Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH Helicopters, 16121-16123 [2021-06214]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 57 / Friday, March 26, 2021 / Proposed Rules
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain instructions
from a manufacturer, the instructions must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, Large Aircraft Section,
International Validation Branch, FAA; or
EASA; or Airbus SAS’s EASA DOA. If
approved by the DOA, the approval must
include the DOA-authorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except
as required by paragraph (j)(2) of this AD, if
any service information contains procedures
or tests that are identified as RC, those
procedures and tests must be done to comply
with this AD; any procedures or tests that are
not identified as RC are recommended. Those
procedures and tests that are not identified
as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator’s
maintenance or inspection program without
obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can
be done and the airplane can be put back in
an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or
changes to procedures or tests identified as
RC require approval of an AMOC.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
(k) Related Information
(1) For information about EASA AD 2020–
0268, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer
3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49
221 8999 000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu;
internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may find
this EASA AD on the EASA website at
https://ad.easa.europa.eu. For Airbus SAS
service information identified in this
proposed AD, contact Airbus SAS,
Airworthiness Office—EAL, Rond-Point
Emile Dewoitine No: 2, 31700 Blagnac Cedex,
France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33
5 61 93 45 80; email continuedairworthiness.a350@airbus.com; internet
https://www.airbus.com. You may view this
material at the FAA, Airworthiness Products
Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195. This
material may be found in the AD docket on
the internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2021–0193.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Kathleen Arrigotti, Aerospace
Engineer, Large Aircraft Section,
International Validation Branch, FAA, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone and fax 206–231–3218;
Kathleen.Arrigotti@faa.gov.
Issued on March 18, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–05948 Filed 3–25–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Mar 25, 2021
Jkt 253001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2021–0196; Project
Identifier 2018–SW–021–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Helicopters Deutschland GmbH
Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH
Model MBB–BK 117 A–1, MBB–BK 117
A–3, MBB–BK 117 A–4, MBB–BK 117
B–1, MBB–BK 117 B–2, and MBB–BK
117 C–1 helicopters. This proposed AD
was prompted by an analysis of the
main rotor (M/R) blade loop area. This
proposed AD would require repetitive
inspections of certain M/R blade
thimble areas and corrective actions if
necessary, as specified in a European
Aviation Safety Agency (now European
Union Aviation Safety Agency) (EASA)
AD, which is proposed for incorporation
by reference (IBR). The FAA is
proposing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by May 10, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For material that is proposed for IBR
in this AD, contact EASA, KonradAdenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne,
Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000;
email ADs@easa.europa.eu; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
material on the EASA website at https://
ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this
material at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N–321,
Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
16121
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call (817) 222–5110. It is also
available in the AD docket on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2021–0196.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2021–
0196; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this NPRM, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathleen Arrigotti, Aerospace Engineer,
Large Aircraft Section, International
Validation Branch, FAA, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA; telephone
(206) 231–3218; email
kathleen.arrigotti@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send
your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2021–0196; Product Identifier
2018–SW–021–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of
the proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. The FAA will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend this proposal
because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this proposal.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this NPRM
contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated
as private, that you actually treat as
E:\FR\FM\26MRP1.SGM
26MRP1
16122
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 57 / Friday, March 26, 2021 / Proposed Rules
private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this NPRM, it is important
that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each
page of your submission containing CBI
as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such
marked submissions as confidential
under the FOIA, and they will not be
placed in the public docket of this
NPRM. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to Kathleen Arrigotti,
Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA; telephone (206) 231–3218;
email kathleen.arrigotti@faa.gov. Any
commentary that the FAA receives that
is not specifically designated as CBI will
be placed in the public docket for this
rulemaking.
Discussion
The EASA, which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the
European, has issued EASA AD 2018–
0061, dated March 20, 2018 (EASA AD
2018–0061), to correct an unsafe
condition for Airbus Helicopters
Deutschland GmbH (AHD) (formerly
Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH,
Eurocopter Hubschrauber GmbH,
Messerschmitt-Bo¨lkow-Blohm GmbH),
Airbus Helicopters Inc. (formerly
American Eurocopter LLC) Model MBB–
BK117 A–1, MBB–BK117 A–3, MBB–
BK117 A–4, MBB–BK117 B–1, MBB–
BK117 B–2, and MBB–BK117 C–1
helicopters, all serial numbers.
