General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation; Remove Office of General Counsel Review for Final Payments, 20359-20360 [2021-07817]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 73 / Monday, April 19, 2021 / Proposed Rules
submitted, and the emissions from
federal agency actions are essentially
considered to not be limited.
IV. The EPA’s Proposed Action
For the reasons explained in Section
III, we are proposing to approve the
LMP for the Butte NAA and the State’s
request to redesignate the Butte NAA
from nonattainment to attainment for
the 1987 24-hour PM10 NAAQS.
Additionally, the EPA is proposing to
determine that the Butte NAA has
attained the NAAQS for PM10. This
determination is based upon monitored
air quality data for the PM10 NAAQS
during the years 2014–2018. The EPA is
proposing to approve the Butte LMP as
meeting the appropriate transportation
conformity requirements found in 40
CFR part 93, subpart A.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely proposes to approve state law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Apr 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the proposed rule does
not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Greenhouse gases, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur
oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, National parks, and
Wilderness areas.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: April 8, 2021.
Debra H. Thomas,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2021–07793 Filed 4–16–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Part 532
[GSAR Case 2020–G521; Docket No. 2021–
0008; Sequence No. 1]
RIN 3090–AK35
General Services Administration
Acquisition Regulation; Remove Office
of General Counsel Review for Final
Payments
Office of Acquisition Policy,
General Services Administration (GSA).
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ACTION:
20359
Proposed rule.
GSA is proposing to amend
the General Services Administration
Acquisition Regulation (GSAR) to revise
internal agency approval procedures for
processing a final payment for
construction and building service
contracts where, after 60 days, a
contracting officer is unable to obtain a
release of claims from a contractor.
DATES: Interested parties should submit
written comments to the Regulatory
Secretariat Division at the address
shown below on or before June 18, 2021
to be considered in the formation of the
final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in
response to GSAR Case 2020–G521 to:
Regulations.gov: https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit comments
via the Federal eRulemaking portal by
searching for ‘‘GSAR Case 2020–G521’’.
Select the link ‘‘Comment Now’’ that
corresponds with GSAR Case 2020–
G521. Follow the instructions provided
at the ‘‘Comment Now’’ screen. Please
include your name, company name (if
any), and ‘‘GSAR Case 2020–G521’’ on
your attached document. If your
comment cannot be submitted using
https://www.regulations.gov, call or
email the points of contact in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document for alternate instructions.
Instructions: Please submit comments
only and cite GSAR Case 2020–G521 in
all correspondence related to this case.
Comments received generally will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal and/or business confidential
information provided. To confirm
receipt of your comment(s), please
check https://www.regulations.gov
approximately two to three days after
submission to verify posting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Logan Kemp, GSA Acquisition Policy
Division, at 202–969–4066 or by email
at gsarpolicy@gsa.gov, for clarification
of content. For information pertaining to
status or publication schedules, contact
the Regulatory Secretariat Division at
202–501–4755 or GSARegSec@gsa.gov.
Please cite GSAR Case 2020–G521.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
GSA is proposing to amend the
General Services Administration
Regulations (GSAR) to modify GSAR
532.905–70 so it no longer requires
contracting officers to obtain approval of
legal counsel before processing final
payments for construction and building
service contracts where, after 60 days,
the contracting officer is unable to
E:\FR\FM\19APP1.SGM
19APP1
20360
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 73 / Monday, April 19, 2021 / Proposed Rules
obtain a release of claims from the
contractors. Legal review is not a
statutory requirement, and the decision
to process final payments in such cases
is a business decision, rather than a
legal one.
II. Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 40 of the United States Code
(U.S.C.) Section 121 authorizes GSA to
issue regulations, including the GSAR,
to control the relationship between GSA
and contractors.
III. Discussion and Analysis
Prior to this rule, GSA guidance on
final payments for construction and
building service contracts provided that,
‘‘in cases where, after 60 days from the
initial attempt, the contracting officer is
unable to obtain a release of claims from
the contractor, the final payment may be
processed with the approval of assigned
legal counsel.’’ GSA is proposing to
amend GSAR 532.905–70(c) by
removing the legal approval
requirement because this is a business
decision to be made by the contracting
officer, not a legal decision. Therefore,
if there is implementation of this
proposed rule, a contracting officer may
instead process a final payment in such
a situation after documenting in the
contract file: (i) That the contracting
officer requested a release of claims
from the contractor and did not receive
a response within 60 calendar days; and
(ii) approval to process the final
payment from one level above the
contracting officer.
IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:42 Apr 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This rule has been reviewed
and determined by Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) not to
be a significant regulatory action and,
therefore, was not subject to review
under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, dated
September 30, 1993.
V. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as amended by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a ‘‘major rule’’ may take
effect, the agency promulgating the rule
must submit a rule report, which
includes a copy of the rule, to each
House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United
States. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
Federal Register. This rule has been
reviewed and determined by OMB not
to be a ‘‘major rule’’ under 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
GSA does not expect this proposed
rule to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities within the meaning of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601,
et seq.
Therefore, an Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis has not been
performed. GSA invites comments from
small business concerns and other
interested parties on the expected
impact of this rule on small entities.
GSA will also consider comments
from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected
by the rule in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5
U.S.C. 610 (GSAR Case 2020–G521), in
correspondence.
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain any
information collection requirements that
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 35,
et seq.).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 532
Government procurement.
Jeffrey A. Koses,
Senior Procurement Executive, Office of
Acquisition Policy, Office of Governmentwide Policy, General Services Administration.
Therefore, GSA proposes to amend 48
CFR part 532 as set forth below:
PART 532—CONTRACT FINANCING
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
part 532 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c).
