Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Consumer Products; Early Assessment Review; Boilers, 15804-15810 [2021-06071]
Download as PDF
15804
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 56 / Thursday, March 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, AMS proposes to amend 7
CFR part 205 as follows:
PART 205—NATIONAL ORGANIC
PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 205 is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 6501–6524.
2. Amend § 205.601 by:
a. Revising paragraph (a)(2)(iv);
b. Adding paragraph (a)(2)(v); and
c. Revising paragraph (k).
The revisions and addition to read as
follows:
■
■
■
■
§ 205.601 Synthetic substances allowed
for use in organic crop production.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) Potassium hypochlorite—not
allowed for edible sprout production.
(v) Sodium hypochlorite.
*
*
*
*
*
(k) As plant growth regulators.
(1) Ethylene gas—for regulation of
pineapple flowering.
(2) Fatty alcohols (C6, C8, C10, and/or
C12)—for sucker control in organic
tobacco production.
*
*
*
*
*
§ 205.605
[Amended]
3. In § 205.605, amend paragraph (a)
by removing the words ‘‘Dairy
cultures’’.
■
Bruce Summers,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–05700 Filed 3–24–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[EERE–2019–BT–STD–0036]
RIN 1904–AE82
Energy Conservation Program: Energy
Conservation Standards for Consumer
Products; Early Assessment Review;
Boilers
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Request for information.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE) is undertaking an early
assessment review for consumer boilers
to determine whether to amend the
applicable energy conservation
standards for this product. Specifically,
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Mar 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
through this request for information
(RFI), DOE seeks data and information
to evaluate whether amended energy
conservation standards would result in
significant savings of energy, be
technologically feasible, and be
economically justified. DOE welcomes
written comments from the public on
any subject within the scope of this
document (including those topics not
specifically raised in this RFI), as well
as the submission of data and other
relevant information concerning this
early assessment review.
DATES: Written comments and
information are requested and will be
accepted on or before April 26, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
encouraged to submit comments using
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Alternatively, interested persons may
submit comments by email to the
following address: Email:
ConsumerBoilers2019STD0036@
ee.doe.gov. Include ‘‘Consumer Boilers
RFI’’ and docket number EERE–2019–
BT–STD–0036 and/or RIN 1904–AE82
in the subject line of the message.
Submit electronic comments in
WordPerfect, Microsoft Word, PDF, or
ASCII file format, and avoid the use of
special characters or any form of
encryption.
Although DOE has routinely accepted
public comment submissions through a
variety of mechanisms, including postal
mail and hand delivery/courier, the
Department has found it necessary to
make temporary modifications to the
comment submission process in light of
the ongoing Covid–19 pandemic. DOE is
currently accepting only electronic
submissions at this time. If a commenter
finds that this change poses an undue
hardship, please contact Appliance
Standards Program staff at (202) 586–
1445 to discuss the need for alternative
arrangements. Once the Covid–19
pandemic health emergency is resolved,
DOE anticipates resuming all of its
regular options for public comment
submission, including postal mail and
hand delivery/courier.
No telefacsimiles (faxes) will be
accepted. For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional
information on this process, see section
III of this document (Submission of
Comments).
Docket: The docket for this activity,
which includes Federal Register
notices, comments, and other
supporting documents/materials, is
available for review at https://
www.regulations.gov. All documents in
the docket are listed in the https://
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
www.regulations.gov index. However,
some documents listed in the index,
such as those containing information
that is exempt from public disclosure,
may not be publicly available.
The docket web page can be found at:
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=EERE-2019-BT-STD0036. The docket web page contains
instructions on how to access all
documents, including public comments,
in the docket. See section III of this
document for information on how to
submit comments through https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Catherine Rivest, U.S. Department
of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency
and Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies Office, EE–5B, 1000
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20585–0121. Telephone: (202) 586–
7335. Email:
ApplianceStandardsQuestions@
ee.doe.gov.
Mr. Eric Stas, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of the General Counsel,
GC–33, 1000 Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC 20585–0121.
Telephone: (202) 586–5827. Email:
Eric.Stas@hq.doe.gov.
For further information on how to
submit a comment or review other
public comments and the docket,
contact the Appliance and Equipment
Standards Program staff at (202) 287–
1445 or by email:
ApplianceStandardsQuestions@
ee.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
A. Authority
B. Rulemaking History
II. Request for Information and Comments
A. Product Classes
B. Significant Savings of Energy
C. Technological Feasibility
D. Economic Justification
III. Submission of Comments
I. Introduction
DOE has established an early
assessment review process to conduct a
more focused analysis to evaluate, based
on statutory criteria, whether a new or
amended energy conservation standard
is warranted. Based on the information
received in response to the RFI and
DOE’s own analysis, DOE will
determine whether to proceed with a
rulemaking for a new or amended
energy conservation standard. If DOE
makes an initial determination that a
new or amended energy conservation
standard would satisfy the applicable
statutory criteria or DOE’s analysis is
inconclusive, DOE would undertake the
E:\FR\FM\25MRP1.SGM
25MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 56 / Thursday, March 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules
preliminary stages of a rulemaking to
issue a new or amended energy
conservation standard. Otherwise, if
DOE makes an initial determination
based upon available evidence that a
new or amended energy conservation
standard would not meet the applicable
statutory criteria, DOE would engage in
notice and comment rulemaking before
issuing a final determination that new
or amended energy conservation
standards are not warranted.
A. Authority
The Energy Policy and Conservation
Act, as amended (EPCA),1 among other
things, authorizes DOE to regulate the
energy efficiency of a number of
consumer products and certain
industrial equipment. (42 U.S.C. 6291–
6317) Title III, Part B 2 of EPCA
established the Energy Conservation
Program for Consumer Products Other
Than Automobiles. These products
include consumer boilers, the subject of
this document. (42 U.S.C. 6292(a)(5))
Under EPCA, DOE’s energy
conservation program consists
essentially of four parts: (1) Testing, (2)
labeling, (3) Federal energy conservation
standards, and (4) certification and
enforcement procedures. Relevant
provisions of EPCA specifically include
definitions (42 U.S.C. 6291), test
procedures (42 U.S.C. 6293), labeling
provisions (42 U.S.C. 6294), energy
conservation standards (42 U.S.C. 6295),
and the authority to require information
and reports from manufacturers (42
U.S.C. 6296).
Federal energy efficiency
requirements for covered products
established under EPCA generally
supersede State laws and regulations
concerning energy conservation testing,
labeling, and standards. (42 U.S.C.
6297(a)–(c)) DOE may, however, grant
waivers of Federal preemption in
limited instances for particular State
laws or regulations, in accordance with
the procedures and other provisions set
forth under EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6297(d))
DOE must follow specific statutory
criteria for prescribing new or amended
standards for covered products. EPCA
requires that any new or amended
energy conservation standard prescribed
by the Secretary of Energy (Secretary) be
designed to achieve the maximum
improvement in energy or water
efficiency that is technologically
feasible and economically justified. (42
U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(A)) The Secretary may
not prescribe an amended or new
1 All references to EPCA in this document refer
to the statute as amended through the Energy Act
of 2020, Public Law 116–260 (Dec. 27, 2020).
2 For editorial reasons, upon codification in the
U.S. Code, Part B was redesignated Part A.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Mar 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
standard that will not result in
significant conservation of energy or is
not technologically feasible or
economically justified. (42 U.S.C.
6295(o)(3))
EPCA requires that, no later than six
years after the issuance of any final rule
establishing or amending a standard,
DOE evaluate the energy conservation
standards for each type of covered
product, including those at issue here,
and publish either a notice of
determination that the standards do not
need to be amended, or a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NOPR) that
includes new proposed energy
conservation standards (proceeding to a
final rule, as appropriate). (42 U.S.C.
6295(m)(1)) DOE must make the
analysis on which its notice if based
publicly available and provide an
opportunity for written comment. (42
U.S.C. 6295(m)(2)) DOE is issuing this
early assessment review pursuant to the
requirements of 42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(1).
B. Rulemaking History
EPCA established energy conservation
standards for consumer furnaces and
boilers in terms of the Annual Fuel
Utilization Efficiency (AFUE) (42 U.S.C.
6295(f)(1)–(3)) and directed DOE to
conduct a series of rulemakings to
determine whether to amend these
standards (42 U.S.C. 6295(f)(4); see also
42 U.S.C. 6295(m)). DOE completed the
most recent rulemaking cycle to amend
the standards for consumer boilers by
publishing a final rule in the Federal
Register on January 15, 2016 (January
2016 final rule), as required under 42
U.S.C. 6295(f)(4)(C). 81 FR 2320. The
January 2016 final rule adopted new
standby mode and off mode standards
for consumer boilers in addition to
amended AFUE energy conservation
standards. Id. Compliance with the new
and amended standards for consumer
boilers is required beginning January 15,
2021. Id. The current energy
conservation standards for consumer
boilers are located at title 10 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 430,
subpart C, section 32(e)(2). 10 CFR
430.32(e)(2). The currently applicable
DOE test procedures for consumer
boilers appear at 10 CFR part 430,
subpart B, appendix N (Appendix N).
