Title: Notice of Availability: Proposed Guidance on Alternative Test Methods and Integrated Testing Approaches, 16704-16705 [2021-06567]
Download as PDF
16704
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 31, 2021 / Notices
collection should be submitted within
30 days of the publication of this notice
on the following website
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
Find this particular information
collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under
30-day Review—Open for Public
Comments’’ or by using the search
function and entering either the title of
the information collection or the OMB
Control Number 0651–0035.
Further information can be obtained
by:
• Email: InformationCollection@
uspto.gov. Include ‘‘0651–0035
information request’’ in the subject line
of the message.
• Mail: Kimberly Hardy, Office of the
Chief Administrative Officer, United
States Patent and Trademark Office,
P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313–
1450.
Kimberly Hardy,
Information Collections Officer, Office of the
Chief Administrative Officer, United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2021–06578 Filed 3–30–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. CPSC–2021–0006]
Title: Notice of Availability: Proposed
Guidance on Alternative Test Methods
and Integrated Testing Approaches
U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
The Consumer Product Safety
Commission (Commission or CPSC) is
announcing the availability of a
document titled, ‘‘Proposed Guidance
for Industry and Test Method
Developers: CPSC Staff Evaluation of
Alternative Test Methods and Integrated
Testing Approaches and Data Generated
from Such Methods to Support FHSA
Labeling Requirements.’’ The
Commission requests comments on the
proposed guidance.
DATES: Submit comments by June 14,
2021.
SUMMARY:
You may submit comments,
identified by Docket No. CPSC–2021–
0006, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit
electronic comments to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
The CPSC does not accept comments
submitted by electronic mail (email),
except through https://
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:54 Mar 30, 2021
Jkt 253001
www.regulations.gov. The CPSC
encourages you to submit electronic
comments by using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal, as described above.
Mail/hand delivery/courier Written
Submissions: Submit comments by
mail/hand delivery/courier to: Division
of the Secretariat, Consumer Product
Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330
East West Highway, Bethesda, MD
20814; telephone: (301) 504–7479;
email: cpsc-os@cpsc.gov.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number for this notice. CPSC may post
all comments received without change,
including any personal identifiers,
contact information, or other personal
information provided, to: https://
www.regulations.gov. Do not submit
electronically: Confidential business
information, trade secret information, or
other sensitive or protected information
that you do not want to be available to
the public. If you wish to submit such
information, please submit it according
to the instructions for written
submissions.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to: https://
www.regulations.gov, and insert the
docket number, CPSC–2021–0006, into
the ‘‘Search’’ box, and follow the
prompts. The proposed guidance is
available under ‘‘Supporting and
Related Material.’’ It is also available on
the Commission’s website at: https://
cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/NOA-ProposedGuidance-on-Alternative-Test-Methodsand-Integrated-Testing-Approaches.pdf
?NDYVpNRIAMpOPJDPzlt770dvx
nvPJHh6 and from the Commission’s
Division of the Secretariat.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Gordon, Toxicologist, Directorate for
Health Sciences, U.S. Consumer Product
Safety Commission, 5 Research Place,
Rockville, MD 20850; telephone: 301–
987–2025; email: jgordon@cpsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
The Federal Hazardous Substances
Act (FHSA), 15 U.S.C. 1261–1275,
requires that hazardous substances bear
certain cautionary statements on their
labels. Manufacturers may perform
toxicological tests to determine whether
such products require cautionary
labeling addressing the hazard.
Although animals are still used in
toxicological testing, most governmental
agencies support reduced use of animals
in testing, by promoting the acceptance
of data from alternative test methods.
In 1997, the National Institute of
Environmental Health Sciences
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(NIEHS), the National Toxicology
Program (NTP), and 13 federal agencies
(including CPSC) joined to form the
Interagency Coordinating Committee for
the Validation of Alternative Methods
(ICCVAM). ICCVAM sponsors scientific
review of non-animal tests (known as
New Approach Methodologies or
NAMs) that may reduce, refine, or
replace animal tests in evaluating
potential hazards. Reviews from
ICCVAM and other federal agencies can
provide a basis for regulatory agencies,
such as CPSC, to consider non-animal
testing alternatives for use in regulatory
decision making. In the past, CPSC staff
relied upon ICCVAM’s validation of
new alternative testing methods, as
reliable test methods to determine
compliance with the labeling
requirements of the FHSA. However,
ICCVAM no longer formally validates
test methods.
