Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes, 20453-20455 [2021-08057]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 20, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the certification office,
send it to ATTN: Program Manager,
Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New
York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue,
Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone
516–228–7300; fax 516–794–5531. Before
using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a
principal inspector, the manager of the local
flight standards district office/certificate
holding district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain instructions
from a manufacturer, the instructions must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, New York ACO Branch,
FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA); or MHI RJ Aviation ULC’s TCCA
Design Approval Organization (DAO). If
approved by the DAO, the approval must
include the DAO-authorized signature.
(j) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) TCCA AD
CF–2020–08, dated April 6, 2020, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the
AD docket on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA–2020–0911.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Siddeeq Bacchus, Aerospace
Engineer, Mechanical Systems and
Administrative Services Section, FAA, New
York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue,
Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone
516–228–7362; fax 516–794–5531; email
9-avs-nyaco-cos@faa.gov.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) [Bombardier] CRJ700/900/1000 Series
Regional Jet Temporary Revision ALI–0721,
dated December 20, 2019.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact MHI RJ Aviation ULC, 12655
Henri-Fabre Blvd., Mirabel, Que´bec J7N 1E1,
Canada; Widebody Customer Response
Center North America toll-free telephone +1
844 272 2720 or direct-dial telephone +1 514
855 8500; fax +1–514 855–8501; email
thd.crj@mhirj.com; internet https://
mhirj.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th
St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
206–231–3195.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Apr 19, 2021
Jkt 253001
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA,
email fedreg.legal@nara.gov, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued on March 30, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–07624 Filed 4–19–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2020–0965; Project
Identifier MCAI–2020–01068–T; Amendment
39–21502; AD 2021–08–08]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus SAS Model A350–941 and –1041
airplanes. This AD was prompted by a
report that a welding quality issue has
been identified in the gimbal joint of the
air bleed duct located at each wing-topylon interface; the inner ring of a
gimbal had deformed to an oval shape,
which could lead to cracking caused by
direct contact between metal parts. This
AD requires replacing affected bleed
duct assemblies and bleed gimbals at
the wing-to-pylon interface with a
serviceable part, as specified in a
European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD, which is incorporated by
reference. The FAA is issuing this AD
to address the unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: This AD is effective May 25,
2021.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of May 25, 2021.
ADDRESSES: For material incorporated
by reference (IBR) in this AD, contact
EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668
Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221
8999 000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu;
internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may
find this IBR material on the EASA
website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu.
You may view this IBR material at the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20453
FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
It is also available in the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2020–
0965.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2020–
0965; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this final rule,
any comments received, and other
information. The address for Docket
Operations is U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathleen Arrigotti, Aerospace Engineer,
Large Aircraft Section, International
Validation Branch, FAA, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone and fax 206–231–3218;
Kathleen.Arrigotti@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The EASA, which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD
2020–0169R1, dated August 19, 2020
(EASA AD 2020–0169R1) (also referred
to as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or the
MCAI), to correct an unsafe condition
for all Airbus SAS Model A350–941 and
–1041 airplanes.
The FAA issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to all Airbus SAS Model A350–
941 and –1041 airplanes. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on
October 23, 2020 (85 FR 67467). The
NPRM was prompted by a report that a
welding quality issue has been
identified in the gimbal joint of the air
bleed duct located at each wing-topylon interface; the inner ring of a
gimbal had deformed to an oval shape,
which could lead to cracking caused by
direct contact between metal parts. The
NPRM proposed to require replacing
affected bleed duct assemblies and
bleed gimbals at the wing-to-pylon
interface with a serviceable part, as
specified in EASA AD 2020–0169R1.
The FAA is issuing this AD to address
a welding quality issue that could cause
E:\FR\FM\20APR1.SGM
20APR1
20454
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 20, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
cracking, and could lead to hot bleed air
leakage in the pylon area, and possibly
result in loss of the pneumatic system
and exposure of the wing structure to
high temperatures, and lead to reduced
structural integrity of the airplane. See
the MCAI for additional background
information.