II. Request for Information and
Comments
DOE is publishing this RFI to collect
data and information during the early
assessment review to inform its
decision, consistent with its obligations
under EPCA, as to whether the
Department should proceed with an
energy conservation standards
rulemaking. Below DOE has identified
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
15805
certain topics for which information and
data are requested to assist in the
evaluation of the potential for amended
energy conservation standards. DOE
also welcomes comments on other
issues relevant to its early assessment
that may not specifically be identified in
this document.
A. Product Classes
When evaluating and establishing
energy conservation standards, DOE
may divide covered products into
product classes by the type of energy
used, or by capacity or other
performance-related features that justify
a different standard. (42 U.S.C. 6295(q)).
In making a determination whether
capacity or another performance-related
feature justifies a different standard,
DOE must consider such factors as the
utility of the feature to the consumer
and other factors DOE deems
appropriate. (Id.)
On January 15, 2021, DOE published
a final interpretive rule determining that
in the context of residential furnaces,
commercial water heaters, and
similarly-situated products/equipment,
use of non-condensing technology (and
associated venting) constitutes a
performance-related ‘‘feature’’ under
EPCA that cannot be eliminated through
adoption of an energy conservation
standard. 86 FR 4776. Consumer boilers
are similarly-situated products given
that there are consumer boilers
currently on the market which employ
non-condensing technology (and the
associated venting). In considering
whether to amend the energy
conservation standards for consumer
boilers, DOE seeks information that
would allow the agency to evaluate noncondensing technology (and the
associated venting) consistent with the
final interpretative rule, and whether a
separate product class is warranted
under 42 U.S.C. 6295(q)(1).
On this topic, DOE is particularly
interested in comments, information,
and data on the following:
Issue 1: DOE requests feedback on the
current consumer boiler product classes
and whether changes to these individual
product classes and their descriptions
should be made or whether certain
classes should be separated or merged.
Specifically, with regard to consumer
boilers that use condensing technology,
DOE requests information and data on
potential impacts as compared to
consumer boilers that use noncondensing technology, such as, but not
limited to, the complexity/cost of
installation, changes to a home’s living/
storage space, and the potential for fuel
switching.
E:\FR\FM\25MRP1.SGM
25MRP1
15806
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 56 / Thursday, March 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules
B. Significant Savings of Energy
On January 15, 2016, DOE established
an energy conservation standard for
consumer boilers that is expected to
result in 0.14 quadrillion British
thermal units (quads) of site energy
savings over a 30-year period.3 81 FR
2320, 2396. The adopted levels can be
met by consumer boilers using either
condensing or noncondensing
technology. Additionally, in the January
2016 final rule, DOE estimated that an
energy conservation standard
established at an energy efficiency level
equivalent to that achieved using the
maximum available technology (maxtech) would have resulted in 1.295
additional quads of site energy savings
over a 30-year period. Id. For gas-fired
hot water boilers and oil-fired hot water
boilers, energy conservation standards
at the max-tech levels analyzed in the
January 2016 final rule could only be
met by consumer boilers utilizing
condensing technology (96 percent
AFUE and 91 percent AFUE,
respectively). 81 FR 2320, 2381 (Jan. 15,
2016). The majority of the additional
potential energy savings were from the
gas-fired hot water boiler product class.
Currently, based on information from
the DOE Compliance Certification
Management System (CCMS)
certification database, non-condensing
gas-fired hot water boilers range in
AFUE from 84.0 percent to 86.1 percent,
and condensing gas-fired hot water
boilers range in AFUE from 88.3 percent
to 96.8 percent. Based on the CCMS
certification database, oil-fired hot water
boilers currently on the market are noncondensing and range in AFUE from
86.0 to 88.2 percent. All gas-fired steam
and oil-fired steam boilers in the CCMS
certification database are noncondensing, ranging in AFUE from 82.0
to 83.4 and 85.0 to 86.5 percent,
respectively.
While DOE’s request for information
is not limited to the following issues,
DOE is particularly interested in
comment, information, and data on the
issues discussed in the following
paragraphs.
As part of the rulemaking process,
DOE conducts an energy use analysis to
identify how products are used by
consumers, which then allows the
Department to determine the energy
savings potential of energy efficiency
improvements. The purpose of the
energy use analysis is to determine the
annual energy consumption of
consumer boilers at different
efficiencies in representative U.S.
single-family homes, manufactured
housing, multi-family residences, and
commercial buildings, and to assess the
energy savings potential of increased
consumer boiler efficiency. The energy
use analysis estimates the range of
energy use of consumer boilers in the
field (i.e., as they are actually used by
consumers). Furthermore, the energy
use analysis provides the basis for other
analyses DOE performs, particularly
assessments of the energy savings and
the savings in consumer operating costs
that could result from adoption of
amended or new standards, including
the life-cycle cost (LCC) and payback
period (PBP) analysis and the national
impact analysis (NIA). DOE will
estimate the annual energy consumption
of consumer boilers at specified energy
efficiency levels across a range of
applications, house or building types,
and climate zones. Similar to the
January 2016 final rule, DOE intends to
determine the annual energy
consumption, including the use of
natural gas, liquefied petroleum gas
(LPG), oil, or electricity for space and
water heating,4 as well as use of
electricity for any auxiliary components.
Issue 3: DOE requests feedback on the
levels of energy savings that could be
expected from the adoption of a morestringent standard for consumer boilers.
Specifically, with regard to potential
product class changes discussed in
section II.A of this RFI, DOE requests
information and data on the potential
change in energy savings if certain
classes are split or merged.
Issue 4: DOE seeks input and sources
of data or recommendations to support
sizing of consumer boilers typical in
consumer space heating and water
heating applications.
Issue 5: DOE requests comment on the
fraction of installations and classes of
consumer boilers that are used in
commercial applications.
Issue 6: DOE seeks field data and
input on representative space heating
usage, space heating load profile, and
representative return water
temperatures for consumer boilers used
in various consumer and commercial
space heating applications.
Issue 7: DOE requests comment on the
fraction of installations by consumer
boiler product classes used for different
space heating applications include
radiant heating (in-floor, radiant panels,
radiators, baseboards) and forced air
using fan coils or central air handlers.
Issue 8: DOE seeks input on adjusting
AFUE for different return water
temperatures, for automatic means for
adjusting water temperature, and for
jacket losses. DOE seeks input on any
other adjustments to AFUE to better
capture field conditions. DOE also seeks
data on the relationship between return
water temperature and AFUE to more
accurately calculate the return water
temperature adjustment.
Issue 9: DOE seeks additional data on
the fraction of boiler shipments that go
to installations that serve both space
heating and water heating by product
class, by efficiency level or boiler
technology type (e.g., non-condensing
and condensing), and type of water
heating (e.g., indirect tank water
heating, combination products, and
tankless coil).
3 This estimate of 0.14 quads reflects site energy
savings, which for natural gas and oil are
considered equal to the primary energy savings
because they are supplied to the user without
transformation from another form of energy. The
January 2016 final rule presented the 30-year energy
savings estimate as 0.16 quads, reflecting full-fuelcycle (FFC) energy savings. The FFC measure
includes point-of-use (site) energy; the energy losses
associated with generation, transmission, and
distribution of electricity; and the energy consumed
in extracting, processing, and transporting or
distributing primary fuels. For purposes of its
consideration of significant energy savings, DOE
has calculated its estimate of potential site energy
savings from the estimate of FFC energy savings in
the January 2016 final rule.
4 Space heating applications for consumer boilers
include radiant heating (e.g., in-floor, radiant
panels, radiators, baseboard) and forced air using
fan coils or central air handlers. Domestic water
heating applications for consumer boilers include
indirect water heating, combination products, and
tankless coil.
Issue 2: DOE also requests comment
on other instances where it may be
appropriate to separate or combine any
of the existing product classes and
whether such potential changes would
impact product utility by eliminating
any performance-related features or
reduce any compliance burdens.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Mar 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
C. Technological Feasibility
DOE considers technologies
incorporated in commercially-available
products or in working prototypes to be
technologically feasible. 10 CFR part
430. subpart C, appendix A, sections
6(c)(3)(i) and 7(b)(1). In the rulemaking
proceeding leading to the January 2016
final rule, DOE considered a number of
technology options that manufacturers
could use to reduce energy consumption
in consumer boilers. 81 FR 2320, 2340–
2341 (Jan. 15, 2016). Table II.1 shows
the technologies previously considered
for the January 2016 final rule.
E:\FR\FM\25MRP1.SGM
25MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 56 / Thursday, March 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules
15807
TABLE II.1—TECHNOLOGY OPTIONS FOR CONSUMER BOILERS CONSIDERED IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE JANUARY 2016
FINAL RULE
Heat exchanger improvements.
Modulating operation.
Dampers.†
Direct vent.
Pulse combustion.*
Premix burners.
Burner derating.*
Delayed-action oil pump solenoid valve.
Electronic ignition.†
Low-pressure air-atomized oil burner.
Transformer improvements (standby mode and off mode).
Control relay for models with brushless permanent magnet motors (standby mode and off mode).*
Switching mode power supply (standby mode and off mode).
† Technology already in baseline units, so not considered further.
* Screened-out technology.
DOE seeks comment on any changes
to these technology options that could
affect DOE’s evaluation of whether
energy conservation standards need to
be amended. DOE also seeks comment
on whether there are any other
technology options that DOE should
consider in its analysis.