In 2012, CPSC issued a policy on nonanimal or alternative testing methods to
support labeling requirements under the
FHSA, as codified under 16 CFR
1500.232 (Animal Testing Policy).
CPSC’s website lists current CPSCaccepted alternative test methods and
their conditions of use.1 Since 2012,
new advancements in toxicological
testing, and, in particular, with NAMs,
have occurred. NAMs include in vitro
(in test tube), in chemico (all chemical
test, no biological material), or in silico
(computer models) methods and
approaches used to test for toxicological
effects in place of animal testing. In
some cases, NAMs are combined with
other NAMs or existing in vivo (animal)
data to form an ‘‘integrated approach to
testing and assessment’’ (IATAs).
The Commission reaffirms its policy
to find alternatives to traditional animal
testing that replace animals, reduce the
number of animals tested, and decrease
the pain and suffering in animals
associated with testing household
products. As such, the Commission
strongly encourages all agency
stakeholders to submit for evaluation by
CPSC staff any scientifically validated
alternative test methods that do not
require animal testing for determining
compliance with the labeling
requirements under the FHSA.
Because ICCVAM no longer formally
validates test methods, to assist
stakeholders, including the public,
manufacturers, test method developers,
and test laboratories, in determining
what test methods are deemed reliable
for determining compliance with the
labeling requirements under the FHSA,
1 https://www.cpsc.gov/Business-Manufacturing/
Testing-Certification/Recommended-ProceduresRegarding-the-CPSCs-Policy-on-Animal-Testing/.
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 60 / Wednesday, March 31, 2021 / Notices
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
CPSC staff drafted proposed guidance
clarifying staff’s informational
requirements and process for evaluating
NAMs and IATAs. As described in the
proposed guidance, the types of
information CPSC staff would use to
evaluate NAMs or IATAs submitted to
CPSC would include (but not be limited
to): Concordance and reproducibility
data; false positive and false negative
rates; applicability domain; test
endpoint; validation studies; or any
other pertinent information needed to
make a determination. The proposed
guidance also includes an optional
NAM nomination form, which can be
used to organize information about a
NAM or IATA for CPSC staff evaluation.
Such non-animal alternative test
methods, if accepted by CPSC, would be
considered reliable test methods for
determining compliance with the
labeling requirements under the FHSA.
Additionally, CPSC would continue to
list CPSC-accepted alternative test
methods on CPSC’s website.
The proposed guidance is not a rule
and does not establish legal
requirements. The proposed guidance is
intended to inform stakeholders about
what information CPSC staff uses to
evaluate NAMs or IATAs for FHSA
labeling determinations. The proposed
guidance also informs stakeholders of
CPSC staff’s process for evaluating that
information. Depending on the
complexity of specific NAMs or IATAs,
the information discussed in the
guidance may or may not apply; and in
some instances, staff may need
additional information not specifically
described in the guidance document to
make an evaluation. The proposed
guidance is available at: https://
www.regulations.gov under docket
number, CPSC–2021–0006, under
‘‘Supporting and Related Material’’, on
the Commission’s website at: https://
cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/NOA-ProposedGuidance-on-Alternative-Test-Methodsand-Integrated-Testing-Approaches.pdf
?NDYVpNRIAMpOPJDP
zlt770dvxnvPJHh6, and from the CPSC’s
Division of the Secretariat, as provided
in the ADDRESSES section of this notice.
B. Request for Comments
The Commission invites comments on
the ‘‘Proposed Guidance for Industry
and Test Method Developers: CPSC Staff
Evaluation of Alternative Test Methods
and Integrated Testing Approaches and
Data Generated from Such Methods to
Support FHSA Labeling Requirements.’’
The CPSC will consider all timely
comments before finalizing the
guidance. Comments should be
submitted by June 14, 2021. Information
on how to submit comments can be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:54 Mar 30, 2021
Jkt 253001
found in the ADDRESSES section of this
notice.
Alberta E. Mills,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021–06567 Filed 3–30–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355–01–P
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND
COMMUNITY SERVICE
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget for Review
and Approval; Comment Request;
Application Package for AmeriCorps
VISTA Application and Reporting
Forms
Corporation for National and
Community Service.
ACTION: Notice of information collection;
request for comment.