Comments
The FAA gave the public the
opportunity to participate in developing
this final rule. The following presents
the comments received on the NPRM
and the FAA’s response to each
comment.
Request To Correct Notes and
Clearances in the Referenced Service
Information
Delta Airlines (DAL) stated that the
service information referenced in EASA
AD 2020–0169R1 calls out the wrong
note in several locations. DAL stated
that view A–A, ‘‘The Wing
Environment,’’ in SHEET 3/3 of Figure
ICN–A350–A–36XXP023–A–FAPE3–
05BQ7–A–001–01; and SHEET 3/3 of
Figure ICN–A350–A–36XXP024–A–
FAPE3–05CCU–A–001–01; calls out
Note 03 and this should be Note 04.
DAL also stated that in View B–B, those
figures call out Note 04 and this should
be Note 03. The FAA infers that DAL is
requesting the FAA add an exception to
the proposed AD to clarify the correct
note numbers.
DAL commented that when reviewing
maintenance procedure (MP) A350–A–
36–11–48–08001–720A–A, it noted that
the MP does not specify a clearance
during the installation process and it
does not mention clearance to structure.
DAL stated that both notes in the
referenced figures should use the same
standard as the MP installation
instructions, which is, ‘‘Make sure there
is clearance between structure and
sensing elements,’’ rather than
specifying minimum clearances. DAL
added that including minimum
clearance dimensions in the notes in the
referenced figures will make them
mandatory.
The FAA agrees to provide
clarification regarding these issues.
Airbus has confirmed that the notes
could have been written without
mentioning general terms like
‘‘elements’’ or ‘‘wing environment,’’ but
all drawing references and the
clearances expressed in them are
correct. Specifying minimum clearance
dimensions in the referenced figures is
intentional and needed to address the
unsafe condition identified in this AD.
The FAA has not changed the AD in this
regard.
Request To Clarify Verbiage in the
Referenced Service Information
DAL stated that the service
information referenced in EASA AD
2020–0169R1 uses the terms ‘‘detailed
inspection of bleed gimbals’’ and
‘‘general visual inspection of bleed
gimbal records.’’ DAL commented that
these terms are confusing and negate the
FAA’s definition of general visual
inspection. DAL proposed the
following, which it stated is the FAA’s
standard wording: ‘‘perform a detailed
visual inspection on bleed gimbals’’ and
‘‘review aircraft maintenance records for
bleed gimbal removals.’’
The FAA agrees to provide
clarification. The FAA contacted EASA
for clarification of the inspections
specified in the service information
referenced in EASA AD 2020–0169R1.
The intent of the ‘‘detailed inspection of
bleed gimbals’’ and the ‘‘general visual
inspection of the bleed gimbal records’’
is to verify the part numbers and
manufacturing dates of the bleed
gimbals. The FAA has added paragraph
(h)(3) of this AD to clarify that where
the service information referenced in
EASA AD 2020–0169R1, specifies doing
a ‘‘general visual inspection’’ and
‘‘detailed inspection’’ of the bleed
gimbals and bleed gimbal records, this
AD allows for an inspection to
determine the part number and
manufacturing date of the bleed
gimbals.
Conclusion
The FAA reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this
final rule with the changes described
previously and minor editorial changes.
The FAA has determined that these
minor changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM for
addressing the unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
The FAA also determined that these
changes will not increase the economic
burden on any operator or increase the
scope of this final rule.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
EASA AD 2020–0169R1 describes
procedures for replacing affected bleed
duct assemblies and bleed gimbals at
the wing-to-pylon interface with
serviceable parts. This material is
reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business
or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD
affects 13 airplanes of U.S. registry. The
FAA estimates the following costs to
comply with this AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS FOR REQUIRED ACTIONS
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per product
25 work-hours × $85 per hour = $2,125 ...............................................................
