Airworthiness Directives; International Aero Engines AG Turbofan Engines, 15791-15795 [2021-06139]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 56 / Thursday, March 25, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2020–0700; Project
Identifier AD–2020–00238–E; Amendment
39–21461; AD 2021–05–18]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; International
Aero Engines AG Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The FAA is superseding
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2019–06–
06 for all International Aero Engines AG
(IAE) V2500–A1, V2522–A5, V2524–A5,
V2525–D5, V2527–A5, V2527E–A5,
V2527M–A5, V2528–D5, V2530–A5,
and V2533–A5 model turbofan engines.
AD 2019–06–06 required initial and
repetitive borescope inspections (BSIs)
of the M-flange and, if it fails the
inspection, replacement of the diffuser
case with a part eligible for installation.
This AD requires an initial BSI of the Mflange and, if it fails the inspection,
repetitive BSIs of the M-flange until
replacement of the diffuser case Mflange. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these
products.
SUMMARY:
This AD is effective April 29,
2021.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of April 29, 2021.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact
International Aero Engines AG, 400
Main Street, East Hartford, CT 06118;
phone: (800) 565–0140; email: help24@
pw.utc.com; website: https://
fleetcare.pw.utc.com. You may view this
service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (781) 238–
7759. It is also available at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2020–
0700.
DATES:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket at
https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2020–0700; or in person at Docket
Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Mar 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
final rule, any comments received, and
other information. The address for
Docket Operations is U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicholas Paine, Aviation Safety
Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone: (781) 238–7742; fax: (781) 238–
7199; email: nicholas.j.paine@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The FAA issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2019–06–06,
Amendment 39–19604 (84 FR 11642,
March 28, 2019), (AD 2019–06–06). AD
2019–06–06 applied to all IAE V2500–
A1, V2522–A5, V2524–A5, V2525–D5,
V2527–A5, V2527E–A5, V2527M–A5,
V2528–D5, V2530–A5, and V2533–A5
model turbofan engines. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on
September 9, 2020 (85 FR 55624). The
NPRM was prompted by a crack found
at the diffuser case M-flange during
overhaul inspection. Since the FAA
issued AD 2019–06–06, the
manufacturer performed an updated
safety risk analysis, which resulted in
reducing the M-flange inspection
intervals and adding the performance of
a replacement of the diffuser case Mflange, which terminates the need for
repetitive BSIs of the M-flange. In the
NPRM, the FAA proposed to require an
initial BSI of the M-flange and, if it fails
the inspection, repetitive BSIs of the Mflange until replacement of the diffuser
case M-flange.
Discussion of Final Airworthiness
Directive
Comments
The FAA received comments from six
commenters. The commenters were Air
Line Pilots Association, International
(ALPA); Cathay Dragon Airways
(Cathay); IAE; MTU Maintenance
Hannover GmbH (MTU); Willis Lease
Finance Corporation (WLFC); and
United Airlines (United). Five of six
commenters requested changes to this
AD. One commenter requested an
update to Applicability. Two
commenters requested clarification
when cycles are unknown or cannot be
determined. Three commenters
requested that the FAA reference the
latest service information. One
commenter requested an update to
terminology. Three commenters
requested credit for replacement before
the effective date of this AD. One
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
15791
commenter requested clarification to
‘‘engine shop visit.’’ One commenter
requested an update to a Note in
paragraph (g)(2) of this AD. One
commenter requested an update to
include diffuser case assembly part
numbers (P/Ns) after modification. One
commenter supported this AD as
written. The following presents the
comments received on the NPRM and
the FAA’s response to each comment.
Request To Update Applicability To
Include IAE V2500–E5 Model Engines
IAE requested that the FAA update
paragraph (c), Applicability, of this AD
to include the IAE V2500–E5 model
turbofan engine. IAE reasoned that the
V2500–E5 model turbofan engine shares
diffuser case assembly, P/N 2A2891–01,
with IAE V2500–A1, –A5, and –D5
model turbofan engines.
The FAA agrees that the IAE V2500–
E5 model turbofan engine shares an
affected diffuser case assembly with
other affected engines, and therefore, is
susceptible to the unsafe condition of
this AD. The FAA added the IAE
V2531–E5 model turbofan engine to the
Applicability of this AD. The IAE
V2531–E5 model turbofan engine is not
currently installed on any airplanes of
U.S. registry. Therefore, this change to
applicability does not add any
additional burden on U.S. operators or
increase the estimated cost of this AD.
Request To Clarify Compliance Time
When Cycles Are Unknown or Cannot
Be Determined
Cathay and WLFC requested
clarification when to perform the
actions if the cycles since new (CSN) are
unknown or cannot be determined.
Cathay suggested adding the following
note to paragraphs (g)(1)(i), (ii), and (iii)
of this AD for the BSI of the M-flange
to align this AD with IAE NonModification Alert Service Bulletin
(NMASB) V2500–ENG–72–A0706,
Revision 2, dated November 7, 2019 (the
NMASB): ‘‘If the cycles on the diffuser
case M-flange cannot be determined,
you must use the total cycles on the
diffuser case. If the cycles on the
diffuser case cannot be determined, you
must use the total engine cycles if it can
be documented that the diffuser case
was always with the engine.’’ WLFC
asked for clarification on the
compliance time for the diffuser case Mflange replacement.
Although the FAA disagrees with
adding the note suggested by Cathay,
the FAA agrees to clarify when to
perform the actions if the CSN are
unknown or cannot be determined. The
FAA updated paragraph (g)(1)(iii) of this
AD to clarify when to perform the initial
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
15792
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 56 / Thursday, March 25, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
BSI of the M-flange and added
paragraph (g)(2)(ii) of this AD to clarify
when to replace the diffuser case Mflange if the diffuser case M-flange CSN
are unknown or cannot be determined.
