Safety Standard for High Chairs, 17296-17302 [2021-06419]
Download as PDF
17296
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 62 / Friday, April 2, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
§ 601.36 Procedures for direct final
rulemaking.
PART 389—RULEMAKING
PROCEDURES—FEDERAL MOTOR
CARRIER SAFETY REGULATIONS
*
13. The authority citation for part 389
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 113, 501 et seq.,
subchapters I and III of chapter 311, chapter
313, and 31502; sec. 5204 of Pub. L. 114–94,
129 Stat. 1312, 1536; 42 U.S.C. 4917; and 49
CFR 1.87.
§ 389.13
[Amended]
14. Amend § 389.13 by removing the
first sentence of paragraph (a).
■ 15. Amend § 389.39 by revising
paragraph (d)(1) to read as follows:
■
§ 389.39 Direct final rulemaking
procedures.
*
*
*
*
(d) If FTA receives any written
adverse comment within the specified
time of publication in the Federal
Register, FTA will either publish a
document withdrawing the direct final
rule before it becomes effective and may
issue an NPRM, or proceed by any other
means permitted under the
Administrative Procedure Act.
*
*
*
*
*
Signed in Washington, DC, on March 24,
2021.
Peter Paul Montgomery Buttigieg,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–06416 Filed 4–1–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) If FMCSA receives an adverse
comment within the comment period, it
will either publish a document
withdrawing the direct final rule before
it becomes effective and may issue an
NPRM, or proceed by any other means
permitted under the Administrative
Procedure Act.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 553—RULEMAKING
PROCEDURES
16. The authority citation for part 553
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 322, 30103, 30122,
30124, 30125, 30127, 30146, 30162, 32303,
32502, 32504, 32505, 32705, 32901, 32902,
33102, 33103, and 33107; delegation of
authority at 49 CFR 1.95.
17. Amend § 553.14 by revising
paragraphs (d) to read as follows:
■
§ 553.14
Direct final rulemaking.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) If NHTSA receives any written
adverse comment within the specified
time after publication of the direct final
rule in the Federal Register, the agency
will either publish a document
withdrawing the direct final rule before
it becomes effective and may issue an
NPRM, or proceed by any other means
permitted under the Administrative
Procedure Act.
*
*
*
*
*
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
PART 601—ORGANIZATION,
FUNCTIONS, AND PROCEDURES
18. The authority citation for part 601
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552; 49 U.S.C. 5334; 49
CFR 1.91.
19. Amend § 601.36 by revising
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
00:14 Apr 02, 2021
Jkt 253001
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
16 CFR Part 1231
[Docket No. CPSC–2015–0031]
Safety Standard for High Chairs
Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
In June 2018, the U.S.
Consumer Product Safety Commission
(CPSC) published a consumer product
safety standard for high chairs under
section 104 of the Consumer Product
Safety Improvement Act of 2008
(CPSIA). The standard incorporated by
reference the ASTM voluntary standard
that was in effect for high chairs at the
time. The CPSIA sets forth a process for
updating mandatory standards for
durable infant or toddler products that
are based on a voluntary standard, when
a voluntary standards organization
revises the standard. In December 2020,
ASTM published a revised voluntary
standard for high chairs, and it notified
the Commission of this revised standard
in January 2021. This direct final rule
updates the mandatory standard for
high chairs to incorporate by reference
ASTM’s 2020 version of the voluntary
standard for high chairs.
DATES: The rule is effective on July 3,
2021, unless CPSC receives a significant
adverse comment by May 3, 2021. If
CPSC receives such a comment, it will
publish notification in the Federal
Register, withdrawing this direct final
rule before its effective date. The
incorporation by reference of the
publication listed in this rule is
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of July 3, 2021.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
You can submit comments,
identified by Docket No. CPSC–2015–
0031, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit
electronic comments to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
CPSC typically does not accept
comments submitted by electronic mail
(email), except through https://
www.regulations.gov. CPSC encourages
you to submit electronic comments by
using the Federal eRulemaking Portal,
as described above.
Mail/hand delivery/courier Written
Submissions: Submit comments by
mail/hand delivery/courier to: Division
of the Secretariat, Consumer Product
Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330
East West Highway, Bethesda, MD
20814; telephone: (301) 504–7479.
Alternatively, as a temporary option
during the COVID–19 pandemic, you
can email such submissions to: cpsc-os@
cpsc.gov.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number for this document. CPSC may
post all comments without change,
including any personal identifiers,
contact information, or other personal
information provided, to: https://
www.regulations.gov. Do not submit
electronically: Confidential business
information, trade secret information, or
other sensitive or protected information
that you do not want to be available to
the public. If you wish to submit such
information, please submit it according
to the instructions for mail/hand
delivery/courier written submissions.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to: https://
www.regulations.gov, and insert the
docket number, CPSC–2015–0031, into
the ‘‘Search’’ box, and follow the
prompts.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Keysha Walker, Compliance Officer,
U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301)
504–6820; email: kwalker@cpsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Background
A. Statutory Authority
Section 104(b)(1) of the CPSIA
requires the Commission to assess the
effectiveness of voluntary standards for
durable infant or toddler products and
adopt mandatory standards for these
products. 15 U.S.C. 2056a(b)(1). The
mandatory standard must be
‘‘substantially the same as’’ the
voluntary standard, or it may be ‘‘more
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 62 / Friday, April 2, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
stringent than’’ the voluntary standard,
if the Commission determines that more
stringent requirements would further
reduce the risk of injury associated with
the product. Id.
Section 104(b)(4)(B) of the CPSIA
specifies the process for when a
voluntary standards organization revises
a standard that the Commission
incorporated by reference under section
104(b)(1). First, the voluntary standards
organization must notify the
Commission of the revision. Once the
Commission receives this notification,
the Commission may reject or accept the
revised standard. The Commission may
reject the revised standard by notifying
the voluntary standards organization
that it has determined that the revised
standard does not improve the safety of
the consumer product and that it is
retaining the existing standard. When
rejecting a revision, the Commission
must notify the voluntary standards
organization of this determination
within 90 days of receiving notice of the
revision. If the Commission does not
take this action to reject the revised
standard, the revised voluntary standard
will be considered a consumer product
safety standard issued under section 9
of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15
U.S.C. 2058), effective 180 days after the
Commission received notification of the
revision (or a later date specified by the
Commission in the Federal Register). 15
U.S.C. 2056a(b)(4)(B).
B. Safety Standard for High Chairs
In June 2018, under section 104(b)(1)
of the CPSIA, the Commission adopted
a mandatory rule for high chairs,
codified in 16 CFR part 1231. The rule
incorporated by reference ASTM F404–
18, Standard Consumer Safety
Specification for High Chairs, without
modification. 83 FR 28358 (June 19,
2018). At the time the Commission
published the final rule, ASTM F404–18
was the current version of the voluntary
standard.
On April 3, 2019, ASTM notified
CPSC that it had issued a revised
standard for high chairs, ASTM F404–
18a, which added a new subsection
6.5.1 to exempt high chairs intended for
infants who are unable to sit upright
unassisted (birth to approximately 6
months of age) or weigh 20 lbs or less
(reclined seat high chairs) from sections
6.5.2. Forward and Sideways Stability,
6.5.3. Rearward Stability, and 6.5.4
Stability with Child Climbing into Chair.
In accordance with the procedures set
out in section 104(b)(4)(B) of the CPSIA,
staff reviewed the revised standard to
determine whether ASTM F404–18a
improved the safety of high chairs. Staff
concluded that the addition of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
00:14 Apr 02, 2021
Jkt 253001
subsection 6.5.1 was a substantive
change to ASTM F404–18 that did not
improve the safety of high chairs.
In the June 5, 2019 staff briefing
memorandum, staff explained that the
stability requirements in ASTM F404–
18 address stability as the child
occupant moves within and about the
chair, and from external forces on the
chair, such as sibling or caregiver
interactions. ASTM developed these
stability requirements because high
chairs are intended for use by mobile
children, up to 3 years of age. ASTM’s
rationale for exempting reclined seat
high chairs from stability requirements
was that the test methods in ASTM
F404–18 could not be conducted on
these products, as required in the
standard. Staff’s briefing memorandum
stated that ASTM’s assertion that
stability testing could not be done on
reclined seat high chairs was inaccurate,
because staff was able to test such
products under the standard’s existing
stability requirements.
Staff’s briefing memorandum also
expressed concern that exempting high
chairs and high chair accessories
intended for children who are unable to
sit upright unassisted (birth to
approximately 6 months of age) from
stability requirements was not
consistent with other product standards
that are intended for the same age
group, such as bouncers and bassinets,
which also are intended for young
infants, but are tested to stability
requirements to prevent tipovers.
Tipover requirements in the bouncers
and bassinets standards (16 CFR parts
1229 and 1218, respectively) are
intended to address tipovers caused by
the infant user moving within the
product (bouncers), as well as external
forces (bassinets), such as sibling or
caregiver interactions with the product.
Moreover, staff’s review of high chair
incident data showed that tipover
incidents resulting from occupant
movement within the high chair, or
from external forces, such as a sibling or
caregiver acting on the high chair, do
occur with children 6 months and
younger.
Based on staff’s recommendation, the
Commission voted not to adopt the
revised voluntary standard and
maintained the mandatory standard
based on ASTM F404–18.1 Staff notified
ASTM of the Commission’s decision to
retain ASTM F404–18 on June 19, 2019.
On January 4, 2021, ASTM notified
CPSC that it had again revised the
1 https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/Update%20to
%20Voluntary%20Standard%20for%20High
%20Chairs.pdf?5nvjyCgQrNh.pQhwmCtd85a
QJjc2mohX.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17297
voluntary standard for high chairs,
approving ASTM F404–20 on October 1,
2020.2 As this preamble discusses,
based on CPSC staff’s review of ASTM
F404–20,3 the Commission will allow
the revised voluntary standard to
become the mandatory standard because
the revised requirements in the
voluntary standard either improve the
safety of high chairs, or are safety
neutral. Accordingly, by operation of
law under section 104(b)(4)(B) of the
CPSIA, ASTM F404–20 will become the
mandatory consumer product safety
standard for high chairs on July 3,
2021.4 15 U.S.C. 2056a(b)(4)(B). This
direct final rule updates 16 CFR part
1231 to incorporate by reference the
revised voluntary standard, ASTM
F404–20.
