which is
designated as whiting-only receivers
and 11 that may receive both whiting
and non-whiting.
These regulations also directly affect
participants in the MS Co-op Program,
a general term to describe the limited
access program that applies to eligible
harvesters and processors in the MS
sector of the Pacific whiting at-sea trawl
fishery. This program consists of six MS
processor permits, and a catcher vessel
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
fleet currently composed of a single coop, with 34 Mothership/Catcher Vessel
(MS/CV) endorsed permits (with three
permits each having two catch history
assignments).
These regulations also directly affect
the C/P Co-op Program, composed of 10
C/P endorsed permits owned by three
companies that have formed a single
coop. These co-ops are considered large
entities from several perspectives; they
have participants that are large entities,
and have in total more than 750
employees worldwide including
affiliates.
Although there are three non-tribal
sectors, many companies participate in
two sectors and some participate in all
three sectors. As part of the permit
application processes for the non-tribal
fisheries, based on a review of the Small
Business Administration size criteria,
permit applicants are asked if they
considered themselves a ‘‘small’’
business, and they are asked to provide
detailed ownership information. Data on
employment worldwide, including
affiliates, are not available for these
companies, which generally operate in
Alaska as well as the West Coast and
may have operations in other countries
as well. NMFS has limited entry permit
holders self-report size status. For 2021,
all 10 CP permits reported they are not
small businesses, as did 8 mothership
catcher vessels. There is substantial, but
not complete overlap between permit
ownership and vessel ownership so
there may be a small number of
additional small entity vessel owners
who will be impacted by this rule. After
accounting for cross participation,
multiple Quota Share account holders,
and affiliation through ownership,
NMFS estimates that there are 103 nontribal entities directly affected by these
proposed regulations, 89 of which are
considered ‘‘small’’ businesses.
This rule will allocate Pacific whiting
between tribal and non-tribal harvesters
(a mixture of small and large
businesses). Tribal fisheries consist of a
mixture of fishing activities that are
similar to the activities that non-tribal
fisheries undertake. Tribal harvests may
be delivered to both shoreside plants
and motherships for processing. These
processing facilities also process fish
harvested by non-tribal fisheries. The
effect of the tribal allocation on nontribal fisheries will depend on the level
of tribal harvests relative to their
allocation and the reapportionment
process. If the tribes do not harvest their
entire allocation, there are opportunities
during the year to reapportion
unharvested tribal amounts to the nontribal fleets. For example, in 2020 NMFS
reapportioned 40,000 mt of the original
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
04MYP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 4, 2021 / Proposed Rules
74,342 mt tribal allocation. This
reapportionment was based on
conversations with the tribes and the
best information available at the time,
which indicated that this amount would
not limit tribal harvest opportunities for
the remainder of the year. The
reapportioning process allows
unharvested tribal allocations of Pacific
whiting to be fished by the non-tribal
fleets, benefitting both large and small
entities. The revised Pacific whiting
allocations for 2020 following the
reapportionment were: Tribal 34,342 mt,
C/P Co-op 132,249 mt; MS Co-op 93,352
mt; and Shorebased IFQ Program
163,367 mt.
The prices for Pacific whiting are
largely determined by the world market
because most of the Pacific whiting
harvested in the United States is
exported. The U.S. Pacific whiting TAC
is highly variable, as have subsequent
harvests and ex-vessel revenues. For the
years 2016 to 2020, the total Pacific
whiting fishery (tribal and non-tribal)
averaged harvests of approximately
303,782 mt annually. The 2020 U.S.
non-tribal fishery had a Pacific whiting
catch of approximately 287,400 mt, and
the tribal fishery landed less than 200
mt.
Impacts to the U.S. non-tribal fishery
are measured with an estimate of exvessel revenue. The NMFS proposed
adjusted coastwide TAC of 500,000 mt
would result in an adjusted U.S. TAC of
369,400 mt and U.S. non-tribal harvest
guideline of 304,005 mt. Using the 2020
weighted-average non-tribal Oregon
shoreside price per metric ton (e.g. $154
per metric ton), the proposed TAC is
estimated to result in an ex-vessel
revenue of $46.9 million for the U.S.
non-tribal fishing fleet. The low and
high range of the coastwide TAC NMFS
considered (475,000 mt and 565,191 mt,
respectively) is estimated to result in
projected ex-vessel revenue range of
$44.5 million to $53 million,
respectively.
Impacts to tribal catcher vessels who
elect to participate in the tribal fishery
are measured with an estimate of exvessel revenue. In lieu of more complete
information on tribal deliveries, total exvessel revenue is estimated with the
2020 average shoreside ex-vessel price
of Pacific whiting, which was $154 per
mt. At that price, the proposed 2020
tribal allocation of 64,645 mt would
have an ex-vessel value of $10 million.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 May 03, 2021
Jkt 253001
A Description of Any Significant
Alternatives to the Proposed Rule That
Accomplish the Stated Objectives of
Applicable Statutes and That Minimize
Any Significant Economic Impact of the
Proposed Rule on Small Entities
NMFS considered a ‘‘No Action’’
alternative as well as a range of
alternatives for setting the Pacific
whiting coastwide TAC. NMFS
considered setting the coastwide TAC
between 475,000 mt to 565,191 mt. A
coastwide TAC at the bottom of the
range (475,000 mt) may provide less
economic opportunity for 2021 as
compared to the TAC proposed in this
rule (a coastwide TAC of 500,000 mt).
A higher coastwide TAC of 565,191 mt
may offer an increased economic
opportunity for 2021 as compared to the
TAC proposed in this rule. However, the
2021 stock assessment projections
indicate this higher catch levels may
result in near-term stock biomass
declines below target levels. This is
contrary to the Whiting Act and
Agreement, which requires sustainable
management of the Pacific whiting
resource. Under the no action
alternative, NMFS would not set a
coastwide TAC, which would not fulfill
NMFS’ responsibility to manage the
U.S. fishery. Therefore this alternative
received no further consideration.
NMFS considered two alternatives for
the Pacific whiting tribal allocation: The
‘‘No Action’’ and the ‘‘Proposed
Action.’’ NMFS did not consider a
broader range of alternatives to the
proposed tribal allocation because the
tribal allocation is a percent of the
adjusted U.S. TAC and is based
primarily on the requests of the tribes.
These requests reflect the level of
participation in the fishery that will
allow them to exercise their treaty right
to fish for Pacific whiting. Under the
Proposed Action alternative, NMFS
proposes to set the tribal allocation
percentage at 17.5 percent, as requested
by the Tribes. This would yield a tribal
allocation of 64,645 mt for 2021.
Consideration of a percentage lower
than the tribal request of 17.5 percent is
not appropriate in this instance. As a
matter of policy, NMFS has historically
supported the harvest levels requested
by the Tribes. Based on the information
available to NMFS, the tribal request is
within their tribal treaty rights. A higher
percentage would arguably also be
within the scope of the treaty right.
However, a higher percentage would
unnecessarily limit the non-tribal
fishery.
Under the no action alternative,
NMFS would not make an allocation to
the tribal sector. This alternative was
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
23665
considered, but the regulatory
framework provides for a tribal
allocation on an annual basis only.
Therefore, the no action alternative
would result in no allocation of Pacific
whiting to the tribal sector in 2021,
which would be inconsistent with
NMFS’ responsibility to manage the
fishery consistent with the Tribes’ treaty
rights. Given that there is a tribal
request for allocation in 2021, this
alternative received no further
consideration.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Determination
of No Significant Impact
NMFS determined this proposed rule
would not adversely affect small
entities. The reapportioning process
allows unharvested tribal allocations of
Pacific whiting, fished by small entities,
to be fished by the non-tribal fleets,
benefitting both large and small entities.
NMFS has prepared an IRFA and is
requesting comments on this
conclusion. See ADDRESSES.
This proposed rule contains no
information collection requirements
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995.
No Federal rules have been identified
that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
this action.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
Fisheries, Fishing, Indian Fisheries.
Dated: April 26, 2021.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 660 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 660—FISHERIES OFF WEST
COAST STATES
1. The authority citation for part 660
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16
U.S.C. 773 et seq., and 16 U.S.C. 7001 et seq.
2. In § 660.50, revise paragraph (f)(4)
to read as follows:
■
§ 660.50 Pacific Coast treaty Indian
fisheries.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(4) Pacific whiting. The tribal
allocation for 2021 will be 64,645 mt.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Revise Table 1a to part 660, subpart
C–2021, to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
04MYP1
23666
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 4, 2021 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1a TO PART 660, SUBPART C—2021, SPECIFICATIONS OF OFL, ABC, ACL, ACT AND FISHERY HG (Weights in
Metric Tons) CAPITALIZED STOCKS ARE REBUILDING
ACL a//
Fishery HG b//
Stocks
Area
OFL
ABC
Yelloweye Rockfish c/ .......................
Arrowtooth Flounder d/ ......................
Big Skate e/ .......................................
Black Rockfish f/ ................................
Black Rockfish g/ ...............................
Bocaccio h/ ........................................
Cabezon i/ .........................................
California Scorpionfish j/ ...................
Canary Rockfish k/ ............................
Chilipepper l/ .....................................
Cowcod m/ .........................................
Cowcod ......................................
Cowcod ......................................
Darkblotched Rockfish n/ ..................
Dover Sole o/ .....................................
English Sole p/ ..................................
Lingcod q/ ..........................................
Lingcod r/ ...........................................
Longnose Skate s/ .............................
Longspine Thornyhead t/ ..................
Longspine Thornyhead u/ ..................
Pacific Cod v/ .....................................
Pacific Ocean Perch w/ ......................
Pacific Whiting x/ ................................
Petrale Sole y/ ....................................
Sablefish z/ .........................................
Sablefish aa/ .......................................
Shortspine Thornyhead bb/ ................
Shortspine Thornyhead cc/ ................
Spiny Dogfish dd/ ...............................
Splitnose ee/ .......................................
Starry Flounder ff/ ..............................
Widow Rockfish gg/ ............................
Yellowtail Rockfish hh/ ........................
Coastwide .........................................
Coastwide .........................................
Coastwide .........................................
California (S of 42° N lat.) ................
Washington (N of 46°16′ N lat.) .......
S of 40°10′ N lat ...............................
California (S of 42° N lat.) ................
S of 34°27′ N lat ...............................
Coastwide .........................................
S of 40°10′ N lat ...............................
S of 40°10′ N lat ...............................
(Conception) .....................................
(Monterey) ........................................
Coastwide .........................................
Coastwide .........................................
Coastwide .........................................
N of 40ß10′ N lat ...............................
S of 40°10′ N lat ...............................
Coastwide .........................................
N of 34°27′ N lat ..............................
S of 34°27′ N lat ...............................
Coastwide .........................................
N of 40°10′ N lat ..............................
Coastwide .........................................
Coastwide .........................................
N of 36° N lat ...................................
S of 36° N lat ...................................
N of 34°27′ N lat ..............................
S of 34°27′ N lat ...............................
Coastwide .........................................
S of 40°10′ N lat ...............................
Coastwide .........................................
Coastwide .........................................
N of 40°10′ N lat ..............................
97
13,551
1,690
379
319
1,887
225
319
1,459
2,571
114
95
19
953
93,547
11,107
5,816
1,255
2,086
5,097
........................
3,200
4,497
565,191
4,402
9,402
........................
3,211
........................
2,479
1,868
652
15,749
6,534
83
9,933
1,477
348
293
1,748
210
291
1,338
2,358
84
72
11
882
84,192
9,175
5,386
1,162
1,823
3,466
........................
1,926
3,854
(x/)
4,115
8,791
........................
2,183
........................
