Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (AHD) Helicopters, 18221-18223 [2021-07127]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 66 / Thursday, April 8, 2021 / Proposed Rules
operational check fails, before next flight
involving a hoist operation, repair in
accordance with FAA-approved procedures
or replace the hoist.
(D) 2,200 hours TIS or 111 hoist operating
hours, whichever occurs first, perform a
functional check of the cable cutter cartridge
electrical system to inspect for correct
functioning of the cable cutter switches (hoist
pendant, pilot cyclic, and copilot cyclic) and
associated wiring. If a functional check fails,
before next flight involving a hoist operation,
repair in accordance with FAA-approved
procedures or replace the hoist.
(E) 111 hoist operating hours, overhaul or
replace the hoist.
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, International Validation
Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the International Validation
Branch, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (i)(1) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-AVS-AIR730-AMOC@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
(i) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Matt Fuller, AD Program Manager,
General Aviation & Rotorcraft Unit,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational
Safety Branch, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy.,
Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone (817) 222–
5110; email matthew.fuller@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Bell Textron Canada
Limited, 12,800 Rue de l’Avenir, Mirabel,
Quebec J7J1R4; telephone (450) 437–2862 or
(800) 363–8023; fax (450) 433–0272; or at
https://www.bellcustomer.com. You may
review this referenced service information at
the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy.,
Room 6N–321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (817) 222–5110.
(3) The subject of this AD is addressed in
Transport Canada AD CF–2017–16, dated
May 17, 2017. You may view the Transport
Canada AD on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov in the AD Docket.
Issued on April 2, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–07184 Filed 4–7–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:26 Apr 07, 2021
Jkt 253001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2021–0265; Project
Identifier MCAI–2020–01541–R]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (AHD)
Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH
(AHD) Model MBB–BK117 C–2 and
MBB–BK117 D–2 helicopters. This
proposed AD was prompted by a report
of increased control force in the
collective axis. This proposed AD
would require repetitive visual
inspections of the main rotor actuator
(MRA), as specified in a European
Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
AD, which is proposed for incorporation
by reference (IBR). The FAA is
proposing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by May 24, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For material that is proposed for IBR
in this AD, contact the EASA, KonradAdenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne,
Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000;
email ADs@easa.europa.eu; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
material on the EASA website at https://
ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this
material at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N–321,
Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call (817) 222–5110. It is also
available in the AD docket on the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18221
internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2021–0265.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2021–
0265; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this NPRM, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Katherine Venegas, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Los Angeles ACO Branch,
FAA, 3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood,
California 90712; telephone (562) 627–
5353; email katherine.venegas@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send
your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2021–0265; Project Identifier
MCAI–2020–01541–R’’ at the beginning
of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of
the proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. The FAA will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend this proposal
because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this proposal.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this NPRM
contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated
as private, that you actually treat as
private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this NPRM, it is important
that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each
E:\FR\FM\08APP1.SGM
08APP1
18222
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 66 / Thursday, April 8, 2021 / Proposed Rules
page of your submission containing CBI
as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such
marked submissions as confidential
under the FOIA, and they will not be
placed in the public docket of this
NPRM. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to Katherine Venegas,
Aviation Safety Engineer, Los Angeles
ACO Branch, FAA, 3960 Paramount
Blvd., Lakewood, California 90712;
telephone (562) 627–5353; email
katherine.venegas@faa.gov. Any
commentary that the FAA receives that
is not specifically designated as CBI will
be placed in the public docket for this
rulemaking.
information and determining the unsafe
condition described previously is likely
to exist or develop in other products of
these same type designs.
Discussion
The EASA, which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD
2018–0283, dated December 20, 2018
(EASA AD 2018–0283), to correct an
unsafe condition for AHD Model MBB–
BK117 C–2 and MBB–BK117 D–2
helicopters. EASA later issued EASA
AD 2020–0257, dated November 17,
2020 (EASA AD 2020–0257), to
supersede EASA AD 2018–0283.
