Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993-R Consortium, Inc., 18323 [2021-07245]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 66 / Thursday, April 8, 2021 / Notices
decree against that case.’’ Microsoft, 56
F.3d at 1459; see also U.S. Airways, 38
F. Supp. 3d at 75 (noting that the court
must simply determine whether there is
a factual foundation for the
government’s decisions such that its
conclusions regarding the proposed
settlements are reasonable); InBev, 2009
U.S. Dist. LEXIS 84787, at *20 (‘‘[T]he
‘public interest’ is not to be measured by
comparing the violations alleged in the
complaint against those the court
believes could have, or even should
have, been alleged’’). Because the
‘‘court’s authority to review the decree
depends entirely on the government’s
exercising its prosecutorial discretion by
bringing a case in the first place,’’ it
follows that ‘‘the court is only
authorized to review the decree itself,’’
and not to ‘‘effectively redraft the
complaint’’ to inquire into other matters
that the United States did not pursue.
Microsoft, 56 F.3d at 1459–60.
In its 2004 amendments to the APPA,
Congress made clear its intent to
can make its public interest
determination based on the competitive
impact statement and response to public
comments alone.’’ U.S. Airways, 38 F.
Supp. 3d at 76 (citing Enova Corp., 107
F. Supp. 2d at 17).
VIII. Determinative Documents
There are no determinative materials
or documents within the meaning of the
APPA that were considered by the
United States in formulating the
proposed Final Judgment.
Dated: April 2, 2021
Respectfully submitted,
For Plaintiff United States of America:
lllllllllllllllllllll
Gabriella R. Moskowitz, (D.C. Bar #1044309),
Defense, Industrials, and Aerospace Section,
Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of
Justice, 450 Fifth Street NW, Suite 8700,
Washington, DC 20530, Telephone: (202)
598–8885, gabriella.moskowitz@usdoj.gov
Appendix A: Areas for Which the
Notice Provision in Paragraph XII(A) of
the Proposed Final Judgment Applies
Geographic market
Counties within geographic market
Birmingham, Alabama .............................
Chattanooga, Tennessee and North
Georgia.
Jefferson and Shelby Counties .............................................
Hamilton, Marion, Rhea, and Sequatchie Counties in Tennessee; and Catoosa, Chattooga, Dade, Gordon, Murray,
and Walker Counties in Georgia.
Montgomery County (limited to zip codes 77357, 77365,
and 77372).
Franklin and Lincoln Counties ...............................................
MSW Disposal.
Forrest and Jones Counties ..................................................
SCCW Collection.
Eastern Montgomery County, Texas ......
Estill Springs and Fayetteville, Tennessee.
Hattiesburg, Mississippi ..........................
[FR Doc. 2021–07224 Filed 4–7–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—R Consortium, Inc.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
preserve the practical benefits of using
judgments proposed by the United
States in antitrust enforcement, Public
Law 108–237 § 221, and added the
unambiguous instruction that ‘‘[n]othing
in this section shall be construed to
require the court to conduct an
evidentiary hearing or to require the
court to permit anyone to intervene.’’ 15
U.S.C. 16(e)(2); see also U.S. Airways,
38 F. Supp. 3d at 76 (indicating that a
court is not required to hold an
evidentiary hearing or to permit
intervenors as part of its review under
the Tunney Act). This language
explicitly wrote into the statute what
Congress intended when it first enacted
the Tunney Act in 1974. As Senator
Tunney explained: ‘‘[t]he court is
nowhere compelled to go to trial or to
engage in extended proceedings which
might have the effect of vitiating the
benefits of prompt and less costly
settlement through the consent decree
process.’’ 119 Cong. Rec. 24,598 (1973)
(statement of Sen. Tunney). ‘‘A court
Notice is hereby given that, on March
22, 2021, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), R Consortium, Inc.
(‘‘R Consortium’’) has filed written
notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing changes in its
membership. The notifications were
filed for the purpose of extending the
Act’s provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, GlaxoSmithKline USA,
Research Triangle Park, NC, has been
added as a party to this venture.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Apr 07, 2021
Jkt 253001
No other changes have been made in
either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project.
Membership in this group research
project remains open, and R Consortium
intends to file additional written
notifications disclosing all changes in
membership.
On September 15, 2015, R Consortium
filed its original notification pursuant to
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department
of Justice published a notice in the
Federal Register pursuant to Section
6(b) of the Act on October 2, 2015 (80
FR 59815).
The last notification was filed with
the Department on December 28, 2020.
A notice was published in the Federal
Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the
Act on January 13, 2021 (86 FR 2698).
Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics,
Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2021–07245 Filed 4–7–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–11–P
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18323
Relevant service
SCCW Collection.
MSW Disposal and SCCW Collection.
SCCW Collection.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—The National Advanced
Mobility Consortium, Inc. (Formerly
Known as The Robotics Technology
Consortium)
Notice is hereby given that, on March
18, 2021, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the
National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301
et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), The National
Advanced Mobility Consortium, Inc.
(‘‘NAMC’’) has filed written
notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade
Commission disclosing changes in its
membership. On February 3, 2015, the
RTC officially changed its name to
NAMC. The notifications were filed for
the purpose of extending the Act’s
provisions limiting the recovery of
antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages
under specified circumstances.
Specifically, 3-Dimensional Services
E:\FR\FM\08APN1.SGM
08APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 66 (Thursday, April 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 18323]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-07245]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and
Production Act of 1993--R Consortium, Inc.
Notice is hereby given that, on March 22, 2021, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), R Consortium, Inc. (``R
Consortium'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
Specifically, GlaxoSmithKline USA, Research Triangle Park, NC, has been
added as a party to this venture.
No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group
research project remains open, and R Consortium intends to file
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
On September 15, 2015, R Consortium filed its original notification
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of
the Act on October 2, 2015 (80 FR 59815).
The last notification was filed with the Department on December 28,
2020. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to
Section 6(b) of the Act on January 13, 2021 (86 FR 2698).
Suzanne Morris,
Chief, Premerger and Division Statistics, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2021-07245 Filed 4-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-P