Waterways Commerce Cutter Acquisition Program; Preparation of a Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, 20376-20379 [2021-07969]
Download as PDF
20376
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 73 / Monday, April 19, 2021 / Notices
meeting. Individuals interested in
making oral presentations are
encouraged to notify the contact person
on or before April 30, 2021. Five
minutes will be allotted for each
presentation.
The meeting may be accessed via
telephone or web meeting. To obtain the
call-in number and access code, submit
written or brief oral comments, or
request special accommodations for
persons with disabilities, please register
on-line at https://
snacregister.samhsa.gov/
MeetingList.aspx, or communicate with
SAMHSA’s Designated Federal Officer,
Ms. Valerie Kolick.
Substantive meeting information and
a roster of ACWS members may be
obtained either by accessing the
SAMHSA Committees’ Web https://
www.samhsa.gov/about-us/advisorycouncils/meetings, or by contacting Ms.
Kolick.
Committee Name: Substance Abuse
and Mental Health Services
Administration, Advisory Committee for
Women’s Services (ACWS).
Date/Time/Type: Wednesday, May 5,
2021, from: 1:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. EDT
(OPEN).
Place: SAMHSA, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857 (Virtual).
Contact: Valerie Kolick, Designated
Federal Officer, SAMHSA’s Advisory
Committee for Women’s Services, 5600
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857,
Telephone: (240) 276–1738, Email:
Valerie.kolick@samhsa.hhs.gov.
Dated: April 14, 2021.
Carlos Castillo,
CAPT, USPHS, Committee Management
Officer, Substance Abuse and Mental Health,
Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 2021–07994 Filed 4–16–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162–20–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
[Docket Number USCG–2021–0191]
Waterways Commerce Cutter
Acquisition Program; Preparation of a
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of intent to prepare a
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (PEIS); notice of virtual
public meeting; and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
ACTION:
Abbreviations
The United States Coast
Guard (Coast Guard), as the lead agency,
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Apr 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
announces its intent to prepare a
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (PEIS) for the Waterways
Commerce Cutter (WCC) Program’s
acquisition and operation of up to 30
WCCs. The Coast Guard has determined
that a PEIS is the most appropriate type
of National Environmental Policy Act
document for this action because of the
scope and complexity of the proposed
acquisition and operation of up to 30
WCCs. Notice is hereby given that the
public scoping process has begun for the
preparation of a PEIS that will address
the reasonable alternatives and potential
environmental impacts associated with
implementing the Proposed Action. The
scoping process solicits public
comments regarding the range of issues,
information, and analyses relevant to
the Proposed Action, including
potential environmental impacts and
reasonable alternatives to address in the
PEIS. Your comments may cause a
change in the scope of the PEIS.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before June 11th, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2021–0191 using the Federal DecisionMaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information about this document, email
HQS-SMB-CG-WaterwaysCommerce
Cutter@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
Notice of Intent briefly summarizes the
proposed project, including the purpose
and need and possible alternatives. As
required by the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) and Council
on Environmental Quality (CEQ)
implementing regulations (40 CFR
1502.3), a Federal agency must prepare
an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) if it is proposing a major Federal
action to analyze the environmental
consequences of implementing each of
the alternatives, if carried forward for
full review following public scoping, by
assessing the effects of each alternative
on the human environment. The Coast
Guard has determined that a PEIS is the
most appropriate type of EIS for this
action because of the scope and
complexity of the proposed acquisition
and operation of up to 30 WCCs.
ATON Aids to Navigation
AUTEC Atlantic Undersea Test and
Evaluation Center
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
CEQ Council on Environmental Quality
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
EIS Environmental Impact Statement
ESA Endangered Species Act
FR Federal Register
GoMEX Gulf of Mexico
ICW Intracoastal Waterway
IW&WR Inland Waterways and Western
Rivers
MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act
MMPA Marine Mammal Protection Act
NEPA National Environmental Policy Act
nm nautical miles
PEIS Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement
PNW Pacific Northwest
SEAK Southeast Alaska
U.S.C. United States Code
WCC Waterways Commerce Cutter
WLI WCC inland buoy tenders
WLIC WCC inland construction tenders
WLR WCC river buoy tenders
USEC-MidATL U.S. East Coast MidAtlantic
USEC-South U.S. East Coast-South
Purpose and Need for the Proposed
Action
The Coast Guard has a statutory
mission to establish, maintain, and
operate aids to navigation (ATON) in
the Inland Waterways and Western
Rivers (IW&WR). The IW&WR includes
the Gulf and Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway (ICW); the Mississippi,
Missouri, Alabama, Tennessee,
Columbia, and Ohio Rivers, their
associated tributaries and other
connecting waterways; portions of the
Alaska Inside Passage; portions of the
Great Lakes; and several other navigable
waterways around the United States.
The 35 cutters and associated 27 barges
that comprise the current inland tender
fleet servicing the IW&WR are, on
average, more than 54 years old and all
have significantly exceeded their design
service life of 30 years. There is no
redundant vessel capability within the
Coast Guard, Department of Homeland
Security (DHS), or other government
agencies. Without replacement of the
current inland tender fleet, the Coast
Guard could face an increasing risk of
failure to maintain the capability to
execute its ATON mission and provide
timely ATON services in the IW&WR
and other navigable waters around the
United States.
Due to obsolescence, hull limitations,
and asset age, service life extension and
modernization efforts are increasingly
difficult, expensive to maintain, and
cannot be justified. To maintain the
Coast Guard’s vital inland waterways
mission and continue to provide a
consistent and reliable presence in the
IW&WR, the Coast Guard is proposing to
replace the current aging tender fleet.