1,621
1,666
392
14,725
6,050
50
9,933
1,477
348
293
1,748
210
291
1,338
2,358
84
NA
NA
882
50,000
9,175
5,369
1,102
1,823
2,634
832
1,600
3,854
(x/)
4,115
6,892
1,899
1,428
756
1,621
1,666
392
14,725
6,050
41.2
7,837.9
1,419.7
345.7
274.9
1,700.2
208.7
287.1
1,268.6
2,260.3
72.8
NA
NA
862.9
48,402.8
8,924.37
5,090.6
1,089
1,571.6
2,580.3
829.8
1,093.9
3,829.3
304,005
3,727.5
See Table 1c
1,871.6
1,349.6
749.3
1,277
1,647.6
343.6
14,476.7
5,012.5
603
198
20
79
1,016
223
4,802
1,511
1,439
1,595
709
603
198
20
79
1,016
223
4,802
1,511
1,438
1,595
709
600.7
197.8
18.0
75.9
1,011.6
201.7
4,581.1
1,438.7
1,305.2
1,529.1
670.1
Stock Complexes
Blue/Deacon/Black Rockfish ii/ ..........
Cabezon/Kelp Greenling jj/ ................
Cabezon/Kelp Greenling kk/ ...............
Nearshore Rockfish North ll/ ..............
Nearshore Rockfish South mm/ ..........
Other Fish nn/ .....................................
Other Flatfish oo/ ................................
Shelf Rockfish North pp/ .....................
Shelf Rockfish South qq/ ....................
Slope Rockfish North rr/ .....................
Slope Rockfish South ss/ ...................
Oregon .............................................
Oregon .............................................
Washington ......................................
N of 40°10′ N lat ..............................
S of 40°10′ N lat ...............................
Coastwide .........................................
Coastwide .........................................
N of 40°10′ N lat ..............................
S of 40°10′ N lat ...............................
N of 40°10′ N lat ..............................
S of 40°10′ N lat ...............................
676
215
25
94
1,232
286
7,714
1,888
1,842
1,862
873
a/ Annual
catch limits (ACLs), annual catch targets (ACTs) and harvest guidelines (HGs) are specified as total catch values.
HGs means the HG or quota after subtracting Pacific Coast treaty Indian tribes allocations and projected catch, projected research
catch, deductions for fishing mortality in non-groundfish fisheries, and deductions for EFPs from the ACL or ACT.
c/ Yelloweye rockfish. The 50 mt ACL is based on the current rebuilding plan with a target year to rebuild of 2029 and an SPR harvest rate of
65 percent. 8.85 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (5 mt), EFP catch (0.24 mt), research (2.92 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (0.69 mt) resulting in a fishery HG of 41.2 mt. The non-trawl HG is 37.9 mt. The combined non-nearshore/nearshore
HG is 7.9 mt. Recreational HGs are: 9.7 mt (Washington); 8.8 mt (Oregon); and 11.4 mt (California). In addition, the non-trawl ACT is 29.5, and
the combined non-nearshore/nearshore ACT is 6.2 mt. Recreational ACTs are: 7.5 mt (Washington), 6.9 (Oregon), and 8.9 mt (California).
d/ Arrowtooth flounder. 2,095.08 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (2,041 mt), EFP fishing (0.1 mt), research
(12.98 mt) and incidental open access (41 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 7,837.9 mt.
e/ Big skate. 57.31 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (15 mt), EFP fishing (0.1 mt), and research catch (5.49 mt),
and incidental open access (36.72 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,419.7 mt.
f/ Black rockfish (California). 2.26 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP fishing (1.0 mt), research (0.08 mt), and incidental open
access (1.18 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 345.7 mt.
g/ Black rockfish (Washington). 18.1 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (18 mt) and research catch (0.1 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 274.9 mt.
h/ Bocaccio south of 40°10′ N lat. 47.82 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP catch (40 mt), research (5.6 mt), and incidental
open access (2.22 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,700.2 mt. The combined non-nearshore and nearshore HG is 320.2 mt. The California recreational fishery HG is 716.2 mt.
i/ Cabezon (California). 1.28 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP (1 mt), research (0.02 mt), and incidental open access fishery
(0.26 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 208.7 mt.
j/ California scorpionfish south of 34°27′ N lat. 3.89 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate research (0.18 mt) and the incidental open
access fishery (3.71 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 287.1 mt.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
b/ Fishery
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 May 03, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
04MYP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 4, 2021 / Proposed Rules
23667
k/ Canary rockfish. 69.39 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (50 mt), EFP catch (8 mt), and research catch (10.08
mt), and the incidental open access fishery (1.31 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,268.6 mt. The combined nearshore/non-nearshore HG is
126.6 mt. Recreational HGs are: 43.3 mt (Washington); 65.1 mt (Oregon); and 116.7 mt (California).
l/ Chilipepper rockfish south of 40°10′ N lat. 97.7 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP fishing (70 mt), research (14.04 mt), the
incidental open access fishery (13.66 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 2,260.3 mt.
m/ Cowcod south of 40°10′ N lat. 11.17 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP fishing (1.0 mt), research (10 mt), and incidental
open access (0.17 mt), resulting in a fishery harvest guideline of 72.8 mt. A single ACT of 50 mt is being set for the Conception and Monterey
areas combined.
n/ Darkblotched rockfish. 19.06 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (0.2 mt), EFP catch (0.6 mt), and research
catch (8.46 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (9.8 mt) resulting in a fishery HG of 862.9 mt.
o/ Dover sole. 1,597.21 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (1,497 mt), EFP fishing (0.1 mt), research (50.84 mt),
and incidental open access (49.27 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 48,402.8 mt.
p/ English sole. 250.63 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (200 mt), EFP fishing (0.1 mt), research (8.01 mt), and
the incidental open access fishery (42.52 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 8,924.37 mt.
q/ Lingcod north of 40°10′ N lat. 278.38 mt is deducted from the ACL for the Tribal fishery (250 mt), EFP catch (0.1 mt), research (16.6 mt),
and the incidental open access fishery (11.68 mt) resulting in a fishery HG of 5,090.6 mt.
r/ Lingcod south of 40°10′ N lat. 13 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP catch (1.5 mt), research (3.19 mt), and incidental open
access fishery (8.31 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,089 mt.
s/ Longnose skate. 251.40 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (220 mt), EFP catch (0.1 mt), and research catch
(12.46 mt), and incidental open access fishery (18.84 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,571.6 mt.
t/ Longspine thornyhead north of 34°27′ N lat. 53.71 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (30 mt), research catch
(17.49 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (6.22 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 2,580.3 mt.
u/ Longspine thornyhead south of 34°27′ N lat. 2.24 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate research catch (1.41 mt) and the incidental
open access fishery (0.8 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 829.6 mt.
v/ Pacific cod. 506.1 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (500 mt), EFP fishing (0.1 mt), research catch (5.47 mt),
and the incidental open access fishery (0.53 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,093.9 mt.
w/ Pacific ocean perch north of 40°10′ N lat. 24.73 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (9.2 mt), EFP fishing (0.1
mt), research catch (5.39 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (10.04 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 3,829.3 mt.
x/ The 2021 OFL of 565,191 mt is based on the 2021 assessment with an F40 percent of FMSY proxy. The proposed 2021 coastwide adjusted
Total Allowable Catch (TAC) is 500,000 mt. The U.S. TAC is 73.88 percent of the coastwide TAC. The proposed 2021 adjusted U.S. TAC is
369,400 mt (314,320 mt unadjusted TAC + 55,080 mt carryover adjustment). From the adjusted U.S. TAC, 64,645 mt is deducted to accommodate the Tribal fishery, and 750 mt is deducted to accommodate research and bycatch in other fisheries, resulting in a 2021 fishery HG of
304,005 mt. The TAC for Pacific whiting is established under the provisions of the Agreement with Canada on Pacific Hake/Whiting and the Pacific Whiting Act of 2006, 16 U.S.C. 7001–7010, and the international exception applies. Therefore, no ABC or ACL values are provided for Pacific whiting.
y/ Petrale sole. 387.54 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (350 mt), EFP catch (0.1 mt), research (24.14 mt), and
the incidental open access fishery (13.3 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 3,727.5 mt.
z/ Sablefish north of 36° N lat. This coastwide ACL value is not specified in regulations. The coastwide ACL value is apportioned north and
south of 36° N lat., using a rolling 5-year average estimated swept area biomass from the NMFS NWFSC trawl survey, with 78.4 percent apportioned north of 36° N lat. and 21.6 percent apportioned south of 36° N lat. The northern ACL is 6,892 mt and is reduced by 689.2 mt for the Tribal allocation (10 percent of the ACL north of 36° N lat.). The 689.2 mt Tribal allocation is reduced by 1.7 percent to account for discard mortality.
Detailed sablefish allocations are shown in Table 1c.
aa/ Sablefish south of 36° N lat. The ACL for the area south of 36° N lat. is 1,899 mt (21.6 percent of the calculated coastwide ACL value). 27.4
mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate research (2.40 mt) and the incidental open access fishery (25 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of
1,871.6 mt.
bb/ Shortspine thornyhead north of 34°27′ N lat. 78.4 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (50 mt), EFP catch (0.1
mt), and research catch (10.48 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (17.82 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,349.6 mt for the area north
of 34°27′ N lat.
cc/ Shortspine thornyhead south of 34°27′ N lat. 6.71 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate research catch (0.71 mt) and the incidental
open access fishery (6 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 749.3 mt for the area south of 34°27′ N lat.
dd/ Spiny dogfish. 344 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (275 mt), EFP catch (1.1 mt), research (34.27 mt), and
the incidental open access fishery (33.63 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,277 mt.
ee/ Splitnose rockfish south of 40°10′ N lat. 18.42 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP catch (1.5 mt), research (11.17 mt), and
the incidental open access fishery (5.75 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,647.6 mt.
ff/ Starry flounder. 48.38 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (2 mt), EFP catch (0.1 mt), research (0.57 mt), and
the incidental open access fishery (45.71 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 343.6 mt.
gg/ Widow rockfish. 248.32 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (200 mt), EFP catch (28 mt), research (17.27 mt),
and the incidental open access fishery (3.05 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 14,476.7 mt.
hh/ Yellowtail rockfish north of 40°10′ N lat. 1,047.55 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (1,000 mt), EFP catch (10
mt), research (20.55 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (7 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 5,012.5 mt.
ii/ Black rockfish/Blue rockfish/Deacon rockfish (Oregon). 2.32 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the EFP catch (0.5 mt), research
(0.08 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (1.74 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 600.7 mt.
jj/ Cabezon/kelp greenling (Oregon). 0.21 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP catch (0.1 mt), research (0.05 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (0.06 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 197.8 mt.
kk/ Cabezon/kelp greenling (Washington). 2 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery, therefore the fishery HG is 18 mt.
ll/ Nearshore Rockfish north of 40°10′ N lat. 3.08 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (1.5 mt), EFP catch (0.5 mt),
research (0.47 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (0.61 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 75.9 mt. State specific HGs are Washington
(18.4 mt), Oregon (22.7 mt), and California (37.6 mt).
mm/ Nearshore Rockfish south of 40°10′ N lat. 4.42 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate research catch (2.68 mt) and the incidental
open access fishery (2.68 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,011.6 mt.
nn/ Other Fish. The Other Fish complex is comprised of kelp greenling off California and leopard shark coastwide. 21.34 mt is deducted from
the ACL to accommodate EFP catch (0.1 mt), research (6.29 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (14.95 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of
201.7 mt.
oo/ Other Flatfish. The Other Flatfish complex is comprised of flatfish species managed in the PCGFMP that are not managed with stock-specific OFLs/ABCs/ACLs. Most of the species in the Other Flatfish complex are unassessed and include: Butter sole, curlfin sole, flathead sole, Pacific sanddab, rock sole, sand sole, and rex sole. 220.89 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (60 mt), EFP catch (0.1
mt), research (23.63 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (137.16 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 4,581.1 mt.
pp/ Shelf Rockfish north of 40°10′ N lat. 72.44 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (30 mt), EFP catch (1.5 mt), research (15.32 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (25.62 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,438.66 mt.
qq/ Shelf Rockfish south of 40°10′ N lat. 132.77 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP catch (50 mt), research catch (15.1 mt),
and the incidental open access fishery (67.67 mt) resulting in a fishery HG of 1,305.2 mt.
rr/ Slope Rockfish north of 40°10′ N lat. 65.89 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (36 mt), EFP catch (0.5 mt), and
research (10.51 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (18.88 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,529.1 mt.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 May 03, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
04MYP1
23668
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 4, 2021 / Proposed Rules
ss/ Slope Rockfish south of 40°10′ N lat. 38.94 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP catch (1 mt), and research (18.21 mt), and
the incidental open access fishery (19.73 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 670.1 mt. Blackgill rockfish has a stock-specific HG for the entire
groundfish fishery south of 40°10′ N lat. set equal to the species′ contribution to the ACL. Harvest of blackgill rockfish in all groundfish fisheries
south of 40°10′ N lat. counts against this HG of 176.5 mt.
