Veterans Legacy Grants Program, 16165-16171 [2021-05721]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 57 / Friday, March 26, 2021 / Proposed Rules
Office has adopted various rules with
respect to the operation of the Patent
Trial and Appeals Board and the
Trademark Trial and Appeals Board, as
well as for attorneys and entities
prosecuting applications before the
agency. Those rules address various
issues, such as conduct and discipline,
duties of candor, fraud prevention, and,
if necessary, sanction, suspension,
exclusion or censure.163 Commenters
are encouraged to suggest other models
(including any adopted by state small
claims courts), as well as to offer
regulatory language tailored to the CCB
specifically.
I. Other Subjects
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
163 See, e.g., 35 U.S.C. 32 (authorizing the Patent
and Trademark Office Director to ‘‘suspend or
exclude . . . from further practice . . . any person,
agent or attorney shown to be in competent or
disreputable’’); 37 CFR 11.19(b) (grounds for
disciplining or disqualifying practitioners); see also
37 CFR 1.56, 1.97 and 1.98, 41.128, 42.11 and 42.12;
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Scam
Prevention, https://www.uspto.gov/patents/basics/
using-legal-services/scam-prevention (including
general information to the public and a link to a
publically available complaint form).
164 17 U.S.C. 1505(d). Before the CCB renders a
determination in any infringement dispute, the
work at issue must be registered by the Office and
the other parties in the proceeding must have an
opportunity to address the registration certificate.
But the statute allows a party to file a claim with
the CCB before the Office has issued a registration,
as long as ‘‘a completed application, a deposit, and
the required fee for registration’’ have been
delivered to the Office. Id. at 1505(a)(1).
165 Id. at 1504(t)(4).
166 Id. at 1504(c).
16:46 Mar 25, 2021
[FR Doc. 2021–06322 Filed 3–25–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 38
RIN 2900–AR00
Veterans Legacy Grants Program
Jkt 253001
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
While this notification outlines a
variety of issues relevant to
implementation of the CCB, the Office
welcomes input on any issues not
specifically identified that commenters
believe are appropriate and within the
Office’s regulatory authority.
Commenters should be aware that apart
from this notification, the Office intends
to separately publish a proposed rule
regarding a process to expedite a
registration decision for an unregistered
work at issue before the CCB,164 as well
as a conforming technical edit to the
Office’s FOIA regulations.165
In some cases, the Office may defer
exercising its regulatory authority until
a later date. For example, the Office has
the authority to limit claims regarding
particular classes of works (e.g., musical
works, audiovisual works, architectural
works, etc.) that the CCB can hear.166
While the Office welcomes any
suggestions regarding this authority
now, it may delay exercising it until a
later date, including potentially after the
CCB is operational.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Dated: March 23, 2021.
Regan A. Smith,
General Counsel and Associate Register of
Copyrights.
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) proposes regulations to
establish the Veterans Legacy Grants
Program (VLGP). VA would establish
grant application procedures and
evaluative criteria for determining
whether to issue funding to eligible
entities to conduct cemetery research
and produce VLGP educational
materials. Educational materials would
relate the histories of Veterans interred
in national, State, or Tribal Veterans’
cemeteries and would promote
community engagement with those
histories.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received on
or before May 25, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted through www.Regulations.gov
or mailed to: Director, Legislative and
Regulatory Service (42E), Department of
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20420. Comments
should indicate that they are submitted
in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–AR00—
Veterans Legacy Grants Program.’’
Comments received will be available at
regulations.gov for public viewing,
inspection, or copies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bryce Carpenter, Educational Outreach
Programs Officer, National Cemetery
Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461–5362.
(This is not a toll-free telephone
number.)
DATES:
In Public
Law 116–107, sec. 1 (Jan. 17, 2020)
(codified at 38 U.S.C. 2400 note),
Congress authorized VA to establish a
grant program to conduct cemetery
research and produce educational
materials for the VLGP. VA proposes to
add new 38 CFR 38.710 through 38.785
to implement this new grant authority.
The mission of the National Cemetery
Administration (NCA) is to honor
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
16165
Veterans and their eligible family
members with final resting places and
lasting tributes, thus ensuring that ‘‘No
Veteran Ever Dies.’’ In 2016, the
Veterans Legacy Program (VLP) was
established to support NCA’s mission to
ensure ‘‘No Veteran Ever Dies’’ through
contract awards to educational entities
to conduct cemetery research and
produce educational tools for the public
to utilize and learn about the histories
of Veterans interred in VA national
cemeteries, as well as VA grant-funded
State and Tribal Veterans’ cemeteries.
By engaging educators, students,
researchers, and the public, VLP
enabled NCA to share the stories of
those who served and build an
understanding and appreciation of the
reasons national cemeteries are
considered national shrines. Through
contract awards from 2016 to 2020, VLP
funded research for 19 projects, which
produced more than 573 Veteran
biographies, 17 documentary films
about Veterans, and 6 Veterans’
cemetery walking tours. Additionally,
under VLP contracts issued to date, VLP
will have engaged almost 9,000
kindergarten through high school
students, more than 200 undergraduate
students, nearly 40 graduate students,
more than 50 scholars, and more than
300 teachers.
As the VLP program grew, VA sought
authority to award grants to entities
rather than request contract proposals
from educational institutions to carry
out this mission-critical function. Public
Law 116–107, sec. 1 (codified at 38
U.S.C. 2400 note), enacted in early 2020,
authorizes VA to make such grants.
Under that authority, this proposed rule
would establish regulations to govern
VA’s funding of VLP projects through
more effective and efficient grant
awards that would be administered by
the VLGP. The proposed regulations
address the purpose and use of grant
funds and set out the general process for
awarding a grant, as well as criteria for
evaluating grant applications, priorities
related to the award of a grant, and other
general requirements and guidance for
administering the VLGP.
Section 38.710 sets forth the purpose
of the VLGP, which is to fund projects
for research related to national, State, or
Tribal Veterans’ cemeteries, to present
such research through site hosting and
other digital technologies, and to
produce educational materials that
teach about the history of Veterans
interred in those cemeteries. Grants may
also fund projects that promote
community engagement with the
histories of Veterans interred in those
locations.
E:\FR\FM\26MRP1.SGM
26MRP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
16166
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 57 / Friday, March 26, 2021 / Proposed Rules
Because this is a new VA authority,
we propose to define terms in § 38.715
that would be referenced in §§ 38.710
through 38.785. For the ‘‘Notice of
Funding Availability (NOFA)’’
definition, we propose to cite to
§ 38.725, which would include
information such as application
requirements and filing deadlines, as
well as basic scoring information,
timeframes for grant awards and
payments, and a provision for other
requirements that give VA flexibility to
determine and target areas of focus,
according to agency need. We also
propose to cite to 2 CFR 200.203, which
provides guidance for all Federal grants.
We define generic administrative terms
such as ‘‘applicant’’ and ‘‘grantee’’ to
reflect change in status as an entity
moves through the grant review process.
Additionally, in § 38.715, we propose
to define the term ‘‘eligible recipient’’ as
set forth in Public Law 116–107, sec.
1(a)(2); define the term ‘‘institution of
higher learning’’ similar to the
definition of that term in 38 U.S.C.
3452(f); and define the term ‘‘local
educational agency’’ similar to the
definition of that term in 20 U.S.C.
7801(30). Because the definition of
‘‘local educational agency’’ in sec.
7801(30) also includes the term ‘‘State
educational agency,’’ VA proposes to
include it as an eligible recipient for
Veterans Legacy grants. The public law
specifies that an eligible recipient can
be a ‘‘non-profit entity’’ that has a
demonstrated history of community
engagement but did not define that
term. We would limit the definition of
‘‘non-profit entity’’ to mean an
organization chartered under 26 U.S.C.
501(c)(3). VA proposes to require each
non-profit entity to provide information
about its history of community
engagement as it pertains to projects
described in the NOFA publication for
that year. Flexibility is needed for VA’s
annual publication of the NOFA’s based
on VA’s analysis of grant project needs,
emerging trends in Veteran histories,
and other significant milestone events
related to military service.
The statute also allows VA to
determine other recipients that may be
eligible to receive a Veterans Legacy
grant, so VA proposes to include
‘‘educational institutions’’ as defined in
38 U.S.C. 3452(c). This term is
commonly used to capture the full
spectrum of school systems that fall
outside the scope of institutions of
higher learning, such as public or
private elementary and secondary
schools, as well as vocational schools
and other trade, professional, and
scientific schools. The inclusion of
‘‘educational institutions,’’ as defined in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Mar 25, 2021
Jkt 253001
38 U.S.C. 3452(c), is necessary given
NCA’s previous contracting experience
for Veterans Legacy projects with these
entities. VA intends to continue the
practice of recognizing educational
institution recipients, which include
elementary and secondary schools, as
eligible entities for Veterans Legacy
grant purposes.