WCCs would be designed to replace the
E:\FR\FM\19APN1.SGM
19APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 73 / Monday, April 19, 2021 / Notices
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
capabilities of the existing inland fleet;
therefore, the purpose of the Proposed
Action is the acquisition and operation
of up to 30 WCCs to replace the
capabilities of the current inland tender
fleet, thereby enabling the safe
navigation of waters that support the
nation’s economy through maritime
commerce throughout the Marine
Transportation System.
Preliminary Proposed Action and
Alternatives
Coast Guard has identified a proposed
action and preliminary alternatives for
potential consideration in the draft EIS.
Both a no-action and several
preliminary action alternatives are
presented for consideration for public
review and comment. Six proposed
action areas that the WCCs would
support have been identified.
(1) The U.S. East Coast Mid-Atlantic
(USEC-MidATL) proposed action area
includes state and territorial waters
extending 12 nautical miles (nm; 19
kilometers [km]) from New Jersey
(where it borders with New York) to the
border of North Carolina (where it
borders with South Carolina) and also
extends into certain inland waterways.
(2) The U.S. East Coast-South (USECSouth), including Florida and the
Bahamas proposed action area includes
state and territorial waters extending 12
nm (19 km) from South Carolina (where
it borders with North Carolina) to
Florida (where it borders with Alabama)
and extends to the Florida Keys and Dry
Tortugas off the southwest coast of
Florida. This proposed action area also
includes inland waterways, such as the
St John’s River and the Caloosahatchee
River and the Department of Defenseowned ATON near the Atlantic
Undersea Test and Evaluation Center
(AUTEC) in the Bahamas.
(3) The Great Lakes proposed action
area includes waters off northern
Michigan to the border between the
United States and Canada. This
proposed action area includes the
northern portion of Lake Michigan
extending into St. Mary’s River,
Munuscong Lake, and Lake Nicolet. Of
note, no oceanic waters are part of the
Great Lakes proposed action area.
(4) The Gulf of Mexico and U.S.
Inland States, including the Mississippi
River and its Tributaries, (GoMEX and
Mississippi River) proposed action area
includes state and territorial waters
extending 12 nm (19 km) from Alabama
(where it borders with Florida) to Texas
(where it borders with Mexico). This
proposed action area also includes
inland waterways and their tributaries
along the Ohio and Tennessee Rivers,
the Cumberland River in Kentucky and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Apr 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
Tennessee, Tombigbee River in Alabama
and Mississippi; the Mississippi River
in Louisiana, Mississippi, and Arkansas;
and the Ouachita River in Louisiana and
Arkansas.
(5) The Pacific Northwest (PNW)
proposed action area includes state and
territorial waters extending 12 nm (19
km) from southern Washington State to
northern Oregon where they border each
other along the Columbia River. The
proposed action area includes the
Columbia River from the mouth at the
Pacific Ocean to where it joins the
Snake River and ends at the border of
Washington and Idaho and also
includes a northern segment of the
Willamette River that joins with and the
Columbia River in Oregon. The Pacific
Ocean is not a part of the PNW
proposed action area.
(6) The Southeast Alaska (SEAK)
proposed action areas includes state and
territorial waters extending 12 nm (19
km) from Baranof and Prince of Wales
Islands and consists primarily of a
portion of the inside passage from
Juneau south to Revillagigedo Island.
This proposed action area includes only
coastal passages of the Pacific Ocean.
Alternative 1: Replacement of Up to 30
WCCs
Under Alternative 1, the Coast Guard
would acquire and operate up to 30
WCCs with planned design lives of 30
years each to fulfill mission
requirements in the proposed action
areas in IW&WR, portions of the Alaska
Inside Passage; portions of the Great
Lakes, and several other navigable
waterways around the United States.
Similar to the current fleet’s
operations, the Alternative 1 would
include vessel operations to establish,
operate, and maintain the lighted and
unlighted buoys and beacons to
maintain the United States Visual
ATON System. This mission contributes
to protecting national interests by
ensuring safe and efficient flow of
commercial vessel traffic through our
nation’s waters. Although it is expected
that the WCCs, similar to the current
inland tender fleet, would be capable of
performing non-ATON missions such as
Ports, Waterways and Coastal Security;
Search and Rescue; Marine
Environmental Protection; and Marine
Safety, their primary focus would be on
the ATON mission.
Full operational capability would be
achieved when all planned WCCs have
been produced and are operational.
Coast Guard WCC operations and
training would occur after delivery of
each WCC from the shipbuilder to the
Coast Guard. For example, the first WCC
delivery to the Coast Guard is expected
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20377
in 2023 and the cutter would then be
operational in 2024. The last WCC is
expected to be delivered and
operational in 2030.
The Proposed Action would include
WCC operation, maintenance, and
decommissioning of up to 11 WCC
construction class (WCC WLIC) tenders
to replace the current capabilities of 13
inland construction tenders (WLIC); up
to 16 WCC River Buoy class (WCC WLR)
tenders to replace the capabilities of the
river buoy tenders (WLR); and up to
three Inland Buoy class (WCC WLI)
tenders to replace the capabilities of the
inland buoy tenders (WLI). Although
there are three classes proposed and
design specifications are not final, the
design would maximize commonality
between the three classes to reduce
sustainment costs, training needs, and
other associated requirements
The WCC WLIC would be specifically
designed for establishing and replacing
fixed ATON and would be equipped
with impact and vibratory pile driving
and extraction equipment and spuds.
The WCC WLR an WCC WLI would
have capability to deploy and retrieve
buoy mooring equipment from the
seabed or riverbed using a water jet
system would also be equipped to move
buoys, and move and recover sinkers,
chain, wire rope, synthetic rope, and
other materials without a crane.
All WCCs would have the ability to
tow one vessel (of equivalent
displacement) in either a side tow or
stern tow. Each WCC would also have
the capability to be towed by the bow,
pushed ahead from the stern, and towed
alongside from either port or starboard.