II. Description of ASTM F404–20
The ASTM standard for high chairs
includes performance requirements, test
methods, and requirements for warning
labels and instructional literature, to
address hazards to infants and children
associated with high chairs. ASTM has
revised the voluntary standard for high
chairs twice since ASTM F404–18,
which is the current mandatory
standard. Section I.B of this preamble
explains that the Commission
previously rejected a revised high chair
voluntary standard, ASTM F404–18a, in
2019, because the standard exempted
reclined seat high chair products from
stability testing. The latest revision,
ASTM F404–20, now includes stability
testing for these products, developed in
conjunction with CPSC staff.
Accordingly, the Commission will allow
ASTM F404–20 to become the
mandatory standard, and is updating 16
CFR part 1231 to reference this most
recent updated voluntary standard.
This section describes the changes in
ASTM F404–20 compared to ASTM
2 ASTM published ASTM F404–20 in December
2020. Until the standard becomes effective on July
3, 2021, a read-only copy of ASTM’s standard is
available at: https://www.astm.org/CPSC.htm. After
the effective date of the revised part 1231, ASTM
F404–20 becomes the mandatory standard for high
chairs, and it will be available, to read only, at:
https://www.astm.org/READINGLIBRARY/.
3 CPSC staff’s briefing memorandum regarding
ASTM F404–20 is available at: https://
www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/ASTMs-Revised-SafetyStandard-for-High-Chairs.pdf?_dFed3_
8cTsV0J0TTVXk4oCRCWUGxsPx.
4 The statute provides that if the Commission
does not take action to reject a revised standard, the
revised voluntary standard will be considered a
consumer product safety standard issued under
section 9 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15
U.S.C. 2058), effective 180 days after the
Commission received notification of the revision (or
a later date specified by the Commission in the
Federal Register). 15 U.S.C. 2056a(b)(4)(B). In this
case, 180 days from the January 4, 2021 notice date
is July 3, 2021.
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
17298
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 62 / Friday, April 2, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
F404–18. On October 1, 2020, ASTM
approved a revised version of the
standard, ASTM F404–20. In
accordance with CPSIA section
104(b)(4)(B), ASTM notified CPSC of
this revision on January 4, 2021. ASTM
F404–20 includes several substantive
changes, several revisions to clarify
existing requirements, and editorial
revisions that do not alter substantive
requirements in the standard or affect
safety.
A. Substantive Revisions
ASTM F404–20 contains substantive
revisions from the current mandatory
standard to distinguish performance
requirements and test methods for two
types of high chairs: (1) ‘‘[h]igh chairs
and high chair accessories that have
adjustment positions that, per the
manufacturer’s instructions, are
recommended for use only for children
able to sit upright unassisted
(approximately 6 months of age) or
weighing more than 20 lb (9.1 kg)’’
(hereinafter referred to as upright seat
high chairs) and (2) ‘‘[h]igh chairs and
high chair accessories that have
adjustment positions that are
manufacturer’s recommended use
positions for use with children who are
unable to sit upright unassisted (birth to
approximately 6 months of age) or
weigh 20 lb (9.1 kg) or less, when
adjusted into the most onerous
manufacturer’s recommended use and/
or adjustment position for each
direction to be tested’’ (hereinafter
referred to as reclined seat high chairs).
Primarily, ASTM F404–20 provides new
performance requirements and
associated test methods to test the
stability of reclined seat high chairs.
1. Performance Requirements
CPSC staff worked closely with ASTM
to help develop new stability testing
requirements for reclined seat high chair
products. In November 2018, CPSC staff
tested six reclined seat high chair
products to proposed stability
requirements from a manufacturer who
expressed concerns about the ability to
test reclined seat high chairs. In March
2019, CPSC staff hosted an ASTM
reclined seat high chair task group
meeting at CPSC’s laboratory in
Rockville, Maryland, where staff
demonstrated testing on reclined seat
high chair products. The task group
decided to explore the idea of using the
stability test from the bassinet and
cradle standard to develop stability
requirements for reclined seat high chair
products because this test addresses the
tip over hazard that was most
concerning to both ASTM and CPSC
staff: The interaction of a sibling or
caregiver pulling on the reclined seat
product. The task group presented the
idea of developing a test for reclined
seat high chairs that is similar to the
bassinet stability testing at the ASTM
subcommittee teleconference on April 4,
2019. This idea ultimately was the basis
of the new stability requirements for
reclined seat products in ASTM F404–
20.
Substantively, ASTM F404–20
improves the safety of high chairs
because it adds a new stability
requirement and test method for
reclined seat high chairs. Table 1 below
summarizes the differences between
ASTM–F404–18 and ASTM F404–20
with regard to stability testing in section
6.5 of ASTM F404 (changes are
highlighted in bold).
TABLE 1—STABILITY PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS: COMPARISON OF F404–18 TO F404–20
Section
F404–18
F404–20
6.5 .......................
6.5.1 ....................
6.5.1.1 .................
Stability ....................................................
Forward and Sideways Stability—A high
chair shall not tip over when setup as
defined in 7.7.2.1–7.7.2.3, and then
when forces are applied in accordance with 7.7.2.4 and 7.7.2.5.
.................................................................
6.5.1.2 .................
.................................................................
6.5.1.3 .................
.................................................................
6.5.2 ....................
Rearward Stability—When setup as defined in 7.7.2.1– 7.7.2.3, and then
tested in accordance with 7.7.2.6, the
high chair shall have a Rearward Stability Index of 50 or more.
Stability
High chairs and high chair accessories that have adjustment positions that, per
the manufacturer’s instructions, are recommended for use only for children
able to sit upright unassisted (approximately 6 months of age) or weighing
more than 20 lb (9.1 kg) shall comply with 6.5.1.1 to 6.5.1.3. in all those manufacturer’s recommended use and adjustment positions.
Forward and Sideways Stability—A high chair shall not tip over when setup as
defined in 7.7.2.1–7.7.2.3, and then when forces are applied in accordance
with 7.7.2.4 and 7.7.2.5.
Rearward Stability—When setup as defined in 7.7.2.1– 7.7.2.3, and then tested
in accordance with 7.7.2.6, the high chair shall have a Rearward Stability Index
of 50 or more.
Stability with Child Climbing into Chair—A high chair shall not tip over when tested in accordance with 7.7.4.
High chairs and high chair accessories that have adjustment positions that are
manufacturer’s recommended use positions for use with children who are unable to sit upright unassisted (birth to approximately 6 months of age) or weigh
20 lb (9.1 kg) or less, when adjusted into the most onerous manufacturer’s recommended use and/or adjustment position for each direction to be tested, shall
not tip over and shall retain the CAMI dummy when tested in accordance with
7.7.3, in the forward, rearward, and sideways directions.
6.5.3 ....................
Stability with Child Climbing into Chair—
A high chair shall not tip over when
tested in accordance with 7.7.3.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
2. Stability Test Methods
ASTM F404–18 requires testing a high
chair for stability in the forward,
rearward, and sideways directions,
requiring that the chair not tip over as
the child occupant, up to 3 years of age,
moves within the chair. Because this
test was intended for upright seat high
chairs designed for children up to 3
VerDate Sep<11>2014
00:30 Apr 02, 2021
Jkt 253001
years old, the test places a total of 40lb weights (two 20-lb weights), to
simulate the weight of a 95th percentile
36-month-old, on the seat of the high
chair to simulate a child in the seat,
which acts as a counter-balance when
horizontal forces are applied in the
forward, rearward and sideways
directions. The forces applied are
designed to simulate the forces that the
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
child occupant would exert on the high
chair by moving within the seat of the
product.
For reclined seat high chairs, the
ASTM subcommittee concluded that
this stability testing developed for
upright seat high chairs was inadequate,
because the child’s counter-balance load
is different, based on the intended
weight range for reclined seat products.
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 62 / Friday, April 2, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Stability testing for upright seat high
chairs uses a 40-lb counter-balance
weight, because the weight range is for
children weighing more than 20 lbs.
This 40-lb counter-balance weight
would not effectively test the stability of
reclined seat high chair products that
are intended for lower-weight infants
from birth (∼7 lb) to 20 lbs, because a
40-lb counter-balance weight would
make the reclined seat high chair
product more stable than a 20-lb
counter-balance weight. A 20 lb
counter-balance weight is a more
stringent weight to test stability for high
chairs intended for lower weight
children. Moreover, the seat recline
affects both the seat back and the seat
bottom, causing the center of mass to be
distributed differently than with an
upright seat high chair. Weight
distribution in reclined seat high chairs
is more towards the seat back, whereas
weight distribution in upright seat high
chairs is more towards the seat bottom.
Finally, due to the inclined seat design,
test engineers had difficulty placing the
40 lb test weight in the seat to conduct
stability testing.
Because of these design differences,
ASTM developed a new testing
methodology for reclined seat high
chairs, in collaboration with CPSC staff.
After evaluating several test methods,
the task group decided that the stability
testing from the bassinet standard was
most appropriate to test reclined seat
high chairs. Instead of using a weight to
simulate a child as a counter-balance in
the seat, the new stability test uses a
CAMI Newborn Dummy (7.5 lb). The
anthropomorphic CAMI Newborn
Dummy better fits the reclined seat, and
the weight is better distributed within
the high chair than with the barbell type
weights used to test upright seat high
chairs. Also, the test engineer can more
easily locate the points on the reclined
seat high chair to place the loads around
the chair. Using the CAMI Newborn
Dummy instead of weights resulted in
more repeatable and consistent test
results.
Given that reclined seat high chairs
are designed for infants in a lower age/
weight range (birth to 20 lbs), who have
limited moving capabilities, these
infants are unlikely to create instability
issues by themselves. Instead, instability
for reclined seat high chair products
would likely come from external
sources (e.g., caregivers bumping into
the chair and/or siblings pulling on the
chair). Accordingly, for reclined seat
products, the new stability test method
in section 7.7.3 of ASTM F404–20
adopts stability requirements and
testing from the bassinet standard,
ASTM F2194–16e1, which was
VerDate Sep<11>2014
00:14 Apr 02, 2021
Jkt 253001
designed to test siblings interacting with
the product. Section 7.4 of ASTM F404–
20 uses the CAMI Newborn Dummy as
the counter-balance weight in the
reclined seat high chair to simulate
external forces that may tip the product
over, such as a sibling pulling down on
the edge of the product. This test
employs a dual application of horizontal
and vertical forces to simulate
application of an angled load; the
combination of the weights and forces
in the testing simulate the mean
strength of a 2-year-old pulling on the
product.
