Implementation of Executive Order on Access to Affordable Life-Saving Medications; Final Rule; Delay of Effective Date, 15423-15426 [2021-05981]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 23, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Where:
K5 = 4.3209 for metric units = 0.09450 for
English units.
*
*
*
*
16.1.1.4 Calculate flow rate, Q, for
each run using the wet test meter
volume, Vw, and the run time, q.
Calculate the DGM coefficient, Yds, for
*
Yds
Where:
K1 = 0.38572 °K/mm Hg for metric units =
17.636 °R/in. Hg for English units.
Vw = Wet test meter volume, liter (ft3).
Vds = Dry gas meter volume, liter (ft3).
Tds = Average dry gas meter temperature, °C
(°F).
=
Vw(Td 5 +Tstd)Pbartl
v ds(Tw+Tstd)(Pbar+ 1;6)
=
K 1 Vm[Pbar+(~)]
Tm
- K'
Vcr(std) -
Pbar0
.Jr
amb
Pbar 8
Y=--
each run. These calculations are as
follows:
Eq. 5-10
Tadj = 273.15 °C for metric units = 459.67 °F
for English units.
Tw = Average wet test meter temperature, °C
(°F).
Pbar = Barometric pressure, mm Hg (in. Hg).
Dp = Dry gas meter inlet differential pressure,
mm H2O (in. H2O).
Vm(std)
15423
q = Run time, min.
*
*
*
*
*
16.2.3.3 Calculate the standard
volumes of air passed through the DGM
and the critical orifices, and calculate
the DGM calibration factor, Y, using the
equations below:
Eq. 5-12
Eq. 5-13
Eq. 5-14
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
42 CFR Part 51c
RIN 0906–AB25
Implementation of Executive Order on
Access to Affordable Life-Saving
Medications; Final Rule; Delay of
Effective Date
Health Resources and Services
Administration (HRSA), Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Final rule; delay of effective
date.
AGENCY:
This final rule implements a
further delay until July 20, 2021, of the
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Mar 22, 2021
Jkt 253001
As of March 22, 2021, the
effective date of the final rule published
at 85 FR 83822 (December 23, 2020),
which was delayed at 86 FR 7059
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
I. Public Participation
On March 9, 2021, the Office of the
Federal Register placed a HHS notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on file for
public inspection. This NPRM was
published in the Federal Register on
March 11, 2021, proposing to further
delay, until July 20, 2021, the effective
date of the rule entitled
‘‘Implementation of Executive Order on
Access to Affordable Life-saving
Medications’’ published in the Federal
Register on December 23, 2020. The
comment period closed on March 14,
2021, with HHS receiving 198
comments on the proposed delay.
Section 553(d) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 551 et
E:\FR\FM\23MRR1.SGM
23MRR1
ER23MR21.012
*
ER23MR21.011
*
[FR Doc. 2021–05761 Filed 3–22–21; 8:45 am]
(January 26, 2021), is further delayed
until July 20, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Joseph, Director, Office of
Policy and Program Development,
Bureau of Primary Health Care, HRSA,
5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD
20857; by email at jjoseph@hrsa.gov;
telephone: 301–594–4300; fax: 301–
594–4997.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ER23MR21.010
*
effective date of the rule entitled
‘‘Implementation of Executive Order on
Access to Affordable Life-saving
Medications’’ published in the Federal
Register on December 23, 2020. This
rule was scheduled to take effect on
March 22, 2021, after a delay from its
original effective date of January 22,
2021. HHS is delaying the effective date
of the rule to July 20, 2021, to ensure
that implementation of the rule does not
impede HHS’s and health centers’
immediate priority work, on a
nationwide basis, of responding to and
mitigating the spread of COVID–19,
including ensuring widespread and
equitable access to COVID–19 vaccines,
and maintaining the delivery of
comprehensive primary health services
to medically underserved populations,
while considering how to address
administrative/implementation issues
raised by commenters and further
address comments regarding the impact
of the rule.
ER23MR21.009
Where:
Vcr(std) = Volume of gas sample passed
through the critical orifice, corrected to
standard conditions, dscm (dscf).
K1 = 0.38572 °K/mm Hg for metric units =
17.636 °R/in. Hg for English units.
ER23MR21.013
Vmcstd)
15424
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 23, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
seq.) requires that Federal agencies
provide at least 30 days after
publication of a final rule in the Federal
Register before making it effective,
unless good cause can be found not to
do so. HHS finds that there is good
cause for making this final rule effective
less than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register given that failure to do
so would result in the final rule going
into effect before the delay begins.
Allowing for a 30-day delay between
publication and the effective date is
both unnecessary and impracticable, as
it would undermine this rule’s objective
of delaying the ‘‘Implementation of
Executive Order on Access to Affordable
Life-saving Medications’’ rule so that
HHS can fully review it for questions of
law, policy, and fact.
HHS has considered all comments in
finalizing this rule, as outlined in
Section III below, and presents a
summary of all significant comments
and HHS responses.