Up to $48,800 .......
Up to $50,925 .......
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Apr 19, 2021
Jkt 253001
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: General requirements. Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Cost on U.S.
operators
Up to $662,025.
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
E:\FR\FM\20APR1.SGM
20APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 74 / Tuesday, April 20, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
■
2021–08–08 Airbus SAS: Amendment 39–
21502; Docket No. FAA–2020–0965;
Project Identifier MCAI–2020–01068–T.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) is
effective May 25, 2021.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Airbus SAS Model
A350–941 and –1041 airplanes, certificated
in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 36, Pneumatic.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a report that a
welding quality issue has been identified in
the gimbal joint of the air bleed duct located
at each wing-to-pylon interface; the inner
ring of a gimbal had deformed to an oval
shape, which could lead to cracking caused
by direct contact between metal parts. The
FAA is issuing this AD to address this
condition, which could lead to hot bleed air
leakage in the pylon area, and possibly result
in loss of the pneumatic system and exposure
of the wing structure to high temperatures,
and lead to reduced structural integrity of the
airplane.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:56 Apr 19, 2021
Jkt 253001
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this
AD: Comply with all required actions and
compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2020–0169R1,
dated August 19, 2020 (EASA AD 2020–
0169R1).
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2020–0169R1
(1) Where EASA AD 2020–0169R1 refers to
its effective date, this AD requires using the
effective date of this AD.
(2) The ‘‘Remarks’’ section of EASA AD
2020–0169R1 does not apply to this AD.
(3) Where the service information
referenced in paragraph (2) of EASA AD
2020–0169R1 specifies doing a ‘‘general
visual inspection’’ and ‘‘detailed inspection’’
of bleed gimbal records and bleed gimbals,
this AD allows for an inspection to determine
the part number and manufacturing date of
the bleed gimbals. A review of airplane
maintenance records is acceptable in lieu of
this inspection for the part number of the
bleed gimbals if it can be conclusively
determined from that review.
(i) No Reporting Requirement
Although the service information
referenced in EASA AD 2020–0169R1
specifies to submit certain information to the
manufacturer, this AD does not include that
requirement.
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or responsible Flight
Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch,
send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (k) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-AVS-AIR730-AMOC@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the responsible
Flight Standards Office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain instructions
from a manufacturer, the instructions must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, Large Aircraft Section,
International Validation Branch, FAA; or
EASA; or Airbus SAS’s EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the
DOA-authorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except
as required by paragraph (j)(2) of this AD, if
any service information contains procedures
or tests that are identified as RC, those
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
20455
procedures and tests must be done to comply
with this AD; any procedures or tests that are
not identified as RC are recommended. Those
procedures and tests that are not identified
as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator’s
maintenance or inspection program without
obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can
be done and the airplane can be put back in
an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or
changes to procedures or tests identified as
RC require approval of an AMOC.
(k) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Kathleen Arrigotti, Aerospace
Engineer, Large Aircraft Section,
International Validation Branch, FAA, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone and fax 206–231–3218;
Kathleen.Arrigotti@faa.gov.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD 2020–0169R1, dated August 19,
2020.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For EASA AD 2020–0169R1, contact
EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668
Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999
000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://
ad.easa.europa.eu.
(4) You may view this material at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational
Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
206–231–3195. This material may be found
in the AD docket on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA–2020–0965.
(5) You may view this material that is
incorporated by reference at the National
Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, email fedreg.legal@
nara.gov, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued on April 1, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–08057 Filed 4–19–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
E:\FR\FM\20APR1.SGM
20APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 20, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20453-20455]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-08057]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2020-0965; Project Identifier MCAI-2020-01068-T;
Amendment 39-21502; AD 2021-08-08]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus SAS Model A350-941 and -1041 airplanes. This AD was prompted by
a report that a welding quality issue has been identified in the gimbal
joint of the air bleed duct located at each wing-to-pylon interface;
the inner ring of a gimbal had deformed to an oval shape, which could
lead to cracking caused by direct contact between metal parts. This AD
requires replacing affected bleed duct assemblies and bleed gimbals at
the wing-to-pylon interface with a serviceable part, as specified in a
European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which is incorporated
by reference. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective May 25, 2021.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of May 25,
2021.