Vessels would be towed according to
specifications in the Cutter Towing
Operations Tactics, Techniques, and
Procedures (CGTTP 3–91.15 issued
March 2017). All WCCs would also
recover stray, stranded, and scrap
buoys.
Vessel performance testing for a WCC
would be similar to testing conducted
for the current inland tender fleet.
Scheduled maintenance would likely
occur within close proximity to each
WCC’s homeport; however, the exact
locations of all the homeports for all
WCCs are not known at this time.
Alternative 2, Reduced Acquisition of
Coast Guard Owned and Operated
Systems
The Coast Guard would explore
hybrid government and contracted
options for mission performance. Ship
platforms would meet similar technical
specifications discussed in Alternative
1. Potential scenarios could include:
Contractor-owned (commercial entity
funds ship construction, overhaul and
E:\FR\FM\19APN1.SGM
19APN1
20378
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 73 / Monday, April 19, 2021 / Notices
maintenance) and government-operated
(Coast Guard provides the personnel);
government-owned (government funds
ship construction, overhaul and
maintenance) and contractor-operated (a
commercial operating company
provides the crew); or contractor-owned
and contractor-operated systems (Coast
Guard provides neither platforms or
personnel).
Alternative 3, Mixed Fleet
The mixed fleet solution would be a
combination of cutters and shore-based
assets (including ATON team units),
electronic ATON, and contracted ATON
services. To accomplish a mixed fleet
solution, additional Coast Guard ATON
personnel and teams would be required.
To accommodate the additional ATON
teams, existing facilities would require
expansion and construction of new
shore based facilities could be
necessary. Use of electronic ATON
instead of physical ATON could also
prove necessary.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
No Action Alternative
The evaluation of a No Action
Alternative is required by the
regulations implementing NEPA. Under
the No Action Alternative, the Coast
Guard would fulfill its statutory
missions in the IW&WR using the
existing inland tender fleet. The existing
assets would continue to age, causing a
decrease in efficiency, increasing
operational costs, and increasing risk of
equipment failure or damage due to
significant systems and parts no longer
being available.
Summary of Expected Impacts
While the Coast Guard must work
toward environmental compliance
during the design and acquisition of
WCCs, each vessel is not expected to
impact the environment (biological,
physical, or socioeconomic resources)
until it is operational. In addition,
vessel construction in commercial
shipyards is not expected to impact any
physical or biological resources.
The three action alternatives being
considered would all reduce the size of
the overall fleet. As such, the PEIS
analyzes the potential impact of the
range of up to 30 WCCs, as this would
be the highest number projected to be
operational in the Coast Guard’s
proposed action areas. Acoustic and
physical stressors associated with the
Proposed Action may potentially impact
the physical and biological environment
in the proposed action areas. Potential
acoustic stressors include: The depthsounder, navigation system, vessel
noise, ATON signal noise, tool noise,
and pile driving noise. Potential
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Apr 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
physical stressors include: Vessel
movement, bottom disturbance, ground
disturbance (removal of brush), pile
driving, debris, and ATON retrieval
devices and tow lines.
Since the WCC fleet would service a
broad geographic area, stressors
associated with the Proposed Action
may potentially impact physical
resources (including air quality, ambient
sound, bottom habitat and sediments,
and water quality), biological resources
(including critical habitat), and
socioeconomic resources. The PEIS
evaluates the likelihood that a resource
would be exposed to or encounter a
stressor and identifies the impact
associated with that exposure or
encounter. The likelihood of an
exposure or encounter is based on the
stressor, location, and timing relative to
the spatial and temporal distribution
each biological resource or critical
habitat.
Under the Proposed Action, the
depth-sounder, navigation system,
vessel noise, ATON signal noise, tool
noise, pile driving noise, vessel
movement, anchoring, spud placement,
debris, ATON retrieval devices and tow
lines, and pile driving associated with
the Proposed Action are not expected to
result in significant impact to the
following resources: Air quality,
ambient sound, bottom habitat and
sediments, water quality, amphibians,
aquatic and terrestrial vegetation, birds,
invertebrates, insects, fish, Essential
Fish Habitat, reptiles, terrestrial and
marine mammals, commercial fishing,
marine construction, mineral extraction,
oil and gas extraction, recreation and
tourism, renewable energy, research,
transportation and shipping, and
subsistence fishing and hunting. The
Proposed Action may affect, but is not
likely to adversely affect, any
Endangered Species Act (ESA)-listed
amphibians, aquatic and terrestrial
vegetation, birds, invertebrates, insects,
fish, reptiles, and terrestrial and marine
mammals.
The Proposed Action is not expected
to result in the destruction or adverse
modification of federally-designated
critical habitat that may be found in any
of the proposed action areas. Pursuant
to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act
(MBTA; 16 U.S.C 703–712 et seq.), the
Proposed Action would not result in a
significant adverse effect on migratory
bird populations. Pursuant to the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (16
U.S.C. 1801–1882), depth-sounder/
navigation system noise, vessel noise,
vessel movement, and pile driving
associated with the Proposed Action
would not adversely affect the quality or
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
quantity of Essential Fish Habitat within
the Coast Guard’s proposed action areas.
Anticipated Permits and Authorizations
The Coastal Zone Management Act
(16 U.S.C 1451 et seq.) was enacted to
protect the coastal environment from
demands associated with residential,
recreational, and commercial uses. The
Coast Guard would determine the
impact of the Proposed Action and
provide a Coastal Consistency
Determination or Negative
Determination to the appropriate state
agency for anticipated concurrence once
the homeports are selected for the
WCCs.
The ESA of 1973 (16 U.S.C 1531 et
seq.) provides for the conservation of
endangered and threatened species and
the ecosystems on which they depend.