II. Background
HHS published a NPRM in the
Federal Register on September 28, 2020
(85 FR 60748), and a final rule on
December 23, 2020 (85 FR 83822). The
rule, ‘‘Implementation of Executive
Order on Access to Affordable LifeSaving Medications,’’ established a new
requirement directing all health centers
receiving grants under section 330(e) of
the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C.
254b(e)) that participate in the 340B
Drug Pricing Program (340B Program)
(42 U.S.C. 256b), to the extent that they
plan to make insulin and/or injectable
epinephrine available to their patients,
to provide assurances that they have
established practices to provide these
drugs at or below the discounted price
paid by the health center or subgrantees
under the 340B Program (plus a
minimal administration fee) to health
center patients with low incomes, as
determined by the Secretary, who have
a high cost sharing requirement for
either insulin or injectable epinephrine;
have a high unmet deductible; or have
no health insurance.
As stated in the NPRM, consistent
with Regulatory Freeze Memorandum
and OMB Memorandum M–21–14, a
delay of the ‘‘Implementation of
Executive Order on Access to Affordable
Life-saving Medications’’ rule will
provide HHS additional time to review
and consider further questions of fact,
law, and policy the rule may raise,
including whether revision or
withdrawal of the rule may be
warranted. HHS invited comments on
the impact of the rule’s administrative
requirements, costs of new processes
and procedures that would be necessary
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Mar 22, 2021
Jkt 253001
under the rule, the impact of the
establishment of a new income
eligibility threshold for health center
operations, and the overall impact on
care delivery and service levels for
health center patients.
After HHS review of submitted
comments, HHS believes that this delay
is reasonable, and will allow HHS to
consider the impact that the
‘‘Implementation of Executive Order on
Access to Affordable Life-saving
Medications’’ rule may have. The delay
will also ensure that, consistent with
concerns raised by commenters,
implementation of the rule does not
impede HHS’s and health centers’
immediate priority work, on a
nationwide basis, of responding to and
mitigating the spread of COVID–19,
including ensuring equitable access to
COVID–19 vaccines, and maintaining
the delivery of comprehensive primary
health services to medically
underserved populations, while
considering how to address
administrative/implementation issues
raised by commenters and further
address comments regarding the impact
of the rule. In addition, the delay will
not be disruptive since the
‘‘Implementation of Executive Order on
Access to Affordable Life-saving
Medications’’ rule has not yet taken
effect and neither HHS nor health
centers have undertaken the
administrative changes associated with
implementation of the rule.
III. Public Comments and Responses
Consistent with Regulatory Freeze
Memorandum and OMB Memorandum
M–21–14, HHS requested comment on
whether a delay of the final rule would
provide HHS additional time to review
and consider further questions of fact,
law, and policy the rule may raise,
including whether revision or
withdrawal of the rule may be
warranted. HHS stated that it would
further consider comments regarding
the impact of the rule’s administrative
requirements, costs of new processes
and procedures that would be necessary
under the ‘‘Implementation of Executive
Order on Access to Affordable Lifesaving Medications’’ rule, the impact of
the establishment of a new income
eligibility threshold for health center
operations, and the overall impact on
care delivery and service levels for
health center patients.
HHS received a total of 198
comments. Commenters identified
themselves as individuals requiring
insulin or injectable epinephrine and
their family members, health centers,
associations and organizations
representing health centers, a
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
professional organization, a diabetes
research foundation, a pharmaceutical
manufacturer, and clinical
professionals. The vast majority of
comments (187) favored a further delay
in the effective date of the
‘‘Implementation of Executive Order on
Access to Affordable Life-saving
Medications’’ rule. Three comments
opposed further delay of the effective
date for the ‘‘Implementation of
Executive Order on Access to Affordable
Life-saving Medications’’ rule and
supported implementation of the rule,
though one commenter opposed to a
further delay also urged HHS to take
steps to limit administrative burden to
health centers. The remaining
comments did not explicitly support or
oppose the delay.
Many commenters (175), including
many health centers, primary care
associations, and a number of other
individuals and organizations,
including a Health Care Controlled
Network and a Medicaid Accountable
Care Organization, also strongly urged
that the ‘‘Implementation of Executive
Order on Access to Affordable Lifesaving Medications’’ rule be rescinded.
Three commenters supported
implementation of the ‘‘Implementation
of Executive Order on Access to
Affordable Life-saving Medications’’
rule, although one of those commenters
also supported a delay to allow health
centers time to come into compliance
with the regulation.
All comments were considered in
developing this final rule. This section
presents a summary of all major issues
raised by commenters, grouped by
subject, as well as responses to the
comments. Commenters used the terms
‘‘Federally Qualified Health Centers
(FQHCs)’’ and ‘‘health centers’’
interchangeably. For consistency, and as
this rule applies to health centers
funded under Section 330(e) of the PHS
Act and not to other FQHCs this final
rule uses ‘‘health center’’ throughout.
1. Delay Implementation Based on
‘‘Regulatory Freeze Pending Review’’
Memo
Approximately 181 commenters
supported the delay as consistent with
the ‘‘Regulatory Freeze Pending
Review’’ issued by the White House
Chief of Staff on January 20, 2021.
