30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: The Outcomes Evaluation of the Choice Neighborhoods Program; OMB Control No. 2528-New, 22064-22066 [2021-08634]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
22064
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 78 / Monday, April 26, 2021 / Notices
The meeting will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
as amended. The grant applications and
the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material,
and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the grant
applications, the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
Name of Committee: National Institute on
Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel;
Exploring Epigenomic or Non-Coding RNA
Regulation in the Development,
Maintenance, or Treatment of Chronic Pain
(R61/R33 Clinical Trial Optional).
Date: June 2, 2021.
Time: 12:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: National Institutes of Health,
National Institute on Drug Abuse, 301 North
Stonestreet Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892,
(Virtual Meeting).
Contact Person: Soyoun Cho, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review
Branch, Division of Extramural Research,
National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH,
3WFN, MSC 6021, 301 North Stonestreet
Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 594–
9460, Soyoun.cho@nih.gov.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.277, Drug Abuse Scientist
Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist
Development Awards, and Research Scientist
Awards; 93.278, Drug Abuse National
Research Service Awards for Research
Training; 93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction
Research Programs, National Institutes of
Health, HHS)
Dated: April 20, 2021.
Tyeshia M. Roberson,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021–08596 Filed 4–23–21; 8:45 am]
property such as patentable material,
and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the grant
applications, the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
Name of Committee: National Institute of
Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
Special Emphasis Panel; Limited
Competition for the Continuation of the
Urinary Stone Disease Research Network
(USDRN).
Date: July 8, 2021.
Time: 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: National Institutes of Health, Two
Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy
Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual
Meeting).
Contact Person: Jason D. Hoffert, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch,
DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health,
Room 7343, 6707 Democracy Boulevard,
Bethesda, MD 20817, 301–496–9010,
hoffertj@niddk.nih.gov.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes,
Endocrinology and Metabolic Research;
93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition
Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology
and Hematology Research, National Institutes
of Health, HHS)
Dated: April 21, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021–08618 Filed 4–23–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
[CIS No. 2684–21; DHS Docket No. USCIS–
2021–0004]
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
RIN 1615–ZB87
National Institutes of Health
National Institute of Diabetes and
Digestive and Kidney Diseases; Notice
of Closed Meeting
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended, notice is hereby given of the
following meeting.
The meeting will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
as amended. The grant applications and
the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:01 Apr 23, 2021
Jkt 253001
Identifying Barriers Across U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services
(USCIS) Benefits and Services;
Request for Public Input
Correction
In Notice document 2021–07987
beginning on page 20398 in the issue of
April 19, 2021, make the following
correction:
On page 20398, in the first column,
under DATES, in the second line ‘‘April
19, 2021’’ should read ‘‘May 19, 2021’’.
[FR Doc. C1–2021–07987 Filed 4–23–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1301–00–D
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–7034–N–23]
30-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: The Outcomes Evaluation
of the Choice Neighborhoods
Program; OMB Control No. 2528-New
Office of the Chief Information
Officer, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
HUD is seeking approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for the information collection
described below. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is
requesting comment from all interested
parties on the proposed collection of
information. The purpose of this notice
is to allow for 30 days of public
comment.
DATES: Comments Due Date: May 26,
2021.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to OIRA_submission@
omb.eop.gov or www.reginfo.gov/public/
do/PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anna P. Guido, Reports Management
Officer, QMAC, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW, Washington, DC 20410; email her at
Anna.P.Guido@hud.gov or telephone
202–402–5535. This is not a toll-free
number. Person with hearing or speech
impairments may access this number
through TTY by calling the toll-free
Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–8339.
Copies of available documents
submitted to OMB may be obtained
from Ms. Guido.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice informs the public that HUD is
seeking approval from OMB for the
information collection described in
Section A. The Federal Register notice
that solicited public comment on the
information collection for a period of 60
days was published on June 1, 2020 at
85 FR 33189.
SUMMARY:
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection: The
Outcomes Evaluation of the Choice
Neighborhoods Program.
