Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the West Fork Kickapoo Watershed, Monroe and Vernon Counties, Wisconsin, 15641-15642 [2021-06049]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 24, 2021 / Notices
received, including the names and
addresses of those who comment, will
be part of the public record. Scoping
meeting presentation materials will be
available on the project website when
this notice is published:
www.wfkandccwatershed.com. The
date, time, and location for the second
meeting will be announced on the
project website.
Alternatives
Federal Assistance Programs
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Natural Resources Conservation
Service
[Docket No. NRCS–2020–0006]
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for
the West Fork Kickapoo Watershed,
Monroe and Vernon Counties,
Wisconsin
Natural Resources
Conservation Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
AGENCY:
The objective of the EIS is to
formulate and evaluate alternatives for
flood prevention or flood damage
reduction in the Coon Creek Valley
through the Village of Chaseburg.
Alternatives to be evaluated include the
repair, replacement, relocation, or
removal of the three failed dams, final
disposition of future dams that fail or
require major rehabilitation, upland
watershed treatments to reduce runoff,
and land use changes in the floodplain.
Implementation of the proposed
federal action would require a Clean
Water Act (CWA) Section 404 permit
from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
The project would also require water
quality certification under Section 401
of the CWA. Permitting under Section
402 of the CWA (National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System Permit)
may be required. Local dam safety and
floodplain permits may be required
dependent upon the selected
alternative. A draft EIS will be prepared
and circulated for review and comment
by agencies and the public per 40 CFR
1503.1, 1502.20, 1506.11, 1502.17, and
7 CFR 650.13. The draft EIS is estimated
to be complete and available for public
review in 2021. NRCS invites agencies
and individuals who have special
expertise, legal jurisdiction, or interest
in the Coon Creek Watershed to
participate and identify potential
alternatives.
The title and number of the Federal
assistance program in the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance to which
this NOFA applies: 10.904 Watershed
Protection and Flood Prevention- and is
subject to the provisions of Executive
Order 12372, which requires
intergovernmental consultation with
State and local officials.
Angela Biggs,
Wisconsin State Conservationist, Natural
Resources Conservation Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–06050 Filed 3–23–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–16–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
16:30 Mar 23, 2021
Jkt 253001
The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) Wisconsin
State Office announces its intent to
prepare an EIS for the West Fork
Kickapoo Watershed Project in the
proximity of Cashton, Westby, Viroqua,
and Liberty, Wisconsin. NRCS is
requesting comments to identify
significant issues and alternatives to be
addressed in the EIS from all interested
individuals. The EIS process will
examine existing flood control measures
and evaluate additional (new)
alternatives identified during scoping.
DATES: We will consider comments that
we receive by April 23, 2021. Comments
received after this date will be
considered to the extent possible.
ADDRESSES: We invite you to submit
comments in response to this notice.
You may submit your comments
through one of the methods below:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for docket ID NRCS–2020–0006. Follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments; or
• Mail or Hand Delivery: Keri Hill,
Project Manager, Sundance Consulting,
Inc., 305 N 3rd Ave., Ste. B, Pocatello,
ID 83201.
For written comments that are
submitted via mail, specify the docket
ID NRCS–2020–0006. All comments
received will be posted without change
and publicly available on
www.regulation.gov.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Angela Biggs, telephone: 608–662–4422;
email: angela.biggs@usda.gov. In
addition, for questions related to
submitting comments via Sundance Hill
Consulting: Kari Hill at 202–274–9004,
Fax (208) 478–2032, khill@sundanceinc.net, or the project website at:
www.wfkandccwatershed.com. Persons
with disabilities who require alternative
means for communication should
contact the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) Target Center at
(202) 720–2600 (voice).
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
15641
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need
The primary purpose for watershed
planning and preparation of an EIS is
flood prevention and flood damage
reduction in the West Fork Kickapoo
Valley. Watershed planning was
authorized under Public Law 83–566,
the Watershed Protection and Flood
Prevention Act of 1954, as amended,
and Public Law 78–534, the Flood
Control Act of 1944.
This proposed action is prepared
under the authority of the Watershed
Prevention and Flood Protection Act
(Pub. L. 83–566). This action is needed
because two flood control dams failed,
and two additional dams over-topped
during an 11-inch rainstorm on August
27–28, 2018. These dams are critical to
prevent future flood damages and loss of
life.