Specifically, commenters noted that this
delay aligns with the Regulatory Freeze
language to delay implementation
‘‘where necessary to continue to review
these questions of fact, law, and policy,’’
and acknowledged the effort required
for HHS to address those questions.
Response: HHS appreciates these
comments and agrees that delaying the
E:\FR\FM\23MRR1.SGM
23MRR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 23, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
effective date of this final rule is
consistent with the intent of the
‘‘Regulatory Freeze Pending Review’’
memorandum.
2. Delay Implementation Based on
Health Centers’ Role in National
COVID–19 Vaccination Campaign
Approximately 169 commenters
suggested that the impact of
implementing the ‘‘Implementation of
Executive Order on Access to Affordable
Life-Saving Medications’’ rule on health
centers’ efforts to vaccinate hard-toreach populations against COVID–19
should be considered as a new issue of
‘‘fact, law, and policy,’’ necessitating a
further delay. These commenters noted
that since the rule was initially delayed
in January, health centers have been
requested to perform a critical role in
the national efforts to vaccinate hard-toreach populations. Commenters stated
that, in taking on this responsibility,
health centers’ staff and resources are
being stretched to unprecedented levels,
making the administrative and financial
burden of implementing the rule even
more challenging.
Response: HHS agrees that health
centers’ need to focus efforts on
expeditiously vaccinating their patient
populations against COVID–19,
including as part of the Health Center
COVID–19 Vaccine Program, is a factor
that supports a further delay in the
effective date of the ‘‘Implementation of
Executive Order on Access to Affordable
Life-saving Medications’’ rule. Health
centers across the nation are engaging in
mitigating and otherwise responding to
the effects of COVID–19, and many
health centers are participating in the
Health Center COVID–19 Vaccine
Program, to ensure the nation’s
underserved communities and those
disproportionately affected by COVID–
19 are equitably vaccinated against
COVID–19. In addition, under the
American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (Pub.
L. 117–2), HHS will soon be issuing
additional funds for health centers to
increase efforts to plan, prepare for,
promote, distribute, administer, and
track COVID–19 vaccines and to carry
out a range of activities to further
support detecting, diagnosing, tracing,
and monitoring of COVID–19 infections
necessary to mitigate the spread of
COVID–19.
3. Delay Implementation Due to
Administrative Procedure Act Concerns
One commenter urged HHS to rescind
the rule implementing Executive Order
13937 or delay implementation until the
rule could be adequately considered and
‘‘substantive shortcomings’’ under the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Mar 22, 2021
Jkt 253001
addressed. This commenter further
noted that neither a rational basis nor
legal authority was offered to target
health centers for differential treatment
nor to establish different policies for
insulin and injectable epinephrine. In
addition, the commenter expressed
concern that the ‘‘Implementation of
Executive Order on Access to Affordable
Life-saving Medications’’ rule neither
provided a rational basis for
implementation of the new policy, nor
addressed comments concerning the
complexity and administrative
challenges of implementation.
Response: HHS appreciates the
commenter’s support for delaying the
effective date of the rule. During the
period of additional delay, HHS will
consider whether potential APA issues
were raised by the promulgation of the
‘‘Implementation of Executive Order on
Access to Affordable Life-saving
Medications’’ rule. HHS plans to use the
delay period to review and consider all
questions of fact, law, and policy.
4. Delay Implementation for Duration of
COVID–19 Public Health Emergency
One commenter requested HHS
consider delaying the effective date of
the ‘‘Implementation of Executive Order
on Access to Affordable Life-saving
Medications’’ rule for the duration of
the COVID–19 public health emergency.
Response: HHS appreciates the
commenter’s support for delaying the
effective date of the rule. This final rule
will delay the effective date of the
‘‘Implementation of Executive Order on
Access to Affordable Life-saving
Medications’’ rule for 120 days, until
July 20, 2021. HHS plans to use the
delay period to review and consider all
questions of fact, law, and policy that
would be presented by implementation
of the ‘‘Implementation of Executive
Order on Access to Affordable Lifesaving Medications’’ rule, including the
ongoing COVID–19 public health
emergency. As the NPRM for this delay
specified the new effective date of July
20, 2021, and as the duration of the
COVID–19 public health emergency is
currently unknown, HHS declines at
this time to change the period of delay
to extend through the duration of the
COVID–19 public health emergency.
5. Delay To Allow Health Centers Time
To Come Into Compliance With the
Regulation
One commenter, a patient with Type
1 diabetes who supported the
underlying rule, requested HHS delay
the effective date of the rule to allow
health centers time and resources to
come into compliance with the
‘‘Implementation of Executive Order on
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
15425
Access to Affordable Life-saving
Medications’’ rule. The commenter also
stated that implementing the new rule
will take substantial time and resources
for health centers who are currently
playing a critical role leading the
national COVID–19 vaccination
campaign.
