Social Security Number Fraud Prevention Act of 2017 Implementation, 21933-21935 [2021-06823]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 78 / Monday, April 26, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
good cause exists for making some
SIAPs effective in less than 30 days.
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. It, therefore—(1) is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. For the same
reason, the FAA certifies that this
amendment will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97
Air Traffic Control, Airports,
Incorporation by reference, Navigation
(Air).
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 16,
2021.
Wade Terrell
Aviation Safety Manager, Flight Procedures
& Airspace Group, Flight Technologies and
Procedures Division.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me, Title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations, Part 97 (14
CRF part 97) is amended by
establishing, amending, suspending, or
removing Standard Instrument
Approach Procedures and/or Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle Departure
Procedures effective at 0901 UTC on the
dates specified, as follows:
PART 97—STANDARD INSTRUMENT
APPROACH PROCEDURES
1. The authority citation for part 97
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103,
40106, 40113, 40114, 40120, 44502, 44514,
44701, 44719, 44721–44722.
2. Part 97 is amended to read as
follows:
■
Effective 20 May 2021
Los Angeles, CA, KLAX, ILS OR LOC
RWY 24R, ILS RWY 24R (CAT II), ILS
RWY 24R (CAT III), Amdt 26B
Los Angeles, CA, KLAX, ILS OR LOC
RWY 25L, ILS RWY 25L (CAT II), ILS
RWY 25L (CAT III), Amdt 14C
Los Angeles, CA, KLAX, RNAV (GPS) Y
RWY 24R, Amdt 3B
Los Angeles, CA, KLAX, RNAV (GPS) Y
RWY 25L, Amdt 4C
Los Angeles, CA, KLAX, RNAV (RNP) Z
RWY 24R, Amdt 1C
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Apr 23, 2021
Jkt 253001
Los Angeles, CA, KLAX, RNAV (RNP) Z
RWY 25L, Amdt 2C
Jackson, OH, I43, VOR/DME–A, Amdt
2C, CANCELLED
Effective 17 June 2021
Gadsden, AL, KGAD, RNAV (GPS) RWY
6, Amdt 1D
Cloverdale, CA, Cloverdale Muni,
Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 2
Santa Rosa, CA, Charles M SchulzSonoma County, Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle DP, Amdt 8
Atlanta, GA, KHMP, RNAV (GPS) RWY
6, Amdt 3
Atlanta, GA, KHMP, RNAV (GPS) RWY
24, Amdt 3
Cochran, GA, 48A, RNAV (GPS) RWY
29, Amdt 1D
Cochran, GA, Cochran, VOR/DME RWY
5, Amdt 6B, CANCELLED
Galesburg, IL, KGBG, ILS OR LOC RWY
3, Amdt 11
Galesburg, IL, KGBG, VOR RWY 21,
Amdt 7C, CANCELLED
Gary, IN, KGYY, ILS OR LOC RWY 30,
Amdt 7
Gary, IN, KGYY, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY
12, Amdt 3
Gary, IN, KGYY, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY
30, Amdt 2
Gary, IN, KGYY, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY
12, Amdt 2
Gary, IN, KGYY, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY
30, Amdt 2
Ashland, KY, KDWU, VOR/DME RWY
10, Amdt 12, CANCELLED
Shreveport, LA, Shreveport Downtown,
Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 4
Mountain View, MO, Mountain View,
Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 5
Haverhill, NH, Dean Memorial, Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 1
Keene, NH, Dillant-Hopkins, Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 6
Manchester, NH, KMHT, RNAV (GPS)
RWY 6, Amdt 3
Malone, NY, KMAL, RNAV (GPS) RWY
5, Amdt 1
Malone, NY, KMAL, RNAV (GPS) RWY
23, Orig-D
Sebring, OH, 3G6, RNAV (GPS) RWY
18, Orig
Sebring, OH, Tri-City, Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig-A
Sebring, OH, 3G6, VOR RWY 18, Amdt
4A
Stillwater, OK, Stillwater Rgnl. RNAV
(GPS) RWY 17, Amdt 1
Gillette, WY, KGCC, ILS OR LOC RWY
34, Amdt 4A
Gillette, WY, KGCC, RNAV (GPS) RWY
16, Orig-B
Gillette, WY, KGCC, RNAV (GPS) RWY
34, Orig-B
Gillette, WY, Northeast Wyoming Rgnl,
Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 6
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21933
Gillette, WY, KGCC, VOR RWY 16, OrigB
[FR Doc. 2021–08590 Filed 4–23–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Office of the Secretary
15 CFR Part 4
[Docket No. 210329–0073]
RIN 0605–AA49
Social Security Number Fraud
Prevention Act of 2017 Implementation
Office of the Secretary,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule revises the
Department of Commerce (Department)
regulations under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) and the Privacy
Act. The revisions clarify and update
the language of procedural requirements
pertaining to the inclusion of Social
Security account numbers on
documents that the Department sends
by mail. These revisions are necessary
to implement the Social Security
Number Fraud Prevention Act of 2017
(the Act), which restricts the inclusion
of Social Security numbers (SSNs) on
documents sent by mail by the Federal
government.