This proposed AD was prompted by
a report of increased control force in the
collective axis on an AHD Model EC135
helicopter. Subsequent inspections
determined that a nut on a piston of the
MRA had cracked and separated from
the piston rod. Due to design similarity,
Model MBB–BK117 C–2 and MBB–
BK117 D–2 helicopters are also affected
by this unsafe condition. The FAA is
proposing this AD to prevent failure of
the MRA and subsequent loss of control
of the helicopter. See the EASA AD for
additional background information.
Explanation of Required Compliance
Information
In the FAA’s ongoing efforts to
improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA initially worked with
Airbus and EASA to develop a process
to use certain EASA ADs as the primary
source of information for compliance
with requirements for corresponding
FAA ADs. The FAA has since
coordinated with other manufacturers
and civil aviation authorities (CAAs) to
use this process. As a result, EASA AD
2020–0257 will be incorporated by
reference in the FAA final rule. This
proposed AD would, therefore, require
compliance with EASA AD 2020–0257
in its entirety, through that
incorporation, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this proposed AD.
Using common terms that are the same
as the heading of a particular section in
the EASA AD does not mean that
operators need comply only with that
section. For example, where the AD
requirement refers to ‘‘all required
actions and compliance times,’’
compliance with this AD requirement is
not limited to the section titled
‘‘Required Action(s) and Compliance
Time(s)’’ in the EASA AD. Service
information specified in EASA AD
2020–0257 that is required for
compliance with EASA AD 2020–0257
will be available on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2021–0265 after the FAA final
rule is published.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
EASA AD 2020–0257 describes
procedures for a repetitive visual
inspection of the MRA and depending
on the results, replacing the affected
parts.
This material is reasonably available
because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course
of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
These products have been approved
by the aviation authority of another
country, and are approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to the
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, the FAA has been
notified of the unsafe condition
described in the EASA AD referenced
above. The FAA is proposing this AD
after evaluating all the relevant
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:26 Apr 07, 2021
Jkt 253001
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
EASA AD 2020–0257 described
previously, as incorporated by
reference, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this proposed AD and
except as discussed under ‘‘Differences
Between this Proposed AD and the
EASA AD.’’
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the EASA AD
The EASA AD requires contacting
Airbus Helicopters or replacing an
affected part, whereas this proposed AD
would require performing the corrective
action in accordance with FAAapproved procedures or removing the
affected parts from service instead. The
service information referenced in the
EASA AD refers to calendar time when
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
specifying the compliance time for the
inspections, whereas this proposed AD
uses hours time-in-service. The EASA
AD allows a tolerance to the compliance
times, whereas this proposed AD would
not. The EASA AD does not specify a
compliance time for the reporting
requirements; this proposed AD would
require performing the reporting action
within 30 days after the effective date of
this AD.
Interim Action
The FAA considers this proposed AD
interim action. If final action is later
identified, the FAA might consider
further rulemaking then.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD
affects 216 helicopters of U.S. Registry.
Labor rates are estimated at $85 per
work-hour. Based on these numbers, the
FAA estimates that operators may incur
the following costs in order to comply
with this proposed AD.
Inspecting the nuts on the MRA
pistons would take about 1 work-hour
for an estimated cost of $85 per
helicopter and $18,360 for the U.S. fleet,
per inspection cycle.
Replacing the MRA would take about
7 work-hours and parts would cost
$286,554 for an estimated cost of
$287,149 per helicopter.
Repairing the MRA would take up to
about 8 work hours and parts would
cost about $110 for an estimated cost of
up to $790 per MRA.
If required, reporting information
would take about 1 work-hour for an
estimated cost of $85 per instance.