OMB Approval Number: 2528-New.
Type of Request: New collection.
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
22065
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 78 / Monday, April 26, 2021 / Notices
Form Number: NA.
Description of the need for the
information and proposed use:
This request is for the collection of
information for an outcomes evaluation
of the Choice Neighborhoods Program
(Choice). Choice leverages significant
public and private dollars to support
locally driven strategies that address
struggling neighborhoods with
distressed public or HUD-assisted
housing through a comprehensive
approach to neighborhood
transformation; local leaders, residents,
and stakeholders come together to create
and implement a plan that revitalizes
distressed HUD housing and addresses
the challenges in the surrounding
neighborhood.
Launched in 2010, Choice provides
direct investments through competitive
grants targeted to neighborhoods
marked by high rates of poverty with
distressed public or HUD-assisted
housing. Today, Choice remains one of
HUD’s primary tools to support
planning and implementation efforts to
catalyze redevelopment efforts in cities
across the nation.
Under contract with HUD’s Office of
Policy Development and Research, the
Urban Institute (Urban) is conducting an
evaluation of Choice, focusing on the
neighborhoods that received grants in
2011 and 2013: Quincy Corridor
neighborhood in Boston, Massachusetts;
Woodlawn neighborhood in Chicago,
Illinois; Iberville/Treme´ neighborhood
in New Orleans, Louisiana; Eastern
Bayview neighborhood in San
Francisco, California; Yesler
neighborhood in Seattle, Washington;
Near East Side neighborhood in
Columbus, Ohio; South Norwalk
neighborhood in Norwalk, Connecticut;
North Central Philadelphia
neighborhood in Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania; and Larimer/East Liberty
neighborhood in Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania. The overarching goal of
the current evaluation is to understand
the impact of the Choice program and
the investment it brings, with an
emphasis on understanding the first
cohort of grantees, funded in 2011 and
four additional grantees from the third
cohort of grantees, funded in 2013.
The evaluation will use qualitative
and quantitative methods to answer the
following overarching research
question: Whether public and private
dollars were successfully leveraged to
(1) replace distressed public and
assisted housing with high-quality
mixed-income housing that is wellmanaged and responsive to the needs of
the surrounding neighborhood, (2)
improve outcomes for households in the
target housing, including employment
and income, health, and education, and
(3) create the conditions necessary for
public and private reinvestment in
distressed neighborhoods to improve
amenities and assets. The evaluation is
a follow-up to an initial evaluation
completed by Urban in 2016, and will
employ analysis of administrative/
secondary data, including HUD data, as
well as primary data collection in the
form of a large household survey of
households living in the Choice sites,
and interviews and observations from
stakeholders regarding the Choice
program. In total, Urban expects to field
Number of
respondents
Information collection
Responses
per
annum
Frequency
of response
the survey to up to 2,388 Choice
residents and contact 275 respondents
for qualitative interviews. This
information is necessary to evaluate
Choice and to understand differences
across sites, over time, in different types
of HUD-assisted housing, by grantee
type, and for different contextual
conditions.
Respondents: Residents who are
living in Choice Neighborhoods
(Choice) sites in the Quincy Corridor
neighborhood in Boston, Massachusetts;
Woodlawn neighborhood in Chicago,
Illinois; Iberville/Treme´ neighborhood
in New Orleans, Louisiana; Eastern
Bayview neighborhood in San
Francisco, California; Yesler
neighborhood in Seattle, Washington;
Near East Side neighborhood in
Columbus, Ohio; South Norwalk
neighborhood in Norwalk, Connecticut;
North Central Philadelphia
neighborhood in Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania; and Larimer/East Liberty
neighborhood in Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania, as well as stakeholders
who were, or remain, engaged with the
Choice program. Stakeholders include
the lead grantee, implementation leads
for housing, people, and neighborhood
pillars, HUD managers of Choice grants,
city agency officials and staff, public
housing and affordable-housing
property management staff, housing
developers, early education providers,
case management providers, other
service providers, community and
resident leaders, local police precinct
commanders, and staff from local
anchor institutions.
