Proposed Information Collection Activity; Evaluation of the Child Welfare Capacity Building Collaborative (New Collection), 14930-14932 [2021-05781]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
14930
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 52 / Friday, March 19, 2021 / Notices
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 114.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 5141.
Mary B. Jones,
ACF/OPRE Certifying Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021–05780 Filed 3–18–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–41–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Proposed Information Collection
Activity; Evaluation of the Child
Welfare Capacity Building
Collaborative (New Collection)
Children’s Bureau,
Administration for Children and
Families; HHS.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
AGENCY:
The Children’s Bureau,
Administration for Children and
Families (ACF), U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS), is
proposing to collect data for an
evaluation of the services provided to
child welfare jurisdictions and Court
Improvement Programs (CIP) by the
Child Welfare Capacity Building
Collaborative. This study uses
instruments that build on previously
approved OMB instruments, including
satisfaction surveys, assessment tools,
interview protocols, and service-specific
feedback forms (OMB #0970–0484,
expiration 11/30/22; OMB #0970–0494,
expiration 2/28/23).
DATES: Comments due within 60 days of
publication. In compliance with the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, ACF is soliciting
public comment on the specific aspects
of the information collection described
above.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the proposed
collection of information can be
obtained and comments may be
forwarded by emailing infocollection@
acf.hhs.gov. Alternatively, copies can
also be obtained by writing to the
Administration for Children and
Families, Office of Planning, Research,
and Evaluation (OPRE), 330 C Street
SW, Washington, DC 20201, Attn: ACF
Reports Clearance Officer. All requests,
emailed or written, should be identified
by the title of the information collection.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Description: The Capacity Building
Collaborative includes three centers
(Center for States, Center for Tribes,
Center for Courts) funded by the
Children’s Bureau to provide national
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:13 Mar 18, 2021
Jkt 253001
child welfare expertise and evidenceinformed training and technical
assistance services to state, tribal, and
U.S. territorial public child welfare
agencies and CIP. The Centers offer
services including Web-based content
and resources, product development
and dissemination, self-directed and
group-based training, virtual learning
and peer networking events, and
tailored consultation, coaching, and
facilitation (‘‘tailored services’’).
Centers’ services will be evaluated by
Center-specific evaluations and a crossCenter evaluation. The cross-Center
evaluation will examine collaboration
across and within Centers; how well
Centers have established themselves
nationally, and how the child welfare
field perceives their expertise,
credibility, and value; what services are
delivered by the Centers, and how well
they are defined; service recipient
satisfaction with service quality; child
welfare jurisdiction and federal staff’s
experiences of assessment and work
planning services offered by Centers;
effectiveness of Center services; how
Centers apply a common ‘‘change
management approach’’ in their work;
what affects child welfare jurisdiction
engagement with and use of Center
services; and the costs of Center
services. The Center for States’
evaluation consists of data collection
around two research questions and five
sub-studies. The research questions
focus on understanding usefulness,
relevance, and satisfaction from a
stakeholder perspective, as well as
outcomes of all services, with a focus on
tailored services. The sub-studies assess
organizational capacities, child welfare
policy and practice, and outcomes for
children and families. The Center for
Tribes’ evaluation will examine the
extent to which the Center provides
effective, culturally responsive services
that meet the needs of tribal child
welfare programs; the satisfaction of
service recipients with service quality;
and service outcomes for tribal child
welfare programs and stakeholders. The
Center for Courts’ evaluation will assess
satisfaction with and effectiveness of
service delivery; progress toward
meeting Center goals and the needs of
CIP to promote continuous quality
improvement (CQI); and increased
knowledge, collaboration, and capacity
to improve court performance and child
and family outcomes.