Following is a description of each
new stability test method for reclined
seat high chair products:
• 7.7.3.4 Forward Stability, requires
that a 23-lb weight be hung onto the
forward-most edge of the high chair seat
or tray. The high chair must not tip over
while this load is maintained, and then
a horizontal force of 5 lb is applied
outward from the center of the seat, at
the same location as the 23-lb weight.
• 7.7.3.5 Rearward Stability,
requires that a 23-lb weight be hung
onto the rearmost edge of the seat. The
high chair must not tip over while this
load is maintained, and then a
horizontal force of 5 lb is applied
outward from the center of the seat, at
the same location as the 23-lb weight.
• 7.7.3.6 Sideways Stability,
requires that a 23-lb weight be hung
onto the outermost point of the frame on
the side being tested. The high chair
must not tip over while this load is
maintained and then a horizontal force
of 5 lb is applied from the center of the
seat, at the location as the 23-lb weight.
The Commission concludes that new
stability performance and test methods
for reclined seat high chairs improve the
safety of high chairs, because these tests
are designed to address tipover hazards
associated with infant users moving
within the product and external forces
like a sibling or caregiver interacting
with the product. Additionally, use of
the 7.5-lb CAMI Newborn Dummy
provides a more stringent test for the
tipover hazard. The test is more
stringent because a lighter weight
provides less of a counter-balance in
assessing external forces acting on the
reclined seat high chair products than
the heavier 40-lb weight used to test
upright seat high chairs intended for
children up to 3 years old.
3. Static Load Test Methods
a. High Chair Seat
ASTM F404–18, the current
mandatory standard, requires a static
load test for high chair seats. The test
requires the high chair seat to support
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17299
static loads without causing any
hazardous conditions, such as
collapsing or breaking.
ASTM F404–20 splits into two parts
section 7.6.1 Seat Static Load Test to
separate the test method intended for
upright seat high chairs in section
7.6.1.1, from a new test method
intended for reclined seat high chairs in
section 7.6.1.2. Separating test
requirements by product type allows for
static load testing requirements based
on the weight of the child the seat was
intended to hold. Accordingly, section
7.6.1.2 of ASTM F404–20, for reclined
seat high chairs, uses half the test
weight compared to section 7.6.1.1, for
upright seat high chairs, to test for
collapse (50 lbs applied over 60
seconds, compared to 100 lbs applied
over 60 seconds in section 7.6.1.1).
The rationale for the 100-lb load for
the upright seat high chair static load
test is that it represents 2.5 times that of
the maximum occupant’s weight of 40
lbs. The test weight for reclined seat
high chairs in section 7.6.1.2 follows
this same rationale, using a 50-lb load
weight, which is 2.5 times the
maximum occupant’s weight of 20 lbs.
Lowering the static load test weight for
products intended for lower-weight
occupants provides the same level of
safety for both upright and reclined seat
high chairs, because the respective
weights represent the maximum
intended occupant weights for each
product type. Accordingly, because both
types of high chairs in section 7.6.1 use
the same weight ratio to test the static
load, this change is neutral to the safety
of high chairs.
b. Step/Footrest
The current mandatory standard,
ASTM F404–18, requires that a step or
footrest shall support static loads
without causing any hazardous
conditions, such as collapsing and
breaking. This step/footrest static load
test is designed to test that the step/foot
rest of the high chair will not collapse
under the weight of the child climbing
into the high chair. Section 7.6.2 Step/
Footrest Static Load Test of ASTM
F404–20 has a new section, 7.6.2.1,
which exempts high chairs intended for
children weighing less than 20 lbs from
the step/footrest static load testing
requirement, because infants who weigh
less than 20 lbs would not be mobile
enough to climb into the high chair
using the step/footrest. Staff states that
they are unaware of any incidents
involving step/footrest collapse with
children who weigh less than 20 lbs,
meaning children 6 months old or
younger. Based on this analysis, the
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
17300
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 62 / Friday, April 2, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Commission concludes that this change
is neutral to the safety of high chairs.
c. High Chair Tray
Currently, in ASTM F404–18, the
intent of the tray static load test is to
ensure that a high chair tray does not
collapse under the weight of the child
occupant if placed there temporarily
while the caregiver is putting the child
into the high chair. ASTM F404–20,
section 7.6.3 Tray Static Load Test,
separates the tray static load test into
two parts: Section 7.6.3.1 describes
testing high chairs intended for children
weighing more than 20 lbs (9 kg), and
section 7.6.3.2 describes testing high
chairs intended for children weighing
20 lbs or less. Because high chairs
intended for infants who weigh 20 lbs
or less would have less of a static load
to cause collapse of the high chair tray,
section 7.6.3.2 uses half the test weight
of the tray static load test for high chairs
intended for children who weight more
than 20 lbs (25 lbs applied over 60
seconds, compared to 50 lbs applied
over 60 seconds in section 7.6.3.1).
As with the high chair seat static load
testing, ASTM F404–20 requires that
both types of high chairs be tested to the
same level of safety, because load
testing is adjusted based on the
maximum weight of the child occupant.
Accordingly, this change is neutral to
the safety of high chairs because
differentiating the tray static load test
based on the weight of the intended
child occupant does not reduce the level
of safety for high chair products.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
4. Dynamic High Chair Test Methods
ASTM F404–18 requires that all high
chairs meet a dynamic high chair test,
which is intended to address the
collapse of a high chair when an older
child (up to 3 years old) bounces up and
down in the chair. Section 7.10.1 of
ASTM F404–20 adds an exemption from
this test for high chairs intended for use
with children weighing 20 lbs or less.
ASTM’s rationale for the exemption is
that lower weight users of the product
will not be mobile enough to bounce
significantly in the high chair, or bear
enough weight to cause the high chair
to collapse. Staff is unaware of incidents
of high chair collapse due to lower
weight children, 6 months old and
younger, bouncing in the product.
Accordingly, this change is neutral to
the safety of high chairs, because
exemption of high chairs intended for
children weighing 20 lbs or less from
dynamic testing is unlikely to reduce
the level of safety for these products,
given that these high chairs are intended
for use by infants with limited mobility.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
00:14 Apr 02, 2021
Jkt 253001
B. Non-Substantive Changes
ASTM F404–20 also includes minor
additions and revisions that are editorial
and do not alter any substantive
requirements in the standard. Because
they do not change any substantive
requirements, these revisions are neutral
regarding the safety of high chairs.
to be consistent with other ASTM
standards. For example, ASTM made
editorial changes such as revising
‘‘0.210 in (5 mm)’’ to ‘‘0.210-in (5-mm).’’
These revisions are neutral to the safety
of high chairs, because they do not
substantively alter the requirements in
these sections.
1. Referenced Documents
Section 2 of ASTM F404–20 lists
other standards referenced in F404.
Section 2.3 of ASTM F404–20, ANSI
standards, was revised to include a
reference to ANSI Z535.1 Safety Colors.
This revision was made to be consistent
with other ASTM standards that
reference the ANSI standard for safety
colors for use in distinguishing warning
labels. Additionally, section 2.4 of
ASTM F404–20, Other references, adds
a reference to new test equipment, the
CAMI Infant Dummy Mark II and the
CAMI Newborn Dummy, which are
used in the new stability testing for
reclined seat high chair products. Staff
considers these changes to be neutral to
the safety of high chairs, because they
are editorial in nature and do not
substantively alter requirements in the
standard.
III. Incorporation by Reference
Section 1231.2 of the direct final rule
incorporates by reference ASTM F404–
20. The Office of the Federal Register
(OFR) has regulations regarding
incorporation by reference. 1 CFR part
51. Under these regulations, agencies
must discuss, in the preamble to a final
rule, ways in which the material the
agency incorporates by reference is
reasonably available to interested
parties, and how interested parties can
obtain the material. In addition, the
preamble to the final rule must
summarize the material. 1 CFR 51.5(b).
In accordance with the OFR
regulations, section II. Description of
ASTM F404–20 of this preamble
summarizes the major provisions of
ASTM F404–20 that the Commission
incorporates by reference into 16 CFR
part 1231. The standard is reasonably
available to interested parties and
interested parties can purchase a copy
of ASTM F404–20 from ASTM
International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive,
P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA
19428–2959 USA; phone; 610–832–
9585; www.astm.org. Additionally, until
the direct final rule takes effect, a readonly copy of ASTM F404–20 is available
for viewing on ASTM’s website at:
https://www.astm.org/CPSC.htm. Once
the rule takes effect, a read-only copy of
the standard will be available for
viewing on the ASTM website at:
https://www.astm.org/
READINGLIBRARY/. Interested parties
can also schedule an appointment to
inspect a copy of the standard at CPSC’s
Division of the Secretariat, U.S.
Consumer Product Safety Commission,
Room 820, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814, telephone: 301–
504–7479; email: cpsc-os@cpsc.gov.
2. Terminology
Section 3.1.7.2 of ASTM F404–20,
Discussion, includes a new note stating
that a product that has an elevated seat
and is designed or promoted for eating
and feeding, or shown near a dining
table would be considered within the
scope of the high chair standard. Staff
considers this change to be neutral to
the safety of high chairs, because it
provides further discussion on the
definition of ‘‘high chairs,’’ but does not
alter the definition, nor change the
scope of the standard.
Other changes in Terminology
include changing the term ‘‘free
standing’’ to ‘‘free-standing,’’ and in
section 3.1.21, revising the definition of
‘‘static load,’’ as follows:
3.1.21 static load, n—vertically
downward force load applied by a
calibrated force gauge or by dead weights.
weights or other means.
These changes in terminology are
neutral to the safety of high chairs
because they are editorial in nature and
do not substantively alter the
definitions.
