Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; U.S. Department of Homeland Security/Immigration and Customs Enforcement-018 Analytical Records System of Records, 15134-15136 [2021-05643]

Download as PDF 15134 Proposed Rules Federal Register Vol. 86, No. 53 Monday, March 22, 2021 This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Office of the Secretary 6 CFR Part 5 [Docket No. ICEB–2020–0007] Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; U.S. Department of Homeland Security/Immigration and Customs Enforcement–018 Analytical Records System of Records U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. AGENCY: The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is giving concurrent notice of a newly established system of records pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 for the ‘‘DHS/U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)–018 Analytical Records System of Records’’ and this proposed rulemaking. In this proposed rulemaking, the Department proposes to exempt portions of the system of records from one or more provisions of the Privacy Act because of criminal, civil, and administrative enforcement requirements. SUMMARY: Comments must be received on or before April 21, 2021. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number ICEB– 2020–0007, by one of the following methods: • Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Fax: 202–343–4010. • Mail: James Holzer, Acting Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy Office, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528. Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and docket number for this notice. All comments received will be posted without change to https:// jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS DATES: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:27 Mar 19, 2021 Jkt 253001 www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to https:// www.regulations.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general questions please contact: Jordan Holz, ICEPrivacy-GeneralMailbox@ ice.dhs.gov, Privacy Officer, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), 500 12th Street SW, Mail Stop 5004, Washington, DC 20536. For privacy questions, please contact: James Holzer, Privacy@hq.dhs.gov, (202) 343– 1717, Acting Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy Office, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528–0655. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) proposes to issue a new system of records notice (SORN) titled, ‘‘DHS/ICE–018 Analytical Records.’’ DHS/ICE is creating a new system of records to better reflect and clarify the nature of all records collected, maintained, processed, and shared by ICE in large analytical data environments. A fuller description of this SORN can be found herein the Federal Register. The DHS/ICE–018 Analytical Records system of records consolidates the following two notices, DHS/ICE–005 Trade Transparency Analysis and Research (TTAR) System of Records, 79 FR 71112, (December 1, 2014), and DHS/ICE–016 FALCON Search and Analysis (FALCON–SA) System of Records, 82 FR 20905, (May 4, 2017), into one new system of records. This new system of records reflects the types of information and records ICE collects and maintains in analytical systems to support its law enforcement and investigative mission, rather than linking the SORN to specific IT system(s). ICE analytical systems help ICE personnel conduct research and analysis using advanced analytic tools in support of their law enforcement and investigative mission. These tools allow ICE to query, analyze, and present large amounts of data in a variety of formats that can help illuminate relationships PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 among the various data elements. Some analytical tools may incorporate the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning to assist ICE personnel in examining large and complex datasets. All analytical systems and tools under this system of records use a central data store to eliminate the need for multiple copies of the data. This system of records ingests and aggregates data from a number of system and database interfaces that collects data for ICE’s law enforcement, national security, immigration enforcement, and customs enforcement missions. The analytical data store also contains metadata that is created by an ICE analytical system when it ingests data. ICE uses the metadata to apply access controls and other system rules (such as retention policies) to the contents of the central data store. The metadata also provides important contextual information about the date the information was added to the data store and the source system where the data originated. ICE analytical systems also ingest external information from nonfederal entities, including state and local law enforcement authorities, private corporations, or foreign governments. The DHS/ICE–018 Analytical Records SORN also covers tips submitted to ICE via email, an online form on the ICE website, or by calling an ICE tip line phone number. These tips are created electronically using an ICE-wide tip line interface or may be manually entered by ICE analysts. Once ICE analysts adjudicate the tips for action, the tips will then be accessible to authorized users to conduct further investigation. Users of an analytical tool or system may create visualizations, match records, or create analyses of large volumes of data through