Request To Update Service Information
IAE, MTU, and United requested that
IAE Service Bulletin (SB) V2500–ENG–
72–0709, Revision 1, dated February 20,
2020 (the SB), be referenced in this AD
instead of the Original Issue, dated
December 13, 2019. United also
requested that ‘‘IAE NMASB V2500–
ENG–72–A0706, Revision 2, dated
November 7, 2019,’’ be referenced.
The FAA partially agrees. Revision 2
of the NMASB was already referenced
in the NPRM and, therefore, no change
is needed to this AD. The FAA agrees
to reference Revision 1 to the SB, which
was issued after publication of the
NPRM. The SB provides guidance on
performing the replacement of the
diffuser case M-flange and is not
required for compliance with the AD.
Therefore, revising this AD to reference
Revision 1 of the SB adds no additional
burden on U.S. operators.
Request To Change ‘‘Diffuser Case MFlange’’ References
IAE requested that the FAA change
‘‘diffuser case M-flange’’ to ‘‘M-flange’’
when referencing inspections. IAE
reasoned that inspection zone 2
includes all three flanges of the Mflange: Diffuser case M-flange, nozzle
guide vane support, and the highpressure turbine (HPT) case forward
flange, and all three flanges are required
to be inspected.
The FAA agrees. The inspections are
required on all surfaces of inspection
zones 1, 2, and 3 of the M-flange. The
FAA changed ‘‘diffuser case M-flange’’
to ‘‘M-flange’’ when referencing
inspections throughout this AD. The
FAA, however, did not change ‘‘diffuser
case M-flange’’ when referencing
replacement. Replacement of the
diffuser case M-flange is the terminating
action for the repetitive BSIs of the Mflange required by this AD.
Request for Credit for Diffuser Case MFlange Replacement
Cathay, MTU, and WLFC requested
credit for the replacement of the diffuser
case M-flange if it was replaced before
the effective date of this AD using TASK
72–42–11–300–028, Repair-028
(VRS3633), of the IAE V2500 Engine
Manual (VRS3633 Repair-028). Cathay
and WLFC reasoned that the
replacement of the diffuser case Mflange resets the M-flange cycles to zero.
Cathay and MTU cited the note to
VRS3633 Repair-028 in the NMASB.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Mar 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
Cathay also cited the note in the
NMASB that fluorescent penetrant
inspection (FPI) of the diffuser case Mflange bolt holes resets the cycles since
the last FPI to zero.
The FAA disagrees with revising the
Credit for Previous Actions section of
this AD to give credit for replacement of
the diffuser case M-flange using
VRS3633 Repair-028. The FAA
determined that it is not necessary to
provide previous credit for replacement
of the diffuser case M-flange because
this AD does not require use of specific
service information to perform this
replacement. The FAA revised
paragraph (i), Credit for Previous
Actions, of this AD by removing
references to providing credit for
replacement of the diffuser case Mflange. If operators replaced the diffuser
case M-flange prior to the effective date
of this AD using any FAA-approved
method, they meet the requirements of
this AD under paragraph (f) of this AD.
Request To Clarify ‘‘Major Mating
Engine Flanges’’
United requested that the FAA clarify
the definition of ‘‘engine shop visit’’ and
‘‘major mating engine flange.’’ United
asked if ‘‘major flange’’ aligns with the
NMASB, which in Figure 1 of the
NMASB, identifies the engine major
flanges as H through P flanges. United
also asked if the ‘‘separation of pairs of
major mating engine flanges’’ includes
the separation of H and J flanges when
replacing damaged blades in HPC stages
3 through 6 during an HPC Surgical
Strike Repair. If an engine shop visit
includes separating flanges when
performing an HPC Surgical Strike
Repair, United requested that the FAA
update estimated costs of this AD to
include costs associated with the
teardown of modules.
The FAA agrees to clarify this
definition of ‘‘engine shop visit’’ in this
AD. The FAA has revised the definition
of ‘‘engine shop visit’’ in this AD to refer
to the induction of the engine into the
shop for maintenance involving the
separation of pairs of major mating
engine flanges, K–N. Based on this
definition, separating H and J flanges
during an HPC Surgical Strike Repair
does not constitute an ‘‘engine shop
visit.’’
The FAA disagrees with updating the
estimated costs of this AD. The cost
analysis in AD rulemaking actions
typically includes only the costs
associated with complying with the AD,
and does not include secondary costs.
The FAA’s cost estimate includes the
work hours and parts costs to inspect
and replace the parts.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Request To Update Note to Paragraph
(g)(2)
MTU requested that the FAA update
Note 1 to paragraph (g)(2)(i) of this AD
to ‘‘Instructions on performing the
replacement of the diffuser case Mflange can be found in the
Accomplishment Instructions,
paragraphs 1.A. and B., of IAE SB
V2500–ENG–72–0709, Revision 1, dated
February 20, 2020.’’ MTU reasoned that
the current wording suggests that there
may be alternative instructions to
replace the diffuser case M-flange other
than the SB. MTU suggested that there
are no alternatives to using IAE SB
V2500–ENG–72–0709 to replace the
diffuser case M-flange. Therefore, MTU
notes that the language in the NPRM
may generate ambiguity.
The FAA disagrees. The SB is
referenced in Note 2 to paragraph (g)(2)
of this AD as guidance for performing
the replacement. The FAA is not
mandating the use of a specific method
to replace the diffuser case M-flange in
this AD. The FAA did not change this
AD based on this comment, but
redesignated ‘‘Note 1 to paragraph
(g)(2)(i)’’ in the NPRM to ‘‘Note 2 to
paragraph (g)(2)’’ in this AD based on
the addition of a Note earlier in
paragraph (g) of this AD.
Request To Include Diffuser Case
Assembly P/Ns After Modification
IAE requested that the FAA include
the diffuser case assembly P/Ns,
modified by the SB that are re-identified
with new P/Ns after modification, and
require replacement before the M-flange
accumulates 20,000 CSN.