DATES: Effective May 26, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Departmental Privacy Act
Officer, Office of Privacy and Open
Government, Department of Commerce,
1401 Constitution Ave. NW, Mail Stop
61025, Washington, DC 20230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Departmental Privacy Act Officer, Office
of Privacy and Open Government,
Department of Commerce, (202) 482–
1190, PrivacyAct@doc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
The Act (Pub. L. 115–59; 42 U.S.C.
405 note), which was signed on
September 15, 2017, restricts Federal
agencies from including individuals’
SSNs on documents sent by mail, unless
the head of the agency determines that
the inclusion of the SSN on the
document is necessary (section 2(a) of
the Act). The Act requires agency heads
to issue regulations specifying the
circumstances under which inclusion of
a SSN on a document sent by mail is
necessary. These regulations, which
must be issued not later than five years
after the date of enactment, shall
include instructions for the partial
E:\FR\FM\26APR1.SGM
26APR1
21934
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 78 / Monday, April 26, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
redaction of SSNs where feasible, and
shall require that SSNs not be visible on
the outside of any package sent by mail
(section 2(b) of the Act). This final rule
revises the Department regulations
under FOIA (subpart A, 15 CFR part 4)
and the Privacy Act (subpart B, 15 CFR
part 4), consistent with these
requirements in the Act. This final rule
also clarifies the language of procedural
requirements pertaining to the inclusion
of SSNs on documents that the
Department sends by mail; makes
clarifying updates by changing the term
‘‘Privacy Officer’’ to ‘‘Privacy Act
Officer’’ where it occurs in Subpart B of
15 CFR part 4, and by changing the term
‘‘FOI Officer’’ to ‘‘FOIA Officer’’ in
several places in Appendix B.; and
updates an office name by changing the
phrase ‘‘Assistant General Counsel for
Employment, Litigation, and Oversight’’
to ‘‘Assistant General Counsel for
Employment, Litigation, and
Information’’ where it occurs in part 4.
Comments on the Proposed Rule
The Office of the Secretary received
four general comments on the proposed
rule from members of the public. The
comments on the proposed rule can be
viewed and downloaded at the
following link: https://
www.regulations.gov/document/DOC2020-0001-0001. No changes have been
made to the regulatory text of the
proposed rule in response to these four
comments. The following are our
responses to the comments.
Comment 1: I haven’t received my
stimulus check. I want to check my
information and update my information.
Response: This comment is not
addressed, as it is not within the scope
of this action to amend the Department’s
regulations in order to implement the
Act.
Comment 2: Noting concerns about
fraud and criminal activity, a
commenter stated that SSNs should be
allowed to be used only for social
security. The commenter stated that a
company wanting to do business with
you should assign an account number to
serve as your identification, rather than
request and use your personal
information, including your SSN, and
that this needs to be put into law.
Response: The Act is a law that
restricts the inclusion of SSNs on
Federal documents sent by mail. This
final rule implements the Act by making
changes to the Department’s regulations,
which state that the collection of SSNs
on Federal documents by mail must be
required or authorized by law, or must
be deemed by the agency to be
necessary for fulfilling a compelling
business need of the agency. To the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Apr 23, 2021
Jkt 253001
extent that this comment addresses the
enactment of laws or the conduct of
businesses and other entities, the
comment is not applicable to this action
amending the Department’s regulations.