The Coast Guard anticipates consulting
under Section 7 of the ESA with the
services, the National Marine Fisheries
Service and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, that have jurisdiction over the
species (50 CFR 402.14(a)).
The Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA; 16 U.S.C 1361 et seq.)
established, with limited exceptions, a
moratorium on the ‘‘taking’’ of marine
mammals in waters or on lands under
U.S. jurisdiction, and on the High Seas
by vessels or persons under U.S.
jurisdiction. The MMPA further
regulates ‘‘takes’’ of marine mammals in
U.S. waters and by U.S. citizens on the
High Seas. The term ‘‘take,’’ as defined
in Section 3 (16 U.S.C. 1362) of the
MMPA, means ‘‘to harass, hunt, capture,
or kill, or attempt to harass, hunt,
capture, or kill any marine mammal’’.
‘‘Harassment’’ was further defined in
the 1994 amendments to the MMPA as
any act of pursuit, torment, or
annoyance which (i) has the potential to
injure a marine mammal or marine
mammal stock in the wild (that is, Level
A Harassment); or (ii) has the potential
to disturb a marine mammal or marine
mammal stock in the wild by causing
disruption of behavioral patterns,
including, but not limited to, migration,
breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering (that is, Level B Harassment).
Where appropriate, the Coast Guard
anticipates requesting a Letter of
Authorization to ‘‘take’’ marine
mammals, defined as Level B
harassment.
Schedule for the Decision-Making
Process
Following the scoping period
announced in this Notice of Intent, and
after consideration of all comments
received during scoping, Coast Guard
will prepare a Draft PEIS for the
acquisition and operation of up to 30
E:\FR\FM\19APN1.SGM
19APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 73 / Monday, April 19, 2021 / Notices
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
WCCs. Once the Draft EIS is completed,
it will be made available for a 45-day
public review and comment period.
Coast Guard will announce the
availability of the Draft EIS in the
Federal Register and local media
outlets. Coast Guard expects the Draft
EIS will be available for public review
and comment in 2021. In meeting CEQ
regulations requiring EISs to be
completed within 2 years the Coast
Guard anticipates the final PEIS would
be available in 2022, which would be
published in the Federal Register.
Should new information become
available after the completion of the
draft or final PEIS, supplemental NEPA
documentation may be prepared in
support of new information or changes
in the Proposed Action considered
under the PEIS.
Public Scoping Process
The Notice of Intent initiates the
scoping process, which guides the
development of a PEIS. The Coast Guard
is seeking comments on the potential
environmental impacts that may result
from the Proposed Action or
preliminary program alternatives. The
PEIS would include, among other
topics, discussions of the purpose and
need for the Proposed Action, a
description of alternatives, a description
of the affected environment, and an
evaluation of the environmental impact
of the Proposed Action and alternatives.
The Coast Guard intends to follow the
CEQ regulations implementing the
NEPA (40 CFR 1500–1508) by scoping
through public comments. Scoping,
which is integral to the process for
implementing NEPA, provides a process
to ensure that (1) issues are identified
early and properly studied; (2) issues of
little significance do not consume
substantial time and effort; (3) the draft
PEIS is thorough and balanced; and (4)
delays caused by an inadequate PEIS are
avoided.
Public scoping is a process for
determining the scope of issues to be
addressed in this PEIS and for
identifying the issues related to the
Proposed Action that may have a
significant effect on the environment.
The scoping process begins with
publication of this notice and ends after
the Coast Guard has:
• Invited the participation of federal,
state, and local agencies, any affected
Indian tribe, and other interested
persons;
• Consulted with affected Federally
Recognized Tribes on a government-togovernment basis, and with affected
Alaska Native corporations, in
accordance with Executive Order 13175
and other policies. Native American
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Apr 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
concerns, including impacts on Indian
trust assets and potential impacts to
cultural resources, will be given
appropriate consideration;
• Determined the scope and the
issues to be analyzed in depth in the
PEIS;
• Indicated any related
environmental assessments or
environmental impact statements that
are not part of the PEIS;
• Identified other relevant
environmental review and consultation
requirements, such as Coastal Zone
Management Act consistency
determinations, and threatened and
endangered species and habitat impacts;
and
• Indicated the relationship between
timing of the environmental review and
other aspects of the application process.
With this Notice of Intent, the Coast
Guard is asking federal, state, and local
agencies with jurisdiction or special
expertise with respect to environmental
issues in the project area to formally
cooperate with us in the preparation of
the PEIS.
Once the scoping process is complete,
the Coast Guard will prepare a draft
PEIS, and will publish a Federal
Register notice announcing its public
availability. The Coast Guard will
provide the public with an opportunity
to review and comment on the draft
PEIS. After the Coast Guard considers
those comments, we will prepare the
final PEIS and similarly announce its
availability, as well as solicit public
review and comment. Comments
received during the draft PEIS review
period will be available in the public
docket.
Public Participation
Pursuant to the CEQ regulations, the
Coast Guard invites public participation
in the NEPA process. This notice
requests public participation in the
scoping process, establishes a public
comment period, and provides
information on how to participate.
The 45-day public scoping period
begins April 27th, 2021 and ends June
11th, 2021. Comments and related
material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 11th, 2021.
The Coast Guard encourages
comments submitted through the
Federal Decision-Making portal at
https://www.regulations.gov, using the
search function for Waterways
Commerce Cutter or by docket number.
If your material cannot be submitted
using https://www.regulations.gov,
contact U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters,
ATTN: LCDR S. Krolman (CG–9327),
2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave. SE,
Stop 7800, Washington DC 20593–7800
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
20379
or Coast Guard at HQS-SMB-CGWaterwaysCommerceCutter@uscg.mil. A
phone message may be left at 202–475–
3104. In your submission, please
include the docket number for this
notice of intent and provide a reason for
each suggestion or recommendation.