Initial agency scoping of this federally
assisted action indicates that proposed
alternatives may have significant local,
regional, or national impacts on the
environment. Angela Biggs, State
Conservationist, has determined that the
preparation of an EIS is needed. This
EIS will be prepared as required by
section 102(2)(C) of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA); the Council on Environmental
Quality Regulations (40 CFR parts 1500–
1508); and NRCS regulations that
implement NEPA in 7 CFR part 650.
Description
A watershed project plan was
developed in 1961 to reduce flood
damages in the West Fork Kickapoo
Valley. Major problems in the watershed
were floodwater damages to crops and
pasture, fences, farmsteads, machinery,
buildings, livestock, county and
township roads and bridges, and urban
areas in the Town of Liberty. Nine flood
control dams and a multitude of land
treatment measures were implemented
between 1956 and 1971 under the
Watershed Protection and Flood
Prevention Act of 1954, as amended in
1956.
On the night of August 27, 2018, two
dams over-topped and two dams failed
as a result of rainfall amounts up to 11
inches over a 6-hour period. The dams
breached along the interface between
the earthfill and bedrock abutments.
Each breach extended full depth to the
valley floor. No one was injured or
killed. Large debris fields were observed
downstream of the dams for about 1⁄4
mile. An unoccupied house was moved
off its foundation. Agricultural lands
and road crossings were damaged. The
Sponsors and NRCS are concerned
about the commonality in breach
E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM
24MRN1
15642
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 55 / Wednesday, March 24, 2021 / Notices
descriptions. The consensus is that flow
through the foundations during high
pool stage contributed to the failures. A
similar vulnerability may exist in the
remaining seven dams.
NRCS is proposing to develop a
Watershed Project Plan (Planning-EIS)
to evaluate alternatives to reduce flood
damage in the West Fork Kickapoo
valley including analysis of the flood
control structures and the watershed.
Watershed planning under the EIS will
evaluate the effectiveness,
environmental effects, and socioeconomic impacts of the original project
measures over the last 64 years. The
results of these analyses will provide
the context for determining the
environmental, economic, and social
effects of considered alternatives for
additional (new) flood prevention or
flood damage reduction measures.
Potential impacts (beneficial and
adverse) related to the project include
modifications to ecological habitat, fish
and wildlife resources, downstream
effects, flood control capability,
floodplain alteration, safety and
engineering improvements, cultural
resources, environmental justice, and
recreation. An in-depth analysis of
impacts will be evaluated for each
alternative in the draft Planning-EIS.
The focused planning area is 63,761
acres (99.6 square miles).
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Scoping Process
Two scoping meetings will be held to
present the project and develop the
scope of the draft EIS. The first meeting
was Wednesday, September 16, 2020 at
the Cashton Community Hall.
Comments received, including the
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be part of the public
record. Scoping meeting presentation
materials will be available on the project
website when this notice is published:
www.wfkandccwatershed.com. The
date, time, and location for the second
meeting will be announced on the
project website.
Alternatives
The objective of the EIS is to
formulate and evaluate alternatives for
flood prevention or flood damage
reduction in the West Fork Kickapoo
Valley through the Town of Liberty.
Alternatives to be evaluated include the
repair, replacement, relocation, or
removal of the two failed dams, final
disposition of future dams that fail or
require major rehabilitation, upland
watershed treatments to reduce runoff,
and land use changes in the floodplain.
Implementation of the proposed
federal action would require a Clean
Water Act (CWA) Section 404 permit
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:30 Mar 23, 2021
Jkt 253001
from the US Army Corps of Engineers.
The project would also require water
quality certification under Section 401
of the CWA. Permitting under Section
402 of the CWA (National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System Permit)
may be required. Local dam safety and
floodplain permits may be required
dependent upon the selected
alternative. A draft EIS will be prepared
and circulated for review and comment
by agencies and the public per 40 CFR
1503.1, 1502.20, 1506.11, 1502.17, and
7 CFR 650.13. The draft EIS is estimated
to be complete and available for public
review in 2021. NRCS invites agencies
and individuals who have special
expertise, legal jurisdiction, or interest
in the West Fork Kickapoo Watershed to
participate and identify potential
alternatives.
Federal Assistance Programs
The title and number of the Federal
assistance program in the Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance to which
this NOFA applies: 10.904 Watershed
Protection and Flood Prevention and is
subject to the provisions of Executive
Order 12372, which requires
intergovernmental consultation with
State and local officials.