This proposed AD was prompted by
new test results from an analysis of the
M/R blade loop area, which revealed
that certain M/R blade thimbles require
reduced inspection intervals. The FAA
is proposing this AD to address
composite failure of the M/R blades,
resulting in loss of control of the
helicopter. See the EASA AD for
additional background information.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
EASA AD 2018–0061 specifies
compliance intervals to repetitively
inspect certain M/R blades, with a blade
sweep angle of 1 degree, for cracks and
resin chippings in the area of the greater
thimble radius and corrective actions, if
there is a crack or anomaly. EASA AD
2018–0061 also specifies compliance
intervals to repetitively inspect certain
M/R blades, with a blade sweep angle of
0 degrees, for cracks and bulging in the
teflon foil in the area of the greater
thimble radius and corrective actions, if
there is a crack or bulge. Corrective
actions include dispatching the M/R
blades to an authorized repair station, as
required.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Mar 25, 2021
Jkt 253001
This material is reasonably available
because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course
of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
These products have been approved
by the aviation authority of another
country, and are approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to the
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, the FAA has been
notified of the unsafe condition
described in the EASA AD referenced
above. The FAA is proposing this AD
after evaluating all the relevant
information and determining the unsafe
condition described previously is likely
to exist or develop in other products of
the same type designs.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
EASA AD 2018–0061 described
previously, as incorporated by
reference, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this proposed AD and
except as discussed under ‘‘Differences
Between this Proposed AD and the
EASA AD.’’
Explanation of Required Compliance
Information
In the FAA’s ongoing efforts to
improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA initially worked with
Airbus and EASA to develop a process
to use certain EASA ADs as the primary
source of information for compliance
with requirements for corresponding
FAA ADs. The FAA has since
coordinated with other manufacturers
and civil aviation authorities (CAAs) to
use this process. As a result, EASA AD
2018–0061 will be incorporated by
reference in the FAA final rule. This
proposed AD would, therefore, require
compliance with EASA AD 2018–0061
in its entirety, through that
incorporation, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this proposed AD.
Using common terms that are the same
as the heading of a particular section in
the EASA AD does not mean that
operators need comply only with that
section. For example, where the AD
requirement refers to ‘‘all required
actions and compliance times,’’
compliance with this AD requirement is
not limited to the section titled
‘‘Required Action(s) and Compliance
Time(s)’’ in the EASA AD. Service
information specified in EASA AD
2018–0061 that is required for
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
compliance with EASA AD 2018–0061
will be available on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2021–0196 after the FAA final
rule is published.
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the EASA AD
The EASA AD applies to Model
MBB–BK117 A–1, MBB–BK117 A–3,
MBB–BK117 A–4, MBB–BK117 B–1,
MBB–BK117 B–2 and MBB–BK117 C–1
helicopters, whereas this proposed AD
would apply to Model MBB–BK 117 A–
1, MBB–BK 117 A–3, MBB–BK 117 A–
4, MBB–BK 117 B–1, MBB–BK 117 B–
2, and MBB–BK 117 C–1 helicopters
with certain M/R blades installed
instead. The service information
required by the EASA AD requires
accomplishment of certain corrective
action by ‘‘ECD’’ or an authorized
service or repair station, whereas this
proposed AD would require performing
the corrective action in accordance with
FAA-approved procedures, instead. The
EASA AD requires revising the Aircraft
Maintenance Program (AMP), whereas
this proposed AD would not. The EASA
AD allows a tolerance to compliance
times, whereas this proposed AD would
not.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this proposed
AD affects 216 helicopters of U.S.
Registry. Labor rates are estimated at
$85 per work-hour. Based on these
numbers, the FAA estimates that
operators may incur the following costs
in order to comply with this proposed
AD.
Inspecting an M/R blade thimble area
would take about 1 work-hour for an
estimated cost of about $85 per M/R
blade thimble, per inspection cycle.
Repairing or replacing an M/R blade
could take up to about 20 work-hour(s)
and parts could cost up to about $23,100
for an estimated cost of up to $24,800
per blade.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: General requirements. Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
E:\FR\FM\26MRP1.SGM
26MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 57 / Friday, March 26, 2021 / Proposed Rules
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
MBB–BK 117 B–1, MBB–BK 117 B–2, and
MBB–BK 117 C–1 helicopters, certificated in
any category, with an ‘‘affected ‘angle 0’
parts’’ or ‘‘affected ‘angle 1’ parts’’ installed,
as identified in European Aviation Safety
Agency (now European Union Aviation
Safety Agency) (EASA) AD 2018–0061, dated
March 20, 2018 (EASA AD 2018–0061).
Regulatory Findings
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)
Code: 6200, Main Rotor System.