3. Calibrations and Standardizations,
General Requirements, and Performance
Requirements
ASTM made a few editorial changes
to the sections of ASTM F404–20 on
calibrations and standardizations,
general requirements, and performance
requirements, to clarify provisions and
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
IV. Certification
Section 14(a) of the Consumer
Product Safety Act (CPSA; 15 U.S.C.
2051–2089) requires manufacturers of
products subject to a consumer product
safety rule under the CPSA, or to a
similar rule, ban, standard, or regulation
under any other act enforced by the
Commission, to certify that the products
comply with all applicable CPSC
requirements. 15 U.S.C. 2063(a). Such
certification must be based on a test of
each product, or on a reasonable testing
program, or, for children’s products, on
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 62 / Friday, April 2, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
tests of a sufficient number of samples
by a third party conformity assessment
body accredited by CPSC to test
according to the applicable
requirements. As noted, standards
issued under section 104(b)(1)(B) of the
CPSIA are ‘‘consumer product safety
standards.’’ Thus, they are subject to the
testing and certification requirements of
section 14 of the CPSA.
Because high chairs are children’s
products, a CPSC-accepted third party
conformity assessment body must test
samples of the products for compliance
with part 1231. Products subject to part
1231 also must comply with all other
applicable CPSC requirements, such as
the lead content requirements in section
101 of the CPSIA,5 the phthalates
prohibitions in section 108 of the
CPSIA 6 and 16 CFR part 1307, the
tracking label requirements in section
14(a)(5) of the CPSA,7 and the consumer
registration form requirements in
section 104(d) of the CPSIA.8
V. Notice of Requirements
In accordance with section
14(a)(3)(B)(iv) of the CPSIA, the
Commission previously published a
notice of requirements (NOR) for
accreditation of third party conformity
assessment bodies (third party labs) for
testing high chairs, and codified the
requirement at 16 CFR § 1112.15(b)(44).
83 FR at 28368–70. The NOR provided
the criteria and process for CPSC to
accept accreditation of third party labs
for testing high chairs to 16 CFR part
1231. Id. The Commission codified
NORs for all mandatory standards for
durable infant or toddler products in
‘‘Requirements Pertaining to Third Party
Conformity Assessment Bodies,’’ 16
CFR part 1112.
ASTM F404–20 includes new stability
requirements for testing reclined seat
high chairs. We note that the current
mandatory standard based on ASTM
F404–18 already requires stability
testing for high chairs intended for
children up to 3 years old, such that the
Commission considers third party labs
that are currently CPSC-accepted for 16
CFR part 1231 have demonstrated
competence for the new stability testing
for reclined seat high chairs in ASTM
F404–20.
Additional testing requirements for
reclined seat high chair products in
ASTM F404–20, however, introduce test
equipment previously not required in
testing to ASTM F404–18, specifically,
a 23-lb weight, and a CAMI Newborn
5 15
U.S.C. 1278a.
U.S.C. 2057c.
7 15 U.S.C. 2063(a)(5).
8 15 U.S.C. 2056a(d).
6 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
00:14 Apr 02, 2021
Jkt 253001
Dummy. Similar stability testing, with
similar weights and the CAMI Newborn
Dummy, are also required in testing to
the mandatory standard for bassinets
and cradles, 16 CFR part 1218, based on
ASTM F2194–16e1. Additionally, the
CAMI Newborn Dummy is required test
equipment for the mandatory standard
for hand-held infant carriers, 16 CFR
part 1225, based on ASTM F2050–16.
Currently, 19 third party labs are CPSCaccepted to test to the Safety Standard
for High Chairs, and 17 of these 19 third
party labs are also CPSC-accepted to test
to part 1218 and/or part 1225.
Accordingly, only two of the 19 third
party labs will likely have to source new
test materials to test to ASTM F404–20.
Based on experience purchasing test
equipment, these two third party labs,
one in Singapore and one in Taiwan,
should be able to purchase the
necessary weights, as these weights can
be as simple as gym/barbell weights or
even weight bags. Additionally, staff
advises that the CAMI Newborn Dummy
is available from at least three sources
globally. Because the effective date of
the revised high chair standard is July
3, 2021, these two third party labs have
sufficient time to acquire the necessary
test equipment.
Third party labs will begin testing to
the new standard when ASTM F404–20
goes into effect on July 3, 2021, and the
existing accreditations that the
Commission has accepted for testing to
this standard will cover testing to the
revised standard. Accordingly, the
existing NOR for the Safety Standard for
High Chairs will remain in place, and
CPSC-accepted third party labs are
expected to update the scope of the
third party lab’s accreditations to reflect
the revised high chair standard in the
normal course of renewing their
accreditations.
VI. Direct Final Rule Process
The Commission is issuing this rule
as a direct final rule. Although the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA; 5
U.S.C. 551–559) generally requires
agencies to provide notice of a rule and
an opportunity for interested parties to
comment on it, section 553 of the APA
provides an exception when the agency,
‘‘for good cause finds’’ that notice and
comment are ‘‘impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’ Id. 553(b)(B). The Commission
concludes that when it updates a
reference to an ASTM standard that the
Commission incorporated by reference
under section 104(b) of the CPSIA,
notice and comment are not necessary.
Under the process set out in section
104(b)(4)(B) of the CPSIA, when ASTM
revises a standard that the Commission
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
17301
has previously incorporated by
reference under section 104(b)(1)(B) of
the CPSIA, that revision will become the
new CPSC standard, unless the
Commission determines that ASTM’s
revision does not improve the safety of
the product. Thus, unless the
Commission makes such a
determination, the ASTM revision
becomes CPSC’s standard by operation
of law. The Commission is allowing
ASTM F404–20 to become CPSC’s new
standard. The purpose of this direct
final rule is to update the reference in
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
so that it reflects the version of the
standard that takes effect by statute.
This rule updates the reference in the
CFR, but under the terms of the CPSIA,
ASTM F404–20 takes effect as the new
CPSC standard for high chairs, even if
the Commission does not issue this rule.
Thus, public comments would not alter
substantive changes to the standard or
the effect of the revised standard as a
consumer product safety rule under
section 104(b) of the CPSIA. Under
these circumstances, notice and
comment are unnecessary.
In Recommendation 95–4, the
Administrative Conference of the
United States (ACUS) endorses direct
final rulemaking as an appropriate
procedure to expedite rules that are
noncontroversial and that are not
expected to generate significant adverse
comments. See 60 FR 43108 (Aug. 18,
1995). ACUS recommends that agencies
use the direct final rule process when
they act under the ‘‘unnecessary’’ prong
of the good cause exemption in 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B). Consistent with the ACUS
recommendation, the Commission is
publishing this rule as a direct final
rule, because CPSC does not expect any
significant adverse comments.
Unless CPSC receives a significant
adverse comment within 30 days of this
notification, the rule will become
effective on July 3, 2021. In accordance
with ACUS’s recommendation, the
Commission considers a significant
adverse comment to be ‘‘one where the
commenter explains why the rule would
be inappropriate,’’ including an
assertion challenging ‘‘the rule’s
underlying premise or approach,’’ or a
claim that the rule ‘‘would be ineffective
or unacceptable without change.’’ 60 FR
43108, 43111. As noted, this rule merely
updates a reference in the CFR to reflect
a change that occurs by statute.
If the Commission receives a
significant adverse comment, the
Commission will withdraw this direct
final rule. Depending on the comment
and other circumstances, the
Commission may then incorporate the
adverse comment into a subsequent
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
17302
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 62 / Friday, April 2, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
direct final rule or publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking, providing an
opportunity for public comment.
VII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA;
5 U.S.C. 601–612) generally requires
agencies to review proposed and final
rules for their potential economic
impact on small entities, including
small businesses, and prepare regulatory
flexibility analyses. 5 U.S.C. 603, 604.
The RFA applies to any rule that is
subject to notice and comment
procedures under section 553 of the
APA. Id. As discussed in section VI.
Direct Final Rule Process of this
preamble, the Commission has
determined that notice and the
opportunity to comment are
unnecessary for this rule. Therefore, the
RFA does not apply. The Commission
also notes the limited nature of this
document, which merely updates the
incorporation by reference to reflect the
mandatory CPSC standard that takes
effect under section 104 of the CPSIA.
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act
The current mandatory standard for
high chairs includes requirements for
marking, labeling, and instructional
literature that constitute a ‘‘collection of
information,’’ as defined in the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA; 44
U.S.C. 3501–3521). The revised
mandatory standard for high chairs does
not alter these requirements. The
Commission took the steps required by
the PRA for information collections
when it adopted 16 CFR part 1231,
including obtaining approval and a
control number. Because the
information collection is unchanged, the
revision does not affect the information
collection requirements or approval
related to the standard.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
IX. Environmental Considerations
The Commission’s regulations
provide a categorical exclusion for the
Commission’s rules from any
requirement to prepare an
environmental assessment or an
environmental impact statement where
they ‘‘have little or no potential for
affecting the human environment.’’ 16
CFR 1021.5(c)(2). This rule falls within
the categorical exclusion, so no
environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement is
required.
X. Preemption
Section 26(a) of the CPSA provides
that where a consumer product safety
standard is in effect and applies to a
product, no state or political
subdivision of a state may either
VerDate Sep<11>2014
00:14 Apr 02, 2021
Jkt 253001
establish or continue in effect a
requirement dealing with the same risk
of injury unless the state requirement is
identical to the Federal standard. 15
U.S.C. 2075(a). Section 26(c) of the
CPSA also provides that states or
political subdivisions of states may
apply to CPSC for an exemption from
this preemption under certain
circumstances. Section 104(b) of the
CPSIA deems rules issued under that
provision ‘‘consumer product safety
standards.’’ Therefore, once a rule
issued under section 104 of the CPSIA
takes effect, it will preempt in
accordance with section 26(a) of the
CPSA.
List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 1231
Consumer protection, Imports,
Incorporation by reference, Imports,
Infants and children, Law enforcement,
Safety, Toys.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Commission amends 16
CFR chapter II as follows:
PART 1231—SAFETY STANDARD FOR
HIGH CHAIRS
1. Revise the authority citation for part
1231 to read as follows:
■
Authority: Sec. 104, Pub. L. 110–314, 122
Stat. 3016 (15 U.S.C. 2056a); Sec 3, Pub. L.