4. Revise Table 1b to part 660, subpart
C, to read as follows:
■
TABLE 1b TO PART 660, SUBPART C—2021, ALLOCATIONS BY SPECIES OR SPECIES GROUP
[Weight in metric tons]
Stocks/stock complexes
Trawl
Fishery HG or
ACT a/b/
Area
%
Yelloweye Rockfish a/ ..........
Arrowtooth flounder .............
Big skate a/ ..........................
Bocaccio a/ ...........................
Canary rockfish a/ ................
Chilipepper rockfish ............
Cowcod a/ ............................
Darkblotched rockfish .........
Dover sole ...........................
English sole .........................
Lingcod ................................
Lingcod a/ .............................
Longnose skate a/ ................
Longspine thornyhead ........
Pacific cod ...........................
Pacific ocean perch ............
Pacific whiting c/ ..................
Petrale sole a/ ......................
Coastwide ...........................
Coastwide ...........................
Coastwide ...........................
S of 40°10′ N lat .................
Coastwide ...........................
S of 40°10′ N lat .................
S of 40°10′ N lat .................
Coastwide ...........................
Coastwide ...........................
Coastwide ...........................
N of 40′10° N lat ................
S of 40′10° N lat .................
Coastwide ...........................
N of 34°27′ N lat ................
Coastwide ...........................
N of 40°10′ N lat ................
Coastwide ...........................
Coastwide ...........................
41.2
7,837.9
1,419.7
1,700.2
1,268.6
2,260.3
50
862.9
48,402.8
8,924.4
5,090.6
1,089
1,571.6
2,580.3
1,093.9
3,829.3
304,005
3,727.9
Sablefish .............................
N of 36° N lat .....................
NA
Sablefish .............................
Shortspine thornyhead ........
Shortspine thornyhead ........
Splitnose rockfish ................
Starry flounder ....................
Widow rockfish a/ .................
Yellowtail rockfish ...............
Other Flatfish ......................
Shelf Rockfish a/ ..................
Shelf Rockfish a/ ..................
Slope Rockfish ....................
Slope Rockfish a/ .................
S of 36° N lat .....................
N of 34°27′ N lat ................
S of 34°27′ N lat .................
S of 40°10′ N lat .................
Coastwide ...........................
Coastwide ...........................
N of 40°10′ N lat ................
Coastwide ...........................
N of 40°10′ N lat ................
S of 40°10′ N lat .................
N of 40°10′ N lat ................
S of 40°10′ N lat .................
1,861.6
1,349.6
749.3
1,647.6
343.6
14,476.7
5,012.5
4581.1
1,438.7
1,305.2
1,529.1
670.1
8
95
95
39
72
75
36
95
95
95
45
40
90
95
95
95
100
........................
Non-trawl
Mt
%
3.3
7,446
1,348.7
663.8
917
1,695.2
18
819.8
45,982.7
8,478.2
2,290.8
435.6
1,414.4
2,451.3
1,039.2
3,637.8
304,005
3,697.9
Mt
92
5
5
60
28
25
64
5
5
5
55
60
10
5
5
5
0
........................
37.9
391.9
71
1,036.4
351.6
565.1
32
43.1
2,420.1
446.2
2,799.8
653.4
157.2
129
54.7
191.5
0
30
See Table 1c
42
95
........................
95
50
........................
88
90
60.2
12.2
81
........................
782.3
1,282.1
50
1,565.2
171.8
14,076.7
4,411.0
4,123
866.1
159.2
1,238.6
526.4
58
5
........................
5
50
........................
12
10
39.8
87.8
19
........................
1,080.3
67.5
699.3
82.4
171.8
400
601.5
458.1
572.6
1,146
290.5
143.7
a/ Allocations
decided through the biennial specification process.
cowcod fishery harvest guideline is further reduced to an ACT of 50 mt. The non-trawl allocation is further split 50:50 between the commercial and recreational sectors.
c/ Consistent with regulations at § 660.55(i)(2), the commercial harvest guideline for Pacific whiting is allocated as follows: 34 percent for the C/
P Coop Program; 24 percent for the MS Coop Program; and 42 percent for the Shorebased IFQ Program. No more than 5 percent of the
Shorebased IFQ Program allocation may be taken and retained south of 42° N lat. before the start of the primary Pacific whiting season north of
42° N lat.
b/ The
5. In § 660.140, revise paragraph
(d)(1)(ii)(D) to read as follows:
■
§ 660.140
*
Shorebased IFQ Program.
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
*
*
(ii) * * *
(D) For the trawl fishery, NMFS will
issue QP based on the following
shorebased trawl allocations:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (d)(1)(ii)(D)
IFQ species
Area
Yelloweye Rockfish .................................................
Arrowtooth flounder ................................................
Bocaccio .................................................................
Canary rockfish .......................................................
Chilipepper ..............................................................
Cowcod ...................................................................
Coastwide ...............................................................
Coastwide ...............................................................
South of 40°10′ N lat ..............................................
Coastwide ...............................................................
South of 40°10′ N lat ..............................................
South of 40°10′ N lat ..............................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 May 03, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
2021 Shorebased
trawl allocation
(mt)
2022 Shorebased
trawl allocation
(mt)
3.3
7,376.02
663.75
880.96
1,695.2
18
3.4
5974.77
654.38
858.56
1,621
18
04MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 84 / Tuesday, May 4, 2021 / Proposed Rules
23669
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (d)(1)(ii)(D)—Continued
IFQ species
Area
Darkblotched rockfish .............................................
Dover sole ...............................................................
English sole ............................................................
Lingcod ...................................................................
Lingcod ...................................................................
Longspine thornyhead ............................................
Pacific cod ..............................................................
Pacific halibut (IBQ) ................................................
Pacific ocean perch ................................................
Pacific whiting .........................................................
Petrale sole .............................................................
Sablefish .................................................................
Sablefish .................................................................
Shortspine thornyhead ............................................
Shortspine thornyhead ............................................
Splitnose rockfish ....................................................
Starry flounder ........................................................
Widow rockfish ........................................................
Yellowtail rockfish ...................................................
Other Flatfish complex ............................................
Shelf Rockfish complex ..........................................
Shelf Rockfish complex ..........................................
Slope Rockfish complex .........................................
Slope Rockfish complex .........................................
Coastwide ...............................................................
Coastwide ...............................................................
Coastwide ...............................................................
North of 40°10′ N lat ..............................................
South of 40°10′ N lat ..............................................
North of 34°27′ N lat ..............................................
Coastwide ...............................................................
North of 40°10′ N lat ..............................................
North of 40°10′ N lat ..............................................
Coastwide ...............................................................
Coastwide ...............................................................
North of 36° N lat ...................................................
South of 36° N lat ..................................................
North of 34°27′ N lat ..............................................
South of 34°27′ N lat ..............................................
South of 40°10′ N lat ..............................................
Coastwide ...............................................................
Coastwide ...............................................................
North of 40°10′ N lat ..............................................
Coastwide ...............................................................
North of 40°10′ N lat ..............................................
South of 40°10′ N lat ..............................................
North of 40°10′ N lat ..............................................
South of 40°10′ N lat ..............................................
*
*
*
*
2021 Shorebased
trawl allocation
(mt)
2022 Shorebased
trawl allocation
(mt)
743.39
45,972.65
8,478.2
2,275.78
435.6
2,451.28
1,039.21
69.6
3,337.74
127,682
3,692.9
3,139.59
786
1,212.12
50
1,565.20
171.8
13,600.68
4,091.13
4,088.00
831.07
159.24
938.58
526.4
694.94
45,972.65
8,407.9
2,090.83
463.6
2,278.38
1,039.21
69.6
3,201.94
TBD
3,237.5
2,985.42
748
1,178.87
50
1,531.00
171.8
12,663.68
3,898.4
4,120.40
794.56
158.02
916.71
523.9
*
[FR Doc. 2021–08997 Filed 5–3–21; 8:45 am]
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 May 03, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\04MYP1.SGM
04MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 4, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 23659-23669]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-08997]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 660
[Docket No. 210423-0088]
RIN 0648-BK25
Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; Fisheries off West Coast States;
Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery; 2021 Harvest Specifications for
Pacific Whiting, and 2021 Pacific Whiting Tribal Allocation
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Revised proposed rule; reopening of public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS issues the revised proposed rule for the 2021 Pacific
whiting fishery under the authority of the Pacific Coast Groundfish
Fishery Management Plan, the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act, the Pacific Whiting Act of 2006 (Whiting Act), and
other applicable laws. NMFS issued a proposed rule on February 16, 2021
that proposed the 2021 Pacific whiting tribal allocation and set-asides
for research and incidental mortality. NMFS is issuing a revised
proposed rule to include additional actions due to the lack of a
bilateral agreement on the 2021 Pacific whiting coastwide total
allowable catch (TAC) by the Governments of Canada and the United
States. This revised proposed rule includes the 2021 coastwide TAC and
U.S. TAC for Pacific whiting as determined by NMFS under the Whiting
Act, the non-tribal sector allocations, and the tribal allocation and
set-asides included in the original proposed rule. The proposed
measures are intended to help prevent overfishing, achieve optimum
yield, and ensure that management measures are based on the best
scientific information available.
DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received no later than
May 19, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, identified by
NOAA-NMFS-2021-0002 by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to https://www.regulations.gov and enter NOAA-NMFS-2021-0002 in the Search box.
Click on the ``Comment'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
Mail: Barry Thom, c/o Stacey Miller, Sustainable Fisheries
Division, West Coast Region, NMFS, 1201 NE Lloyd Blvd., Suite 1100,
Portland, OR 97232.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NMFS. All comments received are part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NMFS will accept anonymous
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
Electronic Access
This proposed rule is accessible via the internet at the Office of
the Federal Register website at https://www.federalregister.gov.
Background information and documents are available at the NMFS website
at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov and at the Pacific Fishery Management
Council's website at https://www.pcouncil.org/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stacey Miller, phone: 503-231-6290,
and email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 23660]]
Background
This rule proposes establishing the 2021 Pacific whiting harvest
specifications, including the adjusted coastwide TAC of 500,000 mt and
the adjusted U.S. TAC of 369,400 mt, and 2021 tribal allocations. NMFS
issued a proposed rule on February 16, 2021 (86 FR 9473) that proposed
allocating 17.5 percent of the U.S. TAC of Pacific whiting for 2021 to
Pacific Coast Indian tribes that have a treaty right to harvest
groundfish, and implement set-asides (750 mt) for Pacific whiting for
research and incidental mortality in other fisheries. We requested
public comment on these proposed actions through March 18, 2021 but
received no public comments during the comment period. NMFS is issuing
a revised proposed rule for these two actions as well as several
additional actions related to the Pacific whiting fishery due to the
lack of a bilateral agreement on the 2021 Pacific whiting coastwide TAC
under the Agreement between the Government of the United States of
America and the Government of Canada on Pacific Hake/Whiting of 2003
(Agreement). The Agreement's Joint Management Committee (JMC) met on
March 15-17, 2021 but was not able to reach agreement on a coastwide
TAC, which resulted in the JMC not recommending a coastwide TAC by
March 25th, as required by the Agreement. If the JMC does not recommend
a TAC, the Whiting Act directs NMFS (as delegated by the Secretary of
Commerce) to establish a coastwide and U.S. TAC for Pacific whiting.
