Certification of Evidence for Proof of Service, 17098-17100 [2021-06535]
Download as PDF
17098
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 61 / Thursday, April 1, 2021 / Proposed Rules
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01, Rev.1,
associated implementing instructions,
and Environmental Planning Policy
COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f) and have made. The Coast Guard
has determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
promulgates the operating regulations or
procedures for drawbridges. Normally
such actions are categorically excluded
from further review, under paragraph
L49, of Chapter 3, Table 3–1 of the U.S.
Coast Guard Environmental Planning
Implementation Procedures.
Neither a Record of Environmental
Consideration nor a Memorandum for
the Record are required for this rule. We
seek any comments or information that
may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
V. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
16:05 Mar 31, 2021
Dated: March 16, 2021.
John P. Nadeau,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Eighth Coast Guard District.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
AGENCY:
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
ACTION:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1;
DHS Delegation No. 0170.1.
■
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
submissions in response to this
document, see DHS’s eRulemaking
System of Records notice (85 FR 14226,
March 11, 2020).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
as being available in this docket and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
website’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
Jkt 253001
2. Add § 117.111 to read as follows:
§ 117.111
Mobile River.
(a) The draw of the CSX
Transportation railroad bridge, mile
13.3 located near Hurricane, AL shall be
remotely operated by the bridge
operator at CSX’s bridge remote control
center in Mobile, Alabama. Closed
Circuit TVs, infrared detectors,
communications systems and
information technology systems have
been installed at the bridge. Vessels can
contact the CSX bridge operator via
VHF–FM channel 13 or by telephone at
the number displayed on the signs
posted at the bridge to request an
opening of the draw.
(b) CSX will return the operator to the
bridge location within 3 hours following
any of the situations in this paragraph
(b):
(1) Any component of the remote
operations system fails and prevents the
remote operator from being able to
visually identify vessels, communicate
with vessels, detect vessels immediately
underneath the bridge or visually
identify trains approaching the bridge.
(2) CSX fails to meet Federal Railway
Administration (FRA) or any other
government agency safety requirements.
(3) Anytime that CSX procedures,
equipment or operators fail to safely
open and close the bridge fail.
(4) Anytime at the direction of the
District Commander.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
[FR Doc. 2021–06483 Filed 3–31–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 3
RIN 2900–AR13
Certification of Evidence for Proof of
Service
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Proposed rule.
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its
adjudication regulations concerning the
nature of evidence that VA will accept
as proof of military service and
character of discharge. In the past, VA
only accepted original service
documents, copies of service documents
issued by the service department or by
a public custodian of records, or
photocopies of service documents if
they were certified to be true copies of
documents acceptable to VA by an
accredited agent, attorney or service
organization representative who had
successfully completed VA-prescribed
training on military records. This
proposed change would allow VA to
accept uncertified copies of service
documents as evidence of military
service if VA is satisfied that the
documents are free from alteration. The
intended effect of this amendment is to
streamline and improve the timeliness
of adjudication and claims processing
for VA benefits—without compromising
program integrity.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before June 1, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted through www.Regulations.gov
or mailed to: Pension and Fiduciary
Service (21PF), Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20420. Comments
should indicate that they are submitted
in response to RIN 2900–AR13–
Certification of Evidence for Proof of
Service. Comments received will be
available at www.Regulations.gov for
public viewing, inspection or copies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Klusman, Lead Program Analyst,
Pension and Fiduciary Service (21PF),
Veterans Benefits Administration,
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01APP1.SGM
01APP1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 61 / Thursday, April 1, 2021 / Proposed Rules
20420, (202) 632–8863. (This is not a
toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
cornerstone of eligibility for VA benefits
is active military, naval, or air service
and a discharge or release under
conditions other than dishonorable. VA
regulations at 38 CFR 3.203 establish the
nature of the evidence VA will accept as
proof of active military service and
character of discharge. In general, those
regulations require original service
documents; VA will accept copies of
those documents only if the copies are
issued by the military service
department or by a public custodian of
records or photocopies if they are
certified to be true copies of documents
acceptable to VA by an accredited agent,
attorney or service organization
representative who has successfully
completed VA-prescribed training on
military records.
On November 3, 1980, VA amended
38 CFR 3.203 as a consequence of the
Department of Defense’s revision to its
DD Form 214, (Certificate of Release or
Discharge from Active Duty). 45 FR
72654 (Nov. 3, 1980). Under the revised
version of § 3.203, VA would only
accept a copy of a DD Form 214 or
Certificate of Discharge if the copy was
issued by the service department. VA’s
revisions precluded acceptance of a
document certified by a notary public or
a public record custodian without
verification by the service department.