Proposed cross-Center evaluation
data sources for this effort include (1) a
survey to assess child welfare staff
perceptions of the outcomes of
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
intensive 1 courses of tailored services
and their satisfaction with those
services, completed by a project team
lead with input from the rest of the
team; (2) a survey to assess child welfare
staff perceptions of the outcomes of
brief courses of tailored services, for use
with tribes and CIP; 2 (3,4,5) a
leadership interview protocol
administered to all state/territory child
welfare directors and to tribal child
welfare directors and CIP coordinators
receiving services from the Centers; (6)
a collaboration and communication
survey administered twice to Center
staff/contractors and their federal
partners to understand whether factors
that support collaboration are in place
and improving over time; (7) a survey to
assess whether collaborative teams for
specific projects and/or communication
teams exhibit signs of healthy
collaboration; and (8) a survey to assess
child welfare jurisdiction staff
satisfaction with the assessment and
work planning services provided by
Centers.
Center for States’ data sources
include (1) a registration form for
participation in virtual events; (2,3) a
survey to gather feedback from
participants in brief service events of
100+ registrants, and a follow-up survey
to measure outcomes 3 months later; (4)
a short poll for use by participants in
brief service events with fewer than 100
registrants; (5) a peer learning group
survey to gather feedback to inform
program planning; (6) a survey to
measure satisfaction with learning
experiences; (7) a protocol for
interviewing staff in jurisdictions
receiving intensive services; (8) a
protocol for use with state project leads
to capture feedback following meetings
associated with intensive projects, for
use in a fidelity study; (9) a tailored
services brief project survey to inform
outcome reporting and CQI; (10) a
survey of participants in peer-to-peer
events to inform project planning; and
(11) a jurisdiction interview protocol for
a longitudinal ethnographic sub-study
of several intensive projects. Center for
Tribes’ data sources include (1) a form
for tribes requesting Center services; (2)
an inquiry form for Center staff to
collect information on services the tribe
requests; (3) a demographic survey to
provide information about the tribal
child welfare program; (4) a ‘‘needs and
fit exploration tool-phase 1’’ to gather
information to decide if the tribe’s
request meets criteria for services; (5) a
1 Intensive services typically last 9 or more
months and involve 20 or more hours of service.
2 The Center for States will administer its own,
similar survey for use with state respondents.
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
14931
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 52 / Friday, March 19, 2021 / Notices
‘‘needs and fit exploration tool-phase 2’’
for use when meeting with tribes whose
service request has been approved; (6,7)
a Tribal Child Welfare Leadership
Academy Self-Assessment (pre- and
post-training versions); and (8) a
feedback survey to measure satisfaction
with Center webinars. Center for Courts’
data sources include (1) a survey to
assess the usefulness of CQI workshops
and perceived knowledge gained from
participating in them; (2) a survey to
assess participant satisfaction with
Judicial and Attorney Academies and
perceived knowledge gained; and (3) a
pre-post survey to assess knowledge
gained from the Academies and to
provide exposure to material tailored to
the participant’s knowledge.
Respondents: Respondents to the data
collection instruments will include (1)
child welfare and judicial professionals
that use the Centers’ web pages,
products, and online courses;
participate in virtual or in-person
Cross-Center: Outcomes of and Satisfaction with Tailored Services Survey (Intensive projects)—team
lead’s completion of survey ..........................................
Cross-Center: Outcomes of and Satisfaction with Tailored Services Survey (Intensive projects)—input from
other members of the team ..........................................
Cross-Center: Outcomes of Tailored Services Survey
(Brief projects) ..............................................................
Cross-Center: Leadership Interview—States and Territories .............................................................................
Cross-Center: Leadership Interview—CIPs .....................
Cross-Center: Leadership Interview—Tribes ...................
Cross-Center: Collaboration and Communication Survey—Center staff ..........................................................
Cross-Center: Collaboration Project Team Survey .........
Cross-Center: Assessment and Work Planning Survey—Jurisdiction Staff ..................................................
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Total number
of responses
per respondent
Total number
of respondents
Instrument
trainings or peer events; and/or receive
brief or intensive, tailored services from
the Centers; (2) state child welfare
directors, tribal child welfare directors,
and CIP coordinators receiving services
from the Centers; (3) directors, staff, and
consultants of the three Capacity
Building Centers; and (4) federal staff.
Annual Burden Estimates
The proposed data collection will
span 3 years.
Average
burden hours
per response
Total burden
hours
Annual burden
hours
120
1
0.25
30
10
576
1
0.17
98
33
150
1
0.05
8
3
43
37
14
2
2
2
1
1
1.25
86
74
35
29
25
12
200
120
1
1
0.22
0.23
44
28
15
9
130
1
0.15
20
7
Center for States: Event Registration ..............................