Angela Biggs,
Wisconsin State Conservationist, Natural
Resources Conservation Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–06049 Filed 3–23–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–16–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[B–23–2021]
Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 7—
Mayaguez, Puerto Rico; Notification of
Proposed Production Activity; IPR
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; (Pharmaceutical
Products); Canovanas, Puerto Rico
IPR Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (IPR
Pharmaceuticals) submitted a
notification of proposed production
activity to the FTZ Board for its facility
in Canovanas, Puerto Rico. The
notification conforming to the
requirements of the regulations of the
FTZ Board (15 CFR 400.22) was
received on March 15, 2021.
IPR Pharmaceuticals already has
authority to produce certain
pharmaceutical products within FTZ 7.
The current request would add a
finished product and foreign status
material to the scope of authority.
Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b),
additional FTZ authority would be
limited to the specific foreign-status
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
material and specific finished product
described in the submitted notification
(as described below) and subsequently
authorized by the FTZ Board.
Production under FTZ procedures
could exempt IPR Pharmaceuticals from
customs duty payments on the foreignstatus materials/components used in
export production. On its domestic
sales, for the foreign-status materials/
components noted below and in the
existing scope of authority, IPR
Pharmaceuticals would be able to
choose the duty rate during customs
entry procedures that applies to
FARXIGA\FORXIGA (dapagliflozin)
tablets (duty-free). IPR Pharmaceuticals
would be able to avoid duty on foreignstatus components which become scrap/
waste. Customs duties also could
possibly be deferred or reduced on
foreign-status production equipment.
The material sourced from abroad is
dapagliflozin active pharmaceutical
ingredient (duty rate 6.5%). The request
indicates the foreign-status material is
subject to duties under Section 301 of
the Trade Act of 1974 (Section 301),
depending on the country of origin. The
applicable Section 301 decisions require
subject merchandise to be admitted to
FTZs in privileged foreign status (19
CFR 146.41).
Public comment is invited from
interested parties. Submissions shall be
addressed to the Board’s Executive
Secretary and sent to: ftz@trade.gov. The
closing period for their receipt is May 3,
2021.
A copy of the notification will be
available for public inspection in the
‘‘Reading Room’’ section of the Board’s
website, which is accessible via
www.trade.gov/ftz.
For further information, contact
Christopher Wedderburn at
Chris.Wedderburn@trade.gov.
Dated: March 19, 2021.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–06064 Filed 3–23–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
[B–22–2021]
Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 123—
Denver, Colorado, Notification of
Proposed Production Activity;
Lockheed Martin Corporation,
Lockheed Martin Space (Satellites and
Other Spacecraft), Littleton, Colorado
Lockheed Martin Corporation,
Lockheed Martin Space (formerly
E:\FR\FM\24MRN1.SGM
24MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 24, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15641-15642]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-06049]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation Service
[Docket No. NRCS-2020-0006]
Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for
the West Fork Kickapoo Watershed, Monroe and Vernon Counties, Wisconsin
AGENCY: Natural Resources Conservation Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Wisconsin
State Office announces its intent to prepare an EIS for the West Fork
Kickapoo Watershed Project in the proximity of Cashton, Westby,
Viroqua, and Liberty, Wisconsin. NRCS is requesting comments to
identify significant issues and alternatives to be addressed in the EIS
from all interested individuals. The EIS process will examine existing
flood control measures and evaluate additional (new) alternatives
identified during scoping.
DATES: We will consider comments that we receive by April 23, 2021.
Comments received after this date will be considered to the extent
possible.
ADDRESSES: We invite you to submit comments in response to this notice.
You may submit your comments through one of the methods below:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for docket ID NRCS-2020-0006. Follow the
online instructions for submitting comments; or
Mail or Hand Delivery: Keri Hill, Project Manager,
Sundance Consulting, Inc., 305 N 3rd Ave., Ste. B, Pocatello, ID 83201.
For written comments that are submitted via mail, specify the
docket ID NRCS-2020-0006. All comments received will be posted without
change and publicly available on www.regulation.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angela Biggs, telephone: 608-662-4422;
email: [email protected]. In addition, for questions related to
submitting comments via Sundance Hill Consulting: Kari Hill at 202-274-
9004, Fax (208) 478-2032, inc.net">[email protected]inc.net, or the project
website at: www.wfkandccwatershed.com. Persons with disabilities who
require alternative means for communication should contact the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA) Target Center at (202) 720-2600
(voice).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need
The primary purpose for watershed planning and preparation of an
EIS is flood prevention and flood damage reduction in the West Fork
Kickapoo Valley. Watershed planning was authorized under Public Law 83-
566, the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act of 1954, as
amended, and Public Law 78-534, the Flood Control Act of 1944.