algorithmic processes. The end result of user efforts with an analytical tool, such as a map or list, is an analytical work product. Analytical products, information sharing, and user collaboration made possible in analytical systems may result in the creation of a lead to the field. Consistent with DHS’s information sharing mission, information stored in the DHS/ICE–018 Analytical Records system of records may be shared with other DHS Components components that have a need to know the information to carry out their national E:\FR\FM\22MRP1.SGM 22MRP1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 53 / Monday, March 22, 2021 / Proposed Rules jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS security, law enforcement, immigration, intelligence, or other homeland security functions. In addition, DHS/ICE may share information with appropriate federal, state, local, tribal, territorial, foreign, or international government agencies consistent with the routine uses set forth in this system of records notice. II. Privacy Act The Privacy Act embodies fair information practice principles in a statutory framework governing the means by which federal government agencies collect, maintain, use, and disseminate individuals’ records. The Privacy Act applies to information that is maintained in a ‘‘system of records.’’ A ‘‘system of records’’ is a group of any records under the control of an agency from which information is retrieved by the name of the individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to the individual. In the Privacy Act, an individual is defined to encompass U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents. Additionally, and similarly, the Judicial Redress Act (JRA) provides a statutory right to covered persons to make requests for access and amendment to covered records, as defined by the JRA, along with judicial review for denials of such requests. In addition, the JRA prohibits disclosures of covered records, except as otherwise permitted by the Privacy Act. The Privacy Act allows government agencies to exempt certain records from the access and amendment provisions. If an agency claims an exemption, however, it must issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to make clear to the public the reasons why a particular exemption is claimed and provide an opportunity for public comment. DHS is claiming exemptions from certain requirements of the Privacy Act for DHS/ICE–018 Analytical Records System of Records. Some information in DHS/ICE–018 Analytical Records System of Records relates to official DHS national security, law enforcement, immigration, and intelligence activities. These exemptions are needed to protect information relating to DHS activities from disclosure to subjects or others related to these activities. Specifically, the exemptions are required to preclude subjects of these activities from frustrating these processes; to avoid disclosure of activity techniques; to protect the identities and physical safety of confidential informants and law enforcement personnel; to ensure DHS’ ability to obtain information from third parties and other sources; to protect the privacy of third parties; and to safeguard VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:27 Mar 19, 2021 Jkt 253001 classified information. Disclosure of information to the subject of the inquiry could also permit the subject to avoid detection or apprehension. In appropriate circumstances, when compliance would not appear to interfere with or adversely affect the law enforcement purposes of this system and the overall law enforcement process, the applicable exemptions may be waived on a case by case basis. A system of records notice for DHS/ ICE–018 Analytical Records System of Records is also published in this issue of the Federal Register. List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5 Freedom of information; Privacy. For the reasons stated in the preamble, DHS proposes to amend chapter I of title 6, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows: PART 5—DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS AND INFORMATION 1. The authority citation for Part 5 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.; Pub. L. 107–296, 116 Stat. 2135; 5 U.S.C. 301. 2. In appendix C to part 5, add paragraph 85 to read as follows: ■ Appendix C to Part 5—DHS Systems of Records Exempt From the Privacy Act * * * * * 85. The DHS/ICE–018 Analytical Records System of Records consists of electronic and paper records and will be used by DHS and its components. The DHS/ICE–018 Analytical Records System of Records is a repository of information held by DHS in connection with its several and varied missions and functions, including, but not limited to the enforcement of civil and criminal laws; investigations, inquiries, and proceedings thereunder; and national security and intelligence activities. The DHS/ICE–018 Analytical Records System of Records contains information that is collected by, on behalf of, in support of, or in cooperation with DHS and its components and may contain personally identifiable information collected by other federal, state, local, tribal, foreign, or international government agencies. The Secretary of Homeland Security, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), has exempted this system from the following provisions of the Privacy Act: 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (c)(4), (d), (e)(1), (e)(2), (e)(3), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), (e)(5), (e)(8), (f), and (g). Additionally, the Secretary of Homeland Security, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a (k)(2), has exempted this system from the following provisions of the Privacy Act: 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), and (f). Where a record received from another system has been exempted in that source system under 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), DHS will claim the same exemptions for those records that are claimed for the original primary systems of records from which they PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 15135 originated and claims any additional exemptions set forth here. Exemptions from these particular subsections are justified, on a case-by-case basis to be determined at the time a request is made, for the following reasons: (a) From subsection (c)(3) and (4) (Accounting for Disclosures) because release of the accounting of disclosures could alert the subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal, civil, or regulatory violation to the existence of that investigation and reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS as well as the recipient agency. Disclosure of the accounting would therefore present a serious impediment to law enforcement efforts and efforts to preserve national security. Disclosure of the accounting would also permit the individual who is the subject of a record to impede the investigation, to tamper with witnesses or evidence, and to avoid detection or apprehension, which would undermine the entire investigative process. When an investigation has been completed, information on disclosures made may continue to be exempted if the fact that an investigation occurred remains sensitive after completion. (b) From subsection (d) (Access and Amendment to Records) because access to the records contained in this system of records could inform the subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal, civil, or regulatory violation to the existence of that investigation and reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS or another agency. Access to the records could permit the individual who is the subject of a record to impede the investigation, to tamper with witnesses or evidence, and to avoid detection or apprehension. Amendment of the records could interfere with ongoing investigations and law enforcement activities and would impose an unreasonable administrative burden by requiring investigations to be continually reinvestigated. In addition, permitting access and amendment to such information could disclose security-sensitive information that could be detrimental to homeland security. (c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and Necessity of Information) because in the course of investigations into potential violations of federal law, the accuracy of information obtained or introduced occasionally may be unclear, or the information may not be strictly relevant or necessary to a specific investigation. In the interests of effective law enforcement, it is appropriate to retain all information that may aid in establishing patterns of unlawful activity. (d) From subsection (e)(2) (Collection of Information Directly from Individuals) because requiring that information be collected from the subject of an investigation would alert the subject to the nature or existence of the investigation, thereby interfering with that investigation and related law enforcement activities. (e) From subsection (e)(3) (Notice to Subjects) because providing such detailed information could impede law enforcement by compromising the existence of a confidential investigation or reveal the E:\FR\FM\22MRP1.SGM 22MRP1 15136 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 53 / Monday, March 22, 2021 / Proposed Rules identity of witnesses or confidential informants. (f) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), and (e)(4)(I) (Agency Requirements) and (f) (Agency Rules), because portions of this system are exempt from the individual access provisions of subsection (d) for the reasons noted above, and therefore DHS is not required to establish requirements, rules, or procedures with respect to such access. Providing notice to individuals with respect to existence of records pertaining to them in the system of records or otherwise setting up procedures pursuant to which individuals may access and view records pertaining to themselves in the system would undermine investigative efforts and reveal the identities of witnesses, and potential witnesses, and confidential informants. (g) From subsection (e)(5) (Collection of Information) because with the collection of information for law enforcement purposes, it is impossible to determine in advance what information is accurate, relevant, timely, and complete. Compliance with subsection (e)(5) would preclude DHS agents from using their investigative training and exercise of good judgment to both conduct and report on investigations. (h) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on Individuals) because compliance would interfere with DHS’s ability to obtain, serve, and issue subpoenas, warrants, and other law enforcement mechanisms that may be filed under seal and could result in disclosure of investigative techniques, procedures, and evidence. (j) From subsection (g) (Civil Remedies) to the extent that the system is exempt from other specific subsections of the Privacy Act. James