Response: HHS appreciates the
commenter’s support for delaying the
effective date of the rule. HHS agrees
that health centers need to continue to
focus efforts on the critical work of
responding to the COVID–19 public
health emergency while continuing to
provide essential comprehensive
primary care to medically underserved
communities. HHS will continue during
the delay period to further consider and
review questions of fact, law, and policy
that impact the implementation of the
final rule.
6. Opposition to Proposed Delay
Three commenters opposed further
delaying the effective date of the rule.
Two of the three commenters opposed
to delaying the effective date of the rule,
including the family member of a
patient with diabetes, cited the
importance of insulin to patients with
Type 1 diabetes. One of the three
commenters opposed to delaying the
effective date, supported
implementation of the ‘‘Implementation
of Executive Order on Access to
Affordable Life-saving Medications’’
rule because access to affordable insulin
is a top priority that can help those with
Type 1 diabetes avoid emergency room
visits, inpatient admissions, other
complications, and save lives. The
commenter cited the cost of insulin as
a substantial economic burden for those
living with Type 1 diabetes, and stated
that the ‘‘Implementation of Executive
Order on Access to Affordable Lifesaving Medications’’ rule will benefit
certain health center patients between
200% and 350% of the Federal Poverty
Guidelines by helping them afford the
insulin they need to survive. The
commenter also encouraged HHS to
limit any administrative burden to
health centers subject to the
‘‘Implementation of Executive Order on
Access to Affordable Life-saving
Medications’’ rule. Another of the three
commenters, a patient of a health center,
expressed concern that further delaying
of the effective date would keep muchneeded pharmaceuticals out of the
hands of certain patients, especially
those with disabilities.
Response: HHS appreciates the
commenters’ opposition to delaying the
effective date of the rule, as well as the
concern about limiting administrative
burden to health centers associated with
E:\FR\FM\23MRR1.SGM
23MRR1
15426
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 54 / Tuesday, March 23, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
implementing the rule. Given the
overwhelming support by other
commenters for delaying
implementation of the ‘‘Implementation
of Executive Order on Access to
Affordable Life-saving Medications’’
rule, HHS is finalizing this rule to delay
the effective date to July 20, 2021. HHS
will use the delay period to review and
consider the questions of fact, law, and
policy posed by and the potential
impact of the ‘‘Implementation of
Executive Order on Access to Affordable
Life-saving Medications’’ rule, including
on access to affordable insulin for health
center patients, including those with
Type 1 diabetes, patients with
disabilities, and those with incomes up
to 350% of the Federal Poverty
Guidelines.
Another commenter, a pharmaceutical
manufacturer, opposed any further
delay of the effective date, arguing that
policymakers are operating under the
erroneous assumption that 340B
discounts directly benefit patient access
to drugs. Instead, the commenter stated,
covered entity middlemen pocket the
discounts, rather than pass them on to
patients. The commenter provided data
suggesting that the markup charged by
some covered entities on insulin is as
much as 200,000%. However, the
commenter noted that none of the
covered entities examined were health
centers. The commenter encouraged
HHS to look at its own data to see if
‘‘spread pricing’’ on penny priced
insulin is an appropriate policy solution
for federal grantees. The commenter
stated that they have implemented a
program for 340B pass-through pricing
where patients receive insulin at the
340B price at the point-of-sale, which
five covered entities have instituted, as
evidence that such a policy is
operationally feasible. The commenter
stated that the ‘‘Implementation of
Executive Order on Access to Affordable
Life-saving Medications’’ rule would
dramatically lower the cost of insulin
for many of the most vulnerable patients
in the country.
Response: HHS appreciates the
commenter’s opposition to delaying the
effective date of the rule. However,
given the overwhelming support by
other commenters for delaying
implementation of the ‘‘Implementation
of Executive Order on Access to
Affordable Life-saving Medications’’
rule, HHS is finalizing this rule to delay
the effective date to July 20, 2021. HHS
will use the delay period to review and
consider the questions of fact, law, and
policy posed by and the potential
impact of the ‘‘Implementation of
Executive Order on Access to Affordable
Life-saving Medications’’ rule, whether
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Mar 22, 2021
Jkt 253001
the rule would be likely to significantly
lower the cost of insulin for the most
vulnerable patients.
As stated in the NPRM for this delay,
HHS will further consider and review
comments submitted, including those
made on the substance of the
‘‘Implementation of Executive Order on
Access to Affordable Life-saving
Medications’’ rule.
7. Comments on the Underlying Rule
Most commenters raised issues that
concerned the underlying rule, in
particular, the high cost of these drugs,
and the significant administrative costs
associated with the rule. The nature of
these comments suggests that a further
delay of the ‘‘Implementation of
Executive Order on Access to Affordable
Life-saving Medications.’’ rule is
warranted. This final rule does not
address these substantive issues, but
rather responds to concerns raised
regarding the proposed delayed effective
date. However, as stated in the NPRM,
HHS will consider and review these
comments on the substance of the
underlying rule during the delay period.
8. Miscellaneous
Other commenters raised a variety of
issues that do not pertain directly to
either the delay period extended by this
final rule or to the underlying
‘‘Implementation of Executive Order on
Access to Affordable Life-saving
Medications’’ rule. This final rule does
not address those issues as they are
outside of its scope.