This proposed action is prepared under the authority of the
Watershed Prevention and Flood Protection Act (Pub. L. 83-566). This
action is needed because two flood control dams failed, and two
additional dams over-topped during an 11-inch rainstorm on August 27-
28, 2018. These dams are critical to prevent future flood damages and
loss of life.
Initial agency scoping of this federally assisted action indicates
that proposed alternatives may have significant local, regional, or
national impacts on the environment. Angela Biggs, State
Conservationist, has determined that the preparation of an EIS is
needed. This EIS will be prepared as required by section 102(2)(C) of
the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA); the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations (40 CFR parts 1500-1508); and NRCS
regulations that implement NEPA in 7 CFR part 650.
Description
A watershed project plan was developed in 1961 to reduce flood
damages in the West Fork Kickapoo Valley. Major problems in the
watershed were floodwater damages to crops and pasture, fences,
farmsteads, machinery, buildings, livestock, county and township roads
and bridges, and urban areas in the Town of Liberty. Nine flood control
dams and a multitude of land treatment measures were implemented
between 1956 and 1971 under the Watershed Protection and Flood
Prevention Act of 1954, as amended in 1956.
On the night of August 27, 2018, two dams over-topped and two dams
failed as a result of rainfall amounts up to 11 inches over a 6-hour
period. The dams breached along the interface between the earthfill and
bedrock abutments. Each breach extended full depth to the valley floor.
No one was injured or killed. Large debris fields were observed
downstream of the dams for about \1/4\ mile. An unoccupied house was
moved off its foundation. Agricultural lands and road crossings were
damaged. The Sponsors and NRCS are concerned about the commonality in
breach
[[Page 15642]]
descriptions. The consensus is that flow through the foundations during
high pool stage contributed to the failures. A similar vulnerability
may exist in the remaining seven dams.
NRCS is proposing to develop a Watershed Project Plan (Planning-
EIS) to evaluate alternatives to reduce flood damage in the West Fork
Kickapoo valley including analysis of the flood control structures and
the watershed. Watershed planning under the EIS will evaluate the
effectiveness, environmental effects, and socio-economic impacts of the
original project measures over the last 64 years. The results of these
analyses will provide the context for determining the environmental,
economic, and social effects of considered alternatives for additional
(new) flood prevention or flood damage reduction measures. Potential
impacts (beneficial and adverse) related to the project include
modifications to ecological habitat, fish and wildlife resources,
downstream effects, flood control capability, floodplain alteration,
safety and engineering improvements, cultural resources, environmental
justice, and recreation. An in-depth analysis of impacts will be
evaluated for each alternative in the draft Planning-EIS. The focused
planning area is 63,761 acres (99.6 square miles).
Scoping Process
Two scoping meetings will be held to present the project and
develop the scope of the draft EIS. The first meeting was Wednesday,
September 16, 2020 at the Cashton Community Hall. Comments received,
including the names and addresses of those who comment, will be part of
the public record. Scoping meeting presentation materials will be
available on the project website when this notice is published:
www.wfkandccwatershed.com. The date, time, and location for the second
meeting will be announced on the project website.
Alternatives
The objective of the EIS is to formulate and evaluate alternatives
for flood prevention or flood damage reduction in the West Fork
Kickapoo Valley through the Town of Liberty. Alternatives to be
evaluated include the repair, replacement, relocation, or removal of
the two failed dams, final disposition of future dams that fail or
require major rehabilitation, upland watershed treatments to reduce
runoff, and land use changes in the floodplain.
Implementation of the proposed federal action would require a Clean
Water Act (CWA) Section 404 permit from the US Army Corps of Engineers.
The project would also require water quality certification under
Section 401 of the CWA. Permitting under Section 402 of the CWA
(National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit) may be
required. Local dam safety and floodplain permits may be required
dependent upon the selected alternative. A draft EIS will be prepared
and circulated for review and comment by agencies and the public per 40
CFR 1503.1, 1502.20, 1506.11, 1502.17, and 7 CFR 650.13. The draft EIS
is estimated to be complete and available for public review in 2021.
NRCS invites agencies and individuals who have special expertise, legal
jurisdiction, or interest in the West Fork Kickapoo Watershed to
participate and identify potential alternatives.
Federal Assistance Programs
The title and number of the Federal assistance program in the
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance to which this NOFA applies:
10.904 Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention and is subject to the
provisions of Executive Order 12372, which requires intergovernmental
consultation with State and local officials.
Angela Biggs,
Wisconsin State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation
Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-06049 Filed 3-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-16-P