The FAA determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
■
Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH:
Docket No. FAA–2021–0196; Project
Identifier 2018–SW–021–AD.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments by May
10, 2021.
(b) Affected Airworthiness Directives (ADs)
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Helicopters
Deutschland GmbH Model MBB–BK 117 A–
1, MBB–BK 117 A–3, MBB–BK 117 A–4,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Mar 25, 2021
Jkt 253001
(d) Subject
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by new test results
from a composite analysis of the main rotor
(M/R) blade loop area, which revealed that
certain M/R blade thimbles require reduced
inspection intervals. The FAA is issuing this
AD to address composite failure of an M/R
blade, which if not addressed could result in
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this
AD: Comply with all required actions and
compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, EASA AD 2018–0061.
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2018–0061
(1) Where EASA AD 2018–0061 refers to its
effective date, this AD requires using the
effective date of this AD.
(2) Where EASA AD 2018–0061 refers to
flight hours, this AD requires using hours
time-in-service (TIS).
(3) Where Table 1, Table 2, and Note 2 of
EASA AD 2018–0061 specify inspection
thresholds, intervals, and a non-cumulative
compliance time tolerance of 10% for certain
required compliance times, this AD requires
accomplishing those requirements, as
follows:
(i) For helicopters with an ‘‘affected ‘angle
0’ parts,’’ the compliance time is before
accumulating 660 total hours TIS on the
affected part or within 100 hours TIS after
the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs later, and without accumulating 1,600
total hours TIS on the affected part.
Thereafter, the compliance time is at
intervals not to exceed 330 hours TIS.
(ii) For helicopters with an ‘‘affected ‘angle
1’ parts,’’ the compliance time is before
accumulating 110 total hours TIS on the
affected part or within 50 hours TIS after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs
later, and without accumulating 950 total
hours TIS on the affected part. Thereafter, the
compliance time is at intervals not to exceed
110 hours TIS.
(iii) For helicopters specified in paragraph
(c) of this AD, Note 1 of EASA AD 2018–0061
specifies accumulated FH as, ‘‘Unless
otherwise specified, the FH specified in
Table 2 of this AD are those accumulated
since the previous M/R blade thimble
inspection.’’ This AD requires intervals
thereafter to be accumulated since
accomplishment of paragraph (g) of this AD.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
16123
(4) While paragraph (5) and Note 3 of
EASA AD 2018–0061 specify revising the
Aircraft Maintenance Program (AMP), this
AD does not require this action.
(5) Where the service information
referenced in EASA AD 2018–0061 specifies
accomplishment of certain corrective action
by ‘‘ECD’’ or an authorized service or repair
station, this AD requires the corrective
actions to be performed by a qualified
mechanic.
(6) Where the service information
referenced in EASA AD 2018–0061 specifies
contacting ‘‘ECD’’ or an authorized service or
repair station, this AD requires performing
the corrective action in accordance with
FAA-approved procedures.
(7) The ‘‘Remarks’’ section of EASA AD
2018–0061 does not apply to this AD.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, International Validation
Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the International Validation
Branch, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (j)(2) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-AVS-AIR730-AMOC@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(j) Related Information
(1) For EASA AD 2018–0061, contact the
EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668
Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999
000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://
ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this
material at the FAA, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood
Pkwy., Room 6N–321, Fort Worth, TX 76177.
For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (817) 222–5110.
This material may be found in the AD docket
on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA–2021–0196.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Kathleen Arrigotti, Aerospace
Engineer, Large Aircraft Section,
International Validation Branch, FAA, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA; telephone
(206) 231–3218; email kathleen.arrigotti@
faa.gov.
Issued on March 20, 2021.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives,
Compliance & Airworthiness Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–06214 Filed 3–25–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
E:\FR\FM\26MRP1.SGM
26MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 57 (Friday, March 26, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 16121-16123]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-06214]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2021-0196; Project Identifier 2018-SW-021-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH
Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH Model MBB-BK 117 A-1, MBB-BK
117 A-3, MBB-BK 117 A-4, MBB-BK 117 B-1, MBB-BK 117 B-2, and MBB-BK 117
C-1 helicopters. This proposed AD was prompted by an analysis of the
main rotor (M/R) blade loop area. This proposed AD would require
repetitive inspections of certain M/R blade thimble areas and
corrective actions if necessary, as specified in a European Aviation
Safety Agency (now European Union Aviation Safety Agency) (EASA) AD,
which is proposed for incorporation by reference (IBR). The FAA is
proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by May 10,
2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For material that is proposed for IBR in this AD, contact EASA,
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999
000; email [email protected]; internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may
find this material on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu.