Further, we propose to define terms
such as ‘‘educational materials’’ to
clarify one of the purposes of the VLGP,
which is to utilize the research
conducted by grantees to develop
instructional materials, such as lesson
plans and other teaching aids. While
these teaching aids are contemplated for
students from kindergarten through the
12th grade, these materials may also be
used for outreach events at VA national
cemeteries. Additionally, we propose to
define ‘‘community engagement’’ to
describe the strategic interaction with
certain groups of people to identify and
address issues related to the legacy of
Veterans.
VA proposes to annually publish in
the Federal Register a NOFA that would
set out the grant application and other
requirements. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
requires the issuance of a NOFA and
publication of this information to ensure
that eligible entities have the
information required to apply for grants.
Proposed § 38.725 sets out certain
provisions that would be included in a
NOFA, including instructions on how
interested parties could apply for a
grant. At a minimum, we propose the
NOFA include application filing
requirements, deadlines for submission,
estimates of the total available funding,
and the maximum funding availability
to a single eligible recipient. For
example, eligibility for a Veterans
Legacy grant may require an entity to be
accredited to ensure that an educational
institution has the operational capacity
to manage a Federal grant. This type of
requirement would minimize the risk of
default recovery actions posed by
awarding grants to non-accredited
institutions. These components are
consistent with 2 CFR 200.203, which
requires the issuance of a NOFA that
includes information describing the
funding opportunity, eligible entities,
application submission, application
review, and Federal award
administration. Other information we
propose to be imparted in a NOFA
includes minimum scores that an
applicant must receive for VA review,
timeframes and manner of grant
payments, and other information VA
deems necessary for the application
process that is commonly utilized in
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
similar Federal educational and
research grant programs.
In § 38.720, we would provide general
information about grant requirements
that limit VLGP grants to eligible
entities to the maximum funding
availability specified in the NOFA. We
would clarify that like most other
educational grants, the VLGP grant is
not a course buyout for teachers to use
as a substitute for course instruction
during an academic year. The
expectation for these grants is to provide
maximum resources to enable student
research on Veterans and to produce
that research into publicly-accessible
formats. Additionally, we would clarify
that the VLGP grant is not a Veterans’
benefit and that decisions on grant
applications are not subject to appellate
review. In this section, we would inform
applicants that if VA requires a grantee
to provide matching funds as a
condition for receiving a VLGP grant,
those criteria will be included in the
NOFA published in that year.
In § 38.730, we would provide general
information about the minimum
requirements for grant applications that
applicants must address to be
considered for a VLGP grant. To apply
for a VLGP grant, applicants would be
required to submit a complete grant
application package through Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). Use of this
portal is a familiar and efficient means
for applicants to submit grant
applications. Applicants would need to
provide a project description that
demonstrates the best approach to
accomplish the required results set out
in the NOFA. The description would
have to identify any project team
partner entities, provide a detailed plan
of projected milestones, and
demonstrate the applicant’s ability and
capacity to administer the grant project.
VA would consider an applicant’s past
experience with similar projects as
defined by the NOFA or related work in
that particular field or subject matter.
Applicants would need to propose a
budget of costs and proposed
expenditures, to include compensation
and honoraria. Other budgetary
requirements may be included in the
NOFA for that year. These disclosures
would help VA assess the extent to
which an applicant has considered all
aspects of planning and the likelihood
of successful completion of grant
objectives. Further, if matching funds
are required by the NOFA, the applicant
would have to provide evidence of
secured cash matching in a 1-to-1 ratio
or an explanation of the applicant’s
ability to secure commitments to receive
such funding. In this section, VA also
proposes a catch-all provision to allow
E:\FR\FM\26MRP1.SGM
26MRP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 57 / Friday, March 26, 2021 / Proposed Rules
for flexibility in setting grant
application requirements that would be
published in the NOFA to tailor projects
as needed.
As proposed under § 38.740, VA
would review completed grant
applications to ensure they meet the
minimum criteria proposed in § 38.730
and score them as specified in the
NOFA as published under § 38.725.
Applications would have to be timely
submitted and meet the minimum
application and NOFA requirements,
which VA would publish annually for
grant projects contemplated for that
year. The NOFA would include
information about the scoring process
and clarify the minimum point totals
per scoring category that an applicant
must receive to be considered for a
grant. VA would rate all grant
applications against each other to
determine the likelihood of successful
implementation of the grant projects
published in that year’s NOFA and
would consider other factors to qualify
for the grant award, as explained in
proposed § 38.735. Factors such as an
applicant’s past performance on a prior
award, an applicant’s fiscal integrity, or
risk assessments are examples of other
considerations that would affect VA’s
scoring of grant applications.
As proposed under § 38.745, VA may
approve VLGP grant applications in
whole or in part subject to conditions
VA deems necessary to ensure full
flexibility in meeting Departmental or
programmatic goals. VA may also
disapprove an application because it
does not rank sufficiently high in
relation to other applications. Further,
VA may defer action on applications for
reasons that require further review or
additional time to meet grant
requirements, such as lack of funds. In
all instances, VA would convey
decisions in writing to applicants on all
grant submissions.
For grant awards, VA proposes in
§ 38.755 to memorialize the awards in
an agreement, in accordance with the
terms set out in §§ 38.755 and 38.760
and in the NOFA published for that
year. As a condition of receiving a VLGP
grant, grantees and grantee
subrecipients (e.g., contractors and other
entities utilized by a grantee to execute
grant requirements) would have to agree
to operate their programs in accordance
with VA regulations in proposed
§§ 38.710 through 38.785, Federal
regulations in 2 CFR part 200, and the
information provided in the grant
application. Part 200 provides uniform
guidance and government-wide terms
and conditions for the management of
awards and the administration of
Federal grants, and this rulemaking
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Mar 25, 2021
Jkt 253001
provides additional guidance and
conditions for the administration of
VLGP grants in particular. Adherence to
the government-wide rules would be
mandatory, and compliance with the
additional rules specific to VLGP grants
would ensure program integrity across
all VLGP grants VA awards. Included
among those terms would be the
grantees’ compliance with
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements, provided in proposed
§§ 38.765, 38.775, 38.780, and 38.785
and as specified in the Terms and
Conditions of the grant agreement.
Under proposed § 38.765, within 60
days after the last day of the grant
period, grantees would have to submit
a final report to VA that meets the
requirements set forth in the NOFA.
Additionally, under proposed
§ 38.755, upon execution of the grant
agreement, VA would obligate grant
funds and in some cases, as provided in
proposed § 38.760, would reimburse
grantees for costs incurred before the
effective date of the grant, to the extent
such costs are authorized by VA in the
NOFA or the grant agreement or
authorized subsequently by VA in
writing should the need arise.
VA also proposes to include
withdrawal provisions in § 38.750.
Applicants would be able to submit a
request in writing to the VA point of
contact specified in the NOFA
published for that year to withdraw
their application from consideration.
Applicants would be required to
provide a rationale for the withdrawal
request. VA recognizes that the potential
pool of grant applicants usually operates
with limited funding and that schools,
non-profit organizations, and
institutions of higher learning may be
subject to competing interests,
especially during times of unforeseen
crisis.
As proposed in § 38.770, if VA
determines that recovery of funds is
necessary for violations of the grant
agreement or unauthorized uses of grant
funds, VA would notify grantees in
writing of the intent to recover grant
funds. Grantees would have 30 days to
submit documentation refuting the
proposed recovery, which VA would
review for a final determination. If VA
makes a final decision that action would
be taken to recover grant funds from the
grantee, VA would stop further
payments of grant funds under this part
until the grant funds are recovered and
the condition that led to the decision to
recover grant funds has been resolved.
We believe these measures would help
safeguard Federal funds and ensure
appropriate use of the VLGP grant funds
awarded.
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
16167
As part of VA’s duty to ensure fiscal
responsibility, we propose in § 38.775 to
conduct site visits to grantee locations
to review grantee accomplishments and
management control systems. In
addition, VA may conduct as needed
inspections of grantee records to
determine compliance with the
provisions of this part. All visits and
evaluations would be performed with
minimal disruption to the grantee to the
extent practicable. Further, as proposed
in § 38.780, VA would enforce 2 CFR
part 200 regulations to ensure all VLGP
grant recipients comply with
requirements of the Single Audit Act of
1996 and use a compliant financial
management system based on OMB cost
principles. As proposed in § 38.785,
grantees would have to produce upon
VA’s request records maintained in
accordance with 2 CFR 200.333.
Executive Orders 12866, 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has
determined that this proposed rule is
not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
VA’s impact analysis can be found as
a supporting document at https://
www.regulations.gov, usually within 48
hours after the rulemaking document is
published. Additionally, a copy of the
rulemaking and its Regulatory Impact
Analysis are available on VA’s website
at https://www.va.gov/orpm/, by
following the link for ‘‘VA Regulations
Published From FY 2004 Through Fiscal
Year to Date.’’