Comment 3: Noting concerns about
privacy and potential identity theft,
another commenter agreed with the
proposed rule, but requested the listing
out of specific circumstances in which
the inclusion of a SSN on a document
is necessary. The commenter stated that
the SSN should not appear on any
document, because ensuring that the
SSN does not appear on the envelope is
not enough to guarantee that the
information will not be stolen. The
commenter also asked why the Act
allows a five-year period for
implementation, and notes that the Act
should be implemented sooner.
Response: The Department has
policies and procedures in place for
justifying the collections, maintenance,
and uses of SSNs, as well as for
maintaining an inventory of forms
collecting SSNs, and for safeguarding
the SSNs. The Department also has
policies and procedures in place for
eliminating the unnecessary collections,
maintenance, and uses of SSNs. The Act
requires Federal agencies with Chief
Financial Officers to issue regulations,
and the rationale for such
determination, not later than five years
after enactment. We note that the
question regarding the Congress’ reasons
for including a five-year implementation
period in the Act is beyond the scope of
this final rule. However, this final rule
will fully implement the Act’s
requirements in advance of the
prescribed statutory five-year period.
Comment 4: One commenter stated
that protecting American’s identities
needs to be a high concern of the United
States government. With the
advancement of technology, it is
becoming easier for individuals to
engage in identity fraud through SSNs.
Therefore, the SSN should not be sent
by the Federal government through
mail. Many citizens are awaiting their
stimulus checks, and criminals may be
looking to steal checks that are mailed.
Response: The Act requires Federal
agencies with Chief Financial Officers to
issue regulations specifying the
circumstances under which the
inclusion of the SSN is necessary on a
mailed document. The regulations must
include instructions for partial
redaction of the SSN where feasible and
a requirement that the SSN not be
visible on the outside of any mail. The
Department has policies and procedures
in place for eliminating the unnecessary
collections, maintenance, and uses of
SSNs. The comment regarding the
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
potential theft of stimulus checks is not
addressed, as it is not within the scope
of this action to amend the Department’s
regulations in order to implement the
Act.
Changes Between the Proposed Rule
and Final Rule
This final rule makes no changes to
the regulatory text of the proposed rule.
Classification
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for purposes of review
under Executive Order 12866. In
accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), the
Chief Counsel for Regulation has
reviewed this rule and certified that this
regulation, if implemented, will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This rule is largely procedural in nature,
and, therefore, will not affect requesters.
This regulation does not contain a
collection of information as defined by
the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501, et seq.
List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 4
Appeals, Freedom of Information Act,
Information, Privacy, Privacy Act.
Jennifer Goode,
Acting Director and Deputy Director of Open
Government, and Departmental Privacy
Officer.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Department of Commerce
amends Subparts A and B of 15 CFR
part 4 as follows:
PART 4—DISCLOSURE OF
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION
1. The authority citation for part 4
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 5 U.S.C. 552; 5
U.S.C. 552a; 5 U.SC. 553; 31 U.S.C. 3717; 44
U.S.C. 3101; Reorganization Plan No. 5 of
1950; Pub. L. 115–59, 131 Stat. 1152 (42
U.S.C. 405, note).
Subpart A—Freedom of Information
Act
2. In § 4.7, add paragraph (d) to read
as follows:
■
§ 4.7
Responses to Requests.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) All responses shall be made
subject to the provisions of
§ 4.25(b)(2)(iv).
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart B—Privacy Act
3. Amend subpart B by removing the
words ‘‘Privacy Officer’’ wherever they
■
E:\FR\FM\26APR1.SGM
26APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 78 / Monday, April 26, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
appear and adding in their place the
words ‘‘Privacy Act Officer’’.