The FAA disagrees with including the
list of diffuser case assembly P/Ns. The
diffuser case M-flange, regardless of P/
N, must be replaced at the next engine
shop visit after the effective date of this
AD or before the M-flange accumulates
20,000 CSN, whichever occurs later.
Thereafter, the diffuser case M-flange
must be replaced before accumulating
20,000 cycles since the previous
replacement. Therefore, listing diffuser
case assembly P/Ns is unnecessary.
Clarification to BSI Requirement
The FAA determined the need to
clarify the instructions required by
paragraph (g)(1)(iv) of the NPRM. The
NPRM referenced paragraphs 2.A.
through 2.G. of the NMASB to perform
the BSI. However, paragraph 2.G. of the
NMASB provides instructions to
perform a FPI of the M-flange to confirm
the indication as a crack. The FAA
added a note to paragraph (g)(1)(iv) of
this AD to clarify that paragraph 2.G. of
the NMASB describes procedures for
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 56 / Thursday, March 25, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
described previously, this AD is
adopted as proposed in the NPRM.
None of the changes will increase the
economic burden on any operator.
performing a local FPI of the M-flange
if you are unable to confirm if an
indication is a crack.
Support for the AD
ALPA expressed support for the AD
as written.
Conclusion
The FAA reviewed the relevant data,
considered any comments received, and
determined that air safety requires
adopting the AD as proposed.
Accordingly, the FAA is issuing this AD
to address the unsafe condition on these
products. Except for minor editorial
changes, and any other changes
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed International Aero
Engines NMASB V2500–ENG–72–
A0706, Revision 2, dated November 7,
2019. The NMASB describes procedures
for inspecting the M-flange. This service
information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course
of business or by the means identified
in ADDRESSES.
15793
Other Related Service Information
The FAA reviewed International Aero
Engines SB V2500–ENG–72–0709,
Revision 1, dated February 20, 2020.
The SB identifies the diffuser case
assembly P/Ns and describes procedures
for replacing the diffuser case M-flange.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD
affects 1,654 engines installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry.
The FAA estimates the following
costs to comply with this AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
BSI of M-flange ...............................................
Replace the diffuser case M-flange ................
2 work-hours × $85 per hour = $170 .............
40 work-hours × $85 per hour = $3,400 ........
The FAA has included all known
costs in its cost estimate. According to
the manufacturer, however, some of the
costs of this AD may be covered under
warranty, thereby reducing the cost
impact on affected operators.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701, General requirements Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA has determined that this AD
will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD
will not have a substantial direct effect
on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Mar 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
Parts cost
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
Cost per
product
$0
20,000
$170
23,400
Cost on U.S.
operators
$281,180
38,703,600
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) is
effective April 29, 2021.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2019–06–06,
Amendment 39–19604 (84 FR 11642, March
28, 2019).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all International Aero
Engines AG (IAE) V2500–A1, V2522–A5,
V2524–A5, V2525–D5, V2527–A5, V2527E–
A5, V2527M–A5, V2528–D5, V2530–A5,
V2531–E5, and V2533–A5 model turbofan
engines.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)
Code 7250, Turbine Section.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a crack found
at the diffuser case M-flange during overhaul
inspection. The FAA is issuing this AD to
prevent failure of the diffuser case. The
unsafe condition, if not addressed, could
result in uncontained diffuser case rupture,
damage to the engine, and damage to the
airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
■
(g) Required Actions
2021–05–18 International Aero Engines
AG: Amendment 39–21461; Docket No.
FAA–2020–0700; Project Identifier AD–
2020–00238–E.
(1) Borescope Inspection of M-Flange
For engines with a diffuser case assembly,
part number 2A0051, 2A2081–01, 2A2581–
01, 2A2883–01, 2A2885–01, 2A2889–01,
2A2891–01, 2A2896–01, 2A2897–01, or
2A3132 installed, perform an initial
borescope inspection (BSI) of zones 1, 2, and
3 of the M-flange as follows:
(i) For engines with a diffuser case Mflange that has 19,000 or more cycles since
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by:
■ a. Removing airworthiness directive
2019–06–06, Amendment 39–19604 (84
FR 11642, March 28, 2019); and
■ b. Adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
15794
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 56 / Thursday, March 25, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
new (CSN) on the effective date of this AD,
perform the initial BSI of the M-flange before
accumulating the ‘‘Inspect within (Cycles)’’
in Table 1 to paragraph (g)(1) of this AD. If
the CSLFPI is unknown, use the CSN of the
diffuser case M-flange.
(ii) For engines with a diffuser case Mflange that has fewer than 19,000 CSN on the
effective date of this AD, perform the initial
BSI of the M-flange before accumulating
20,300 CSN.
(iii) For engines with a diffuser case Mflange or diffuser case in which the CSN is
unknown or cannot be determined, perform
the initial BSI of the M-flange before
accumulating the ‘‘Inspect within (Cycles)’’
in Table 1 to paragraph (g)(1) of this AD
using one of the following options:
(A) If the cycles of the diffuser case Mflange are unknown or cannot be determined,
use the total cycles on the diffuser case.
(B) If the cycles on the diffuser case are
unknown or cannot be determined and it can
be documented that the diffuser case was
always installed on the engine, use total
engine cycles.
(C) If neither paragraph (g)(1)(iii)(A) or (B)
applies, perform the BSI of the M-flange
within 250 cycles after the effective date of
this AD.
(iv) Use the Accomplishment Instructions,
paragraphs 2.A. through 2.G. of IAE NonModification Alert Service Bulletin (NMASB)
V2500–ENG–72–A0706, Revision 2, dated
November 7, 2019 (the NMASB), to perform
the initial BSI.