2. Amend section 532.905–70 by—
a. Removing from paragraph (a)
‘‘amount due the Contractor’’ and
adding ‘‘amount due to the contractor’’
in its place;
■ b. Revising paragraph (b); and
■ c. Removing paragraphs (c) and (d).
The revision reads as follows:
■
■
532.905–70 Final payment—construction
and building service contracts.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) A contracting officer may only
process the final payment for a
construction or building service contract
once:
(1) The contractor submits a properly
executed GSA Form 1142, Release of
Claims; or
(2) The contracting officer documents
in the contract file:
(i) That the contracting officer
requested a release of claims from the
contractor and did not receive a
response within 60 calendar days; and
(ii) Approval to process the final
payment from one level above the
contracting officer.
[FR Doc. 2021–07817 Filed 4–16–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–61–P
E:\FR\FM\19APP1.SGM
19APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 73 (Monday, April 19, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 20359-20360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-07817]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Part 532
[GSAR Case 2020-G521; Docket No. 2021-0008; Sequence No. 1]
RIN 3090-AK35
General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation; Remove
Office of General Counsel Review for Final Payments
AGENCY: Office of Acquisition Policy, General Services Administration
(GSA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: GSA is proposing to amend the General Services Administration
Acquisition Regulation (GSAR) to revise internal agency approval
procedures for processing a final payment for construction and building
service contracts where, after 60 days, a contracting officer is unable
to obtain a release of claims from a contractor.
DATES: Interested parties should submit written comments to the
Regulatory Secretariat Division at the address shown below on or before
June 18, 2021 to be considered in the formation of the final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in response to GSAR Case 2020-G521 to:
Regulations.gov: https://www.regulations.gov. Submit comments via the
Federal eRulemaking portal by searching for ``GSAR Case 2020-G521''.
Select the link ``Comment Now'' that corresponds with GSAR Case 2020-
G521. Follow the instructions provided at the ``Comment Now'' screen.
Please include your name, company name (if any), and ``GSAR Case 2020-
G521'' on your attached document. If your comment cannot be submitted
using https://www.regulations.gov, call or email the points of contact
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
Instructions: Please submit comments only and cite GSAR Case 2020-
G521 in all correspondence related to this case. Comments received
generally will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal and/or business confidential information
provided. To confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check https://www.regulations.gov approximately two to three days after submission to
verify posting.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Logan Kemp, GSA Acquisition Policy
Division, at 202-969-4066 or by email at [email protected], for
clarification of content. For information pertaining to status or
publication schedules, contact the Regulatory Secretariat Division at
202-501-4755 or [email protected]. Please cite GSAR Case 2020-G521.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
GSA is proposing to amend the General Services Administration
Regulations (GSAR) to modify GSAR 532.905-70 so it no longer requires
contracting officers to obtain approval of legal counsel before
processing final payments for construction and building service
contracts where, after 60 days, the contracting officer is unable to
[[Page 20360]]
obtain a release of claims from the contractors. Legal review is not a
statutory requirement, and the decision to process final payments in
such cases is a business decision, rather than a legal one.
II. Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 40 of the United States Code (U.S.C.) Section 121 authorizes
GSA to issue regulations, including the GSAR, to control the
relationship between GSA and contractors.
III. Discussion and Analysis
Prior to this rule, GSA guidance on final payments for construction
and building service contracts provided that, ``in cases where, after
60 days from the initial attempt, the contracting officer is unable to
obtain a release of claims from the contractor, the final payment may
be processed with the approval of assigned legal counsel.'' GSA is
proposing to amend GSAR 532.905-70(c) by removing the legal approval
requirement because this is a business decision to be made by the
contracting officer, not a legal decision. Therefore, if there is
implementation of this proposed rule, a contracting officer may instead
process a final payment in such a situation after documenting in the
contract file: (i) That the contracting officer requested a release of
claims from the contractor and did not receive a response within 60
calendar days; and (ii) approval to process the final payment from one
level above the contracting officer.
IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This rule has been reviewed and determined by Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) not to be a significant regulatory action and, therefore,
was not subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, dated September 30, 1993.
V. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as amended by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a ``major rule'' may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes
a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United States. A major rule cannot take
effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register.
This rule has been reviewed and determined by OMB not to be a ``major
rule'' under 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
GSA does not expect this proposed rule to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the
meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.
Therefore, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has not been
performed. GSA invites comments from small business concerns and other
interested parties on the expected impact of this rule on small
entities.
GSA will also consider comments from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected by the rule in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such comments
separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (GSAR Case 2020-G521), in
correspondence.
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 35, et seq.).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 532
Government procurement.
Jeffrey A. Koses,
Senior Procurement Executive, Office of Acquisition Policy, Office of
Government-wide Policy, General Services Administration.
Therefore, GSA proposes to amend 48 CFR part 532 as set forth
below:
PART 532--CONTRACT FINANCING
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 532 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c).
0
2. Amend section 532.905-70 by--
0
a. Removing from paragraph (a) ``amount due the Contractor'' and adding
``amount due to the contractor'' in its place;
0
b. Revising paragraph (b); and
0
c. Removing paragraphs (c) and (d).
The revision reads as follows:
532.905-70 Final payment--construction and building service
contracts.
* * * * *
(b) A contracting officer may only process the final payment for a
construction or building service contract once:
(1) The contractor submits a properly executed GSA Form 1142,
Release of Claims; or
(2) The contracting officer documents in the contract file:
(i) That the contracting officer requested a release of claims from
the contractor and did not receive a response within 60 calendar days;
and
(ii) Approval to process the final payment from one level above the
contracting officer.
[FR Doc. 2021-07817 Filed 4-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-61-P