This revised proposed rule would establish the 2021 coastwide and U.S.
TAC for Pacific whiting based on the criteria identified in the Whiting
Act and establish the Pacific whiting non-tribal sector allocations.
This revised proposed rule also includes the 2021 tribal allocation and
research set aside, which were described in the original proposed rule
published February 16, 2021 (86 FR 9473). The allocations for Pacific
whiting would be effective until December 31, 2021.
Pacific Whiting Agreement and Whiting Act
The transboundary stock of Pacific whiting is managed through the
Agreement, which establishes bilateral bodies to implement the terms of
the Agreement. The bilateral bodies include: The JMC, which recommends
the annual catch level for Pacific whiting; the Joint Technical
Committee (JTC), which conducts the Pacific whiting stock assessment;
the Scientific Review Group (SRG), which reviews the stock assessment;
and the Advisory Panel (AP), which provides stakeholder input to the
JMC.
The Agreement establishes a default harvest policy of F-40 percent,
which means a fishing mortality rate that would reduce the spawning
biomass to 40 percent of the estimated unfished level. The Agreement
also allocates 73.88 percent of the Pacific whiting total allowable
catch (TAC) to the United States and 26.12 percent of the TAC to
Canada.
Based on recommendations from the Agreement's JTC, SRG, and AP, the
JMC recommends the coastwide Pacific whiting TAC by March 25th of each
year, which is subsequently approved by NMFS, under the delegation of
authority from the Secretary of Commerce. In years when the JMC does
make a TAC recommendation to the parties, NMFS (under the delegation of
authority from the Secretary of Commerce) approves the U.S. TAC with
concurrence from the Department of State. The U.S. TAC is then
allocated into tribal and non-tribal sectors.
The 2021 JMC negotiations were held from March 15-17, 2021. These
negotiations typically focus on two factors to derive a coastwide TAC:
Agreement on a sustainable level of realized catch using stock
assessment projections and other relevant scientific advice, and
estimating the likely utilization rate, which is the proportion of the
TAC harvested by the various sectors of the U.S. and Canadian fisheries
based on historical rates and knowledge of existing conditions. Full
utilization of the TAC (100 percent) is not practicable, due to myriad
of regulatory and operational constraints. These constraints are long-
identified factors that affect utilization rates and setting the
coastwide TAC at a higher level allows the fisheries to achieve the
realized catch target. During the March 2021 JMC meeting, the JMC
agreed on a realized catch target of 380,000 mt but did not reach an
agreement on a utilization rate, and therefore did not come to a
bilateral agreement on the coastwide TAC. This is the second
consecutive year that the JMC did not reach an agreement on a coastwide
TAC.
The Agreement does not specify a procedure for when the JMC does
not agree on a coastwide TAC, however, the Whiting Act directs the
Secretary of Commerce to establish the TAC for Pacific whiting when the
JMC does not agree on a coastwide TAC. The Act states that NMFS (as
delegated by the Secretary of Commerce) should establish the coastwide
Pacific whiting TAC, taking into account recommendations from the JMC,
JTC, SRG, AP, and the Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council). The
Act requires NMFS to base the coastwide TAC decision on the best
scientific information available, and use the default harvest rate
unless scientific information indicates a different rate is necessary
to sustain the Pacific whiting resource. The Act also requires NMFS to
establish the U.S. share of the TAC based on the U.S./Canada percentage
split and adjustments specified in the Agreement.
2021 Stock Assessment and Scientific Review
The JTC completed a stock assessment for Pacific whiting in
February 2021. This assessment is available at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/document/2021-pacific-hake-whiting-stock-assessment. The assessment was reviewed by the SRG during a four-
day meeting held online. The SRG report is available at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/document/2021-pacific-hake-whiting-scientific-review-group-report. The SRG considered the 2021 assessment
report and appendices to represent the best scientific information
available for Pacific hake/whiting.
The 2021 assessment model uses the same structure as the 2020 stock
assessment model. The model is fit to an acoustic survey index of
abundance, annual commercial catches of the transboundary Pacific
whiting stock, and age composition data from an acoustic survey and
commercial fisheries. Age-composition data provide information to
estimate relative year class strength. Updates to the data in the 2021
assessment include: Fishery catch and age-composition data from 2020,
weight-at-age data for 2020, and minor changes to pre-2020 data. There
was not an acoustic survey planned for 2020 and therefore no new survey
data were included in the 2021 model. Additionally, no new age data
were available from the Canadian freezer-trawler feet in 2020 due to
the ongoing pandemic.
The Pacific whiting biomass is a highly cyclical and highly
productive stock. Since the 1960s, it is estimated to have ranged from
well below to above unfished levels. Compared to other groundfish
stocks, the Pacific whiting stock has high recruitment variability,
with low average recruitment levels and occasional large year-classes
that often comprise much of the biomass. At the start of 2021, the
Pacific whiting stock continues to be supported by multiple above
average cohorts, including the 2010, 2014, 2016, and 2017 year classes
which comprise 14 percent, 25 percent, 24 percent and 17 percent,
respectively
[[Page 23661]]
of the stock biomass. The 2010 year class is estimated to be the second
highest recruitment in the assessment time series; the 2014 and 2016
year classes are estimated to be above average in strength; and the
2012 and 2017 year classes are about average. The assessment estimates
small year classes in 2011, 2013, 2015, and 2018. There is very little
information in the data to estimate the size of the 2019 year class and
there is no information in the data to estimate the sizes of the 2020
and 2021 year classes.
The Pacific whiting relative spawning biomass was near unfished
levels (97.9 percent of unfished) in 2017 and has been declining since
that time as the 2010 and 2014 year classes are ageing and mortality
surpasses increased production, combined with record high catches. At
the start of 2021, the relative spawning stock biomass is still well
above the biomass level associated with the default harvest rate (40
percent of unfished level), and is estimated to be 0.981 million mt, or
59 percent of unfished levels. The stock is considered at a healthy
level, and the joint probability that the relative spawning stock
biomass is both below 40 percent of unfished level and that fishing
mortality is above the relative fishing intensity of the Agreement's F-
40 percent default harvest rate is estimated to be 1.7 percent.
2021 Pacific Whiting Coastwide TAC Evaluation and Recommendation
In determining the coastwide TAC, NMFS considered information and
recommendations from the Agreement's JMC, JTC, SRG, and AP, and the
Council. The stock assessment from the JTC and the SRG peer review are
the best scientific information available for determining the coastwide
Pacific whiting TAC. NMFS heard testimony from the AP and JMC at the
JMC's March 2021 meeting. NMFS has reached out to the Council and will
consider any recommendations provided by the Council.
NMFS considered a range of coastwide TAC alternatives including the
coastwide TAC resulting from the default harvest rate (565,191 mt) and
the coastwide TACs that were discussed during the AP and JMC March 2021
meeting. This includes the U.S. delegation's initial (500,000 mt) and
final positions (475,000 mt) and the Canadian delegation's initial
(422,000 mt) and final positions (465,000 mt). However, we excluded the
Canadian delegation's proposed TACs from further consideration because
according to the stock assessment they are not necessary to support a
sustainable Pacific whiting resource. Members of the JMC and AP also
identified that these TACs would have a disproportionally negative
economic impact on the U.S. fishing fleet compared to the Canadian
fishing fleet.
NMFS therefore evaluated coastwide TACs ranging from 475,000 mt to
565,191 mt in developing our proposed coastwide TAC of 500,000 mt. The
stock assessment supports the lower TACs within this range and would
provide adequate opportunity for both Canadian and U.S. fleets, while
sustainably managing the Pacific whiting resource.
Biological Impacts of Potential Whiting TAC Levels
The Act directs NMFS to use the default harvest rate set out in the
Agreement unless NMFS determines that a different rate is necessary to
sustain the offshore whiting resource. The Agreement specifies a
default harvest rate of ``F-40 percent'' which is the fishing mortality
rate that would reduce the relative spawning stock biomass, calculated
on a per recruit basis (a measure of stock reproductive potential) to
40 percent of what it would have been in the absence of fishing
mortality, often called B40. Although there is not a default biomass
level, the JMC, since implementation of the Agreement, has focused on
choosing a TAC designed to prevent the relative spawning stock biomass
from falling below B40. NMFS followed the same practice of choosing a
TAC designed to prevent the relative spawning stock biomass from
falling below this biomass level.
To evaluate the impact of the TACs on relative spawning stock
biomass, we applied an estimate of the coastwide Pacific whiting
fleet's utilization rate (i.e. the proportion of the TAC removed
through fishing effort) to the range of TACs we considered. Over the
last ten years, neither the U.S. nor the Canadian fishing fleets have
caught the entire coastwide TAC (100 percent utilization rate). The
ten-year (2010-2019) average utilization rate is 69.8 percent of the
coastwide TAC and the average utilization rate for the last 5 years was
70.06 percent of the coastwide TAC. To derive an upper estimate of
utilization, NMFS took the average of the five highest utilization
rates from 2011-2020, which results in a utilization rate of 75.82
percent of the coastwide TAC. Because of this, NMFS determined it is
reasonable to focus on a range of utilization rates from 70 percent to
76 percent, which encompass the average of the last five years (70.06
percent) and the average of the highest 5 utilization rates since 2011
(75.82 percent). These averages provide a realistic range for
projecting the coastwide utilization rates in 2021 and 2022 and are
consistent with the 2021 projected utilization rates provided by U.S.
members of the AP during the JMC negotiations.
We applied the range of average utilization rates to the range of
coastwide TACs to derive the projected harvest level and anticipated
impacts to the Pacific whiting spawning stock biomass. The stock
assessment indicates that across the range of TACs and utilization
rates evaluated, the projected harvest levels result in relative
spawning stock biomass levels above B40 percent after one fishing year
(47-49 percent of unfished levels) and between 39-44 percent of
unfished levels after two years of fishing at the same level.
Using the same approach as described above, a coastwide TAC set at
the default harvest rate (565,191 mt) combined with the 0.70 and 0.76
utilization rates results in projected harvest rates between 395,634
mt-429,545 mt and a projected spawning biomass of 48-47 percent of
unfished levels after one year of fishing, and 41-39 percent of
unfished levels after two years of fishing. Of the lower TACs
considered in the range, a coastwide TAC of 500,000 mt results in
projected harvest rates between 350,000 mt-380,000 mt and projected
spawning biomass of 49-48 percent of unfished levels after one year of
fishing, and 43-42 percent of unfished levels after 2 years of fishing,
using the lower (0.70) and higher (0.76) utilization rates
respectively. The lowest TAC considered (475,000 mt) combined with the
0.70 and 0.76 utilization rates results in lower projected harvest
(332,500 mt-361,000 mt) and projections of relative spawning biomass of
49 percent after one year of fishing, and 44-43 percent of unfished
levels after two years of fishing.
Overall, the stock assessment indicates that the relative spawning
stock biomass of Pacific whiting has a high probability of being lower
at the beginning of 2022 than 2021, ranging from 65 percent probability
with no harvest to a 90 percent probability at a catch equal to the
default harvest rate. Although a decline in the Pacific whiting stock
is probable even in the absence of fishing pressure, the decline does
not threaten the sustainability of the resource. At the proposed TAC of
500,000 mt, with a realized catch goal of 380,000 mt (based on a 0.76
utilization rate), the stock assessment indicates there is a 36 percent
chance of relative spawning stock biomass falling
[[Page 23662]]
below B40 percent in one year. The stock assessment also indicates
there is an 11 percent probability of falling below B25 percent, and a
1 percent chance of falling below B10 percent after one year for this
realized catch level.