IV. Regulatory Impact Analysis
Executive Order 12866 directs
agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and,
when rulemaking is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that provide the
greatest net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health,
safety, distributive, and equity effects).
In addition, under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, if a rule has a significant
economic effect on a substantial number
of small entities, HHS must specifically
consider the economic effect of a rule on
small entities and analyze regulatory
options that could lessen the impact of
the rule.
The Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has determined that
this rule is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866.
HHS has determined that no resources
are required to implement the
requirements in this rule because
compensation will continue to be made
consistent with the status quo.
Therefore, in accordance with the
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(RFA), and the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Act of 1996,
which amended the RFA, HHS certifies
that this rule will not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
HHS has also determined that this
rule does not meet the criteria for a
major rule under the Congressional
Review Act or Executive Order 12866
and would have no major effect on the
economy or federal expenditures.
Similarly, it will not have effects on
state, local, and tribal governments and
on the private sector such as to require
consultation under the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995. Nor on
the basis of family well-being will the
provisions of this rule affect the
following family elements: Family
safety; family stability; marital
commitment; parental rights in the
education, nurture and supervision of
their children; family functioning;
disposable income or poverty; or the
behavior and personal responsibility of
youth, as determined under section
654(c) of the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act of
1999.
V. Impact of the New Rule
This final rule delays the effective
date of the rule entitled
‘‘Implementation of Executive Order on
Access to Affordable Life-saving
Medications’’ until July 20, 2021, to
allow HHS additional opportunity for
review and consideration of the rule.
This delay is reasonable and will not be
disruptive because the underlying rule
has not yet been implemented or taken
effect.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This rule has no information
collection requirements.
Norris Cochran,
Acting Secretary, Department of Health and
Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2021–05981 Filed 3–19–21; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
E:\FR\FM\23MRR1.SGM
23MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 54 (Tuesday, March 23, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 15423-15426]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-05981]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
42 CFR Part 51c
RIN 0906-AB25
Implementation of Executive Order on Access to Affordable Life-
Saving Medications; Final Rule; Delay of Effective Date
AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Department
of Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Final rule; delay of effective date.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule implements a further delay until July 20,
2021, of the effective date of the rule entitled ``Implementation of
Executive Order on Access to Affordable Life-saving Medications''
published in the Federal Register on December 23, 2020. This rule was
scheduled to take effect on March 22, 2021, after a delay from its
original effective date of January 22, 2021. HHS is delaying the
effective date of the rule to July 20, 2021, to ensure that
implementation of the rule does not impede HHS's and health centers'
immediate priority work, on a nationwide basis, of responding to and
mitigating the spread of COVID-19, including ensuring widespread and
equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines, and maintaining the delivery of
comprehensive primary health services to medically underserved
populations, while considering how to address administrative/
implementation issues raised by commenters and further address comments
regarding the impact of the rule.
DATES: As of March 22, 2021, the effective date of the final rule
published at 85 FR 83822 (December 23, 2020), which was delayed at 86
FR 7059 (January 26, 2021), is further delayed until July 20, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Joseph, Director, Office of
Policy and Program Development, Bureau of Primary Health Care, HRSA,
5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857; by email at [email protected];
telephone: 301-594-4300; fax: 301-594-4997.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Public Participation
On March 9, 2021, the Office of the Federal Register placed a HHS
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on file for public inspection.
This NPRM was published in the Federal Register on March 11, 2021,
proposing to further delay, until July 20, 2021, the effective date of
the rule entitled ``Implementation of Executive Order on Access to
Affordable Life-saving Medications'' published in the Federal Register
on December 23, 2020. The comment period closed on March 14, 2021, with
HHS receiving 198 comments on the proposed delay.
Section 553(d) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C.
551 et
[[Page 15424]]
seq.) requires that Federal agencies provide at least 30 days after
publication of a final rule in the Federal Register before making it
effective, unless good cause can be found not to do so. HHS finds that
there is good cause for making this final rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal Register given that failure to do
so would result in the final rule going into effect before the delay
begins. Allowing for a 30-day delay between publication and the
effective date is both unnecessary and impracticable, as it would
undermine this rule's objective of delaying the ``Implementation of
Executive Order on Access to Affordable Life-saving Medications'' rule
so that HHS can fully review it for questions of law, policy, and fact.
HHS has considered all comments in finalizing this rule, as
outlined in Section III below, and presents a summary of all
significant comments and HHS responses.
II. Background
HHS published a NPRM in the Federal Register on September 28, 2020
(85 FR 60748), and a final rule on December 23, 2020 (85 FR 83822). The
rule, ``Implementation of Executive Order on Access to Affordable Life-
Saving Medications,'' established a new requirement directing all
health centers receiving grants under section 330(e) of the Public
Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254b(e)) that participate in the 340B
Drug Pricing Program (340B Program) (42 U.S.C. 256b), to the extent
that they plan to make insulin and/or injectable epinephrine available
to their patients, to provide assurances that they have established
practices to provide these drugs at or below the discounted price paid
by the health center or subgrantees under the 340B Program (plus a
minimal administration fee) to health center patients with low incomes,
as determined by the Secretary, who have a high cost sharing
requirement for either insulin or injectable epinephrine; have a high
unmet deductible; or have no health insurance.