Center for States: Brief Event Survey .............................
Center for States: Event Follow-up Survey .....................
Center for States: Event Poll ...........................................
Center for States: Peer Learning Group Survey .............
Center for States: Learning Experience Satisfaction Survey ................................................................................
Center for States: Jurisdiction Interview Protocol ...........
Center for States: Fidelity Study: State Lead Debrief
Questions .....................................................................
Center for States: Tailored Services Brief Project Survey ................................................................................
Center for States: Peer to Peer Event Survey ................
Center for States: Longitudinal Ethnographic Sub-study
Jurisdiction Interview ....................................................
13,500
1,500
1,500
300
300
1
1
1
1
1
0.03
0.1
0.08
0.03
0.33
405
150
120
9
99
135
50
40
3
33
975
90
1
1
0.33
1
322
90
107
30
108
1
0.25
27
9
150
60
1
1
0.13
0.08
20
5
7
2
45
2
1
90
30
Center for Tribes: Request for Services Form ................
Center for Tribes: Inquiry Form .......................................
Center for Tribes: ICW Demographic Survey ..................
Center for Tribes: Needs and Fit Exploration Tool
Phase 1 ........................................................................
Center for Tribes: Needs and Fit Exploration Tool
Phase 2 (Process Narrative) ........................................
Center for Tribes: Tribal Child Welfare Leadership
Academy Pre-Training Self-Assessment .....................
Center for Tribes: Tribal Child Welfare Leadership
Academy Post-Training Self-Assessment ....................
Center for Tribes: Universal Services Webinar Feedback Survey ..................................................................
100
200
60
1
1
1
1
0.08
1.75
100
16
105
33
5
35
150
1
2
300
100
80
1
3
240
80
240
1
0.5
120
40
240
1
0.5
120
40
400
1
0.08
32
11
240
600
600
1
1
2
0.07
0.07
0.22
17
42
264
6
14
88
Center for Courts: CQI Workshop Feedback Survey ......
Center for Courts: Academy Feedback Survey ...............
Center for Courts: Pre/Post Academy Assessment ........
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 1,041.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:13 Mar 18, 2021
Jkt 253001
Comments: The Department
specifically requests comments on (a)
whether the proposed collection of
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
14932
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 52 / Friday, March 19, 2021 / Notices
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information; (c) the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology. Consideration will be given
to comments and suggestions submitted
within 60 days of this publication.
Authority: Sec. 5106, Pub. L. 111–320, the
Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act
Reauthorization Act of 2010, and titles IV–B
and IV–E of the Social Security Act.
Mary B. Jones,
ACF/OPRE Certifying Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021–05781 Filed 3–18–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–44–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Submission for OMB Review; Human
Services Programs in Rural Contexts
Study
Office of Planning, Research,
and Evaluation, Administration for
Children and Families, HHS.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Request for public comment.
The Administration for
Children and Families (ACF) at the U.S.
Department of Health and Human
Services is proposing to collect data on
the challenges and unique opportunities
of administering human services
programs in rural contexts. Case studies
of 12 communities, in combination with
analysis of administrative data and
qualitative comparative analysis of the
qualitative data, will provide ACF with
a rich description of human services
programs in rural contexts and provide
ACF opportunities for strengthening
human services programs’ capacity to
promote the economic and social
wellbeing of individuals, families, and
communities in rural contexts.
DATES: Comments due within 30 days of
publication. OMB must make a decision
about the collection of information
between 30 and 60 days after
publication of this document in the
Federal Register. Therefore, a comment
is best assured of having its full effect
if OMB receives it within 30 days of
publication.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
SUMMARY:
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Description: ACF proposes to conduct
key informant interviews during site
visits to 12 rural communities. While
ACF intends to conduct on-site visits, if
the current COVID–19 pandemic makes
it too difficult to travel safely, we will
conduct these interviews virtually. This
study will involve four data collection
instruments:
• Site Visit Planning Template. Each
Project Director (or their designee) will
complete a Site Visit Planning Template
to assist the study team in scheduling
site visit interviews.