Continuing this harvest level into a second year does have an
increased chance of the relative spawning stock biomass falling below
B40 percent. Two years of actual harvests at approximately 380,000 mt
result in a 47 percent probability of falling below B40 percent, a 23
percent probability of falling below B25 percent, and a 4 percent
probability of falling below B10 percent.
In setting last year's coastwide TAC, (85 FR 36803; June 18, 2020)
NMFS selected a TAC that resulted in a biomass level above B40 after 2
years of fishing and took into account economic impacts to U.S.
fisheries and coastal communities. NMFS continued with this approach to
determine the 2021 coastwide TAC. The 2021 stock assessment estimates
that the whiting stock is at a healthy level of 59 percent of unfished
biomass. However, the stock is continuing to decline at an increased
rate as natural mortality of the 2010 and 2014-year classes exceeds
biomass growth. There is also a high level of uncertainty regarding the
strength of recent recruitments. Therefore, NMFS determined the best
scientific information available indicates that reduction from last
year's coastwide TAC (575,000 mt), and deviation from the Act's default
harvest rate, would support the long-term sustainability of the stock.
Economic Impacts of Potential Pacific Whiting TAC levels
The Pacific whiting fishery is the highest volume fishery on the
West Coast of the United States, providing hundreds of jobs. In 2020,
total revenue was estimated to be $21.4 million in the non-tribal
shoreside sector and $21.5 million in the at-sea whiting sector. The
total non-tribal ex-vessel revenue in 2020 is estimated to have been
about $42.9 million. Maintaining access to the Pacific whiting resource
is important for both direct fishery participants and West Coast
fishing communities. During the JMC meeting, members of the JMC and AP
also discussed the projected realized catch levels under each proposed
TAC scenario and resulting economic impacts on the U.S. whiting
fishery.
The starting and ending coastwide TAC proposals from Canada,
422,000 mt and 465,000 mt, represent a 26 percent and 19 percent
reduction from the 2020 U.S. determined coastwide TAC, respectively.
Reductions of this magnitude would have negative economic impacts on
U.S. fisheries and coastal communities. Canada's proposed TACs reflect
their concern with the declining Pacific whiting biomass as the 2010
and 2014 year classes continue to age, as well as uncertainty of the
recent recruitment strength because the stock assessment is not able to
predict cohort strength until they are detected by the acoustic survey
and fishery. However, the stock assessment indicates that the higher
TACs proposed by the United States continue to provide a sustainable
Pacific whiting resource and result in the relative spawning stock
biomass levels above B40 percent after 1 year, and at or above B40
percent after 2 years of fishing.
Because of these factors, NMFS has determined that a measured
reduction in the coastwide TAC from last year is appropriately
precautionary to achieve the conservation goals, but also recognizes
the need to minimize the economic impacts to U.S. fisheries and coastal
communities as much as possible.
2021 Pacific Whiting Adjusted TAC Recommendation
The Act requires NMFS to make the necessary adjustments to the TAC
specified in the Agreement (Paragraph 5 of Article II). The Agreement
(Paragraph 5 of Article II) requires adjustments to the coastwide TAC
to account for overages if either U.S. or Canadian catch in the
previous year exceeded its individual TAC, or carryovers, if U.S. or
Canadian catch was less than its individual TAC in the previous year.
Both the United States and Canada harvested less than their individual
TACs in 2020, therefore carryover is applied to the 2021 TACs.
Taking into account the percentage shares for each country (26.12
percent for Canada and 73.88 percent for the United States) and the
adjustments for uncaught fish (12,617 mt carryover for Canada and
55,080 mt carryover for the United States), as required by the Act, we
recommend a final adjusted coastwide TAC of 500,000 mt, with a final
adjusted TAC for Canada of 130,600 mt (117,983 mt + 12,617 mt carryover
adjustment), and a final adjusted TAC for the United States of 369,400
mt (314,320 mt + 55,080 mt carryover adjustment). This recommendation
is consistent with the best scientific information available,
provisions of the Agreement, and the Whiting Act.
Tribal Allocations
The regulations at 50 CFR 660.50(d) identify the procedures for
implementing the treaty rights that Pacific Coast treaty Indian tribes
have to harvest groundfish in their usual and accustomed fishing areas
in U.S. waters. Tribes with treaty fishing rights in the area covered
by the Pacific Coast Groundfish FMP request allocations, set-asides, or
regulations specific to the tribes during the Council's biennial
harvest specifications and management measures process. The regulations
state that the Secretary will develop tribal allocations and
regulations in consultation with the affected tribe(s) and, insofar as
possible, with tribal consensus.
NMFS allocates a portion of the U.S. TAC of Pacific whiting to the
tribal fishery, following the process established in 50 CFR 660.50(d).
The tribal allocation is subtracted from the U.S. Pacific whiting TAC
before allocation to the non-tribal sectors.
Four Washington coastal treaty Indian tribes including the Makah
Indian Tribe, Quileute Indian Tribe, Quinault Indian Nation, and the
Hoh Indian Tribe (collectively, the ``Treaty Tribes''), can participate
in the tribal Pacific whiting fishery. Tribal allocations of Pacific
whiting have been based on discussions with the Treaty Tribes regarding
their intent for those fishing years. The Hoh Tribe has not expressed
an interest in participating in the Pacific whiting fishery to date.
The Quileute Tribe and Quinault Indian Nation have expressed interest
in beginning to participate in the Pacific whiting fishery at a future
date. To date, only the Makah Tribe has prosecuted a tribal fishery for
Pacific whiting, and has harvested Pacific whiting since 1996 using
midwater trawl gear. Table 1 below provides a recent history of U.S.
TACs and annual tribal allocation in metric tons (mt).
Table 1--U.S. Total Allowable Catch and Annual Tribal Allocation in
Metric Tons (mt)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tribal
Year U.S. TAC \1\ allocation
(mt) (mt)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2010.................................... 193,935 49,939
2011.................................... 290,903 66,908
2012.................................... 186,037 48,556
2013.................................... 269,745 63,205
2014.................................... 316,206 55,336
2015.................................... 325,072 56,888
2016.................................... 367,553 64,322
2017.................................... 441,433 77,251
2018.................................... 441,433 77,251
2019.................................... 441,433 77,251
[[Page 23663]]
2020.................................... 424,810 74,342
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Beginning in 2012, the United States started using the term Total
Allowable Catch, or TAC, based on the Agreement between the Government
of the United States of America and the Government of Canada on
Pacific Hake/Whiting. Prior to 2012, the terms Optimal Yield (OY) and
Annual Catch Limit (ACL) were used.
In 2009, NMFS, the states of Washington and Oregon, and the Treaty
Tribes started a process to determine the long-term tribal allocation
for Pacific whiting. However, these groups have not yet determined a
long-term allocation. In order to ensure Treaty Tribes continue to
receive allocations, this rule proposes the 2021 tribal allocation of
Pacific whiting. This allocation is not intended to set precedent for
future allocations.
In exchanges between NMFS and the Treaty Tribes during November and
December 2020, the Makah Tribe indicated their intent to participate in
the tribal Pacific whiting fishery in 2021 and requested 17.5 percent
of the U.S. TAC. The Quinault Indian Nation, Quileute Indian Tribe and
Hoh Indian Tribe informed NMFS in December 2020 that they will not
participate in the 2021 fishery. NMFS will contact the Tribes during
the proposed rule comment period to refine the 2021 allocation before
allocating the final U.S. TAC between the tribal and non-tribal whiting
fisheries. NMFS proposes a tribal allocation that accommodates the
tribal request, specifically 17.5 percent of the U.S. TAC. The proposed
2021 adjusted U.S. TAC is 369,400 mt, and therefore the proposed 2021
tribal allocation is 64,645 mt. NMFS has determined that the current
scientific information regarding the distribution and abundance of the
coastal Pacific whiting stock indicates the 17.5 percent is within the
range of the tribal treaty right to Pacific whiting.
Non-Tribal Research and Bycatch Set-Asides
The U.S. non-tribal whiting fishery is managed under the Council's
Pacific Coast Groundfish FMP. Each year, the Council recommends the
amount of Pacific whiting to accommodate incidental mortality of
Pacific whiting in research activities and non-groundfish fisheries
based on estimates of scientific research catch and estimated bycatch
mortality in non-groundfish fisheries. At its November 2020 meeting,
the Council recommended an incidental mortality set-aside of 750 mt for
2021. This is a reduction of the amount set-aside for research and
incidental mortality from 1,500 mt in 2020. The 750 mt recommendation,
however, reflects the recent 3 year average mortality that has declined
from 942 mt in 2014-2016 to 216 mt in 2017-2019. This rule proposes the
Council's recommendations.
Non-Tribal Harvest Guidelines and Allocations
In addition to the tribal allocation, this proposed rule
establishes the fishery harvest guideline (HG), called the non-tribal
allocation. The proposed 2021 fishery HG for Pacific whiting is 304,005
mt. This amount was determined by deducting the 64,645 mt tribal
allocation and the 750 mt allocation for scientific research catch and
fishing mortality in non-groundfish fisheries from the total adjusted
U.S. TAC of 369,400 mt. The Council recommends the research and bycatch
set-aside on an annual basis, based on estimates of scientific research
catch and estimated bycatch mortality in non-groundfish fisheries. The
regulations further allocate the fishery HG among the three non-tribal
sectors of the Pacific whiting fishery: The catcher/processor (C/P)
Coop Program, the Mothership (MS) Coop Program, and the Shorebased
Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) Program. The C/P Coop Program is
allocated 34 percent (103,362 mt for 2021), the MS Coop Program is
allocated 24 percent (72,961 mt for 2021), and the Shorebased IFQ
Program is allocated 42 percent (127,682 mt for 2021). The fishery
south of 42[deg] N lat. may not take more than 6,384 mt (5 percent of
the Shorebased IFQ Program allocation) prior to May 15, the start of
the primary Pacific whiting season north of 42[deg] N lat.
Table 2--2021 Proposed Pacific Whiting Allocations in Metric Tons
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2021 Pacific
whiting
Sector allocation
(mt)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tribal.................................................. 64,645
Catcher/Processor (C/P) Coop Program.................... 103,362
Mothership (MS) Coop Program............................ 72,961
Shorebased IFQ Program.................................. 127,682
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This proposed rule would be implemented under the statutory and
regulatory authority of section 304(b) and 305(d) of the Magnuson-
Stevens Act, and the Pacific Whiting Act of 2006. With this proposed
rule, NMFS, acting on behalf of the Secretary, would ensure that the
FMP is implemented in a manner consistent with treaty rights of four
Treaty Tribes to fish in their ``usual and accustomed grounds and
stations'' in common with non-tribal citizens. United States v.
Washington, 384 F. Supp. 313 (W.D. 1974).
Classification
NMFS notes that the public comment period for this proposed rule is
15 days.
Finalizing the Pacific whiting harvest specifications closer to the
start of the Pacific whiting fishing season on May 15th provides the
industry with more time to plan and execute the fishery and gives them
earlier access to the finalized allocations of Pacific whiting.
Moreover, the public already had an opportunity to comment under the
proposed rule issued on February 16, 2021 on percentage of the U.S. TAC
allocated to the Pacific Coast Indian tribes that have a treaty right
to harvest groundfish and set-aside research and incidental mortality.
NMFS has determined that a 15-day comment period best balances the
interest in allowing the public adequate time to comment on the
proposed measures while implementing the management measures, including
the finalizing Pacific whiting allocations, in a timely manner.