However, in June 1981, VA proposed
to further amend § 3.203 to again accept
a copy of a discharge document certified
as a true and exact copy by a public
custodian of records. 46 FR 32036 (Jun.
19, 1981). VA explained that ‘‘[i]t now
appears that failure to use certified
copies of discharge documents is
causing lengthy delays in claims
processing because verification of
service must be obtained from the
service departments in many more cases
than we originally believed.’’ 46 FR
32036. VA noted that, ‘‘[s]ince the
process of obtaining verification is
lengthy, the volume of requests is
rapidly increasing. Consequently, we
are proposing to amend § 3.203 so as to
again accept a certified copy of a DD
Form 214 or the Certificate of Discharge
issued by a public custodian of
records.’’ Id. VA published a final rule
adopting these proposed changes in
October 1981. 46 FR 51246 (Oct. 19,
1981).
In June 2000, VA proposed further
revision to § 3.203 to allow VA to accept
photocopies of service documents as
proof of service if an accredited agent,
attorney, or service organization
representative who had successfully
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Mar 31, 2021
Jkt 253001
completed VA-prescribed training on
military records certified them to be true
copies of documents acceptable to VA.
VA explained that the proposed
amendment would ‘‘help streamline
claims processing because it will reduce
the number of instances where VA must
seek verification of military service from
the service department.’’ 65 FR 39580.
VA published a final rule adopting these
changes in April 2001. 66 FR 19857
(Apr. 18, 2001).
Under the current process, when the
Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA)
receives uncertified service documents
(i.e., not originals or certified copies), it
must seek to verify service through
other means, such as data sharing with
other Federal agencies. Although VA is
engaged in these efforts, the available
tools to rapidly request verification of
service only apply to service that ended
after 1994. Thus, particularly for
pension and survivor benefits claims—
where the population skews towards a
service period prior to 1994—VA cannot
utilize the more rapid service
verification methods noted above, as the
majority of those claimants served in (or
are beneficiaries of those who served in)
periods that pre-date 1994.
VA’s inability to use the more rapid
service verification methods in these
cases often adds months to the claims
process, and yet the responses received
from the other Federal agencies almost
always affirm the information that was
already available on the uncertified
service document. And in instances
where the records cannot be located—
such as those destroyed in the 1973 fire
at the National Personnel Records
Center—VA must conduct additional
review and request additional service
information from the claimants, which
adds more time to the claims process.
Lastly, specific to pension benefit
claims, service verification is often the
only additional piece of information
needed for final adjudication—turning a
claim that should be completed in one
touch into a claim requiring multiple
touches that almost always add no
additional value.
From August 1, 2017, to September
30, 2017, the Saint Paul and Milwaukee
Pension Management Centers (PMCs)
conducted a service verification pilot
program that accepted uncertified
copies of service documents to expedite
claims adjudication. The PMCs
adjudicated the claims with uncertified
copies of the service documents and
then requested that the Records
Management Center (RMC) verify said
service. As of June 4, 2019, of the 2,113
total claims completed, the RMC
verified as correct the service
information that was initially obtained
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17099
from the uncertified copy of the service
document in 2,105 claims (99.6%). Of
the eight remaining claims, VA is
awaiting a response from the RMC
because the records are fire-related or
cannot be located. Thus, there is little
evidence that the current regulation
concerning the nature of evidence that
VA will accept as proof of military
service and character of discharge
actually reduces fraud; rather, it only
increases the time to deliver benefits
and services to Veterans and
beneficiaries.
Therefore, VA proposes to amend 38
CFR 3.203 to authorize VA to accept
uncertified copies of service
documents—submitted by claimants
and/or their representatives—as
evidence of military service if VA is
satisfied that the documents are free
from alteration. This proposed
amendment would help streamline and
improve the timeliness of adjudication
and claims processing for VA benefits
by providing VA additional flexibility
regarding the nature of evidence that VA
will accept as proof of military service
and reducing the number of instances
where VA must unnecessarily seek
verification of military service from
other Federal agencies. VA also
proposes minor technical changes to
§ 3.203(a)(1) for clarity.