While DOE’s request for information
is not limited to the following issues,
DOE is particularly interested in
comment, information, and data on the
following:
Issue 10: DOE seeks information on
technologies that may impact the
efficiency of consumer boilers as
measured according to the DOE test
procedure. DOE also seeks information
on how these technologies may have
changed since they were considered in
the January 2016 final rule analysis.
Specifically, DOE seeks information on
the range of efficiencies or performance
characteristics that are currently
available for each technology option.
Issue 11: DOE seeks comment on
other technology options that it should
consider for inclusion in its analysis
and whether these technologies would
be expected to impact product features
or consumer utility of consumer boilers.
DOE defines the max-tech efficiency
level to represent the theoretical
maximum possible efficiency if all
available design options are
incorporated in a model. In the January
2016 final rule, the max-tech efficiency
levels for AFUE corresponded to the
maximum available AFUE levels in
products on the market at the time of
the analysis (except for oil-fired hot
water boilers for which the max-tech
level was slightly below the maximum
available level).5 For standby mode and
5 See the technical support document for the
January 2016 final rule, Chapter 3, section 3.2.9 and
chapter 5, section 5.4.4. Available at: https://
www.regulations.gov/document/EERE-2012-BTSTD-0047-0070.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Mar 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
off mode energy consumption, the maxtech efficiency levels (i.e., the levels
with the lowest amount of energy
consumption) were determined by
starting with the baseline design and
implementing design options based on
cost-effectiveness until all available
technologies were employed.6 At the
time this RFI was drafted, based on data
from the CCMS database, the maximum
available AFUE efficiency levels
currently on the market for the subject
products are as follows: 86.1 percent for
non-condensing gas-fired hot water
boilers, 96.8 percent for condensing gasfired hot water boilers, 88.2 percent for
oil-fired hot water boilers (which are all
non-condensing), 83.4 percent for gasfired steam boilers (which are all noncondensing), and 86.5 percent oil-fired
steam boilers (which are all noncondensing). In the January 2016 final
rule, DOE identified the max-tech level
for standby mode and off mode
consumption as follows: 9 watts for gasfired hot water boilers; 8 watts for gasfired steam, electric hot water, and
electric steam boilers; and 11 watts for
oil-fired hot water and oil-fired steam
boilers. 81 FR 2320, 2345–2346 (Jan. 15,
2016).
Issue 12: DOE seeks input on whether
the maximum available AFUE efficiency
levels are appropriate and
technologically feasible for potential
consideration as possible energy
conservation standards—and if not, why
not. DOE also seeks feedback on the
design options incorporated at max-tech
efficiency levels. As part of this request,
DOE also seeks information as to
whether there are limitations on the use
of certain combinations of design
options.
6 See the technical support document for the
January 2016 final rule, chapter 5, section 5.4.2.
Available at: https://www.regulations.gov/
document/EERE-2012-BT-STD-0047-0070.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Issue 13: DOE seeks input on the maxtech standby mode and off mode
efficiency levels. In particular, are morestringent (i.e., lower) standby mode and
off mode efficiency levels
technologically feasible that are
appropriate for consideration as
possible energy conservation standards,
and if so, what are the design options
incorporated at those levels. DOE also
seeks information as to whether there
are limitations on the use of certain
combinations of design options.
D. Economic Justification
In determining whether a proposed
energy conservation standard is
economically justified, DOE analyzes,
among other things, the potential
economic impact on consumers,
manufacturers, and the Nation. DOE
seeks comment on whether there are
economic barriers to the adoption of
more-stringent energy conservation
standards for consumer boilers. DOE
also seeks comment and data on any
other aspects of its economic
justification analysis from the January
2016 final rule that may indicate
whether a more-stringent energy
conservation standard would be
economically justified or cost-effective.
While DOE’s request for information
is not limited to the following issues,
DOE is particularly interested in
comment, information, and data on the
issues discussed in the following
paragraphs.
In its analysis, DOE intends to take
into account consumer prices from
locations where ultra-low-NOX gas-fired
hot water and steam boilers would be
required by the compliance date for any
amended standards, such as the Bay
Area Air Quality Management District
(AQMD) (Regulation 9, Rule 6),7
7 Bay Area Air Quality Management District,
Regulation 9: Inorganic Gaseous Pollutants; Rule 6:
E:\FR\FM\25MRP1.SGM
Continued
25MRP1
15808
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 56 / Thursday, March 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules
Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD (Rule
414),8 San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution
Control District (APCD) (Rule 4308),9
Santa Barbara County APCD (Rule
360),10 South Coast AQMD (Rule
1146.2),11 and Ventura County AQMD
(Rule 74–11.1).12
Issue 14: DOE seeks input on whether
there are additional jurisdictions
requiring ultra-low-NOX gas-fired hot
water and steam boilers.
In the January 2016 final rule, to
determine the venting installation costs
for consumer boilers, DOE considered
vent categories as defined in the
National Fuel Gas Code.13 81 FR 2320,
2359–2361 (Jan. 15, 2016). In its
analysis, DOE determined that all
natural draft boilers and a fraction of
mechanical draft boilers would be
vented as a Category I appliance
(negative pressure vent system with
high temperature flue gases). DOE
determined that the remaining fraction
of mechanical draft boilers would be
vented as a Category III appliance
(positive pressure vent system with high
temperature flue gases). DOE
determined that very few noncondensing models would be installed
as a Category II appliance (negative
pressure vent system with low
temperature flue gases) or a Category IV
Nitrogen Oxides Emissions from Natural Gas-Fired
Boilers and Water Heaters (Available at: https://
ww3.arb.ca.gov/drdb/ba/curhtml/r9-6.pdf) (Last
accessed October 30, 2019).
8 Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality
Management District, Rule 414: Water Heaters,
Boilers and Process Heaters Rated Less Than
1,000,000 BTU PER HOUR Adopted 08–01–96
(Amended 03–25–10) (Available at: https://
www.airquality.org/ProgramCoordination/
Documents/rule414.pdf) (Last accessed October 30,
2019).
9 San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control
District, Rule 4308: Boilers, Steam Generators, and
Process Heaters—0.075 MMBtu/hr to less than 2.0
MMBtu/hr (Adopted October 20, 2005, amended
December 17, 2009, Amended November 14, 2013)
(Available at: https://www.valleyair.org/rules/
currntrules/03-4308_CleanRule.pdf) (Last accessed
October 30, 2019).
10 Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control
District, Rule 360: Boilers, Steam Generators, and
Process Heaters (0.075–2 MMBtu/hr) (Adopted 10/
17/2002, revised 3/15/2018) (Available at: https://
www.ourair.org/wp-content/uploads/rule360.pdf)
(Last accessed October 30, 2019).
11 South Coast Air Quality Management District,
Rule 1146.2: Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from
Large Water Heaters and Small Boilers and Process
Heaters (Adopted January 9, 1998, amended January
7, 2005, amended May 5, 2006, amended December
7, 2018) (Available at: https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/
default-source/rule-book/reg-xi/rule-11462.pdf?sfvrsn=17) (Last accessed October 30, 2019).
12 Ventura County Air Quality Management
District, Rule 74–11.1: Large Water Heaters and
Small Boilers (Adopted 9/14/99, revised 9/11/12)
(Available at: https://vcapcd.org/Rulebook/Reg4/
RULE%2074.11.1.pdf) (Last accessed October 30,
2019).
13 Available at: https://catalog.nfpa.org/NFPA54ANSI-Z2231-National-Fuel-Gas-Code-P1184.aspx
(Last accessed March 5, 2021).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Mar 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
appliance (positive pressure vent system
with low flue gases temperatures).
However, DOE determined that all
condensing installations would be
vented as a Category IV appliance. For
non-condensing boilers, DOE accounted
for both commonly-vented consumer
boilers (together with a water heater)
and isolated consumer boilers
(separately vented). For replacements,
DOE added any costs associated with
updating or repairing existing flue
venting including vent resizing,
chimney relining, and updating of flue
vent connectors. DOE also accounted for
additional labor costs associated with
larger boilers, replacing a larger drain
pan, and potential space-constraint
issues when the original boiler location
is too small to accommodate the
replacement boiler. For efficiency levels
that include electronic ignition, power
vent, or condensing design, DOE added
the cost of installing an electrical outlet,
a new venting system, any additional
cost for condensate disposal, any
additional costs for secondary and
primary piping, and cost of a Y-strainer,
if required for a fraction of installations.
In the January 2016 final rule, DOE
also included installation adders for
new construction, as well as for new
owner installations for hot water gasfired boilers. 81 FR 2320, 2361 (Jan. 15,
2016). For non-condensing boilers, the
only adder would be a new metal flue
vent (including a fraction with stainless
steel venting) and condensate
withdrawal for a fraction of category III
models. For condensing gas boilers, the
additional costs for new construction
installations related to potential
amended standards would include a
new flue vent, combustion air venting
for direct vent installations and
accounting for a commonly-vented
water heater, and condensate
withdrawal.
Issue 15: DOE seeks input on issues
and costs associated with venting of flue
gases of boilers, in particular regarding
retrofit issues related to installing a new
vent system for higher-efficiency
consumer boilers, disconnecting the
existing consumer boiler from a noncondensing common venting system,
and upgrading existing non-condensing
venting (chimney relining or vent
resizing). DOE also seeks input on how
often and in what applications direct
venting or sealed combustion are used
or required.