Pursuant to section 304 (b)(1)(A) and 305 (d) of the Magnuson-
Stevens Act, the NMFS Assistant Administrator has determined that this
proposed rule is consistent with the Pacific Coast Groundfish FMP,
other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and other applicable law,
subject to further consideration after public comment. In making its
final determination, NMFS will take into account the complete record,
including comments received during the comment period.
Pursuant to Executive Order 13175, this proposed rule was developed
after meaningful consultation and collaboration with tribal officials
from the area covered by the Pacific Coast Groundfish FMP. Under the
Magnuson-Stevens Act at 16 U.S.C. 1852(b)(5), one of the voting members
of the Pacific Council must be a representative of an Indian tribe with
federally recognized fishing rights from the area of the Council's
jurisdiction. In addition, regulations implementing the Pacific Coast
Groundfish FMP establish a procedure by which the tribes with treaty
fishing rights in the area covered
[[Page 23664]]
by the Pacific Coast Groundfish FMP request allocations or regulations
specific to the Tribes, in writing, before the first of the two
meetings at which the Council considers groundfish management measures.
The regulations at 50 CFR 660.324(d) further state, the Secretary will
develop tribal allocations and regulations under this paragraph in
consultation with the affected tribe(s) and, insofar as possible, with
tribal consensus. The tribal management measures in this proposed rule
have been developed following these procedures.
The Office of Management and Budget has determined that this
proposed rule is not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866.
A range of potential total harvest levels for Pacific whiting have
been considered under the Final Environmental Impact Statement for
Harvest Specifications and Management Measures for 2015-2016 and
Biennial Periods thereafter (2015/16 FEIS) and in the Environmental
Assessment for Harvest Specifications and Management Measures for 2021-
2022 and Biennial Periods Thereafter and is available from NMFS (see
ADDRESSES). The 2015/16 FEIS examined the harvest specifications and
management measures for 2015-16 and 10 year projections for routinely
adjusted harvest specifications and management measures. The 10 year
projections were produced to evaluate the impacts of the ongoing
implementation of harvest specifications and management measures and to
evaluate the impacts of the routine adjustments that are the main
component of each biennial cycle. The EA for the 2021-22 cycle tiers
from the 2015/16 FEIS and focuses on the harvest specifications and
management measures that were not within the scope of the 10 year
projections in the 2015/16 FEIS.
An Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) was prepared for
this action, as required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA). The IRFA describes the economic impact this proposed rule,
if adopted, would have on small entities. A description of the action,
why it is being considered, and the legal basis for this action is
contained in the SUMMARY section and at the beginning of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of the preamble. A summary of the
IRFA follow. Copies of the IRFAs are available from NMFS (See
ADDRESSES).
Under the RFA, the term ``small entities'' includes small
businesses, small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions.
The Small Business Administration has established size criteria for
entities involved in the fishing industry that qualify as small
businesses. A business involved in fish harvesting is a small business
if it is independently owned and operated and not dominant in its field
of operation (including its affiliates) and if it has combined annual
receipts, not in excess of $11 million for all its affiliated
operations worldwide (see 80 FR 81194, December 29, 2015). A wholesale
business servicing the fishing industry is a small business if it
employs 100 or fewer persons on a full time, part time, temporary, or
other basis, at all its affiliated operations worldwide. A small
organization is any nonprofit enterprise that is independently owned
and operated and is not dominant in its field. Effective February 26,
2016, a seafood processor is a small business if it is independently
owned and operated, not dominant in its field of operation, and employs
750 or fewer persons on a full time, part time, temporary, or other
basis, at all its affiliated operations worldwide (See NAICS 311710 at
81 FR 4469; January 26, 2016). For purposes of rulemaking, NMFS is also
applying the seafood processor standard to catcher processors because
whiting C/Ps earn the majority of the revenue from processed seafood
product.
Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which the
Rule Applies, and Estimate of Economic Impacts by Entity Size and
Industry
This proposed rule would establish the coastwide and U.S. TAC and
affect how Pacific whiting is allocated to the following sectors/
programs: Tribal, Shorebased IFQ Program Trawl Fishery, MS Coop Program
Whiting At-sea Trawl Fishery, and C/P Coop Program Whiting At-sea Trawl
Fishery. The amount of Pacific whiting allocated to these sectors is
based on the U.S. TAC.
We expect one tribal entity to fish for Pacific whiting in 2021.
Tribes are not considered small entities for the purposes of RFA.
Impacts to tribes are nevertheless considered in this analysis.
As of January 2021, the Shorebased IFQ Program is composed of 166
Quota Share permits/accounts (134 of which were allocated whiting quota
pounds), and 35 first receivers, one of which is designated as whiting-
only receivers and 11 that may receive both whiting and non-whiting.
These regulations also directly affect participants in the MS Co-op
Program, a general term to describe the limited access program that
applies to eligible harvesters and processors in the MS sector of the
Pacific whiting at-sea trawl fishery. This program consists of six MS
processor permits, and a catcher vessel fleet currently composed of a
single co-op, with 34 Mothership/Catcher Vessel (MS/CV) endorsed
permits (with three permits each having two catch history assignments).
These regulations also directly affect the C/P Co-op Program,
composed of 10 C/P endorsed permits owned by three companies that have
formed a single coop. These co-ops are considered large entities from
several perspectives; they have participants that are large entities,
and have in total more than 750 employees worldwide including
affiliates.
Although there are three non-tribal sectors, many companies
participate in two sectors and some participate in all three sectors.
As part of the permit application processes for the non-tribal
fisheries, based on a review of the Small Business Administration size
criteria, permit applicants are asked if they considered themselves a
``small'' business, and they are asked to provide detailed ownership
information. Data on employment worldwide, including affiliates, are
not available for these companies, which generally operate in Alaska as
well as the West Coast and may have operations in other countries as
well. NMFS has limited entry permit holders self-report size status.
For 2021, all 10 CP permits reported they are not small businesses, as
did 8 mothership catcher vessels. There is substantial, but not
complete overlap between permit ownership and vessel ownership so there
may be a small number of additional small entity vessel owners who will
be impacted by this rule. After accounting for cross participation,
multiple Quota Share account holders, and affiliation through
ownership, NMFS estimates that there are 103 non-tribal entities
directly affected by these proposed regulations, 89 of which are
considered ``small'' businesses.
This rule will allocate Pacific whiting between tribal and non-
tribal harvesters (a mixture of small and large businesses). Tribal
fisheries consist of a mixture of fishing activities that are similar
to the activities that non-tribal fisheries undertake. Tribal harvests
may be delivered to both shoreside plants and motherships for
processing. These processing facilities also process fish harvested by
non-tribal fisheries. The effect of the tribal allocation on non-tribal
fisheries will depend on the level of tribal harvests relative to their
allocation and the reapportionment process. If the tribes do not
harvest their entire allocation, there are opportunities during the
year to reapportion unharvested tribal amounts to the non-tribal
fleets. For example, in 2020 NMFS reapportioned 40,000 mt of the
original
[[Page 23665]]
74,342 mt tribal allocation. This reapportionment was based on
conversations with the tribes and the best information available at the
time, which indicated that this amount would not limit tribal harvest
opportunities for the remainder of the year. The reapportioning process
allows unharvested tribal allocations of Pacific whiting to be fished
by the non-tribal fleets, benefitting both large and small entities.
The revised Pacific whiting allocations for 2020 following the
reapportionment were: Tribal 34,342 mt, C/P Co-op 132,249 mt; MS Co-op
93,352 mt; and Shorebased IFQ Program 163,367 mt.
The prices for Pacific whiting are largely determined by the world
market because most of the Pacific whiting harvested in the United
States is exported. The U.S. Pacific whiting TAC is highly variable, as
have subsequent harvests and ex-vessel revenues. For the years 2016 to
2020, the total Pacific whiting fishery (tribal and non-tribal)
averaged harvests of approximately 303,782 mt annually. The 2020 U.S.
non-tribal fishery had a Pacific whiting catch of approximately 287,400
mt, and the tribal fishery landed less than 200 mt.
Impacts to the U.S. non-tribal fishery are measured with an
estimate of ex-vessel revenue. The NMFS proposed adjusted coastwide TAC
of 500,000 mt would result in an adjusted U.S. TAC of 369,400 mt and
U.S. non-tribal harvest guideline of 304,005 mt. Using the 2020
weighted-average non-tribal Oregon shoreside price per metric ton (e.g.
$154 per metric ton), the proposed TAC is estimated to result in an ex-
vessel revenue of $46.9 million for the U.S. non-tribal fishing fleet.
The low and high range of the coastwide TAC NMFS considered (475,000 mt
and 565,191 mt, respectively) is estimated to result in projected ex-
vessel revenue range of $44.5 million to $53 million, respectively.
Impacts to tribal catcher vessels who elect to participate in the
tribal fishery are measured with an estimate of ex-vessel revenue. In
lieu of more complete information on tribal deliveries, total ex-vessel
revenue is estimated with the 2020 average shoreside ex-vessel price of
Pacific whiting, which was $154 per mt. At that price, the proposed
2020 tribal allocation of 64,645 mt would have an ex-vessel value of
$10 million.
A Description of Any Significant Alternatives to the Proposed Rule That
Accomplish the Stated Objectives of Applicable Statutes and That
Minimize Any Significant Economic Impact of the Proposed Rule on Small
Entities
NMFS considered a ``No Action'' alternative as well as a range of
alternatives for setting the Pacific whiting coastwide TAC. NMFS
considered setting the coastwide TAC between 475,000 mt to 565,191 mt.
A coastwide TAC at the bottom of the range (475,000 mt) may provide
less economic opportunity for 2021 as compared to the TAC proposed in
this rule (a coastwide TAC of 500,000 mt). A higher coastwide TAC of
565,191 mt may offer an increased economic opportunity for 2021 as
compared to the TAC proposed in this rule. However, the 2021 stock
assessment projections indicate this higher catch levels may result in
near-term stock biomass declines below target levels. This is contrary
to the Whiting Act and Agreement, which requires sustainable management
of the Pacific whiting resource. Under the no action alternative, NMFS
would not set a coastwide TAC, which would not fulfill NMFS'
responsibility to manage the U.S. fishery. Therefore this alternative
received no further consideration.
NMFS considered two alternatives for the Pacific whiting tribal
allocation: The ``No Action'' and the ``Proposed Action.'' NMFS did not
consider a broader range of alternatives to the proposed tribal
allocation because the tribal allocation is a percent of the adjusted
U.S. TAC and is based primarily on the requests of the tribes. These
requests reflect the level of participation in the fishery that will
allow them to exercise their treaty right to fish for Pacific whiting.
Under the Proposed Action alternative, NMFS proposes to set the tribal
allocation percentage at 17.5 percent, as requested by the Tribes. This
would yield a tribal allocation of 64,645 mt for 2021. Consideration of
a percentage lower than the tribal request of 17.5 percent is not
appropriate in this instance. As a matter of policy, NMFS has
historically supported the harvest levels requested by the Tribes.
Based on the information available to NMFS, the tribal request is
within their tribal treaty rights. A higher percentage would arguably
also be within the scope of the treaty right. However, a higher
percentage would unnecessarily limit the non-tribal fishery.
Under the no action alternative, NMFS would not make an allocation
to the tribal sector. This alternative was considered, but the
regulatory framework provides for a tribal allocation on an annual
basis only. Therefore, the no action alternative would result in no
allocation of Pacific whiting to the tribal sector in 2021, which would
be inconsistent with NMFS' responsibility to manage the fishery
consistent with the Tribes' treaty rights. Given that there is a tribal
request for allocation in 2021, this alternative received no further
consideration.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Determination of No Significant Impact
NMFS determined this proposed rule would not adversely affect small
entities. The reapportioning process allows unharvested tribal
allocations of Pacific whiting, fished by small entities, to be fished
by the non-tribal fleets, benefitting both large and small entities.
NMFS has prepared an IRFA and is requesting comments on this
conclusion. See ADDRESSES.