Note 1 to paragraph (g)(1)(iv): Paragraph
2.G. of the NMASB describes procedures for
performing a local fluorescent penetrant
inspection of the M-flange if you are unable
to confirm if an indication is a crack.
(v) If no crack is found as a result of the
inspections required by paragraphs (g)(1)(i)
through (iv) of this AD, repeat the BSI of
zones 1, 2, and 3 of the M-flange at intervals
not to exceed 2,100 cycles since the previous
BSI.
(vi) If a crack is found as a result of the
inspections required by paragraphs (g)(1)(i)
through (iv) of this AD, replace the diffuser
case M-flange or repeat the BSI of zones 1,
2, and 3 of the M-flange as specified by either
‘‘Table 2: Fly on Limits’’ or ‘‘Table 4: Fly on
Limits,’’ in paragraph 2.H., Accomplishment
Instructions, of the NMASB as appropriate
for the affected the engine model.
Table 1 to paragraph (g)(l) -M-flange cycle inspection limits
30,000 and greater
250
20,000 to 29,999
500
15,000 to 19,999
1,000
1 to 14,999
1,300
0
2,100
(2) Replacement of the Diffuser Case MFlange
(i) At the next engine shop visit after the
effective date of this AD or before the diffuser
case M-flange accumulates 20,000 CSN,
whichever occurs later, replace the diffuser
case M-flange.
(ii) For engines with a diffuser case Mflange or diffuser case in which the CSN is
unknown or cannot be determined, perform
one of the following options:
(A) If the cycles of the diffuser case Mflange are unknown or cannot be determined,
at the next engine shop visit after the
effective date of this AD or before the diffuser
case accumulates 20,000 CSN, whichever
occurs later, replace the diffuser case Mflange.
(B) If the cycles of the diffuser case are
unknown or cannot be determined, and if it
can be documented that the diffuser case was
always installed on the engine, at the next
engine shop visit after the effective date of
this AD or before the engine accumulates
20,000 CSN, whichever occurs later, replace
the diffuser case M-flange.
(C) If the cycles on the diffuser case Mflange are unknown or cannot be determined
based on the criteria identified in paragraphs
(g)(2)(ii)(A) and (B), or it cannot be shown
that the diffuser case was always installed on
the engine, at the next engine shop visit after
the effective date of this AD, replace the
diffuser case M-flange.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Inspect within (Cycles)
16:53 Mar 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
Note 2 to paragraph (g)(2)(ii): Guidance on
performing the replacement of the diffuser
case M-flange described in paragraphs
(g)(2)(i) and (ii) can be found in the
Accomplishment Instructions, paragraphs
1.A. and B., of IAE SB V2500–ENG–72–0709,
Revision 1, dated February 20, 2020.
(iii) Thereafter, repeat the replacement of
the diffuser case M-flange before
accumulating 20,000 cycles since the
previous replacement.
(iv) Replacement of the diffuser case Mflange is the terminating action for the
repetitive BSIs required by paragraph (g)(1) of
this AD.
(h) Installation Prohibition
After the effective date of this AD, do not
install a diffuser case onto any affected
engine if the diffuser case M-flange has more
than 20,000 CSN.
(i) Credit for Previous Actions
You may take credit for the initial BSIs that
are required by paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through
(iii) of this AD, if you performed those
actions before the effective date of this AD
using IAE NMASB V2500–ENG–72–A0706,
Revision 1, dated June 28, 2019, or Original
Issue, dated February 14, 2019; IAE V2500
Special Instruction (SI) No. 341F–18, dated
November 19, 2018; IAE V2500 SI No. 350F–
18, Rev. 1, dated December 17, 2018; IAE
V2500 SI No. 356F–18, Rev. 1, dated January
9, 2019; IAE V2500 SI No. 372F–18, dated
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
January 8, 2019; or IAE V2500 Special SI No.
04F–19, dated January 14, 2019.
(j) Definition
For the purpose of this AD, an ‘‘engine
shop visit’’ is the induction of the engine into
the shop for maintenance involving the
separation of pairs of major mating engine
flanges, K–N, except that the separation of
engine flanges solely for the purposes of
transportation without subsequent engine
maintenance does not constitute an engine
shop visit.
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, ECO Branch, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD,
if requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the certification office,
send it to the attention of the person
identified in Related Information. You may
email your request to: ANE-AD-AMOC@
faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
ER25MR21.000
Cycles Since Last Fluorescent Penetrant
Inspection (CSLFPI)
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 56 / Thursday, March 25, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
(l) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Nicholas Paine, Aviation Safety
Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: (781)
238–7742; fax: (781) 238–7199; email:
nicholas.j.paine@faa.gov.
(m) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) International Aero Engines (IAE) NonModification Alert Service Bulletin V2500–
ENG–72–A0706, Revision 2, dated November
7, 2019.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For IAE service information identified
in this AD, contact International Aero
Engines AG, 400 Main Street, East Hartford,
CT 06118; phone: (800) 565–0140; email:
help24@pw.utc.com; website: https://
fleetcare.pw.utc.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (781) 238–7759.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA,
email: fedreg.legal@nara.gov, or go to:
https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations.html.
Issued on February 25, 2021.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives,
Compliance & Airworthiness Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
Authority for This Rulemaking
[FR Doc. 2021–06139 Filed 3–24–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2020–1186; Airspace
Docket No. 20–AGL–42]
RIN 2120–AA66
Amendment of Class E Airspace;
Fosston and Little Falls, MN
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This action amends the Class
E airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface at Fosston
Municipal Airport-Anderson Field,
Fosston, MN, and Little Falls/Morrison
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Mar 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
County Airport-Lindbergh Field, Little
Falls, MN. This action is the result of
airspace reviews caused by the
decommissioning of the Fosston and
Little Falls non-federal non-directional
beacons (NDBs). The names and
geographic coordinates of the airports
are also being updated to coincide with
the FAA’s aeronautical database.
DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, June 17,
2021. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by
reference action under 1 CFR part 51,
subject to the annual revision of FAA
Order 7400.11 and publication of
conforming amendments.
ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11E,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can
be viewed online at https://
www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/.
For further information, you can contact
the Airspace Policy Group, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267–8783.
The Order is also available for
inspection at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of FAA
Order 7400.11E at NARA, email
fedreg.legal@nara.gov or go to https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support
Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX
76177; telephone (817) 222–5711.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it amends the
Class E airspace extending upward from
700 feet above the surface at Fosston
Municipal Airport-Anderson Field,
Fosston, MN, and Little Falls/Morrison
County Airport-Lindbergh Field, Little
Falls, MN, to support instrument flight
rule operations at these airports.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
15795
History
The FAA published a notice of
proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register (86 FR 3894; January 15, 2021)
for Docket No. FAA–2020–1186 to
amend the Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface
at Fosston Municipal Airport-Anderson
Field, Fosston, MN, and Little Falls/
Morrison County Airport-Lindbergh
Field, Little Falls, MN. Interested parties
were invited to participate in this
rulemaking effort by submitting written
comments on the proposal to the FAA.
No comments were received.
Class E airspace designations are
published in paragraph 6005 of FAA
Order 7400.11E, dated July 21, 2020,
and effective September 15, 2020, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designations
listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order.
Availability and Summary of
Documents for Incorporation by
Reference
This document amends FAA Order
7400.11E, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated July 21, 2020,
and effective September 15, 2020. FAA
Order 7400.11E is publicly available as
listed in the ADDRESSES section of this
document. FAA Order 7400.11E lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas,
air traffic service routes, and reporting
points.
The Rule
This amendment to 14 CFR 71:
Amends the Class E airspace
extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface to within a 6.3-mile
(decreased from a 7-mile) radius of
Fosston Municipal Airport-Anderson
Field, Fosston, MN; adds an extension
1 mile each side of the 341° bearing
from the airport extending from the 6.3mile radius to 6.5 miles north of the
airport; and updates the name
(previously Fosston Municipal Airport)
of the airport to coincide with the FAA’s
aeronautical database;
And amends the Class E airspace
extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface to within a 6.5-mile
(decreased from a 7-mile) radius of
Little Falls/Morrison County AirportLindbergh Field, Little Falls, MN; and
updates the name (previously Little
Falls-Morrison County Airport) and
geographic coordinates of the airport to
coincide with the FAA’s aeronautical
database.
This action is the result of airspace
reviews caused by the decommissioning
of the Fosston and Little Falls nonfederal NDBs which provided
E:\FR\FM\25MRR1.SGM
25MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 56 (Thursday, March 25, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15791-15795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-06139]
[[Page 15791]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2020-0700; Project Identifier AD-2020-00238-E;
Amendment 39-21461; AD 2021-05-18]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; International Aero Engines AG Turbofan
Engines
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2019-06-06
for all International Aero Engines AG (IAE) V2500-A1, V2522-A5, V2524-
A5, V2525-D5, V2527-A5, V2527E-A5, V2527M-A5, V2528-D5, V2530-A5, and
V2533-A5 model turbofan engines. AD 2019-06-06 required initial and
repetitive borescope inspections (BSIs) of the M-flange and, if it
fails the inspection, replacement of the diffuser case with a part
eligible for installation. This AD requires an initial BSI of the M-
flange and, if it fails the inspection, repetitive BSIs of the M-flange
until replacement of the diffuser case M-flange. The FAA is issuing
this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective April 29, 2021.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of April 29,
2021.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact International Aero Engines AG, 400 Main Street, East Hartford,
CT 06118; phone: (800) 565-0140; email: [email protected]; website:
https://fleetcare.pw.utc.com. You may view this service information at
the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch,
1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call (781) 238-7759. It is
also available at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0700.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0700; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, any
comments received, and other information. The address for Docket
Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE, Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicholas Paine, Aviation Safety
Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone: (781) 238-7742; fax: (781) 238-7199; email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 to supersede AD 2019-06-06, Amendment 39-19604 (84 FR
11642, March 28, 2019), (AD 2019-06-06). AD 2019-06-06 applied to all
IAE V2500-A1, V2522-A5, V2524-A5, V2525-D5, V2527-A5, V2527E-A5,
V2527M-A5, V2528-D5, V2530-A5, and V2533-A5 model turbofan engines. The
NPRM published in the Federal Register on September 9, 2020 (85 FR
55624). The NPRM was prompted by a crack found at the diffuser case M-
flange during overhaul inspection. Since the FAA issued AD 2019-06-06,
the manufacturer performed an updated safety risk analysis, which
resulted in reducing the M-flange inspection intervals and adding the
performance of a replacement of the diffuser case M-flange, which
terminates the need for repetitive BSIs of the M-flange. In the NPRM,
the FAA proposed to require an initial BSI of the M-flange and, if it
fails the inspection, repetitive BSIs of the M-flange until replacement
of the diffuser case M-flange.
Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive
Comments
The FAA received comments from six commenters. The commenters were
Air Line Pilots Association, International (ALPA); Cathay Dragon
Airways (Cathay); IAE; MTU Maintenance Hannover GmbH (MTU); Willis
Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC); and United Airlines (United). Five of
six commenters requested changes to this AD. One commenter requested an
update to Applicability. Two commenters requested clarification when
cycles are unknown or cannot be determined. Three commenters requested
that the FAA reference the latest service information. One commenter
requested an update to terminology. Three commenters requested credit
for replacement before the effective date of this AD. One commenter
requested clarification to ``engine shop visit.'' One commenter
requested an update to a Note in paragraph (g)(2) of this AD. One
commenter requested an update to include diffuser case assembly part
numbers (P/Ns) after modification. One commenter supported this AD as
written. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and
the FAA's response to each comment.