■ 4. Amend § 4.22 by adding paragraph
(b)(10) to read as follows:
§ 4.22
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(10) Un-redacted SSN Mailed
Documents Listing (USMDL) means the
Department approved list, as posted at
www.commerce.gov/privacy,
designating those documents for which
the inclusion of SSN is determined to be
necessary to fulfill a compelling
Department business need when the
documents are requested by individuals
outside the Department or other Federal
agencies, as determined jointly by the
Senior Agency Official for Privacy and
the Departmental Privacy Act Officer.
■ 5. Amend § 4.25 by:
■ a. Adding paragraphs (a)(3) and (4);
and
■ b. Revising paragraph (b)(2)(iii) and
adding paragraphs (b)(2)(iv) and (v).
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
§ 4.25 Disclosure of requested records to
individuals [Amended]
(a) * * *
(3) Inclusion of SSNs on responsive
documents.
(i) The Department shall redact SSNs
from responsive documents provided to
requesters where feasible. Where full
redaction is not feasible, partial
redaction to create a truncated SSN
shall be preferred to no redaction. The
following conditions must be met for
the inclusion of an unredacted (full)
SSN or partially redacted (truncated)
SSN on a responsive document:
(ii) The inclusion of the full SSN or
truncated SSN of an individual must be
required or authorized by law,
(iii) The inclusion of the full SSN or
truncated SSN of an individual must be
determined by the Senior Agency
Official for Privacy and Departmental
Privacy Act Officer to be necessary to
fulfill a compelling Department
business need; and
(iv) The full SSN of an individual may
be included only on documents listed
on the USMDL.
(4) The following requirements apply
when the Department mails or delivers
responsive documents containing SSNs
or truncated SSNs:
(i) The full SSN of an individual may
be included only on documents listed
on the USMDL.
(ii) For documents that are listed on
the USMDL and that include the full
SSN of an individual, the signature of
the recipient is required upon delivery.
(iii) For documents that include the
truncated form of the SSN of an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Apr 23, 2021
Jkt 253001
individual, the signature of the recipient
is required upon delivery.
(iv) The full SSN, the truncated SSN,
any part of the SSN of an individual
must not be visible from the outside of
the envelope or package.
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) Copies of documents may be
mailed at the request of the individual
and may be subject to payment of the
fees prescribed in §§ 4.25(a)(3) and 4.31.
In the event that the Department, at its
own initiative, elects to provide a copy
by mail, no fee will be charged to the
individual.
(iv) Copies of documents listed on the
USMDL that include full SSNs and that
are requested by an individual are
subject to payment of the fees
prescribed in § 4.31.
(v) Documents containing SSNs or
truncated SSNs that are required to be
returned by the individual to the
Department will be mailed or delivered
along with a prepaid mail or delivery
service envelope at the expense of the
Department.
*
*
*
*
*
Appendix B to Part 4 [Amended]
6. Amend Appendix B to part 4 by:
a. Adding the word ‘‘Act’’ after the
phrase ‘‘Freedom of Information’’
wherever it appears in the introductory
text, under ‘‘Office of the Secretary,’’
and under ‘‘Assistant Secretary for
Administration’’; and
■ b. Adding a semicolon after the term
‘‘Office of Privacy and Open
Government: Director’’.
■
■
[FR Doc. 2021–06823 Filed 4–23–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–17–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY
COMMISSION
18 CFR Part 35
[Docket No. RM16–17–000; Order No. 860]
Data Collection for Analytics and
Surveillance and Market-Based Rate
Purposes
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule; delay of compliance.
AGENCY:
The Commission delays the
compliance date for the requirements of
its final rule, ‘‘Data Collection for
Analytics and Surveillance and MarketBased Rate Purposes’’ (Order No. 860)
until July 1, 2021.
DATES: The compliance date for the final
rule published on July 26, 2019, at 84
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21935
FR 36390 (Order No. 860), is delayed to
July 1, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ryan Stertz (Technical Information),
Office of Energy Market Regulation,
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502–
6473, ryan.stertz@ferc.gov
Regine Baus (Legal Information), Office
of the General Counsel, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street NE, Washington, DC
20426, (202) 502–8757, regine.baus@
ferc.gov
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. In this Final Rule, the Commission
delays the compliance date for the
requirements of Order No. 860 until July
1, 2021.