Burden
hour per
response
Annual
burden
hours
Hourly cost
per
response
Cost
Household survey .....................................................
Interviews with resident leaders ................................
Interviews with High-level informants: Lead grantees, City officials and staff ....................................
Interviews with HUD staff ..........................................
Interviews with housing informants: Housing implementation lead, Housing developers, Public housing and affordable-housing property management
staff ........................................................................
Interviews with people informants: People implementation lead, Case management staff, Other
service providers ...................................................
Interviews with education informants: Education implementation lead, education implementation staff
Interviews with Neighborhood informants: Implementation lead, Local police precinct commanders, Local anchor institution staff, Community leaders ............................................................
2,388
5
1
1
2,388
5
.58
1.5
1,385.04
7.5
$17.00
17.00
$23,545.68
127.50
45
18
1
1
45
18
1.5
1.5
67.5
27
42.30
75.82
2,855.25
2,047.14
54
1
54
1.5
81
35.39
2,866.59
63
1
1
1.5
94.5
23.92
2,260.44
27
1
1
1.5
40.5
23.92
968.76
63
1
1
1.5
94.5
35.52
3,356.64
Total ...................................................................
2,663
........................
........................
........................
1,797.54
....................
38,028.00
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected
parties concerning the collection of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:01 Apr 23, 2021
Jkt 253001
information described in Section A on
the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
22066
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 78 / Monday, April 26, 2021 / Notices
(2) If the information will be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information;
(4) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(5) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond; including through
the use of appropriate automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
HUD encourages interested parties to
submit comment in response to these
questions.
C. Authority
Section 3507 of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C.
chapter 35.
Anna P. Guido,
Department Reports Management Officer,
Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021–08634 Filed 4–23–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–7034–N–22]
30-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: Veterans Housing
Rehabilitation and Modification and
Pilot Program; OMB Control No. 2506–
0213
Office of the Chief Information
Officer, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
HUD is seeking approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
SUMMARY:
Information collection
Frequency of
responses
information collection for a period of 60
days was published on March 1, 2021,
at 86 FR 12018.
(OMB) for the information collection
described below. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is
requesting comment from all interested
parties on the proposed collection of
information. The purpose of this notice
is to allow for 30 days of public
comment.
DATES:
A. Overview of Information Collection
Comments Due Date: May 26,
2021.
Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to OIRA_submission@
omb.eop.gov or www.reginfo.gov/public/
do/PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anna P. Guido, Reports Management
Officer, QMAC, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW, Washington, DC 20410; email her at
Anna.P.Guido@hud.gov or telephone
202–402–5535. This is not a toll-free
number. Person with hearing or speech
impairments may access this number
through TTY by calling the toll-free
Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–8339.
Copies of available documents
submitted to OMB may be obtained
from Ms. Guido.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice informs the public that HUD is
seeking approval from OMB for the
information collection described in
Section A.
The Federal Register notice that
solicited public comment on the
ADDRESSES:
Number of
respondents
Responses
per annum
Burden hour
per response
Title of Information Collection:
Veterans Housing Rehabilitation and
Modification and Pilot Program.
OMB Approval Number: 2506–0213.
Type of Request: Extension of
currently approved collection.
Form Number: SF–424; HUD 424CB;
HUD 424–CBW; SF–LLL; HUD 2880;
HUD 2990; HUD 2991; HUD 2993; HUD
2994A; HUD 27061; and HUD 27300.
Description of the need for the
information and proposed use: The
Veterans Housing Rehabilitation and
Modification Pilot Program funding in
FY 2020 was provided under the
Further Consolidated Appropriations
Act, 2020 (Pub. L. 116–94, approved
December 20, 2019), the Consolidated
Appropriations Act of 2018 (Pub. L.
115–141), and the Consolidated
Appropriations Action, 2019 (Pub. L.