112–28, 125 Stat. 273.
2. Revise § 1231.2 to read as follows:
XI. Effective Date
■
Under the procedure set forth in
section 104(b)(4)(B) of the CPSIA, when
a voluntary standards organization
revises a standard that the Commission
adopted as a mandatory standard, the
revision becomes the CPSC standard
within 180 days of notification to the
Commission, unless the Commission
determines that the revision does not
improve the safety of the product, or the
Commission sets a later date in the
Federal Register. 15 U.S.C.
2056a(b)(4)(B). The Commission is
taking neither of those actions with
respect to the revised standard for high
chairs. Therefore, ASTM F404–20
automatically will take effect as the new
mandatory standard for high chairs on
July 3, 2021, 180 days after the
Commission received notice of the
revision on January 4, 2021. As a direct
final rule, unless the Commission
receives a significant adverse comment
within 30 days of this document, the
rule will become effective on July 3,
2021.
§ 1231.2
XII. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act (CRA;
5 U.S.C. 801–808) states that before a
rule may take effect, the agency issuing
the rule must submit the rule, and
certain related information, to each
House of Congress and the Comptroller
General. 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1). The CRA
submission must indicate whether the
rule is a ‘‘major rule.’’ The CRA states
that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) determines
whether a rule qualifies as a ‘‘major
rule.’’
Pursuant to the CRA, this rule does
not qualify as a ‘‘major rule,’’ as defined
in 5 U.S.C. 804(2). To comply with the
CRA, CPSC will submit the required
information to each House of Congress
and the Comptroller General.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Requirements for High Chairs.
Each high chair shall comply with all
applicable provisions of ASTM F404–
20, Standard Consumer Safety
Specification for High Chairs, approved
on October 1, 2020. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this
incorporation by reference in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51. You may obtain a copy
from ASTM International, 100 Barr
Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West
Conshohocken, PA 19428–2959; phone:
(610) 832–9585; www.astm.org. A readonly copy of the standard is available
for viewing on the ASTM website at
https://www.astm.org/
READINGLIBRARY/. You may inspect a
copy at the Division of the Secretariat,
U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission, Room 820, 4330 East West
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814,
telephone (301) 504–7479, email: cpscos@cpsc.gov, or at the National Archives
and Records Administration (NARA).
For information on the availability of
this material at NARA, email
fedreg.legal@nara.gov, or go to:
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations.html.
Alberta E. Mills,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021–06419 Filed 4–1–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 230
RIN 0596–AD23
Community Forest Program
Forest Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA).
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\02APR1.SGM
02APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 62 (Friday, April 2, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17296-17302]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-06419]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
16 CFR Part 1231
[Docket No. CPSC-2015-0031]
Safety Standard for High Chairs
AGENCY: Consumer Product Safety Commission.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In June 2018, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission
(CPSC) published a consumer product safety standard for high chairs
under section 104 of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of
2008 (CPSIA). The standard incorporated by reference the ASTM voluntary
standard that was in effect for high chairs at the time. The CPSIA sets
forth a process for updating mandatory standards for durable infant or
toddler products that are based on a voluntary standard, when a
voluntary standards organization revises the standard. In December
2020, ASTM published a revised voluntary standard for high chairs, and
it notified the Commission of this revised standard in January 2021.
This direct final rule updates the mandatory standard for high chairs
to incorporate by reference ASTM's 2020 version of the voluntary
standard for high chairs.
DATES: The rule is effective on July 3, 2021, unless CPSC receives a
significant adverse comment by May 3, 2021. If CPSC receives such a
comment, it will publish notification in the Federal Register,
withdrawing this direct final rule before its effective date. The
incorporation by reference of the publication listed in this rule is
approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of July 3, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You can submit comments, identified by Docket No. CPSC-2015-
0031, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit electronic comments to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments. CPSC typically does not accept
comments submitted by electronic mail (email), except through https://www.regulations.gov. CPSC encourages you to submit electronic comments
by using the Federal eRulemaking Portal, as described above.
Mail/hand delivery/courier Written Submissions: Submit comments by
mail/hand delivery/courier to: Division of the Secretariat, Consumer
Product Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda,
MD 20814; telephone: (301) 504-7479. Alternatively, as a temporary
option during the COVID-19 pandemic, you can email such submissions to:
[email protected].
Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number for this document. CPSC may post all comments without
change, including any personal identifiers, contact information, or
other personal information provided, to: https://www.regulations.gov.
Do not submit electronically: Confidential business information, trade
secret information, or other sensitive or protected information that
you do not want to be available to the public. If you wish to submit
such information, please submit it according to the instructions for
mail/hand delivery/courier written submissions.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to: https://www.regulations.gov, and insert the
docket number, CPSC-2015-0031, into the ``Search'' box, and follow the
prompts.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keysha Walker, Compliance Officer,
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814; telephone (301) 504-6820; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Statutory Authority
Section 104(b)(1) of the CPSIA requires the Commission to assess
the effectiveness of voluntary standards for durable infant or toddler
products and adopt mandatory standards for these products. 15 U.S.C.
2056a(b)(1). The mandatory standard must be ``substantially the same
as'' the voluntary standard, or it may be ``more
[[Page 17297]]
stringent than'' the voluntary standard, if the Commission determines
that more stringent requirements would further reduce the risk of
injury associated with the product. Id.
Section 104(b)(4)(B) of the CPSIA specifies the process for when a
voluntary standards organization revises a standard that the Commission
incorporated by reference under section 104(b)(1). First, the voluntary
standards organization must notify the Commission of the revision. Once
the Commission receives this notification, the Commission may reject or
accept the revised standard. The Commission may reject the revised
standard by notifying the voluntary standards organization that it has
determined that the revised standard does not improve the safety of the
consumer product and that it is retaining the existing standard. When
rejecting a revision, the Commission must notify the voluntary
standards organization of this determination within 90 days of
receiving notice of the revision. If the Commission does not take this
action to reject the revised standard, the revised voluntary standard
will be considered a consumer product safety standard issued under
section 9 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2058),
effective 180 days after the Commission received notification of the
revision (or a later date specified by the Commission in the Federal
Register). 15 U.S.C. 2056a(b)(4)(B).
B. Safety Standard for High Chairs
In June 2018, under section 104(b)(1) of the CPSIA, the Commission
adopted a mandatory rule for high chairs, codified in 16 CFR part 1231.
The rule incorporated by reference ASTM F404-18, Standard Consumer
Safety Specification for High Chairs, without modification. 83 FR 28358
(June 19, 2018). At the time the Commission published the final rule,
ASTM F404-18 was the current version of the voluntary standard.
On April 3, 2019, ASTM notified CPSC that it had issued a revised
standard for high chairs, ASTM F404-18a, which added a new subsection
6.5.1 to exempt high chairs intended for infants who are unable to sit
upright unassisted (birth to approximately 6 months of age) or weigh 20
lbs or less (reclined seat high chairs) from sections 6.5.2. Forward
and Sideways Stability, 6.5.3. Rearward Stability, and 6.5.4 Stability
with Child Climbing into Chair. In accordance with the procedures set
out in section 104(b)(4)(B) of the CPSIA, staff reviewed the revised
standard to determine whether ASTM F404-18a improved the safety of high
chairs. Staff concluded that the addition of subsection 6.5.1 was a
substantive change to ASTM F404-18 that did not improve the safety of
high chairs.
In the June 5, 2019 staff briefing memorandum, staff explained that
the stability requirements in ASTM F404-18 address stability as the
child occupant moves within and about the chair, and from external
forces on the chair, such as sibling or caregiver interactions. ASTM
developed these stability requirements because high chairs are intended
for use by mobile children, up to 3 years of age. ASTM's rationale for
exempting reclined seat high chairs from stability requirements was
that the test methods in ASTM F404-18 could not be conducted on these
products, as required in the standard. Staff's briefing memorandum
stated that ASTM's assertion that stability testing could not be done
on reclined seat high chairs was inaccurate, because staff was able to
test such products under the standard's existing stability
requirements.
Staff's briefing memorandum also expressed concern that exempting
high chairs and high chair accessories intended for children who are
unable to sit upright unassisted (birth to approximately 6 months of
age) from stability requirements was not consistent with other product
standards that are intended for the same age group, such as bouncers
and bassinets, which also are intended for young infants, but are
tested to stability requirements to prevent tipovers. Tipover
requirements in the bouncers and bassinets standards (16 CFR parts 1229
and 1218, respectively) are intended to address tipovers caused by the
infant user moving within the product (bouncers), as well as external
forces (bassinets), such as sibling or caregiver interactions with the
product. Moreover, staff's review of high chair incident data showed
that tipover incidents resulting from occupant movement within the high
chair, or from external forces, such as a sibling or caregiver acting
on the high chair, do occur with children 6 months and younger.
Based on staff's recommendation, the Commission voted not to adopt
the revised voluntary standard and maintained the mandatory standard
based on ASTM F404-18.\1\ Staff notified ASTM of the Commission's
decision to retain ASTM F404-18 on June 19, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/Update%20to%20Voluntary%20Standard%20for%20High%20Chairs.pdf?5nvjyCgQrNh.pQhwmCtd85aQJjc2mohX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On January 4, 2021, ASTM notified CPSC that it had again revised
the voluntary standard for high chairs, approving ASTM F404-20 on
October 1, 2020.\2\ As this preamble discusses, based on CPSC staff's
review of ASTM F404-20,\3\ the Commission will allow the revised
voluntary standard to become the mandatory standard because the revised
requirements in the voluntary standard either improve the safety of
high chairs, or are safety neutral. Accordingly, by operation of law
under section 104(b)(4)(B) of the CPSIA, ASTM F404-20 will become the
mandatory consumer product safety standard for high chairs on July 3,
2021.\4\ 15 U.S.C. 2056a(b)(4)(B). This direct final rule updates 16
CFR part 1231 to incorporate by reference the revised voluntary
standard, ASTM F404-20.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ ASTM published ASTM F404-20 in December 2020. Until the
standard becomes effective on July 3, 2021, a read-only copy of
ASTM's standard is available at: https://www.astm.org/CPSC.htm.
After the effective date of the revised part 1231, ASTM F404-20
becomes the mandatory standard for high chairs, and it will be
available, to read only, at: https://www.astm.org/READINGLIBRARY/.