Issue 16: DOE seeks input on issues
and costs associated with condensate
disposal for higher-efficiency consumer
boilers, specifically how often and in
what applications a condensate filter or
a condensate pump is installed.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Issue 17: DOE seeks input on issues
and costs associated with installing
consumer boilers in multi-family
buildings.
DOE measures LCC and PBP impacts
of potential standard levels relative to a
no-new-standards case that reflects the
likely market in the absence of amended
standards. Similar to the 2016 final rule,
DOE plans to develop market-share
efficiency data (i.e., the distribution of
product shipments by efficiency) for the
product classes DOE is considering, for
the year in which compliance with any
potential amended standards would be
required. For the 2016 final rule, DOE
developed market shares of different
consumer boiler energy efficiency levels
in the no-new-standards case, using
historical shipments data provided by
stakeholders, data from the AirConditioning, Heating and Refrigeration
Institute (AHRI) contractor survey, and
ENERGY STAR unit shipment data for
residential boilers.14 81 FR 2320, 2364–
2366 (Jan. 15, 2016). If DOE determines
that a rulemaking is necessary, DOE
intends to use the most recent data
available from these sources, together
with any more current data that may be
provided by stakeholders. Also similar
to the January 2016 final rule, because
these data may not cover all of the
energy efficiency levels under
consideration, DOE intends to use most
the recent data on the number of water
heater models at different energy
efficiency levels, as reported in DOE’s
compliance certification database,15 the
AHRI directory of certified product
performance,16 the California Energy
Commission appliance efficiency
database,17 and the ENERGY STAR
certified boiler directory.18
Issue 18: DOE requests shipments
data for consumer boilers, broken down
by product class, that show current
14 ENERGY STAR, Unit Shipments data
(Available at: https://www.energystar.gov/
index.cfm?c=partners.unit_shipment_data) (Last
accessed October 30, 2019).
15 U.S. Department of Energy, Compliance
Certification Database (Available at: https://
www.regulations.doe.gov/certification-data/
#q=Product_Group_s%3A*) (Last accessed October
30, 2019).
16 Air-Conditioning Heating and Refrigeration
Institute, Directory of Certified Product
Performance for Residential Boilers (Available at:
https://www.ahridirectory.org/
NewSearch?programId=25&searchTypeId=3) (Last
accessed October 30, 2019).
17 California Energy Commission (CEC),
Appliance Efficiency Database. (Available at:
https://cacertappliances.energy.ca.gov/Pages/
ApplianceSearch.aspx) (Last accessed October 30,
2019).
18 ENERGY STAR, ENERGY STAR Certified
Boilers Directory (Available at: https://
www.energystar.gov/productfinder/product/
certified-boilers/results) (Last accessed October 30,
2019).
E:\FR\FM\25MRP1.SGM
25MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 56 / Thursday, March 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules
market shares by efficiency level. DOE
also seeks input on similar historic data
from 2016–2020.
Issue 19: DOE also requests
information on expected future trends
in efficiency for consumer boiler
product classes, including the relative
market shares of condensing versus noncondensing products in the market for
gas-fired and oil-fired hot water boilers
in the absence of amended efficiency
standards.
Issue 20: DOE requests 2016–2020
data on the fraction of sales in the
residential and commercial sector for
consumer boilers.
Issue 21: DOE requests comment on
the anticipated future market share of
higher-efficiency products, such as
condensing gas-fired and oil-fired hot
water boilers, as compared to lessefficient products for each consumer
boiler product class.
III. Submission of Comments
DOE invites all interested parties to
submit in writing by the date specified
under the DATES heading of this
document, comments and information
on matters addressed in this RFI and on
other matters relevant to DOE’s early
assessment of whether more-stringent
energy conservation standards are
warranted for consumer boilers.
Submitting comments via https://
www.regulations.gov. The https://
www.regulations.gov web page requires
you to provide your name and contact
information. Your contact information
will be viewable to DOE Building
Technologies staff only. Your contact
information will not be publicly
viewable except for your first and last
names, organization name (if any), and
submitter representative name (if any).
If your comment is not processed
properly because of technical
difficulties, DOE will use this
information to contact you. If DOE
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, DOE may not be
able to consider your comment.
However, your contact information
will be publicly viewable if you include
it in the comment or in any documents
attached to your comment. Any
information that you do not want to be
publicly viewable should not be
included in your comment, nor in any
document attached to your comment. If
this instruction is followed, persons
viewing comments will see only first
and last names, organization names,
correspondence containing comments,
and any documents submitted with the
comments.
Do not submit to https://
www.regulations.gov information for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Mar 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
which disclosure is restricted by statute,
such as trade secrets and commercial or
financial information (hereinafter
referred to as Confidential Business
Information (CBI)). Comments
submitted through https://
www.regulations.gov cannot be claimed
as CBI. Comments received through the
website will waive any CBI claims for
the information submitted. For
information on submitting CBI, see the
Confidential Business Information
section.
DOE processes submissions made
through https://www.regulations.gov
before posting. Normally, comments
will be posted within a few days of
being submitted. However, if large
volumes of comments are being
processed simultaneously, your
comment may not be viewable for up to
several weeks. Please keep the comment
tracking number that https://
www.regulations.gov provides after you
have successfully uploaded your
comment.
Submitting comments via email.
Comments and documents submitted
via email also will be posted to https://
www.regulations.gov. If you do not want
your personal contact information to be
publicly viewable, do not include it in
your comment or any accompanying
documents. Instead, provide your
contact information in a cover letter.
Include your first and last names, email
address, telephone number, and
optional mailing address. The cover
letter will not be publicly viewable as
long as it does not include any
comments.
Include contact information each time
you submit comments, data, documents,
and other information to DOE.
Telefacsimiles (faxes) will not be
accepted.
Comments, data, and other
information submitted to DOE
electronically should be provided in
PDF (preferred), Microsoft Word or
Excel, WordPerfect, or text (ASCII) file
format. Provide documents that are not
secured, written in English, and free of
any defects or viruses. Documents
should not contain special characters or
any form of encryption and, if possible,
they should carry the electronic
signature of the author.
Campaign form letters. Please submit
campaign form letters by the originating
organization in batches of between 50 to
500 form letters per PDF or as one form
letter with a list of supporters’ names
compiled into one or more PDFs. This
reduces comment processing and
posting time.
Confidential Business Information.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 1004.11, any person
submitting information that he or she
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
15809
believes to be confidential and exempt
by law from public disclosure should
submit via email two well-marked
copies: One copy of the document
marked ‘‘confidential’’ including all the
information believed to be confidential,
and one copy of the document marked
‘‘non-confidential’’ with the information
believed to be confidential deleted. DOE
will make its own determination about
the confidential status of the
information and treat it according to its
determination.
It is DOE’s policy that all comments
may be included in the public docket,
without change and as received,
including any personal information
provided in the comments (except
information deemed to be exempt from
public disclosure).
DOE considers public participation to
be a very important part of the process
for developing test procedures and
energy conservation standards. DOE
actively encourages the participation
and interaction of the public during the
comment period in each stage of this
process. Interactions with and between
members of the public provide a
balanced discussion of the issues and
assist DOE in the process. Anyone who
wishes to be added to the DOE mailing
list to receive future notices and
information about this process should
contact Appliance and Equipment
Standards Program staff at (202) 287–
1445 or via email at
ApplianceStandardsQuestions@
ee.doe.gov.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of
Energy was signed on March 18, 2021,
by Kelly Speakes-Backman, Principal
Deputy Assistant Secretary and Acting
Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency
and Renewable Energy, pursuant to
delegated authority from the Secretary
of Energy. That document with the
original signature and date is
maintained by DOE. For administrative
purposes only, and in compliance with
requirements of the Office of the Federal
Register, the undersigned DOE Federal
Register Liaison Officer has been
authorized to sign and submit the
document in electronic format for
publication, as an official document of
the Department of Energy. This
administrative process in no way alters
the legal effect of this document upon
publication in the Federal Register.
E:\FR\FM\25MRP1.SGM
25MRP1
15810
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 56 / Thursday, March 25, 2021 / Proposed Rules
Signed in Washington, DC, on March 19,
2021.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S.
Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2021–06071 Filed 3–24–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
17 CFR Chapter II
[Release Nos. 33–10934; 34–91344; 39–
2537; IA–5698; IC–34225; File No. S7–02–
21]
List of Rules To Be Reviewed Pursuant
to the Regulatory Flexibility Act
Securities and Exchange
Commission.
ACTION: Publication of list of rules
scheduled for review.
AGENCY:
The Securities and Exchange
Commission is publishing a list of rules
to be reviewed pursuant to Section 610
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. The
list is published to provide the public
with notice that these rules are
scheduled for review by the agency and
to invite public comment on whether
the rules should be continued without
change, or should be amended or
rescinded to minimize any significant
economic impact of the rules upon a
substantial number of small entities.