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains
provisions constituting collections of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3521) that require approval
by OMB. Accordingly, under 44 U.S.C.
3507(d), VA has submitted a copy of
this rulemaking action to OMB for
review.
OMB assigns control numbers to
collections of information it approves.
VA may not conduct or sponsor, and a
E:\FR\FM\26MRP1.SGM
26MRP1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
16168
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 57 / Friday, March 26, 2021 / Proposed Rules
person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. Proposed 38 CFR 38.730
contains collections of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995. If OMB does not approve the
collections of information as requested,
VA will immediately remove the
provisions containing collections of
information or take such other action as
is directed by OMB.
Comments on the collections of
information contained in this proposed
rule should be submitted to the Office
of Management and Budget, Attention:
Desk Officer for the Department of
Veterans Affairs, Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs, Washington, DC
20503. Send your comments and
suggestions on this information
collection by the date indicated in the
DATES section to the Desk Officer for the
Department of the Veterans Affairs at
OMB–OIRA at (202) 395–5806 (fax) or
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov
(email). Please indicate ‘‘Attention: This
is a new OMB Control Number request.’’
Comments should indicate that they are
submitted in response to ‘‘RIN 2900–
AR00.’’
OMB is required to make a decision
concerning the collections of
information contained in this proposed
rule between 30 and 60 days after
publication of this document in the
Federal Register. Therefore, a comment
to OMB is best assured of having its full
effect if OMB receives it within 30 days
of publication. This does not affect the
deadline for the public to comment on
the proposed rule. Notice of OMB
approval for this information collection
will be published in a future Federal
Register document.
The Department considers comments
by the public on proposed collections of
information in—
• Evaluating whether the proposed
collections of information are necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Department, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluating the accuracy of the
Department’s estimate of the burden of
the proposed collections of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhancing the quality, usefulness,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimizing the burden of the
collections of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Mar 25, 2021
Jkt 253001
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
The collections of information
contained in 38 CFR 38.730 are
described immediately following this
paragraph.
Title: SF–424 Application for Federal
Assistance.
• Summary of collection of
information: The new collection of
information in proposed 38 CFR 38.730
would require VLGP grant applicants to
submit the SF–424 as a minimum
requirement to qualify for a VLGP grant.
• Description of the need for
information and proposed use of
information: The collection of
information is necessary to determine
applicant eligibility for a VLGP grant.
VA will use this information to score
completed grant applications.
• Description of likely respondents:
Members of the public, institutions, and
non-profits that are interested in
applying for VA grants.
• Estimated number of respondents:
20 per year.
• Estimated frequency of responses:
Annually.
• Estimated average burden per
response: 1 hour.
• Estimated annual cost to
respondents for the hour burdens for
collections of information: According to
the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Mean
Hourly Earnings, the cost to each
respondent is $25.72, making the total
cost for respondents an estimated
$514.40 (20 burden hours × $25.72 per
hour). (Source: May 2019 BLS National
Occupational Employment and Wage
Estimates, Code: 00–0000, All
Occupations: https://www.bls.gov/oes/
current/oes_nat.htm#00-0000)
• Estimated total annual reporting
and recordkeeping burden: There is no
anticipated recordkeeping burden.
• Estimated cost to the Federal
Government: There is no projected
incremental increase in the cost burden
to the Federal Government with the
requirement of the SF–424, Application
for Federal Assistance. NCA currently
has existing personnel, systems, and
processes (or other resources) in place to
receive and review their grant
applications. Any additional cost for
agency system development,
maintenance, and enhancements should
not be attributed to use of SF–424, and
therefore its use is not expected to alter
annualized Federal costs.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
they are defined in the Regulatory
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612.
Receiving or not receiving a grant is
unlikely to have a significant economic
impact on small entity applicants,
specifically non-profit institutions.
Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b),
the initial and final regulatory flexibility
analysis requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603
and 604 do not apply.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
1 year. This proposed rule would have
no such effect on State, local, and Tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance number and title for the
program affected by this document is
64.204, Veterans Legacy Grant Program.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 38
Administrative practice and
procedure, Cemeteries, Veterans.
Signing Authority
Denis McDonough, Secretary of
Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on March 12, 2021 and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Luvenia Potts,
Regulation Development Coordinator, Office
of Regulation Policy & Management, Office
of the Secretary, Department of Veterans
Affairs.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, VA proposes to amend 38
CFR part 38 as follows:
PART 38—NATIONAL CEMETERIES
OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
1. The authority citation for part 38 is
revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 107, 501, 512, 2306,
2400, 2402, 2403, 2404, 2407, 2408, 2411,
7105.
2. Add an undesignated center
heading, ’’Veterans Legacy Grants
Program,’’ and §§ 38.710 through 38.785
to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
*
■
Veterans Legacy Grants Program
Sec.
E:\FR\FM\26MRP1.SGM
26MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 57 / Friday, March 26, 2021 / Proposed Rules
38.710 Purpose and use of grant funds.
38.715 Definitions.
38.720 Grants—general.
38.725 Notice of Funding Availability
(NOFA).
38.730 Applications.
38.735 Additional factors for deciding
applications.
38.740 Scoring and selection.
38.745 Disposition of applications.
38.750 Withdrawal of grant application.
38.755 Grant agreement.
38.760 Payments under the grant.
38.765 Grantee reporting requirements.
38.770 Recovery of funds by VA.
38.775 Compliance review requirements.
38.780 Financial management.
38.785 Recordkeeping.
Veterans Legacy Grants Program
§ 38.710
Purpose and use of grant funds.
Sections 38.710 through 38.785
establish the Veterans Legacy Grants
Program (VLGP). Under this program,
VA may provide grants to eligible
entities defined in § 38.715 to:
(a) Conduct research related to
national, State, or Tribal Veterans’
cemeteries;
(b) Produce educational materials that
teach about the history of Veterans
interred in national, State, or Tribal
Veterans’ cemeteries;
(c) Contribute to the extended
memorialization of Veterans interred in
national, State, or Tribal Veterans’
cemeteries by presenting grantee
research on national, State, or Tribal
Veterans’ cemeteries through site
hosting and other digital technologies;
and,
(d) Promote community engagement
with the histories of Veterans interred in
national, State, or Tribal Veterans’
cemeteries.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note)
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 38.715
Definitions.
For purposes of this part and any
Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA)
issued pursuant to this part:
(a) Applicant means an eligible entity
that submits a VLGP grant application
that is announced in a NOFA.
(b) Community engagement means
strategic interaction with identified
groups of people, whether they are
connected by geographic location,
special interest, or affiliation, to identify
and address issues related to the legacy
of Veterans.
(c) Eligible recipient (or entity) means
one of the following:
(1) An institution of higher learning;
(2) A local educational agency;
(3) A non-profit entity that the
Secretary determines has a
demonstrated history of community
engagement that pertains to the projects
described in the relevant NOFA;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Mar 25, 2021
Jkt 253001
(4) An educational institution; or
(5) Another recipient (or entity) the
Secretary deems appropriate.
(d) Institution of higher learning (IHL)
means a college, university, or similar
institution, including a technical or
business school, offering postsecondary
level academic instruction that leads to
an associate or higher degree if the
school is empowered by the appropriate
State education authority under State
law to grant an associate or higher
degree.
(e) Educational institution means any
public or private elementary school,
secondary school, vocational school,
correspondence school, business school,
junior college, teachers’ college, college,
normal school, professional school,
university, or scientific or technical
institution, or other institution
furnishing education for adults.
(f) Local educational agency (LEA)
means any public agency or authority,
including a state educational agency,
that has administrative control or
direction over public elementary or
secondary schools under 20 U.S.C.
7801(30). The term would also include
any Bureau of Indian Education school,
as covered in 20 U.S.C. 7801(30)(C).
(g) State educational agency (SEA)
means the agency primarily responsible
for the State supervision of public
elementary schools and secondary
schools.
(h) Non-profit entity means any
organization chartered under 26 U.S.C.
501(c)(3).
(i) Educational materials means a
framework of digital instructional
materials relevant to the grade level of
K–12 students involved (e.g., lesson
plans) that can be used for outreach and
other purposes.
(j) Grantee means an eligible recipient
that is awarded a VLGP grant under this
part.
(k) Notice of Funding Availability
(NOFA) means a Notice of Funding
Availability published in the OMBdesignated government-wide website in
accordance with § 38.725 and 2 CFR
200.203 regulations.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and
2 CFR 200.203)
§ 38.720
Grants—general.
(a) Grants. VA may award VLGP
grants to eligible recipients selected
under § 38.730 of this part.