I. Background
1. On July 18, 2019, the Commission
issued Order No. 860,1 which revised
certain aspects of the substance and
format of information submitted for
market-based rate purposes by Sellers.2
Specifically, the Commission adopted
the approach to data collection
proposed in the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking issued in July 2016, i.e., to
collect market-based rate information in
a relational database.3 The current
effective date of Order No. 860 was
October 1, 2020.4
2. On March 18, 2021, the
Commission issued a Notice Seeking
Comments (Notice) on a proposal to
collect additional data from certain
Sellers through revisions to the data
dictionary and XML schema that
accompany the relational database
established in Order No. 860 (MBR Data
Dictionary).5 Specifically, the Notice
proposes to update the MBR Data
Dictionary and add three new attributes
to the Entities to Entities table. This
requirement includes submitting into
1 Data Collection for Analytics & Surveillance and
Market-Based Rate Purposes, Order No. 860, 84 FR
36390 (Jul. 26, 2019) 168 FERC ¶ 61,039 (2019),
order on reh’g, Order No. 860–A, 85 FR 13013 (Mar.
6, 2020) 170 FERC ¶ 61,129 (2020).
2 A Seller is defined as any person that has
authorization to or seeks authorization to engage in
sales for resale of electric energy, capacity or
ancillary services at market-based rates under
section 205 of the Federal Power Act (FPA). 18 CFR
35.36(a)(1); 16 U.S.C. 824d.
3 Data Collection for Analytics & Surveillance and
Market-Based Rate Purposes, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, 81 FR 51726 (Aug. 4, 2016), 156 FERC
¶ 61,045 (2016).
4 On May 20, 2020, the Commission issued a
Notice of Extension of Time to notify industry that
the implementation of Order No. 860 would be
delayed by six months.
5 Data Collection for Analytics & Surveillance and
Market-Based Rate Purposes, Proposed revision of
collected information; request for comments, 86 FR
17823 (Apr. 6, 2021), 174 FERC ¶ 61,214 (2021).
E:\FR\FM\26APR1.SGM
26APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 78 (Monday, April 26, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21933-21935]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-06823]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Office of the Secretary
15 CFR Part 4
[Docket No. 210329-0073]
RIN 0605-AA49
Social Security Number Fraud Prevention Act of 2017
Implementation
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule revises the Department of Commerce
(Department) regulations under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
and the Privacy Act. The revisions clarify and update the language of
procedural requirements pertaining to the inclusion of Social Security
account numbers on documents that the Department sends by mail. These
revisions are necessary to implement the Social Security Number Fraud
Prevention Act of 2017 (the Act), which restricts the inclusion of
Social Security numbers (SSNs) on documents sent by mail by the Federal
government.
DATES: Effective May 26, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Departmental Privacy Act Officer, Office of Privacy and Open
Government, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Ave. NW, Mail
Stop 61025, Washington, DC 20230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Departmental Privacy Act Officer,
Office of Privacy and Open Government, Department of Commerce, (202)
482-1190, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Act (Pub. L. 115-59; 42 U.S.C. 405 note), which was signed on
September 15, 2017, restricts Federal agencies from including
individuals' SSNs on documents sent by mail, unless the head of the
agency determines that the inclusion of the SSN on the document is
necessary (section 2(a) of the Act). The Act requires agency heads to
issue regulations specifying the circumstances under which inclusion of
a SSN on a document sent by mail is necessary. These regulations, which
must be issued not later than five years after the date of enactment,
shall include instructions for the partial
[[Page 21934]]
redaction of SSNs where feasible, and shall require that SSNs not be
visible on the outside of any package sent by mail (section 2(b) of the
Act). This final rule revises the Department regulations under FOIA
(subpart A, 15 CFR part 4) and the Privacy Act (subpart B, 15 CFR part
4), consistent with these requirements in the Act. This final rule also
clarifies the language of procedural requirements pertaining to the
inclusion of SSNs on documents that the Department sends by mail; makes
clarifying updates by changing the term ``Privacy Officer'' to
``Privacy Act Officer'' where it occurs in Subpart B of 15 CFR part 4,
and by changing the term ``FOI Officer'' to ``FOIA Officer'' in several
places in Appendix B.; and updates an office name by changing the
phrase ``Assistant General Counsel for Employment, Litigation, and
Oversight'' to ``Assistant General Counsel for Employment, Litigation,
and Information'' where it occurs in part 4.