Finally, we note that VA’s proposed
revisions to § 3.203 would not alter the
underlying standards for determining
qualifying service, which would
continue to be dependent on the
information contained in the service
documents. Nothing in this proposed
rule would alter VA’s essential policy,
reflected in § 3.203, of relying on service
department determinations of qualifying
service, and for any disputes regarding
the content of a person’s service record
to be raised with the appropriate service
department. Rather, this proposed
rulemaking would only address the
circumstances under which a copy of
the service document would be
acceptable to VA without requiring
verification from the service
department.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
E:\FR\FM\01APP1.SGM
01APP1
17100
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 61 / Thursday, April 1, 2021 / Proposed Rules
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has
determined that this rule is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
VA’s impact analysis can be found as
a supporting document at https://
www.regulations.gov, usually within 48
hours after the rulemaking document is
published. Additionally, a copy of the
rulemaking and its Regulatory Impact
Analysis (RIA) are available on VA’s
website at https://www.va.gov/orpm/, by
following the link for ‘‘VA Regulations
Published From FY 2004 Through Fiscal
Year to Date.’’
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no
provisions constituting a collection of
information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3521).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary certifies that this
proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. There
are no small entities involved with the
process and/or benefits associated with
this rulemaking. Therefore, pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 605(b), the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604 do
not apply.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year. This proposed rule would
have no such effect on State, local, and
tribal governments, or on the private
sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance numbers and titles for the
programs affected by this document are
64.100, Automobiles and Adaptive
Equipment for Certain Disabled
Veterans and Members of the Armed
Forces; 64.101, Burial Expenses
Allowance for Veterans; 64.104, Pension
for Non-Service-Connected Disability
for Veterans; 64.105, Pension to
Veterans Surviving Spouses, and
Children; 64.106, Specially Adapted
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Mar 31, 2021
Jkt 253001
Housing for Disabled Veterans; 64.109,
Veterans Compensation for ServiceConnected Disability; and 64.110,
Veterans Dependency and Indemnity
Compensation for Service-Connected
Death.
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 3
AGENCY:
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Disability benefits,
Health care, Pensions, Veterans.
Signing Authority: Denis McDonough,
Secretary of Veterans Affairs, approved
this document on March 12, 2021, and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION:
Jeffrey M. Martin,
Assistant Director, Office of Regulation Policy
& Management, Office of the Secretary,
Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, VA proposes to amend 38
CFR part 3 as follows:
PART 3—ADJUDICATION
1. The authority citation for part 3,
subpart A, continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), unless
otherwise noted.
2. Revise 38 CFR 3.203(a)(1) to read as
follows:
■
§ 3.203 Service records as evidence of
service and character of discharge.
(a) * * *
(1) The evidence is a document issued
by the service department. A copy of an
original document is acceptable if:
(i) The copy was issued by the service
department; or
(ii) The copy was issued by a public
custodian of records who certifies that
it is a true and exact copy of the
document in the custodian’s custody; or
(iii) The copy was submitted by an
accredited agent, attorney or service
organization representative who has
successfully completed VA-prescribed
training on military records, and who
certifies that it is a true and exact copy
of either an original document or of a
copy issued by the service department
or a public custodian of records; or
(iv) The Department of Veterans
Affairs is satisfied that an otherwise
uncertified copy submitted by the
claimant or by the claimant’s
representative is free from alteration;
and
*
*
*
*
*
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a))
[FR Doc. 2021–06535 Filed 3–31–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
39 CFR Part 3050
[Docket No. RM2021–4; Order No. 5852]
Periodic Reporting
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
The Commission is
acknowledging a recent filing requesting
the Commission initiate a rulemaking
proceeding to consider changes to
analytical principles relating to periodic
reports (Proposal Two). This document
informs the public of the filing, invites
public comment, and takes other
administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: May 14,
2021.
SUMMARY:
Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Proposal Two
III. Notice and Comment
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On March 24, 2021, the Postal Service
filed a petition pursuant to 39 CFR
3050.11 requesting that the Commission
initiate a rulemaking proceeding to
consider changes to analytical
principles relating to periodic reports.1
The Petition identifies the proposed
analytical changes filed in this docket as
Proposal Two.
II. Proposal Two
Background. To estimate costs
avoided by mailer presort activities for
First-Class Mail letters, a workshare
model is developed and filed each year
as part of the Postal Service’s Annual
Compliance Report (ACR). Petition,
Proposal Two at 1. Mail processing flow
is ‘‘modeled by rate category, and the
activities involved are assigned costs
based on the appropriate wage rate,
productivity, and related indirect (i.e.
1 Petition of the United States Postal Service for
the Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider Proposed
Changes in Analytical Principles (Proposal Two),
March 24, 2021 (Petition).