Paperwork Reduction Act
A federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, nor shall a person be subject
to penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a current valid
OMB control number. The control
number for the collection of information
required by this proposed AD is 2120–
0056. The paperwork cost associated
with this proposed AD has been
detailed in the Costs of Compliance
section of this document and includes
time for reviewing instructions, as well
as completing and reviewing the
collection of information. Therefore, all
reporting associated with this proposed
AD is mandatory. Comments concerning
the accuracy of this burden and
suggestions for reducing the burden
should be directed to Information
Collection Clearance Officer, Federal
Aviation Administration, 10101
E:\FR\FM\08APP1.SGM
08APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 66 / Thursday, April 8, 2021 / Proposed Rules
§ 39.13
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX
76177–1524.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: General requirements. Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:26 Apr 07, 2021
Jkt 253001
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH
(AHD): Docket No. FAA–2021–0265;
Project Identifier MCAI–2020–01541–R.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments by May
24, 2021.
(b) Affected Airworthiness Directives (ADs)
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Airbus Helicopters
Deutschland GmbH (AHD) Model MBB–
BK117 C–2 and MBB–BK117 D–2
helicopters, certificated in any category.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)
Code: 6710, Main Rotor Control.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a report of
increased control force in the collective axis.
The FAA is issuing this AD to prevent failure
of the main rotor actuator and subsequent
loss of control of the helicopter.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this
AD: Comply with all required actions and
compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2020–0257, dated
November 17, 2020 (EASA AD 2020–0257).
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2020–0257
(1) Where EASA AD 2020–0257 refers to its
effective date, this AD requires using the
effective date of this AD.
(2) Where Note 1 of EASA AD 2020–0257
specifies a tolerance of 3 months may be
applied to the initial threshold and to the
repetitive inspection interval, this AD does
not allow this tolerance.
(3) Where paragraph (2) of EASA AD 2020–
0257 specifies contacting Airbus Helicopters,
this AD requires performing the corrective
action in accordance with FAA-approved
procedures.
(4) Where paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2020–
0257 specifies an alternative method to
comply with the requirements of paragraph
(2) of EASA AD 2020–0257 by replacing an
affected part, this AD requires removing an
affected part from service as an alternative
method.
(5) Where paragraph (1) of EASA AD 2020–
0257 specifies a compliance time for the
initial inspection of ‘‘before an affected part
exceeds 12 months since new, or since last
overhaul, or within 3 months after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later’’ and repetitive inspections at intervals
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18223
not to exceed 12 months, this AD requires a
compliance time for the initial inspection of
before an affected part exceeds 319 total
hours time-in-service (TIS), or within 319
hours TIS after the date of the last overhaul,
or within 80 hours TIS after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs later, and
repetitive inspections at intervals not to
exceed 319 hours TIS.
(6) Although the service information
referenced in EASA AD 2020–0257 does not
specify a compliance time for the reporting
requirement, this AD requires the reporting
action to be performed within 30 days after
the effective date of this AD.
(7) The ‘‘Remarks’’ section of EASA AD
2020–0257 does not apply to this AD.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, International Validation
Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the International Validation
Branch, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (j)(2) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-AVS-AIR730-AMOC@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(j) Related Information
(1) For EASA AD 2020–0257, contact the
EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668
Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999
000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://
ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this
material at the FAA, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood
Pkwy., Room 6N–321, Fort Worth, TX 76177.
For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 817–222–5110. This
material may be found in the AD docket on
the internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2021–0265.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Katherine Venegas, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA,
3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, California
90712; telephone (562) 627–5353; email
katherine.venegas@faa.gov.
Issued on April 1, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–07127 Filed 4–7–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
E:\FR\FM\08APP1.SGM
08APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 66 (Thursday, April 8, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18221-18223]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-07127]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2021-0265; Project Identifier MCAI-2020-01541-R]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH
(AHD) Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (AHD) Model MBB-BK117 C-2 and
MBB-BK117 D-2 helicopters. This proposed AD was prompted by a report of
increased control force in the collective axis. This proposed AD would
require repetitive visual inspections of the main rotor actuator (MRA),
as specified in a European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD,
which is proposed for incorporation by reference (IBR). The FAA is
proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 24,
2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For material that is proposed for IBR in this AD, contact the EASA,
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999
000; email [email protected]; internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may
find this material on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu.