As stated in the NPRM, consistent with Regulatory Freeze Memorandum
and OMB Memorandum M-21-14, a delay of the ``Implementation of
Executive Order on Access to Affordable Life-saving Medications'' rule
will provide HHS additional time to review and consider further
questions of fact, law, and policy the rule may raise, including
whether revision or withdrawal of the rule may be warranted. HHS
invited comments on the impact of the rule's administrative
requirements, costs of new processes and procedures that would be
necessary under the rule, the impact of the establishment of a new
income eligibility threshold for health center operations, and the
overall impact on care delivery and service levels for health center
patients.
After HHS review of submitted comments, HHS believes that this
delay is reasonable, and will allow HHS to consider the impact that the
``Implementation of Executive Order on Access to Affordable Life-saving
Medications'' rule may have. The delay will also ensure that,
consistent with concerns raised by commenters, implementation of the
rule does not impede HHS's and health centers' immediate priority work,
on a nationwide basis, of responding to and mitigating the spread of
COVID-19, including ensuring equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines, and
maintaining the delivery of comprehensive primary health services to
medically underserved populations, while considering how to address
administrative/implementation issues raised by commenters and further
address comments regarding the impact of the rule. In addition, the
delay will not be disruptive since the ``Implementation of Executive
Order on Access to Affordable Life-saving Medications'' rule has not
yet taken effect and neither HHS nor health centers have undertaken the
administrative changes associated with implementation of the rule.
III. Public Comments and Responses
Consistent with Regulatory Freeze Memorandum and OMB Memorandum M-
21-14, HHS requested comment on whether a delay of the final rule would
provide HHS additional time to review and consider further questions of
fact, law, and policy the rule may raise, including whether revision or
withdrawal of the rule may be warranted. HHS stated that it would
further consider comments regarding the impact of the rule's
administrative requirements, costs of new processes and procedures that
would be necessary under the ``Implementation of Executive Order on
Access to Affordable Life-saving Medications'' rule, the impact of the
establishment of a new income eligibility threshold for health center
operations, and the overall impact on care delivery and service levels
for health center patients.
HHS received a total of 198 comments. Commenters identified
themselves as individuals requiring insulin or injectable epinephrine
and their family members, health centers, associations and
organizations representing health centers, a professional organization,
a diabetes research foundation, a pharmaceutical manufacturer, and
clinical professionals. The vast majority of comments (187) favored a
further delay in the effective date of the ``Implementation of
Executive Order on Access to Affordable Life-saving Medications'' rule.
Three comments opposed further delay of the effective date for the
``Implementation of Executive Order on Access to Affordable Life-saving
Medications'' rule and supported implementation of the rule, though one
commenter opposed to a further delay also urged HHS to take steps to
limit administrative burden to health centers. The remaining comments
did not explicitly support or oppose the delay.
Many commenters (175), including many health centers, primary care
associations, and a number of other individuals and organizations,
including a Health Care Controlled Network and a Medicaid Accountable
Care Organization, also strongly urged that the ``Implementation of
Executive Order on Access to Affordable Life-saving Medications'' rule
be rescinded. Three commenters supported implementation of the
``Implementation of Executive Order on Access to Affordable Life-saving
Medications'' rule, although one of those commenters also supported a
delay to allow health centers time to come into compliance with the
regulation.
All comments were considered in developing this final rule. This
section presents a summary of all major issues raised by commenters,
grouped by subject, as well as responses to the comments. Commenters
used the terms ``Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)'' and
``health centers'' interchangeably. For consistency, and as this rule
applies to health centers funded under Section 330(e) of the PHS Act
and not to other FQHCs this final rule uses ``health center''
throughout.
1. Delay Implementation Based on ``Regulatory Freeze Pending Review''
Memo
Approximately 181 commenters supported the delay as consistent with
the ``Regulatory Freeze Pending Review'' issued by the White House
Chief of Staff on January 20, 2021. Specifically, commenters noted that
this delay aligns with the Regulatory Freeze language to delay
implementation ``where necessary to continue to review these questions
of fact, law, and policy,'' and acknowledged the effort required for
HHS to address those questions.
Response: HHS appreciates these comments and agrees that delaying
the
[[Page 15425]]
effective date of this final rule is consistent with the intent of the
``Regulatory Freeze Pending Review'' memorandum.
2. Delay Implementation Based on Health Centers' Role in National
COVID-19 Vaccination Campaign
Approximately 169 commenters suggested that the impact of
implementing the ``Implementation of Executive Order on Access to
Affordable Life-Saving Medications'' rule on health centers' efforts to
vaccinate hard-to-reach populations against COVID-19 should be
considered as a new issue of ``fact, law, and policy,'' necessitating a
further delay. These commenters noted that since the rule was initially
delayed in January, health centers have been requested to perform a
critical role in the national efforts to vaccinate hard-to-reach
populations. Commenters stated that, in taking on this responsibility,
health centers' staff and resources are being stretched to
unprecedented levels, making the administrative and financial burden of
implementing the rule even more challenging.