You may view this material at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321, Fort Worth, TX
76177. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call (817) 222-5110. It is also available in the AD docket on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2021-0196.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-
0196; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for Docket Operations is listed above. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Arrigotti, Aerospace
Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA; telephone (206) 231-3218; email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2021-0196; Product Identifier
2018-SW-021-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposal because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this proposal.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as
[[Page 16122]]
private, and that is relevant or responsive to this NPRM, it is
important that you clearly designate the submitted comments as CBI.
Please mark each page of your submission containing CBI as ``PROPIN.''
The FAA will treat such marked submissions as confidential under the
FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public docket of this NPRM.
Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Kathleen Arrigotti,
Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, International Validation
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA; telephone (206) 231-
3218; email [email protected]. Any commentary that the FAA
receives that is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in
the public docket for this rulemaking.
Discussion
The EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European, has issued EASA AD 2018-0061, dated March 20, 2018 (EASA AD
2018-0061), to correct an unsafe condition for Airbus Helicopters
Deutschland GmbH (AHD) (formerly Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH,
Eurocopter Hubschrauber GmbH, Messerschmitt-B[ouml]lkow-Blohm GmbH),
Airbus Helicopters Inc. (formerly American Eurocopter LLC) Model MBB-
BK117 A-1, MBB-BK117 A-3, MBB-BK117 A-4, MBB-BK117 B-1, MBB-BK117 B-2,
and MBB-BK117 C-1 helicopters, all serial numbers.
This proposed AD was prompted by new test results from an analysis
of the M/R blade loop area, which revealed that certain M/R blade
thimbles require reduced inspection intervals. The FAA is proposing
this AD to address composite failure of the M/R blades, resulting in
loss of control of the helicopter. See the EASA AD for additional
background information.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
EASA AD 2018-0061 specifies compliance intervals to repetitively
inspect certain M/R blades, with a blade sweep angle of 1 degree, for
cracks and resin chippings in the area of the greater thimble radius
and corrective actions, if there is a crack or anomaly. EASA AD 2018-
0061 also specifies compliance intervals to repetitively inspect
certain M/R blades, with a blade sweep angle of 0 degrees, for cracks
and bulging in the teflon foil in the area of the greater thimble
radius and corrective actions, if there is a crack or bulge. Corrective
actions include dispatching the M/R blades to an authorized repair
station, as required.
This material is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
These products have been approved by the aviation authority of
another country, and are approved for operation in the United States.
Pursuant to the bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority,
the FAA has been notified of the unsafe condition described in the EASA
AD referenced above. The FAA is proposing this AD after evaluating all
the relevant information and determining the unsafe condition described
previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same
type designs.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in EASA AD 2018-0061 described previously, as incorporated by
reference, except for any differences identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this proposed AD and except as discussed under
``Differences Between this Proposed AD and the EASA AD.''
Explanation of Required Compliance Information
In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA initially worked with Airbus and EASA to develop a
process to use certain EASA ADs as the primary source of information
for compliance with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has
since coordinated with other manufacturers and civil aviation
authorities (CAAs) to use this process. As a result, EASA AD 2018-0061
will be incorporated by reference in the FAA final rule. This proposed
AD would, therefore, require compliance with EASA AD 2018-0061 in its
entirety, through that incorporation, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this proposed AD.
Using common terms that are the same as the heading of a particular
section in the EASA AD does not mean that operators need comply only
with that section. For example, where the AD requirement refers to
``all required actions and compliance times,'' compliance with this AD
requirement is not limited to the section titled ``Required Action(s)
and Compliance Time(s)'' in the EASA AD. Service information specified
in EASA AD 2018-0061 that is required for compliance with EASA AD 2018-
0061 will be available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0196 after the FAA
final rule is published.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the EASA AD
The EASA AD applies to Model MBB-BK117 A-1, MBB-BK117 A-3, MBB-
BK117 A-4, MBB-BK117 B-1, MBB-BK117 B-2 and MBB-BK117 C-1 helicopters,
whereas this proposed AD would apply to Model MBB-BK 117 A-1, MBB-BK
117 A-3, MBB-BK 117 A-4, MBB-BK 117 B-1, MBB-BK 117 B-2, and MBB-BK 117
C-1 helicopters with certain M/R blades installed instead. The service
information required by the EASA AD requires accomplishment of certain
corrective action by ``ECD'' or an authorized service or repair
station, whereas this proposed AD would require performing the
corrective action in accordance with FAA-approved procedures, instead.