DATES: Comments should be submitted
by April 26, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
SUMMARY:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/submitcomments.htm); or
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments to Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission,
100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number S7–02–21. We will post all
submitted comments, requests, other
submissions and other materials on our
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/other.shtml). Typically, comments
are also available for website viewing
and printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Due to pandemic
conditions, however, access to the
Commission’s public reference room is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:19 Mar 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
not permitted at this time. All
comments received will be posted
without change. Persons submitting
comments are cautioned that we do not
redact or edit personal identifying
information. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Leila Bham, Senior Special Counsel,
Office of the General Counsel, 202–551–
5532.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Regulatory Flexibility Act (‘‘RFA’’),
codified at 5 U.S.C. 601–612, requires
an agency to review its rules that have
a significant economic impact upon a
substantial number of small entities
within ten years of the publication of
such rules as final rules. 5 U.S.C. 610(a).
The purpose of the review is ‘‘to
determine whether such rules should be
continued without change, or should be
amended or rescinded . . . to minimize
any significant economic impact of the
rules upon a substantial number of such
small entities.’’ 5 U.S.C. 610(a). The
RFA sets forth specific considerations
that must be addressed in the review of
each rule:
• The continued need for the rule;
• the nature of complaints or
comments received concerning the rule
from the public;
• the complexity of the rule;
• the extent to which the rule
overlaps, duplicates or conflicts with
other federal rules, and, to the extent
feasible, with state and local
governmental rules; and
• the length of time since the rule has
been evaluated or the degree to which
technology, economic conditions, or
other factors have changed in the area
affected by the rule. 5 U.S.C. 610(b).
The list below includes rules adopted
in 2011 that may have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities (but excludes
rules that have been substantially
changed since adoption, rules that are
minor amendments to previously
adopted rules, and rules that are
ministerial, procedural, or technical in
nature). Where the Commission has
previously made a determination of a
rule’s impact on small businesses, the
determination is noted on the list.
The Commission particularly solicits
public comment on whether the rules
listed below affect small businesses in
new or different ways than when they
were first adopted. The rules and forms
listed below are scheduled for review by
staff of the Commission.
Title: Mine Safety Disclosure.
Citation: 17 CFR 229.104, 17 CFR
229.601, 17 CFR 249.308, 17 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
249.308a, 17 CFR 249.310, 17 CFR
249.220f, 17 CFR 249.240f, and 17 CFR
239.13.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77g, 77j, 77s(a),
78l, 78m, 78o, 78w; and Section 1503 of
the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (‘‘Dodd-Frank
Act’’).
Description: The Commission adopted
rule amendments to implement Section
1503 of the Dodd-Frank Act. Section
1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act requires
issuers that are operators, or that have
a subsidiary that is an operator, of a coal
or other mine to disclose in their
periodic reports filed with the
Commission information regarding
specified health and safety violations,
orders and citations, related assessments
and legal actions, and mining-related
fatalities. Section 1503(b) of the DoddFrank Act mandates the filing of a Form
8–K disclosing the receipt of certain
orders and notices from the Mine Safety
and Health Administration.
Prior RFA Analysis: When the
Commission adopted the rule
amendments on December 21, 2011, it
published a Final Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis in the adopting release,
Release No. 33–9286, available at:
https://www.federalregister.gov/
documents/2011/12/28/2011-33148/
mine-safety-disclosure. The
Commission received no comments on
the Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis published in the proposing
release, Release No. 33–9164 (Dec. 15,
2010), available at: https://
www.federalregister.gov/documents/
2010/12/22/2010-31941/mine-safetydisclosure.
*
*
*
*
*
Title: Reporting by Investment
Advisers to Private Funds and Certain
Commodity Pool Operators and
Commodity Trading Advisors on Form
PF; Joint Final Rule.
Citation: 17 CFR 275.204(b)–1 and 17
CFR 279.9.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 80b–4 and 80b–
11.
Description: The Commodity Futures
Trading Commission and the Securities
and Exchange Commission adopted new
rules under the Commodity Exchange
Act and the Investment Advisers Act of
1940 (‘‘Advisers Act’’) to implement
provisions of Title IV of the Dodd-Frank
Act. The rule adopted by the SEC, Rule
204(b)–1, requires investment advisers
registered with the SEC that advise one
or more private funds and have at least
$150 million in private fund assets
under management to file Form PF with
the SEC. Advisers must file Form PF
electronically, on a confidential basis.
The information contained in Form PF
E:\FR\FM\25MRP1.SGM
25MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 56 (Thursday, March 25, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15804-15810]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-06071]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[EERE-2019-BT-STD-0036]
RIN 1904-AE82
Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for
Consumer Products; Early Assessment Review; Boilers
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Request for information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is undertaking an early
assessment review for consumer boilers to determine whether to amend
the applicable energy conservation standards for this product.
Specifically, through this request for information (RFI), DOE seeks
data and information to evaluate whether amended energy conservation
standards would result in significant savings of energy, be
technologically feasible, and be economically justified. DOE welcomes
written comments from the public on any subject within the scope of
this document (including those topics not specifically raised in this
RFI), as well as the submission of data and other relevant information
concerning this early assessment review.
DATES: Written comments and information are requested and will be
accepted on or before April 26, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are encouraged to submit comments using
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments. Alternatively, interested
persons may submit comments by email to the following address: Email:
[email protected]. Include ``Consumer Boilers RFI''
and docket number EERE-2019-BT-STD-0036 and/or RIN 1904-AE82 in the
subject line of the message. Submit electronic comments in WordPerfect,
Microsoft Word, PDF, or ASCII file format, and avoid the use of special
characters or any form of encryption.
Although DOE has routinely accepted public comment submissions
through a variety of mechanisms, including postal mail and hand
delivery/courier, the Department has found it necessary to make
temporary modifications to the comment submission process in light of
the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic. DOE is currently accepting only
electronic submissions at this time. If a commenter finds that this
change poses an undue hardship, please contact Appliance Standards
Program staff at (202) 586-1445 to discuss the need for alternative
arrangements. Once the Covid-19 pandemic health emergency is resolved,
DOE anticipates resuming all of its regular options for public comment
submission, including postal mail and hand delivery/courier.
No telefacsimiles (faxes) will be accepted. For detailed
instructions on submitting comments and additional information on this
process, see section III of this document (Submission of Comments).
Docket: The docket for this activity, which includes Federal
Register notices, comments, and other supporting documents/materials,
is available for review at https://www.regulations.gov. All documents in
the docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov index. However,
some documents listed in the index, such as those containing
information that is exempt from public disclosure, may not be publicly
available.
The docket web page can be found at: https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=EERE-2019-BT-STD-0036. The docket web page contains
instructions on how to access all documents, including public comments,
in the docket. See section III of this document for information on how
to submit comments through https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms. Catherine Rivest, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Office, EE-5B,
1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585-0121. Telephone:
(202) 586-7335. Email: [email protected].
Mr. Eric Stas, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the General
Counsel, GC-33, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585-0121.
Telephone: (202) 586-5827. Email: [email protected].
For further information on how to submit a comment or review other
public comments and the docket, contact the Appliance and Equipment
Standards Program staff at (202) 287-1445 or by email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
A. Authority
B. Rulemaking History
II. Request for Information and Comments
A. Product Classes
B. Significant Savings of Energy
C. Technological Feasibility
D. Economic Justification
III. Submission of Comments
I. Introduction
DOE has established an early assessment review process to conduct a
more focused analysis to evaluate, based on statutory criteria, whether
a new or amended energy conservation standard is warranted. Based on
the information received in response to the RFI and DOE's own analysis,
DOE will determine whether to proceed with a rulemaking for a new or
amended energy conservation standard. If DOE makes an initial
determination that a new or amended energy conservation standard would
satisfy the applicable statutory criteria or DOE's analysis is
inconclusive, DOE would undertake the
[[Page 15805]]
preliminary stages of a rulemaking to issue a new or amended energy
conservation standard. Otherwise, if DOE makes an initial determination
based upon available evidence that a new or amended energy conservation
standard would not meet the applicable statutory criteria, DOE would
engage in notice and comment rulemaking before issuing a final
determination that new or amended energy conservation standards are not
warranted.
A. Authority
The Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended (EPCA),\1\ among
other things, authorizes DOE to regulate the energy efficiency of a
number of consumer products and certain industrial equipment. (42
U.S.C. 6291-6317) Title III, Part B \2\ of EPCA established the Energy
Conservation Program for Consumer Products Other Than Automobiles.
These products include consumer boilers, the subject of this document.
(42 U.S.C. 6292(a)(5))
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ All references to EPCA in this document refer to the statute
as amended through the Energy Act of 2020, Public Law 116-260 (Dec.
27, 2020).
\2\ For editorial reasons, upon codification in the U.S. Code,
Part B was redesignated Part A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under EPCA, DOE's energy conservation program consists essentially
of four parts: (1) Testing, (2) labeling, (3) Federal energy
conservation standards, and (4) certification and enforcement
procedures. Relevant provisions of EPCA specifically include
definitions (42 U.S.C. 6291), test procedures (42 U.S.C. 6293),
labeling provisions (42 U.S.C. 6294), energy conservation standards (42
U.S.C. 6295), and the authority to require information and reports from
manufacturers (42 U.S.C. 6296).