AGENCY:
The Corporation for National
and Community Service (operating as
AmeriCorps) has submitted a public
information collection request (ICR)
entitled Application Package for
AmeriCorps VISTA Application and
Reporting Forms for review and
approval in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the individual and office
listed in the ADDRESSES section by April
30, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Copies of this ICR, with applicable
supporting documentation, may be
obtained by calling AmeriCorps, Kelly
Daly at 202–606–6849 or by email to
kdaly@cns.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The OMB
is particularly interested in comments
which:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of CNCS, including whether
the information will have practical
utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions;
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
16705
• Propose ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
• Propose ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments
A 60-day Notice requesting public
comment was published in the Federal
Register on November 30, 2020 at Vol.
85, No. 230, Page 76542. This comment
period ended January 29, 2021. Zero
public comments were received from
this Notice.
Title of Collection: Application
Package for AmeriCorps VISTA
Application and Reporting Forms.
OMB Control Number: 3045–0038.
Type of Review: Renewal.
Respondents/Affected Public:
Organizations and State, Local or Tribal
Governments.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 850.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 20,450.
Abstract: AmeriCorps is revising its
VISTA application and reporting forms
to remove duplicative questions,
improve readability, and reflect changes
in reporting requirements, including a
reduction in frequency of programmatic
reporting.
Dated: March 25, 2021.
Margery Ansara,
Director, AmeriCorps VISTA.
[FR Doc. 2021–06574 Filed 3–30–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6050–28–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
Negotiation of a Renewal of the
Reciprocal Defense Procurement
Memorandum of Understanding with
the Ministry of Defense of Japan
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Request for public comments.
AGENCY:
On behalf of the U.S.
Government, DoD is contemplating a
renewal of Reciprocal Defense
Procurement Memorandum of
Understanding with the Ministry of
Defense of Japan. DoD is requesting
industry feedback regarding its
experience in public defense
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\31MRN1.SGM
31MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 60 (Wednesday, March 31, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16704-16705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-06567]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION
[Docket No. CPSC-2021-0006]
Title: Notice of Availability: Proposed Guidance on Alternative
Test Methods and Integrated Testing Approaches
AGENCY: U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Consumer Product Safety Commission (Commission or CPSC) is
announcing the availability of a document titled, ``Proposed Guidance
for Industry and Test Method Developers: CPSC Staff Evaluation of
Alternative Test Methods and Integrated Testing Approaches and Data
Generated from Such Methods to Support FHSA Labeling Requirements.''
The Commission requests comments on the proposed guidance.
DATES: Submit comments by June 14, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. CPSC-2021-
0006, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions: Submit electronic comments to the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments. The CPSC does not accept comments
submitted by electronic mail (email), except through https://www.regulations.gov. The CPSC encourages you to submit electronic
comments by using the Federal eRulemaking Portal, as described above.
Mail/hand delivery/courier Written Submissions: Submit comments by
mail/hand delivery/courier to: Division of the Secretariat, Consumer
Product Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda,
MD 20814; telephone: (301) 504-7479; email: [email protected].
Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number for this notice. CPSC may post all comments received
without change, including any personal identifiers, contact
information, or other personal information provided, to: https://www.regulations.gov. Do not submit electronically: Confidential
business information, trade secret information, or other sensitive or
protected information that you do not want to be available to the
public. If you wish to submit such information, please submit it
according to the instructions for written submissions.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to: https://www.regulations.gov, and insert the
docket number, CPSC-2021-0006, into the ``Search'' box, and follow the
prompts. The proposed guidance is available under ``Supporting and
Related Material.'' It is also available on the Commission's website
at: https://cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/NOA-Proposed-Guidance-on-Alternative-Test-Methods-and-Integrated-Testing-Approaches.pdf?NDYVpNRIAMpOPJDPzlt770dvxnvPJHh6 and from the
Commission's Division of the Secretariat.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Gordon, Toxicologist, Directorate
for Health Sciences, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 5
Research Place, Rockville, MD 20850; telephone: 301-987-2025; email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
The Federal Hazardous Substances Act (FHSA), 15 U.S.C. 1261-1275,
requires that hazardous substances bear certain cautionary statements
on their labels. Manufacturers may perform toxicological tests to
determine whether such products require cautionary labeling addressing
the hazard. Although animals are still used in toxicological testing,
most governmental agencies support reduced use of animals in testing,
by promoting the acceptance of data from alternative test methods.