(b) Maximum amounts. The
maximum grant amount to be awarded
to each grantee and the total maximum
amount for all grants will be specified
in the annually published NOFA.
(c) Number of grants awarded. The
number of grants VA will award will
depend on the total amount of grant
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
16169
funding available at VA’s discretion and
the funding amount awarded to each
grantee, which is based on each
grantee’s proposal.
(d) Grant is not a course buyout. The
grant funds shall not be used to
substitute a class that an instructor is
required to teach during an academic
year.
(e) Matching requirement. VA will
determine whether a grantee must
provide matching funds as a condition
of receiving a VLGP grant as set forth in
the NOFA.
(f) Grant is not Veterans’ benefit. The
VLGP grant is not a Veterans’ benefit.
VA decisions on VLGP applications are
final and not subject to the same appeal
rights as Veterans’ benefits decisions.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note)
§ 38.725
(NOFA).
Notice of Funding Availability
When funds are available for VLGP
grants, VA will publish a NOFA in the
Federal Register and in Grants.gov
(https://www.grants.gov). The NOFA will
identify:
(a) The location for obtaining VLGP
grant applications, including the
specific forms that will be required;
(b) The date, time, and place for
submitting completed VLGP grant
applications;
(c) The estimated total amount of
funds available and the maximum funds
available to a single grantee;
(d) The minimum number of total
points and points per category that an
applicant must receive to be considered
for a grant and information regarding
the scoring process;
(e) Any timeframes and manner for
payments under the VLGP grant;
(f) A description of eligible entities or
other eligibility requirements necessary
to receive the grant; and
(g) Other information necessary for
the VLGP grant application process, as
determined by VA, including contact
information for the office that will
oversee the VLGP within VA.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and
2 CFR 200.203)
§ 38.730
Applications.
To apply for a grant, an eligible entity
must submit to VA a complete
application package, as described in the
NOFA. Applications will be accepted
only through Grants.gov (https://
www.grants.gov). A complete grant
application, as further described in the
NOFA, includes standard forms
specified in the NOFA and the
following:
(a) Project Description. Each project
must serve a minimum of one VA
national cemetery, State Veterans’
E:\FR\FM\26MRP1.SGM
26MRP1
16170
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 57 / Friday, March 26, 2021 / Proposed Rules
cemetery, or Tribal Veterans’ cemetery.
The applicant must provide a narrative
project description that demonstrates
the best approach for attaining required
results as set forth in the NOFA;
(b) Project Team. If applicable, the
applicant must provide a narrative
description of anticipated project team
and any work partner(s), including the
responsibilities of the principal
investigator, the co-principal
investigators, and any extramural
partner entity;
(c) Project plan. The applicant must
include a detailed timeline for the tasks
outlined in the project description and
proposed milestones;
(d) Expertise and capacity. The
applicant must provide a description of
the applicant’s ability and capacity to
administer the project. This may
include evidence of past experience
with projects similar in scope as defined
by the NOFA, to include descriptions of
the engagement model, examples of
successful leadership and management
of a project of similar scale and budget
(or greater), or related work in this field;
(e) Match. If specified as a
requirement in the NOFA, the applicant
must provide evidence of secured cash
matching (1:1) funds or of its ability to
secure commitments to receive such
funds;
(f) Proposed Budget. The applicant’s
proposed budget should identify all
costs and proposed expenditures, to
include additional compensation and
honoraria (and to whom); equipment
costs; production costs; and travel costs.
The applicant must provide a budget
that specifies costs and payments, as
well as indirect and other relevant costs.
The budget will be submitted in a
format specified in the NOFA; and
(g) Additional information. Any
additional information as deemed
appropriate by VA and set forth in the
NOFA.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and
2 CFR 200.203)
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 38.735 Additional factors for deciding
applications.
(a) Applicant’s performance on prior
award. VA may consider the applicant’s
noncompliance with requirements
applicable to prior VA or other Federal
agency awards as reflected in past
written evaluation reports and
memoranda on performance and the
completeness of required prior
submissions.
(b) Applicant’s fiscal integrity.
Applicants must meet and maintain
standards of fiscal integrity for
participation in Federal grant programs
as reflected in 2 CFR 200.205.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Mar 25, 2021
Jkt 253001
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and
2 CFR 200.203)
§ 38.740
Scoring and selection.
(a) Scoring. VA will only score
complete applications received from
eligible applicants by the deadline
established in the NOFA. The
applications must meet the minimum
criteria set forth in § 38.730 and will be
scored as specified in the NOFA, as set
forth in § 38.725.
(b) Selection of recipients. All
complete applications will be scored
using the criteria in paragraph (a) of this
section and ranked in order of highest
to lowest total score. NOFA
announcements may also clarify the
selection criteria in paragraph (a). The
relative weight (point value) for each
selection will be specified in the NOFA.
VA will award any VLGP grant on the
primary basis of the scores but will also
consider a risk assessment evaluation.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and
2 CFR 200.203)
§ 38.745
Disposition of applications.
(a) Disposition of applications. Upon
review of an application and dependent
on availability of funds, VA will:
(1) Approve the application for
funding, in whole or in part, for such
amount of funds, and subject to such
conditions that VA deems necessary or
desirable;
(2) Determine that the application is
of acceptable quality for funding, in that
it meets minimum criteria, but
disapprove the application for funding
because it does not rank sufficiently
high in relation to other applications to
qualify for an award based on the level
of funding available, or for another
reason as provided in the decision
document; or
(3) Defer action on the application for
such reasons as lack of funds or a need
for further review.
(b) Notification of disposition. VA
will notify the applicant in writing of
the disposition of the application. A
signed grant agreement form, as defined
in § 38.755, will be issued to the
applicant of an approved application.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and
2 CFR 200.203)
§ 38.755
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and
2 CFR 200.203)
§ 38.760
Withdrawal of grant application.
Applicants may withdraw a VLGP
application submitted through
Grants.gov by writing the specified VA
point of contact and including rationale
for the withdrawal request within a
certain number of days as determined in
the NOFA.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and
2 CFR 200.203)
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Payments under the grant.
(a) Grantees are to be paid in
accordance with the timeframes and
manner set forth in the NOFA.
(b) Availability of grant funds. Federal
financial assistance will become
available subsequent to the effective
date of the grant as set forth in the grant
agreement. Recipients may be
reimbursed for costs resulting from
obligations incurred before the effective
date of the grant, if such costs are
authorized by VA in the NOFA or the
grant agreement or authorized
subsequently by VA in writing, and
otherwise would be allowable as costs
of the grant under applicable guidelines,
regulations, and terms and conditions of
the grant agreement.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and
2 CFR 200.203)
§ 38.765
§ 38.750
Grant agreement.
After a grant is approved for award,
VA will draft a grant agreement to be
executed by VA and the grantee. Upon
execution of the grant agreement, VA
will obligate the grant amount. The
grant agreement will provide that the
recipient agrees, and will ensure that
each subrecipient (if applicable) agrees,
to:
(a) Operate the program in accordance
with the provisions of §§ 38.710 through
38.785, 2 CFR part 200, and the
applicant’s VLGP application;
(b) Comply with such other terms and
conditions, including recordkeeping
and reports for program monitoring and
evaluation purposes, as VA may
establish in the Terms and Conditions of
the grant agreement for purposes of
carrying out the VLGP project in an
effective and efficient manner; and
(c) Provide additional information
that VA requests with respect to:
(1) Program effectiveness, as defined
in the Terms and Conditions of the grant
agreement;
(2) Compliance with the Terms and
Conditions of the grant agreement; and
(3) Criteria for evaluation, as defined
in the Terms and Conditions of the grant
agreement.
Grantee reporting requirements.
(a) Final report. All grantees must
submit to VA, not later than 60 days
after the last day of grant period for
which a grant is provided under this
part, a final report that meets the
requirement set forth in the NOFA.
(b) Additional reporting. Additional
reporting requirements may be
requested by VA to allow VA to assess
program effectiveness.
E:\FR\FM\26MRP1.SGM
26MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 57 / Friday, March 26, 2021 / Proposed Rules
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and
2 CFR 200.203)
§ 38.770
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and
2 CFR 200.333)
[FR Doc. 2021–05721 Filed 3–25–21; 8:45 am]
Recovery of funds by VA.
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
(a) Recovery of funds. VA may recover
from the grantee any funds that are not
used in accordance with a grant
agreement. If VA decides to recover
such funds, VA will issue to the grantee
a notice of intent to recover grant funds,
and the grantee will then have 30 days
to return the grant funds or submit
documentation demonstrating why the
grant funds should not be returned.
After review of all submitted
documentation, VA will determine
whether action will be taken to recover
the grant funds.
(b) Prohibition of additional VLGP
payments. When VA makes a final
decision to recover grant funds from the
grantee, VA must stop further payments
of grant funds under this part until the
grant funds are recovered and the
condition that led to the decision to
recover grant funds has been resolved.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and
2 CFR 200.203)
§ 38.775
Compliance review requirements.