\3\ CPSC staff's briefing memorandum regarding ASTM F404-20 is
available at: https://www.cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/ASTMs-Revised-Safety-Standard-for-High-Chairs.pdf?_dFed3_8cTsV0J0TTVXk4oCRCWUGxsPx.
\4\ The statute provides that if the Commission does not take
action to reject a revised standard, the revised voluntary standard
will be considered a consumer product safety standard issued under
section 9 of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2058),
effective 180 days after the Commission received notification of the
revision (or a later date specified by the Commission in the Federal
Register). 15 U.S.C. 2056a(b)(4)(B). In this case, 180 days from the
January 4, 2021 notice date is July 3, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Description of ASTM F404-20
The ASTM standard for high chairs includes performance
requirements, test methods, and requirements for warning labels and
instructional literature, to address hazards to infants and children
associated with high chairs. ASTM has revised the voluntary standard
for high chairs twice since ASTM F404-18, which is the current
mandatory standard. Section I.B of this preamble explains that the
Commission previously rejected a revised high chair voluntary standard,
ASTM F404-18a, in 2019, because the standard exempted reclined seat
high chair products from stability testing. The latest revision, ASTM
F404-20, now includes stability testing for these products, developed
in conjunction with CPSC staff. Accordingly, the Commission will allow
ASTM F404-20 to become the mandatory standard, and is updating 16 CFR
part 1231 to reference this most recent updated voluntary standard.
This section describes the changes in ASTM F404-20 compared to ASTM
[[Page 17298]]
F404-18. On October 1, 2020, ASTM approved a revised version of the
standard, ASTM F404-20. In accordance with CPSIA section 104(b)(4)(B),
ASTM notified CPSC of this revision on January 4, 2021. ASTM F404-20
includes several substantive changes, several revisions to clarify
existing requirements, and editorial revisions that do not alter
substantive requirements in the standard or affect safety.
A. Substantive Revisions
ASTM F404-20 contains substantive revisions from the current
mandatory standard to distinguish performance requirements and test
methods for two types of high chairs: (1) ``[h]igh chairs and high
chair accessories that have adjustment positions that, per the
manufacturer's instructions, are recommended for use only for children
able to sit upright unassisted (approximately 6 months of age) or
weighing more than 20 lb (9.1 kg)'' (hereinafter referred to as upright
seat high chairs) and (2) ``[h]igh chairs and high chair accessories
that have adjustment positions that are manufacturer's recommended use
positions for use with children who are unable to sit upright
unassisted (birth to approximately 6 months of age) or weigh 20 lb (9.1
kg) or less, when adjusted into the most onerous manufacturer's
recommended use and/or adjustment position for each direction to be
tested'' (hereinafter referred to as reclined seat high chairs).
Primarily, ASTM F404-20 provides new performance requirements and
associated test methods to test the stability of reclined seat high
chairs.
1. Performance Requirements
CPSC staff worked closely with ASTM to help develop new stability
testing requirements for reclined seat high chair products. In November
2018, CPSC staff tested six reclined seat high chair products to
proposed stability requirements from a manufacturer who expressed
concerns about the ability to test reclined seat high chairs. In March
2019, CPSC staff hosted an ASTM reclined seat high chair task group
meeting at CPSC's laboratory in Rockville, Maryland, where staff
demonstrated testing on reclined seat high chair products. The task
group decided to explore the idea of using the stability test from the
bassinet and cradle standard to develop stability requirements for
reclined seat high chair products because this test addresses the tip
over hazard that was most concerning to both ASTM and CPSC staff: The
interaction of a sibling or caregiver pulling on the reclined seat
product. The task group presented the idea of developing a test for
reclined seat high chairs that is similar to the bassinet stability
testing at the ASTM subcommittee teleconference on April 4, 2019. This
idea ultimately was the basis of the new stability requirements for
reclined seat products in ASTM F404-20.
Substantively, ASTM F404-20 improves the safety of high chairs
because it adds a new stability requirement and test method for
reclined seat high chairs. Table 1 below summarizes the differences
between ASTM-F404-18 and ASTM F404-20 with regard to stability testing
in section 6.5 of ASTM F404 (changes are highlighted in bold).
Table 1--Stability Performance Requirements: Comparison of F404-18 to F404-20
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section F404-18 F404-20
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.5........................... Stability.................... Stability
6.5.1......................... Forward and Sideways High chairs and high chair accessories that have
Stability--A high chair adjustment positions that, per the
shall not tip over when manufacturer's instructions, are recommended for
setup as defined in 7.7.2.1- use only for children able to sit upright
7.7.2.3, and then when unassisted (approximately 6 months of age) or
forces are applied in weighing more than 20 lb (9.1 kg) shall comply
accordance with 7.7.2.4 and with 6.5.1.1 to 6.5.1.3. in all those
7.7.2.5. manufacturer's recommended use and adjustment
positions.
6.5.1.1....................... ............................. Forward and Sideways Stability--A high chair
shall not tip over when setup as defined in
7.7.2.1-7.7.2.3, and then when forces are
applied in accordance with 7.7.2.4 and 7.7.2.5.
6.5.1.2....................... ............................. Rearward Stability--When setup as defined in
7.7.2.1- 7.7.2.3, and then tested in accordance
with 7.7.2.6, the high chair shall have a
Rearward Stability Index of 50 or more.
6.5.1.3....................... ............................. Stability with Child Climbing into Chair--A high
chair shall not tip over when tested in
accordance with 7.7.4.
6.5.2......................... Rearward Stability--When High chairs and high chair accessories that have
setup as defined in 7.7.2.1- adjustment positions that are manufacturer's
7.7.2.3, and then tested in recommended use positions for use with children
accordance with 7.7.2.6, the who are unable to sit upright unassisted (birth
high chair shall have a to approximately 6 months of age) or weigh 20 lb
Rearward Stability Index of (9.1 kg) or less, when adjusted into the most
50 or more. onerous manufacturer's recommended use and/or
adjustment position for each direction to be
tested, shall not tip over and shall retain the
CAMI dummy when tested in accordance with 7.7.3,
in the forward, rearward, and sideways
directions.
6.5.3......................... Stability with Child Climbing
into Chair--A high chair
shall not tip over when
tested in accordance with
7.7.3.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Stability Test Methods
ASTM F404-18 requires testing a high chair for stability in the
forward, rearward, and sideways directions, requiring that the chair
not tip over as the child occupant, up to 3 years of age, moves within
the chair. Because this test was intended for upright seat high chairs
designed for children up to 3 years old, the test places a total of 40-
lb weights (two 20-lb weights), to simulate the weight of a 95th
percentile 36-month-old, on the seat of the high chair to simulate a
child in the seat, which acts as a counter-balance when horizontal
forces are applied in the forward, rearward and sideways directions.
The forces applied are designed to simulate the forces that the child
occupant would exert on the high chair by moving within the seat of the
product.
For reclined seat high chairs, the ASTM subcommittee concluded that
this stability testing developed for upright seat high chairs was
inadequate, because the child's counter-balance load is different,
based on the intended weight range for reclined seat products.
[[Page 17299]]
Stability testing for upright seat high chairs uses a 40-lb counter-
balance weight, because the weight range is for children weighing more
than 20 lbs. This 40-lb counter-balance weight would not effectively
test the stability of reclined seat high chair products that are
intended for lower-weight infants from birth (~7 lb) to 20 lbs, because
a 40-lb counter-balance weight would make the reclined seat high chair
product more stable than a 20-lb counter-balance weight. A 20 lb
counter-balance weight is a more stringent weight to test stability for
high chairs intended for lower weight children. Moreover, the seat
recline affects both the seat back and the seat bottom, causing the
center of mass to be distributed differently than with an upright seat
high chair. Weight distribution in reclined seat high chairs is more
towards the seat back, whereas weight distribution in upright seat high
chairs is more towards the seat bottom. Finally, due to the inclined
seat design, test engineers had difficulty placing the 40 lb test
weight in the seat to conduct stability testing.
Because of these design differences, ASTM developed a new testing
methodology for reclined seat high chairs, in collaboration with CPSC
staff. After evaluating several test methods, the task group decided
that the stability testing from the bassinet standard was most
appropriate to test reclined seat high chairs. Instead of using a
weight to simulate a child as a counter-balance in the seat, the new
stability test uses a CAMI Newborn Dummy (7.5 lb). The anthropomorphic
CAMI Newborn Dummy better fits the reclined seat, and the weight is
better distributed within the high chair than with the barbell type
weights used to test upright seat high chairs. Also, the test engineer
can more easily locate the points on the reclined seat high chair to
place the loads around the chair. Using the CAMI Newborn Dummy instead
of weights resulted in more repeatable and consistent test results.
Given that reclined seat high chairs are designed for infants in a
lower age/weight range (birth to 20 lbs), who have limited moving
capabilities, these infants are unlikely to create instability issues
by themselves. Instead, instability for reclined seat high chair
products would likely come from external sources (e.g., caregivers
bumping into the chair and/or siblings pulling on the chair).
Accordingly, for reclined seat products, the new stability test method
in section 7.7.3 of ASTM F404-20 adopts stability requirements and
testing from the bassinet standard, ASTM F2194-16e1, which was designed
to test siblings interacting with the product. Section 7.4 of ASTM
F404-20 uses the CAMI Newborn Dummy as the counter-balance weight in
the reclined seat high chair to simulate external forces that may tip
the product over, such as a sibling pulling down on the edge of the
product. This test employs a dual application of horizontal and
vertical forces to simulate application of an angled load; the
combination of the weights and forces in the testing simulate the mean
strength of a 2-year-old pulling on the product.
Following is a description of each new stability test method for
reclined seat high chair products:
7.7.3.4 Forward Stability, requires that a 23-lb weight be
hung onto the forward-most edge of the high chair seat or tray. The
high chair must not tip over while this load is maintained, and then a
horizontal force of 5 lb is applied outward from the center of the
seat, at the same location as the 23-lb weight.
7.7.3.5 Rearward Stability, requires that a 23-lb weight
be hung onto the rearmost edge of the seat. The high chair must not tip
over while this load is maintained, and then a horizontal force of 5 lb
is applied outward from the center of the seat, at the same location as
the 23-lb weight.