Request To Update Applicability To Include IAE V2500-E5 Model Engines
IAE requested that the FAA update paragraph (c), Applicability, of
this AD to include the IAE V2500-E5 model turbofan engine. IAE reasoned
that the V2500-E5 model turbofan engine shares diffuser case assembly,
P/N 2A2891-01, with IAE V2500-A1, -A5, and -D5 model turbofan engines.
The FAA agrees that the IAE V2500-E5 model turbofan engine shares
an affected diffuser case assembly with other affected engines, and
therefore, is susceptible to the unsafe condition of this AD. The FAA
added the IAE V2531-E5 model turbofan engine to the Applicability of
this AD. The IAE V2531-E5 model turbofan engine is not currently
installed on any airplanes of U.S. registry. Therefore, this change to
applicability does not add any additional burden on U.S. operators or
increase the estimated cost of this AD.
Request To Clarify Compliance Time When Cycles Are Unknown or Cannot Be
Determined
Cathay and WLFC requested clarification when to perform the actions
if the cycles since new (CSN) are unknown or cannot be determined.
Cathay suggested adding the following note to paragraphs (g)(1)(i),
(ii), and (iii) of this AD for the BSI of the M-flange to align this AD
with IAE Non-Modification Alert Service Bulletin (NMASB) V2500-ENG-72-
A0706, Revision 2, dated November 7, 2019 (the NMASB): ``If the cycles
on the diffuser case M-flange cannot be determined, you must use the
total cycles on the diffuser case. If the cycles on the diffuser case
cannot be determined, you must use the total engine cycles if it can be
documented that the diffuser case was always with the engine.'' WLFC
asked for clarification on the compliance time for the diffuser case M-
flange replacement.
Although the FAA disagrees with adding the note suggested by
Cathay, the FAA agrees to clarify when to perform the actions if the
CSN are unknown or cannot be determined. The FAA updated paragraph
(g)(1)(iii) of this AD to clarify when to perform the initial
[[Page 15792]]
BSI of the M-flange and added paragraph (g)(2)(ii) of this AD to
clarify when to replace the diffuser case M-flange if the diffuser case
M-flange CSN are unknown or cannot be determined.
Request To Update Service Information
IAE, MTU, and United requested that IAE Service Bulletin (SB)
V2500-ENG-72-0709, Revision 1, dated February 20, 2020 (the SB), be
referenced in this AD instead of the Original Issue, dated December 13,
2019. United also requested that ``IAE NMASB V2500-ENG-72-A0706,
Revision 2, dated November 7, 2019,'' be referenced.
The FAA partially agrees. Revision 2 of the NMASB was already
referenced in the NPRM and, therefore, no change is needed to this AD.
The FAA agrees to reference Revision 1 to the SB, which was issued
after publication of the NPRM. The SB provides guidance on performing
the replacement of the diffuser case M-flange and is not required for
compliance with the AD. Therefore, revising this AD to reference
Revision 1 of the SB adds no additional burden on U.S. operators.
Request To Change ``Diffuser Case M-Flange'' References
IAE requested that the FAA change ``diffuser case M-flange'' to
``M-flange'' when referencing inspections. IAE reasoned that inspection
zone 2 includes all three flanges of the M-flange: Diffuser case M-
flange, nozzle guide vane support, and the high-pressure turbine (HPT)
case forward flange, and all three flanges are required to be
inspected.
The FAA agrees. The inspections are required on all surfaces of
inspection zones 1, 2, and 3 of the M-flange. The FAA changed
``diffuser case M-flange'' to ``M-flange'' when referencing inspections
throughout this AD. The FAA, however, did not change ``diffuser case M-
flange'' when referencing replacement. Replacement of the diffuser case
M-flange is the terminating action for the repetitive BSIs of the M-
flange required by this AD.
Request for Credit for Diffuser Case M-Flange Replacement
Cathay, MTU, and WLFC requested credit for the replacement of the
diffuser case M-flange if it was replaced before the effective date of
this AD using TASK 72-42-11-300-028, Repair-028 (VRS3633), of the IAE
V2500 Engine Manual (VRS3633 Repair-028). Cathay and WLFC reasoned that
the replacement of the diffuser case M-flange resets the M-flange
cycles to zero. Cathay and MTU cited the note to VRS3633 Repair-028 in
the NMASB. Cathay also cited the note in the NMASB that fluorescent
penetrant inspection (FPI) of the diffuser case M-flange bolt holes
resets the cycles since the last FPI to zero.
The FAA disagrees with revising the Credit for Previous Actions
section of this AD to give credit for replacement of the diffuser case
M-flange using VRS3633 Repair-028. The FAA determined that it is not
necessary to provide previous credit for replacement of the diffuser
case M-flange because this AD does not require use of specific service
information to perform this replacement. The FAA revised paragraph (i),
Credit for Previous Actions, of this AD by removing references to
providing credit for replacement of the diffuser case M-flange. If
operators replaced the diffuser case M-flange prior to the effective
date of this AD using any FAA-approved method, they meet the
requirements of this AD under paragraph (f) of this AD.
Request To Clarify ``Major Mating Engine Flanges''
United requested that the FAA clarify the definition of ``engine
shop visit'' and ``major mating engine flange.'' United asked if
``major flange'' aligns with the NMASB, which in Figure 1 of the NMASB,
identifies the engine major flanges as H through P flanges. United also
asked if the ``separation of pairs of major mating engine flanges''
includes the separation of H and J flanges when replacing damaged
blades in HPC stages 3 through 6 during an HPC Surgical Strike Repair.
If an engine shop visit includes separating flanges when performing an
HPC Surgical Strike Repair, United requested that the FAA update
estimated costs of this AD to include costs associated with the
teardown of modules.