Holzer, Acting Chief Privacy Officer, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. [FR Doc. 2021–05643 Filed 3–19–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111–28–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Office of the Secretary 6 CFR Part 5 [Docket No. USCBP–2020–0051] RIN 1651–AB30 Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; U.S. Department of Homeland Security/U.S. Customs and Border Protection–018 Customs Trade Partnership Against Terrorism System of Records U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS AGENCY: The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is giving concurrent notice of a modified and reissued system of records pursuant to SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:27 Mar 19, 2021 Jkt 253001 the Privacy Act of 1974 for the ‘‘DHS/ U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)–018 Customs Trade Partnership Against Terrorism System of Records,’’ and this proposed rulemaking. In this proposed rulemaking, the Department and CBP proposes to exempt portions of the system of records from one or more provisions of the Privacy Act because of criminal, civil, and administrative enforcement requirements. DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 21, 2021. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number USCBP– 2020–0051, by one of the following methods: • Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. • Fax: 202–343–4010. • Mail: James Holzer, Acting Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy Office, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528. Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and docket number for this notice. All comments received will be posted without change to https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or comments received, go to https:// www.regulations.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general questions, please contact: Debra Danisek, Privacy.CBP@cbp.dhs.gov, (202) 344–1610, CBP Privacy Officer, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20229. For privacy issues, please contact: James Holzer, Privacy@hq.dhs.gov, (202) 343–1717, Acting Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy Office, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528–0655. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) proposes to modify and reissue a current DHS system of records titled, ‘‘DHS/CBP–018 Customs Trade Partnership Against Terrorism System of Records.’’ DHS/CBP is reissuing this modified system of records notice to update its description of how CBP collects and maintains information pertaining to prospective, ineligible, current, or former trade partners in the CTPAT Program; other entities and individuals in their supply chains; and members of foreign PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 governments’ secure supply chain programs that have been recognized by CBP, through a mutual recognition arrangement or comparable arrangement, as being compatible with CTPAT. DHS/CBP is updating this system of records notice to clarify that CTPAT Program members may also submit information to DHS/CBP under the CTPAT Trade Compliance program, to include importer self-assessments and other documentation. CBP uses the information collected and maintained through the CTPAT security and trade compliance programs to carry out its trade facilitation, law enforcement, and national security missions. In direct response to 9/11, CBP challenged the trade community to partner with the government to design a new approach to supply chain security—one that protects the United States from acts of terrorism by improving security while facilitating the flow of compliant cargo and conveyances. The result was the CTPAT Program—a voluntary government/ private sector partnership program in which certain types of businesses agree to cooperate with CBP in the analysis, measurement, monitoring, reporting, and enhancement of their supply chains. Businesses accepted into the CTPAT Program are called partners and agree to take actions to protect their supply chain, identify security gaps, and implement specific security measures and best practices in return for facilitated processing of their shipments by CBP. The CTPAT Program focuses on improving security from the point of origin (including manufacturer, supplier, or vendor) through a point of distribution to the destination. The current security guidelines for CTPAT Program members address a broad range of topics including personnel, physical, and procedural security; access controls; education, training, and awareness; manifest procedures; conveyance security; threat awareness; and documentation processing. These guidelines offer a customized solution for the members, while providing a clear minimum standard that approved companies must meet. Businesses eligible to fully participate in the CTPAT Program include U.S. importers; exporters; U.S./Canada highway carriers; U.S./Mexico highway carriers; rail and sea carriers; licensed U.S. Customs brokers; U.S. marine port authority/terminal operators; U.S. freight consolidators; ocean transportation intermediaries and nonoperating common carriers; Mexican and Canadian manufacturers; and Mexican long-haul carriers. E:\FR\FM\22MRP1.SGM 22MRP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 53 (Monday, March 22, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15134-15136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-05643]