Federal energy efficiency requirements for covered products
established under EPCA generally supersede State laws and regulations
concerning energy conservation testing, labeling, and standards. (42
U.S.C. 6297(a)-(c)) DOE may, however, grant waivers of Federal
preemption in limited instances for particular State laws or
regulations, in accordance with the procedures and other provisions set
forth under EPCA. (42 U.S.C. 6297(d))
DOE must follow specific statutory criteria for prescribing new or
amended standards for covered products. EPCA requires that any new or
amended energy conservation standard prescribed by the Secretary of
Energy (Secretary) be designed to achieve the maximum improvement in
energy or water efficiency that is technologically feasible and
economically justified. (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(2)(A)) The Secretary may not
prescribe an amended or new standard that will not result in
significant conservation of energy or is not technologically feasible
or economically justified. (42 U.S.C. 6295(o)(3))
EPCA requires that, no later than six years after the issuance of
any final rule establishing or amending a standard, DOE evaluate the
energy conservation standards for each type of covered product,
including those at issue here, and publish either a notice of
determination that the standards do not need to be amended, or a notice
of proposed rulemaking (NOPR) that includes new proposed energy
conservation standards (proceeding to a final rule, as appropriate).
(42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(1)) DOE must make the analysis on which its notice
if based publicly available and provide an opportunity for written
comment. (42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(2)) DOE is issuing this early assessment
review pursuant to the requirements of 42 U.S.C. 6295(m)(1).
B. Rulemaking History
EPCA established energy conservation standards for consumer
furnaces and boilers in terms of the Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency
(AFUE) (42 U.S.C. 6295(f)(1)-(3)) and directed DOE to conduct a series
of rulemakings to determine whether to amend these standards (42 U.S.C.
6295(f)(4); see also 42 U.S.C. 6295(m)). DOE completed the most recent
rulemaking cycle to amend the standards for consumer boilers by
publishing a final rule in the Federal Register on January 15, 2016
(January 2016 final rule), as required under 42 U.S.C. 6295(f)(4)(C).
81 FR 2320. The January 2016 final rule adopted new standby mode and
off mode standards for consumer boilers in addition to amended AFUE
energy conservation standards. Id. Compliance with the new and amended
standards for consumer boilers is required beginning January 15, 2021.
Id. The current energy conservation standards for consumer boilers are
located at title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 430,
subpart C, section 32(e)(2). 10 CFR 430.32(e)(2). The currently
applicable DOE test procedures for consumer boilers appear at 10 CFR
part 430, subpart B, appendix N (Appendix N).
II. Request for Information and Comments
DOE is publishing this RFI to collect data and information during
the early assessment review to inform its decision, consistent with its
obligations under EPCA, as to whether the Department should proceed
with an energy conservation standards rulemaking. Below DOE has
identified certain topics for which information and data are requested
to assist in the evaluation of the potential for amended energy
conservation standards. DOE also welcomes comments on other issues
relevant to its early assessment that may not specifically be
identified in this document.
A. Product Classes
When evaluating and establishing energy conservation standards, DOE
may divide covered products into product classes by the type of energy
used, or by capacity or other performance-related features that justify
a different standard. (42 U.S.C. 6295(q)). In making a determination
whether capacity or another performance-related feature justifies a
different standard, DOE must consider such factors as the utility of
the feature to the consumer and other factors DOE deems appropriate.
(Id.)
On January 15, 2021, DOE published a final interpretive rule
determining that in the context of residential furnaces, commercial
water heaters, and similarly-situated products/equipment, use of non-
condensing technology (and associated venting) constitutes a
performance-related ``feature'' under EPCA that cannot be eliminated
through adoption of an energy conservation standard. 86 FR 4776.
Consumer boilers are similarly-situated products given that there are
consumer boilers currently on the market which employ non-condensing
technology (and the associated venting). In considering whether to
amend the energy conservation standards for consumer boilers, DOE seeks
information that would allow the agency to evaluate non-condensing
technology (and the associated venting) consistent with the final
interpretative rule, and whether a separate product class is warranted
under 42 U.S.C. 6295(q)(1).
On this topic, DOE is particularly interested in comments,
information, and data on the following:
Issue 1: DOE requests feedback on the current consumer boiler
product classes and whether changes to these individual product classes
and their descriptions should be made or whether certain classes should
be separated or merged. Specifically, with regard to consumer boilers
that use condensing technology, DOE requests information and data on
potential impacts as compared to consumer boilers that use non-
condensing technology, such as, but not limited to, the complexity/cost
of installation, changes to a home's living/storage space, and the
potential for fuel switching.
[[Page 15806]]
Issue 2: DOE also requests comment on other instances where it may
be appropriate to separate or combine any of the existing product
classes and whether such potential changes would impact product utility
by eliminating any performance-related features or reduce any
compliance burdens.
B. Significant Savings of Energy
On January 15, 2016, DOE established an energy conservation
standard for consumer boilers that is expected to result in 0.14
quadrillion British thermal units (quads) of site energy savings over a
30-year period.\3\ 81 FR 2320, 2396. The adopted levels can be met by
consumer boilers using either condensing or noncondensing technology.
Additionally, in the January 2016 final rule, DOE estimated that an
energy conservation standard established at an energy efficiency level
equivalent to that achieved using the maximum available technology
(max-tech) would have resulted in 1.295 additional quads of site energy
savings over a 30-year period. Id. For gas-fired hot water boilers and
oil-fired hot water boilers, energy conservation standards at the max-
tech levels analyzed in the January 2016 final rule could only be met
by consumer boilers utilizing condensing technology (96 percent AFUE
and 91 percent AFUE, respectively). 81 FR 2320, 2381 (Jan. 15, 2016).
The majority of the additional potential energy savings were from the
gas-fired hot water boiler product class.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ This estimate of 0.14 quads reflects site energy savings,
which for natural gas and oil are considered equal to the primary
energy savings because they are supplied to the user without
transformation from another form of energy. The January 2016 final
rule presented the 30-year energy savings estimate as 0.16 quads,
reflecting full-fuel-cycle (FFC) energy savings. The FFC measure
includes point-of-use (site) energy; the energy losses associated
with generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity; and
the energy consumed in extracting, processing, and transporting or
distributing primary fuels. For purposes of its consideration of
significant energy savings, DOE has calculated its estimate of
potential site energy savings from the estimate of FFC energy
savings in the January 2016 final rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, based on information from the DOE Compliance
Certification Management System (CCMS) certification database, non-
condensing gas-fired hot water boilers range in AFUE from 84.0 percent
to 86.1 percent, and condensing gas-fired hot water boilers range in
AFUE from 88.3 percent to 96.8 percent. Based on the CCMS certification
database, oil-fired hot water boilers currently on the market are non-
condensing and range in AFUE from 86.0 to 88.2 percent. All gas-fired
steam and oil-fired steam boilers in the CCMS certification database
are non-condensing, ranging in AFUE from 82.0 to 83.4 and 85.0 to 86.5
percent, respectively.
While DOE's request for information is not limited to the following
issues, DOE is particularly interested in comment, information, and
data on the issues discussed in the following paragraphs.
As part of the rulemaking process, DOE conducts an energy use
analysis to identify how products are used by consumers, which then
allows the Department to determine the energy savings potential of
energy efficiency improvements. The purpose of the energy use analysis
is to determine the annual energy consumption of consumer boilers at
different efficiencies in representative U.S. single-family homes,
manufactured housing, multi-family residences, and commercial
buildings, and to assess the energy savings potential of increased
consumer boiler efficiency. The energy use analysis estimates the range
of energy use of consumer boilers in the field (i.e., as they are
actually used by consumers). Furthermore, the energy use analysis
provides the basis for other analyses DOE performs, particularly
assessments of the energy savings and the savings in consumer operating
costs that could result from adoption of amended or new standards,
including the life-cycle cost (LCC) and payback period (PBP) analysis
and the national impact analysis (NIA). DOE will estimate the annual
energy consumption of consumer boilers at specified energy efficiency
levels across a range of applications, house or building types, and
climate zones. Similar to the January 2016 final rule, DOE intends to
determine the annual energy consumption, including the use of natural
gas, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), oil, or electricity for space and
water heating,\4\ as well as use of electricity for any auxiliary
components.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Space heating applications for consumer boilers include
radiant heating (e.g., in-floor, radiant panels, radiators,
baseboard) and forced air using fan coils or central air handlers.
Domestic water heating applications for consumer boilers include
indirect water heating, combination products, and tankless coil.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issue 3: DOE requests feedback on the levels of energy savings that
could be expected from the adoption of a more-stringent standard for
consumer boilers. Specifically, with regard to potential product class
changes discussed in section II.A of this RFI, DOE requests information
and data on the potential change in energy savings if certain classes
are split or merged.
Issue 4: DOE seeks input and sources of data or recommendations to
support sizing of consumer boilers typical in consumer space heating
and water heating applications.
Issue 5: DOE requests comment on the fraction of installations and
classes of consumer boilers that are used in commercial applications.
Issue 6: DOE seeks field data and input on representative space
heating usage, space heating load profile, and representative return
water temperatures for consumer boilers used in various consumer and
commercial space heating applications.
Issue 7: DOE requests comment on the fraction of installations by
consumer boiler product classes used for different space heating
applications include radiant heating (in-floor, radiant panels,
radiators, baseboards) and forced air using fan coils or central air
handlers.