(a) Site visits. VA may conduct, as
needed, site visits to grantee locations to
review grantee accomplishments and
management control systems.
(b) Inspections. VA may conduct, as
needed, inspections of grantee records
to determine compliance with the
provisions of this part. All visits and
evaluations will be performed with
minimal disruption to the grantee to the
extent practicable.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and
2 CFR 200.203)
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 38.780
Financial management.
(a) Compliance. All recipients will
comply with applicable requirements of
the Single Audit Act Amendments of
1996, as implemented by 2 CFR part
200.
(b) Financial Management. All
grantees must use a financial
management system that complies with
2 CFR part 200. Grantees must meet the
applicable requirements of the Office of
Management and Budget’s regulations
on Cost Principles at 2 CFR 200.400–
200.475.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and
2 CFR 200.400–200.475)
§ 38.785
Recordkeeping.
Grantees must ensure that records are
maintained in accordance with 2 CFR
200.333. Grantees must produce such
records at VA’s request.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Mar 25, 2021
Jkt 253001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R06–OAR–2021–0177; FRL–10021–
16–Region 6]
Air Plan Approval; Texas; Clean Air
Act Requirements for Emissions
Inventories for Nonattainment Areas
for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient
Air Quality Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
the portions of the State Implementation
Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of
Texas to meet the Emissions Inventory
(EI) requirements of the Federal Clean
Air Act (CAA or the Act), for the DallasFort Worth (DFW), Houston-GalvestonBrazoria (HGB), and Bexar County
ozone nonattainment areas for the 2015
8-hour ozone national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS). EPA is
proposing to approve this action
pursuant to section 110 and part D of
the CAA and EPA’s regulations.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before April 26, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket No. EPA–R06–
OAR–2021–0177, at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
16171
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
www.regulations.gov. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may not be
publicly available due to docket file size
restrictions or content (e.g., CBI).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Nevine Salem, EPA Region 6 Office,
Infrastructure and Ozone Section, 214–
665–7222, salem.nevine@epa.gov. Out
of an abundance of caution for members
of the public and our staff, the EPA
Region 6 office will be closed to the
public to reduce the risk of transmitting
COVID–19. We encourage the public to
submit comments via https://
www.regulations.gov, as there will be a
delay in processing mail and no courier
or hand deliveries will be accepted.
Please call or email the contact listed
above if you need alternative access to
material indexed but not provided in
the docket.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
the EPA.
I. Background
Ozone is a gas that is formed by the
reaction of Volatile Organic Compounds
(VOC) and Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX) in
the atmosphere in the presence of
sunlight. Therefore, an emission
inventory for ozone focuses on the
emissions of VOC and NOX referred to
as ozone precursors. These precursors
(VOC and NOX) are emitted by many
types of pollution sources, including
point sources such as power plants and
industrial emissions sources; on-road
and off-road mobile sources (motor
vehicles and engines); and smaller
residential and commercial sources,
such as dry cleaners, auto body shops,
and household paints, collectively
referred to as nonpoint sources (also
called area sources).
1. The 2015 Ozone NAAQS
On October 1, 2015 the EPA revised
both the primary and secondary
NAAQS 1 for ozone from concentration
1 The primary ozone standards provide protection
for children, older adults, and people with asthma
or other lung diseases, and other at-risk populations
against an array of adverse health effects that
include reduced lung function, increased
respiratory symptoms and pulmonary
inflammation; effects that contribute to emergency
department visits or hospital admissions; and
mortality. The secondary ozone standards protect
E:\FR\FM\26MRP1.SGM
Continued
26MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 57 (Friday, March 26, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 16165-16171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-05721]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 38
RIN 2900-AR00
Veterans Legacy Grants Program
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposes regulations
to establish the Veterans Legacy Grants Program (VLGP). VA would
establish grant application procedures and evaluative criteria for
determining whether to issue funding to eligible entities to conduct
cemetery research and produce VLGP educational materials. Educational
materials would relate the histories of Veterans interred in national,
State, or Tribal Veterans' cemeteries and would promote community
engagement with those histories.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 25, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted through www.Regulations.gov or
mailed to: Director, Legislative and Regulatory Service (42E),
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC
20420. Comments should indicate that they are submitted in response to
``RIN 2900-AR00--Veterans Legacy Grants Program.'' Comments received
will be available at regulations.gov for public viewing, inspection, or
copies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryce Carpenter, Educational Outreach
Programs Officer, National Cemetery Administration, Department of
Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420, (202)
461-5362. (This is not a toll-free telephone number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In Public Law 116-107, sec. 1 (Jan. 17,
2020) (codified at 38 U.S.C. 2400 note), Congress authorized VA to
establish a grant program to conduct cemetery research and produce
educational materials for the VLGP. VA proposes to add new 38 CFR
38.710 through 38.785 to implement this new grant authority.
The mission of the National Cemetery Administration (NCA) is to
honor Veterans and their eligible family members with final resting
places and lasting tributes, thus ensuring that ``No Veteran Ever
Dies.'' In 2016, the Veterans Legacy Program (VLP) was established to
support NCA's mission to ensure ``No Veteran Ever Dies'' through
contract awards to educational entities to conduct cemetery research
and produce educational tools for the public to utilize and learn about
the histories of Veterans interred in VA national cemeteries, as well
as VA grant-funded State and Tribal Veterans' cemeteries. By engaging
educators, students, researchers, and the public, VLP enabled NCA to
share the stories of those who served and build an understanding and
appreciation of the reasons national cemeteries are considered national
shrines. Through contract awards from 2016 to 2020, VLP funded research
for 19 projects, which produced more than 573 Veteran biographies, 17
documentary films about Veterans, and 6 Veterans' cemetery walking
tours. Additionally, under VLP contracts issued to date, VLP will have
engaged almost 9,000 kindergarten through high school students, more
than 200 undergraduate students, nearly 40 graduate students, more than
50 scholars, and more than 300 teachers.
As the VLP program grew, VA sought authority to award grants to
entities rather than request contract proposals from educational
institutions to carry out this mission-critical function. Public Law
116-107, sec. 1 (codified at 38 U.S.C. 2400 note), enacted in early
2020, authorizes VA to make such grants. Under that authority, this
proposed rule would establish regulations to govern VA's funding of VLP
projects through more effective and efficient grant awards that would
be administered by the VLGP. The proposed regulations address the
purpose and use of grant funds and set out the general process for
awarding a grant, as well as criteria for evaluating grant
applications, priorities related to the award of a grant, and other
general requirements and guidance for administering the VLGP.
Section 38.710 sets forth the purpose of the VLGP, which is to fund
projects for research related to national, State, or Tribal Veterans'
cemeteries, to present such research through site hosting and other
digital technologies, and to produce educational materials that teach
about the history of Veterans interred in those cemeteries. Grants may
also fund projects that promote community engagement with the histories
of Veterans interred in those locations.
[[Page 16166]]
Because this is a new VA authority, we propose to define terms in
Sec. 38.715 that would be referenced in Sec. Sec. 38.710 through
38.785. For the ``Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA)'' definition,
we propose to cite to Sec. 38.725, which would include information
such as application requirements and filing deadlines, as well as basic
scoring information, timeframes for grant awards and payments, and a
provision for other requirements that give VA flexibility to determine
and target areas of focus, according to agency need. We also propose to
cite to 2 CFR 200.203, which provides guidance for all Federal grants.
We define generic administrative terms such as ``applicant'' and
``grantee'' to reflect change in status as an entity moves through the
grant review process.
Additionally, in Sec. 38.715, we propose to define the term
``eligible recipient'' as set forth in Public Law 116-107, sec.
1(a)(2); define the term ``institution of higher learning'' similar to
the definition of that term in 38 U.S.C. 3452(f); and define the term
``local educational agency'' similar to the definition of that term in
20 U.S.C. 7801(30). Because the definition of ``local educational
agency'' in sec. 7801(30) also includes the term ``State educational
agency,'' VA proposes to include it as an eligible recipient for
Veterans Legacy grants. The public law specifies that an eligible
recipient can be a ``non-profit entity'' that has a demonstrated
history of community engagement but did not define that term. We would
limit the definition of ``non-profit entity'' to mean an organization
chartered under 26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3). VA proposes to require each non-
profit entity to provide information about its history of community
engagement as it pertains to projects described in the NOFA publication
for that year. Flexibility is needed for VA's annual publication of the
NOFA's based on VA's analysis of grant project needs, emerging trends
in Veteran histories, and other significant milestone events related to
military service.
The statute also allows VA to determine other recipients that may
be eligible to receive a Veterans Legacy grant, so VA proposes to
include ``educational institutions'' as defined in 38 U.S.C. 3452(c).