The Coast Guard reviews all
comments received but will only post
comments that address the topic of this
notice. The Coast Guard may choose not
to post off-topic, inappropriate, or
duplicate comments that we receive. If
you visit the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or when the
Coast Guard publishes another notice,
such as the meeting notice mentioned
below.
The Coast Guard accepts anonymous
comments. Comments we post to
https://www.regulations.gov will
include any personal information you
have provided. For more about privacy
and the docket, and submissions in
response to this document, see DHS’s
eRulemaking System of Records notice
(85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).
Documents mentioned in this notice of
intent as being available in the docket,
and public comments, will be in our
online docket at https://
www.regulations.gov and can be viewed
by following that website’s instructions.
Public Meeting
Coast Guard does not plan to hold inperson public meetings during the
scoping period due to the ongoing
COVID–19 pandemic; however, the
Coast Guard does plan to host virtual
meetings May 11th and May 12th, 2021.
The times and virtual meeting
registration information will be
announced in a separate notice
published in the Federal Register.
Meeting information will also be posted
on https://www.dcms.uscg.mil/OurOrganization/Assistant-Commandantfor-Engineering-Logistics-CG-4-/
Program-Offices/EnvironmentalManagement/Environmental-Planningand-Historic-Preservation/, no later than
April 27th, 2021.
Dated: April 13, 2021.
Aileen Sedmak,
Waterways Commerce Cutter Program
Manager.
[FR Doc. 2021–07969 Filed 4–16–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\19APN1.SGM
19APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 73 (Monday, April 19, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20376-20379]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-07969]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
[Docket Number USCG-2021-0191]
Waterways Commerce Cutter Acquisition Program; Preparation of a
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (PEIS); notice of virtual public meeting; and request for
comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The United States Coast Guard (Coast Guard), as the lead
agency, announces its intent to prepare a Programmatic Environmental
Impact Statement (PEIS) for the Waterways Commerce Cutter (WCC)
Program's acquisition and operation of up to 30 WCCs. The Coast Guard
has determined that a PEIS is the most appropriate type of National
Environmental Policy Act document for this action because of the scope
and complexity of the proposed acquisition and operation of up to 30
WCCs. Notice is hereby given that the public scoping process has begun
for the preparation of a PEIS that will address the reasonable
alternatives and potential environmental impacts associated with
implementing the Proposed Action. The scoping process solicits public
comments regarding the range of issues, information, and analyses
relevant to the Proposed Action, including potential environmental
impacts and reasonable alternatives to address in the PEIS. Your
comments may cause a change in the scope of the PEIS.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 11th, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2021-0191 using the Federal Decision-Making Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation'' portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further instructions on
submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about this document,
email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This Notice of Intent briefly summarizes the
proposed project, including the purpose and need and possible
alternatives. As required by the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA) and Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) implementing
regulations (40 CFR 1502.3), a Federal agency must prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) if it is proposing a major Federal
action to analyze the environmental consequences of implementing each
of the alternatives, if carried forward for full review following
public scoping, by assessing the effects of each alternative on the
human environment. The Coast Guard has determined that a PEIS is the
most appropriate type of EIS for this action because of the scope and
complexity of the proposed acquisition and operation of up to 30 WCCs.
Abbreviations
ATON Aids to Navigation
AUTEC Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center
CEQ Council on Environmental Quality
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
EIS Environmental Impact Statement
ESA Endangered Species Act
FR Federal Register
GoMEX Gulf of Mexico
ICW Intracoastal Waterway
IW&WR Inland Waterways and Western Rivers
MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act
MMPA Marine Mammal Protection Act
NEPA National Environmental Policy Act
nm nautical miles
PEIS Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement
PNW Pacific Northwest
SEAK Southeast Alaska
U.S.C. United States Code
WCC Waterways Commerce Cutter
WLI WCC inland buoy tenders
WLIC WCC inland construction tenders
WLR WCC river buoy tenders
USEC-MidATL U.S. East Coast Mid-Atlantic
USEC-South U.S. East Coast-South
Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action
The Coast Guard has a statutory mission to establish, maintain, and
operate aids to navigation (ATON) in the Inland Waterways and Western
Rivers (IW&WR). The IW&WR includes the Gulf and Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway (ICW); the Mississippi, Missouri, Alabama, Tennessee,
Columbia, and Ohio Rivers, their associated tributaries and other
connecting waterways; portions of the Alaska Inside Passage; portions
of the Great Lakes; and several other navigable waterways around the
United States. The 35 cutters and associated 27 barges that comprise
the current inland tender fleet servicing the IW&WR are, on average,
more than 54 years old and all have significantly exceeded their design
service life of 30 years. There is no redundant vessel capability
within the Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), or other
government agencies. Without replacement of the current inland tender
fleet, the Coast Guard could face an increasing risk of failure to
maintain the capability to execute its ATON mission and provide timely
ATON services in the IW&WR and other navigable waters around the United
States.
Due to obsolescence, hull limitations, and asset age, service life
extension and modernization efforts are increasingly difficult,
expensive to maintain, and cannot be justified. To maintain the Coast
Guard's vital inland waterways mission and continue to provide a
consistent and reliable presence in the IW&WR, the Coast Guard is
proposing to replace the current aging tender fleet. WCCs would be
designed to replace the
[[Page 20377]]
capabilities of the existing inland fleet; therefore, the purpose of
the Proposed Action is the acquisition and operation of up to 30 WCCs
to replace the capabilities of the current inland tender fleet, thereby
enabling the safe navigation of waters that support the nation's
economy through maritime commerce throughout the Marine Transportation
System.