Issue 8: DOE seeks input on adjusting AFUE for different return
water temperatures, for automatic means for adjusting water
temperature, and for jacket losses. DOE seeks input on any other
adjustments to AFUE to better capture field conditions. DOE also seeks
data on the relationship between return water temperature and AFUE to
more accurately calculate the return water temperature adjustment.
Issue 9: DOE seeks additional data on the fraction of boiler
shipments that go to installations that serve both space heating and
water heating by product class, by efficiency level or boiler
technology type (e.g., non-condensing and condensing), and type of
water heating (e.g., indirect tank water heating, combination products,
and tankless coil).
C. Technological Feasibility
DOE considers technologies incorporated in commercially-available
products or in working prototypes to be technologically feasible. 10
CFR part 430. subpart C, appendix A, sections 6(c)(3)(i) and 7(b)(1).
In the rulemaking proceeding leading to the January 2016 final rule,
DOE considered a number of technology options that manufacturers could
use to reduce energy consumption in consumer boilers. 81 FR 2320, 2340-
2341 (Jan. 15, 2016). Table II.1 shows the technologies previously
considered for the January 2016 final rule.
[[Page 15807]]
Table II.1--Technology Options for Consumer Boilers Considered in the
Development of the January 2016 Final Rule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Heat exchanger improvements.
Modulating operation.
Dampers.[dagger]
Direct vent.
Pulse combustion.*
Premix burners.
Burner derating.*
Delayed-action oil pump solenoid valve.
Electronic ignition.[dagger]
Low-pressure air-atomized oil burner.
Transformer improvements (standby mode and off mode).
Control relay for models with brushless permanent magnet motors (standby
mode and off mode).*
Switching mode power supply (standby mode and off mode).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[dagger] Technology already in baseline units, so not considered
further.
* Screened-out technology.
DOE seeks comment on any changes to these technology options that
could affect DOE's evaluation of whether energy conservation standards
need to be amended. DOE also seeks comment on whether there are any
other technology options that DOE should consider in its analysis.
While DOE's request for information is not limited to the following
issues, DOE is particularly interested in comment, information, and
data on the following:
Issue 10: DOE seeks information on technologies that may impact the
efficiency of consumer boilers as measured according to the DOE test
procedure. DOE also seeks information on how these technologies may
have changed since they were considered in the January 2016 final rule
analysis. Specifically, DOE seeks information on the range of
efficiencies or performance characteristics that are currently
available for each technology option.
Issue 11: DOE seeks comment on other technology options that it
should consider for inclusion in its analysis and whether these
technologies would be expected to impact product features or consumer
utility of consumer boilers.
DOE defines the max-tech efficiency level to represent the
theoretical maximum possible efficiency if all available design options
are incorporated in a model. In the January 2016 final rule, the max-
tech efficiency levels for AFUE corresponded to the maximum available
AFUE levels in products on the market at the time of the analysis
(except for oil-fired hot water boilers for which the max-tech level
was slightly below the maximum available level).\5\ For standby mode
and off mode energy consumption, the max-tech efficiency levels (i.e.,
the levels with the lowest amount of energy consumption) were
determined by starting with the baseline design and implementing design
options based on cost-effectiveness until all available technologies
were employed.\6\ At the time this RFI was drafted, based on data from
the CCMS database, the maximum available AFUE efficiency levels
currently on the market for the subject products are as follows: 86.1
percent for non-condensing gas-fired hot water boilers, 96.8 percent
for condensing gas-fired hot water boilers, 88.2 percent for oil-fired
hot water boilers (which are all non-condensing), 83.4 percent for gas-
fired steam boilers (which are all non-condensing), and 86.5 percent
oil-fired steam boilers (which are all non-condensing). In the January
2016 final rule, DOE identified the max-tech level for standby mode and
off mode consumption as follows: 9 watts for gas-fired hot water
boilers; 8 watts for gas-fired steam, electric hot water, and electric
steam boilers; and 11 watts for oil-fired hot water and oil-fired steam
boilers. 81 FR 2320, 2345-2346 (Jan. 15, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See the technical support document for the January 2016
final rule, Chapter 3, section 3.2.9 and chapter 5, section 5.4.4.
Available at: https://www.regulations.gov/document/EERE-2012-BT-STD-0047-0070.
\6\ See the technical support document for the January 2016
final rule, chapter 5, section 5.4.2. Available at: https://www.regulations.gov/document/EERE-2012-BT-STD-0047-0070.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issue 12: DOE seeks input on whether the maximum available AFUE
efficiency levels are appropriate and technologically feasible for
potential consideration as possible energy conservation standards--and
if not, why not. DOE also seeks feedback on the design options
incorporated at max-tech efficiency levels. As part of this request,
DOE also seeks information as to whether there are limitations on the
use of certain combinations of design options.
Issue 13: DOE seeks input on the max-tech standby mode and off mode
efficiency levels. In particular, are more-stringent (i.e., lower)
standby mode and off mode efficiency levels technologically feasible
that are appropriate for consideration as possible energy conservation
standards, and if so, what are the design options incorporated at those
levels. DOE also seeks information as to whether there are limitations
on the use of certain combinations of design options.
D. Economic Justification
In determining whether a proposed energy conservation standard is
economically justified, DOE analyzes, among other things, the potential
economic impact on consumers, manufacturers, and the Nation. DOE seeks
comment on whether there are economic barriers to the adoption of more-
stringent energy conservation standards for consumer boilers. DOE also
seeks comment and data on any other aspects of its economic
justification analysis from the January 2016 final rule that may
indicate whether a more-stringent energy conservation standard would be
economically justified or cost-effective.
While DOE's request for information is not limited to the following
issues, DOE is particularly interested in comment, information, and
data on the issues discussed in the following paragraphs.
In its analysis, DOE intends to take into account consumer prices
from locations where ultra-low-NOX gas-fired hot water and
steam boilers would be required by the compliance date for any amended
standards, such as the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (AQMD)
(Regulation 9, Rule 6),\7\
[[Page 15808]]
Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD (Rule 414),\8\ San Joaquin Valley Air
Pollution Control District (APCD) (Rule 4308),\9\ Santa Barbara County
APCD (Rule 360),\10\ South Coast AQMD (Rule 1146.2),\11\ and Ventura
County AQMD (Rule 74-11.1).\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Regulation 9:
Inorganic Gaseous Pollutants; Rule 6: Nitrogen Oxides Emissions from
Natural Gas-Fired Boilers and Water Heaters (Available at: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/drdb/ba/curhtml/r9-6.pdf) (Last accessed October 30,
2019).
\8\ Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District,
Rule 414: Water Heaters, Boilers and Process Heaters Rated Less Than
1,000,000 BTU PER HOUR Adopted 08-01-96 (Amended 03-25-10)
(Available at: https://www.airquality.org/ProgramCoordination/Documents/rule414.pdf) (Last accessed October 30, 2019).
\9\ San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District, Rule
4308: Boilers, Steam Generators, and Process Heaters--0.075 MMBtu/hr
to less than 2.0 MMBtu/hr (Adopted October 20, 2005, amended
December 17, 2009, Amended November 14, 2013) (Available at: https://www.valleyair.org/rules/currntrules/03-4308_CleanRule.pdf) (Last
accessed October 30, 2019).
\10\ Santa Barbara County Air Pollution Control District, Rule
360: Boilers, Steam Generators, and Process Heaters (0.075-2 MMBtu/
hr) (Adopted 10/17/2002, revised 3/15/2018) (Available at: https://www.ourair.org/wp-content/uploads/rule360.pdf) (Last accessed
October 30, 2019).
\11\ South Coast Air Quality Management District, Rule 1146.2:
Emissions of Oxides of Nitrogen from Large Water Heaters and Small
Boilers and Process Heaters (Adopted January 9, 1998, amended
January 7, 2005, amended May 5, 2006, amended December 7, 2018)
(Available at: https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/rule-book/reg-xi/rule-1146-2.pdf?sfvrsn=17) (Last accessed October 30, 2019).
\12\ Ventura County Air Quality Management District, Rule 74-
11.1: Large Water Heaters and Small Boilers (Adopted 9/14/99,
revised 9/11/12) (Available at: https://vcapcd.org/Rulebook/Reg4/RULE%2074.11.1.pdf) (Last accessed October 30, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issue 14: DOE seeks input on whether there are additional
jurisdictions requiring ultra-low-NOX gas-fired hot water
and steam boilers.