Comments on the Proposed Rule
The Office of the Secretary received four general comments on the
proposed rule from members of the public. The comments on the proposed
rule can be viewed and downloaded at the following link: https://www.regulations.gov/document/DOC-2020-0001-0001. No changes have been
made to the regulatory text of the proposed rule in response to these
four comments. The following are our responses to the comments.
Comment 1: I haven't received my stimulus check. I want to check my
information and update my information.
Response: This comment is not addressed, as it is not within the
scope of this action to amend the Department's regulations in order to
implement the Act.
Comment 2: Noting concerns about fraud and criminal activity, a
commenter stated that SSNs should be allowed to be used only for social
security. The commenter stated that a company wanting to do business
with you should assign an account number to serve as your
identification, rather than request and use your personal information,
including your SSN, and that this needs to be put into law.
Response: The Act is a law that restricts the inclusion of SSNs on
Federal documents sent by mail. This final rule implements the Act by
making changes to the Department's regulations, which state that the
collection of SSNs on Federal documents by mail must be required or
authorized by law, or must be deemed by the agency to be necessary for
fulfilling a compelling business need of the agency. To the extent that
this comment addresses the enactment of laws or the conduct of
businesses and other entities, the comment is not applicable to this
action amending the Department's regulations.
Comment 3: Noting concerns about privacy and potential identity
theft, another commenter agreed with the proposed rule, but requested
the listing out of specific circumstances in which the inclusion of a
SSN on a document is necessary. The commenter stated that the SSN
should not appear on any document, because ensuring that the SSN does
not appear on the envelope is not enough to guarantee that the
information will not be stolen. The commenter also asked why the Act
allows a five-year period for implementation, and notes that the Act
should be implemented sooner.
Response: The Department has policies and procedures in place for
justifying the collections, maintenance, and uses of SSNs, as well as
for maintaining an inventory of forms collecting SSNs, and for
safeguarding the SSNs. The Department also has policies and procedures
in place for eliminating the unnecessary collections, maintenance, and
uses of SSNs. The Act requires Federal agencies with Chief Financial
Officers to issue regulations, and the rationale for such
determination, not later than five years after enactment. We note that
the question regarding the Congress' reasons for including a five-year
implementation period in the Act is beyond the scope of this final
rule. However, this final rule will fully implement the Act's
requirements in advance of the prescribed statutory five-year period.
Comment 4: One commenter stated that protecting American's
identities needs to be a high concern of the United States government.
With the advancement of technology, it is becoming easier for
individuals to engage in identity fraud through SSNs. Therefore, the
SSN should not be sent by the Federal government through mail. Many
citizens are awaiting their stimulus checks, and criminals may be
looking to steal checks that are mailed.
Response: The Act requires Federal agencies with Chief Financial
Officers to issue regulations specifying the circumstances under which
the inclusion of the SSN is necessary on a mailed document. The
regulations must include instructions for partial redaction of the SSN
where feasible and a requirement that the SSN not be visible on the
outside of any mail. The Department has policies and procedures in
place for eliminating the unnecessary collections, maintenance, and
uses of SSNs. The comment regarding the potential theft of stimulus
checks is not addressed, as it is not within the scope of this action
to amend the Department's regulations in order to implement the Act.
Changes Between the Proposed Rule and Final Rule
This final rule makes no changes to the regulatory text of the
proposed rule.
Classification
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of review under Executive Order 12866. In accordance with the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), the Chief Counsel for
Regulation has reviewed this rule and certified that this regulation,
if implemented, will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. This rule is largely procedural
in nature, and, therefore, will not affect requesters. This regulation
does not contain a collection of information as defined by the
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 4
Appeals, Freedom of Information Act, Information, Privacy, Privacy
Act.