You may view this material at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321, Fort Worth, TX
76177. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call (817) 222-5110. It is also available in the AD docket on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2021-0265.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-
0265; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for Docket Operations is listed above. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine Venegas, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, 3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood,
California 90712; telephone (562) 627-5353; email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2021-0265; Project Identifier
MCAI-2020-01541-R'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposal because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this proposal.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each
[[Page 18222]]
page of your submission containing CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will
treat such marked submissions as confidential under the FOIA, and they
will not be placed in the public docket of this NPRM. Submissions
containing CBI should be sent to Katherine Venegas, Aviation Safety
Engineer, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, 3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood,
California 90712; telephone (562) 627-5353; email
[email protected]. Any commentary that the FAA receives that is
not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket
for this rulemaking.
Discussion
The EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2018-0283, dated December 20, 2018
(EASA AD 2018-0283), to correct an unsafe condition for AHD Model MBB-
BK117 C-2 and MBB-BK117 D-2 helicopters. EASA later issued EASA AD
2020-0257, dated November 17, 2020 (EASA AD 2020-0257), to supersede
EASA AD 2018-0283.
This proposed AD was prompted by a report of increased control
force in the collective axis on an AHD Model EC135 helicopter.
Subsequent inspections determined that a nut on a piston of the MRA had
cracked and separated from the piston rod. Due to design similarity,
Model MBB-BK117 C-2 and MBB-BK117 D-2 helicopters are also affected by
this unsafe condition. The FAA is proposing this AD to prevent failure
of the MRA and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. See the
EASA AD for additional background information.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
EASA AD 2020-0257 describes procedures for a repetitive visual
inspection of the MRA and depending on the results, replacing the
affected parts.
This material is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
These products have been approved by the aviation authority of
another country, and are approved for operation in the United States.
Pursuant to the bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority,
the FAA has been notified of the unsafe condition described in the EASA
AD referenced above. The FAA is proposing this AD after evaluating all
the relevant information and determining the unsafe condition described
previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of these
same type designs.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in EASA AD 2020-0257 described previously, as incorporated by
reference, except for any differences identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this proposed AD and except as discussed under
``Differences Between this Proposed AD and the EASA AD.''
Explanation of Required Compliance Information
In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA initially worked with Airbus and EASA to develop a
process to use certain EASA ADs as the primary source of information
for compliance with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has
since coordinated with other manufacturers and civil aviation
authorities (CAAs) to use this process. As a result, EASA AD 2020-0257
will be incorporated by reference in the FAA final rule. This proposed
AD would, therefore, require compliance with EASA AD 2020-0257 in its
entirety, through that incorporation, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this proposed AD.
Using common terms that are the same as the heading of a particular
section in the EASA AD does not mean that operators need comply only
with that section. For example, where the AD requirement refers to
``all required actions and compliance times,'' compliance with this AD
requirement is not limited to the section titled ``Required Action(s)
and Compliance Time(s)'' in the EASA AD. Service information specified
in EASA AD 2020-0257 that is required for compliance with EASA AD 2020-
0257 will be available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0265 after the FAA
final rule is published.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the EASA AD
The EASA AD requires contacting Airbus Helicopters or replacing an
affected part, whereas this proposed AD would require performing the
corrective action in accordance with FAA-approved procedures or
removing the affected parts from service instead. The service
information referenced in the EASA AD refers to calendar time when
specifying the compliance time for the inspections, whereas this
proposed AD uses hours time-in-service. The EASA AD allows a tolerance
to the compliance times, whereas this proposed AD would not. The EASA
AD does not specify a compliance time for the reporting requirements;
this proposed AD would require performing the reporting action within
30 days after the effective date of this AD.