In the January 2016 final rule, to determine the venting
installation costs for consumer boilers, DOE considered vent categories
as defined in the National Fuel Gas Code.\13\ 81 FR 2320, 2359-2361
(Jan. 15, 2016). In its analysis, DOE determined that all natural draft
boilers and a fraction of mechanical draft boilers would be vented as a
Category I appliance (negative pressure vent system with high
temperature flue gases). DOE determined that the remaining fraction of
mechanical draft boilers would be vented as a Category III appliance
(positive pressure vent system with high temperature flue gases). DOE
determined that very few non-condensing models would be installed as a
Category II appliance (negative pressure vent system with low
temperature flue gases) or a Category IV appliance (positive pressure
vent system with low flue gases temperatures). However, DOE determined
that all condensing installations would be vented as a Category IV
appliance. For non-condensing boilers, DOE accounted for both commonly-
vented consumer boilers (together with a water heater) and isolated
consumer boilers (separately vented). For replacements, DOE added any
costs associated with updating or repairing existing flue venting
including vent resizing, chimney relining, and updating of flue vent
connectors. DOE also accounted for additional labor costs associated
with larger boilers, replacing a larger drain pan, and potential space-
constraint issues when the original boiler location is too small to
accommodate the replacement boiler. For efficiency levels that include
electronic ignition, power vent, or condensing design, DOE added the
cost of installing an electrical outlet, a new venting system, any
additional cost for condensate disposal, any additional costs for
secondary and primary piping, and cost of a Y-strainer, if required for
a fraction of installations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ Available at: https://catalog.nfpa.org/NFPA-54ANSI-Z2231-National-Fuel-Gas-Code-P1184.aspx (Last accessed March 5, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the January 2016 final rule, DOE also included installation
adders for new construction, as well as for new owner installations for
hot water gas-fired boilers. 81 FR 2320, 2361 (Jan. 15, 2016). For non-
condensing boilers, the only adder would be a new metal flue vent
(including a fraction with stainless steel venting) and condensate
withdrawal for a fraction of category III models. For condensing gas
boilers, the additional costs for new construction installations
related to potential amended standards would include a new flue vent,
combustion air venting for direct vent installations and accounting for
a commonly-vented water heater, and condensate withdrawal.
Issue 15: DOE seeks input on issues and costs associated with
venting of flue gases of boilers, in particular regarding retrofit
issues related to installing a new vent system for higher-efficiency
consumer boilers, disconnecting the existing consumer boiler from a
non-condensing common venting system, and upgrading existing non-
condensing venting (chimney relining or vent resizing). DOE also seeks
input on how often and in what applications direct venting or sealed
combustion are used or required.
Issue 16: DOE seeks input on issues and costs associated with
condensate disposal for higher-efficiency consumer boilers,
specifically how often and in what applications a condensate filter or
a condensate pump is installed.
Issue 17: DOE seeks input on issues and costs associated with
installing consumer boilers in multi-family buildings.
DOE measures LCC and PBP impacts of potential standard levels
relative to a no-new-standards case that reflects the likely market in
the absence of amended standards. Similar to the 2016 final rule, DOE
plans to develop market-share efficiency data (i.e., the distribution
of product shipments by efficiency) for the product classes DOE is
considering, for the year in which compliance with any potential
amended standards would be required. For the 2016 final rule, DOE
developed market shares of different consumer boiler energy efficiency
levels in the no-new-standards case, using historical shipments data
provided by stakeholders, data from the Air-Conditioning, Heating and
Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) contractor survey, and ENERGY STAR unit
shipment data for residential boilers.\14\ 81 FR 2320, 2364-2366 (Jan.
15, 2016). If DOE determines that a rulemaking is necessary, DOE
intends to use the most recent data available from these sources,
together with any more current data that may be provided by
stakeholders. Also similar to the January 2016 final rule, because
these data may not cover all of the energy efficiency levels under
consideration, DOE intends to use most the recent data on the number of
water heater models at different energy efficiency levels, as reported
in DOE's compliance certification database,\15\ the AHRI directory of
certified product performance,\16\ the California Energy Commission
appliance efficiency database,\17\ and the ENERGY STAR certified boiler
directory.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ ENERGY STAR, Unit Shipments data (Available at: https://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=partners.unit_shipment_data) (Last
accessed October 30, 2019).
\15\ U.S. Department of Energy, Compliance Certification
Database (Available at: https://www.regulations.doe.gov/certification-data/#q=Product_Group_s%3A*) (Last accessed October
30, 2019).
\16\ Air-Conditioning Heating and Refrigeration Institute,
Directory of Certified Product Performance for Residential Boilers
(Available at: https://www.ahridirectory.org/NewSearch?programId=25&searchTypeId=3) (Last accessed October 30,
2019).
\17\ California Energy Commission (CEC), Appliance Efficiency
Database. (Available at: https://cacertappliances.energy.ca.gov/Pages/ApplianceSearch.aspx) (Last accessed October 30, 2019).
\18\ ENERGY STAR, ENERGY STAR Certified Boilers Directory
(Available at: https://www.energystar.gov/productfinder/product/certified-boilers/results) (Last accessed October 30, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issue 18: DOE requests shipments data for consumer boilers, broken
down by product class, that show current
[[Page 15809]]
market shares by efficiency level. DOE also seeks input on similar
historic data from 2016-2020.
Issue 19: DOE also requests information on expected future trends
in efficiency for consumer boiler product classes, including the
relative market shares of condensing versus non-condensing products in
the market for gas-fired and oil-fired hot water boilers in the absence
of amended efficiency standards.
Issue 20: DOE requests 2016-2020 data on the fraction of sales in
the residential and commercial sector for consumer boilers.
Issue 21: DOE requests comment on the anticipated future market
share of higher-efficiency products, such as condensing gas-fired and
oil-fired hot water boilers, as compared to less-efficient products for
each consumer boiler product class.
III. Submission of Comments
DOE invites all interested parties to submit in writing by the date
specified under the DATES heading of this document, comments and
information on matters addressed in this RFI and on other matters
relevant to DOE's early assessment of whether more-stringent energy
conservation standards are warranted for consumer boilers.
Submitting comments via https://www.regulations.gov. The https://www.regulations.gov web page requires you to provide your name and
contact information. Your contact information will be viewable to DOE
Building Technologies staff only. Your contact information will not be
publicly viewable except for your first and last names, organization
name (if any), and submitter representative name (if any). If your
comment is not processed properly because of technical difficulties,
DOE will use this information to contact you. If DOE cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, DOE may not be able to consider your comment.
However, your contact information will be publicly viewable if you
include it in the comment or in any documents attached to your comment.
Any information that you do not want to be publicly viewable should not
be included in your comment, nor in any document attached to your
comment. If this instruction is followed, persons viewing comments will
see only first and last names, organization names, correspondence
containing comments, and any documents submitted with the comments.
Do not submit to https://www.regulations.gov information for which
disclosure is restricted by statute, such as trade secrets and
commercial or financial information (hereinafter referred to as
Confidential Business Information (CBI)). Comments submitted through
https://www.regulations.gov cannot be claimed as CBI. Comments received
through the website will waive any CBI claims for the information
submitted. For information on submitting CBI, see the Confidential
Business Information section.
DOE processes submissions made through https://www.regulations.gov
before posting. Normally, comments will be posted within a few days of
being submitted. However, if large volumes of comments are being
processed simultaneously, your comment may not be viewable for up to
several weeks. Please keep the comment tracking number that https://www.regulations.gov provides after you have successfully uploaded your
comment.
Submitting comments via email. Comments and documents submitted via
email also will be posted to https://www.regulations.gov. If you do not
want your personal contact information to be publicly viewable, do not
include it in your comment or any accompanying documents. Instead,
provide your contact information in a cover letter. Include your first
and last names, email address, telephone number, and optional mailing
address. The cover letter will not be publicly viewable as long as it
does not include any comments.
Include contact information each time you submit comments, data,
documents, and other information to DOE. Telefacsimiles (faxes) will
not be accepted.
Comments, data, and other information submitted to DOE
electronically should be provided in PDF (preferred), Microsoft Word or
Excel, WordPerfect, or text (ASCII) file format. Provide documents that
are not secured, written in English, and free of any defects or
viruses. Documents should not contain special characters or any form of
encryption and, if possible, they should carry the electronic signature
of the author.
Campaign form letters. Please submit campaign form letters by the
originating organization in batches of between 50 to 500 form letters
per PDF or as one form letter with a list of supporters' names compiled
into one or more PDFs. This reduces comment processing and posting
time.
Confidential Business Information. Pursuant to 10 CFR 1004.11, any
person submitting information that he or she believes to be
confidential and exempt by law from public disclosure should submit via
email two well-marked copies: One copy of the document marked
``confidential'' including all the information believed to be
confidential, and one copy of the document marked ``non-confidential''
with the information believed to be confidential deleted. DOE will make
its own determination about the confidential status of the information
and treat it according to its determination.
It is DOE's policy that all comments may be included in the public
docket, without change and as received, including any personal
information provided in the comments (except information deemed to be
exempt from public disclosure).
DOE considers public participation to be a very important part of
the process for developing test procedures and energy conservation
standards. DOE actively encourages the participation and interaction of
the public during the comment period in each stage of this process.
Interactions with and between members of the public provide a balanced
discussion of the issues and assist DOE in the process. Anyone who
wishes to be added to the DOE mailing list to receive future notices
and information about this process should contact Appliance and
Equipment Standards Program staff at (202) 287-1445 or via email at
[email protected].
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of Energy was signed on March 18,
2021, by Kelly Speakes-Backman, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary
and Acting Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy, pursuant to delegated authority from the Secretary of Energy.
That document with the original signature and date is maintained by
DOE. For administrative purposes only, and in compliance with
requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, the undersigned DOE
Federal Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to sign and submit
the document in electronic format for publication, as an official
document of the Department of Energy. This administrative process in no
way alters the legal effect of this document upon publication in the
Federal Register.
[[Page 15810]]
Signed in Washington, DC, on March 19, 2021.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2021-06071 Filed 3-24-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P