This proposed rule contains no information collection requirements
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
No Federal rules have been identified that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this action.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660
Fisheries, Fishing, Indian Fisheries.
Dated: April 26, 2021.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 660 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 660--FISHERIES OFF WEST COAST STATES
0
1. The authority citation for part 660 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq., and
16 U.S.C. 7001 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 660.50, revise paragraph (f)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 660.50 Pacific Coast treaty Indian fisheries.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(4) Pacific whiting. The tribal allocation for 2021 will be 64,645
mt.
* * * * *
0
3. Revise Table 1a to part 660, subpart C-2021, to read as follows:
[[Page 23666]]
Table 1a to Part 660, Subpart C--2021, Specifications of OFL, ABC, ACL, ACT and Fishery HG (Weights in Metric
Tons) Capitalized Stocks are Rebuilding
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fishery HG b//
Stocks Area OFL ABC ACL a//
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yelloweye Rockfish c/......... Coastwide....... 97 83 50 41.2
Arrowtooth Flounder d/........ Coastwide....... 13,551 9,933 9,933 7,837.9
Big Skate e/.................. Coastwide....... 1,690 1,477 1,477 1,419.7
Black Rockfish f/............. California (S of 379 348 348 345.7
42[deg] N lat.).
Black Rockfish g/............. Washington (N of 319 293 293 274.9
46[deg]16' N
lat.).
Bocaccio h/................... S of 40[deg]10' 1,887 1,748 1,748 1,700.2
N lat.
Cabezon i/.................... California (S of 225 210 210 208.7
42[deg] N lat.).
California Scorpionfish j/.... S of 34[deg]27' 319 291 291 287.1
N lat.
Canary Rockfish k/............ Coastwide....... 1,459 1,338 1,338 1,268.6
Chilipepper l/................ S of 40[deg]10' 2,571 2,358 2,358 2,260.3
N lat.
Cowcod m/..................... S of 40[deg]10' 114 84 84 72.8
N lat.
Cowcod.................... (Conception).... 95 72 NA NA
Cowcod.................... (Monterey)...... 19 11 NA NA
Darkblotched Rockfish n/...... Coastwide....... 953 882 882 862.9
Dover Sole o/................. Coastwide....... 93,547 84,192 50,000 48,402.8
English Sole p/............... Coastwide....... 11,107 9,175 9,175 8,924.37
Lingcod q/.................... N of 40[ordm]10' 5,816 5,386 5,369 5,090.6
N lat.
Lingcod r/.................... S of 40[deg]10' 1,255 1,162 1,102 1,089
N lat.
Longnose Skate s/............. Coastwide....... 2,086 1,823 1,823 1,571.6
Longspine Thornyhead t/....... N of 34[deg]27' 5,097 3,466 2,634 2,580.3
N lat.
Longspine Thornyhead u/....... S of 34[deg]27' .............. .............. 832 829.8
N lat.
Pacific Cod v/................ Coastwide....... 3,200 1,926 1,600 1,093.9
Pacific Ocean Perch w/........ N of 40[deg]10' 4,497 3,854 3,854 3,829.3
N lat.
Pacific Whiting x/............ Coastwide....... 565,191 (x/) (x/) 304,005
Petrale Sole y/............... Coastwide....... 4,402 4,115 4,115 3,727.5
Sablefish z/.................. N of 36[deg] N 9,402 8,791 6,892 See Table 1c
lat.
Sablefish aa/................. S of 36[deg] N .............. .............. 1,899 1,871.6
lat.
Shortspine Thornyhead bb/..... N of 34[deg]27' 3,211 2,183 1,428 1,349.6
N lat.
Shortspine Thornyhead cc/..... S of 34[deg]27' .............. .............. 756 749.3
N lat.
Spiny Dogfish dd/............. Coastwide....... 2,479 1,621 1,621 1,277
Splitnose ee/................. S of 40[deg]10' 1,868 1,666 1,666 1,647.6
N lat.
Starry Flounder ff/........... Coastwide....... 652 392 392 343.6
Widow Rockfish gg/............ Coastwide....... 15,749 14,725 14,725 14,476.7
Yellowtail Rockfish hh/....... N of 40[deg]10' 6,534 6,050 6,050 5,012.5
N lat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stock Complexes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blue/Deacon/Black Rockfish ii/ Oregon.......... 676 603 603 600.7
Cabezon/Kelp Greenling jj/.... Oregon.......... 215 198 198 197.8
Cabezon/Kelp Greenling kk/.... Washington...... 25 20 20 18.0
Nearshore Rockfish North ll/.. N of 40[deg]10' 94 79 79 75.9
N lat.
Nearshore Rockfish South mm/.. S of 40[deg]10' 1,232 1,016 1,016 1,011.6
N lat.
Other Fish nn/................ Coastwide....... 286 223 223 201.7
Other Flatfish oo/............ Coastwide....... 7,714 4,802 4,802 4,581.1
Shelf Rockfish North pp/...... N of 40[deg]10' 1,888 1,511 1,511 1,438.7
N lat.
Shelf Rockfish South qq/...... S of 40[deg]10' 1,842 1,439 1,438 1,305.2
N lat.
Slope Rockfish North rr/...... N of 40[deg]10' 1,862 1,595 1,595 1,529.1
N lat.
Slope Rockfish South ss/...... S of 40[deg]10' 873 709 709 670.1
N lat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a/ Annual catch limits (ACLs), annual catch targets (ACTs) and harvest guidelines (HGs) are specified as total
catch values.
b/ Fishery HGs means the HG or quota after subtracting Pacific Coast treaty Indian tribes allocations and
projected catch, projected research catch, deductions for fishing mortality in non-groundfish fisheries, and
deductions for EFPs from the ACL or ACT.
c/ Yelloweye rockfish. The 50 mt ACL is based on the current rebuilding plan with a target year to rebuild of
2029 and an SPR harvest rate of 65 percent. 8.85 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery
(5 mt), EFP catch (0.24 mt), research (2.92 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (0.69 mt) resulting in
a fishery HG of 41.2 mt. The non-trawl HG is 37.9 mt. The combined non-nearshore/nearshore HG is 7.9 mt.
Recreational HGs are: 9.7 mt (Washington); 8.8 mt (Oregon); and 11.4 mt (California). In addition, the non-
trawl ACT is 29.5, and the combined non-nearshore/nearshore ACT is 6.2 mt. Recreational ACTs are: 7.5 mt
(Washington), 6.9 (Oregon), and 8.9 mt (California).
d/ Arrowtooth flounder. 2,095.08 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (2,041 mt), EFP
fishing (0.1 mt), research (12.98 mt) and incidental open access (41 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 7,837.9
mt.
e/ Big skate. 57.31 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (15 mt), EFP fishing (0.1 mt),
and research catch (5.49 mt), and incidental open access (36.72 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,419.7 mt.
f/ Black rockfish (California). 2.26 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP fishing (1.0 mt), research
(0.08 mt), and incidental open access (1.18 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 345.7 mt.
g/ Black rockfish (Washington). 18.1 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (18 mt) and
research catch (0.1 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 274.9 mt.
h/ Bocaccio south of 40[deg]10' N lat. 47.82 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP catch (40 mt),
research (5.6 mt), and incidental open access (2.22 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,700.2 mt. The combined
non-nearshore and nearshore HG is 320.2 mt. The California recreational fishery HG is 716.2 mt.
i/ Cabezon (California). 1.28 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP (1 mt), research (0.02 mt), and
incidental open access fishery (0.26 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 208.7 mt.
j/ California scorpionfish south of 34[deg]27' N lat. 3.89 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate research
(0.18 mt) and the incidental open access fishery (3.71 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 287.1 mt.
[[Page 23667]]
k/ Canary rockfish. 69.39 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (50 mt), EFP catch (8
mt), and research catch (10.08 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (1.31 mt), resulting in a fishery
HG of 1,268.6 mt. The combined nearshore/non-nearshore HG is 126.6 mt. Recreational HGs are: 43.3 mt
(Washington); 65.1 mt (Oregon); and 116.7 mt (California).
l/ Chilipepper rockfish south of 40[deg]10' N lat. 97.7 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP fishing
(70 mt), research (14.04 mt), the incidental open access fishery (13.66 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of
2,260.3 mt.
m/ Cowcod south of 40[deg]10' N lat. 11.17 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP fishing (1.0 mt),
research (10 mt), and incidental open access (0.17 mt), resulting in a fishery harvest guideline of 72.8 mt. A
single ACT of 50 mt is being set for the Conception and Monterey areas combined.
n/ Darkblotched rockfish. 19.06 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (0.2 mt), EFP
catch (0.6 mt), and research catch (8.46 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (9.8 mt) resulting in a
fishery HG of 862.9 mt.
o/ Dover sole. 1,597.21 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (1,497 mt), EFP fishing
(0.1 mt), research (50.84 mt), and incidental open access (49.27 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 48,402.8
mt.
p/ English sole. 250.63 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (200 mt), EFP fishing (0.1
mt), research (8.01 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (42.52 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of
8,924.37 mt.
q/ Lingcod north of 40[deg]10' N lat. 278.38 mt is deducted from the ACL for the Tribal fishery (250 mt), EFP
catch (0.1 mt), research (16.6 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (11.68 mt) resulting in a fishery
HG of 5,090.6 mt.
r/ Lingcod south of 40[deg]10' N lat. 13 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP catch (1.5 mt), research
(3.19 mt), and incidental open access fishery (8.31 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,089 mt.
s/ Longnose skate. 251.40 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (220 mt), EFP catch (0.1
mt), and research catch (12.46 mt), and incidental open access fishery (18.84 mt), resulting in a fishery HG
of 1,571.6 mt.
t/ Longspine thornyhead north of 34[deg]27' N lat. 53.71 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal
fishery (30 mt), research catch (17.49 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (6.22 mt), resulting in a
fishery HG of 2,580.3 mt.
u/ Longspine thornyhead south of 34[deg]27' N lat. 2.24 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate research
catch (1.41 mt) and the incidental open access fishery (0.8 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 829.6 mt.
v/ Pacific cod. 506.1 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (500 mt), EFP fishing (0.1
mt), research catch (5.47 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (0.53 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of
1,093.9 mt.
w/ Pacific ocean perch north of 40[deg]10' N lat. 24.73 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal
fishery (9.2 mt), EFP fishing (0.1 mt), research catch (5.39 mt), and the incidental open access fishery
(10.04 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 3,829.3 mt.
x/ The 2021 OFL of 565,191 mt is based on the 2021 assessment with an F40 percent of FMSY proxy. The proposed
2021 coastwide adjusted Total Allowable Catch (TAC) is 500,000 mt. The U.S. TAC is 73.88 percent of the
coastwide TAC. The proposed 2021 adjusted U.S. TAC is 369,400 mt (314,320 mt unadjusted TAC + 55,080 mt
carryover adjustment). From the adjusted U.S. TAC, 64,645 mt is deducted to accommodate the Tribal fishery,
and 750 mt is deducted to accommodate research and bycatch in other fisheries, resulting in a 2021 fishery HG
of 304,005 mt. The TAC for Pacific whiting is established under the provisions of the Agreement with Canada on
Pacific Hake/Whiting and the Pacific Whiting Act of 2006, 16 U.S.C. 7001-7010, and the international exception
applies. Therefore, no ABC or ACL values are provided for Pacific whiting.
y/ Petrale sole. 387.54 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (350 mt), EFP catch (0.1
mt), research (24.14 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (13.3 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of
3,727.5 mt.