ADDRESSES: For material incorporated by reference (IBR) in this AD,
contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone
+49 221 8999 000; email [email protected]; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this IBR material on the EASA website
at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this IBR material at the
FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195. It is also available in
the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0965.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-
0965; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, any comments received, and other information. The
address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Arrigotti, Aerospace
Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax 206-231-
3218; [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2020-0169R1, dated August 19, 2020
(EASA AD 2020-0169R1) (also referred to as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or the MCAI), to correct an unsafe condition
for all Airbus SAS Model A350-941 and -1041 airplanes.
The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all Airbus SAS Model
A350-941 and -1041 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal
Register on October 23, 2020 (85 FR 67467). The NPRM was prompted by a
report that a welding quality issue has been identified in the gimbal
joint of the air bleed duct located at each wing-to-pylon interface;
the inner ring of a gimbal had deformed to an oval shape, which could
lead to cracking caused by direct contact between metal parts. The NPRM
proposed to require replacing affected bleed duct assemblies and bleed
gimbals at the wing-to-pylon interface with a serviceable part, as
specified in EASA AD 2020-0169R1.
The FAA is issuing this AD to address a welding quality issue that
could cause
[[Page 20454]]
cracking, and could lead to hot bleed air leakage in the pylon area,
and possibly result in loss of the pneumatic system and exposure of the
wing structure to high temperatures, and lead to reduced structural
integrity of the airplane. See the MCAI for additional background
information.
Comments
The FAA gave the public the opportunity to participate in
developing this final rule. The following presents the comments
received on the NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.
Request To Correct Notes and Clearances in the Referenced Service
Information
Delta Airlines (DAL) stated that the service information referenced
in EASA AD 2020-0169R1 calls out the wrong note in several locations.
DAL stated that view A-A, ``The Wing Environment,'' in SHEET 3/3 of
Figure ICN-A350-A-36XXP023-A-FAPE3-05BQ7-A-001-01; and SHEET 3/3 of
Figure ICN-A350-A-36XXP024-A-FAPE3-05CCU-A-001-01; calls out Note 03
and this should be Note 04. DAL also stated that in View B-B, those
figures call out Note 04 and this should be Note 03. The FAA infers
that DAL is requesting the FAA add an exception to the proposed AD to
clarify the correct note numbers.
DAL commented that when reviewing maintenance procedure (MP) A350-
A-36-11-48-08001-720A-A, it noted that the MP does not specify a
clearance during the installation process and it does not mention
clearance to structure. DAL stated that both notes in the referenced
figures should use the same standard as the MP installation
instructions, which is, ``Make sure there is clearance between
structure and sensing elements,'' rather than specifying minimum
clearances. DAL added that including minimum clearance dimensions in
the notes in the referenced figures will make them mandatory.
The FAA agrees to provide clarification regarding these issues.
Airbus has confirmed that the notes could have been written without
mentioning general terms like ``elements'' or ``wing environment,'' but
all drawing references and the clearances expressed in them are
correct. Specifying minimum clearance dimensions in the referenced
figures is intentional and needed to address the unsafe condition
identified in this AD. The FAA has not changed the AD in this regard.
Request To Clarify Verbiage in the Referenced Service Information
DAL stated that the service information referenced in EASA AD 2020-
0169R1 uses the terms ``detailed inspection of bleed gimbals'' and
``general visual inspection of bleed gimbal records.'' DAL commented
that these terms are confusing and negate the FAA's definition of
general visual inspection. DAL proposed the following, which it stated
is the FAA's standard wording: ``perform a detailed visual inspection
on bleed gimbals'' and ``review aircraft maintenance records for bleed
gimbal removals.''