========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 53 / Monday, March 22, 2021 / 
Proposed Rules

[[Page 15134]]



DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Office of the Secretary

6 CFR Part 5

[Docket No. ICEB-2020-0007]


Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; U.S. 
Department of Homeland Security/Immigration and Customs Enforcement-018 
Analytical Records System of Records

AGENCY: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of 
Homeland Security.

ACTION:  Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is giving 
concurrent notice of a newly established system of records pursuant to 
the Privacy Act of 1974 for the ``DHS/U.S. Immigration and Customs 
Enforcement (ICE)-018 Analytical Records System of Records'' and this 
proposed rulemaking. In this proposed rulemaking, the Department 
proposes to exempt portions of the system of records from one or more 
provisions of the Privacy Act because of criminal, civil, and 
administrative enforcement requirements.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 21, 2021.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number ICEB-
2020-0007, by one of the following methods:
     Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax: 202-343-4010.
     Mail: James Holzer, Acting Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy 
Office, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number for this notice. All comments received will be posted 
without change to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal 
information provided.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or 
comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general questions please contact: 
Jordan Holz, [email protected], Privacy Officer, 
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), 500 12th Street SW, 
Mail Stop 5004, Washington, DC 20536. For privacy questions, please 
contact: James Holzer, [email protected], (202) 343-1717, Acting Chief 
Privacy Officer, Privacy Office, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 
Washington, DC 20528-0655.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, the U.S. 
Department of Homeland Security (DHS), U.S. Immigration and Customs 
Enforcement (ICE) proposes to issue a new system of records notice 
(SORN) titled, ``DHS/ICE-018 Analytical Records.'' DHS/ICE is creating 
a new system of records to better reflect and clarify the nature of all 
records collected, maintained, processed, and shared by ICE in large 
analytical data environments. A fuller description of this SORN can be 
found herein the Federal Register.
    The DHS/ICE-018 Analytical Records system of records consolidates 
the following two notices, DHS/ICE-005 Trade Transparency Analysis and 
Research (TTAR) System of Records, 79 FR 71112, (December 1, 2014), and 
DHS/ICE-016 FALCON Search and Analysis (FALCON-SA) System of Records, 
82 FR 20905, (May 4, 2017), into one new system of records. This new 
system of records reflects the types of information and records ICE 
collects and maintains in analytical systems to support its law 
enforcement and investigative mission, rather than linking the SORN to 
specific IT system(s).
    ICE analytical systems help ICE personnel conduct research and 
analysis using advanced analytic tools in support of their law 
enforcement and investigative mission. These tools allow ICE to query, 
analyze, and present large amounts of data in a variety of formats that 
can help illuminate relationships among the various data elements. Some 
analytical tools may incorporate the use of artificial intelligence and 
machine learning to assist ICE personnel in examining large and complex 
datasets. All analytical systems and tools under this system of records 
use a central data store to eliminate the need for multiple copies of 
the data.
    This system of records ingests and aggregates data from a number of 
system and database interfaces that collects data for ICE's law 
enforcement, national security, immigration enforcement, and customs 
enforcement missions. The analytical data store also contains metadata 
that is created by an ICE analytical system when it ingests data. ICE 
uses the metadata to apply access controls and other system rules (such 
as retention policies) to the contents of the central data store. The 
metadata also provides important contextual information about the date 
the information was added to the data store and the source system where 
the data originated. ICE analytical systems also ingest external 
information from non-federal entities, including state and local law 
enforcement authorities, private corporations, or foreign governments.
    The DHS/ICE-018 Analytical Records SORN also covers tips submitted 
to ICE via email, an online form on the ICE website, or by calling an 
ICE tip line phone number. These tips are created electronically using 
an ICE-wide tip line interface or may be manually entered by ICE 
analysts. Once ICE analysts adjudicate the tips for action, the tips 
will then be accessible to authorized users to conduct further 
investigation.
    Users of an analytical tool or system may create visualizations, 
match records, or create analyses of large volumes of data through 
algorithmic processes. The end result of user efforts with an 
analytical tool, such as a map or list, is an analytical work product. 
Analytical products, information sharing, and user collaboration made 
possible in analytical systems may result in the creation of a lead to 
the field.
    Consistent with DHS's information sharing mission, information 
stored in the DHS/ICE-018 Analytical Records system of records may be 
shared with other DHS Components components that have a need to know 
the information to carry out their national

[[Page 15135]]

security, law enforcement, immigration, intelligence, or other homeland 
security functions. In addition, DHS/ICE may share information with 
appropriate federal, state, local, tribal, territorial, foreign, or 
international government agencies consistent with the routine uses set 
forth in this system of records notice.