In 1997, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
(NIEHS), the National Toxicology Program (NTP), and 13 federal agencies
(including CPSC) joined to form the Interagency Coordinating Committee
for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM). ICCVAM sponsors
scientific review of non-animal tests (known as New Approach
Methodologies or NAMs) that may reduce, refine, or replace animal tests
in evaluating potential hazards. Reviews from ICCVAM and other federal
agencies can provide a basis for regulatory agencies, such as CPSC, to
consider non-animal testing alternatives for use in regulatory decision
making. In the past, CPSC staff relied upon ICCVAM's validation of new
alternative testing methods, as reliable test methods to determine
compliance with the labeling requirements of the FHSA. However, ICCVAM
no longer formally validates test methods.
In 2012, CPSC issued a policy on non-animal or alternative testing
methods to support labeling requirements under the FHSA, as codified
under 16 CFR 1500.232 (Animal Testing Policy). CPSC's website lists
current CPSC-accepted alternative test methods and their conditions of
use.\1\ Since 2012, new advancements in toxicological testing, and, in
particular, with NAMs, have occurred. NAMs include in vitro (in test
tube), in chemico (all chemical test, no biological material), or in
silico (computer models) methods and approaches used to test for
toxicological effects in place of animal testing. In some cases, NAMs
are combined with other NAMs or existing in vivo (animal) data to form
an ``integrated approach to testing and assessment'' (IATAs).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ https://www.cpsc.gov/Business-Manufacturing/Testing-Certification/Recommended-Procedures-Regarding-the-CPSCs-Policy-on-Animal-Testing/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission reaffirms its policy to find alternatives to
traditional animal testing that replace animals, reduce the number of
animals tested, and decrease the pain and suffering in animals
associated with testing household products. As such, the Commission
strongly encourages all agency stakeholders to submit for evaluation by
CPSC staff any scientifically validated alternative test methods that
do not require animal testing for determining compliance with the
labeling requirements under the FHSA.
Because ICCVAM no longer formally validates test methods, to assist
stakeholders, including the public, manufacturers, test method
developers, and test laboratories, in determining what test methods are
deemed reliable for determining compliance with the labeling
requirements under the FHSA,
[[Page 16705]]
CPSC staff drafted proposed guidance clarifying staff's informational
requirements and process for evaluating NAMs and IATAs. As described in
the proposed guidance, the types of information CPSC staff would use to
evaluate NAMs or IATAs submitted to CPSC would include (but not be
limited to): Concordance and reproducibility data; false positive and
false negative rates; applicability domain; test endpoint; validation
studies; or any other pertinent information needed to make a
determination. The proposed guidance also includes an optional NAM
nomination form, which can be used to organize information about a NAM
or IATA for CPSC staff evaluation. Such non-animal alternative test
methods, if accepted by CPSC, would be considered reliable test methods
for determining compliance with the labeling requirements under the
FHSA. Additionally, CPSC would continue to list CPSC-accepted
alternative test methods on CPSC's website.
The proposed guidance is not a rule and does not establish legal
requirements. The proposed guidance is intended to inform stakeholders
about what information CPSC staff uses to evaluate NAMs or IATAs for
FHSA labeling determinations. The proposed guidance also informs
stakeholders of CPSC staff's process for evaluating that information.
Depending on the complexity of specific NAMs or IATAs, the information
discussed in the guidance may or may not apply; and in some instances,
staff may need additional information not specifically described in the
guidance document to make an evaluation. The proposed guidance is
available at: https://www.regulations.gov under docket number, CPSC-
2021-0006, under ``Supporting and Related Material'', on the
Commission's website at: https://cpsc.gov/s3fs-public/NOA-Proposed-Guidance-on-Alternative-Test-Methods-and-Integrated-Testing-Approaches.pdf?NDYVpNRIAMpOPJDPzlt770dvxnvPJHh6, and from the CPSC's
Division of the Secretariat, as provided in the ADDRESSES section of
this notice.
B. Request for Comments
The Commission invites comments on the ``Proposed Guidance for
Industry and Test Method Developers: CPSC Staff Evaluation of
Alternative Test Methods and Integrated Testing Approaches and Data
Generated from Such Methods to Support FHSA Labeling Requirements.''
The CPSC will consider all timely comments before finalizing the
guidance. Comments should be submitted by June 14, 2021. Information on
how to submit comments can be found in the ADDRESSES section of this
notice.
Alberta E. Mills,
Secretary, Consumer Product Safety Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-06567 Filed 3-30-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P