Jennifer Goode,
Acting Director and Deputy Director of Open Government, and
Departmental Privacy Officer.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of Commerce
amends Subparts A and B of 15 CFR part 4 as follows:
PART 4--DISCLOSURE OF GOVERNMENT INFORMATION
0
1. The authority citation for part 4 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 5 U.S.C. 552; 5 U.S.C. 552a; 5 U.SC.
553; 31 U.S.C. 3717; 44 U.S.C. 3101; Reorganization Plan No. 5 of
1950; Pub. L. 115-59, 131 Stat. 1152 (42 U.S.C. 405, note).
Subpart A--Freedom of Information Act
0
2. In Sec. 4.7, add paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 4.7 Responses to Requests.
* * * * *
(d) All responses shall be made subject to the provisions of Sec.
4.25(b)(2)(iv).
* * * * *
Subpart B--Privacy Act
0
3. Amend subpart B by removing the words ``Privacy Officer'' wherever
they
[[Page 21935]]
appear and adding in their place the words ``Privacy Act Officer''.
0
4. Amend Sec. 4.22 by adding paragraph (b)(10) to read as follows:
Sec. 4.22 Definitions.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(10) Un-redacted SSN Mailed Documents Listing (USMDL) means the
Department approved list, as posted at www.commerce.gov/privacy,
designating those documents for which the inclusion of SSN is
determined to be necessary to fulfill a compelling Department business
need when the documents are requested by individuals outside the
Department or other Federal agencies, as determined jointly by the
Senior Agency Official for Privacy and the Departmental Privacy Act
Officer.
0
5. Amend Sec. 4.25 by:
0
a. Adding paragraphs (a)(3) and (4); and
0
b. Revising paragraph (b)(2)(iii) and adding paragraphs (b)(2)(iv) and
(v).
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 4.25 Disclosure of requested records to individuals [Amended]
(a) * * *
(3) Inclusion of SSNs on responsive documents.
(i) The Department shall redact SSNs from responsive documents
provided to requesters where feasible. Where full redaction is not
feasible, partial redaction to create a truncated SSN shall be
preferred to no redaction. The following conditions must be met for the
inclusion of an unredacted (full) SSN or partially redacted (truncated)
SSN on a responsive document:
(ii) The inclusion of the full SSN or truncated SSN of an
individual must be required or authorized by law,
(iii) The inclusion of the full SSN or truncated SSN of an
individual must be determined by the Senior Agency Official for Privacy
and Departmental Privacy Act Officer to be necessary to fulfill a
compelling Department business need; and
(iv) The full SSN of an individual may be included only on
documents listed on the USMDL.
(4) The following requirements apply when the Department mails or
delivers responsive documents containing SSNs or truncated SSNs:
(i) The full SSN of an individual may be included only on documents
listed on the USMDL.
(ii) For documents that are listed on the USMDL and that include
the full SSN of an individual, the signature of the recipient is
required upon delivery.
(iii) For documents that include the truncated form of the SSN of
an individual, the signature of the recipient is required upon
delivery.
(iv) The full SSN, the truncated SSN, any part of the SSN of an
individual must not be visible from the outside of the envelope or
package.
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) Copies of documents may be mailed at the request of the
individual and may be subject to payment of the fees prescribed in
Sec. Sec. 4.25(a)(3) and 4.31. In the event that the Department, at
its own initiative, elects to provide a copy by mail, no fee will be
charged to the individual.
(iv) Copies of documents listed on the USMDL that include full SSNs
and that are requested by an individual are subject to payment of the
fees prescribed in Sec. 4.31.
(v) Documents containing SSNs or truncated SSNs that are required
to be returned by the individual to the Department will be mailed or
delivered along with a prepaid mail or delivery service envelope at the
expense of the Department.
* * * * *
Appendix B to Part 4 [Amended]
0
6. Amend Appendix B to part 4 by:
0
a. Adding the word ``Act'' after the phrase ``Freedom of Information''
wherever it appears in the introductory text, under ``Office of the
Secretary,'' and under ``Assistant Secretary for Administration''; and
0
b. Adding a semicolon after the term ``Office of Privacy and Open
Government: Director''.
[FR Doc. 2021-06823 Filed 4-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-17-P