Response: HHS agrees that health centers' need to focus efforts on
expeditiously vaccinating their patient populations against COVID-19,
including as part of the Health Center COVID-19 Vaccine Program, is a
factor that supports a further delay in the effective date of the
``Implementation of Executive Order on Access to Affordable Life-saving
Medications'' rule. Health centers across the nation are engaging in
mitigating and otherwise responding to the effects of COVID-19, and
many health centers are participating in the Health Center COVID-19
Vaccine Program, to ensure the nation's underserved communities and
those disproportionately affected by COVID-19 are equitably vaccinated
against COVID-19. In addition, under the American Rescue Plan Act of
2021 (Pub. L. 117-2), HHS will soon be issuing additional funds for
health centers to increase efforts to plan, prepare for, promote,
distribute, administer, and track COVID-19 vaccines and to carry out a
range of activities to further support detecting, diagnosing, tracing,
and monitoring of COVID-19 infections necessary to mitigate the spread
of COVID-19.
3. Delay Implementation Due to Administrative Procedure Act Concerns
One commenter urged HHS to rescind the rule implementing Executive
Order 13937 or delay implementation until the rule could be adequately
considered and ``substantive shortcomings'' under the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) addressed. This commenter further noted that
neither a rational basis nor legal authority was offered to target
health centers for differential treatment nor to establish different
policies for insulin and injectable epinephrine. In addition, the
commenter expressed concern that the ``Implementation of Executive
Order on Access to Affordable Life-saving Medications'' rule neither
provided a rational basis for implementation of the new policy, nor
addressed comments concerning the complexity and administrative
challenges of implementation.
Response: HHS appreciates the commenter's support for delaying the
effective date of the rule. During the period of additional delay, HHS
will consider whether potential APA issues were raised by the
promulgation of the ``Implementation of Executive Order on Access to
Affordable Life-saving Medications'' rule. HHS plans to use the delay
period to review and consider all questions of fact, law, and policy.
4. Delay Implementation for Duration of COVID-19 Public Health
Emergency
One commenter requested HHS consider delaying the effective date of
the ``Implementation of Executive Order on Access to Affordable Life-
saving Medications'' rule for the duration of the COVID-19 public
health emergency.
Response: HHS appreciates the commenter's support for delaying the
effective date of the rule. This final rule will delay the effective
date of the ``Implementation of Executive Order on Access to Affordable
Life-saving Medications'' rule for 120 days, until July 20, 2021. HHS
plans to use the delay period to review and consider all questions of
fact, law, and policy that would be presented by implementation of the
``Implementation of Executive Order on Access to Affordable Life-saving
Medications'' rule, including the ongoing COVID-19 public health
emergency. As the NPRM for this delay specified the new effective date
of July 20, 2021, and as the duration of the COVID-19 public health
emergency is currently unknown, HHS declines at this time to change the
period of delay to extend through the duration of the COVID-19 public
health emergency.
5. Delay To Allow Health Centers Time To Come Into Compliance With the
Regulation
One commenter, a patient with Type 1 diabetes who supported the
underlying rule, requested HHS delay the effective date of the rule to
allow health centers time and resources to come into compliance with
the ``Implementation of Executive Order on Access to Affordable Life-
saving Medications'' rule. The commenter also stated that implementing
the new rule will take substantial time and resources for health
centers who are currently playing a critical role leading the national
COVID-19 vaccination campaign.
Response: HHS appreciates the commenter's support for delaying the
effective date of the rule. HHS agrees that health centers need to
continue to focus efforts on the critical work of responding to the
COVID-19 public health emergency while continuing to provide essential
comprehensive primary care to medically underserved communities. HHS
will continue during the delay period to further consider and review
questions of fact, law, and policy that impact the implementation of
the final rule.
6. Opposition to Proposed Delay
Three commenters opposed further delaying the effective date of the
rule.
Two of the three commenters opposed to delaying the effective date
of the rule, including the family member of a patient with diabetes,
cited the importance of insulin to patients with Type 1 diabetes. One
of the three commenters opposed to delaying the effective date,
supported implementation of the ``Implementation of Executive Order on
Access to Affordable Life-saving Medications'' rule because access to
affordable insulin is a top priority that can help those with Type 1
diabetes avoid emergency room visits, inpatient admissions, other
complications, and save lives. The commenter cited the cost of insulin
as a substantial economic burden for those living with Type 1 diabetes,
and stated that the ``Implementation of Executive Order on Access to
Affordable Life-saving Medications'' rule will benefit certain health
center patients between 200% and 350% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines
by helping them afford the insulin they need to survive. The commenter
also encouraged HHS to limit any administrative burden to health
centers subject to the ``Implementation of Executive Order on Access to
Affordable Life-saving Medications'' rule. Another of the three
commenters, a patient of a health center, expressed concern that
further delaying of the effective date would keep much-needed
pharmaceuticals out of the hands of certain patients, especially those
with disabilities.