This term is commonly used to capture the full spectrum of school
systems that fall outside the scope of institutions of higher learning,
such as public or private elementary and secondary schools, as well as
vocational schools and other trade, professional, and scientific
schools. The inclusion of ``educational institutions,'' as defined in
38 U.S.C. 3452(c), is necessary given NCA's previous contracting
experience for Veterans Legacy projects with these entities. VA intends
to continue the practice of recognizing educational institution
recipients, which include elementary and secondary schools, as eligible
entities for Veterans Legacy grant purposes.
Further, we propose to define terms such as ``educational
materials'' to clarify one of the purposes of the VLGP, which is to
utilize the research conducted by grantees to develop instructional
materials, such as lesson plans and other teaching aids. While these
teaching aids are contemplated for students from kindergarten through
the 12th grade, these materials may also be used for outreach events at
VA national cemeteries. Additionally, we propose to define ``community
engagement'' to describe the strategic interaction with certain groups
of people to identify and address issues related to the legacy of
Veterans.
VA proposes to annually publish in the Federal Register a NOFA that
would set out the grant application and other requirements. The Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) requires the issuance of a NOFA and
publication of this information to ensure that eligible entities have
the information required to apply for grants. Proposed Sec. 38.725
sets out certain provisions that would be included in a NOFA, including
instructions on how interested parties could apply for a grant. At a
minimum, we propose the NOFA include application filing requirements,
deadlines for submission, estimates of the total available funding, and
the maximum funding availability to a single eligible recipient. For
example, eligibility for a Veterans Legacy grant may require an entity
to be accredited to ensure that an educational institution has the
operational capacity to manage a Federal grant. This type of
requirement would minimize the risk of default recovery actions posed
by awarding grants to non-accredited institutions. These components are
consistent with 2 CFR 200.203, which requires the issuance of a NOFA
that includes information describing the funding opportunity, eligible
entities, application submission, application review, and Federal award
administration. Other information we propose to be imparted in a NOFA
includes minimum scores that an applicant must receive for VA review,
timeframes and manner of grant payments, and other information VA deems
necessary for the application process that is commonly utilized in
similar Federal educational and research grant programs.
In Sec. 38.720, we would provide general information about grant
requirements that limit VLGP grants to eligible entities to the maximum
funding availability specified in the NOFA. We would clarify that like
most other educational grants, the VLGP grant is not a course buyout
for teachers to use as a substitute for course instruction during an
academic year. The expectation for these grants is to provide maximum
resources to enable student research on Veterans and to produce that
research into publicly-accessible formats. Additionally, we would
clarify that the VLGP grant is not a Veterans' benefit and that
decisions on grant applications are not subject to appellate review. In
this section, we would inform applicants that if VA requires a grantee
to provide matching funds as a condition for receiving a VLGP grant,
those criteria will be included in the NOFA published in that year.
In Sec. 38.730, we would provide general information about the
minimum requirements for grant applications that applicants must
address to be considered for a VLGP grant. To apply for a VLGP grant,
applicants would be required to submit a complete grant application
package through Grants.gov (https://www.grants.gov). Use of this portal
is a familiar and efficient means for applicants to submit grant
applications. Applicants would need to provide a project description
that demonstrates the best approach to accomplish the required results
set out in the NOFA. The description would have to identify any project
team partner entities, provide a detailed plan of projected milestones,
and demonstrate the applicant's ability and capacity to administer the
grant project. VA would consider an applicant's past experience with
similar projects as defined by the NOFA or related work in that
particular field or subject matter. Applicants would need to propose a
budget of costs and proposed expenditures, to include compensation and
honoraria. Other budgetary requirements may be included in the NOFA for
that year. These disclosures would help VA assess the extent to which
an applicant has considered all aspects of planning and the likelihood
of successful completion of grant objectives. Further, if matching
funds are required by the NOFA, the applicant would have to provide
evidence of secured cash matching in a 1-to-1 ratio or an explanation
of the applicant's ability to secure commitments to receive such
funding. In this section, VA also proposes a catch-all provision to
allow
[[Page 16167]]
for flexibility in setting grant application requirements that would be
published in the NOFA to tailor projects as needed.
As proposed under Sec. 38.740, VA would review completed grant
applications to ensure they meet the minimum criteria proposed in Sec.
38.730 and score them as specified in the NOFA as published under Sec.
38.725. Applications would have to be timely submitted and meet the
minimum application and NOFA requirements, which VA would publish
annually for grant projects contemplated for that year. The NOFA would
include information about the scoring process and clarify the minimum
point totals per scoring category that an applicant must receive to be
considered for a grant. VA would rate all grant applications against
each other to determine the likelihood of successful implementation of
the grant projects published in that year's NOFA and would consider
other factors to qualify for the grant award, as explained in proposed
Sec. 38.735. Factors such as an applicant's past performance on a
prior award, an applicant's fiscal integrity, or risk assessments are
examples of other considerations that would affect VA's scoring of
grant applications.
As proposed under Sec. 38.745, VA may approve VLGP grant
applications in whole or in part subject to conditions VA deems
necessary to ensure full flexibility in meeting Departmental or
programmatic goals. VA may also disapprove an application because it
does not rank sufficiently high in relation to other applications.
Further, VA may defer action on applications for reasons that require
further review or additional time to meet grant requirements, such as
lack of funds. In all instances, VA would convey decisions in writing
to applicants on all grant submissions.
For grant awards, VA proposes in Sec. 38.755 to memorialize the
awards in an agreement, in accordance with the terms set out in
Sec. Sec. 38.755 and 38.760 and in the NOFA published for that year.
As a condition of receiving a VLGP grant, grantees and grantee
subrecipients (e.g., contractors and other entities utilized by a
grantee to execute grant requirements) would have to agree to operate
their programs in accordance with VA regulations in proposed Sec. Sec.
38.710 through 38.785, Federal regulations in 2 CFR part 200, and the
information provided in the grant application. Part 200 provides
uniform guidance and government-wide terms and conditions for the
management of awards and the administration of Federal grants, and this
rulemaking provides additional guidance and conditions for the
administration of VLGP grants in particular. Adherence to the
government-wide rules would be mandatory, and compliance with the
additional rules specific to VLGP grants would ensure program integrity
across all VLGP grants VA awards. Included among those terms would be
the grantees' compliance with recordkeeping and reporting requirements,
provided in proposed Sec. Sec. 38.765, 38.775, 38.780, and 38.785 and
as specified in the Terms and Conditions of the grant agreement. Under
proposed Sec. 38.765, within 60 days after the last day of the grant
period, grantees would have to submit a final report to VA that meets
the requirements set forth in the NOFA.
Additionally, under proposed Sec. 38.755, upon execution of the
grant agreement, VA would obligate grant funds and in some cases, as
provided in proposed Sec. 38.760, would reimburse grantees for costs
incurred before the effective date of the grant, to the extent such
costs are authorized by VA in the NOFA or the grant agreement or
authorized subsequently by VA in writing should the need arise.
VA also proposes to include withdrawal provisions in Sec. 38.750.
Applicants would be able to submit a request in writing to the VA point
of contact specified in the NOFA published for that year to withdraw
their application from consideration. Applicants would be required to
provide a rationale for the withdrawal request. VA recognizes that the
potential pool of grant applicants usually operates with limited
funding and that schools, non-profit organizations, and institutions of
higher learning may be subject to competing interests, especially
during times of unforeseen crisis.
As proposed in Sec. 38.770, if VA determines that recovery of
funds is necessary for violations of the grant agreement or
unauthorized uses of grant funds, VA would notify grantees in writing
of the intent to recover grant funds. Grantees would have 30 days to
submit documentation refuting the proposed recovery, which VA would
review for a final determination. If VA makes a final decision that
action would be taken to recover grant funds from the grantee, VA would
stop further payments of grant funds under this part until the grant
funds are recovered and the condition that led to the decision to
recover grant funds has been resolved. We believe these measures would
help safeguard Federal funds and ensure appropriate use of the VLGP
grant funds awarded.
As part of VA's duty to ensure fiscal responsibility, we propose in
Sec. 38.775 to conduct site visits to grantee locations to review
grantee accomplishments and management control systems. In addition, VA
may conduct as needed inspections of grantee records to determine
compliance with the provisions of this part. All visits and evaluations
would be performed with minimal disruption to the grantee to the extent
practicable. Further, as proposed in Sec. 38.780, VA would enforce 2
CFR part 200 regulations to ensure all VLGP grant recipients comply
with requirements of the Single Audit Act of 1996 and use a compliant
financial management system based on OMB cost principles. As proposed
in Sec. 38.785, grantees would have to produce upon VA's request
records maintained in accordance with 2 CFR 200.333.