II. Privacy Act

    The Privacy Act embodies fair information practice principles in a 
statutory framework governing the means by which federal government 
agencies collect, maintain, use, and disseminate individuals' records. 
The Privacy Act applies to information that is maintained in a ``system 
of records.'' A ``system of records'' is a group of any records under 
the control of an agency from which information is retrieved by the 
name of the individual or by some identifying number, symbol, or other 
identifying particular assigned to the individual. In the Privacy Act, 
an individual is defined to encompass U.S. citizens and lawful 
permanent residents. Additionally, and similarly, the Judicial Redress 
Act (JRA) provides a statutory right to covered persons to make 
requests for access and amendment to covered records, as defined by the 
JRA, along with judicial review for denials of such requests. In 
addition, the JRA prohibits disclosures of covered records, except as 
otherwise permitted by the Privacy Act.
    The Privacy Act allows government agencies to exempt certain 
records from the access and amendment provisions. If an agency claims 
an exemption, however, it must issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to 
make clear to the public the reasons why a particular exemption is 
claimed and provide an opportunity for public comment.
    DHS is claiming exemptions from certain requirements of the Privacy 
Act for DHS/ICE-018 Analytical Records System of Records. Some 
information in DHS/ICE-018 Analytical Records System of Records relates 
to official DHS national security, law enforcement, immigration, and 
intelligence activities. These exemptions are needed to protect 
information relating to DHS activities from disclosure to subjects or 
others related to these activities. Specifically, the exemptions are 
required to preclude subjects of these activities from frustrating 
these processes; to avoid disclosure of activity techniques; to protect 
the identities and physical safety of confidential informants and law 
enforcement personnel; to ensure DHS' ability to obtain information 
from third parties and other sources; to protect the privacy of third 
parties; and to safeguard classified information. Disclosure of 
information to the subject of the inquiry could also permit the subject 
to avoid detection or apprehension.
    In appropriate circumstances, when compliance would not appear to 
interfere with or adversely affect the law enforcement purposes of this 
system and the overall law enforcement process, the applicable 
exemptions may be waived on a case by case basis.
    A system of records notice for DHS/ICE-018 Analytical Records 
System of Records is also published in this issue of the Federal 
Register.

List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5

    Freedom of information; Privacy.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, DHS proposes to amend 
chapter I of title 6, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:

PART 5--DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS AND INFORMATION

0
1. The authority citation for Part 5 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.; Pub. L. 107-296, 116 Stat. 
2135; 5 U.S.C. 301.

0
2. In appendix C to part 5, add paragraph 85 to read as follows:

Appendix C to Part 5--DHS Systems of Records Exempt From the Privacy 
Act

* * * * *
    85. The DHS/ICE-018 Analytical Records System of Records 
consists of electronic and paper records and will be used by DHS and 
its components. The DHS/ICE-018 Analytical Records System of Records 
is a repository of information held by DHS in connection with its 
several and varied missions and functions, including, but not 
limited to the enforcement of civil and criminal laws; 
investigations, inquiries, and proceedings thereunder; and national 
security and intelligence activities. The DHS/ICE-018 Analytical 
Records System of Records contains information that is collected by, 
on behalf of, in support of, or in cooperation with DHS and its 
components and may contain personally identifiable information 
collected by other federal, state, local, tribal, foreign, or 
international government agencies.
    The Secretary of Homeland Security, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 
552a(j)(2), has exempted this system from the following provisions 
of the Privacy Act: 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (c)(4), (d), (e)(1), 
(e)(2), (e)(3), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), (e)(5), (e)(8), 
(f), and (g). Additionally, the Secretary of Homeland Security, 
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a (k)(2), has exempted this system from the 
following provisions of the Privacy Act: 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), 
(e)(1), (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), and (f). Where a record received from 
another system has been exempted in that source system under 5 
U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), DHS will claim the same exemptions for those 
records that are claimed for the original primary systems of records 
from which they originated and claims any additional exemptions set 
forth here.
    Exemptions from these particular subsections are justified, on a 
case-by-case basis to be determined at the time a request is made, 
for the following reasons:
    (a) From subsection (c)(3) and (4) (Accounting for Disclosures) 
because release of the accounting of disclosures could alert the 
subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal, 
civil, or regulatory violation to the existence of that 
investigation and reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS 
as well as the recipient agency. Disclosure of the accounting would 
therefore present a serious impediment to law enforcement efforts 
and efforts to preserve national security. Disclosure of the 
accounting would also permit the individual who is the subject of a 
record to impede the investigation, to tamper with witnesses or 
evidence, and to avoid detection or apprehension, which would 
undermine the entire investigative process. When an investigation 
has been completed, information on disclosures made may continue to 
be exempted if the fact that an investigation occurred remains 
sensitive after completion.
    (b) From subsection (d) (Access and Amendment to Records) 
because access to the records contained in this system of records 
could inform the subject of an investigation of an actual or 
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory violation to the existence 
of that investigation and reveal investigative interest on the part 
of DHS or another agency. Access to the records could permit the 
individual who is the subject of a record to impede the 
investigation, to tamper with witnesses or evidence, and to avoid 
detection or apprehension. Amendment of the records could interfere 
with ongoing investigations and law enforcement activities and would 
impose an unreasonable administrative burden by requiring 
investigations to be continually reinvestigated. In addition, 
permitting access and amendment to such information could disclose 
security-sensitive information that could be detrimental to homeland 
security.
    (c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and Necessity of 
Information) because in the course of investigations into potential 
violations of federal law, the accuracy of information obtained or 
introduced occasionally may be unclear, or the information may not 
be strictly relevant or necessary to a specific investigation. In 
the interests of effective law enforcement, it is appropriate to 
retain all information that may aid in establishing patterns of 
unlawful activity.
    (d) From subsection (e)(2) (Collection of Information Directly 
from Individuals) because requiring that information be collected 
from the subject of an investigation would alert the subject to the 
nature or existence of the investigation, thereby interfering with 
that investigation and related law enforcement activities.
    (e) From subsection (e)(3) (Notice to Subjects) because 
providing such detailed information could impede law enforcement by 
compromising the existence of a confidential investigation or reveal 
the

[[Page 15136]]

identity of witnesses or confidential informants.
    (f) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), and (e)(4)(I) (Agency 
Requirements) and (f) (Agency Rules), because portions of this 
system are exempt from the individual access provisions of 
subsection (d) for the reasons noted above, and therefore DHS is not 
required to establish requirements, rules, or procedures with 
respect to such access. Providing notice to individuals with respect 
to existence of records pertaining to them in the system of records 
or otherwise setting up procedures pursuant to which individuals may 
access and view records pertaining to themselves in the system would 
undermine investigative efforts and reveal the identities of 
witnesses, and potential witnesses, and confidential informants.
    (g) From subsection (e)(5) (Collection of Information) because 
with the collection of information for law enforcement purposes, it 
is impossible to determine in advance what information is accurate, 
relevant, timely, and complete. Compliance with subsection (e)(5) 
would preclude DHS agents from using their investigative training 
and exercise of good judgment to both conduct and report on 
investigations.
    (h) From subsection (e)(8) (Notice on Individuals) because 
compliance would interfere with DHS's ability to obtain, serve, and 
issue subpoenas, warrants, and other law enforcement mechanisms that 
may be filed under seal and could result in disclosure of 
investigative techniques, procedures, and evidence.
    (j) From subsection (g) (Civil Remedies) to the extent that the 
system is exempt from other specific subsections of the Privacy Act.

James Holzer,
Acting Chief Privacy Officer, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2021-05643 Filed 3-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-28-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.