Preliminary Proposed Action and Alternatives
Coast Guard has identified a proposed action and preliminary
alternatives for potential consideration in the draft EIS. Both a no-
action and several preliminary action alternatives are presented for
consideration for public review and comment. Six proposed action areas
that the WCCs would support have been identified.
(1) The U.S. East Coast Mid-Atlantic (USEC-MidATL) proposed action
area includes state and territorial waters extending 12 nautical miles
(nm; 19 kilometers [km]) from New Jersey (where it borders with New
York) to the border of North Carolina (where it borders with South
Carolina) and also extends into certain inland waterways.
(2) The U.S. East Coast-South (USEC-South), including Florida and
the Bahamas proposed action area includes state and territorial waters
extending 12 nm (19 km) from South Carolina (where it borders with
North Carolina) to Florida (where it borders with Alabama) and extends
to the Florida Keys and Dry Tortugas off the southwest coast of
Florida. This proposed action area also includes inland waterways, such
as the St John's River and the Caloosahatchee River and the Department
of Defense-owned ATON near the Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation
Center (AUTEC) in the Bahamas.
(3) The Great Lakes proposed action area includes waters off
northern Michigan to the border between the United States and Canada.
This proposed action area includes the northern portion of Lake
Michigan extending into St. Mary's River, Munuscong Lake, and Lake
Nicolet. Of note, no oceanic waters are part of the Great Lakes
proposed action area.
(4) The Gulf of Mexico and U.S. Inland States, including the
Mississippi River and its Tributaries, (GoMEX and Mississippi River)
proposed action area includes state and territorial waters extending 12
nm (19 km) from Alabama (where it borders with Florida) to Texas (where
it borders with Mexico). This proposed action area also includes inland
waterways and their tributaries along the Ohio and Tennessee Rivers,
the Cumberland River in Kentucky and Tennessee, Tombigbee River in
Alabama and Mississippi; the Mississippi River in Louisiana,
Mississippi, and Arkansas; and the Ouachita River in Louisiana and
Arkansas.
(5) The Pacific Northwest (PNW) proposed action area includes state
and territorial waters extending 12 nm (19 km) from southern Washington
State to northern Oregon where they border each other along the
Columbia River. The proposed action area includes the Columbia River
from the mouth at the Pacific Ocean to where it joins the Snake River
and ends at the border of Washington and Idaho and also includes a
northern segment of the Willamette River that joins with and the
Columbia River in Oregon. The Pacific Ocean is not a part of the PNW
proposed action area.
(6) The Southeast Alaska (SEAK) proposed action areas includes
state and territorial waters extending 12 nm (19 km) from Baranof and
Prince of Wales Islands and consists primarily of a portion of the
inside passage from Juneau south to Revillagigedo Island. This proposed
action area includes only coastal passages of the Pacific Ocean.
Alternative 1: Replacement of Up to 30 WCCs
Under Alternative 1, the Coast Guard would acquire and operate up
to 30 WCCs with planned design lives of 30 years each to fulfill
mission requirements in the proposed action areas in IW&WR, portions of
the Alaska Inside Passage; portions of the Great Lakes, and several
other navigable waterways around the United States.
Similar to the current fleet's operations, the Alternative 1 would
include vessel operations to establish, operate, and maintain the
lighted and unlighted buoys and beacons to maintain the United States
Visual ATON System. This mission contributes to protecting national
interests by ensuring safe and efficient flow of commercial vessel
traffic through our nation's waters. Although it is expected that the
WCCs, similar to the current inland tender fleet, would be capable of
performing non-ATON missions such as Ports, Waterways and Coastal
Security; Search and Rescue; Marine Environmental Protection; and
Marine Safety, their primary focus would be on the ATON mission.
Full operational capability would be achieved when all planned WCCs
have been produced and are operational. Coast Guard WCC operations and
training would occur after delivery of each WCC from the shipbuilder to
the Coast Guard. For example, the first WCC delivery to the Coast Guard
is expected in 2023 and the cutter would then be operational in 2024.
The last WCC is expected to be delivered and operational in 2030.
The Proposed Action would include WCC operation, maintenance, and
decommissioning of up to 11 WCC construction class (WCC WLIC) tenders
to replace the current capabilities of 13 inland construction tenders
(WLIC); up to 16 WCC River Buoy class (WCC WLR) tenders to replace the
capabilities of the river buoy tenders (WLR); and up to three Inland
Buoy class (WCC WLI) tenders to replace the capabilities of the inland
buoy tenders (WLI). Although there are three classes proposed and
design specifications are not final, the design would maximize
commonality between the three classes to reduce sustainment costs,
training needs, and other associated requirements
The WCC WLIC would be specifically designed for establishing and
replacing fixed ATON and would be equipped with impact and vibratory
pile driving and extraction equipment and spuds. The WCC WLR an WCC WLI
would have capability to deploy and retrieve buoy mooring equipment
from the seabed or riverbed using a water jet system would also be
equipped to move buoys, and move and recover sinkers, chain, wire rope,
synthetic rope, and other materials without a crane.
All WCCs would have the ability to tow one vessel (of equivalent
displacement) in either a side tow or stern tow. Each WCC would also
have the capability to be towed by the bow, pushed ahead from the
stern, and towed alongside from either port or starboard. Vessels would
be towed according to specifications in the Cutter Towing Operations
Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (CGTTP 3-91.15 issued March 2017).
All WCCs would also recover stray, stranded, and scrap buoys.
Vessel performance testing for a WCC would be similar to testing
conducted for the current inland tender fleet. Scheduled maintenance
would likely occur within close proximity to each WCC's homeport;
however, the exact locations of all the homeports for all WCCs are not
known at this time.