116–6). The purpose of VHRMP is to
award grants to nonprofit veteran’s
service organizations to rehabilitate and
modify the primary residence of
disabled and low-income veterans. The
program goal is to support eligible
activities that serve the following
objectives: (1) Modify and rehabilitate
the primary residence of disabled and
low-income veterans; (2) rehabilitate
such residence that is in a state of
interior and exterior disrepair; and (3)
install energy efficient features or
equipment. Information is required to
rate and rank competitive applications
and to ensure eligibility of applicants
for funding. Quarterly reporting is
required to monitor grant management.
Annual
burden hours
Hourly cost
per hour
Total
HUD–424CB ................
HUD–424CBW .............
HUD–2880 ...................
HUD–2991 ...................
HUD–2993 ...................
HUD–2994A .................
HUD–27061 .................
HUD–27300 .................
200.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
200.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
200.00
2.60
3.12
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.50
3.00
520.00
624.00
400.00
........................
........................
100.00
100.00
600.00
$70.45
70.45
70.45
70.45
70.45
70.45
70.45
70.45
36,634.00
43,960.80
28,180.00
Total ......................
........................
........................
........................
11.72
........................
........................
165,134.80
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected
parties concerning the collection of
information described in Section A on
the following:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:01 Apr 23, 2021
Jkt 253001
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) If the information will be
processed and used in a timely manner;
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7,045.00
7,045.00
42,270.00
(3) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information;
(4) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(5) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 78 (Monday, April 26, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22064-22066]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-08634]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR-7034-N-23]
30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: The Outcomes
Evaluation of the Choice Neighborhoods Program; OMB Control No. 2528-
New
AGENCY: Office of the Chief Information Officer, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: HUD is seeking approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for the information collection described below. In
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is requesting comment
from all interested parties on the proposed collection of information.
The purpose of this notice is to allow for 30 days of public comment.
DATES: Comments Due Date: May 26, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of
this notice to [email protected] or www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular information collection by selecting
``Currently under 30-day Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using
the search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anna P. Guido, Reports Management
Officer, QMAC, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th
Street SW, Washington, DC 20410; email her at [email protected] or
telephone 202-402-5535. This is not a toll-free number. Person with
hearing or speech impairments may access this number through TTY by
calling the toll-free Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Copies
of available documents submitted to OMB may be obtained from Ms. Guido.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice informs the public that HUD is
seeking approval from OMB for the information collection described in
Section A. The Federal Register notice that solicited public comment on
the information collection for a period of 60 days was published on
June 1, 2020 at 85 FR 33189.
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection: The Outcomes Evaluation of the
Choice Neighborhoods Program.
OMB Approval Number: 2528-New.
Type of Request: New collection.
[[Page 22065]]
Form Number: NA.
Description of the need for the information and proposed use:
This request is for the collection of information for an outcomes
evaluation of the Choice Neighborhoods Program (Choice). Choice
leverages significant public and private dollars to support locally
driven strategies that address struggling neighborhoods with distressed
public or HUD-assisted housing through a comprehensive approach to
neighborhood transformation; local leaders, residents, and stakeholders
come together to create and implement a plan that revitalizes
distressed HUD housing and addresses the challenges in the surrounding
neighborhood.
Launched in 2010, Choice provides direct investments through
competitive grants targeted to neighborhoods marked by high rates of
poverty with distressed public or HUD-assisted housing. Today, Choice
remains one of HUD's primary tools to support planning and
implementation efforts to catalyze redevelopment efforts in cities
across the nation.
Under contract with HUD's Office of Policy Development and
Research, the Urban Institute (Urban) is conducting an evaluation of
Choice, focusing on the neighborhoods that received grants in 2011 and
2013: Quincy Corridor neighborhood in Boston, Massachusetts; Woodlawn
neighborhood in Chicago, Illinois; Iberville/Trem[eacute] neighborhood
in New Orleans, Louisiana; Eastern Bayview neighborhood in San
Francisco, California; Yesler neighborhood in Seattle, Washington; Near
East Side neighborhood in Columbus, Ohio; South Norwalk neighborhood in
Norwalk, Connecticut; North Central Philadelphia neighborhood in
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Larimer/East Liberty neighborhood in
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The overarching goal of the current
evaluation is to understand the impact of the Choice program and the
investment it brings, with an emphasis on understanding the first
cohort of grantees, funded in 2011 and four additional grantees from
the third cohort of grantees, funded in 2013.