z/ Sablefish north of 36[deg] N lat. This coastwide ACL value is not specified in regulations. The coastwide ACL
value is apportioned north and south of 36[deg] N lat., using a rolling 5-year average estimated swept area
biomass from the NMFS NWFSC trawl survey, with 78.4 percent apportioned north of 36[deg] N lat. and 21.6
percent apportioned south of 36[deg] N lat. The northern ACL is 6,892 mt and is reduced by 689.2 mt for the
Tribal allocation (10 percent of the ACL north of 36[deg] N lat.). The 689.2 mt Tribal allocation is reduced
by 1.7 percent to account for discard mortality. Detailed sablefish allocations are shown in Table 1c.
aa/ Sablefish south of 36[deg] N lat. The ACL for the area south of 36[deg] N lat. is 1,899 mt (21.6 percent of
the calculated coastwide ACL value). 27.4 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate research (2.40 mt) and
the incidental open access fishery (25 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,871.6 mt.
bb/ Shortspine thornyhead north of 34[deg]27' N lat. 78.4 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal
fishery (50 mt), EFP catch (0.1 mt), and research catch (10.48 mt), and the incidental open access fishery
(17.82 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,349.6 mt for the area north of 34[deg]27' N lat.
cc/ Shortspine thornyhead south of 34[deg]27' N lat. 6.71 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate research
catch (0.71 mt) and the incidental open access fishery (6 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 749.3 mt for the
area south of 34[deg]27' N lat.
dd/ Spiny dogfish. 344 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (275 mt), EFP catch (1.1
mt), research (34.27 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (33.63 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of
1,277 mt.
ee/ Splitnose rockfish south of 40[deg]10' N lat. 18.42 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP catch
(1.5 mt), research (11.17 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (5.75 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of
1,647.6 mt.
ff/ Starry flounder. 48.38 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (2 mt), EFP catch (0.1
mt), research (0.57 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (45.71 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 343.6
mt.
gg/ Widow rockfish. 248.32 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (200 mt), EFP catch (28
mt), research (17.27 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (3.05 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of
14,476.7 mt.
hh/ Yellowtail rockfish north of 40[deg]10' N lat. 1,047.55 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the
Tribal fishery (1,000 mt), EFP catch (10 mt), research (20.55 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (7
mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 5,012.5 mt.
ii/ Black rockfish/Blue rockfish/Deacon rockfish (Oregon). 2.32 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the
EFP catch (0.5 mt), research (0.08 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (1.74 mt), resulting in a
fishery HG of 600.7 mt.
jj/ Cabezon/kelp greenling (Oregon). 0.21 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP catch (0.1 mt),
research (0.05 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (0.06 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 197.8 mt.
kk/ Cabezon/kelp greenling (Washington). 2 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery,
therefore the fishery HG is 18 mt.
ll/ Nearshore Rockfish north of 40[deg]10' N lat. 3.08 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal
fishery (1.5 mt), EFP catch (0.5 mt), research (0.47 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (0.61 mt),
resulting in a fishery HG of 75.9 mt. State specific HGs are Washington (18.4 mt), Oregon (22.7 mt), and
California (37.6 mt).
mm/ Nearshore Rockfish south of 40[deg]10' N lat. 4.42 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate research catch
(2.68 mt) and the incidental open access fishery (2.68 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,011.6 mt.
nn/ Other Fish. The Other Fish complex is comprised of kelp greenling off California and leopard shark
coastwide. 21.34 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP catch (0.1 mt), research (6.29 mt), and the
incidental open access fishery (14.95 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 201.7 mt.
oo/ Other Flatfish. The Other Flatfish complex is comprised of flatfish species managed in the PCGFMP that are
not managed with stock-specific OFLs/ABCs/ACLs. Most of the species in the Other Flatfish complex are
unassessed and include: Butter sole, curlfin sole, flathead sole, Pacific sanddab, rock sole, sand sole, and
rex sole. 220.89 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal fishery (60 mt), EFP catch (0.1 mt),
research (23.63 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (137.16 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 4,581.1
mt.
pp/ Shelf Rockfish north of 40[deg]10' N lat. 72.44 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal
fishery (30 mt), EFP catch (1.5 mt), research (15.32 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (25.62 mt),
resulting in a fishery HG of 1,438.66 mt.
qq/ Shelf Rockfish south of 40[deg]10' N lat. 132.77 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP catch (50
mt), research catch (15.1 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (67.67 mt) resulting in a fishery HG of
1,305.2 mt.
rr/ Slope Rockfish north of 40[deg]10' N lat. 65.89 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate the Tribal
fishery (36 mt), EFP catch (0.5 mt), and research (10.51 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (18.88
mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 1,529.1 mt.
[[Page 23668]]
ss/ Slope Rockfish south of 40[deg]10' N lat. 38.94 mt is deducted from the ACL to accommodate EFP catch (1 mt),
and research (18.21 mt), and the incidental open access fishery (19.73 mt), resulting in a fishery HG of 670.1
mt. Blackgill rockfish has a stock-specific HG for the entire groundfish fishery south of 40[deg]10' N lat.
set equal to the species' contribution to the ACL. Harvest of blackgill rockfish in all groundfish fisheries
south of 40[deg]10' N lat. counts against this HG of 176.5 mt.
0
4. Revise Table 1b to part 660, subpart C, to read as follows:
Table 1b to Part 660, Subpart C--2021, Allocations by Species or Species Group
[Weight in metric tons]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Trawl Non-trawl
Stocks/stock complexes Area Fishery HG or ---------------------------------------------------------------
ACT a/b/ % Mt % Mt
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yelloweye Rockfish a/..................... Coastwide................... 41.2 8 3.3 92 37.9
Arrowtooth flounder....................... Coastwide................... 7,837.9 95 7,446 5 391.9
Big skate a/.............................. Coastwide................... 1,419.7 95 1,348.7 5 71
Bocaccio a/............................... S of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 1,700.2 39 663.8 60 1,036.4
Canary rockfish a/........................ Coastwide................... 1,268.6 72 917 28 351.6
Chilipepper rockfish...................... S of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 2,260.3 75 1,695.2 25 565.1
Cowcod a/................................. S of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 50 36 18 64 32
Darkblotched rockfish..................... Coastwide................... 862.9 95 819.8 5 43.1
Dover sole................................ Coastwide................... 48,402.8 95 45,982.7 5 2,420.1
English sole.............................. Coastwide................... 8,924.4 95 8,478.2 5 446.2
Lingcod................................... N of 40'10[deg] N lat....... 5,090.6 45 2,290.8 55 2,799.8
Lingcod a/................................ S of 40'10[deg] N lat....... 1,089 40 435.6 60 653.4
Longnose skate a/......................... Coastwide................... 1,571.6 90 1,414.4 10 157.2
Longspine thornyhead...................... N of 34[deg]27' N lat....... 2,580.3 95 2,451.3 5 129
Pacific cod............................... Coastwide................... 1,093.9 95 1,039.2 5 54.7
Pacific ocean perch....................... N of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 3,829.3 95 3,637.8 5 191.5
Pacific whiting c/........................ Coastwide................... 304,005 100 304,005 0 0
Petrale sole a/........................... Coastwide................... 3,727.9 .............. 3,697.9 .............. 30
---------------------------------------------------------------
Sablefish................................. N of 36[deg] N lat.......... NA See Table 1c
---------------------------------------------------------------
Sablefish................................. S of 36[deg] N lat.......... 1,861.6 42 782.3 58 1,080.3
Shortspine thornyhead..................... N of 34[deg]27' N lat....... 1,349.6 95 1,282.1 5 67.5
Shortspine thornyhead..................... S of 34[deg]27' N lat....... 749.3 .............. 50 .............. 699.3
Splitnose rockfish........................ S of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 1,647.6 95 1,565.2 5 82.4
Starry flounder........................... Coastwide................... 343.6 50 171.8 50 171.8
Widow rockfish a/......................... Coastwide................... 14,476.7 .............. 14,076.7 .............. 400
Yellowtail rockfish....................... N of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 5,012.5 88 4,411.0 12 601.5
Other Flatfish............................ Coastwide................... 4581.1 90 4,123 10 458.1
Shelf Rockfish a/......................... N of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 1,438.7 60.2 866.1 39.8 572.6
Shelf Rockfish a/......................... S of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 1,305.2 12.2 159.2 87.8 1,146
Slope Rockfish............................ N of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 1,529.1 81 1,238.6 19 290.5
Slope Rockfish a/......................... S of 40[deg]10' N lat....... 670.1 .............. 526.4 .............. 143.7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a/ Allocations decided through the biennial specification process.
b/ The cowcod fishery harvest guideline is further reduced to an ACT of 50 mt. The non-trawl allocation is further split 50:50 between the commercial
and recreational sectors.
c/ Consistent with regulations at Sec. 660.55(i)(2), the commercial harvest guideline for Pacific whiting is allocated as follows: 34 percent for the
C/P Coop Program; 24 percent for the MS Coop Program; and 42 percent for the Shorebased IFQ Program. No more than 5 percent of the Shorebased IFQ
Program allocation may be taken and retained south of 42[deg] N lat. before the start of the primary Pacific whiting season north of 42[deg] N lat.
0
5. In Sec. 660.140, revise paragraph (d)(1)(ii)(D) to read as follows:
Sec. 660.140 Shorebased IFQ Program.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) * * *
(D) For the trawl fishery, NMFS will issue QP based on the
following shorebased trawl allocations:
Table 1 to Paragraph (d)(1)(ii)(D)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2021 Shorebased 2022 Shorebased
IFQ species Area trawl allocation trawl allocation
(mt) (mt)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yelloweye Rockfish......................... Coastwide.................... 3.3 3.4
Arrowtooth flounder........................ Coastwide.................... 7,376.02 5974.77
Bocaccio................................... South of 40[deg]10' N lat.... 663.75 654.38
Canary rockfish............................ Coastwide.................... 880.96 858.56
Chilipepper................................ South of 40[deg]10' N lat.... 1,695.2 1,621
Cowcod..................................... South of 40[deg]10' N lat.... 18 18
[[Page 23669]]
Darkblotched rockfish...................... Coastwide.................... 743.39 694.94
Dover sole................................. Coastwide.................... 45,972.65 45,972.65
English sole............................... Coastwide.................... 8,478.2 8,407.9
Lingcod.................................... North of 40[deg]10' N lat.... 2,275.78 2,090.83
Lingcod.................................... South of 40[deg]10' N lat.... 435.6 463.6
Longspine thornyhead....................... North of 34[deg]27' N lat.... 2,451.28 2,278.38
Pacific cod................................ Coastwide.................... 1,039.21 1,039.21
Pacific halibut (IBQ)...................... North of 40[deg]10' N lat.... 69.6 69.6
Pacific ocean perch........................ North of 40[deg]10' N lat.... 3,337.74 3,201.94
Pacific whiting............................ Coastwide.................... 127,682 TBD
Petrale sole............................... Coastwide.................... 3,692.9 3,237.5
Sablefish.................................. North of 36[deg] N lat....... 3,139.59 2,985.42
Sablefish.................................. South of 36[deg] N lat....... 786 748
Shortspine thornyhead...................... North of 34[deg]27' N lat.... 1,212.12 1,178.87
Shortspine thornyhead...................... South of 34[deg]27' N lat.... 50 50
Splitnose rockfish......................... South of 40[deg]10' N lat.... 1,565.20 1,531.00
Starry flounder............................ Coastwide.................... 171.8 171.8
Widow rockfish............................. Coastwide.................... 13,600.68 12,663.68
Yellowtail rockfish........................ North of 40[deg]10' N lat.... 4,091.13 3,898.4
Other Flatfish complex..................... Coastwide.................... 4,088.00 4,120.40
Shelf Rockfish complex..................... North of 40[deg]10' N lat.... 831.07 794.56
Shelf Rockfish complex..................... South of 40[deg]10' N lat.... 159.24 158.02
Slope Rockfish complex..................... North of 40[deg]10' N lat.... 938.58 916.71
Slope Rockfish complex..................... South of 40[deg]10' N lat.... 526.4 523.9
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-08997 Filed 5-3-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P