Alternative 2, Reduced Acquisition of Coast Guard Owned and Operated
Systems
The Coast Guard would explore hybrid government and contracted
options for mission performance. Ship platforms would meet similar
technical specifications discussed in Alternative 1. Potential
scenarios could include: Contractor-owned (commercial entity funds ship
construction, overhaul and
[[Page 20378]]
maintenance) and government-operated (Coast Guard provides the
personnel); government-owned (government funds ship construction,
overhaul and maintenance) and contractor-operated (a commercial
operating company provides the crew); or contractor-owned and
contractor-operated systems (Coast Guard provides neither platforms or
personnel).
Alternative 3, Mixed Fleet
The mixed fleet solution would be a combination of cutters and
shore-based assets (including ATON team units), electronic ATON, and
contracted ATON services. To accomplish a mixed fleet solution,
additional Coast Guard ATON personnel and teams would be required. To
accommodate the additional ATON teams, existing facilities would
require expansion and construction of new shore based facilities could
be necessary. Use of electronic ATON instead of physical ATON could
also prove necessary.
No Action Alternative
The evaluation of a No Action Alternative is required by the
regulations implementing NEPA. Under the No Action Alternative, the
Coast Guard would fulfill its statutory missions in the IW&WR using the
existing inland tender fleet. The existing assets would continue to
age, causing a decrease in efficiency, increasing operational costs,
and increasing risk of equipment failure or damage due to significant
systems and parts no longer being available.
Summary of Expected Impacts
While the Coast Guard must work toward environmental compliance
during the design and acquisition of WCCs, each vessel is not expected
to impact the environment (biological, physical, or socioeconomic
resources) until it is operational. In addition, vessel construction in
commercial shipyards is not expected to impact any physical or
biological resources.
The three action alternatives being considered would all reduce the
size of the overall fleet. As such, the PEIS analyzes the potential
impact of the range of up to 30 WCCs, as this would be the highest
number projected to be operational in the Coast Guard's proposed action
areas. Acoustic and physical stressors associated with the Proposed
Action may potentially impact the physical and biological environment
in the proposed action areas. Potential acoustic stressors include: The
depth-sounder, navigation system, vessel noise, ATON signal noise, tool
noise, and pile driving noise. Potential physical stressors include:
Vessel movement, bottom disturbance, ground disturbance (removal of
brush), pile driving, debris, and ATON retrieval devices and tow lines.
Since the WCC fleet would service a broad geographic area,
stressors associated with the Proposed Action may potentially impact
physical resources (including air quality, ambient sound, bottom
habitat and sediments, and water quality), biological resources
(including critical habitat), and socioeconomic resources. The PEIS
evaluates the likelihood that a resource would be exposed to or
encounter a stressor and identifies the impact associated with that
exposure or encounter. The likelihood of an exposure or encounter is
based on the stressor, location, and timing relative to the spatial and
temporal distribution each biological resource or critical habitat.
Under the Proposed Action, the depth-sounder, navigation system,
vessel noise, ATON signal noise, tool noise, pile driving noise, vessel
movement, anchoring, spud placement, debris, ATON retrieval devices and
tow lines, and pile driving associated with the Proposed Action are not
expected to result in significant impact to the following resources:
Air quality, ambient sound, bottom habitat and sediments, water
quality, amphibians, aquatic and terrestrial vegetation, birds,
invertebrates, insects, fish, Essential Fish Habitat, reptiles,
terrestrial and marine mammals, commercial fishing, marine
construction, mineral extraction, oil and gas extraction, recreation
and tourism, renewable energy, research, transportation and shipping,
and subsistence fishing and hunting. The Proposed Action may affect,
but is not likely to adversely affect, any Endangered Species Act
(ESA)-listed amphibians, aquatic and terrestrial vegetation, birds,
invertebrates, insects, fish, reptiles, and terrestrial and marine
mammals.
The Proposed Action is not expected to result in the destruction or
adverse modification of federally-designated critical habitat that may
be found in any of the proposed action areas. Pursuant to the Migratory
Bird Treaty Act (MBTA; 16 U.S.C 703-712 et seq.), the Proposed Action
would not result in a significant adverse effect on migratory bird
populations. Pursuant to the Magnuson[hyphen]Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 1801-1882), depth-sounder/
navigation system noise, vessel noise, vessel movement, and pile
driving associated with the Proposed Action would not adversely affect
the quality or quantity of Essential Fish Habitat within the Coast
Guard's proposed action areas.
Anticipated Permits and Authorizations
The Coastal Zone Management Act (16 U.S.C 1451 et seq.) was enacted
to protect the coastal environment from demands associated with
residential, recreational, and commercial uses. The Coast Guard would
determine the impact of the Proposed Action and provide a Coastal
Consistency Determination or Negative Determination to the appropriate
state agency for anticipated concurrence once the homeports are
selected for the WCCs.
The ESA of 1973 (16 U.S.C 1531 et seq.) provides for the
conservation of endangered and threatened species and the ecosystems on
which they depend. The Coast Guard anticipates consulting under Section
7 of the ESA with the services, the National Marine Fisheries Service
and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, that have jurisdiction over the
species (50 CFR 402.14(a)).
The Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA; 16 U.S.C 1361 et seq.)
established, with limited exceptions, a moratorium on the ``taking'' of
marine mammals in waters or on lands under U.S. jurisdiction, and on
the High Seas by vessels or persons under U.S. jurisdiction. The MMPA
further regulates ``takes'' of marine mammals in U.S. waters and by
U.S. citizens on the High Seas. The term ``take,'' as defined in
Section 3 (16 U.S.C. 1362) of the MMPA, means ``to harass, hunt,
capture, or kill, or attempt to harass, hunt, capture, or kill any
marine mammal''. ``Harassment'' was further defined in the 1994
amendments to the MMPA as any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance
which (i) has the potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal
stock in the wild (that is, Level A Harassment); or (ii) has the
potential to disturb a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
by causing disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not
limited to, migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering (that is, Level B Harassment). Where appropriate, the Coast
Guard anticipates requesting a Letter of Authorization to ``take''
marine mammals, defined as Level B harassment.