Executive Orders 12866, 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that
this proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
VA's impact analysis can be found as a supporting document at
https://www.regulations.gov, usually within 48 hours after the
rulemaking document is published. Additionally, a copy of the
rulemaking and its Regulatory Impact Analysis are available on VA's
website at https://www.va.gov/orpm/, by following the link for ``VA
Regulations Published From FY 2004 Through Fiscal Year to Date.''
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains provisions constituting collections of
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501-3521) that require approval by OMB. Accordingly, under
44 U.S.C. 3507(d), VA has submitted a copy of this rulemaking action to
OMB for review.
OMB assigns control numbers to collections of information it
approves. VA may not conduct or sponsor, and a
[[Page 16168]]
person is not required to respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Proposed 38
CFR 38.730 contains collections of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995. If OMB does not approve the collections of
information as requested, VA will immediately remove the provisions
containing collections of information or take such other action as is
directed by OMB.
Comments on the collections of information contained in this
proposed rule should be submitted to the Office of Management and
Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for the Department of Veterans Affairs,
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Washington, DC 20503.
Send your comments and suggestions on this information collection by
the date indicated in the DATES section to the Desk Officer for the
Department of the Veterans Affairs at OMB-OIRA at (202) 395-5806 (fax)
or [email protected] (email). Please indicate ``Attention:
This is a new OMB Control Number request.'' Comments should indicate
that they are submitted in response to ``RIN 2900-AR00.''
OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collections of
information contained in this proposed rule between 30 and 60 days
after publication of this document in the Federal Register. Therefore,
a comment to OMB is best assured of having its full effect if OMB
receives it within 30 days of publication. This does not affect the
deadline for the public to comment on the proposed rule. Notice of OMB
approval for this information collection will be published in a future
Federal Register document.
The Department considers comments by the public on proposed
collections of information in--
Evaluating whether the proposed collections of information
are necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the
Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility;
Evaluating the accuracy of the Department's estimate of
the burden of the proposed collections of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
Enhancing the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimizing the burden of the collections of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
The collections of information contained in 38 CFR 38.730 are
described immediately following this paragraph.
Title: SF-424 Application for Federal Assistance.
Summary of collection of information: The new collection
of information in proposed 38 CFR 38.730 would require VLGP grant
applicants to submit the SF-424 as a minimum requirement to qualify for
a VLGP grant.
Description of the need for information and proposed use
of information: The collection of information is necessary to determine
applicant eligibility for a VLGP grant. VA will use this information to
score completed grant applications.
Description of likely respondents: Members of the public,
institutions, and non-profits that are interested in applying for VA
grants.
Estimated number of respondents: 20 per year.
Estimated frequency of responses: Annually.
Estimated average burden per response: 1 hour.
Estimated annual cost to respondents for the hour burdens
for collections of information: According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor
Statistics Mean Hourly Earnings, the cost to each respondent is $25.72,
making the total cost for respondents an estimated $514.40 (20 burden
hours x $25.72 per hour). (Source: May 2019 BLS National Occupational
Employment and Wage Estimates, Code: 00-0000, All Occupations: https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm#00-0000)
Estimated total annual reporting and recordkeeping burden:
There is no anticipated recordkeeping burden.
Estimated cost to the Federal Government: There is no
projected incremental increase in the cost burden to the Federal
Government with the requirement of the SF-424, Application for Federal
Assistance. NCA currently has existing personnel, systems, and
processes (or other resources) in place to receive and review their
grant applications. Any additional cost for agency system development,
maintenance, and enhancements should not be attributed to use of SF-
424, and therefore its use is not expected to alter annualized Federal
costs.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601-612. Receiving or not receiving a grant is unlikely to have
a significant economic impact on small entity applicants, specifically
non-profit institutions. Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), the
initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of 5
U.S.C. 603 and 604 do not apply.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any 1 year. This proposed rule would have no such effect
on State, local, and Tribal governments, or on the private sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number and title for the
program affected by this document is 64.204, Veterans Legacy Grant
Program.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 38
Administrative practice and procedure, Cemeteries, Veterans.
Signing Authority
Denis McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, approved this
document on March 12, 2021 and authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the Federal Register for
publication electronically as an official document of the Department of
Veterans Affairs.
Luvenia Potts,
Regulation Development Coordinator, Office of Regulation Policy &
Management, Office of the Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, VA proposes to amend 38
CFR part 38 as follows:
PART 38--NATIONAL CEMETERIES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
0
1. The authority citation for part 38 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 107, 501, 512, 2306, 2400, 2402, 2403,
2404, 2407, 2408, 2411, 7105.
0
2. Add an undesignated center heading, ''Veterans Legacy Grants
Program,'' and Sec. Sec. 38.710 through 38.785 to read as follows:
* * * * *
Veterans Legacy Grants Program
Sec.
[[Page 16169]]
38.710 Purpose and use of grant funds.
38.715 Definitions.
38.720 Grants--general.
38.725 Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA).
38.730 Applications.
38.735 Additional factors for deciding applications.
38.740 Scoring and selection.
38.745 Disposition of applications.
38.750 Withdrawal of grant application.
38.755 Grant agreement.
38.760 Payments under the grant.
38.765 Grantee reporting requirements.
38.770 Recovery of funds by VA.
38.775 Compliance review requirements.
38.780 Financial management.
38.785 Recordkeeping.
Veterans Legacy Grants Program
Sec. 38.710 Purpose and use of grant funds.
Sections 38.710 through 38.785 establish the Veterans Legacy Grants
Program (VLGP). Under this program, VA may provide grants to eligible
entities defined in Sec. 38.715 to:
(a) Conduct research related to national, State, or Tribal
Veterans' cemeteries;
(b) Produce educational materials that teach about the history of
Veterans interred in national, State, or Tribal Veterans' cemeteries;
(c) Contribute to the extended memorialization of Veterans interred
in national, State, or Tribal Veterans' cemeteries by presenting
grantee research on national, State, or Tribal Veterans' cemeteries
through site hosting and other digital technologies; and,
(d) Promote community engagement with the histories of Veterans
interred in national, State, or Tribal Veterans' cemeteries.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note)
Sec. 38.715 Definitions.
For purposes of this part and any Notice of Funding Availability
(NOFA) issued pursuant to this part:
(a) Applicant means an eligible entity that submits a VLGP grant
application that is announced in a NOFA.
(b) Community engagement means strategic interaction with
identified groups of people, whether they are connected by geographic
location, special interest, or affiliation, to identify and address
issues related to the legacy of Veterans.
(c) Eligible recipient (or entity) means one of the following:
(1) An institution of higher learning;
(2) A local educational agency;
(3) A non-profit entity that the Secretary determines has a
demonstrated history of community engagement that pertains to the
projects described in the relevant NOFA;
(4) An educational institution; or
(5) Another recipient (or entity) the Secretary deems appropriate.
(d) Institution of higher learning (IHL) means a college,
university, or similar institution, including a technical or business
school, offering postsecondary level academic instruction that leads to
an associate or higher degree if the school is empowered by the
appropriate State education authority under State law to grant an
associate or higher degree.
(e) Educational institution means any public or private elementary
school, secondary school, vocational school, correspondence school,
business school, junior college, teachers' college, college, normal
school, professional school, university, or scientific or technical
institution, or other institution furnishing education for adults.
(f) Local educational agency (LEA) means any public agency or
authority, including a state educational agency, that has
administrative control or direction over public elementary or secondary
schools under 20 U.S.C. 7801(30). The term would also include any
Bureau of Indian Education school, as covered in 20 U.S.C. 7801(30)(C).
(g) State educational agency (SEA) means the agency primarily
responsible for the State supervision of public elementary schools and
secondary schools.
(h) Non-profit entity means any organization chartered under 26
U.S.C. 501(c)(3).
(i) Educational materials means a framework of digital
instructional materials relevant to the grade level of K-12 students
involved (e.g., lesson plans) that can be used for outreach and other
purposes.
(j) Grantee means an eligible recipient that is awarded a VLGP
grant under this part.
(k) Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) means a Notice of Funding
Availability published in the OMB-designated government-wide website in
accordance with Sec. 38.725 and 2 CFR 200.203 regulations.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and 2 CFR 200.203)
Sec. 38.720 Grants--general.
(a) Grants. VA may award VLGP grants to eligible recipients
selected under Sec. 38.730 of this part.
(b) Maximum amounts. The maximum grant amount to be awarded to each
grantee and the total maximum amount for all grants will be specified
in the annually published NOFA.
(c) Number of grants awarded. The number of grants VA will award
will depend on the total amount of grant funding available at VA's
discretion and the funding amount awarded to each grantee, which is
based on each grantee's proposal.
(d) Grant is not a course buyout. The grant funds shall not be used
to substitute a class that an instructor is required to teach during an
academic year.
(e) Matching requirement. VA will determine whether a grantee must
provide matching funds as a condition of receiving a VLGP grant as set
forth in the NOFA.