• Three Site Visit Discussion Guides.
To systematically capture data on
challenges and unique opportunities,
the study team will conduct interviews
with (1) project directors and leaders
from human services organizations, (2)
staff from the human services and
partner organizations, and (3) staff from
nonprofit and partner organizations that
support individuals who utilize human
services.
Respondents: Human services project
directors and leadership staff, human
services program staff, and staff from
nonprofit organizations and partners
that provide support to individuals who
utilize human services.
ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES
Number of
respondents
(total over
request period)
Instrument
In-Person Site Visit Planning Template (Instrument
1a); or Virtual Site Visit Planning Template (Instrument 1b) ...................................................................
Project Directors and Leaders Site Visit Discussion
Guide (Instrument 2) ................................................
Staff Site Visit Discussion Guide (Instrument 3) .........
Nonprofit or Partner Organizations Site Visit Discussion Guide (Instrument 4) ........................................
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 189.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4184–09–P
24
12
60
108
1
1
2
1.5
120
162
60
81
72
1
1
72
36
Administration for Children and
Families
Proposed Information Collection
Activity; Renewal of the Low Income
Home Energy Assistance Program
(LIHEAP) Performance Measures
Office of Community Services,
Administration for Children and
Families, HHS.
19:13 Mar 18, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Annual burden
(in hours)
2
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Total burden
(in hours)
1
[OMB No. 0970–0449]
[FR Doc. 2021–05771 Filed 3–18–21; 8:45 am]
Avg. burden
per response
(in hours)
12
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 613, 42 U.S.C. 1397,
42 U.S.C. 711, and 42 U.S.C. 603(a)(2).
Mary B. Jones,
ACF/OPRE Certifying Officer.
Number of
responses per
respondent
(total over
request period)
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ACTION:
Request for public comment.
The Administration for
Children and Families (ACF) is
requesting reinstatement of the Low
Income Home Energy Assistance
Program (LIHEAP) Performance
Measures (Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) #0970–0449, expiration
date March 31, 2021) with changes.
Changes include a single addition of a
field to capture a potential additional
source of funding, and other minor
changes to the most recent version of
this form.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\19MRN1.SGM
19MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 52 (Friday, March 19, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14930-14932]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-05781]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families
Proposed Information Collection Activity; Evaluation of the Child
Welfare Capacity Building Collaborative (New Collection)
AGENCY: Children's Bureau, Administration for Children and Families;
HHS.
ACTION: Request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Children's Bureau, Administration for Children and
Families (ACF), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), is
proposing to collect data for an evaluation of the services provided to
child welfare jurisdictions and Court Improvement Programs (CIP) by the
Child Welfare Capacity Building Collaborative. This study uses
instruments that build on previously approved OMB instruments,
including satisfaction surveys, assessment tools, interview protocols,
and service-specific feedback forms (OMB #0970-0484, expiration 11/30/
22; OMB #0970-0494, expiration 2/28/23).
DATES: Comments due within 60 days of publication. In compliance with
the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, ACF is
soliciting public comment on the specific aspects of the information
collection described above.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the proposed collection of information can be
obtained and comments may be forwarded by emailing
[email protected]. Alternatively, copies can also be obtained
by writing to the Administration for Children and Families, Office of
Planning, Research, and Evaluation (OPRE), 330 C Street SW, Washington,
DC 20201, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. All requests, emailed or
written, should be identified by the title of the information
collection.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Description: The Capacity Building
Collaborative includes three centers (Center for States, Center for
Tribes, Center for Courts) funded by the Children's Bureau to provide
national child welfare expertise and evidence-informed training and
technical assistance services to state, tribal, and U.S. territorial
public child welfare agencies and CIP. The Centers offer services
including Web-based content and resources, product development and
dissemination, self-directed and group-based training, virtual learning
and peer networking events, and tailored consultation, coaching, and
facilitation (``tailored services''). Centers' services will be
evaluated by Center-specific evaluations and a cross-Center evaluation.