7.7.3.6 Sideways Stability, requires that a 23-lb weight
be hung onto the outermost point of the frame on the side being tested.
The high chair must not tip over while this load is maintained and then
a horizontal force of 5 lb is applied from the center of the seat, at
the location as the 23-lb weight.
The Commission concludes that new stability performance and test
methods for reclined seat high chairs improve the safety of high
chairs, because these tests are designed to address tipover hazards
associated with infant users moving within the product and external
forces like a sibling or caregiver interacting with the product.
Additionally, use of the 7.5-lb CAMI Newborn Dummy provides a more
stringent test for the tipover hazard. The test is more stringent
because a lighter weight provides less of a counter-balance in
assessing external forces acting on the reclined seat high chair
products than the heavier 40-lb weight used to test upright seat high
chairs intended for children up to 3 years old.
3. Static Load Test Methods
a. High Chair Seat
ASTM F404-18, the current mandatory standard, requires a static
load test for high chair seats. The test requires the high chair seat
to support static loads without causing any hazardous conditions, such
as collapsing or breaking.
ASTM F404-20 splits into two parts section 7.6.1 Seat Static Load
Test to separate the test method intended for upright seat high chairs
in section 7.6.1.1, from a new test method intended for reclined seat
high chairs in section 7.6.1.2. Separating test requirements by product
type allows for static load testing requirements based on the weight of
the child the seat was intended to hold. Accordingly, section 7.6.1.2
of ASTM F404-20, for reclined seat high chairs, uses half the test
weight compared to section 7.6.1.1, for upright seat high chairs, to
test for collapse (50 lbs applied over 60 seconds, compared to 100 lbs
applied over 60 seconds in section 7.6.1.1).
The rationale for the 100-lb load for the upright seat high chair
static load test is that it represents 2.5 times that of the maximum
occupant's weight of 40 lbs. The test weight for reclined seat high
chairs in section 7.6.1.2 follows this same rationale, using a 50-lb
load weight, which is 2.5 times the maximum occupant's weight of 20
lbs. Lowering the static load test weight for products intended for
lower-weight occupants provides the same level of safety for both
upright and reclined seat high chairs, because the respective weights
represent the maximum intended occupant weights for each product type.
Accordingly, because both types of high chairs in section 7.6.1 use the
same weight ratio to test the static load, this change is neutral to
the safety of high chairs.
b. Step/Footrest
The current mandatory standard, ASTM F404-18, requires that a step
or footrest shall support static loads without causing any hazardous
conditions, such as collapsing and breaking. This step/footrest static
load test is designed to test that the step/foot rest of the high chair
will not collapse under the weight of the child climbing into the high
chair. Section 7.6.2 Step/Footrest Static Load Test of ASTM F404-20 has
a new section, 7.6.2.1, which exempts high chairs intended for children
weighing less than 20 lbs from the step/footrest static load testing
requirement, because infants who weigh less than 20 lbs would not be
mobile enough to climb into the high chair using the step/footrest.
Staff states that they are unaware of any incidents involving step/
footrest collapse with children who weigh less than 20 lbs, meaning
children 6 months old or younger. Based on this analysis, the
[[Page 17300]]
Commission concludes that this change is neutral to the safety of high
chairs.
c. High Chair Tray
Currently, in ASTM F404-18, the intent of the tray static load test
is to ensure that a high chair tray does not collapse under the weight
of the child occupant if placed there temporarily while the caregiver
is putting the child into the high chair. ASTM F404-20, section 7.6.3
Tray Static Load Test, separates the tray static load test into two
parts: Section 7.6.3.1 describes testing high chairs intended for
children weighing more than 20 lbs (9 kg), and section 7.6.3.2
describes testing high chairs intended for children weighing 20 lbs or
less. Because high chairs intended for infants who weigh 20 lbs or less
would have less of a static load to cause collapse of the high chair
tray, section 7.6.3.2 uses half the test weight of the tray static load
test for high chairs intended for children who weight more than 20 lbs
(25 lbs applied over 60 seconds, compared to 50 lbs applied over 60
seconds in section 7.6.3.1).
As with the high chair seat static load testing, ASTM F404-20
requires that both types of high chairs be tested to the same level of
safety, because load testing is adjusted based on the maximum weight of
the child occupant. Accordingly, this change is neutral to the safety
of high chairs because differentiating the tray static load test based
on the weight of the intended child occupant does not reduce the level
of safety for high chair products.
4. Dynamic High Chair Test Methods
ASTM F404-18 requires that all high chairs meet a dynamic high
chair test, which is intended to address the collapse of a high chair
when an older child (up to 3 years old) bounces up and down in the
chair. Section 7.10.1 of ASTM F404-20 adds an exemption from this test
for high chairs intended for use with children weighing 20 lbs or less.
ASTM's rationale for the exemption is that lower weight users of the
product will not be mobile enough to bounce significantly in the high
chair, or bear enough weight to cause the high chair to collapse. Staff
is unaware of incidents of high chair collapse due to lower weight
children, 6 months old and younger, bouncing in the product.
Accordingly, this change is neutral to the safety of high chairs,
because exemption of high chairs intended for children weighing 20 lbs
or less from dynamic testing is unlikely to reduce the level of safety
for these products, given that these high chairs are intended for use
by infants with limited mobility.
B. Non-Substantive Changes
ASTM F404-20 also includes minor additions and revisions that are
editorial and do not alter any substantive requirements in the
standard. Because they do not change any substantive requirements,
these revisions are neutral regarding the safety of high chairs.
1. Referenced Documents
Section 2 of ASTM F404-20 lists other standards referenced in F404.
Section 2.3 of ASTM F404-20, ANSI standards, was revised to include a
reference to ANSI Z535.1 Safety Colors. This revision was made to be
consistent with other ASTM standards that reference the ANSI standard
for safety colors for use in distinguishing warning labels.
Additionally, section 2.4 of ASTM F404-20, Other references, adds a
reference to new test equipment, the CAMI Infant Dummy Mark II and the
CAMI Newborn Dummy, which are used in the new stability testing for
reclined seat high chair products. Staff considers these changes to be
neutral to the safety of high chairs, because they are editorial in
nature and do not substantively alter requirements in the standard.
2. Terminology
Section 3.1.7.2 of ASTM F404-20, Discussion, includes a new note
stating that a product that has an elevated seat and is designed or
promoted for eating and feeding, or shown near a dining table would be
considered within the scope of the high chair standard. Staff considers
this change to be neutral to the safety of high chairs, because it
provides further discussion on the definition of ``high chairs,'' but
does not alter the definition, nor change the scope of the standard.
Other changes in Terminology include changing the term ``free
standing'' to ``free-standing,'' and in section 3.1.21, revising the
definition of ``static load,'' as follows:
3.1.21 static load, n--vertically downward force load applied by a
calibrated force gauge or by dead weights. weights or other means.
These changes in terminology are neutral to the safety of high
chairs because they are editorial in nature and do not substantively
alter the definitions.
3. Calibrations and Standardizations, General Requirements, and
Performance Requirements
ASTM made a few editorial changes to the sections of ASTM F404-20
on calibrations and standardizations, general requirements, and
performance requirements, to clarify provisions and to be consistent
with other ASTM standards. For example, ASTM made editorial changes
such as revising ``0.210 in (5 mm)'' to ``0.210-in (5-mm).'' These
revisions are neutral to the safety of high chairs, because they do not
substantively alter the requirements in these sections.
III. Incorporation by Reference
Section 1231.2 of the direct final rule incorporates by reference
ASTM F404-20. The Office of the Federal Register (OFR) has regulations
regarding incorporation by reference. 1 CFR part 51. Under these
regulations, agencies must discuss, in the preamble to a final rule,
ways in which the material the agency incorporates by reference is
reasonably available to interested parties, and how interested parties
can obtain the material. In addition, the preamble to the final rule
must summarize the material. 1 CFR 51.5(b).
In accordance with the OFR regulations, section II. Description of
ASTM F404-20 of this preamble summarizes the major provisions of ASTM
F404-20 that the Commission incorporates by reference into 16 CFR part
1231. The standard is reasonably available to interested parties and
interested parties can purchase a copy of ASTM F404-20 from ASTM
International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken,
PA 19428-2959 USA; phone; 610-832-9585; www.astm.org. Additionally,
until the direct final rule takes effect, a read-only copy of ASTM
F404-20 is available for viewing on ASTM's website at: https://www.astm.org/CPSC.htm. Once the rule takes effect, a read-only copy of
the standard will be available for viewing on the ASTM website at:
https://www.astm.org/READINGLIBRARY/. Interested parties can also
schedule an appointment to inspect a copy of the standard at CPSC's
Division of the Secretariat, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission,
Room 820, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, telephone: 301-
504-7479; email: [email protected].
IV. Certification
Section 14(a) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (CPSA; 15 U.S.C.
2051-2089) requires manufacturers of products subject to a consumer
product safety rule under the CPSA, or to a similar rule, ban,
standard, or regulation under any other act enforced by the Commission,
to certify that the products comply with all applicable CPSC
requirements. 15 U.S.C. 2063(a). Such certification must be based on a
test of each product, or on a reasonable testing program, or, for
children's products, on
[[Page 17301]]
tests of a sufficient number of samples by a third party conformity
assessment body accredited by CPSC to test according to the applicable
requirements. As noted, standards issued under section 104(b)(1)(B) of
the CPSIA are ``consumer product safety standards.'' Thus, they are
subject to the testing and certification requirements of section 14 of
the CPSA.
Because high chairs are children's products, a CPSC-accepted third
party conformity assessment body must test samples of the products for
compliance with part 1231. Products subject to part 1231 also must
comply with all other applicable CPSC requirements, such as the lead
content requirements in section 101 of the CPSIA,\5\ the phthalates
prohibitions in section 108 of the CPSIA \6\ and 16 CFR part 1307, the
tracking label requirements in section 14(a)(5) of the CPSA,\7\ and the
consumer registration form requirements in section 104(d) of the
CPSIA.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 1278a.
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 2057c.