(f) Grant is not Veterans' benefit. The VLGP grant is not a
Veterans' benefit. VA decisions on VLGP applications are final and not
subject to the same appeal rights as Veterans' benefits decisions.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note)
Sec. 38.725 Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA).
When funds are available for VLGP grants, VA will publish a NOFA in
the Federal Register and in Grants.gov (https://www.grants.gov). The
NOFA will identify:
(a) The location for obtaining VLGP grant applications, including
the specific forms that will be required;
(b) The date, time, and place for submitting completed VLGP grant
applications;
(c) The estimated total amount of funds available and the maximum
funds available to a single grantee;
(d) The minimum number of total points and points per category that
an applicant must receive to be considered for a grant and information
regarding the scoring process;
(e) Any timeframes and manner for payments under the VLGP grant;
(f) A description of eligible entities or other eligibility
requirements necessary to receive the grant; and
(g) Other information necessary for the VLGP grant application
process, as determined by VA, including contact information for the
office that will oversee the VLGP within VA.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and 2 CFR 200.203)
Sec. 38.730 Applications.
To apply for a grant, an eligible entity must submit to VA a
complete application package, as described in the NOFA. Applications
will be accepted only through Grants.gov (https://www.grants.gov). A
complete grant application, as further described in the NOFA, includes
standard forms specified in the NOFA and the following:
(a) Project Description. Each project must serve a minimum of one
VA national cemetery, State Veterans'
[[Page 16170]]
cemetery, or Tribal Veterans' cemetery. The applicant must provide a
narrative project description that demonstrates the best approach for
attaining required results as set forth in the NOFA;
(b) Project Team. If applicable, the applicant must provide a
narrative description of anticipated project team and any work
partner(s), including the responsibilities of the principal
investigator, the co-principal investigators, and any extramural
partner entity;
(c) Project plan. The applicant must include a detailed timeline
for the tasks outlined in the project description and proposed
milestones;
(d) Expertise and capacity. The applicant must provide a
description of the applicant's ability and capacity to administer the
project. This may include evidence of past experience with projects
similar in scope as defined by the NOFA, to include descriptions of the
engagement model, examples of successful leadership and management of a
project of similar scale and budget (or greater), or related work in
this field;
(e) Match. If specified as a requirement in the NOFA, the applicant
must provide evidence of secured cash matching (1:1) funds or of its
ability to secure commitments to receive such funds;
(f) Proposed Budget. The applicant's proposed budget should
identify all costs and proposed expenditures, to include additional
compensation and honoraria (and to whom); equipment costs; production
costs; and travel costs. The applicant must provide a budget that
specifies costs and payments, as well as indirect and other relevant
costs. The budget will be submitted in a format specified in the NOFA;
and
(g) Additional information. Any additional information as deemed
appropriate by VA and set forth in the NOFA.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and 2 CFR 200.203)
Sec. 38.735 Additional factors for deciding applications.
(a) Applicant's performance on prior award. VA may consider the
applicant's noncompliance with requirements applicable to prior VA or
other Federal agency awards as reflected in past written evaluation
reports and memoranda on performance and the completeness of required
prior submissions.
(b) Applicant's fiscal integrity. Applicants must meet and maintain
standards of fiscal integrity for participation in Federal grant
programs as reflected in 2 CFR 200.205.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and 2 CFR 200.203)
Sec. 38.740 Scoring and selection.
(a) Scoring. VA will only score complete applications received from
eligible applicants by the deadline established in the NOFA. The
applications must meet the minimum criteria set forth in Sec. 38.730
and will be scored as specified in the NOFA, as set forth in Sec.
38.725.
(b) Selection of recipients. All complete applications will be
scored using the criteria in paragraph (a) of this section and ranked
in order of highest to lowest total score. NOFA announcements may also
clarify the selection criteria in paragraph (a). The relative weight
(point value) for each selection will be specified in the NOFA. VA will
award any VLGP grant on the primary basis of the scores but will also
consider a risk assessment evaluation.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and 2 CFR 200.203)
Sec. 38.745 Disposition of applications.
(a) Disposition of applications. Upon review of an application and
dependent on availability of funds, VA will:
(1) Approve the application for funding, in whole or in part, for
such amount of funds, and subject to such conditions that VA deems
necessary or desirable;
(2) Determine that the application is of acceptable quality for
funding, in that it meets minimum criteria, but disapprove the
application for funding because it does not rank sufficiently high in
relation to other applications to qualify for an award based on the
level of funding available, or for another reason as provided in the
decision document; or
(3) Defer action on the application for such reasons as lack of
funds or a need for further review.
(b) Notification of disposition. VA will notify the applicant in
writing of the disposition of the application. A signed grant agreement
form, as defined in Sec. 38.755, will be issued to the applicant of an
approved application.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and 2 CFR 200.203)
Sec. 38.750 Withdrawal of grant application.
Applicants may withdraw a VLGP application submitted through
Grants.gov by writing the specified VA point of contact and including
rationale for the withdrawal request within a certain number of days as
determined in the NOFA.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and 2 CFR 200.203)
Sec. 38.755 Grant agreement.
After a grant is approved for award, VA will draft a grant
agreement to be executed by VA and the grantee. Upon execution of the
grant agreement, VA will obligate the grant amount. The grant agreement
will provide that the recipient agrees, and will ensure that each
subrecipient (if applicable) agrees, to:
(a) Operate the program in accordance with the provisions of
Sec. Sec. 38.710 through 38.785, 2 CFR part 200, and the applicant's
VLGP application;
(b) Comply with such other terms and conditions, including
recordkeeping and reports for program monitoring and evaluation
purposes, as VA may establish in the Terms and Conditions of the grant
agreement for purposes of carrying out the VLGP project in an effective
and efficient manner; and
(c) Provide additional information that VA requests with respect
to:
(1) Program effectiveness, as defined in the Terms and Conditions
of the grant agreement;
(2) Compliance with the Terms and Conditions of the grant
agreement; and
(3) Criteria for evaluation, as defined in the Terms and Conditions
of the grant agreement.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and 2 CFR 200.203)
Sec. 38.760 Payments under the grant.
(a) Grantees are to be paid in accordance with the timeframes and
manner set forth in the NOFA.
(b) Availability of grant funds. Federal financial assistance will
become available subsequent to the effective date of the grant as set
forth in the grant agreement. Recipients may be reimbursed for costs
resulting from obligations incurred before the effective date of the
grant, if such costs are authorized by VA in the NOFA or the grant
agreement or authorized subsequently by VA in writing, and otherwise
would be allowable as costs of the grant under applicable guidelines,
regulations, and terms and conditions of the grant agreement.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and 2 CFR 200.203)
Sec. 38.765 Grantee reporting requirements.
(a) Final report. All grantees must submit to VA, not later than 60
days after the last day of grant period for which a grant is provided
under this part, a final report that meets the requirement set forth in
the NOFA.
(b) Additional reporting. Additional reporting requirements may be
requested by VA to allow VA to assess program effectiveness.
[[Page 16171]]
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and 2 CFR 200.203)
Sec. 38.770 Recovery of funds by VA.
(a) Recovery of funds. VA may recover from the grantee any funds
that are not used in accordance with a grant agreement. If VA decides
to recover such funds, VA will issue to the grantee a notice of intent
to recover grant funds, and the grantee will then have 30 days to
return the grant funds or submit documentation demonstrating why the
grant funds should not be returned. After review of all submitted
documentation, VA will determine whether action will be taken to
recover the grant funds.
(b) Prohibition of additional VLGP payments. When VA makes a final
decision to recover grant funds from the grantee, VA must stop further
payments of grant funds under this part until the grant funds are
recovered and the condition that led to the decision to recover grant
funds has been resolved.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and 2 CFR 200.203)
Sec. 38.775 Compliance review requirements.
(a) Site visits. VA may conduct, as needed, site visits to grantee
locations to review grantee accomplishments and management control
systems.
(b) Inspections. VA may conduct, as needed, inspections of grantee
records to determine compliance with the provisions of this part. All
visits and evaluations will be performed with minimal disruption to the
grantee to the extent practicable.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and 2 CFR 200.203)
Sec. 38.780 Financial management.
(a) Compliance. All recipients will comply with applicable
requirements of the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996, as implemented
by 2 CFR part 200.
(b) Financial Management. All grantees must use a financial
management system that complies with 2 CFR part 200. Grantees must meet
the applicable requirements of the Office of Management and Budget's
regulations on Cost Principles at 2 CFR 200.400-200.475.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and 2 CFR 200.400-200.475)
Sec. 38.785 Recordkeeping.
Grantees must ensure that records are maintained in accordance with
2 CFR 200.333. Grantees must produce such records at VA's request.
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501(d), 2400 note and 2 CFR 200.333)
[FR Doc. 2021-05721 Filed 3-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P