The FAA agrees to provide clarification. The FAA contacted EASA for
clarification of the inspections specified in the service information
referenced in EASA AD 2020-0169R1. The intent of the ``detailed
inspection of bleed gimbals'' and the ``general visual inspection of
the bleed gimbal records'' is to verify the part numbers and
manufacturing dates of the bleed gimbals. The FAA has added paragraph
(h)(3) of this AD to clarify that where the service information
referenced in EASA AD 2020-0169R1, specifies doing a ``general visual
inspection'' and ``detailed inspection'' of the bleed gimbals and bleed
gimbal records, this AD allows for an inspection to determine the part
number and manufacturing date of the bleed gimbals.
Conclusion
The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments
received, and determined that air safety and the public interest
require adopting this final rule with the changes described previously
and minor editorial changes. The FAA has determined that these minor
changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
The FAA also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final
rule.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
EASA AD 2020-0169R1 describes procedures for replacing affected
bleed duct assemblies and bleed gimbals at the wing-to-pylon interface
with serviceable parts. This material is reasonably available because
the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD affects 13 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
25 work-hours x $85 per hour = Up to $48,800............ Up to $50,925............ Up to $662,025.
$2,125.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
[[Page 20455]]
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:
2021-08-08 Airbus SAS: Amendment 39-21502; Docket No. FAA-2020-0965;
Project Identifier MCAI-2020-01068-T.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective May 25, 2021.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Airbus SAS Model A350-941 and -1041
airplanes, certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 36, Pneumatic.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a report that a welding quality issue
has been identified in the gimbal joint of the air bleed duct
located at each wing-to-pylon interface; the inner ring of a gimbal
had deformed to an oval shape, which could lead to cracking caused
by direct contact between metal parts. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address this condition, which could lead to hot bleed air leakage in
the pylon area, and possibly result in loss of the pneumatic system
and exposure of the wing structure to high temperatures, and lead to
reduced structural integrity of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
2020-0169R1, dated August 19, 2020 (EASA AD 2020-0169R1).
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2020-0169R1
(1) Where EASA AD 2020-0169R1 refers to its effective date, this
AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
(2) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2020-0169R1 does not
apply to this AD.
(3) Where the service information referenced in paragraph (2) of
EASA AD 2020-0169R1 specifies doing a ``general visual inspection''
and ``detailed inspection'' of bleed gimbal records and bleed
gimbals, this AD allows for an inspection to determine the part
number and manufacturing date of the bleed gimbals. A review of
airplane maintenance records is acceptable in lieu of this
inspection for the part number of the bleed gimbals if it can be
conclusively determined from that review.
(i) No Reporting Requirement
Although the service information referenced in EASA AD 2020-
0169R1 specifies to submit certain information to the manufacturer,
this AD does not include that requirement.
(j) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or responsible Flight
Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, send it
to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (k) of this
AD. Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
responsible Flight Standards Office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus
SAS's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the
DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except as required by
paragraph (j)(2) of this AD, if any service information contains
procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those procedures and
tests must be done to comply with this AD; any procedures or tests
that are not identified as RC are recommended. Those procedures and
tests that are not identified as RC may be deviated from using
accepted methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or
inspection program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can be done and the
airplane can be put back in an airworthy condition. Any
substitutions or changes to procedures or tests identified as RC
require approval of an AMOC.
(k) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Kathleen Arrigotti,
Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, International Validation
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone
and fax 206-231-3218; [email protected].
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2020-0169R1,
dated August 19, 2020.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For EASA AD 2020-0169R1, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer
3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email
[email protected]; internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu.
(4) You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St.,
Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material
at the FAA, call 206-231-3195. This material may be found in the AD
docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0965.
(5) You may view this material that is incorporated by reference
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, email
[email protected], or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued on April 1, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-08057 Filed 4-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P