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 2063(a)(5).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 2056a(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Notice of Requirements
In accordance with section 14(a)(3)(B)(iv) of the CPSIA, the
Commission previously published a notice of requirements (NOR) for
accreditation of third party conformity assessment bodies (third party
labs) for testing high chairs, and codified the requirement at 16 CFR
Sec. 1112.15(b)(44). 83 FR at 28368-70. The NOR provided the criteria
and process for CPSC to accept accreditation of third party labs for
testing high chairs to 16 CFR part 1231. Id. The Commission codified
NORs for all mandatory standards for durable infant or toddler products
in ``Requirements Pertaining to Third Party Conformity Assessment
Bodies,'' 16 CFR part 1112.
ASTM F404-20 includes new stability requirements for testing
reclined seat high chairs. We note that the current mandatory standard
based on ASTM F404-18 already requires stability testing for high
chairs intended for children up to 3 years old, such that the
Commission considers third party labs that are currently CPSC-accepted
for 16 CFR part 1231 have demonstrated competence for the new stability
testing for reclined seat high chairs in ASTM F404-20.
Additional testing requirements for reclined seat high chair
products in ASTM F404-20, however, introduce test equipment previously
not required in testing to ASTM F404-18, specifically, a 23-lb weight,
and a CAMI Newborn Dummy. Similar stability testing, with similar
weights and the CAMI Newborn Dummy, are also required in testing to the
mandatory standard for bassinets and cradles, 16 CFR part 1218, based
on ASTM F2194-16e1. Additionally, the CAMI Newborn Dummy is required
test equipment for the mandatory standard for hand-held infant
carriers, 16 CFR part 1225, based on ASTM F2050-16. Currently, 19 third
party labs are CPSC-accepted to test to the Safety Standard for High
Chairs, and 17 of these 19 third party labs are also CPSC-accepted to
test to part 1218 and/or part 1225. Accordingly, only two of the 19
third party labs will likely have to source new test materials to test
to ASTM F404-20.
Based on experience purchasing test equipment, these two third
party labs, one in Singapore and one in Taiwan, should be able to
purchase the necessary weights, as these weights can be as simple as
gym/barbell weights or even weight bags. Additionally, staff advises
that the CAMI Newborn Dummy is available from at least three sources
globally. Because the effective date of the revised high chair standard
is July 3, 2021, these two third party labs have sufficient time to
acquire the necessary test equipment.
Third party labs will begin testing to the new standard when ASTM
F404-20 goes into effect on July 3, 2021, and the existing
accreditations that the Commission has accepted for testing to this
standard will cover testing to the revised standard. Accordingly, the
existing NOR for the Safety Standard for High Chairs will remain in
place, and CPSC-accepted third party labs are expected to update the
scope of the third party lab's accreditations to reflect the revised
high chair standard in the normal course of renewing their
accreditations.
VI. Direct Final Rule Process
The Commission is issuing this rule as a direct final rule.
Although the Administrative Procedure Act (APA; 5 U.S.C. 551-559)
generally requires agencies to provide notice of a rule and an
opportunity for interested parties to comment on it, section 553 of the
APA provides an exception when the agency, ``for good cause finds''
that notice and comment are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.'' Id. 553(b)(B). The Commission concludes that
when it updates a reference to an ASTM standard that the Commission
incorporated by reference under section 104(b) of the CPSIA, notice and
comment are not necessary.
Under the process set out in section 104(b)(4)(B) of the CPSIA,
when ASTM revises a standard that the Commission has previously
incorporated by reference under section 104(b)(1)(B) of the CPSIA, that
revision will become the new CPSC standard, unless the Commission
determines that ASTM's revision does not improve the safety of the
product. Thus, unless the Commission makes such a determination, the
ASTM revision becomes CPSC's standard by operation of law. The
Commission is allowing ASTM F404-20 to become CPSC's new standard. The
purpose of this direct final rule is to update the reference in the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) so that it reflects the version of
the standard that takes effect by statute. This rule updates the
reference in the CFR, but under the terms of the CPSIA, ASTM F404-20
takes effect as the new CPSC standard for high chairs, even if the
Commission does not issue this rule. Thus, public comments would not
alter substantive changes to the standard or the effect of the revised
standard as a consumer product safety rule under section 104(b) of the
CPSIA. Under these circumstances, notice and comment are unnecessary.
In Recommendation 95-4, the Administrative Conference of the United
States (ACUS) endorses direct final rulemaking as an appropriate
procedure to expedite rules that are noncontroversial and that are not
expected to generate significant adverse comments. See 60 FR 43108
(Aug. 18, 1995). ACUS recommends that agencies use the direct final
rule process when they act under the ``unnecessary'' prong of the good
cause exemption in 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). Consistent with the ACUS
recommendation, the Commission is publishing this rule as a direct
final rule, because CPSC does not expect any significant adverse
comments.
Unless CPSC receives a significant adverse comment within 30 days
of this notification, the rule will become effective on July 3, 2021.
In accordance with ACUS's recommendation, the Commission considers a
significant adverse comment to be ``one where the commenter explains
why the rule would be inappropriate,'' including an assertion
challenging ``the rule's underlying premise or approach,'' or a claim
that the rule ``would be ineffective or unacceptable without change.''
60 FR 43108, 43111. As noted, this rule merely updates a reference in
the CFR to reflect a change that occurs by statute.
If the Commission receives a significant adverse comment, the
Commission will withdraw this direct final rule. Depending on the
comment and other circumstances, the Commission may then incorporate
the adverse comment into a subsequent
[[Page 17302]]
direct final rule or publish a notice of proposed rulemaking, providing
an opportunity for public comment.
VII. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA; 5 U.S.C. 601-612) generally
requires agencies to review proposed and final rules for their
potential economic impact on small entities, including small
businesses, and prepare regulatory flexibility analyses. 5 U.S.C. 603,
604. The RFA applies to any rule that is subject to notice and comment
procedures under section 553 of the APA. Id. As discussed in section
VI. Direct Final Rule Process of this preamble, the Commission has
determined that notice and the opportunity to comment are unnecessary
for this rule. Therefore, the RFA does not apply. The Commission also
notes the limited nature of this document, which merely updates the
incorporation by reference to reflect the mandatory CPSC standard that
takes effect under section 104 of the CPSIA.
VIII. Paperwork Reduction Act
The current mandatory standard for high chairs includes
requirements for marking, labeling, and instructional literature that
constitute a ``collection of information,'' as defined in the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA; 44 U.S.C. 3501-3521). The revised mandatory
standard for high chairs does not alter these requirements. The
Commission took the steps required by the PRA for information
collections when it adopted 16 CFR part 1231, including obtaining
approval and a control number. Because the information collection is
unchanged, the revision does not affect the information collection
requirements or approval related to the standard.
IX. Environmental Considerations
The Commission's regulations provide a categorical exclusion for
the Commission's rules from any requirement to prepare an environmental
assessment or an environmental impact statement where they ``have
little or no potential for affecting the human environment.'' 16 CFR
1021.5(c)(2). This rule falls within the categorical exclusion, so no
environmental assessment or environmental impact statement is required.
X. Preemption
Section 26(a) of the CPSA provides that where a consumer product
safety standard is in effect and applies to a product, no state or
political subdivision of a state may either establish or continue in
effect a requirement dealing with the same risk of injury unless the
state requirement is identical to the Federal standard. 15 U.S.C.
2075(a). Section 26(c) of the CPSA also provides that states or
political subdivisions of states may apply to CPSC for an exemption
from this preemption under certain circumstances. Section 104(b) of the
CPSIA deems rules issued under that provision ``consumer product safety
standards.'' Therefore, once a rule issued under section 104 of the
CPSIA takes effect, it will preempt in accordance with section 26(a) of
the CPSA.
XI. Effective Date
Under the procedure set forth in section 104(b)(4)(B) of the CPSIA,
when a voluntary standards organization revises a standard that the
Commission adopted as a mandatory standard, the revision becomes the
CPSC standard within 180 days of notification to the Commission, unless
the Commission determines that the revision does not improve the safety
of the product, or the Commission sets a later date in the Federal
Register. 15 U.S.C. 2056a(b)(4)(B). The Commission is taking neither of
those actions with respect to the revised standard for high chairs.
Therefore, ASTM F404-20 automatically will take effect as the new
mandatory standard for high chairs on July 3, 2021, 180 days after the
Commission received notice of the revision on January 4, 2021. As a
direct final rule, unless the Commission receives a significant adverse
comment within 30 days of this document, the rule will become effective
on July 3, 2021.
XII. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act (CRA; 5 U.S.C. 801-808) states that
before a rule may take effect, the agency issuing the rule must submit
the rule, and certain related information, to each House of Congress
and the Comptroller General. 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1). The CRA submission
must indicate whether the rule is a ``major rule.'' The CRA states that
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) determines
whether a rule qualifies as a ``major rule.''
Pursuant to the CRA, this rule does not qualify as a ``major
rule,'' as defined in 5 U.S.C. 804(2). To comply with the CRA, CPSC
will submit the required information to each House of Congress and the
Comptroller General.
List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 1231
Consumer protection, Imports, Incorporation by reference, Imports,
Infants and children, Law enforcement, Safety, Toys.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Commission amends 16
CFR chapter II as follows:
PART 1231--SAFETY STANDARD FOR HIGH CHAIRS
0
1. Revise the authority citation for part 1231 to read as follows:
Authority: Sec. 104, Pub. L. 110-314, 122 Stat. 3016 (15 U.S.C.
2056a); Sec 3, Pub. L. 112-28, 125 Stat. 273.
0
2. Revise Sec. 1231.2 to read as follows:
Sec. 1231.2 Requirements for High Chairs.
Each high chair shall comply with all applicable provisions of ASTM
F404-20, Standard Consumer Safety Specification for High Chairs,
approved on October 1, 2020. The Director of the Federal Register
approves this incorporation by reference in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You may obtain a copy from ASTM
International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken,
PA 19428-2959; phone: (610) 832-9585; www.astm.org. A read-only copy of
the standard is available for viewing on the ASTM website at https://www.astm.org/READINGLIBRARY/. You may inspect a copy at the Division of
the Secretariat, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Room 820,
4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, telephone (301) 504-7479,
email: [email protected], or at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, email [email protected], or go to:
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Alberta E. Mills,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-06419 Filed 4-1-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P