The EASA AD requires revising the Aircraft Maintenance Program (AMP),
whereas this proposed AD would not. The EASA AD allows a tolerance to
compliance times, whereas this proposed AD would not.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this proposed AD affects 216 helicopters of
U.S. Registry. Labor rates are estimated at $85 per work-hour. Based on
these numbers, the FAA estimates that operators may incur the following
costs in order to comply with this proposed AD.
Inspecting an M/R blade thimble area would take about 1 work-hour
for an estimated cost of about $85 per M/R blade thimble, per
inspection cycle.
Repairing or replacing an M/R blade could take up to about 20 work-
hour(s) and parts could cost up to about $23,100 for an estimated cost
of up to $24,800 per blade.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
[[Page 16123]]
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:
Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH: Docket No. FAA-2021-0196;
Project Identifier 2018-SW-021-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments by May 10, 2021.
(b) Affected Airworthiness Directives (ADs)
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH Model
MBB-BK 117 A-1, MBB-BK 117 A-3, MBB-BK 117 A-4, MBB-BK 117 B-1, MBB-
BK 117 B-2, and MBB-BK 117 C-1 helicopters, certificated in any
category, with an ``affected `angle 0' parts'' or ``affected `angle
1' parts'' installed, as identified in European Aviation Safety
Agency (now European Union Aviation Safety Agency) (EASA) AD 2018-
0061, dated March 20, 2018 (EASA AD 2018-0061).
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code: 6200, Main Rotor
System.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by new test results from a composite
analysis of the main rotor (M/R) blade loop area, which revealed
that certain M/R blade thimbles require reduced inspection
intervals. The FAA is issuing this AD to address composite failure
of an M/R blade, which if not addressed could result in subsequent
loss of control of the helicopter.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, EASA AD 2018-0061.
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2018-0061
(1) Where EASA AD 2018-0061 refers to its effective date, this
AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
(2) Where EASA AD 2018-0061 refers to flight hours, this AD
requires using hours time-in-service (TIS).
(3) Where Table 1, Table 2, and Note 2 of EASA AD 2018-0061
specify inspection thresholds, intervals, and a non-cumulative
compliance time tolerance of 10% for certain required compliance
times, this AD requires accomplishing those requirements, as
follows:
(i) For helicopters with an ``affected `angle 0' parts,'' the
compliance time is before accumulating 660 total hours TIS on the
affected part or within 100 hours TIS after the effective date of
this AD, whichever occurs later, and without accumulating 1,600
total hours TIS on the affected part. Thereafter, the compliance
time is at intervals not to exceed 330 hours TIS.
(ii) For helicopters with an ``affected `angle 1' parts,'' the
compliance time is before accumulating 110 total hours TIS on the
affected part or within 50 hours TIS after the effective date of
this AD, whichever occurs later, and without accumulating 950 total
hours TIS on the affected part. Thereafter, the compliance time is
at intervals not to exceed 110 hours TIS.
(iii) For helicopters specified in paragraph (c) of this AD,
Note 1 of EASA AD 2018-0061 specifies accumulated FH as, ``Unless
otherwise specified, the FH specified in Table 2 of this AD are
those accumulated since the previous M/R blade thimble inspection.''
This AD requires intervals thereafter to be accumulated since
accomplishment of paragraph (g) of this AD.
(4) While paragraph (5) and Note 3 of EASA AD 2018-0061 specify
revising the Aircraft Maintenance Program (AMP), this AD does not
require this action.
(5) Where the service information referenced in EASA AD 2018-
0061 specifies accomplishment of certain corrective action by
``ECD'' or an authorized service or repair station, this AD requires
the corrective actions to be performed by a qualified mechanic.
(6) Where the service information referenced in EASA AD 2018-
0061 specifies contacting ``ECD'' or an authorized service or repair
station, this AD requires performing the corrective action in
accordance with FAA-approved procedures.
(7) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2018-0061 does not apply
to this AD.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, International Validation Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the International Validation Branch, send
it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (j)(2) of
this AD. Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(j) Related Information
(1) For EASA AD 2018-0061, contact the EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-
Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email
[email protected]; internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may
view this material at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321, Fort Worth, TX
76177. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call (817) 222-5110. This material may be found in the AD
docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0196.
(2) For more information about this AD, contact Kathleen
Arrigotti, Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, International
Validation Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA;
telephone (206) 231-3218; email [email protected].
Issued on March 20, 2021.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-06214 Filed 3-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P