E:\FR\FM\01APP1.SGM
01APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 61 (Thursday, April 1, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17098-17100]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-06535]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 3
RIN 2900-AR13
Certification of Evidence for Proof of Service
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposes to amend its
adjudication regulations concerning the nature of evidence that VA will
accept as proof of military service and character of discharge. In the
past, VA only accepted original service documents, copies of service
documents issued by the service department or by a public custodian of
records, or photocopies of service documents if they were certified to
be true copies of documents acceptable to VA by an accredited agent,
attorney or service organization representative who had successfully
completed VA-prescribed training on military records. This proposed
change would allow VA to accept uncertified copies of service documents
as evidence of military service if VA is satisfied that the documents
are free from alteration. The intended effect of this amendment is to
streamline and improve the timeliness of adjudication and claims
processing for VA benefits--without compromising program integrity.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 1, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted through www.Regulations.gov or
mailed to: Pension and Fiduciary Service (21PF), Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420. Comments should
indicate that they are submitted in response to RIN 2900-AR13-
Certification of Evidence for Proof of Service. Comments received will
be available at www.Regulations.gov for public viewing, inspection or
copies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Klusman, Lead Program Analyst,
Pension and Fiduciary Service (21PF), Veterans Benefits Administration,
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC
[[Page 17099]]
20420, (202) 632-8863. (This is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The cornerstone of eligibility for VA
benefits is active military, naval, or air service and a discharge or
release under conditions other than dishonorable. VA regulations at 38
CFR 3.203 establish the nature of the evidence VA will accept as proof
of active military service and character of discharge. In general,
those regulations require original service documents; VA will accept
copies of those documents only if the copies are issued by the military
service department or by a public custodian of records or photocopies
if they are certified to be true copies of documents acceptable to VA
by an accredited agent, attorney or service organization representative
who has successfully completed VA-prescribed training on military
records.
On November 3, 1980, VA amended 38 CFR 3.203 as a consequence of
the Department of Defense's revision to its DD Form 214, (Certificate
of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). 45 FR 72654 (Nov. 3, 1980).
Under the revised version of Sec. 3.203, VA would only accept a copy
of a DD Form 214 or Certificate of Discharge if the copy was issued by
the service department. VA's revisions precluded acceptance of a
document certified by a notary public or a public record custodian
without verification by the service department.
However, in June 1981, VA proposed to further amend Sec. 3.203 to
again accept a copy of a discharge document certified as a true and
exact copy by a public custodian of records. 46 FR 32036 (Jun. 19,
1981). VA explained that ``[i]t now appears that failure to use
certified copies of discharge documents is causing lengthy delays in
claims processing because verification of service must be obtained from
the service departments in many more cases than we originally
believed.'' 46 FR 32036. VA noted that, ``[s]ince the process of
obtaining verification is lengthy, the volume of requests is rapidly
increasing. Consequently, we are proposing to amend Sec. 3.203 so as
to again accept a certified copy of a DD Form 214 or the Certificate of
Discharge issued by a public custodian of records.'' Id. VA published a
final rule adopting these proposed changes in October 1981. 46 FR 51246
(Oct. 19, 1981).
In June 2000, VA proposed further revision to Sec. 3.203 to allow
VA to accept photocopies of service documents as proof of service if an
accredited agent, attorney, or service organization representative who
had successfully completed VA-prescribed training on military records
certified them to be true copies of documents acceptable to VA. VA
explained that the proposed amendment would ``help streamline claims
processing because it will reduce the number of instances where VA must
seek verification of military service from the service department.'' 65
FR 39580. VA published a final rule adopting these changes in April
2001. 66 FR 19857 (Apr. 18, 2001).
Under the current process, when the Veterans Benefits
Administration (VBA) receives uncertified service documents (i.e., not
originals or certified copies), it must seek to verify service through
other means, such as data sharing with other Federal agencies. Although
VA is engaged in these efforts, the available tools to rapidly request
verification of service only apply to service that ended after 1994.
Thus, particularly for pension and survivor benefits claims--where the
population skews towards a service period prior to 1994--VA cannot
utilize the more rapid service verification methods noted above, as the
majority of those claimants served in (or are beneficiaries of those
who served in) periods that pre-date 1994.
VA's inability to use the more rapid service verification methods
in these cases often adds months to the claims process, and yet the
responses received from the other Federal agencies almost always affirm
the information that was already available on the uncertified service
document. And in instances where the records cannot be located--such as
those destroyed in the 1973 fire at the National Personnel Records
Center--VA must conduct additional review and request additional
service information from the claimants, which adds more time to the
claims process. Lastly, specific to pension benefit claims, service
verification is often the only additional piece of information needed
for final adjudication--turning a claim that should be completed in one
touch into a claim requiring multiple touches that almost always add no
additional value.