The FAA agrees to clarify this definition of ``engine shop visit''
in this AD. The FAA has revised the definition of ``engine shop visit''
in this AD to refer to the induction of the engine into the shop for
maintenance involving the separation of pairs of major mating engine
flanges, K-N. Based on this definition, separating H and J flanges
during an HPC Surgical Strike Repair does not constitute an ``engine
shop visit.''
The FAA disagrees with updating the estimated costs of this AD. The
cost analysis in AD rulemaking actions typically includes only the
costs associated with complying with the AD, and does not include
secondary costs. The FAA's cost estimate includes the work hours and
parts costs to inspect and replace the parts.
Request To Update Note to Paragraph (g)(2)
MTU requested that the FAA update Note 1 to paragraph (g)(2)(i) of
this AD to ``Instructions on performing the replacement of the diffuser
case M-flange can be found in the Accomplishment Instructions,
paragraphs 1.A. and B., of IAE SB V2500-ENG-72-0709, Revision 1, dated
February 20, 2020.'' MTU reasoned that the current wording suggests
that there may be alternative instructions to replace the diffuser case
M-flange other than the SB. MTU suggested that there are no
alternatives to using IAE SB V2500-ENG-72-0709 to replace the diffuser
case M-flange. Therefore, MTU notes that the language in the NPRM may
generate ambiguity.
The FAA disagrees. The SB is referenced in Note 2 to paragraph
(g)(2) of this AD as guidance for performing the replacement. The FAA
is not mandating the use of a specific method to replace the diffuser
case M-flange in this AD. The FAA did not change this AD based on this
comment, but redesignated ``Note 1 to paragraph (g)(2)(i)'' in the NPRM
to ``Note 2 to paragraph (g)(2)'' in this AD based on the addition of a
Note earlier in paragraph (g) of this AD.
Request To Include Diffuser Case Assembly P/Ns After Modification
IAE requested that the FAA include the diffuser case assembly P/Ns,
modified by the SB that are re-identified with new P/Ns after
modification, and require replacement before the M-flange accumulates
20,000 CSN.
The FAA disagrees with including the list of diffuser case assembly
P/Ns. The diffuser case M-flange, regardless of P/N, must be replaced
at the next engine shop visit after the effective date of this AD or
before the M-flange accumulates 20,000 CSN, whichever occurs later.
Thereafter, the diffuser case M-flange must be replaced before
accumulating 20,000 cycles since the previous replacement. Therefore,
listing diffuser case assembly P/Ns is unnecessary.
Clarification to BSI Requirement
The FAA determined the need to clarify the instructions required by
paragraph (g)(1)(iv) of the NPRM. The NPRM referenced paragraphs 2.A.
through 2.G. of the NMASB to perform the BSI. However, paragraph 2.G.
of the NMASB provides instructions to perform a FPI of the M-flange to
confirm the indication as a crack. The FAA added a note to paragraph
(g)(1)(iv) of this AD to clarify that paragraph 2.G. of the NMASB
describes procedures for
[[Page 15793]]
performing a local FPI of the M-flange if you are unable to confirm if
an indication is a crack.
Support for the AD
ALPA expressed support for the AD as written.
Conclusion
The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered any comments
received, and determined that air safety requires adopting the AD as
proposed. Accordingly, the FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products. Except for minor editorial changes, and
any other changes described previously, this AD is adopted as proposed
in the NPRM. None of the changes will increase the economic burden on
any operator.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed International Aero Engines NMASB V2500-ENG-72-
A0706, Revision 2, dated November 7, 2019. The NMASB describes
procedures for inspecting the M-flange. This service information is
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in
ADDRESSES.
Other Related Service Information
The FAA reviewed International Aero Engines SB V2500-ENG-72-0709,
Revision 1, dated February 20, 2020. The SB identifies the diffuser
case assembly P/Ns and describes procedures for replacing the diffuser
case M-flange.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD affects 1,654 engines installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry.
The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BSI of M-flange....................... 2 work-hours x $85 per $0 $170 $281,180
hour = $170.
Replace the diffuser case M-flange.... 40 work-hours x $85 per 20,000 23,400 38,703,600
hour = $3,400.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA has included all known costs in its cost estimate.
According to the manufacturer, however, some of the costs of this AD
may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on
affected operators.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, General requirements
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA has determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by:
0
a. Removing airworthiness directive 2019-06-06, Amendment 39-19604 (84
FR 11642, March 28, 2019); and
0
b. Adding the following new airworthiness directive:
2021-05-18 International Aero Engines AG: Amendment 39-21461; Docket
No. FAA-2020-0700; Project Identifier AD-2020-00238-E.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective April 29, 2021.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2019-06-06, Amendment 39-19604 (84 FR 11642,
March 28, 2019).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all International Aero Engines AG (IAE)
V2500-A1, V2522-A5, V2524-A5, V2525-D5, V2527-A5, V2527E-A5, V2527M-
A5, V2528-D5, V2530-A5, V2531-E5, and V2533-A5 model turbofan
engines.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 7250, Turbine
Section.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a crack found at the diffuser case M-
flange during overhaul inspection. The FAA is issuing this AD to
prevent failure of the diffuser case. The unsafe condition, if not
addressed, could result in uncontained diffuser case rupture, damage
to the engine, and damage to the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Required Actions
(1) Borescope Inspection of M-Flange
For engines with a diffuser case assembly, part number 2A0051,
2A2081-01, 2A2581-01, 2A2883-01, 2A2885-01, 2A2889-01, 2A2891-01,
2A2896-01, 2A2897-01, or 2A3132 installed, perform an initial
borescope inspection (BSI) of zones 1, 2, and 3 of the M-flange as
follows:
(i) For engines with a diffuser case M-flange that has 19,000 or
more cycles since
[[Page 15794]]
new (CSN) on the effective date of this AD, perform the initial BSI
of the M-flange before accumulating the ``Inspect within (Cycles)''
in Table 1 to paragraph (g)(1) of this AD. If the CSLFPI is unknown,
use the CSN of the diffuser case M-flange.