Interim Action
The FAA considers this proposed AD interim action. If final action
is later identified, the FAA might consider further rulemaking then.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD affects 216 helicopters of U.S.
Registry. Labor rates are estimated at $85 per work-hour. Based on
these numbers, the FAA estimates that operators may incur the following
costs in order to comply with this proposed AD.
Inspecting the nuts on the MRA pistons would take about 1 work-hour
for an estimated cost of $85 per helicopter and $18,360 for the U.S.
fleet, per inspection cycle.
Replacing the MRA would take about 7 work-hours and parts would
cost $286,554 for an estimated cost of $287,149 per helicopter.
Repairing the MRA would take up to about 8 work hours and parts
would cost about $110 for an estimated cost of up to $790 per MRA.
If required, reporting information would take about 1 work-hour for
an estimated cost of $85 per instance.
Paperwork Reduction Act
A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a current valid OMB control number. The control
number for the collection of information required by this proposed AD
is 2120-0056. The paperwork cost associated with this proposed AD has
been detailed in the Costs of Compliance section of this document and
includes time for reviewing instructions, as well as completing and
reviewing the collection of information. Therefore, all reporting
associated with this proposed AD is mandatory. Comments concerning the
accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should
be directed to Information Collection Clearance Officer, Federal
Aviation Administration, 10101
[[Page 18223]]
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177-1524.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (AHD): Docket No. FAA-2021-0265;
Project Identifier MCAI-2020-01541-R.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments by May 24, 2021.
(b) Affected Airworthiness Directives (ADs)
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (AHD)
Model MBB-BK117 C-2 and MBB-BK117 D-2 helicopters, certificated in
any category.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code: 6710, Main Rotor
Control.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a report of increased control force in
the collective axis. The FAA is issuing this AD to prevent failure
of the main rotor actuator and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
2020-0257, dated November 17, 2020 (EASA AD 2020-0257).
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2020-0257
(1) Where EASA AD 2020-0257 refers to its effective date, this
AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
(2) Where Note 1 of EASA AD 2020-0257 specifies a tolerance of 3
months may be applied to the initial threshold and to the repetitive
inspection interval, this AD does not allow this tolerance.
(3) Where paragraph (2) of EASA AD 2020-0257 specifies
contacting Airbus Helicopters, this AD requires performing the
corrective action in accordance with FAA-approved procedures.
(4) Where paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2020-0257 specifies an
alternative method to comply with the requirements of paragraph (2)
of EASA AD 2020-0257 by replacing an affected part, this AD requires
removing an affected part from service as an alternative method.
(5) Where paragraph (1) of EASA AD 2020-0257 specifies a
compliance time for the initial inspection of ``before an affected
part exceeds 12 months since new, or since last overhaul, or within
3 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later'' and repetitive inspections at intervals not to exceed 12
months, this AD requires a compliance time for the initial
inspection of before an affected part exceeds 319 total hours time-
in-service (TIS), or within 319 hours TIS after the date of the last
overhaul, or within 80 hours TIS after the effective date of this
AD, whichever occurs later, and repetitive inspections at intervals
not to exceed 319 hours TIS.
(6) Although the service information referenced in EASA AD 2020-
0257 does not specify a compliance time for the reporting
requirement, this AD requires the reporting action to be performed
within 30 days after the effective date of this AD.
(7) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2020-0257 does not apply
to this AD.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, International Validation Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the International Validation Branch, send
it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (j)(2) of
this AD. Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(j) Related Information
(1) For EASA AD 2020-0257, contact the EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-
Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email
[email protected]; internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may
view this material at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321, Fort Worth, TX
76177. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 817-222-5110. This material may be found in the AD docket
on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0265.
(2) For more information about this AD, contact Katherine
Venegas, Aviation Safety Engineer, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, 3960
Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, California 90712; telephone (562) 627-
5353; email [email protected].
Issued on April 1, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-07127 Filed 4-7-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P