The evaluation will use qualitative and quantitative methods to
answer the following overarching research question: Whether public and
private dollars were successfully leveraged to (1) replace distressed
public and assisted housing with high-quality mixed-income housing that
is well-managed and responsive to the needs of the surrounding
neighborhood, (2) improve outcomes for households in the target
housing, including employment and income, health, and education, and
(3) create the conditions necessary for public and private reinvestment
in distressed neighborhoods to improve amenities and assets. The
evaluation is a follow-up to an initial evaluation completed by Urban
in 2016, and will employ analysis of administrative/secondary data,
including HUD data, as well as primary data collection in the form of a
large household survey of households living in the Choice sites, and
interviews and observations from stakeholders regarding the Choice
program. In total, Urban expects to field the survey to up to 2,388
Choice residents and contact 275 respondents for qualitative
interviews. This information is necessary to evaluate Choice and to
understand differences across sites, over time, in different types of
HUD-assisted housing, by grantee type, and for different contextual
conditions.
Respondents: Residents who are living in Choice Neighborhoods
(Choice) sites in the Quincy Corridor neighborhood in Boston,
Massachusetts; Woodlawn neighborhood in Chicago, Illinois; Iberville/
Trem[eacute] neighborhood in New Orleans, Louisiana; Eastern Bayview
neighborhood in San Francisco, California; Yesler neighborhood in
Seattle, Washington; Near East Side neighborhood in Columbus, Ohio;
South Norwalk neighborhood in Norwalk, Connecticut; North Central
Philadelphia neighborhood in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Larimer/
East Liberty neighborhood in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, as well as
stakeholders who were, or remain, engaged with the Choice program.
Stakeholders include the lead grantee, implementation leads for
housing, people, and neighborhood pillars, HUD managers of Choice
grants, city agency officials and staff, public housing and affordable-
housing property management staff, housing developers, early education
providers, case management providers, other service providers,
community and resident leaders, local police precinct commanders, and
staff from local anchor institutions.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual Hourly cost
Information collection Number of Frequency of Responses per Burden hour burden per Cost
respondents response annum per response hours response
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Household survey................................. 2,388 1 2,388 .58 1,385.04 $17.00 $23,545.68
Interviews with resident leaders................. 5 1 5 1.5 7.5 17.00 127.50
Interviews with High-level informants: Lead 45 1 45 1.5 67.5 42.30 2,855.25
grantees, City officials and staff..............
Interviews with HUD staff........................ 18 1 18 1.5 27 75.82 2,047.14
Interviews with housing informants: Housing 54 1 54 1.5 81 35.39 2,866.59
implementation lead, Housing developers, Public
housing and affordable-housing property
management staff................................
Interviews with people informants: People 63 1 1 1.5 94.5 23.92 2,260.44
implementation lead, Case management staff,
Other service providers.........................
Interviews with education informants: Education 27 1 1 1.5 40.5 23.92 968.76
implementation lead, education implementation
staff...........................................
Interviews with Neighborhood informants: 63 1 1 1.5 94.5 35.52 3,356.64
Implementation lead, Local police precinct
commanders, Local anchor institution staff,
Community leaders...............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total........................................ 2,663 .............. .............. .............. 1,797.54 ........... 38,028.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and
affected parties concerning the collection of information described in
Section A on the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
[[Page 22066]]
(2) If the information will be processed and used in a timely
manner;
(3) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information;
(4) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(5) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond; including through the use of appropriate
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.
HUD encourages interested parties to submit comment in response to
these questions.
C. Authority
Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C.
chapter 35.
Anna P. Guido,
Department Reports Management Officer, Office of the Chief Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021-08634 Filed 4-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