(ii) For engines with a diffuser case M-flange that has fewer
than 19,000 CSN on the effective date of this AD, perform the
initial BSI of the M-flange before accumulating 20,300 CSN.
(iii) For engines with a diffuser case M-flange or diffuser case
in which the CSN is unknown or cannot be determined, perform the
initial BSI of the M-flange before accumulating the ``Inspect within
(Cycles)'' in Table 1 to paragraph (g)(1) of this AD using one of
the following options:
(A) If the cycles of the diffuser case M-flange are unknown or
cannot be determined, use the total cycles on the diffuser case.
(B) If the cycles on the diffuser case are unknown or cannot be
determined and it can be documented that the diffuser case was
always installed on the engine, use total engine cycles.
(C) If neither paragraph (g)(1)(iii)(A) or (B) applies, perform
the BSI of the M-flange within 250 cycles after the effective date
of this AD.
(iv) Use the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraphs 2.A.
through 2.G. of IAE Non-Modification Alert Service Bulletin (NMASB)
V2500-ENG-72-A0706, Revision 2, dated November 7, 2019 (the NMASB),
to perform the initial BSI.
Note 1 to paragraph (g)(1)(iv): Paragraph 2.G. of the NMASB
describes procedures for performing a local fluorescent penetrant
inspection of the M-flange if you are unable to confirm if an
indication is a crack.
(v) If no crack is found as a result of the inspections required
by paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (iv) of this AD, repeat the BSI of
zones 1, 2, and 3 of the M-flange at intervals not to exceed 2,100
cycles since the previous BSI.
(vi) If a crack is found as a result of the inspections required
by paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (iv) of this AD, replace the
diffuser case M-flange or repeat the BSI of zones 1, 2, and 3 of the
M-flange as specified by either ``Table 2: Fly on Limits'' or
``Table 4: Fly on Limits,'' in paragraph 2.H., Accomplishment
Instructions, of the NMASB as appropriate for the affected the
engine model.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR25MR21.000
(2) Replacement of the Diffuser Case M-Flange
(i) At the next engine shop visit after the effective date of
this AD or before the diffuser case M-flange accumulates 20,000 CSN,
whichever occurs later, replace the diffuser case M-flange.
(ii) For engines with a diffuser case M-flange or diffuser case
in which the CSN is unknown or cannot be determined, perform one of
the following options:
(A) If the cycles of the diffuser case M-flange are unknown or
cannot be determined, at the next engine shop visit after the
effective date of this AD or before the diffuser case accumulates
20,000 CSN, whichever occurs later, replace the diffuser case M-
flange.
(B) If the cycles of the diffuser case are unknown or cannot be
determined, and if it can be documented that the diffuser case was
always installed on the engine, at the next engine shop visit after
the effective date of this AD or before the engine accumulates
20,000 CSN, whichever occurs later, replace the diffuser case M-
flange.
(C) If the cycles on the diffuser case M-flange are unknown or
cannot be determined based on the criteria identified in paragraphs
(g)(2)(ii)(A) and (B), or it cannot be shown that the diffuser case
was always installed on the engine, at the next engine shop visit
after the effective date of this AD, replace the diffuser case M-
flange.
Note 2 to paragraph (g)(2)(ii): Guidance on performing the
replacement of the diffuser case M-flange described in paragraphs
(g)(2)(i) and (ii) can be found in the Accomplishment Instructions,
paragraphs 1.A. and B., of IAE SB V2500-ENG-72-0709, Revision 1,
dated February 20, 2020.
(iii) Thereafter, repeat the replacement of the diffuser case M-
flange before accumulating 20,000 cycles since the previous
replacement.
(iv) Replacement of the diffuser case M-flange is the
terminating action for the repetitive BSIs required by paragraph
(g)(1) of this AD.
(h) Installation Prohibition
After the effective date of this AD, do not install a diffuser
case onto any affected engine if the diffuser case M-flange has more
than 20,000 CSN.
(i) Credit for Previous Actions
You may take credit for the initial BSIs that are required by
paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (iii) of this AD, if you performed
those actions before the effective date of this AD using IAE NMASB
V2500-ENG-72-A0706, Revision 1, dated June 28, 2019, or Original
Issue, dated February 14, 2019; IAE V2500 Special Instruction (SI)
No. 341F-18, dated November 19, 2018; IAE V2500 SI No. 350F-18, Rev.
1, dated December 17, 2018; IAE V2500 SI No. 356F-18, Rev. 1, dated
January 9, 2019; IAE V2500 SI No. 372F-18, dated January 8, 2019; or
IAE V2500 Special SI No. 04F-19, dated January 14, 2019.
(j) Definition
For the purpose of this AD, an ``engine shop visit'' is the
induction of the engine into the shop for maintenance involving the
separation of pairs of major mating engine flanges, K-N, except that
the separation of engine flanges solely for the purposes of
transportation without subsequent engine maintenance does not
constitute an engine shop visit.
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, ECO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of the person
identified in Related Information. You may email your request to:
[email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
[[Page 15795]]
(l) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Nicholas Paine,
Aviation Safety Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803; phone: (781) 238-7742; fax: (781) 238-7199;
email: [email protected].
(m) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) International Aero Engines (IAE) Non-Modification Alert
Service Bulletin V2500-ENG-72-A0706, Revision 2, dated November 7,
2019.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For IAE service information identified in this AD, contact
International Aero Engines AG, 400 Main Street, East Hartford, CT
06118; phone: (800) 565-0140; email: [email protected]; website:
https://fleetcare.pw.utc.com.
(4) You may view this service information at FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (781) 238-7759.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email: [email protected], or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued on February 25, 2021.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-06139 Filed 3-24-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P