Response: HHS appreciates the commenters' opposition to delaying
the effective date of the rule, as well as the concern about limiting
administrative burden to health centers associated with
[[Page 15426]]
implementing the rule. Given the overwhelming support by other
commenters for delaying implementation of the ``Implementation of
Executive Order on Access to Affordable Life-saving Medications'' rule,
HHS is finalizing this rule to delay the effective date to July 20,
2021. HHS will use the delay period to review and consider the
questions of fact, law, and policy posed by and the potential impact of
the ``Implementation of Executive Order on Access to Affordable Life-
saving Medications'' rule, including on access to affordable insulin
for health center patients, including those with Type 1 diabetes,
patients with disabilities, and those with incomes up to 350% of the
Federal Poverty Guidelines.
Another commenter, a pharmaceutical manufacturer, opposed any
further delay of the effective date, arguing that policymakers are
operating under the erroneous assumption that 340B discounts directly
benefit patient access to drugs. Instead, the commenter stated, covered
entity middlemen pocket the discounts, rather than pass them on to
patients. The commenter provided data suggesting that the markup
charged by some covered entities on insulin is as much as 200,000%.
However, the commenter noted that none of the covered entities examined
were health centers. The commenter encouraged HHS to look at its own
data to see if ``spread pricing'' on penny priced insulin is an
appropriate policy solution for federal grantees. The commenter stated
that they have implemented a program for 340B pass-through pricing
where patients receive insulin at the 340B price at the point-of-sale,
which five covered entities have instituted, as evidence that such a
policy is operationally feasible. The commenter stated that the
``Implementation of Executive Order on Access to Affordable Life-saving
Medications'' rule would dramatically lower the cost of insulin for
many of the most vulnerable patients in the country.
Response: HHS appreciates the commenter's opposition to delaying
the effective date of the rule. However, given the overwhelming support
by other commenters for delaying implementation of the ``Implementation
of Executive Order on Access to Affordable Life-saving Medications''
rule, HHS is finalizing this rule to delay the effective date to July
20, 2021. HHS will use the delay period to review and consider the
questions of fact, law, and policy posed by and the potential impact of
the ``Implementation of Executive Order on Access to Affordable Life-
saving Medications'' rule, whether the rule would be likely to
significantly lower the cost of insulin for the most vulnerable
patients.
As stated in the NPRM for this delay, HHS will further consider and
review comments submitted, including those made on the substance of the
``Implementation of Executive Order on Access to Affordable Life-saving
Medications'' rule.
7. Comments on the Underlying Rule
Most commenters raised issues that concerned the underlying rule,
in particular, the high cost of these drugs, and the significant
administrative costs associated with the rule. The nature of these
comments suggests that a further delay of the ``Implementation of
Executive Order on Access to Affordable Life-saving Medications.'' rule
is warranted. This final rule does not address these substantive
issues, but rather responds to concerns raised regarding the proposed
delayed effective date. However, as stated in the NPRM, HHS will
consider and review these comments on the substance of the underlying
rule during the delay period.
8. Miscellaneous
Other commenters raised a variety of issues that do not pertain
directly to either the delay period extended by this final rule or to
the underlying ``Implementation of Executive Order on Access to
Affordable Life-saving Medications'' rule. This final rule does not
address those issues as they are outside of its scope.
IV. Regulatory Impact Analysis
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when rulemaking is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that provide the greatest
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health, safety, distributive, and equity effects). In addition, under
the Regulatory Flexibility Act, if a rule has a significant economic
effect on a substantial number of small entities, HHS must specifically
consider the economic effect of a rule on small entities and analyze
regulatory options that could lessen the impact of the rule.
The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined
that this rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
HHS has determined that no resources are required to implement the
requirements in this rule because compensation will continue to be made
consistent with the status quo. Therefore, in accordance with the
Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), and the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Act of 1996, which amended the RFA, HHS
certifies that this rule will not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
HHS has also determined that this rule does not meet the criteria
for a major rule under the Congressional Review Act or Executive Order
12866 and would have no major effect on the economy or federal
expenditures. Similarly, it will not have effects on state, local, and
tribal governments and on the private sector such as to require
consultation under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995. Nor on the
basis of family well-being will the provisions of this rule affect the
following family elements: Family safety; family stability; marital
commitment; parental rights in the education, nurture and supervision
of their children; family functioning; disposable income or poverty; or
the behavior and personal responsibility of youth, as determined under
section 654(c) of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations
Act of 1999.
V. Impact of the New Rule
This final rule delays the effective date of the rule entitled
``Implementation of Executive Order on Access to Affordable Life-saving
Medications'' until July 20, 2021, to allow HHS additional opportunity
for review and consideration of the rule. This delay is reasonable and
will not be disruptive because the underlying rule has not yet been
implemented or taken effect.
VI. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This rule has no information collection requirements.
Norris Cochran,
Acting Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2021-05981 Filed 3-19-21; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-15-P