The cross-Center evaluation will examine collaboration across and
within Centers; how well Centers have established themselves
nationally, and how the child welfare field perceives their expertise,
credibility, and value; what services are delivered by the Centers, and
how well they are defined; service recipient satisfaction with service
quality; child welfare jurisdiction and federal staff's experiences of
assessment and work planning services offered by Centers; effectiveness
of Center services; how Centers apply a common ``change management
approach'' in their work; what affects child welfare jurisdiction
engagement with and use of Center services; and the costs of Center
services. The Center for States' evaluation consists of data collection
around two research questions and five sub-studies. The research
questions focus on understanding usefulness, relevance, and
satisfaction from a stakeholder perspective, as well as outcomes of all
services, with a focus on tailored services. The sub-studies assess
organizational capacities, child welfare policy and practice, and
outcomes for children and families. The Center for Tribes' evaluation
will examine the extent to which the Center provides effective,
culturally responsive services that meet the needs of tribal child
welfare programs; the satisfaction of service recipients with service
quality; and service outcomes for tribal child welfare programs and
stakeholders. The Center for Courts' evaluation will assess
satisfaction with and effectiveness of service delivery; progress
toward meeting Center goals and the needs of CIP to promote continuous
quality improvement (CQI); and increased knowledge, collaboration, and
capacity to improve court performance and child and family outcomes.
Proposed cross-Center evaluation data sources for this effort
include (1) a survey to assess child welfare staff perceptions of the
outcomes of intensive \1\ courses of tailored services and their
satisfaction with those services, completed by a project team lead with
input from the rest of the team; (2) a survey to assess child welfare
staff perceptions of the outcomes of brief courses of tailored
services, for use with tribes and CIP; \2\ (3,4,5) a leadership
interview protocol administered to all state/territory child welfare
directors and to tribal child welfare directors and CIP coordinators
receiving services from the Centers; (6) a collaboration and
communication survey administered twice to Center staff/contractors and
their federal partners to understand whether factors that support
collaboration are in place and improving over time; (7) a survey to
assess whether collaborative teams for specific projects and/or
communication teams exhibit signs of healthy collaboration; and (8) a
survey to assess child welfare jurisdiction staff satisfaction with the
assessment and work planning services provided by Centers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Intensive services typically last 9 or more months and
involve 20 or more hours of service.
\2\ The Center for States will administer its own, similar
survey for use with state respondents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Center for States' data sources include (1) a registration form for
participation in virtual events; (2,3) a survey to gather feedback from
participants in brief service events of 100+ registrants, and a follow-
up survey to measure outcomes 3 months later; (4) a short poll for use
by participants in brief service events with fewer than 100
registrants; (5) a peer learning group survey to gather feedback to
inform program planning; (6) a survey to measure satisfaction with
learning experiences; (7) a protocol for interviewing staff in
jurisdictions receiving intensive services; (8) a protocol for use with
state project leads to capture feedback following meetings associated
with intensive projects, for use in a fidelity study; (9) a tailored
services brief project survey to inform outcome reporting and CQI; (10)
a survey of participants in peer-to-peer events to inform project
planning; and (11) a jurisdiction interview protocol for a longitudinal
ethnographic sub-study of several intensive projects. Center for
Tribes' data sources include (1) a form for tribes requesting Center
services; (2) an inquiry form for Center staff to collect information
on services the tribe requests; (3) a demographic survey to provide
information about the tribal child welfare program; (4) a ``needs and
fit exploration tool-phase 1'' to gather information to decide if the
tribe's request meets criteria for services; (5) a
[[Page 14931]]
``needs and fit exploration tool-phase 2'' for use when meeting with
tribes whose service request has been approved; (6,7) a Tribal Child
Welfare Leadership Academy Self-Assessment (pre- and post-training
versions); and (8) a feedback survey to measure satisfaction with
Center webinars. Center for Courts' data sources include (1) a survey
to assess the usefulness of CQI workshops and perceived knowledge
gained from participating in them; (2) a survey to assess participant
satisfaction with Judicial and Attorney Academies and perceived
knowledge gained; and (3) a pre-post survey to assess knowledge gained
from the Academies and to provide exposure to material tailored to the
participant's knowledge.