From August 1, 2017, to September 30, 2017, the Saint Paul and
Milwaukee Pension Management Centers (PMCs) conducted a service
verification pilot program that accepted uncertified copies of service
documents to expedite claims adjudication. The PMCs adjudicated the
claims with uncertified copies of the service documents and then
requested that the Records Management Center (RMC) verify said service.
As of June 4, 2019, of the 2,113 total claims completed, the RMC
verified as correct the service information that was initially obtained
from the uncertified copy of the service document in 2,105 claims
(99.6%). Of the eight remaining claims, VA is awaiting a response from
the RMC because the records are fire-related or cannot be located.
Thus, there is little evidence that the current regulation concerning
the nature of evidence that VA will accept as proof of military service
and character of discharge actually reduces fraud; rather, it only
increases the time to deliver benefits and services to Veterans and
beneficiaries.
Therefore, VA proposes to amend 38 CFR 3.203 to authorize VA to
accept uncertified copies of service documents--submitted by claimants
and/or their representatives--as evidence of military service if VA is
satisfied that the documents are free from alteration. This proposed
amendment would help streamline and improve the timeliness of
adjudication and claims processing for VA benefits by providing VA
additional flexibility regarding the nature of evidence that VA will
accept as proof of military service and reducing the number of
instances where VA must unnecessarily seek verification of military
service from other Federal agencies. VA also proposes minor technical
changes to Sec. 3.203(a)(1) for clarity.
Finally, we note that VA's proposed revisions to Sec. 3.203 would
not alter the underlying standards for determining qualifying service,
which would continue to be dependent on the information contained in
the service documents. Nothing in this proposed rule would alter VA's
essential policy, reflected in Sec. 3.203, of relying on service
department determinations of qualifying service, and for any disputes
regarding the content of a person's service record to be raised with
the appropriate service department. Rather, this proposed rulemaking
would only address the circumstances under which a copy of the service
document would be acceptable to VA without requiring verification from
the service department.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of
[[Page 17100]]
quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules,
and promoting flexibility. The Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs has determined that this rule is not a significant regulatory
action under Executive Order 12866.
VA's impact analysis can be found as a supporting document at
https://www.regulations.gov, usually within 48 hours after the
rulemaking document is published. Additionally, a copy of the
rulemaking and its Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) are available on
VA's website at https://www.va.gov/orpm/, by following the link for ``VA
Regulations Published From FY 2004 Through Fiscal Year to Date.''
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no provisions constituting a collection
of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501-3521).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary certifies that this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-
612. There are no small entities involved with the process and/or
benefits associated with this rulemaking. Therefore, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 605(b), the initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604 do not apply.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year. This proposed rule would have no such
effect on State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private
sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance numbers and titles for
the programs affected by this document are 64.100, Automobiles and
Adaptive Equipment for Certain Disabled Veterans and Members of the
Armed Forces; 64.101, Burial Expenses Allowance for Veterans; 64.104,
Pension for Non-Service-Connected Disability for Veterans; 64.105,
Pension to Veterans Surviving Spouses, and Children; 64.106, Specially
Adapted Housing for Disabled Veterans; 64.109, Veterans Compensation
for Service-Connected Disability; and 64.110, Veterans Dependency and
Indemnity Compensation for Service-Connected Death.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 3
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Disability benefits,
Health care, Pensions, Veterans.
Signing Authority: Denis McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs,
approved this document on March 12, 2021, and authorized the
undersigned to sign and submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication electronically as an official document
of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Jeffrey M. Martin,
Assistant Director, Office of Regulation Policy & Management, Office of
the Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, VA proposes to amend 38
CFR part 3 as follows:
PART 3--ADJUDICATION
0
1. The authority citation for part 3, subpart A, continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a), unless otherwise noted.
0
2. Revise 38 CFR 3.203(a)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 3.203 Service records as evidence of service and character of
discharge.
(a) * * *
(1) The evidence is a document issued by the service department. A
copy of an original document is acceptable if:
(i) The copy was issued by the service department; or
(ii) The copy was issued by a public custodian of records who
certifies that it is a true and exact copy of the document in the
custodian's custody; or
(iii) The copy was submitted by an accredited agent, attorney or
service organization representative who has successfully completed VA-
prescribed training on military records, and who certifies that it is a
true and exact copy of either an original document or of a copy issued
by the service department or a public custodian of records; or
(iv) The Department of Veterans Affairs is satisfied that an
otherwise uncertified copy submitted by the claimant or by the
claimant's representative is free from alteration; and
* * * * *
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(a))
[FR Doc. 2021-06535 Filed 3-31-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P