Schedule for the Decision-Making Process
Following the scoping period announced in this Notice of Intent,
and after consideration of all comments received during scoping, Coast
Guard will prepare a Draft PEIS for the acquisition and operation of up
to 30
[[Page 20379]]
WCCs. Once the Draft EIS is completed, it will be made available for a
45-day public review and comment period. Coast Guard will announce the
availability of the Draft EIS in the Federal Register and local media
outlets. Coast Guard expects the Draft EIS will be available for public
review and comment in 2021. In meeting CEQ regulations requiring EISs
to be completed within 2 years the Coast Guard anticipates the final
PEIS would be available in 2022, which would be published in the
Federal Register. Should new information become available after the
completion of the draft or final PEIS, supplemental NEPA documentation
may be prepared in support of new information or changes in the
Proposed Action considered under the PEIS.
Public Scoping Process
The Notice of Intent initiates the scoping process, which guides
the development of a PEIS. The Coast Guard is seeking comments on the
potential environmental impacts that may result from the Proposed
Action or preliminary program alternatives. The PEIS would include,
among other topics, discussions of the purpose and need for the
Proposed Action, a description of alternatives, a description of the
affected environment, and an evaluation of the environmental impact of
the Proposed Action and alternatives.
The Coast Guard intends to follow the CEQ regulations implementing
the NEPA (40 CFR 1500-1508) by scoping through public comments.
Scoping, which is integral to the process for implementing NEPA,
provides a process to ensure that (1) issues are identified early and
properly studied; (2) issues of little significance do not consume
substantial time and effort; (3) the draft PEIS is thorough and
balanced; and (4) delays caused by an inadequate PEIS are avoided.
Public scoping is a process for determining the scope of issues to
be addressed in this PEIS and for identifying the issues related to the
Proposed Action that may have a significant effect on the environment.
The scoping process begins with publication of this notice and ends
after the Coast Guard has:
Invited the participation of federal, state, and local
agencies, any affected Indian tribe, and other interested persons;
Consulted with affected Federally Recognized Tribes on a
government-to-government basis, and with affected Alaska Native
corporations, in accordance with Executive Order 13175 and other
policies. Native American concerns, including impacts on Indian trust
assets and potential impacts to cultural resources, will be given
appropriate consideration;
Determined the scope and the issues to be analyzed in
depth in the PEIS;
Indicated any related environmental assessments or
environmental impact statements that are not part of the PEIS;
Identified other relevant environmental review and
consultation requirements, such as Coastal Zone Management Act
consistency determinations, and threatened and endangered species and
habitat impacts; and
Indicated the relationship between timing of the
environmental review and other aspects of the application process.
With this Notice of Intent, the Coast Guard is asking federal,
state, and local agencies with jurisdiction or special expertise with
respect to environmental issues in the project area to formally
cooperate with us in the preparation of the PEIS.
Once the scoping process is complete, the Coast Guard will prepare
a draft PEIS, and will publish a Federal Register notice announcing its
public availability. The Coast Guard will provide the public with an
opportunity to review and comment on the draft PEIS. After the Coast
Guard considers those comments, we will prepare the final PEIS and
similarly announce its availability, as well as solicit public review
and comment. Comments received during the draft PEIS review period will
be available in the public docket.
Public Participation
Pursuant to the CEQ regulations, the Coast Guard invites public
participation in the NEPA process. This notice requests public
participation in the scoping process, establishes a public comment
period, and provides information on how to participate.
The 45-day public scoping period begins April 27th, 2021 and ends
June 11th, 2021. Comments and related material must be received by the
Coast Guard on or before June 11th, 2021.
The Coast Guard encourages comments submitted through the Federal
Decision-Making portal at https://www.regulations.gov, using the search
function for Waterways Commerce Cutter or by docket number. If your
material cannot be submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact
U.S. Coast Guard Headquarters, ATTN: LCDR S. Krolman (CG-9327), 2703
Martin Luther King Jr. Ave. SE, Stop 7800, Washington DC 20593-7800 or
Coast Guard at [email protected]. A phone
message may be left at 202-475-3104. In your submission, please include
the docket number for this notice of intent and provide a reason for
each suggestion or recommendation.
The Coast Guard reviews all comments received but will only post
comments that address the topic of this notice. The Coast Guard may
choose not to post off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that
we receive. If you visit the online docket and sign up for email
alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or when the Coast
Guard publishes another notice, such as the meeting notice mentioned
below.
The Coast Guard accepts anonymous comments. Comments we post to
https://www.regulations.gov will include any personal information you
have provided. For more about privacy and the docket, and submissions
in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking System of Records
notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020). Documents mentioned in this
notice of intent as being available in the docket, and public comments,
will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be
viewed by following that website's instructions.
Public Meeting
Coast Guard does not plan to hold in-person public meetings during
the scoping period due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic; however, the
Coast Guard does plan to host virtual meetings May 11th and May 12th,
2021. The times and virtual meeting registration information will be
announced in a separate notice published in the Federal Register.
Meeting information will also be posted on https://www.dcms.uscg.mil/Our-Organization/Assistant-Commandant-for-Engineering-Logistics-CG-4-/Program-Offices/Environmental-Management/Environmental-Planning-and-Historic-Preservation/, no later than April 27th, 2021.
Dated: April 13, 2021.
Aileen Sedmak,
Waterways Commerce Cutter Program Manager.
[FR Doc. 2021-07969 Filed 4-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P