Respondents: Respondents to the data collection instruments will
include (1) child welfare and judicial professionals that use the
Centers' web pages, products, and online courses; participate in
virtual or in-person trainings or peer events; and/or receive brief or
intensive, tailored services from the Centers; (2) state child welfare
directors, tribal child welfare directors, and CIP coordinators
receiving services from the Centers; (3) directors, staff, and
consultants of the three Capacity Building Centers; and (4) federal
staff.
Annual Burden Estimates
The proposed data collection will span 3 years.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total number Average
Instrument Total number of responses burden hours Total burden Annual burden
of respondents per respondent per response hours hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross-Center: Outcomes of and 120 1 0.25 30 10
Satisfaction with Tailored
Services Survey (Intensive
projects)--team lead's
completion of survey.........
Cross-Center: Outcomes of and 576 1 0.17 98 33
Satisfaction with Tailored
Services Survey (Intensive
projects)--input from other
members of the team..........
Cross-Center: Outcomes of 150 1 0.05 8 3
Tailored Services Survey
(Brief projects).............
Cross-Center: Leadership 43 2 1 86 29
Interview--States and
Territories..................
Cross-Center: Leadership 37 2 1 74 25
Interview--CIPs..............
Cross-Center: Leadership 14 2 1.25 35 12
Interview--Tribes............
Cross-Center: Collaboration 200 1 0.22 44 15
and Communication Survey--
Center staff.................
Cross-Center: Collaboration 120 1 0.23 28 9
Project Team Survey..........
Cross-Center: Assessment and 130 1 0.15 20 7
Work Planning Survey--
Jurisdiction Staff...........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Center for States: Event 13,500 1 0.03 405 135
Registration.................
Center for States: Brief Event 1,500 1 0.1 150 50
Survey.......................
Center for States: Event 1,500 1 0.08 120 40
Follow-up Survey.............
Center for States: Event Poll. 300 1 0.03 9 3
Center for States: Peer 300 1 0.33 99 33
Learning Group Survey........
Center for States: Learning 975 1 0.33 322 107
Experience Satisfaction
Survey.......................
Center for States: 90 1 1 90 30
Jurisdiction Interview
Protocol.....................
Center for States: Fidelity 108 1 0.25 27 9
Study: State Lead Debrief
Questions....................
Center for States: Tailored 150 1 0.13 20 7
Services Brief Project Survey
Center for States: Peer to 60 1 0.08 5 2
Peer Event Survey............
Center for States: 45 2 1 90 30
Longitudinal Ethnographic Sub-
study Jurisdiction Interview.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Center for Tribes: Request for 100 1 1 100 33
Services Form................
Center for Tribes: Inquiry 200 1 0.08 16 5
Form.........................
Center for Tribes: ICW 60 1 1.75 105 35
Demographic Survey...........
Center for Tribes: Needs and 150 1 2 300 100
Fit Exploration Tool Phase 1.
Center for Tribes: Needs and 80 1 3 240 80
Fit Exploration Tool Phase 2
(Process Narrative)..........
Center for Tribes: Tribal 240 1 0.5 120 40
Child Welfare Leadership
Academy Pre-Training Self-
Assessment...................
Center for Tribes: Tribal 240 1 0.5 120 40
Child Welfare Leadership
Academy Post-Training Self-
Assessment...................
Center for Tribes: Universal 400 1 0.08 32 11
Services Webinar Feedback
Survey.......................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Center for Courts: CQI 240 1 0.07 17 6
Workshop Feedback Survey.....
Center for Courts: Academy 600 1 0.07 42 14
Feedback Survey..............
Center for Courts: Pre/Post 600 2 0.22 264 88
Academy Assessment...........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 1,041.
Comments: The Department specifically requests comments on (a)
whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether
the
[[Page 14932]]
information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information; (c) the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection
of information on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted
within 60 days of this publication.
Authority: Sec. 5106, Pub. L. 111-320, the Child Abuse
Prevention and Treatment Act Reauthorization Act of 2010, and titles
IV-B and IV-E of the Social Security Act.
Mary B. Jones,
ACF/OPRE Certifying Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021-05781 Filed 3-18-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-44-P
